HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.F.2. City Council Minutes 11111116111 Consent Business 6. F. 2.
SHAKO1'EE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Lori Hensen, City Clerk
DATE: 12/01/2015
SUBJECT: City Council Minutes (F)
Action Sought
Move to approve the City Council Minutes from November 17, 2015.
Attachments: November 17, 2015
4 _
DRAFT
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE SHAKOPEE
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION LOCATION Council Chambers City Hall 129 Holmes Street South November 17,2015
SHAKOPEE MINNESOTA
7:00 p.m.
1. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Brad Tabke; Councilmember Matt Lehman;Councilmember Jay Whiting; Councilmember
Kathi Mocol;Councilmember Mike Luce
Staff City Administrator Bill Reynolds;Assistant City Administrator Kris Wilson;Public Works
Present: Director/Engineer Bruce Loney; City Attorney Jim Thomson;Parks and Recreation Director Jamie
Polley; City Engineer Jeff Weyandt; Senior Planner Kyle Sobota;Planner Alex Sharpe;City Clerk
Lori Hensen
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Reynolds stated that item 4., Special recognition of employee Darwin Gilbertson,be removed
from the Agenda.He also stated that there were additions to item 11.A.1.
Moved by Councilmember Kathi Mocol,Seconded by Councilmember Jay Whiting to approve the
Agenda as amended.
Vote: 5-0
4. Special Recognition of Employee Darwin Gilbertson
This item was removed from the Agenda.
5. Consent Business -(All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine.After a discussion by
the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to remove any items from the
consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered following the
Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed
and will be approved in one motion.)
Item 5.A.2.,Zoning Text Amendment to City Code 151.112,Pedestrian Walkways-Ord.No.923,
was removed for discussion by Cud. Lehman
Item 5.A.4., Final Plat of Saint Francis Medical Campus 2nd Addition-Res.No.7637,was removed
for discussion by Cncl.Lehman
Item 5.D.I.,Approval of job description for Technology Support Assistant and Adjustment to
Communications Coordinator position,was removed for discussion by Cncl.Luce
Item 5.E.1.,Award of Contract for the Quarry Lake Park Pedestrian Bridge,Project No.PR2015-2,
was removed for discussion by Cncl. Luce
Item 5.E.2., Shakopee Sponsorship policy and Program-Resolution No.7642,was removed for
discussion by Cncl. Lehman
Item 11.F.1.,2015 Budget Amendment 0 Res.No.7644,was added to Consent by Cncl.Whiting
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Mike Luce to approve the
Consent Agenda as amended.
Vote: 5 -0
A. Community Development
1. Zoning Text Amendment to City Code 151.002,Definition of Taverns-Ord.No. 922 (F)
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 922,an ordinance amending City Code Section 151.002,Definitions
(Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
2. Zoning Text Amendment to City Code 151.112,Pedestrian Walkways-Ord.No. 923 (B)
Mr. Sobota presented a Zoning Text Amendment to City Code 151.112,Pedestrian Walkways-
Ordinance No. 923,an ordinance amending City Code Section 151.112,regarding pedestrian
walkways in parking areas.
The City Council recently reviewed and approved a PUD Amendment to the Southbridge Crossings
East PUD for Marcus Theatres.One of the requirements of City Code that was waived by the PUD
Amendment is the requirement for pedestrian islands/sidewalk connections in the theater parking
lot. Currently,a pedestrian island/walkway is required in new parking lots greater than 100 spaces in
commercial and industrial zones. The Council gave staff direction to return with a text amendment
amending the language about pedestrian islands.The Council felt a connection was not required in
the Marcus case because there was not an exterior trail connection.
Mr. Sobota reviewed adjustments that Staff has proposed in regards to the project.The adjustments
include:
-An adjustment to N.#1 to specifically name retail centers,because industrial developments do not
typically have pedestrians traveling from business to business.A retail center is a retail development
with greater than 50,000 square feet of retail or service businesses.
-An adjustment to the language of#2,regarding the size of the parking lot that triggers the
requirement. Staff is proposing that the requirement apply to parking areas that have greater than
15%of their parking stalls greater than 250'from the main entrance of a building.
-A clarification that changes the furthest row to the furthest drive aisle,and adding an allowance for
staff discretion when an adjacent facility that serves the far extents of a parking area exists. Staff also
added"or walkway" to sections that noted only pedestrian island.The code section does not require
the connection to be a raised island.
Cncl.Lehman stated that he feels the Pedestrian walkway requirements are to restrictive,and that
they are not functional. He added that it would be more beneficial to paint the pedestrian walkways
on to the parking lot, as opposed to a raised walkway.
Steve Soltau, Shakopee Crossings,addressed the Council and reviewed concerns with the pedestrian
walkway requirements. He stated that he does not feel that the majority of people will use the
walkways.He also added that,in his opinion,parking lot islands are ineffective and create
maintenance issues.
Cncl.Lehman asked what the spacing requirements are for bollards in the parking lot.Mr.Sobota
reviewed the language.
Cncl.Whiting made a motion. Cud..Lehman asked if the language can be added to a motion
allowing staff to incorporate the language from this discussion. Mr.Thomson stated that the
Ordinance has the exact language in it.
Cncl.Luce stated that the current language states that the bollards have to be placed so that a vehicle
cannot encroach in the walkway,which will prevent a snowplow from being able to go between as
well.
Discussion:
Cncl.Luce asked if the bollards can be placed at a distance that will allow a snowplow to fit between.
Mr. Reynolds stated that guidance is needed so that the developers can come up with a solution.
Cud.Lehman thanked staff for their efforts,but feels that the language is to restrictive.
Moved by Councilmember Jay Whiting,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Ordinance No. 923,an ordinance amending City Code Section 151.112,regarding pedestrian
walkways in parking areas,and move its adoption.
Vote: 4- I
Opposed: Councilmember Matt Lehman
•
3. PUD Amendment for South Valley Health Campus-Res.No. 7635 (B)
Motion to approve Resolution No. 7635,a resolution approving an amendment to the South
Valley Health Campus PUD,and move its adoption. (Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
4. Final Plat of Saint Francis Medical Campus 2nd Addition-Res.No. 7637 (B)
Final Plat of Saint Francis Medical Campus 2nd Addition-Resolution No.7637,a resolution
approving the Final Plat of St.Francis Medical Campus 2nd Addition,and move its adoption.
Cncl. Lehman stated that he has concerns about signage during construction,and he would like the
plans communicated with the public before construction begins. Mike McMann,President of Saint
Francis Regional Medical Center,stated that there is a solid plan for signage and wayfinding during
construction.The plans will be publicized in the local newspaper,and there will be signs around the
hospital.They also plan to add security to act as concierge during construction to help people fmd
their way.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Resolution No.7637,a resolution approving the Final Plat of St Francis Medical Campus 2nd
Addition,and move its adoption.
Vote: 5 -0
B. Police and Fire
1. Master Subscriber Agreement Resolution-Res.No.7641 (A)
Motion to approve Resolution Number 7641, a Resolution authorizing the police department to enter
into a.Master Subscriber Agreement with the State of Minnesota. (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda)
C. Public Works and Engineering
1. Authorize the Purchase of a Storm Water Assessment Management Program(SWAMP)(E)
Motion to authorize the Appropriate City Officials to Execute the attached Extension Agreement to
Purchase a Storm Water Asset Management Program(SWAMP) (Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda)
2. Authorize a Feasibility Study for the 2016 Reclamation Project-Res.No.7638 (E)
Motion to approve Resolution 7638,which orders a Preliminary Engineering Report for the 2016
Bituminous Reclamation Project(Motion carried under the Consent Agenda)
D. Personnel
1. Approval of Job Description for Technology Support Assistant and Adjustment to Communications
Coordinator position(E)
Approval of Job Description for Technology Support Assistant and Adjustment to Communications
Coordinator position.The full-time staff position of Telecommunications Coordinator is currently
vacant following the recent resignation of employee John Peterson. This position was created ten
years ago at a time when the City had a Telecommunications Advisory Commission(TAC)and
operated a Public Access channel and studio,in addition to the Government Access Channel. In
recent years, the public access studio has been closed and both the public access channel and the
TAC have been discontinued. As a result,Mr. Peterson was managing the operation of the
Government Access Channel,creating original video programs,and using his remaining time
assisting with a variety of IT tasks.
Cncl.Luce asked if the position was necessary.Mr.Reynolds answered that it is a necessary position.
Moved by Councilmember Kathi Mocol, Seconded by Councilmember Matt Lehman to approve the
position description for the position of Technology Support Assistant,authorize placement of the
position of Grade 5 of the City's Non-Union Pay Plan,and authorize the reclassification of the
Communications Coordinator position to Grade 7 of the City's Non-Union Pay Plan.
Vote: 5 -0
E. Parks and Recreation
1. Award of Contract for the Quarry Lake Park Pedestrian Bridge,Project No.PR2015-2(A)
Award of Contract for the installation of the pedestrian bridge at Quarry Lake Park. On December
16,2014 the City Council approved the final design of Quarry Lake Park and authorized the
development of plans and specifications.On April 7,2015 the City Council supported the new
construction timeline of the park that included bidding the park construction over the winter of
2015 and construction to begin in the spring of 2016.The project will include three bid packages;site
work,building and pedestrian bridge.The site work and building packages will be presented to the
City Council for approval and authorization to bid on December 15, 2015.
The bid opening for the pedestrian bridge package was held at 10:00am on Thursday,November
12th. The low bidder for the project was J.F. Brennan Company,Inc.for the amount of$167,311.50.
The bid has been verified and approved by the architect,WSB.
Cncl. Luce stated that he feels the Memorial Park Pedestrian bridge should be completed before
construction on the Quarry Lake pedestrian bridge begins.Mr.Reynolds responded that the
Memorial Bridge project is being reviewed,and that the funding for the Quarry Lake pedestrian
bridge will not impact the new bridge at Memorial Park.
Cncl.Lehman asked which bridge would be completed first.Mr.Loney answered that the Quarry
Lake pedestrian bridge will be completed first.He added that due to the multiple entities involved in
the Memorial Park pedestrian bridge,it is far more complicated and will take longer to complete.
Ms.Polley added that the funding for the Quarry lake pedestrian bridge will come from the Park
Asset Fund,and the funding for the Memorial Park pedestrian bridge will come from the Park
Reserve fund.
Moved by Councilmember Jay Whiting,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to award a
contract to J.F.Brennan Company,Inc.for the pedestrian bridge package at Quarry Lake Park,Project
No.PR2015-2 and set aside a 7.5%contingency.
Vote: 5 -0
2. Shakopee Sponsorship Policy and Program-Resolution No.7642(B,C,D)
•
Shakopee Sponsorship Policy and Program-Resolution No.7642.The sponsorship program includes
a booklet for facility sponsorship and a booklet for program and supplies sponsorship.On May 18,
2010 the City Council adopted the revised Shakopee Sponsorship program pertaining to the facility
sponsorships. It further approved the usage of the Shakopee Facility Sponsorship Program by the
"Shakopee Recreation: Bring People Together"(SR:BPT)group to fundraise for the Community
Center Improvements upon a successful 2010 referendum.
The PRAB reviewed the proposed policy and program booklet at their November 9th meeting.The
board provided comments on the appeal process.In addition they felt that the amount listed in the
program booklet should serve as a starting point for sponsorship negotiations.The ••
board recommended that the City utilize the program sponsorship policy and program booklet with •
an open mind and that sponsorships are open to negotiation.
Cncl.Lehman asked for clarification that approval of this Resolution does not mean that the City
would be commercializing its Fire Trucks,Public Works vehicles and squad cars.He added that he
would like the Resolution updated to specifically state this.Mr.Reynolds replied that the Sponsorship
program is specifically related to Parks and Recreation facilities,but the language relating to
donations applies to the City as a whole.
Ms. Polley added that all naming rights would still come to the City Council for approval.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Resolution No. 7642,A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Minnesota Establishing a Sponsorship
Policy and Amending the Shakopee Sponsorship Program,and move its adoption.
Vote: 5 -0
F. General Administration
•
1. City Bill List(F)
Motion to approve the bills and electronic funds transfers in the amount$1,320,768.52 and payroll
transfers in the amount of$577,234.88 for a total of$1,898,003.40. (Motion carried under the
Consent Agenda)
2. City Council Minutes(F)
Motion to approve the City Council Minutes from October 20 and November 4, 2015. (Motion
carried under the Consent Agenda)
3. Response to SMSC Fee to Trust Application(D)
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign the response on behalf of the City of Shakopee regarding the
SMSC's application to move the identified parcels into trust status. (Motion carried under the
Consent Agenda)
6. Public Hearings:
A. 2015 Currency Exchange Licenses -Res.No. 7643 (F)
Moved by Councilmember Kathi Mocol, Seconded by Councilmember Jay Whiting to open the Public
Hearing.
Vote: 5-0
Ms.Hensen presented a Public Hearing for the 2015 Currency Exchange Licenses - Resolution No,
7643,a resolution approving the application of Madison Financial Companies,dba MoneyXchange,
1147 Canterbury Road;and DRM LLC of Shakopee,dba Excel Pawn,450 West 1st Avenue for
currency exchange licenses.Ms.Hensen explained that the licenses are ultimately issued by the State
of Minnesota. Current law requires that the local municipality approve or deny the issuance of a
license,after published notice and a public hearing.The applicants have provided the State with the
required$10,000 Currency Exchange Surety Bonds.
The Police Department has advised that they are unaware of any reason for the City to object to the
granting currency exchange licenses to these two businesses.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to close the
Public Hearing.
Vote: 5-0
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Resolution No. 7643,a resolution approving the application of Madison Financial
Companies,dba MoneyXchange; 1147 Canterbury Road; and DRM LLC of Shakopee,dba Excel
Pawn,450 West 1st Avenue,for currency exchange licenses,and move its adoption
Vote: 5 -0
B. Certify Assessments for the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project No.2015-1,Res.No. 7631 (E)
Moved by Councilmember Jay Whiting,Seconded by Councilmember Matt Lehman to open the
Public Hearing.
Vote: 5 -0
Mr.Weyandt addressed the Council regarding a Public Hearing to Certify Assessments for the 2015
Street Reconstruction Project No. 2015-1,Resolution No. 7631,a resolution which adopts the
assessment for the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project,Project No. 2015-1.This project has
essentially been completed and all project costs identified.The final project cost is$2,329,084.86,
which consists of construction costs, financing costs and engineering/administration costs.A
breakdown of the project costs are as follows:
Assessments $387,772.55
CIF $914,651.86
Sanitary Sewer Fund $337,120.26
Storm Sewer Fund $130,561.96
Shakopee Public Utilities $558,978.23
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS$2,329,084.86
Mr.Weyandt added that it is City policy to assess 30%of the street improvements to the benefiting
properties.Properties will be assessed upon a per lot basis. The proposed assessment rate is
$4,147.30 per lot.
1
Cncl.Lehman asked if there was anything abnormal with the project.Mr. Weyandt responded that
everything went as planned, and added that the sod will need to be looked at in the spring.
Cncl.Luce asked if the City was charging the standard interest rate.Mr.Weyandt answered that the
rate being charged has been the same for the last 5 years.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Mike Luce to close the Public
Hearing.
Vote: 5 -0
Moved by Councilmember Jay Whiting,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Resolution No.7631,a resolution which adopts the assessment for the 2015 Street Reconstruction
Project,Project No.2015-1.
Vote: 5 -0
C. Vacation of Water Main Easement at Saint Francis Regional Medical Center-Res.No.7636(B)
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Jay Whiting to open the
Public Hearing.
Vote: 5 -0
Mr. Sobota presented a Public Hearing regarding a Vacation of Water Main Easement at Saint
Francis Regional Medical Center-Resolution No. 7636,a resolution vacating a water main easement
within the Saint Francis Regional Medical Center Campus.
Mr. Sobota stated that Saint Francis Regional Medical Center is requesting the vacation of a water
main easement on the site of the hospital complex. Saint Francis is proposing construction of a new
15,000 square-foot front entrance addition.As a result of the proposed addition,the existing public
water main will need to be relocated because it is within the footprint of the proposed addition(see
attached drawing).The applicant is proposing to install water main south of the addition and has
revised the existing agreement with Shakopee Public Utilities to reflect the location change.
Shakopee Public Utilities reviewed and approved the revised agreement request at
the SPU Commission's November 2 meeting.
Cncl.Lehman asked if the driveway area would be heated.Mr. Sobota answered that it would be.
Cncl.Whiting asked if there would be any service interruption during the installation of the new
water main.Mike McMann,President of Saint Francis Regional Medical Center,answered that the
hospital is supplied by multiple water mains,and there will not be any service interruption during the
project.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to close the
Public Hearing.
Vote: 5 -0
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Resolution No. 7636,a resolution vacating a water main easement within the Saint Francis Regional
Medical Center Campus, and move its adoption.
Vote: 5 -0
7. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED CITIZENS BY CITY COUNCIL-Provides an opportunity for the
public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Comments should not be more
than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that time limit based upon the number of persons
seeking to comment. This comment period may not be used to make personal attacks,to air
personality grievances,to make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council
Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens,and questions from Council will be for
clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to the comments
made,but rather for informational purposes only.
Chris Miller, 1877 Quail Drive,addressed the Council regarding his unhappiness the recent raise in
property taxes.
Timothy Johnson,4651 Village Square, addressed the Council and expressed his anger in regards to
some members of the City Council.
8. Business removed from the Consent Agenda will be discussed at this time
9. Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting:
Moved by Councilmember Jay Whiting,Seconded by Councilmember Matt Lehman to recess for the
Economic Development Authority meeting.
Vote: 5 -0
10. Reconvene
11. General Business:
A. Community Development
1. Rezoning a Portion of 1716 Stagecoach Road from Rural Residential(RR)to Multiple Family
Residential (R3)and a Portion to Urban Residential(Rl-B)a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from
Single Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential Guiding(A,B)
Mr. Sharpe addressed the Council in regards to Rezoning a Portion of 1716 Stagecoach Road from
Rural Residential(RR)to Multiple Family Residential(R3)and a Portion to Urban Residential 1
(RI-B)a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Single Family Residential to Multi-Family
Residential Guiding.
Mr. Sharpe explained that MWF Properties LLC has submitted an application for rezoning of 1716
Stagecoach Road from Rural Residential(RR)to Multiple Family Residential(R3)with a portion of
Urban Residential(RI-B)and a Comprehensive Plan amendment to reguide the property from Single
Family to High Density Residential.The 10 acre site is currently used as a horse stable facility and
single family dwelling. If the rezoning is approved,MWF proposes to develop workforce housing on
the site. The original concept plans reviewed by the Planning Commission proposed a three-story,
60 unit apartment building located on the southern 5 acres with the northern 5 acres reserved for
future development of an additional 60 unit apartment complex.
Mr. Sharpe stated that the Council was asked to approve one of the following:Ordinance 920,an
ordinance amending the zoning map adopted by City Code 151.003 by rezoning land to Multiple
Family Residential(R3)and Urban Residential(Rl-B)from Rural Residential(RR) and Resolution
7622,a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan for land guided Single-Family Residential to
High Density Residential or Resolution 7623,a resolution denying the request to rezone land
to Multiple-Family Residential(R3)and Urban Residential(R1-B)from Rural Residential(RR)and
amending the Comprehensive Plan for land guided Single-Family Residential to High Density
Residential.
II
In response to the Planning Commission and adjacent resident concerns the developer has amended
their submission.The new site plan includes one 66 unit apartment complex for workforce housing,
and single family homes. The design attempts to buffer the Rural Residential homes along
Stagecoach Road with single family lots.The single family lots are proposed to be served through an
alley, and the apartment complex through a new connecting street from Stagecoach to Riverside
Drive.This proposal is a result of meeting with staff at the Development Review Committee on
Tuesday November 10.
Following the public hearing,the Planning Commission voted 6—0 to recommend denial of the
requested rezoning.
Cncl.Whiting asked if the project qualifies as Workforce Housing.Mr. Sharpe answered that there is
not a true definition of Workforce Housing used nationally.This project qualifies for the 30%to 60%
median income Federal and State Tax Credit Credit program.
Peter Worthington,MWF Properties,was invited to address the Council.
Cncl.Whiting asked if the property would be considered Section 8 or subsidized housing.Mr.
Worthington responded no.
Cncl. Whiting asked if current zoning densities allow for this type of building.Mr. Sharpe answered
that the zoning densities will not need to be amended for this project. •
Cncl. Lehman asked for clarification on some wording in the Ordinance.Mr. Thomson provided
clarification.
Cncl.Luce asked Mr.Worthington why he brought the new plan to the City Council after it was
denied by the Planning Commission.Mr.Worthington replied that they feel there is a need for mid
market rental housing in Shakopee.
Shauna Brick, 8615 Boiling Springs Lane,addressed the Council regarding her opposition to the
rezoning request.
Ellen Evjen, 9075 Boiling Springs Lane,addressed the Council and expressed her opposition to the
rezoning request.
Marie Corbett,9315 Lancaster Lane, stated she was the Realtor for the property owner and asked the
Council to consider approving the request to rezone.
Diane Vonbank, 1943 Boiling Springs Circle,expressed her opposition to the request to rezone.
Jim Clark, 1155 W. 223rd Street,Jordan,addressed the Council and spoke about the developments
surrounding the property, and asked the Council to approve the request to rezone.
Jason Wilking,3800 297th Avenue NE,asked the Council to approve the request to rezone.
Darcy Pouti,9427 Boiling Springs Lane,addressed the Council and asked them to deny the request
to rezone.
Dan Buzicky, 1723 Stagecoach Road,addressed the Council and expressed his opposition to the
rezoning request.
Bill Mars, 1279 Cider Circle,addressed the Council and asked them to deny the request for rezoning.
He stated that the City should look for a different site where this project could work.
Cncl. Whiting stated that believes this is an issue that will come up more often in the future as the
City moves forward.He added that while this project does have a lot going for it,but he does not feel
that this is the right area for it.
Cncl.Luce feels that the City Council should follow the Planning Commissions direction.
Cncl. Lehman stated that he does not feel this project is consistent with the comprehensive plan that
was created for the property.He added that he is not in favor of the proposal. •
Cncl.Mocol stated that she feels that this is a good project on its own,but that Stagecoach is a unique
area. She said that she is concerned about increased traffic on Stagecoach Road,a lack of services to
the area,and the impact to the neighborhood itself. She added that she is not in favor of this project.
Discussion:
Mayor Tabke stated that he agrees that the previous proposed project did not meet the look and feel
of the neighborhood,but he feels that the new proposal is a good fit.He added that he thinks the new
proposal adds green space and it is not a dramatic change from what was intended to be there.
Cncl.Lehman stated that he feels it is necessary to have a good discussion on affordable housing in
the near future.
Cud..Whiting stated that Shakopee has a definite need for affordable housing. Shakopee needs to
have single family homes mixed with multiple family housing, and to find a good area where a
project like this would be a good fit.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to Resolution
7623,a resolution denying the request to rezone land to Multiple-Family Residential(R3)and Urban
Residential(R1-B)from Rural Residential(RR) and amending the Comprehensive Plan for land
guided Single-Family Residential to High Density Residential.
Vote: 4- 1
Opposed: Mayor Brad Tabke
2. Request for Fee Waivers to Support Workforce Housing Project(B,D)
This item was contingent upon approval of 11.A.1.
B. Police and Fire
C. Public Works and Engineering
D. Personnel
E. Parks and Recreation
1. Set the Sale of Tax Abatement Bonds to Fund the Community Center/Ice Arena Project-Res.No.
7640(B)
Ms.Wilson addressed the Council with a request to Set the Sale of Tax Abatement Bonds to Fund
the Community Center/Ice Arena Project-Resolution No. 7640,a resolution providing for the
issuance and sale of general obligation tax abatement bonds,series 2016A,in the proposed aggregate
principal amount of$31,845,000,and move its adoption.
On September 22, the City Council conducted a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 7615,
approving the use of tax abatement bonds to finance construction of a new two-sheet ice arena and
remodeling of the existing Community Center to include an indoor aquatic park.The Council was
now asked to set the sale of the bonds for December 17,2015. Secondly,the Council was asked to
set a special City Council meeting for that evening,Thursday,December 17 at 7:00 pm.,to award the
sale of the bonds.
•
Ms.Wilson stated that the project is currently out for bids and Council will be asked to award bids at
its meeting on Tuesday,December 15. If the bids are favorable,and the dollar amount of the bonds
can be reduced,there will be time to do that between the December 15 Council meeting and the sale
of bonds on December 17.
Cncl.Lehman asked what the difference in interest would be if it was approved on a 20 year voter
approved referendum.Ms.Wilson answered that there would not be a difference in interest between
voter approved and tax abatement.
Cud.Luce stated that he does not feel that now is the time to move forward with this project.
Moved by Councilmember Jay Whiting,Seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol to approve
Resolution No.7640,a resolution providing for the issuance and sale of general obligation tax
abatement bonds,series 2016A,in the proposed aggregate principal amount of$31,845,000,and move
its adoption.
Vote: 3 -2
Opposed: Councilmember Matt Lehman
Councilmember Mike Luce
F. General Administration
1. 2015 Budget Amendment-Res.No.7644(C)
Motion to approve Resolution 7644 amending the 2015 budget.(Motion carried under the Consent
Agenda)
12. Other Business
Cncl.Luce stated that he has received complaints about parking issues around Munkabeans in
downtown Shakopee.
13. Adjourn to Tuesday,December 1,2015 at 7:00 p.m.
Moved by Councilmember Matt Lehman,Seconded by Councilmember Jay Whiting to adjourn.
te: 5 -0
Lori He en
Acting ity Clerk
Heidi Emerson
Recording Secretary