HomeMy WebLinkAbout14.B. Preliminary/Final Plat for Audrella Addition-Res. No. 5914
IY.6,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 03-040 CONSENT
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat - Audrella Addition
MEETING DATE: July 15, 2003
REVIEW PERIOD: April 11, 2003 to August 8, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Rob Larsen has submitted an application for concurrent preliminary and final plat review for
Audrella Addition. On April 15, 2003, the City Council approved the request for concurrent
review. This plat proposes the creation of nine (9) single-family lots and one (1) outlot. The
subject site is located on the south side of Valley View Road, east of Pheasant Run and west of
Williams Street (Exhibit A). The site is presently being utilized as one single-family residence.
CONSIDERATIONS
This item was place on the Council's June 17,2003 agenda, but was continued as recommended
by the City Engineering Department until further information has been submitted and approved.
This information has now been provided to Engineering Department's satisfaction.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Plat application at their June 5, 2003
meeting, and by a 6-1 vote, they recommended approval of the request. Several of the
Commissioners expressed a concern that the curb cuts on Valley View Road had already been
installed, prior to the review of the preliminary plat application. The staff report to the Planning
Commission is attached for the Council's information.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the Preliminary and Final Plat of Audrella Addition subject to the following
proposed conditions:
1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final
Plat:
1. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
2. Execution of a Developers Agreement which shall include provisions for security
for the public improvements within the Final Plat and payment of engineering
review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most
current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. Payment of Trunk Storm Sewer Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and
Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of
Shakopee Fee Schedule.
5. Payment of grading fees will be required. Grading fees will be developed as
required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
6. Correct all misspellings of "RIGHT OF WAY" on all sheets.
7. Submit revised Final Plat showing all necessary easements:
a. Drainage and utility easement to encompass the wetland on Lot 1 of Block 1.
b. Water service to Lot 1 will require an additional water main to the south
property line, along the common property line of Lots 1 and 9. Provide a ten
(10) foot easement on both Lots 1 and 9 (20 feet total).
8. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department electronic (Auto CAD)
files of the Final Plat.
9. The developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree
to the City Engineer's reapportionment. The developer shall pay existing levied
special assessments or may request that special assessments code 27125 be
reapportioned against new lots. If the request is approved, the developer shall pay
the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineer's
reapportionment.
10. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
11. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
12. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
13. Installation of storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements of the
Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee.
14. The developer shall be responsible for payment of engineering review fees, and
other fees as required by the City's adopted Fee Schedule.
15. Park Dedication fees shall apply to this plat in an amount consistent with the
adopted fee schedule in place at the time of recording and shall be paid at the time
of recording of the Final Plat, unless the applicant requests in writing before the
City Council conducts action on the resolution that they be deferred to the time of
building permit. If deferred, the fees due will be in an amount consistent with the
adopted fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance.
16. Final Construction Plans and Specifications must conform to City requirements
and are subject to approval by City Engineer. Such plans as they relate to water or
electricity are subject to the approval of the SPUC Utilities Manager.
17. The developer shall work with City Engineering to design the driveway
turnarounds closer to Valley View Road.
18. The developer shall discuss with City Engineering a shared driveway design
concept.
II. Following approval and recording of the Final Plat, the following conditions shall
apply:
1. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be
reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
2. Approve the Preliminary and Final Plat of Audrella Addition subject to revised conditions.
3. Deny the proposed Preliminary and Final Plat of Audrella Addition, and direct staffto prepare
a resolution of denial for action at the Council's August 5, 2003 meeting.
4. Table a decision in order to allow time for the applicant and/or staffto provide additional
information.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion and approve Resolution No. 5914, a request to approve a resolution approving the
Preliminary and Final Plat of Audrella Addition. ~~
~
Mark Noble
Planner I
G:CC\2003\07-15\pp-fplarsen.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 5914
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKO PEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF AUDRELLA ADDITION
WHEREAS, Rob and Debra Larsen, applicants and property owners, have made
application for Preliminary and Final Plat approval of AUDRELLA ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as:
That part ofthe East Y2 ofthe Southwest ~ of Section 17, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, lying South and East of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South
line of said East Y2 of the Southwest 1'4 distant 200.00 feet East of the Southwest comer thereof;
thence Northwesterly at an angle of69 degrees 53 minutes 20 seconds (as measured East to North)
a distance of 623.76 feet to the center line of a town road; thence Southeasterly along said center
line a distance of 1075 feet more or less to its intersection with the East line of said East Y2 of the
Southwest ~ and there terminating; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of
the Preliminary Plat on June 5, 2003; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were duly sent and
posted and all persons appearing at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Shakopee did review the Preliminary and
Final Plat of AUDRELLA ADDITION on July 15, 2003; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
That the Preliminary and Final Plat of AUDRELLA ADDITION is approved subject to the
following conditions:
1. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the
Final Plat:
1. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
2. Execution of a Developers Agreement which shall include provisions for security
for the public improvements within the Final Plat and payment of engineering
review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most
current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. Payment of Trunk Storm Sewer Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and
Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of
Shakopee Fee Schedule.
5. Payment of grading fees will be required. Grading fees will be developed as
required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
6. Correct all misspellings of "RIGHT OF WAY" on all sheets.
7. Submit revised Final Plat showing all necessary easements:
a. Drainage and utility easement to encompass the wetland on Lot 1 of Block 1.
b. Water service to Lot 1 will require an additional water main to the south
property line, along the common property line of Lots I and 9. Provide a ten
(10) foot easement on both Lots I and 9 (20 feet total).
8. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department electronic (Auto CAD)
files of the Pinal Plat.
9. The developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree
to the City Engineer's reapportionment. The developer shall pay existing levied
special assessments or may request that special assessments code 27125 be
reapportioned against new lots. If the request is approved, the developer shall pay
the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineer's
reapportionment.
10. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
11. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
12. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements ofthe Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission.
13. Installation of storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements ofthe
Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee.
14. The developer shall be responsible for payment of engineering review fees, and
other fees as required by the City's adopted Fee Schedule.
15. Park Dedication fees shall apply to this plat in an amount consistent with the
adopted fee schedule in place at the time of recording and shall be paid at the time
of recording of the final plat, unless the applicant requests in writing before the
City Council conducts action on the resolution that they be deferred to the time of
building permit. If deferred, the fees due will be in an amount consistent with the
adopted fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance.
16. Pinal Construction Plans and Specifications must conform to City requirements
and are subject to approval by City Engineer. Such plans as they relate to water or
electricity are subject to the approval ofthe SPUC Utilities Manager.
17. The developer shall work with City Engineering to design the driveway
turnarounds closer to Valley View Road.
18. The developer shall discuss with City Engineering a shared driveway design
concept.
II. Following approval and recording of the Final Plat, the following conditions shall
apply:
I. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be
reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s).
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of the Preliminary and
Final Plat of AUDRELLA ADDITION does not constitute a representation or guarantee by the
City of Shakopee as to the amount, sufficiency or level of water service that will be available to
lots within the plat as they are developed.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held the _ day of , 2003.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
#~
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 03-040
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Audrella Addition
MEETING DATE: Jtme 5, 2003
REVIEW PERIOD: Aprtlll, 2003 to August 8, 2003
Site Information
Applicant: Rob Larsen
Propeliy Owners: Rob & Debra Larsen
Location: 2424 Valley View Road
Existing Zoning: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
Proposed Zoning: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
Adjacent Zoning: North: Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone
South: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
West: Rural Residential (RR) Zone
East: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
Compo Plan: Single Family Residential
Acreage: 7.0 Acres
MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary.
Attachments: Exhibit A: Zoning/Location Map
Exhibit B: Site Plans
ExhibitC: Engineering Department Memorandum
INTRODUCTION
Rob Larsen has submitted an application for concurrent preliminary and final plat review for
Audrella Addition. Under the subdivision ordinance, only the preliminary plat application is
reviewed by the Planning Commission. This plat proposes the creation of nine (9) single-
family lots and one (1) outlot. The subject site is located on the south side of Valley View
Road, east of Pheasant Run and west of Williams Street (Exhibit A). The site is presently
being utilized as one single-family residence.
This item was scheduled for the May 22,2003 meeting, but due to the applicant absence, the
item was tabled to the June 5, 2003 meeting. The Planning Commission will also be asked to
review the Rezoning request for this property at the June 5, 2003 meeting.
CONSIDERATIONS
Other staff were provided the opportunity to provide comments regarding this application.
Based on comments received regarding the name and lot configuration of the initial plat plan,
the applicant has submitted a revised plat plan that addresses those concerns (Exhibit B).
The City Pinance Department has commented that the developer shall pay the current fee for
reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineer's reapportiomnent. They also
commented that the developer shall pay existing levied special assessments or may request
with the application for the final plat, that special assessments code 27125 be reapportioned
against new lots. If the request is approved, the developer shall pay the current fee for
reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineer's reapportionment.
The City Engineering Depaliment has provided two (2) memorandums (Exhibit C), which
have been incorporated into the staff recommendation. Shakopee Public Utilities has
provided comments regarding easement and water main issues, which have been incorporated
into the staff recommendation as well.
Planning staff have noted that Lot 1 may be subj ect to a minor subdivision application in the
future, as the applicant intends to split the propeliy and create an additional lot with access to
Valley View Road (between Lots 8 & 9), with the existing single family residence gaining
access to a future street located southerly of their property.
Planning staff have been asked to research the process of extending MUSA to this property as
well as others on Valley View Road and the reguiding of these propeliies for single-family
development. A memorandum which addressed this issue was drafted by R. Michael Leek,
Community Development Director, and was included with the Rezoning staff report (Case
No. 03-041).
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Audrella Addition
subject to the following proposed conditions:
1. The following actions must be submitted to the City Engineering Department before
the review of the preliminary plat by the Planning Commission:
1. Provide a storm water management plan verifying the downstream storm sewer
system is adequately sized to accommodate runoff from the proposed plat. If
the downstream system cannot handle the additional runoff from the proposed
conditions, the applicant shall provide the necessary ponding onsite. Along
with this management plan, submit a tributary drainage area map.
2. Provide a wetland delineation report clearly defining the limits and class of
wetland in Lot 1 of Block 1 and the Normal Water Level (NWL) and High
Water Level (HWL) of this wetland.
3. Provide additional existing contours lOO-feet beyond the plat boundaries (or as
necessary to clearly define the tributary drainage area).
II. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the
final plat:
1. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
2. Execution of a Developers Agreement which shall include provisions for
security for the public improvements within the Final Plat and payment of
engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted
fee schedule.
3. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the
most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. Payment of Trunk Storm Sewer Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and
Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of
Shakopee Fee Schedule.
5. Payment of grading fees will be required. Grading fees will be developed as
required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
6. Correct all misspellings of "RlGHT OF WAY" on all sheets.
7. Submit revised Final Plat showing all necessary easements:
a. Drainage and utility easement to encompass the wetland on Lot 1 of
Block 1.
b. Water service to Lot 1 will require an additional water main to the
south property line, along the common property line of Lots 1 and 9.
Provide a ten (10) foot easement on both Lots 1 and 9 (20 feet total).
8. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Depaliment electronic (AutoCAD)
files of the Final Plat.
9. The developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and
agree to the City Engineer's reapportiomnent. The developer shall pay existing
levied special assessments or may request that special assessments code 27125
be reapportioned against new lots. If the request is approved, the developer
shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City
Engineer's reapportiOlIDlent.
10. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements ofthe
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
11. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
12. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements ofthe
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
13. Installation of storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements ofthe
Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee.
14. The developer shall be responsible for payment of engineering review fees, and
other fees as required by the City's adopted Fee Schedule.
15. Park Dedication fees shall apply to this plat in an amount consistent with the
adopted fee schedule in place at the time of recording and shall be paid at the
time of recording of the final plat, unless the applicant requests in writing that
they be deferred to the time of building permit. If deferred, the fees due will be .
in an amount consistent with the adopted fee schedule in place at the time of
building permit issuance.
16. Final Construction Plans and Specifications must conform to City requirements
and are subject to approval by City Engineer. Such plans as they relate to
water or electricity are subject to the approval of the SPUC Utilities Manager.
m. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall
apply:
1. Building construction, sewer, water service, fIre protection and access will be
reviewed for code compliance at the time of building pennit application(s).
2. Recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Audrella Addition
subject to revised conditions.
3. Recommend delaying the approval of the Final Plat until the Preliminary Plat conditions
are met.
4. Recommend denial of the proposed preliminary plat of Audrella Addition.
S. Continue the public hearing.
6. Close the public hearing, but table a decision in order to allow time for the applicant and/or
staff to provide additional infonnation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative No.1, approval with conditions.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Audrella Addition subject to
the conditions outlined in Alternative No.1.
G:BOAA - PC\2003 \06-05\pplarsen .doc
N
~ W*E
SHAKOPEE
COMMtlNrIY PRlDESINCE la57 S
Preliminary and Final Plat
of Boulder Hill
D Zoning Boundary
. Parcel Boundary
~ Parcel Area in Question
City of Shakopee ;
.
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat - Audrella Addition
Submittal Extension for Items A.1, A.2 and A.3 (May 15,2003 Memo)
DATE: May 21,2003
Due to the amount of information requested twenty-four hours prior to the May 22, 2003
Planning Commission meeting and the relatively short time frame to complete these tasks, the
Engineering Department grants an extension for submitting the above referenced items. I have
contacted Jim Sturm of James R. Hill and Associates to inform him the City will require these
actions be completed by May 30,2003.
City of Shakopee
Memorandum
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat - Audrella Addition
DATE: May 15, 2003
After reviewing the above referenced application, I have the following comments for the
applicant and for the planning department:
Recommendation
I recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat, subject to the following conditions:
A. Due to the potential impacts to the proposed plat, the Engineering Department
requests twenty-four hours prior to the May 22,2003 Planning Commission meeting,
the following actions be completed:
1. Provide a storm water management plan verifying the downstream storm
sewer system is adequately sized to accommodate runoff from the proposed
plat. If the downstream system cannot handle the additional runoff from the
proposed conditions, the applicant shall provide the necessary ponding onsite.
Along with this management plan, submit a tributary drainage area map.
2. Provide a wetland delineation report clearly defining the limits and class of
wetland in Lot 1 of Block 1 and the Normal Water Level (NWL) and High
Water Level (HWL) of this wetland.
3. Provide additional existing contours 100-feet beyond the plat boundaries (or
as necessary to clearly define the tributary drainage area.
B. Prior to recording of the Final Plat, the following actions must be completed:
1. Execution of the Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for
security for the public improvements within the Final Plat and engineering
review fees.
2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the
most current City of Shako pee Fee Schedule.
10f2
G:'JS wentek\CUP.PlatReview.PlanReview\AudrelJa.Add i tion \Audrella.Addn .Prelim&FinaIPlat.doc
3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and
Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of
Shakopee Fee Schedule.
4. Correct all misspellings of "RIGHT OF WAY" on all sheets.
5. Submit the revised Final Plat showing all necessary easements.
. Drainage and utility easement to encompass the wetland on Lot 1 of
Block 1.
. Verify the correct common lot line for the two ten-foot drainage and
utility easements requested by SPUC.
6. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department electronic
(AutoCAD) files of the Final Plat.
c. Prior to construction of the public improvements, the City Engineer and the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission must approve the Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion
Control plans and the Final Utility Plans and Specifications.
20f2
G:VS wenteklCUP .PlatReview .Plan ReviewlAudrella.Add i lion lAud reI la.Addn.Prel i m&FinaIPlat.doc
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.:
TO: Mark Noble, Planner I
FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Questions or Concerns Regarding Robert Larson
Preliminary Plat
DATE: May 27,2003
REVIEW PERIOD: NA
INTRODUCTION
It is my understanding that at its May 22nd meeting the Commission expressed concerns about the
subject property being zoned and platted for single-family development. In this memo I will
attempt to address those concerns describing the process that lead to the extension of MUSA to
the subject property (as well as others on the south side of Valley View Road) and re-guiding for
single- family use.
DISCUSSION:
The Transportation Plan, first developed with the assistance ofWSB and finally adopted by the
City Council in the spring of 2002, identifies the 2020 functional classification of Valley View
Road as "collector." That classification recognizes that in the future it will serve an important
transportation function for the residential areas that have been under development since 1995.
As the development of new homes continued east of Marschall Road between STH 169 and
Valley View Road, the need to upgrade Valley View Road to provide an alternative route to the
south became ever more apparent.
On January 16, 2001 the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for the
improvement of a portion of Valley View Road. At that same meeting, recognizing that there
would be substantial assessments for the improvements that the City would otherwise have to
pick up, the Council also directed staff to take action to have MUSA allocated on the south side
of Valley View Road, and to allow direct access from lots on the south side of Valley View
Road, so as to make the project feasible. In connection with the development ofthe Valley View
Road project, a great deal of staff, consultant, and attorney time was spent on 1) what
assessments would be reasonable for the properties on the south side of V alley View Road, 2)
what likely development scenarios would be for the properties south of Valley View Road. A
concern of the Public Works Director was the impact of direct access, and he has concluded that
the access represented by the proposed Larson plat is reasonable in light of V alley View Road
function and configuration in this area.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK2<T1 \PPLARSONROADINFO.doc
When staff was finally able to bring the Comprehensive Plan forward for consideration by the
Planning Commission on March 21, 2002 staff outlined and asked for direction on establishing
MUSA on the south side of Valley View Road. While the Commission at that time
recommended that the Council adopt the Comprehensive Plan, it did not provide direction
regarding the extension of MUS A to the sourth side of Valley View Road.
//
/f; ~c-/~~~':/t~:P
R. Michael Leek
Community Development Director
C:\ WINDOWS\T emporary Internet Files\OLK2<Zl \PPLARSONROAD INFO .doc
CITY OF SHAKO PEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Sarazin Street, from Mooer's Avenue to Valley View Road; and Valley
View Road, from Sarazin Street to the East Plat Line of Pheasant Run 6th
Addition
DATE: January 16, 2001
INTRODUCTION:
Staff is requesting Council direction in the preparation of the feasibility report for the
above referenced project.
BACKGROUND:
On November 6, 2000, City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for an
improvement to Sarazin Street, from Mooer's A venue to Valley View Road; and Valley
View Road, from Sarazin Street to the East Plat Line of Pheasant Run 6th Addition.
Currently the property on the north side of Valley View Road lies within "MUSA", while
the property on the south side of Valley View Road does not. In the City of Shakopee' s
"Draft Comprehensive Plan" submitted to the Met Council, the property on the north side
of Valley View Road land use is designated single family and the property on the south
side of Valley View Road land use is designated rural residential. Staff is anticipating
Met Council approval by April or May of this year, which would allow the City of
Shakopee to have a floating "MUSA" boundary.
The Shakopee Public Utilities Commission has indicated that they would like to have
waterrnain installed along Valley View Road as part of their system and also to provide a
waterrnain connection to the new water tower. By placing the properties along the south
side of Valley View Road into "MUSA", staff feels that this would allow some of the
properties to subdivide, which would help offset their special assessment for the
improvements to Valley View Road. In order for these parcels to subdivide, driveway
access would need to be given to Valley View Road. Since there are already driveways
onto Valley View Road staff would recommend additional driveway access be granted.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Provide staff direction on the feasibility report on whether the parcels along the south side
of Valley View Road being placed into "MUSA" and direct lot access should be granted.
~H
Public Works Director
BLljd
Memojan16
Official Proceedings January 16, 2001
of the City Council Page 13
Cncl. Morke asked about assessing the costs of the sanitary sewer costs to the residents along Holmes
Street between 7th Avenue and 10th Avenue. Mr. Loney stated that back in 1980 the sanitary sewer fund
did not pay for replacing the sewer main so the residents in this area requested that the sanitary sewer
main not be replaced at that time. Ifwe do the project today, the project gets paid for out of the sanitary
sewer fund.
MorkeILink: offered Resolution No. 5472, A Resolution Ordering The Preparation Of A Report On The
2001 Street Overlay Project - Holmes Street, from 3rd Avenue to 10th Avenue, and moved its adoption.
Motion carried unanimously with Cncl. Sweeney abstaining.
Mr. Loney discussed the preparation of the Sarazin Street and Valley View Road feasibility report. The
feasibility study is being done to improve Sarazin Street and curve it to the east plat line of Pheasant Run
6th Addition to Valley View Road. This improvement to Sarazin Street is being done so collector routes
can be built and other paved access can be made available for the developments out in that area.
Shako pee Public Utilities is going forward and building a water tower and an extension of a water main is
needed in the water tower area. The extension of the watermain, therefore should be part of this project.
Weare also finding on the south side of Valley View Road, which is not in MUSA and zoned nmil
residential, the amount that can be assessed is much lower than ifthere was sewer and water available and
people could subdivide their property. Mr. Loney had a copy of the Comprehensive Plan that was
submitted to the Metropolitan Council. If these improvements to Sarazin Street are assessed based on
our policy, Mr. Loney feels the assessments would be exceeding the benefits the property owner would
receive. If direct access is given to some parts of Valley View Road, there are some buildable lots to
allow expansion in this rural residential area. The assessments the City would.most likely need to pay, if
the land isn't reguided along Valley View Road to urban residential is approximately $300,000 plus. The
Council needs to answer the question regarding the south side of Valley View Road. Do you see the land
on the south side of Valley View Road 1) always being rural residential or should the City allow that area
to be reguided to urban residential and 2) should the City of Shakopee allow MUSA and direct lot access
. from Valley View Road on future subdivided lots. Valley View Road will be a collector street and the
City's current policy tends not to allow access onto a collector street. . Depending on the policy direction
of the two questions that the engineering department has, the feasibility report can then be finished.
Sweeneyl Amundson moved to direct the City staff to take appropriate action to have MUSA allocated on
the south side of Valley View Road as far as needed to make improvements to Valley View Road
feasible.
Mr. Loney asked how the Council wanted this area developed.
There was discussion on a future intersection point with Valley View Road and property owners having
the ability to develop their property.
Cnd. Sweeney stated that sewer and water lines may be running past 10 acres parcels and the Council
needs to accept the fact that these people will need to be able to subdivide their property or there will be
assessment appeals.
. .
'.
.-..... ..... ...... .... ''':'' .",".
. Official Proceedings January 16, 2001
of the City Council Page 14
Cne!. Morke wondered what the position of the Metropolitan Council would be on this area being asked
to have MUSA made available? Mr. Leek approached the podium and addressed this question. He
suggested that the City not submit a separate application for this area, but essentially that the Council
detennine that this is a priority area, so that when there is an agreed acreage amount for a five year
increment for residential development, that this would become one of the areas that the City would
extend the MUSA to and report back to the Metropolitan Council under the floating MUSA agreement.
Mr. Leek also stated that the land use is also a component of extending MUSA
Mayor Brekke did not see the south side of Valley View Road as a priority for allocating MUSA He
liked the idea of preserving this area as rural. residential. and preserving the bluff line. He would rather see
MUSA extension on the east side of CR. 83 on the abutting parcels to the Mdewal.canton Sioux property
and getting developments along C.R. 83 as soon as possible.
Cncl. Sweeney said he would oppose vehemently the paving of Valley View Road at the expense of the
general taxpayers.
Motion carried 3 - 2 with Cncl. Morke and Mayor Brekke dissenting.
The discussion on having MUSA on the east side of C.R. 83 adjacent to the Mdewakanton Sioux
property will be scheduled for a future meeting.
Sweeney/Amundson moved to direct staff to allow appropriate direct lot access from the south side of
Valley View Road in. the event that Valley View Road is improved. Motion carried 3 -2 with Cncl.
Morke and Mayor Brekke dissenting.
Mr. McNeill reported on the Public Works/Police building roof repair. Approximately a year ago the
City hired JEA Architects to perform an analysis on City facilities. In a report dated May 15, 2000.JEA
Architects noted that the Public W orksIPolice building needed replacement of the existing root: which is
25 years old. This roof replacement was listed as a high priority in the JEA analysis. JEA has supplied a
cost estimate to be somewhere between $310,000 to $350,000. JEA Architects will prepare the plans
and .specifications on a hourly basis at a cost not to exceed $30,500 plus reimbursables.
Cncl. Link thought this figure was extremely high.
According to Mr. McNeill, because of the amount of the estimated cost a formal bid process is needed.
Morke/Sweeney moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute an agreement with JEA
Architects for architectural services needed for the reroofing of the Public Services building located at
476 Gorman Street, a total not to exceed $30,500, plus reimbursables. Motion carried unanimously.
Link! Amundson moved to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into an agreement with WSB
for the installation design of the EVPS System and obtain quotes for the actual installation. Motion
carried under the Consent Agenda).
. .'
"
.'""\0 < . ...~. .,'. ... '.... .. "
AUDRELLA ADDITION
~~, ~ / <.) \' 1 / / I
~ ' ~ , ~ / 1 jl:~~ ,___ .~ ~ / / ;-~, 60 /
'" '~"> '-\{~> \ '" / / -'~} / I
~ '<$ I' "" ~ ~ 'Z C)
,'!' /....) / /-..), CJ
DRAINAGEANDUTlUTYEASfMENTS ~ ",'" IL,/~I "<...../~I / ,<,'",- /
ARE SHOWN THUS: I V ,,~ C\, \.) ,
^ "'-' ~ / ("I
1 1 / J I "" '4 ./.. /
I I I I, ",,/ '1
5-1 //1)'} '-. /') > ~ ~ - 7
I I G " - .<:-
: 1-5 .,.<1 ^ J'....... / ( )
I I I , / ' /
II C[}I ( t'-\ f--
>? II >? /)... ~ \ \-f"I"'~ --
ul__J L__l__ / /O~ / ___ ' "00\ \ \VI I Cj
\ IV/ - \ \ _' '1-)"'-'" ,-' C:J
I .~ r "'\...iI,1 ~
/ \" V <l
SEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS \ ," \ \
OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING ..,- "C.) V \ \l ~ ___ __ -r
LOT LINES, AND SEING 10 FEET IN r- " ,,\ \ \ ,,-- ["" '-
WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE 3 I r- " " -, \ \l \ "-. .- -
INDICA TED. ADJOINING RIGHT OF ;_J 'e""\ L_l-'.J I '\ - 7"
WAY LINES. AS SHOWN ON THE I \ ' L_
PLAT. 1\ I l L,J
~\' f':::. '\ ::)I""'\~,nC' 1-
C;{~ I', 4 " ' V"U-...) 1 >,
,'J I' 1"'1""'\1 ',)"T' ....'...J
.-(, \\.' I '....., ~ ,-,VV,-, I / (n
, \ \ I ,
(' <~ I , '-
..)' I' 5 .......-7
In fj"'1 I " ' .-/ L_
1\ I v i:ioC'v I " -----)
" , /!;::!: I " ::......
\.' ;; ~ I lL
~ I 6
~I
"'J' 1 I f- -
I ~ C'v 1 I -7
..... co I I L_
~ 1 7' 1 <(
~ / I~S"'- ~ C'J
I\:; I 7';'--::- <I-
N I,.ry I /' ~ ~ 1 I I
..... I':' 8 - '" :: ...J
1 '" I ~ ~ _::::::
~ I u.. f"'\
~ I 0 L.L
\:; I ~l ~
'g I OrX' W
~ I ~ w
~ I ~\; I'
~ I ~ 5
/ I...... _ 1 ^, 9 ~
I --.-( -'
. 1 / ,\ :;;
./ I " <
I / \ 1\ \' 't
I' ~
I /) , (.... : --
I -,. " J' : -
I ~O'JTHWEST .:ORNE~. 0' . I ! \ C _ v : 0 . ..
.,.__ ,HE El/2 0, THE,W 1/_ I .--"DCE 0' VI1:TLA"D--' J 12).4 <89'01'23"- OUTLOT A ' SOO 0040 W
\./ OF SEC. 17, r. ",. R 22 I \.' _ I ", . < ... _,..:::::-15.43
, .;,/ . /- -
... __' 200.CO "89'17'O<-E _'. I L1' ..- 67 g, / -- -
~~~' _ .....1 0 -:::. .-,-,'- - - 5;;8.9:;- - - - 459.65 -- .' -- - - -
_ v - _ _ 1116.51 NS9017'04"E EAST OUARTER COR-,]ER -~
.. SEt;. 17, T liS. R. 22. ---..
SOUTH LIN!: OF THE E 1/2 OF THE SW ]/4----' - -
N
Nor::: no MON~lA=:NT 5'(~~:B~:JL S~S''N:'j AT t:N'~ S:.~.T!jT~ .
ijl;t;~:~\i:g2g,~~kg~;,;~~iit~, " ?Jl;:~:;~ii~~;~:rt~t~:~1,::~~~;\;;:, : ;:;;;,~: ;;:;,;:',:,;; ;;;;:::: .::,::" .. '" ,ce' ~"
G 50 1':0 i.~O
~-- ]
JAMES R. HILL, INC.
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
I I
~~'5tT e .
l
)--.~ N = .
I 0 "ON'" (.)
. IRON FOUND C (J'l
I ~ .""" "" - ~~
CUY WIRE 0....,
-0- PO ll'ER PO LE [;j ~
I ~ '" "'''"'''"'' ON" --",'.=
/ 0 rLARED END SECTIOi'l := =>- "" ~
PROPANE TANK ::c en 'ei 6
: E:LECTRIC BOX ......... ~;..
WELL (J'l' ~:;:;
" TELEPHONE PEDESTAL . E5 cce
. METAL GUARD POSTS ,.".. LWZ g~
o ~ -.
o SCA~ IN FEEl 0 HYDRANT ~ >g - ~
"-- ""-"'~~ ~ '~ ",;,,, ,<0''"'''' "" en ~;~~
" / ,~. '''~ L.,.".",I "'""''''''''', CLl dl
" ""' E 1Q. ,,-;:;'j;!
1 Li.:..:-J.'., . CONCRETE SURrACE LW' U ~ s:
r-:--::l Z . - 0;
'-... ~ '''''''''' "'''''' CO '" ~~,
__ _d ,,,,__ -.:> c: ~ =c ~
'- ............. / ---.:.;;.;~., _ _ EX1STU-IG CONTOURS Co. ..,
"- / ' -,- "''"'" ""un "'"' ~.~
I " --'.. ., '"'' "'"'
,~ ELECTRIC rENCE
, TREE LlNE
I !.:- __ / ,/ I-- 00000 """'" '''''''''''~ ~
) / -- ----I / / "-- "-- '
( '. \ " ; ." I
1 '-J ~ \.... "- ~ i!i~l~ ~
I ' " ...." ·
I)...., " 1~ll~J:.d .
(' '1 ___ / :.-.,~v== I
.') ,,--- ' ' .... "
I \...' ~_ \ ~ '---- eFi~H
-~ < " .....
__ '11)-. "- / -..... A....~n
" . " illl'l. ,
<...... /'- ",,' " ,..",. ,
I,)' ~'~ "- I "-
<""'1 ','') . '
I ~I / " (...:.-:- '" 7'
)... . '" I
;/' I'/""-.... y::.. '- /
-' /I> I" -:::::' '. " '
I "\;) / "-- ~ '-... - --- / /' /
I ~'- · / /
-..... __~ Z .
" 0 rn ,
o ~ r-- _ "0 <: / e:: 2; '
I /\ l' \ 0 \ / >-< e:: ~
(l / / 0 ~-/, / Q ~...... ~..
uO ,'. 0 "'." rn'
I 0 ' ,'.,:) 1 \ 01' ,:', I / "" lZ 0 0:: i
;. )' 1', ' " -......-t-- --- r '" ~ <:e: Gi
,', ' ""wU'""
'" , - .
I ',:,,,,.1 \.... '< - - j~ '-' m;
''j,')... 1,- "'-.... L ~iJj~ O~
I' " ,,~ '" ... "':
~ ,,' ~ Ul ..
<:or " '''-- - - ~ x '
o ~..<-1'C,"?-.,.o. / / -I \ ~ ~ ~
o 0iJ.' ,.,""" ~ ^ "-- I ~ "
O"!':;"t;{;;>~;, "Ce'" /\ - - - -
I "...". '..' ,..... .,~ " .j T" <~ \
o . . _ .... .... ,. .v.' , ' ' " ' J
I . 0 ",. .... .- . /:>.... \
. ,"
'- ' '1
o 0 " ~~'
O 0 I \.1 ./
~ ' ') ,> ~', "
,~ l- , '-" ' ,
I ~. 'fI!fo .D I ,,' \. (". '7 DR'~"
, ~ (J \ I t-~ ~v <" FoSS
_ '" = "'.', '," 0,"
I \ / '/ ~~ <"','-; 09/13/02
r /"., ,"
/ ;,> REv1SIQNS
I ' "" 0"""
'" ..., ' " '. ",. '"
" :'.:,:_./ 1 ~--/I""i
-.... '- ,
,,7.. ~ ; < . .... ,,;,_/
. . ... : ' """" "0
_ _ _ _ _ / '.~, . r ''';0
_ ' :'J "D ''''
. . '.' .. ,. , ' , ,,,,,,,'
o . , ... I ;::;;OJECT NO.
2':;~.;
rll_E NO.
O=:~'/I::;::
Sri::::' 2 Ci'" S
EK~\e,\ B'2..
I ; .
(..)
CUl
_Cl:<~
~~
Prooertv Des(nonan Ol!r Document No. 34lJ65 ~ _~ Iol"'f -
LOTS 9 = Cl:< 3 ~
I PROPOSEO ZONING R-IS .. - ~ ~
Th>r p"" of <11: E.., on, helf of th, Southw,st Qu= ofSe"ion 17, Township 115, \l..1ng, 22, S,on COUll'l., EXISTING ZONING RR (RURAL RESIDEN nAL) ....,... ~ ~
MiM'SO,", lying South:Uld (OSI ofthefollo\>;ng desoribed line: DENSITY 0,76 O.U./ACRE ....... --.... ~;:;;o
I CROSS 7,00 ACRES I./l ",:Q
I Beginning ~ a point on the South tine or sOlid E:1$t one h~f' aCme SouthWc.u Q~er dist~t 200.00 rr:.et E~t or the LOTS 5.67 ACRES . es . '7":
Southwest comc:r thcrco(: thence Northwcstl:r1~' Olt.m MZlc 0(69 degrees 53 minutes 20 seconds (:IS t;\c:1SW'ed E01St to ,q.O.w. 0.80 ACRES c:c WJ ~ ~
" I North) adist\Ll\cc 0(623,76 rcct to the center line o('3lDwn rOi1d; thence SQuthe:l5tc:rl~' 3long said centerline a disunte OUTLOT ,4 0.5J ACRES .~ -: '- ::!
I'-..J, , I 1 of I07Heetmore or less 10 iLS in""",,"on I.ith <11, Eos' line ofsoid E",' OIl' hc!foClhe Southwcst Quoner:Uld there TOTAL 7.00 ACRES ~ j ~ ~
I) 1', termin.un.!; , ^ LU .;;; ~
.:::" / \JJ~~~s:
'1~-;' <1 AVERAGE LOT AREA 27,400 5.F. Q.) in &! ~ a
'1 ~ MINIMUM LOT AREA 9.000 S.;. E Cl:: ",;:;;OlE
1 /'>- MINIMUM LOT WlOiH AT SETBACK 60 FEET W cJ:Q :;:
I "'- 1 MINIMUM lOT OEPiH 100 FEET _ Z .., ~ g;
..... ,,'-'::;Z ~ ,.
/1J, 1 MINIMUM SETSACKS - :s ~)5 i:i
~........ c. ~ FRONT JO FEET ,.I 0.. ... iE a
I ,,' ~' ORAINAC. AND unLlTr cASeMeNTS SlOE (SrnEET) 20 FE:ET
,~^ - ~~ ~. ,OC ("00'" " "" t~
.... "'- ""'c '..-, REAR JO FEET
~ '\... --r--;..:; ~-T-- ~
""'.... "'- I ~ II ~
.... ::-...... "'- 1->
" ~ / / II
o I I c
.... ,- I I -
I I / __1-_-, ,-__L.
I / ( ! I N
" 'I
I \
"'- I'-:;le, \ \ '"
,,(~:"'\ \ '
I " (~I -t ~ " "
"'- 'I, I)... '-..... ~
I "'- ~ 1 .... "-........ ,<Jo~"
/1)/ ~/'1 ,,/ z ~
C.:1, "-- z.-s . / ' SCALE IN F"T 8 E-< ~
It )... .... ~'" ........ 0 50 100 150 E--< <
, ........ ~'~~1" / I 1"""\ F" =J -- J ..-....:l z
/ , ""'" I ... -- WiiiI8 2'
1';1;"'),. ~ '--.... / / 1 ;,,<h . 50/,,1 0 g il. i3 ~
1(.,1 "'- ~ _.-/ 0 ~:>< Cf)!
1 ........ ./ / <r:zll:: o::~
;,'1 ", ~ :;<~<C'"
I C (.'1, -- - ( <C ::{ Z "-.....J g.
"//).., ~ \ ~~- ~
I 101 ___ "J ~ ~ ~ o:l ~
. / _ -""\ _ (.... \ r_' :r >-:: 0.-
, if \ <..' \....1 f-'o-< 1/1..... 0::: ~
o ~-:^ ~ (il ;
C'. c.: 0 ll:: g
,~ \ ":.(: \.,~ '- I ....... il. ~
.J 1 1 .>, , _____ --... -- ~
, 1';'''' \^ , " <C N
(' -1 "'-.... \
....., \l
\..' 'I \
I -'I'~> '" '- 1 I
I 'f)(,/~ "'- J I \
1 1
It Ie.., "'- ./ \
~I - ~
L~ -~
1/))... /,', \
1 1 ) A
r;, (, ,
,,-1 ')"'1"
I 0'1 I ~
<.... ,)... ,-, -'/1
11/") :,_~::--" ;/.;>-. DRAWN BY
I ~,~/ I ',',' _ .. FLM
~ ~ "\ ('~ /<') DA TE
BLOCK 1 ";!-;;>- 'e-, 09113/02
: '" /,~" ' / ;' REVISiONS
... / :. 01 /03 P.'='/is~
. ..... , Nam! & La!.
I : i; '", Le. cut. KMG.
'- .
...~) ~. I ~ (......;".
J I..:r,/j Jr. \ ..: /" ""
...... 9 _ .', -) BOQK/?ACE
I'" ..." " I 1 '- - NCN~
" --- -,'..
:,. CONTROL NO.
I I - 2",0".
/'. -- - ...........
r - CAD FILE
_, /'1;;!,;:"~~~;;,.,_ _ __,o~~~ ~~= _{____ __ ____ _,,,, ____ ____ u_ _ u _~~;;: :;,:,~~:.~ u,_ / ,'. "". ""., au T.~RT A <-- _- _ ,::~;~:::
__ i -Q2- 2:2
;::....... _~I~ -:: .,.~ :112~; r.:; :11:;...... -- - - SH;:;:T J 'OF' 6
, E'lt+he.,T fI.;) ~
.
LEGEND (.)
o IROi'! SET ~ Vl
. IROi'! FOUi'!D - gr :::;
I '" MAlL BOX >- :;::
e- GUY WIRE _~ on -
-0- POWER POLE - c<:' '" ~
I · "' """''''' "'IT = 01 : J
/ 1>0 FLARED END SECTION ::r:: '- ~ m
PROPANE: TANK . ~....
" / / I!l ELECTRIC BOX ~ '" g
,<".JI 0 WELL . W ..'
r)'" ' I · """'" "'''''' 0:: ~ !"
<,......1 :'\ / . MEUL CUARD POSTS 0-z S - 8
I' '" - '
" < 4 ~ """"" (JJ 'C .. ~
"l, ,'" . 0 '"'''"'"' "" Q) '>-: H
, 0)', i>~~ ","""""",,, E ~ a.
G,~, 0 "",'" so,,,,, co " ~ c "
" c=J - -' 015<
" t,'. . . '","'''OR'''' J ~ ". 2
< ~l
, ~ 04 I..:.'; I ,,,eo,", '''"''''"' "",.." ~
/ ---".',J','--- EXISTINC CONTOURS ~
-o><u- OVERHE:AD UTILITY LINE
/ / U " FENCE LlNE -.
I -EF-E'- ELECTRIC FENCE
/ ~~ TREE LINE
I / I ----o-c-- EXISTrI'IG SANlTARY SEWER
! -1-1- EXISTING WATER MAIN I
--0--'- EXISTING STORM SEWER g ,~ ~
( I - PROPOSED DRlVEWAY CURB CUTS ;i~~l: J!
I ~ <:::eo'O (PROPOSED RE:TAIN1NG WALL :i~~"~ g-
BY DEVELOPER) H~.~~~ "
" \ \ '.::-a::,.,.::" EXISTING RETAINING WALL ~~~h;: I
<".J' .. ::.'! ~~.~
, / I,. \. ,_,_",_V,:-"_v."."v_v.,v"v, PROPOSED SILT FENCE ~~: ~~.~
I,' " .... ~o
I ("..:! _ \ ' .'0 i'';;" ~ ·
," <~~.;~r2 '0
,-' 1 " "-.. _.~. .w~ c
I '")/~/^ '"" ~
/ ",<.J ....... U
1...' ,,' 0 ~ .......' n
/ <:;1 I "-.. ~~S "- / /
V ..,.., ..... ~:::"1 '- I
/ r / "-.. '" I.... " /
I _ _ Jih ,-': '--- // / :z I
c ................. _ .....-/ <t
I -1 '-.......... / z...:i '"
"C'') ....... ~ :\"" 0 0.. ~
I C';", '--- ~ - .;::" :
1/'14 __ .,,\ ::::: :z ..,..::e
'-'I I --- -.J ...... <( >-< .-.
~ _ "\ \..' ,0 \ I""\bQ !:ill:
T. W. 66.0 ~ - 7 ...... ::J <t rn 13-
B.W. 58.0 /,.), \0, ~-I SCAlE ,N FEET <C ~ 0:: p:::-a
/")' ", C. . (_ ,) 0 50 100 'SO :> c..:r'" -< OJ
<' " _p \.' '- I f"'.......~ .....J <c w e.....J...
""-;"1 ~1. '- _____ ---- !;"c/>=SOlee, .....:l~:>< ~
'-" 4 \ ' " ......:l ~ 0:: c:o.
I T.W 700 /, It ,).. " \ Cil ;:; <t O.~
B.W. 59.0 I ""'" "':z p::: ':
,,~ \ 0:::.- ~
I '- --- I I Q ~ :
,., ....... I \ ~......l !;!
1'0," / <C ~ '"'
c,;()).. "-.. -'" \ 0.
(1)1 ~ ./'
I -1 -<),
"''' /", \
'e-'') ) A
I ~~ ~
/ --. I I,
'L'" I ~
, 1/ ,') ")"71
\ J ..... ;' ./
I 'C., ",>-- DRAWN BY
\ t.,. ........ WHK
c,>, /;\ DATE
" >. C. 09/11/02
"/" "1,,
/ ' . .REXI?IONS
, /(jj In", ?~'I;"'i'
~ ' Nome &. Lot
I " ') ,,-~,. ""
.... ,
I ,. I.
I I ,. ~"
,. ,
/ -,
," I (_,i1
~".. \., "., ..~ "
'i~'. _ /i:!./';~:: ... , - - ',,;:,;;,!
_ _ _ _ ~ ,.' _ ,_.". _____~ ' , I "O~" '0
'." .__ ..... ..... _. _. .____ ,_ ____ ___._ .. -l:J....-J ~.'.. ~- i Fi~~9~~O.
---...:: ___ DR~.WE,::::
- - - SHS::i 4 OF E
'f )C\-( ,cp> \-r ,,~
I .
I ~ (.) ~
\ 0 IRON SE:T c:: Vl .
~ \ . IRON FOUND - gs :::;
o MAIL BOX >- :;::
_ )-. e-- GUY WIRE: -!5' '" ~.
-C- POWER POLE _ e:: % ~
\ \ \. ........ I8l AIR CONDrTIONER UNIT == ~ ~ 'f
~ '" / t> FLARED END SECTIO N ..... ~ ~ .
I 0 PROPANE TANK ...... '- ~~
A "'- /i1 ELECTRIC BOX )Q CD g
.,r '\. ' s WELL . u..J _..
I / '""" "'-/ / m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ex: ~ ~ ~
"'- >--- "'- / . METAL GUARD POSTS c::5 ~ ~ 8
_ /" ' I, , / Z '" ~ .
,-"Y; .....I'/~, / / 'd HYDRANT UJ N:il.~
/ Jl;~" \"," A I I '" ~~, ~"'- '- / / / Wfj;j\;,j ~~~~:L~U:U::~E E~ ~ ~ II
~ ., /....... ,')... '- ....... CJ Z .~g;
'//~?' '- \..', <..' /,!. I ....... .'. '. CONCRETE SURFACE C'tS Z '" W ..
~ "J"',,~ ' , '- . <( 8~;z
<..'; '-,5/')... /'--' '- r-:-'l GRAVEL SURFACE ~ a: ~~a
I J I ; .. , I""~"'/ ~
"{ G/~I I / P~.< "'- t''''YI "0""" '"""''''''' Offi"',^'" ~
~ / r: ' ....;..,...
1St- /: 'IJ........ ----ICXJ--- EXISTING CONTOURS ~
(, r\ ..,.'~....... ........ -OI<u- OVERHE.~D UTILITY LINE "
\....O~ I ,"j'....... ............... / .1 II FE:NCE LINE
I v/ '1 I <<.~ -Er-E'- ELECTRIC FE:NCE
(., I'!' ........... / ~ TREE LINE
I ~'~' / ' --Q---<>- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
"(~I ....... J..... -,-,- EXISTING WATER MAIN I
/ /'.J '- I /..... -cr-->- EXISTING STORM SEWER g ~~ "
I V ~ ':"~ / .....'1 ^....... --- ___ I! "'" . PROPOSIW SANITARY SEWER (BY OTHERS) ,.~ ~ ~ ~o .
;(,vl 1(.,''") ....... __ _'_1_ PROPOSED WATER MAIN (BY OTHERS) '.'1'~='=; ~
I (< (.,/>- ( / ............. --il.-----:-"-- PROPOSED STORM SEWER (BY OTHERS) ii~H~!! ;:
/ / / I~' ........ _ PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CURB CUTS ~;E:~~~~ I
~ v/~/ I I "- ~ c:.oooo PROPOSED RETA1NING WALL .i~i5~~
V \ (BY DEVELOPER) ;'1; 1~io
~ \ \ ':',.Ctl>;.') EXISTING RETAlNING WALL .~ il.~;i-'~ .
''--l/t, __....--\ \ '" /............. - . :~i-L.5~ .g
(,'/" \) -- \" "'- I "'"
I ...-->~).. "'- ,<J ....... "'" '
/ ^' 0 "-
I /1';' , / "....... ~;,;,; -Z Y / N
I G/ ~ / / ....... ,-.:, / r
~ )- /"-- ~7,'-"....... / / I J ~
I c I "'- '-........................, - --- ,,/ / / ~ ~ A: ~
^ , ~ E--<:>-< z
/' -- ......... E-< Z'"
I ............... -, \ I 25 g::J ~ i
I I ;-- - J l-' ~<)~ \ I / < i ~ ~ I
~ 0 ~'/ '" l:3 <x:
(,~, \ c.', '-: < t:f:>-< u.....:l i
/1,~' -(\ \.,1 ~ is 0:: 0:
(,,," ,-, I /_J), '......... J -- "< 1_ SCAl~ IN r~ET ~ ~ <x: ~ ~
/ I -1 \ \ 0 50 :00 150 t:z:l iJi Z ""';;
~~_ -. __..J 0::: -.. ........;
L I inc.h = 50 lee! Q ~ ~
O....:l ;:.
I --I \ <~;:.
I ) ---- 0-
/'\ ,() \
\ ~~ \
(' '
/ \ ,-).,.,,\./ ;
I \.1 ..,. ./
I \ \..\),.. -;;1"K' DRAWN 8Y
(' } ".("~" vrr<8
, t- -
I I ((',/ /) DATE
'\ ,/-f/ I, 10/23/02
./ f, ).. '-'1
./ / ,,/ ", / REVISIONS
\ r /" , 5 01 03 P..',;s.
_ Ncm~ &: Lot
\J ....i; ....} La ou t. KMG.
, I ~('-i
\ -- /" /
. / '.
I .. . , ,
-D ~~~
,. "-'1
I ' "
~, '
;c::;~.. \ i CAD FILE
~ 2tJ966PU
; - :
'\ _. =. / .{s.,,:'~) ~. ",.. " (~_,_,~: ". :'.~: ,.... it' PR:~f.~~NO.
-- "...-U I .. I ;:(1 0",..-..
_ _ - - . . - _ _. -. __ _" -- --.. ~..' , ....... , . it.d __ -
- -..- --- - - - SHEET 5 OF 6