The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. Growth Projections for the City of Shakopee #-Co CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council ISD 720 Board Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Growth Projections for the City of Shakopee MEETING DATE: June 4, 2003 INTRODUCTION: In 2002, the Shakopee City Council adopted an update to its Comprehensive Plan that had been under review since 1998. Attached to this report are the population, household, employment, housing mix and density projections that were agreed to with the Metropolitan CounciL The City is going through a very public process to develop an update to the Comprehensive Plan. Because that update will likely address the annexation of land from Jackson Township in the future, these projections will need to be reviewed and revised. R. Michael Leek Community Development Director C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\ISD720COUNCIL06042003.doc 8,500 .Existin osed.Flan 66% 65% 34% 35% 3.0 units/acre Same 8.0 units/acre Same C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\ISD720COUNCIL06042~03.doc Prepared May 2001 By R. Michael Leek Existin Qsed PI~m Housin Mix . Single-family 66% 65% . Multiple-family 34% 35% Densit . Single-family 3.0 units/acre Same . Multiple-family 8.0 units/acre Same SAFE SCHOOLS INTERAGENCY TEAM The mission of the Safe Schools Interagency Team is to collaborate efforts and resources to ensure a safe community that is conducive to the success of our children. A team of 11 people from Shakopee and Scott County area attended a one-week safe schools interagency planning program. The representatives included: Sue Broholm, Director of Special Services Bob Forberg, Sergeant Shakopee Area Catholic Schools Shakopee Police Department Steve Brown, Supervisor Dan Hughes, Chief Scott County Social Services Shakopee Police Department Judith Brumfield, Assistant Director John McBroom, Superintendent Scott County Human Services Shakopee Schools Pat Ciliberto, Prosecutor Therese McCoy, Director Scott Joint Prosecution Association Scott County Court Services Tracy Coenen, Assistant to the City Jan Vohnutka, Deputy Administrator Administrator Scott County Court Administration City of Shakopee Ruby Dasgupta, Assistant County Attorney Scott County Attorney's Office Goals of the planning program include: . Promoting Community and School collaboration that supports comprehensive, pro-active partnerships among public and private entities, schools, and the community. . Increase the capacity of community leaders, organizations, and schools to use information to make more informed decisions regarding children, youth, and families, particularly as they relate to school safety. . Help community leaders develop and action plan centered on specific goals and objectives related to safe schools. . Help communities refocus existing community resources to better serve children, youth and families in the community and schools. Current goals identified of the Interagency Team: . Develop a mission statement (August 2002). . Develop strategies for information sharing across agency lines. County Attorney will play key role in identifying legal issues. . Identify other team members to bring to the table. . Present safe school information to stakeholders and boards of the respective agencies involved. , - Debt Service Tax Information Pay 97 Pay 98 Pay 99 Pay 00 Pay 01 Pay 02 Pay 03 Tax Rate Value 13,197,484 13,528,668 15,122,559 17,680,669 22,778,960 20,214,536 23,239,850 Adjusted Levy 608,008 2,662,167 2,593,530 3,080,128 3,162,030 4,615,016 4,676,090 Debt Rate 4.607% 19.678% 17.150% 17.421 % 13.881% 22.830% 20.121% Constant Home Value of $150,000 Home of $150,000 Debt Service tax $ 98 $ 421 $ 347 $ 345 $ 275 $ 342 $ 302 Change from prior year $ 322 $ (73) $ (2) $ (70) $ 67 $ (41 ) District Predicted Increase $ 359 $ 125 Home Value Adjusted for Inflation Value adjusted for inflation 150,000 165,000 179,025 194,242 210,753 231,828 Debt Service Tax $ 98 $ 421 $ 391 $ 429 $ 376 $ 481 $ 466 Change from prior year $ 322 $ (30) $ 38 $ (52) $ 105 $ (15) District Predicted Increase $ 359 $ 192 County Rate of Market Value Change 1.100 1.085 1.085 1.085 1.100 P:\Referendum INFO\debt service since 97.xls] Sheet1 6/4/2003 1 :02 PM < ", Debt Service - $150,000 Home Constant Value $600 $550 $500 457 $450 . - " $421 400 $400 . ... . , I ... $350 , , ~347 1- - Debt Service Tax I I - - - -,$345 ,.., ~342 ... ~ "" I , ~ ,/ .. "" ~'=lfV $300 I ,/ ....-- ,~ $275 , $250 I , $200 , I I $150 I I , $100 1$ 98 I Pay 97 Pay 98 Pay 99 Pay 00 Pay 01 Pay 02 Pay 03 P:\Referendum INFO\debt service since 97.xls No Increase 6/4/2003 1 :01 PM ~ ,.- Debt Service - $150,000 Home Market Value increases since 1998 $600 $550 . 568 Proposed $500 $481 457 Proposed 466 $450 . $400 $350 1- Debt Service Tax I $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 Pay 97 Pay 98 Pay 99 Pay 00 Pay 01 Pay 02 Pay 03 P:\Referendum INFO\debt service since 97.xls Inflation Increase 6/4/2003 1 :01 PM