Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.C.2. Award a Contract for the 2015 Sanitary Sewer lateral Pipe Rehabilitation project No. 2015-4, Res. No. 7598 11111/6121111 Consent Business 4. C. 2. SI1.\KOMI' TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director DATE: 08/18/2015 SUBJECT: Award a Contract for the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation Project No. 2015-4, Res. No. 7598 (E) Action Sought Approve Resolution No. 7598, which accepts the bid and awards a contract for 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation, Project No. 2015-4 and includes a contingency amount equal to 5% of the contract to cover minor change orders and quantity adjustments that may occur on the project. Background On July 21, 2015, City Council adopted Resolution No. 7597, which approved the plans and specifications and authorized the advertisement for bids on the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation. On August 7, 2015, a bid opening was held for this project in which three bids were received. The bids are summarized in the attached resolution. From the bid opening, the low bidder is National Water Main Cleaning Company from Kearny, New Jersey and a bid of$606,316.00. The Engineer's estimate for this project was $890,201.40. The project is funded 100% from the City's Sanitary Sewer Enterprise fund in which sufficient funds exist. Attached is a memo from Paul Pasko of SEH, Inc. who was the design engineer and his recommendation is to proceed with the bid of National Water Main Cleaning Company. If Council awards a contract, staff is also requesting a contingency amount equal to 5% of the contract to cover minor change orders and quantity adjustments that may occur on the project. An extension agreement for construction engineering services from SEH will be forthcoming on the September 1, 2015 council meeting. Recommendation 1. Accept the low base bid from National Water Main Cleaning Company and adopt Resolution No. 7598. 2. Approve a 5% contingency amount for this project for use by the City Engineer in authorizing change orders or quantity adjustments on this project. Budget Impact The project is funded 100% from the City's Sanitary Sewer Fund. Relationship to Vision This supports Goal E: Deliver effective and efficient public services by a staff of well-trained, caring, and professional employees. Requested Action Approve Resolution No. 7598, which accepts the bid and awards a contract for 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation, Project No. 2015-4 and includes a contingency amount equal to 5% of the contract to cover minor change orders and quantity adjustments that may occur on the project. Attachments: Res. No. 7598 SEH Recommendation Memo to Award RESOLUTION NO. 7598 A Resolution Accepting Bids For For The 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation Project No. 2015-4 WHEREAS,pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation, Project No. 2015-4, bids were received, opened on August 7, 2015, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: BIDDER BID National Water Main Cleaning Co. $606,316.00 Quam Construction Co.,Inc. $1,144,749.00 Performance Pipelining, Inc. $1,365,070.00 WHEREAS, it appears that National Water Main Cleaning Company, 1806 Newark Turnpike, Kearny, NJ, 07032-4314, is the lowest responsible bidder for the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA: 1. The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract for the base bid amount of$606,316.00 with National Water Main Cleaning Company. in the name of the City of Shakopee for the2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,held this day of ,2015. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: Acting City Clerk ENGR/2015PROJECTS/SANITARYSE WERLATERALPIPE/RES7598-AWARD-CONTRACT i SEH Building a Better World for All of Us` August 12, 2015 RE: Shakopee, Minnesota 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation SEH No. 131119 14.00 Bruce Loney, PE Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Dear Bruce: Please recall that Paragraph 22 of the Instructions to Bidders in the Bidding Documents requires bidders to submit a detailed Proof of Responsibility(Proof)with their proposal form. The proof contained a detailed Contractor Questionnaire. For your convenience, a complete Proof is attached to this letter as Exhibit 1. The objective of the Questionnaire was not to discourage bidding or make it difficult for qualified bidders to submit bids. Neither was it intended to discourage beginning contractors. It was intended to make it possible for the City to have exact information on financial ability, equipment and experience involved in awarding contracts to Contractors that would likely be unfamiliar to the City. Exhibit 2 enclosed with this recommendation summarizes who bid the project, for how much, using what structural cured-in-place pipe lining for laterals via blindshot method (CIPPLL)tool, and our scoring based on bidder responses to the questionnaire. For your convenience, this letter is divided into the sections titled Recommendation, and Results of Review of Bidders Proof. RECOMMENDATION On August 7 the City received bids from the 3 bidders for the amounts shown in rows 13 and 14 in Exhibit 2 respectively.After considering each bidders adaptability on previous CIPPLL contracts, quality and experience, and the long-term value of that experience; we recommend the City award its contract for the referenced project to National Water Main Cleaning Company of Kearny, New Jersey(NWMCC). RESULTS OF REVIEW OF BIDDERS PROOF We divided the Proof into 3 sections; Requirements for Qualification, Qualifying Projects, and Qualifications of Bidder. These sections begin in rows 19, 25, and 26 in Exhibit 2 respectively. Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.,10901 Red Circle Drive,Suite 300,Minnetonka,MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100%employee-owned I sehinc.com I 952.912.2600 I 800.734.6757 I 888.908.8166 fax Bruce Loney, PE August 12, 2015 Page 2 Requirements for Qualification Because of the contents of cell H22 in Exhibit 2, Quam Construction (QC) is not qualified for this project. Both NWMCC and Performance Pipelining Incorporated (PPI) are qualified.While cell F24 in Exhibit 2 is not definitive for NWMCC,we know enough from information submitted by NWMCC to conclude they do meet the requirements of Paragraph 1.D. Qualifying Projects Because this section of the Proof only describes what a Qualifying Project is in section 1.2 of the Contractor Questionnaire in the Bidders Proof of Responsibility Form;we did not review this section of the Proof. Instead we will review Qualifying Projects as part of the Qualifications of Bidder section of the Proof. Qualifications of Bidder Row 43 in Exhibit 2 shows that NWMCC, QC, and PPI scored a total of 10, 0, and 42 points respectively. We consider a Bidder not qualified for this project unless they receive a total score of at least 10 points. Cell FG42 in Exhibit 2 reports that we deducted 8 points from the 18 points NWMCC scored in Section 1.0 for information they provided in Section 2.0. If the site work scored in Section 2.0 becomes necessary, NWMCC will use GM Contracting of Lake Crystal, MN (GM)to complete it. Because of corporate history with GM; deducting these 8 points does not concern us. Using our contract documents, GM is now successfully completing a trenchless raw water main pipe reconstruction project using pipe bursting method in Montevideo, Minnesota. We are confident in GM's ability to help NWMCC successfully complete this project. Based on their total score, and as in section `Requirements for Qualification', QC remains not qualified to complete this project. While PPI scored the most points of any of the 3 bidders, they also had the highest total bid amount. Based on questions received during the bid preparation process,we believe PPI's bid amount is high because it includes an estimate of liquidated damages the City would likely need to assess against them. PPI did not believe it could complete its work within the contract time allotted. Please contact me with questions and comments at 952.912.2611 or ppaskoasehinc.com. Please let us know if we can assist the City with construction phase activities. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager pjp3 Enclosure c: Rick Thomson, City of Shakopee John Rodeberg, SEH Jennifer Schumann, SEH p:\pt\s\shako\131119\6-const-contracts\award recommendation\08 12 15 rcmdtn to awrd.docx EXHIBIT 1 21. SURETY DEPOSITS-All out-of-state contractors on construction work over$100,000 will be required to file an exemption from Surety Deposit(Form SD-E) prior to their first progress payment. 22. BIDDERS PROOF OF RESPONSIBILITY-This Bidders Proof of Responsibility must be submitted in accordance Instructions to Bidders. On all contracts, bidder must submit a full and complete statement sworn to before any officer authorized to administer oaths of financial ability, equipment, experience in the work prescribed, and such other matters as the municipality may require for the protection and welfare of the public. The objective of the questionnaire is not to discourage bidding or make it difficult for qualified bidders to file bids. Neither is it intended to discourage beginning contractors. It is intended to make it possible for the Owner to have exact information on financial ability, equipment and experience involved in awarding contracts to parties unfamiliar to the Owner. Owner reserves the right to require additional information before awarding the contract in order to determine qualification for the work. The contents of this questionnaire will be considered confidential. This questionnaire is to be submitted with the Bid Form. If the Owner is not satisfied with the sufficiency of the answers to the questionnaire a financial statement may be required or they may reject the bid or require additional information. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION 1. In order to be considered acceptable,the Contractor must demonstrate,to the Owner's satisfaction, compliance with the following requirements: A. These bidding documents allow only the use of in this rehabilitation project leak-resistant structural cured-in-place lateral pipe lining (CIPPLL) products T-Liner as manufactured by LMK Enterprises, Inc., connection seal and lateral liner as manufactured by BLD Services, and Epros DrainMtH Liner as manufactured by Trelleborg, Inc. Because the City believes these products not only meet ASTM 1216 or ASTM 2561; or both ASTM 1216 and ASTM 2561; but they can also be installed using blindshot method. B. The Contractor must have at least three (3)years active experience in the commercial installation of one of these CIPPLL products. C. The Contractor must satisfy all safety, insurance, financial, and bonding requirements of the Owner. D. The Contractor must certify that the installation of the product will be done in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended procedures. QUALIFYING PROJECTS Experience requirements shall include: CONTRACTOR shall be licensed and certified by the manufacturer of the CIPLL Blindshot process and have successfully completed two qualifying projects within the last three (3)years prior to the bid opening date for the manufacturer proposed using the specific method of installation and curing proposed.* 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 4 Installation crew(s) sent to this project must be directly supervised by a dedicated FOREMAN having successfully completed two qualifying projects within the last three (3)years prior to the bid opening date for the manufacturer proposed using the specific method of installation and curing proposed. Exclusive of the foreman, installation crew(s) sent to this project must include at least 2 CREW MEMBERS who have each successfully completed two qualifying projects within the last three (3)years prior to the bid opening date for the manufacturer proposed using the specific method of installation and curing proposed. A qualifying project shall consist of: 1. The installation of at least 12 CIPPLL at least 20 feet long each using blindshot method in an established residential or commercial subdivision with minimal impacts to the property owners use of their sanitary sewer collection system, driveways, and street rights-of-ways. Upon request, the Contractor must submit a letter from the manufacturer stating that the Contractor is a licensed installer of the product, and that the manufacturer will provide on-site technical support during the entire CIPPLL blindshot liner installation portion of the project. On-site technical support shall include at a minimum; inspection, installation design, resin impregnation, installation of CIPPLL, curing, cool- down, reinstatement, and inspection and testing. *The following meet the Contactor's company experience requirements: Acquisition of a company with relevant successful experience within three (3)years prior to the bid opening date by the Bidder; a company in existence for less than three(3)years that meets the minimum experience requirements for the foreman and at least 2 crew members. QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDER As described in the Instructions to Bidders, bidders are required to submit this Bidders Proof of Responsibility form as evidence that they have practical knowledge of the particular work bid upon, and that they have the financial resources to complete the proposed work. Failure on the part of any Bidder to carry out previous contracts satisfactorily or his lack of experience or equipment necessary for the satisfactory and timely completion of this project may be deemed sufficient cause for disqualification of said Bidder. The Bidder must readily and independently document that the Bidder possesses the experience, available personnel, equipment and financial resources for a timely and professional completion of this project. The Bidder shall submit, on the forms provided, the requested information that will assist the Owner in determining whether the Bidder is adequately prepared to fulfill the Contract. Evaluation of Contractor Questionnaires is separated into two (2) sections as follows: 1.0 CIPPLL Work a. This work is defined as the lining of the lateral pipe. 2.0 Site Work (a) This work is defined as all work not related to actual lining of the lateral pipe. This includes work related to traditional street and utility construction projects including but not limited to open cut excavations, boulevard restoration, bituminous and concrete paving and traffic control within an established subdivision. If the Bidder by themselves will complete all of the work included in section 1.0 and 2.0 listed above, then the Bidder shall complete and submit only Section 1.0 of the Contractor Questionnaire. If the Bidder will use a subcontractor for either the CIPPLL work or some or all of the Site Work, then the Bidder and subcontractor shall complete and submit Sections 1.0 and 2.0 of the Contractor Questionnaire. This format of evaluation is necessary to protect the Owner from poor cooperation among potential members of the Contractor team. Poor cooperation results in unnecessary production issues that affect both property owners in the project area and the Owner. Bidders are required to submit evidence that they have practical knowledge of the particular work bid upon and that they have the financial resources to complete the proposed work. Failure on the part of 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 5 any Bidder to carry out previous contracts satisfactorily, or his lack of experience or equipment necessary for the satisfactory and timely completion of this project, may be deemed sufficient cause for disqualification of said Bidder. A Bidder will not be considered as a qualified contractor for this project unless the Bidder receives a rating of at least 10 points, as determined by the Owner, using the following system for assigning or deducting points: 1.0 CIPP Work Contracting company experience completing 2 qualifying projects within the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the 5 points satisfaction of the Owner. ➢ For each additional qualifying project completed by the Contracting company within the last 3 years prior to the 1 point each bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner Experience of the foreman assigned to this project completely supervising 2 qualifying projects within the last three years prior 5 points to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner ➢ For each additional qualifying project completely supervised by the foreman assigned to this project within 1 point each the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner Experience for at least 2 crew members assigned to this project participating in the completion of 2 qualifying projects within the 5 points last 3 years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner. ➢ For each additional qualifying project the at least 2 crew members assigned to this project participated in 1 point each completing within the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner. History of initiating change orders (not at the owner's request) Deduct 2 points that total more than 5% of the original bid within the last five for each confirmed years project History of complaints regarding completion deadlines or the Deduct 2 points quality of the work of projects within the last five years for each confirmed project 2.0 Site Work Experience in street reconstruction/utility projects entailing 0 points for three (3) or aspects of open cut excavations, installations of temporary sewer more projects bypass systems, paving operations, restoration and traffic control Deduct 2 points for each similar in scope to this project within the last three years project less than three (3) Experience of the assigned job superintendent in supervising 0 points for three (3) or street reconstruction/utility projects entailing aspects of open cut more projects excavations, installations of temporary sewer bypass systems, Deduct 2 points for each paving operations, restoration and traffic control similar in scope project less than three to this project within the last three years (3) History of initiating change orders (not at the owner's request) Deduct 2 points that total more than 5% of the original bid within the last three for each confirmed years project History of complaints regarding completion deadlines or the Deduct 2 points quality of the work of projects within the last three years for each confirmed project The Owner may give partial credit for points or deducts depending upon the nature of the projects. The object of the request for the Bidder's qualifications is to make it possible for the Owner to have exact information of the financial ability, equipment and personnel available and past performance and experience of the Bidder, in order to reduce the hazards involved in awarding a Contract to a party 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 6 apparently not qualified to perform it, and to select only those Bidders qualified to properly complete the work. The Owner reserves the right to reject any Proposal where an investigation of the available evidence or information does not satisfy the Owner that the Bidder is qualified to carry out the terms of the Contract. False information by the bidder shall also be cause for rejecting bids. The Owner's decision as to qualifications of the Bidder shall be final. The Owner has limited financial resources to commit to the project. Accordingly, the project must be accomplished with a minimum of interruption, on time and without cost overruns. The Owner believes that only a contractor with good experience in installing CIPPLL via blindshot method is necessary for a successful project. Therefore, the Owner will take into consideration the quality and experience of each Bidder. The Owner will award a contract to the Bidder whose bid price, quality and experience best conform to the overall interests of the Owner. The Owner will consider the long-term value of the Contractor's previous construction experience. The Contractor's adaptability on previous contracts and suitability to the bid the contract will be considered in determining a contract award. BEGIN BIDDERS PROOF OF RESPONSIBILITY FORM CONTRACTOR QUESTIONNAIRE 1.0 CIPPLL Work 1.1 BIDDER GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1.1. Name of Bidder: State Type of Contractor: 1.1.2. Bidder's Address: 1.1.3. When Organized: 1.1.4. Where Incorporated: 1.1.5 How many years have you been engaged in the contracting business under the present name? 1.1.6 Contracts on hand (attach a list of present contracts, including the nature of the work, a schedule as to estimated completion date, and gross amount of each contract). 1.1.7 General character of the work performed by your firm: 1.1.8. Have you ever failed to complete any work awarded to you? Yes No If yes, attach a statement explaining where and why. 1.1.9. Have you ever defaulted on a contract? Yes No If yes, attach a statement explaining where and why. 1.1.10. Attach a list of the more important contracts completed by your firm, including the kind of work and approximate cost. 1.1.11. Attach a list of the major equipment that you have available. 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 7 1.2 QUALIFYING PROJECTS 1.2.1. Qualifying Project Experience Within Last Three Years: a.) Project Name b.) Brief Description of Work c.) Number of Laterals Receiving a CIPPLL at least 20 feet long in Project Using Blindshot Method d.) Date of Contract e.) Owner f.) Owner's Representative g.) Title Phone h.) Name of General /Prime Contractor for Project i.) General Contractor's Project Superintendent Phone j.) Your Jobsite Foreman k.) Original Contract Amount(your contract only) $ I.) Final Contract Amount$ m.) If Change Orders were issued were they requested by the Contractor or Owner? (circle one) n.) Amount of the Change Orders requested by the Contractor for this project? $ o.) Original Completion Date for project p.) Actual Date that all work including any punch list items were finished q.) Contract Time Extensions Issued r.) Reason Contract was extended s.) List Complaints involving Quality of Work or Completion Deadlines: (Include above information for other qualifying projects in the last three (3)years that you want considered in evaluation in the same format provided and attach to your submittal.) 1.2.2. Credit available. Furnish written evidence, preferably from banks. 1.2.3. Submit a signed statement from the contractor's bonding company, establishing the bonding capacity for the firm. 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 8 1.3 QUALIFYING FOREMAN 1.3.1 Qualifying Foreman Experience: Name of Foreman proposed for this project List the following information regarding qualifying projects that the above named foreman managed within the last three (3)years: a.) Project Name b.) Brief Description of Project c.) Number of Laterals Receiving a CIPPLL at least 20 feet long in Project Using Blindshot Method d.) Contract Amount$ e.) Original Contract Completion Date f.) Was project completed by the above date? (yes /no, reason) g.) Owner h.) Owner Representative i.) Title Phone (Include above information for other qualifying projects in last three (3) years managed by the above foreman that you want considered in evaluation in the same format provided and attach to your submittal.) 1.4 QUALIFYING 2 CREW MEMBERS 1.4.1 Qualifying 2 Crew Members Experience: Name of Project 2 crew members proposed for this project List the following information regarding qualifying projects that the above named 2 crew members participated in completing within the last three (3) years: a.) Project Name b.) Brief Description of Project c.) Number of Laterals Receiving a CIPPLL at least 20 feet long in Project Using Blindshot Method d.) Contract Amount$ e.) Original Contract Completion Date f.) Was project completed by the above date? (yes /no, reason) 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 9 g.) Owner h.) Owner Representative i.) Title Phone (Include above information for other qualifying projects in last three (3)years completed by the above 2 crew members that you want considered in evaluation in the same format provided and attach to your submittal.) 2.0 Site Work 2.1 BIDDER GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1.1.Name of Bidder: State Type of Contractor: 2.1.2 Bidder's Address: 2.1.3 When Organized: 2.1.4 Where Incorporated: 2.1.5 How many years have you been engaged in the contracting business under the present name? 2.1.6 Contracts on hand (attach a list of present contracts, including the nature of the work, a schedule as to estimated completion date, and gross amount of each contract). 2.1.7 General character of the work performed by your firm: 2.1.8. Have you ever failed to complete any work awarded to you? Yes No If yes, attach a statement explaining where and why. 2.1.9. Have you ever defaulted on a contract? Yes No If yes, attach a statement explaining where and why. 2.1.10. Attach a list of the more important contracts completed by your firm, including the kind of work and approximate cost. 2.1.11. Attach a list of the major equipment that you have available and the hourly rates for each piece (list whether equipment prices are with or without operator). 2.2 QUALIFYING PROJECTS 2.2.1 Experience requirements shall include: The Contractor's company, project superintendent and job site foreman must all have successful construction experience on three qualifying projects within the last five years prior to the bid opening date.* A qualifying project is an urban residential reconstruction/utility project with a minimum Engineer's Estimate of$400,000. *The following meet the Contactor's company experience requirements: Acquisition of a company with relevant successful experience within five(5)years prior to the bid opening date by the Bidder; a company in existence for less than five (5)years that meets the minimum experience requirements for the project superintendent and job site foreman. 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 10 2.2.2. Qualifying Project Experience Within Last Five Years: a.) Project Name b.) Brief Description of Work(List if Project included Open Cut Excavations, Installations of Temporary Sewer Bypass Systems, Paving Operations, Restorations and Traffic Control) c.) Date of Contract d.) Owner e.) Owner's Representative f.) Title Phone g.) Name of General/Prime Contractor for Project h.) General Contractor's Project Superintendent Phone i.) Your Jobsite Foreman j.) Original Contract Amount(your contract only) $ k.) Final Contract Amount$ I.) If Change Orders were issued were they requested by the Contractor or Owner? (circle one) m.) Amount of the Change Orders requested by the Contractor for this project? $ n.) Original Completion Date for project o.) Actual Date that all work including any punch list items were finished p.) Contract Time Extensions Issued q.) Reason Contract was extended r.) List Complaints involving Quality of Work or Completion Deadlines: (Include above information for at least two (2) other qualifying projects in the last five (5)years that you want considered in evaluations in the same format provided and attach to your submittal.) 2.2.3. Credit available. Furnish written evidence, preferably from banks. 2.2.4. Submit a signed statement from the contractor's bonding company, establishing the bonding capacity for the firm. 2.3 QUALIFYING PROJECT SUPERVISOR 2.3.1 Qualifying Project Supervisor Experience: Name of Project Supervisor proposed for this project 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 11 List the following information regarding qualifying projects that the above named supervisor managed within the last five (5)years: a.) Project Name b.) Brief Description of Work(List if Supervision included Open Cut Excavations, Installations of Temporary Sewer Bypass Systems, Paving Operations, Restorations and Traffic Control) c.) Contract Amount$ d.) Original Contract Completion Date e.) Was project completed by the above date? (yes /no, reason) f.) Owner g.) Owner Representative h.) Title Phone (Include above information for at least two (2) other qualifying projects in last five (5)years managed by the above supervisor that you want considered in evaluation in the same format provided and attach to your submittal.) 2.4 COORDINATION 2.4.1 Describe the methods, communications and procedures proposed that will ensure cooperation between the CIPPLL contractor and the site work contractor to ensure that this project's required coordination results in a project that is completed on-time and within budget. Certified as true and correct this day of , 2015. (Company Name) (Authorized Signature) (Title) (Signer's Printed Name) END BIDDERS PROOF OF RESPONSIBILITY FORM Submit Bidders Proof of Responsibility with your proposal form. 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation ITB Project No.2015-4 Page 12 B I c I D I E I F I G I H I I I J K SEH EXHIBIT 2 2 CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MN 3 2015 SANITARY SEWER LATERAL PIPE REHABILITATION PROJECT 4 SCORING BIDDERS PROOF OF RESPONSIBILITY FORMS 5 CITY PROJECT NO.2014-4 6 SEH NO.SHAKO 131119 8-Date:08/12115 9 Revised Date: 10 P WTSIShekot13111915constconlractoUwam Raceme,dationl0a 1215 Bid Smdna.a idSheetl 11 12 Bidder National Water Main Cleaning Quant Construction-Willmar, Performance Pipelining Incorporated Company-Kearney,New Jersey Minnesota Ottawa,Illinois 13 14 Total Bid $606,316.00 $1,144,749.00 $1,365,070.00 15 2561 X X 16-CIPPLL Product to be installed Meets this ASTM Standard 1216 X 17 1216 and 2561 19 Name of CIPPLL Product to be Installed EPR05 DrainMtH Liner LMKT-liner LMKT-Liner 19 Requirements for Qualification 20 Paragraph No. Met(Y or N) Comment Met(Y or NI Comment Met(V or N) Comment 1.A-These bidding documents allow only the use of in this rehabilitation project leak-resistant structural cured-in-place lateral pipe lining(CIPPLLI products T-liner as manufactured by LMK See'Name of CIPPLL See'Name of CIPPLL See'Name of CIPPLL Enterprises,Inc.,connecdon seal and lateral liner as manufactured by 8l Services,and Epros y product to be Installed' Y Product to be installed' Y Product to be Installed' meetAtH Liner as manufactured by TrelleboMInc.Because the City believes these products not only above above above ASTM 1216 or ASTM 2561;or both ASTM 1216 and ASTM 2561;but they can also be installed 21 using blindshot method. 1.13-The Contractor must have at least three(3)years active experience in the commercial Installation See Qualifications of See qualifications of See Section of Y Bidders Section 1.0 CIPPLL N Bidders Section 1.0 CIPPLL V Bidders Section 1.O CIPPLL 22 of one of these CIPPLL products. Work Work Work S.C-The Contractor must satisfy all safety,insurance,financial,and bonding requiremenSee letter from Travellers See letters from Home ts of the Y and Financial References Y State Bank and Liberty Y See letters from Castle Owner. document Mutual Surety Bank and Holmes Murphy 23 1.D-The Contractor must certify that the installation of the product will be done in accordance with Strongly inferred,but not See letter dated August 6, See letter dated January the manufacturers recommended procedures. ? clearly stated In the Y 2015 Y 15,2015 24 • documents 25 Qualifying Projects(1) 26 Qualifications of Bidder 27 Section No.1.0 CIPPLL Work Points Comment Points Comment Points Comment Contracting company experience completing 2 qualifying projects within the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner. 5 0 5 28 For each additional qualifying project completed by the Contracting company within the last 3 years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner 1 0 14 29 Experience of the foreman assigned to this project completely supervisIng 2 qualifying projects within 5 0 5 the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner 30 For a project of this size, For each additional qualifying project completely supervised by the foreman assigned to this project1 0 and the first of its kind In 7 within the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of die Owner Minnesota featuring 31 blindshot method,we Experience for at least 2 crew members assigned to this project participating in the completion of 20 disagree with the qualifying projects within the last 3 years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner. 5 contents of the letter 5 32 dated August 6,2015 For each additional qualifying project the at least 2 crew members assigned to this project participated 1 0 6 33 in completing within the last three years prior to the bid opening date to the satisfaction of the Owner. History of initiating change orders(not at the owner's request)that total more than 5%of the original bid within the tart five years 0 0 0 34 History of complaints regarding completion deadlines or the quality of the work of projects within the 0 0 0 last five years 35 36 Subtotal 18 0 42 37 section No.2.0 Slte Work Points Comment Points Comment Points Comment Listed 1 project each for National Water Main projects entailingaspects ofcut excavations, Cleaning Company and Experience in street reconstruction/utility openGM Contracting because installations of temporary sewer bypass systems,paving operations,restoration and traffic control -2 National Water Main similar In scope to this project within the last three years Cleaning Company will work in partnership with GM Contracting 38 Neither National Water Experience of the assigned job superintendent in supervising street reconstruction/utility projects Main Cleaning nor GM entailing aspects of open cut excavations,installations of temporary sewer bypass systems,paving -6 Contracting included this operations,restoration and traffic control similar In scope to this project within the last three years 39 experience. History of Initiating change orders(not at the owner's request)that total more than 5%of the original 0 bid within the last three years 40 History of complaints regarding completion deadlines or the quality of the work of projects within the 0 last three years 41 42 Subtotal -8 0 0 43 Total Section No.LO and 2.0 10 0 42 44 45 Notes: (1)Because this section of the Bidders Proof of Responsibility only describes what a qualifying project is in section 1.2 of the Contractor Questionnaire In the Bidders Proof of Responsibility Form;we did 46 not review this section of the Proof.Instead we will review Qualifying Projects as part of the Qualifications of Bidder section of the Proof. Page 1of1