HomeMy WebLinkAbout15.F.4. Joint Powers Agreement with Scott Joint Prosecution
IS; F. Y.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum CONSENT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Joint Powers Agreement - Scott Joint Prosecution Association
DATE: March 13, 2003
INTRODUCTION:
The Council is asked to approve an agreement between Scott County, the Scott County
Attorney's Office, the Scott Joint Prosecution Association, and the City (as one ofthe
individual City members of the Scott Joint Prosecution Association), for the provision of
attorney services.
BACKGROUND:
In 1992, the Scott Joint Prosecution Association (SJP A) was formed by five Scott County
cities to provide for prosecution of non- felony offensives. The advantage of the SJP A to
the member cities has been that there is a greater efficiency in having one agency do
prosecution work, both in terms of cost and expertise.
In 1996, Shakopee joined as a member of the SJP A. The current seven members
comprise all incorporated cities of Scott County, with the exception of New Prague.
Since its inception in 1992, Pat Ciliberto has served as the lead and managing attorney for
the SJP A. In November 2002, Mr. Ciliberto was elected Scott County Attorney. During
his campaign, and in the time since, he indicated a desire to continue to work with the
SJP A, and in fact, recommended that the office be "mingled" with the Scott County
Attorney's Office. By doing this, there would be greater efficiencies in terms of overall
supervision, office management, and the ability to reduce the number of hires as the
caseload grows.
That idea is now being formally presented as the joint powers agreement that is attached
to this memo. The SJP A will rent space from Scott County (provided under a separate
agreement), and the overall supervision of SJP A employees will be made by the Scott
County Attorney. However, SJP A employees would remain as separate employees of the
SJP A, and the SJP A would provide its own insurance. This agreement would be in effect
for a minimum of two years; after the expiration of that two-year term, either party could
serve notice to withdraw at the end of any calendar year with 120 days prior written
notice.
DISCUSSION:
There are several advantages to the SJP A, and to the City of Shakopee, as a result ofthis
arrangement. It allows the continuation of an organization that has worked well; in
recent years the revenues seen from fines collected have fully covered the cost of
prosecution (something that Shakopee taxpayers had been subsidizing for many years
previously). By having one office manager and the lead attorney serve both the SIP A
and Scott County, an estimated $11,000 annually will be saved by the City of Shakopee
alone (this is a net savings, after factoring out the reduction in rental income that has been
realized over the past years from the rental of office space in the basement of Shakopee
City Hall to the SJP A).
More importantly, by having one attorney (either Scott County or SJP A) sitting in the
courtroom to handle both County and SJP A cases, it causes the prosecution action to
work more efficiently. In this way, the SJP A will not have to hire a fourth full time
attorney when Scott County opens its additional courtroom, anticipated later this year -
these particular cases will be tracked to assure costs are proportionally divided.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The immediate annual savings to the City of Shakopee will be $11,000 for the first full
year of operation. These savings are expected to grow as the number of cases increases -
Shakopee's share ofthe SIP A budget is proportionate to the number of cases opened.
Shakopee pays 42% of the SJP A budget as a result.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that the Joint Powers Agreement be executed.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, authorize the appropriate officials to execute
the Joint Powers Agreement for the provision of attorney services, by and between Scott
County, the SJP A, Scott County Attorney's Office, and Scott County member cities.
~~~~
Mark McNeill
City Administrator
MM:th
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the County of Scott, a municipal
corporation and political subdivision, hereinafter referred to as the "County," the Scott
County Attorney's Office, an Office within the County, hereinafter referred to as
"SCAO," the cities of Belle Plaine, Elko, Jordan, New Market, Prior Lake, Savage, and
Shakopee, municipal corporations located within Scott County, hereinafter referred to as
the "Cities," and the Scott Joint Prosecution Association, a Joint Powers Municipal
Prosecution Board, created by the Cities pursuant to a joint powers agreement dated July
8, 1991, as amended thereafter, hereinafter referred to as "SJP A," all collectively referred
to as the Parties,
WHEREAS, the SCAO has the duty, power and responsibility to prosecute felony
criminal matters, and statutorily designated gross misdemeanors and misdemeanors,
within Scott County, and all criminal matters within the townships of the County;
WHEREAS, the Cities have delegated their power and authority to prosecute
gross misdemeanors and misdemeanors, and pursue forfeiture cases, within their
jurisdictions to the SJP A;
WHEREAS, the County, the SCAO, the Cities, and the SJP A desire to enter into
this agreement for the purpose of providing for the joint exercise of their prosecutorial
powers according to the authority and procedures set forth in Minn. Stat. 99471.59 and
487.25, subd. 10; and
WHEREAS, participating in the implementation of such an agreement will
increase efficiency and accuracy and decrease duplication of services, resulting in
increased safety and substantial monetary savings for the citizens and governments of the
County and the Cities;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits that
the Cities comprising the SJP A and Scott County shall derive herefrom, Scott County, the
SCAO, the Cities, and the SJP A hereby enter into this joint powers agreement,
hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement," for the purposes herein.
1. Scope of Agreement.
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide an effective and efficient method of
criminal prosecution and statutory forfeitures through a centralized system within Scott
County, related to the public safety responsibilities of the various Parties. Implementa-
tion of the system will occur only upon the approval ofthe County, the SCAO, the Cities,
and the SJP A, and execution of a Rental Agreement by the Parties, which is set forth in
the attached Exhibit A.
1
2. Delegation and Jurisdiction ofProsecutorial Authority
The SCAO shall appoint all licensed and qualified attorneys employed by the SJP A
"Special Assistant County Attorneys," and shall authorize said attorneys to prosecute
felonies, statutorily designated gross misdemeanors and misdemeanors, and pursue
forfeiture actions occurring within Scott County, pursuant to law, and to prosecute
misdemeanor crimes occurring within the townships. The SCAO shall prepare the
required oaths of office, shall administer, and file the oaths prior to any SJP A attorney
representing the County. Said attorneys shall sign the oath of office. Appointment as a
"Special Assistant County Attorney" shall cease at any point that this Agreement
terminates for any reason.
The Cities shall delegate authority to licensed and qualified assistant county
attorneys of the SCAO to prosecute gross misdemeanors, misdemeanors, and forfeitures
within their respective municipal jurisdictions. Each city shall sign a letter delegating
such authority, which shall be kept on file with the SCAO, prior to any assistant county
attorney representing a city. Said authority for assistant county attorneys to prosecute
gross misdemeanors and misdemeanors and pursue forfeiture actions within a city's
jurisdiction shall cease upon a city's withdrawal from SIP A or this Agreement, or upon
termination ofthis Agreement for any reason.
The licensed and qualified attorneys employed by the SJP A shall follow prosecution
and forfeiture action practices and procedures as set by the Scott County Attorney. The
SCAO and the SJP A shall cooperate to maintain and improve good prosecutorial
practice and procedures.
3. Employees
The SJP A currently employs attorneys and secretarial staff and may hire additional
legal and/or support staff. Any person currently employed by SJP A, or hired by it after
execution of this Agreement, shall be and remain employees of the SJP A. Under no
circumstances shall the SJP A's employees be deemed employees of the County,
regardless of assignment of duties. The employees ofthe SJP A shall be governed by the
policies, rules and regulations set forth by the SJP A, which shall have the authority to
hire, terminate, promote, and discipline. All salary, wages, and benefits, including
liability and workers' compensation insurance, shall be provided by the SJP A.
Conversely, any persons, including attorneys, office administrator, victim/witness
coordinator, and secretarial staff, currently employed by the County in the SCAO, or
hired by it after execution of this Agreement, shall be and remain employees of the
County. Under no circumstances shall the employees of the SCAO be deemed
employees of the SJP A or the Cities, regardless of assignment of duties. The employees
of the SCAO shall be governed by the policies, rules and regulations set forth by the
County and the SCAO, which shall have the authority to hire, terminate, promote and
discipline. The County shall provide all salary, wages and benefits, including liability
and workers' compensation insurance to the employees ofthe SCAO.
2
4. Data Practices
The Parties agree to abide by the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minn.
Stat. Chap. 13, as amended, and Minn. Rules promulgated pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chap.
13. Each Party agrees to hold the other Parties, their officers, department heads and
employees harmless from any claims resulting from said Party's unlawful disclosure or
use of data protected under state and federal laws.
5. Civil Legal Matters
This Agreement shall be limited exclusively to criminal prosecutorial matters and,
with the exception of civil forfeiture matters related to criminal statutes, shall not extend
to the provision of other civil legal services or non-criminal legal advice by attorneys of
the SCAO or the SJP A to the Cities.
6. Contracting for Prosecutorial Services
The SCAO and the SIP A may from time to time need to contract with attorneys
outside of the SCAO andlor the SIP A for the provision of prosecutorial services. Said
contracting, or subcontracting shall be agreed upon by the County and the SJP A Board
and the costs shared equally. If, however, the County and the SJP A Board cannot agree
on the need for outside prosecutoriallegal services, either may independently contract
and assume responsibility for the cost of such contract legal service and said services
shall be contributed solely to the needs and be the responsibility of the contracting party.
7. mdemnification
Each Party shall be liable for its own acts to the extent provided by law and hereby
agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the others, their officers and employees
against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions, including
attorney's fees which the other, their officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur
or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any act or omission of the Party, its
agents, servants or employees, in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately
perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
8. msurance
Each Party shall provide and be liable for its own insurance. The SJP A shall maintain
public liability coverage protecting itself, its Board, officers, agents, employees, and duly
authorized volunteers against any usual and customary public liability claims in amounts
which shall, at a minimum, comply with Minn. Stat. g466.04 and Workers' Compensa-
tion rules, and shall be in accordance with state statutory requirements. m addition, the
SJP A shall provide Professional Liability msurance in the amount of $1 million covering
the SIP A employees when assigned county prosecutorial or forfeiture duties. msurance
certificates evidencing that the above insurance is in force with companies acceptable to
the County, and in the amounts required, shall be submitted to the County for approval
3
prior to the execution of the Agreement, after which they shall be filed with the County.
Said policies shall be maintained in effect during the entire term ofthis Agreement.
9. Severability
The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. A finding that any part
of this Agreement is void, invalid, or unenforceable shall not affect the enforceability and
validity of the remainder ofthis Agreement unless the part or parts which are void,
invalid or unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire agreement with
respect to any Party.
10. Duration of Agreement
The term of this Agreement shall commence on March 1,2003, the date of signature
by the Parties notwithstanding, and shall continue in effect thereafter for two (2) years.
No Party to this Agreement may withdraw its participation prior to the expiration of the
initial two (2) year term without good cause presented in writing. This Agreement shall
be automatically renewed for annual terms after the initial two-year term and shall be
valid for the next calendar year, unless withdrawal occurs as set forth below.
11. Withdrawal from Agreement
Following expiration of the two-year term described in section 10 above, any Party
may withdraw at the end of any calendar year upon one hundred twenty (120) days prior
written notice to all other Parties, or at any time with the express written approval of all
other Parties hereto. Withdrawal shall not act to discharge any liability incurred or
chargeable to the withdrawing Party before the effective date of the withdrawal. Such
liability shall continue until discharged by law or agreement.
This Agreement shall terminate upon the withdrawal of the County, the SCAO, or
four (4) or more member Cities from the SIP A. In the event this Agreement is
terminated, all records stored by the County and the SCAO pertaining to the SIP A and
the Cities shall be returned to those Parties.
12. Amendment of Agreement
This Agreement may be amended upon agreement ofthe Parties, authorized and
signed in same manner as this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
as ofthis 1st day of March, 2003.
COUNTY OF SCOTT
APPROVED:
4
Jon Ulrich, Chair, Scott County Pat Ciliberto
Board of Commissioners Scott County Attorney
Date: ,2003 Date: , 2003
Date: , 2003
David J. Unmacht
Scott County Administrator
SCOTT JOINT PROSECUTION ASSOCIATION
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Luayn Murphy
Chair, Scott Joint Prosecution Board
CITY OF BELLE PLAINE
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Maynard Harms
Mayor, City of Belle Plaine Approved as to form:
Luayn Murphy Steve Bubul
Belle Plaine City Administrator Belle Plaine City Attorney
Date: , 2003 Date: ,2003
CITY OF ELKO
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Carolyn Miller
Mayor, City of Elko Approved as to form:
5
Patricia Nutt Andrea Poehler
Elko Clerk/Treasurer Elko City Attorney
Dated: ,2003 Date: , 2003
CITY OF JORDAN
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Ron Jabs
Mayor, City of Jordan Approved as to form:
Todd Bodem Annette Margarite
Jordan City Administrator Jordan City Attorney
Date: ,2003 Date: ,2003
CITY OF NEW MARKET
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Jim Friedges
Mayor, City of New Market Approved as to form:
Jan Seykora Andrea Poehler
New Market Clerk/Treasurer New Market City Attorney
Date: ,2003 Date: ,2003
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Jack G. Haugen
Mayor, City of Prior Lake
6
Approved as to form:
Frank Boyles Suesan Pace
Prior Lake City Manager Prior Lake City Attorney
Date: ,2003 Date: ,2003
CITY OF SA V AGE
APPROVED:
Date: ,2003
Tom Brennan
Mayor, City of Savage Approved as to form:
Barry Stock David Keller
Savage Acting City Administrator Savage City Attorney
Date: ,2003 Date: ,2003
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
APPROVED:
By Date: ,2003
William P. Mars
Mayor, City of Shakopee Approved as to form:
Mark MeN eil James J. Thomson
Shakopee City Administrator Shakopee City Attorney
Date: ,2003 Date: ,2003
7