HomeMy WebLinkAbout15.D.1. Animal Regulations-Ord. No. 660
15:0./,
City of Shakopee
Police Department
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: John Flynn, Sergeant~ ~
Jaclyn Yzennans, Community Service Office
Subject: Ordinance No. 660 Animal Regulations
Date: April 1 st, 2003
INTRODUCTION:
Council is asked to adopt Ordinance No. 660, amending section 10.21 of the City
Code pertaining to animal regulation.
BACKGROUND:
In November of2002, a situation arose where a pit bull was loose and off of the
homeowners property. The pit bull went onto the neighbor's property and bit the
neighbor's dog. After this situation was reported, the police department found
that this was not the first time this dog had bitten. There were previous citations
and incidents on record. Inquiry revealed the same pit bull had also bitten an
elderly male who never reported the incident. The dog owners were charged with
several violations, and they plead guilty.
However, the dog could not be deemed a "dangerous" or "potentially dangerous
dog" based upon our current City Ordinance. Attorney Lisa Skoog, with Scott
Joint Prosecution Association, recommended that the ordinance be updated and
more in depth about addressing similar situations in the future. The City
Attorney, Kennedy and Graven, drafted Ordinance No. 660 to meet this need.
Future cases would be easier to prosecute with a more in depth, definitive
ordinance for owning and/or harboring an animal deemed "potentially dangerous"
or "dangerous" by the City of Shakopee. The ordinance amendment would
impact the safety of Shakopee citizens, creating a safer community and knowledge
of where these "dangerous" or ''potentially dangerous dogs" are located.
The complainants from the incident back in November of 2002 support the
proposed ordinance change. They may also attend the council meeting and testify
on be half of the changes.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Any fees for registering, posting signage, impounding, or micro chipping an
animal would be covered by the owner of the animal or person(s) harboring the
animal.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt Ordinance No. 660.
2. Do not adopt Ordinance No. 660.
3. Table and provide direction to staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommend alternative #1, adopt Ordinance No. 660.
ACTION REQUESTED
If the Council concurs, they should, by motion, adopt Ordinance No. 660,
amending section 10.21 of the City Code pertaining to animal regulation.
ORDINANCE NO. 660 , FOURTH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.21 OF THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO ANIMAL REGULATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 10.21, Subd.1, Paragraph C is amended to read as follows:
C. "Under restraint" means on the premises of the owner, or on a leash and under a
responsible person's control and obedience. The leash shall be a restraint or a line,
belt, cord or chain, not more than ten (10) feet in length for leading or restraining a
dog, securely fastened around the neck or collar of said dog. In the case of a
potentially dangerous or viciol.ls animal dangerous dog, the leash shall be no longer
than four (4) feet in length.
SECTION 2. Section 10.21, Subd.1 is amended by adding the following paragraphs:
D. "Dangerous Do\!" means any dog that has:
a. without provocation. inflicted sub,stantial bodily harm on a human being on
public or private property:
b. killed a domestic animal without provocation while offthe owner's property; or
c. been found to be potentially dangerous. and after the owner has notice that the
dog is potentially dangerous. the dog aggressively bites. attacks. or endangers
the safety of humans or domestic animals.
E. "Potentially Dangerous Dog" means any dog that:
a. when unprovoked. inflicts bites on a human or domestic animal on public or
private property;
b. when lmprovoked. chases or approaches a person. including a person on a
bicycle. upon the streets. sidewalks, or any public or private property. other than
the dog owner's property. in an apparent attitude of attack; or
c. has a known propensity. tendency. or disposition to attack un~rovoked. causing
injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals.
F. "Proper Enclosure" means securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and
locked pen or stmcture suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and providing
protection from the elements for the dog. A proper enclosure does not include a porch.
patio or any part of a house. garage. or other stmcture that would allow the dog to exit
of its own volition. or any house or structure in which windows are open or in which
door or window screens are the only obstacles that prevent the do~ from exiting.
G. "Substantial bodily harm" has the meaning given it under Milmesota Statutes section
609.02. subdivision 7a.
.
H. "Great bodily harm" has the meaning given it under Minnesota Statutes section
609.02, subdivision 8.
SECTION 3. Section 10.21 is amended by adding the following Subdivision:
Subd.18. Dangerous Dogs.
A. It is unlawful for any person to possess, own, or keep a potentially
dangerous dog or dangerous dog within the City limits, except as provided
in this Section. The provisions of this Section do not apply to dogs used by
law enforcement officials for police work.
B. The City may designate any dog as a potentially dangerous dog, or a
dangerous dog upon determining that the dog meets the applicable
definitional criteria as stated in Subd.l. The City shall cause the owner of
the dog to be notified in writing that such dog is designated as potentially
dangerous, or dangerous.
C. lf the City designates a dog as a potentially dangerous dog, or a dangerous
dog, the owner shall maintain posting on the owner's property warning
that there is a dangerous dog on the premises. The posting shall be in a
conspicuous location in plain sight on the property and be in a fonn
authorized by the City.
D. No person may own a potentially dangerous dog, or a dangerous dog
unless the dog is registered and has microchip identification as provided in
Milmesota Statutes, Section 347.51. 347.515 and 347.52.
E. Any potentially dangerous dog, or dangerous dog must be kept in a proper
enclosure while on the owner's property. If the dog is outside the proper
enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain
or leash not longer than 4 feet in length and be and under the physical
restraint of a responsible person.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and
publication.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Milmesota
held the _ day of ,2003.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PAC-227565v2 2
SH155-23