HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 17, 2006
S,N,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum CONSEr~JT
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Authorize Agreement between Scott County and the
City of Shakopee on Wetland Mitigation for CSAH 21 and
Pike Lake Road Improvements
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is an agreement between Scott County and the City of Shakopee on the wetland
mitigation costs for mitigating wetlands associated with future CSAH 21 and future Pike
Lake Road improvements in the City of Shakopee.
BACKGROUND:
Previously, in September, 2005, City Council authorized WSB & Associates, Inc. to
proceed with wetland mitigation for the future construction of Pike Lake Road and
CSAH 21 in the area south of Southbridge Parkway and future C.R. 21. Wetland
mitigation work has proceeded for locating a site in Scott County. This would be a major
wetland restoration project to restore a large area and mitigate the wetlands that are being
failed by the roadway construction of CSAH 21 and Pike Lake Road. This agreement
formalizes previous verbal and e-mail correspondence from staff into an agreement
between Scott County and the City of Shakopee officials.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an agreement between Scott
County and the City of Shako pee for wetland mitigation associated with future
CSAH 21 and Pike Lake Road improvement projects.
2. Do not authorize the appropriate City officials to execute this agreement at this
time.
3. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend Alternative No.1.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an agreement between Scott County
and the City of Shakopee for wetland mitigation associated with future CSAH 21 and
Pike Lake Road improvement projects.
{h~
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGRl2006PROJECT/CSAH21-P1KELAKERDIWORDISCOTTCTY AGREEMENT
County Project No. CP 91-21-03
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
TIDS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , 20_, by and between
the County of Scott, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred
to as the "County" and the City of Shakopee, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
RECITALS:
A. The City and County seek to construct County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 21 from CSAH 16 to
CSAH 18, Pike Lake Road from CSAH 16 to Southbridge and future Fire Station.
B. The above described Projects lie within the corporate limits ofthe City.
C. The City and County are responsible for mitigating wetland impacts associated with CSAH 21, Pike
Lake road and the future Fire Station in the area of South bridge Parkway and CSAH 21.
D. .The City and County seek to combine their wetland mitigation for those wetland impacts in an area in
Scott County and preferably in the Prior Lake - Spring Lake Watershed District.
E. The above described wetland mitigation Project lies within the corporate limits ofthe County.
F. It is contemplated that said improvement work shall be carried out by the parties under the provisions
ofMinn .Stat. 162.17, subd. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
1. The City shall execute a contract for the mitigation work and construction of the aforesaid Project No.
2006-6, receive and open bids and enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in
the bid of such bidder, according to law in such case provided for cities. The contract is in form and includes
the plans and specifications prepared by the City or its agents, which said plans and specifications are made a
part hereof.
2. The City shall administer the contract and inspect the construction of the contract work for the Project at
the sole cost of the City. The County Engineer shall cooperate with the City Engineer and his staff at their
request to the extent necessary.
3. The County shall reimburse the City for its proportionate share in all costs associated with the wetland
mitigation work for said Project.
4. It is estimated that the County's proportionate share of the wetland impacts and mitigation is seventy-six
percent (76%) and the City's proportionate share of the wetland impacts and mitigation is twenty-four percent
1
County Project No. CP 91-21-03
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
(24%) to be utilized for partial payments only. Final costs will be based on a cost per acre to develop wetland
mitigation and actual acreage to be utilized by County or City.
5. The City Engineer shall prepare monthly progress reports as provided in the specifications. A copy of
these reports shall be furnished to the County upon request.
6. In the event that a dispute arises, the County and the City agree that all disputes between them arising
out of or relating to this Agreement shall be submitted, upon agreement of both parties, to mediation, with the
cost being shared equally.
7. All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the Project shall be subject to examination by
the representatives of each party. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any
purpose by the activities of the City or County pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereafter
adopted.
8. N~ith~r the County, its officers, agents or employees, either ~n their individual or official capacity, shall
be responsible or liable in any manner to the City for any claim, demand, action or cause of action of any kind or
character arising out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance, negligent performance or
nonperformance ofthe described maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement work by the City, or arising out
of the negligence of any contractor under any contract let by the City for the performance of said work; and the
City agrees to defend, save and keep said County, its officers, agents and employees harmless from all claims,
demands, actions or causes of action arising out of negligent performance by the City, its officers, agents or
employees.
9. It is further agreed that neither the City, its officers, agents or employees, either in their individual or
official capacity, shall be responsible or liable in any manner to the County for any claim, demand, action or
cause of action of any kind or character arising out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance,
negligent performance or nonperformance of the described maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement work
by the County, or arising out of the negligence of any contractor under any contract let by the County for the
performance of said work; and the County agrees to defend, save and keep said City, its officers, agents and
employees harmless from all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of negligent performance
by the County, its officers, agents or employees.
10. It is further agret:cl. th;:J.t i;:ach P;:J.!iY tg tl1is Agreement shall not be responsible or liable to the other or to
" ,',--' -,-.: . -,',::'." "':,. ,
any other person or entity for any claims, damages, actions, or causes of actions of any kind or character arising
out of, allegedly arising out of or by reason of the performance, negligent performance or nonperformance of
2
County Project No. CP 91-21-03
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
any work or part hereof by the other as provided herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sole cost
and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever
character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein.
11. It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the
performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed by the City shall not be
considered employees, agents or independent contractors of the County, and that any and all claims that mayor
might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of said City employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties
. as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees while so engaged shall be the sole
responsibility of the City and shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the County.
Any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of
any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered
employee~, agents or independent contractors of the City, and that any and all claims that may o~ might arise
under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on
behalf of said County employees while. so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees while so engaged in any of the work
or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole responsibility of the County and shall not be the
obligation or responsibility ofthe City.
12. The provisions of Minn. Stat. 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to Civil Rights and
discrimination and the affirmative action policy statement of Scott County shall be considered a part of this
Agreement as though fully set forth herein. See Exhibit "A".
13. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 16C.05, subd. 5 (2004), the books, records, documents, and accounting
procedures and practices of the County and City pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to examination by
the County, City and the State Auditor. Complete and accurate records of the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall be kept by the County and City for a minimum of six (6) years following termination of this
Agreement for such auditing purposes. The retention period shall be automatically extended during the course of
any administrative or judicial action involving the County or the City regarding matters to which the records are
relevant. The retention period shall be automatically extended until the administrative or judicial action is
fmally completed or umil fu~ ftuthO)i~yq, f1,~ent of the County or City notifies each party in writing that the
, : "" ..{
records no longer need to be kept.
3
County Project No. CP 91-21-03
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
14. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity
and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and performance under it. The
appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation hereunder will be those courts located with the County of
Scott, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties shall be in the
appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota.
15. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid and unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties unless such invalidity or non-enforceability would cause
the Agreement to fail its purpose. One or mo~e waivers by either party of any provision, term, condition or
covenant shall not be construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the other
party.
16. The County's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Maria A.
Heller, Public Works Technician, or her successor. Her current address and phone number are Scott County
Hi~way Department, 600 Country Trail East, Jordan, MN 55352, (952) 496-8369.
The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Joe Swentek,
Project Engineer, or his successor. His current address and phone number are Shakopee City Hall, 129 Holmes
Street South, Shakopee, MN 55379, (952)233-9363. Any change in name, address, or telephone shall be
noticed to the other party.
4
It is the policy of SCott County Government to provide Equal Opportunity toaH employees and
applicants for employment in accordance with all applicable Equal Employment Opportunity.
laws; directives, and regulations of Federal, State, and local governing bodies or agencies
thereof, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363.
ScottCountywill not engage in any employment practices which discriminate against or
. . harass any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed,. religion; .
national origin, sex, disability, age, martial status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to .
. public assistance. Such employment practices include, but are not limited to, the following:
. hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, selection, layoff,
disciplinary action, termination, rates of payor other forms of compensation, and selection for.
training, including apprenticeship.
Further, Scott County fully supports incorporation of nondiscrimination rules and regulations
into Gontractsand will commit the necessary time and resources to achieve the goals of Equal
Employment Opportunity.
Any employee ofthe County who does not comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity.
Policies and Procedures set forth in this Statement and Plan will be subjectto disciplinary. .
action. Any subcontractor of the County not complying with. all applicable Equal Employment
Opportunity laws, directives, and regulations of Federal, State, and local governing bOdies or
agencies thereof, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363, will be subject to appropriate
contractual sanctions.
Scott County has designated the Employee Relations Director as the manager of the Equal
Opportunity Program, These responsibilities will include monitoring all Equal El11ployment
Opportunity activities find reporting the effectiveness of this program, as required by Federal,
State, and local agencies. The Scott County Administrator will receive and review reports on
the progress of the program. If any employee or applicant for employment believes he or she
has been discriminated against, please contact the Scott County Employee Relations Director;
Scott County Employee Relations, Government Center Room 201, 200 Fourth Avenue West,
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379~1220, or call (952) 496~8103.
.~~
'../'. ."~'L"/_"'_.."..... 1 /3/2005
Date RObert Voger Date
1 Chair, Board of Commissioners
--- - - - .-------- ---
5
(SEAL)
By And
John Schmitt, Mayor Mark McNeill, City Administrator
Date Date
COUNTY OF SCOTT
ATTEST:
By By
David Un macht, County Administrator -Jonathan Ulrich, Chair of Its County Board
Date Date
Upon proper execution, this Agreement RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL:
will be legally valid and binding.
By By
Pat Ciliberto, County Attorney Mitchell J. Rasmussen, County Engineer
Date Date
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:
By
Pat Ciliberto, County Attorney
Date
w:\WORD\PROJEC1\91-21-03\Construction _coop _ Shakopee.doc
6
EXHIBIT A
I ... POLICY STATEMENT. .1
It is the policy of Scott County Government to provide Equal Opportunity to all employees and
applicants for employment in accordance with all applicable Equal Employment Opportunity
laws, directives, and regulations of Federal, State, and local governing bodies or agencies
thereof, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 36~. .
Scott County will not engage in any employment practices which discriminate against or
harass any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, disability, age, martial status, sexual orientation, or status with. regard to
public assistance. Such employment practicesinciude, but are not limited to, the following:
hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, selection, layoff,
disciplinary action, termination, rates of payor other forms of compensation, and selection for
training, including apprenticeship.
Further, Scott County fully supports incorporation (jf nondiscrimination rules and regulations
into contracts and will commit the necessary time and resources to achieve the goals of Equal
. Employment Opportunity.
Any employee of the County who does not comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity
Policies and Procedures set forth in this Statement and Plan will be subject to disciplinary
action. Any subcontractor of the County notcomplying with all applicable Equal Employment
Opportunity laws, directives, and regulations of Federal, State, and local governing bodies or
agencies thereof, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363, will be subject to appropriate
contractual sanctions.
Scott County has designated the Employee Relations Director as the manager of the Equal
Opportunity Program. These responsibilities will include monitoring all Equal Employment
Opportunity activities and reporting the effectiveness of this program, as required by Federal,
State, and local agencies. The Scott County Administrator will receive and review reports on
the progress of the program. If any employee or applicant for employment believes he or she
has been discriminated against, please contact the Scott County Employee Relations Director,
Scott County Employee Relations, Government Center Room 201,200 Fourth Avenue West,
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1220, or call (952) 496-8103.
-.
i L{IR I~.
f Jo than Ulrich
Chair, Board of Commissioners
s: 0./
CITY OF SHAKO PEE CONSE~~.r
Memorandum . . ..... . ~, Y'.J ~\} ;
~ ij ,
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Appraisal Services for Wetland Mitigation of
CSAH 21 and Pike Lake Road Improvements
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a proposal for appraisal services by Roger Rohrer, of BRKW, associated with
wetland mitigation for future CSAH 21 and Pike Lake Road improvements.
BACKGROUND:
Previously, the City Council authorized WSB & Associates, Inc. to prepare a wetland
mitigation plan for future CSAH 21 and Pike Lake Road in the area of Southbridge
Parkway and future C.R. 21 intersection. Staff has met with the Wetland Technical
Evaluation Panel on mitigating these wetland impacts to an area in rural Scott County,
particularly restoring a previous large wetland area that has been drain tiled. WSB &
Associates, Inc. has been working with Pete Beckius, of Scott Soil and Water
Conservation District, in locating sites that would be suitable for wetland mitigation.
One site that has been high on the list is the one shown on the attached map and is owned
by Gene Hauer, who has been receptive to restoring wetlands on his property and
receiving compensation for that.
Now that a site has been identified for possible wetland mitigation, the costs of
purchasing conservation easements and to restore an area for wetland mitigation needs to
be done. In order to provide and offer a purchase for easements, an appraisal needs to be
done on the land in a before and an after condition. The cost of the appraisal, which is
attached, is estimated to be $4,200.00 from Roger Rohrer ofBRKW, as recommended by
WSB & Associates, Inc. The action for City Council is to approve the proposal for
appraisal services so that a purchase price can be determined.
GOALS AND STRATEGIES:
This agenda item supports the goals of high quality of life and the strategy of providing
high quality services.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a motion authorizing the appraisal services of Roger Rohrer, of BRKW,
at a cost not-to-exceed $4,200.00 for the wetland mitigation project on CSAH 21
and Pike Lake Road improvements.
2. Do not authorize the appraisal services at this time.
3. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No.1, as a site has been identified that is suitable for
wetland mitigation and a willing property owner has been found and the next step would
be to determine a price for purchase.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Approve a motion authorizing the appraisal services of Roger Rohrer, of BRKW, at a
cost not-to-exceed $4,200.00 for the wetland mitigation project on CSAH 21 and Pike
Lake Road improvements.
~~
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGRl2006PROJECTfCSAH2I-PlKELAKERD/WORDIAPPRAISAL
JAN-11-2006 10:11 WSB & ASSOCIATES 7635411700 P.02/03
01/10/2005 05:30 512-545-8085 BRKW PAGE 02
BRKW APPRAISALS, IN C.
R.EAL ESTATE VALUATION SERVICES
, , J anuarY,ll,. 2006
WSB & Associates
Attn: Sonya Henning
Right-of-Way Services Manager
701 Xenia Avenue S., Suite 3-00
Minneapolis, Mhmesota 55416
Re: Hauer Property Easement
Sand Creek Township, Scott County ~
Dear Ms. Henning:
Thank you for requesting a fee and timing proposal for an appraisal relating to a proposed
easement acquisition of approximately 22 acres of land that may be used in a wetland mitigation
program.
Reference to a township plat map indicates the total contiguous Hauer ownership is 107.9 acres,
more or less. The 22 acres of land to be encumbered with the wetland conservation easement
will essentially sever the remainder property into two land tracts, both of which will continue to
have adequate access from abutting Highway 282.
My recommendation is that a "before and after" appraisal be prepared on the land component of
the ownership. At this point, I do not know'whether or not there is a home or other buildings on
the property. The homelbuildings, if any, would presumably not be affected by the partial
property acquisition. AccQrdingly, my appraisal would be of the land only.
Please be advised I can provide you with the requested property appraisal under the following
terms and conditions:
)> An appraisal of the total contiguous land tract will be prepared in the form of a summary
report on a llbefore and after" basis. The report will provide summary :information on the
subject property as well as on value related market information including res6atGhed sales
found to be most pertinent in the valuation issue.
)> The appraisal will conform to the standards and requirements of the Unifonn Standards
of Professional Appraisal Practice (lJSP AP).
SPRUCE T R lie CENTRE SUI TE 314
.1600 UNIVHSITY AVe ST PAUL MN 5$104
651'046.6114 FAX 651-646-8086 brkw@brk.w.com
JAN-11-2006 10:11 WSB & ASSOCIATES 7635411700 P.03/03
01/10/2006 06:30 612-646-8086 BRKW PAGE 03
)> The completed appraisal will be provided to you within one month from the date I
receive notification that I am to proceed with the appraisal assignment. Three copies of
the appraisal report will be provided unless I am advised a larger number is desired.
>- The total appraisal fee will be in the amount of$4,200. The payment check is to be made
out to BRKW Appraisals, Inc. Please advise me as to whether the payment is to be made
by Scott County or by WSB & Associates. Payment in full for the appraisal services
provided is to be made within 30 days from when the appraisal report is completed and
submitted.
)- The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of value for the property rights to
be acquired in the form of a wetland conservation easement, and the value damages to the
remainder property, if any.
If I am to do the appraisal, please provide me with the legal description of the total ownership,
and/or the county property identification numbers. Again, I believe the appraisal of the Hauer
property should be limited to the contiguous land tract located south of the highway and north of
Swamp Lake. The 12.9 acres of the Hauer ownership l,ocated east of Swamp Lake should be
excluded in that it is apparently separated from the balance of the property by an. area platted as
Klehr Frist Addition, based on reference to the Sand Creek Township plat map.
I look forward to hearing from you on this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC.
/ C:t:;;-t Jr:-L -----
Roger M. R hrer
TOTAL P.03
.&
.:6S
&.,1 \'$(1(. ["...."'}.[m:;
Memorandum
To: Bruce Loney, Director of Public Works
From: Terry Jeffery, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Date: January 11,2006
Re: Proposed Wetland Restoration Site for the CSAH 21 and Pike Lake Rd. Wetland
Mitigation Plan
WSB Project No. 1281-90
With the assistance of Mr. Pete Beckius of the Scott SWCD, we have identified a suitable site for wetland
restoration with the intent of using it as mitigation for the Pike Lake Road, CSAH 21, and Shakopee Fire
Department projects. Initial discussions with Mr. Eugene Hauer, the property owner, indicated that he
had an interest in selling a portion of the property specifically for the purpose of wetland restoration.
Mr. Hauer has provided access to his property for the purpose of performing a topographic survey to aide
in the design of the mitigation area. Permission was granted and survey crews have been on his property
to complete this work. Through all of this, there was no indication that Mr. Hauer had any reservations
about proceeding with the process.
Given Mr. Hauer's background in land acquisition and development, there is no reason to suspect that he
is not aware of what the outcome of this restoration will be or what the intent of the City and the County
is regarding the property.
In order to proceed with this project, it is necessary to obtain an appraisal to determine fair market value
so that an offer may be extended to Mr. Hauer. To this end we have contacted Mr, Roger Rohrer of
BRKW. The BRKW proposal is included with this memo. Should you have any questions, please feel
free to contact us at 763.541.4800.
Ene.
C:\Documents and Settings\bloney\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK108\Memo_BLoneLOll 106 (4).<Ioc
i
c
CJ'
v
Q;
"
,
c
.S!'
"6
.~
OJ
~
Cl.
/'
~
'.0
L
x
w
/'
"0
0
U
/'
" Ridge View Farms Wetland Delineation
co WSB Project No. 1281.87 Date: August 30, 2005
A -..
co 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
~ WSB Minneapolis, MN 55416
0 www.wsbeng.com
/' Figure
~ Il"'!ZCL . ,,,1"""-
& A~'sodate~', 1nc:.
n._763-5414800-Fax763.541-1700 Shakopee, Minnesota
INFRASTRUCTURE I ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CONSTRUCTION
'S p,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM CO~JSE'Jr
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
FROM: Michael Hullander, Public Works Supervisor
DATE: January 17, 2006
SUBJECT: Purchase of a John Deere 5425 Tractor for the Park Division.
INTRODUCTION:
The Parks Division is requesting to purchase an additional John Deere 5425 Tractor for
maintaining park and athletic field turf. Activities include application of weed control and
fertilizing chemicals, aeration, top dressing and seeding. Other activities include mowing
and softballlbaseball infield grooming.
BACKGROUND:
Park Maintenance currently has two tractors for all activities. One tractor is used solely
for grooming purposes and the other was initially purchased for turf maintenance and
mo""ing. It is also needed for grooming activities during high use times, late spring and
early summer.
With the full development of the soccer complex and other additional parks the second
tractor has full-time duty in mowing and is not available to do turf maintenance activities
and assist with grooming during high use times.
The soccer complex is a high use facility that requires additional turf aeration above the
annual fall core aeration which is currently being done on all athletic field turf. This is
done by using a turf slicing technique and not core aeration so as not to disrupt the
playability of the fields. We currently have both types of aeration.
The turf also requires extra overseeding during the season to provide continual new
growth in the high use areas at the center of the fields and in front of the goal areas. We
currently have a slit seeder for this purpose.
This tractor will also be used, along with our current spraying unit, for spring and fall
weed control and fertilizer applications.
Along with turf maintenance activities, this tractor will be available to assist in grooming
activities for numerous softball and baseball fields. During high use times and wet
conditions Tahpah Park has taken priority over other fields due to the limited amount of
time to properly condition the fields. This addition allows us the time to provide better
playing surfaces for the youth baseball association and not just focus on adult activities.
Park Maintenance has budgeted $45,000 for this purchase and is requesting to utilize
state bid pricing. Attached to this memo is the state bid price for a John Deere 5425
Tractor from Siemon Implement, Inc. The state bid price plus tax is $38,932.56. Staff
will also pursue an 18 month buy back agreement.
AL TERNA TIVES:
1. Authorize staff to purchase one new John Deere 5425 tractor from Siemon
Implement, Inc. for the price of$38,932.56.
2. Deny the request.
3. Table for additional information.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIP:
This action supports many of the goals and strategies such as:
Goals: A. "Active and Healthy Community."
B. "High Quality of Life."
C. "Great Place for Kids to Grow Up."
D. "Vibrant, resilient and stable."
E. "Financially Strong."
Strategies: 2. "Enhance physical, mental, and spiritual health."
6. "Provide high quality services."
7. "Make community welcoming."
10. "Ensure City's fiscal health."
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative No.1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Move to authorize staff to purchase one new John Deere 5425 Tractor by using state bid
pricing from Siemon Implement, Inc. for the price of$38,932.50 with the expenditure to
come out of the Internal Service Equipment Fund.
-rJ-Y,;- ~
Michael Hullander
Public Works Supervisor
..- '--. .-...-
jfil!t'tioP(//l-L St(J S- TtlJ-vr{)((
;~;:<!:;'~i~
Siemon Implement Inc.
10935 Old Hwy 169 Blvd.
Belle Plame, MN 56011
(952) 873-2224 Fax (952) 873-4227
E-Mail: siemonim@frontiemet.net
Web: http://iddealer.deere.com/siemon
Shakopee Public Works
State Contract #434179
Shakopee,MN
12-28-05
6710LV- New JD 5425 Utility Tractor $27,724.00
1004- MFWD (4 wheel drive) $5,660.00
1511- Cab wi Air Suspension Seat $9,803.00
2210- 12 FIl2 R Power Reverser $2,274.00
3015- Vertical Exhaust
4036- 16.9..24 R3 Turf Tires $19.00
6441- 9.3-24 R3 Turf Tires -$153.00
7030- Triple Rear Deluxe Valve w/LeverControls $1,869.00
7220- Dual Mid Valve w/Joystick Control $986.00
7520- 3 PT w/Telescopic Draft Links $279.00
8005-~echanical
9450- Cold Weather Package $157.00
AL71215- 4 Wheel Drive Front Fenders $430.00
LVIOOI25- Fender Support $136.00
L113922- Antenna $14.25
RE 196202- AMJFM Stereo Radio $450.00
AL80126- Telescopic Minor-L.H. $104.00
AL80127- Telescopic MiITor-R.H. $104.00
L VB25712- Rear Wiper w/Washer Kit $221.00
$50,077.25
-$13.520.86
State Contract Price $36,556.39
Tax $2.376.17
$38,932.56
coo~ .LN3Jll31dJ'H NOJll3IS LZ6f1CL9ZS6 XVd 911:60 900616;;161
~. -.. -. -- .--.-. .--...--....-..
s. Q.
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council CONSENT
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Plans & Specifications for Dominion Hills
Outlet Structure, Project No. 2005-3
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
This item is for City Council to approve plans and specifications for the installation of
outlet structures in the Dominion Hills area for stormwater management.
BACKGROUND:
City Council authorized WSB & Associates, Inc. to prepare plans for outlet structures to
manage stormwater runoff more effectively in the Dominion Hills area. The stormwater
runoff from this area flows into the Pheasant Run area. Part of the City's overall
Stormwater Management Plan is to construct outlet structures to "regulate" the flow from
several large wetland areas.
The plans prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc. have three outlet structures being
constructed, and as shown on the attached drawing. Staffhas obtained easements and/or
a right-of-entry to construct the work. Staff believes the best time for construction of
these outlets is before the spring runoff.
GOALS AND STRATEGIES:
This item supports the goal of vibrant, resilient and stable community and the strategy of
providing high quality services.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. 6352, a resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering an advertisement for bids on Dominion Hills Outlet Structure,
Project No. 2005-3.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 6352.
3. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No.1.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 6352, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and
Ordering Advertisement for Bids on Dominion Hills Outlet Structure, Project No. 2005-3
and move its adoption.
~~~
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGR/2005PROJECTIDOMINIONHILLSIWORD/MEM6352
RESOLUTION NO. 6352
A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications
And Ordering Advertisement For Bids
For The Dominion Hills Outlet Structure
Project No. 2005-3
WHEREAS, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications
for improvements for the Dominion Hills Outlet Structure, which includes grading, installation of
structures and pipes and any appurtenant work, and has presented such plans and specifications to
the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office
ofthe City Engineer, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such
approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by
law.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota,
held this day of , 2006.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ENGR/200SPROJECTIDOMlNIONHD.l.SlWORDIRES6352
,
~
;;
co
on
co
<0
0
0
~
'i
."
-i
<;J
;;;
N
'6
'"
()
6
'?
;;;
~
9
~
S. R,
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council CONSENT
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
FROM: Michael Hullander, Public Works Supervisor
DATE: January 17, 2006
SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Television Inspection
INTRODUCTION:
Public Works has received two quotes for the television inspection of 60,000 linear feet
of main line sewer.
BACKGROUND:
In 2005, City Council approved a formal policy for the inspection and maintenance of the
sanitary sewer system. Part of that policy requires the television inspection of sanitary
sewer mains every 10 years. Staff is requesting to televise 60,000 linear feet which is
10% of the City's system. Television inspection allows staff to identify any defects such
as tree root growth, off-set joints, protruding taps, sags, and cracks which could
potentially cause a blockage or collapse in the system.
Staffhas received two quotes, which are attached to this memo, and is requesting council
authorization to approve and accept the low quote from Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc.
for the quoted price of $0.39 per linear foot. The total cost for televising 60,000 linear
feet is $24,921.00 including tax.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the low quote from Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. for $0.39 per linear
foot to televise 60,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer mains.
2. Do not accept the low quote.
3. Table for additional information.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIP:
This action supports: Goal B "High Quality of life" and Strategy 6 "Provide High Quality
Services. "
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative No.1.
"--
I
I
I
i
ACTION REobESTED: /
Authorize staff io contract -with Visu-Sewer Clean & Sea!l1nc. for the television
inspection Of60~000 linear feetor.sat:ti~ary sewer main,at a cost of$0.39 per linear foot
with funding to e expended from the sanit~y sewer"fund.
1"""- ,/
I ,/
7"
I .~~
II'~'
i ~ l ""'t;
I ,. .~ .
,.,~
I Ai"/" Michael Hulland~~""",
"If Public Works SuperviS6r'""",,,~~
/"
e'
.,;/
p
~f' ,
l~
ACTION REoIuESTED:
Authorize staff io contract with Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. for the television
in~pectio~ of 6~bOOO linear feet of sanit~ sewer main at a cost of $0.39 per linear foot
With fundmg to I e expended from the samtary sewer fund.
i
I ~,~
i
i
1 Michael Hullander
Public Works Supervisor
i
I
01/04/06 . \YED 16: 21 FAX_.763 252 0008 VISU-SEWER ___.....'".__n_~'_.....,.,...._....._
I4J 001
I
Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc.
7905 Beech Street NE :
Fridley, MN 55432.1762 I
I
763-252-0004 I
Proposal i
I
I
To: Mike Hullander From: Ronald Fenney
City of Shakopee Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc.
500 Gorman St.
Shakopee,~ 55379 Date: 01/04/2006
952-233-3826
fax: -233-3821 Project: 2006 Sanitary Sewer TV Inspection Proposal
I would like to thank you for the opportunity to quote this and
future projects and we look forward to working with you again.
Visu-Sewer will provide equipment and personnel to televise
approximately 60,000 L.F. of sanitary sewer at a cost of:
$ 0.39 per L.F.
This will include mobilization and an indexed booklet of the TV logs
with video tapes of each line televised.
The city will be responsible for pre-cleaning each line and supplying
access to each MIl.
Should you have any questions or would like to schedule please contact
. me at the office.
Acceptance of Proposal
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.
VSC&S, Inc. is authorized to do the work as specified.
Date: Signature:
Please sign and return to sender
"...---......-....--.-1----.
Jan 06 06 09:24a i Greg Ranta 763 428 8067
I
i p. 1
I
I
I
I
I
InfrarectD.
\ I Infrastructpfe TI3~hnologies
I 2104Q1 Commerce Blvd.
~ I
Rog~rs, MN 55374-9341
Phone 763 428 6488/ Fax 763 428 6489
Web Site wwW.infratechcataloq.cor.,
~. I
Janua~~,20b6 ;1
" I f
" I ./
To: Mike HU1Cl~der /
City ofShtl~opee /
I' /
RE: Te'evisif Q~te /
Project: City \ l
Bid Date: 1- -06 \, ,f
, 8
\ "
Infratech is pl~ased to pr~s~nt this proposal ~or Televising as required for the
above-mentiqned project.\\. ;I
I' ."
~ ff
Televising AFProximatelY 60,'oO\LF of;8"san'tary Sewer @ $0.47 LF
The above p~ce includes mobilizati()~. a,Ji equipment, labor, per diem and
material to p rform televising for this pr,pject. The above price does not include
cleaning the pipe prior to televising. If ~Ie~ning is required please contact
I ." "
Infratech for I pnce. I \
('j \
J \
Please phon. with any questions cl concerns.\pank you for considering
Infratech. I \
./ \,
Sincerely, l' "\
\
I y \\
1
,;1 \
I'
i \
to'. ~
'h) ~~v \.
.i, ~ [( .~.~ / \
'\
\.,
I '\
'I \
Greg Ranta ! \
\.
Project Administrator f ),
';\
Infratech j \\
,
I '\
\
Shakopee 1-5-06 f \
\
.'.
"-T-'--
Jan 06 06 OS:24a i Greg Ranta 763 428 80S7
p. 1
I nfratec It:)
. ..
Infrastructure Technologies
21040 Commerce Blvcl~
i Rogers, MN 55374-9341
Phone 763 428 6488/ Fax 763 428 6489
Web Site www.infratechcataloa.cor::
I
January 6, 2006
To: Mike HUla~der
City of Shrkopee
RE: Televisi.1g Quote
Project: City 1
Bid Date: 1-~-O6
Infratech is pI based to present this proposal for Televising as required for the
above-menti~ned project.
Televising ArPrOXimatelY 60,000 LF of S"Sanitary Sewer @ $0.47 LF
The above pnce includes mobilization, all equipment, labor, per diem and
material to p~rform televising for this project. The above price does not include
cleaning the fipe prior to televising. If cleaning is required please contact
lnfratech for ~ price.
I
Please phon~ with any questions or concerns. Thank you for considering
Infratech. I
I
Sincerely, I
I
I
,~~ H-1.~
(. -:-' !
I
I
Greg Ranta I
Project Admijnistrator
Infratech
I
I
I
Shakopee 1-5-06 !
i
I
!
!
i
I
i
i
i
I
;
i
5:5,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
CONSENT
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Meeting Date: January 16, 2006
Subject: Contract Extension for 17th Avenue Soccer Complex Design Services
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item request approval of a contract extension with BKY Group for
additional services required to redesign and rebid the restroom and support building at
the 17th Avenue Sports (Soccer) complex.
BACKGROUND
In early 2004, we submitted requests for architecture services to design the building for
the soccer complex. Four firms submitted proposals, and BKY Group was selected as
lowest cost and familiarity with the City.
BKY, user groups, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, neighborhood residents,
and staff worked through the remainder of 2004 on the building design, and the project
was finally bid in the spring of 2005. However, the bids came in over budget.
City Council rejected all bids and directed that the project be redesigned. In this action,
they also set the project funding for all remaining construction work at $521,000. This
would include the building, final ADA modifications, water/sewer/building permit fees,
and fencing along 1 ih Avenue that is needed to stop ball from entering into the storm
water ponds. (The 2005 adopted CIP also includes an additional $15,000 in funding for
design services. (Attached)
DISCUSSION
BKV's proposal and contract specified an amount for the following phases of design:
3 Concept Designs $4,400
5 Meetings $2,500
Prepare Final Plans and Specifications $9,000
Prepare Project Manuals, Issue Bid Docs, and Assist with Bid Process $1,200
Oversee Construction Work $6,900
Reimbursables and Allowances $7,350
Total $31,350
BKV has indicated that they fulfilled the terms of their contract through the bid process,
and has submitted the attached proposal for the work required to redesign, rebid, and
oversee the construction work. 0Ne have not been billed for the construction
administration portion.)
Unfortunately, our project architect that did the first design has left BKV. I met with David
Kroos (Principal at BKV), and he has committed himself and a structural engineer to lead
the redesign. As part of the additional design service proposal, BKV is offering to provide
the concept redesign and cost estimating (to ensure the building will be within budget) at
no cost. The contract extension proposal is as follows:
Concept Finalization No Charge
Prepare Final Plans and Specifications $8,940
Bidding $1,200
Reimbursables and Allowances (estimate) $4,000
Total $14,140
In addition, there would be the costs from the original contract of $6,900 to oversee the
construction of the building. Sinc~ the total remaining costs are over the budget in the
CIP of $15,000, the additional funding would need to come from reductions in the
construction of either the building or the other site improvements.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIOP
Extending the contract will allow the building redesign to move forward yet this winter,
with bidding in spring, hopefully resulting in an acceptable bid. This action appears to
meet the following aspects of the City's vision:
Goal: Active and healthy community
Great place for kids to grow up.
Strategies: Increase use of Park and Recreation
Enhance physical, mental, spiritual health
Provide high quality services
REQUESTED ACTION
If City Council concurs, move to authorize a contract extension with BKV Group for
additional design services for the 17th Avenue Sports Complex building.
City of Shakopee Capital Improvement Program 2006. 2010
Project Manager Project Type: Project Title: Total Project Cost:
Mark Themig Special Facility Construction 17th Avenue Sports Complex 536,000
Year Added to CIP:
A. Ex enditure Items: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Land & ROW
Construction 521,000
Improvements
Engineering/Admin. 15,000
Total 536,000 - - - -
B. Fundin Source:
General Fund
Capital Improvement Funds
Park Reserve Fund 536,000
Grants (specify)
Donations {specify}
State Aid
Assessments
Sanitary Sewer Fund-Base
Sanitary Sewer Fund-Flow
Sanitary Sewer Fund-Trunk
Storm Drainage Fund-Base
Storm Drainage Fund-Trunk
Tax Levy
Total 536,000 - - - - -
DescriDtion
This project would provide funding for completion of the 17th Avenue Sports Complex.
Construction: Completion of Phase 2, $520,000 (Park Reserve)
Building, inc. permits -$493,000
Water and Sewer Fees - $13,000
Fencing - $10,000
ADA Modifications - $5,000
Engineering/Admin: Architectural fees $15,000 (Park Reserve)
Justification
This project completes the development of a major sports complex that will serve the City's needs for many
years. The building will need to be constructed of durable materials that will stand up to public use, as well as
abuse (vandalism). Costs reflect similar buildings.
Other Comments
There was an extensive design process that produced the original design for the building, which bid in spring
2005. Low bid ($528,000) was overbudget. On June 7, 2005, City Council set a maximum construction
budget of $520,000 for Phase 2.
Ooeratina Costs
Estimated operating costs: $5,000
BKV
GROUP
Architecture January 3, 2006
Interior Design
Engineering
Boarman
Kroos
Vogel Mr. Mark Themig, Director
Group
Inc. Shako pee Parks and Recreation
1255 Fuller Street
222 North Second Street Shakopee. MN 55379-1351
Minneapolis, MN S540 I
Telephone: 612.339.3752
Facsimile: 612.339.6212 RE: Shako pee Soccer Complex Redesign Fee
www.bkvgroup.com
EOE
Dear Mark Themig:
We are pleased to present our fees for the redesign of the Shakopee Soccer Complex.
Prior to beginning the CD phase, we will work with you to establish the revised design concept which
will be at no cost to the City of Shakopee. Once that is established we can move forward to
construction documents and the completion of this project.
Sincerely.
~
David Kroos. AlA
Partner
End
Proposal for Services
City of Shakoppee
Soccer Complex Facility
B KV
GROUP Staff I Time
Task BKV Group BKV Group BKV Group BKV Group BKV Group Cost
Partner I Specificatio Structural Mechanical Electrical Estimator
Architect n Writer Engineer Engineer Engineer
Revise Architectural Concept
Revise Structural Concept
Final Concept I Design Model
a
Revise Site Plan and Details 12 0 0 0 0 0
Revise Roof Plan 5 0 0 0 0 0
Revise Building Sections and Wall Sections 16 0 0 0 0 0
Revise Architectural Details 8 0 0 0 0 0
Revise Specifications 1 8 4 0 0 0
Revise Roof Structural Documentation 1 0 16 0 0 0
Revise Structural Details 1 0 10 0 0 0
Revise Electrical Documentation - Lighting 1 0 0 0 8 0
Modify Mechanical Documentation (as required) 1 0 0 2 0 0
Revise I Finalize Specifications 0 0 0 0 0 0
90% Construction Document 8
~s it;.,
Fee Assumptions
1) Concept Design Revisions are provided by BKV Group at no cost to owner as indicated under Part A above
2) BKV Group assumes no Civil Engineering to be required for this effort
3) BKV Group assumes no Landscape Architectural effort to be required.
4) Approval of Design Concept revisions are anticipated prior to revisions of Construction Documents
~~~t~ l €> tf\J
~ t'1\ V-to
s, r;
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
COt~Sf~JT
,'\ . 1'" 6'i"
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Meeting Date: January 16, 2006
Subject: Facility Maintenance Worker Revised Job Description
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item requests approval of a revised job description for the Facility
Maintenance Worker position.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The 2006 operating budget provides funding for a second Facility Maintenance Worker
position that would provide support in maintaining the increasing number of city
buildings. On January 3, City Council approved advertising and recruitment for this
position.
We currently have one individual in this job classification that works in recreation
facilities (Community Center, Ice Arena, Outdoor Pool, and Youth Building). The second
(new) position will primarily be performing maintenance activities on other government
buildings (City Hall, Library, Police Department, old and new Public Works buildings, old
and new Fire Stations, Senior High Rise).
The proposed revisions remove language in the job description that were facility-specific,
such as operating ice arena refrigeration system, and makes the job description more
generic so it applies to maintenance at all City buildings. This will allow the two
individuals to cross over between government buildings and recreation facilities when
needed.
Rod Kelsey, the City's pay consultant, has reviewed the proposed revisions and
determined that the position should remain in the same pay grade (Grade 2).
I've attached a clean and strikeout version of the proposed changes.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIOP
This position will help ensure the long-term viability of the City's investment in buildings
that serve our residents, employees, and guests by providing preventative, ongoing, and
emergency maintenance and repairs. With this in mind, this action appears to meet the
following aspects ofthe City's vision:
Goal: Vibrant, Resilient, Stable
Strategies: Provide High Quality Services
Ensure City's Fiscal Health
REQUESTED ACTION
If City Council concurs, move to approve the revised job description for the Facility
Maintenance Worker position.
Job Description
Job Title: Facility Maintenance Worker
Department: Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities
location: Government Buildings and Recreation Facilities
Reports To: Government Building Maintenance Supervisor OR Recreation Supervisor
FlSA Status: Non-exempt
Prepared By: Mark Themig
Prepared Date: 01/1999, Revised 01/2006
Salary level: Grade 2
SUMMARY
This position performs or assists in the maintenance, repair and operation of recreation facilities
and government buildings. Work includes performing upkeep and making repairs to buildings
and grounds, maintaining equipment, and conducting cleaning duties, ensuring work priorities
are completed in a timely manner and proper City policies and procedures are followed.
ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBiliTIES include the following. Other duties may be
assigned.
Performs building upkeep and maintenance such as wall repairs, painting, door and door
closure systems repair, minor plumbing repairs, and lighting repairs.
Performs material handling including office furniture/equipment re-configuration, event set-up,
and deliveries.
Performs maintenance and upkeep of exterior buildings and grounds such as tree and shrub
pruning, turf maintenance, weeding, cleaning sidewalks, painting, exterior light repairs, and
snow and ice removal.
Performs annual maintenance activities for recreation facilities such as assisting with startup
and shut down of the aquatic park and assisting with ice arena ice removal, installation and
maintenance.
Performs maintenance and upkeep on mechanical systems such as changing filters and belts
on air handling units, monitoring and maintaining salt in water softeners, and cleaning screens
and condensers on chillers and air conditioning units. Operates facility energy management
software.
Occasionally performs cleaning duties for buildings and grounds such as mopping floors,
vacuuming, dusting, carpet cleaning, light fixture cleaning, floor refinishing, and floor scrubbing.
Works as a substitute custodian when assigned.
Assists in evaluating the need for construction, maintenance and repair work. Coordinates work
with contractors as directed by supervisor.
Assists in recommending purchases of needed equipment and supplies in accord with
established policy.
Responds willingly to varied work assignments and to flexible working hours to facilitate meeting
desired results, e.g. perform seasonal boiler/building checks and snow removal duty over
weekends and holidays on a rotating basis.
Responds to internal and external requests for service promptly, efficiently, and effectively.
Communicates building operation and maintenance needs in a professional manner.
Participates in and helps promote a clean, safe environment, and a pro-active preventive
maintenance program.
Performs other related duties as required.
QUALIFICATIONS To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each
essential duty satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge,
skill, and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals
with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
EDUCATION and/or EXPERIENCE
High school diploma (or GED).
2 years experience building maintenance
General knowledge of HVAC systems, plumbing, electrical, and other mechanical systems.
LANGUAGE SKILLS
Ability to speak, read and understand all instructions and documents related to performance of
this position, i.e., safety rules, operating and maintenance instructions, and procedure manuals.
Ability to review and record records.
Ability to read and send electronic communication using a computer, and use of a telephone
voice mail system.
Ability to read and interpret documents such as safety rules, operating and maintenance
instructions, and procedure manuals. Ability to write routine reports and correspondence. Ability
to speak effectively before groups of customers or employees of organization.
REASONING ABILITY
Ability to apply commonsense understanding to carry out instructions furnished in written, oral,
or diagram form. Ability to deal with problems involving several concrete variables in
standardized situations.
MATHEMATICAL SKILLS
Addition, subtraction, multiplication.
CERTIFICATES, LICENSES, REGISTRATIONS
Possession of MN (Special) 3rd Class C Boiler Operator's License is preferred. Employee must
possess valid MN Class D Drivers License.
OTHER SKILLS AND ABILITIES
Ability to work independently without direct on-site supervision, make on-site decisions related
to task assignments, and work cooperatively with co-workers and customers.
Ability to operate cleaning equipment and small tools.
Knowledge of the materials, methods, techniques, tools and equipment used in maintaining and
cleaning buildings.
Ability to work overtime when assigned.
Ability to work various shifts and schedules when required and assigned, including evenings
and weekends.
PHYSICAL DEMANDS The physical demands described here are representative of those that
must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job.
Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee is regularly required to stand; walk; use
hands to finger, handle, or feel objects, tools, or controls; reach with hands and arms; and talk
or hear. The employee frequently is required to climb or balance and stoop, kneel, crouch, or
crawl. The employee is occasionally required to sit and taste or smell. The employee must
frequently lift and/or move up to 50 pounds. Specific vision abilities required by this job include
close vision, distance vision, color vision, peripheral vision, depth perception, and the ability to
adjust focus.
WORK ENVIRONMENT The work environment characteristics described here are
representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this
job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform
the essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee frequently works near moving mechanical
parts. The employee occasionally works in outside weather conditions and is occasionally
exposed to toxic or caustic chemicals and risk of electrical shock. The employee is occasionally
exposed to dirty/dusty conditions and loud environments
COMMENTS
Job Description
Job Title: Facility Mainten::mce '.Ilforker
Job Code:
Employee Name:
Di':ision: Parks & Recreation
Department: Community Services
Lo.catio.n: Community Center
Shift:
Repo.rts To.: Facility Manager
FLSA Status: Nonexompt
Prepared By: Mark McQuillan
Prepared Date: 01/99
Appro.'.'od By:
Appro.\'ed Date: 01/99
User Defined 1:
Salary Level: Grade A
Jo.b Title: Facility Maintenance Worker
Department: Parks & Recreation. Natural Resources. and Facilities
Lo.catio.n: Government BuildinQs and Recreation Facilities
Repo.rts To.: Government BuildinQ Maintenance Supervisor OR Recreation Supervisor
FLSA Status: Non-exempt
Prepared Bv: Mark ThemiQ
Prepared Date: 01/1999. Revised 01/2006
Salary Level: Grade 2
SUMMARY
This position performs or assists in the maintenance, repair and operation of equipment at the
community centor and outdoor municipal pool recreation facilities and Qovernment buildinQs.
The position performs manual labor for cleaning and maintenance, operates the ice resufacer
and is responsible for preventive maintenance and equipment operation of assigned facilities.
Work includes performinQ upkeep and makinQ repairs to buildinQs and Qrounds. maintaininQ
equipment. and conductinQ c1eaninQ duties. ensurinQ work priorities are completed in a timely
manner and proper City policies and procedures are followed.
ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES include the following. Other duties may be
assigned.
Performs buildinQ upkeep and maintenance such as wall repairs. paintinQ. door and door
closure systems repair. minor plumbinQ repairs. and IiQht-inQ repairs.
Performs material handlinQ includinQ';' office furniture/equipment re-confiQuration. event set-up.
and deliveries. bulb replacement.preventive maintenance tasks and duties for ice arena, civic
center and pool facilities.
Porforms maintenance
Performs maintenance and upkeep of exterior buildinQs and Qrounds such as tree and shrub
pruninQ. turf maintenance, weedinQ, c1eaninQ sidewalks. paintinQ. exterior liQht
repairsreplacement. and snow and ice removal.
Performs annual maintenance activities for recreation facilities such as assistinq with startup
and shut down of the aQuatic park and assistinQ with ice arena ice removal. installation and
maintenance. on the pool filtr:3tion pumps, motors and chemical systems to ensure proper
oper:3tion and W:3ter quality.
Performs maintenance and upkeep on mechanical systems such as chanQinQ filters and belts
on air handlinQ units. monitorinQ and maintaininQ salt in water softeners. and c1eaninq screens
and condensers on chillers and air conditioninQ units. Operates facilitv enerQV manaQement
software.Performs routine m:3inten::mce of equipment at the community center including such
things :3S refriger:3tion equipment, ice re surf:3cer, pool filtr:3tion system, heating :3nd cooling
units and ventil:3tion equipment.
I Perf-orms light duty rep:3ir or upkeep of doors, plumbing fixtures :3nd m:3intenance equipment :3t
the community center :3nd pool.
Occasionallv Responsible for j::mitorbl functions of the community center :3S
:3ssigned.pPerforms cleaninQ duties for buildinQs and Qrounds such as moppinQ floors,
vacuuminq. dustinQ. carpet cleaninQ, liQht fixture c1eaninQ. floor refinishinQ. and floor scrubbinQ.
Works as a substitute custodian when assiQned.
I Oper:3tes the Olympic Ice Resurf:3cer in the ice arena.
I Assists in the inst:311:3tion and removal of ice sheets in the ice arena.
I Performs occ:3sion:31 grounds m:3intenance outdoors :3t the community center and outdoor pool.
I Assists in evaluating the need for construction, maintenance and repair work.:. at community
center :3nd pool. Coordinates work with contractors as directed bv supervisor.
I Assists in recommending :3nd coordinatinQ purchases of needed equipment and supplies in
accord with established policy.
Assists in providing direction to volunteers :3nd seasonal f:3cilities personnel.
Responds willinQlv to varied work assiqnments and to flexible workinQ hours to facilitate meetinQ
desired results. e.o. perform seasonal boiler/building checks and snow removal duty over
weekends and holidavs on a rotatinQ basis.
Responds to internal and external reQuests for service promptlv. efficientlv, and effectivelv.
Communicates buildinQ operation and maintenance needs in a professional manner.
Participates in and helps promote a clean. safe environment. and a pro-active preventive
maintenance prOQram.
Performs other related duties as required.
QUALIFICATIONS To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each
essential duty satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge,
skill, and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals
with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
" .
EDUCATION and/or EXPERIENCE
Hiah school diploma (or GED).
2 years experience buildina maintenance
High school diplom:::l or gener:::ll education degree (GED); one to two ye:::lrs rebted experience in
ice :::lrena refriger:::ltion, pool m:::linten:::lnce and
General knowledae of HVAC systems, plumbina. electrical. and other mechanical systems.
and/or training; or equivalent combination of education and experience. Kno'/Jledge of ice arena
methods :::lnd procedures, refrigeration systems used in ice arenas, pool equipment including
chlorination systems, :::lnd :::lbility to perform routine facility maintenence :::lctivities.
LANGUAGE SKILLS
Ability to speak. read and understand all instructions and documents related to performance of
this position. i.e.. safety rules. operatina and maintenance instructions. and procedure manuals.
Ability to review and record records.
Ability to read and send electronic communication usina a computer. and use of a telephone
voice mail system.
Ability to read and interpret documents such as safety rules, operating and maintenance
instructions, and procedure manuals. Ability to write routine reports and correspondence. Ability
to speak effectively before groups of customers or employees of organization.
REASONING ABILITY
Ability to apply commonsense understanding to carry out instructions furnished in written, oral,
or diagram form. Ability to deal with problems involving several concrete variables in
standardized situations.
MA THEMA TICAL SKILLS
Addition. subtraction. multiplication.
CERTIFICATES, LICENSES, REGISTRATIONS
I Possession of MN (Special) 3rd Class C Boiler Qperator'ss License (/0'11) or the ability to obtain
one 'Nithin one year is preferred. Employee must possess valid MN Class D Drivers License.
OTHER SKILLS AND ABILITIES
Ability to work industriously 'Nithout constant supervision. Ability to work independently without
direct on-site supervision. . make on-site decisions related to task assionments. and work
cooperatively with co-workers and customers.
Abilitv to operate cleanina equipment and small tools.
Knowledae of the materials. methods. techniques. tools and equipment used in maintainina and
cleanina buildinas.
Ability to work overtime when assianed.
Ability to work various shifts and schedules when required and assianed. includina eveninas
and weekends.
Ability to work 'Nell with fellO'.\' employees and/or volunteers. Must be physically c:::lpable of
performing m:::lintenance and cleaning required in a re:::lsonable amount of time.
PHYSICAL DEMANDS The physical demands described here are representative of those that
must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job.
Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential. functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee is regularly required to stand; walk; use
hands to finger, handle, or feel objects, tools, or controls; reach with hands and arms; and talk
or hear. The employee frequently is required to climb or balance and stoop, kneel, crouch, or
crawl. The employee is occasionally required to sit and taste or smell. The employee must
frequently lift and/or move up to 50 pounds. Specific vision abilities required by this job include
close vision, distance vision, color vision, peripheral vision, depth perception, and the ability to
adjust focus.
WORK ENVIRONMENT The work environment characteristics described here are
representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this
job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform
the essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee frequently works near moving mechanical
parts. The employee occasionally works in outside weather conditions and is occasionally
exposed to toxic or caustic chemicals and risk of electrical shock. The employee is occasionally
exposed to dirty/dusty conditions and loud environmentsnoise level in the work environment is
usually loud.
COMMENTS
v,Ur
CITY OF SHAKOPEE CONSENT
Memorandum
TO: Shakopee City Council
FROM: John Schmitt, Mayor
SUBJECT: Council Meeting Procedures
DATE: January 13, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
At the January 1 ih City Council, I would like the Council to re-endorse the operating
policies for City Council meetings.
BACKGROUND:
In recent years, mayors in Shakopee have defined their expectations and proposed
operating policies to maintain decorum and a smoothly flowing City Council meeting.
The following are the guidelines which were adopted by the City Council last year; I
would suggest that they be readopted for use in 2006:
1. "Liaison Reports" should be only for reports relating to other meetings that a
Council member has attended, and if information was obtained at that meeting
that is of general interest to members of the public, or other members of the
Council.
2. A "Council Concerns" section of the agenda is listed near the end of the agenda,
and is for issues needing to be brought up by the Council that are unable to be
included on the printed Council agenda due to late notification, and which cannot
be deferred to a future meeting. Issues of concerns brought to Councilmembers
by residents should be forwarded to staff before the meeting so that staff can
review and respond in the most timely manner.
3. If an issue presents a potential conflict of interest, the affected Council member
should remove himself :from the Council table for the discussion and subsequent
vote on the issue. Council members should not abstain from a vote simply
because they do not wish to take a stand on an issue.
4. Councilmembers need not remove themselves from the Council table to abstain
from a vote on something for which there is no discussion needed; i.e., not voting
on minutes for which that Councilmember was not in attendance. ,
5. There is a five-minute limit per person/subject for issues that are brought before
the Council under the "Concerned Citizens" portion of the agenda. An issue that
must be resolved at that meeting and cannot be deferred, should be placed under
"Other Business" later on the agenda, out of fairness to other individuals who are
on the agenda.
6. As long as there people in the audience for agenda items, reasonable
accommodations will try to be made to deviate from the set agenda to allow those
issues to be heard before Council and get the audience issues resolved. Public
Hearings, however, will be heard in the order that they are placed on the agenda.
7. To the greatest extent possible, we will follow parliamentary procedure as
outlined in "Robert's Rules of Order". I shall adhere to the following concepts:
. Only those having the floor as recognized by the Chair shall speak.
. Encourage both audience members and Council members to address
the Chair.
. Encourage that motions be descriptive of action sought, i.e. not simply
"move the requested action".
. Make a strong effort to ensure that motions are made only in the
affirmative.
. Allow any member to make modifications to a motion, if acceptable to
the maker, but only prior to the start of discussion as signaled by the
Chair.
. The chair will not make a motion.
. Disallow discussion on a motion until seconded.
. Generally follow that the member who makes a motion will be given
the first opportunity to speak in discussion.
. Generally recognize any member who has not spoken on a question
over one who has.
. Rule against explanation of vote by members during voting.
. Declare a unanimous vote if a motion receives any votes on one side
and none on the other.
. Generally report by the Chair results of all votes indicating those
members in the majority.
8. "Other Business" and "Mayor Report" items will be included as a regular part of
every agenda.
9. Any audience member or Councilmember may ask to have an item removed from
the consent agenda.
10. Prior to adoption of the consent agenda, I will ask for any additions or deletions
. from the consent agenda. A synopsis of each item proposed to be adopted as the
consent agenda will be read prior to a vote being taken.
11. Presentations from members of the Council, staff, consultants, or members of the
public shall be in their entirety before questions shall be posed from the Council.
12. In order to move the meeting along, cumbersome, lengthy, and numerous
amendments to a motion will be discouraged.
13. I will make every effort to be protective of staff, Council, and citizens from
personal or unnecessary derogatory attacks.
14. Council members should make an effort to keep the discussion relevant to the
topic at hand.
15. Unless waived by a majority vote of the City Council, no new item of business
should be undertaken after 11 :00 PM at a City Council meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
I believe adherence to the above policies and procedures will be of benefit in the
operation of City Council meetings. For that reason I recommend that Council adopt
these guidelines.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, endorse the above policies.
John Schmitt
Mayor
JS:th
5: v,
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
Memorandum CONSENT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: February 28th Workshop Meeting Change
DATE: January 12, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this memo is to advise Council of a change for the meeting which was
givententative approval by the City Council on January 3rd, relating to ajoint meeting
with Jackson and Louisville townships.
BACKGROUND:
Louisville Township did not meet until January 5th, and therefore, their response to our
request to meet on February 28th to discuss annexation and natural resource corridor
issues could not have been answered when the meeting was set.
Louisville Township has since indicated that it is preparing for an audit, and that it will
be impossible to meet with the City prior to the annual township meeting on March 11 th.
They suggested later in March; however, I am aware that there will be a conflict with at
least one member of the City Council the last week of March.
The question remains as to whether we should maintain the existing February 28th
meeting with Jackson Township. The opinion of staff is that that meeting is still
warranted, given the number of annexation issues to discuss with Jackson Township
alone.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that the City continue with the scheduled meeting with Jackson
Township only on February 28th, and discuss setting a separate meeting with Louisville
township in March or April, at a later date.
RELATION TO VISIONING:
Goals: This supports Goal D - Vibrant, resilient and stable, and
Strategy 5-Foster Community Connections
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that a joint meeting be scheduled with Jackson Township at 6:30 p.m. on
Tuesday, February 28, 2006.
A separate meeting with Louisville Township will be considered at a future time.
ACTION REQUIRED:
lfthe Council concurs, it should, by motion, set a joint meeting to be held with Jackson
Township at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 28,2006, for the purpose of discussing
annexation and natural resource corridor issues.
1.M~Vtall~
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
c."
s. W...
CITY OF SHAKOPEE COi~SENT
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Scott County Transportation Coalition Funding
DATE: January 12, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
The Council is asked to authorize $5,000 to be pledged as its share of funding a
revamped Transportation Coalition.
BACKGROUND:
From the 1980's into the mid-1990's, a group of cities, Scott County, and private
businesses and attractions formed the Scott County Transportation Coalition (SCTC),
which advocated for major transportation projects, none of which would likely have
become realities had it not been for a broad base of support. Three major projects which
came about at a result of the SCTC were the downtown mini-bypass and new river bridge
crossing, the Highway 169 bypass, and the Bloomington Ferry Bridge replacement.
After the opening ofthe Bloomington Ferry Bridge in 1995, the SCTC ceased to exist.
Recently, there has been discussion that the SCTC should be re-formed, so as to make a
high priority for transportation projects that will benefit Shakopee, and the rest of Scott
County. Two needed projects which would impact Shakopee residents would include
improvements to the portionofTH 13 in Savage in the vicinity ofthe river grain
terminals (subject to heavy congestion and traffic safety issues), and also the TH 41 river
crossing to Chaska. (While there is a study committee looking at locations, funding is
still such that the actual construction may be decades away).
Staff from the County and the cities have met to discuss how to proceed on this. It has
been recommended that Fred Corrigan, a consultant with a Twin Cities engineering firm,
be retained to start this process anew. Mr. Corrigan was instrumental during the first
round of the SCTC in seeing the projects to reality.
In order to provide funding, it was recommended that the cost sharing be identical to the
initial funding for the study of oneofthe SCALE projects:
Scott County - $20,000
Shakopee, Savage, Prior Lake - 5,000 each
New Prague, Jordan, Belle Plaine- 1,500 each
New Market, Elko- 500 each
Note that the participation is only by the cities and County at this time.
BUDGET IMPACT:
No money was specifically identified for this, but there is money in Council Contingency
that could be utilized for this in 2006.
IMP ACT ON VISIONING:
This supports Goal B - High Quality of Life (potential to reduce traffic congestion)
Strategy 5-- Foster community connections.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that Shakopee participate, and commit to a $5,000 funding for 2006.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, indicate its approval to participate in SCTC
by funding a contribution of $5,000.00.
l}kL~
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
J ~. At J *
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Meeting Date: January 16, 2006
Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Environmental Advisory
Committee Structure
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item is to request discussion on the structure of the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board and the Environmental Advisory Committee.
DISCUSSION
The City created the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board by ordinance in 1990, with a
charge of having advisory powers related to parks and recreation services (attached).
City Council created the Environmental Advisory Committee in 2001 by resolution, with a
charge of advising the City in the use and management of its natural resources
(attached).
Since the creation of the Environmental Advisory Committee, there have periodic
discussions about the separation and overlap of the two boards. For example, each
board reviews the same development proposals at different times, and, at times,
requests information on how the other board is handling review of a certain aspect of a
development. Since both boards have staff support from the same department, relaying
information is relatively easy.
There are also some aspects that are entirely unique for each board. For example, the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board advises on recreation services such as the
Community Center and athletics, while the Environmental Advisory Committee advises
on topics like AUAR area designation and noise.
The following are a few examples of recent topics that have been discussed at each
board, and whether or not there has been overlap in discussion:
Topic Environmental Advisory Parks and Recreation
Committee Advisorv Board
Development Reviews Occasionally the EAC Occasional the PRAB
requests PRAB's thoughts requests EAC's thoughts on
and desire related parks, wetlands and other natural
woodlands, and other resources. Some
natural resources discussions on
conservation easements.
Natural Resource Corridor Discussed how park Discussed how Natural
Plan and Design Standards dedication could be a Resource Corridors can be
mechanism for integrated into park areas
implementation
Noise Discussed whether park No discussion involving
land could help buffer noise environmental issues
from homes (Countryside)
EMF/High Voltage Analysis of EMF included No discussion involving
Transmission Lines park and open space areas environmental issues
and proximity to High
Voltage Transmission lines
(South bridge and
Countryside)
Park Design Park design and plans have PRAB has requested that
been presented to EAC for EAC review some
review (Quarry, Huber proposals (Quarry, Huber
Park) Park)
AUAR Area Designation No overlap No discussion
Athletic Associations No discussion No overlao
Community Center Future No discussion No overlap
ShakopeeGravel CUP No overlap No discussion
Park Plan Update (2006 Would likely have some Would likely have some
project) overlap as it relates to overlap as it relates to
Natural Resource Natural Resource
Corridors. Corridors.
In addition to discussions about overlap, there have also been periodic questions about
whether it would be more efficient and effective if the two boards were combined. The
cities of Eden Prairie and Savage both have a combined Parks, Recreation, and Natural
Resource Commission that advises City Council on all three topics (attached). Merging
the two boards in this way would result in a single board with expanded advisory
charges.
On January 10, Ryan Hughes and I met jointly with both Kathy Gerlach, Chair of the
Environmental Advisory Committee, and Arvid Sornberger, Chair of the Park and
Recreation Advisory Board, to discuss the structure of the two boards. During this
meeting, we had considerable discussion about the charge for each board, the overlap
that at times seems to occur related to certain topics, and unique topics that each board
handles. We came to the conclusion that there is indeed overlap for some topics, and
yet no overlap for other topics. However, the question remained as to whether or not
there is enough overlap to conclude that we are duplicating efforts, and whether or not
each board's work load is such that combining the two boards would not be in the best
interest of the city.
If City Council was interested in exploring whether a merged Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board and Environmental Advisory Committee would serve the city as well as
the current separate boards do (but more efficiently), we came up with an idea: Ask each
board to meet in a joint meeting as a test pilot for a two to three month period. At these
meetings, there would be agenda items that each board would vote on, and items that
only one board or the other would vote on depending on its content. This would give
each board the opportunity to assess whether or not merging the two would create better
efficiency, and not be a detriment to the City. Feedback from this exercise would be
provided to City Council for future consideration.
I do want to note that we have not discussed this concept with either board yet. In talking
with the Chairs, there was consensus that we wanted to get input from City Council
before any discussion. If you were interested in the idea of the test pilot, we would look
at trying to coordinate the joint meetings for the months of February, March, and April (if
needed).
VISIONING RELATIONSHIOP
Although only for consideration by City Council, this action appears to potentially meet
the following aspects of the City's vision:
Goal: Active and healthy community
High quality of life
Strategies: Protect the environment
I ncrease use of Park and Recreation
Provide high quality services
REQUESTED ACTION
If City Council concurs, move to ask the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and
Environmental Advisory Committee to meet jointly for the months of February, March,
and April (if needed) to assess whether or not merging the two boards would result in
greater efficiency and effectiveness for the City, and not be a detriment to either board's
charge.
S2.57
SEC. 2.57. PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD.
Subd. 1. Establishment and Duties. A Shakopee Park and Recreation Advisory Board is hereby
established. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board shall have advisory powers and shall be subordinate
to the Council. The duties of this Board shall consist of making recommendations to the Council on
establishing policies and programs relating to park, recreation and leisure services. This includes, but is not
limited to, the following:
A. The Board shall make recommendations to the Council regarding park development
including the maintenance and upgrade of facilities and equipment, the naming of parks,
and the location of new parks and what facilities they shall include.
B. The Board shall make recommendations to the Council concerning park land acquisition
procedures and park dedication requirements.
C. The Board shall be responsible for submitting an annual and five (5) year capital
improvement program, outlining recommended improvements to existing and proposed
park lands prior to July 1 of each year.
D. The Board shall make recommendations and submit to the Council an annual operating
budget and schedule for recreational program fees.
Subd. 2. Composition of Commission. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board shall consist of seven
(7) members appointed by the Council having staggered terms of three (3) years each. Appointment shall
be made by resolution naming the Board members and setting the term of office. Vacancies occurring
thereafter shall be filled for the unexpired term of the vacant office and shall be by resolution adopted by a
majority vote of the Council. The composition of the Board may include citizens from the community
representing the following interests in the community:
A. School.
B. Community Organization(s).
C. General Public.
D. Senior Citizens.
E. Neighboring Townships.
(Ord. No. 290, June 5, 1990; Ord. 305, February 6,1991; Ord. 311, June 14, 1991; Ord 323, December 12,
1991; Ord. 340, October 8, 1992)
SECTIONS 2.58 - 2.69. Reserved.
(The next page is 100.)
88 Chapter 2, City Code, Shakopee, MN
,
.
RESOLUTION NO. 5495
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISIDNG AN EVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to create an Environmental Advisory
Committee for the purpose of advising the City in the use and management of its natural
resources, and
WHEREAS, the preservation and restoration of the environment is an important concern
of its residents, and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Advisory Committee shall perform its duties and
responsibilities at the same peer level as other City Board and Commissions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKO PEE, MINNESOTA, THAT:
1. An Environmental Advisory Committee is hereby established, composed of five
(5) members, to be appointed by the City Council, and to include representatives
from the community.
2. Terms on the Committee shall be three (3) years in duration to be calculated from
March 1,2001. Terms of the initial appointments shall be staggered so as to
provide orderly transition for future appointees.
3. The following persons are hereby appointed to the Environmental Adviosry
Committee for terms of the office as follows:
a. Charlie Kubler for a one-year term expiring February 28, 2002.
b. Russell Kennedy and Jeff Rienhard for a two-year term expiring February
28,2003.
c. Steve Menden and Mary Pennington-Hoyt for a three-year term expiring
February 28, 2004.
And, the foregoing shall hold their office until their successors are appointed and
qualified as provided by law.
4. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation and not directly or
personally benefit from any recommendations of the Committee. Members shall
annually select a Chairperson, Vice Chair and Secretary, at the first meeting in
March. A majority shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
Where not otherwise stated, the business of the Committee shall be governed by
Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised.
5. The Committee shall have the following Charges:
a. Review land use and development proposals,
b. Develop and recommend policies, ordinances and procedures for the
management of natural resources, wildlife habitat and conservation
development.
c. Provide direction for the creation of greenways and protection of cultural
and ecological assets within the community.
d. Provide community-wide environmental education programs.
e. Preserve and enhance water conveyances, water quality, wetlands,
woodlands, grasslands, soils and wildlife habitat.
f. Preserve and establish a healthy urban forest.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this _ day of ,2001.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission Page 1 of2
-
Home ~ Departments New to Community FAQs Helpful Site
Gov't & Services tbeCity? Profile links lnde
I IJ~:~~
CITY GOVERNMENT _~{illli'I*ngaut'C(~ Cf!lilllllt#81Qtii
.">";';.'Iii.~~;..;'::;;'.",.
What's Inside
:;:: Citv Council & Commissions The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission consists of seven r
~ "". City Council alternates. Alternates participate in the discussion of issues like regular membel
<I') when a regular member is absent. Terms are for. three years.
~ "". Planning Commission
~
8 "". Econ. Dev. Commission Known as the PRNRC, the Commission works with staff to provide input and m
tl "". Communications Commission
u regarding recreational programming and the acquisition and development of pal
5 ~ Parks Commission meets the fourth Monday of month at 7 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Agel
00 Citv Calendar from City Hall, 6000 McColl Drive, the Friday before the meeting.
~
...I Traffic Safety Committee
~ Budaet Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commissioners
Press Releases
~ Legal Notices
Greg Boatman Terms: 2/1/03 - 1/31/06
~ Minutes & Aaendas
g Citv Buildings Paul Barton Terms: 2/1/03 - 1/31/06
~ City Directorv 2/1/00 - 1/31/03
'" 2/1/97 - 1/31/00
~ ,Permits & Licenses
t;::
~ Steven R. Davis Terms: 2/1/04 - 1/31/07
t;::
~ 2/7/01 - 1/31/04
2/1/98 - 1/31/01
2/1/96 - 1/31/98
Jean Fideler Terms: 2/1/05 - 1/31/08
2/1/02 - 1/31/05
2/1/99 - 1/31/02
Ruth Lundquist (Vice Chair) Terms: 2/1/05 - 1/31/08
2/1/02 - 1/31/05
Paul Meehl (Chair) Terms: 2/1/03 - 1/31/06.
2/1/00 - 1/31/03
Michael P. Metz Terms: 2/1/04 -1/31/07
2/7/01 - 1/31/04
2/1/99 - 1/31/01
3/18/96 -1/31/99
(3/96 2nd Alternate; 7/96 1
http://www.ci.savage.mn.us/park_rec_naturaCres.html 1/12/2006
Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission Page 2 of2
Alternate; 11/96 Reg. Mem
Kathy Peterson (2nd Alternate) Terms: 2/01/05 - 1/31/08
2/01/04 - 1/31/05
Patrick Stieg (1st Alternate) Terms: 2/01/04 - 1/31/07
3/17/03 - 1/31/04
.... Back to Top
Parks Staff
Ann Mahnke, Assistant Public Works Director 952.224.3401
Chris Dill, Recreation Supervisor 952-224-3421
Ramona Hennen, Secretary 952.224.3420
Jon Allen, Natural Resource 952.882.2678
Specialist/Forester
Home II City Government II Departments & Services II Communitv Profile II FAQ
New to the Citv? II Helpful Links
The City of Savage I 6000 McColl Drive I Savage, MN 55378-2464
Phone: 952.882.2660 I Email the City of Savaae
~
http://www.ci.savage.mn.us/parkJec_naturaIJes.html 1/12/2006
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission - City Of Eden Prairie Page 1 of3
Home > City Government > Boards & Commissions > Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
Arts & Culture Commission Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Board of Appeal & Equalization Commission Search
IEnter search
Heritage Preservation [ Sea
Commission Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources
Human Rights & Diversity Commission A to Z Listi
Commission
New! Conservation Commission The Parks, Recreation
Newl Flying Cloud Airport and Natural Resources
Commission advises the To transl
Commisson City on matters of clil
Parks, Recreation & Natural development and use of
parks and recreation
Resources Commission facilities, leisure services,
Planning Commission recreation programming, preservation of natural resources and _.
promotion of environmental awareness. Meetings are held on the first D
Students on Commissions Monday of every month at 7 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
FILES Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission roster:
fJ 2006 City Commission Application . Rob Barrett (Chair)
fJ 2006 Supplimental Questionaires . Tom Bierman
. John Brill
fJ Commission Charter Statements . Tom Crain
fJ Students on Commission . Jeffrey Gerst (Vice-Chair)
. Randy Jacobus
Application . Ian Mackay
. Michael Moriarity
. Geri Napuck
fJl!!I~1!j
Commission meetings are open to the public. Please contact the
Commission Staff Liaison and request, in advance, to be considered to
be placed on the meeting agenda and/or to speak before the
Commission.
The City Staff Liaison to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission is Bob Lambert.
Bob Lambert
Parks and Recreation Department Director
952-949-8440
rlambert@edenprairie.org
http://www.ci.eden-prairie.mn.us/vCurrent/live/article.asp?r=1480 1/1212006
/d..6.ft
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Jeff Weyandt, Assistant City Engineer, Andrea Weber, Park and
Recreation Landscape Design
SUBJECT: 2006 Street Reconstruction Project,
Project No. 2006-2, and
Tahpah Park Redevelopment, Project No. PR 2006-1
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No. 6359, a resolution receiving a report and calling for a hearing
on the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project, Project No. 2006-2 and Tahpah Park
Redevelopment, PR2006-1.
BACKGROUND:
2006 Street Reconstruction (Jeff Weyandt)
On November 1, 2005, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report to
analyze the reconstruction of various streets throughout the City. This report has been
completed and is attached for Council review.
The purpose of the feasibility report is to evaluate the existing infrastructure (streets,
utilities, drainage) and make recommendations for any improvements that are needed.
The feasibility report also addresses the estimated costs for the improvements and the
proposed assessments that result from the proj ect being constructed.
The attached resolution sets a date for the public hearing for this project for February 21,
2006. The approval of Resolution No. 6359 does not order the project nor does it commit
the Council to constructing any improvements. The intent of this resolution is to accept
the feasibility report and set the public hearing date. The public hearing will allow the
property owners adjacent to the project area and the general public the opportunity to
address the City Council on this project.
Staff will make a full presentation at the February 21, 2006 public hearing on the
feasibility report to the public and the City Council.
Prior to the public hearing, the Council should meet with Shakopee Public Utilities
Commission (SPUC) to discuss assessing the water services. On January 3, 2006, SPUC
adopted a policy to assess water services. SPUC is a public utility so the City must assess
for them.. Appraisers have stated that replacing the water service does not give benefit to
the property and therefore should not be assessed. Assessing the water service is a
change in policy that will result in assessment appeals that the City will have a difficult
time in proving benefit. It will also create a situation in which only residents on City
proj ects will be assessed. SPUC does not have the authority to assess, therefore, on
watermain replacement projects conducted by SPUC, the residents will not be assessed.
At the last Council meeting, there was discussion regarding sidewalk construction. The
report has been revised, per that discussion. The report also lists the impacts of
constructing a sidewalk on the north side of 6th Avenue.
Tahpah Park Redevelopment Feasibility Study (Andrea Weber)
On November 1, 2005, City Council authorized the schematic design process and
feasibility study for Tahpah Park Redevelopment as an extension to the 2006 Street
Reconstruction project. This study includes conceptual design and cost estimates for the
parking lot replacement, storm water systems, and playground replacement and was
completed by Bonestroo, Rosene Anderlik and Associates.
Additional Park improvements related to the playing fields were approved by Council on
December 20th and as being funded through the Park Reserve Fund. These improvements
are not parts of the Feasibility Study being discussed here.
The feasibility study provides cost estimates and assessment estimates for the following
work related to Tahpah Park Redevelopment:
. Reconstructing and adding curb and gutter to the entrance Drive from Adams Street
to the parking lot.
. Reconstructing the main parking lot (the West parking lot is not included in this
project) with curb and gutter and landscaped islands
. Improving pedestrian safety along the entrance drive and parking lot with the addition
of "speed humps" and with a defined drop off area in front of Schleper Stadium.
. Installing curb and gutter and additional storm water systems
. Adding Parking Lot Lighting
. Reconstructing the playground
VISIONING RELATIONSHIOP
This project will help ensure the long-term viability ofthe City's investment in roads and
park facilities that serve our residents, employees, and guests by completing preventative
maintenance, ongoing maintenance and, design improvements and repairs to park areas
which have playability problems (lack of stormwater control is causing erosion, ponding
in outfields reduces potential use) and increasing the use of already existing park
facilities by adding lighting. These considerations appear to support the following aspects
of the City's Vision:
Goals:
. Active and healthy community.
. High quality of life.
. Great place for kids to grow up.
. Vibrant, resilient and stable.
. Financially strong.
Strategies:
. Increase use of Park and Recreation (adding lighting increases use of
existing fields, and allows for more teams to be formed)
. Foster community connections (team sports foster connections between
members, their families and visiting teams)
. Make community welcoming (visiting teams gain a feel for the city by
their use of our athletic facilities)
. Strengthen small town feel (what is more small town than joining and/or
cheering on your local team)
. Provide High Quality Services (improving the park facility will improve
its quality)
. Ensure City's Fiscal Health (adequate maintenance preserves value of
existing investments in infrastructure)
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 6359. This action will receive the feasibility report and set
the date for the public hearing for February 21,2006.
2. Deny Resolution No. 6359. This action will halt the project until such time that
City Council reconsiders the resolution.
3. Move to receive the feasibility report but do not set a date for the public hearing at
this time. This action will place the project on hold until such time as the City
Council sets a date for the public hearing.
4. Table Resolution No. 6359 to allow time for staff to prepare additional
information and/or revise the feasibility report as directed by the City CounciL
RECOMMENDATION:
1. If the City Council wishes to pursue this project for the 2006 construction season,
staff recommends Alternative No.1, to adopt Resolution No. 6359.
2. Ifthe City Council does not wish to pursue this project then the appropriate action
would be to move the ::ipproval of Resolution No. 6359, and vote against the
motion.
3. If City Council provides additional direction and modifications to the report, then
Alternative No. 3 may be appropriate to table this action and have staff modify
the report.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 6359, A Resolution Receiving a Report and Calling a Hearing for
the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project and Tahpah Park Revelopment, Project No. 2006-
2, and move its adoption.
Jeff Weyandt
Assistant City Engineer
Andrea Weber,
Park and Recreation Landscape Design
JW/pmp
ENGR/2006PROJECT/2006 RECONSTRUCTION/WORDlMEM6359
I /~.C!>.J.
I
I
I \ ~_()I?II
I
I
I
I Feasibility Report For
I Tahpah Park - Parking Lot and
I Storm Water Improvements
I Shakopee, Minnesota
I
I January 2006
I File No. 77-05110-0
I
I
I
I
I
I
n Bonestroo 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113
I IIDiIII Rosene
1\11 Anderlil< & Office: 651.636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311
Associates www.bonestroo.com
I Engineers & Architects
I January 11, 2006
I Mr. Mark Themig
Parks, Recreation, Natural Resources and Facilities Director
City of Shakopee
I 1255 Fuller Street
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
.1 Re: Feasibility Report for Tahpah Park - Parking Lot and Storm Water Improvements
Bonestroo File No. 77 -OS 110-0
I Dear Mark:
I Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report on proposed improvements for
Tahpah Park. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost
estimate.
I We will be pleased to meet with the Council, yourself, and other interested parties at a mutually
convenient time to discllss this rep0l1. Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City with this
I project
Respectfully submitted,
I BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOClA TES, INe.
~~~dr
I
I I hereby ce11ify that this report, drawing, or specification
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the
laws of the S tate of Minnesota.
I Da~;::?Or--
I
Date: Januarv 11. 2006 Reg.No.. 23451
I
I . St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
I Affirmative ActiOn/equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
I
I
I Table of Contents
I Letter of Transmittal 1.
Table of Contents 2.
I 1. Introduction 3.
2. Parking Lot Improvements 4.
I 3. Storm Sewer Improvements 7.
4. Playground Equipment Improvements 9.
I 5. Easements and Permits 10.
5. Cost Analysis 11.
I Table 1 - Project Cost Summary 11.
6. Recommendations and Conclusions 12.
I 7. Project Schedule 13.
I Figure 1 - Location Map
Figure 2 - Concept Drawing
I Appendix A - Cost Estimates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I City of Shakopee -'- Tahpah Park Page 2
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I Introduction
I On November 1,2005 the City of Shakopee adopted Resolution No. 6320 which ordered
the preparation of a feasibility report to analyze the feasibility of the following
I improvements at Tahpah Park:
I . Reconstruction of the existing parking lot
. Reconstruction of all or portions of the existing entrance road from Adams Street
I . Construction of additional parking space
. Construction of various storm water improvements for the park consisting of curb
I and gutter for parking lot and entrance road, storm sewer piping and structures,
and storm water ponding.
I . Construction of parking lot lighting.
. Comments on how the existing sanitary sewer system is operating and any
I performance feedback.
I Figure 1 at the end of the report shows the location map of Tahpah Park. The proposed
improvements are part of a larger redevelopment plan for Tahpah Park being studied by
I the City's Park and Landscape Department. This report examines the feasibility and cost
effectiveness of the proposed improvements and reflects feedback from the Park and
I Recreation Design Committee and City Staff. Descriptions of the proposed
improvements are found in the following sections of this report. Cost estimates are
I provided in the Appendix A, and financing considerations are provided in the cost
analysis section ofthis feasibility report.
I
I
I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 3
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I Proposed Improvements
I Parking Lot
I Section 1 - Main Parking Lot, Entrance Road, and new Northerly Parking Lot
These improvements are shown on the Figure 2 Concept Drawing at the end of this report
and include:
I
. Reconstructing the existing bituminous entrance road and parking lot with curb
I and gutter and a new street/parking lot section.
. Constructing a new parking lot to the north of the existing parking lot in the area
I
of Ballfield #5. Existing Ballfield #5 is being eliminated with the overall Tahpah
I Park redevelopment.
. Constructing landscaped islands with trees and shrubs.
. Constructing a drop-off and larger pedestrian area at the entrance to Schleper
I Stadium.
. Adding parking lot lighting.
I
I The existing parking lot is in poor condition and shows various pavement distress
conditions including alligator cracking and block cracking. Portions of the parking lot
I were constructed approximately 20 years ago and other portions 35 years ago. The City
wants to reconstruct the entrance road with concrete curb and gutter to help control
people pulling off the road and parking in non-designated areas.
I
Based upon review of current parking needs, City Staff have identified a need for
I approximately 300 parking spaces in this part of Tahpah Park. The reconstruction of the
existing parking lot and construction of the north parking lot will result in 278 parking
I spaces. The lots are configured to avoid parking in a 50 foot area from proposed fence
lines to help minimize balls hitting parked vehicles as per the Park and Recreation Design
I Committee feedback.
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 4
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I The City hired a geotechnical consultant to take soil borings in the parking lot area in
I January of 2004. Two borings were taken and showed an existing section of 1 inch of
bituminous and 3 to 4 inches of gravel. It is proposed to reconstruct the existing entrance
I road and existing and new parking lots with the current City Street Section of 8 inches of
class 5 aggregate base, 2 inches of bituminous base, and 1.5 inches of bituminous wear.
I Based on feedback from City Staff familiar with soils in the area, it is anticipated that
I 20% of the existing parking lot and all of the new parking lots will need a 1 foot subgrade
correction. The soil borings show approximately 4.5 feet of fill under the parking lot and
I then poorly graded sand/gravel to the depth of 12 feet. We anticipate the fill material was
brought onto the site during original park construction and that the new parking lot areas
I would have a similar fill material and poorly graded sand/gravel beneath the fill section.
Thus, we do not anticipate additional borings are needed at this time.
I The new and reconstructed parking lots are proposed to match as close as possible to the
I existing grades with some changes for pedestrian ramps, storm sewer catchbasins, and
improving drainage along new curb lines. Additional elevation information and
I surveying are needed and will be done as part of the design phase of the project to
finalize the parking lot elevations and grades.
I Islands with trees, shrubs, and wood mulch will be added. to the existing parking lot.
I Because of concerns on having more room for pedestrians at the entrance toSchleper
Stadium, a larger concrete area was created in this location as well as a drop-off area.
Trees are proposed for the new drop off area near the stadium entrance. The final
I number of trees and location in this drop-of area and other locations will be determined in
I final design.
I The existing parking lot does not have lighting. Due to the costs associated with lighting
the entire parking lot area, it is proposed to add lighting in just a few areas to improve
I upon the existing condition. Proposed locations are shown in Figure 2. We anticipate
some adjustment to the final location of the street lighting during final design.
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 5
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I The costs for the recommended parking lot improvements are presented in the Cost
Analysis section and Appendix A.
I Section 2 - Alternate 1- North Parking Lot
I As shown on Figure 2, adding Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot would add an additional
35 parking spaces to the 278 spaces discussed in Section 1. The total parking spaces
I would then be 313, which exceed the 300 parking space number discussed in the previous
section. The parking lot section, grades, and elevations would be the same as discussed
I in Section 1.
The parking lot is listed as an alternate, and the City can decide to continue to look at this
I alternate during design and bidding. If the City chooses this option, then the City still
would have the option to delete it from the project following review of bid results. The
I cost for Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot is presented in the Cost Analysis section and
Appendix A.
I
I Section 3 - Alternate 2 - South Parking Lot
As shown on Figure 2, adding the Alternate 2 - South Parking Lot would add an
,
I additional 14 parking spaces to the 278 spaces discussed inSection 1. The total parking
spaces would then be 292, which is less than the 300 parking space number discussed in
I the Section 1.
This parking lot area currently has gravel base and is next to the batting cages. The
I parking lot section, grades, and elevations would be the same as discussed in Section 1.
I The parking lot is listed as an alternate, and the City can decide to continue to look at this
alternate during design and bidding. If the City chooses this option, then the City still
I would have the option to delete it from the project following review of bid results. The
cost for Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot is presented in the Cost Analysis section and
I Appendix A.
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 6
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I Storm Sewer Improvements
I The storm sewer improvements involve construction of storm sewer structures and piping
to convey surface water runoff from the existing parking lot, entrance road, and new
parking lot areas to the Upper Valley Drainage Way.
I
Currently, the majority of the existing parking lot drains by overland flow in a
I northwesterly direction. There is an existing catchbasin under Schleper Stadium that is
connected to catchbasins at the west end of the existing parking lot. These structures then
I connect to a catchbasin in the low area between Ballfields 6 and 7. This piping ties into
the Upper Valley Drainage Way at the Northeast side of Ballfield 6. Some of the runoff
I from the east end of the site drains overland along the existing trail between Ballfields 2,
3, and 4. This easterly route experiences erosion and requires continual maintenance by
I the City.
I Part of the scope of this study was to review storm ponding requirements. Based on the
Main Lot, Entry, and North Lot improvements, the City is not required by National
I Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to construct a pond since the proposed
improvements will not add more than 1 acre of new impervious surface. The City could
I add Alternate 1 - North Lot or Alternate 2 - South Lot and still remain under the 1 acre
of new impervious surface. However the City could not add both of these areas without
I exceeding I acre of new impervious surface.
I From discussions with City Staff on the City's.overall surface management system, there
are concerns with adding ponding to this area and not allowing the runoff from this
I portion ofTahpah Park to get to the Upper Valley Drainage Way and then downstream as
soon as possible before upstream flows arrive. Additional modeling would need to be
I done to verify this concern. At this time, construction of a storm water pond is not
included in the study.
I I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 7
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I The storm sewer system shown on Figure 2 reflects routing runoff from the reconstructed
I and new parking lots up to the Upper Valley Drainage Way via a westerly and easterly
route. The preferred option would be to route all the drainage to the west end of the
I project. This area has fewer conflicts with existing trails, ballfield lighting, existing
forcemain, etc. However there is a shallow sanitary sewer line that crosses the existing
I parking lot from the restrooms at Schleper Stadium to a lift station near the concession
stand between Ballfield 4 and 2. More information will be obtained on the elevation of
I this sanitary sewer line during final design, but at this time it is anticipated that its
elevation will be in conflict with the elevation of the new storm sewer.
I Routing storm sewer pipe at the east end ofthe existing parking lot and to the north along
I the existing trail between Ballfield 2,3, and 4 will require restoration of the existing trail,
possible supporting existing lighting, possible crossing of underground wiring, and other
I miscellaneous restoration.
I It is anticipated at this time that the existing storm sewer system at the west end of the
project will be removed due to size and depth issues. This situation will be evaluated in
I final design when additional survey information is obtained. If possible, reusing portions
of the existing. storm sewer system will be evaluated in order to reduce construction costs.
I We did review the existing sanitary sewer system with Shakopee Public Works. The
sanitary sewer system in the park is seasonal and not used in the winter and appears to be
I working fine. Because of the seasonal use, there is not a freezing issue with its shallow
depth. At this time, there are not plans for improvements to the system under the parking
I lot. We would recommend Public Works televise the line prior to construction to
confirm the condition of the line is adequate in order to minimize the need to repair the
I line after the new parking lot is constructed.
I The costs for the proposed storm sewer improvements are presented in the Cost Analysis
section and Appendix A.
I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 8
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I.
I
I
I, Playground Equipment Improvements
I The City has evaluated installing new playground equipment and surfacing associated
with the proposed improvements. Two products from Playworld Systems, Inc. and Little
I Tikes were recommended by the Park and Recreation Design Committee and Staff and
reviewed and chosen by the Council at the December 20, 2005. Playground curb,
I playground fencing, and draintile are also needed for the new playground area.
I The costs for the proposed playground equipment and surfacing improvements are
presented in the Cost Analysis section and Appendix A. The playground curb,
I playground fencing, and draintile for the new playground area are included in the Base
Bid Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Sections for the Main Lot, Entry, and North Lot.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I City of Shakopee - Tahpah Park Page 9
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I Easements and Permits
I All of the work is proposed to be done within City property or County Road right-of-way,
and no easements will be needed.
I Work in the right-of-way of Adams Street (County Road 15) will require a permit from
I Scott County. Due to the size of the project, a General Storm Water Permit for
Construction Activity will be needed from the MPCA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 10
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I Cost Analysis
The estimated costs of the proposed improvements are summarized in Table 1 and
I Appendix A. The costs in Appendix A include 5% for contingencies and 20% for
indirect costs for Parking Lot Improvements and 10% for contingencies and 25% for
I indirect costs for Storm Sewer Improvements. The contingencies and indirect costs are
less on the Parking Lot Improvements for budgetary reasons. No contingencies and
I indirect costs are anticipated for the playground equipment and surfacing.
I Table 1 - Project Cost Summary
Item Estimated Cost
I Section 1- Parking Lot - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $678,000
Section 2 - Parking Lot - Alternate 1 (North Lot) $55,400
I Section 3 - Parking Lot - Alternate 2 (South Lot) $32,800
Section 1- Storm Sewer - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $174,500
Section 1 - Playground Equipment - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & $75,000
I North Lot)
Total Project - Base Bid and Alternates $1,015,700
I
Base Bid and Alternate 1 (North Lot) $982,900
I Base Bid and Alternate 2 (South Lot) $960,300
I The City will be bonding for these park improvements along with the 2006 Street
Reconstruction Project.
I
I
I
I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 11
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Ii
I
I
I Recommendations and Conclusions
The improvements described in this report are feasible from and engineering standpoint.
I This project is necessary to reconstruct the existing bituminous, create parking, and
install storm sewer and other parking lot improvements to Tahpah Park. The project is
I cost effective based on conditions and acceptable standards proposed to construct the
improvements.
I
The estimated cost of the parking lot and storm sewer improvements is $1,015,700 for the
I Base Bid, Alternate 1, and Alternate 2. The estimated cost for the Base Bid and Alternate
1 is $982,900 and Base Bid and Alternate 2 is $960,300. The following
I recommendations are presented for consideration of Shakopee City Council and Staff:
I 1. That the improvements presented herein be considered for 2006 construction.
I 2. That the City Council bO!ld for the project costs.
I 3. That the City review whether the Base Bid and Alternate 1 - North Lot or Base
Bid and Alternate 2 - South Lot is preferred and choose one or the other due to
I ponding issues.
I
I
I
I
I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 12
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I
I
I Project Schedule
I The City wants to have these improvements completed after August 1, 2006 based on
discussions with Adult Softball groups. The following schedule is proposed to meet this
I requirement.
Item Date
I Council Reviews Report January 17,2006
Council Authorizes Preparation of Plans and February 7, 2006
I Specifications
I Council Approves Plans and Specifications March 21, 2006
Advertisement for bid published in Local Paper March 29,2006
I Advertisement published in Construction Bulletin March 31 & April 7,
2006
I Open Bids April 21, 2006
Council Awards Contract for Construction May 2, 2006
I Construction Begins August 4, 2006
Construction Ends October 27, 2006
I
I
I
I
I
I
I City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 13
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
I
I .,......,..... ::-:.." ..,'., ,.'. '. "'.
'. .' ::... ..
I .. ... ., ,...., ..... '.' ..".',.. fl.:.' l~iiS ", ...' "":"'.
.. ., ~ .'.,. ......' , ' ", -"
,~.... .:...~.'
-" .' '
";' " .. i1' /', < ;:J! ,,'" , ' ,.".., ',.......,'
I ',,';' <M' ; ,< " t, "', ' T+ ,"J'
.'.~.- - '
,<,' " ,,' \;," '
,,' """" '" ',t / , ' ;
. .. . .. ' , ,.,_ . . '.. ' 1 L., ^' ' ' ;
;" . " <M ' ,I
I ,,' ',', '", , ,fiN. .1:. .'.' ..'
, 'i" ' ,,,'", ' ,""- " , ",5t;, ,'I'
<,,;, - 1= "', \ ,,,' ,,',
p, '4,1':" " " " ~." ~IHIH ,:;::J , ,,'. ",' , '
I ,"1~(:" ~,? ~1" '}'jt;;--'~i~5 fl!W nFiI"il.\ \~~
,,:\ ~ W \J /0 '.; l'iWWm 00 -,
I .././:" /VJ'Jif' - 1.'(.,' " '" ,=l "~~I m~I~~i~.'
",.....c.w.... .... ,..' !' i!"" .;;HW,,,,, "",1\\1 '
I '7 " ,:t ""ao ""..,,'
_"" ',{J I ~ Illl!lB ~~ ~,~ '~
I II ~ .... .'.,'..' _ -:'" ~~ . ~~Ol\m I I .
/1,; , ",- r I ' ~" ~ ~~~~m\ll " 'Z
,/\" '''' ' ,;.oJ. eal<<i\1Jmm\fl\ " %.
,'. , ' " ' "_,,,' ,.. j [ ... \!03 a3. Eli\ 6l'l ea ...
I ~ " 0;-' " · m~~""~~~ ,\
,;;1, <, - I" ~ll" ~ ~. ~m~~~'~' "
I ;J~~i!i~Eili 1,;;]l. IIg~ Q (, _~'I~\il~il>
_ 0 I. '!,; ~ iii _~mm~!!I!L~'
W~ =u ," jli\ ., __~.\IIm""ao""'~~~ '
I ~ 19(,:" ' ,~ ~ ~ 1_'\lI~\
ffilt.m ,~ W~ ,'""'- _1~\1I~
I ~.ml""\;': "I ... iI~ j! t.>!II =WJ~mm
~\.I!!::! V I !II m~m~
I ~ ..~~.:: 1;-' _ '''-." I ' = Im~m "
, ~,,' T " ' fL.,,, m~m
'" ;'i1';;I:.<:: ~" r" ~ U IIllllll ~ I':, ~ ~~-
, " , -, rmrrn ",< ~
I ~,~ I.'
',,, ~~, CHA. "D. \ ,h, '- ~ ~ IDII;!; , ~
I" I'''' 'j C. }17 Y c:"'.... ~
I I f f"", i, ','. "7:1I~..r
..I" ,h" BlIIJ ~~ \l\~Lifjll.' . i. I
.. " " ", ~," . ' ,
smlllBl!l ... ~., .., II ~elll . -. I
, ~~ I~" '
I """" ff'7l!"- '. I ~ ~A=r= 1'.l::H=I - I . . \
, ,:,..' ~ '""e1=t: u' 8Ft' ' '
I ' , ~. == '\" ii\li'....~ ," I
, >" .., '"
" '" _I; " ~ Ii!!!!!" '-
..: _" \ll!!B -,:, ffi!I
Effi .,. '.. ! : '.. I\\. ' , I~; II I
I ' r' ~ I " m. 'L ~" OIIJJJ.:l I ,,;'b ' '
I;, ;'" ,II' El3 EJ ,:, " i$ t IIJ ,.~ "ff I.
, '1,1 tEl ";- , ; ~ "", ",d' -~"-'
~ ' , ' " ,'~ 'Ie I," , ' "
I ' ' ,.-' '
i 'h ',4 ,',' , - I"'"
., '.. ';,"'- ..' .
.. ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
I Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 1
City of Shakopee Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot)
I SCHEDULE A - Parking Lot Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
1 Mobilization LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
I 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 12700 $1.50 $19,050.00
4 Remove Concrete Walk SF 880 $1.50 $1,320.00
5 Common Excavation CY 8550 $6.00 $51,300.00
I 6 Subgrade Excavation CY 1850 $6.00 $11,100.00
7 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 1850 $12.00 $22,200.00
8 Class 5 Aggregate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 8" thick) SY 17100 $5.00 $85,500.00
9 Bituminous Base Course, 2.5" thick SY 15060 $5.75 $86,595.00
I 10 Bituminous Wear Course, 1.5" thick SY 15060 $4.25 $64,005.00
11 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GL 755 $3.00 $2,265.00
12 Entry Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desian B612 LF 1560 $9.00 $14,040.00
13 Pka Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 3615 $9.00 $32,535.00
I 14 Playoround Curb LF 470 $25.00 $11,750.00
15 Concrete Walk SF 6555 $3.50 $22,942.50
16 Playoround Fence LF 470 $27.00 $12,690.00
17 Parkina Lot Liaht Quad EA 4 $7,200.00 $28,800.00
I 18 Pedestrian Ramp EA 6 $400.00 $2,400.00
19 Speed Humos EA 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00
20 Silt Fence, Heavy Duty Type LF 2130 $2.50 $5,325.00
21 Sodding, Tvoe Lawn SY 3160 $3.50 $11,060.00
I 22 Handicap Symbol EA 7 $120.00 $840.00
23 4" White Strioina LF 6640 $0.50 $3,320.00
24 Zebra Strioina cross walk SF 144 $5.00 $720.00
25 Install new sign SF 40 $100.00 $4,000.00
I 26 Mulched Islands SY 845 $4.50 $3,802.50
27 Shrubs for Islands EA 42 $50.00 $2,100.00
28 Deciduous Tree EA 21 $400.00 $8,400.00
Subtotal $538,060.00
I + 5% Contingency $26,903.00
Subtotal $564,963.0C
+ 20% Indirect Costs $113,037.0C
I Total Schedule A - Parking Lot Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lo ) $678,000.00
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A - Page 1 of 5
I
I
I APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
I Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 2
City of Shakopee Alternate 1 - North Lot
I SCHEDULE A - Parking Lot Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
1 Mobilization LS 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00
I 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $0.00 $0.00
3 Reclaim Bituminous Pavement SY 0 $0.00 $0.00
4 Remove Concrete Walk SF 0 $0.00 $0.00
5 Common Excavation CY 760 $6.00 $4,560.00
I 6 Subarade Excavation CY 505 $6.00 $3,030.00
7 Select Granular Borrow IC\!) CY 505 $12.00 $6,060.00
8 Class 5 Aaareaate Base 1100% crushed Limestone, 8" thick) SY 1,510 $5.00 $7,550.00
9 Bituminous Base Course, 2.5" thick SY 1 ,460 $5.75 $8,395.00
I 10 Bituminous Wear Course, 1.5" thick SY 1 ,460 $4.25 $6,205.00
11 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GL 75 $3.00 $225.00
12 Entrv Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 0 $9.00 $0.00
13 Pka Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 405 $9.00 $3,645.00
I 14 Concrete Walk SF 0 $3.50 $0.00
15 Parkina Lot Liaht Quad EA 0 $7,200.00 $0.00
16 Pedestrian Rame EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
17 Seeed Humes EA 0 $1,000.00 $0.00
I 18 Silt Fence, Heaw Dutv TVDe LF 0 $2.50 $0.00
19 Soddina, Tvee Lawn SY 500 $3.50 $1,750.00
20 Handicap Svmbol EA 0 $120.00 $0.00
21 4" White Strieina LF 920 $0.50 $460.00
I 22 Zebra Stripina cross walk SF 0 $5.00 $0.00
23 Install new sian SF 0 $100.00 $0.00
24 Mulched Islands SY 0 $4.50 $0.00
25 Shrubs for Islands EA 0 $50.00 $0.00
I 26 Deciduous Tree EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
Subtotal $43,980.00
+ 5% Contingency $2,199.00
Subtotal $46,179.00
I + 20% Indirect Costs $9,221.00
Total Schedule A - Parking Lot Improvements - Alternate 1 - North Lc $55,400.00
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A - Page 2 of 5
I
I
I APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
I Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 3
City of Shakopee Alternate 2 - South Lot
I SCHEDULE A - Parking Lot Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
1 Mobilization LS 1 $1,250.00 $1,250.00
I 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $0.00 $0.00
3 Reclaim Bituminous Pavement SY 0 $0.00 $0.00
4 Remove Concrete Walk SF 0 $0.00 $0.00
5 Common Excavation CY 405 $6.00 $2,430.00
I 6 Subarade Excavation CY 270 $6.00 $1,620.00
7 Select Granular Borrow 7CV)- CY 270 $12.00 $3,240.00
8 Class 5 Aaareaate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 8" thick) SY 805 $5.00 $4,025.00
9 Bituminous Base Course, 2.5" thick SY 750 $5.75 $4,312.50
I 10 Bituminous Wear Course, 1.5" thick SY 750 $4.25 $3,187.50
11 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GL 40 $3.00 $120.00
12 Entrv Concrete Curb and Gutter, Design B612 LF 0 $9.00 $0.00
13 Pka Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 410 $9.00 $3,690.00
I 14 Concrete Walk SF 0 $3.50 $0.00
15 Parkina Lot Lioht Quad EA 0 $7,200.00 $0.00
16 Pedestrian Rame EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
17 Seeed Humes EA 0 $1,000.00 $0.00
I 18 Silt Fence, Heavv Dutv Tvee LF 0 $2.50 $0.00
19 Soddina, Tvee Lawn SY 500 $3.50 $1,750.00
20 Handicae Svmbol EA 1 $120.00 $120.00
21 4" White Strieina LF 330 $0.50 $165.00
I 22 Zebra Strioino cross walk SF 0 $5.00 $0.00
23 Install new sian SF 1.50 $100.00 $150.00
24 Mulched Islands SY 0 $4.50 $0.00
25 Shrubs for Islands EA 0 $50.00 $0.00
I 26 Deciduous Tree EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
Subtotal $26,060.00
+ 5% Contingenc~ $1,303.00
Subtotal $27,363.00
I + 20% Indirect Costs $5,437.00
Total Schedule A - Parking Lot Improvements - Alternate 2. South Let $32,800.00
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A - Page 3 of 5
I
I
I APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
I Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 1
City of Shakopee Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot)
I SCHEDULE B - Storm Sewer Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
1 Mobilization LS 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00
I 2 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 300 $1.50 $450.00
3 Remove Storm Sewer Pipe LF 850 $7.00 $5,950.00
4 Remove Manhole or Catch Basin EA 3 $200.00 $600.00
5 Clear and Grub EA 4 $500.00 $2,000.00
I 6 Common Excavation CY 100 $6.00 $600.00
7 Class 5 Aggregate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 6" thick) SY 380 $4.00 $1,520.00
8 Bituminous Wear Course, 2.5" thick SY 300 $7.50 $2,250.00
9 Connect to Existing Pipe EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
I 10 15" RCP Storm Sewer, CI5 LF 654 $30.00 $19,620.00
11 18" RCP Storm Sewer, CI 5 LF 1,370 $35.00 $47,950.00
12 18" Flared End Section, IncludinQ Trash Guard EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
13 27" Dia Storm CBMH EA 1 $800.00 $800.00
I 14 2' x 3' Catch Basin EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00
15 4' Dia Storm CBMH EA 10 $1,500.00 $15,000.00
16 4" Draintile LF 480 $7.00 $3,360.00
17 Class III Random Riprap CY 20 $150.00 $3,000.00
I 18 Sodding, Type Lawn SY 2,350 $3.50 $8,225.00
19 Protect LiQht Pole EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00
20 Protection of Catch basin Non-street EA 3 $150.00 $450.00
21 Protection of Catchbasin in Street EA 11 $150.00 $1,650.00
I Subtotal $126,925.00
+ 10% Contingenc~ $12,692.50
Subtotal $139,617.50
+ 25% Indirect Costs $34,882.50
I Total Schedule B - Storm Sewer - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot $174,500.00
Preliminary Cost Estimate
I Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 1
City of Shakopee Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot)
I SCHEDULE C - Playground Equipment Improvements
Item #. IDescription I Units I Quantity) Unit Price Total PricE
1 IPlayground Equipment and Surfacing 1 LS I 11 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
I Total Schedule C. Playground Equipment - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lo ) $75,000.00
I
I
I
I. APPENDIX A - Page 4 of 5
I
I
I APPENDIX A
SUMMARY. Tahpah Park
I Description Total Price
Schedule A - Section 1 . ParkinQ Lot Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot) $678,000.00
Schedule A . Section 2 . Parkina Lot Imorovements . Alternate 1 North Lot) $55,400.00
I Schedule A - Section 3 - ParkinQ Lot Improvements - Alternate 2 South Lot) $32,800.00
Schedule B . Section 1 . Storm Sewer Imorovements . Base Bid Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $174,500.00
Schedule C - Section 1 - Playground Equipment Imp. - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot) $75,000.00
Total- Tahpah Parkl $1,015,700.00
I, SUMMARY. Tahpah Park - Base Bid and Alternate 1 (North Lot)
Description Total Price
I Schedule A . Section 1 - ParkinQ Lot Improvements. Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot) $678,000.00
Schedule A . Section 2 . Parking Lot Imorovements - Alternate 1 (North Lot) $55,400.00
Schedule B . Section 1 . Storm Sewer Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot) $174,500.00
Schedule C - Section 1 - Playground Equipment Imp. . Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $75,000.00
I Total - Tahpah Park! $982,900.00
SUMMARY - Tahpah Park - Base Bid and Alternate 2 (South Lot)
I Description Total Price
Schedule A . Section 1 . Parking Lot Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $678,000.OC
Schedule A - Section 3 . ParkinQ Lot Improvements - Alternate 2 (South Lot) $32,800.00
I Schedule B . Section 1 . Storm Sewer Improvements. Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $174,500.0C
Schedule C . Section 1 . Playground Equipment Imp. - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot) $75,000.00
Total - Tahpah Parkl $960,300.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A . Page 5 of 5
I
I 1~.f2:J.I.
I December, 2005
Feasibility Report
I SHAKOPEE
CoMMUNl1Y PRlDE$INC."'E 1857
I
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
· 4th Avenue - Cass Street to Scott Street
I · 5th Avenue - Webster Street to Scott Street
· 6th Avenue - Webster Street to Scott Street
I · Webster Street - 5th Avenue to 6th Avenue
· Cass Street - 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
. Clay Street - 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
I · Pierce Street- 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
I Street, Utilities and Appurtenant Work
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FEASIBILITY REPORT
I
I
I 2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
I . 4th Avenue - Cass Street to Scott Street
. 5th Avenue - Webster Street to Scott Street
. 6th Avenue -Webster Street to Scott Street
I . Webster Street - 5th A venue to 6th Avenue
. Cass Street - 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
. Clay Street - 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
I . Pierce Street - 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
I City Project Number 2006-2
I
I
I December, 2005
I
I Prepared By:
I City of Shakopee
Engineering Department
I 129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee,MN 55379
(952) 233-9300
I (952) 233-3801 (Fax)
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2
I
I
I
I
I FEASIBILITY REPORT
I FOR
2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
I SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA
I
I
I
I
I
I I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered
I Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
I ~ k.)~4-{b
. ._..
I Date iIJ~/D6 Registration No. 41342.
I ,
I
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2
I
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
I Description Paf!e No.
I Introduction 1
I Scope 1
Background 1
I Existing Conditions 1
I Proposed Improvements 3
Special Assessments 7
I Estimated Costs 8
I Funding Sources 8
Conclusion 9
I Appendix 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2
I
I
I 1. INTRODUCTION
On November 1, 2005 the City of Shakopee adopted Resolution No. 6320 which
I ordered the preparation of a feasibility report to analyze the reconstruction of the
following streets:
I . 4th Avenue - Cass Street to Scott Street
. 5th Avenue - Webster Street to Scott Street
. 6th Avenue - Webster Street to Scott Street
I . Webster Street - 5th A venue to 6th Avenue
. Cass Street - 4th Avenue to 6th Avenue
I . Clay Street - 4th A venue to 6th Avenue
. Pierce Street - 4th A venue to 6th Avenue
I This project is included in the City's 2006 Capital hnprovement Program.
2. SCOPE
I This report will determine the feasibility and cost effectiveness of reconstructing
I the above mentioned streets. All existing infrastructure elements (street, utilities,
etc.) within the project area were evaluated as part ofthisreport.
I The report will provide a description of the proposed improvements, an itemized
cost estimate, a cost apportionment and a preliminary assessment roll.
I 3. BACKGROUND
I The streets and utilities were constructed in the 1950's and 1960's. hnprovements
to the streets have since been limited to patching and seal coating.
I The existing pavements are deteriorated to the point where they require more than
normal. maintenance. There are many transverse and longitudinal cracks, large
areas of patching, severe crown problems, and curb and gutter deficiencies.
I
4. EXISTING CONDITIONS
I 4th Avenue is 45 feet wide within the project limits. Based on valve records and
I existing dated hydrants, the watermain is estimated to be 80-90 years old. The
watermain is 8-inch cast iron from Clay Street to Scott Street. West of Clay street
it is 6-inch pipe and has 5 services determined to be deficient. The sanitary sewer
I is 8-inch clay pipe in poor condition. The condition of the sanitary sewer services
cannot be determined. The storm sewer is RCP and consists of two catch basins at
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 1 -
I
I the intersection of 4th A venue and Cass Street, four catch basins at the intersection
I with Shumway Street and two catch basins at the intersection with Scott Street.
The existing sidewalk is identified in Drawing No.1.
I 5th Avenue is 45 feet wide within the project limits. The watermain was replaced
in the early 1980's and is in good condition. The sanitary sewer was replaced in
1984, and is PVC pipe in good condition. The sanitary sewer services within the
I right-of-way were also replaced in 1984. Storm sewer was added in 1988 at the
intersections with, Pierce Street, Shumway Street, Apgar Street and Scott Street.
There are concrete cross pans at the intersections with Cass Street and Clay Street.
I The existing sidewalk is identified in Drawing No.1.
I 6th Avenue is 45 feet wide within the project limits and is a former County Road
that is now designated as a collector street. The watermain is 6-inch cast iron the
entire length of the street and is estimated to be 80-90 years old. There is a two
I block section of parallel 12-inch pipe from Webster Street to Clay Street. The
sanitary sewer is 8-inch clay pipe in poor condition. The condition of the sanitary
sewer services cannot be determined. The storm sewer is RCP and consists of
I catch basins at the intersections with Webster Street, Apgar Street and Scott
Street. There are concrete cross pans along 6th A venue at the intersections with
Saint Mark's Street and Shumway Street. The existing sidewalk is identified in
I Drawing No. 1.
Webster Street is a gravel road within the project limits. The watermain was
I analyzed by Shakopee Public Utilities, and determined sufficient. The sanitary
sewer is PVC pipe installed in 1984 and in good condition. There are no sanitary
sewer services on this block. The storm sewer is RCP with catch basins at the
I intersections with 6th Avenue and 5th Avenue.
Cass Street is 45 feet wide within the project limits. Watermain is located between
I 4th Avenue and 5th Avenue and is in good condition. There is no sanitary sewer
on this street. The storm sewer is corrugated metal pipe and consists of catch
basins at the intersection with 4th A venue and 6th A venue. There are concrete
I cross pans at the intersection with 5th Avenue.
I Clay Street is 45 feet wide within the project limits. The watermain exists from 4th
Avenue to 5th Avenue and is in good condition. There is no sanitary sewer on this
street. The storm sewer is corrugated metal pipe and consists of two catch basins
I at a low point between 4th Avenue and 5th Avenue. There are concrete cross pans
at the intersection with 5th Avenue.
I Pierce Street is 45 feet wide within the project limits. There is no watermain on
this street. There is no sanitary sewer on this street. The storm sewer is RCP and
consists of catch basins at the intersection with 5th A venue and 6th Avenue.
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 2 -
I
I 5. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
I
The proposed improvements are as follows:
I 5.1 Street
I The proposed street improvements are identified in Drawing No.2 in the
Appendix.
I 4th Avenue, 5th Avenue, Webster Street, Cass Street, Clay Street and
Pierce Street are residential streets and are proposed to be reconstructed to
I a 7 -ton design at a width of 37 feet. Reducing the street width has the
following benefits: Reduced hard surface, reduction in runoff, increased
green space, lower maintenance cost, and a reduction in construction cost.
I A 37- foot roadway allows for parking on both sides of the street.
6th Avenue is designated as a collector road and will maintain its current
I width of45 feet. 6th A venue will be constructed to a 9-ton design.
The location of the existing sidewalk segments within the project area are
I identified on Drawings No. 1 and No. lA in the Appendix.
Sidewalk is not located along the entire project and some sidewalk
I sections dead end without leading to an intersection or another sidewalk.
Following are options for handling sidewalks on the 2006 Street
Reconstruction Project. We have the option of replacing the entire
I sidewalk, only replacing the sidewalk that has heaved or settled, remove
all or portions of the sidewalk and extend sidewalk in areas. where
sidewalk does not exist.
I Section A (north of 4th Avenue between Apgar Street and Scott
I Street): This portion of sidewalk connects Apgar Street to Scott Street and
will not be disturbed due to street reconstruction or service replacement.
I Options:
1. Replace only the panels that have settled or heaved.
2. Replace the entire section of sidewalk.
I 3. Remove the entire section of sidewalk.
I Recommendation:
Staff recommends option number 1.
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 3 -
I
I Section B (north of 4th Avenue between Shumway Street and
I Apgar Street): This small section of sidewalk does not extend the entire
length of the block and will be disturbed by service replacement.
I Options:
1. Remove the sidewalk.
2. Replace the sidewalk.
I Recommendation:
Staff recommends option number 1.
I Section C (north of 4th Avenue between Pierce Street and
I Shumway Street): This section of sidewalk does not connect one street to
another (pierce Street, north of 4th Avenue is not constructed) and will be
disturbed by service replacement.
I Options:
1. Remove the sidewalk.
I 2. Replace the sidewalk.
Recommendation:
I Staff recommends option number 1.
Section D (sidewalk along 5th Avenue): The sidewalk along 5th
I A venue will not be disturbed by street reconstruction or service
replacement. By minimizing the amount of sidewalk replacement on 5th
Avenue we can lower costs, milllmlze disturbance and shorten
I construction time in the area. In the future the City can complete a
sidewalk replacement project ifthe residents and/or City desires.
I Options:
1. Replace existing panels that have heaved or settled. Remove
section D 1 on the north side of 5th A venue and construct new
I sidewalk where sidewalk currently does not exist on. the south side
of 5th A venue, between Webster Street and Apgar Street.
I 2. Replace all of the existing sidewalk.
3. Replace all of the existing sidewalk and remove sections D 1 and
D2.
I Recommendation:
Staff recommends option 1.
I
Section E (sidewalk along 6th Avenue): 6th Avenue is designated
I as a collector street and warrants consideration of a sidewalk on both sides
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 4 -
I
I The sidewalk on the south side of 6th A venue west of St.
of the street.
I Marks Street is in good condition and will not be disturbed by
construction. The remaining sidewalk along 6th A venue will be disturbed
by service replacement. Construction of new sidewalk along 6th Avenue
I will be funded 100% by the city due to the collector street designation.
Options:
I 1. Remove the existing sidewalk on north side of 6th Avenue.
2. Remove the existing sidewalk on the south side of 6th A venue east
of St. Mark's Street.
I 3. Replace only the panels that have heaved or settled.
4. Replace all ofthe sidewalk.
I 5. Extend the sidewalk to Scott Street on the south side of 6th Avenue.
6. Construct sidewalk on the north side of 6th A venue from Webster
Street to Scott Street.
I 7. Construct sidewalk on the north side of 6th Avenue, from Apgar
Street to Scott Street. Extending the sidewalk to Apgar Street
would allow pedestrian traffic to cross 6th A venue at a 4-way stop.
I Current City policy requires a sidewalk on both sides of the street.
However, sidewalks on both sides of the street may not be warranted or
I desired by the city. Constructing sidewalk on the north side of 6th
Avenue, between Apgar Street and Webster Street,will have the following
impacts:
I . The sidewalk will only be 7 feet from the house located at 503 6th
Avenue.
I . The sidewalk will be 15 feet from most houses.
. The City will need to obtain additional easements.
I . A 28-inch tree will be removed.
. A 4-inch tree will be removed.
. Shrubs, landscaping and a row of hedges will be removed.
I . There are 38 trees ranging in size from 10 inches to 36 inches on
the north side of 6th Avenue. Construction of a sidewalk will result
in several ofthe roots being cut, possibly killing the trees.
I . Seven light poles will be relocated.
. The sidewalk will cost approximately $85,000.00.
I The cost estimate in the Appendix reflects option no.'s 1,5 and 7.
I The total estimated project cost for the proposed street improvements on
paved streets is $1,993,062.09, and for non-paved streets (Webster Street)
is $49,596.94.
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 ~Page 5 -
I
I
I 5.2 Storm Sewer
The proposed storm sewer improvements are identified in Drawing No. 3
I in the Appendix.
I The proposed storm sewer improvements consist of replacing the
corrugated metal pipe with RCP, and adding catch basins to eliminate
concrete cross pans.
I The total estimated proj ect cost for the proposed storm sewer
improvements is $248,320.88.
I 5.3 Watermain
I The proposed watermain improvements are identified in Drawing No.4 in
the Appendix.
I The proposed watermain improvements consist of replacing the watermain
on 4th Avenue with 8-inch Ductile Iron Pipe, removing the 6-inch pipe
I from the section of 6th Avenue that runs parallel with the 12-inch pipe,
replaceing remaining 6-inch watermain on 6th Avenue from Clay Street to
Scott Street and replacing all the water services on 4th Avenue and 6th
I Avenue within the project limits.
The total estimated project cost for the proposed watermain improvements
I is $383,879.38
I 5.4 Sanitary Sewer
I The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are identified in Drawing No.
S in the Appendix.
I The proposed sanitary sewer improvements consist of replacing sanitary
sewer main line and all services on 4th Avenue and 6th Avenue. The
sanitary sewer lines will be replaced with 8-inch PVC pipe. Services will
I be replaced with 4-inch or 6-inch PVC pipe from the main line to 10 feet
inside of the Right of Way.
I The total estimated project cost for the sanitary sewer improvements is
$333,616.25.
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 6 -
I
I 6. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
I 6.1 Street
I 2S% of the project costs for the street improvements on existing
bituminous streets are proposed to be assessed on an adjusted front footage
basis to benefiting properties. The remaining 7S% of the street costs will
I be funded by the City through general tax levy.
I The estimated assessment rate for the proposed street improvements on
existing bituminous streets is $54.4S per front foot.
I Webster Street is a gravel road. It is City Policy to Assess 100% of the
proj ect costs for street improvements to gravel roads. The improvements
will be assessed on an adjusted front footage basis to the benefiting
I properties.
The estimated assessment rate for the proposed street improvements on
I Webster Street is $122.46 per front foot.
A preliminary assessment roll is included in the Appendix.
I
6.2 Storm Sewer
I 100% of the storm sewer improvements will be funded by the General
Storm Sewer Fund.
I
6.3 Watermain
I Shakopee Public Utilities current policy is to fund 100% of the watermain
I improvements including service replacement. They are in the process of
modifying the policy to assess the service cost to the benefited property.
I If service connections are assessed, the estimated assessment rate for the
proposed water service improvements is $ 1,454.93 per lot.
I If Shakopee Public Utilities and the City Council do not come to an
agreement regarding watermain assessments prior to the public hearing,
watermain improvements, including service replacement, will be paid
I 100% by Shakopee Public Utilities.
The preliminary assessment roll located in the Appendix does not include
I a watermain assessment.
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 7 -
I
I
I 6.4 Sanitary Sewer
100% of the mainline sanitary sewer replacement will be funded by the
I Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Fund. Service connections will be assessed
directly back to the benefited property.
I The estimated assessment rates for the proposed sanitary sewer
improvements is $ 1,241.81 per lot
I Actual Assessments will be based on the final project costs and apportionments.
I 7. ESTIMATED COSTS
An itemized cost estimate is included in the Appendix. The following costs were
I prepared using 2005 construction costs and are subject to change, depending on the final
design of the project, bids received, and actual work performed. A summary of the
estimated construction costs plus a 10% contingency and engineering and administration
I costs for the project are as follows:
Street Improvements (paved) $ 1,993,062.09
I Storm Sewer Improvements $ 248,320.88
Watermain Improvements $ 383,879.38
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $ 333,616.25
I Webster Street Improvements $ 49,596.94
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 3.008.475.54
I
8. FUNDING SOURCES
I A summary of the estimated funding apportionment for the recommended
I improvements is as follows:
TOTAL COST APPORTIONMENT:
I Street Assessments $ 547,896.12
Sanitary Service Assessments $ 103,070.23
I General Tax Levy $ 904,762.91
State Aid (6th Avenue) $ 590,000.00
Storm Sewer Fund $ 248,320.88
I Shakopee Public Utilities $ 383,879.38
Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 230,546.02
I TOTAL COST $ 3.008.475.54
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 8 -
I
I
I The city owns property within the project area. The estimated assessment for the
city is $ 25,744.31.
I The city's portion of the assessment will be paid from the general fund.
I 9. CONCLUSION
I From an engineering standpoint, the recommended improvements are feasible, cost
effective and necessary.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 9 -
I
I
I APPENDIX
I
I Existing sidewalk 1
Proposed Street Improvements 2
I Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements 3
Proposed Watermain Improvements 4
I Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements 5
Parcel Maps 6-12
I Cost Estimate. 13
Assessment Roll. 4th Avenue 14
I Assessment Roll. sth Avenue 15
I Assessment Roll. 6thAvenue 16
Assessment Roll. Webster Street 17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Feasibility Report
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 10-
I
I
I APPENDIX
I
Existing sidewalk 1
I Proposed Street Improvements 2
I Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements 3
Proposed Watermain Improvements 4
I Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements 5
Parcel Maps 6-12
I Cost Estimate. 13
Assessment Roll. 4th Avenue 14
I Assessment Roll. 5th Avenue 15
Assessment Roll. 6th A venue 16
I Assessment Roll. Webster Street 17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Feasibility Report
2006 Street Reconstruction
I City of Shakopee, MN
City Project No: 2006-2 -Page 10 -
IN3YUWd30 ONI1I33NION3 33dO>lVHS iffid~ I
T I ----..."
0001 o avo :A8 NMVllO
'oN ONIMVllO .000 ~ = . ~ 31V~S .OO~ 1I38Y'/3030 :31VO ~
I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
51 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lN3ruWd30 ONlij33NION3 33dO>lVHS dVW )l1V.M.3:aIS ....l<NS1IlJlI.PIlNIlJI I
VI I ----..." g[adImtVHS
Og~ 0 0\10 :AS NM~O NOI.L:Jf1 (J.LSNO:JJI(J ~
'oN DNIM~O ,Og~ ~.t 31\IOS soot: 113SVOO30 :31'9'0 L:iI:iItl.LS 9006
g / WEBSTER ST I
" r-
;;;
d
~ i!_ I
b ---.....~ f-
~ -
t:i
:~
- I
CASS ST I
I -
0) ~ (Jl -
r+ r+ -f:>.
::J '''W ::J I
,.-;-
::J
~lr-Ai.ARk~ ~ ~ )>
fTJ < - I
/I r---E.T . L \:j f1l
""'"
CLAY ST
/ I
/ -
- I
b
-
.
=I-~ ~ I
PIERCE ST
0) (Jl ~ ~/ I
t: r+ r+ -f:>.
::J ::r- I - ,.-;-
::r- -
)> ~ CJ I
t--
< )>
f1l f1l f1l < l-
I...... '" f1l
- ~
SHUMWAY ST I
-
I .--
l- I
~ I-
-,-- t-
."" t:t:1 I
- t-- I t-
--'--
APGAR ST I
r-
0) (Jl
- r+ ,.-;- -f:>. -
- ::r- ::r-
r+ I
= ::r- ~ =
- ~ )>
< )> t--
fTI fTI < l- I
f1l
- '--
.sCOTT ST
I
I
I STREET WIDTHS
STREET
EX
I ~~ rn ~..
5TH AVE 45' 37' ""
6TH AVE 45' 37'
I WEBSTER 45' 4 '
CASS 38' 5
37'
I CLAY 45' 37'
PIERCE 45' 37'
45'
I 37' ~
; LEVEE DR \ ~
U1 ~ 0 /'''''' '...-..-. I-
~ . -
>- BROOK ~ / .---------.....~ (j)
'" ~ ;0 // - '---
I ... __ _...--- _-~.::J~Bi--------.-..-.-----.-.--.-./~/-~-;-.,.l~~..--JC..:::..-..-=:-..::.'
69 _______________ -- - - l. ~
~-i\; "
/ ~ . 2ND \j( C
~R!\\LROf\O ~ 0 QW D' ~ l.. l-
I ~' oOQWOC
I W .Ilt=JOOO~
I ~ '- 00000'
I VE100rJf]C
I ~ oooOQ~C
I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~D\J\
15 p 0 [- <C:> --' - '"
O~OPOSED. -": ~ ~ ~
I r EMENTS >- /'fCll'ytVil~ [. 10TH AVE
j I ~ InIDMAs T
, ~AV'
I ; I t;; W ~-- _........E .)
) I U .-....
! ,I~ es KENNES -
CIR' MENKE
20 r c
RECJ6 STREET
PROPOS NSTRUCTION
ED IMPROVEMENTS DRAWN BY: DECEMBER 2005
SCALE 1"
SHAKOPEE ENGINE CAD 0 = 800'
ERING DEPARTMENT r-o-- _ - 800
I
I
I
I
I
I {\\Ji----
_:....--
1-
-
-
---
f-
. (j) f-:-
t- -- --
(j) >- I- ~ r-i
<( c.n
r:;', Existing Storm Manhole W S 0::::
\.~) U :2 <(
.....-->>..--......->>---. Existing Storm Sewer er::: =:J () 0 X
~ Existing Storm Catch Basin W I D- U
-
@ Proposed Storm Manhole CL (j) <( c.n
--
->>->>- Proposed Storm Sewer nn-
~ Proposed Storm Catch Basin
~ 2006 STREET DATE: DECEMBER 2005 SCALE 1. = 400' DRAWING No.
RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: CAD ~ _ _ 40~ 3
~~! PROPOSED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT --
I
I . _ 3J L----------' ~-
.--------
-.-'" '1 - ,'--"--~ :'::=\r-=--~:C"--+----~"=--------- -- \ U
_-.~_ ' _Cl_ j ,
I \-- I ~~'-I--.-.._ · \ \ \ 2NU \
, ,~- ~~
~ -~ ' -- ' ' , '
_______ +-+ '1 r----+---' " ,-' --- ~l--- -+--~
~~\ _"_'-1--"--"-' ' - -.
, --' - - . '
_ __ _- l-iIII" "
_ ,1..,.' ;
\ I
, '
I \ J~ --
I ~: ~ ~\ ,~'-u~wo-c
____ 1. 1. ",----,-.,-------. ,---'
.- '
I cd if) 4. ' \
uJ 4. -1 \
3:, -- --
__ . _ _, '_ ,_,_-'- '__"_-"-->'1
I ~--t<\-t",,,\...---I---'.:\ _,----\.----\...--.~. --~! ._.\-~:.;-. .,_;::;;-~~-.-W.-.,..-.:.-. \ ~\.~ \ \--~;::;..>--"I--\--I. ----1.....--1...-...'.-..-'.-...\
\ .. -- -..--- ---= -"" ~ ::::-...:\" -
_ _- _" .....__ .. _ --r
.~., __-- _'_ i
__ ~ ,r.' 1
V) I \
, -,_.,--- " ' ---
I <C 1- _ ' . if 1. '. -. .
~ I I \ l \
,,! \
I~' '
(J)i
I
I -1-1
- Existin
~~ . g Watermain
EXIsting G t
_._ . a e Valve
I I EXisting Hyd
_I rant.
-I
- Proposed W
~ atermain
I Proposed Gate V
___ alve
ir Proposed H
ydrant
~
SHAlKOPElE 2006 ST R
___ PROPOSE~E~iNSTRU~~!o
TERMAlN IMPRf: "'''''''' ""
VEMENTS SCALE I" = 4 .
SHAKOPE CAD 0 00
E ENGINEERING DEP,oT ,.., -
~ MENT - ...-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
r-
(j)
. Existing Sanitary Manhole 'I
I
->->- Existing Sanitary Sewer I
^
!
-F- Existing Sanitary Forcemain i
I
. Proposed Sanitary Manhole "
--,
->->- Proposed Sanitary Sewer
~ 2006 STREET DATE: DECEMBER 2005 SCALE I" = 400' DRAWING No.
RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: CAD ~ _ _ 40~ 5
~!!~ PROP" SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT --
I ~
I
I
I
270012964 -
I - 805 4- A" W 270012990 -
- 735 4 A" W
I
I
I
I
270014-780 S
-408 CASS Sl
2006 STREET DATE: DICEMBER 2005 SCALE l' = 100' DRAWING No.
RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: CAD 0 100 6
PARCEL MAP ~-- I
--
SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
I
I
I Ll
I
_ 27001308 -
I 2700'300 l' 4 AV _ 2700'
- 533 4
25 4 AV
- - - 70013090 -
I 05 4 AV
-
I
I
_ 270014600 -
_ 2700' 4620 - 406 PIERCE 51 5
409 CLAY 51 5
2700146'0 -
724 4 AV IN _ 270014590 -
4'8 PIERCE 51 5
_ 2700' 4540 - \--
628 4 AV W (j)
270014560 -
723 5 AV IN
_ 2700' 4550
735 5 AV IN
-
~ 2006 S
~1PlEJE _ 2700'509 -
_fIla_ RECONSTJ,REET ?7 6 (>.v
PARCEL ~flION DATE:
DRAWN BY: DICEMBER 2005
SCALE I" = 100'
SHAKOPEE CAD 0
ENGINEERING D ,-,-- 100
EPARTMENT - - I
I
I
I
I _ 270013230 -
0
I 270013130 -
- 533 4 AV W
I
7001528 -
- 38 5 AV
-
~ _ 270
403
~ 2006 STREET DATE: D1CEMBER 2005 SCALE 1" = 100' DRAWING No.
RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: CAD 0 100 8
SHAIDlPJElE PARCEL MAP ,-,-- I
- -
CXIIGII.1NllY1'SINallB' SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
I
I
I
I - _ 270C
2700H750 - 11
919 5 AV W
I 2700H740 - -
9:;5 5 AV W
I
_ 2700H880
924 5 AV W
_ 270018610 - _ 2700
0 270014870 - _ 2700148 0 -
9:;8 5 AV '# 914 5 A\! W 20 ~
- - - 2'
,
.
_ 270018610 -
0 - _ 27001490
29 6 A\!
_ 270016960 - _ 27C
0
_ 279120:;40 -
1010 6 AV E
2006 S
RECONSTJ.REET DATE:
PARCEL ~fJION
SCALE ,. = '00'
SHAKO CAD
PEE ENGINEERING DEP 100
ARTMENT I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I /
_ 27001501~-
715 6AV .
270016940 -
- 746 6 p..V IN
270016950 - Ul
- 0 '"
y
u::
<C
:2
2006 STREET DATE: DICEMBER 2005 SCALE ,. = 100' DRAWING No.
~ RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: CAD 0 100 10
~--- I
SHAIDPEE PARCEL MAP SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
OYmNaYI'IDSN:IlIIf
I
I L---J=--:=
\-
I _ 270014540 -
628 4 AV W (j';
_ 27001
_ 2700H450 - _ 2700H4 0 - 35 5
I 535 5 AV W ,:; 5 AV W \-
_ 270014480 - U)
2700H460 43 APGAR S S
I 519 5 AV W
I ~
I
- - _ 27001513 -
I Q4 5 AV
_ 27001524
-
- _ 27001514- - 14 5 AV
I 10 5 AV
- 7001521 -
_ 27001509 - 11 6 AV
27 6 AV
_ 270015220 -
03 6 AV
_ '270016691 -
_ 270016780 - 504 6 AV W
_ 270016800 - 618 6 AV W
636 6 AV
~- _ 270016770 70016720 - _ 27001670 -
608 6 AV W - 20 6 AV
_ 270016790 - 36 6 AV
628 6 AV W
1
~ 2006
~lPEE RECONS~J;,~EET
PIaISN:Il_
PARCEL MflION
SCALE ,. = '00'
SHAKOPE CAD D
E ENGINEERING DEP ~--
ARTMENT --
I
-
I
I
I -~
I \-
5 \-
I 0
0 0
I ()l
I
270015310 -
- 403 6 "''' W
270015300 -
- 423 6 ",,, W
270016640 -
- 436 6 A" W
2006 STREET DATE: DICEM8ER 2005 SCALE 1. = 100' DRAWING No.
RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: CAD 0 100 12
PARCEL MAP ~-- I
- -
SHAKOPEE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
I
Preliminary Cost Estimate
I 2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee
I SCHEDULE A.- Street Improvements
.
I Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Extended Total
1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
I 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING < 12" TREE 9 $ 250.00 $ 2,250.00
4 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 12" - 24" TREE 11 $ 350.00 $ 3,850.00
I 5 CLEARING AND GRUBBING> 24" TREE 7 $ 600.00 $ 4,200.00
6 SAWCUT (BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE) L1N FT 2116 $ 3.50 $ 7,406.00
I 7 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L1N FT 16662 $ 2.80 $ 46,653.60
8 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQFT 26748 $ 0.60 $ 16,048.80
I 9 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 1250 $ 5.00 $ 6,250.00
10 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CUYD 12691 $ 10.00 $ 126,910.00
11 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CUYD 5078 $ 7.00 $ 35,546.00
I 12 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CUYD 5078 $ 10.00 $ 50,780.00
13 TOPSOIL BORROW TON 1321 $ 12.00 $ 15,852.00
I 14 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE) TON 18943 $ 12.50 $ 236,787.50
14 TYPE MV NON-WEAR COURSE (MVNW35035B) TON 4565 $ 35.00 $ 159,775.00
I 15 TYPE MV WEAR COURSE (MVWE45035B) TON 2740 $ 39.00 $ 106,860.00
16 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL. 1633 $ 2.60 $ 4,245.80
I 17 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (3" THICK) SQYD 2067 $ 10.00 $ 20.670.00
18 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 L1N FT 16720 $ 9.00 $ 150,480.00
19 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 1834 $ 39.00 $ 71,526.00
I 20 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 247 $ 50.00 $ 12,350.00
21 10" CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 71 $ 60.00 $ 4,260.00
I 22 4" CONCRETE WALK SQFT 40382 $ 3.50 $ 141,337.00
23 CONCRETE STEPS EACH 108 $ 160.00 $ 17,280.00
I 24 PEDESTRIAN RAMP EACH 29 $ 500.00 $ 14.500.00
25 SODDING LAWN TYPE SQYD 37894 $ 3.00 $ 113,682.00
I Subtotal $ 1,449,499.70
+10% Contingecy $ 144,949.97
Subtotal $ 1,594,449.67
I +25% Indirect Costs $ 398,612.42
Total Schedule A $ 1,993,062.09
I Feasibility Report
2006 Street Reconstruction
CffyofShakopee. MN Appendix - 13
I City Project No: 2006-2
I
I
I Preliminary Cost Estimate
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shako pee
I
WEBSTER STREET
I Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Extended Total
1 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L1N FT 300 $ 2.80 $ 840.00
I 2 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CUYD 433 $ 10.00 $ 4,330.00
3 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CUYD 173 $ 7.00 $ 1,211.00
4 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CUYD 173 $ 10.00 $ 1,730.00
I 5 TOPSOIL BORROW TON 56 $ 12.00 $ 672.00
6 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE) TON 647 $ 12.50 $ 8,087.50
I 7 TYPE MV NON-WEAR COURSE (MVNW35035B) . TON 155 $ 35.00 $ 5,425.00
8 TYPE MV WEAR COURSE (MVWE45035B) TON 93 $ 39.00 $ 3,627.00
I 9 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL. 55 $ 2.60 $ 143.00
10 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 L1N FT 634 $ 9.00 $ 5,706.00
11 SODDING LAWN TYPE SQYD 1433 $ 3.00 $ 4,299.00
I Subtotal $ 36,070.50
+10% Contingecy $ 3,607.05
I Subtotal $ 39,677 .55
+25% Indirect Costs $ 9,919.39
I Total Webster $ 49,596.94
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Feasibility Report
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN Appendix - 13
I City Project No: 2006~2
I
I Preliminary Cost Estimate
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee
I
SCHEDULE S.- Storm Sewer Improvements
I Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Extended Total
1 REMOVE CATCH BASIN (INCLUDES CASTING) EACH 34 $ 300.00 $ 10,200.00
I 2 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE UN FT 1346 $ 9.00 $ 12,114.00
3 REMOVE CASTING EACH 13 $ 50.00 $ 650.00
4 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V UN FT 2027 $ 29.00 $ 58,783.00
I 5 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V UN FT 420 $ 30.00 $ 12,600.00
6 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 2'x3' EACH 35 $ 1,350.00 $ 47,250.00
I 7 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 EACH 7 $ 1,800.00 $ 12,600.00
8 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 13 $ 400.00 $ 5,200.00
I 9 ADJUST CASTING EACH 8 $ 250.00 $ . 2,000.00
10 CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER (STORM) EACH 24 $ 800.00 $ 19,200.00
I Subtotal $ 180,597.00
+10% Contingecy $ 18,059.70
Subtotal $ 198.656.70
I +25% Indirect Costs $ 49,664.18
Total Schedule S $ 248,320.88
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Feasibility Reporl
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN Appendix -13
I City Project No: 2006-2
I
I, Preliminary Cost Estimate
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee
I
SCHEDULE C.- Watermain Improvements
I Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Extended Total
1 REMOVE WATER MAIN UN FT 4180 $ 5.00 $ 20,900.00
I 2 REMOVE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY EACH 7 $ 300.00 $ 2,100.00
3 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX ASSEMBLY EACH 4 $ 150.00 $ 600.00
4 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE EACH 5 $ 350.00 $ 1,750.00
I 5 REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPE . UN FT 3585 $ 2.00 $ 7,170.00
(INCLUDES CURB STOP)
I 6 SALVAGE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY EACH 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
7 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE L.S. 1 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
I 8 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 9 $ 700.00 $ 6,300.00
9 6" WATER MAIN - DUCTILE IRON PIPE CL 52 UN FT 1780 $ 22.00 $ 39,160.00
I 10 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX ASSEMBLY EACH 14 $ 700.00 $ 9,800.00
11 8" WATER MAIN - DUCTILE IRON PIPE CL 52 UN FT 1900 $ 24.00 $ 45,600.00
12 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX ASSEMBLY EACH 6 $ 900.00 $ 5,400.00
I 13 HYDRANT EACH 8 $ 2,200.00 $ 17,600.00
14 INSTALL HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EACH 2 $ 850.00 $ 1,700.00
I (SALVAGED)
15 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 84 $ 150.00 $ 12,600.00
I 16 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 84 $ 70.00 $ 5,880.00
17 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 84 $ 100.00 $ 8,400.00
I 18 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LfN FT 3585 $ 15.00 $ 53,775.00
19 GATE VALVE EXTENSION UN FT 6 $ 75.00 $ 450.00
20 HYDRANT EXTENSION UN FT 6 $ 400.00 $ 2,400.00
I 21 WATER MAIN FITTINGS LBS. 5800 $ 2.00 $ 11,600.00
Subtotal $ 279,185.00
I +10% Contingecy $ 27,918.50
Subtotal $ 307,103.50
I +25% Indirect Costs $ 76,775.88
.. Total Schedule C $ 383,879.38
I
I Feasibility Report
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN Appendix -13
I City Project No: 2006-2
I
I Preliminary Cost Estimate
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee
I
SCHEDULE D.- Sanitary Sewer Improvements
I Item # Description Units Quantity Unit Price Extended Total
1 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY) UN FT 4180 $ 2.00 $ 8,360.00
I 2 REMOVE SANITARY SERVICE PIPE UN FT 3440 $ 1.00 $ 3,440.00
3 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE (INCLUDES CASTING) EACH 13 $ 300.00 $ 3,900.00
4 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 6 $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00
I 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE EACH 83 $ 180.00 $ 14,940.00
6 8" PVC SEWER PIPE. SDR 35 UN FT 4180 $ 26.00 $ 108,680.00
I 7 PVC SERVICE PIPE. SDR 26 UN FT 3440 $ 15.00 $ 51,600.00
8 PVC WYE. SDR 26 EACH 83 $ 60.00 $ 4,980.00
I 9 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER UN FT 4180 $ 1.00 $ 4,180.00
10 48" SANITARY MANHOLE UP TO 8' DEEP. EACH 13 $ 2,500.00 $ 32,500.00
I 11 SANITARY MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH UN FT 26 $ 100.00 $ 2,600.00
12 ADJUST CASTING EACH 13 $ 250.00 $ 3,250.00
Subtotal $ 242,630.00
I +10% Contingecy $ 24,263.00
Subtotal $ 266,893.00
I +25% Indirect Costs $ 66,723.25
Total Schedule D $ 333,616.25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Feasibility Report
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN Appendix -13
I City Project No: 2006-2
I
I Preliminary Cost Estimate
2006 Street. Reconstruction
City of Shakopee
I SCHEDULE A.- Street Improvements
I Subtotal $ 1,449,499.70
+10% Contingecy $ 144,949.97
Subtotal $ 1,594,449.67
I +25% Indirect Costs $ 398,612.42
Total Schedule D $ 1,993,062.09
I SCHEDULE B.- Storm Sewer Improvements
Subtotal $ 180,597.00
+10% Contingecy $ 18,059.70
I Subtotal $ 198,656.70
+25% Indirect Costs $ 49,664.18
I Total Schedule D $ 248,320.88
SCHEDULE C.- Watermain Improvements
I Subtotal $ 279,185.00
+10% Contingecy $ 27,918.50
Subtotal $ 307,103.50
I +25% Indirect Costs $ 76,775.88
Total Schedule D $ 383,879.38
I SCHEDULE D.- Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Subtotal $ 242,630.00
I +10% Contingecy $ 24,263.00
Subtotal $ 266,893.00
+25% Indirect Costs $ 66,723.25
I Total Schedule D $ 333,616.25
WEBSTER STREET
I Subtotal $ 36,070.50
+10% Contingecy $ 3,607.05
I Subtotal $ 39,677.55
+25% Indirect Costs $ 9,919.39
Total Webster Street $ 49,596.94
I TOTAL $ 2,187,982.20
I TOTAL WITH 10% CONTINGENCY $ 2,406,780.42
TOTAL WITH INDIRECT COST $ 3,008,475.54
I Feasibility Report
2006 Street Reconstruction
City of Shakopee, MN Appendix . 13
I City Project No: 2006-2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IiIII
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 4TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 11/18/2005
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
JAMES G & LOUISE A LEBENS 8454AVEW
270012960 8454AVEW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-OOl Block-041 & VAC ADJ ALLEY & 100 1241.61 $5,445.00 $6,666.61
P/O El/2 VACCASS STREET
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JAMES L LUKER 835 4 AVE W
270012961 626 HOLMES ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. . CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002 Bloek-041 & VAC ADJ ALLEY 60 1241.61 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MIGUEL A CIGARRERO 8254AVE W
270012962 8254 AV sHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-003 Block-041 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,506.61
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
MATIHEW C STANLEY 815 4 AVE W
270012963 815 4 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-004 Block-041 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BARBARA L MELIUS 805 4 AVE W
270012964 8054 AVE W sHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-005 Bloek-041 & VAC ALLEY Wl/2 100 1241.61 $5,445.00 $6,666.61
S1/2 OFVAC CLAY ST BET BLKS 41 &42
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
SARIN SEANG 7354AVEW
270012990 7354 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-OOl Bloek-042 EX E 3' & Sl/2 ALLEY 97 1241.81 $5,281.65 $6,523.46
ADJ TO LOTS 1 & 2 & El/2 Sl/2 VAC CLAY STREET
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
LARRY J & LORRIs THORNTON 725 4 AVE W
270013000 7254AVEW sHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002Bloek-042 & E 3' OF LOT 1 63 1241.81 $3,430.35 $4,672.16
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
TODD H LAUMANN 715 4 AVE W
270013010 7154 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-003 Bloek-042 & LOT 4 120 1241.81 $6,534.00 $7,775.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
DALE W GREENING . 705 4 AVE W
270013020 7054 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-005 Block-042 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
KATHLEEN LINDGREN 635 4 AVE W
270013050 635 4 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-OOl Bloek-043 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ROBERT & ROBIN J DEDEKER 627 4 AVE W
270013060 PO BOX 322 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002 Block-043 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ROSEMARY F ASHTON 619 4 AVE W
270013070 6194 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-003 Block-043 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MARK A & ROBIN L BARRY 6114AVEW
270013080 611 4 AV W sHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-004 Bloek-043 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:12006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS12006 RECONSTRUCTIONIFEASIBIUTY\Preliminary assessment roll (2006 Reeon) 4th Ave Appendix - 14
- .. - .. - - ... - - IiiiiI - - - - - .. - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 4TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 11/1 B/ZOOS
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
FRANK L & ALICE M GROCUTI 520 4 AVE W
270014510 5204 AVE W . SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-008 Block-D60 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
SCOTIA & SUSAN K WARE 530 4 AVE W .
270014520 530 4 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-D09 Block-D60 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JAMESG LEBENS 5384 AVE W *
270014530 215 A1WOOD ST SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-DlO Block-D60 30 1241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 628 4 AVE W *
270014540 129 HOLMES ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-DOl Block-061 & LOTS 2-10 450 1241.81 $24,502.50 $25,744.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
RONALD W & CARRIE R TOWARD 418 PIERCE ST S
270014590 418 PIERCE ST 5 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-D62 & LOT 7 (S 71' OF 71 1241.81 $3,865.95 $5,107.76
LOTS)
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
RICHARD TESSMER 406 PIERCE ST S
270014600 237 ALTHEA LN SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D06 Block-062 & LOT 7 (N 71' OF 71 1241.81 $3,865.95 $5,107.76
LOTS)
HOPKINS, MN 55343 55379
LORRAINE F BECKMAN 7244 AVE W
270014610 7244 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D08 Block-062 & E 15' OF LOT 9 75 1241.81 $4,083.75 $5,325.56
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
RONALD M WOODWARD 409 CLAY ST S
270014620 409 CLAY ST S SHAKOPEE, MN, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Dl0 Block-062 & W 45' OF LOT 9 105 1241.81 $5,717.25 $6,959.06
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ANDREW TESCH 406 CLAY ST S
270014690 406 CLAY ST SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-063 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
REBECCA L JOHNSON 8144 AVE W
270014700 8144AVW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-007 Block-063 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JASON OWENS 8204 AVEW
-
270014710 8204 AVE W SHAKOPEE, .MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D08 Block-063 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
GAY L RANTA 8244 AVE W
270014720 8244 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D09 Block-063 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
KRISTINE S HEINEN 8364AVEW
270014730 825 128 ST W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Ol0 Block-D63 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:12006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS12006 RECONSTRUCTIONlFEASIBIUTY\Preliminary assessment roll (2006 Reeon) 4th Ave Appendix - 14
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 4TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 1 1/18/2005
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
JEROME A & GEORGIA STEINHOFF 605 4 AVE W *
270013090 6054 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-005 Block-043 30 1241.81 $1.633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MARLENE R LINK 5334 AVE W *
270013130 535 4AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-001 Bloek-044 & LOT 2 60 2483.62 $3,267.00 $5,750.62
SHAKOI'EE, MN 55379 55379
BERNICE A NEUBERGER 5254 AVE W
270013140 5254 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D03 Bloek.044 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
TAMI 30 HARTMAN 511 4 AVE W
270013150 511 4'AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-D04 Block-044 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BENEDICT THEIS 326 APGAR ST S *
270013160 326 APGAR ST SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-D05 Block-D44 30 1241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JOSEPH E DIlTO 4354 AVE W *
270013220 8328 AVE E SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-001 Bloek-045 S1/2 OF LOTS 1 & 2 35.5 1241.81 $1,932.98 $3,174.79
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ST MARKS CHURCH 0 *
270013230 350 ATWOOD ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D03 Block-045 & LOTS 4 & 5 71 0.00 $3,865.95 $3,865.95
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 .
FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF ST PAUL 4264 AVE W
270014400 1388 PRIOR AV S SHAKO PEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D09 Bloek-D59 & W1/2 OF 8 90 1241.81 $4,900.50 $6,142.31
ST PAUL, MN 55116 55379
SCOTT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 0 *
270014420 2004 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-D07 BJock-059 N1/2 OF 6 & N1/2 E1/2 35.5 0.00 $1,932.98 $1,932.98
OFLOT 7
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
LESLIE E & JOELLEN M SWENSON 4144 AVE W
270014430 4144 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-008 Block-D59 W1/2 OF 7 & E1/2 OF 8 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
ROMAN H MEUWISSEN 405 APGAR ST S *
270014440 405 APGAR ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-010 Bloek-059 30 1241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
TERRENCE W & KATHRYN FURST 5064 AVE W *
270014490 5064AVEW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-060 30 1241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GARY L & ANITA LILIENTHAL 5144 AVE W
270014491 5144 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-007 Block-060 60 1241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTIONIFEASIBILlTY\Preliminary assessment roll (2006 Reeon) 4th Ave Appendix - 14
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 4TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 11/1 8/2005
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DARREN GIESE 408 CASS ST S
270014780 408 CASS ST 5 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot.006 Block-064 & LOTS 7-9 EX S 8' & 174 1241.81 $9,474.30
Sl/2 VAC 4TH AV LYING ADJ TO LOTS 6-9 $10,716.11
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
TOTAL 3,008.00 48,430.59 163,785.60 212,216.19
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTION\FEASIBILlTY\Prellminary assessment roll (2006 Recon) 4th Ave Appendix - 14
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 5TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 1111 B/2CCS
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DONALD J HENNEN 435 5 AVE W '"
270014350 4355 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-DOl Block-D59 30 0.00 $1,633.50 . $1,633.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GERALD G PINK 429 5 AVE W
270014360 4295AVEW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-D02 Block-D59 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
HEcrOR PEREZ 421 5 AVE W
270014370 421 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-003 Block-059 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JANET M STRUNK 415 5 AVE W
270014380 415 SAVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot.004 Block-059 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MICHAEL C & NICOLE M MURRAY 4055 AVE W *
270014390 405 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-DOS Block-DS9 30 0.00 $1,633.50 $1,633.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MICHAEL & JANELL BREEGGEMANr-J 5355 AVE W *
2700144S0 5355 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-OOl Block-D60 & W 40' OF 2 50 0.00 $2,722.50 $2.722.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
EUX S PADILA 519 5 AVE W
270014460 519 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-003 Block-D60 & E 20' OF lOT 2 80 0.00 $4,356.00 $4,356.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JAMES R MOORE 513 5 AVE W
270014470 513 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-004 Block-DeO 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
RICHARD J & EILEEN SCHMITZ 436 APGAR ST S *
270014480 436 APGAR ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-D05 Block-D60 30 0.00 $1,633.50 $1,633.50
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
SHAINE A GASTON 7355 AVE W
270014550 735 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-D01 Block-D62 & Wl/2 lOT 2 90 0.00 $4,900.50 $4,900.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
STACY L SIMONSON 7235 AVE W
270014560 723 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-D03 Block-062 E112 OF 2 & W 45' OF 75 0.00 $4,083.75 $4,083.75
lOT 3
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MATTHEW ANDERSON 713 5 AVE W
270014570 713 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lol-004 Block-De2 & E 15' OF lOT 3 75 0.00 $4,083.75 $4.083.75
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GEORGE P & BARBARA J LUSKEY 7055 AVE W
270014580 7055 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-005 Block-D62 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:12006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTIONIFEASIBllITYlPreliminary assessment roll (2006 Recon) 5th Ave Appendix - 15
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 5TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 1 1/18/2005
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAl DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
CONNIE L SCHWICHTENBERG 427 CASS ST S
270014630 427 CASS ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot.oOl Bloek.o63 Nll2 OF 71 0.00 $3,865.95 $3,865.95
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
NANCY RAE NARCOMA 8375 AVE W
270014640 8375AVW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot.oOl Bloek-063 Sll2 OF 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
WAYNE F HUNTER 827 5 AVE W
270014650 827 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002 Block.o63 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
DEBORAH M HACKETT 821 5 AVE W
270014660 8215AVW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot.o03 Bloek.o63 W 50' OF 50 0.00 $2,722.50 $2,722.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JOHN R & CINDY LOU MAYERHOFER 811 5 AVE W
270014670 811 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lol.o04 Bloek-063 E 10' OF 3 & W 50' OF 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
LOT 4
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BRUCE L PAUL 805 5 AVE W
270014680 805 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot.o05 Block-063 & E 10' OF LOT 4 70 0.00 $3,811.50 $3,811.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ROBIN R MCCULLOUGH 935 5 AVE W
270014740 1160 VIERLING DR E STE 140 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-OOl BJock-064 & W112 OF LOT 2 EX N 90 0.00 $4,900.50 $4,900.50
6'
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GLENN 0 & BETSY G GRABER 919 5 AVE W
270014750 919 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-003 Block.o64 EX N 6' & Ell2 OF LOT 92 0.00 $5,009.40 $5,009.40
2 & W2'OF N 25'. OF S SO'OF LOT 4
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 .
LAUREN C & VIRGINIA M BURGESS 911 5 AVE W
270014760 911 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF sHAKOPEE Lot.o04 Bloek.o64 EX N 8' & EX W 2' OF N 58 0.00 $3,156.10 $3,156.10
25' OF S 90'
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JAMES E & MARLENE K MORK 9035 AVE W
270014770 9035 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF sHAKOPEE Lot.o05 Bloek-064 EX N 8' 60 0.00 $3.267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JASON W & ANNA MALLEN 9065 AVE W
270014850 906 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF sHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block.o65 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
WILUAM R SCHROEDER 9145 AVE W
270014860 914 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-007 Block.o65 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
WILFREDO J GALVEZ 9385 AVE W *
270014670 938 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF sHAKOPEE Lot-Ol0 Block.o65 & Wll2 LOT 9 45 0.00 $2,450.25 $7,961.02
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 *** 45 $5,510.77
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTs\2006 RECONSTRUCTIONIFEASIBIUTY\Preliminary assessment roll (2006 Reeon) 5th Ave Appendix -15
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 5TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 1 1/1 B/ZOOS
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
KENNET G KLEHR 9245 AVE W
270014880 1429 3 ST SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKOPEE Lol-Q08 Block-Q65 & E112 OF LOT 9 90 0.00 $4,900.50 $4,900.50
TURTLE LAKE, WI 54889 55379
DOROTHY J CLAUSEN 804 5 AVE W
270014940 8045 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN, CIlY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-Q66 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
JAMES H & JUDITH A CASE 812 5 AVE W
270014950 812 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKO PEE Lot-007 Block.066 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MICHAEL & CYNTHIA HUTH 820 5 .AVE W
270014960 820 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKO PEE Lot-QOB Block-Q66 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
DOUGLAS J SUDENGA 828 5 AVE W
270014970 828 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKO PEE Lot-Q09 Block-Q66 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BARBARA A LATHAM 8365 AVE W
2700149BO 8365 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CIlY OF SHAKOPEE Lol-Q10 Block-Q66 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN55379 55379
NADINE M BEULKE 706 5 AVE W
270015030 7065AVW SHAKOPEE, MN, CI1Y OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-067 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GERMAIN A & VIRGINIA WECKMAN 714 5 AVE W
270015040 714 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKO PEE Lot-007 Block-Q67 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BRUCE H & JOAN R HEINZ 722 5 AVE W
270015050 16237 FRANKUN CIR SHAKOPEE, MN. CIlY OF SHAKOPEE Lol-QOB Block-Q67 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 55379
JAMES W & SARA REINKE 7345 AVE W
270015060 734 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CIlY OF SHAKOPEE Lol-Q09 Block-067 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MARY J PROCHASKA 736 5 AVE W
270015070 736 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Q10 Block-Q67 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
FREDERICK A & GLADYS C lEBENS 604 5 AVE W *
270015130 6045 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CI1Y OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Q06 Block-06B 30 0.00 $1,633.50 $1,633.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
HARVEY H & DARLENE M TESCH 6105 AVE W
270015140 610 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CIlY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Q07 Block-Q6B 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTlONIFEASIB1LlTYIPreliminary assessment roll (2006 Recon) 5th Ave Appendix - 15
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 5TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 11/18/2005
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
MARTIN H & PATRICIA MOLSON 6205 AVE W
270015150 620 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-Q08 Block-Q68 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
STEVEN 0 IVERSON 628 5 AVE W
270015160 6285 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot.009 Block-068 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JEFFREY CHEEVER 6365 AVE W
270015170 6365AVEW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q10 Block-Q66 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JOHNE BAKER 5045 AVE W *
270015230 2608 BROOKVIEW DR SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lol-006 Block-069 30 0.00 $1,633.50 $1,633.50
BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 55379
GEORGE H & CAROL V BREEGGEMANN 514 5 AVE W
270015240 514 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q07 Block-Q69 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MOISES G RICO 5205 AVE W
270015250 520 5 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-006 Block-069 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
OSCAR DE LA ROSA-LOPEZ 0
270015260 1841 PRESERVE CT SHAKOPEE, MN. . CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-Q09 Block-Q69 W 5' OF 5 0.00 $272.25 $272.25
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
NANCY A KOCH 5285 AVE W
270015270 528 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-Q09 Block-069 E 55' OF 55 0.00 $2,994.75 $2,994.75
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
OSCAR DE LA ROSA-LOPEZ 5385 AVE W *
270015260 1841 PRESERVE CT SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q10 Block-Q69 30 0.00 $1,633.50 $1,633.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
AGNES R KLEIN 4085 AVE W *
270015320 4085 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q06 Block-070 & E 5' OF lOT 7 32.5 0.00 $1,769.63 $1,769.63
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 . 55379
DAVID M & AMY B PISTULKA 4145 AVE W
270015330 414 5 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-Q07 Block-070 W 55' OF 55 0.00 $2,994.75 $2,994.75
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BRIAN SANDERS 4225 AVE W
270015340 4225 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q08 Block-Q70 60 0.00 $3,267.00 $3,267.00
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379 .
AARON V & MITZI J SANDERS 436 5 AVE W '"
270015350 746 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q10 Block.070 W 112 LOT 9 45 0.00 $2,450.25 $2,450.25
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTIONIFEASIBllITY\Prelimlnary assessment roll (2006 Recon) 5th Ave Appendix -15
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '. - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 5TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 1 1/1 a/200S
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
BRIAN SANDERS 422 5 AVE W
270015351 4225AVW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-009 Block'()70 E1/2 OF 30 0.00 $1,633.50 $1,633.50
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
TOTAL 3,018.50 0.00 169,868.10 169,868.10
.. Corner Lot Assessment
...... Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTION\FEASIBILlTYlPrelimlnary assessment roll (2006 Recon) 5th Ave Appendix - 15
- -, - _. - - - _. - - - - ~.. - - .. -' _. -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 6TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCfION 11/1 B/2CC5
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
.
ROBERT J COLE 935 6AVE W ,..
270014810 935 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE.Lot-001 Block-065 30 $1,241.81 $1,633.50 $6,549.16
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 *** 30 $3,673.85
ROBIN R MCCULLOUGH 927 GAVE W
270014811 1160 VIERLING DR E STE 140 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002 Block-065 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JAYSON A & TINA L SCHULTZ 921 GAVE W
270014820 9216AVW SHAKOPEE, MN, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-003 Block-065 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ROLAND H & LORRAINE R SNELL 913 GAVE W
270014830 913 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-004 Block-065 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
THOMAS J & SANDRA A MCGOVERN 903 6AVE W
270014840 9036 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-005 Block-065 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 .
RODNEY BASSINGER 835 GAVE W
270014890 8356 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-001 Block-066 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
LAWRENCE E & DELORES GARDNER 829 6 AVE W
270014900 8296 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002 Block-066 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
THOMAS A JOHNSON 821 6 AVE W
270014910 8216 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-003 Block-066 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
DONALD W & JUDITH A KOCH 813 6 AVE W
270014920 1461 N ARM DR SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-004 Block-066 60 . $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
MOUND, MN 55364 55379
JOHN E BREEGGEMANN 8056AVEW
270014930 805 6 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-005 Block-066 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MARK SEVERSON 737 6 AVE W
270014990 7376 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-001 Block-067 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
ANN W KINDSCHUH 727 6 AVE W
270015000 7276 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-002 Block-067 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
DOUGLAS R FIlHR 715 6 AVE W
270015010 7156 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-003 Block-067 & LOT 4 120 $1,241.81 $6,534.00 $7,775.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTION\FEASIBILITYlPrellmlnary assessment roll (2006 Recen) 6th Ave Appendix - 16
- ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 6TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 11/1 B/2005
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERlY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
. FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
TIMOTHY J VON NEUPERT 703 6 AVE W
270015020 2501 EMERALD LN SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q05 Block-Q67 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JARED C & SARAH A LARSEN 533 PIERCE ST 5
270015080 533 PIERCE ST S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Q01 Block-Q68 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
AMY M HOLLOM 6276AVEW
270015090 6276 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-Q02 Block-Q68 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GARY J & JOYCE L KASPER 619 6 AVE W
270015100 619 6 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-003 Block-Q68 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
CLAYTON MEYER 615 6 AVE W
270015110 6156 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-004 Block-068 60 $1,241.81 $3.267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
KENNETH R & UNDA SCHROERS 605 6 AVE W *
270015120 605 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-005 Block-068 30 $1,241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
CHRISTOPHER D JACOBSEN 537 6 AVE W *
270015180 5376AVW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE lot-001 Block-OS9 30 $1,241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
WAYNE L & ROSEMARY CESS 529 6 AVE W
270015190 529 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lol-Q02 Block-OS9 W 50' OF 50 $1,241.81 $2,722.50 $3,9S4.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BRIDGET LARSEN 521 6 AVE W
270015200 521 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lol-003 Block-OS9 & E 10' OF 2 70 $1,241.81 $3,811.50 $5.053.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
GREGORY A & FRANCIS I ANDERSON 5116AVE W
270015210 511 6 AV W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-004 Block-Q69 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
FRANCIS J & KAREN A PARON 503 6 AVE W *
270015220 503 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-005 Block-QS9 30 $1,241.81 $1,S33.50 $2,875.31
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
FLORENCE EIDSVOLD 4356 AVE W *
270015290 4356AVW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-Q01 Block-070 & W 30' OF lOT 2 45 $1,241.81 $2,450.25 $3,S92.06
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 .
KURT A ZARTH 4236 AVE W
270015300 4236 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE lot-003 Block-Q70 & W 15' OF LOT 4 & E 105 $1,241.81 $5,717.25
30' OF 2 $6,959.06
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
200S RECONSTRUCTION H:\200S ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTIONIFEASIBIUTYlPreliminary assessment roll (200S Recon) Sth Ave Appendix - 16
- - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - _.
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 6TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 11/1 a/2DDS
.
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
KYLE W WHITE 403 6 AVE W *
270015310 1727 GREENWAY AVE SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-005 Block-070 & LOT 4 EX W 15' OF 52.5 $1,241.81 $2,858.63 $4,100.44
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JOHN P& BRENDA J WARD 408 6 AVE W *
270016620 4086 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-085 & E112 OF LOT 7 45 $1,241.81 $2,450.25 $3,692.06
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
KEVIN A WECKMAN 416 6 AVE W
270016630 416 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-008 Block-085 & W112 OF 7 90 $1,241.81 $4,900.50 $6,142.31
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
DONALD J LINK 436 6 AVE W *
270016640 1053 LEGION ST SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-009 Block-085 & LOT 10 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
TIMOTHY J & MICHELLE K BURT 504 6 AVE W *
270016691 16153 NORTHWOOD RD NW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-007 Block-086 & LOT 6 (N 71' OF 35.5 $1,241.81 $1,932.98 $3,174.79
LOTS)
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 55379
KENNETH P & BERYL N KLEAVER 520 6 AVE W
270016700 5206AVEW SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-008 Block-086 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
BRIAN M & LORI A CHALLANS 526 6 AVE W
270016710 526 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-009 Block-086 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MARY JO SCHUElTE 536 6 AVE W *
270016720 5366 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-010 Block-086 30 $1,241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
CHRISTINE MARIE JOHNSON 608 6 AVE W *
270016770 608 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-006 Block-087 & E1/2 OF 7 45 $1,241.81 $2,450.25 $3,692.06
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 .
ALVIN TROST 618 6 AVE W
270016780 618 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-007 Block-087 W112 OF 7 & E 40' OF 70 $1,241.81 $3,811.50 $5,053.31
LOT 8
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
MICHAEL A WOLF 628 6 AVE W
270016790 628 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-009 Block-087 & W 20' OF 8 & E 50' 70 $1,241.81 $3,811.50 $5,053.31
OF LOT 9
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
JILL C ROCHELEAU 636 6 AVE W 7r
270016800 5208 HAUFAX AVE S SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-01 OBlock-087 & W 10' OF LOT 9 35 $1,241.81 $1,905.75 $3,147.56
EDINA MN, 55424 55379
JAMES E & JUUE PALMERSHEIM 704 6 AVE W '"
270016860 704 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Lot-006 Block-088 30 $1,241.81 $1,633.50 $2,875.31
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS\2006 RECONSTRUCTIONlFEASIBILlTYlPreliminary assessment roll (2006 Recon) 6th Ave Appendix - 16
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 6TH AVENUE
2005 RECONSTRUCTION 1 1/1 B/ZCC5
ASSESSABLE SANITARY STREET TOTAL
PID PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT SERVICE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
DONALD A GElS 714 6 AVE W
270016870 714 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-007 Bloek-088 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
sHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
JOHN V LANG 722 6 AVE W
270016880 7226 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE LoI-008 Bloek-088 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
sHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
PATRICIA A BJORK 726 6 AVE W
270016890 7266 AVE W SHAKO PEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lot-009 Block-08B 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKO PEE, MN 55379 55379
DOROTHY A SKELLY 736 6 AVE W
270016900 736 6 AVE W SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE LoI-010 Block-088 60 $1,241.81 $3,267.00 $4,508.81
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379
AARON V & MITZI J SANDERS 746 6 AVE W CITY OF SHAKOPEE Bloek-089 P/O BLK 89 & CLAY ST COM "'Ii'
270016940 7466 AVE W SHAKO PEE, MN. NW COR BLK 88 S ALONG W LN 142', W 128.66' TO E LN OF 52 $1,241.81 $2,831.40 $4,073.21
ST MARKS CEM RD, NE ALONG E LN OF CEM RD 144.15' TO S
sHAKOPEE, MN 55379 55379 LN 6 ST, E 104' TO POB
MINN DEPT OF CORRECTIONS 0
270016950 1450 ENERGY PARK DR SUITE 200 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lol-007 Block-089 & LOTS 8-10 290 $0.00 $15,790.50 $15,790.50
ST PAUL, MN 55108 55379
MINN DEPT OF CORRECTIONS 0
270016960 1450 ENERGY PARK DR SUITE 200 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Lol-004 Bloek-090 & LOTS 5-10 330 $0.00 $17,968.50 $17,968.50
ST PAUL, MN 55108 55379
MINN DEPT OF CORRECTIONS 1001 6AVE W
270018610 1450 ENERGY PARK DR SUITE 200 SHAKOPEE, MN. CITY OF SHAKO PEE LoI-001 Bloek-172 & LOTS 2-10 "'''' 330 $0.00 $40,412.32 $40,412.32
ST PAUL, MN 55108 55379
TOTAL 3,125.00 54,639.64 214,242.42 268,882.06
** Front footage assessed for Webster Street at 100% (unpaved road) (380' . 50' setback)
* Corner Lot Assessment
*** Half of front footage assessed for Webster Street at 1 00% (unpaved road)
NOTE: final quantities may not match exactly due to rounding.
2006 RECONSTRUCTION H:\2006 ENGINEERING PROJECTS12006 RECONSTRUCTIONlFEASIBILITY\Prelimlnary assessment roll (2006 Reeon) 6th Ave Appendix - 16
/2.. . 6.2 ..
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Authorize Extension Agreement for
Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Design
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is an extension agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. to prepare final plans
on a storm sewer design to increase capacity of storm water facilities in the Pheasant
Run subdivisions.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has identified a need to increase the storm water capacity of outlet pipes from
Pheasant Run ponds to the trunk storm sewer system by Quail Drive. Phase I of the
improvements included increasing the outlet from the pond north of Mathias Road to
Quail Drive.
Phase II improvements include increasing the pipe capacity from ponds south of Mathias
Road and east of Pheasant Run Street. The alternative that was analyzed by Todd
Hubmer, ofWSB & Associates, Inc., is to construct a parallel pipe system in an area east
of the original outlet pipe. It is proposed to construct a 21-inch storm sewer to increase
the outlet flow and decrease the high water elevations ofthe ponds.
By constructing this improvement and adding outlet structures in the Dominion Hills, the
storm water system will be improved. Staff is recommending that WSB & Associates
complete the plans and specifications of this design for a spring construction.
GOALS AND STRATEGY:
This project supports the goal of high quality of life and the strategy of providing high
quality services.
ALTERNAVTES:
1. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an extension agreement with
WSB& Associates, Inc. for the design and construction services of additional
storm pond outlets on Mathias Road in the Pheasant Run subdivisions.
2. Do not execute the agreement.
3. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Additional funds of $35,000.00 was provided by
the developer and Storm Trunk funds to fund this project.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an extension agreement with WSB&
Associates, Inc. for the design and construction services of additional storm pond outlets
on Mathias Road in the Pheasant Run subdivisions.
~~cror
BUpmp
ENGR/2006PROJECTIPHEASANTRUN/WORD/WSBEXTENSION
A.
WSB
- Infrastructure I Engineering I Planning I Construction
& Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
December 29,2005 Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Mr. Bruce Loney
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379-1328
Re: Pheasant Run Storm Water Improvements
City of Shakopee
WSB Project No. 1281-42
Dear Bruce:
As a follow-up to our conversation regarding construction of a parallel outlet pipe from Pond 2
to Pond 1 in the Pheasant Run Development, I have contacted Minn Comm Utilities to discuss
the directional boring alternative. ~ased on my conversations with Minn Comm Utilities and
other contractors over rece~tweeks, I offer the following comments for completing this project:
1. Currently the cost to directional bore the 2 I-inch parallel pipe is approximately $130-
$170 per lineal foof for labor only. This would not include the costto offset the
watermain, repair the street or the cost of the pipe for the directional bore.
2. As indicated in our previous conversations, the directional bore alternative would require
open-cutting the street to offset the watermain, thereby negating the advantage of using
directional boring.
3. Traditional open-cutting along the parallel pipe alignment appears to be the more
economical alternative.
Therefore, we would recommend that the 2 I-inch parallel stonn sewer be constructed along the
parallel alignment in Pheasant Run.
If you have any questions, please call me at 763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
/~;~'
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Projeqt Manager
cc: Jeff Weyandt, City of Shako pee
kw
Minneapolis I St. Cloud
W:I01 281 -42IDocILTR-b/oney-1 22905.doc Equal Oppo'rtunity Employer
.atL
w..
&.4i!i&llII~~l@.
January 10,2006
Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Re: Pheasant Run Storm Sewer
Construction Documents
Shakopee, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Loney:
We are pleased to submit to you this proposal to provide professional services associated with
preparing storm sewer construction documents for the construction of a new outlet from Pond 2
to Pond I in the Pheasant Run Development. The tasks anticipated to be completed and the
project schedule is proposed as follows:
I. Compile Background Information and Complete Design Survey
We will complete a design survey ofthe pipe alignment within the Pheasant Run
Development. WSB Staff will combine the field data with utility as-builts to create a
map showing existing topography and utilities for the project.
Anticipated cost to complete this task: $1,600
II. Prepare Plans and Specifications
WSB proposes to prepare construction plans, specifications, and bid documents for the
proposed storm sewer connecting Pond I to Pond 2. Construction plans will include plan
and profile drawings of the proposed sewer line and the construction details needed for
the project. As a part of this task, it is anticipated that a neighborhood meeting will be
held to receive input from the adjacent land owners and provide them project
information.
Anticipated cost to complete this task: $ 5,500
III. Construction Services
WSB proposes to provide construction survey and on-site inspection as needed to
complete the project. An estimate for these costs will be determined at your request or
after construction documents for the project have been completed and bids received.
W:\paulh\pheasant run storm proposal-email to bloney.doc
I
Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Shako pee
January 10, 2006
Page 2 of2
We anticipate the total cost to prepare the project documents outlined in items I and II listed
above to not exceed $7,100. Construction services will be proposed under a separate letter once
the construction documents have been completed.
It is estimated that we can complete the construction documents within 60 days ofthe City's
written notice to proceed with plans. This should allow ample time to meet the City's proposed
spring I summer construction for the project.
The City of Shakopee agrees to reimburse WSB & Associates, Inc. for these services in
accordance with Section IV of the Agreement for Professional Services. If this agreement meets
with your approval, please sign below and return one copy to our office.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Associate
Attachment
cc: Steve Ische, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Bret Weiss, WSB & Associates, Inc.
ph/kw
City Administrator
City Clerk
Mayor
Date
W:\paulh\pheasant run stonn proposal-email to bloney.doc
PROJECT SCHEDULE
I. Collect Background Information........ ............................. ............. .February 2006
II. Prepare Construction Plans & Specs..................................................................March 2006
III. Receive Bids............................................................................ ...ApriI2006
IV. Begin Construction....................................................................... .May 2006
V. Pinal Restoration............................ ..................................... ......... .June 2006
W:\paulh\pheasant run storm proposal-email to bloney.doc
,
W: \01281- 4 2\Cod\Pheos-Bor ing- op t .dgn
I I
e
/
/77
/
Exist. 21 /I RCP e
remain inplace
Ex i st. 181/ RCP
Prop. 24/J P.E.P.
Exist. 1 S/JRCP
Prop. 24/J RCP
CPipe Bursting)
Exist. 1 S /I RCP
Prop. 2ijl/ P.E.P.
Prop. 21 Directional Boring
0 Exist. 1 S /I RCP
~O-\D \ . to remain
-J-
if)
C
0
U)
100 50 0 100 200
I I
SCALE IN FEET
IHEREBY CERTIF'r THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT SCALE: AS NOT[O
WAS PREPARED ilY OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPPERVISION AND
rHA T I At.! A OUl Y REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER P/"AN BY;
... ?iii'X;j; Avenue South, Suite 300 Pheasant Run Ponds 1 & 2 THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NINNESOTA TAW
WSB Minneapolis, MN 55416 CHECKED aYI
www.wsbeng.com SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA PRW
TODD E. HU8MER. P.E.
"""" 24043
& Associates, Inc. 763-541-4800. Fax 763{i41.1100 DAlE.l 12/21/04 REG. NOl
INFRASTRUCTURE 'ENGIM;'e;;;;~PLANNING 'CONSTRUCTION
I~. 13,3;
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
/
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Jeff Weyandt, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Right-of-Way Plat No. 2 for the
17t Avenue Improvements, Project No. 2006-1
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No. 6353, a resolution approving Right-of-Way Plat No.2 for the
right-of-way needed on parcels for the 17th A venue Improvements, Project No. 2006-1.
BACKGROUND:
In the right-of-way acquisition process the consultant engineer for the design, WSB &
Associates, Inc., has recommended that the City prepare a right-of-way plat which can be
recorded for the right-of-way needed on the 17th A venue Improvements Project.
Attached to this memo is a memo from WSB & Associates outlining the benefit of
recording the right-of-way in the form of a plat, a resolution approving Right-of-Way Plat
No.2 and the plat drawings showing the right-of-way needed for the project.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a motion adopting Resolution No. 6353, a resolution approving Right-
of-Way Plat No.2 for the 17th A venue Improvements Project.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 6353.
3. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No.1, to approve the resolution approving Right-of-Way
Plat No.2, which then can be recorded after the parcels have been obtained.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 6353, A Resolution by the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota Adopting Right-of-Way Plat No. 2 for the 17th Avenue
Improvements, Project No. 2006-1, and move its adoption.
'tf(- ~
Jeff Weyandt
Assistant City Engineer
JW Jprnp
ENGRl2006PROJECTJ17THA VEIWORDIMEM6353
RESOLUTION NO. 6353
A RESOLUTION BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
APPROVING CITY OF SHAKOPEE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO.2
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to acquire road right-of-way
along 1 th Avenue and that such acquisition be accomplished using the procedures set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.1792; and
WHEREAS, prior to filing the right-of-way plat with the County, the City of
Shakopee must approve the right-of-way plat by Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA that City of Shakopee Road Right of Way
Plat No.2 is approved and that it be recorded with the County.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of
Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of ,2006.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ENGRl2006PROJECT/I7THA VElWORDlRES63S3
Memorandum
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Shako pee, Minnesota
From: Don Sterna, P.E.
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Date: January 6, 2006
Re: 1ih Avenue Connection to CSAH 83
City Project 2006-1
S.A.P. 166-119-003
Final Right-of-Way Plat Approval
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
., WSB Project No. 1677-00
The City of Shako pee, as part of its 2006 capital improvement projects, has identified the
completion ofthe remaining one-half mile section of 17th Avenue east to connection with CSAH 83.
As part of the project, additional right-of-way and construction easements will be required. There
are two processes for identifying and acquiring right-of-way and easements for public improvement
projects. The proposed land to be acquired can be either legally identified by a Mete's and Bound's
description with a parcel drawing or a right-of-way plat can be prepared. Platting is the preferred
process, which annotates the legal property owner, proposed land acquisition area, type of
easements on one simple to understand document that can be utilized by the appraisers simplifies
the legal description and is a usable document for future reference.
The proposed roadway right-of-way width of ISO feet is a Scott County requirement since 17th
Avenue East has been identified as a roadway turnback to the County once this remaining section of
1 ih A venue is completed. A 10- foot drainage and utility easement will be secured along the south
right-of-way line adjacent to the Shakopee Gravel site, along with a short segment of drainage and
utility easement along the north side of the roadway from CSAH 83 extending approximately 500
feet to the west, in order to provide area for the extension of sanitary sewer trunk line to service the
future developments in the area. In addition, a 10- foot temporary easement will be secured along
the north right-of-way and easement line to provide proper room in order to construct the project. A
small drainage and utility easement of20 feet x 10 feet, near the mid-point ofthe project, will also
be secured on the north side in order to facilitate the installation of an electrical transformer that is
needed to power the street lights at the proposed new intersection locations along 17th A venue East.
C:lDocuments and Settings\jweyandtlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLK5\MEMO-HMCC-122305.doc
Honorable Mayor and City Council
January 6, 2006
Page 2
The Right-of-Way Plat will need to be recorded with Scott County, and we are hereby requesting
City Council approval of the Right-of-Way Plat that will be utilized in the right-of-way and
easement acquisitions. The Right-of-Way Plat needs City Council approval prior to being recorded
with Scott County. The City is currently working on appraisals, which should be completed around
mid-January, with offers being made to the affected property owners by the end of January.
Negotiations with the property owners will be ongoing once the offers are made; however, it is
anticipated that not all of the property owners will be willing sellers, and we are recommending that
a condemnation resolution be presented to the City Council at the February 21,2006, Council
meeting.
lh/sm
C:\Documents and SettingsyweyandtlLocal Settings I Temporary Internet FilesIOLK5\MEMO-HMCC-122305.doc
-:..
'~-~
CITY Or SHAlfOPff 1f0AO RICHT or WA Y PLA T NO. 2
K. NOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: that the City of Shakopee. a body politic and corporate under the Il. I I
laws oCthe State of Minnesota, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Chapw.r 505.1792 as amended, has caused the .. .
right of way of 17th Avenue to be mapped as it transgresses over and across the following described lands situated . -. 1
in Scott County, Minnesota. To wit: I I I
That part of said right of way included in the following des<ribed tracts ofland: I I: I
in Township 115 North, Range 22 West \.
Se<tion 9 I I
Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter \ I
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter J: I I
Section 16 ~ ~ ,', I I
'" to '.'1'
Northwest Quarter ~ f" ~ ~.
~ g " \'" I I I
Z tt~.)\
I hereby certify thatthe location ofthis right of way is ",nedy show on this plat. , " .. . :: \1
Minnesota license number ~ .~:. \ I
City Engineer t'. ~... I
dated this day of 2006 ~ :~. (:;""" I
..:-\.\ '.' I' ,
I hereby certify that this plat we-s prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered ..' I I
Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota; that this plat meets the requirements of , : ~.
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 505.1792; that all parcels of land affecte d by the acquisition are correct as shown on . <,', '.' \ ;;J
the plat; that monuments indicating the boundary lines will be correctly placed in the ground as shown after '-:// .
completion of construction; that all measurements are correctly shown on the plat: and that the right of way I i ~
boundary lines are correctly designated on this plat. >- I
I I ~ \
Steven V. Ische 1'1 I ~ I
WSB and Associates Ine. Q
Minnesota License No. 22103 . <
natedthis day of 2006 I. rSOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 ~ ~ I
, J. I OF THE SW 1/4 / I I- I
Z I EXISTING UTILITY AND Ul
. :J ~/ 80.00 I DRAINAGE EASEMENT // I 1= L
State of Minnesota :J: /" / IS89'57'56"W PER DOC 0 512 7 -- - / Z
County of () /'. I '.' N . 5 1 ........"'. . ::>
';( 500D~- / I ~_/50.00 I 10.00 '-=.===i====3~~=<::..== -~I 8
The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was ackoowtedgedbefore me :2. NOO.2S.20..W........ -. /.......NO.O.25.20..WI J If-" , ;Y · ·
this_day of ,2006 by Steven V. Ische, Land : 10.00, "... 50.00 -::..=::..=::..r-1E,---ej- - T ~ \ \
Surveyor, Minnesota license No. 22703. -1--r4----'----------------- _ 71 ~ ~ T ~.o~ _ . _ -r .... I ~~ >i' .., _ _ _ _
1 \ I -... , S 35.00 9 9
\ 5 - _::::::.. 80.00 I 25.00 . // (1616
I ~ ... N89'57'56"E I EXISTING HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER-<..
NolaryPublic,. County,Minnesota 1 PARCEL 4 112,.00 '-.,. 112.00 I DOC. NO. 551217 " I
Mycommlsslonexplfes: I //"NOO'25'20"W I PARCEL ~49 77 \ I NORTH 1/4 COR
t t 5 N89'57'56"E 38.00-, L ~O.:?O _ SEC 16 T_ll~ "-22 _ _
The City Council for the City ofShakopee, pursuant to Resolution No. I PER DOC. NO, ~o~g29g5"; -- - - -7 EXISTING HIGHWAY
dated 2006 , /" EASEMENT PEFR - - -
Is hereby designating the right'ofway of 17th Avenue as Indicatooon C ITY OF SHAKOPEE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY -I -r- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ ...I..-.=5800- / 'DOC N0552408
PLAT NUMBER 2, J~'!.?c::"___________L______________________.., : 10.oo-lr__J____~ _
I I 13900 --r
1 I I '''' I
Chair, City Council of Shakopee, Scott County. Minnesota ~ I L I ~ I I 1
~ I-~-- ------1 I I ,
~ "f------2000o----t------25900- --+-~ I
Dated this day of . 2006. ~ ';'.' '~.:' 1 /'1' .
:::E: ~':;..,\ . /' .
Document number I " " ,/
I -(,' / I I
I "::,, EAST LINE OF THE NW 1/4-..../ I I I
I hereby certify that this instrumentwa.s med in the office of the County Recorder for record on this'_ day of . C .
2006 at _ o'clock_m., and was duly recorded in the Scott County Records ,:...~..;, ~. I I
o 100 200 .~.
County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota ~ _ ~ I . \:' I /'
LEGEND _ _ .:::\'\ I I I ~'Il \
PROPOSED R/W '.' I I I
- - -EXISTING EASEMENT ( IN FEET) I I I I
PARCEL LINE 1 inch = 100 It.
- - - - - - - - - - - - TEMPORARY EASEMENT
I I 1 :i.- \ /'"
- - - - - -DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT SECTION 9 T 115 R 22 I, S
. - - - - -EXISTING R/W ' .' I I
- - - - SECTION LINE DEED RECORDED CERTIFICATE EXISTING NEW TOTAL ~=:'lE ~ TEMP
PARe OWNER LOCATION DOC. NO. OR BOOK OF TITLE HIGHWAY HIGHWAY HIGHWAY UTILITY EASEMENT TEMP
AND Pf\GE NUMBER }\IW RIW RIW SQ IT EASEMENT
~ f1o. DENOTES SCOTT COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT 'SQ IT SQ IT SQ IT ~<\S~ENT EXPIRES ON I II ~
"0 V I I I :i.-\
~ lE 1 DENOTES TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND PARCEL NO. 1 GENE HAUER FARMS SWlI40"FSWlI4 312138 13594 32100 45694 4118 December 31st, 2007 I I t t\: ~
2 GENE HAUER FARMS SW II. OF SW 114 3 38 15718 37628 53346 47133 December 31st, 2OO"i I 0 ?:
~ '" DENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT AND PARCEL NO. 121 . I I \\'" ~.
:: 3 GENE HAUER FARMS SW 114 OFsW 114 3121$ 14268 34152 48418 200 4123 Deeember31st,2007 I " "\.
- ./ DENOTES PARCEL NUMBER AND LIMITS ~ \>+. -
~ 4 4 AMALGAMATEDLANDCOMPANY SE1I40FSWtl4 377221 62255 62255 5574 Deee-mber31st,2007 tsx..c'\\o I
OJ 0 R/W BOUNDARY CORNER 5 MARKD.SALITERMAN SE 114 OF SW 1/4 688404 126499 4000 130499 1S8i.l7 00.23 Decelnber31st,2007 I
s. I I
~. SECTION 16, T 115, R.22 I I c,'l'l \ /'" c,"- \!'
i - ~.~ I
6 WSB 6 sHAKOPEEGRAVEL,INC Deeell1ber31st,2007
o ~. PLAT BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO THE SCOTT COUNTY NO SCALE
,..:. _~o___=_~,____. COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83 (86 ADJUSTMENT) I I I
lO' VICINITY MAP
~ SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
~
..
"".
CITY OF SHAf(OPEE ROAD RICHT OF WA Y PLAT NO. 2,
I
.'j I
':..' I
f0~' I
<,;) \ I
... I
..:~,' I
,- I
~'. ,.,'
I ':;,".., I
\ ".:'" I
I
I ,:;;,l'~ I
otrn.n: n I
, \:... 0:.;:1.0: t' I 0:.:11.0: ~:
. ',\'~ I
'-:- . I
I
I
~
w
U)
I f- W
U)
I w H:~-~-:; iE..
"'...
w........ ...'
I I- 0-
f-3: w3:
...U) ZVl
Ow :Jw
,;E: :/:: (~' ;;ii. \\:~ ~~ }j;F
:J... ctrn.C: ~. - :~ OUILO: .u. ~~ I
f-O ~<; t. L ::\ r~H t: Y O:.rrt.O: .- ) J,
VlN
:;E:C, ~', ,. ~~ z
:J
) I
U
(" R~99,OO f-
<<
173S.26 ~
I k~'~~;~}___-__- ~O~OJ___,--____________ 10,O~ I
-- ----'-------- S89'57'S6"W I
1-::-= . . T 1 ---------- -----.
, , , I
~ j PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 I
o~ PARCEL 1
~~ , I
112,00
~~ ~ --- ---.- ,~ ~ -1873.6a- ~ ~ ~ I
NORTHWEST COR OF ,,{I -7-EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENL P,ER PLAT OF KILLARNEY HILLS , " , I
THE NW 1/4 SEC 16 ~,
T lIS R 22 /1 PARCEL 6 1136;75" EXISTING GAS EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 393487 -::::.... I
II .-
J... '\?> / / ~ h7 \ I
8 9 ___;,..<? /'" - ~49.00_ ~ ~ ~ ~ --T-- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~I
171~ ~ 0 i'<- L~139,88 \ 10.00 . 30,00 \ TE 6
~ <j.;i~ b~10'42'01" \ f L_-'=__-='-_'-'___-1_
~O' 11 I \ II 80.00 \\ I
\ I }" S89'S7'S6"W 13: I
<Xl 0'"
" 0.. I
'-NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 o. 0.:<' w
I \ .m :p z
"0
'I i I "'0 :J
0 0
Z 0 I
Vl U
f-
N <<
"' ~
I 0 I
r--
'" I
<D
ci 'i':. I
z "
,i <.5 '~:.,
0 <:;:.\ BEARING ORIENTATION
0
'" ........ PLAT BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO THE SCOTT COUNTY
w t:';)
tI. COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83 (86 ADJUSTMENT)
:/ f- ,-
Z ('.,-,'
w ,;:/...,
~
w
Vl , '..i'.'
<< LEGEND
I w
>- "~':'\'~
>--
:J PROPOSED RjW
<= ~'l1 \I~
OJ
i '" - - ~ -EXiSTING EASEMENT
z
<= PARCEL LINE
Vl
X -
I w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEMPORARY EASEMENT
:1 - - - - - - - -DRAiNAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
- - - - - - -EXISTING R/W s"- \/~
I - -- SECTION LINE
~ DENOTES SCOTT COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT
Cl I '" DENOTES TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND PARCEL NO.
;:
"0 0 100 200 '" DENOTES DRAiNAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT AND PARCEL NO. ~"- \/~
oj ~-.... I
a. ,/ DENOTES PARCEL NUMBER AND LIMITS ~'o
,.,
Ul :/ I \\'0, It.
;:
'0 0 R/W BOUNDARY CORNER "\.
~\fl.' -
.E ( IN FEET ) r"' ,
Cl 1 inch = 100 It. ,
~
S. ii
" A s'l1 \/~ s"- \I~
c:
::> WSB
CfJ ""''''''00.'' In..
<5
0 .."""""....,.1>> ,- =.,.:................ -
..:. VICINITY MAP
.... I
~
52 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
~
/J., o,/~
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE LOG NO.: 05-119
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat of Southbridge Fields
MEETING DATE: January 17, 2006
REVIEW PERIOD: October 28, 2005 - February 24, 2006
DISCUSSION
Shakopee Crossings, LP have submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of property
located north of Crossings Boulevard and west of County Road 18 (Outlot B, Riverside Fields 3rd
Addition - Exhibit A). The plat, as currently proposed, contemplates the creation of six (6)
commercial lots and one (1) outlot (Exhibit B) on approximately 10 acres of land. The proposed
lots will have frontage on County Road.18 and/or Crossings Boulevard, but will be accessed
from private drives with access to Crossings Boulevard. The submitted concept plan identifies a
number of potential uses, several of which would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
approval, such as a bank and a car wash. These uses are shown for reference purposes only.
Actual uses will reviewed on an individual basis, at which time it will be determined whether a
CUP, Variance, and/or another application would be required. Staffhas discussed with the
property owner the processes, and design and performance standards that may be applicable for
potential uses in this development.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat at its January 5,2006 meeting. By a 4-
1 vote the Planning Commission recommended approval ofthe preliminary plat application, with
revisions. Specifically, the Commission discussed access to and from the first access to
Crossings Boulevard, (with it recommended that this access shall be constructed and signed as a
right-in only), and that screening be allowed in the easement along Riverside Fields 3rd Addition
to ensure that there is the ability to provide an adequate buffer between the commercial and
residential developments. Those revisions have been incorporated into the draft resolution
attached to this report. A copy of the Planning Commission memo has been attached for the
Council's reference.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve Resolution No. 6355, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat for Southbridge
Fields, subject to the conditions presented.
2. Approve Resolution No. 6355, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat for Southbridge
Fields, subject to revised conditions.
I
3. Do not approve the preliminary and final plat and direct staff to prepare a resolution
consistent with the direction of the Council.
4. Table the matter and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIP
This action supports:
Goal E: "Financially strong", and
Strategy 5: "Foster community connections".
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion approving Resolution No. 6355, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat for
Southbridge Fields, subject to the conditions presented, and move its adoption.
g:\cc\2006\0 1-17\ppfpsouthbridgefields.doc
2
RESOLUTION NO. 6355
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF SOUTHBRIDGE FIELDS
WHEREAS, , Southbridge Crossings, L.P., applicant and property owner, has made
application for preliminary and final plat approval of Southbridge Fields; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
Outlots B, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Scott County,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval ofthe proposed preliminary
plat with conditions; and
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2006, the City Council reviewed the proposed preliminary
and final plat.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of
Shakopee, Minnesota that the preliminary and final plat of Southbridge Fields is hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording ofthe
Final Plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. The legal description of the parcel being platted shall be identified on the plat
as Outlot B of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
C. Remove the signature block for the City Planning Commission.
D. Identify the temporary easement for emergency access purposes from
Southbridge Parkway to Crossings Boulevard on the plat (Document No. A
712552).
E. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include-Drmcisions f{"\r -
security for public improvements within the r
fees, and any other fees as required by the Ci1 0)o9;~iJ ~
1. Shakopee Public Utilities CommissiOl
applicant wishes to contract with theIIj . ~rL&}
2. Electrical system to be installed in acq I;vv .
ofthe Shakopee Public Utilities C01lll1 ([%" /J0 Lf~S-
3. Water system to be installed in accord!
the Shakopee Public Utilities Commisi
4. Public sanitary sewer, public storm se~ + YA/J'-4ffj/kA9~ ()'\'jJ.90r
been extended through the site. The at '~ f 12'6 G "\ r-1>~IJ')1'-O h
Shakopee staff to provide acceptable aJ
associated appurtenances. This includj
and entering into an encroachment agr\
I
3
5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water
Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage
and Treatment Charges, security for the public improvements,
engineering review fees, and other fees as required by the City's most
recent adopted Fee Schedule.
6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer
and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final
Construction Plans and Specifications.
7. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit prior to any land
disturbing activity. A copy of this permit shall be forwarded to the
City. The applicant shall adhere to all MPCA NPDES requirements.
8. The applicant shall provide suitable easements for access to all
adjacent properties utilizing the private sewer system. These
easements shall be approved by the City prior to recording of the plat.
Maintenance of these utilities shall be the responsibility of the
applicant.
F. The applicant shall provide a more defined site plan showing impervious
surface percentages complying with the requirements set forthby City Code,
at time of Conditional Use Permit and Building Permit application submittals.
G. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer.
H. The applicant shall contact City Engineering to apply for and secure an
encroachment agreement for the trunk storm sewer located along the westerly
line of Lots 1,3,4,5 & 6, as well as secure an encroachment agreement for
the trunk sanitary sewer located between Lots 4 & 5.
I. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot.
J. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street
signs are installed.
K. Adequate easements for watermains shall be required, consistent with
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's requirements.
L. Water services shall be shown for each lot.
M. Park dedication requirements shall be met through a cash contribution in an
amount in accordance with the adopted fee schedule in place at the time of
final plat approval ($68,884.20, based on $6,930/acre & 9.94 acres). The
required park dedication fees shall be paid at the time of the recording of the
final plat.
N. The applicant shall provide sidewalks along the proposed internal street, to be
built at the time of the street construction.
o. Screening elements required by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, the
City Council, and City Staff shall be allowed within drainage and utility
easements adjacent to Riverside Fields 3rd Addition, provided the applicant
provides a document stating that they agree to maintain, repair and/or replace
any landscaping located in the easements.
P. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit prior to any additional land
disturbing activity.
Q. The soils on site shall be subject to sampling and testing at the City's
discretion. The cost associated with the testing, and if necessary, the removal
4
of any material deemed unacceptable by the City shall be the applicant's
responsibility.
R. The applicant shall provide storm water computations for the proposed
development as required by City Engineering to insure the downstream
system can accommodate the runoff.
S. The applicant shall ensure that the emergency access from Crossings
Boulevard to Southbridge Parkway be well maintained and accessible at all
times.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions
shall apply;
A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be
reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
B. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or
desired noise or dust mitigation measures.
C. Shall provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the Engineering
Department.
D. The applicant shall meet the screening and landscaping ordinance
requirements of the City Code.
E. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for review and approval by the
City of Shakopee Natural Resource Specialist.
F. The applicant shall provide six (6) inches of topsoil below areas to be sodded.
The soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow
requirements.
G. The applicant shall provide rain sensors for any irrigation system.
H. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices for
erosion control and stormwater management during construction.
I. The applicant shall utilize the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban
Areas as a technical reference for erosion control.
J. The applicant shall comply with the design and performance standards for the
Planned Residential District (PRD).
K. Silt fence and/or tree protection fence is to be removed following
establishment of vegetation as determined by an inspection by City staff.
L. The easternmost access to Crossings Boulevard shall be constructed and
signed as a right-in only.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the _ day of , 2006.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest:
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
H: \CC\2006\06007FPRiverV alleyEstatesII
5
r.
, lil
I ~4
1 ,-
.:~"
,.';
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
;~ '"
CASE NO.: OS-119 " .,.,
" ,'S:
,..,,,
TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Southbridge Fields
MEETING DATE: January S, 2006
REVIEW PERIOD: October 28, 2005 - February 24, 2006
DISCUSSION
Shakopee Crossings, LP have submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of
property located north of Crossings Boulevard and west of County Road 18 (Outlot B,
. Riverside Fields 3rd Addition - Exhibit A). The plat, as currently proposed, contemplates
the creation of six (6) commercial lots and one (1) outlot (Exhibit B) on approximately 10
acres of land. The proposed lots will have frontage on County Road 18 and/or Crossings
Boulevard, but will be accessed from private drives with access to Crossings Boulevard.
The. submitted concept plan identifies a number of potential uses, several of which would
require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval, such as a bank and a car wash. ' These
uses are shown for reference purposes only. Actual uses will reviewed on an individual
basis, at which time it will be determined whether a CUP, Variance, and/or another
application would be required. Staff has discussed with the property owner the
processes, and design and performance standar~s that may be applicable for potential
uses in this development.
The Commission reviewed this application at their December 8, 2005 meeting, and
recommended tabling this application to allow staff to address questions they had
regarding a number of the draft conditions. Staff have discussed the questions raised by
the Commission, and have made several changes to the draft conditions. .As shown in the
following revised conditions, Deletions are shown with a strike through, whereas
additions are underlined.
STAFFRECO~NDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the
approval of the Preliminary Plat of South bridge Fields subject to the following
conditions:
1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of
the Final Plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. The legal description of the parcel being platted shall be identified on
the plat as Outlot B of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
.,
..
C. Remove the signature block for the City Planning Commission.
D. Identify the temporary easement for emergency access purposes from
Southbridge Parkway to Crossings Boulevard on the plat (Document
No. A 712552).
E. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions
for security for public improvements within the plat and the
engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's
adopted fee schedule.
1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance Y/ith the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission
shall be contacted if the applicant wishes to contract with them
for security lighting.
2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
4. Public sanitary sewer, public storm sewer and public
watermain have been extended through the site. The applicant
shall work with City.ofShakopee staff to provide acceptable
access to each system and their associated appurtenances. This
includes providing adequate easements and entering into an
encroachment agreement with the City.
5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm
Water Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, Trunk Storm
Water Storage and Treatment Charges, security for the public
improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees as
required by the City's most recent adopted Fee Schedule.
6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City
Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve
the Final Construction Plans and Specifications.
7. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit prior to any land
disturbing activity. A copy of this permit shall be forwarded to
the City. The applicant shall adhere to all MPCA NPDES
requirements.
8. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm se'Ner shall be prhate.
The applicant shall provide suitable easements for access to all
adjacent properties utilizing the private seWer system. These
easements shall be approved by the City prior to recording of
the plat. Maintenance of these utilities shall be the
responsibility of the applicant.
F. The applicant shall provide a more defined site plan showing
impervious surface percentages complying with the requirements set
forth by City Code, at time of Conditional Use Permit and Building
Permit application submittals.
G. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City
~l1gil1eer .
H. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be
recorded on property lines as designated by the City.
The Deed Restriction shall appear as the f-ollow~..ng:
This con~:eyance is made conditioned upon and subj ect to the
following restriction. The Gi"antee, heirs, sucoessors and assigns, are
restricted from erecting any fenoe or other struoture v,'ithin the utility
and drainage easements dedicated by plat oyer the above described
property, except ~,vith the prior written consent of the City of
Shakopee. This restriction shall run in f,r,;orof and be enf-orceablo by
the City of Shako pee.
The applicant shall contact City Engineering to apolv for and secure an
encroachment agreement for the trunk storm sewer located along the
westerlv line of Lots 1. 3. 4. 5 & 6, as well as secure an encroachment
agreement for the trunk sanitary sewer located between Lots 4 & 5.
.l. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot.
J. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that
permanent street signs' are installed.
K. Adequate easements for watermains shall be required, consistent with
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission's requirements.
L. Water services shall be shown for each lot.
.~ Park dedication requirements shall be met through a cash contribution
in an amount in accordance with the adopted fee schedule in place at
the time of final plat approval. The required park dedication fees shall
be paid at the time of the recording of the final plat.
N. The applicant shall provide a trail connection bet\veen Crossings
Boule":ard and Southbridgo Park\vay sidewalks_along the proposed
internal street, to be built at the time of the street construction.
tl. Screening elements shall not be allowed within drainage and utility
easements adjacent to Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
P. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit prior to any additional land
..----- disturbing activity.
Q. The soils on site shall be subject to sampling and testing at the City's
discretion. The cost associated with the testing, ~nd if necessary, the
removal of any material deemed unacceptable by the City shall be the
applicant's responsibility.
R. The applicant shall provide storm water computations for the proposed
site development as required by City Engineering to insure the
downstream system can accommodate the runoff.
S. The applicant shall ensure that the emergency access from Crossings
Boulevard to Southbridge Parkwav be well maintained and accessible
at all times. work with City staff to provide an emergency acoess from
the end of Fescue Court to tho site.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following
cOl!ditions shall apply;
....".............. ......" ...................... ........... .... .. ................ .............. .
A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access
will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit
application(s).
B. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any
required or desired noise or dust mitigation measures.
C. Shall provide electronic (Auto CAD) files ofthe Final Plat to the
Engineering Department.
D. The applicant shall meet the screening and landscaping ordinance
requirements of the City Code.
E. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for review and approval
by the City of Shakopee Natural Resource Specialist.
F. The applicant shall provide six (6) inches of topsoil below areas to be
sodded. The soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil
borrow requirements.
G. The applicant shall provide rain sensors for any irrigation system.
H. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices
for erosion control and stormwater management during construction.
I. The applicant shall utilize the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in
Urban Areas as a technical reference for erosion control.
J. The applicant shall comply with the design and performance standards
for the Planned Residential District (pRD). .
K. Silt fence and/or tree protection fence is to be removed following
establishment of vegetation as determined by an inspection by City
staff.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the
Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions as presented by staff.
2. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the
Preliminary Plat subject to revised conditions.
3. Offer a motion to continue the public hearing to request additional
information from the applicant and/or staff. .
4. Offer a motion to table a decision and request additional information from the
applicant andlor staff.
5. Offer a motion to recommend denial to the City Council offue Preliminary
Plat.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary Plat of
Southbridge Fields subject to the conditions as presented by staff, and move its adoption.
~~
M~k Noble .
Planner I
g:\boaa-pc\2006\O 1-05\prplatsouthbridge fields 05 I 19.doc
. .... ............ ...... n... . ...... ..............
..
S-Kt-I. e.,.. ~'
It RtB
R1B AG
- -
"'1~lJ;.
---~'f::.--
IIIfIII!;;.II .. _ SubJeot Property
SHAKOPEE ' r:y ....,/' Shakopee. Boundary
COMMUNttYl'IUtlUSlNCl1 lSn' S c:J ZonIng Boundary
CJ Parcel Boundary
,Preliminary Plat and Final ~Iat of
Sout~bridge .F.ields
Ek+\ '6'''- c:.
, .~ "&.
City of Shakopee
, . Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Joe Swentek, Proj ect Engineer
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat - Southbridge Fields
PID NO.: 27-379021-0
CASE NO.: 05119
DATE: December 1, 2005
The application indicates a Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat request for a commercial
development to be located in Outlot B of the Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
'After reviewing the above referenced application, we have the following comments for the
applic8l1-t and the planning department:
General
1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for
public improvements within the plat and the engineering review fees.
2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges ~hall be made, as required by the most current
City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment
Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. Public sanitary sewer, public stann sewer and public watermain have been extended
through the site. The applicant shall work with City of Shakopee staff to provide
acceptable access to each system and their associated appurtenances. This includes
providing ,adequate. easements and entering into an encroachment agreement with the
City.
5. The applicant shall provide a .more. defined site plan showing impervious surface
percentages complying with the requirements set forth by City Code.
6. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer shall be private. The applicant shall provide
suitable easements for access to all adjacent properties utilizing the private sewer system.
The easements shall be approved by the City prior to recording of the plat. Maintenance
of these utilities shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
C:\Docurnents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Ternporary internet Files\OLK9\Prelim.Final.Plat.Review.Southbridge.Fields.doc
Page 1 of2
tKH'.'T Co.
1._ 'L
7. Screening elements shall not be al10wed within drainage and utility easements adjacent to
Riverside Fields 3rd Addition.
8. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit prior to any additional land disturbing
activity.
9. The soils on site shall be subject to sampling and testing at the City's discretion. The cost
associated with the testing, and if necessary, the removal of any material deemed
unacceptable by the City shall be the applicant's responsibility.
10. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the engineering department.
PreIiminarvlFinal Plat
1. The applicant shall work with City staff to provide an emergency access from the end of
Fescue Circle to the site.
2. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer.
3. Simultaneous to thf:l r~cording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on properly
lines as designated by the City.
The, Deed Restriction shall appear as th,e following:
Tbis conveyance is made 'conditioned upon and subject to the following restriction. The
Grantee, heirs, successors and assigns, are restricted from erecting any fence or other
structure within the utility and drainage easements dedicated by plat over the above.
described property, except with the prior written consent of the City of Shakopee. This
restriction shall run in favor of and be enfor~eable by the City of Shakopee.
Storm Water Manaeement Plan
The applicant shall provide stonn water computations for the proposed site to insure the
downstream system can accommodate the runoff.
Recommendation
Engineering staff recommends approval subject to the comments listed above being addressed by
the applicant prior to recording of the Final Plat.
C:\Documents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK9\Prelim.FinaI.Plat.Review.Southbridge.Fields.doc
Page 2 of2
ND~-23~2~05 ~9:2e 5HAKDPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES
."" - ......~........... ".....~.. .........._".n .... ..._. .. .................. .. " .....,..........-. .', .......-....... "'.. .. ..........-."'................- .,....-............. ...... ..... u ........eJC'~'ti,,..u.D.u. u:.u
"
..
SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Shakopee Community Development Department
FROM: Joseph D. Adams, Planning and Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: STAFF REVIEW RECORD COMMENTS for:
Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Southbrldge Fields
CASE NO: 05119
DATE: 11/22/05
COMMENTS:
Municipal water service is available subject to our standard terms and conditions. These
,include, but are not limIted to: installing a lateral water main distribution system in
accordance with utility policy, paying the associated insp~ctions costs, paying the Trunk
Water Charge, and paying the Water .connection Charge. .
Underground electric service is available subject to our standard texms and conditions.
These include, but are not limited to: entering into an Underground ))istributio~
Agreement, granting any necessary easements, and paying the associated fees,
Street Lighting installation is available subject to our standard tenns and conditions.
These are contained in the current City of Shakopee Street Lighting Policy. Applicant
must pay the associated fees.
Applioant should contact Shakopee PublioUti1i~ies directly for specific requirements
relating to their project.
Note: Watennain plans under review. ,Shakopee Public Utilities to provide
comments directly to project engineer for developer. Easements do not
appear to match proposed alignment of water main. Adequate easements for
watermain shall be required. Not all lots have water services sbown. .
.
.
"
.... ......... .. ... .............-..... ..... .. ....... ......" ..........
....... .... .......
EtcK\~n-1E.'
"
CITY OF SHAKOPEE "
Memorandum
To: Mark Noble, Project Manager
From: Andrea Weber, Parks and Recr~ati6n Landscape Design
Subject: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Southbridge Filelds
Date: November 23,2005
INTRODUCTION
The following are comments ~egarding the application by Shakopee Crpssings for the
Preliminary and Final Plat of S outhbridge Fields, Outlot B Riverside Fields, 3 rd Addition.
DISCUSSION- Parks and trails
The applicant is requesting that park dedication be made at the time of the issuance of
building permits. .Since the park development needs for Riverside fields PRD, which this
application is a part of, are pressing, and the park to serve this PRD has not yet been
developed, and would rely on Park Reserve funding, I believe that this fee dedication is
needed at the time of platting. Second, since there is no guarantee that the lots would be
sold or that building permits would be issued prior to the timefi:ame for the park '
development, I believe that this fee dedication is needed at the time of platting.
In addition, the applicant stated in the application that there would be no sidewalks or
trails in this development. I would strongly state that a trail and or. sidewalk connection
between Crossings Boulevard and future CR 21 is mGHL Y NEEDED. There is no
county trail along CR 18 at this location. This neighborhood commercial area is a link
between two residential areas with sidewalks and trails which are . heaVily used. Future.
CR 21 is expected to have sidewalks and trails as per their .standard policy. Including an
internal sidewalk or trail would benefit all proposed commercial uses by allowing for
pedestrian access to their sites. Leaving out this connection would certainly cause
, unplanned trails to be created by pedestrians; which is not a desired condition for
aesthetics, safety, and erosion control. An alternative to this request is for the developer to
put in a trail along CR 18, but I think an internal walkway will serve the needs of the area
better if it were connected to the commercial site and would be safer and more appealing
for residents use.
STAFF COMMENTS
1. Staff recommends that the applicant provide Park Dedication Fees at the time of this
plat application.
2. Staff also recommends that the applicant provide a trail connection between Crossings.
Boulevard and Southbridge Parkway along the proposed ititernal street, to be built at the
time of the street construction.
f\C+-t , &,,.. F
1
(
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mark Noble, Project Manager
From: Ryan Hughes, Natural Resource SpeciaHst
Date: November 21, 2005
Subject: , Outlot 8, Riverside Fields '3rd Addition
Based on a review of the application materials the following are conditions for the above
mentioned CUP:
1. The applicant shal!' meet the screening and landscaping orcfinance ,requirements. .
2. The applicant submit an approved landscaping plan.
3. The applicant provide 6 inches of topsoil below areas to be sodded. The soil
composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements.
4. The applicant provide ra,in sensors for any irrigation system.
5. The applicant implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control
and stormwater management during construction.
6. The applicant adhere to all MPCA NPDES requirements.
7. The applicant utilize the, MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas as a
technical reference for erosion control.
8. The applicant comply with the design standards for Planned Residential District
(PRO):
9. Silt fence and/or tree protection fence is to be removed following establishment of
, vegetation as determined by an inspection by City Staff.
ek"~, C!>IT' GIt
I .f '3
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Julie Klima, Planner 11
FROM: Judith S. Cox, City Cler~
SUBJECT: . Southbridge Fields Addition
DATE: November 28, 2005
1. The legal description of the parpel being platted is not "Outlot B, Southbridge
,. Fields Addition" as indicated on the drawing. It'is actually Outlot B of
Riverside Fields 3rdAddition." ,
. 2. There is a temporary emergency access easement upon which there should be
no building permits issued until the 2nd access is constructed to the west along
Crossings Boulevard. See attached. .
3. The drawing shows an easement for roadway purposes in :some locations and
in some locations it states "Easement for road purposes per document No. ___cc
It is unclear whether there will be an easement document recorded prlorto the
plat or whether the easement for roadway purposes will actually be depicted
on the plat. It would be clearer for the public if it were actually depicted on
the plat.
4. Why not title the plat as Southbridge Crossings 4th Addition, consistent with
adjacent commercial property to the northwest, or Riverside Fields 5th,
consistent with the name of property to the west and south, as opposed to
introducing a new plat name so similar to another plat name???
5. Signature block for city appears to be in ordeJ;'. .
6. Is the roadway to be public or private? Ifit is to be public, there is no cuI-de-
sac at the end of the road for a snowplow to turn around.
"- "
" " (,
1,,">" t:~<;;" .:. ,. -- ...
" d;<." \,..'.(~;) . f.. ,A~r;;"
" ~. .~\ '4>'<* -2'/
~ " ~...,' " t.,)' I'
"\::> '0. \ r;,."
B " Ol ~ ~"/
-:z: " .~.:, v
. is " of
: a ~~1'" "-
.,)
,~;I" ..'. / ;'
,.0;) .cl:J' ,. ;'
I:;~ ~\'~ / ,.
1.(,," > (',i ,. (.
,.,{.).J .c, (' ,."
,~<<.- ,.../3., . / \
"tf,," c(~. / \ .4
,r.i ,~, ;'
;) (~(" / !,.') \ t1
// ty \ (-<,
// . .<.. \ d~ 1.1."'>
\ !,.')l .f.
,./. . '.~ \ . {~~
.../ .,' '':) \.....
'" .~ 0 ,~ \ .. ....:.,..
....'" ,0'.' '. ' \... ......... ~ ,,.,-'
...,~".~\S\ c.\o1IUI'
'" ~- ". ~ - ,ot
.... . -' (.i ,'" , ,...!Z
..../ ~~:r' , ".1""\'..... .-
......../ . ,.dt~ ~ .........
.... .~..' '" ( ~~
............ .,r,; ("oJ \ 1.1) I.i\.
~ \ <'3~
,A.. >("
.c >(" . L') \ (~')
','
,-'.. f \..~
r" 'I'" . ~{t
....' .' \
r.)' ~
ClJ \.
~l~ \
1.1\' \
':> c.') \
rJ r/~ \
'... . 't,
"
C;> ------
~"...
(l.-
.
..
"
'-<......
;,.."... ~! ~.lplfll:l ~ 'I . Ii
t"-' ,)1 JJ~'il!iUjiI1 i :11,1,
"ll=JJjSl!! Jjl 'flljii
If I i:!Jl!IlI!i~!n' i' 'I.il
Jr! ~IIJr'!lfl,'f/i · /'1 III
, I! ....:JiJlf1(n I Ill!' 1
;1 "nflmln~J p ! filii: j ,~
"
~II~~U IJlt5l1 J I " r~ 11
1\. . ' 41 'III:I:'~Jl~.i 11 " II: I
1 J ""1f~rl'AJI fe, 'J I ~~ J
!II I~I~llllflJiifli ~ I II/Ifl
't". ' yh
. '
" .:s.'"
(I" .
, 1- -z,
'-' ....a. , ti , ~-'C -a .
.
.
.-.- ..--..:-.------ ---=-- -------
---.--------... . .- ... .. .- -.---....
.... ...
tit
" ~
0
I- ~
-
Q
'"
-
J
).
U!
,
:- 4 "= I
6" Cl5 AGGR~'IE
ACCESS ROAD
(lYPICAl SEC1I~ I'/OT TO SCALE)
E:Z: -....c: .
l:::::l-.1 r
- ...... II .....
..
,
-
. '4' EMERGENCY \/FHIClE ACCESS
PI.~ ---
---..-..-........... ~
)..~..... -....Pom.. ~- =:~~... ~ - w IUVERSIJ)E FIEl.DS "lli At>omON
.......~..'"" . CENTEX HOMES I
. ~,-~ ,.......-.- .......A.'-....~...:= .........._ ____ ..... - ACCESS ROAD EXHIBIT $lIulOPU. MtffM:J01,.,
. ..... ~
- .
-
.
._.................._.......m. __.._.......... ........,.......__............_~....,......_"'....#...~.......__.."......... ............... ..... ........... . -...... ...... .....,-.-......... ..... ..~. ........-.-.."..............:..-.. .....,. ~.. .
1 "".....,,"" SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVIS/O.N
Scott HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ,600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST 'JORDAN, MN 55352-
9339
(952) 496-8346 . Fax: (952) 496-8365 'www.co.scott,mn.us
LEZLlE A. VERMILLION
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
December 7, 200S
Mark Noble
City of Shakopee
129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379 .
RE: Preliminary Plat, Southbridge Fields Addition
CSAH 18 and future CSAH 21
Dear Mark:
We have reviewed the request for a preliminary plat and offer the following comments:
. As you are aware the County ism the process of an EIS for the future CSAH 21 extension. One
of the concepts identified in the EIS is for an interchange at the CSAH 21 and CSAH 18
intersection: The interchange concept shows a need for a ramp over Lot 6 of Block 1. If
development does occur on this lot it could be impacted, anywhere from minor grading to total
take, in the future.
. The proposed four and.six..lane concepts in the EIS for CSAH 21 show the need to grade into
Outlot A and Lot 6, Block 1. We do not recommend any landscaping to be located adj acent to
the CSAH 21 corridor until after construction of CSAH 21.
. There is an existing drainage and utility easement adjacent to CSAH 21 on Lot 6, Block 1, for
stromwater in the area. We recommend the drainage and utility easement is widened to a
minimum of25 feet instead of the existing 20. .
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me.
Sincerely,
~~
Craig Jenson
Transportation Planner
.
. e e
.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mark Noble, Project Manager
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Date: December 8, 2005
Subject: Preliminary and Final Plat of Southbridge Fields
INTRODUCTION
lam writing to provide. comments related to park dedication for the South bridge Fields
preliminary and final plat.
DISCUSSION
South bridge Fields preliminary and final plat is for a 10 acre commercial parcel. Based
on the criteria established for the Riverside Fields PRD and First Addition plats, the City
intended to require cash in lieu of land for this parcel at the time it was platted.
City Code Section 12.34, Subd. 2.K. and 2.0. states that:
In lieu of park land dedication, the City may require an equivalent cash
dedication based upon the average fair market value of undeveloped land
that is, or under the City's adopted comprehensive plan, may be served
by municipal sanitary sewer and water service. The cash dedication
requirement shall be established annually by the City Council.
Park and trail cash contributions are to be calculated based on the fees in
place at the time of the final plat approval.
The City's adopted 2005 Fee Schedule, park dedication for commercial property is
$6,277/acre, for a total park dedication of 10 acres X $6,277/acre = $62,770. If the final
plat is not approved by December 31,2005, park dedication would be calculated based
on the fee in place at that time. (The City Council has not adopted 2006 fees yet.)
City Code Section 12.34, Subd. 2.T. states that:
Required land dedication and/or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication
shall be required at the time of recording the final plat.
Therefore, Park Dedication fees are payable at time of recording the final plat.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION
a. The applicant shall meet park dedication requirements by providing a cash
contribution in the amount of $62,770, provided that the Final Plat is approved by
City Council on or before December 31,2005. If the Final Plat is approved after this
date, Park Dedication shall be calculated based on the fee in place at the time of
approval.
...._.._...... .___""h'-.__.""'" .... ........ . . ...........---...-.....-..... . ......_...._.-_...._...".~------_..-_....~.... ". ...........'. ...
January 3, 2006
Mr. Mark Noble
mnoble@ci.shakopee.mn.tls
Re: Riverfields/ Centex Homes
Commercial Development
Southbridge Fields
Dear Mark:
I'm writing to express concern about the commercial development next to the Centex Homes. My
issue is not with the development, but with the type of usage that is proposed
As we have discussed, I'm opposed to the use of a fast food unit. I don't know what is planned, but
a fast food unit direcdy behind the homes is wrong. When we signed up. for the home, we were led
to believe that light commercial, such as bank offices, etc., would be built.
If fast food is in fact the proposed use, I would urge the developer to think about its placement. We
are concerned about noise pollution screening, light pollution, etc., all items you and I have talked
about.
I can't make it to the planning meeting on the 5th, thus I am. writing to express my concern about
usage.
ale R. Everson
1761 Fescue Court
Shakopee, MN 55379
deverson@mmrs.com
DRE/jk
....,,-
.~ ~~'-',','",,__'--""--''''~-'''-___._=_ . _-.____ ----=,~~______,__~_."..H. -'-'__E~- t~,]:._...;.~_'___#~'2..'__~=""'H
0.2004 RlJ(-Kw.lllto, LTD. . J~i~ !g. i
. Prelil71inary Plat ~o~;J. Shakopee Crossing,LP o,,;J . .PropC?,sed . . fj/l:' ~
" " ,Southbridge FIelds AddItion il r:~ i
Shakopee, Minnesota illiit :
, ~
, 3
. i
, NO~ I i
}os of 9/12/05 prellm!lxlry, grading of tna rood .on fila lIert d A If. .,.ro 18 I 'C ~ ~i
illeS. '1'10' uncltt' w~y. Sit, may bo ll!1<llll'vmlous stGllllS of C w. . . J Y I . tl
cc!llltnt~on lit th/:r tTmlr. '. ~ .
~ ~ J
. .
..
it
, J
// / a ,
!i c:l
{fIt g
~l'" !
.r !..
. .toE
'&~.
b 1 I' =-::3;
.t ..1 ~e ~e!j ~
'. m~~
( flil
~
tn
Z
o
.. Ii)
. ~
0::
a./r
...J::IOJ
enOl'-
~Ol")
Z wit)
_"It)
l:J<z
O-:::E
'0:: 0::
o~ .
1I.I0~
11.I90
- &O~
DesIgn.... engineer f.38 C1cres :Ie .....
&: SUl:Ve)'Or; < 0 ~
RI.J( - Kuu.Jrio. Ltd. J: ""
6110 Blue Circle Drift V1 ....
~ SURfACES l:1ilt&i..!il'....~ Mfnneton~ll, I./lnnO$Ow 5534J OJ
Tel. (952) 933-097.2
ATJNi Kurt j(J.cll ~ MunlclpolJty. Shokopee
OUTLOT A . Proposed UtlllUost
. CONCRE11!: SllRf'ACI: DESCRIPTION, ~:::; t'mng Rc *"S"'-~' .cYrIl ~cn.-
Outlot 9, R/YeilSIDE Aaos 3JlD ADDl11ot1, Scott County. MTnnesOto. A__ .... < <C
. '" "" ....mmary. ,... -1
Porcel NfIZ - 432,832 .q. 11. ct' 9.94 ocres ~VICINITY MAP~~~~ u: ~ a.
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION Zoning: . , NOT TO SCl.lE Zld
. ! COUNTl' _1& '01 W ~
Lots 1-5 OIld OuUot A. SOUTHIlRlDGE: FIELDS ADDmO/l. Seo It -ExIstIng Zo ~rng: PRO (Plonned Resldentlol Dlslrk:t) ~--:l C) i!!O ~
:!! County. Minnesota.. CUrrent use: Y<<ont 0 ::& <
1 . . ~. LEGEND Ptopo.e.d us= CommercTol /lORlH NE: 1/4 I 0:: ~ ~
, i ~7 ~ Satbacks: (See 51> 9\llder.,e.s) : . I OJ 0 ~
a '\"i . - IRClH IIC1NUIlOO' FCU<<l 'is',, WAtER &lAHIW! F'ront yard: SO feet ~ '~ ~ ...J
i ..;:% 0 .. SmTAA'f SEIlElIlIAHHOLE 'il' " WATfR CUllS SlOP Rear ~ord: 40 'eat __ " _. g ~ w
~ .... ILCl -9><- H'tll1WlT If .. lliUPHCl1ll: BOX SFde )CII'd: ~o 'eat 0 _ 0::
'I 10@. 72 ';:0 \. ~_ FOlJ!IO Sl'1lCt 0'.. $TOlUl SE'I1l!ll .wtIClE: RelIr & Sld. )'01'<:1: 50 feet trom any residential zone "'-.~& 9 a.
~ -.. . 'Ol"W 1IH e...9" CATClI BASH ' I ,,' "VI
~ N40 'Sir " 0 .. 'laEI'HOlitt IWlllOU: H .. GA'lt VN.:Vr. MInimum Bulcllng Height: 35 feet BENCHMA1lK LW 1/l' Se: 1/4 I
j m-J:.~~od ~~~gt\od '_<~: =~0lI W" CABl!lEL!\ISICI/ sox MInImum Lot \\ldlll: 1-4Q feel frOIl\ ..!bock to se!bao!<. ~J!acr;::U1:1 ~>:':i)tl)'li'tlnt located on th. north slde of 'F"T I
g . .... em.. .. $TOflIIllI:fIElI ~ .. SEClRIC 1WlH0l! MinImum Lot \\ldth: 150 feet per City Ordlnonce Crossfngs Blvd. 130 feet:/: northeest or P..memlll'J Lane ---1
[t . ... - - - -- =nH<1 ~ cctmUll fi - CAS.Mm:R MInimum Lot Dq>th: 2Sll.1> f...t SaY.- 765.5S feet. per Pioneer EngIneering -- -- :::i U'l
~l : I --" Dm1IlG to' CONlOUR l8l- a!C1m'llWlSFORllElt80X J.lIhlmum lot Depth: 200 f..t per CIty ord'II"'llce ' NW 1/+ "'1'- '"'E "'~
~~ . _ Ue-- UIIDERGRClIHll elM 0 1lW1'1C 5n:lI.Il. Site b....cI1mor1c: SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 115. f:j, IS ,<ell
8 \ . '" - Lot summo~ '!<1M I'D/I' #20 RANGe: 22 ; 0 "'-
Ifl - Ut -- UHDERCllQUIQ EI.ECll1IC " .. WATtIl POST IHllICA'IQl\ VAl.~ Number of lots: S Ccmmerclol Elevation.. 76S.35 feet scorr COUNTY. MINNESOTA. C'o/...~ 5!
;;! I OIlUot At. ahovm hereon.
02004 RLK-KIIUS!sfo, L111.
Cell 48' .. before digging i!iiii ~!! I i
GOPh STATE ONE CALL :!fflf lij ii
C.S.A.H. NO. 18 Twfn C/Ues He<! 651-45+-0002 is=; ii~ J:
t.lH. Toll F'ree 2-800-252-2168 = i e.e.~.j
i5Ji i
J..: -
. ".
1Up1ll1lP"''''/ ~ g
...
.!l
__________1 1________:...______ . r!11,. . 1/ . ~
",' ..,...... ---.-----------....--- -------------------.....--.--..,. ---------------------------------j ~ : I ii
'" _ _ _ I - - - - - :;:::::.>'! r _ _ _ -. _ -. .1' ,.- -___.______________ ..., I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ' .
",/.. r l I r, )!~!~~_~~~~_ I I ~P!~~-~~~~~~ If 1 I r ~ II I r.:------------------c:--------------------:::-:;;?. I f Ii .. (~ )1
" .< ! I I I r-----------1.. I , l r-------... _J I II I I I BU!LOlNG SElBACK~ · I I "l BUILDING SEmAac-/ . '. I I ; ..
/ / "-sUILOINO SEiBACK f I , I' I! I i r---' : / /: tr-c n . I I I I I TURE CURB \ If';
" ~_------~------~--__ 1 / I~' I I' I I' I ' , I II ,: I ' I I J I' Ii I ,------------------;. ,.---..-, . \ I I . ..
~,.""...r . . ......" I J I I It: I : : : I I: ...tI FU11JRE. <-' I f ( II l r--- ,I I "'-"1: ' . =
p"/ TURE CURB I' I I 'I FUTURE I (t I I I I I I 'I I' I . OE\'ElOFME'1lT I I (' ,'\, ,.--------." " ,,' : ..
r. ....------------- '\ k:J I I · · 'f , · II.. I · ' '" I I ...
. :i;' / ,,'. ", \1 . I DEVELOI'MENT , I I" . , I' 1/ II/,- - - - - , II II' I, I I I' " : I 'I '
",,' , . r I I r 'f .. , 1ft I I I .' I
(l,' __ ,I J' 1 ': "I I: I OFFIce I I III 1'1 ,,----------------.----- II I' III " , : : GAS: II I > ..I.
I r""1 ~___, I I I I . I I' , . , / I l \ 'I I: . I J I I I I I !I ,,,-:5 c
I !( r--- BANK --1 I .',' I I! OFFICE I 1 I /! I LOT 4 I I I II 'I I '1/ { ,-----, ! " P r! ,W- 1 Ie-STOREl! jpuMPsl I f il.4 ~
/ '[ ..--------1 LOT 6 I I ' · LOT 5 ' I M' · I I' . ,I I, · ., I , II /' II · 'lOT 2 I ' "I ~1l5 ...
II:. """ I I: I' I I " I I ',I II I .: r-------.....-----., " " I: ,:I I I , : I I J', I In k
, J I, , , I I "I ' I I' I" '^'" I I" II · ' --a" .. " ·
/ : I II : . I I I .{ I': FUTURE: I I II' , I F,...., T FOOD II II II : I · I I:' : , " ; of, d .
IV i~ u I. 1,' I 'I I: I I' IDEVELOFJ.(EXrl~ I 1,',':1 \ I " LOT 3 II I i' I: 1:1 .I! -, FUTURE I " I III Iilt5~ %
I .~---E: FUTURE ~ I " 'I I: II " I, 'I ,II'''' " "OE..'''OPJ.(.....T.' ,I 'li.1!-'ll= c.l
" , I . I ,) I' . , . II /I '-,' I I II I IL~_.,J ~-----._-.. L_.:~ ..., I I I" I ..::l
It ,~_E~e!:~!!l_T__~ l, , f: TURE CURB J I I ~~ [-----_.. , 'II II I " -_~.J.-----_-__.._-_-.1.. I 'I I, I: I '---------~------- ..?.J ,..L I .. ;l"U "
'I' , I I ' I , 'I i~TURtCURBI "1/' _ ,..~-, II,' -~ , , _io!_ l:I I
11 I r---------,. I, ( I I l.l t:= -- _...::;-0 _ : , 'I /1 I - - - - I I I I I [.J UTURE aJllS I. I~{gf I giE: U
I I I I L___ ' L_______=~-' -; ,I --_"::':.,-1",-- ,___J I '. I II - - - - - - - - - - I. 1 ..r 'is ~
h \_J' t11,' --b.-.J..----- y -,~ .";.",,. ---::r--::f::J /1..-(.---------_. TURECURB,____.~.. I J.....--....-=====-=--===~.----i""'=,...::L:.... --W I . ~.iiii ~
, ---::.J __- - -.- _ . , .'. y, '""" _ J I --.f I 1..-. I " I, , ,- --...J I ' 5"'1:111. .c
I '" __ __ . l ,,, -. 'l(;! _.' =~. . ~~ ~~, ~ \ --_ "-- I I '\ .;'. ~ . ~~ " ... ~t (."'" __1-....... u1:j5 a.
I '., __ " .,~ ". ~-,'. . -.. ",.. ----I-- ' '. \. ',' . r:ta"''''''' >' ___J>"li~;;;;., .. -..2
,_ _ _ I' " ~ '", " , _ -~----:-=:::::.--~---' . ,- . ., - -~~, -=."0 .. I.s
r- -=- ----------.-----__.. '._.. gR;" !, .' ----_- ') i}i!, ,- " ' . '" . - . "'- ',',. ' .l!.il- ~ !<
\. _--- ,;:..,,_ws,l, .. _ .,; ,,' '''''.. ---'::::-:--.,. ,,'I/J'-, . - I " - .. ' _Eo! 6 co
'-_---- __- .______~ -- i!!'-!_;,;' . -...... . - "'-4--:--------,'---"<.--........----..... . '
..""", rr..... --- - --s;: -.:.r-'- ...,.".,. ",.::........ . "Ii II<
.. ,..,_~.. \', ,,'" ""'. '..-. '. -... .....".....,... IE I!!
.~ . . \ "",' \ '\: '" I. r-- I
./ I I, ' II " '~ ". y ~ '" \ TURE CURB ) I / f ~ 8 B
/ /" , ''" '.' . " " ( I I, t; ii '" '"
~ ,..... ~ ' . , . II PI ill U
~/ .) " /. .' ~. . .'~~\ . ~ D~~NT "l.~) I /! i I : ~ : ~: ~:
1 ..If JI ,,\ / .~ . \ n::,..... " '~. <o~ .. '. "<2 I 1,.' ;. ; i ii i i i i
-.. ~". , / / -. " ~~.. " /" . .. .. . . ,
I .-" . / '" ~ \ '. ;' ..' ,'-', I II ,'. l11111il
.... . 1 ..... '~ .. '." .. ' .. . .. . . .
I ". , ',"-__J I 1,' 1 iflliiii
. . . 'I ,,,./ /" , ! : : : : : : :
./ " ..., ,I . 1 :: ;; : :;
. . ' " C'. '1 : : : : : : : ;
'Y -./ / lit \. L. /' /"" '~IlDINC <$!riACK.--I l . f : i ! i'i' i i i i
I . '/t' V -( / \..;, ,'J / il':':;:;;
\ \\. <, / I VIi i i ill 1 1
__ ,\. ~ '/ Z' . . .. . . .
I -- V 1-- __ . /"" ~ I \\\/1 I I, ,} I 011 i if i f 1
-r / -- ....\.1 /1 \ l 1/ oS, . In, 1 : : : 1 ; :
) -- -( (\' ~ -- / /" . .,.. . . .. . . .
-- . ./ \' ~ , , .....: : : :, : : :
",- \ 1 /" . .............
/ " ,/"');- _ -f f. /~.../. I fP.\:\. :;ll:~ <<~;~Hijj
,/'" ". ~ ~ . ~ ~ D ,. .o~
. . . ~ . .~O~
'/': @ ~ lJJ It)
;/ ;/ \ \\-- //i\ A ~o" j.. ~~~
. /\ '\ ,;?-..7 \~Pr. (..)~LJ
/' . /. /- ~ wOl:e
/' ,/ , ~ woo
/' '\ /~ h a..::J~
, ~,' SITE NOTES ~ 0<(
, .. ..'" . <toX
,.,/" SITE NOTES . .~ CONffiACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS J: r-. Vl
, . ~ OF EXISTING .uTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC rEA TURES PRIOR TO en ....
THE sm: PLAN SUGGESTS BUILDING AND USES FOR EACH LOT. .' / lHE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR OJ
THESE ARE FOR REFFERANCES ONLY, E"ACH LOT Y1lLL BE V.. . SH AU. 'MMEDlATELY NOTIfY THE ENGINEER Of' DISCREPANCIES'
SU8MITTED TO THE CITY FOR FORMAL SliE PLAN REVIEW BASED . OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.
UPON MARKET CONDITIONS. . Z
/ ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOI'tN TO THE F' ACE OF CURB UNLESS en :5
. OTHERI'c1SE NOTED. 9 ,.( a..
" / ALL CURS AND GUTTER TO BE 8612 UNJ.ESS OTHERWISE NOlED. ~ i t=!
I '\ LOTS WlLL BE DEVELOPED ON AN INDIVIDUAl. BASIS IN THE W i en
~ FUTURE. g 3 -l
~ PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED P.R.D. (2. ~ :3
a m 0 ~
I ~ F~ fu
_ ::> ~ 0
f ~~. '.. LEGEND PROPOSED EXtSTlNG ~ 6
~ ~IYI.IC - - - (..)
~ tA!alDl1 I.IC .-------- ---------
I~ st'l!lJDC I.IC - - - - - - - - - -
d 0 50 100 c:DIlDlLfl! - - - - - - ."~ U'l
1& · I 0JAll1.IC ..." ..1/'1 ...~
"j SCALE IN FEET SIQl .". . .. ."" p......... ~:g g!!!
~! IIlU1NlOUSPAl(1,lO{1 I~~~ ~,., 8:8 a
&~ N -
SOUTHBRIDGE FI ELDS ADDITION
/
/ "
/ "00 "
/ t, ~
.-, " # ~
f'
/ .-, . ,... , t ',--r....,......',-.... r- -
, , I I-r" I I' 1-- I-r" -. II '----
' - , , , . ....- , , ........,L......
..,...... '----
,
/ (-, of" e '----
>, 'v' ,'~.
I" ~ f '----
/ r" .";) ~ ,-.
(~( ,) ~co'~ ";)01;> '- ;-,
.. ~ ~ . '-'" ~ ~
. ,{, ,
\ ' ~ i~~Ib~, S I ... , '----
/ ,., ~~ ~o/ ., ;v .
,\' ~ 1. ~ ~,. ,'I,' _, ~
.:\ ' cr ~ ~ to .:...
- '----
' , , -.
, " ,--,,--, r.... ,... ',:::r
_, I , 1-- I I I....... .............
I , ' , L..._ L. _ '-_ - -'
I ... '...'
',' <l S
"'b I..
.,
l
flI04' ,~ .t,,_ ". 1"'-' " -.- "
~~ ^' 'c:' 1.1 I I . I " H #
\,...-- "..., . r......... I "of
~
o~b. 0
0& ;::y I:~;:' / ~f~ .,~-~. ..J 7
.f: ;) t, ~"~ '-'
,0 ,
<;; ~4>
/l 0 ......
......----...... / c~:~~' ~ /" ',:. - ............... 'V ..a
I
I c;...;"" ... ,,\, A r.... r.... , -,- , " . I
I ........- / ~S <S'..... , I I II I I I II I I '\ I
I
I ~ - ',-,' , . ~;.9'Sl' ... -, L...... t...-' I I , ,... , y
I ........-
I .;-/ ~~
I ~ f (I, -
f So-- ....,. I:r ~ -2
I O),<y ,<.'7-- , '00
I h. r-
I p).C}) ....l., .. (~\
/ '". .o/~;>~.9, : ~Sf:) .....~I C'l\ ... \. .. / I
" :.r,,: ~ " '" ',:. y' ,\ I
tj '-- ,
, ,~> /' O;>.~_ ~ (\"'j\ /
'",'.- I " .
,",')' ~ /f/.. )"00 (,I ;(
C:::'. .......tI
V' I
,,( '-', 11"0. ..> I
,-~- t, . ~.9' ':.?
. '\ -',' / 11"<9" , /
- \ ,~- '~. ~ ~ ,
..'I, 1-. .. . . ' ,,/ , ,
rio," ... t c... I'..;' (-,
- c;:;:Z' I / '-~:-'
- - -
I,,; '\I ".:l:l 1
~1I:: ~
VICINITY MAP /~~~
O'l~t..a
tiiOc::)
NOT TO SCAlE / ~O
~ NE --1/4!
DRAINAGE AND UnUlY ~
EASEMENlS ARE SHO'hN lHUS: For the purposes of this plat the most \Xl
Easterly line of Outlot B, RIVERSIDE FIElDS , .a1i~
NllRlH ,> ----1 \\ ~\\~
I I 5 THIRD ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota Is
~ r- assumed to beor S 44'30'OS" E z.~~~ 0 60 120
C) ~ O.
?~c~o U\ U\9t...l I ,
I I t.5 ~oO)
__t_J L_l__ ~.~O SCALE IN FEEf
o 1/2 Inch by 14 Inch iron monument set : SW 1/4: SE 1/4 : o ~ /'
~ ~ and marl<ed with Minnesota License No, 2396S. L__-L__~ U\
~
/ ~
beIng 5 feet In width. unres9. otherwise NW 1/4 RLK
'nd1i8t~f1~~~?,,~o~n\~:... o~:"'I:lng SECTION 1.3, TOWNSHIP 115, /\
Indicated adjoining rlght-ol-way line. RANGE 22 (XUUI!ilISTOLTDJ
as shown on thfs plot. SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. /"\..... "---/
RLK - Kuuslsto. Ltd.
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
-
/2. o. ,t J
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 05-079
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Julie Klima, Planner IT
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Reguide Property from Rural
Residential to Single Family Residential, Extend MUSA, and Rezone
Property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB)
Zone
MEETING DATE: January 17, 2006
REVIEW PERIOD: Applicant has extended the review period to March 1,2006
INTRODUCTION:
CJM Properties has made application to re-guide property from Rural Residential to Single
Family Residential, and to extend Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to that same
property. Additionally, they have requested that the property be rezoned from Rural Residential
(RR)Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
The property is located south of Hillwood Drive and east of County Road 79. The property is
approximately 4.5 acres in size. Please find attached to this report a copy ofa communication
from a neighboring property owner (Exhibit 1).
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission reviewed this application at its January 5, 2006 meeting. The
Commission recommended approval of the reguiding, MUSA extension request, and the
rezoning of property to Urban Residential (R-IB) by a 3-2 vote.
The Planning Commission staff report is attached for the Council's information. Attached to the
Planning Commission report, please find a copy of the concept plan proposed by the applicant for
this site. Resolution No. 6357, a resolution approving the reguiding and MUSA extension, and
Ordinance No. 745, an ordinance approving the rezoning, based on the Planning Commission's
recommendations, are attached for the Council's review and consideration.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIP:
This action supports Goal D "Vibrant, resilient, and stable", Strategy 11 "Ensure Range of
Housing".
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the request to extend MUSA to the subject property, to re-guide to single family
residential and to rezone the property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban
Residential (R-IB) Zone, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council.
2. Deny the request to extend MUSA to the subject property, to re-guide to single family
residential, and to rezone the property from Rural Residential (RR) to Single Family
Residential (R-IB) Zone.
3. Table the matter and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 6357, reguiding the property to single family residential
and extending MUSA to the property, and to approve Ordinance No. 745, rezoning the property to
Urban Residential (R-IB), (Alternative No.1), and move its adoption
i -
lL/~ W1MJ
lie Klima
lanner II
h:\cc\2006\0 1-17\cmpplmezcjm05079 .doc
RESOLUTION NO. 6357
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPROVING A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REGUIDE PROPERTY TO SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND TO EXTEND MUSA TO PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH
OF HILL WOOD DRIVE AND EAST OF COUNTY ROAD 79
WHEREAS, CJM Properties, applicant and property owner, has requested the guiding of
property to single family residential and the extension of MUSA to the property; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
Lot 1, Block 1, Beckrich Park Estates, Scott County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on July 7,2005, August 4,2005, and January 5,2006, at which time all
persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on January 17, 2006; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request:
GOAL #1
Growth and expansion of that portion of Shakopee served by public services shall be controlled and
focused to maintain the City's fiscal soundness consistent with other community-wide goals.
The subject property is in an area very near where the City has guided and approved sewered
development. To that extent, and when coupled with the developers obligation to pay the cost of
any sewer extension, the proposed expansion of public services will not have a negative impact on
the City of Shako pee s fiscal soundness.
GOAL #2
Any future annexation shall be undertaken in an orderly, fiscally sound manner. Property in
annexed areas shall be treated fairly relative to taxes and the provision of service.
Annexation is not applicable in this case.
Policies:
a. New areas will be added to MUSA only when that designation is consistent
with Goal #1 above.
The subject property can be added to MUSA because its addition is consistent with
Goal No.1.
b. Areas to be added to MUSA shall be located where utilities and community
facilities can be efficiently located or extended.
Sanitary sewer and water can efficiently be extended to the subject site from
property to the east.
c. Designation of MUSA areas will be timed to enhance the City's ability to plan
for, develop, and/or acquire new utilities and public facilities.
Sanitary sewer and water services could be extended as a part of this development.
Serving the subject site may be beneficial to other properties in the vicinity if and
when, the City requires or desires further extension of services.
d. The addition of new MUSA areas shall either be timed to coincide with the
availability of utilities and community facilities, or be coordinated with plans
to provided utilities and community facilities.
Sanitary sewer and water services could be extended as a part of this development.
Serving the subject site may be beneficial to other properties in the vicinity if and
when, the City requires or desires further extension of services.
e. The City will find that new MUSA areas will be suitable for development
within the timeframe being considered.
The subject site would be suitable for development within the timeframe being
considered.
f. Designation of new MUSA areas shall be undertaken to better react to the
marketplace and to serve the community as a whole.
The plan concept shared by the applicant seems to propose lot sizes, and by
extension likely housing values, that are larger than are typically seen in the Urban
Residential (R-IB) zoning district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan by
reguiding the property to single family residential and the extension of the MUSAboundary is
hereby approved:;
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota held this
day of ,2006.
Mayor of the City of Shako pee
Attest: ,
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
h:\cc\2006\O 1-17\cmpplnrezcjm05079 .doc
ORDINANCE NO. 739
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPROVING A REQUEST TO
REZONE PROPERTY FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) ZONE TO URBAN
RESIDENTIAL (R-1B) ZONE
WHEREAS, CJM Properties, applicant and property owner, has requested the rezoning
of property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as
Lot 1, Block 1, Beckrich Park Estates, Scott County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on July 7,2005, August 4, 200S, and January 5,2006, at which time all
persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that the property be rezoned to
Urban Residential (R-IB); and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on January 17, 2006; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Shakopee hereby'adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request:
Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place
that mandate the requested zoning classification.
Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred in that
development of single family residential uses have extended in the vicinity
of the subject site.
Finding #4 The requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan that has
been adopted by the City Council and submitted to the Metropolitan Council
for approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to rezone the property from Rural
Residential (RR)Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone is hereby approved.
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota held this
day of ,2006.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest: ,
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
h:\cc\2006\O 1-17\cmpplnrezcjm05079 .doc
CITY OF SHAKOPEE ~S-
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 05-079
TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II
SUBJECT: Reguiding of property to Single J<'amily, Extension of MUS A, and Zoning to Urban
Residential (R-IB)
MEETING DATE: January 5,2006
REVIEW PERIOD: Applicant has granted an extension of the review period until March I, 2006
INTRODUCTION
CJM Properties (Jim & Mike Monnens) has submitted applications for the reguiding of property from Rural
Residential to Single Family Residential, extension of MUS A, and rezoning to Urban Residential (R-IB)
zone. The property is located south of Hillwood Drive and east of CSAH 79 (see Exhibit A). The property
is approximately 4.4 acres in size.
DISCUSSION
The public hearing on this item was opened on July ih and at the applicants request, continued to August 4th
to allow time to work toward a resolution regarding the capacity issues with the Shakopee Chaska
Interceptor. At the August 4th meeting, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to January 5,
2006 with the applicants' consent. At that time, the Metropolitan Council indicated that a study of the
capacity of the Chaska-Shakopee Interceptor would be completed by the end of 2005. Since that time, the
Metropolitan Council has indicated that the study will actually be initiated in early 2006, however, the Met
Council has completed some preliminary research indicating that adequate capacity would exist to serve this
property .
The following Goals and Policies contain provisions for the granting of MUS A only if all of the
following circumstances are found to exist. Failure to comply with all goals and policies shall result in
the denial of the request.
GOAL #1:
Growth and expansion of that portion of Shako pee served by public services shall be controlled and
focused to maintain the City's fiscal soundness consistent with other community-wide goals.
GOAL #2:
Any future annexation shall be undertaken in an orderly, fiscally sound manner. Property in annexed
areas shall be treated fairly relative to taxes and the provision of service.
Policies:
a. New areas will be added to MUSA only when that designation is consistent with
Goal #1 above.
b. Areas to be added to MUSA shall be located where utilities and community
facilities can be efficiently located or extended.
c. Designation of MUSA areas will be timed to enhance the City's ability to plan for,
develop, and/or acquire new utilities and public facilities.
d. The addition of new MUSA areas shall either be timed to coincide with the
availability of utilities and community facilities, or be coordinated with plans to
provided utilities and community facilities.
e. The City will fmd that new MUSA areas will be suitable for development within
the timeframe being considered.
f. Designation of new MUSA areas shall be undertaken to better react to the
marketplace and to serve the community as a whole.
The subject site is located within the Phase II area for extension of urban services. Sanitary sewer
flow from this site would be handled by the Shakopee Chaska Interceptor. While sanitary sewer is
nearby, it has not been extended to serve this site.
The City's Comprehensive Plan sets basic policies to ~ide the development of the City. The purpose
of designating different areas for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses is to promote the
location of compatible land uses, as well as to prevent incompatible land uses from being located in
close proximity to one another. The Zoning Ordinance is one of the legal means by which the City
implements the Comprehensive Plan. Under Minnesota statute, zoning is to conform with a city's
comprehensive plan.
Copies of the land use plans and the Zoning Ordinance are available for viewing at City Hall and
will be made available at the January 5,2006, meeting.
Other staff were provided the opportunity to provide comments regarding this application. The City
Clerk has commented that approval of this request would result in spot zoning. However, because
the requested zoning is consistent with the proposed guiding for this area, this does not appear to be
a real concern. The Engineering Department has commented that due to the Comprehensive Plan
Update not being approved by Metropolitan Council that this application is premature and
recommends action not be taken until resolution with Met Council occurs. Because of Engineering
concerns, the draft findings below reflect these concerns and staff is not providing a clear
recommendation.
Staff has received comment from a concerned resident regarding this application. Communication
from the resident will be forthcoming to the Commission for their review.
FINDINGS
The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below with draft
findings for the Commission's consideration.
Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error;
Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place;
Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place that mandate
the requested zoning classification.
Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have
occurred; or
Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have not occurred in the immediate
vicinity of the subject site.
Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision.
Finding #4 The requested zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan that has been
adopted by the Metropolitan Council. However, the requested rezoning is consistent
with the guiding proposed in the draft Comprehensive Plan.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to extend
MUSA, reguide from Rural Residential to Single Family Residential and to rezone the
subject site to Urban Residential (R-IB), subject to approval by the Metropolitan
Council.
2. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the denial of the request to extend
MUSA, reguide from Rural Residential to Single Family Residential and to rezone the
subject site to Urban Residential (R-IB).
3. Offer a motion to continue the public hearing and request additional information from
the applicant and/or staff.
4. Offer a motion to table a decision and request additional information from the applicant
and/or staff.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion consistent with the wishes of the Commission, and move its adoption.
h:\boaa-pc\2005\08-04\reguiderezmusacjrn05079.doc
Shakopee - Location Maps Page 1 of 1
"G-)qftBFI.!t
(~ r:rn;"-''l AG
. r
~ N _ Subject Property
W.E
SHAKOPEE '5J ...... Shakopee Boundary
COM~ft1NIn'PRlDESINCE 1857 S r:=J Zoning Boundary
c=J Parcel Boundary
Camp Plan Amendement and
Rezoning from Rural Residential
(RR) to Single Family (RiB) and
MUSA Expansion
httn:/ / Q; s.lo ill s.om/shakonee/locationmao/mao.aso ?title=Como+Plan+ AmendemenHand+... OS/26/2005
CJM PROPERTIES l2XHtBfTB
PO Box 277
Shakopee, MN 55379
May 25,2005
City of Shako pee
129 Holmes St S.
Sbakopee, MN 55379
RE: Rezoning Request
Dear City ofShakopee Officials:
We are requesting MUSA extension and rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, Beckrich Park Estates (pill 271650010). We would like
the existing zoning ofRR Rural Residential to RIB Uroan Residential to accommodate a 7 lot subdivision.
The 4.4 acre lot is currently vacant Existing water and sewermains would be extended from AC.C. Second Addition
approximately 650 feet east of the proposed site. It is our understanding that Shakopee Public Utilities would like the
watermain extended through this parcel, which is one reason for developing the property at this time.
We believe the proposed 7 lot subdivision will blend in with the neighboring subdivisions. Although the potential for this lot
with an RIB zoning would be approximately 13 lots, we are only proposing 7 lots to help maintain the larger lot feeling of the
area.
This site was included in a rezoning and MUSA extension request by the Beckrich ParkEstates homeowners association in
Spring of2004. It is our understanding that this request was denied due to the large amount of MUS A area it would have
encompassed along with the potential for a lot splits within Beckrich Park Estates. We understand the difficulties the city faced
in approving the previous request, but believe this request is different for the following reasons:
1. The lot we are requesting rezoning on was not intended to be one single family lot The way it was originally laid out
and separated from Beckrich Park Estates made it ideal for subdivision.
2. Unlike many of the Beckrich Park Estates lots which could be split, the subdivision we are proposing could bave no
additional lot splits.
3. The proposed 7 lots on 4.4 acres appears to be an adequate density for MUSA extension when compared to other
MUSA extensions within the city.
We believe the proposed change is in cOnipliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The four criteria for amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance will be addressed below.
1. The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
2. Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
3. Significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred. Growth is occurring to
the west and the potential for utility extensions have made this parcel desirable for development
4. The comprehensive plan does not appear to require a different position.
Because at least one of the criteria has been met, we believe this application does constitute a change in the zoning map and
MUSA boundaty.
Sincerely,
CJM PROPERTIES
*/?~ ~~4cJ?HtN~
Jim Monnens Mike Monnens
Preliminary Layout for Rezoning and MUSA Extension Request
I I II I I EXISTING DRAINAGE I
& UTILITY EASEMENT
L__
~----Ir---- -------~~------~
I r--------ll' I r--------i r-----------7j, 1,------------1 I
I I : II I: I I /~ ~/ f I
I I I I ~ II , I UTILITY CONNECTIONS
I I III I " I 3 /; '/. I I TO EXISTING STUBS
I ~ I : 1 :r I: 2 I~ I 16,616 sq.ft. / '/, / f I APPROX. 650 FT EAST.
I 18,408 sq.ft. I I 17,571 sq.ft. 0.39 acres /j, / 4 I
I I 0.42 acres II II 0.40 acres I L _ - - - _ -.J~ II 36.515 sq. ft. I I ~~G(, ~'\
I I I I ) '/ I 0.68 acres , \)~~ ~~~
I L________J I I L________ - _ ~ <. I I :\\~\-{ ~~Cj ............\
<J) -- 77 ~ " I I ~~S:\~ ............\
I" L - ~ - - --1 L - - - - \ 16" WAlER"AlN FOR I "~......-'. /'
115 110 .~ \ SPUC MAINLINE LOOP I ............'
o ~ \ : '/-'/
z L\_ _____1-1 /-'
~ -. > 185 n /
0::: 115 110 ,-1 - - - - - -, -, /-, /
10 ~----lr--- /;' J In/,
o I r--------l\ I r------ '1 ~ :'.l'O<. / ,/) /
I I' ", ~\ / 5 " ,/ /
I I' :11: -1 \ . \ 33."",." / /' /' -<
I : I I 6 I \ \ 0.76 acres ,," /"
I 7 ,~ II/"" - . /" /" /7
I ~ I ' 'T I' 17...... ..fl. I~ . ,;a.OING \ \ / / /' /
- I 19,888 sq.ft. I I 0.40 acres I \,// /" \
I I 0.46 acres 'I I' . /) n /
I I I '-- -' ~ 'v/" /
I I I II I' _- - -- -I \ n / I 80 FT. I
I __J 1.----/ \
I L_----- J L---/ V-' /'
I L -- \;
-- ~
,- .,.. ^ "I C .~
/: \ 0 II E ~ I n I ~
" -) I I' \.J .J n \-, I ,
I ~ r I' < t-, I v I/""I \ \
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION t, L.. v I' 1:
I Lot 1. Block 1, BECKRICH PARK ESTATES. Scott County, Minnesota. / -
I Existing Zoning: RR Rurol Residential/,\ \ lAJ
Proposed Zoning: R18 Urban Residential -...
-J
0
JAN-10-2006 13:48 DONALDSON COMPANY 952 887 3059 P.02/05
Janual)' 7,2006
E:)CH1Blf .t
OBJECTION TO REZONING PROPOSAL
To: John Schmitt, Joseph Helkamp, TerryJoos, Steve Menden, Matt Lehman, Julie
Klima and Michael Leak.
I recently attended a city planning commission meeting on January 5th, 2006 to express
my concerns over a rezoning proposal. Considering the information presented in the
meeting and prior meetings related to this parcel of land I was surprised to see the
planning commission approve the application. Below are some of the reasons:
1. The proposal was basioally the same proposal submitted approximately 2 yrs ago
by Beckrich Park Estates to rezone to an RIB classification. This proposal
included the 4.5 acre parcel of land in question in the meeting on Jan 5th, 2006.
This earlier proposal was denied. The issue was higher density housing not
conforming to the surrounding area and MUSA.
a. The outcome from the decision was to look into alternative zoning
proposals that would confonn better to the surrounding area that would
allow water and sewer service availability.
2. The CJM Properties application was submitted in the spring of 2005. It is
basically the same proposal as the 2004 applioation. The main difference was that
it just included the 4.5 acre parcel of land located between Beckrich Park Estates
and Hillwood Estates to rezone from RR to RIB.
a. The meeting was scheduled for July 2005 but was delayed.
b. My discussion with Michael Leak just prior to the July 2005 meeting on
this indicated that the proposal did not meet certain requirements to
include:
i. Did not conform to the .sun:ounding area
ii. MUSA not available or unknown capacity at sewer interceptor.
c. Therefore, application was delayecluntil January 2006 in anticipation of
Met Council decision on city comprehensive plan lMUSA / interceptor
capacity in the area
3. Details of January 5th 2006 meeting.
a. I presented my reasons for tne objection to the proposal at the meeting.
Details for objections can be found in a separate letter created for the J an
5th 2006 meeting. This letter is located at the end of this document.
b. Julie Klima indicated that no fannal response had been supplied by the
Met Council related to comprehensive plan I MUSA. Just verbal
indication that there is some. capacity in the interceptor located by new
high school construction.
c. The proposal was approved, but I question why based on the above
information. The first proposal was denied back in 2004. This latest
proposal is no different. This latest proposal just includes less land and it
was submitted by another person. Other reasons include:
i. No fonnal response from Met Council, just verbal response.
ii. Does it make sense to have an RIB zone when a RR zone
surrounds it on all sides? I talked to Julian Smith (Met Council
JAN-10-2006 13:49 DONALDSON COMPANY 952 887 3059 P.03/05
January 7, 2006
representative for the Shakopee area), he commented he would be
surprised if a city placed an RIB zone in the middle of an RR
zone.
iii. Would this be an efficient use of MUS A?
iv. Addinganotber road entrance onto a busy CR79 road could cause
traffic I safety issues. There are already four roads entering indus
area within -113 oia mile from each other.
v. What ever happened to looking into alternative zoning options that
was an outcome from the initial proposal by Beckrich Park Estates
back in 2004?
Base on the above infonnation, past decisions on this land and related property, I
question why this proposal should be approved? I understand the desire of the property
owner to develop the land, but if approved, the only person who benefits is the property
owner. They assumed a risk when they purchased the land. What about the desire of the
existing surrounding property owners who desire to maintain the feel and look of the
more open area. This is the biggest reason we moved to the area we are at. This is a well
established developed area. What about our rights to maintain it that way? A proposal of
3 to 4 houses would fit fine within the surrounding area.
We hope you seriously consider our conoerns and viewpoints.
Respectfully, .
~~~
Brian L Mandt
t~" ~
Cindy I. Mandt
l,t ,(Jj 3v
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 06-003
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II
SUBJECT: Request to Extend MUSA, and Rezone Property from Rural Residential
(RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
MEETING DATE: January 17, 2006
REVIEW PERIOD: November 24, 2005 - March 23, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Ken & Sonya Kraft have made application to extend Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to
property located southwest ofCSAH 18; north ofCSAH 16, and east of Hill dale Drive (west of
Glacier Estates), and to rezone from the property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban
Residential (R-IB) Zone.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant's are requesting MUSA and rezoning of property adjacent to Glacier Estates, with
access to the property proposed from the temporary cul-de-sac in Glacier Estates. They have
submitted a letter in support oftheir request, and have submitted a concept plan that illustrates their
development as proposed (shown generally consistent with the density allowed in an R-IB Zone).
If this application is approved, they will then need to submit a preliminary plat and final plat for
review and approval of the lot configuration for this development.
Several city departments and outside reviewing agencies provided memorandums regarding this
request, commenting that they recommend approval subject to conditions noted in their
memorandums. If approved, the applicants are aware that these items shall be addressed at the
time of preliminary/final plat submittal.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. 6358, a resolution approving the request to extend MUSA to the
subject property.
2. Approve Ordinance No. 746, an ordinance approving the request to rezone the subject property
from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
3. Approve Resolution No. 6358, a resolution approving the request to extend MUSA to the
subject property, with modifications.
4. Approve Ordinance No. 746, an ordinance approving the rezoning request to the same property
from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone, with modifications.
5. Deny the request to extend MUSA to the subject property and direct staff to prepare the
appropriate resolution.
6. Deny the request to rezone the property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential
(R-IB) Zone and direct staffto prepare the appropriate ordinance.
7. Table the matter and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIP
This action supports:
Goal E: "Financially strong", and
Strategy 4: "Improve individual financial health".
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning commission reviewed this request at their January 5, 2006 meeting, and by a S-O vote,
recommended approval of the request to extend MUSA to the subject property and to rezone the
property to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone. A copy of the Planning Commission's report is
attached for the Council's information.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Resolution No. 6358, a resolution approving the request to extend MUSA to the subject
property, and approve Ordinance No. 746, an ordinance approving the rezoning request to the same
property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone. to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
~
Mark Noble .
Planner IT
RESOLUTION NO. 6358
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE APPROVING A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO EXTEND MUSA TO PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 16 AND WEST OF GLACIER ESTATES
WHEREAS, Ken & Sonya Kraft, applicants, and Kim H. & Xuan Pham, property
owners, have requested an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to extend MUSA to the
property as described below; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
See Exhibit 1,' and
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on January 5,2006, at which time all persons present were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on January 17, 2006; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request:
GOAL #1:
Development of this property shall be controlled and focused to maintain the City's fiscal
soundness consistent with other community-wide goals.
GOAL #2:
This property is currently within the City limits; therefore, this not a request for an annexation.
This property shall be treated fairly relative to taxes and the provision of service.
Policies:
a. Development of this property is consistent with Goal #1 above.
b. This property is located where utilities and community facilities can be efficiently
located or extended.
c. Extending MUSA to this property is timed to enhance the City's ability to plan for,
develop, and/or acquire new utilities and public facilities.
d. Extending MUSA to this property is timed to coincide with the availability of
utilities and community facilities, or shall be coordinated with plans to provided
utilities and community facilities.
e. The City has determined that in extending MUSA to this property, it will be
suitable for development within the timeframebeing considered.
f. Granting MUSA to this property is undertaken to better react to the marketplace
and to serve the community as a whole.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan to
extend MUSA to the property described above is hereby approved.
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota, held this
day of ,2006.
Mayor of the City of Shako pee
Attest:
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
H:\CC\2006\06003KraftMUSA
ORDINANCE NO. 746, FOURTH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE SEe. 11.03 BY REZONING LAND
LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 16 AND WEST OF GLACIER ESTATES FROM
RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) ZONE TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL (R-1B) ZONE
WHEREAS, Ken & Sonya Kraft, applicants, and Kim H. & Xuan Pham, property owners, have
requested the rezoning of property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone;
and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
See Exhibit 1,. and
WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the
Planning Commission on January 5, 2006, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to
be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on January 17,2006; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shako pee
hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative t6 the above-named request:
Finding No.1: The original Zoning Ordinance is not in error.
Finding No.2: Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
Finding No.3: Significant changes in City wide or neighborhood development patterns
have occurred in that development has proceeded in the vicinity of the
subject parcels.
Finding No.4: Zoning of the subject property to Urban Residential (R-lB) is consistent
with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to rezone the property from Urban Residential
(R-lB) Zone to Urban Residential (R-lB) Zone is hereby approved.
Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota, held this
day of ,2006.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest:
Judith S. Cox, City Clerk
Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of ,20_.
H:\CC\2006\06003KraftRezoning
ExHI6(--r .1--.
That part ofthe East one-half of the ~outhwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East line
of said East one-half ofthe Southwest Quarter and the center line of Co. Road No. 16, said point
being 1486.36 feet South ofthe Northeast comer thereof; thence North along said East line a
distance of 427.49 feet; thence West at right angles a distance of300.0 feet to the point of
beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing West along the last described
line a distance of 315 .98 feet to its intersection with the east line of the plat of ZOSCHKE' S -
ADDITION TO SHAKOPEE Scott County, Minnesota; thence South along said East line to the
center line of County Road No. 16; thence Easterly along said center line to its intersection with a
line drawn South from the point of beginning and parallel with said East line of the East one-half
of the Southwest Quarter; thence North along said parallel line a distance of 466.93 feet to the
point of beginning.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 06-003
TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Request to Extend MUSA, and Rezone Property from Rural Residential
(RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
MEETING DATE: January 5,2006
REVIEW PERIOD: November 24, 200S - March 23, 2006
Site Information:
Applicant: Ken & Sonya Kraft
Property Owner: Kim H. & Xuan Pham
Location: Southwest ofCSAH 18; north ofCSAH 16, East of Hill dale Drive
Adjacent Zoning: North: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
South: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
East: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
West: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
Acreage: 3.32 acres
MUSA: The applicant is requesting extension of the MUSA boundary to include
the subject property. The property is within the Phase I MUSA area
approved by the Council with the Comprehensive Plan Update
Attachments: Exhibit A: ZoningILocation Map
Exhibit B: Applicant's Narrative/Concept Plan
Exhibit C: City Engineering's Memorandum
Exhibit D: Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Memorandum
INTRODUCTION:
Ken & Sonya Kraft have made application to extend Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to
property located southwest ofCSAH 18; north ofCSAH 16, and east of Hill dale Drive (west of
Glacier Estates), and to rezone from the property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban
--' - -..-
Zone to Urban Residential (R -IB) Zone. Please refer to Sections 11.24 and 11.28 of the City
Code for the list of uses and design standards of the RR and R-IB zones.
DISCUSSION:
The City's Comprehensive Plan sets basic policies to guide the development of the City. The
purpose of designating different areas for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses is
to promote the location of compatible land uses, as well as to prevent incompatible land uses
from being located in close proximity to one another. The Zoning Ordinance is one of the
legal means by which the City implements the Comprehensive Plan. Under Minnesota
statute, zoning is to conform with a city's comprehensive plan.
The applicant's are requesting MUSA and rezoning of property adjacent to Glicier Estates,
with access to the property proposed from the temporary cul-de-sac in Glacier Estates. They
have submitted a letter in support of their request, and have submitted a concept plan that
illustrates their development as proposed (shown generally consistent with the density
allowed in an R-1B Zone). If this application is approved, they will then need to submit a
preliminary plat and final plat for review and approval of the lot configuration for this
development.
The City Clerk has recommended approval, if the proposal is consistent with the approved
Comprehensive Plan and MUSA extension plan. The request is consistent with the
approved Comprehensive Plan, and the subject property is within the Phase I MUSA area.
City Engineering has provided a memorandum, commenting that after reviewing the above
referenced application, the engineering department recommends approval subject to the
following condition:
1. The approvals of the MUSA Expansion and the rezoning request do not constitute
approval of the submitted drawing(s).
They have also commented that prior to future submittals, the applicant shall provide plans
that address the following issues:
1. The lots lines in the proposed cul-de-sac shall be realigned so as to be more radial
with the right-of-way.
2. The proposed driveways shall be realigned so as to comply with the City of
Shakopee's setback requirements.
SPUC has recommended approval subject to the comments attached to this report,
including a note that an 18" trunk watermain is required with Shakopee Public Utilities
paying oversizing per policy, to be extended across this parcel east to west. The applicants
should contact SPUC regarding any questions they may have about the comments.
FINDINGS:
The Zoning Ordinance does not specify criteria for granting a Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment, though reasonable criteria would be Criteria #1 -3 for Zoning Ordinance
amendments. Staffhas provided Criteria #1 - 3, as well as draft findings for the
Commission's review and discussion.
')....
Criteria #1: That the original Comprehensive Plan is in error;
Finding #1: The original Comprehensive Plan is not in error.
Criteria #2: That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken
place;
Finding #2: Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
Criteria #3: That significant changes in Citywide or neighborhood development
patterns have occurred.
Finding #3: Significant changes have occurred in neighborhood development patterns.
Specifically, since adoption of the 2000 Comprehensive/Land Use Plan,
development has proceeded in the vicinity of the subject property. SPUC
infrastructure (i.e. water lines and storagefacilities) has been extended to
serve this area of the City.
The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below
with proposed findings for the Commission's consideration.
Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error;
Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error.
Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken
place;
Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place.
Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development
patterns have occurred; or
Finding #3 Zoning of the subject property to Urban Residential (R-1B) is consistent
with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision.
Finding #4 Zoning of the subject property to Urban Residential (R-1B) is consistent
with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to extend MUSA to the
subject property, and to rezone the same property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to
Urban Residential (R-l B) Zone. .
2. Recommend to the City Council the denial of the request to extend MUSA to the balance
of the subject property, and to rezone the same property from Rural Residential (RR)
Zone to Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone.
3. Continue the public hearing and request additional information from the applicant or
staff.
4. Close the public hearing, but table the matter and request additional information.
:>
-""
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request to extend MUSA to the subject property, and to
rezone the same property from Rural Residential (RR) Zone to Urban Residential (R -IB)
Zone.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer and approve a motion to make a recommendation to the City Council consistent with
the Planning Commission's wishes.
~ts~~ J
Marl<: Nob e ..
Planner I
~
Shakopee - Location Maps "'''"5'''''' VJ. J.
If)(t{\~\, A:
. ...-..........-. "
~"
~
,~
rp\
. .....
RD ( 'RI
' .
~.
~l-6.'-\~ ~~~
t+
C
:It
~
t4j
I
~
L "r
~ cs1\lt ' --
-
..--,
llil'
i!
~ -
Q
~
Z
~
AG ~
a
~
I
~ .. _ Subject Property
SHAKOPEE W . E ....,," Sha~opee Boundary
COMMUNIrYl'IUOUSlNCll1S57' s [::J zonrng Boundary
c:J Parcel Boundary
MUSA Expansion and Rezoning
Rural Residential (RR) to Urban
Residential (RiB)
httn. / / oi!:: In pi~.orp'/~hakonee/locationmap/map .asp 7ti tle~MUSA + Expansion+and+ Rezoni... 11/28/2005
~1P.:>lT 'e>, f.. .
. 3
Nov 21,2005
City of Shakopee
129 HoIms Street South
Shakopee, l\1N 55379
Tele:952-233-9300
RE: Zoning Amendment Request
MUSA Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
. To whom it may concern,
We, Ken and Sonya Kraft, are requesting a rezoning and a MUSA Amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan for the property listed below.
Pill: 279130620
House #: 8455
Street: Eagle Creek Blvd
City, State: Shakopee, MN 55379
Set-13 Twp-115 Range-022 3.32AC 3.32A in E1I2
SW ~ Com. At Int. Of Line & C/L of Co Rd #16
1486.36' S OfNE Cor
With the College City Home development directly to the East and North of the above described, we
believe that the rezone from RR to RIB will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. We also
find that there is a significant change in the neighborhood development patterns along Eagle Creek Blvd
with the recent land clearing by Tollefson and College City for single family dwellings, which would
justify the zone change.
" In regards to the MUSA Amendment, the property has already been guided for single family residential
as is the adjacent property to the East and North.
Please accept this request and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you in the future.
Sincerely,
~ fC /) -
.~..
" 1~-~ l-J/>; .
l ' .
),r J,./
Sonya i1I1d Ken Kraft
1744 Windsor Drive South
Shakopee, :MN 55379
952-233-5738
1.04' PROP. LINE *" ton~t .Plon
i3l~"'I:JI.
.:-.!~.?01~____ _____~~:~__ _____~~.~' '5c~\€:>\ \ B2.~
,
,I . --=--
: \ ,I I
I I I
I " ' ,------..------------- I I
l -------.--
\ .. I r r---'----"-'---
: ,\ .31 ACRE ,I I . .31 ACRE l :: 33 ACRE :
I '\ \" 13,684 i I I 13,422 I I I '14,213 I
I_ t\, \ I I I I ' I '
1 0: I'. '\ \ I I I" . 1 '
I~ 1\\ \ i 1 : I I ! I
, C'\I I' \. '- \ I 1 I LO T 3 I, I " I
1 . \ I Ii' I I I
I I \ '- Iii ' B LK? I I . I'=!
I I \ \\ : I . I , I ,a
i 36 ACRl\ '. J ! ! ! ' I LOT ~'~
-!: 15,792 \ \ ... I L----_.. I ! I 8LK . !
0-1 ' \ '. I ' i ' ,
in, \ \" I " I
...., \ ,I
~ ' 1 L '
I \ '\ I ..----- -- --'- I
I 41\0' '\ ' I
I . '\ I I
! LOT 1 __Jl5..' ----~
I
I BLK ? '
,
I
r-----------------~--
I ~ T 5
: j" LK ?
I I
I I ' I
1 I / I
Ii / I
I I I
: / I: ---,
I /1,' I /' I, I'
I .33 ACRE I ..-'- I 1 I
I 14,480 / II I 1----.-.- I I I I '
I , I' ! I " I : I LOT S I I-a
Ii' I , I I BLK I I
" I " I ,'I LOT _ : I ? I I'~
I I" LOT I I ~ I I 1 I C'\I
I I ", BLK? . I 1 I ,
I / " I B LK I 'i' I I I ! I
I- .I I / " I I' I I I I
o '/" I" , , : I I I
'. i I / ' I : I I ' I I
Il~ i/ I / I II I .33 ACRE: I .37 ACRE I 11
C\I V " / .41 ACRE I I 14,238 I: I 15,535 I
: / / 17,889 I : I I II I :
I " / i Ii: I I ,
: 1.1 i : I I I ! :
I 1.1 I I I . I ' I
,/L.____ I,J ::1,
, I ------------..-J 1 L I L I 1
~' . I ------.J ' I
. ..._....._..__..... : ....__ . t
147.65': I . .-.-----..--.-1 :
-L 85 25' : I
313' EAGLE CREEK BLVD' I 85.25' j
SevlJ i Ce.. c, ,
I I
I I I
I I I I I
I / I I I
/ ./ I I I I
/ I I, ~ -------l
I u 3/1 f\
/ ..-> ,rl --------
'"' ' ';,) ;.
I .., I V ... ,----
S ;. 1 ClDOma Old -----------~
/ _aaw ~, -.._--..;.....-
---:::: - 'Ill " II I,
___- II'DH'G1I
---1- - d
- '011 'Q'll I f"~ DlODIISOLf I
9~ __
.,.""..------- L~--
.-
--- I "
I :1: OlllOssoa !lI
....
--
-
(/)
D'IDClI;DlS Old
l)~
i---
$I t,
DiIlJl:II" Old I~
DfoDOIIOlS llId
I-~
---
)f'd,(d 110
Lr
, ~ ... otODllDLllOld
-~
V.---
Ii)
-._-- :J:
:l~
:;:; DlDOll'lILS Old
30 0 "
I
:36 i I '0
I
I
, DIPOl:ISLll Old 'I'
;;l" ~ ,
0 \ r"
! ,
. ; ! \
DIllIrlOa llII .,' ~ "iIraDl"Il' ,
I. a. ; It
'. e . ! V J.O'llnO
\ .1 i
If? ; .....) a
,
. . I
I P"I<I: 'OM ':IllllIllJlY IDIlOl:ISlZ Old
b e"i';- I," ~AVAl.lO~1lI
d- bel :
"Zit ~'u~' I
b lO"ODS :iI.S~.tt.9SS
", -~
~y fncl
b \, St:f
of
.", " ...-....-...-....
. -... _..._..._~. ..-.. .-... -... -...- "','"-''' - ...-...- ...-...-... ~1.tI9 3.S~.tt.eiS mDISta Old
.- - - - - \N n/'jn "ClV" ~ ~;;;DId~.
. " . nv... u · ... :"t
" " 1 . s a \'1 3 f:1 . 3/a I S ~ 13,,\ ~ \
" " " DnOHM ad , '. omlJla Old ....... \
" ' " : '" \ momls aid / OIJDHrlf rHi I . "'-
" '." !', \ / }- "-
~ ......." ......., i "'-, \ I' _ y
1~g -!..lcall'i"'9 . .
,.
'. '9c+le:>r\ L
City of Shakopee
Memorandum.
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I ~
Joe Swentek, Project Engineer ~ &"
FROM:
SUBJECT: MUSA Expansion and Rezoning from Rural Residential (RR) to Urban
Residential (R-IB)
(North of CSAH 16/East of Hill dale Drive)
PID NO.: 27-913062-0
CASE NO.: 06003
DATE: December 5, 2005
The application indicates a request for MUSA Expansion and Rezoning from Rural Residential
(RR) to Urban Residential (R-1B). The property is an extension of Moraine Circle, West of the
Glacier Estates Addition.
After reviewing the application, the engineering department offers the following preliminary
comments to be addressed by the applicant prior to future submittals:
1, The lots lines in the proposed cul-de-sac shall be realigned so as to be more radial with
the right-of-way.
2. The proposed driveways shall be realigned so as to comply with the City of Shakopee's
setback requirements.
Recommendation
After reviewing the above referenced application, the engineering department recommends
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. The approvals of the MUSA Expansion and the rezoning request do not constitute
approval of the submitted drawing(s).
H:IEMPLOYEE fOLDERSUSwontoklStaff.ReviowslMUSAE.pansionICnse.Numbor.06003. MUSA. Exp (CR 16 _Hilldnle Dr).doc
Pago J of 1
.IEC-23-2005 07:51 SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UIILlllc~ J_....-.-,_. . -. . ---
.'
, Z\cH\~l'\ D
SHAKO PEE PUBLIC UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Shakopee Community Development Department
FROM: Joseph D. Adams, Planning and Engineering Director
SUBJECT: STAFF REVIEW RECORD COMMENTS for:
MUSA expansion and Rezoning from Rural
Residential (RR) to Urban Residential (Rlll)
CASE NO: 06003
DATE: 12/22/05
COMMENTS:
Municipal water service is available subject to our standard tenns and conditions. These
include, but are not limited to: installing a lateral water main distribution system in
accordance with utility policy, paying the associated inspections costs, paying the Trunk
Water Charge, and paying the Water Connection Charge.
Underground electric service is ava.ilable subject to our standard tenl1S and conditions.
These include, but are not limited to: entering into an Underground Distribution
Agreement, granting any necessary easements, and paying the associated fees.
Street Lighting installation is available subject to our standard tenns and conditions.
These are contained in the ourrent City of Shakopee Street Lighting Policy. Applicant
must pay the assooiated fees.
Applicant should contact Shakopee Public Utilities directly for specific requirements
relating to their project.
Note: An 18" Trunk Watermain is required with Shakopee Public Utilities paying
oversizing per policy, to be extended across this parcel east to west.
I
J~. o. tf~
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Consider Approving Plans and Ordering Advertisement for
Bids for the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension, from the
Prior Lake Interceptor to the East Plat Line of Riverside Bluffs,
Project No. 2006-4
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is Resolution No, 6360, which approves the plans and specifications and
authorizes staff to advertise for bids for the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension, from the
Prior Lake Interceptor to the East Plat Line of Riverside Bluffs, Project No. 2006-4.
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 2005, City Council ordered the preparation of plans after a public
hearing on the Trunk Sewer Extension, from the Prior Lake Interceptor to the East Plat
Line of Riverside Bluffs. Council approved Resolution No, 6329 and ordered the project.
Staff has obtained an easement for the construction of the trunk sanitary sewer through
the Ridge Creek development and plans have been completed by WSB & Associates, Inc.
Per the feasibility report, as prepared by WSB & Associates, the schedule included that
plans would be presented to City Council on January 17, 2006 in order to proceed to
advertisement for bids and possible award on February 21,2006, The goal ofthis project
, would be to have a sanitary sewer line operational by June 1, 2006 for the Riverside
Bluffs development.
During the design process, one change in the alignment was made in order to facilitate
construction and future maintenance of the line by making the connection to the Prior
Lake Interceptor within the Pike Lake Road right-of-way, versus easements in backyards
of future residents,
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 6360, a resolution approving plans and specifications and
ordering advertisement for bids for the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension, from the
Prior Lake Interceptor to the East Plat Line of Riverside Bluffs, Project No. 2006-
4.
2, Deny Resolution No. 6360.
3. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No.1, to approve plans and specifications in ordef to
proceed with this project, as outlined in this memo and the previously accepted feasibility
report,
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No, 6360, A Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and
Ordering Advertisement fOf Bids for the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension, from the Prior
Lake Interceptor to the East Plat Line of Riverside Bluffs, Project No. 2006-4 and move
its adoption.
b~~
Public Wo Director
BUpmp
ENGRl2006PROlECTfWORDISEWEREXTPU-RlVERSIDEBLUFFS
RESOLUTION NO. 6360
A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications
And Ordering Advertisement For Bids
For The Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension,
From the Prior Lake Interceptor To The
East Plat Line of Riverside Bluffs
Project No. 2006-4
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 6336 adopted by City Council on December 6,
2005, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for improvements
for the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension, from the Prior Lake Interceptor to the East Plat Line of
Riverside Bluffs, Project No. 2006-4 which includes the installation of sanitary sewer and any
appurtenant work, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office
ofthe City Engineer, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such. improvement under such
approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by
law.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held this day of ,2006.
Mayor ofthe City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ENGRI2006PROJECfISEWEREXT-PU-RlVERSIDEBWFFS
/2. /),.5
MH 3
~~'
=_m ~~1
H 4 '
~IM 834.0'
NV 797,87' I
~.~3:. ~
CR 83 SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION E::;J la' Perl"lo.nent. EOSeME>nt
FEASIBILITY D 40' Perp\o.nent Eo.seM.ent DRAVlNBY: 0<. ......CT "" '/A
l>>MIlIM'IIII"". SCALE: 1.. 4OD' SHEET '''''
Ih I D, s:
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing Feasibility Study for
Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension along CSAH 83, from
Church Addition to Valley View Road
DATE: January 17, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is a resolution authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report for a Trunk
Sanitary Sewer Extension along CSAH 83, from Church Addition to Valley View Road.
BACKGROUND:
Previously, in 2005, City Council directed staff to review alternatives in extending a
trunk sanitary sewer to Valley View Road and to remove a future lift station associated
with the development of River Valley Estates. At that time staff mentioned to Council
that the County had not yet obtained additional right-of-way from the Shakopee
Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC), on the east side ofCSAH 83, and staff needed
further investigation on which alternative would be the best.
The County has recently obtained the additional right-of-way on the east side of CSAH
83 and staff has reviewed what would be the best alternative in extending sewer along
CSAH 83. Attached is a drawing showing the proposed alignment from Church Addition
to the southeast comer of Valley View Road and the west side of CSAH 83,
Staff believes the best alternative would be to cross CSAH 83, as soon as practical, and
extend the sewer on the west side as this property would be serviced by this sewer line.
TheSMSC has indicated that they would serve their own property with sewer and with
their own waster water treatment plant.
Staff has had conversations with Pulte Homes, the developer of River Valley Estates, and
would be given additional funding if the trunk sanitary sewer line would be available and
operational by August 1, 2006 to their development, as per a previous condition of
approval. The River Valley Estates development will contribute $150,000.00 when all
the site is final platted, as part of the preliminary plat approval, and in addition is paying
its trunk sanitary sewer fees. Staff believes it is possible to construct the trunk sanitary
sewer extension line to River Valley Estates by August 1, 2006. A feasibility report
would need to be authorized at this time in order to meet this time1ine, if the City Council
is interested in extending atrunk sewer line to this location. If the City Council does not
want to extend the trunk sewer line, at this time, then a lift station would be installed in
the River Valley Estates development until such time when the trunk sewer is extended.
Staff has requested a feasibility study proposal from WSB & Associates, mc. and a
schedule on how this project can be accomplished, considering that easement acquisition
would be necessary, as well as obtaining County approval for working in their right-of-
way. Attached to this memo is a proposal from WSB & Associates, mc, to prepare the
feasibility study.
As mentioned before, the City Council's decision is on whether or not to extend this
trunk sewer line to this location at this time and proceed with a feasibility report,
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt Resolution No, 6361, a resolution authorizing the preparation of a
feasibility report for a Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension along CSAH 83, from
Church Addition to Valley View Road.
2. Do not authorize Resolution No. 6361 at this time.
3. Table for additional information.
4. Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an extension agreement with
WSB & Associates, mc. for the preparation of the feasibility report at a cost not-
to-exceed $40,881.00.
5. Do not authorize an extension agreement at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 and No.4, if the City Council desires to extend the
trunk sanitary sewer to this area and to remove a lift station in River Valley Estates and
provide sanitary sewer service for property west of CSAH 83 and for properties in the
future south of Valley View Road and west of CSAH 83. If Council does not want to
extend trunk sewer at this time, then voting against Resolution No, 6361 is the proper
action.
Staff has negotiated additional trunk funds from the developer of River Valley Estates
with the $150,000.00 for the development to proceed and the amount for the lift station
and force main if a trunk sewer is available, prior to a lift station being constructed.
Additionally, trunk sewer fees, lateral sewer connection charges and sewer availability
charges will be collected from properties along CSAH 83 and north of River Valley
Estates to pay for the trunk sewer extension.
GOALS AND STRATEGIES:
This project is to eliminate a lift station and provide sanitary sewer service to areas along
CSAH 83 in the short term and south of Valley View Road and west of CSAH 83 in the
long term potentially,
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Offer Resolution No, 6361, A Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Report on
an hnprovement for a Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension, along CSAH 83, from
Church Addition to Valley View Road and move its adoption.
2, Authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an extension agreement with
WSB & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of the feasibility report.
~~
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGR/2006PROJECT/SEWEREXTENSIONCSAH83/WORDIMEM6361
RESOLUTION NO. 6361
A Resolution Ordering The Preparation Of A
Report On An Improvement For
A Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension,
Along CSAH 83, From Church Addition
To Valley View Road
WHEREAS, it is proposed to extend trunk sanitary sewer along CSAH 83, from Church
Addition to Valley View Road, by construction of sanitary sewer and all appurtenant work and to
assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to Bruce
Loney, Public Works Director, for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all
convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed
improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with
some other improvement, and the estimated cost ofthe improvement as recommended.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 2006,
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ENGRI2006PROJECI'/CSAH83SEWEREXTENSIONIWORD/RES6361
Project Manager Project Type: Project Title: Total Project Cost:
Bruce Lone Sanitary Sewer Area SS-C&E Trunk Sewer $600,000
A, Expenditure Items: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Land & ROW 75,000
Construction 425,000
Improvements -
Engineering/Admin, 100,000
Total 600,000 - - - - -
B. Funding Source:
General Fund
Capital Improvement Funds
Park Reserve Fund
Grants (specify)
Donations (specify)
State Aid
Assessments 150,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund-Base
Sanitary Sewer Fund-Flow
Sanitary Sewer Fund-Trunk 450,000
Storm Drainage Fund-Base
..... Storm Drainage Fund-Trunk
I Tax Levy
IJ1
IJ1 Total 600,000 - - - - -
Description:
Extension oftrunk sewer to serve area to recently added MUSA area.
Justification:
Sewer extension is part of City's sanitary sewer plan and is needed in order
for area to develop along C.R. 83 and south of Valley View Road.
~ Other Comments:
... Trunk sewer will be extended along C.R. 83 within County's right-of-way or
additional easements may need to be purchased. Coordination with SMSC
will be needed as sewer is extended.
Operating Costs:
....--.---.--... ....... .... . -.... "-'"
.._ n. 0.. . . . ._n ~"__'_ _ _
~"''"' .~
January 12, 2006
Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Shakopee
129 South Holmes Street
Shakopee,1fN 55379
Re: Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension
Along CSAH 83 from Church Addition to Valley View Road
City of Shakopee, 1fN
WSB Project No. 1281-96
pear Mr, Loney:
Weare pleased to present this proposal for professional services to complete the feasibility
study, design and contraCt documents for the improvements relating to the trunk. sanitary sewer
extension along CSAH 83 from the Church Addition just south of CSAH 16 to the north plat line
ofthe proposed River Valley Estates subdivision just north of Valley View Road. The proposed
project includes the feasibility analysis, design and construction services for the installation of an
18-inch trunk sanitary sewer pipe extending southerly along the CSAH 83 corridor as previously
described. This proposal presents our understanding of the project along with our proposed
scope of services relating to the feasibility, design and construction of the project.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Shakopee is in need of a consultant to complete the feasibility study, design and
construction documents relating to the extension of an 18-inch trunk sanitary sewer facility from
the Church addition south of CSAH 16 to Valley View Road within the CSAH 83 corridor along
an alignment that has been developed by City Staff. It is our understanding that the feasibility
study will include the development of a preliminary design for the trunk sewer from the Church
Addition to Valley View Road. However, the proposed construction anticipated to be built with
this project includes the installation ofthe trunk sewer pipe to the north plat line ofthe proposed
River Valley Estates Subdivision. The future extension to Valley View Road is anticipated to be
installed with the River Valley Estates development project.
The trunk sanitary sewer alignment is proposed to connect to an existing manhole at the south
end of the Church Addition east of CSAH 83. The pipe is then proposed to be extended
approximately 400 feet south where it will turn southwesterly and cross beneath the CSAH 83
roadway surface. Due to the proposed grades of less than 1,0 percent, it is anticipated that
jacking will be required forthe installation of sewer crossing beneath CSAH 83. A preliminary
review ofthe project area indicates that wetlands maybe contained within the project limits.
Delineation of any wetlands will need to be completed as part of the project scope.
C:\DoClIlIIeIlIS and Seuings1blolleylLoco/ SerrillgsITemporar)' Intemel FileslOLKI08lLTR PROP.b IOlle)'-OI/206 (1).doc
Mr. Bruce Loney, P .E.
January 12, 2006
Page 2
The alignment on the west side of CSAH 83 is proposed to parallel the roadway to the south to
Valley View Road, The proposed depths for the trunk sewer installation range up to 39 feet
based on the preliminary grades and alignment as established by City Staff. The right-of-way in
this area is limited and permanent as well as temporary easements will be necessary for
properties belonging to Harold and Roberta Schneider and Beverly Koehnen. Discussions with
City Staff indicate that the acquisition of easements across the Schneider parcel can be
negotiated without the need for eminent domain proceedings. However, this may not be the case
for any easements over the Koehnen parcel. The definition of easements and the development of
easement descriptions and exhibits will need to be prepared during the feasibility phase of the
project to insure that the acquisition of easements does not adversely impact the project schedule.
The design ofthe project will require close coordination with Scott County. The depth ofthe
installation will disrupt a wide area adjacent to the roadway shoulder. It will be necessary to
develop a design that will be consistent with Scott County policies, work within the confines of
the project limits and still provide a constructable project within the City's timeline for the
project. In addition, the City is being requested to have the sewer facility available for
connection in the River Valley Estates by August 14th, 2006, The developer has indicated that
they will make additional funding available for the project if this schedule can be met. It will be
critical that milestones established for the timely completion of the construction.
It is understood that this project is being undertaken as a M.S. 429 improvement. According to
the City's recently adopted assessment policy, the lateral benefits provided to the Schneider and
Koehnen properties will be established and collected as connection charges at the time these
properties are ready to develop. Assessments to the River Valley Estates are not anticipated as
the trunk will be extended through the subdivision as part ofthe public improvements completed
with the development.
PROJECT APPROACH/SCOPE OF SERVICES
WSB & Associates, Inc.'s project scope and proposed work plan is based on our understanding
of the project scope and experience on similar projects, The preliminary and final elements of
design will be based on a topographical survey proposed to be performed as part of this project,
and the preliminary design provided by City staff. The work plan has been separated into the
key components and is broken down in an hourly task budget attached to this letter. The key
components are discussed for clarification in the following paragraphs.
1. Project Management
Project management is a key task included in each phase ofthe project. In each case, this
task consists of management and administration, project coordination and communication
with the City of Shakopee. Proper completion ofthis task will allow for routine updates
on project l~~ues as well flS l<e@ping the project on schedule and within budget.
2. Wetland Delineations
C:\Documems and Sellil1gslblo/le)'ILocal SelllllgsITemporal)' [lItemet FileslOJ.KJ08\LTR PROP-b lOlley-OJ /206 (1).doc
Mr. Bruce Loney, P.R
January 12, 2006
Page 3
This task involves the delineation of wetlands within the project limits. Work to .be
completed with this task includes the following:
. Delineation of wetlands. Delineation will include sides ofthe wetland complex
affected by the construction,
. Conformance to 1987 US Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
. Field review with watershed TEP.
. Preparation and submittal of the delineation report,
. Survey ofthe delineation.
3. Topographic Survey
A WSB survey crew will perform a topographic survey of the proposed alignment. The
distance to be surveyed is approximately 2,900 feet along the proposed alignment.
Global positioning (GPS) receivers will be used in conjunction with electronic total
station.s in the field to expedite the survey process. Items to be included in the, survey
will include:
. Spot elevations
. Cross-sections at 50-foot intervals
. Profiles along the proposed utility alignment
. All existing conditions in the project area
. Significant trees
. Property lines/comers
. Existing utilities
. Delineated wetland boundaries
4. Prepare Legal Descriptions for Proposed Right-of-Way/Easements
Based on the final alignment and easement needs, WSB will prepare easement exhibits
and legal descriptions needed for the acquisition ofthe identified easements. Appraisals
and appraisal review will be completed by sub-consultatits under this contract. The
budget included for this task represents acquiring easements from two parcels.
5. Easement AcquisitionlNegotiations
The work involved with this task will include the coordination of all property appraisals
and appraisal reviews determined to be necessary for the proj ect. In addition, it will
include the coordination of certificates of title. This task also includes the negotiation
and acquisition process with, thy individual property owners. These tasks will be
completed by WSB & Associates personnel and our proposed sub-consultant up to the
point of initiating eminent domain proceedings. Additional services associated with the
eminent domain process will be completed on an hourly basis at the rates specified in the
task hour budget developed for this project.
C:ll)ocumellls and Seltillgslhlone)'lLocut SeuiltgslTempol'ary' /lItemet Fi/esIOLKI08\LTR PROP.b lOlley-OJ J1Q6 (l).doc
Mr.. Bruce Loney, P.E.
January 12,2006
Page 4
6. Feasibility Study
The work involved with this task includes the following tasks:
. Verification of the preliminary alignment and grade supplied by the City.
. Verification of design flow calculations for pipe sizing.
. Quantity takeoff/cost estimate.
. Report preparation including description of improvements, conclusions and
recommendations regarding project feasibility and preliminary assessment
information.
. Graphics illustrating improvements.
. Development of a subsurface soils investigation plan, Costs are included for the
City's geotechnical engineering firm.
7. Final Design Services
This task represents the final design, plan preparation, specifications and bidding
services. Design services will include:
. Alignment and profile for the gravity sanitary sewer. The design will address
details associated with the construction including wetland crossings and impact
minimization, trench requirements, and MCES !equirements fo! the sewer
extension.
. Identification of final easement dimensions and requirements,
. Construction plans that include a title sheet, construction details and plan and
profile sheets detailing the requirements for the construction of the improvements
as proposed,
. A temporary/permanent erosion control plan for the project for the application of
for the NPDES Phase II construction permit. We will also prepare Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan documentation in accordance with the construction
activity permit.
. Preparation ofproject specifications, bidding and contract documentation
necessary for the construction contracting portion ofthe project.
. P!eparation of quantity takeoffs and cost estimates for the purposes of evaluating
bids received for the work, and bidding assistance.
The construction plans will be submitted to the City of Shakopee at various stages of the
Design development and plan preparation for review.
8. Permit Applications
C:\Documems and Settil1gslblol1eylLocal SetlingsITemporaf)' I",enter FiJesIOLKIQ8\LTR PROP-b IOl/e)'-OI/:06 C).doc
Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E.
January 12, 2006
Page 5
The following permits will be prepared and submitted by WSB on behalf of the City. It
is anticipated that the City will provide fees for the submittals.
. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency - Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
. Scott County - Work within County right-of-way
. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency - NPDES Phase II Construction Activity
Permit
. US Army Corps of Engineers - Nationwide Wetland Permit
. Minnesota DNR - Wetlands impacts
. DNR - Water Appropriations Permit for dewatering (if necessary)
9. Construction Services
Construction services will be provided as part of the scope of services included in this
proposaL Services to be provided include:
. Construction staking for the propose~ improvements.
. Engineering consultation and support during the construction as requested by the
. City.
. Surveying of final improvements for the preparation of record drawings.
. Preparation of record drawings in accordance with the City of Shakopee
standards.
SCHEDULE
In order to have the trunk sewer complete and available for service by August, 2006, we will
need to adhere to the following schedule:
Council Orders Feasibility Study, Survey, Wetland
Delineation and Appraisal, Geotechnical..................................... January 17, 2006
Council Accepts Feasibility Report, Orders Public Hearing,
Authorizes Condemnation Proceedings .......,............,...........,........ February 7, 2006
Public Bearing .......... ......,........ ........ ...... ...... ..,......... ..,...... ..............,... .... March 7, 2006
Receive Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bids...................... March 21, 2006
File for Condemnation "..................,....,.......,............,............................ March 22,2006
Open Bids... ......... ..... ...,. ............... ........... .....,... ............ ............... ............. April 25, 2006
A ward Contract .......... ....................... ..,............... ..... ..........,........ ....,.... .... .... May 2, 2006
Begin Construction... ................... .......... ........... ......,................ ..,.. ....... ..... May 16, 2006
Substantial Completion (System Operational)........,............................. August 14,2006
Final Completion/Restoration ................. ,.. ................................ ..... September 30, 2006
This is a very aggressive schedule for the feasibility and design process. In order for this
schedule to met, it will be necessary for the design work to begin prior to conducting the Public
Hearing for the improvements.
C:\DoClIlllems and Sellillgslb/Ol1eylLocllf Serti"gsITemporol)' 11Ifemel Files\OLK/08\LTR PROP-b lOlley-OJ I~06 (2).do(.'
Mr. Bruce Loney, P,E.
January 12,2006
Page 6
Right-of- W ay/Easement Acquisition Timeline
In an effort to keep the project on schedule, it will be necessary to start the land acquisition for
the project immediately. The following'schedule addresses the possible need to acquire the
property through the use of eminent domain, Our proposed schedule outlines an aggressive
program. However, the schedule for the eminent domain proceedings for the Koehnen property
will allow for work to commence as proposed with the construction across this property by late
June. If eminent domain proceedings become necessary for the Schneider parcel, construction
will not be allowed to commence until late June, 2006.
Appraisal..................,...... ........,...."....,.....,........,..,............................. February 17, 2006
Offer Letter.......... .......,.. .....,....... ..... ..,.. ..,....... ..,..... .... ........... ..........., February 22, 2006
File for Condemnation ...,.......,........,..,........,.....,..,......................,..,...,... March 22,2006
Obtain Right-of- Entry. ......,.. ........................... ......'..... ......... ........ ......,.....' June 22, 2006
PROPOSED FEE
The attached task hour budget shows the proposed hours and fee proposed to complete the
design and contract documents for the project. Construction services are proposed to be
contracted on hourly basis following the award of the construction contract for the project. The
proposed fee is based on our 2006 rates as shown on the attached work sheet.
A summary of the fees by task is as follows:
1. Project Management $ 3,774.00
2. Wetland Delineation $ 1,330.00
3. Topographic Survey (Preliminary) $ 5,482.00
4. Prepare Legal Descriptions and Exhibits $ 2,852.00
5. Easement Acquisition and Negotiation $ 2,912.00
6. Feasibility Study $ 8,965.00
7. Final Design Services $21,877.00
8. Permit Applications $ 2,113.00
9. Construction Services $15,754.00
10. Titles and Appraisals $13,000.00
11. Geotechnical Services $ 7,000.00
Total Proposed Fee $85,059.00
We propose to conduct the work on an hourly basis with a fee not-to-exceed $85,059.00. We
will review our prqgress monthly allct Will not exceed this amount without your prior approval.
Construction services will be provided as an extra on an hourly basis as required.
C:1DoClI/lIcllts and SetfingslblolleylLoc!l1 Serri1lgs1Temporary lllfenlct FilesIO/.KI081LTR PROP.b IOlle)'-OI/:!06 (2).dac
Mr, Bruce Loney, P .E.
January 12, 2006
Page 7
COMPONENT AUTHORIZATION
In order to complete the project in accordance with the schedule provided in this proposal, we
would request authorization ofthe following components on January 17, 2006:
Council authorizes Feasibility Study..................................,............... January 17, 2006
Preliminary Topographic Survey....,................................................... January 17, 2006
Easement Negotiation ........................................................................, January 17, 2006
Easement Preparation ..........................,.........,..................................... January 17, 2006
Order Appraisals ..,.........,....................................,............,.................. January 17, 2006
The initial authorizations at the January 17, 2006 Council Meeting will not need to include the
field work. The wetland delineations need to be completed when vegetation in the wetland is
growing, which will not occur until later this spring. The preliminary survey will need to be
completed prior to any delineation being completed. A second visit to the site will be necessary
following the wetland delineations to ensure that boundary locations are accurate. The land
acquisition process will need to be authorized at the immediately to start this process. This will
allow the identification of easements necessary for the construction, The proposed schedule
allows only minimal time for the negotiations to proceed. If it is found that the eminent domain
process is required, initiation of these proceedings on March 22, 2006 will still allow
construction to begin in May, 2006 as proposed.
The items that would need to be authorized at the January 17, 2006 Council Meeting include:
. Project Management $ 670.00
. Topographic Survey (Preliminary) $ 5,482,00
. Legal Descriptions and Exhibits $ 2,852.00
. Feasibility Study $ 8,965.00
. Appraisal $15,912.00
. Geotechnical $ 7.000.00
Subtotal $40,881.00*
* While all of the geotechnical expense of$7,000 does not need to be authorized, we would like
to order soil borings due to depth of installation and cost verification.
Preliminary survey on the Koehnen Property is not anticipated to be completed. The survey will
be limited to right-of-way only unless authorized by the property owner.
Also attached to this letter is the project team we are proposing for the project. This information
has been included for your review.
This letter represents our entire understanding of the project scope. If you are in agreement,
please sign on the space provided and return one original signed copy to us for our records. We
will start immediately upon receipt of the signed agreement.
C:\Doctlmems and SetlingslblolteylLocal SellillgslTempormy Il1lemet FiJesIOLK108\LTR PROP.!; /ul1ey-OI12Q6 a). doc
Mr, Bruce Loney, P.E.
January 12, 2006
Page 8
If you have any questions concerning the work plan or fee as discussed herein, please feel free to
contact me at 763-287-7190 or Kevin Kawlewski at 763-287-7193. We look forward to working
with you and greatly appreciate the opportunity to assist you and your staff in the completion of
this project.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, lltc.
Bret A, Weiss, P ,E. Kevin B. Kawlewski, P.E,
President Senior Project Manager
Attachments
ACCEPTED BY:
City of Shakopee, MN
By
Its
Date
CIDocumellls cmd Settillgslblo/le)'ILocul SertfugsITemportly)' lmemel FilesIOLKI08\LTR PROP-b IOlley-QJ /2Q6 (2).doc
Mr. Bruce Loney, P .E.
January 12, 2006
Page 9
PROJECT PERSONNEL
Kevin Kawlewski, P .E.
Project Manager
Mr. Kawlewski will serve as the Project Manager for the project. He will be responsible for
coordinating the work within the WSB team and responsible for the quality control, staff
scheduling, and overall project management to ensure that the project meets a high quality
standard, is delivered on time, and within budget. He will serve as the primary contact for the
City.
Mr. Kawlewski currently has two deep trunk sanitary sewer projects under construction in the
cities of Monticello and Lonsdale. The Monticello project includes the installation of Hob as
manufactured pipe at depths ranging from 25 to 45 feet deep, The construction required the
installation underneath 1-94, BNSF railroad, and in easements acquired along rear lot lines of
precision machining industrial plants.
The trunk sewer in Lonsdale involved installation ofPVC pipe at depths of 25 to 40 feet through >
wetlands and fat clay soils, The extension of this sewer has been completed in segments through
three different development sites. As the City Engineer, Mr. Kawlewski has reviewed and
approved all design and managed the construction observation and pipeline construction on
behalf of the City.
Mr. Kawlewski is a professional engineer with over 12 years of experience in project
management of municipal engineering projects from concept development to construction and
operations. His responsibilities include feasibility studies, cost estimating, comprehensive
planning, construction plans and specifications, operation, and construction observation. His
general project types include new and reconstructed roadways, Municipal State Aid (MSA)
streets, storm water collection systems, sanitary sewers, and water distribution and analysis. He
recently completed the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Study for the Andover Rural Reserve Area.
Bret Weiss, P.E.
Principal-in-Charge/QA-QC/Policy Review
Bret will serve as the Principal-in-Charge for the project. As Principal-in-Charge, he is the WSB
contact for performance or contract related issues with the City of Shakopee. Bret will also be
responsible for the quality control/quality assurance elements of the project. While it is expected
that the other members ofthe WSB Project Team will satisfy all ofthe City's needs, he provides
the City the assurance that WSB will meet its commitments to the City of Shakopee.
Bret is a registered Professional Engineer with over 18 years of diverse experience in many types
of municipal and g;~Ileral civil eIlgin~~rtng projects and 14 of these years have involved a role
with the City of Shako pee. His wide range ofproject experience includes storm sewers, water
distribution systems, sanitary sewer systems, site grading, parking facilities, and municipal State-
aid systems. He is an experienced project manager responsible for the planning, coordination,
design, and construction administration of a wide variety of municipal proj ects. Mr. Weiss
C lDocumelllS and ScrrllJgslbloneylLocal SeuillgslTempontT)' Intemcl FilesIOLKJ08\LTR PROP-b JOlleJ,.OI1206 (1).doc
Mr. Bruce Loney, P .E.
January 12, 2006
Page 10
excels at public involvement and in finding solutions to difficult project issues. Mr. Weiss has
also served as the City Engineer on a permanent to interim basis for four growing communities
and has interpreted policies for each ofthese communities.
Sonya Henning, P.E
Right-of-Way Engineer
Ms. Henning has over a decade of experience in civil engineering field with the majority ofthat
experience focused specifically on right-of-way engineering. Prior to her joining WSB, Ms.
Henning worked for the Minnesota Department of Transportation managing and coordinating
right-of-way programs throughout the state. Her primary duties included right-of-way
acquisition coordination with the various MnDOT Districts, utilities, FHW A and other various
agencies, eminent domain processes on selected MnDOT projects and contract negotiation for
right-of-way acquisition.
Ms. Henning will coordinate all activities relating to the negotiation and acquisition of easements
necessary for the project. Her extensive experience with MnDOT in this capacity will ensure . .
that the necessary easements are acquired within the timelines specified for the project.
Tom VoU, P.E.
Project Engineer
Mr. V 011 has over ten years of experience in the surveying, design, drafting, construction
management, and inspection of residential, municipal, commercial and industrial sites including
four years with the City of Shakopee. His design experience includes roadways, sanitary sewers,
storm sewers, watermains, detention ponds, private development projects, well drilling,
wastewater treatment facility construction, and water tower construction. Mr. Voll's
responsibilities include plan design and drafting, grading plan design, construction inspection,
surveying, permit acquisition, public information meetings, project management, final contractor
payments, right-of way acquisition, construction and grading plan review and public
assessments.
Pierre Amyotte
CADD Design
Mr. Amyotte will serve as the lead project design technician. His role will include working with
the designers on the project design and drafting of the construction plans.
Mr. Amyotte is a CADD Technician in the Municipal Group. He has 21 years of experience in
Computer-Aided Drafting and Design (CADD). Mr. Amyotte is skilled in the use of AutoCad,
Land Development, Civil Survey, MicroStation, and Eagle Point. As a CADD Technician, Mr.
Amyotte provide9 getail design and gflta management services for infrastructure engineering
, projects.
C\DoculIlems and Serrillgs1blolleyllocal SertillgsITemponl1,' {1llet'net FileslOlKI08\LTR PROP-b IOJley-OI/206 (2).doc
Table 1
...... Estimate of Cost ~
WSB TrunkSanitarySew~r.Extension , ~ ~
& Associates, Inc. Along CSAH 83 from Ch~rch Addition to Valley View Road SHAKOPEE
CIty of Shako pee
Scott County
Estimated Hours
Sr. I I 1 Sr. i Registered I
~i~l~t &~ql~l~ ~~ 3~11~ ~
Principal ! Manager I Enl!ineer! Eng, Specialist I I Scientist 1 Scientist Surveyor Survey Crew Survey Crew Clerical Hours Cost
Tw.k Descriptioll ._ .' . _ I.
\ Pr..j.ct M....g....ot ..2 8 I ! m.. .h 10 $ \,146.00
^r~~:rtnU~iU}~~_~ ~:j mn .. _ i:~:
B. MCES Coordination I 4 'I 4 $ 448.00
, ~~:~;~=."'".~..~......,...~-) "'j=b -.t~_ t n' n .u ;:~_ '::
B. Field ReviewwilhScottCo\lntyTEP . . . 'on _ ! I I ~ 2 $ 128.00
C. l)repul".lton of Rq>orl 1 i i I 2 i 4 7 $ 592.00
Subtotal ~. .... . . . .!.. j:2.. .14 18 S .1~~~.OO
3 Topo~nll)hicSurvey(l)relhnhlu.ry) ._... ._. ..... j_on .1 .. .
A. R.s.arch ... ._ i 2 2. $ 2.3~.00
B. Set GPS Survey Control . . _._ . _ I u_ . 1.... _ .. 4 4 $ . .._5~!!.':..QQ.
C. Topographic Survey _ _... .. . 16 16 ~ .-?~4?~..~0
D. Parcel Base Mapping .. _.. _ m _.L_____L....._...._ 6 $ 480.00
E. Edilt..poda'a .... ._ .__ .... ....._._.._. ._._..._~m.____L. . ..16 __ ~._ ....._... 1,280.00
F. Crew coordination/management I I 4 4 $ 468.00
Sobt..t.. .__. .._..m...__..'.._....... ._........ .__ 22 i I 6 16 4 48~. 5,482.00
4 ..reIJare Ll'~~" DcscrilJtions Cor ~r.~I~~~.~J~Jg~!:-oJ:W!r.~l!.seme~!~ . _ -. ... ... ; _..._m_~._1
A. Prepare legal descriptions and exhibits for permanent easements J. .. .. ..!.. ._~.. q 'j!"__" ._. _ .....~.. .~L. ..~ l,970.OQ
13. ..repure legal descriptions and exhibits for temporary easements I I I 4 2 2 10 $ 882.00
Sobl..tal ~. 3. 16... ; 8 2 ... __ .. ..~~ ..__ _$ 2,8,s_2.0Q
.--- -- -- ;--- ! .
5 Easement Ae(lllistion/N~otlations I .$. _
A. Field Title Investigations .l! ___. : 6 $ .. . .~I~~~Q.
B. Coordinateappnlisalsandtitles .L. ,._... ... ....._ ... ..... 1 $ 112.00
C. Coordinate document prepurotion ... ~ . . ~ . ~_ . 112.00
D. Original otTers ~_... .... 6 $ 672.00
E. Negotiations t~. J l~ $ 1,120.00
F. RceordingDocuments 2 1 i"'- -s' 224:00'
Subtotal ~6 _ ....... ..__.___...~_..lnn. un . _.. i 26 $ 2,912.00
I I
6 FCllSibilit)' Study .-.. r - i
A. Preliminary Design 2 ~.. 40 10 ..1._....; 60 $ 4~648.00
B. Gcotc~hnical Coo:<'ination . . .1.. . ! .! '1 $ 98.00.
c. QuantIty Calculations 2 8 j. 10 S 764.00
D. Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 I . ~... 8 I. 12 $ t,ooi.ao
E. Prepar.R.portGraphics ...1 1 ..... ..........2._ .._._ ...4. 10.!...! 18. .......s. 1,517.00.
F. Dr.1i R.port I 2 6 i! 9 $ 937.00
Sob'..,.,- 3 6 _. _"'i---'--'-~-- ._._! 60.. 20 . ___ ...11_0_ ____$ 8,9~5.00
7 Final Desig1l Services . ~i .~.-~" ~:~.~.! .. .._.._ ..
A. TnlllkSanitarySewerAlignment 1_ .... ._...1... _...~"1.. t .~. i3.... ...... -S 1,072.00
B. SanitaryScwcrProlilc I ~_.. ......_L.._. u~_ . ...._~ ._ 6 $ 480.00
C. Construction Details .1 .. ._._.1.. 12 ! !,~. 28 -$" 2,476.00
D. EuscmcntIdcntilicalion 2 l ....l.....:. ~_...'.._.... ...... 10 -i ....846.00
E. Construction Plan Preparotio':l ~ 12' 24 ! 48 69.._.. : 148 $ 12.404.00
F. Erosion Control Plan and SWPPP Documentation ...1..._... . i. . _~. 2 6 Ii $ 928.00
G. Project Speciticutions 2 .. .. .~ . I .~ . !. 6 26 $ ....- 2.452.00
H. Cost Eslimat.andQuantityTakeoIT I I 2 I 12 i.--........- 1 16 $ 1,219.00
Sobtulal 6 ..._ 26 i 58 90 I 64_.._ I. 2 ; 6 ! 7 259 $ 21,877.00
C:IDocumenls and SelllngslbloneylLocal SetlingslTempotary Internet FileslOLK1081PROP BUDGET-trunk san swrext-o.11206 1/12120.0.6
Table 1
.4.. Estimate of Cost ~
WSB Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension ~~
& Associates, inc. Along CSAH 83 from Ch~rch Addition to Valley View Road Su A V'OPEE
CltyofShakopee 1 ~
Scoll County
/
Estimated Hours /
i Sr. I I Sr.. Registered I
'~'~(l~ ~~!~!~ ~ 3~oo ~I ~
Principal I Mana ~er ! Enl!ineer l Enp. Specialist I. i Scientist I Scientist Surveyor Survey Crew Survey Crew I Clerical Hours Cost
8 I'crmlt AI'pHcat;ous .. .: .1. . .. .... .!.....
A. MPCA _ Sanitary Sewer Extension j .-.- -1 I 'I I 2 $ 157.00
B. MPCA _ NIlDES Phase II Construction Activity j " .... - . "in 4 1 '6 ... -.'~.'.-" 4~?Q9_
c. Scott County. Work w\th," right-of-way i ~. I 4 j... .,,~. 1 7 $ 675.00
D. US Army Corps or Eugincers i! ..... I..L 4 I 6 $ 427.00
E. Minnesota DNR _ Wetland Impacts \ I .! 1 4 1 6 S 427.00
Subtotal 2 5.. 3 12 I 5 27 $ 2,113.00
. ... '
9 Construction Services \
A. Construction Staking I .
I. Comps for.Staking _... _ 4... ;....0. ! 4 $ ~~Q:Q9_
ii. SanilarySewer ... j..__........ .. ....__......... 40 40 J ~.~1Q:..~9
iv. Prepare Cut Sheets 4 $ 320.00
v. Surface Rest9ration Slaking .m.......! f 4 4 $ 524.00
vi. CrewCoordinlltion .._.. . . ..__!__...... __. .... ..., 6 "6 "s . 70~~qQ
B. Construction Consultation (As needed) \0 .. ~oQ_ . ._0_.__ f_m_... . .... SO .$ . . ...~.91Q.QQ
c. Record Drawing Preparation 32 8 40 $ 3.608.00
Subtotal ! 10 .......L.._ ......~!l.. . ...... 40 I. 6 52 I 148 $ 15,754.00
I I..! I!m \..... :
Totul Hour. 15 ; 93 i 136 I t50 I 162 I 7 I 32 20 I 16 56 I 14 I 701
IIllollrlnCo.<I., 125.00 I 112.00 98.00; 71.00 80.00 I 112.00 : 64.00 I 117.00 I 156.00 131.00 T 59.00 I T 11
IITot,,1 Direct Labor Costs $1,875.00 $10.416.00 I $13.328.00 $10,650.00 I $12960.00 $784.00 I $2,048.00 $2.340.00 I $2,496.00 $7,336.00 I $826,00 I $65,059.00 II
SlIbctl/umlt'IIIt Ex I!lIses
Lam. Services S lccialist (Title \Vork, A) raisol, Offer Letter, Appraisal Review> $ 13,000.00
C..'Otecbllical $ 7,000.00
hOTAL PROJECT COST I $85,059;00 ~
C:\Documents and SettingslbloneylLocal SettlngslTemporary Internel FileslOLK1081PROP BUDGET.trunk san swr exl-011206 1/12/2006
I J... o~ b.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Shakopee City Council
FROM: John Schmitt, Mayor
SUBJECT: 2006 Liaison Appointments
DATE: January 13, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
The Council is asked to endorse the following Council Liaison appointments for 2006.
BACKGROUND:
In order to maintain effective communications individual members of the City Council
are typically appointed as liaison to the various groups with whom the City deals.
I would like to appoint the following people as liaisons or Council officer for 2006:
2006 Liaison Appointments
1. Acting Mayor - Terry Joos
2. Shakopee Public Utilities Commission Liaison - Terry Joos
3. LS.D. 720 School Board - Steve Menden
4, Shakopee Convention and Visitors Bureau - Matt Lehman
5. Shakopee Chamber Of Commerce Board of Directors - Matt Lehman
6. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities - John Schmitt and Mark McNeill
. (alt)
7. Suburban Rate Authority - Mark McNeill & John Schmitt
8. Vision Shakopee - Steve Menden
9. Interview Committee -Steve Menden and Steve Clay
10. Park and Rec Advisory Board - Pending
11. Metropolitan Council- John Schmitt and Michael Leek (alt)
12. Environmental Advisory Board - Pending
13. Board of Review-Terry Joos & Matt Lehman
14. SCALE - John Schmitt & Mark McNeill
15. Scott County Transit Review Board - Steve Clay
16. Suburban Transit Authority Board of Directors - Steve Clay
Ad Hoc Committee Representatives
1. Railroad Safety Committee - Terry Joos and Matt Lehman
2. US 169 Corridor Committee
a. Technical Advisory subcommittee - Michael Leek and Bruce Loney
b. Policy Advisory subcommittee - Matt Lehman
3. Public Works Building - Matt Lehman
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend the above be appointed to the various offices/liaison posts for 2006.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If the Council concurs with the appointments, they should, by motion, affirm the
appointments.
John Schmitt
Mayor
JS:th
--~-_._._---------~
J (). (J '1
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Fence at Women's Prison
DATE: January 12, 2006
INTRODUCTION:
The Council is asked to discuss the proposed plans from the State from to construct two
12 foot-high fences at the women's prison.
BACKGROUND:
Mayor Schmitt has asked to have a general discussion ofthe State's proposal to surround
the Shakopee Correctional Facility for Women with two fences - it is our understanding
that these would each be 12 feet in height. It does not appear that news media accounts
have made the public aware that the height of the fences will be 12 feet. The outer one
would be constructed with brick pillars, with a combination of iron rods and pickets
between the pillars; the inner fence would be of un climbable chain link: construction.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The council should discuss and determine possible action.
Mark McNeill
City Administrator