HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 19, 2016
RESOLUTION NO. 7658
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,
APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF CANTERBURY PARK SIXTH
ADDITION
________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS,
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation,applicant and property owner, hasfiled an
application for a Preliminary and Final Plat of Canterbury Park Sixth Addition.
WHEREAS,
the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as;
See attached Exhibit #1; and
WHEREAS,
notice was provided and on December 3, 2015, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing regarding this application, at which it heard from City Planning staffand invited members of the
public to comment; and
WHEREAS,alsoat
the City Council heard this matter at their meeting on December 15, 2015; and
their meeting on April 19, 2016; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota
that the Preliminary and Final Plat of Canterbury Park Sixth Addition isapproved, subject to the
following conditions:
I.The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final
Plat:
A.Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B.Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format) of the Final Plat
to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system.
of $22,840.46
C.A special assessment for property included in this Plat shall be paid at
the time of or prior to the recording of the Final Plat.
D.Park dedication, given the location of the development, as cash in lieu of land is
recommended.
E.The platting of Lots 1 & 2 are to establish lots from a metesand bounds description
with no intended redevelopment. Park dedication fees should have been paid at the
time of building permit in 1985 but were not collected. The applicant has requested
that the park dedicationrequirementbe calculated as it would haveoriginally been
calculated in 1985(5% of the fair market value of each lot) plus 5% annual interest.
The FMV ofthe landin 1985 for Lots 1 & 2 (282.11 acres) was$712,416.00X 5%
$153,580.04161,649.00
in park
=$35,620.80 + 5% interest over 31 years =
dedication to be paid for Lots 1 & 2.
1
F.If Lots 1 & 2 are replatted for additional development in the future, the developer
will pay the park dedication fees that are in place at that time; however, the
developer will receive a credit for the proportionate amount of the park dedication
fees that are being paid now for Lots 1 &2.
G.Park dedication fees in the amount required by the City Codeand adopted City fee
schedule shall be paid at the time ofrecording of Final Platting of the Outlots.
H.The exact amount of acreage accepted by the City for public utility easements must
be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Director for the exact Park Dedication
calculation.
I.A trail along Shenandoah Drive must be constructed from Eastway Avenue to Eagle
at the time ofconstructionof Shenandoah Drive
Creek Boulevard, consistentwith
City Code design standards.
J.The applicant shall discuss with City Public Works the design/development of a trail
th
and/or sidewalk along 4Avenue, adjacent to Outlot I and that section of Lot 1, as
th
well as adjacent to Lot 1 & Lot 2 along 12Avenue, and agree to construct that
trail/sidewalk, consistent with any approved design standards.
for property located within the plat
K.Additional right-of-way, in the form of sight
triangles fifteen (15) feet in dimension, will be provided at the following
intersections:
1.Shenandoah Drive and Eagle Creek Boulevard.
2.Shenandoah Drive and Eastway Avenue.
th
3.12Avenue and Canterbury Road (County Road 83).
A minimum of sixty(60) feet ofrR
L.ight-of-way will be provided north of the
th
, asapproved by the City Engineer and as shown on the
centerline of 12Avenue
revised plat
.
M.A minimum of fifty (50) feet of right-of-way will be provided south of the centerline
th
of 4Avenue.
N.Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They
include, but are not be limited to, the following:
1.Minimum drainage and utility easements for public utilities need to be
dedicated per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 10.1 (A-D).
2.The applicant will provide a minimum of ten (10) feet of drainage and utility
(including Shenandoah Drive and
easement adjacent to all rights-of-way
Eagle Creek Blvd.), with a minimum of fifteen (15) feet required along
th
12Avenue and CSAH 83 (including Outlot A)
.
3.IDatthe time of
Outlotwill be deeded to the City of Shakopee
construction of Shenandoah DriveDrainage and utility easementsshall
.
be provided over all of OutlotsD& E.
II.Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall
apply:
A.Since most of the development of this property took place prior to the enactment of
the trunk storm water charge in 1996, and the platting of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 of
Canterbury Park 6th Addition will have no storm water related impacts on the
downstream system, there is no need to collect trunk storm water charges.Future
platting of all outlots in the Canterbury Park 6th Addition will be subject to payment
of all trunk storm water charges and trunk storm water storage and treatment charges
as required by the most recent versions of the City Code and the City of Shakopee
Fee Schedule.
2
B.The existing public water main and underground electric facilities should be
surveyed and easements shall be required for these facilities.
C.All outlots depicted in the preliminary plat are unbuildable and must be further
platted into lots and blocks before development can occur on them. Any outlot that
does not currently have frontage on an existing or proposed right-of-way must be
further platted, by combination with another outlot or otherwise, in a manner that
provides frontage and access to a public right-of-way, consistent with the City Code
regulations.
III.The following conditions need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a
grading permit and/or a street and utility plan:
A.Landscaping in drainage and utility easements encompassing public storm sewer
structures and pipes will need to be in compliance with the most recent version of the
City of Shakopee’s Easement Fencing and Landscaping Policy.
B.Additional plan review comments for grading and/or building permit applications
will be sent under separate correspondence.
IV.Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions
need to be addressed/completed prior to issuance of a building permit:
A.If a grading permit is approved, record plans need to be provided per the City of
Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2.5 and Section 11.2 (A-L). The record plans
need to be submitted to the engineering department.
B.The applicant will provide paper and electronic(AutoCAD and Portable Document
Format) as-built record drawings for all public storm sewer and watermain. As-built
record plan requirements are set forth in Section 11 of the City of Shakopee Design
Criteria.
C.Sewer, water service, fire protection and access shall be reviewed for code
compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
D.Specific performance/design standard details will be reviewed for compliance with
the City Code Section 151.044 &Section 151.105 at the time of any building permit
application(s).
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the _____ day of ____________________, 2016.
__________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
Attest:
________________________
Lori Hensen, City Clerk
3
Declaration of Property - April 19, 2016
Qty.Description
14Pentax Pocket Jet Mobile
1Mag-lite
13Black/brown
5Radios
BoxSpare L3 camera gear
4Long soft sided gun cases
3Camo rain pants
2Camo jackets
1Camo hat
2Camo backpacks
3Black Police vests
1Camo Police vest
6Swat Vests
1Black nylon vest
BoxKevlar pieces, ammo holders, misc. gear
8Gas masks
215' laddars
9Respirators
1Navy jacket
1Green snow pants
1Water cooler
3Green foam mats
13Helmets
1Set of Stop sticks
9Tactical armor shields
4Sight markers
RESOLUTION 7711
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO SUBMIT A BODY-WORN CAMERA POLICY AND
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE POLICE
DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the grant application made to the US Department
of Justice for the Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program. The application is to
obtain Body-Worn Cameras and supporting software and hardware to develop and implement
camera and data usage, recording, access and storage policies, and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes the sixty thousand dollar ($60,000.00) match
requirement for the Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program and has secured the
matching funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the US Department of
Justice, the City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award, and may enter into an agreement with
the US Department of Justice for the above referenced project. The City of Shakopee will comply with
all applicable laws, requirements and regulations as stated in the grant agreement.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this
th
19 Day of April, 2016.
______________________________
William Mars
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 7714
A Resolution Accepting Bids For
For The 2016Street Reconstruction
Project No. 2016-1
WHEREAS,
pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2016Street Reconstruction,
Project No. 2016-1,bids were received, opened on April 12,2016, and tabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
BidderAmount
RYAN CONTRACTING CO.$2,020,143.30
CHARD TILING & EXCAVATING INC.$2,053,132.90
PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$2,189,476.13
NORTHWEST$2,208,588.17
WM. MUELLER & SONS$2,457,125.44
WHEREAS,
it appears that Ryan Contracting Co., 26480 France Ave, Elko, MN 55020,is
the lowest responsible bidder for the 2016Street ReconstructionProject;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1.
The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with Ryan ContractingCo. in the name of the City of Shakopee for the 2016Street
ReconstructionProject according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 2016.
__________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
ENGR/2016-PROJECTS/2016-RECONSTRUCTION/WORD/RES7714-AWARD-CONTRACT
RESOLUTION NO. 7716
A Resolution Accepting Bids For
For The Hilldale Drive Improvement
Project No. 2014-3
WHEREAS,
pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Hilldale Drive Improvement,
Project No. 2014-3,bids were received, opened on April 12,2016, and tabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
BidderAmount
CHARD TILING & EXCAVATING$396,708.50
RYAN CONTRACTING$457,390.90
NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC.$469,618.30
MIDWEST CIVILCONSTRUCTURES$480,890.00
NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.$521,998.50
BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION$501,621.00
WHEREAS,
it appears that Chard Tiling & Excavating, Inc., 26239 State Highway 25,
Belle Plaine, MN 56011,is the lowest responsible bidder for the Hilldale Drive Improvement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1.
The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with Chard Tiling & Excavating, Inc.in the name of the City of Shakopee for the Hilldale
Drive ImprovementProject according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 2016.
__________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
$2,565.00$1,120.00$946.00$9,335.00$9,650.00$1,120.00$3,685.00$2,130.00$4,340.00$9,560.00$1,840.00$105,680.00$920.00$3,668.00$3,338.00$2,760.00$920.00$1,840.00$2,240.00$4,110.00$32,800.00$4,100.00$208
,667.00$250.00$208,917.00
Cost
Total
Hours
11402042
105103200
251010951035254420103936301020203025
SAP 166-108-005/ SAP 166-125-001 4th Avenue and Shenandoah Drive Improvements
$3,965.00
Clerical
65.00
15101061
525482
Grading, Surfacing, Water Main, Storm Sewer, Trail, and Appurtenant Work
Two Person
Survey Crew
$36,900.00
164.00
200225
25
Assume May 9th through September 30th 2016, 20 weeks construction, 5 days per week, 55 hours per week, including 2 weeks of 2016 winter closeout documentation
Senior Survey
Pete Helder
Technician
$4,110.00
137.00
3030
Estimate of Cost-City of Shakopee
WSB & Associates Inc.
Labor Compliance
Scott Ramlo
State Aid$7,520.00
94.00
8080
Lead Inspector
$129,628.00
Phil Vigen
92.00
11001409
301010208020103530301020
4
Project Manager
Jeff Eggert
$26,544.00
112.00
237
201050103020154020
45544
WORK TASK Contract No
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES
Pre-Project Inspection / Removal Measurements
SAP 166-108-005/ SAP 166-125-001
Full Time Construction Inspection (20 Weeks)
Traffic Control Inspection / Haul Roads
Weekly Meeting (Assume 20 meetings)
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Public Involvement & Coordination
Monthly Pay Estimates (5 months)
Monthly Audits / Quarterly Review
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Pre-Construction Conference
Weekly NPDES InspectionsPost Rain Event Inspections
Final 2016 Documentation
Punchlist / Final Inspection
Contract Administration
On Site Documentation
Documentation Review
Materials Certification
Survey Computations
Project Management
Construction staking
Labor Compliance
As-built Survey
WSB SALARY COSTS
As-builts
Description
SURVEY
Survey Stakes
Hourly Costs
Total Hours
EXPENSES
Task
1234
RESOLUTION NO. 7717
A Resolution Accepting Bids For
th
Avenue & Shenandoah Drive Improvements
For 4
Project No. 2015-7
th
WHEREAS,
pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 4Avenue & Shenandoah Drive
Improvements, Project No. 2014-3,bids were received, opened on April 12, 2016, and tabulated
according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
BidderAmount
PARK CONSTRUCTION CO$2,119,046.75
VALLEY PAVING$2,189,909.68
NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC.$2,245,913.30
st
WHEREAS,
it appears that Park ConstructionCompany, 1481 81Avenue NE,
th
Minneapolis, MN 55432,is the lowest responsible bidder for the 4Avenue & Shenandoah Drive
ImprovementsProject; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1.
The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
th
contract with Park Construction Co.in the name of the City of Shakopee for the 4Avenue &
Shenandoah Drive ImprovementsProject according to the plans and specifications therefore
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 2016.
__________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
__________________________
Acting City Clerk
th
ENGR/2016-PROJECTS/4&SHENANDOAH/WORD/RES7717-AWARD-CONTRACT
RESOLUTION NO. 7718
A Resolution Accepting Bids For
For The 2016Bituminous Overlay
Project No. 2016-2
WHEREAS,
pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2016Bituminous Overlay,
Project No. 2016-2,bids were received, opened on April 12, 2016, andtabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
BidderAmount
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC.$949,488.16
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP$978,319.60
HARDRIVES INC$1,016,167.96
VALLEY PAVINGINC.$1,048,642.16
PARK CONSTRUCTION$1,084,918.20
WM. MUELLER & SONS$1,093,852.70
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS$1,107,317.15
WHEREAS,
it appears thatNorthwest Asphalt, Inc., 1451 Stagecoach Road, Shakopee,
MN 55379is the lowest responsible bidder for the 2016Bituminous Overlay Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1.
The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with Northwest Asphalt, Inc.in the name of the City of Shakopee for the 2016Bituminous
OverlayProject according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council
and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of theCity of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 2016.
__________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
__________________________
Acting City Clerk
ENGR/2016-PROJECTS/2016-OVERLAY/WORD/RES7718-AWARD-CONTRACT
TS NIZARAS
TS
RELLIM
TFIWS
TS
YESMAR
TS
DR LLAHCSRAM
ESUOH
TS YELBIS
TS
CSRAM
LLAH
TS NOIGEL
TS TUMWAHS
EK
GA
TS
W
CIR
EGAS
EIRIARP
ATOKAD
TS
TS ATOKAD
TC
TS ATOSENNIM
REVOLC
TEKRAM
TS TEKRAM
NIAM
TS NIAM
SENNIM
RECNEPS
REMMOS
TS SIWEL
TS SEMLOH
TS RELLUF
TS DOOWTA
TS TTOCS
TS RAGPA
TS YAWMUHS
TS ECREIP
RESOLUTION NO. 7719
A Resolution Accepting Bids For
For The 2016Bituminous Reclamation
Project No. 2016-3
WHEREAS,
pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2016Bituminous Reclamation,
Project No. 2016-3,bids were received, opened on April 12, 2016, and tabulated according to law,
and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
BidderAmount
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC.$348,788.80
PARK CONSTRUCTION CO$368,074.00
HARDRIVES INC.$389,043.25
MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO.$389,880.00
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC.$397,313.50
CHARD TILING & EXCAVATING INC.$414,671.00
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP$422,530.00
WHEREAS,
it appears thatNorthwest Asphalt, Inc., 1451 Stagecoach Road, Shakopee,
MN 55379is the lowest responsible bidder for the 2016Bituminous ReclamationProject.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA:
1.
The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with Northwest Asphalt, Inc.in the name of the City of Shakopee for the 2016Bituminous
ReclamationProject according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.
TheCity Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this day of , 2016.
__________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
ENGR/2016-PROJECTS/2016-RECLAMATION/WORD/RES7719/AWARD-CONTRACT
FundstransferredelectronicallyApril6,2016toApril19,2016
PAYROLL
$ 264,369.90
FIT/FICA80,299.33$
STATEINCOMETAX16,616.52$
PERA79,294.84$
HCSP11,128.08$
Nationwide13,822.07$
ICMA
$1,904.02
MSRS3,382.85$
HealthSavingsAccount5,620.78$
FSA8,125.32$
MNWageLevy144.23$
TOTAL484,707.94$
Page 1 of 1
4/15/2016 7:59:38 AM
TAX INCREMENT
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement(the “Agreement”) is made as of March __, 2016by and
between the CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), the ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, a public body
corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”) andSCOTT COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, political subdivision under the laws of Minnesota (the “County”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Authority was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to
469.1081, as amended (the “EDA Act”) and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers
by a resolution of the City Council of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken a program to promote economic development and job
opportunities and to promote the development and redevelopment of land which is underutilized within
the City, and has created the Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1
(hereinafter referred to as the “Project”) in an area (hereinafter referred to as the “Project Area”) located
in the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections469.001 through 469.047, as amended (the “HRA
Act”); and
WHEREAS, by resolution dated April 4, 1995, the City Council of the City transferred control,
authority, and operation of the Project to the Authority, which currently administers the Project,
exercising the powers of a housing and redevelopment authority under the HRA Act, in accordance with
the EDA Act; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has established the Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development)
District No. 17 (“TIF District”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as
amended (the “TIF Act”), made up of the area to be developed by the Developer; and
WHEREAS, Amazon.com.dedc, LLC, a Delaware corporation(the “Developer”), has proposed
to cause the construction of an approximately 820,000 square foot building for use as a distribution and
warehouse facility including approximately 750,000 square feet of warehouse processing space and
approximately 70,000 square feet of associated office space (the “Minimum Improvements”), on real
property located in the City(the “Development Property”), within the TIF District; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has proposed to lease the Minimum Improvements for use as a
distribution and warehouse facility; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.175, subd. 1a of the TIF Act, the Board of Commissioners of
the County may require that certain costs of County road improvements be paid out of tax increment if
certain conditions are met and the County has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of County road
improvements related to the Minimum Improvements with tax increment from the TIF District; and
WHEREAS, the City finds it necessary to reconstruct and improve streets adjacent to the Minimum
Improvements and has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of City road improvements related to the
Minimum Improvements with tax increment from the TIF District
WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to forego any tax increment generated by the Minimum
Improvements; and
1
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
WHEREAS, the Authority, the City and the County propose to enter into this Agreement in order
to allocate tax incrementgenerated by the TIF District to the City’s and County’s costs related to the
construction of public road improvements related to and necessitated by the development of the Minimum
Improvements; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutualobligations of the Parties
hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1.Definitions.
“Agreement” means this Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement, as the same may be from time to
time modified, amended, or supplemented.
“Authority” means the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota.
“Available Tax Increment” means 99.1% of the Tax Increment attributable to the Development
Property and paid to the Authority by the County in the six months preceding eachPayment Date.
“City” means the City of Shakopee, Minnesota.
“City Road Project” means the City road improvements described in Section 3.1hereof.
“County” means Scott County, Minnesota.
“County Road Project” means the County road improvements described in Section 3.2hereof.
“Developer” means Amazon.com.dedc, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or its
permitted successors and assigns.
“Event of Default” has the meaning provided to such term in Section 4.1 hereof.
“Development Property” means the real property described in EXHIBITA of this Agreement.
“Minimum Improvements” means the construction of a building totaling approximately 820,000
square feet including approximately 750,000 square feet of warehouse processing space and
approximately 70,000 square feet of associated office space on the Development Property which will be
leased to the Developer for use a distribution and warehouse facility.
“Party” or “Parties” shall mean one or more of the Authority, the City and the County, as parties
to this Agreement.
“Payment Date” means February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1of the first year Tax
Increment is received by the City, which is expected to be August 1, 2017.
“Tax Increment” means that portion of the real property taxes that is paid with respect to the
Development Property and that is remitted to the Authority as tax increment pursuant to the Tax Increment
Act.
2
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
“Tax Increment Act” or “TIF Act” means the Tax Increment FinancingAct, Minnesota Statutes
Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended.
“Tax Increment District” or “TIF District” means Tax Increment Financing (Economic
Development) District No. 17, an economic development tax increment financing district created by the
City and the Authority.
“Tax Increment Plan” or “TIF Plan” means the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District
approved by the City Council on May 19, 2015, and as it may be amended.
“State” means the State of Minnesota.
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS
Section 2.1.Representations by the City. The City is a statutory city duly organized and
existing under the laws of the State. The City has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
Section 2.2. Representations by the County. The County is a public corporation and political
subdivision of the State. The County has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
Section 2.3.Representations by the Authority. The Authority makes the following
representations and warranties as the basis for its covenants herein:
(a)The Authority is an economic development authority duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State. The Authority has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
(b)The activities of the Authority are undertaken for the purpose of fostering the
development of certain real property in the City for the purposes of increasing tax base, creating
employment opportunities, and encouraging economic development within the City.
ARTICLE III
ROAD PROJECTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
Section 3.1.CityRoad Projects. The City agrees to completethe following public
improvements necessitated by the Minimum Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the “City Road
Project”):
th
(a)Improvements to 4Avenue from Shenandoah Drive to CSAH 83 (Canterbury Road)
th
• Widening 4Street to a three lane roadway from Shenandoah Drive to CSAH 83
• Related improvements to storm sewer, water system, sanitary sewer system
• Related sidewalk improvements
th
Avenue to CSAH 101
(b)Improvements to Shenandoah Drive from 4
th
Avenue to CSAH 101
•Reclamation of Shenandoah Drive from 4
• Railroad crossing improvements
• Related improvements to storm sewer, water system, sanitary sewer system
3
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
• Related sidewalk improvements
(c)All engineering costs and costs of right-of-way for the above-mentioned projects.
Section 3.2.County Road Projects. The County agrees to completethe following public
improvements necessitated by the Minimum Improvements (hereinafter referred to collectively as the
“County Road Project”):
(a)Improvements to CSAH 101/Shenandoah Drive
• Extension of westbound 101 left turn land at Shenandoah.
(b)Improvements to CSAH 83/4th Avenue
• Construct a northbound left, southbound right, and eastbound right-turn lane.
• Monitor the need for future traffic signal control. Install conduit and handholes.
• Relocate the Inland Container driveway to 4th Avenue.
• Relocate all Anchor Glass driveways to IndustrialBoulevard.
• Close north private driveway just south of 4th Avenue on the east side of CSAH 83.
(d)All engineering costs and costs of right-of-way for the above-mentioned projects.
Section 3.3.Payment of City Road Project Costs.
(a)In order to make the City Road Improvements necessitated by the construction of the
Minimum Improvements economically feasible, the Authority shall reimburse the City for the actual costs
of the City Road Project.
(b)On each Payment Date, the Authority will pay the City a pro rata portion of the Available
Tax Increment based on the costs of the City Road Project compared to the costs of the County Road
Project. The pro rata portion of Available Tax Increment to be paid to the City each Payment Date is
40.7%(equal to $2,319,076 divided by $5,698,326).
(c)Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Available Tax Increment exceeds the dollar amount
expected and the City is legally able to modify the TIF Plan to increase the expenditure of Available Tax
Increment, the excess Available Tax Increment may be used to provide the following road improvements
if warranted and justified by future road studies:
Improvements to County State Aid Highway 83/Twelfth Avenue in Shakopee, including
construction of dual westbound left turn lanes and modification of existing traffic signal
to accommodate dual westbound left turn lanes.
Traffic signal at State Highway 101 and Shenandoah Drive.
Traffic signal at County State Aid Highway 83 and Fourth Avenue in Shakopee.
(d)Prior to the Authority reimbursing the City for costs of the City Road Project, the City
shallprovide the Authority with written evidence in a form satisfactory to the Authority that the City has
paid the costs of the City Road Project. If the City Road Project is not complete prior to the first Payment
Date, the City may submit evidence of costs paid for a portion of the City Road Project.
4
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
Section 3.4.Payment of County Road Project Costs.
(a)In order to make the County Road Improvements necessitated by the construction of the
Minimum Improvements economically feasible, the Authority shall reimburse the County for the actual
costs of the County Road Project.
(b)On each Payment Date, the Authority will pay the County a pro rata portion of the
Available Tax Increment based on the costs of the CountyRoad Project compared to the costs of the City
Road Project. The pro rata portion of Available Tax Increment to be paid to the Countyeach Payment
Date is 59.3%(equal to $3,379,250 divided by $5,698,326).
(c)Prior to the Authority reimbursing the County for costs of the County Road Project, the
County shallprovide the Authority with written evidence in a form satisfactory to the Authority that the
County has paid the costs of the County Road Project. If the County Road Project is not complete prior to
the first Payment Date, the County may submit evidence of costs paid for a portion of the County Road
Project.
Section 3.5.Estimated Costs of Road Projects.
(a)The City understands and acknowledges that the TIF Plan budgeted approximately
$2,319,076 to pay the costs of the City Road Project and no additional Available Tax Increment will be
available to pay such costs.
(b)The County understands and acknowledges that the TIF Plan budgeted approximately
$3,379,250to pay thecosts of the CountyRoad Project and no additional Available Tax Increment will
be available to pay such costs.
(c)Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the tax increment derived from the TIF Project exceeds
what is estimated in the TIF Plan and if the costs of either or both of the City Road Project and the
County Road Project are significantly over the amounts estimated for such projects, the Board of the
Authority and the City Council of the City will consider modifying the TIF Plan to increase the budgetfor
both projects, if such modification is allowed under the TIF Act.
Section 3.6.Annual Accounting. Within 30 days of each fiscal year end (December 31), the
Authority shall provide to the City and the County an accounting of how the Tax Increment received from
the County in the previous year was expended. On or prior to May 1 of each year, the City and the
County shall provide to the Authority an accounting of how Available Tax Increment it received in the
previous year was expended and what Available Tax Increment remains unexpended.
agree to indemnify and
Section 3.7.Indemnification. The Authority, the City, and the County
hold harmless the otherPartiesfrom any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages, including
reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or
employees of the indemnifying Party, to theextent such acts or omissions relate toactivities conducted
by the indemnifying Party under this Agreement.
Each Party's liability is governed by the provisions
established in the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. No Party intends to waive any defenses or immunities
available under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466.
5
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
ARTICLE IV
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
Section 4.1. Events of Default Defined. The failure by the Authority, the City or the Countyto
observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation, or agreement on its part to be observed orperformed
under this Agreement shall be an Event of Default under this Agreement.
Section 4.2. Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in Section4.1 of this
Agreement occurs, the Authority, the City, or the Countymay:
(a)Suspend its performance under the Agreement until it receives reasonably satisfactory
assurances that the defaulting Party will cure its default and continue its performance under the Agreement.
(b)Upon a default by the City, the Authority may suspend the payment ofAvailable Tax
Increment tothe City.
(c)Upon a default by the County, the Authority may suspect the payment of Available Tax
Increment tothe County.
(d)Take whatever action, including legal, equitable, or administrative action, which may appear
necessary or desirable to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to enforce performance and
observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this Agreement.
Section 4.3. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to any Party is
intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be
cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter
existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon
any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such
right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient.
Section 4.4. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. In the event any agreement contained
in this Agreement should be breached by anyParty and thereafter waived by one or more of the other Parties,
such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other
concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder.
Section 4.5. Attorneys’Fees. Whenever any Event of Default occurs and if a Partyshall employ
attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due orfor the enforcement
of performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of another Partyunder this
Agreement, each Party will pay its own attorneys’fees.
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 5.1. Conflict of Interests; RepresentativesNot Individually Liable. The Authority, the City,
and the County,to the best of their respective knowledge, represent and agree that no member, official, or
employee of the Authority, the City or the Countyshall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in the
Agreement, nor shall any such member, official, or employee participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement that affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership, or association in
which he, directly or indirectly, is interested. No member, official, or employee of the Authority, the City or
the Countyshall be personally liable to any other Party to this Agreementin the event of any default or
6
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
breach by the Authority, the City or the Countyor for any amount that may become due to other Parties to
this Agreement or on any obligations under the terms of the Agreement.
Section 5.2. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections of
the Agreement are inserted forconvenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or
interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 5.3. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a
notice, demand, or other communication under the Agreement by either Party to the other shall be sufficiently
given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
or delivered personally, to the following addresses (or to such other addresses as either Party may notify the
other):
To Authority:Shakopee EDA
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: Executive Director
To City:City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: City Administrator
To County:Scott County
Scott County Government Center
200 Fourth Avenue West
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: County Auditor
Section 5.4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 5.5. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement approved by
the City, the Authority, and the County.
Section 5.6.Term of Agreement.With respect to the County, this Agreement shall terminate
on the earlier of (i) the date that TIF payments to the County totaling $3,379,250 have been made or (ii)
the expiration of the TIF District. With respect to the City, this Agreement shall terminate on the earlier
of (i) the date that TIF payments to the City totaling $2,319,076have been made or (ii) the expiration of
the TIF District.
Section 5.7.Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the
laws of Minnesota.
Section 5.8.Entire Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement
constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and there
are no other representations, warranties, or agreements except as herein provided.
\[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.\]
7
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and the County have caused this Tax
Increment Cooperative Agreementto be duly executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the
date first above written.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By
Its Mayor
By
Its CityAdministrator
(Signature Page of City to Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement)
S-1
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By:
Its: President
By:
Its: Executive Director
(Signature Page of Authority to Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement)
S-2
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
By
Its Board Chair
By
Its County Administrator
(Signature Page of County to Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement
S-3
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
Lot 1, Block 1, Shenandoah East First Addition, Scott County, Minnesota
A-1
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 7715
RESOLUTIONAPPROVINGATAXINCREMENT
COOPERATIVEAGREEMENT RELATINGTOTAX
INCREMENT FINANCING (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
DISTRICT NO. 17
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Shakopee,Minnesota
(the “City”) as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01.The Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the
“Authority”) has established Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 17 (the “TIF
District”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended (the “TIF Act”),
within the Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1in an area located in the City
of Shakopee, Minnesota (the “City”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections469.001 through 469.047, as
amended.
1.02.The City, the Authority, and Amazon.com.NVDC, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the
“Developer”), have entered into a Contract for Private Development, dated September 15, 2015 (the
“Contract”), pursuant to which the Developer agreed to cause the construction of an approximately 820,000
square foot building for use as a distribution and warehouse facility including approximately 750,000 square
feet of warehouse processing space and approximately 70,000 square feet of associated office space (the
“Minimum Improvements”), on real property located in the City (the “Development Property”), within the
TIF District, and to lease the Minimum Improvements for use as a distribution and warehouse facility.
1.03.In connection with the development of the Minimum Improvements, Scott County,
Minnesota (the “County”) may require that certain costs of County road improvements be paid out of tax
increment if certain conditions are met,and the County has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of
County road improvements related to the Minimum Improvements with tax increment generated from the
TIF District.
1.04.The City has proposed to reconstruct and improve streets adjacent to the Minimum
Improvements and has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of City road improvements related to the
Minimum Improvements with tax increment from the TIF District, and the Developer has proposed to forego
any tax increment generated by the Minimum Improvements.
1.05.A form of Tax Incentive Cooperative Agreement (the “Cooperative Agreement”) between
the City, the Authority, and the County has been presented before the City Council, which allocatestax
increment generated by the TIF District to the City’s and County’s costs related to the construction of public
road improvements related to and necessitated by the development of the Minimum Improvements.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01.The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this resolution.
476438v1 JAE SH235-23
2.02.The Cooperative Agreementis hereby in all respects authorized, approved, and confirmed
and the Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
Cooperative Agreementfor and on behalf of the City in substantially the form now on file with the City but
with such modifications as shall be deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate, their execution thereof to
constitute such conclusive evidence of their approval of any and all modifications therein.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized and directed to
execute and deliver any additional agreements, certificates or other documents that the City determines are
necessary to implement this resolution.
Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon the date of its adoption.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota this 19day of April,2016.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
476438v1 JAE SH235-23
D
A
C
E
H
FG
B
N
I
L
M
O
P
K
Q
J
603 total acres
SF MF TOTAL TOTAL
QUADRANTIDFUTURE LAND USEACRES
UNITSUNITSUNITSS.F.
ROW1.52--00
1,687 housing units
ARetail18.04--0157,151
BSingle Family Attached4.3337-370
net residential density: 5.3
ROW5.22--00
ARetail4.17--036,332
1,199,139 square feet retail/
BMultifamily Stacked1.20-32320
business park
BParks2.20--00
CMixed Use (Retail/BP)3.24--035,292
3,034 jobs
DMixed Use (Retail/BP)12.03--0130,977
ROW43.39--00
AMixed Use (Retail/BP)65.76--0716,126
BParks86.69--00
UNITS PER ACRE UNITS PER ACRE UNITS PER ACRE
RESIDENTIAL
CSingle Family Attached14.09120-1200
LOWHIGH
DRetail5.25--045,780 Traditional Single Family2.003.00
Small Lot Single Family3.005.00
EMixed Use (HD/Retail)4.24-575718,452
Single Family Attached5.0012.00
FMultifamily Stacked6.90-1861860
Multifamily Stacked24.0030.00
GRetail6.78--059,029
Mixed Use (HDR Portion)24.0030.00
HSingle Family Attached7.9568-680
ITraditional Single Family79.90200-2000
PARK FAR FAR FAR
RESIDENTIALDEDICATIONLOWHIGHAVERAGE
JTraditional Single Family22.7057-570
Retail0.100.15.25.20
JSmall Lot Single Family13.7555-550
Mixed Use
JParks6.19--00
(Commercial 0.10.20.30.25
Portion)
KTraditional Single Family34.9987-870
D
A
C
E
H
FG
B
N
I
L
M
O
P
K
Q
J
603 TOTAL ACRES
SF MF TOTAL
IDFUTURE LAND USEACRESTOTAL S.F.
UNITSUNITSUNITS
ROW1.52--00
1,793 HOUSING UNITS
ARetail18.04--0157,151
BMultifamily Stacked4.33-1171170
NET RESIDENTIAL DENSITY: 5.7
ROW5.22--00
ARetail4.17--036,332
1,373,145 SQUARE FEET RETAIL/
BMultifamily Stacked1.20-32320
BParks2.20--00
BUSINESS PARK
CMixed Use (Retail/BP)3.33--043,561
DMixed Use (Retail/BP)12.03--0157,173
3,372 JOBS
ROW43.39--00
AMixed Use (Retail/BP)65.76--0859,352
BParks86.69--00
CSingle Family Attached14.09120-1200
UNITS PER ACRE UNITS PER ACRE UNITS PER ACRE
RESIDENTIAL
LOWHIGH
DRetail5.25--045,780
Traditional Single Family2.003.00
ERetail4.24--036,903
Small Lot Single Family3.005.00
FMultifamily Stacked6.90-1861860
Single Family Attached5.0012.00
Mixed Use (HD/Retail/
G6.78-919136,893
Multifamily Stacked24.0030.00
HSingle Family Attached7.9568-680
Mixed Use (HDR Portion)24.0030.00
ITraditional Single Family79.08198-1980
PARK FAR FAR FAR
JTraditional Single Family22.0955-550
RESIDENTIALDEDICATIONLOWHIGHAVERAGE
JSmall Lot Single Family13.7655-550
Retail0.100.15.25.20
JParks6.78--00
Mixed Use
(Commercial 0.10.20.30.25
KTraditional Single Family32.1380-800
Portion)
KSmall Lot Single Family20.4182-820
initiated a process to complete a master plan for an
infrastructure (roads, sanitary sewer, potable water,
and Jackson Township. This area is the next logical
and storm water) that will help facilitate growth in
Group Inc., a planning and landscape architecture
approximately 850 acre area in western Shakopee
Sobota, Senior Planner with the City of Shakopee.
The project was overseen and managed by Kyle
mix of land uses within the area and to provide
a preliminary guide to the future installation of
area for future municipal growth. The purpose
of the land use study is to determine optimal
To complete the study, the City of Shakopee
in collaboration with SRF Consulting Group,
retained the services of Hoisington Koegler
In the Spring of 2015, the City of Shakopee
The project began in April of 2015.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
_______________, 2016.
Plymouth.
the area.
232627293031323333343743
132139
13
Based on Development Program
velopment Phasing Concept
Infrastructure & Access Points
roposed Parks & Open Space
nDOT Access Management
Density Housing Depending
ormwater BMP Footprint
roposed Transportation
our Levels of Functional
pportunities for Higher
idge Feature & Land Use
astructure
Management Guidelines
velopment Summary
ight-of-Way Sections
cott County Access
on Market Demand
Phasing of Infr
Interaction
Guidelines
DeDe
St
PRPMSFRO
Figure 13:Figure 14:Figure 15:Figure 16:Figure 17:Figure 18:Figure 19:
Table 3:Table 4:Table 5:Table 6:Table 7:
05 | IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
02 | PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
01 | INTRODUCTION + PROCESS
134678910111315191922
04 | MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
Vacant Land in Shakopee
velopment
anitary Sewer Utilities
ercentages Throughout
ay Functional
ummary Diagram
Projections for Shakopee
rinking Water Utilities
Storm Water Treatment
tory Matrix For
TABLES + FIGURES
oning Map
and Use Master Plan
ormwater Features
roject Area Contextuture Land Use Plan
THRIVE MSP 2040 De
roperty Ownership
(Current as of 2015)
(City of Shakopee)
the Project Area
Existing Roadw
Existing SExisting Z
Utilities S
Existing
Slope P
CONTENTS
Regula
St
PPDFL
Figure 10:Figure 11:Figure 12:
Figure 1:Figure 2:Figure 3:Figure 4:Figure 5:Figure 6:Figure 7:Figure 8:Figure 9:
Table 1:Table 2:
INTRODUCTION + PROCESS
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
It allows communities to plan development in
DRAFT
The process allows for stakeholder dialogue
Source: Adapted from an article by Gary Taylor, Iowa State
It is the means by which a community can
appearance of districts or neighborhoods
The land use master plan serves the following
It is a means by which a community can
The plan provides continuity across time
WHAT THE MASTER PLAN DOES
It provides guidance for shaping the
It promotes economic development
a way that protects valued resources
balance competing private interests
and expression of a collective vision
protect public investments
within the community
University Extension Service
functions:
»»»»»»»»
Shakopee and Jackson Township nor does it initiate
public hearings and ordinance adoption is required
City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The master
water management approaches, and development/
the City of Shakopee. The master plan may be used
to rezone property. The master plan may inform or
orderly annexation agreement between the City of
requests or re-zoning requests initiated by private
any annexation of lands in Jackson Township into plan provides a basis for evaluating future zoning
natural resource/open space preservation, storm
The master plan is not a law or legal document.
help to evaluate revisions or amendments to the
and analysis contained within it may be used to
as a source of information to inform or evaluate
Comprehensive Plan; however, the information
policies regarding park and recreation systems,
evaluate upcoming comprehensive planning
This master plan is not an amendment to the
The master plan does not amend the current
such requests for annexation.
land owners or developers.
infrastructure phasing.
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
processes.
ROCESS P +NTRODUCTIONI
2
3
PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
CSAH 16
VIERLING DR
HWY 169
CSAH 15
CSAH 78
Property Ownership
Shakopee City Limits
Project Area
CR 69
Figure 2:
property tax relief for owners of agricultural property in areas where the market
Some of the City of Shakopee holdings include Tahpah Park and remnants from
land, or other non-agricultural factors. Properties are enrolled in the program at
the Old Brickyard Road (CR 69) and Highway 169 interchange construction. The
size, or a nursery or greenhouse; and be primarily devoted to the production of
properties must meet certain requirements including being at least 10 acres in
the request of the property owners through the county assessor. To be eligible
69), on the south by CSAH 78, and on the east by Marystown Road (CSAH 15).
bound on the north by Vierling Drive, on the west by Old Brickyard Road (CR
and the higher value taxes is deferred until the property is sold or no longer
A large percentage of the land holdings within the project area are enrolled
of Shakopees current city limits. The remainder (280 acres) is located within
Approximately 67% of the project area (570 acres) is located within the City
in the Green Acres program. The Minnesota Green Acres Program provides
The project area consists of approximately 850 gross acres and is generally
Once enrolled, property owners will pay real estate taxes based on the
The vast majority of property is owned by a handful of family estates.
PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
agricultural products among other requirements.
remnant parcels are available for development.
PARCELS/PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
Green Acres (MS 273.111)
Jackson Township.
BOUNDARIES
02 |
DRAFT
Latour Farms LP
ESCRIPTION DREA AROJECTP
5
PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Forested & agricultural land in the southwest project area
Farmstead in southern project area on CR 78
churches, Jackson Town Hall, an elementary school
etc) and the minimal impact from invasive species.
A number of woods, draw like features, and rolling
based on the species present (oak, hickory, maple,
South of Highway 169, the project area consists of
exist. North of Highway 169, urban land uses exist
including low and moderate density housing and
A few scattered single family estate residents also
Shakopee. It is considered high quality woodland
zone is considered non-developable. Other steep NRCDC; however, steep slopes less than 18% that
use patterns while unsewered lands adjacent the
residential land use patterns. A number of public
topography extends across the remainder of the
extends through the project site is that it would
the City of Shakopee include similar urban land
facilities are adjacent the project area including
public park facilities. Adjacent land uses within
site. The highpoint of the site is located on the
site are mostly similar ag uses with some rural
be one of the largest intact woodlands left in
also subject to certain regulations under the
south central tier of the project site.
EXISTING LAND USES
and Fire Station.
development.
TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES/NATURAL
areas. The ridge itself has been minimally disturbed
of the ridge like feature contains slopes exceeding
which categorized city resources into three
adherence of these criteria. Anything meeting the
while in Green Acres. Special assessments are due
A large ridge line runs from the northeast portion
and only a few home sites have been built within
of the property to the west central portion of the
City of Shakopee Natural Resources Prioritization
taxes, special local assessments may be deferred
. This ridge consists it. A 2002 natural resource inventory studied the
categories: good, better, and best. The ridge line
with interest accrued when the property is sold,
good and better resources in the City. A portion
Subdivision Ordinance requires application and
paid to the county. In addition to local property
of steep and severely steep slopes and wooded
project area and continues beyond the project
through the project area contains some of the . The City of Shakopee
ridge line and in 2005 the City established the
Natural Resources Corridor
transferred, or otherwise withdrawn from the
tax payable year and two prior years must be
Figure 3
Design Criteria (NRCDC)
area to the west, see
as provided in the
RESOURCES
program.
DRAFT
Matrix
at Old Brickyard Road (CR 69) and one at Marystown constructed Marschall Road Transit Center is located
DRAFT
available to serve the site at its edges on the north
Highway 169 is available at two interchanges: one
Road (CSAH 15). Transit service currently does not
Existing sanitary sewer and water infrastructure is The existing interceptor along the north property
approved connection points via city sewer mains.
less than two miles to the east of the project area.
line is a two barrel forcemain (30 and 20 pipes).
MCES does not allow for a direct connection into
County Roads and limited local streets. Access to extend to the project area; however, the recently
their forcemain as it is a pressurized system. The
Council Environmental Services (MCES) policy is
Roads serving the project area consist mostly of
and north east. A Metropolitan Council Sanitary
highway ROW and thus any easement does not
that connections to the interceptor be through
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
interceptor changes from forcemain to gravity
sewer interceptor runs along the south side of
Future water supply connections are available
east of Marystown and south of Highway 169
Highway 169. The line runs largely within the
TRANSPORTATION AND ROADS
sewer at Marystown Road.
Sanitary Sewer
Potable Water
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Figure 4:
ESCRIPTION DREA AROJECTP
6
PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
ESCRIPTION DREA AROJECTP
9
PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
COMMENTS
Natural Area
rules: Scott
Additional
constraints
County
Erosion Control
temporary and
SEDIMENT
NPDES Permit
EROSION
Requirements
requirements
CONTROL
permanent
See NPDES
AND Shall meet
Permit for
Control .5 in of
except where
VOLUME
water quality
0.5 in of new
volume shall
CONTROL
At least 1 of
impervious impervious
conditions
surfaces,
infeasible
surfaces
where
allow.
the contributing
surfaces shall be
Permanent pool new impervious
2.5 rainfall over
volume at least
development).
WQ Volume of
treated before
(assuming full
NPDES Permit
drainage area
WATER
requirements
QUALITY
Shall meet
Regulatory Matrix For Storm Water Treatment
predevelopment condition
2-, 10-, and 100-year storm
2-year, 10-year and 100-yr
elevation within 72 hours.
8-in opening to allow the
but the minimum outlet down to within one foot
discharge rates shall not
events to presettlement
rates with given CNs for
Unincorporated areas
Shall not exceed 1/3 cfs
critical duration events,
detention area to draw
exceed pre-settlement
of the normal run-out
RATE CONTROL
per acre for 100-year
24-hour storm events
Shall not exceed
soil groups.
rates.
AGENCY
annexation area
City of Shakopee
WMO
Jackson Township
Table 1:
LMRWDNPDES/MPCA
Scott County
City of Shakopee
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
A Scott County Natural Area Corridor is located
during the design phases of the development.
Management Area (DWSMA) and the designer
low lying areas and will need to be considered
however, the land use concept recognizes this
jurisdictions, the most stringent rules were applied project area. Thus, the Minnesota Pollution Control
The proposed development is almost entirely
(98%) located within a Drinking Water Supply
As development occurs, projects will be subject to
Agency will require that the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be submitted for review Some small, isolated wetlands are shown on
rates, and volume reduction. Due to the fact that is an impaired water and is within one mile of the
project area drains to the Minnesota River, which
the National Inventory of Wetlands in some
area by preserving the land for future parks
treatment. See Table 1 for the regulatory matrix,
waters were found within the project area.
with the most stringent requirements shown in
within a large portion of the project area;
(NPDES) Permit requirements. In addition, the
to determine the estimates for water quality
Other notable requirements include:
30 days before construction.
and open spaces.
DRAFT
bold.
»»»»
ESCRIPTION DREA AROJECTP
11
PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
RAHR Gas Pipeline
Easement
Utilities Summary Diagram
Figure 8:
from the corridor makes the northern portion of the
two key interchanges on Highway 169 and visibility
an impact on key land uses. However, proximity to
and coordinated development. Proximity to utility
slopes create challenges for road connections and
Large parcels under common ownership presents
physical development barriers and in many cases, project area well suited for larger retail uses in the
to key locations. Such access challenges can have
regional roadway network becomes vary limited
Power line easements and gas easements create
the locations of these easements in proximity to
opportunities for master planned communities
(sewer and water) connections will dictate to a
Coupled with the topographic challenges and
existing highways can often create challenges
large degree the phasing and timing of future
other physical barriers such as steep slopes or
various easements, gaining access from the
eyes of developers and landowners.
development. development.
purposes.
DRAFT
DRAFT
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
12
ESCRIPTION DREA AROJECTP
13
POLICY DIRECTION GUIDING DOCUMENTS
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Future Land Use Plan
Figure 9:
approval by the City Council. Amendments typically also require a review by
Plan Amendment will be needed to establish the land use designations for
(due to market driven development demand), the transportation network,
review the amendment request against regional system plans and policies.
in Jackson Township are for information purposes only. When the Jackson
Scott County, and the School District. The Metropolitan Council also must
Brickyard Road (CR 69) and Highway 169 as a commercial pattern to support
Township properties are annexed into the community a Comprehensive
the property. Such amendment will also address changes to projections
entire project area, the Comprehensive Plan clearly states that the areas
to 5 units per acre. The plan establishes two other categories for residential
units per acre). Commercial uses generally refer to retail services or goods.
development with urban services is described as housing at a density of 1
Comprehensive Plan and the Scott County Comprehensive Plan. While
the interchange investment and enhance shopping in the western end of
and infrastructure needs. Comprehensive Plan Amendments require a
The Shakopee Comprehensive Plan describes land uses in a very general
the Shakopee Comprehensive Plan shows proposed land uses for the
opportunity to act as a gateway from the southwest into Shakopee. The
Shakopee. Commercial uses in this area are referenced as presenting an
uses based on density: medium (5 to 8 units per acre) and high (8 to 14
manner. Residential land uses include three categories. Single family
Future development is currently guided by both the Shakopee
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DOCUMENTS
Land Use
03 |
DRAFT
to residential or commercial zoning districts. Within
development at a maximum density of 5 units
to Marystown road and intersection controls, steep DRAFT
evaluated and would likely serve as more of a local
constraints with this endeavor that will likely make
area, and navigating the existing utility easements
The majority of the project area is currently zoned
need for a local frontage road. There are potential
has been completed, this connection has been re-
plan was updated. Since the comprehensive plan
topography, parcel usability based on the impact
frontage road. Further evaluation of this concept
in the corridor. Future land uses may warrant the
Road (CR 69) was also envisioned at the time the
a new road corridor would have on developable
The comprehensive plan depicts the extension
allows single family detached or attached
Marystown Road (CSAH 15) with Old Brickyard
1.3b Strongly encourage that all trails not
a Collector street. A frontage road connecting
it challenging to construct and increase costs.
of 17th Avenue (CSAH 16) through the site as
the City of Shakopee, the residential districts
which
R1B Urban Residential district
Roadways and Transportation
ZONING ORDINANCE
follow a road system.
per acre.
include the:
»»
2 to 10 acres in size with
Business Reserve, generally consistent with the City
of the comprehensive plan) for future parkland and
more diversity in activities. Hybrid Parks could
focus for this area is emphasized as an opportunity
The comprehensive plan establishes the following
For comparison purposes, national park standards
The Project Area is within a search area (Figure 3.5
1.3a Review and enhance the current zoning
include Neighborhood Parks 2.2 acres per 1,000
ordinance requiring developers to dedicate
10 to 20 acres in size with a ½
1.2a Provide neighborhood parks within ½
mile to 1 mile service radius. Intention is to
for an Active Park/Natural Resource park facility.
(CR 69) and Highway 169 interchange as Urban
create a larger amount of open space and
1.1c Provide system wide safe trail access
area south and east of the Old Brickyard Road
Scott County Comprehensive Plan guides the
include an entire neighborhood.
people to 6 acres per 1,000 people.
within ¼ mile of all residents.
a ¼ to ½ mile service radius.
trail easements to the City
Parks, Trails, and Open Space
Neighborhood Parks
Comprehensive Plan.
mile of homes.
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Hybrid Park
park categories:
»»»»»
Search area map - Figure 3.5 of the City Comprehensive Plan
14
OCUMENTS DUIDING GIRECTION DOLICYP
15
POLICY DIRECTION GUIDING DOCUMENTS
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
RO
S TS YELBI
S
AHCSRAM
S DR LL
A
B
D
VL
H
S
RL
TA
EE
WN
AT
SH
G
N
S TS NOIGEL
L
RK
N
N
L
E
O
D
E
WESTON CT
T
S
R
L
L
E
W
O
Y
E
LN
L
N
L
RK
A
E
E
NV
ONL NEERGREVE
I
PN
L
N
L
D
R
R
O
T
Y
R
RD
EDIN
E
U
S
D
OC
D
L
T
W
C
S
E
AE
S
G
R
V
E
P
MS
TE
I
T
R
N
D
E
U
J
N
ST
E
P
PH
E
L
S
T
E
T
TC REVOLC
S
C
I
EH
NT
I
T
P
U
L
YTE
RBR
TSIL
H
D
M
TSDAETSE
D
Y
T
R
E
B
I
O
L
MO
W
L
E
L
I
S TS RECNE
PS
L
H
Y
N
R
N
L
E
T
V
C
S
I
H
TS
NAP
RAT
S TS SI
WEL
T
O
P
M
T
S
H
Y
E
N
I
T
T
S E
RIHS
N
L
A
P
U
TS
NOT
ERB
S TS RELLUF
S
ICT
R
O
N
UHS
AWM
S TS Y
N
L
T
S
1
V
N
L
N
A
EI
P
E
S
A
C
B
S TS
ECREIPU
S
N
A
D
TS NAISEIRF
R
O
T
Existing Zoning Map (City of Shakopee)
9
W
6
1
H
AINIP
TS
A
SS
AT
D
A
T
SM
Y
R
A
S TS
SMADA
CNIUQ
S TS Y
W
V
S TS NOSIDAMA
2
1
MONROE ST S
L
IL
T
DN
E
TS NOSKCAJ
S
I
W
TS NOSIRRAH
S V
P
A
3
1
D
RELYT
S TS
O
TS KLOP
S
L
Y
R
A
T
SU
R
Q
O
L
Y
A
T
Figure 10:
fronting on or with immediate access to arterial and
applicable comprehensive plan land uses; however,
and hotels; restaurants; retail establishments; utility
establishments. Within the highway business zone, under County Zoning rules. Current County zoning
dental; public buildings; dwellings combined with
which allows
districts essentially allow uses consistent with the
collector streets. Such uses might include motels density development pattern so that longer term
as a transition zone between lower density
townhome residential in addition to single single and mixed use developments (consistent
Remaining lands not located within the City fall
family units up to a maximum density of 8
units per acre. The R2 is intended to serve
the reserve aspect essentially requires a lower
The commercial district within the project area
consistency with the comprehensive plan and
, the purpose of Some land area that was brought into the city
Reserve and Urban Expansion Reserve. Both
Any development applications would require
districts guide these areas as Urban Business
with PUD ordinance); Drive up/drive through
which is to provide an area for business uses
is currently not designated a zoning district.
would apply the applicable zoning district.
residential districts and other districts.
R2 Medium Density Residential
retail centers shall be PUD uses.
B1 Highway Business
includes
DRAFT
»
annexed into Shakopee. Key points of consideration
Scott County. Land Use and planning authority
Consideration by the MBAU is not needed if an
Shakopee Joint Orderly Annexation Board was
Currently the Municipal Boundary Adjustment
Property Owner Annexation Petition (Sections
and undeveloped property. The limit does not
regarding the orderly annexation agreement are as landowners with contiguous property adjacent
DRAFT
limited to a maximum of 250 acres per year of
include publicly owned or properties exempt
annexation according to the OAA. The City is established between the Township, City, and annexation, planning and land use authority
system of municipal boundary adjustments.
annexation occurs as stipulated in the OAA.
of the annexed land rests with the City once
City-initiated annexation area of developed
for lands outside of the City rests with Scott
to the municipal boundary may be annexed.
for local property taxes. (Sections I. 6 & IV.1)
Any landowner or combination of multiple
Hearings administers and adjudicates the
the MBAU orders the annexation. Prior to
Joint Board (Sections I. 13 -16) Jackson/
All land in the Township is subject to
County.
II. 2 & 4)
follows:
-
»»»»
ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE
annexation agreement is in place between Jackson
development with municipal infrastructure is most
(Ehlers) to understand the impact on the township
multiple family dwellings. For non-residential uses
and plats, the subdivision ordinance requires that
states that the City has
divisions of land must conform. This includes the
an amount of land equal to 10% of the buildable
Apartments, Townhomes, Condominiums, other
that sidewalks and trail shall be provided where
Natural Resources Corridor. Section 12.32 states
Approximately 1/3 of the project area is located
of future annexations. The study found that the
people is established. Population assumptions
A standard of one acre of parkland for every 75 Duplex-Twin homes; 1 person per bedroom for
include: 3 persons per lot for Single-family and
addresses Park Land Dedication.
NATURAL RESOURCES CORRIDOR
land area within the project area will not have
established certain design criteria to which all
within Jackson Township. An existing orderly
Township and the City of Shakopee. Jackson
land as guided be dedicated for park land.
Sect. 12.24 Design Criteria
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Section 12.34
16
OCUMENTS DUIDING GIRECTION DOLICYP
17
POLICY DIRECTION GUIDING DOCUMENTS
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
2013 rates were 12.207% for Jackson Township
property as of January 2nd the year the parcel is
and 1.2% of the Towns net tax capacity ($1,752 levy
acres designated parcels means that although
Jackson Township south of Highway 169. The area
property tax exempt properties is not required.
2014 Ehlers Annexation Fiscal Impact Analysis In 2014 Ehlers was engaged through Scott County
than 1,600 acres, the total tax capacity of the
impact of future annexation. Target Area B, which
The low tax values on agricultural and green-
Towns future property tax collections and overall
75 parcels equaled only 26.4% of the Towns
to operate as a separate unit of government. The
analysis developed a set of 5 annexation target
represents 3.1% of the Towns total market value
based on the assessed value of the annexed
the Fiscal Impact Analysis comprised more
Reimbursement for publicly owned or local
the entire set of target areas evaluated in
portion of this projects study area that falls in
to assist Jackson Township in evaluating how
encompasses 7 parcels with 226 acres, is the
and 41.996% for Shakopee
existing tax base.
annexed.
-
»»
the municipal boundary of the City based on the developed property or multiple properties which
properties which are at least 50% surrounded by
to exceed 10 years, unless requested by property
minimum of one year notice. The pay back time
occurs, the City shall have a period of one year
with the annexation shall be for a period of not
proportional amount of taxes that would have
Undeveloped property The City of Shakopee
Adjacent means 50 feet or more of the subject annexation would not contribute to the area
No reimbursement shall be required and the
City Initiated Annexation (Sections II. 3, 7 & 8)may annex undeveloped property or multiple
on assessments for improvements associated
annexation area boundary is shared with the
boundary of the City. The City must provide a
are completely surrounded by the municipal
to initiate the annexation of the properties.
been due the Township without annexation
Township Requested Annexation (Section
perimeter of the entire area to be annexed.
completely surrounded by the City. If this
Reimburse for a period of two years of the
IV. 2) the township can require the City
Municipal Reimbursement (Section III. 1)
at any time to annex properties that are
limitation for City initiated annexations.
Developed Property City may annex
owners for it to be extended.
boundary of the City
DRAFT
----
»»»
which
DRAFT
be re-designated to an urban designation. In order
designation of lands within Jackson Township may MUSA is distinguished from the Rural Service Area.
One of the components considered in community
through investments such as regional wastewater
Regional Park System, and programs that support
Approximately 120 acres of the project area is not
Community and land with MUSA receive a higher
level of regional services in exchange for building
Services Area) and the rural designations are not.
categories are in the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban
for this to occur a more detailed staging plan for
existing orderly annexation agreement (OAA) in higher levels of development that economically
forecasted growth through 2040 and beyond at
support the regional services. MUSA supported
designation assignment implies that the Urban
be required to plan and stage development for
of lands in both categories. Because there is an
services, regional highways, transit service, the
overall average net densities of 3 to 5 dwelling
units per acre. Jackson Township is designated
of land for future development. Shakopee will
place, there is an expectation that the current
Figure 10
orderly annexation needs to be completed.
shows the current MUSA boundary.)
within the planned MUSA area (see
redevelopment.
Plan. This designation covers cities that experienced
Disparities distribution so the study assumed a
reducing annual expenses to be a potentential
The study found that the annexation of Target
Analysis of budget expenditures indicate that
that the Towns annual levy is generated from
notably through annexation. This means that
community by the Metropolitan Council Regional
likely have to either use fund balance and/or
estimates can be made on how annexations
the Towns annual costs would not decrease annexation scenario that would present the
based to the Fiscal Disparities (FD) pool and
Area B would have an impact of 1.2% of tax
driven reduction is complicated by the fact
two sources: (a) the Towns net tax capacity
Analysis found that if the Township wished
(b) its Fiscal Disparities distribution. While
to remain autonomous there was not an
Shakopee is designated as a Suburban Edge
after its contribution of commercial tax
proportional reduction.
THRIVE MSP 2040
raise the tax rate.
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
base.
»»»»
Thrive MSP 2040 community designations
18
OCUMENTS DUIDING GIRECTION DOLICYP
POLICY DIRECTION GUIDING DOCUMENTS
include the notion that not all property owners may
be willing or interested in selling land. Furthermore,
with municipal sanitary sewer and as such are likely
available for development is planned ahead so that
will be absorbed within redevelopment areas more growth through redevelopment at higher densities
DRAFT
To adequately serve future demand for population
or key commercial nodes), there is a need to guide
proximate to existing centers (such as downtown
future moderate to high density housing areas in
absorb some future
add roughly 500 to 1,000 acres of land to the city
and employment growth, Shakopee will need to
the City needs to make sure that the land supply
Even if we assume some higher density housing
Other factors to consider in planning new land
areas for population or employment growth
beyond the 2040 planning horizon.
and
within the next 25 years
near existing centers.
negatively.
the city.
The City of Shakopee currently has available for new
portion (300-400 acres) of the lower density guided
high density guided lands and nearly 2,000 acres of
The Metropolitan Council Thrive MSP 2040 process
lands over the next 25 year period, to 2040. Using
more moderate to high density guided lands (see
provided development projections for the City of
studies for Scott County communities. Using key
development less than 200 acres of moderate to
moderate density guided lands and 440 acres of
looking at recent building permit trends for the
City of Shakopee, we have projected a demand
for roughly 1,800 acres of residentially guided
RESIDENTIAL LAND DEMAND
.
Table 2
Shakopee, which are displayed in
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
ANALYSIS
).
Figure 11
20
OCUMENTS DUIDING GIRECTION DOLICYP
21
MASTER PLAN
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
(capital) and ongoing (operations and maintenance) public infrastructure
development pattern nor does it dictate an architectural or design aesthetic. It
Create desirable and sustainable neighborhoods with a range of housing
community planning principles. At the beginning of the process, a number of
recreation, or contribute to the ecological, social, or cultural value of the
key principles were derived from existing policy plans as a means of guiding
commercial centers, downtown, schools, and parks, while anticipating
Expand employment opportunities in areas with good transportation
a preferred land use and open space system, and general guidance for the
Protect and enhance natural features that provide opportunities for
walk, transit) that provide connection to local employment centers,
Balance traditional infrastructure systems with green infrastructure
development demands, community wide vision and aspirations, and
The land use pattern recommended works to balance market driven
strategies to enhance ecological function of natural systems.
types to meet a variety of lifestyle and economic needs.
multi-modal connections to the broader metro area.
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
access and with compatible land use transitions.
landscape and built environment.
extension of public infrastructure.
the master plan development:
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
investments.
04 |
DRAFT
»»»»»»
DRAFT
would require variances from County and MNDOT
allow for a mix of land uses that would contribute when development is proposed. Additional study
and development viability are all interdependent
possibility of a frontage road, internal circulation,
illustration provides an alternative that attempts
to minimize impacts on the natural features and
factors for this node. All factors are impacted by
connection/access to the extension of CSAH 16,
and analysis will be necessary, once an ultimate
alternatives do not meet access guidelines and
policies. This alternative should be considered
unique topography and natural features. The
Access at Marystown Road near TH 169, the
to a sustainable neighborhood node. These
FEET
1,000
500
land use is determined.
0
FEET
2,000
1,000
500
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
0
Land Use Master Plan
Figure 12:
22
LAN PASTERM
23
MASTER PLAN
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
1,236,800
1,655,800
345,200
SQUARE FOOTAGE
73,800
- - - -
HIGH
COMMERCIAL
--
1,134,800
44,300
207,100883,400
- - - -
LOW
--
7.4 U/A
2,370
- - -
HIGH
HOUSING UNITS
400430970370200
-
4.34 U/A
1,390
- - -
270260400300160
LOW
-
% OF
TOTAL
100%
22%14%13%13%20%
2%1%5%8%
TOTAL
ACRES
603
134120
868112328150
7
Development Summary
ow Density (Single
FUTURE LAND USE
AVG. RESIDENTIAL
Mixed (Townhouse/
Parks & Open Space
Mixed Use (Retail/
Residential (HDR)
Medium Density Medium Density
Mixed Use (HDR/
GRAND TOTAL
Business Park)
DESIGNATIONHigh Density
(Small Lot SF)
Small Lot SF)
Family - SF)
DENSITY
Retail)
Retail
Table 3:
ROW
L
based on the assumed residential densities outlined
moderate density ranging from 3 to 5 units per
lot pattern with average densities in the 2 to 3
acre and thus a greater ability to vary housing
Table 3 represents a development summary that is development pattern here is typically a larger
For all residential land use categories, lot sizes and
of gross usable square feet to the lot area) derived
units per acre and thus the greatest ability to
housing types are encouraged to be varied to the
extent the market would support such variations.
adequate transportation, infrastructure, and park/
from an evaluation of area development projects
vary housing types. This category begins to
Adherence to general density ranges will ensure
and best management practices for commercial
Medium Density Mixed (Townhouse/Small
This land use
This land use category provides for a more
This land use category
bumps up the density range from 5 to 12
Medium Density Small Lot (Single Family)
detached single family housing. The
DEVELOPMENT MAGNITUDE
Low Density (Single Family)
open space system planning.
units per acre range.
Lot Single Family)
LAND USE
development.
types.
DRAFT
»»»
uses might consist of a vertically oriented mixed use
museums, or other similar uses. In this land use
is not perceived highly in the suburban market area
DRAFT
excludes detached single unit housing types.
category, the typical pattern of development
is for one or two story buildings with surface
residential category will generally exceed 12
surrounding property access , market conditions,
product or smaller vertical stacked housing
product will be the primary housing type in represented in the project area. These categories
patterns where uses might be market based and
this district. Attached side by side with tuck
introduce an attached side by side housing
category. The density range in high density
Instead a vertical oriented stacked housing
than 30 acres depending on market forces.
units per acre and may range to be greater
Retail areas could include institutions such
under garages may also be mixed into this
This category
oriented towards the sale of goods and
this land use is predominantly
High Density Residential
and development timing.
parking.
types.
Retail
»»
Character precedent for mixed use (retail/business park) development
Character precedent for mixed use (HDR/retail) development
Character precedent for retail development
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Character precedent for medium density small lot development
Character precedent for high density residential development
Character precedent for medium density mixed development
Character precedent for low density development
24
LAN PASTERM
25
MASTER PLAN
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Character precedent of low density neighborhood with a public street fronting on open space.
Bioretention integrated with park and trail system
park. The area of approximately 50 acres could
or all retail services. Alternatively, a multi-story
category is applied to the southeast quadrant
Highway 169/17th Avenue (CR 16) extension. somewhat challenging and may lend more to
applied near Marystown Road (CSAH 15) and
a destination oriented use such as a business
oriented power center, or a mix of both uses.
Uses may include all high density residential
Both mixed use areas could include institutions
This category also applies to the southwest
of Old Brickyard Road (CR 69) and Highway support a small business park, a retail, auto
building with commercial uses on ground
Brickyard Road (CR 69). However, access is
the interchange at Highway 169 and Old
this category is
because of its visibility and proximity to
169. This land area is well suited to retail
this
Mixed Use (Retail/Business Park)
museums, or other similar uses.
quadrant of Vierling Drive.
Mixed Use (HDR/Retail)
this category.
DRAFT
»»
The ridge line is a high valued amenity. The concept
on the open space is a critical design policy. Studies
neighborhoods that are within close proximity (1/4 DRAFT
of acquisition and dedication. Small neighborhood
value of lot premiums across a broader area, rather
for parks and open space focuses on the ridge line,
with Neighborhood Park like facilities and an open
connectivity is important so that homes are within
should be pooled and used to secure the ridgeline
mile). Maintaining a portion of the public frontage
as public park/open space through a combination
have shown that such public frontage spreads the
is to have individual residential lots back up to the
needs to encourage highly connected streets and than limiting that value to the lots backing on the
much of the new residential growth in the district
park. Park dedication from the entire project area
open space. The tendency from the market place
but also provides for a hybrid park that will serve
walkable blocks. Sidewalk connectivity and trail
PARK AND OPEN SPACE NETWORK
the ridge line open space to provide great park
a comfortable and safe walking distance to the
open space. This pattern would then support a
scale pocket parks could also be located along open space will add value across all residential
under this concept, the residential lot pattern
As a high value amenity, the ridge line as an
lots adjacent the open space.
the park system.
Existing Parks/Open Space
FEET
Proposed Open Space
2,000
1,000
500
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
0
Proposed Parks & Open Space
Figure 13:
26
LAN PASTERM
MASTER PLAN
approach, the City and developer could inquire and 15) and 17th Avenue (CR 16). A trunk sanitary sewer
connecting in at Marystown Road. As an alternative
permeable pavement, tree trenches, and bioswales.
DRAFT
Services to the area further south on the top of the
longer term potential development south of CSAH
and may not be permitted by the MCES. The MCES
interceptor. However, this is not a preferred option
Services to areas north of Highway 169 are simple
developer) for the future maintenance of the site. interceptor in this location is a pressurized system
also need to identify the responsible party (city or
If it is not possible to use the MnDOT right-of-way project area and would be sized to accommodate
management options are available that consume sewer through a gravity line running easterly and
pursue with Metropolitan Council Environmental
(Breeggemann Parcel) would connect to sanitary
ridge also connects near Marystown Road (CSAH
existing trunk mains located in Marystown Road
development perspective. This coordination will
system would run generally south through the
or other existing easements, other stormwater
Sanitary Sewer serving the site will connect to and establishing a new connection could be a
less area. Examples of these practices include
(CSAH 15). The lower portion of the ridge line
Services (MCES) a direct connection to the
connections to adjacent service.
Sanitary Sewer
costly project.
78.
is to design a regional stormwater treatment system
A strategy for the drainage area above the ridgeline
future development controlling for volume control,
the lower portion of the project, whereas the lower
be used to meet the stormwater requirements for
portion may be able to have a regional treatment
The isolated development areas in the northwest
commercial development is proposed, a regional
treatment system, and cannot be combined with
proposed ponding area. Additional coordination
and northeast corners of the project area (those follow existing drainage paths and will naturally
accommodate stormwater requirements from a
of BMPs are recommended for the project area:
Various Best Management Practices (BMPs) can
space network. The linear park and trail system
Highway 169 at the Old Brickyard Road (CR 69) interchange could be purchased and used as a
of rain gardens and wet ponds along the open
occur to determine the feasibility of this site to
a portion of excess MnDOT right-of-way along
ponding strategy could meet the stormwater
north of Highway 169) will require their own
between the City and MnDOT will need to
bioretention basins and wet ponds.
Storm Water Approaches
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
UTILITIES
system.
28
LAN PASTERM
29
MASTER PLAN
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
10.1 acres12.6 acres
0.3 acres0.8 acres1.1 acres0.5 acres0.9 acres1.4 acres5.2 acres4.9 acres
Stormwater BMP Footprint Based on
Total Stormwater BMP Footprint
Area of Wet Ponds (at HWL):Area of Wet Ponds (at HWL):Area of Wet Ponds (at HWL):
Development Program
NW QUADRANT
NE QUADRANT
Table 4:
South of the ridge, water service would be provided
property owners to develop independently of other
(more facilities that require maintenance); however, such an approach could be studied in greater detail
would still require the recommended infrastructure
if development pressures warranted an alternative
ridge line and areas beyond the project boundary.
service areas beyond the project area to the south
developer/landowner decisions. This option is not
services could be phased in the following manner:
economical and sustainable solution to providing
and west. Additional system wide study as well as done before pursuing it further. This study should
(CSAH 15) and 17th Avenue (CR 16). Future water
approaches may prove less sustainable over time
has not been studied in detail. At a concept level,
detailed analysis of this option would need to be
The SPU plan is a preferred plan representing an
services to ensure adequate service. Alternative
in boosters and pressure reducing stations and
it would require additional capital investments
from the connection point at Marystown Road
infrastructure costs and implications for future
plausible alternative. However, this alternative
infrastructure north of Highway 169 may be a
water service to the area at the bottom of the
The alternative to connect to existing water This alternative approach would enable the
be coordinated with SPU.
approach.
Distribution Plan and Future Facilities Plan prepared ). Phasing of the improvements
water distribution systems north of Highway 169 by
owners) regarding the ability to connect to existing
right-of-way or within public greenway corridors or challenges and the Highway 169 barrier. The Water
This extension would serve the land areas between
system and within the existing collection system to
of the ridgeline extending from a connection point
handle the projected demand from future growth.
future water main extensions along the north side
discussion was had (prompted by developer/land
consists of three parcels owned by three separate
east to west direction from Marystown Road. The
in 2004 by Shakopee Public Utilities (SPU) shows
at Marystown Road and CR 16 westerly to CR 69.
and to the south beyond the project area. Some
to provide future services to areas west of CR 69
and associated development would occur in an
same system would need to be sized to be able
through connections to existing 12 inch mains
become more challenging due to topographic
the ridge and Highway 169. This area currently
potential north of Highway 169 can be served
Infrastructure would be located within street
Services to the two areas with development
Services to the area south of Highway 169
boring under the highway.
existing utility corridors.
along Vierling Drive.
Figure 2
Potable Water
entities (see
DRAFT
12 watermain. However, this infrastructure will only
of the ultimate development plan. As development occurs this system can be looped to the east side of
DRAFT
service needs. It is assumed that the station will be
boundary between the two high elevation service
Road and extending the watermain through ROW
Marystown Road with a second connection to the of 915 will require a booster station to meet water
located on the eastern portion of the site near the
serve development that occurs up to an elevation
consideration. The installation of the tank/tower
anticipated that it will be installed at or near the
Any development that occurs over an elevation
and supporting facilities will be integrated with
connecting to the 12 watermain at Marystown
of the site into a park or open space could be a
Ultimately a water tower/tank will be required highest point in the development. Integration
to serve the south quadrant as a whole. It is
of 915 (per Future Facilities Plan from SPU).
Initially, water service can be provided by
development of the site.
districts..
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3
Existing Sanitary Sewer
FEET
2,000
Existing Watermain
Phase Two/Three
Phase One
1,000
500
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Phasing of Infrastructure.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 15:
30
LAN PASTERM
31
MASTER PLAN
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
FEET
2,000
1,000
500
0
Proposed Transportation Infrastructure & Access Points
Figure 16:
manage mobility, access, spacing, and alignment of
upon annexation into the city. Access on the Local
as its designation will determine future access, see
hierarchy of an overall transportation system. This
These roadways should be designated as Locals
and ultimately to the state or interstate highway designations that match current and future land
system is used to create a roadway network that
Local roadway is linking to the State or County
system will be controlled by the city; unless, the
major categories Principal Arterials, A and B
CSAH 78, CR 16 and CSAH 15). It is important to
The project area is bound by a Principal Arterial
Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local roadways.
serve as a local function providing unrestricted
In general, the proposed roadway network will
and will typically fall under the city jurisdiction
access and lower mobility to future land uses.
the function and role of a roadway within the
(Highway 169), and A Minor Arterials (CR 69,
uses with the roadways purpose.
TRANSPORTATION
Roadway Network
Findings
.
DRAFT
Table 6
LAN PASTERM
MASTER PLAN
and consistent with applicable city or county standards.
150 ROW - 4 lane section120 ROW - 3 lane section70 ROW66 ROW
LAN PASTERM
35
MASTER PLAN
to accommodate the 17th Avenue (CR16) Extension. WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
a four-lane roadway from Highway 169 through the
evaluation determined the appropriate facility type
Marystown Road (CSAH 15) should be expanded to
17th Avenue (CR 16) intersection. Furthermore, this
Extension should be tapered to a three-lane facility
Road (CSAH 15) to accommodate the existing four-
with turn lanes west of the proposed commercial
preserving the functionality of the road. Designs
should be a four-lane facility west of Marystown lane facility to the east. The 17th Avenue (CR 16)
should support lower speeds of 35-40 miles per
The ultimate design of the 17th Avenue (CR 16)
(CSAH 15) near the Highway 169 South Ramps.
In essence, the 17th Avenue (CR 16) Extension
extension should be pedestrian friendly while
development.
hour.
included a planning level evaluation of the existing
based on current travel patterns, future access, and the Shakopee Transportation Plan will increase as a
result of the new land uses being proposed. In that
determine the potential roadway facilities needed
engineering judgment. For comparison purposes,
Results of this review indicated that the projected
to accommodate projected trips. This assessment
capacity ranges. The capacity ranges were based
trips were distributed throughout the study area
respect, an additional analysis was completed to on guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual
on current and best available data was prepared
results of this assessment were compared to the
Transportation Plan. A technical memorandum
(square feet or number of units). The projected
roadway network by facility type, projected
roadway capacity along Marystown Road
Findings
(HCM).
with the exception of the proposed future access to
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition
and development trips generated by the preferred
volumes were developed based on a review of the
State and County Access Management Guidelines,
169. Continued discussions with MnDOT will need
grade-separated crossings, frontage roads or right-
management in some form (whether it is through
mobility concerns. For example, providing access
The proposed roadway network aligns with the
based on the preferred concepts land uses and
point for balancing property access, safety, and
was used to develop trip generation estimates
to occur to determine the appropriate access
land use plan. The Institute of Transportation
using the preferred land use types and sizes
points, which results in improved safety.
control.
Findings
DRAFT
westerly through the site to Old Brickyard Road (CR
DRAFT
proposed land use plan does not warrant the need with the extension functioning as a collector street
17th Avenue (CR 16) currently stops at Marystown
69). The master plan carries this concept forward
with Scott County jurisdiction and ending at Old
Additional study needs to be done to determine
illustrated a future road connection extending
the feasibility of a frontage road. However, the
Road (CSAH 15). Numerous past studies have
for a future frontage road at this time.
17th Avenue (CR 16) Extension
Brickyard Road (CR 69).
lower portion of the ridge (Breeggemann, NORCOR,
location with input from the City and Scott County. controls would be a key outcome of this discussion
17th Avenue (CR 16). Further analysis and review is
years as well. While the frontage road may provide
Marystown Road (CSAH 15) and accessing directly
The master plan shows access at Marystown Road
area. These challenges include topography, utility
county roads had been widely discussed over the
over the years regarding the idea of connecting a
frontage road from Old Brickyard Road (CR 69) to
maintains permitting authority for access at this
existing property owners are advocating for the
The idea of a frontage road connecting the two
), there are
In order to consider an access point here, more
with constructing a frontage road through this
a valuable connection for development on the
parcels, particularly on the NORCOR parcel. No
easements and narrow areas for development
in the event access is provided in this location.
street that connects south to the extension of
Much discussion and discourse has been had
(CSAH 15) at the on-ramp location via a local
KEY ROADWAY ISSUES AND
Figure 2
and DR Horton parcels - see
frontage road at this time.
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
DISCUSSIONS
would require variances from County and MNDOT
allow for a mix of land uses that would contribute when development is proposed. Additional study
and development viability are all interdependent
possibility of a frontage road, internal circulation,
illustration provides an alternative that attempts
to minimize impacts on the natural features and
factors for this node. All factors are impacted by
connection/access to the extension of CSAH 16,
and analysis will be necessary, once an ultimate
alternatives do not meet access guidelines and
policies. This alternative should be considered
unique topography and natural features. The
Access at Marystown Road near TH 169, the
to a sustainable neighborhood node. These
FEET
Development alternative requiring further study
1,000
500
land use is determined.
0
36
LAN PASTERM
37
MASTER PLAN
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Existing Sanitary Sewer
FEET
Phase One: 2015-2020
Phase Two: 2021-2025
2,000
Existing Watermain
1,000
500
0
Development Phasing Concept
Figure 18:
improvement projects. In order for future municipal
sewer service can be added to the current MUSA by
required to bring areas that are currently not within
are termed undesignated MUSA which represents
the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) into
within the next 5 year period (2016-2020). Phase 2
existing city limits are within the existing MUSA or
growth in the project area could be served within
current city limits, parcels not in Shakopee would
. Phase 1 would be serviced and platted
demand, property owner development interests,
DEVELOPMENT PHASING CONCEPT
the existing orderly annexation agreement and
services to be extended to areas outside of the
the service area. Currently, all lands within the
areas where an agreed upon acreage of urban
Depending on market demand, the projected
a comprehensive plan amendment would be
Phasing of development depends on market
and the logical sequencing of infrastructure
need to request annexation consistent with
would follow, likely post 2021.
Figure 18
DRAFT
2030.
DRAFT
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
38
LAN PASTERM
39
IMPLEMENTATION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
number of recommend actions may better support an approach to zoning that densities to 12 units per acre. In the market place, this density is extremely
of individual project reviews. This will streamline future project approvals and
Just like this plan, communities often plan for lands outside of their corporate
For the project area, the City of Shakopee and Jackson Township should seek
corporate limits and within areas subject to orderly annexation agreements. subsequent development projects. Because future developments within the
The issue of formal land use guidance is closely linked to annexation issues.
formal comprehensive plan review and acceptance of land use plans within
identify environmental mitigation measures that can be accomplished with prohibitive of achieving a diversity of housing types to serve changing
environmental review technique for large land areas like the study area. An
project area are intricately connected, collaborating on an AUAR may prove
Township to an urban designation (Suburban Edge or Emerging Suburban
an amendment to the Thrive MSP designation for the lands within Jackson
Traditional zoning districts may apply within the project area. However, a
limits. The Metropolitan Councils approach to this situation is to provide
Alternative Urban Area-wide Reviews (AUAR) have become a common Increased density: the current residential districts limit residential
Met Council for review and approval before a project can proceed.
ZONING/SUBDIVISION
Edge.)
»
partially outside. The City of Shakopee is preparing this plan to guide future use
of the study area from a rural to a developed landscape that will likely take over
Incorporate the land use plan of this study into the future Comprehensive guidance, a formal comprehensive plan amendment must be submitted to the
jurisdictions and accepted by the Metropolitan Council. This review is typically
land use guidance, annexation, infrastructure needs, open space and parkland
In the Twin Cities metro area, land use guidance is proposed and administered
a decade or more to realize. The study area is within the City of Shakopee and
In cases where proposed development does not conform to current land use
local community and submitted to the Metropolitan Council for acceptance.
Conduct an Alternative Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR) environmental
While the master plan describes a vision for transition of the study area from
toward implementation are addressed in this section with discussion about
done through community comprehensive plans that are completed by the
rural to developed, this section discusses where the community goes from
here in implementing the vision. Questions about procedures and actions
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
of lands adjacent to its corporate limits as well as within.
establishment, and developer performance incentives.
Plan update expected to take place in 2016/2017.
review of the entire study area building.
development within the study area.
use guidance for the study area:
LAND USE GUIDANCE
05 |
DRAFT
»»»
adjoining properties in order to ensure preservation
makers at the table including MnDOT, Scott County,
DRAFT
right of way width, streetscape amenities, roadway
detailed determination of the roadway alignment,
degree on infrastructure coming from Marystown
extension and to lend more certainty to potential
a more sustainable commercial land use pattern.
right of way needs for the eventual design of the
Access at this location will support a commercial
oriented commercial uses. Getting key decisions
of platting. The study is required before platting
roadway so the land can be reserved at the time
MCES existing pressurized interceptor might be
design budget, trail corridors, and construction to more of a residential nature with destination
Road area. However, a direct connection to the
access points. The feasibility study will identify
Phasing for development of the Breeggemann
parcel at the bottom of the ridge depends to a
feasibility of land use on the DR Horton Parcel.
a feasible alternative. Coordination with MCES
Access to Marystown Road at the on-ramps of
Highway 169 is a critical piece to determining
An engineering feasibility study will allow for
to address existing concerns over the CR 16
of adequate right of way in the appropriate
phasing. These determinations are critical
alignment.
considering a direct sanitary sewer connection
establish regional ponding using MnDOT right
potable water facilities (distribution lines, tank/
The following actions are recommended in regard
Prepare a regional stormwater ponding plan
Work with Scott County to design the future
of annexation without a petition. This is as stated
tower, wells, pump house, booster stations,
feasibility study, secure right of way, and to
to cover stormwater needs for the site and
options for phasing, associated costs, and
CR 16 extension, conduct an engineering and NORCOR property owners and MCES
establish a funding/cost sharing strategy feasibility and Marystown Road access in
Facilitate conversations with Breegeman
in the existing orderly annexation agreement
etc...) to serve the project area including
collaboration with key property owners regarding the feasibility and process for
Prepare an engineering study for future
(Breegeman, NORCOR, and DR Horton),
of way and power line easement areas.
Facilitate future study of frontage road
between Shakopee and Jackson Township.
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS
to the existing interceptor.
MnDOT, and Scott County.
to infrastructure needs:
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
»»»»»
might be expected to be annexed into the City.
required by State Law and administered by the
comprehensive plan amendment processes as petition to a municipality or a municipalitys pursuit
incorporate a phasing concept for when lands
of a higher density project in a setting similar perspective, until greater level of commercial The following action is recommended in regard to
Such an amendment will help smooth future
Unit Development District. Currently, the use
to the project area setting. However, greater
20 to 30 units per acre are more supportive
services, park, and recreational facilities are
Mixing uses and could be allowed through
municipality is usually the result of a landowner
in key dimensional standards and density.
of a PUD preserves the underlying zoning
approach through the use of the Planned
in place. The right zoning application can
Work with Jackson Township to update
the orderly annexation agreement and
preserve land areas for this type of use.
density may lag behind from a market
Consideration of a mixed use zoning
Annexation of land from a township to a
annexations in the study area:
Metropolitan Council.
ANNEXATION
»»
40
MPLEMENTATIONI
41
IMPLEMENTATION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
preservation of open space in conjunction with the
Build density incentives into zoning approvals
The following actions are recommended in regard
in Chanhassen, Woodbury, Plymouth, and Dakota Establishment of front-porch neighborhood
features above and beyond parkland dedication.
There are two most likely ways to preserve these
open space referenda passing in the last decade
exceeding the value gained from a single row of
Consider using Planned Unit Development
This approach is becoming more common with
earmarking funds for open space acquisition.
frontage spread value across a neighborhood
incentives into the zoning code to encourage
County. Another option is to build developer
Establishment of permanently preserved
lots that back up to an open space or park.
Preservation of woodlands and other
DEVELOPER PERFORMANCE
to developer performance incentives:
(PUD) zoning for the study area.
greenways and the ridge area
Construction of trails
connecting habitat
elements including:
INCENTIVES
platting process.
----
»»
property prior to development. In order to consider
draw extending southward through the site. These
Park and trail dedication fees on new development
are often the primary if not the only source of park
that could include general fund contribution, park of falling behind is the lessened ability to dedicate
dedication requirements need periodic review to
The master plan recommends establishment of a
ensure compatibility with land values. The result
future development planning and to acquire the The Economic Value of Open Space: Implications
created in the study area. In a publication called
an interconnected network of open space in the and as such, their preservation is very important
area. It is recommended that the City work with
hybrid park in the southern portion of the study
and marketability of new and older homes. The
funding in growing communities. Park and trail park land and trails as development occurs an
study area consisting of the ridge line and a key
, Paul Anton, studies and
The master plan suggests the establishment of
features form the backbone of the master plan
property owners to integrate the concept into
to the ultimate success of the neighborhoods
concludes that proximity to open space has a
dedication contribution, and bonding.
neighborhood quality and value.
for Land Use Decisions
Alternative well locations and its service area should be studied in the near-term in preparation for future
parcel could be an immediate or short term phased
Continually evaluate park and trail dedication
the study area to ensure adequate water pressure.
connection is possible, and water can be provided
The following actions are recommended in regard
by boring under Highway 169 (see disscussion on
project. Providing sewer and water directly to the
be needed in the later phases of development of
page XX), then development of the Breeggeman
It is anticipated that a municipal water tower will
of portions of the ridge that would not be
alternative for sanitary sewer service. If a direct
Breeggemann parcel without traversing other
Therefore, both questions should be pursued
parcels requires both infrastructure systems.
policies to ensure appropriate levels of
to open space and parkland establishment:
OPEN SPACE AND PARKLAND
dedicated through park dedication.
acquisition of a hybrid park site.
space in the master plan.
ESTABLISHMENT
dedication.
simultaneously.
development.
DRAFT
»»»»
DRAFT
changing market conditions and provide a degree
consideration could be given to adding additional
parks, retail services, transit, etc ) amenities built
contribute. Comments were expressed to explore
Opportunities exist for generating higher density
balancing capital infrastructure investments with
are designed to be close to park/natural resource
options rely more on having place making (trails,
choose to live in a geographic location. Typically,
higher density housing patterns. These locations
the project area. The high density areas certainly
illustrates potential areas where future
shows a resultant average density for residential traditional suburban residential densities due to
units per acre. This average density exceeds the
and in place as a reason or draw for someone to
higher density housing. Higher density housing
development timing that supports a market for
Depending on market conditions, full build out
other opportunities for higher density housing
The master plans land use pattern for this area
the amount of medium density designated for
to implementation is the ability to respond to
lands ranging from 3.92 units per acre to 6.95
housing in the project area. The challenge is these housing options follow other forms of
of the project area may take 5-10 years. Key
RESPONDING TO CHANGING
MARKET DEMANDS
within the project area.
development.
Figure 19
restoration, and stormwater bio retention should be
encouraged in these areas along with trail corridors.
encouraged to preserve as much of the integrity of
150 feet elsewhere (although a 300-foot minimum
Front-porch Neighborhood Parks and Open
back up to them. These spaces are encouraged to
network associated with the ridgeline connecting neighborhood parks and open spaces rather than
for underground storm sewers and large ponding
The master plan encourages the creation of a trail
This means that development is oriented to face
Techniques that minimize or eliminate the need
exist and the master plan places a lower density
inhabit prominent spaces within the study area.
residential use in those areas. Housing clusters
along with conservation easements should be
neighborhoods and park features. In addition,
sides of County Roads with road construction/
it is the Countys policy to have trails on both
as close to the point it falls are encourages.
is ideal). Public easements, native habitat
Innovative Stormwater Techniques
these woodlands as possible.
Woodland Preservation
reconstruction projects.
areas are encouraged.
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
Spaces
Trails
parks and open spaces where housing fronts on
sensitive landscapes, steep slopes, and woodlands.
Because the master plan suggests the preservation
the goals outlined in the master plan in addition to density ranges are suggested as the limit when the
park and open space areas as opposed to back
greenways discovered during actual development
minimum widths of 50 feet adjacent to wetlands,
of the ridge and key draw features as open space plan amenities should be granted density credits
the amenities outlined in the master plan and as described below. Projects designed with master
project does not contribute to establishment of
Innovative stormwater retention, recycling,
densities for each residential land use category
The master plan outlines a range of suggested
development acreage of the project. Density
as a balance to the increased cost or reduced There may be other appropriate locations for
project design. Meaningful greenways need
and for the study area as a whole. The lower
developing viable, high-quality projects.
credits should be considered for:
Greenway/Ridge Preservation
yards
-
42
MPLEMENTATIONI
43
IMPLEMENTATION
WESTERN SHAKOPEE JACKSON TOWNSHIP LAND USE STUDY & MASTER PLAN
FEET
2,000
1,000
500
Opportunities for Higher Density Housing Depending on Market Demand
0
Figure 19:
bakery, café, convenience retail, or other basic daily
that mixes higher density housing options in these
Furthermore, consideration could be given on the
features, key road corridors, and trail connections.
land use patterns, open space networks, roadway
term impacts in a collaborative manner between
Planning is a dynamic process that must balance
western edge of the site for small neighborhood
systems, and infrastructure. Continued dialogue
and communication about changing needs and
private property owner/developer interest with
needs must be carefully examined against long
service. A planned unit development approach
are only an initial step to communicate desired
retail services (not more than 15,000 to 20,000
The Master Planning process and master plan
the City, property owners, and prospective
market conditions is highly encouraged.
locations should be supported.
developers.
DRAFT
Page 1 of 1
Date - Batch (Julian)
Doc #
Project
Obj
Acct #
Description
GRAND TOTAL
Vend #
Total Amount
1.7913.44216.4546.00368.00126.36183.7050.00563.80
1,569.54
Ck Date
GL Date
Check TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck TotalCheck Total
Check #
Page 1 of 1
4/15/2016 8:14:58 AM
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 16-2
RESOLUTIONAPPROVING ATAXINCREMENT
COOPERATIVEAGREEMENT RELATINGTOTAX
INCREMENT FINANCING (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
DISTRICT NO. 17
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners(the “Board”) of Economic Development
Authority for the City of Shakopee,Minnesota (the “Authority”) as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01.The Authority has established Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District
No. 17 (the “TIF District”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended
(the “TIF Act”),within the Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1in an area
located in the City of Shakopee, Minnesota (the “City”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections469.001
through 469.047, as amended.
1.02.The City, the Authority, and Amazon.com.NVDC, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the
“Developer”), have entered into a Contract for Private Development, dated September 15, 2015 (the
“Contract”), pursuant to which the Developer agreed to cause the construction of an approximately 820,000
square foot building for use as a distribution and warehouse facility including approximately 750,000 square
feet of warehouse processing spaceand approximately 70,000 square feet of associated office space (the
“Minimum Improvements”), on real property located in the City (the “Development Property”), within the
TIF District, and to lease the Minimum Improvements for use as a distribution and warehouse facility.
1.03.In connection with the development of the Minimum Improvements, Scott County,
Minnesota (the “County”) may require that certain costs of County road improvements be paid out of tax
increment if certain conditions are met,and the County has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of
County road improvements related to the Minimum Improvements with tax increment generated from the
TIF District.
1.04.The City has proposed to reconstruct and improve streets adjacent to the Minimum
Improvements and has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of City road improvements related to the
Minimum Improvements with tax increment from the TIF District, and the Developer has proposed to forego
any tax increment generated by the Minimum Improvements.
1.05.A form of Tax Incentive Cooperative Agreement (the “Cooperative Agreement”) between
the City, the Authority, and the County has been presented before the Board, which allocatestax increment
generated by the TIF District to the City’s and County’s costs related to the construction of public road
improvements related to and necessitated by the development of the Minimum Improvements.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01.The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this resolution.
476456v1 JAE SH235-23
2.02.The Cooperative Agreementis hereby in all respects authorized, approved, and confirmed
and the Presidentand Executive Directorare hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
Cooperative Agreementfor and on behalf of the Authorityin substantially the form now on file with the
Authoritybut with such modifications as shall be deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate, their execution
thereof to constitute such conclusive evidence of their approval of any and all modifications therein.
Section 3. Implementation. The Presidentand the Executive Director are authorized and directed to
execute and deliver any additional agreements, certificates or other documents that the Authoritydetermines
are necessary to implement this resolution.
Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon the date of its adoption.
Sworn and Executed Under My Hand this 17day of April, 2016.
President
Executive Director
2
476456v1 JAE SH235-23
TAX INCREMENT
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement(the “Agreement”) is made as of March __, 2016by and
between the CITY OF SHAKOPEE, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), the ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, a public body
corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”) andSCOTT COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, political subdivision under the laws of Minnesota (the “County”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Authority was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to
469.1081, as amended (the “EDA Act”) and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers
by a resolution of the City Council of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken a program to promote economic development and job
opportunities and to promote the development and redevelopment of land which is underutilized within
the City, and has created the Minnesota River Valley Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1
(hereinafter referred to as the “Project”) in an area (hereinafter referred to as the “Project Area”) located
in the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections469.001 through 469.047, as amended (the “HRA
Act”); and
WHEREAS, by resolution dated April 4, 1995, the City Council of the City transferred control,
authority, and operation of the Project to the Authority, which currently administers the Project,
exercising the powers of a housing and redevelopment authority under the HRA Act, in accordance with
the EDA Act; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has established the Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development)
District No. 17 (“TIF District”) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as
amended (the “TIF Act”), made up of the area to be developed by the Developer; and
WHEREAS, Amazon.com.dedc, LLC, a Delaware corporation(the “Developer”), has proposed
to cause the construction of an approximately 820,000 square foot building for use as a distribution and
warehouse facility including approximately 750,000 square feet of warehouse processing space and
approximately 70,000 square feet of associated office space (the “Minimum Improvements”), on real
property located in the City(the “Development Property”), within the TIF District; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has proposed to lease the Minimum Improvements for use as a
distribution and warehouse facility; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.175, subd. 1a of the TIF Act, the Board of Commissioners of
the County may require that certain costs of County road improvements be paid out of tax increment if
certain conditions are met and the County has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of County road
improvements related to the Minimum Improvements with tax increment from the TIF District; and
WHEREAS, the City finds it necessary to reconstruct and improve streets adjacent to the Minimum
Improvements and has requested that the Authority pay certain costs of City road improvements related to the
Minimum Improvements with tax increment from the TIF District
WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to forego any tax increment generated by the Minimum
Improvements; and
1
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
WHEREAS, the Authority, the City and the County propose to enter into this Agreement in order
to allocate tax incrementgenerated by the TIF District to the City’s and County’s costs related to the
construction of public road improvements related to and necessitated by the development of the Minimum
Improvements; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutualobligations of the Parties
hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1.Definitions.
“Agreement” means this Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement, as the same may be from time to
time modified, amended, or supplemented.
“Authority” means the Economic Development Authority for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota.
“Available Tax Increment” means 99.1% of the Tax Increment attributable to the Development
Property and paid to the Authority by the County in the six months preceding eachPayment Date.
“City” means the City of Shakopee, Minnesota.
“City Road Project” means the City road improvements described in Section 3.1hereof.
“County” means Scott County, Minnesota.
“County Road Project” means the County road improvements described in Section 3.2hereof.
“Developer” means Amazon.com.dedc, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or its
permitted successors and assigns.
“Event of Default” has the meaning provided to such term in Section 4.1 hereof.
“Development Property” means the real property described in EXHIBITA of this Agreement.
“Minimum Improvements” means the construction of a building totaling approximately 820,000
square feet including approximately 750,000 square feet of warehouse processing space and
approximately 70,000 square feet of associated office space on the Development Property which will be
leased to the Developer for use a distribution and warehouse facility.
“Party” or “Parties” shall mean one or more of the Authority, the City and the County, as parties
to this Agreement.
“Payment Date” means February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1of the first year Tax
Increment is received by the City, which is expected to be August 1, 2017.
“Tax Increment” means that portion of the real property taxes that is paid with respect to the
Development Property and that is remitted to the Authority as tax increment pursuant to the Tax Increment
Act.
2
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
“Tax Increment Act” or “TIF Act” means the Tax Increment FinancingAct, Minnesota Statutes
Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended.
“Tax Increment District” or “TIF District” means Tax Increment Financing (Economic
Development) District No. 17, an economic development tax increment financing district created by the
City and the Authority.
“Tax Increment Plan” or “TIF Plan” means the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District
approved by the City Council on May 19, 2015, and as it may be amended.
“State” means the State of Minnesota.
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS
Section 2.1.Representations by the City. The City is a statutory city duly organized and
existing under the laws of the State. The City has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
Section 2.2. Representations by the County. The County is a public corporation and political
subdivision of the State. The County has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
Section 2.3.Representations by the Authority. The Authority makes the following
representations and warranties as the basis for its covenants herein:
(a)The Authority is an economic development authority duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State. The Authority has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
(b)The activities of the Authority are undertaken for the purpose of fostering the
development of certain real property in the City for the purposes of increasing tax base, creating
employment opportunities, and encouraging economic development within the City.
ARTICLE III
ROAD PROJECTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
Section 3.1.CityRoad Projects. The City agrees to completethe following public
improvements necessitated by the Minimum Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the “City Road
Project”):
th
(a)Improvements to 4Avenue from Shenandoah Drive to CSAH 83 (Canterbury Road)
th
• Widening 4Street to a three lane roadway from Shenandoah Drive to CSAH 83
• Related improvements to storm sewer, water system, sanitary sewer system
• Related sidewalk improvements
th
Avenue to CSAH 101
(b)Improvements to Shenandoah Drive from 4
th
Avenue to CSAH 101
•Reclamation of Shenandoah Drive from 4
• Railroad crossing improvements
• Related improvements to storm sewer, water system, sanitary sewer system
3
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
• Related sidewalk improvements
(c)All engineering costs and costs of right-of-way for the above-mentioned projects.
Section 3.2.County Road Projects. The County agrees to completethe following public
improvements necessitated by the Minimum Improvements (hereinafter referred to collectively as the
“County Road Project”):
(a)Improvements to CSAH 101/Shenandoah Drive
• Extension of westbound 101 left turn land at Shenandoah.
(b)Improvements to CSAH 83/4th Avenue
• Construct a northbound left, southbound right, and eastbound right-turn lane.
• Monitor the need for future traffic signal control. Install conduit and handholes.
• Relocate the Inland Container driveway to 4th Avenue.
• Relocate all Anchor Glass driveways to IndustrialBoulevard.
• Close north private driveway just south of 4th Avenue on the east side of CSAH 83.
(d)All engineering costs and costs of right-of-way for the above-mentioned projects.
Section 3.3.Payment of City Road Project Costs.
(a)In order to make the City Road Improvements necessitated by the construction of the
Minimum Improvements economically feasible, the Authority shall reimburse the City for the actual costs
of the City Road Project.
(b)On each Payment Date, the Authority will pay the City a pro rata portion of the Available
Tax Increment based on the costs of the City Road Project compared to the costs of the County Road
Project. The pro rata portion of Available Tax Increment to be paid to the City each Payment Date is
40.7%(equal to $2,319,076 divided by $5,698,326).
(c)Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Available Tax Increment exceeds the dollar amount
expected and the City is legally able to modify the TIF Plan to increase the expenditure of Available Tax
Increment, the excess Available Tax Increment may be used to provide the following road improvements
if warranted and justified by future road studies:
Improvements to County State Aid Highway 83/Twelfth Avenue in Shakopee, including
construction of dual westbound left turn lanes and modification of existing traffic signal
to accommodate dual westbound left turn lanes.
Traffic signal at State Highway 101 and Shenandoah Drive.
Traffic signal at County State Aid Highway 83 and Fourth Avenue in Shakopee.
(d)Prior to the Authority reimbursing the City for costs of the City Road Project, the City
shallprovide the Authority with written evidence in a form satisfactory to the Authority that the City has
paid the costs of the City Road Project. If the City Road Project is not complete prior to the first Payment
Date, the City may submit evidence of costs paid for a portion of the City Road Project.
4
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
Section 3.4.Payment of County Road Project Costs.
(a)In order to make the County Road Improvements necessitated by the construction of the
Minimum Improvements economically feasible, the Authority shall reimburse the County for the actual
costs of the County Road Project.
(b)On each Payment Date, the Authority will pay the County a pro rata portion of the
Available Tax Increment based on the costs of the CountyRoad Project compared to the costs of the City
Road Project. The pro rata portion of Available Tax Increment to be paid to the Countyeach Payment
Date is 59.3%(equal to $3,379,250 divided by $5,698,326).
(c)Prior to the Authority reimbursing the County for costs of the County Road Project, the
County shallprovide the Authority with written evidence in a form satisfactory to the Authority that the
County has paid the costs of the County Road Project. If the County Road Project is not complete prior to
the first Payment Date, the County may submit evidence of costs paid for a portion of the County Road
Project.
Section 3.5.Estimated Costs of Road Projects.
(a)The City understands and acknowledges that the TIF Plan budgeted approximately
$2,319,076 to pay the costs of the City Road Project and no additional Available Tax Increment will be
available to pay such costs.
(b)The County understands and acknowledges that the TIF Plan budgeted approximately
$3,379,250to pay thecosts of the CountyRoad Project and no additional Available Tax Increment will
be available to pay such costs.
(c)Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the tax increment derived from the TIF Project exceeds
what is estimated in the TIF Plan and if the costs of either or both of the City Road Project and the
County Road Project are significantly over the amounts estimated for such projects, the Board of the
Authority and the City Council of the City will consider modifying the TIF Plan to increase the budgetfor
both projects, if such modification is allowed under the TIF Act.
Section 3.6.Annual Accounting. Within 30 days of each fiscal year end (December 31), the
Authority shall provide to the City and the County an accounting of how the Tax Increment received from
the County in the previous year was expended. On or prior to May 1 of each year, the City and the
County shall provide to the Authority an accounting of how Available Tax Increment it received in the
previous year was expended and what Available Tax Increment remains unexpended.
agree to indemnify and
Section 3.7.Indemnification. The Authority, the City, and the County
hold harmless the otherPartiesfrom any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages, including
reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or
employees of the indemnifying Party, to theextent such acts or omissions relate toactivities conducted
by the indemnifying Party under this Agreement.
Each Party's liability is governed by the provisions
established in the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. No Party intends to waive any defenses or immunities
available under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466.
5
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
ARTICLE IV
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
Section 4.1. Events of Default Defined. The failure by the Authority, the City or the Countyto
observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation, or agreement on its part to be observed orperformed
under this Agreement shall be an Event of Default under this Agreement.
Section 4.2. Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in Section4.1 of this
Agreement occurs, the Authority, the City, or the Countymay:
(a)Suspend its performance under the Agreement until it receives reasonably satisfactory
assurances that the defaulting Party will cure its default and continue its performance under the Agreement.
(b)Upon a default by the City, the Authority may suspend the payment ofAvailable Tax
Increment tothe City.
(c)Upon a default by the County, the Authority may suspect the payment of Available Tax
Increment tothe County.
(d)Take whatever action, including legal, equitable, or administrative action, which may appear
necessary or desirable to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to enforce performance and
observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this Agreement.
Section 4.3. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to any Party is
intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be
cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter
existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon
any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such
right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient.
Section 4.4. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. In the event any agreement contained
in this Agreement should be breached by anyParty and thereafter waived by one or more of the other Parties,
such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other
concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder.
Section 4.5. Attorneys’Fees. Whenever any Event of Default occurs and if a Partyshall employ
attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due orfor the enforcement
of performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of another Partyunder this
Agreement, each Party will pay its own attorneys’fees.
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 5.1. Conflict of Interests; RepresentativesNot Individually Liable. The Authority, the City,
and the County,to the best of their respective knowledge, represent and agree that no member, official, or
employee of the Authority, the City or the Countyshall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in the
Agreement, nor shall any such member, official, or employee participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement that affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership, or association in
which he, directly or indirectly, is interested. No member, official, or employee of the Authority, the City or
the Countyshall be personally liable to any other Party to this Agreementin the event of any default or
6
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
breach by the Authority, the City or the Countyor for any amount that may become due to other Parties to
this Agreement or on any obligations under the terms of the Agreement.
Section 5.2. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections of
the Agreement are inserted forconvenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or
interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 5.3. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a
notice, demand, or other communication under the Agreement by either Party to the other shall be sufficiently
given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
or delivered personally, to the following addresses (or to such other addresses as either Party may notify the
other):
To Authority:Shakopee EDA
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: Executive Director
To City:City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: City Administrator
To County:Scott County
Scott County Government Center
200 Fourth Avenue West
Shakopee, MN 55379
Attn: County Auditor
Section 5.4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 5.5. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement approved by
the City, the Authority, and the County.
Section 5.6.Term of Agreement.With respect to the County, this Agreement shall terminate
on the earlier of (i) the date that TIF payments to the County totaling $3,379,250 have been made or (ii)
the expiration of the TIF District. With respect to the City, this Agreement shall terminate on the earlier
of (i) the date that TIF payments to the City totaling $2,319,076have been made or (ii) the expiration of
the TIF District.
Section 5.7.Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the
laws of Minnesota.
Section 5.8.Entire Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement
constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and there
are no other representations, warranties, or agreements except as herein provided.
\[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.\]
7
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and the County have caused this Tax
Increment Cooperative Agreementto be duly executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the
date first above written.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
By
Its Mayor
By
Its CityAdministrator
(Signature Page of City to Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement)
S-1
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
By:
Its: President
By:
Its: Executive Director
(Signature Page of Authority to Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement)
S-2
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
By
Its Board Chair
By
Its County Administrator
(Signature Page of County to Tax Increment Cooperative Agreement
S-3
471652v3 JAE SH235-23
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
Lot 1, Block 1, Shenandoah East First Addition, Scott County, Minnesota
A-1
471652v3 JAE SH235-23