Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 15, 2016 RESOLUTION NO. 7699 A RESOLUTION ISSUINGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT STATEMENT FOR SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: (see attached legal description); and WHEREAS ,pursuant to Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Rules, Chapter 4410, part 4410.1000,Subpart 2, theCity of Shakopeeas the responsible governmental unitcompleted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for theShakopee High School Expansion project; and WHEREAS ,pursuant to Minnesota EQB Rules, Chapter 4410.4300 Subpart 14 and Subpart 26, theproject meetsthe thresholds for an EAW for institutional facilitiesandland use conversion; and WHEREAS , copies of the EAW were distributed to all persons and agencies on the official EQB mailing listprior to January 2, 2016; and WHEREAS , notice of the availability of the EAW for public review for a 30-day comment EQB Monitoron January 2, 2016; and period was published in the th WHEREAS ,a press release was published in the Southwest Newspaperson December 24, 2015 and January 7, 2016to announce the availability of the EAWto interested parties; and WHEREAS , the 30-day comment period ended on February 2, 2016and all comments received have been considered; and WHEREAS , the EAW, in conjunction with comment responses, identifiedpermitting, mitigation, water quality improvements, and parking and intersection improvementsthat, if met, will addressenvironmental effects caused as a result oftheproject. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Shakopee: That it should and hereby does make a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the improvementsincluded in the Shakopee High School ExpansionEAW, provided all mitigation measures of the EAW are implemented by the developer(s)as part of theprojects, and all local, state, and federalenvironmental standards are followed and incorporated into the final site plansfor the project. Adopted this day of , 2016. _____________________________ Bill Mars, Mayor ATTEST:____________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk Reviewed for administration:______________________________ Bill Reynolds, City Administrator Building a legacy –yourlegacy.701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 Memorandum To:Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Shakopee CC:Mark Noble, City of Shakopee From:Alison Harwood, WSB & Associates, Inc. Date:March 8, 2016 Re:Shakopee High School Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet WSB Project No. 1381-560 The public comment period for the New Shakopee High School Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) ended February 2, 2016. The purpose of the EAW is to identify potential environmental impacts and determine whether or not an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. An EIS is a more extensive environmental review process. Determining whether or not an EIS is needed does not relate to providing approval or denial for the project. Based on the information in the EAW and review agency comments regarding the EAW, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental impacts that cannot be addressed as part of the permitting process. Therefore, it is our recommendation that an EIS is not required. Enclosed, please find the following items for your review relating to this EAW: TheRecord of Decision and Findings of Fact on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). A summary of the review agencies comments received on the EAW and the responses to those comments.This section responds to each review agency issue. Draft resolution relating to a Negative Declaration of Need. Summary of Major Comments Comments were received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Metropolitan Council, Jackson Township, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and one private resident. These comments were general in nature. The JacksonTownship comments have either been addressed or will be addressed during Scott County’s Conditional Use Permit process. The MnDOT, DNR, SHPO, and MPCA, Metropolitan Council, and private resident comments did not raise significant issues. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@24C1D0DA\\@BCL@24C1D0DA.docx March 8, 2016 Page 2 City Council Decision Action The decision before the City Council regarding the EAW is to decide whether or not the project has the potential for significant environmental impacts that cannot be addressed through the permitting processes. If the Council determines thatthe project does nothave the potential for these significant environmental impacts, the Council should issue a Negative Declaration of Need for an EIS. If the Council determines that the project doeshave the potential for significant environmental impact that cannot be addressed through the permitting and approval process, the Council should require an EIS. Based on the review completed by WSB & Associates, it is our recommendation that an EIS is not needed for this project. If you have any questions,please feel free to call me at (763) 231-4847. RECORD OF DECISION SHAKOPEE HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION PROJECT City of Shakopee & Jackson Township, Minnesota Scott County March 8, 2016 RECORD OF DECISION I.ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND Pursuant to Minnesota Rule 4410.4500, the City of Shakopee has prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Shakopee High School Expansion Project. This Record of Decision addresses State of Minnesota environmental review requirements as established in Minnesota Rule 4410.1700. Independent School District #720 is the project proposer for this project. The City of Shakopee is the Responsible Governmental Unit(RGU). The EAW was filed with the Minnesota EQB and circulated for review and comments to the required EAW distribution list. A Notice of Availability for the initial EAW was published in the EQB Monitoron January 4, 2016. Notices of Availability and Press Releases were published in the Southwest Newspaperson December 24, 2015 and January 7, 2016. The public comment period ended February 2, 2016. Comments were received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council, Jackson Township, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and one private resident. All comments were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Summaries of the comments received, and the City of Shakopee’s responses to those comments, are provided in Section III, below. II.FINDINGS OF FACTAND CONCLUSIONS As to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project and based on the record in this matter, including the EAW and comments received, the City of Shakopee makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: A.PROJECT DESCRIPTION Shakopee Independent School District 720 proposes to construct an approximately 335,000 square foot addition onto the existing Shakopee high school. In addition, approximately 80 acres of a 106-acre area south of County Highway (CH) 78 is proposed to be developed into an athletic complex. B.PROJECT HISTORY A.The project wassubject to amandatory EAWper Minnesota Rule 4410.4300 Subpt 14 and Subpt 36. Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision B.The EAW wasdistributed to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on January 4, 2016and to the EQB mailing list on December 24, 2015. C.Public noticescontaining information about the availability of the EAW for public review was provided to the Southwest Newspapersfor publication in the December 24, 2015 and January 7, 2016 papers. D.Hard copies of the EAW were provided for public review at Scott County Library, Shakopee City Hall, Minneapolis Public Library, and an electronic copy was provided on the City of Shakopee’swebsite. E.A notice was published for the EAW in the January 4, 2016EQB Monitor. The public comment period ended February 2, 2016. Comments were received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council, Jackson Township, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and one private resident. Copies of these comment letters are hereby incorporated for referenceand included in Attachment A. F.Corrections to the EAW -Based on the comments received, Figures 4band11of the EAW and Figures 6a,7a,8a,and9aof the Traffic and Parking Study were updated. These figures are included in Attachment B. C.CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. Minnesota Rule4410.1700, subp. 1,states “An EIS shall be ordered for projects that have the potential for significant environmental effects.” In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects, the City of Shakopeemust consider the four factors set out in Minnesota Rule4410.1700, subp. 7. With respect to each of these factors, the City of Shakopeefinds thefollowing: 1.MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.A -TYPE, EXTENT, AND REVERSIBILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS a.The type of environmental impacts and mitigation efforts anticipated as part of this project include: Zoning-The property that will contain the athletic complex is not currently zoned to allow for school or recreational facilities. School District No. 720 will be required to get a conditional use permit through Scott County to comply with the zoning for this area. Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision Land Use-The existing property that will contain the athletic complex is comprised primarily of agricultural land which is often farmed for row crops (e.g., corn, soybeans). Most of the development will occur within the existing agricultural areas. There are wooded areas on the west and southeast corners of the property, and wetlands located throughout. The approximately 20 acres of woodland on the west side of the project site is not proposed to be developed. Approximately 8.4 acres of wooded area will be removed to accommodate development of the site. Most of these removals will occur in in the southeast portion of the site. Erosion control best management practices will be incorporated into the design and construction of the site to minimize the potential for sediment leaving the site. Wastewater-It is estimated that the proposed high school will generate an average of 44,000 gallons per day (GPD) of wastewater. Wastewater will be conveyed to the BlueLake Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) via the City of Shakopee sanitary sewer system and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor. The existing wastewater system was originally constructed with anticipation of further development in this area. The increase in wastewater resulting from the proposed project is not expected to require immediate expansion or improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure or treatment plant. Wastewater from the high school expansion will be conveyed through a new sanitary sewer pipe to the existing sanitary pipe that extends from the east side of the school to the street. A sanitary sewer extension permit will be obtained from the MPCA prior to construction. Water Resources–The project will impact approximately 8,500 square feetof wetlandat the athletic complex site. Wetland impacts will be reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies and mitigated prior to construction through the permitting process. The anticipated replacement ratio is 2:1. Erosion prevention and sediment control best management practices (e.g., silt fence, floating silt curtain, erosion control blanket, inlet protection, and stabilization of disturbed areas) will be used to minimizethe risk of sedimentation offsite and into downstream water resources. These requirements will be documented in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which will be included in the final plans, as well as with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Construction Stormwater General Permit, which will be obtained prior to beginning construction. All best management practices used will be reviewed by the appropriate state and local authorities prior to project construction and any additional requirements will be incorporated into the appropriate permits. By incorporating best management practices during construction, adverse impacts to water resources are expected to be minimized. Water Quality–The project will increase impervious surface area and the rate of runoff atboth the high school and athletic complex sites. There are currently two stormwater treatment basins at the high school. These basins were designed for fully developed conditions and will accommodate the additional stormwaterand infiltration needs resultingfrom the high school expansion. Stormwater at the athletic complex will be treated onsite in a new stormwater pond. Infiltration will be provided via irrigation of the athletic fields. The stormwater basins at both sites were designed to meet NURP criteria for fully developed conditions. The ponds will reduce pollutant loading and provide rate control, thereby reducing negative impacts associated with additional impervious surface area. Itis expected that the proposed ponding will improve water quality within the project area and to areas downstream. Potential Environmental Hazards–An active underground storage tank (UST) is located at the Shakopee high schoolSite. If excavation is proposed in the vicinity of this site, there is a potential for encountering petroleum impacted soils and/or groundwater will be encountered from an undocumented leak. Based on current information, the potential for this is low. Three existing buildings currently located at the athletic complex site will be demolished as part of the project. Hazardous materials inspections have been completed for the three buildings that will be removed and identified hazardous materials are planned to be disposed of or abated in accordance with MDH regulations. Removal is anticipated to occur by burning and will be an opportunity for the local fire departments to practice firefighting skills. All applicable state and local permits will be obtained prior to burning. Water Use–The County Well Index identified sixwells in or near the project area. Any wells that are encountered during the project Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision will be abandoned and sealed according to state and local regulations. Transportation (Parking and Traffic)-The parking impacts and demand ofthe proposed high school expansion and athletic complex development were analyzed based on current City Code and Chapter 5 of the County Zoning Ordinance, respectively; the parking generation rates as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4Edition, th and; studies at similar high school and athletic facilities. Based on the analysis, additional parkingat the high school site(446 spaces)and the athletic complex(999 spaces)will be providedto accommodate the proposed uses. A Traffic and Parking Study was completed for the high school expansion and athletic complex. This Study provided a comprehensive look at anticipated traffic impacts for the regional area. The Traffic and Parking Study identified recommended mitigation improvements at two intersections by 2038 and continued monitoring of two additional intersections. These recommendations include: 1.Construction of left and right turn lanes on CH 78 and CH 79 at the athletic complex access locations. 2.17th Avenue (CH 16) at Fuller Street -monitor traffic for future installation of a traffic signal system when warranted. 3.CH 78 at CH 79 -construction of right and left turn lanes on each approach 4.Monitor the intersections of 17th Avenue (CH 16) at CH 15 and the high school Center access for future possible mitigation. Following publication of the EAW, four figures that were contained in the Traffic and Parking Study were updated to include proposed turning movements into and out of the athletic complex. These figures (6a, 7a, 8a, and 9a) are attached. b.The extent and reversibility of environmental impacts for the proposed project are consistent with those of a typical building expansion or recreational site developmentproject. Impacts will be minimized to the extent practical, with mitigation provided for those impacts which cannot be avoided to resources such as wetlands, water surface runoff, etc. Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision 2.MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.B -CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF RELATED OR ANTICIPATED FUTURE PROJECTS The proposed project will result in an expansion of the existing high school as well as development of an athletic complex on a currently undeveloped (agricultural) area to the south of the high school. Impacts within these two areas will result from construction of the high school expansion as well as from the construction of the athletic complex (athletic fields and associated parking areas). No additional development plans are proposed in the area surrounding either the high schoolor athletic complexat this time. In addition, the development within the high schooland athletic complex project areas is not anticipated to create the need for future development. Therefore, no cumulative potential effects are expected. 3.MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.C -THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL AFFECTS ARE SUBJECT TO MITIGATION BY ONGOING PUBLIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY a)The following permits or approvals willbe required for the project: Unit of GovernmentType of ApplicationStatus Federal US Army Corps of EngineersSection 404 PermitTo be obtained State Department of Natural Water Appropriation To be obtained, if ResourcesPermitnecessary Pollution Control AgencyNPDES PermitTo be obtained Pollution Control AgencySanitary Sewer ExtensionTo be obtained Pollution Control AgencySection 401 CertificationTo be obtained Department of HealthWatermain ExtensionTo be obtained Department of HealthPermit to abandon and seal To be obtained, if private wellsnecessary Local Metropolitan CouncilSanitary Sewer ReviewTo be obtained Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision Jackson TownshipWetland Delineation To be obtained Approval Jackson TownshipWetland Conservation Act To be obtained Replacement Plan City of ShakopeeConditional Use PermitTo be obtained Scott CountyConditional Use PermitTo be obtained Scott CountyDemolition PermitTo be obtained b)The City of Shakopeefinds that the potential impacts identified as part of the Shakopee High SchoolExpansionproject are minimal and can be addressed through the regulatory agencies as part of the permitting process. As a result, additional analysis of these impacts is not required. 4.MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.D -THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CAN BE ANTICIPATED AND CONTROLLED AS A RESULT OF OTHER AVAILABLE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY PUBLIC AGENCIES OR THE PROJECT PROPOSER, INCLUDING OTHER EISs. The City finds: 1.The proposed project is reasonably similar to institutional and recreational development projects in the area, including the original Shakopee high schoolconstruction that was completed in 2007. The original Shakopee High School Expansion project EAW Decision Letter concluded that the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects and should be able to mitigate for any potential impacts. Based on similarity, the Shakopee High School Expansion project will have the same conclusions. 2.No EIS that addresses a similarly sized project is known to be available in the City of Shakopee or the surrounding area. In light of the results of environmental review and permitting 3. processes for similar projects, the City of Shakopee finds that the environmental effects of the project can be adequately anticipated, controlled, and mitigated . Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision The City of Shakopeefinds that theenvironmental effects of the project can be anticipated and controlled as a result of the environmental review, planning, and permitting processes. D.CONCLUSIONS The Shakopee High School ExpansionEAW and comments receivedhave generated information adequate to determine thatthe proposed project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW has identified areas where the potential for environmental effects exist, but appropriate mitigation measures have been incorporated intothe project plans and the required approvals and permits to mitigate these effects are being obtained. The project will comply with all county, city, and federal review agency requirements. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental impacts. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)is not required for the Shakopee High School Expansionproject. _________________________________________________________________________________________ Mark Noble, Senior Planner ______________________________________________________________ Date Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision III.AGENCY COMMENTS AND CITY OF SHAKOPEE RESPONSES A 30-day comment period for the above-referenced EAW ended on February 4, 2016. Comments were received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council, Jackson Township, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and one private resident.On behalf of the City of Shakopee as the RGU, comment responses are provided below. These letters are included in Attachment A. Comments received and responses are summarized below. A.Comments from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT): Comment 1: Thank you for the opportunity to review the EAW for Shakopee High School. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the EAW and has no issues. Response 1: Thank you for reviewing the EAW. B.Comments from Jackson Township: Comment 1: Figure 4b: Site Plan (Athletic Complex) does not show a roadway connection to the north at CSAH 78 and CH 77 intersection. It appears this will require an easement or property acquisition to provide this connection. All roadways that are to be maintained by Jackson Township shall include the dedication of a 66’ wide right of way. Response 1: The site plan (Figure 4b) has been updated to show the roadway connection to CHs 78 and 79 and is attached. Easements are currently being pursued to allow these connections. The first 300 feet of these roadways will be maintained by Jackson Township and will include the dedication of 66 feet of right of way. Comment 2: Figure 4b: Site Plan (Athletic Complex) shows a segment of roadway as “future road connection”. Jackson Township requests that this segment be built with the initial project Response 2: In response to comments received from various stakeholders, including Jackson Township, this segment of roadway has been incorporated into the initial project. A revised site plan (Figure 4b) is attached. Comment 3: The project description states that athletic complex will involve gravel surfaces. Jackson Township requests that all roadways and parking areas be paved to minimize maintenance of roadways and parking areas. Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision Response 3: The first 300 feet of roadway that extends from CH 78 and CH 79 into the athletic complex are intended to be paved, per the Township’s request. These roadways will be maintained by Jackson Township. The roadways and parking areas interior to the athletic complex are not intended to function as Township roads and are not anticipated to be maintained by the Township. The maintenance of these private roads and parking areas will be coordinated through the School District and will likely only occur during the spring, summer, and fall as events are not likely to occur during the winter months. Therefore, these interior roadwaysand parking areas will remain gravel. Comment 4: There is no intended use description provided regarding the portion of the athletic field complex southwest of the intersection of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 78 and County Road (CH) 77, and there is no site plan for this area. Based on Figure 9 and Figure 13, this area is made up primarily of wooded and wetland areas. Item 19 states that the athletic complex will be constructed in 2016; it is not clear if this includes the area southwest of the CSAH 78/CH 77 intersection. Please provide a site plan for the area southwest of CSAH 78/CH 77 or at minimum describe the intended use of this area. Response 4: The approximately 20 acres of area located southwest of the intersection of CH 78/CH 77 will not be developed with the athletic complex, and no future development plans currently exist. Therefore, no site plan is available for that portion of the athletic complex site. The extent of Figure 4b has been expanded to show this area. Comment 5: The size of the athletic complex is significant and could become a regional facility in the future depending on use and demand. Please provide an explanation of the long range plan for this facility such as use by organizations other than the Shakopee School District or other intended uses and events? Response 5: The athletic complex will be owned by Shakopee Independent School District #720, and all requests for rental of the site will initially go through the School District. Similar to the School District’s baseball fields, it is anticipated that a Joint Powers Agreement will be developed between the School District and Shakopee Parks and Recreation department. The school will provide scheduling of athletic events prior to 5 pm during the academic year, and the Parks and Recreation department will schedule events outside of those times. It is anticipated that in addition to the Shakopee School District organizations such as athletic associations (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, baseball, softball) and other youth organizations will utilize the space provided by the athletic complex. Events that are not related to athletics will be coordinated through the School District and the city’s Parks and Recreation Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision Department, and may also be subject to existing Scott County permits (e.g., large event permits). Comment 6: Based on the information provided in Item 9.a.iii and 9.b, the development of the new athletic complex will require a conditional use permit from Scott County, which administers zoning matters for developments in Jackson Township. Response 6: As outlined in Item 8 of the published EAW and also in Section II.C.3.aabove, a Conditional Use Permit will be obtained through Scott County. Comment 7: Item 11.a.i states that wetlands southwest of the CSAH 78/CH 77 intersection were identified by National Wetland Inventory mapping, yet Item 11.b.iv states that these were identified through a field delineation. Presumably Item 11.b.iv is correct (and Item 11.a.i is outdated) as it references a second field delineation (October 2015) to capture the area southwest of the CSAH 78/CH 77 intersection. It is unclear why the October 2013 delineation report is included in the EAW appendix, but the October 2015 delineation report is not. Response 7: Item 11.b.iv is correct. The athleticcomplex site located southeast of the CH 78/CH 77 was completed in October 2013 and has been approved by the Local Government Unit (LGU; Jackson Township). The portion of the site located southwest of CH 78/CH 77 was completed in October 2015, but has notyet been approved by the LGU. As a result, the unapproved delineation report was not included with the EAW. This portion of the site is intended to be reviewed and approved in Spring 2016. Comment 8: Based on information provided in 11.b.ii, the stormwater information for the athletic complex covers sub-watersheds MP3-A, MP3- B, MP3-C, MPE1-B, and MPE1-C. Based on Figure 11, this does not include the athletic complex area southwest of the CSAH 78/CH 77 intersection. Response 8: No development is proposed within the approximately 20 acre area southwest of the CH 78/CH 77 intersection; therefore, the pre- settlement curve numbers for those sub-watersheds were not reported. Figure 11 has been updated to show the sub-watershed IDs for the additional area. Comment 9: Item 11.b.ii identifies infiltration requirements for the athletic complex and states that irrigation is planned to meet the infiltration requirements. Previous narrative stated that this area would involve gravel surfaces. If irrigation is not used, the gravel surfaces could create maintenance issues with any proposed infiltration areas. Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision Response 9: Irrigation is intended to be used to meet the infiltration requirements at the athletic complex. The primary source of irrigation will be the created stormwater pond located in the northeast portion of the athletic complex. A well will also be installed to supplement irrigation, if needed. A well installation permit will be obtained. Comment 10: The Response 18 narrative only describes one access to the athletic site –an extended intersection south of the CH78/CH 77 intersection. The site plan and traffic analysis assumes a second access off of CH 79 to the east of the athletic field site. Response 10: A second entrance is proposed off of CH 79 to theeast of the athletic complex. This entrance was evaluated in the traffic analysis and construction of left and right turn lanes at the athletic complex entrance off of CH 79 is recommended. Comment 11: The traffic generation volumes appear sound relativeto the scale and nature of the proposed athletic complex development. Response 11: Thank you for your review of the traffic generation volumes. Comment 12: It appears that there are no turning movement maps for the Build Alternative in the Traffic and Parking Study; the only turning movement maps for the athletic complex (6b, 7b, 8b, and 9b) show no traffic in or out of the site. Response 12: Figures 6a, 7a, 8a, and 9a have been updated to include the turning movements into and out of the athletic complex for the proposed conditions. These figures are attached. The traffic study has also been updated with these figures and has been provided to Scott County and the City of Shakopee. Comment 13: The LOS analysis and resulting proposed mitigation measures appear sound relative to the scale and nature of the proposed athletic complex development. Response 13: Thank you for your review of the Level of Service analysis and proposed mitigation. C.Comments from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA): Comment 1: Item 6 in the EAW mentions the demolition of buildings but no further information is provided. The demolition of the existing buildings must comply with state and federal regulations that required the structure to be inspected for hazardous materials such as asbestos, Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision lead based pain, light ballasts, thermostats, stored chemicals, ozone depleting chemicals, etc. Regulated asbestos-containing materials must be abated prior to demotion activities. A “Notification of Asbestos Related Work” must be submitted to the MDH by a licensed asbestos inspector 10 working days prior to conduction abatement activities, if abatement is a specific size. A “Notification of Intent to Perform a Demolition” must be submitted to the MDH b 10 working days prior to commencement of demolition. Any lead based paint chips present must be encapsulated or removed. The MPCA recommends the recycling of as much of the building materials as possible to reduce the volume of material disposed of in the landfill. Response 1: Hazardous materials inspections have been completed for the three buildings that will be removed and identified hazardous materials are planned to be disposed of or abated in accordance with MDH regulations. Removal is anticipated to occur by burning and will be an opportunity for the local fire departments to practice firefighting skills. All applicable state and local permits will be obtained prior to burning. Two buildings, which are denoted as “existing structures” on the site plan (Figure 4b) will remain on siteand continue to be used for storage. Comment 2:The EAW did not provide a detailed qualitative analysis of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) criteria pollutants: ozone, particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), lead, and carbon monoxide. However, this project is not likely to have a significant negative impact on these pollutants. There will be a spike in emissions in the morning and afternoon, as cars and buses drop off and pick up students. Since NAAQS average PM concentrations over 24 hours and annually, it is not expected for these relatively short spikes in emissions to cause a violation. There are no NAAQS for diesel PM, which would be expected for buses, but the US EPA has determine that PM2.5 NAAQS areprotective of diesel PM health effects. The school may wish to consider an idle reduction policy to reduce the amount of emissions inhaled by students during peak hours. Response 2: Thank you for your review of the EAW. The School District will consider an idle reduction policy at the High School. Comment 3:The Project will involve significant increases in traffic in the area around the school and the athletic facilities, both as part of construction and use. The Project proposer has conducted a Trafficand Parking Study to understand possible impacts of increased traffic. It is important to maintain traffic flow and access to adjacent development throughout the construction period and during use of facilities. The proposed intersection improvements seemreasonable to mitigate the traffic concerns. The MPCA recommends that the Project proposer follow Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision the recommendation to monitor congestion at two additional intersections for possible future mitigation. Response 3: Thank you for your review of the EAW. The project proposer intends to follow the recommendations set forth in the EAW and Traffic and Parking Study. D.Comments from State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO): Comment 1: Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend a Phase I archaeological survey be completed for the proposed athletic complex. Response 1: The School District will consider the completion of a Phase I archaeological survey. If any potential archeological resources are discovered during construction of the project, all construction activities will be stopped and the SHPO will be contacted. E.Comments from Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(DNR): Comment 1: The document appears to be complete and accurate and does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. The DNR does stress the importance of natural forest in the metro area and opportunities for partitioning some of the development area for other activities/uses such as outdoor education/recreation. The 20 acre parcel located on the west side of the athletic complex was included in the EAW but plans for this site were not provided. This land or other wooded areas along the periphery of the proposed athletic complex could be used as opportunities for outdoor classroom space, walking trails, etc. If not already evaluated, it would be worthwhile to pursue the feasibility of developing the trail between the school and athletic complex as a transit/recreation/service trail that does not intersect with traffic on CH 78. Phasing the development of the parking lots, the use of pervious pavement options, or the incorporation of a solar power plant into the plan might also be considered. Response 1: Thank you for your review of the EAW and recommendation that an EIS is not needed. The 20acre parcel located on the west side of the athletic complex, southwest of the intersection of CH 78/CH 77 does not currently have a development plan. The School District will take into consideration the DNR’s recommendations regarding the use of these natural outdoor areas as educational opportunities. A future trail along Townline Avenue that would connect an existing trail east of the High School to the athletic complex is identified as a Regional Trail (Scott County Regional Trail) in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. When this trail is developed, an Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision evaluation of the potential to provide a trail crossing that does not intersect with CH 78 will be conducted. Roadways and parking areas interior to the athletic complex are proposed to be gravel, and are proposed to be developed with the initial project to accommodate the users of the athletic complex. F.Comments from Metropolitan Council: Comment 1: In accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 473.513, at the time of the project proposed makes application to the MPCA for a permit to construct each segment of sanitary sewer for the proposed project, a copy of the plans, design data, and location map of the project will also need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The Council’s Environmental Service Municipal Services staff will need to review, comment, and recommend issuance of the construction permit by the MPCA before connection can be made to the City’s wastewater disposal system. Response 1: The School District will submit to the Metropolitan Council a copy of the sanitary sewer plans, design data, and location map of the project at the same time that application is made to the MPCA. This review requirement has been added to the permit/approval table in Section IV.c. Comment 2:The Land Use Section indicates that the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies a future regional trail along Townline Avenue connecting the High School with the athletic complex. Please note that a portion of the Scott County Regional Trail currently exists and is adjacent to the east side of the High School site. Council staff recommends that any closures or rerouting of the regional trail that are necessitated by the construction project be coordinated with Scott County Parks. Response 2: The School District will coordinate any necessary trail closures with Scott County Parks prior to construction. Comment 3:The Metropolitan Disposal Systemhas adequate capacity for the 335,000 sq. ft. of addition to the existing Shakopee High School. The Athletic Complex development, as proposed in the EAW, located in Jackson Township 0.39 miles south of the existing High School will not be served by the Metropolitan Disposal System at this time. Response 3: Thank you for your review of the EAW. Comment 4:On page 3, the document indicates that “\[p\]arking will also be expanded to accommodate approximately 700 additional cars.” Whereas on page 27, the document notes that “\[p\]arking will also be Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision expanded to accommodate 446 additional vehicles.” Please correct or clarify this apparent inconsistency. Response 4: Based on the most recent site plan, the High School parking areas will be expanded to accommodate an additional 446 vehicles. Comment 5:With the athletic complex will be 0.39 miles south of the High School, it is very likely there will be some students walking or biking that distance between the two sites. Yet there’s no mention of providing sidewalk/pathway connections between the High School and the athletic complex. Currently, it appears that the sidewalks/pathways along Koeper (on the west side of the High School) and Townline (on the east side of the High School) end just south of the High School. From just a safety standpoint, staff recommends that sidewalk/pathway connections between the High School and athletic complex be provided. Response 5: Item 9 of the published EAW refers to the identification of future trails east of the High School (Townline Avenue) and along CH 15 (Marystown Road) west of the High School. The trail on the east side is identified as a futureState/Regional trail (Scott County Regional Trail) and the trail on the west is identified as a future county trail. The trail along Townline Avenue is intended to connect to the athletic complex. The trail along Koeper Avenue, directly west of the High School, currently ends at the city boundary. The School District is not aware of any immediate plans to extend this trail south to the athletic complex. G.Comments from General Public: Comment 1: The baseball field and soccer fields currently provide a great barrier to excessive noise. I believe the entire campus should look good, and I also believe your current plan makes Fuller Street look like a back alley to the building. Green space all around the school really does make for a more decent looking structure, blended a little with landscape. I do believe another option would be to not have a parking lot on the west side, but just a road from the north side to the south side of the building, with additional parking expanded elsewhere. I believe the currentplan will reduce property values, or at least property aesthetics in the neighborhood. Response 1: Thank you for your review of and comment on the EAW. The current site plans for the High School expansion takes into account both available space and building proximity. The parking areas planned for the west side of the existing building are primarily replacement for staff parking lost by expansion of the building. There are currently approximately 200 parking stalls available in the west lot for staff. The site plan provides for 336 parking stalls, which will help to accommodate the approximately 190 additional staff. Additional staff and athletic field Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision parking (approximately 252 stalls) is proposed to the south of the building expansion area, adjacent to the existing tennis courts and baseball field. Additional student parking is being provided east of the existing eastern parking lot. The remaining area in the northeast portion of the High School site is intended to be used to address future parking needs,should they arise. The parking lots west of the High School building are intended to be used as staff parking, which is consistent with the existing use. The post-construction levels and duration of noise are expected to remain consistent with existing levels and duration, primarily occurring in the morning and afternoon during the academic school year when staff are entering and exiting the parking lot. The proposed development will be required to conform to city landscaping standards and a vegetative buffer between the parking lots and Fuller Street will be required, providing both visual screening and a buffer from noise. Shakopee High School Expansion Project Record of Decision July 2013 version EAW NVIRONMENTAL SSESSMENT ORKSHEET This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the http://www.eqb.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addresses collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Shakopee High School Expansion 2. Proposer: 3. RGU: Independent School District #720City of Shakopee Contact person: Dr. Rod Thompson Contact person: Mark Noble Title: High School Superintendent Title: Senior Planner Address: 1200 Town Square Address: 129 Holmes St. S City, State, ZIP: Shakopee, MN 55379 City, State, ZIP: Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone: 952-496-5000 Phone: 952-233-9348 Fax: Fax: Email: rthompson@shakopee.k12.mn.us Email: mnoble@shakopeemn.gov 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary: EIS Scoping Citizen petition Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Subpt. 14: Industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities, and Subpt. 36: Land use conversion, including golf courses 5. Project Location: County: Scott City/Township: Shakopee/Jackson Township PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): NE ¼ S13, T115N, R23W and NE ¼ S24, T115N, R23W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Minnesota River Shakopee (No. 33) GPS Coordinates: -93.526, 44.769 and -93.526, 44.759 page 1 Tax Parcel Number: 279130831, 279130830, 279130840, 279130850, 279130860, 69240140, 69240090, 69240040, 69240020, 69240030, 69240080, 692240091 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: County map showing the general location of the project; U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post- construction site plan. page 2 6.Project Description: Provide the brief project summary to be published in the , (approximately 50 a. EQB Monitor words). Shakopee Independent School District 720 proposes to construct an approximately 335,000 square foot addition onto the existing Shakopee high school. In addition, approximately 80 acres of a 106-acre area south of County Highway (CH) 78 is proposed to be developed into an athletic complex. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including b. infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. Shakopee Independent School District 720 proposes to construct an approximately 335,000 square foot addition onto the existing Shakopee high school. The existing high school, located south of 17 th Avenue between Spencer Street and Fuller Street in Shakopee, was constructed between 2005 and 2007 and was open to students in the fall of 2007. The existing school has an enrollment capacity of 1,600 students and also provides for 190 staff. The existing high school includes parking for approximately 1,000 cars, 86 busses and includes several outdoor athletic Figures 1 4a facilities (). Since the high schoolhigh schoolent capacity was exceeded during this 2015/2016 school year when student enrollment reached 1,675. The proposed expansion will increase the student capacity of the high school by 1,600 students and 190 staff. Parking will also be expanded to accommodate approximately 700 additional cars. The expansion will add to the existing building footprint by approximately 221,500 square feet and will be three stories in height. The expansion will include space for classrooms, offices, a gymnasium, activity center, locker and fitness rooms, and a mechanical room. The gymnasium in the existing school will be renovated into an expanded lunchroom area. The expansion will result in the loss of four athletic fields. There are currently two stormwater treatment basins at the high school. These basins were designed to meet NURP criteria for fully developed conditions and have a total drainage area of approximately 390 acres.he total amount of dead storage available for water quality treatment T on the site is 11.2 ac-ft and the site provides 8.12 ac-ft of infiltration. If required, additional requirements for storm water management. Additional detail regarding the existing and proposed stormwater requirements at the high school site is available under Item 11.b.ii. page 3 In addition to the high school expansion, an athletic complex is also proposed to replace some lost outdoor athletic fields at the existing high school as well as create additional capacity for future students and the community. The proposed athletic complex will be located approximately Figures 1 3, 4b 0.39 mile south of the existing high school, south of CH 78 (). The athletic complex will provide space to replace the four athletic fields lost at the high school and will also create nine additional fields. The athletic complex will provide parking for approximately 999 cars. This space will support school and extracurricular functions for students as well as community functions for the public. Stormwater ponding will also be constructed at the athletic complex to offset the changes in land use and new impervious created as part of the parking lot and athletic field entrances. Infiltration will be required on site to mitigate impacts to downstream water resources. Construction of the high school expansion will result in land disturbance totaling approximately 32 acres and will create approximately 10.9 acres of new impervious surface. Development of the athletic complex will disturb approximately 68.5 acres and create 8.29 acres of new impervious surface. Construction methods for the proposed high school expansion and athletic complex are anticipated to include: Demolition of the buildings associated with the five existing building sites located at the athletic complex. Excavation/grading of soils in preparation of building pad areas, pavement, and athletic fields. Excavation for the installation of utilities. Excavation for the construction of required retention basins. Paving of roadways and parking areas. The high school expansion will involve paved surfaces. o The athletic complex will involve gravel surfaces. o Poured concrete footings with block foundations at the high school. Building construction at the high school, including the following components: Concrete block, brick, precast concrete, steel framing, and gypsum board. Construction Staging/Project Schedule Construction of the high school expansion is proposed to begin in May 2016 and be completed by June 2018. The 335,000 square foot addition will be constructed first and then connected to the existing building in the summer of 2017. Construction of the parking lots will take place between April August 2017. Development of the athletic complex is scheduled to begin in Spring 2016 and be completed by Fall 2016. Project magnitude: c. Total Project Acreage 194 acres Linear project length N/A Number and type of residential units N/A page 4 Commercial building area (in square feet) N/A Industrial building area (in square feet) N/A Institutional building area (in square feet) 335,000 Other uses specify (in square feet) Recreational 3,484,800 square feet Structure height(s) 54 feet 8 inches Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, d. explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the high school expansion project is to create additional space for students. The existing high school has a capacity of 1,600 students and 190 staff. Student enrollment exceeded the capacity this 2015/2016 school year when enrollment reached 1,675. The purpose of the athletic complex is to replace outdoor athletic fields that will be removed as a part of the high school expansion as well as create additional capacity for future students and the community. The proposed project benefits the residents of the City of Shakopee and those within the boundaries of Independent School District 720, some of whom live outside of the city boundary. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned e. or likely to happen? Yes No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? f. Yes No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: High School Site Before After Before After Wetlands 0 0 Lawn/landscaping 35.69 ac 28.21 ac Deep 0 0 Impervious 27.77 ac 38.22 ac water/streams surface Wooded/forest 0.75 ac 0.75 ac Stormwater Pond 2.88 ac 3.80 ac Brush/Grassland 20.91 ac 17.02 ac Other (describe) 0 0 Cropland 0 0 TOTAL 88.00 ac 88.00 ac page 5 Athletic Complex Before After Before After Wetlands 10.40 ac 9.60 ac Lawn/landscaping 4.62 ac 67.03 Deep 0 0 Impervious 1.56 ac 9.85 ac water/streams surface Wooded/forest 22.49 ac 14.1 Stormwater Pond 0 2.10 ac Brush/Grassland 7.79 ac 3.95 Other (describe) 0 0 Cropland 59.77 ac 0 ac TOTAL 106.63 ac 106.63 ac 8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be obtained State Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriation Permit To be obtained, if necessary Pollution Control Agency NPDES Permit To be obtained Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension To be obtained Pollution Control Agency Section 401 Certification To be obtained Department of Health Watermain Extension To be obtained Department of Health Permit to abandon and seal To be obtained, if necessary private wells Local Jackson Township Wetland Delineation Approval To be obtained Jackson Township Wetland Conservation Act To be obtained Replacement Plan City of Shakopee Conditional Use Permit To be obtained Scott County Conditional Use Permit To be obtained Scott County Demolition Permit To be obtained Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 19 page 6 9. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. Zoning and land use regulations for the high school, which is located in the City of Shakopee, are controlled by the City of Shakopee. Zoning and land use regulations for the athletic complex, which is located in Jackson Township, are controlled by Scott County. Figure 5 Current zoning and land use maps are shown on . The high school is currently used as a high school and contains the high school building, parking lots, athletic fields, and stormwater pond areas. Areas adjacent to and near the high school are primarily used for low density single family residential. Some medium density residential also exists just northeast of the high school. The Shakopee Trail Map included Regional Trail) along Townline Avenue, connecting the high school with the athletic complex. In addition, a future county trail is identified along CH 15, just west of the project area. The existing high school is not used for any agricultural activity. Plan identifies the current use of the athletic complex property as being Single Family/Farmstead (15-40 acres) and also Agricultural/Undeveloped (Under 40 acres). Looking at aerial images of the property, it appears that there are approximately 5 residences on the property and that portions of the property are currently farmed. Approximately 1 acre of the currently farmed area is listed as Prime Farmland. Surrounding land uses include low density residential, agriculture, and a golf course. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The City of Shakopee 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the high school property for Figure 6 Institutional use (). The use of the property as a high school is consistent with this future land use designation. The Scott County 2030 Comprehensive Plan currently guides the athletic complex property for Urban Expansion. The plan states that the purpose of this planning category is to preserve areas around cities for future urban expansion and development. The boundaries -range sanitary sewer service plans based on known capacities of existing regional or local treatment facilities. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The high school property is currently zoned R1B, Urban Residential, on the City of Figure 7 Shakopee Zoning Map (). According to Section 151.034 (A) of the Shakopee Zoning Ordinance, the purpose of the R1B district is to provide an area for residential development where public and sanitary sewer and water are available. Section 151.034 (C) page 7 instruction approved by Minnesota Board of Education for students enrolled in K through grade 12, or any porti The athletic complex property is zoned UER, Urban Expansion Reserve on the Scott Figure 7 County Zoning Map (). Section 30-1 of the Scott County Zoning Ordinance states that the purpose of the UER district is to preserve land in those areas of Scott County identified in its Comprehensive Plan for logical future extension of urban land uses served by public utilities. This zoning district is intended to preserve these areas of the County in very low rural development densities or clustered residential developments that may be compatibly integrated with future urban development. This district is also meant to perform the following functions: (1) to conserve land in a viable economic status until such time as public utilities may be extended and urban development densities may be supported and (2) to reduce the possibility of urban/rural land use conflicts in both the use of the land and future extension of public utilities and other infrastructure items. The Scott County Zoning uses, buildings, and storage) which is permitting as a conditional use in the UER district on Table 20-4 of the Ordinance. Neither the high school nor the athletic complex is located within a shoreland area. Both properties are identified as being within Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 500- Appendix B year flood plain) on the FEMA Flood Map (2704280010C; ). b. 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The proposed high school expansion will not change the use of the high school. The use of the property as a high school esignation on the future land use map . The use of the property as a high school is compatible with the surrounding residential uses. The property that will contain the athletic complex is not currently zoned to allow for school or recreational facilities. School District No. 720 will be required to get a conditional use permit through Scott County to comply with the zoning for this area. The athletic complex is surrounded by low density residential, agricultural land, and a golf course. As stated above, the intent of the UER district is to preserve land identified for future extension of urban land uses served by public utilities. The athletic complex is located on the fringe of urban development, approximately 0.39 miles south of the high school. The proposed use as an athletic complex would support the nearby high school and would appear to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. In order to be compatible with the current Scott County Zoning, School District No. 720 will be required to get a condition use permit through Scott County for the athletic complex. page 8 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any a. susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The sandstone, dolostone, and shale of the Prairie Du Chien underlie both the high school and athletic complex.This formation is not susceptible to sinkhole formation. The Scott County Surface recharge and surface infiltration Atlas C-17, Plate 6, maps the site as fast to very fast, which means contaminants will probably reach the water table in weeks to years; little natural protection exists to retard the vertical movement of liquids. During construction activities, a SWPPP will be implemented as part of the NPDES permit requirements. The SWPPP will list all the BMPs that will be implemented during the construction of the project. After construction, the storm water pond, the preservation of wooded areas and the seeding of any leftover exposed soil will help protect both the surface waters and the groundwater. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and b. descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 11.b.ii. The Scott County Soil Survey, published in 1958, shows a total of 28 different soil types on the high school and athletic complex that are included in the Hubbard-Estherville-Dakota soils Figure 8 association (). These soils are described as level and gently sloping, well drained, somewhat poorly drained, and moderately well drained soils that are loamy and sandy on outwash terraces. Side slopes of terraces are fairly steep with slopes ranging from 18-35 percent. These soil types include the Hayden (HaE2), (HaF2) (HcE3) soil series. Soils Characteristics Soil # Soil Name Slope % Hydric Floodplain HEL DbB2 Dakota Sandy Loam 2-6 No No NHEL EaA Estherville Loam and Sandy 0-2 No No NHEL Loam EaB2 Estherville gravelly sandy 0-6 No No NHEL loam EaC2 Estherville gravelly sandy 6-12 No No PHEL loam EaE2 Estherville gravelly sandy 18-25 No No HEL loam Ga Glencoe silty clay loam - Yes No NHEL HaB Hayden loam 0-6 No No NHEL HaB2 Hayden loam 2-6 No No NHEL HaC Hayden loam 6-12 No No PHEL page 9 Soil # Soil Name Slope % Hydric Floodplain HEL HaC2 Hayden loam 6-12 No No PHEL HaD Hayden loam 12-18 No No HEL HaE2 Hayden loam 18-25 No No HEL HaF2 Hayden loam 25-35 No No HEL HcD3 Hayden 12-18 No No HEL HcE3 Hayden 18-25 No No HEL HeB2 Hubbard loamy fine sand 2-6 No No NHEL LcB Lester silt loam 2-6 No No NHEL LcB2 Lester silt loam 2-6 No No NHEL LcC Lester silt loam 6-12 No No PHEL LcC2 Lester silt loam 6-12 No No PHEL LcD2 Lester silt loam 12-18 No No HEL PaA Peat and Muck 0-2 Yes No NHEL PbA Peat Deep 0-2 Yes No NHEL Ta Terrace escarpments - No No HEL TbD Terril sandy loam 0-6 No No HEL WaA Waukegan silt loam 0-2 No No NHEL WaB Waukegan silt loam 2-6 No No NHEL Wb Webster-Glencoe - Yes No NHEL Silty clay loam Legend: Floodplain: Yes= listed as a floodplain soils by Scott County Soil Survey, NRCS. Hydric: Yes= listed on the Hydric Soils In Scott County, Minnesota, April 2015 HEL: Highly Erodible Land NHEL: Not Highly Erodible Land PHEL: Potentially Highly Erodible Land Slope: In percent During construction activities, a SWPPP will be implemented as part of the NPDES permit requirements. The SWPPP will list all the BMPs that will be implemented for erosion control. After construction, the storm water pond, the preservation of wooded areas and the seeding of any leftover exposed soil will help reduce erosion of soils and protect both the surface waters and the groundwater. 11. Water resources: Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. a. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. The National Wetlands Inventory identifies three aquatic resources within the high school Figure 9 project area (). These three areas were determined to be stormwater ponds which were created in upland during construction of the existing high school. Correspondence Appendix B regarding this review is attached in . No other surface water resources exist within the high school project area. page 10 The athletic complex was also reviewed for surface water resources. A wetland delineation was completed for the area southeast of the intersection of CH 78 and CH 77 (Koeper Avenue) and eleven wetland areas were identified. Nine of these wetlands are within the project boundary of the athletic complex. This wetland delineation report is included in Appendix B . Three wetlands were identified using the National Wetland Inventory for the portion of the site located southwest of the intersection of CH 78 and Fuller Street. One DNR Public Water, 119P, is also located on the south end of the project site. The surface water Figure 9 resources available on this site are shown on . The MPCA Construction Stormwater Special Waters Search was reviewed for special or impaired waters within 1 mile of the project areas. No impaired waters exist within 1 mile of the high school. Dowd Lake (95P) is located approximately 0.75 mile Figure 9 southeast of the athletic complex ()Lake is impaired for mercury in fish tissue and nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators; however, runoff from the site athletic complex does not drain to this waterbody. Therefore, no special erosion control provisions will apply. Standard NPDES requirements for erosion control will be utilized for this project. Groundwater aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project ii. is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. Both the high school and athletic complex are located within a wellhead protection area. The County Well Index was reviewed for wells located within or nearby the project sites. Three wells were identified within or adjacent to the high school project site. Three wells were also identified within or adjacent to the athletic complex. These Figure 10. wells are summarized below and shown on Unique Well ID Use Status Well Depth (feet) 185013 Domestic Active 260 731110 Irrigation Active 259 417568 Domestic Active 320 436468 Domestic Active 300 417510 Domestic Active 340 623872 Domestic Active 380 Based on the well and boring records reviewed, the depth to groundwater is an average of 139 feet (range 114.7 feet 170 feet) at the high school project site and 191 feet (range 160 feet 230 feet) at the athletic complex. Additional, unrecorded, wells may be present within the project limits of the athletic complex and will be identified prior to construction. Any wells that are encountered during the project will be abandoned and sealed according to state and local regulations. page 11 b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. Normal wastewater will be generated by the high school. Wastewater will be conveyed to the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) via the City of Shakopee sanitary sewer system and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor. It is estimated that the proposed high school will generate an average of 44,000 gallons per day (GPD) of wastewater. This estimate assumes that the proposed project will increase facility occupancy by approximately 1,760 people and each occupant will generate wastewater averaging 25 GPD. Wastewater from the addition will be conveyed through a new sanitary sewer pipe to the existing sanitary pipe that extends from the east side of the school to the street. The Blue Lake WWTP has an average wastewater design flow capacity of 42 million GPD and has seen an average inflow value of 24.5 million GPD over a recent 12 month period (Metropolitan Council Plant Inflow Summary Report dated 8/31/2015). The existing wastewater system was originally constructed with anticipation of further development in this area. The increase in wastewater resulting from the proposed project is not expected to require immediate expansion or improvements to the existing wastewater infrastructure or treatment plant. The athletic complex is located within Jackson Township and municipal sewer is not available at this time. However, no plumbed restroom facilities are proposed at the athletic complex, so no wastewater will be discharged from this site. Portable restroom facilities will be utilized and these facilities will be maintained and waste from them disposed of through the company hired to provide the facilities. Any existing septic systems on the site that will be abandoned will be done so by a licensed septic professional. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. No wastewater will be discharged to a SSTS.All wastewater generated by the high school and athletic complex projects will be conveyed to the Blue Lake WWTP or disposed of via a portable restroom facility provider, respectively. page 12 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. Wastewater generated by the high school will be treated at the Blue Lake WWTP. Treatment methods at Blue Lake WWTP consists of screening, grit removal, primary treatment, biological phosphorus removal and nitrification in the activated sludge process, secondary clarification, disinfection using gaseous chlorine and de- chlorination using sulfur dioxide gas. Cascade aeration is used to increase effluent dissolved oxygen prior to discharge to the Minnesota River via a 1-mile discharge pipe. No groundwater or surface water impacts are anticipated from the additional wastewater produced by the high school expansion. The athletic complex will use portable restroom facilities, rather than plumbed facilities. The company selected to provide this service will be responsible for maintaining the portable restrooms and disposing of waste. ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. Both the high school and the athletic complex lie within the Mill Pond Subwatershed. This watershed drains approximately 14.3 square miles of Shakopee and Jackson Township. Runoff generally flows from the south to the north, discharging into the Minnesota River at the Mill Pond via overland flow and within the Upper Valley Drainageway. Shakopee High School Expansion There are currently two stormwater treatment basins at the high school. These basins were designed for fully developed conditions and have a total drainage area of approximately 390 acres. The ponds ultimately discharge through a 54-inch culvert that runs under 17 th Avenue. Drainage continues north under Highway 169 and connects in to the Upper Valley Drainageway. The Upper Valley Drainageway drains to the east, ultimately reaching the Minnesota River. The Minnesota River is on the Impaired Waters List for Minnesota, but is over 1 mile away from the project area. The City of Shakopee has the following requirements for storm water management, as outlined in the SWMP: Water Quality event over the entire contributing drainage area assuming full development (NURP Criteria) page 13 Volume Control offsite infiltration facilities is allowed) Rate Control : 1/3 cfs per acre for the 100-year critical duration event Currently, the total amount of dead storage available for water quality treatment on the site is 11.2 ac-ft. The basins were designed to meet NURP criteria for fully developed conditions. Volume Control Currently, the high school property provides 8.12 ac-ft of infiltration. Of that, 1.31 ac-ft is required for treating runoff from the existing high school and future school development. This leaves an excess of 6.81 ac-ft of infiltration credit available. Assuming 32.91 acres of impervious surface, the required infiltration volume for the proposed high school is 2.74 ac-ft, which is a net increase of 1.43 ac-ft required under proposed conditions. If the City agrees to use a portion of the 6.81 ac-ft infiltration credit, no additional infiltration requirements are needed for the proposed high school. This would result in an infiltration credit balance of 5.38 ac-ft. If the City does not agree to use the credit, the proposed plan will need to include 1.43 ac-ft of infiltration on site. Rate Control The maximum allowable peak runoff rate for the high school property is listed in the SWMP and summarized below. The SWMP uses TP40 Rainfall events for establishing peak runoff rate criteria. The proposed high school peak flows from the site will not exceed these rates. Fully Developed Peak Runoff Rate Criteria Storm Event Maximum Allowable Peak Runoff Rate (cfs) 2-year 48.42 10-year 99.17 100-year 169.33 Athletic Complex The proposed athletic complex includes subwatersheds MP3-A, MP3-C, MPE1-B and a Figure 11 portion of MP3-B and MPE1-C (). Currently, drainage from the area is to the north under CH 78 and also to the east, under Townline Avenue. Drainage to the north and east ultimately enters the high school property. The proposed athletic complex falls outside the city limits and Scott County stormwater standards will apply. They are outlined in the Scott County Zoning Ordinance No. 3 and are as follows: Water Quality over the entire contributing drainage area assuming full development (NURP Criteria) Volume Control site, downstream analysis is required) page 14 Rate Control : Reduce to Pre-settlement rates (Curve numbers set by Ordinance) OR 1/3 cfs per acre, whichever is lower Water Quality The proposed athletic complex has approximately 9.6 acres of impervious surface. The event over this area will need to be treated on site in a NURP stormwater basin. The stormwater basin design will follow NURP standard design criteria. Volume Control Using the Scott County infiltration standards and assuming 9.61 acres of impervious area at the proposed complex 0.8 ac ft of infiltration is required on site. The soils are mostly Hydrologic Soil Group B, with some areas shown as B/D on the Scott County Soil Survey. It may be that infiltration is not feasible at the property due to either shallow bedrock/groundwater or poor soils. Currently, infiltration is planned via irrigation of the athletic fields located on the athletic complex property. If this option is chosen, an irrigation management plan will need to be submitted to the Scott County for review and approval. Rate Control Scott County requires the use of Atlas 14 precipitation amounts in rate control analysis. The Pre-Settlement curve numbers for each subwatershed are listed below. Figure 11 Subwatersheds are shown on . Peak runoff rates will be determined using these values for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events. These rates will be assumed to be the rate control criteria unless they are greater than the City Standard of 1/3 cfs per acre. The applicant may choose to apply the lower of these two standards (County vs. City) for calculating peak runoff rates. Subwatershed Pre-Settlement CN MP3-A 55 MP3-B 57 MP3-C 59 MPE1-B 65 MPE1-C 65 Stormwater Management Plan Procedure A development review will be conducted prior to any grading or construction activities for both of the proposed projects in order to determine conformance with the City of design criteria and general plan requirements. Erosion and sediment control standards, both during and after construction activities, are also outlined in the SWMP for projects within the City of Shakopee (high school) and within Chapter 6 of the Scott County Zoning Ordinance for projects within Scott County (athletic complex). Prior to the start of any earthwork an approved erosion control plan and SWPPP that follows this criteria will be in place. Additional erosion control measures at the high school site may be required as directed by the s Public Works Director, and additional erosion control measures at the athletic complex may be required by the Scott County Erosion Control Inspector. In addition, due to page 15 erosion concerns in the downstream channel between the athletic complex and the high County. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. If dewatering is required during construction, a DNR Construction Dewatering permit will be obtained. Irrigation of the fields at the athletic complex may occur via of reuse of water from the stormwater pond proposed within with the site. If this occurs, a DNR Water Appropriations Permit will be required for withdrawing more than 10,000 gallons of water per day or 1,000,000 gallons per year. No new wells are proposed at the athletic complex. No municipal water connections area expected. Any wells located at homes that are purchased as part of the athletic complex will be properly abandoned and sealed. iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. A wetland assessment was conducted on both the high school and athletic complex. The high school was reviewed for wetlands in August 2015. No wetlands were identified during the review. Correspondence regarding this review is attached in Appendix B . page 16 The portion of the proposed athletic complex located southeast of the intersection of CH 77 and CH 78 was reviewed for wetlands in October 2013. Another wetland delineation was completed within the area southwest of the intersection of CH 77 and CH 78 in October 2015. In total, 14 areas were determined to meet the criteria for wetlands and were delineated. Wetland boundaries will be required to be reviewed and approved by Jackson Township prior to construction. The locations of these Figure 9 wetlands are shown on . Development of the athletic complex will be designed to avoid wetlands to the extent feasible, but will result in impacts to two wetlands. Impacts are estimated to total approximately 8,500 square feet. One of the wetlands is a small, farmed wetland located within a drainage swale near the center of the site. The other impact would occur to the southeast corner of a Type 2/3 wetland located in the east-central portion of the site. Mitigation for impacts to these wetlands will comply with the wetland sequencing and siting requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act and the Scott County Wetland Management Organization. Mitigation will be provided at a minimum 2:1 ratio. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. One unnamed lake, DNR Public Water 119P, is located on the southwest corner of Figure 9 the athletic complex ().No impacts are proposed to this waterbody. The project will not affect the number or type of watercraft on the lake. 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental a. hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre- project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Publicly available database information was reviewed to identify verified or potentially contaminated sites that may be encountered during construction of the both the high school expansion and athletic complex. The following databases were reviewed as part of this review: page 17 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search MPCA Tanks and Leaks website search Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) "What's in My Neighborhood?" website search Based on the databases reviewed, one listing was identified in the project areas, two listings were identified on adjoining properties, and forty-five listings were identified in the surrounding area within 1,000 feet of the project areas. None of the listings directly indicated a regulated material spill or release. An active 10,000 gallon UST (containing diesel) is linked to the Shakopee high Figure 12 school (Site 1; ). The UST location is unknown and no leaks or spills associated with the tank have been reported. If excavation is planned in the vicinity of the UST located at Site 1, there is a potential petroleum impacted soils and/or groundwater will be encountered from an undocumented leak that will require management during construction. However, based on the current information, this potential is low at this time. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored b. during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction of the project will generate solid waste and construction debris normal to construction. All waste and unused building materials will be properly disposed of off-site and not allowed to be carried by runoff into a receiving channel or storm sewer system. Following construction, municipal solid waste will be hauled away by local, licensed garbage haulers and the School District will be encouraged to recycle. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous c. materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. During construction of both the high school expansion and athletic complex, vehicles containing gasoline will be present on site. Minimal amounts of gasoline may be stored on site, in approved containers with secondary leak protection. The potential for contamination is low and no toxic or hazardous materials will be present after construction. Fuel trucks and any other hazardous materials will be locked when not in use to avoid vandalism. No above or below ground tanks are proposed to be stored on site following construction. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes d. generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of page 18 disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction of the projects will not involve the generation of significant amounts of hazardous waste. Hazardous waste generated from construction will be properly disposed of as business waste. Hazardous waste generated from the high school and athletic complex (e.g., paint, stain, automotive chemicals, household cleaning chemicals, etc.) is business waste and will be disposed of properly. It can be disposed of at the Scott County Household Hazardous Waste Facility located in Jordan, MN. Shakopee School District is a licensed hazardous waste generator and is routinely inspected by Scott County. The School District will also be encouraged to recycle. page 19 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. The land cover at the existing high school is primarily impervious or maintained turf grass (athletic fields). A narrow upland buffer exists on the south side of the high school and within an approximately 8-acre area in the northeast corner of the high school property and may provide some nesting habitat for local wildlife. The stormwater ponds and surrounding buffered areas may provide Figure 13 some habitat to waterfowl and waterbirds. The existing land cover is shown on . Overall, the existing high school property provides little habitat for wildlife, and does not provide any fisheries habitat. Wildlife present are those that are accustomed to frequently-disturbed areas, such as rabbits, raccoons, mallards, and common songbird species (e.g., American robin, American goldfinch, house sparrow). The existing property that will contain the athletic complex is comprised primarily of agricultural land which is often farmed for row crops (e.g., corn, soybeans). There are wooded areas on the west and southeast corners of the property, and wetlands located throughout. Existing farms/occupied residences are located on the northwest, northeast, and southeast corners of the project. The existing Figure 13 land cover is shown on . The wooded areas and wetland would provide habitat to a variety of wildlife species. DNR Public Water 119P is located in the southwest corner of the athletic complex property and is . Given the shallow nature of the lake, it may support some fish species but this is unknown. b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA-____) and/or correspondence number (ERDB 20160107) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. s Natural Heritage Information System was reviewed for the presence of State-listed threatened, endangered, or special concern species. Rare features have been identified within 1 mile of the high school an athletic complex. These features, and mitigation measures, are summarized below. A portion of the athletic complex is located within a Central Region Regionally Significant Figure 14 (). This area corresponds to DNR Public Water 119P, located in the southwest corner of the athletic complex property. This area will not be impacted by the proposed athletic complex. The northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), a state-listed species of special concern has been documented throughout Minnesota. The long-eared bat hibernates in caves and mines during the winter and roosts underneath loose bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees during the active season (April October). There is a large tract of wooded area located on the western portion of the athletic complex property. This area will not be impacted by construction of the athletic complex. An approximately 7-acre woodland is located in the southeast corner of the athletic complex property. Tree removal in this area is expected. It is anticipated that the tree removal required for the project will occur during winter, and will not impact the northern long-eared bat. page 20 Appendix B Correspondence from the DNR is attached is . c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. The proposed high school expansion will be located primarily on existing impervious surfaces. Some additional parking will be added to the west and south on existing turf grass areas. Wildlife that currently utilizes the area planted with turf grasses may be displaced to the surrounding grassland areas or to the upland buffer located south of the high school. Overall, impacts to wildlife as a result of this project are expected to be minimal. The athletic complex is designed to utilize primarily the agricultural fields and developed farmsteads/residences. Wetland will be avoided to the extent practicable, and much of the wooded area located west side of the athletic complex will remain intact. Given that the athletic fields will consist of maintained turf grass, the available wildlife habitat will remain much the same as what exists today with the agricultural fields. No development is proposed adjacent to Public Water 119P. No impacts to fish or wildlife species are anticipated with the development of this area. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. Minimal impacts to wildlife are anticipated. Both the high school and athletic complex properties are currently either developed or primarily in agricultural land use and frequently disturbed. Wetlands located within the athletic complex will be avoided and much of the wooded areas will remain intact, minimizing impacts to the wildlife that occupy those habitats. 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. The SHPO was contacted regarding the potential for historic, cultural, or architectural resources present near both the high school and athletic complex Figure 15 located west of the athletic complex, along Marystown Road (). This resource will not be physically or visually impacted by development of either the high school expansion or athletic Appendix B complex. Correspondence from the SHPO is included in . page 21 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The existing high school is located within a suburban area and is surrounded by low- to medium- density residential areas. There are no scenic views or vistas near the existing high school. Athletic field lighting may be added to the fields on the south side of the property. These lights are not expected to create any visual impacts and will be utilized only during sporting events. The athletic complex is primarily used for agriculture and is surrounded by rural residential and agricultural areas. There are no scenic views or vistas near the athletic complex. If lighting is proposed at the athletic complex, it will be required to conform to Chapter 4 of the Scott County Zoning Ordinance and a lighting plan will need to be submitted and approved by Scott County. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a e results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. No stationary source emissions are proposed as part of either the high school expansion or athletic complex. b. Vehicle emissions - -related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. The EPA has identified a group of 93 compounds emitted from mobile sources that are listed in their Integrated Risk Information System. In addition, the EPA identified seven compounds with significant contributions from mobile sources that are among the national and regional-scale cancer risk drivers. These are acrolein, benzene, 1, 3-butadiene, diesel particulate matter, plus diesel exhaust organic gases (diesel PM), formaldehyde, naphthalene, and polycyclic organic matter. While Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) considers these the priority mobile source air toxics, the list is subject to change and may be adjusted in consideration of future EPA rules. EPA rule requires controls that will dramatically decrease Mobile Source Air Toxins (MSAT) emissions through cleaner fuels and cleaner engines. According to an FHWA analysis using EPA's MOBILE6.2 model, even if vehicle activity increases as assumed, a combined reduction of 72 percent in the total annual emission rate for the priority MSAT is projected from 1999 to 2050. page 22 Air toxics analysis is a continuing area of research. While much work has been done to assess the overall health risk of air toxics, many questions remain unanswered. In particular, the tools and techniques for assessing project-specific health outcomes as a result of lifetime MSAT exposure remain limited. These limitations impede the ability to evaluate how the potential health risks posed by MSAT exposure should be factored into project-level decision-making within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act. The FHWA will continue to monitor the developing research in this emerging field. Because of the uncertainties outlined above, a quantitative assessment of the effects of air toxic emissions impacts on human health cannot be made at the project level. While available tools do allow us to reasonably predict relative emissions changes between alternatives for larger projects, the amount of MSAT emissions from each of the study scenarios and MSAT concentrations or exposures created by each of the study scenarios cannot be predicted with enough accuracy to be useful in estimating health impacts. Therefore, it is not possible to make a determination of whether any of the scenarios would have "significant adverse impacts on the human environment." This document acknowledges that the build scenarios may result in increased exposure to MSAT emissions in certain locations, although the concentrations and duration of exposures are uncertain, and because of this uncertainty, the health effects from these emissions cannot be estimated. Although a qualitative analysis cannot identify and measure health impacts from MSATs, it can give a basis for identifying and comparing the potential differences among MSAT emissions, if any, from the various scenarios. The qualitative assessment presented below is derived in part from a study conducted by the FHWA entitled A Methodology for Evaluating Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions among Transportation Project Alternatives. For this EAW, the amount of MSAT emitted would be proportional to the average daily traffic (ADT). The ADT estimated for the scenario is higher than that for the no build condition, because the project involves new development that produces additional trips. This increase in ADT means MSAT under the build scenarios would probably be higher than the no build condition in the study area. There could also be localized differences in MSAT from indirect effects of the project such as associated access traffic, emissions of evaporative MSAT (e.g., benzene) from parked cars, and emissions of diesel particulate matter from delivery trucks. Travel to other destinations would be reduced with subsequent decreases in emissions at those locations. For the scenario, emissions are virtually certain to be lower than present levels in the design year as a result of EPA's national control programs that are projected to reduce annual MSAT emissions by 72 percent from 1999 to 2050, as shown in the following graph. The magnitude of the EPA-projected reductions is so great (even after accounting for ADT growth) that MSAT emissions in the study area are likely to be lower in the future than they are today. page 23 NATIONAL MSAT EMISSION TRENDS 1999 - 2050 FOR VEHICLES OPERATING ON ROADWAYS USING EPA's MOBILE6.2 MODEL Note: (1) Annual emissions of polycyclic organic matter are projected to be 561 tons/yr for 1999, decreasing to 373 tons/yr for 2050. (2) Trends for specific locations may be different, depending on locally derived information representing vehicle-miles travelled, vehicle speeds, vehicle mix, fuels, emission control programs, meteorology, and other factors Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. MOBILE6.2 Model run 20 August 2009. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has designated all of Hennepin, Ramsey, Anoka and portions of Carver, Scott, Dakota, Washington and Wright Counties as a maintenance area for carbon monoxide. The EAW study area is in Scott County, which is in this carbon monoxide maintenance area. The EPA has approved a screening method to determine which intersections need a hotspot analysis. A hot spot analysis is required if the intersection is above the benchmark average annual daily traffic (AADT) threshold or listed as one of the "Top Ten" intersections. All of the top ten intersections are within the Twin Cities carbon monoxide maintenance area. Below is a page 24 list of the top ten intersections and their 2007 AADT. 1. TH 169 at CH 81 79,400 2. TH 7 at CH 101 66,600 3. TH 252 at 85th Avenue 66,800 4. University Avenue at Snelling Avenue 59,700 5. TH 252 at Brookdale Drive 61,300 6. Cedar Avenue at County Road 42 75,100 7. TH 7 at Williston Road 54,900 8. University Avenue at Lexington Avenue 59,700 9. TH 252 at 66th Avenue 72,500 10. Hennepin Avenue at Lake Street 37,000 The screening method demonstrates that because this project has less than the benchmark AADT of 79,400 and does not involve or affect the "Top Ten Intersections," a hotspot analysis is not needed. In summary, it is expected there will be slightly higher MSAT emissions in the study area with the project relative to the no build condition due to increased ADT. There also could be increases in MSAT levels in a few localized areas where ADT increases. However, the EPA's vehicle and fuel regulations will bring about significantly lower MSAT levels for the area in the future when compared to today. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. During construction, particulate emissions will temporarily increase due to generation of fugitive dust. The nearest and most sensitive receptors to the construction activity are the high school building itself and the residential properties that immediately surround the high school property. Construction dust control is required to be in coand Scott ordinances and the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit. Following construction, dust generated by the gravel parking lots and drives at the athletic complex will be controlled in accordance with MPCA regulations. The construction and operation of the high school and athletic complex is not anticipated to involve processes that would generate odors. page 25 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. The existing high school is located within a suburban area and is surrounded by low- and medium- density residential areas. Existing noise sources are those typical of suburban residential areas and consist mainly of traffic on the area roadways, which include 17 th Avenue, Fuller Street, Spencer Street and surrounding residential streets. The nearest sensitive receptor is the high school itself. There is also an elementary school located approximately 0.30 mile to the west, north of 17 th Avenue. Construction noise levels and types will be typical of construction equipment will occur as a result of this project. Construction noise will be limited to daytime hours consistent with the City of weekends and holidays). Construction equipment will be fitted with mufflers that would be maintained throughout the construction process. The table below summarizes the peak noise levels of common types of roadway construction equipment. Table 2: Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet Peak Noise Level Manufacturers Total Number of Equipment Type Sampled Models in Sample Range Average Backhoe 5 6 74-92 83 Front Loader 5 30 75-96 85 Dozer 8 41 65-95 85 Grader 3 15 72-92 84 Scraper 2 27 76-98 87 Pile Driver N/A N/A 95-105 101 Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration The proposed athletic complex is currently an agricultural field and is surrounded by a few farmsteads and agricultural land. Existing noise sources would be those typical of a rural area and consist mainly of traffic on the area roadways, which include CH 78 (130 th Avenue West), Koeper Avenue, and Townline Avenue. The nearest sensitive receptor would be the existing high school, which is located approximately 0.39 miles north of the proposed athletic complex. Construction noise levels and types typical of construction equipment will occur as a result of this project. Construction noise is anticipated to be limited to daytime hours. Construction equipment will Table 2 be fitted with mufflers that would be maintained throughout the construction process. , above, summarizes the peak noise levels of common types of roadway construction equipment. page 26 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. Shakopee Independent School District 720 proposes to construct an approximately 335,000 square foot addition onto the existing Shakopee high school. The existing high school is located south of 17 th Avenue between Spencer Street and Fuller Street in Shakopee. The Figures 1 4a existing high school includes parking for 1,004 vehicles, 86 buses. shows the project location and existing site plan. The proposed addition will increase the student capacity of the high school by 1,600 students and 190 staff. Parking will also be expanded to accommodate 446 additional vehicles. In addition to the high school expansion, an athletic complex is also proposed to replace some lost outdoor athletic fields at the existing high school as well as create additional capacity for future students and the community. The proposed athletic complex will be located approximately 0.39 mile south of the high school, south of CH 78. The location of the athletic Figures 1 3, 4b complex is shown on . The athletic complex will provide space to replace the four athletic fields lost at the high school and will also create nine additional fields for a total of 13 fields. The athletic complex will provide parking for 999 vehicles. Access to the athletic complex will be via an extended intersection south of the intersection of CH 78 (a private driveway exists there now). The property required for an entrance will be either purchased by the school district or an easement will be obtained over the private driveway, and the road upgraded per County requirements to allow for traffic to enter and exit the athletic complex. This roadway will provide access to the athletic complex and adjacent properties. The parking impacts and demand of the proposed high school expansion and athletic complex development were analyzed based on current City Code and Chapter 5 of the County Zoning Ordinance, respectively; the parking generation rates as documented in the Institute of th Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4 Edition, and; studies at similar Table 3 high school and athletic facilities. The results are shown in below. Table 3 - Parking Demand Analysis Parking from City CodeParking Demand from ITE Parking Parking UseSizeStudies ProvidedPasses Peak RateParkingRate Parking 1675 Students Existing High School 1004 1/7 Students + 0.25/Student + 190 Staff 778313609 (2015/2016)(0.60/Student)1/Classroom1/Staff 0.32/Student 73 Classrooms to 3200 Students 0.53/Student 1450 1/7 Students + 0.25/Student + High School with Expansion380 Staff 12206011180 (0.45/Student)1/Classroom1/Staff 143 Classrooms 999 38.3/Field - Wkd 39/Field to Athletic Field Comlex 13 FieldsNANANA765 (76.8/Field)58.8/Field - Sat127/Field page 27 Based on the above analysis, the additional parking proposed at the high school site and the new parking at the proposed athletic complex will be adequate to accommodate the proposed uses. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds Use the format and 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: or a similar local http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) guidance, The estimated trip generation from the high school expansion and athletic complex is shown Table 4. below in The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition. The table shows the daily, AM peak hour, PM peak hour and PM peak hour of generator trip generation for the proposed site development. Table 4 - Estimated Development Site Trip Generation PM Peak of Street PM Peak Hour of ADTAM PeakTrafficGenerator Planned Use TotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOut Size Unit High School Expansion1,600Students2,7361,3681,36868846822020898110464153311 Athletic Field Complex 13Fields93446746715862301547623916079 3,6701,8351,835703476226438252186703313390 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects . A Traffic and Parking Study was completed for the high school expansion and athletic complex. This Study provides a comprehensive look at anticipated traffic impacts for the regional area, including this EAW. The Traffic and Parking Study identifies recommended mitigation improvements at two intersections by 2038 and continued monitoring of two additional intersections. These recommendations include: 1. Construction of left and right turn lanes on CH 78 and CH 79 at the athletic complex access locations. th 2. 17 Avenue (CH 16) at Fuller Street - monitor traffic for future installation of a traffic signal system when warranted. page 28 3. CH 78 at CH 79 - construction of right and left turn lanes on each approach 4. Monitor the intersections of 17 th Avenue (CH 16) at CH 15 and the high school Center access for future possible mitigation. Appendix C. The TIS is included to respond to Item 18 of this EAW in 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. The proposed project will result in an expansion of the existing high school as well as development of an athletic complex on a currently undeveloped (agricultural) area to the south of the high school. Impacts within these two areas will result from construction of the high school expansion as well as from the construction of the athletic complex (athletic fields and associated parking areas). Project-related impacts in both areas will include those associated with construction (e.g., soil disturbance, noise, dust, etc.) as well as those associated with the permanent conversion of the existing agricultural areas associated with the athletic complex to recreational use. These impacts will include the addition of impervious surface, vegetation removal, wetland impacts, stormwater, and increased traffic. Construction of the high school expansion is anticipated to begin in spring 2016 and be completed by fall 2018. Construction of the athletic complex is anticipated to begin in spring 2016 and be completed by fall 2016. Any impacts to the environment (e.g., wetland, stormwater) will be required to meet Federal, State, and Local regulation and will be mitigated as required; therefore, it is not anticipated that these impacts will combine to create a cumulative potential effect. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. The land surrounding the existing high school consists of low- and medium-density single family residential and is nearly fully developed. No additional development is planned at this time. The land surrounding the athletic complex is zoned as single family/farmstead and agricultural/undeveloped. There are no development plans for the areas surrounding the proposed athletic complex at this time. Should future projects occur adjacent to either the high school or athletic complex, the impacts associated with them will be reviewed and mitigated for (if necessary) as plans become available. It is not anticipated that future projects will combine with the impacts caused by the proposed projects in this EAW to cause significant cumulative potential effects. page 29 c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects . No development is planned for lands adjacent to either the high school or athletic complex at this time, and the development within both areas is not anticipated to cause any future projects. Therefore, no cumulative effects are expected. 20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. No additional environmental effects have been identified. page 30 RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that: The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature ________________________________ Date _______________________________ Title ________________________________ page 31 THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: STONEBROOKE ENGINEERING, INC. LOT 4 LOT 1 B L O C K 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 3 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 4 LOT 5 B L O C K 2 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 8 SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 115, RANGE 22 4 / 1 DUCK 4 E / VICINITY MAP TRAIL SCOTT COUNTY, MN N1 E NOT TO SCALE 71 .ON DAOR YTNUOC S 19 105 D O E O K W A L D R W D O 4 5 ED / ' K 1 O SITE4 O / 8O 7 R 1 . E B O VE I W N N R O D D N T A S O N R E W V Y S A T H N 10 R U I O A F C 97 .ON DAOR YT NUOC \\\\\\\\\\\\ City of Shakopee aĻƒƚƩğƓķǒƒ TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Final Plat Addition Variance to Setbacks (Lot 4, Block 1 & Lot 1, Block 2) CASE #: 16017 SUBLEDGER #: 116017 DATE: March 9, 2016 The staff reviews indicate requests to review a Final Plat application and a variance request to setback requirements on Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 for the Menden Addition, a single-family (R1-A) residential subdivision located at the terminus of Fairhaven Drive. This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments will follow with additional submittals. However, the public works department offers the following comments at this time to the applicant and to the planning department: Engineering: ŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ źƷĻƒƭ ƓĻĻķ Ʒƚ ĬĻ ĭƚƒƦƌĻƷĻķ ƦƩźƚƩ Ʒƚ ƩĻƌĻğƭĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ CźƓğƌ tƌğƷ ŅƚƩ ƩĻĭƚƩķźƓŭʹ 1.needs to include provisions for security for public improvements associated with the subdivision and payment of the Street and Utility Fee and the Watermain Fee. 2.Payment of all Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees need to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 3.Payment of the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 4.Payment of the Lateral Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge for the Jennifer Lane Sanitary Sewer Extension Project (per Ordinance No. 913) needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. H:\\CC\\2016\\03-15\\16-017 FP_Variance Review (Menden's 1st) 030916.docx 1 of 3 5.Payment of the Trunk Storm Water Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 6.Payment of the Sign Installation Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 7.Payment of the Bituminous Sealcoat Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 8.Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include, but are not be limited to, the following: Minimum drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer and storm sewer need to be dedicated per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 10, Subdivision 1 (A-D). The easements need to be centered on the public utility alignments. The applicant will provide adequate drainage and utility easements to encompass the approved high water level of the storm water basin. er management plan involves the installation of public storm sewer adjacent to and outside of the plat boundary. The applicant will obtain and record adequate drainage and utility easements from these properties in favor of the City of Shakopee. Each wetland and its corresponding buffer will be placed in a conservation easement in compliance with Section 54.32, Subdivision (C) of the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. 9.Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format PDF) of the Final Plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. ŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ źƷĻƒƭ ƓĻĻķ Ʒƚ ĬĻ ĭƚƒƦƌĻƷĻķ ƦƩźƚƩ Ʒƚ ğƦƦƩƚǝğƌ ƚŅ ğ ŭƩğķźƓŭ ƦĻƩƒźƷ ğƓķΉƚƩ ƭƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ǒƷźƌźƷǤ ƦƌğƓʹ 1.The applicant submitted a storm water management plan that was reviewed. The applicant will obtain approval of the storm water management plan prior to approval of a grading permit and the street and utility plans. 2.The applicant will revise the low floor elevations of Lots 2-5 and Lot 8 of Block 2 to meet the requirements set forth in Section 54.15, Subdivision (C)(15)(a-b) of the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. 3.The applicant will provide adequate slopes in the area designated by the City Engineer as the storm water basin maintenance access point. The best access is between Lots 6 and 7 of Block 2 or between Lots 7 and 8 of Block 2. H:\\CC\\2016\\03-15\\16-017 FP_Variance Review (Menden's 1st) 030916.docx 2 of 3 4.The applicant will provide reinforced turf (Geogrid or similar product) in the area designated as the maintenance access point. 5.Class IV fieldstone riprap and geotextile fabric will be placed at each flared end section outlet. The riprap and fabric will be installed to the bottom of the storm water basin and wetlands. 6.The applicant will install sod the full width of all rear yard drainage and utility easements containing storm sewer. 7.The applicant will provide a landscaping plan in compliance with the most recent version Verify landscaping is not in drainage and utility easements containing storm sewer between Lots 2 and 3 and Lots 7 and 8 of Block 2 and between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 1. 8.The applicant will seed the storm water basin area with a native vegetation. The seed mixture, application and maintenance requirements will be determined by the City Engineer or their assign. 9.The applicant will grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one (1) year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as-built record grading plan per Section 2, Subdivision 5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. ŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ źƷĻƒƭ ƓĻĻķ Ʒƚ ĬĻ ĭƚƒƦƌĻƷĻķ ƦƩźƚƩ Ʒƚ źƭƭǒğƓĭĻ ƚŅ ğ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ƦĻƩƒźƷʹ 1.Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2, Subdivision 5 and Section 11, Subdivision 2 (A-L). The record plans need to be submitted to the engineering department. 2.The applicant will install wetland buffer markers/signs in compliance with Section 54.32, Subdivision (C) of the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. Recommendation Public works staff recommends approval of the Final Plat application and the variance request, subject to the comments above being attached as conditions of the approval. H:\\CC\\2016\\03-15\\16-017 FP_Variance Review (Menden's 1st) 030916.docx 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 7698 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF THE MENDEN ADDITION WHEREAS, Opus Development Company, LLC, applicant and property owner, has made application for final plat approval of Valley Park Business Center Fourth Addition; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: Outlots I,N,& O Stonebrooke first Addition, Scott County; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat on March 15, 2016. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the final plat of Menden Addition is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I)The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: 1.needs to include provisions for security for public improvements associated with the subdivision and payment of the Street and Utility Fee and the Watermain Fee. 2.Payment of all Storm Water Management Plan Review Fees need to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 3.Payment of the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 4.Payment of the Lateral Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge for the Jennifer Lane Sanitary Sewer Extension Project (per Ordinance No. 913) needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 5.Payment of the Trunk Storm Water Charge needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 6.Payment of the Sign Installation Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 7.Payment of the Bituminous Sealcoat Fee needs to be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 8.Easements will be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They include, but are not be limited to, the following: Minimum drainage and utility easements for public sanitary sewer and storm sewer need to be dedicated per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 10, Subdivision 1 (A-D). The easements need to be centered on the public utility alignments. The applicant will provide adequate drainage and utility easements to encompass the approved high water level of the storm water basin. er management plan involves the installation of public storm sewer adjacent to and outside of the plat boundary. The applicant will obtain and record adequate drainage and utility easements from these properties in favor of the City of Shakopee. Each wetland and its corresponding buffer will be placed in a conservation easement in compliance with Section 54.32, Subdivision (C) of the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. 9.Provide electronic files (AutoCAD and Portable Document Format PDF) of the Final Plat to be recorded with datum on the Scott County coordinate system. II)The following items need to be addressed/completed prior to approval of a grading permit and/or a street and utility plan: 1.The applicant submitted a storm water management plan that was reviewed. The applicant will obtain approval of the storm water management plan prior to approval of a grading permit and the street and utility plans. 2.The applicant will revise the low floor elevations of Lots 2-5 and Lot 8 of Block 2 to meet the requirements set forth in Section 54.15, Subdivision (C)(15)(a-b) of the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. 3.The applicant will provide adequate slopes in the area designated by the City Engineer as the storm water basin maintenance access point. The best access is between Lots 6 and 7 of Block 2 or between Lots 7 and 8 of Block 2. 4.The applicant will provide reinforced turf (Geogrid or similar product) in the area designated as the maintenance access point. 5.Class IV fieldstone riprap and geotextile fabric will be placed at each flared end section outlet. The riprap and fabric will be installed to the bottom of the storm water basin and wetlands. 6.The applicant will install sod the full width of all rear yard drainage and utility easements containing storm sewer. 7.The applicant will provide a landscaping plan in compliance with the most recent Verify landscaping is not in drainage and utility easements containing storm sewer between Lots 2 and 3 and Lots 7 and 8 of Block 2 and between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 1. 8.The applicant will seed the storm water basin area with a native vegetation. The seed mixture, application and maintenance requirements will be determined by the City Engineer or their assign. 9.The applicant will grade the entire site, as proposed on the approved plans, in one phase within one (1) year from the date of approval of the grading permit application. Grading is defined as bringing the site to the proposed finished grade with materials deemed acceptable by the City of Shakopee engineering department, providing topsoil per City requirements and applying seed, mulch and/or sod per City requirements and providing an as-built record grading plan per Section 2, Subdivision 5 of the City of Shakopee Design Criteria. 10.It is a requirement that a buffer of native plants be established around the storm water basin. A contractor specializing in restoration of native plant communities must be hired to seed and maintain this area for two full growing seasons after the initial seeding. Prior to issuing a grading permit, a financial security will be collected to ensure completion of the grading, erosion control and turf establishment as represented in the approved plans. A portion of this security will be held for a minimum of two full growing seasons to ensure establishment of the native plants surrounding the storm water basin. In order for this portion of the security to be released, 75% dominance of native vegetation must be achieved, as approved by the City Engineer or their assign. 11.The following seed mixes are to be used within the stormwater basin (or a similar mix providing the same benefits/diversity, accepted by the City): Aquatic bench: MN State Seed Mix 34-181 Emergent Wetland Between normal and high water line: MN State Seed Mix 33-262 Dry Swale/Pond Above high water line: MN State Seed Mix 35-641 Mesic Prairie Southeast 12.A seeding/maintenance plan is required to be provided and approved by the City Engineer before seeding of the stormwater basin begins. III)The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1.Record plans need to be provided per the City of Shakopee Design Criteria, Section 2, Subdivision 5 and Section 11, Subdivision 2 (A-L). The record plans need to be submitted to the engineering department. 2.The applicant will install wetland buffer markers/signs in compliance with Section 54.32, Subdivision (C) of the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. 3.Building permits shall not be issued for lot 1 block 2 and lot 4 block 1 prior to the approval of a side yard setback variance. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the _____ day of ____________________, 2016. ________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: ________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk Hilldale Drive E Homes 1 inch = 376 feet February 24, 2016 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates ORDINANCE NO. 930 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE 151.003 BY REZONING PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO HILLDALE DRIVE EAST FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) TO SEWERED RURAL RESIDENTIAL (SRR) WHEREAS , The City of Shakopee on behalf of the property owners adjacent to Hilldale Drive East, have applied to rezone 10 residential properties adjacent to Hilldale Drive East from Rural Residential (RR) to Sewered Rural Residential (SRR) due to the extension of city services; and WHEREAS, the properties are legally described as: Lots 1, 2 Block 1 and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Block 2 of Replat Zoschkes Addition to Shakopee & Lots 2, 3 , 4 of Zoshkes Addition to Shakopee (PID Nos. 27-059002-0, 27-059001-0, 27-049002-0, 27-049003-0, 27-049004-0, 27-059003-0, 27-059004-0, 27-059005-0, 27- 059006-0, 27-059007-0) WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 3, 2016 at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the subject property be rezoned as proposed through a unanimous 6-0 vote; and WHEREAS , the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on March 15, 2016; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED ,that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request: FINDINGS The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below for the City Criteria #1 The original Zoning Ordinance is in error; Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error. However, the zoning ordinance will be in error once city services are extended. Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place; Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place. Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred; or 1 Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred. The neighborhood now has access to city services, the Rural Residential zoning district is not intended for properties which have service available Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision. Finding #4 The Comprehensive Plan does not require a different provision. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the request to rezone the property as stated in this ordinance is hereby approved. th Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 15 day of March, 2016. _______________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: ________________________ City Clerk Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the ______ day of _____________, 20___. 2 Resolution No. 7701 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CHIAN OF COMMAND POLICY NO. 6 FOR FIREFIGHTERS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE WHEREAS, Resolution No. 7701, a resolution adopting the Chain OfCommand Policy No. 6 for firefighters of the City of Shakopee, was adopted on March 15, 2016, and WHEREAS, fromtime to time there is a need to modify such policy to best suit the needs of the City of Shakopee. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that Cain of Command Policy No. 6 herby be adopted as follows: SHAKOPEE FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY NO. 6: CHAIN OF COMMAND Introduction: This policyoutlines the Chain of Command within the Shakopee Fire Department Purpose: This requirementis toensurethat all fire personnel understandthe Chainof Command and how itapplieswithin the Fire Department Policy: TheChainof Command shall be used by all fire personnel for all Fire Department business 1.The chain of commandin orderfrom highest ranking to lowestranking: a)Fire Chief b)Assistant Fire Chief c)Deputy Fire Chief/ Training, Engineering and Fire Marshal d)Station Captain e)Lieutenant f)Firefighter 2.Reporting structure: a)Fire Chief reports to the City Administrator b)Assistant Fire Chief reports to the Fire Chief c)Fire Marshal reports to the Fire Chief d)Deputy Chief reports to the Assistant Fire Chief e)Station Captain reports to the Deputy Fire Chief f)Lieutenant reports to the Station Captain g)Firefighter reportsto Lieutenant 3.The use of the Chain of Command requiresall personnelof the Fire Department to work within his/herassigned sphere of authority and responsibility.The Chain of Command is the vehicle used for all orders, grievances, requests, or any other issuesand its proper use by all personnelof the Fire Department is both necessary and mandatory. a)The Fire Department organization gives every officera rank, and arranges these ranks in a hierarchical order designed to clearly explain who reports to who. b)All personnelof the Fire Department havea supervisorof higher rank. Allranks, except Firefighter,have subordinates whom officers of a higher rank are responsible for. For example, a Captain is responsible for Lieutenants and Firefighters. c)Each rank on Shakopee Fire Department carries with it specific responsibilities. The higher the rank,the more responsibility that is afforded to that employee. d)All Firefighters will be assigned to an officerfor administrative purposes. e)If a firefighter hasa problem/issueor need other than on the scene of an emergency, the firefighter willaddress this to his/herassignedofficer first. The firefighter’s assignedofficer will take such action as is necessaryto resolve the problem/issue or need. f)If the assignedofficercannot or does not have the authority to resolve the problem/issue or need he/sheare required to report it up the Chain of Command. g)Assigned officerassignments do not necessarily apply on the scene of an emergency. In these cases thefireground SOG shallbe followed(National Incident Management System). h)All personnelof the Shakopee Fire Department shall work within the Chain of Command for ALL non-emergency situations. i)All orders given by higher ranking personnel to lower ranking personnel shall be followed unless they violate legalstandards. BE IT FURTHER RESLVED that all related policies and directives in conflict with or adopted prior to this resolution are hereby repealed and terminated effective March 15, 2016. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held th this 15day of March, 2016 ________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ____________________________ City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7695 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids For The 2016 Street Reconstruction Project No. 2016-1 th WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 7684adopted by City Council on February16, 2016, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for improvements rd for the 2016 Street ReconstructionProject, which includes3Avenue from Spencer Street to stth CSAH 17 and Minnesota Street from 1Avenue to 4Avenue by installation of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, street reconstruction,concrete curb & gutter,aggregatebase, bituminous paving and any appurtenant work and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paperand on questcdn.com an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in _________ session of the CityCouncil of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _________ day of _____________, 2016. __________________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: __________________________ City Clerk ENGR/2016-PROJECT/STREETRECONSTRUCTION/WORD/RES7695APPROVE-PLANS-ORDER-BIDS RESOLUTION NO. 7696 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids For The 2016 Bituminous Reclamation Project No. 2016-3 th WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 7685adopted by City Council on February16, 2016, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for improvements for the 2016 Bituminous ReclamationProject, which includesHillwood DriveandHillside Drive, nd north of 22Avenue;Mark Court, Mike Court and Marcia Lane, south of Maxine Circleby installation ofstorm sewer, street reconstruction,aggregatebase, bituminous paving and any appurtenant work and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paperandon questcdn.com an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in _________ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _________ day of _____________, 2016. __________________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: __________________________ City Clerk ENGR/2016-PROJECT/2016BITRECLAMATION/WORD/RES7696APPROVE-PLANS-ORDER-BIDS RESOLUTION NO. 7697 A Resolution Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement For Bids For The 2016 Bituminous Overlay Improvement Project No. 2016-2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 7650adopted by City Council on December 1st, 2015, Bruce Loney, Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for improvements for the 2016 Bituminous Overlay ImprovementProject, by installation of bituminous paving and any appurtenant work and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file and of record in the Office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paperand on questcdn.com an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The Advertisement for Bids shall be published as required by law. Adopted in _________ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _________ day of _____________, 2016. __________________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: __________________________ City Clerk ENGR/2016-PROJECT/2016BITOVERLAY/WORD/RES7697APPROVE-PLANS-ORDER-BIDS HASC 12 TINTA LANE MCKENNA ROAD MCKENNA ROAD AH YRAROPMET DAOR LU CSAH 83 / CANTERBURY ROAD D R W E I V Y E L L A V McKENNA ROAD D AOR Y RUBRE TNAC/3 8 HASC MCKENNA ROAD SMSC TRUST PROPERTY SMSC FEE PROPERTY CSAH 83 600' 600' 6" MIN. EMBEDMENT POST 2'-0" MIN T-POST EMBEDMENT POST 2'-0" MIN 2'-0" 6" R/W NORTH R/W NORTH R/W % 2 0 . 0 R/W R/W SOUTH 0 0 0 0 + + 8 8 1 1 SMSC TRUST LAND SMSC FEE LAND 0 0 + 6 1 1 4 .2 2 1 + 15 1 C PC 0 0 + 4 0 0 + 3 1 1 CCP 11 0+1 7.7 5 CCP 30.20+901 +801 CP 73.73 C HAS 8 3 21 CCP 93.75+8 SMSC TRUST LAND SMSC TRUST LAND SMSC FEE LAND SMSC FEE LAND 0 0 + 5 1 1 3.02SEE SHEET 1 CCP 0.20+90 3 ELEV 822.57 820.28 VPT 108+80.07822.57 820.28 822.69 820.27 822.86 3.73+801 CP 7 820.26 823.08 820.32 823.34 E 820.38 T I 823.65 S R E ELEV 824.00 820.47 T VPC 107+60.07824.00 N E C 820.60 824.38 820.73 824.76 820.79 825.14 820.85 825.51 56' 820.94 F-F 825.89 821.09 826.27 821.25 826.65 821.25 827.03 821.23 827.40 821.47 827.78 822.31 828.16 823.18 828.54 826.62 828.91 829.67 829.29 830.39 829.67 830.06 830.06 830.48 ASC 38 H 830.46 ELEV 830.60 VPI 104+13.16 830.50 830.28 829.94 829.59 829.62 3.03SEE SHEET 4 .2 2 1 + 5 11 C PC 819.10 820.36 ELEV 820.26 819.27 VPT 114+60.00820.26 819.36 820.18 819.40 820.13 ELEV 820.11 819.48 LP 114+00.24 820.11 E T 819.58 I 820.13 S R E T 819.63 820.18 N E C ELEV 820.26 819.64 VPC 113+40.00820.26 819.61 820.36 819.54 820.46 0'819.46 1 ' .33 13 0' 2 S IE R A820.56 V ' 0 2 F F- -F F 819.39 820.66 819.37 820.76 819.39 820.86 819.46 820.96 819.54 821.06 819.54 821.16 819.48 821.26 819.46 821.37 P CC 11 0+1 7.7 5 819.50 821.47 819.53 821.57 819.62 821.67 819.67 821.77 819.75 821.87 819.90 821.97 820.05 822.07 820.15 822.17 820.21 822.27 820.25 822.37 901 CCP 30.20+ 3.01SEE SHEET 3.04SEE SHEET ELEV 819.30 815.27 819.30 HP 120+79.95 815.34 819.27 ELEV 819.20 815.45 VPC 120+40.00819.20 815.58 819.10 E T I S 815.68 R 819.00 E T N E 815.73 C 818.90 815.81 818.80 ELEV 818.75 VPT 119+49.11 F-FF-FF-F 815.94 20'30'20'13.33'10' 818.71 816.12 818.66 ELEV 818.65 LP 119+12.84 816.22 818.67 816.35 818.73 816.52 818.85 816.71 819.02 ELEV 819.14 VPC 118+29.11 816.83 819.24 816.95 819.47 817.09 819.70 817.22 819.94 817.32 820.17 817.58 820.40 ELEV 820.51 VPT 117+10.01 817.84 820.62 818.12 820.80 818.02 820.92 818.09 820.98 ELEV 821.00 HP 116+26.14 818.12 820.99 818.16 820.95 ELEV 820.91 VPC 115+90.01 818.28 820.86 818.40 820.76 818.54 820.66 818.75 820.56 3.02SEE SHEET 814.69 818.30 814.59 818.40 814.47 818.50 814.33 818.60 814.28 818.70 814.22 818.80 ELEV 818.88 814.19 VPT 125+63.46 818.90 814.11 818.97 814.06 ELEV 819.00 819.00 HP 125+18.31 814.12 818.98 814.19 818.91 812.49 818.81 ELEV 818.69 813.24 VPC 124+43.46 818.66 814.17 818.49 814.21 818.33 814.24 818.16 F-FF-FF-F ELEV 817.99 814.26 E 20'30'20'13.33'10'VPT 123+60.00817.99 T I S R 814.30 E 817.86 T N U E K C 814.32 N 817.78 A C ELEV 817.77 O LP 123+05.67 814.33 A 817.77 T N I T 814.42 817.82 814.51 817.93 ELEV 818.10 814.58 VPC 122+40.00818.10 814.63 818.30 814.72 818.50 814.74 818.70 ELEV 818.90 814.79 VPT 121+60.00818.90 814.93 819.07 815.11 819.20 3.03SEE SHEET 0 0 0 4.02SEE SHEET 0 + + 8 8 1 1 0 0 + 6 1 1 4 .2 2 1 + 15 1 C PC 0 0 + 4 0 0 + 3 1 1 CCP 11 0+1 7.7 5 CCP 30.20+901 +801 CP 73.73 SC HA 38 21 CCP 93.75+8 0 0 + 5 1 1 4.01SEE SHEET RESOLUTION NO. 7694 A Resolution Restricting Parking On Southbridge Parkway From CSAH 21to CSAH 21/18 (SAP 166-127-001) City Project No. 2016-2 WHEREAS, the City of Shakopeehas planned construction of improvements to Southbridge Parkway from CSAH 21 to CSAH 21/18; and, WHEREAS, the City of Shakopeewill be expending MunicipalState Aid Funds on the improvement of these roadways; and, WHEREAS, since this improvement lacks adequate width for parking on both sides of the road, approval of the proposed construction as a MunicipalState Aid Project must therefore include certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: That the City of Shakopee shall prohibit the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of Southbridge Parkway from CSAH 21 to CSAH 21/18. Adopted in _________ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _________ day of _____________, 2016. __________________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: __________________________ City Clerk ENGR/2016-PROJECT/2016OVERLAY/WORD/RES7694/PARKINGRESTRICTIONSOUTHBRIDGEPKWY CITY OF SHAKOPEE CONTRACT FOR CLEANING SERVICES - PARK BUILDINGS 2016-2017 Bill Mars, Mayor Members of Council Matt Lehman Mike Luce Kathi Mocol Jay Whiting Bill Reynolds, City Administrator Bruce Loney, Public Works Director Jamie Polley, Parks and Recreation Director Michael Hullander, Public Works Superintendent Bill Egan, Park Maintenance Supervisor City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................... 3 II. GENERAL CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 3 III.SPECIAL CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................12 ATTACHMENT A ............................................................................................................................ 15 SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................................................... 15 ATTACHMENT B ............................................................................................................................ 16 HOURS OF OPERATION ................................................................................................................. 16 ATTACHMENT C ............................................................................................................................ 17 PRICES ........................................................................................................................................... 17 ATTACHMENT D ............................................................................................................................ 18 SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 18 Tahpah Park – 1490 Adams St S .................................................................................................... 19 Schleper Stadium (Tahpah Park) – 1490 Adams St S .................................................................... 20 Lions Park – 1103 Adams St S ....................................................................................................... 21 Lions Park Warming House – 1099 Adams St S............................................................................ 22 Huber Park – 150 Fillmore St N ..................................................................................................... 23 Memorial Park – 1791 Co Rd. 101 E ............................................................................................. 24 th Avenue Sports Complex – 2600 17th Ave East...................................................................... 25 17 Westminster Park – 801 Valley View Rd....................................................................................... 26 Green Meadows Park – 3100 Thrush Street ................................................................................. 27 Riverside Fields Park – 7800 Crossings Blvd................................................................................. 28 Hiawatha Park – 625 7th Avenue East .......................................................................................... 29 Holmes Park – 628 4th Avenue West........................................................................................... 30 Scenic Heights Park – 1195 Ruby Lane......................................................................................... 31 Southbridge Community Park – 7101 Southbridge Parkway ....................................................... 32 Quarry Lake Park – 6201 Innovation Blvd. .................................................................................... 33 Page 2 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Thiscontract is entered into as of April 1,2016 and ends March 31, 2017 by and between the City of Shakopee (“City”) and Treasure Enterprises, Incorporated (“Contractor” or “Treasure Enterprises, Inc.”). Now, therefore, in consideration of the promises and mutual obligation contained in this agreement, the parties covenant and agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS Words, phrases, or other expressions used in these contract documents shall have meanings as follows: 1.1“Administrator” shall mean the City Administrator of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota or his/her duly authorized representative. 1.2 “City” shall mean the City of Shakopee, Minnesota a municipal corporation, acting through its duly appointed officers, employees, agents and representatives. 1.3 “City Council” shall mean the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. 1.4 “Code of Ordinances” shall mean the City of Shakopee Code of Ordinances. 1.5 “Contractor” means Treasure Enterprises, Incorporatedand its duly authorized representatives. 1.6“Date of Contract,” or equivalent words, shall mean the date written in the first paragraph of the Contract Agreement. 1.7“Day” or “days,” unless herein otherwise expressly defined, shall mean a calendar day or days of twenty-four hours each. 1.8“Finance Director” shall mean the Director of Finance of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota. 1.9“Subcontractor” shall mean and refer only to a corporation, partnership, firm or individual having a direct contract with the Contractor for performing work in connection with this contract. II. GENERAL CONDITIONS 2.1 CONTRACTOR’S OBLIGATIONS: Page 3 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 A.In strict accordance with the terms of this Contract (including the General and Special Conditions and Specifications below) and at its sole cost and expense, the Contractor shall provide all of the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, supplies, vehicles, transportation services, required to perform and complete the janitorial duties of the contract. B.Attachments A, B, C, D will have the working details of the cleaning obligations. 2.2 TERM OF CONTRACT: A.This contract shall become effective on the 1stday of April, 2016 and shall remain in full force and effect through March 31, 2017. B.At the expiration of the initial contract term, the City, at its sole discretion, may extend the contract for up to one (1) year each at the proposal price for the option years by delivering written notice of its intent to extend delivery to Contractor at least two (2) months prior to the expiration date of this contract. The proposal price for the option years shall be, at minimum, the proposal price for 2016 adjusted by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban areas (CPI-U) from December 2015 to December 2016. 2.3 PAYMENT: A. After service is complete, the Contractor will bill the City monthly for the services included in this contract in accordance with the charges set forth in Attachment C to this agreement. 2.4 CONTRACTOR’S ACCIDENT PREVENTION: A. The Contractor shall comply with the safety provisions of all applicable laws, regulations and building codes, including, without limitation, the installation and maintenance of safeguards on machinery and equipment, the elimination of hazards, and worker safety training. B. The Contractor shall exercise precaution at all times to protect the safety of persons and property. C. The Contractor shall immediately notify the City of any accident of any kind, which involves the general public or private or public property, which occurs during the performance of this Agreement. Page 4 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 D. Upon City’s request, the Contractor shall provide the City with a written report within forty-eight (48) hours including the details of any such accident. 2.5 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY: A. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to protect public and private property during the performance of this Agreement. B. Such property damage shall be addressed for repair or replacement, at no charge to the property owner, within forty-eight (48) hours with property of the same or equivalent value at the time of the damage. C. If the Contractor fails to address the repair or replacementdamaged property in within forty-eight (48), the City may, but shall not be obligated to, repair or replace such damaged property, and the Contractor shall fully reimburse the City’s for any of its reasonably incurred expenses. D. The Contractor shall reimburse and/or provide evidence of an insurance claim, the City for any such expenses within ten (10) days of receipt of the City’s invoice. 2.6 INSPECTION: A. The City may appoint such Inspectors as it deems proper to inspect the work performed and Contractor’s facilities for compliance with the contract documents. The Contractor shall furnish all reasonable assistance required by the Inspectors for the proper inspection of the work. B. Inspectors and other authorized representatives of the City shall be free at all times to perform their duties. Any attempted intimidation of one of them by the Contractor or his/her employees shall be sufficient reason, if the City so decides, to terminate the contract. C. Such inspection shall not relieve the Contractor from any obligation to perform the work strictly in accordance with the contract. 2.7 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS: A. The Contractor shall be familiar with, observe and comply with all ordinances, laws, and regulations which in any manner affect those engaged or employed in the work, or the materials, facilities or equipment used in the proposed work, or which in any way affect Page 5 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 the conduct of the work, and shall protect and indemnify the City and its officers and agents against any claim or liability arising from or based on any violation of same. B. If the Contractor shall discover any provision in the specifications or the contract, which is contrary to or inconsistent with any law, ordinance or regulation, he/she shall forthwith report it to the Administrator in writing. C. Amendments to existing regulatory laws and ordinances and enactment of new laws and ordinances shall not serve as justification for the Contractor to terminate his/her obligations hereunder, unless said amendments make the completion of this contract impossible. 2.8 TAXES, LICENSES AND PERMITS: A.The Contractor shall pay all sales, use, property, income, and other taxes that are lawfully assessed against the City or Contractor in connection with the Contractor’s facilities and the work included in this contract and shall obtain, maintain and pay for all licenses, permits, certificates of authority, and inspections required for the work during the term of the Contract. 2.9 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: A.The Contractor shall be responsible for the complete supervision and control of his/her Subcontractors. Notice to the Contractor shall be considered notice to the Subcontractors. B.The Contractor is, and shall remain for all purposes, an independent contractor, and its officers, employees, agents, or consultants shall not be deemed employees of the City, nor shall they be entitled to any separate payment of salary, wages, or any employee benefits available to employees of the City. C.The Contractor shall be solely responsible for any salaries, wages, benefits, fees or other compensation, which it may obligate itself to pay to any of its employees or consultants. D.Contractor agrees that during the term of this contract, or any extension of it, Contractor shall not assign, sell, or otherwise transfer more than 10% of: (a) its stock or other beneficial ownership interest; (b) voting rights; or (c) assets, to any person or party other than a member of the immediate family of an existing shareholder. A breach of this contract and the City may immediately terminate the contract. 2.10 ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING: Page 6 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 A.The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract the work, or any part thereof, without the previous consent of the Administrator, nor shall he/she assign, by power of attorney or otherwise, any of the money payable under this contract unless written consent of the City has been obtained. No right under this contract, nor claim for any money due or to become due hereunder shall be asserted against the City, or persons acting for the City, by reason of any so-called assignment of this contract or any part thereof, unless such assignment has been authorized by the consent of the City Council. B.In case the Contractor is permitted to assign moneys due or to become due under this contract, the instrument of assignment shall contain a clause subordinating the claim of the assignee to all prior liens for services rendered and materials supplied for the performance of the work and to any claims of the City arising out of or under this contract. C.Should any subcontractor fail to perform in a satisfactory manner the work undertaken by him/her, his/her subcontract should be immediately terminated by the Contractor upon written notice from the City. The Contractor shall beas fully responsible and accountable to the City for the acts and omissions of his/her subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by him/her, as he/she is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by him. D.Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and the City. The Contractor and his/her Surety alone shall be held responsible for the full and faithful performance of this contract. 2.11 GENERAL INDEMNIFICATION: A.The Contractor shall indemnify, keep and save harmless the City and its respective officers, agents and employees against all suits or claims that may be based upon any injury or damage to persons or property that may occur, or that may be alleged to have occurred, in the course of the performance of this contract by the Contractor, or as a result of the performance of this contract by the Contractor, whether or not it shall be claimed that the injury was caused through a negligent act or omission of the Contractor or his/her employees, or his/her subcontractors or his/her or their agents or in connection with any claim based on lawful demands of subcontractor, work person, suppliers; and whether or not the persons injured or whose property was damaged were third parties, employees or the Contractor or employees of an authorized subcontractor; and the Contractor shall at his/her own expense defend the City in all litigation, pay all attorneys’ fees and all costs and other expenses arising out of the litigation or claim or incurred in connection therewith; and shall, at his/her own Page 7 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 expense, satisfy and cause to be discharged such judgments as may be obtained against the City, or any of its officers, agents or employees. B.When requested by the City, the Contractor shall submit satisfactory evidence that all persons, firms or corporations who have done work or furnished supplies under this contract, for which the City may become liable under the laws of the State of Minnesota, have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured. In case such evidence is not furnished or is not satisfactory, an amount may be retained from money due the Contractor which will be sufficient, in the opinion of the City, to meet all claims of the persons, firms, and corporations as aforesaid. Such sum shall be retained until the liabilities as aforesaid are fully discharged or satisfactorily secured. 2.12 INSURANCE: A.The Contractor (or City-Approved subcontractor) shall furnish prior to commencement of any work under this Contract certificate(s) of insurance providing insurance coverage as follows: (1) Workers’ Compensation Insurance - Covering all persons engaged in work under this Contract to the full statutory limits stipulated in the Minnesota Workmen’s Compensation Law. (2) Commercial Liability Insurance - Including premises and operations and including products/completed operations with the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury & Property Damage $1,500,000/each occurrence (3) Commercial Vehicle Liability Insurance - Including owned, non-owned and hired motor vehicles. Bodily Injury & Property Damage $1,500,000/each occurrence The above requirements should not be interpreted to limit the liability of the Contractor under this Contract. B.All insurers shall be either licensed or authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. C.This coverage shall protect the Contractor, its employees, agents, representatives and subcontractors against claims arising out of the work performed. The City of Shakopee, its agents and employees shall be included as additionally insured with respect to all liability policies herein. Page 8 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 D.A thirty (30) day cancellation clause with notice to the City of Shakopee shall be included; words modifying the cancellation clause such as “endeavor to” provide notice will be unacceptable and must be stricken. E.It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to provide similar insurance for each subcontractor or to provide evidence that each subcontractor carries such insurance in like amount prior to the time such subcontractor proceeds to perform under the Contract. 2.13 DEFAULT AND TERMINATION: A.If the work to be done under this contract is abandoned by the Contractor; or if this contract is assigned by him/her without the written consent of the City Council; or if the Contractor voluntarily files for bankruptcy or is adjudged bankrupt; or if a general assignment of his/her assets is made for the benefit of his creditors; or if a receiver is appointed for the Contractor or any of his/her property; or if at any time the City determines that the performance of the work under this contract is being unnecessarily delayed or that the Contractor is violating any of the conditions of this contract, or that he/she is executing the same in bad faith or otherwise not in accordance with the terms of said contract, then the City may serve written notice upon the Contractor and his/her Surety of the City’s intention to terminate this contract. B.Unless within ten (10) days after the serving of such notice by certified mail, a satisfactory arrangement is made for continuance, this contract shall terminate and the City may take over and prosecute the work to completion, by contract or otherwise. C.In the event of default or nonperformance on the part of the Contractor, the Contractor and its Surety shall be liable to the City for all excess cost sustained by the City by reason of the City. In the event the City complete the contract at a lesser cost than would have been payable to the Contractor under the contract, if the same had been fulfilled by said Contractor, then the City shall retain such difference. Should such costs to the City be greater, the Contractor and its Surety shall be liable for any pay the amount of such excess to the City. D.In the event of Contractor’s default under the terms of this contract, all payments due to the Contractor shall be retained by the City and applied to the completion of the contract and to damages suffered and expense incurred by the City by reason of such default, unless the Surety on the performance bond shall assume the contract, in which event all payments remaining due the Contractor at the time of default, less amounts due the City from the Contractor and less all sums due the City for damages suffered and expense incurred by reason of such default shall be due and payable to such Surety. Page 9 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Thereafter, such Surety shall receive monthly payments equal to those that would have been paid the Contractor had such Contractor continued to perform the contract. E.If the City terminates the contract, the City may procure supplies or services similar to those so terminated, and the contractor/vendor shall be liable to the City for any excess costs for similar supplies and services, unless the contractor/vendor provides acceptable evidence that failure to perform the contract was due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. F.The City may release any building or facility listed on Attachment C from the contract by providing the Contractor with a minimum of 14 days advance written notice. Upon release of any such building or facility, the City will no longer be obligated to make payment to the Contractor for that building or facility. 2.14 FORCE MAJEURE: A.Whenever a period of time is provided for in this Agreement for either the City or the Contractor are to do or perform any act or obligation, neither party shall be liable for any delays or inability to perform due to causes beyond the control of said party such as war, riot, unavoidable casualty or damage to personnel, materials or equipment, fire, flood, storm, earthquake, tornado or any act of God, but not strike or lockout. B.The time period for the performance in question shall be extended for only the actual amount of time said party is so delayed. 2.15 PENALTIES: A.The Administrator and his/her designee shall notify the Contractor for each violation of the Contract, reported to or discovered by him/her or the City. It shall be the duty of the Contractor to take whatever steps may be necessary to remedy the cause of the complaint and notify in writing the City of its disposition within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of complaint. B.The first failure to properly perform any item of work will result in written notification to the contractor by the City Administrator and/or his/her designee. The second failure to properly perform any item of work will result in a penalty to the contractor. The City will reduce the amount of the penalty from the amount owed as payment to the contractor. C. The penalty amounts will be as follows: Page 10 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 1) Failure to complete any daily task ----------------------------$55.00 each incident. Each location is considered one incident. 2.16 NOTICES: A.Any notice or demand required or permitted to be given or made there under shall be sufficiently given or made by facsimile, e-mail, messenger delivery, overnight delivery, or certified mail in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: City of Shakopee Treasure Enterprises, Inc. Public Works Fidelis Odeh, President 400 Gorman Street PO Box 581212 Shakopee, MN 55379 Minneapolis, MN 55458 B.Either party may change the address to which notices may be sent by furnishing written notice of such change to the other party. C.Notice delivered by messenger, overnight delivery, facsimile, or e-mail shall be deemed received upon delivery. Notice delivered by mail shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of the U.S.P.S. postmark. 2.17 SEVERABILITY: A.If any of the provisions of this Contract are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such provisions shall be deemed to be stricken, and such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the terms of this Contract as a whole or of any section, subsection, sentence or clause not adjudged to be invalid so long as the material purposes of this Contract can be determined and effectuated. 2.18 GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE: A. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. B.Venue for any action taken by either the City or the Contractor, whether in law or in equity, to enforce the terms of this Contract shall be in the District Court of the Judicial District, Scott County, Minnesota, and the Contractor hereby waives whatever rights it may have in the selection of venue. 2.19 RIGHT TO REQUIRE PERFORMANCE: Page 11 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 A.The City’s failure at any time to require performance by the Contractor of any of the specifications in this Contract shall in no way affect the right of the City thereafter to enforce it. B.No waiver by the City of any breach of specifications in this Contract shall be taken or held to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of such specifications in this Contract, nor shall such a waiver of a single breach be taken or held to be a waiver of any specification itself. 2.20 OPTION TO CHANGE SERVICE; AMENDMENTS: A.The City shall have the option to change the service provided during the term of this Contract, including, without limitation, changing the types of cleaning materials and equipment used, times and/or days of service, and number and/or location of city facilities. B.The City shall exercise such option by serving written notice to the Contractor at its designated place of business at least ten (10) days before the date such service change is contemplated to begin. C.Immediately after written notice is served, the parties shall enter into good faith negotiations concerning the terms, frequency, and the details of pricing the services that are provided. D.Any modification or amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be signed by the parties. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 3.1 CUSTOMER SERVICE A.The Contractor shall establish and maintain a local phone number to which City personnel may call or send inquiries and complaints, and from which City personnel may receive information and instructions. B.The Contractor shall provide the Administrator with information concerning the location, telephone number(s) and mailing addresses of the customer service office established above, and any other facility that will be used in the provision of services under this Contract. C.The Contractor shall provide the Administrator with information concerning the Page 12 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Contractor’s designated person(s) for the purposes of obtaining instructions, answering inquiries, and resolving complaints. Such persons shall be available to discuss, and if necessary meet with City personnel to resolve problems. D.The Contractor shall provide the City with at least one telephone number and email address, which may be used by City personnel to communicate with the Contractor after regular business hours or during an emergency. E.The Contractor shall equip such office with a sufficient number of telephones and personnel to accommodate inquiries. F.Except as otherwise directed by the City, customer service shall be available at least between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except during holidays. G.In addition, the Contractor will communicate by email with City staff on a quarterly basis in order to discuss the performance of duties carried out by the contractor according to the cleaning services specifications. 3.2 EMPLOYEES AND CONDUCT: A.The Contractor shall use care and diligence in the performance of this Agreement and shall perform all janitorial services required by this Agreement in a neat, orderly, and efficient manner. B.The Contractor shall provide neat, orderly, and courteous personnel for its services and shall provide courteous and knowledgeable personnel for its customer service office. C.The Contractor shall prohibit its employees from drinking alcoholic beverages or using any controlled substance, except pursuant to a doctor’s prescription, while on duty, or in the course of performing their duties under this Agreement. D.If the City determines that any of the Contractor’s employees is unfit or unsuitable to perform the services under this Agreement as a result of intoxication, drug use, or by virtue of abusive or obnoxious behavior, then, upon the City’s written request, the Contractor shall remove such employee from work within the City and furnish a suitable and competent replacement employee. E.All of the Contractor’s employees working within the City shall be required to wear a shirt with their company name and an “Authorized City Contractor” identification badge with a picture that clearly indicates that the Contractor employs the employee. The Page 13 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Contractor will provide the shirt and the identification badge will be provided by the City. F.All of the Contractor’s vehicle operators working within the City shall carry valid state driver’s licenses for the class of vehicle operated. Such vehicle operators shall obey all traffic regulations, including weight and speed limits. 3.3 EQUIPMENT A.All equipment used in the performance of this Contract, shall be wholly owned by the Contractor; provided, leasing or rental agreements or conditional sales contracts may be allowed where approved by the City, in writing, prior to execution of this Contract. The equipment to be used in performance of this Contract is made part of this Contract by reference. B.No further encumbrance shall be placed upon any of such equipment without the approval of the City, save that the Contractor may, without consent, mortgage or otherwise encumber said equipment and facilities for the purpose of enabling the Contractor to replace the same or add thereof. Page 14 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 ATTACHMENT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS GENERAL INFORMATION: General Description of Work: Contractor shall provide all labor, supervision, insurance, equipment and cleaning materials necessary to provide general cleaning for seasonal parks: 1.Hiawatha, 2.Holmes, 3.Huber, 4.Scenic Heights, 5.Tahpah 6.Joe Schleper Stadium(at Tahpah), 7.Memorial, 8.Lions, 9.Lions Warming House, 10.Westminster, 11.Green Meadows, 12.Riverside Fields, th 13.17 Avenue Sports Complex, 14.Southbridge Community, 15.Quarry Lake (future). Supplies: The City shall supply the following materials: All paper towels for dispensers in public and employee restrooms; all “roll-type” paper towels; plastic bags for wastebaskets; all soap for dispensers in public and employee restrooms, fresheners, and toilet paper. The contractor will supply all OSHA/EPA approved cleaning solutions, cleaning soaps, detergents, waxes, polishes, brooms, mops, rags, sponges, squeegees, buckets, mechanical polishers, buffers, vacuum cleaners, and any other item, tool or equipment needed to clean and/or sanitize the building. The awarded contractor must maintain up-to-date SDS (Safety Data Sheets) for all supplies used in each city facility. Keys: To be returned to the Park Supervisor upon contract expiration. Final invoice will be paid upon the return of the keys. Page 15 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 ATTACHMENT B HOURS OF OPERATION Cleaning Schedule: Cleaning is to be done one (1) toseven (7) days per week, depending on the city facility. Cleaning shall be done on weekdays (Mon-Fri) before 10:00 am or after 9:00 pm and on weekends (Sat-Sun) before 7:00 am and after 7:00 pm. City staff and contractor shall discuss, determine, and record the cleaning schedule and hours of operation to ensure a good working schedule for both parties. SPRING-SUMMER-FALL: 7 Days per Week Begin: April 1 – 15* End: October 15 – November 1* Cleaning Days: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday 1)Tahpah Park 2)Joe Schleper Stadium (Tahpah) 3)Lions Park 4)Huber Park 5)Memorial Park th 6)17 Avenue Sports Complex 7)Westminster Park 8)Green Meadows Park 9)Riverside Fields Park 10)Southbridge Community Park** 11)Quarry Lake Park*** SPRING-SUMMER-FALL: 2 Days/Week Begin: May 15* WINTER: 2 DaysperWeek End: October15*Begin: December 20* Cleaning Day: Mondays, Fridays End: February 20* Cleaning Days: Mondays, Fridays 1)Hiawatha Park 2)Holmes Park 1) Lions Park Warming House 3)Scenic Heights Park** 2) Westminster Park 3)Green Meadows Park 4)Riverside Fields Park 5)Scenic Heights Park ** 6)Southbridge Community Park** 7)Quarry Lake Park*** * Dates TBD (weather dependent - City to contact Contractor with exact dates). ** New building to clean in 2016 (new or reopened building) *** Clean building in the future (park building not constructed yet). Page 16 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 ATTACHMENT C PRICES Spring-Summer-Fall use normally starts in April and ends in mid-October. Winter use typically starts mid-December and ends mid-February. Building Services & Prices SPRING-SUMMER-FALL Use: April – October Building Location Days/week Price/Month Tahpah Park 1490 Adams St. S 7: SMTWThFS $ 414.63 Schleper Stadium (Tahpah) 1490 Adams St. S 7: SMTWThFS $ 414.63 Lions Park 1103 Adams St. S. 7: SMTWThFS $ 353.43 Huber Park 150 Fillmore St. N 7: SMTWThFS $ 353.43 Memorial Park 1791 Co Rd. 101 E 7: SMTWThFS $ 353.43 thth 17 Ave Sports Complex 2600 17Ave. E 7: SMTWThFS $ 322.83 $3,888.99 Westminster Park 801 Valley View Rd. 7: SMTWThFS $ 322.83 Green Meadows Park 3100 Thrush St. 7: SMTWThFS $ 322.83 Riverside Fields Park 7800 Crossings Blvd. 7: SMTWThFS $ 322.83 Southbridge Community Park 7101 Southbridge Pkwy. 7: SMTWThFS $ 322.83 th Hiawatha Park 625 7 Ave. E 2: MF $ 128.43 th Ave. W 2: MF $ 128.43 Holmes Park 628 4 Scenic Heights Park 1195 Ruby Lane 2: MF $ 128.43 WINTER Use:December – February (Heated Buildings) Building Location Days/week Price/Month th Hiawatha Park 625 7 Ave. E 2: MF $ 174.33 th Holmes Park 628 4 Ave. W 2: MF $ 146.79 Lions Park Warming House 1099 Adams St. S. 2: MF $ 146.79 Westminster Park 801 Valley View Rd. 2: MF $ 146.79 $1,128.42 Green Meadows Park 3100 Thrush St. 2: MF $ 128.43 Riverside Fields Park 7800 Crossings Blvd. 2: MF $ 128.43 Southbridge Community Park 7101 Southbridge Pkwy. 2: MF $ 128.43 Scenic Heights Park 1195 Ruby Ln. 2: MF $ 128.43 Options: > Window Cleaning Exterior/Interior $ 4.99/sq. ft. > Extra Cleaning/Projects/Events $ 19.00/hour > Open/close “big” deep clean, including windows, walls, etc.: $ 85.00/location (1) Tahpah Park, (2) Schleper Stadium (Tahpah), (3) Huber Park, (4) 17 th Ave Sports o Complex, (5) Westminster, (6) Green Meadows, (7) Riverside Fields, (8) Southbridge Community Park Page 17 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 ATTACHMENT D SPECIFICATIONS Daily Log/Periodic Evaluations: The cleaning contractor will be required to complete a daily log of cleaning services. A cleaning log will be kept in each restroom facility. After the contract is awarded, the Park Maintenance Supervisor and the contractor will determine the logical placement of a daily logbook for each city facility. Damages: Vandalism, damage, safety concerns shall be reported to the City. Emergencies between the hours of 6:30am to 2:30pm Monday through Friday shall be reported immediately by phone to 952-233-9550 or 612-369-1066. Emergencies before 6:30am and after 2:30pmshall be reported to Scott County Dispatch at 952-445-1411. Examples of emergencies include situations that require immediate attention: no heat in the winter, water leaking, overflowingfixtures (toiletsand sinks), extreme vandalism, fires, and any unsafe conditions. Non-emergencydamages or vandalism shall be reported within 24-hours by email to. Examples of non-emergencies include situations that do not require immediate attention: graffiti, missing garbage can, plugged/stopped toilet, etc. If building is occupied and occupants refuse to exit after you announce you are there for cleaning, please call Scott County Dispatch at 952-445-1411 and request an officer remove the occupants.You may choose to move on to clean the next building on your route. The building must be cleaned during the same shift. NEW 2016 --- Minimum Requirements: The following descriptions of cleaning services for the City of Shakopee are minimum requirements only. Page 18 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Tahpah Park – 1490 Adams St S Restrooms: 2 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 19 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Schleper Stadium (Tahpah Park) – 1490 Adams St S Restrooms: 2 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 20 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Lions Park – 1103 Adams St S Restrooms: 2 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 21 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Lions Park Warming House – 1099 Adams St S Restrooms: 1 Indoor Common Area: 1 Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Mondays, Fridays Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits – including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 22 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Huber Park – 150 Fillmore St N Restrooms: 2 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City)weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 23 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Memorial Park – 1791 Co Rd. 101 E Restrooms: 2 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April –October Daily Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Replace air freshener’s blocks when needed. 9)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 24 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 17 th Avenue Sports Complex – 2600 17th Ave East Restrooms: 2 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Clean glass windows of meeting room twice a month. 4)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 5)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 6)Spot clean walls and partitions. 7)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 8)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 9)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 10)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 25 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Westminster Park – 801 Valley View Rd. Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Areas: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Monday, Friday Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 26 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Green Meadows Park – 3100 Thrush Street Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Areas: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Monday, Friday Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 27 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Riverside Fields Park – 7800 Crossings Blvd. Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Areas: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Monday, Friday Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 28 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Hiawatha Park – 625 7th Avenue East Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Area: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Mondays, Fridays Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 29 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Holmes Park – 628 4th Avenue West Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Area: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Mondays, Fridays Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits – including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 30 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Scenic Heights Park – 1195 Ruby Lane NEW (RE-OPENED) 2016 Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Areas: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Mondays, Fridays Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Monday, Friday Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 31 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Southbridge Community Park – 7101 Southbridge Parkway NEW 2016 Restrooms: 2 Indoor Common Areas: 1 Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Monday, Friday Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). 11)Lock all doors. NEW 2016 Page 32 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Quarry Lake Park – 6201 Innovation Blvd. NOT YET CONSTRUCTED Restrooms: Indoor Common Areas: Seasonal: Summer-Use: April – October Daily Seasonal: Winter-Use: December – February Monday, Friday Additional cleaning days may be requested or deleted based on the use of facility. 1)Clean, sanitize and polish all fixtures including toilet bowls, urinals and adjacent tile, hand basins, switch plates, and door handles. 2)Clean all mirrors. 3)Empty waste receptacles and remove all trash to the garbage containers and insert liners as required. 4)Sweep and damp mop resilient and hard floors with disinfectant. 5)Spot clean walls and partitions. 6)Empty and clean the interior of sanitary containers. 7)Refill all dispensers to normal limits - including napkins, soap, tissue (to be furnished by the City) weekly or as needed. 8)Check air fresheners and replace when needed. 9)Pick up trash (common area). 10)Sweep and mop (common area). Page 33 of 34 City of Shakopee Contract for Cleaning Services - Park Buildings April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. Approved by City Council ______________________ , 2016. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Treasure Enterprises, Inc. By:________________________ By:_________________________ Bill Mars, Mayor Fidelis Odeh, President Date:_______________________ Date:_______________________ By:_________________________ Bill Reynolds, City Administrator Date:______________________ Page 34 of 34 RESOLUTION NO. 7700 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO SUBMIT ALOCAL TRAIL CONNECTIONS PROGRAM APPLICATIONFOR THE MEMORIAL PARK BRIDGE WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the grant application made to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the Local Trail Connections Program. The application is to constructa pedestrian bridge from the MN Valley State Trail to Memorial Park. The trail system and bridge are located within 136.9 acres of Memorial Park, and WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes the twenty-five (25) percent match requirement for the Local Trail Connections Program, and has secured the matching funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, thatiftheCity of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the Minnesota Department of Natural resources, the Cityof Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award, and may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced project. The City of Shakopee will comply with all applicable laws, environmental requirements and regulations as stated in the grant agreement, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Shakopee names the fiscal agent of the City of Shakopee for thisproject as: DarinNelson Finance Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes St S. Shakopee, MN 55379 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Shakopee hereby assures the Memorial Park Bridge will be open, available for use and maintained for a period of no less than 20 years. Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesotaheld this th 15Day of March, 2016. ______________________________ William Mars Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk FundstransferredelectronicallyMarch2,2016toMarch15,2016 PAYROLL $ 270,089.81 FIT/FICA80,353.53$ STATEINCOMETAX16,626.46$ PERA78,776.89$ HCSP11,044.68$ $14,016.88 NATIONWIDE ICMA1,904.02$ MSRS3,333.31$ HEALTHSAVINGACCOUN$5,895.78 T FSA2,513.52$ $144.23 MN Wage Levy $484,699.11 Page 1 of 1 3/10/2016 3:21:50 PM RESOLUTION NO. 7702 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, REGUIDING OUTLOT I, CANTERBURY PARK SIXTH ADDITION,FROM ENTERTAINMENT TO INDUSTRIALIN THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND REMOVING OUTLOT I FROM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE NO. 3 WHEREAS , United Properties, applicant, and Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, property owner, haveapplied to reguidepropertyfrom Entertainment to Industrial; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: Outlot I, Canterbury Park Sixth Addition, Scott County, MN; and WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 3, 2016,at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the subject property be reguidedas stated; and WHEREAS , the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on March 15, 2016; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED ,that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request: Criteria #1The original zoning ordinance is in error. Finding #1The original zoning ordinance is not in error; however, the original zoningordinance established a zoning boundary that is compatible with the Canterbury Park campus but is not consistent with the adjacent industrial uses in this area. Criteria#2Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Finding #2Significant changes in community goals and policies that concern this property have taken place, as there is a perception that this property would be better suited for industrial use than entertainment, a the demand is greater for industrial use and with the current city code guidelines that shape development and design performance standards, an industrial development could occur that could generally fit in with the adjacent properties. Fourth Avenue has seen recent significant industrial developments (Amazon, Duke Realty, SanMar, & CommScope), which would be generally consistent with the Applicant’s proposal. Criteria#3Significant changes in development patterns have occurred. 1 Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred for the subject property, as there has been development of 4th Avenue as an industrial corridor, which is a shift from Major Recreation. Criteria#4The Comprehensive Planrequires a different provision. Finding #4 The Comprehensive Plan requires a different provision. The Comprehensive plan guides this property as Recreation. The applicant is requesting an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan for industrial use of this site, which would retain consistency between the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee did review the amendment to the Planned Unit Development and adopted the following findings: Criteria #1Whether the proposed development is consistent in all respects with the comprehensive plan and with this section. Finding #1The use of the property is in compliance with the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which would guide the property for industrial uses. Criteria #2Whether the proposed development, including deviations from design standards of the underlying zones, is compatible with surrounding land uses. Finding #2The proposed development would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Criteria #3Whether the proposed development, including deviations from development standardsof the underlying zone, provides adequate open space, circulation, parking, recreation, screening, and landscaping. Finding #3The proposed development would provide adequate open space, circulation, parking, recreation, screening, and landscaping. Criteria #4Whether the primary function of the PUD is to encourage development which will preserve and enhance the worthwhile, natural terrain characteristics and not force intense development to utilize all portions of a given site in order to arrive atthe maximum density allowed. In evaluating each individual proposal, the recognition of this objective will be a basic consideration in granting approval or denial. Finding #4The proposed development will preserve and enhance the worthwhile, natural terrain characteristics and not force intense development to utilize all portions of the site in order to arrive at the maximum density allowed. Criteria #5Whether there exists an overall compatibility of land uses and overall appearance and compatibility ofindividual buildings to other site elements or to surrounding development. However, the architectural style of buildings shall not solely be a basis for denial or approval of a plan. Finding #5The proposed development will generally be similar in architectural style to the surrounding properties and will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Criteria #6Whether the proposed PUD plan would afford a greater general public benefit than would be realized under the underlying zoning district and/or general zoning provisions. Finding #6The proposed development will afford a greater general public benefit than would be realized under the underlying zoning district and/or general zoning provisions. 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the request to re-guidethe property as stated in this resolutionand to remove the property from Canterbury Park PUD Overlay Zone No. 3 is hereby approved. th Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this15day of March, 2016. _______________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: _________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO. 931 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE SEC. 151.003BY REZONING OUTLOT I, CANTERBURY PARK SIXTH ADDITION FROM MAJOR RECREATION (MR) ZONE TO LIGHT INDUSTRY (I-1) ZONE WHEREAS , United Properties, applicant, and Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, property owner,haveapplied to rezone property from Major Recreation (MR) Zone to Light Industry (I-1) Zone; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: Outlot I, Canterbury Park Sixth Addition, Scott County, MN; and WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 3, 2016,at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the subject property be rezoned as stated; and March 15 WHEREAS , the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on , 2016; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request: Criteria #1The original zoning ordinance is in error. Finding #1The original zoning ordinance is not in error; however, the original zoning ordinance established a zoning boundary that is compatible with the Canterbury Park campus but is not consistent with the adjacent industrial uses in this area. Criteria#2Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. Finding #2Significant changes in community goals and policies that concern this property have taken place, as there is a perception that this property would be better suited for industrial use than entertainment, a the demand is greater for industrial use and with the current city code guidelines that shape development and design performance standards, an industrial development could occur that could generally fit in with the adjacent properties. Fourth Avenue has seen recent significant industrial developments (Amazon, Duke Realty, SanMar, & CommScope), which would be generally consistent with the Applicant’s proposal. Criteria#3Significant changes in development patterns have occurred. Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred for the subject property, as there has been development of 4th Avenue as an industrial corridor, which is a shift from Major Recreation. 1 Criteria#4The Comprehensive Planrequires a different provision. Finding #4 The comprehensive plan is proposed to be amended by Resolution No. 7702to adjust the guiding for this property from Recreation to Industrial. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED , that the request to rezone the property as stated in this ordinance is hereby approved. th Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this15day of March, 2016. _______________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: _________________________ Lori Hensen, City Clerk Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the ______ day of _____________, 20___. 2 TrailerStalls 34 G N I OK NR A P P A RN KIO N G 1 B 2 B 7 2U U 8 2 9 2 1 I , I 06 L 4 , L5 P 8 P a D 0 a D r k r 4 i k n P A R KIN i 0 OG N I IN GOK N ng AR P I 0 g N S N S t BB PP a S t uu aa al G ii r S r l ll kddk G s l ii ii l nn nn s gg gg . SS SS . F ee ee tt tt bb b F b 1 aa aa 2 cc cc . kk kk LL LL . ii ii nn nn ee ee G IN OK NR A P P A RN KIO N G NO NOPARKING PARKING FPE7 T oah6 d lx oe9 l F n9 n r e e A P e rn a a i g r i r e a ((( , 899 m M 855 822ND ))) r 5 i 999 v 5 333 e 3 777 4 --- 555 4 181 525 020 City of Shakopee Memorandum TO:Mark Noble,SeniorPlanner FROM:Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT:Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendment &Rezoning from Major Recreation (MR) to Light Industrial th (I-1) –United Properties (Outlot Iof future Canterbury Park 6Addition) PID #:27-905001-0 CASELOG#:16014 SUDLEDGER #:116014 DATE:February 22, 2016 The staff reviewindicates a request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment, a Comprehensive Plan amendment and a rezoning from Major Recreation (MR) to Light Industrial (I-1). The propertyindicated in the staff reviewis23.79 acres, is located south of thth Avenue, east of Shenandoah Driveand will be Outlot Iof the Canterbury Park 6Addition 4 once recorded at the County. Please note the property indicated in the staff review isalsoshown as Outlot N of the th Canterbury Park 6Addition in the preliminary/final plat application staff reviewpreviously sent. The public worksdepartment has completed its review and offers the following comments at this time for the applicant and for the planning department: Engineering: 1.As this site develops, it will be subject to the storm water treatment,rate control and infiltration requirements set forth in the City of Shakopee’s Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan(CWRMP). 2.As a means to reducecostsassociated with onsite storm water management, the applicant should contact the property owners to the east regarding the possibility of expanding the existing storm water basin. 3.The existing trunk sanitary sewer serving portions of the Canterbury Park th complex from 4Avenue is private, but future development plans in the area may necessitate it being a public system. The applicantshould design thesite to C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@68C3D2AF\\@BCL@68C3D2AF.docx allow for this possibility. Please refer to the City of Shakopee Design Criteria for details. th Avenue will be reconstructed in 2016. They 4.The applicant should be aware 4 th mayneed to coordinate construction activities with those of the 4Avenue reconstruction project. 5.Approval of the PUD amendment, Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests do not constitute approval ofthe submitted plans. Recommendation Should the Cityof Shakopeedecide to approve the PUD amendment, the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the rezoning requests, the public worksdepartment suggests the items abovebe attachedas conditions of the approval. C:\\Windows\\TEMP\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@68C3D2AF\\@BCL@68C3D2AF.docx RESOLUTIONNO.7703 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNNESOTAAPPROVING THE FINANCING SOURCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CITY HALL FACILITY ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS,the City is in the final planning and design stages of a new city hall facility that would be connected to the current police department facility,and WHEREAS,thepreliminary estimate to construct and furnish the city hall is $8.5 million,and WHEREAS,the financing of a new city hall facility will be done internally through a series of transfers and an interfund loan, and WHEREAS, the series of transfers are to be made over the course of several years, and WHEREAS, an interfundloan of $1.65 million will be made from the Surface Water Utility fund, payable from the Government Building Asset Internal Service fund over fifteen years at a simple interest rate of 1.25% annually. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, thatthefinancing for the construction and furnishing of a new city hall facility will be done internally through a series of transfers and an interfund loan. Adopted in theregularsessionof the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota heldthis15day ofMarch, 2016. _________________________________ Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Clerk $17,820$184,110$70,080$7,500$8,883$288,393$4,150$1,150$740$1,495$0$7,535$295,928 TotalTotal 85737563 110 Rate PROJECT SubtotalSubtotal 162960100141 2166 Hours 805050 6173821.7 AprAprApr 260,508.006,820.00 267,328.00 80 6173821.7400100100300900 MarMarMar $ 201720172017 $ 617380821.7350100450 FebFebFeb $ CITY OF SHAKOPEE CITY HALL PROJECT 8040 6173821.7350100490 JanJanJan 617380821.73501007560585 DecDecDec 807560 6173821.7325100560 NovNovNov 807560 6173821.7325100560 OctOctOct Construction Construction Construction 807560 6173821.7325100560 SepSepSep 807560 6173821.7325100560 AugAugAug 807560 6173821.7325100560 JulJulJul 807560 6173821.7325100560 JunJunJun 807560 6173821.7750100985 MayMayMay 4090307575 13.9 AprAprApr 501540 10013.9600640 MarMarMar 0.00 FebFebFeb 201620162016 0.00 JanJanJan 27,885.00715.00 28,600.00 0.00 $ DecDecDec 20152015 2015 $ 0.00 $ NovNovNov Contract Docs.Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Project ManagerCost ManagerTrailer Pre-Construction Estimated Labor RFP Schedule Secretary PhonesSuppliesMonthly Design DevelopBidding/AwardConstructionMove-InMonthly x 1,000Est. ReimbursablesRepro/postage Assistant PM Senior PM CPMI