Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.B. Workshop Discussion 11.1111 General Business 8. B. SH KOP'EE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kyle Sobota, Senior Planner DATE: 09/01/2015 SUBJECT: West End Land Use Study Presentation Action Sought The Council is asked to review and provide comments on two draft concepts for the west end study area. Introduction The City's consultant, HKGI, has met with property owners, developers and real estate brokers, and City, County, and MnDOT staff on the land use study commissioned for land on the western edge of the city. Two concepts have been developed by the consultant, reviewed at a staff level and revised based on staff feedback. They are now attached, along with a memorandum from the consultant, for Council's review and feedback. The concepts are presented merely as concepts, not actual plans. Input and comments from the City Council, Planning Commission, and other stakeholders is planned and expected. Discussion: Concept 1 generally involves planning and guiding land for more immediate market utilization. Concept 2 has a greater amount of amenities, such as trails and parks, and allows for the potential of a parkway along the bluff area serving the residential area. Key differences between the two concepts worth noting based on land use and topic are: Commercial Uses: •Approximately 140 more jobs in Concept 2 •3 more acres of Commercial in Concept 2 •Differences in proposed land use configurations north of US 169 at CSAH 69 •Land use classifications east of Tahpah Park, potential to enhance Tahpah Park as a destination Residential Uses: •High Density Residential near 17th Avenue and Marystown Rd in Concept 1. The contemplated density of 24-30 units / acre is well above what code currently allows, but is in line with proposals by developers. •Bluff areas anticipated to be incorporated into residential lots as conservation easement in Concept 1 •30 more acres of small lot single-family in Concept 2 •26 more acres of large lot single-family in Concept 1 •Approximately 120 more total housing units in Concept 2 Parks and Open Space •Configuration of trails in park (Letters K & I in concepts) •A larger amount of open space around the bluff area with looped trails in Concept 2 •Looped trail system between bluff area and surrounding landuses residential areas Traffic and Circulation •A frontage road / connection to Business Park along US 169 in Concept 2 that allows connections by trail and roadway for business park customers and employees to commercial area. •Proposed street alignment/ development near Friendship Church property •Roadway alignment for commercial and medium density area east of Tahpah Park in Concept 2 The Parks and Recreation Director and Natural Resource Technician have walked the bluff area and have determined that the bluff area is an acceptable area for park dedication and also an ideal area for walking trails and woodland and habitat preservation. The southern park area roughly fits the guidelines of the City's Park Plan regarding proximity to parks for residential properties. Smaller parks can be expected to be incorporated into future developments. The consultant has begun discussions with MnDOT regarding the potential of a remnant right-of-way area south of the northbound ramp at CSAH 69 to be incorporated into the business park area which would increase the developable area of both concepts. The approximate square footage of business park and retail is similar in both concepts. Schedule / Timeline: The proposed schedule for the remainder of the study is: September 14: Presentation of the concepts to Park and Recreation Advisory Board September 16: Property owner open house Late September / Early October: Joint PC/EDAC/CC Meeting October: Preparation of zoning map and ordinance amendments, comprehensive plan amendment reports November 5: Planning Commission Final Review/Recommendation of study, Rezoning / Comp Plan recommendation for CC. November 17: City Council Final Adoption/ Rezoning / Comp Plan /Removal of Moratorium Requested Action: The Council is asked to engage in discussion and provide feedback to the consultant on the proposed concepts. Attachments: Consultant Memo and Concepts MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©© ©® To: Shakopee City Council and Staff From: Hoisington Koegler Group(Consultant Team and Staff) Subject: Update on Western Shakopee/Jackson Township Land Use Study Date: August 27,2015 Attached to this memorandum is an 11X17 sheet illustrating two DRAFT alternative land use concepts and associated development data.These concepts were developed using a variety of inputs gained over the last three months of studying the site and talking with key property owners and stakeholders. The purpose of the land use study is to catalyze current development interest,to ensure that development plans in the study area will further the City's Vision, Strategic Plan,and economic development goals,and provide the City with a more thorough understanding of the transportation, parks, and sewer and water infrastructure that will be needed to serve this important growth area. We are at the phase of the project where we are evaluating concepts and converging on a preferred plan. This meeting is intended to present general concept ideas for input form the City Council.The maps presented before you are NOT the plan, but simply ideas at this point. Purpose of evaluating concepts. At this phase of the project,we are evaluating alternatives/concepts/ideas to that explore the possibilities and the challenges associated with future development growth in the project area. Using these alternatives,our objective is to discuss the merits,challenges,impacts, and opportunities the site offers with key stakeholders. Building off of this input,we will then prepare a final preferred land use concept plan.A set of key guiding principles were developed early in the planning process.These principles were prepared using the city's current Comprehensive Plan and other supporting policy documents.They offer general guidance for evaluating concepts. ► Expand employment opportunities in areas with good transportation access and with compatible land use transitions. ► Create desirable and sustainable neighborhoods with a range of housing types to meet a variety of lifestyle and economic needs. ► Encourage an efficient land use pattern that optimizes both initial(capital) and ongoing (operations and maintenance) public infrastructure investments. ► Balance traditional infrastructure systems with green infrastructure strategies to enhance ecological function of natural systems. ► Protect and enhance natural features that provide opportunities for recreation,or contribute to the ecological,social,or cultural value of the landscape and built environment. ► Promote a range of safe and efficient transportation options(auto,bike,walk,transit)that provide connection to local employment centers,commercial centers, downtown,schools, and parks,while anticipating multi-modal connections to the broader metro area. 123 North Third Street,Suite 100,Minneapolis,MN 55401-1659 Ph(612)338-0800 Fx(612)338-6838 www.hkgi.com Western Shakopee/Jackson Township Land Use Study 27 August 2015 Page 2 The Concepts We will present the concepts in detail at the meeting. In general, both concepts build off the existing natural resource and topographic features the site offers. Both concepts also work with a number of existing site constraints including power line easements,gas line easements,significant grade change, and access challenges. Both alternatives were developed with real estate market demands in mind. Both alternatives provide short, mid, and longer term development opportunities.This memo provides a brief overview of some of the key elements of the concepts that we would like to present and discuss with Council. 1. Land Use and Development Patterns: Both concepts bring in a diversity of land use patterns. One concept introduces a higher density residential development pattern consisting of stacked residential units. Both concepts integrate a variety of single family land use types including traditional single family development,single family development on smaller lots,and attached single family development(townhome/rowhouse/duplex/etc.). Both concepts provide a variety of neighborhood oriented commercial services, but in different configurations based on different access patterns. Both concepts also provide a business park land use intended for a greater intensity of job development.A key consideration that shapes future land use planning is market feasibility. Research suggests that the market demand for development in this area is strongest for traditional single family detached housing and larger scale warehouse/distribution industrial. Proximity and visibility to Highway 169 draws attention from larger scale highway commercial users or destination oriented highway commercial uses.The challenges for this type of development; however, has to do with obtaining access to the site. 2. Roads and Access:Access to the site follows Scott County access and spacing guidelines which generally limit access to 1/4 mile spacing. Limited opportunities for right-in-right out access are also included at key locations.Two key roadway features that warrant further discussion are the CR 16 extension and roads serving the commercial areas near Marystown Road (CR 15)and Highway 169. a. CR 16 has been extended as a County Road consistent with existing transportation policy plans,connecting on the west side to CR 69.This road will function more as a collector road that distributes traffic from the new neighborhoods to other minor arterial streets. The road would likely be a three lane segment,with the third lane being a turn lane at key intersections.The road would include a trail or sidewalk segment on both sides and ample room for landscaping and buffering of adjacent residential uses.The easterly segment connecting to Marystown Road would likely include additional lanes to provide for additional traffic serving the higher density residential areas and commercial areas. Western Shakopee/Jackson Township Land Use Study 27 August 2015 Page 3 b. Past planning efforts have shown a frontage road connecting CR 69 on the west to Marystown Road on the east aligning with the on/off ramps to Highway 169.This frontage road concept is very challenging from a grade and spacing standpoint,and not very desired from property owner perspective. In coordinating with MnDOT and Scott County(who have control over access to County and State roadways)such a connection is also not desirable. However,a frontage road would provide connection between the business park uses on the flat ground at the base of the bluff and service commercial uses. Each concept addresses this idea differently and will be further discussed at the meeting. c. Other local streets are shown which would serve as neighborhood collectors.These streets are also important streets for trail/sidewalk connections.Additional trail/sidewalk connections would be built into individual development projects. 3. Parks and Open Space:The park and open space system shown is very similar with two exceptions. One concept shows a large park area on the northeast quadrant of Marystown and Highway 169.This concept would be fora special use athletic park that builds on the energy of existing athletic park(Tahpah Park)and provides a larger venue to host more significant athletic tournaments.These tournaments bring potential economic benefit to the City due to their regional draw.This type of park would require a significant city investment beyond basic park dedication.The key difference in the park and open space concept is in how it might be implemented. One approach is to utilize park dedication to acquire not only active park lands but also some of the desire open space that is shown as higher value open space in the natural resources plan. One concept would be to build smaller pocket parks into the open space network to serve neighborhood park needs,while the other concept would take a more traditional approach to secure neighborhood park lands through park dedication and preservation of the open space as back yards or through conservation easements. 4. Stormwater: Both concepts take a similar approach to storm water management utilizing regional ponding and the idea of using the powerline easements along Highway 169 and the open space corridors as locations for regional ponding.Additional infiltration strategies could also be explored as future development projects provide greater detailed planning.The land use concepts take into consideration the required ponding needed based on the land use intensity. Next Steps Following the City Council meeting,the consultant team will coordinate stakeholder review of the concepts and using the input form the Council and stakeholders,a preferred land use plan will be prepared.After we converge on a preferred land use plan,the consultant team and staff will begin outlining approaches to implementation which include zoning and regulatory tools,development phasing and financing approaches of key infrastructure,and strategies for implementing the park and open space network concept.The final draft master plan including the implementation strategies is scheduled to be completed for review and consideration in October. Attachments: Land Use Concept Drawings *, ..... Concept 1 •• Concept 2 • 1.7::Gay Bandasy (::3 Prenct Bowdon/ '',.'• C:3PFthect Boundary i i0 Transrtession tine 0 Tranamession Ina 1. a• ED Ful Access Inkersectean E ( l)Full Access Interethlon . , a ••••' •...3. ED licht h/ROI Oul 1 I ..... -: •J ii ...........'''••-" -......... . :- ED....b 0* GD,Right In/Rip Out e ..i. . t • .', . .S. e. ED Right In Only / I ( •I [mem rem ...,-.•Trails sj Tradthcrial Single Family 63.1.0.3.41404330111 0. ......T= I) p I • ... ....... ......t.',.. • el -4 Tradeonal Sr,*Family Small La Stngle Farerly •J ..............:1:''.66 Smell Lot Bangle Feeney .',. Salvia FamthrAltadwad I „. I S. Family Attached k 1 6. . I ._ _. gm kaaliamth Stacked iI INN Multstansly Stacked j lin Retail 3 • • Nii.... ' tli LI • • ,1 • r- MI Business Path i , ...I •.,•., 1111 Business Park INN Pala F°Pen sear. i •-,• •",, gui Parke/Open Spate / F-LN /' ...„_„' ./.....'.- .rit•... :::1-/ ,,,,,.„ gm U3-o(way i ....- I • e'''-'''', ' /'.... ....-J • iththe II.II RMEN a emY 11.1110/313 I: ° ,e.:'..3..'," r• ,...yr 11.13011133, Water i t • F OM Water / i.e.,.....••• '-d• , I e/ l ......' \ I I ,/' /....... -.- / , .,.. •,Aimisiarga,,, • I /'.... . , • II !I! r IP I 111114 60 acres 1 •'------.".*-- G • • I I . . , i i 1 t'•"4. : . ,''.•,' -.• -4 • . _,-i J ! ,_...). : * (71 1 23S aos4 k ,0 t • ' 209 acros t = 14 s .—.......... 103 saes 570 units - / ,' i 650 units \ , L il G . (' j - IA16031 I I Homo I 73 OMR • I; 11 I ;: . 711.3110 O. — •• s 4'..- • ------•-- .... 1,420 Mbs I 'p- _ , • / : 1450 Jobs --' 1/- . .. 94 acros 400 units H I. ... 0 !!! 7 — :j .., 28 OUR{ - t 362,700 a I NI N 0 444••••••' tl , IR11.11410, .4 0110,1 ' 31 acres--- - 42 acres I 220 units 11 420 units 4620(00s . - 1,430)obs - • \---8 acres ..., 220 units 1 901.0111 DEVELOPMENT YIELD SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT YIELD SUMMARY NorMeml ROW * 608 total acres Noodle., ROW z 2 -131..070 33 614 total acres —NorMeas1 A P'13 30 Northeast A Retail 10 WW1.* fl 3.21116nal Single Family * 1,360 housing units Northeast 0 Single Earthly Notched 4 43 0 1,480 housing units reco‘hsvest RCM 5 Northeast C 8 7S Northwest A Read 4 54,490 0 net residential density:4.1 Northwest SIngle Farnth Attached ROW 5 0 net residential density:43 3101350e0 El Multilainth Stacked 3 92 Northwest A Retell 4 54,499 Northwest C Retail 3 42,950 0 1,086,000 square feet retail/business park Northwest 13 Multifamily Stacked 3 92 0 1,115,000 square feet retail/business park Northwest D &Junes,Park 12 114.733 Northwest C Pouness Park 15 144.495 South • ROW 46 0 2,900 jobs ,777, Row 53 0 3,040 jobs South A fluvress Path 62 608 595 South A tholness Park 58 564.849 South ''' 8 Ftths 77 South 0 Petal 212.12I South C Single Family Attached 3 139 ASSUMPTIONS: South C Parks 76 ASSUMPTIONS: South D Retail 20 265894 South Uit (3 /manorial Smote Family 92 252 RESIDENTIAL ns potato. WON pee Acre Units theatre R6 SI US 31111A1. Unne per/km Units Amami Units pm South tthAtilamily Stacked • 1 6 South E Simile Family Attached 22 no LOW HIGH AvERAGE LOW HIGH AVERAOF 503113 F 9030 Family Attached 8 80 South F 90de Family Attached 8 80 Tractiuthat Soth e Farm 250 320 2>5 12151:11=192171MIKIE1111111111111ECMIIIIIM3711111M South G Audit...151/00e faro* 91 250 South Smal Lot Sinole Family 25 507 Smelt.5 •le Farm 350 , 100 4 25 EZEIEEM!EECZIMIEEMIMMEEMMMOE South H 924 0t Single Family 43 South Snug Lot Sinple Family 22 South Traditional Smote Farnily 63 122 South Pa ks 27 Irtirn==iimmErmillillIMIIMMI11300, sis;mm0 00 00 1 F 00 10 00 NM , 27 00 . , I South I Scull Let Single Family 80 South 1 Small totSingleFarnth 23 96 South K 04,11, 29 NoN RESIDENGAL II FAR FAR South A Small lot 5091e Ninth II 61 NON AMMAR. FAR FAR FAR 51 south I Small tor Single Family IS 69 South t Small Lot Rook Family 10 M LOW AKA AVERAGE 1,th,theo• LOW HIGH AVERAGE Employee South 8 Small tot Smote Farndy 17 South MI Traddlonal Single Family 42 114 .30 0111 ''3 150 south N 5.0.11 20 Sine.Family 13 54 South N tadltional Slroye Farolly 1. 0 2SOO S..5 0 Trachllonal.1041/m01y II 05 501413 0 115 West Shakopee/Jackson Township Area Master Plan [E[51 giq Land Use Concepts DRAFT August 2015 Pill (o.6.11 nig( ti liii