The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15.C.1. Ordering Improvement for Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement Project 2003-6-Res. No. 5903 JSC./, CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Consider Preparation of Final Plans for Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement DATE: June 17,2003 INTRODUCTION: This agenda item is for City Council to consider ordering plans and specifications to be prepared for storm sewer replacement in the Pheasant Run Subdivision. BACKGROUND: Pheasant Run Subdivision have been completed and nearly fully developed. This subdivision has 160 acres of drainage in the subdivisions and an additional 160 acres of drainage flowing through the Pheasant Run ponds from the Dominion Hills area. During the summer of 2002, staff had received inquiries as to the height of the pond levels on ponds near Mathias Road and Quail Drive. Upon field investigation and review of drainage calculations, staff authorized WSB & Associates to review the drainage systems in this area by modeling the storm water areas to the 100 year, 10 day snow melt event and the 100 year, 24 hour rainfall event. Also, WSB & Associates did surveying work on the stormwater system in this area for elevations and low building elevations of property. The result of the stormwater analysis in this area, which is attached, indicates that the existing storm sewer outlets from the pond south of Mathias Road to the pond north of Mathias Road and south of Quail Drive and the outlet from the pond to Quail Drive needs to be enlarged to provide the proper safety separation from pond high water level (HWL) to property for the 100 year, 10 day snow melt event. In this analysis it was found that the drainage area that was anticipated to flow to the west and to Beta Seed parcel could not be directed that way but must run into the Pheasant Run development as it currently did before development. Also, the developer's engineer did make a wrong assumption on the pipe size on the pond south of Quail Drive to the storm sewer system north of Quail Drive. Staff has done a preliminary design and cost estimate in replacing the stonn sewer system, from the pond south of Mathias Road to the pond north of Mathias Road and the outlet to Quail Drive. Attached for the City Council's review with this item are the following: 1. Pheasant Run storm water system analysis report from WSB & Associates 2. Preliminary plans on storm sewer replacement for Pheasant Run ponds 1 and 2 3. Preliminary cost estimates for the replacement work and restoration work 4. Letter from Pheasant Run of Shakopee, Inc. to participate up to $35,000.00 for the replacement work. 5. Calculation for storm sewer oversizing of existing pipe, if done with the development 6. Letter sent to property owners affected by storm sewer replacement 7. Watershed map of drainage areas It is estimated that the cost to replace the storm sewer and to restore the area that is disturbed would be $127,000.00. It has been determined that the developer's participation would be $35,000.00 and the developer has agreed to pay the City. The remaining funds for the replacement project would be from the Storm Drainage Fund, as this is a storm sewer replacement/repair project. The City does include an annual project in the Capital Improvement Program for storm sewer work of $125,000.00 per year for storm sewer modifications and repairs to the system, as necessary. It should be noted that the drainage area south of Valley View Road, if directed to the west towards C.R. 79 and T.H. 169, would increase that trunk system. The length of the trunk system from T.H. 169 to Valley View Road is approximately 8,000 lineal feet and the cost to the trunk system could exceed $80,000.00, which is the cost to the City's Storm Drainage Fund for the storm sewer replacement. The main costs for the storm sewer replacement is associated with restoration of property which has retaining walls, landscaping and street repair. Typically, the City would do work within our easement but would be required to restore the property after the work is done. Staffwould like City Council to consider ordering final plans for this project and staff would be able to prepare final plans and bring this back to the July 1, 2003 City Council meeting. It is staff s intent, if Council approves, to replace the storm sewer in the fall ofthis year and restore the property in the 2003 construction season. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 5903, A Resolution Ordering the Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement, Project No. 2003-6. 2. Deny Resolution No. 5903. 3. Table for additional information. 4. Authorize the City Attorney to prepare a reimbursement agreement with Pheasant Run of Shakopee, Inc. for the reimbursement associated with the Pheasant Run storm sewer replacement and authorize the appropriate city officials to sign the agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 and No.4, in order for staff to proceed with final plans with this project and to bring these plans back for City Council to approve. Staff would then advertise for bids and construct the project in the 2003 construction season. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Offer Resolution No. 5903, A Resolution Ordering the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement, Project No. 2003-6, and move its adoption. 2. Authorize the City Attorney to prepare a reimbursement agreement with Pheasant Run of Shakopee, Inc. for the reimbursement associated with the Pheasant Run storm sewer replacement and authorize the appropriate city officials to sign the agreement. ~ob Public Works Director BUpmp MEM5903 RESOLUTION NO. 5903 A Resolution Receiving A Report Ordering An Improvement And Preparation Of Plans & Specifications For The Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement Project No. 2003-6 WHEREAS, the Council has considered the improvements of said Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement, in accordance with the report by staff on June 17, 2003, at an estimated total cost ofthe improvements of$127,031.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. That the improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and is ordered as hereinafter described: Pheasant Run storm sewer replacement, from Quail Drive to Mathias Road 2. Bruce Loney, Public Works Director, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements. 3. The work of this project is hereby designated as part of the 2003-6 Public Improvement Program. 4. The City Council shall let the contract for all or part of the improvements, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 429.041, no later than three years from the date of adoption of this resolution. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of ,2003. Mayor of the City of Shako pee ATTEST: City Clerk . WSB & Associates, Inc, September 20, 2002 Mr. Bruce Loney, P.E. Public Works Director City of Shakopee .-'.- 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379-1328 2 q , .'. ",U', -' ;;~v ( Re: Pheasant Run Development Ponds 1 & 2 Storm Water System Analysis Shakopee,MN WSB Project No. 1281-33 Dear Bruce: We have completed our review of Pheasant Run Ponds 1 & 2, This review included an additional 160 acres of drainage area located south of Valley View Road from subwatersheds MPG 1- A through MPG 1- E being directed through the Pheasant Run ponds. This drainage area was previously anticipated to flow west in the City's Comprehensive Stonn Water Management Plan, but has been directed into the Pheasant Run Development. The existing outlets from Ponds 1 & 2 consist of 15" RCP outlets. The low-building elevations adjacent to Ponds 1 & 2 were anticipated to be at 834,2 and 833.8 respectively. The low building elevations and the elevation of the emergency overflows from these ponds are based on the Pheasant Run grading plan dated February 5, 1998, these elevations should be verified. Under existing conditions, the anticipated high-water levels are: tOO-Year, to-Day Runoff Event tOO-Year, 24-Hour Event Pond 1 HWL- 833.6 Pond 1 HWL - 832.5 . Discharge - 26.9 cfs . Discharge - 6.8 cfs . Freeboard - 0.6 feet . Freeboard - 1.7 feet Pond 2 HWL - 832.6 Pond 2 HWL - 828.3 . Discharge - 25.2 cfs . Discharge - 7.4 cfs . Freeboard - 0.2 feet . Freeboard - 1.5 feet Two alternatives have been evaluated to reduce the anticipated 100- year high-water levels in Ponds 1 & 2, These alternatives limit the discharge rate from Pond 2 to 25 cfs, This reduces the potential for any flooding downstream ofthe Pheasant Run Development. The following outlines each alternative, 4150 Olson Alternative t Memorial Highway Suite 300 This alternative anticipates the following modifications to Pond 1 & 2 outlets within the Pheasant Run Development: Minneapolis Minnesota . Replace the existing IS-inch RCP outlet from Pond 1 with a 27-inch RCP 55422 which flows to Pond 2, 763.541-4800 763.541.1700 FAX Minneapolis' 51. Cloud, Equal Opportunity Employer Bruce Loney, P .E. City of Shakopee September 20, 2002 Page 2 . Lower the normal water elevations of Pond Ifrom 826.7 to 825.0 to increase the available live pool storage. . Replace the IS-inch RCP outlet from Pond 2 with a 24-inch RCP from CB manhole 8 to CB manhole 4 located on the north side of Quail Drive. . Lower the normal water elevation of Pond 2 from 825.5 to 824.5 to increase the available live pool storage, Constructing this alternative anticipates the following performance of Ponds 1 & 2: 100~Year, lO-DayRunoffEvent IOO-Year, 24-Ho~tEvent Pond 1 HWL- 831.4 Pond 1 HWL - 830.3 . Discharge - 22.5 cfs . Discharge - 19.7 cfs . Freeboard - 2.8 feet . Freeboard - 3.9 feet Pond 2 HWL - 829.0 Pond 2 HWL - 828.4 . Discharge - 23.5 cfs . Discharge - 20.7 cfs . Freeboard - 4.8 feet . Freeboard - 5.4 feet Alternative 2 This alternative anticipates the following changes to Pond 1 & 2 outlets: . Maintain the existing normal water elevations for Pond 1 & 2 at 826.7 and 825.5 as indicated in the construction plans. . Increase the outlet pipes from Ponds 1 & 2 similar to Alternative 1. Increasing the Pond 1 outlet to a 27-inch RCP and the Pond 2 outlet to a 24-inch RCP from CBMH 8 to CBMH 4, Constructing this alternative anticipates the following performance of ponds 1 & 2: IOO-Year, IO-Day Runoff Event IOO-Year, 24-Hour Event Pond 1 HWL - 831.8 Pond 1 HWL - 830.9 . Discharge - 22,5 cfs . Discharge - 21,6 cfs . Freeboard - 2.4 feet . Freeboard - 3.3 feet Pond 2 HWL - 829.4 Pond 2 HWL - 828.8 . Discharge - 23.5 cfs . Discharge - 22,1 cfs . Freeboard - 4.3 feet . Freeboard - 5.0 feet The critical event for Pheasant Run Ponds 1 and 2 under both alternatives is the laO-year, 1 a-day runoff event. The freeboard anticipated for Alternative 1 is 2.8' and 4,3' for Pond 1 and 2 respectively. The freeboard anticipated for Alternative 2 is 2.4' for Pond 1 and 4.3' for Pond 2. F:\ WPWIN\1281-33\090502 bl.doc Bruce Loney, P .E. City of Shakopee September 20, 2002 Page 3 Neither alternative provides three feet of freeboard between the low-building elevation and the IOO-year high-water level adjacent to Pond 1. Implementation of Alternative 1 would require the lowering of normal water elevations in both Ponds 1 & 2. The lowering of normal water elevation would change the elevation at which the I 0: I bench should be set in each pond, and would require additional grading and restoration work around each pond to meet the expectation of the adjacent homeowners. Alternative 2 provides slightly less freeboard protection than Alternative 1, but would not require alteration of the normal water elevations of Pond I or 2 and could be constructed with a minimum of disturbance to the existing homeowners, Both altematives provide 100- year flood protection to each ofthe adjacent properties with more than two feet of freeboard. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (763) 287-7182. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Illc. /-4/ /?f!- {l~ V~f Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Ted Witkowski Associate Engineering Specialist cc: Peter Willenberg, WSB & Associates, Inc, sm F:\ WPW!N\128! -33\090502 bl.doc 0 0 f-o "" 4J oj 4. 0 e ------:3 Q u "-------' :0; a a " '" ~ '" 1"'). ~ W :~ ~ ... f-o a v ~ '" - - '" ~ "::_,<t: ~. ~ :. ~t- 0.. <:> ~...~ ~ *~~ un ~"~~' liT~ ~ ~~~ ?J.~~ U6~~ ~~tl:; ~ 3;U ~ ,0,,:1 ~ g~~5 :~f~~'~ '" '" ::~:~-~ " ~~4~ q 61~~ " ill ~J~-~ ~ -v c ~< 0 ~b ~ -'fLJ W:l. ~ g.~. ~. - c:l..~ =~" ~.~ oW=- ~o ~..~ ~ :..~. Jr' ~fLJ -0 ~ f~~ ,~ '<:SJ ' ~'0~U ,l! . I.!! ~ i ... ~ i ri! ~ 9:\11 . ::l ~~J -' [;: .. - -- --- .-- -- -----_.~~~_.~-._~ r PLAN SYMBOLS I ~~A~~~':;NE =::= PHEASANT RUN STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT TOWNSHIP OR RANGE LINE - - ~~~~~~L~~NEE =-=--= C1 TY PROJECT NO. 2003- 6 GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS SIXTEENTH LINE - - - - THE 2000 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE - - - SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION". ~~~~~N~~~H~~OF-WAY - - ~E_ _ S TOR M SE WE R R E P LA C E MEN T & AP PUR TE NAN T WOR K USE SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERMAIN CONTROL OF ACCESS LINE -.- PROPERTY LINES (EXCEPT LAND LINES) VACATED PLATTED PROPERTY ------ CORPORATE OR CITY LIMITS \ll.lll..\ll.U..\..U- TRUNK HIGHWAY CENTER LINE ~ P1 ~ RETAINING WALL ---y-y----y-y RAILROAO RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY - - -- RIVER OR CREEK - NAME. ~ DRY RUN ~ Ef~'~ ~~~~~: L-'j1tJl;rr~~f~ll~I!Ii~r~~'~~ ,~c, \\.-0 ! BARBED WIRE FENCE -x-x- /9,.. &,._...__.,.-/''?}~i@~~(~' ,uji ~II 31[ U u=,.,-,)9. ~Y\lf, ~:::_'_._..m..1?!~m I\V~.._..._ _ INDEX ~~~I~ L:~EF~~~~E ~: c::= 15r~~~~]lt~( -":>r~ 7~~-;;ik~)f . ~~A:"~~".,~!;;c~!::"'t"'''IJ, ~. r mm_m ~,~.....:~,] RAILROAD SNOW FENCE - - - ~i1 wiE' d' ~,l::Aflk:SPUl/ 1('012," \;;;: ~r;:'''"'-' 5 \:\~i~ ".....-,CA fj''''',.... II 'sttRETARIAT ~~~~~ WALL OR FENCE ~ /< /2L~~~!~t~~?'~:~.~rr~~ 1':~ 2, J1'f' ~ ,~~~~~~ :5::G~~~!~lr:~~~:::::])~>~r~;;1!(~f~~~1R -</l~v" DR DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. RAILROAD CROSSING SIGN 'l' ~..g..((, I MINT . _.. 15, "''-''::.::::-,,--:.,.~ . W"lL.....~.~..5'....I'. >-. .1, 4... .".'. .'..'. ~ ~ UJi! W"...m........U "-,C' ....-::.> ~ , TITLE SHEET ~~L;T~~~ ~:~~,~~GS,~~LL ~ {<J[::~".v;;..~~ =if~~;~. ..--":A~/;G:3J~;5f7~ ~1[..2~J,i~lt':~1):5~.~:c:~~o~~c~r~~;;:~;C6~:.:::.};::::::/ x.2Y 2 TYPICALS SHEET CROSSING GATE - ,)iii~:'~ ...... !f~'-I~O )....'<:;.\C;~...~ ..:':'4. //'() U"" I VleRUNG ........0::::.- :.:.1:.-......... 3 STORM SEWER - MATHIAS DR MEANDER CORNER . ............/;:..(.] o!:; ~ (/)y::::;.~'l-o~/ SAgi 0- ~[ ~ 4 STORM SEWER - QUAIL DR SPRINGS 0- --C€.> V[-_......-..... \) Z i ~ iti; j j ~ 1 ~ w L...-;-:,.") Jlf"-"-'"1 VJ MARSH -. Ii * . .. . FOXGLOVE .\~ W l;. \:. ~JlJ(AC CT -=:>L--::l L TIMBER ORCHARD} ~ THIS PLAN CONTAINS 4 SHEETS BRUSH ~ NURSERY CATCH BASIN . C8 '-......, FIRE HYDRANT .... 0 J CATTLE GUARD - r~-f- OVERPASS (HIGHWAY OVER) * UNDERPASS (HIGHWAY UNDER) ~ ~~ ----;;;-w- 03 BRIOGE ).~~ "~ 'I' ==----->. ,T." f........m....m..............m..'a:~ "" !l8TH AvE. " BUILDING (ONE STORY FRAME) : NE~..J>RT ~r H' %RT~~CH TR~~~. U;;i:ii1L 01 \::::::-.::..~:r::::. F - FRAME C - CONCRETE 11-s-FI~ ~ (mIVE ~}}......~~:f6~~~ (fo'l.)QUAIL CT. ~[l ,..~~ S - STONE T - TILE 75 ~ ~\l RO. IC f:i;'RANCIS '\.\ \\':- ~[[ I~ ~ 8 - BRICK ST- STUCCO 8 r-~\\ UL~~SL_ ~~\ ~ ~11'~ <?p IRON ROD OR PIPE. :z~! l ..........Si:...FRANCis :, "'j r...AVE:......~J..xf - f fu! j \\~ . MONUMENT (STONE, CONCRETE, OR METAL) 0 MONU. lii!': (l'ROVEA;i~ .....,J I ~II J;Q WOODEN Hue. H j \ G L D....;);::: ..-.:---.....~ HI: ST I~ 4C1t/il GRAVEL PIT @ ~ J,~Qm;R.~......, /;<'f'S ~'..P:fBl.JSH ST j l ~~~ -l :. .. - aFf. SAND PIT @ %:__,;,~~~~~N N I r"T:;;)~"'\ s. :r ..,~:~",.:.....,...: .......:::--i\. \\ i':":,J27 ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL BE COMPLIED BORROW PIT@if!!II::.lz (( /;;:::::::~~!!IE::.:., '".'o.'!t<, i! ,~"':.) \\ l\o . r, WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. ROCK QUARRY @ II 126th (;::..., .HIL~QOO OR. ...J 1~ l' fr CHESTER:'; /~ )j {i 24. \\ i.n:: \i ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, INCLUDING UTI L1TY SYM BOLS FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS, JANUARY 1998 POWER POLE LINE ~ I / ...- TELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH POLE LINE . . _..... JOINT TELEPHONE AND PowER ON POWER POLE ~ ON TELEPHONE POLES @ @ ANCHOR c-- STREET LIGHT '" ....-...... DESIGN ENGINEER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER PEDESTAL (TELEPHONE CABLE TERMINAL) I8l PED. .. . . c ~_ _ _ ~i MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER GAS MAIN -G- UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. WATER MAIN -1-1- CONDUIT ~ ) f TELEPHONE CABLE IN CONDUIT ~ T= \( AB8EY POINT 0 ~<>~>"'~~7; SCOTT A SMITH ELECTRIC CABLE IN CONDUIT ~rnE= :::"'FAIRHAVE~~ .~-....,""<r \\?'- ..-"Nt.E~.... DATE 'REG NO 40915 TELEPHONE MANHOLE ^""':-..... ......-:.::.::li.....~l~......", "Z.,.... . ..,.' ....]!..... "'l::Ji"~j' . . ELECTRIC MANHOLE CO <=:;. (' ............~".........- <.! l..l1 \...J BURIED TELEPHONE CABLE - T - BURIED ELECTRIC CABLE - E- AERIAL TELEPHONE CABLE ..... T -AE ~ SEWER (SANITARY OR STORM) ->-> PROJECT LOCATION SEWER MANHOLE ->~> SCALES INDEX MAP "'=1000' r".... r [( , ODD 0 1000 PROJECT LOCATION PLAN REVISIONS PLAN HORtZ. r".... r COUNTY: SCOTT DATE SHEET NO, APPROVED BY (ClIJT A 1VfOITrJ)!a!a AND '''=20' 20 0 20 ~~ lL lIdlId PROFILE VERT. r".... r DISTRICT METRO " '5 0 5 1 =5 COJMrM\UNTIY JPmDJE Sl!Na: 1857 SHEET NO. 1 OF ~ SHEETS '" ... I "- .., 0 0 N ~ STORM SEWER TABLE STRUCTURE TYPE RIM INVERT PIPE PIPE FLOWS TO % MISC. 0 CASTING z NUMBER STRUCTURE TYPE ELEVATION ELEVATION SIZE LENGTH STRUCTURE GRADE COMMENTS ~ 80' ROW 8 ~ ~ 0 w w -< '" r 0 a. '" fES 1 826.70 27" 72' CBMH 1 0.31 27" FES W! TRASH GUARD I 831.85 82657 27" CBMH 2 0.31 CD0 23' 36' F-F' I 23' CBMH 1 48-4020 R-4342 132' ~ i" '" -< CD0 Il: '" CBMH 2 60-4020 R-3067 832.25 826.16 27" 38' CBMH 3 0.31 <l CBMH 3 60- 4020 R-3067 831.91 826.05 27" 35' CBMH 4 0.31 CD@ ,.' la' ~ >' CD@ ~~~I~~:l:-hlAX 4: 1 SlOPE UIN 2,,-MAX.; 1 SloPE ID >' al CBMH 4 48-4020 R-3067 831.91 825.94 27" 140' FES 4 0.31 ,. . VARIES S al 8 <- 13 ~ " fES 4 825.50 27" 27" fES W! TRASH GUARD ~~L ~ 1-1/2" TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE \ SURMOUNTABLE C & G U in -< w w '" 0 2* TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 0 0 FES 5 823,50 24" 29' CBMH 5 -7.30 24" FES W! TRASH GUARD (TW.) 6~ CL 5 (lOO" CRUSHED l.lME'STONE) CBMH 5 48-4020 R-4342 829.50 825.50 24" 138' CBMH 6 0,80 CD@ "0 ~I ..i:5 CBMH 6 48-4020 R-3067 831.57 824.39 24" 35' CBMH 7 0.80 CD@ QUAIL DRIVE & MATHIAS ROAD ~'5.o :o~~ CBMH 7 48-4020 R-3067 831.57 824.12 21" EX 21" RCP 0.84 CD@ N,T,S. TYPICAL STREET SECTION >'>..2 E3... c..-,;,;:; "'0 iHi ""z Ill, NOTES: Cl' ~E~~2 <~ CD REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES THE FOLLOWING STANDARD PLATES APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY !iii! ~I AND INSTALL NEW STRUCTURE AT SAME LOCA nON. ADMINISTRATION SHALL APPLY ON THIS PROJECT Maintenance: ~ ~ SALVAGE AND REINSTALL CASTINGS. (ALL TYPES) MnDOT STANDARD DETAIL PLATES 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY 3, SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH ~ ~ ~~~ '0 a AfTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING STORM EVENT, THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS Q) ON ALL APPLICATIONS USE 0,15' SUMP, PLA TE NO, DESCRIPTION PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL REACH APPROXIMATELY HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. BE MADE IMMEDIATELY, A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (800-252-1166) IS REQUIRED (/) A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY 3000L REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 2, SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME 4, ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT Z CONSTRUCTION. 3006G GASKET JOINT FOR R,C. PIPE INEFfECTNE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED fENCE OR fiLTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REOUIRED, SHALL BE 0 THE LOCATIONS OF EXISITING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE NOT 3133C RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS USEABLE liFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED (7) SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. AND SEEDED. 5> 4011E PRECAST CONCRETE BASE W THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE cr COMMENCING WORK. 4020G MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN MUST MAINTAIN ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES FOR 7100G CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERS WIRE FENCING ~ LOCAL TRAFFIC AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES. Q) 7111J INSTALLATION OF REINFORCEMENT OF CATCH BASIN CASTINGS POST - 1 SET POSTS AND 2 STAPLE THE WIRE EXCAVATE A MESH FENCING TO 100 mm X 100 mm TRENCH EACH POST 0 0 TRENCH ~ UPSLOPE ALONG THE 100 mm X 100 mm liNE OF THE POSTS. I- "'"" z 1I111~1II11~1I1111L 11111=11111=11111= III11sllllls111111L IIIl1snlllsllllls W 1I11@1II1I~1II1I ~1I111~1I111 1I1I1~1II11~1I1II ~1II11~n111 :2 ~IIIII~!!!!I~ 1I111~ ~1I111~1I11@ 1II1~ SiIlIllL~1 ii!:1II1 Si W 11111 zO fiLTER FABRIC - 3 ATTACH THE fiLTER 4 BACKFILL THE TRENCH ::>::5 FABRIC TO THE AND COMPACT THE 0: a.. WIRE FENCING AND EXCAVATED SOIL I-W THE TRENCH Zo: 0 0 <(0: COMPACTED \ C/)w BACKFILL U5~ "'"" IllIIslIlIIslllllil. IIlIlslIIllslIlIls IIII1Sllllls111111= IIl11slllllsllllls ::cW 1I111~1I111ii!:11II1 ii!:1I1I1~111II 11111..11111..11111 ' ~11II@1II1 a..C/) ii!:1I11@1I111ii!: ~ii!: -ii!:iiiil~llII= II@ ii!:11II ~IIII :2 11111 11111 0: BOTTOM 0 OF I- DRAINAGE WAY C/) W .~. ~ :3 1/ lL ~~ ELEVATION: ~i POINTS "A" SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINT "B" ~i EROSION CONTROL PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF A wI SYNTHETIC FILTER BARRIER (SILT FENCE) N.T.S. SHEET NO, 2 ~ S' ----------------- \1 x~ 1\ ~ \ -' ~ ~ ; NOTE . ____.___ l\ i ___.__-- 0 '" ...--'" ...-"- I \ I -'-'~ >- N CD REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES ,_____,.------.---------------------._'-. __.----------- .. -.,--.. ;, \\ _..-------------------..--t-..--....------ -..- :i AND INSTALL NEW STRUCTURE AT SAME _-------------- .' _----. \~~~ II ,REMOVE 220 S.Y. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ___---...----.....-... \ 0 LOCATION, ____. __----------- V 'II I (REPLACE AS PER TYPICAL S~9.:~<.?~L--...---------- \ ~ ~ SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEME~IlEULI::-BEPTH) ,\1 \ _----------------..- ..._--- .----- \ :;! a B ~ SALVAGE AND RE~~9.JAL-l--eI"rA1N LIKE FENCH \ \ 1\ ~ 1----- ... __ .__--- .----- \ ;5 g: iJ5 @ SALV}.,9E-ANl:JHfINSTALL RETAINING WALL 8i OI"K 4 :, \ II ~ ._..' ..--..-- ... I ($) SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MISC, LANDSCAPING .. v. \ LOT 4 \ J. \'N I \ \ REMOVE&REPLACE60LFCURB&Gl{ITER N i /' \ 8LOC!, :;, \ ~ ~ * * A CALLTO GOPHER STATE ONE (800-252-1166) IS \ '3 \ / ~ . POND 2 \ REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO \ t: .~. ~.'.''' \ "-il UTILITY PEDESTALS , .. 1 \ \ .. .. ';." ~ " ~Ol .1 j NWL=825.SO' iD iD PERFORMING ANY CONSTRUCTION, 8358 .~...~. \\ _--..-.- --...j ;1. I HWL = 828,80 \24-HOUR) 8 8 (834 6)~'~ . >-o>-o",.,,,'t(:'.'::::.......;i --'-' "" _"> CD ~IH -1 HWL = 829,40 ~1o-DAY RUNOFF) 13 G ** THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND ,_ ,:_ --.-." -",-, - \'o...@';YRE)tOVs\,'2'15"Rl.l-.__..... '" ;.~: ~.~~y;1 80778 ~' \.\~,." ! i:i !11 ..- ._._......-...... (!!. <'\11\ c:..Ll~.;r~; 832 [\ f" ....1 6.~~",,~ J( 1 0 0 UTILITIES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE hili "p Hoo \ _ _-'-~ - '-1':"&12-:;; RCP CL. \II ~ ! - ." 834.3 ~ J .._~i);! {-'[J.,orP;h \ CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT gt ,~~ RS~PVS 35' 15- RC, "",CD"" -.''''' ~'4''\ ___ _ ---- ----, '" r$;\ (833 3) ~,I ~ ~- '-~'^""""4<,\"'- --' - ~Y!.'7< ---,-.-\ ~ s I LOdATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE o+ooD ,,~KT;fii\!\j:)tl277.1p;Q~l\I CBMHl __LJr?$ij",<<,~7i ~\., "'. ~.. ... ",,' .--- \'i~-Rl.~'OV~-')9 1l,"RlP o..+OO~CD_0\~. ,"I \ ]].0 ;;; CO' 'MENCING WORK ---- ~'I;;:: 'C \lIH\_. "G)-' ...-.....-.. ,...; [it':: -' ,-,' , \ Wi, l ~~~ 0 M , ___----.------ . ,~y \ [1\ \::: ~1 " .. __ F&121\..!<[;l" CL. \\1 (/'_.,) v \ ~~" .. 1 ___--- --- l... ('d,.,...{. ~.J ilQ \~,'-\ 1 3....00 'v, -It\' .-- 0 ......! E ~ ~ T: \ ------- \,.{)iJ,) , , 1'" i C; I .- -.......... \ \ II ,-,-- C ."z F 0 ~--------- ~ ~ a (j) .-.----- (/~<.4) (4A':J:_::::~ .-"-' \ \ ~/ __-'-"-"--- ~~~~ ~~ ! "~1 r- '" ~ @ ._..-..-..-ii . ......! Q \ -.--' E ~ 0 5 . '" \ \ :~" - \\ r ~~~~. <~ 1 ' -,., _ \ \ \ ~ ;.=.~i ~ I 1 ; ')T ~. I 1 ^ 1 >".Q~ C; flI u '\ ...'- ." \ . '-( i ~ -a g w g V) i I \ ~ ! , \ \ ~ ~ C gi I POND 1 I \ \ \ \ >.9-.~.2- , . _' 1 I 1 ,Q....>~O J r-- \ \0 \ t ::U~~ 2 -'J NWL = 826.70 \ lor 10 \ \ \ :: ~ !~~ ~ . HWL = 830.60 (24-HOUR) :e,;: , REMOVE & REPLACE 20 L.F, CURB & GUTTER ! \ \ \ HWL = 831,80 (10-DAY RUNOFF) _....._.. "'-"-'''' .-...-'''-'- ;0.. j \ Yl I t \ ..--" .- -.....-.... ...~...,,- ......; ~ \ \ I \ I ,9 \ \ \ \ ~ i If)' 0 L: UTILITY PEDESTALS II \.~""'" (j) \ _' ._....___...._.....-... . I ..~.." .l \ Z ,-..-....-..... AJ' I .. -........... .........- I 0 \-- -'--- -...-..--- .,,- ~! , -.. -- ...- ... .....- ...-. ...__ ..._.__....-_\ 0 , <)Y \ Q .__......._...,_ ''''- .. 0-...20 0 20 > \ LEGEND UTILITY" tJ. - - -' - -- - ......-... HORIz.1 ~-_- , w \ x 835.00 EXISTING ELEVATION I ! ! 5 '" 0 5 (Y \ x(835.00)PROPOSEDELEVATION I I VERT. I ~~ ' . . ... 850 ; . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. 850 . . .. . . l- Z W 845 .. . . . . . . . . . . 845 :;E . .. .. ". . ." ... W . ". zO . ~5 840 ".. .. .. .. .. . ..;. . 840 a: a... . .. " . l-W " . '" ." 1il ~. g; \tl. ~" '.. z a: '" . ..q N co' . .m' 0 C\tl ~. ~ ~in~: .m ~ .;;~: ~o;~ ~ cr:. 835 . .",,,!,,, -. . + II. l(j..",. "+.,.: .. 031::: (j) ... . . . .+;;;." ....--.."....-..-:-..''-;-.. ,- .N.......... i;C;1I ......C\J,~.1l, .. ., U*J ..4'~ . :e.. :I:rr'II~' """"<-'.... .........--...... :i...... W :C'lIna:: tn.llna:... .,.._.._..... ,. '"""" > , .. "'. 'W >...,_~<.;',;.:. ,'., ... ... .,- >. .::i . W "",. w. . , ....-.. . .,. ::> ..~ .' ifi'<~'> . - ---------... ...:...:... '()~ ~.. 'aJ;E~> . . ~..-~>. ....~ "'CO If,,.,U ~J. co. o'~a:~' . .............<:.... O'VJa::~: :;.(/)m~ . . u..J 'I //'.;_;.- "_ . _>-.. ".., m......__..,. "_.. . .._'-'-... ......c, >.J,>/""''''-'''.,..".--: ".,.,;-;"-,,;..,~; I 0' . ... -" . . . -"'-"" ..._". .. ......-' .-:. a... V,I 830. " . ;;; 'l.... .... . .. . . . . . ; "~I' . . . . 830 ~ . u.._, . . .. "',<..,. ...11..3 ,..,.. . /:/ . " " - .".'~"'-<<., ffi~:~ Loot- . (;1/ '" " . ... u.(I)' 0 ~""""". t'''r . '><. .1\. . l- 825 ,," ,," ""." ".. '." l}..~~.Af8Y 42ft@O;1%27-CL:lliRP'.. .132 @O,31%~ ~.\IIRCP. ... ' .; .; ,',.,,,, . .>I<\..,c,..~=-,., 825 (j) . 3Sft@.O:31% 7"CL..1II Rei> . . . . . . ~' :. 820 .. . ; . " . . . . . . .. . . 820 ~ ~ ". . . .. . ~i 815 ". "..". . . . .. ; . . 815 ~ i .. . ... 2) 810 ." . . . . . . ; 810 tffj . . , . .. . . . ,. C\ .,q . b, '" . i:\J .,., b.:-" ' f"-,. C') . <f V> tt>.,., . to .:-.. M,,q . f"- '" . i:O. (\O . i:\J SHEET NO. C\J'1"""" .C\j'\] CQ{',(J O'ld) lO!..O. coco tOtO Q)CC 00) C'i')M C\l(\J C\J~ 00) .(Y')t;t) tOlD t"-.<O 00 rot.rJ C\J~ 1"-<0 '-"t~ <:::t<:::t t-.:~ ,...::~ o}pj ,..-::~ NN crj~. '\.00 lrStri. ~M Me..) NN (\j('\j t\J~ C\ic0. NN M~ 7i"<'i -..t--i- C\l~ do r.....:r--; L.r)ui (.()u) 005 (\\ ('oJ i:\J N . N l'\l '" <:0 '" I:'l '" <:0 C') I:'l '" <:0 C') I:'l '" <:0 '" t', '" <:0 C') t'} '" <:0 (>') t'} '" <:0 C') I:'l '" <Xl C') M C') <:0 N N N N (\J 1\I GOI::: 3 u.. O:>CO.OO<O roro 00<;0 0:>0:>,. roo:> coO:> coCO .roco coco roro coco roo:>. 0000 roco coco 0:> co .coco coco 00 CO coco. rooo roo:> v;,;; "'1+00 0.+00 '1+00 :;~+CG ~1,+GD 4+-00 '" .. I ... i i '" 0 NOTES: i 0 .. i i ~ i i i i i i <D REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES i luj i i AND INSTALL NEW STRUCTURE AT SAME ?:i ! ('; i CY-i i z LOCATION, I (:) j oi ~ i u SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) :d/ if jL _ __ _______ ___ _ __ _ _______ __________ __ _ ________._._._._,_ ~ w ~ (g) , a w << '" 0: W @ SALVAGE AND REINSTALL CHAIN LIKE FENCH !i 0 0- Bi , ail if i ii @ SALVAGE AND REINSTALL RETAINING WALL lOT 4 i ; V If i <5l SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MISC, LANDSCAPING II If i V> ii j ~ i! '" i Ii If i 0: V> i Ii i * A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (800-252-1166) IS J 1/ j ., i REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO II Ii POND 2 ii i >' >' i i! I "' >' <D PERFORMING ANY CONSTRUCTION, """'," j....-nRE RING i [f . REMOVE & REPLACE 20 L.F. CURB & GUTIER 0 CD 8 '\ w NWL = 825.50 I ii , REMOVE 75 S,Y. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (; ~ '" u \. ~~~ i !I " (REPLACE AS PER TYPICAL SECTION) in <{ w W 0: :J: ** THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM 0 0 " UTILITIES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, THE '<:...". CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT .....,'.....,,'.... \{~ ~H ~I .._...~_ ?'V~'f:._..... .....-......-. LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE "....."'-...- i.'X'SmK~, fIl.~E>I.I'iN (:;I;:",:~:-""'-" (-.......\ ~~~ COMMENCING WORK, ------- ---.--- ----- '-J >'>..E EXISTING 21' RC->-O>'~>_ .~ E-sv :J: . c....<o.s::: P CL.m (TO RE:MAIN IN PLAtr........"..>-~~ %~O~ I-- 0 :;;z en :) E" v>. ,~. ;Sa~~ '" d ~...._.._ '~'''_,,,_. <C~ i ~E~~2 ~I ..-...--.-. i i;i~.~ i --,_...--- i ..-.--- i REMOVE & REPLACE 20 L.F. CURB & GUTIER ~a.~.~~ i .Q .....s: III 0 ..-.----- ~ ~8.~i w .--,---- j -0 I _ ~ ~Q.tI) CI I 51 \ I ~I \ , 1 ! LOT 5 i II .-1 i (/) i <I z !I ", I 0 ",. I 61 Of Ii o -___ (/) \ EJLOCK :3 cb o - -.-- ----- -____ ___ 20 0 20 5> LEGEND \ . -.------.- - --- - _ _':l..O~I!____ w \ oc X 835,00 EXISTING ELEVATION \ I ! I 5 -- ---6- 5 X (835.00) PROPOSED ELEVATION I VERT. 845 845 I- Z W 840 840 :2: W zO 835 :::J::J 835 a::. a.. I-W za::. 830 <(0: 830 Ww <($ Ww 825 it 00 825 :2: a::. 0 820 I- 820 00 815 ~~ 810 ~I il 805 SHEET NO. 800 800 4 .+,00 O+DO 1+00 2+00 ~ City Project: Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement Prepared by: JWS Project Location: Pheasant Run J st Addition (Quail Drive & Mathias Road) Checked by: RTH Date: 12-Jun-03 QUANTITIES Subtotal Subtotal ITEM Quail Mathias UNIT Quail Mathias TOTAL NO DESCRIPTION UNITS Drive Road TOTAL PRICE Drive Road COST 1 Mobilization L.S, 0,5 0.5 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 4.000.00 2 T raffle Control L.S. 0.5 0.5 1 $ 2.500.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1.250,00 $ 2.500.00 3 Sawcut Bituminous Pavement L.F, 64 64 128 $ 4.00 $ 256,00 $ 256,00 $ 512.00 4 Remove Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 71 215 286 $ 6,00 $ 426,00 $ 1.290.00 $ 1,716,00 5 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F, 40 120 160 $ 4,00 $ 160.00 $ 480,00 $ 640.00 6 Salvage/Remove RCP L.F. 213 392 605 $ 10.00 $ 2,130,00 $ 3.920.00 $ 6.050.00 7 Remove Storm Sewer Structure EA. 3 4 7 $ 250,00 $ 750,00 $ 1,000,00 $ 1,750,00 8 Salvage/Remove RCP Apron EA. 1 2 3 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 400,00 $ 600.00 9 Remove Riprap Ton 5 10 15 $ 100,00 $ 500,00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.500.00 10 Salvage and Reinstall Chain Link Fence L.F. 85 115 200 $ 15,00 $ 1,275,00 $ 1,725,00 $ 3,000,00 11 Salvage and Reinstall Modular Block Retaining Wall S.F, 400 400 $ 25.00 $ - $ 10,000.00 $ 10.000.00 12 Salvage and Reinstall Landscaping EA. 3 3 $ 100.00 $ - $ 300,00 $ 300.00 13 Salvage Casting EA. 3 4 7 $ 100.00 $ 300,00 $ 400.00 $ 700,00 14 Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Mix. 2" Thick Ton 10 26 36 $ 35,00 $ 350.00 $ 910.00 $ 1,260,00 15 Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Mix, 1,5" Thick Ton 7 20 27 $ 35.00 $ 245,00 $ 700.00 $ 945.00 16 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL. 5 12 17 $ 2,00 $ 10.00 $ 24.00 $ 34,00 17 CI. 5 Aggregate Base (100% Crushed Limestone. 6" Thick) Ton 35 110 145 $ 15,00 $ 525.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 2.175,00 18 Surmountable Concrete Curb & Gutter L.F. 40 120 160 $ 13.00 $ 520.00 $ 1,560.00 $ 2.080.00 19 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer EA. 1 1 $ 300,00 $ 300.00 $ - $ 300.00 20 24" Pipe Sewer RCP Class III L.F. 202 202 $ 41.00 $ 8.282.00 $ - $ 8.282.00 21 27" Pipe Sewer RCP Class III L.F. 387 387 $ 53.00 $ - $ 20,511.00 $ 20,511,00 22 24" RCP Flared End with Trashguard EA. 1 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000,00 $ - $ 1.000.00 23 27" RCP Flared End with Trashguard EA. 2 2 $ 1,300,00 $ - $ 2.600.00 $ 2,600.00 24 Construct Drainage Structure Design 48-4020 EA. 2 2 $ 1.500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ - $ 3,000,00 25 Construct Drainage Structure Design 54-4020 EA. 1 4 5 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000,00 $ 8.000,00 $ 10.000.00 26 Cable-Crete S.Y, 32 64 96 $ 100,00 $ 3,200.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 9,600,00 27 . Sodding Lawn Type. Includes 4" Topsoil S,Y, 600 890 1490 $ 3.50 $ 2.100.00 $ 3,115.00 $ 5,215.00 28 Silt Fence. Preassembled L.F, 40 60 100 $ 1.50 $ 60,00 $ 90.00 $ 150.00 \ , Subtotal Estimated Project Cost $ 30,839,00 $ 69,581.00 $ 100,420,00 10% Contingency $ 3,083.00 $ 6,958,00 $ 10,042,00 I Subtotal Witb 10% Contiugency $ 33,922,00 $ 76,539,00 $ 11 0,462.00 15% Engineering and Administrative Cost $ 5,088,00 $ 11,480,00 $ 16,569.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 39,010.00 $ 88,019,00 $ 127,031,00 G:\JSwentek\Project.Design\Pheas.Run.STS.Repl.COslEstimate Page 1 of 1 May 15,2003 Joe Swintek 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee,~ 55379-1351 Dear Joe, As per our meeting on Wednesday May 14, Pheasant Run Of Shakopee will share in the Pheasant Run sewer placement on Quail Street for an amount of thirty five thousand dollars ($35,000). Sincerely, ~ v.~ Patrick Mason Pheasant Run Of Shakopee, Inc. Pheasant Run of Shako pee II, Inc. 2500 West County Road 42 . BurnsviIle, MN 55337 . (952) 894-2440 . Fax (952) 894-2440 http://www.PheasantRunHomes.com City Project: Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement Oversizing Calculations Prepared by: JWS Project Location: Pheasant Run 1st Addition (Quail Drive & Mathias Road) Date: 12-Jun-03 Proiect Cost for Existing Conditions (2003 unit prices) QUANTITIES Subtotal Subtotal ITEM Quail Mathias UNIT Quail Mathias TOTAL NO DESCRIPTION UNITS Drive Road TOTAL PRICE Drive Road COST 1 L.F. 167 247 414 $ 25.00 $ 4,175.00 $ 6,175.00 2 L.F. 35 140 175 $ 28.00 $ 980.00 $ 3,920.00 3 EA. 1 1 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ - 4 EA. 2 2 $ 750.00 $ $ 1,500.00 5 EA. 3 4 7 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 6,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 10,305.00 $ 17,595.00 Project Cost for Proposed Design (2003 unit prices) QUANTITIES Subtotal Subtotal ITEM Quail Mathias UNIT Quail Mathias TOTAL NO DESCRIPTION UNITS Drive Road TOTAL PRICE Drive Road COST 1 L.F. 202 202 $ 41.00 $ 8,282.00 $ - 2 L.F. 387 387 $ 53.00 $ - $ 20,511.00 3 EA. 1 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 4 EA. 2 2 $ 1,300.00 $ $ 2,600.00 5 EA. 2 2 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ - 6 EA. 1 4 5 2000.00 $ 2000.00 $ 8000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 14,282.00 $ 31,111.00 Summary: Project Cost for Existing Conditions (2003 unit prices) $ 27,900.00 Project Cost for Proposed Design (2003 unit prices) $ 45,393.00 Oversiziug Cost $ 17,493.00 Oversizing Cost PIns 10% Contingency $ 19,242.30 15% Engineering and Administrative Cost $ 22,128.65 TOTAL ESTIMATED OVERSIZING COST $ 22,128.65 G:\JSwentek\Project.Design\Pheas.Run.STS.Rep.OvefSize.Cost.Estimafe Page 1 of 1 SHAKOPEE June 11,2003 Ronald Roder 2166 Mathias Road Shakopee,~ 55379 RE: Pheasant Run Storm Sewer Replacement Dear Mr. Roder: This letter is to inform you that at the June 17, 2003 City Council meeting, the City Council will consider plans for replacement of stann sewer associated with the Pheasant Run Development. Previously, you have been contacted by City staff in regard to a storm sewer replacement project off of Mathias Road, west of Pheasant Run Street and also on Quail Drive, west of Pheasant Run Street for the storm sewer connecting ponds and outlets of ponds to the City stann sewer system. The existing stonn sewer pipe in this area has been determined to be under sized and needs to be enlarged to provide the proper safety and storm water management for the properties in this area. I would also like to note that the City Council meeting on June 17, 2003 will be at the Scott County Government Center in the Scott County Board Room. The City Council Chambers is under repair at this time, thus this has precipitated the move to the Scott County Board Room. If you have any questions in regard to this project, prior to the Council meeting, please feel. free to call Joe Swentek, Project Engineer at (952)233-3800, Extension 164 or myself at Extension 108 to have your questions addressed. I also would like to thank you for your patience and cooperation on this project and look forward to working with you as we complete this project. Sincerely, ~n~ Public Works Director BUpmp PHEASANTRUN Cc: Mark McNeill, City Administrator COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 1:29 Holmes Slreel Soulh' Shtlk\Jp~e, Minn,~ola . ,5379-1351 . 95~.133-3800 . fAX 9:i~.2J3.38n 1 . \\'\\'\\..li.,haKllpcc.mn.u, - '<"",,,,-,,,- - -'--- ~ '" . . '" '" 0'. LEGEND <Ii Ii I ~ ~ MPG3 SUBWAmRSHED ,;; I ~ _ MFRl SURWATERSHRD. ::: .. ... MPG2 SUBWATERSHBD ~ MPG1SUBWATERSHED MPFl SUBWAmR.SHBD ~< ~~ SUBWAl"ERSHED BOUNDARY' ~ 0 ill ~('j.3,:"A SUBWATERSHED ID " DlRECTION OF FLOW ~ I;t;.. _ STORMWATERPONDlNG =~= ~Ot:4 ~,~O O~~ cn~< ~ I + ~ ~ <1 "~Ii '1' '" - ~"'" l( ~ " + + + + + <> 5r 2!>O C 500 1000 / - 11 '-' iN (..-.-.....-.---"7 ;U SCAL.t fEET N <5 < ~