HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.A. Discussion on CR 101 Project
~.f1.
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council, Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Discussion on CR 101 Project
DATE: April 27, 2010
INTRODUCTION:
On April 27, 2010 the City Council has scheduled a workshop to discuss various Public Works
items. One of these items is the C.R. 101 Project, in which the Council is being asked to provide
direction on moving this project forward.
BACKGROUND:
City staff and County staff have met on March 29,2010 to discuss the C.R. 101 Project, and in
particular the attached C.R. 101 talking points, to see where the common ground or consensus
could be in moving this project forward. Staff has assembled these talking points in a way that
would involve Council discussion and direction in moving forward. Staff will make a brief
presentation on the nine talking points for consideration on the C.R. 101 project at the April 27,
2010 Workshop.
County staff will also be available at this meeting to answer any questions and provide input on
the County's position in regard to the talking points. At this current time, and from the last
presentation from the County's consultant on the project, is to move forward with a 5-lane with
no median design or a 4-lane with a median with turn lanes at certain intersections. Another
alternative being considered is to do a mill and overlay of CR 101 now and use the rest of
MNDOT tumback funds for right of way acquisition for the ultimate design of the corridor.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Discuss the various talking points associated with the C.R. 101 project and provide staff
with input and/or direction for the C.R. 101 project.
2. Table for additional information before providing any direction on this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend Alternative No. 1 ~~ ~
ruce Loney: ..
. Public Works Director
ENGR/2009-PROlECTS/CR IOJ/APRIL-27-WORKSHOP
..
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mitch Rasmussen, Scott County Highway Engineer
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director - City of Shakopee
SUBJECT: C.R. 10 1 Talking Points
DATE: April 19, 2010
The following items are for consideration with the C.R. 101
Reconstruction Project, from Spencer Street to
1. access closures as can
between the
owners.
2. standards such
a letter
3.
4. the supporting
using C.R. 101.
5. 101 upon future
previous removal of four
6. working towards a long term solution,
of the corridor area and working
Advisory Committee and the City
agree to consider a plan for relocation of the
Sommerville Street and 1 st A venue to Spencer
can be accomplished.
8. A the CR 101 corridor needs to be agreed upon between
the
9. The would work together on improving the river crossing of
C.R. 101 and other appropriate agencies.
This concludes my list of talking points for consideration and that were discussed at a
March 29,2010 joint staff meeting. ~Lo~
Public Works Director
ENGR/2010-PROlECTS/2010-COUNClllCOST-PARTICIPATION-RR-CROSSING
-.--.-- .-----...
II SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN
PARTNERSHIP
P.O. Box 6 Shakopee, MN 55379
April 16, 2010
Mayor John Schmidt and
City Council Members
City of Shakopee
129 S Holmes Street
Shakopee,~ 55379
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
County Highway 101 is a multifunctional transportation corridor serving as a gateway to local business,
residential and recreational users. It is understood that traffic will continue to gtow and there will be a
need to upgrade the current roadway. It is the Shakopee Downtown Partnership's goal to maintain or
enhance local mobility and accessibility in order to promote business activity. The following two options
are being proposed:
Alternative Approach # 1:
- 5-lane undivided roadway with private driveway removal
- Removal of up to 25 private driveways (of 41 total)
- Mid-term installation of median to mitigate safety and capacity limitations
- Mid to Long-term relocation of traffic signal at 1st Avenue Downtown to Spencer Street
- Maintains all movements into downtown
- Recognize Spencer Street as major collector
- Change would occur when necessary and traffic conditions justify
Alternative Approach # 2:
- 4-Iane divided roadway with less private driveway removal
- Median opening at Spencer Street, Market Street and Naumkeag Street
- Removal of9 private driveways (of 41 total)
- Mid to Long-term relocation of traffic signal at 1st Avenue Downtown to Spencer Street
Given the above options, the Shakopee Downtown Partnership Board respectfully supports Alternative
Approach #1 without the median. The board believes this alternative would be in the best interest ofthe
businesses located on County Highway 101 as well as the consumer who will be driving on this roadway.
Thank you for considering our position. If there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact
us at 952/846-7347.
Kind)-egards, .
-r~41~J
Ka een Klehr I
President
Shakopee Downtown Partnership
----,- --- --- ---~--- -------- -~--- --------
--- --- .------- -------------'--- - ----
LAYOUT LEGEND
~
c==J BITUMINOUS ROADWAY IDRIVEWAY ..IIi .. ~
c==J SHOULDERS (PAVED) ~ .. ~
"" '..
c==J RAISED CONC. MEDIAN, CURB & GUTTER ~ % ' <;.j,~' I
c==J CONCRETE WALK IDRIVEWAY "4i$ f 'll,
c::===:J LANDSCAPED AREA ~ -;; fi
~ff 'iiI'1>i
c==J SITE MODifiCATIONS 'If'il "'~ ~
8 TRAfFIC SIGNAL
~. EXISTING RIGHT.Of-WAY
- - - PROPOSED RIGHT.Of.WAY
- PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT
.~
c ,.
~ ~~ ~
c"!' ':toi
~ _ 1110.0; II
J It; ~~ f ~ 1;-' I==--:"~-'=~~ '_~"" 1
C ,
o
;:;
"-
o
./
U
C
o
;:;
"-
o M
./
'"
N ~
N
" '.
'" ~
./ ~ ~
U ~ ~ ~
C ..{t -.J . I dl
" ~
t3 C:'. - t;Q. _"~ ...
}, ..." .'_ ~ ct~ ffit!t' ~~ ~..1 ~
.,; . .1lIi&ll. .;a1.J.l '... :2:. . i'lb ... -
~ '. ~.~ .",'.'0: ..:,,~~ .... .. ..~~.. .~ ......
./ ~ O~ . .
if) ~ t() '" ,.
ro . A '
'" -"'.. ", . ~ i= ;;{f'
N'" ~~..~:~..~.J.......'....J!A. JI). . ..... ..'
~..-1~~- ~'~ "~Il . - ~l'
~ ,. ....ifl1,....... 1l~ :)..' . . ". .. ~.J.'
- 8' Ufl tI .. t..pO' en:, .-" ~ 1'411
-:9 u ' . ~--,v.:: ~ "'t f,;;! ~"
g ~ _GP ..... "JoAF
.D I >> _ c~ ~_,""" i::IJIf '-', ~j~ ~li:
". W '" ~ i~ ' f...... :9", ~~ p....... .... t::
... 1 ~C. " "'.. _ ." i1 _ _...l~ ........~.;...l". .'
1ft -:--- 'ft;;:"'~" t!;J'I'.lll!t .~. t' ~ -:ilr:- - Ih:- - - J ... '""~,...
'_*,\.ta "... .. ... ," -. ',_,' mJ~ _, 'Ol:l, ,,'.
n ~'j' ~.," - " . . . - - . . '.' . .. ..U .I.ON..Pk\GIEIC,aAILROAO , "
CTI L 11'''' -- ' . ~ .."" __ . """ '"'.... ~~:' _ ~ ""_ ~ ~ "" '$. __ >l'..,,- ~ _..- _ ......#. ... '"" "" t~4 '-,____~~__""',~~~,
~ 0... '" C'r .~-...'"'~_.., ~ ~ ~-~.x;;:... . \.:._ - "," .. ..~'"'! '.If ~ __.~'" ~,"",-'-~_"",,,,,
" ,... :J , ... " ,. '1 _. ~ , . I ,n . ,..... ."~i
~ ~ _-'n~....-;; .dI1 =~-~ ~,.."t?'~(_f...~U ...<<:"t....... . ~"";JL..1.i'--: .,~:.. "="fi;-~:"_- :::. .,.-.. - ~ ---J I. -=.. f' .... .~'. ,....,........,'10)
'R~ ~~{~~~~~~~""'-~'\ ~ ""!1M I~~c--, .r;=-&"w~.~4~""'_..
t.iB.=4'" ~~ . .--.. -..lI!!J!f.. .::. ..J(,' -----.u. m:71r~, ~ ~rs!l
~ 0 50 100 ~ ElC>LTC>N & I'v'1ENK. INC. mm ~ I -~. 4-Lone DIvIded Alternotlve SHEET
~ ~ 1""'--_-' CONSUL TING ENGINEERS 8. SURVEYORS ............... .... . CSAH 101 CORRIDOR STUDY ~F
15 ~ SCALE FEET MANKATO.MN FAlRMONT.MN SLEEPY EYE.MN WILLMAR.MN mn SHAKOPEE rscon
-, " BURNSVILLE. MN CHASKA. MN RAMSEY, MN AMES.IA ~ APRIL. 2010 4
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
DISCUSSION
THE DOWNTOWN AREA
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
CONSTRUCTED 1987/88
UPGRADES AND REPLACEMENTS
1998/2008
• CONSTRUCTION INCLUDED;
✓ UTILITIES
✓ STREET
STREETSCAPE
✓ LIGHTING SYSTEM
✓ PARKING LOTS
,
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSIN SS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
COMMUNITY P K I I) l '-,IN( 1 I S ; _
c OMMUrat - rY PRIDE SINCE W
*t
IL
-' per-. ,� T o !1 ,
SHAKOPEE � � � � _
CU - •
y ,• Kerr - !! i Fi ! s!!t . F !E !H
\iAiIJNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 . _ _ �, \ � ��Et `
0 WIN
dr
IG
0 10
dr
O - O x1;6
I' �O II,S'v ' a .
O p C1 o j w : i `•�
�, 1.tits �. -� _
4A I
ILI
' t4� 0 —rat J
0
too
Ir • , lR T � � f i �� l � � � r L.. *. � • 4 �
i' o R` �f� ice` �• . Y'
�', .: � ` a ;� ��
too
�0 r 1 rrt r rL y O� ! r'
v ` y yEC(7'`ID A f: ; r•
C3' F .� O y�; r T II1t t i� r
tip
t 4 0 _ f
C) 4u
AV -A . . , *
0 10
'7 Q �,, f w q Vii' ` . 1►^
. G
p
Q .
0 00
o 0. ► !
IL
0 1 -ft, V� %,.
iNlF r E �t t j -o�' t �'
'' 3` dir ! !. , f! L y
1F L O _
` \ TYPE. OF POLE COKD ION
dil-
ir ,, � i - �$ 1 ` � Q CONCRETE POLE 0 GOOD
_ s
O CORTEN POLE 0 POOR
TRAFFIC POLE VERY -POOR
� t � w :�:,. t �� �,•� F , 1 1 1 r �� �'�,. _ cx'
WOOD POLE REPLACE
•• it ,. • j eo o e0 MISSING
w 'K F' _t:� s`u )• '
P" AMA
9
. 80 APRIL 22. 2010
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
BACKGROUND
I. SYSTEM BUILT OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS
DIFFERENT PROJECTS AND TIMES.
II. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PROJECT
INSTALLED CONCRETE LIGHT POLES.
III. MINI - BYPASS PROJECT INCLUDED FIRST
AVENUE, CORTEN SELF - WEATHERING LIGHT
POLES.
IV. OVER FIFTY CONCRETE POLES HAVE BEEN
REPLACED (NINE REPLACED TWO OR MORE TIMES).
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
CURRENTLY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA
■ 241 LIGHT POLES IN THE BUSINESS DISTRICT
(169 CONCRETE / 67 CORTEN / 2 WOOD / 3 ALUMINUM)
■ FOUR TYPES OF POLES
■ FIVE DESIGNS OF LIGHTS
■ TEN HEIGHTS OF POLES
P"Jzg DOWNTOWN BUSIN SS DISTRICT P"Jzg
SHAK S
{ '[ )MN -II'NI I'1` PRIDI SINCT' 185
O?MM1 !NI I PRlDl�: S11WC'1= 18
PO S RAT D AS
CO NDITION ONE (GOOD
LIKE NEW TO SMALL CHIPS CRACKS OR LIGHT RUST.
TJ
IL
g e a r _
y•
r tom, t. { :•
r z
_ w
SHAKOPEE P",M
COMMUNITY P KI I )l '-,IN( 1 I S 4- OMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE W
PO S RAT D AS
CO NDITION TWO (P
DEEP CHIPS OR CRACKS, DENTS OR LOSS OF OUTER
SURFACE AREA.
p" f
Y
�I
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHA KOPEE
POLES RATED AS
� CONDITION THREE (VERY -POOR)
LARGE CHIPS AND /OR CRACKS MORE THAN I" DEEP ,LOSS OF
BASE AND /OR OUTER SURFACE, DEEP RUST AND /OR BENT.
�e
P"Jzg DOWNTOWN BUSIN SS DISTRICT P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE
COMMUNITYPRIDi SINN -E• 185 ( PRIDESlN0 1857
PO S RAT D AS
V/ FOUR (MUST CONDITION REPLACE)
RE -BAR UNCOVERED / DEEP CRACKING / RUSTED -OUT.
t
fi
= A
r
Y
til
P"Jzg DOWNTOWN BUSIN SS DISTRICT P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE S
{ '[ )MN -II'NI I'Y PRIDI SINCT' 185
O?MM1 !NI I PRlDl�: S11WC'1= 18
PO S RAT D AS
CO NDITION FIVE (MISSIN
BROKEN OFF, BENT OVER OR MISSING.
r
r
� y{
h
f
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
CURRENTLY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA:
• ONE (1) POLE IS MISSING (CONCRETE TALL)
• PLUS THIRTEEN (13) MUST BE REPLACED THIS
YEAR (9 CONCRETE MEDIUM, 2 TALL AND 2 CORTEN MEDIUM)
■ ALSO; THIRTY (30) WILL NEED REPLACEMENT
WITHIN ONE TO TWO YEARS
(1 CONCRETE SHORT, 18 MEDIUM, 5 TALL AND 6 CORTEN MEDIUM)
■ AN ADDITIONAL FIFTY -ONE (5 1) ARE IN POOR
CONDITION AND WILL NEED REPLACEMENT
WITHIN FIVE YEARS
(1 CONCRETE SHORT, 23 MEDIUM, 7 TALL)
PLUS
(2 CORTEN WALL - MOUNT, 2 SHORT, 16 MEDIUM)
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
CURRENTLY
■ WE HAVE EIGHT POLES IN STOCK
✓ SIX CONCRETE -TALL
✓ ONE CORTEN WALL -MOUNT
✓ ONE CORTEN MEDIUM HEIGHT (USED)
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
REPLACEMENT OF POLES COST
(2010 DOLLARS with 40OZo DISCOUNT ON POLES)
• CONCRETE POLES w /LABOR:
✓ SHORT $ 2,441.00 EACH
✓ MEDIUM $ 2,500.00 EACH
✓ TALL $ 3,340.00 EACH
• NEED OVER NEXT TWO YEARS:
X SHORT 1 $ 2,441.00
X MEDIUM 28 $ 70,000.00
X TALL 7 $ 23,380.00
X TOTAL 95,821.00
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
REPLACEMENT OF POLES COST
(2010 DOLLARS)
• CORTEN POLE w /LABOR:
✓ SHORT $ 2,220.00 EACH
✓ MEDIUM $ 2,425.00 EACH
✓ TALL $ 2,790.00 EACH
• NEED OVER NEXT TWO YEARS:
x MEDIUM 8 $ 19,400.00
x TOTAL $ 19,400.00
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
REPLACEMENT OF "HAND -HOLE BOX"
• HAND -HOLE BOX AND COVER COST w /LABOR:
✓ STANDARD BOX $ 200.00
✓ HEAVY -DUTY BOX $ 300.00
• NEED OVER NEXT TWO YEARS:
x STANDARD BOX 3 $ 600.00
x HEAVY -DUTY BOX 2 $ 600.00
x TOTAL $1,200.00
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
REPLACEMENT
ESTIMATE FOR 2010 TO 2012
• CONCRETE POLES $ 95,821.00
• CORTEN POLES $ 19,400.00
• POWER -BOX REPLACEMENT $ 1,200.00
• TOTAL $116,421.00
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
REMOVE POLES WITHOUT REPLACEMENT
ESTIMATE FOR 2010 TO 2012
REMOVE POLE INSTALL HAND -HOLE BOX
LABOR, WIRING AND BOX $ 500.00 TO $ 600.00
PER -POLE.
1 CONCRETE SHORT
27 CONCRETE MEDIUM UNDER
5 CONCRETE TALL $25
8 CORTEN MEDIUM
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
TIME TO RECONSIDER THE LIGHT SYSTEM
1. EXISTING POLES ARE DETERIORATING.
2. NEW GENERATION OF LED's ARE AVAILABLE
FOR POWER SAVINGS.
3. NEW DESIGNS WOULD REDUCE THE NUMBER
OF LIGHTS IN THE AREA.
4. CURRENT SYSTEM IS 23 YEARS OLD.
5. NEW POLES WILL HAVE A 10 TO 25 YEAR
WARRANTY.
P"Jzg DOV NTOV N BUSIN SS DISTRICT P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE S
{ '[)MN-11 ANI I'Y PRIDI SIN (T' I8
C(A�1k11!Nf I "1` P'RIDI SIiWL'1 I8
HA ARD AH AD
WE MUST LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE
NOT JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG
1111j1
11 1
11 1 11 11 1 \ \
1j 11 X1
1j1 1 11 1 1 ® t
STREET LIGHT SYSTEM a 1
i
PAVERS AND W
ALK WAY AREA
ALLEYWAY SYSTEM
STORM WATER SYSTEM
STEM
PARKING AND PARKING LOTS
TREE / TREE GATES = .—
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHA KOPEE
NEXT STEPS
�. DISCUSS DOWNTOWN VISION WITH THE
DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP.
2. RECOMMEND 2010 -2012 TO REMOVE POLES
THAT WE CAN /REPLACE WITH HAND - HOLES.
3. REQUEST DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL ON
PROCEEDING WITH A FEASIBILITY REPORT.
4. SEEK ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM FEDERAL,
STATE AND S.P.U.C. CONSERVATION FUNDS.
s. REVIEW LONG TERM FUNDING OPTIONS FOR
AREA.
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT SHAKOPEE
UESTIC)NS
CC)MMENTS
REMARKS
P"Jzg COU ROAD 10 1 PROJ CT P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE
{ '[ )MN -1I'NI I')' PRIDI SIN (T' 185
(�� ?f��1"+�11 ��6�f I'1�` �'f�ll�l�: '�11W�L'I= 18
" LIGIITING "
SHAKOPEE P",M
COMMUNITY P KI I )l '-,IN( 1 I S 4- OMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE W
"
Existing Right. of Way
Plain concrete wally
I
lTi CFw
u �
Color concrete edge
el m
d P -
l N ys
ry
Landscape buffer :r
.y a�
Landscaping and railing
by agreement r so -�l -'
1� ■
Decorative Existing Right of W ay Orrrarnental
street lighting grasses
Parking Color concrete maintenance edge 3: Tree planting
z b agreement
A
i
r
�C SAAi 101 C orrio clo r St °
Scott
and Otreescape Desi r6�b
March 3, 2011 ��
Airs.
SHAKOPEE P",M
COMMUNII -Y PK I I) i '-,IN( 1 I S ; _
c O nd :MUrat - rY P RIDE SINCE W
I E
! Voluntary Tree Planting
9 _
8ft } 4.
Plain concrete walk
— — — — — — — e 1�owerra�g perennriaTs — — - — — — — — — — — decorative street lighting — — - - - - Ornamental -Grasses
al median ends C SAH 101
Golor concrete maintenance edge
r
' Lr lrfrng at 75ft 0'.C.TYP
-
A t
y , idea
zi ri
4
E Voluntary Landscape Buffer r
at parking Lots 1
E E
Flowering perennials Tough, salt - tolerant
shrubs and grasses
at median ends through raid sections
Elevation of ,planted median -
Perennial Oft wide
planting bed
l.ft cone. 'J.Sft -low shrub
maintenance strip - °
Section Section
,�1,!��o,r 1 5tudy
Desi
? �Q ' 0
IC r Z.�
March 3, 2010 , L � ��� " - � � 0_ A
�l�f
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE COUNTY ROAD 101 PROJECT SHAKOPEE
EXISTING LIGHTS
1. TWO PER - INTERSECTION.
ii. MnDot TURN BACK FUNDS WILL REPLACE
CURRENT NUMBER OF LIGHTS.
iii. CITY WILL PAY FOR ADDITIONAL LIGHTING.
SHAKOPEE P",M
COMMUNITY PKI I )l '-,IN( 1 I S 4- OMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE W
XISTING IGHTS
_ r
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE COUNTY ROAD 101 PROJECT SHAKOPEE
STAFF HAS TWO QUESTIONS
I. LOCATION OF LIGHTS
x RECOMMEND BACK OF WALK TO FACILITATE
SNOW REMOVAL
x BETTER LONGEVITY
11. TYPE OF LIGHTS
x HIGH EFFICIENCY
x HISTORIC LOOK
x LOW MAINTENANCE
x DURABILITY
x MEET LIGHTING NEEDS
x OVERALL COST EFFECTIVE
AD Of
. e
P
owl
Ma o
- i
3 r
s
+ A 1N r
SHAKOPEE P",M
COMMUNITY P KI I )l '-,IN( 1 I S 4- OMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE W
IGHT PO S AND IGHTS
"Mel
Wow '}
dimom rrs
lob
am -
-a
oft
ri
- - or
� r' � rt� �� two -��� -
o w
sow
tot 00'
we
IN S
p
00
�
Mh go, OEM
Amon W, Or
NO r�
Sol
� !sue ICI -
_,� -
-
v�
im-
tv
- - mom "low, �
lam
-
I
X
COUNTY ROAD 10 1 PROJ CT A
SHAKOPEE SH OPEE
COMMUNITY PRII)l '-,IN( 1 IS4_ OMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE W
IGHT PO S AND IGHTS
Anchora Leads the Wa with LED
- T he Alaskan mountains are covered in white but the streets
of Anchora are turnin g reen from the Cit of Anchorage's
ener initiative. The first cit to embrace LIEID technology
on a lar scale, Anchora will replace 16,000 streetl I g Ints -
rou one- of their 150-watt HPS streetli - with
LEDwa luminaires. The installation will roll out in several phase%,
throu the winter and sprin
LEDwa luminaires consume 50 percent less ener than,
the traditional HPS lamps, savin the Cit and its citizens
approximatel $360,000 per y ear. In addition, with more than
100,000 hours of delivered lumens, no relampin replacement
or labor costs, the Cit will g ain even more savin thro nigh
si reduced maintenance costs.
"We have studied new li technolo extensivel over the pC,
several months to validate ener and maintenance cost saving,-
said Anchora Ma Mark Be "We also conducted a publi
surve that showed our residents overwhelmin apprc:)ve of the
new white LED lighting.
P"Jzg COU ROAD 10 1 PROJ CT P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE SHAKOPEE
{ '[ )MN -1I'NI I'Y PRIDI SIN (T' 185
O)MM1 !NI I PRlDl�: S11W(A = 18
IGHT PO S AND IGHTS
pr
_ I
__ _ -
P"Jzg COU ROAD 10 1 PROJ CT P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE S
COMMUNITY PRIDi SINN -E• 185 C(AIMI 'M I Y PRID SINCI 1 857
IGHT PO S AND IGHTS
48 "
- , o °- "
I�
J911
i
�^ 20' -0"
t
I
'
n
Rr
;•, 1 -
10' -f9"
`v I
I
I
Aces
WX CITY
I?anr
i
1
P"Jzg
SHAKOPEE COUNTY ROAD 101 PROJECT SHAKOPEE
UEST11ONS
CC)MMENTS
REMARKS