HomeMy WebLinkAbout14.A. Preliminary Plat for Park Meadows-Res. No. 6001
MEMORANDUM FOR THE TABLE jlf.ft.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Park Meadows
MEETING DATE: February 3, 2004
CASELOG NO.: 03-116
REVIEW PERIOD: September 25, 2003- February 6, 2004
DISCUSSION:
On February 2,2004 the applicant submitted a letter signed by a representative of Shako pee
Gravel, Inc. (SGI) indicating that the parties had reached a conceptual agreement on a land
trade that would allow the construction of Thrush Street. With that letter, staffs concern has
been addressed, and staff is proposing the adoption of a resolution of approval (attached)
with conditions that will assure the final agreement is reached or the plat will not proceed.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. 6001, a resolution approving the preliminary plat of Park
Meadows with conditions as proposed.
2. Obtain an extension to the review period from the applicant and provide other
direction to staff and the applicant.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer and approve Resolution No. 6001, a resolution approving the preliminary plat of
Park Meadows with conditions as proposed.
4~/~L
R. Michael Leek
Community Development Director
G:\CC\2004\02-03\ppcent03116table.doc 1
02102104 15:51 FAX 9529367839 CENTEX HOMES @002/002
.Feb 02 04 03:23p ShakQpee G....avel 952.403.1265 p. 1
02102104 15:02 FAX 952a361839 CENTEX HOMES It,]UUUtJU2
CENTEX HDMES
Minnesota Division ,.;1400 W"'tlJw",gr orl'oD
SUlle 120
MJrmatonkp, Mill ~1S:S43
PnllnD: IlS2_g36-71!3J
~..: g52.g2&.78~9
February 2., 2004
Mr. R. Michael Leek
COmmunity Development DIrector
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re~ Park Meadows
Dear Mr. Leek.:
It hllS been canmunlcated to CentelC Homes that City staff will not recommend approval of our
preliminary plat ~ppllcation until the City receives verification that Centex Homes and Sha1<opee Gravel,
lne. have agreed to cooperate to allow the extension of Thrush Street. Centex Homes and Shakopee
GraVel, Inc:. have agreed in concept to a land swap and will continue to work out the details 1n the next
few weeks. Please accept this letter as evidence of that agreement and allowing the plat application to
move forwllrd for preliminary plat approval.
If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
fly: :r~\ ~~-
Its: G t:I1a-al ff1CU14 rr
Cc: Mr. BrtJi:e LOfley, PE - Oty of Shalcopee, Director of Public Works
Ms. Julie Klima - City of Snakopee Planner n
Mr. Brad Gonyea - Gonyea Land Company
Mr. steve Am - centex Homes
-
RESOLUTION NO. 6001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING
THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PARK MEADOWS
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant, and BAJ Investments, property owner,
have made application for preliminary plat approval of Park Meadows; and
WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as:
The West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 115 North, Range 22 West,
Scott County, Minnesota AND all that part of the abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul
and Pacific Railroad per Document No. 178639 lying in the Northwest Quarter of Section
16, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, AND all that part of the abandoned
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad per Document No. 178639 lying in the
Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
preliminary plat on November 6,2003, December 4,2003 and January 8,2004; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were posted
and sent; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission has recommended denial of the
requested preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary plat request at its meeting
of February 3, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, as follows:
I. Prior to the acceptance of a final plat application, the alignment of Thrush
Street must be approved by the City Engineer, and the applicant must secure
easements and/or right-of-way and/or land to allow the construction of Thrush
Street so that it aligns directly with existing Thrush Street westerly of the plat.
II. Prior to the acceptance of the final plat application, the applicant must satisfY
the concerns regarding stormwater ponding to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. .
III. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of
the Final Plat:
A. Approval oftitle by the City Attorney.
B. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for Plan A and
Plan B improvements, as well as payment of engineering review fees,
and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule.
1
1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the
requirements ofthe Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
4. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems, and
construction of streets in accordance with the requirements of
the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of
Shakopee.
5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm
Water Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the
public improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees
as required by the City's adopted Fee Schedule for the entire
plat.
6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City
Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve
the Final Construction Plans and Specifications.
7. Park dedication requirements shall be met through land
dedication as shown on the plat (7.5 acres), plus a 20'wide,
650' long trail easement along the pond area, with the trail to
be constructed at some point in the future by the City, for an
additional .3 acres credited toward their park dedication
amount.
8. The applicant shall provide the sidewalks as shown on the plan.
9. Any remaining drainage issues in the park area shall be
addressed by the applicant, with review and approval by the
City's Engineering Department.
10. All park dedication shall be recorded at time of final plat
approval.
11. The applicant is required to notifY in writing those individuals
interested in purchasing lots with the trail easement about the
trail.
12. The applicant is required to post signage showing the trail
alignment.
C. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City
Engineer.
D. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot.
E. The final plat shall be revised to evenly distribute the ponding area
between Block 2 and Block 4.
F. Temporary street signs shall be installed.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following
conditions shall apply;
A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and
access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of
building permit application(s).
2
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held this _ day of , 2004.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3
/ '/. ff,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Park Meadows
MEETING DATE: February 3, 2004
CASELOG NO.: 03-116
REVIEW PERIOD: September 25, 2003- February 5, 2004
DISCUSSION
Centex Homes and Gonyea Land Company have made application for preliminary plat
approval for the proposed Park Meadows. The proposed plat is located north of Valley
View Road and west of CSAH 83. This plat proposes the construction of 195 single family
detached homes on approximately 80 acres.
A public hearing on this request was held by the Planning Commission on November 6,
December 4,2003, and January 8,2004. A copy of the most recent report to the Planning
Commission is attached for the Council's information.
Initially, the review period for this application was set to expire on January 23,2004.
However, due to outstanding issues, the applicant provided the City with an extension of the
review period to February 5,2004.
At the time of preparation of this memo, one outstanding issue remains. This issue being
Thrush Street (along the northern boundary of the plat). The preliminary plat before the
Council illustrates a roadway that straddles the property line between Centex and the
property owner to the north, Shakopee Gravel, Inc. (SGI). SGI has not consented to
providing either an easement or right-of-way to accommodate the illustrated alignment. The
second option for the roadway, would be to curve the roadway to the south at the northwest
corner of the plat to allow the roadway to be constructed entirely within this plat. This
option, as well, would require that easements and/or property be acquired from SGI to
accommodate the curve in the northwest corner of the plat. Centex Homes and SGI have
not yet reached an agreement on this issue.
On January 23, Centex provided to the City drawings of2 options for Thrush Street. One
indicated the need for cooperation with SGI and the other illustrated Thrush Street
encroaching into what is now the Greenfield park area (the northeast corner ofthe park) and
then continuing Thrush Street entirely within the Park Meadows plat. After reviewing these
1
documents, staff informed Centex that the Greenfield option was not acceptable for the
following reasons:
1. That option utilized land which has been set aside for park purposes;
2. Thrush Street has been constructed to the common property line of Greenfield and
the proposed Park Meadows. Therefore, this alignment would require the existing
street to be tom out and reconstructed.
A meeting had been scheduled with Centex Homes for January 27. After reviewing the
options provided by Centex, staff contacted Centex and conveyed that staff did not see a
reason to meet since the Greenfield option was not preferable and SGI has not consented to
the option impacting their land. Centex insisted that a meeting be held so that they could
present their ideas. Several staff members waited for Centex representatives at the
scheduled meeting time. After the scheduled meeting time had passed, staff contacted
Centex staff, who informed staff that Centex would not be attending the meeting.
Since that time (January 27) staffhas not received any further communication from Centex
Homes relative to them reaching an agreement with SGI.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At its January 8 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended denial, by a 5 to 1 vote,
ofthe Preliminary Plat to the City Council due to outstanding issues and the applicant's
unwillingness to grant an extension to the review period. The outstanding issues on January
8 included Thrush Street and stormwater issues. The stormwater concerns have been
addressed sufficiently at this time. Due to the Commission's recommendation, the attached
resolution for denial has been drafted for the Council's consideration.
ALTERNATIVES
l. Approve Resolution No. 6001, a resolution denying the preliminary plat of Park
Meadows.
2. Obtain an extension to the review period from the applicant and direct the preparation
of a resolution approving the preliminary plat of Park Meadows, subject to conditions
that would resolve the remaining issues.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion consistent with Alternative 1, and move its adoption.
~ '
uiiv ~
J 'e Klima
Planner II
g:\cc\2004\02-03\ppcent03116.doc
2
RESOLUTION NO. 6001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DENYING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PARK MEADOWS
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, applicant, and BAJ Investments, property owner,
have made application for preliminary plat approval of Park Meadows; and
WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as:
The West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 115 North, Range 22 West,
Scott County, Minnesota AND all that part of the abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul
and Pacific Railroad per Document No. 178639 lying in the Northwest Quarter of Section
16, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, AND all that part of the abandoned
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad per Document No. 178639 lying in the
Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
preliminary plat on November 6, 2003, December 4, 2003 and January 8, 2004; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were posted
and sent; and
WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission has recommended denial of the
requested preliminary plat based on the finding listed below; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary plat request at its meeting
of February 3, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SHAKO PEE, MINNESOTA, that the preliminary plat is denied and that
the City Council adopts the following findings of fact relative to the request preliminary plat
approval:
Finding A: The proposed street layout does not reflect good planning and development
for the City in the following regards;
The proposed plat provides an access that is on property outside of the control of the
applicant. The applicant has been unable to produce any documentation verifying the
consent of the adjacent property owner to construct the roadway in its illustrated location.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
3
held this ____ day of , 2004.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
City Clerk
4
-
I
:e
~ AG
c:J e;-
::I
~
)",
c>
....
d
~
U
v
RR
t'"l
; I I. .--'.---,
rJ) I t-_._~
N
~ eXfJ 11511 A" * ,
SHAKOPEE
COMMUNIlYl'\UDESlNCE 1617
Preliminary Plat for Centex Homes s
Gonyea Land Parcel
. Subject Property
,. ., ' Boundaryline.shp
i I Jacparcels
CJ Zoning Boundary
, : Parcel Boundary
k---.. .-_._"- - FXH15/T e.
I I . CoIl .fa Hours before dlgglng:
I GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
Twin City He4 651-454-0002
I. I, CENT PROPERTY MR. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166
._ . jAD"A1 262S , ..
r-~.. "\~.:-~-.,r--:-lr--':-'r"'.~'r-~-l rr;-rl f \~ _~~ \r- .---.,r ....-i I. r---lr--lf lr...4.-1r....-lr-11lr -'r---'r--lr-.... 1 , rr----rt Legal Desonption
· if ~~\ jllr41"f l"r lllr ~~ ~ ;-...... II . ...~~\\".lllr.ll Ir'lllr.llr.llr.1lr.lllr'11If.lllr.lllr'lllr'l' oj ~ ._".... .J'
.b. ~~ 6 ~ \. I. S j:. 2 :..1 I L1-.:.:...LJ I ",<' . - ~ ~\ 1 f. 15 . ~ ~. 1 .j I. 2 (. 3 ~ I. 4 ./. '" I. 6 1'. 7 I. II II / Lt=._=-.J.J The W_t 1/2 of SDUthwest 1/4 of SectiDll 16.
: ~ "........... _..... .~... " ~. 14 I I: -', ,f I I .f I .11" I' :~ l' . I.. r.:;'1 Township 115 North, Range 22 West, Scatt Ccun ,
'. . ! ~r~" 6 .'1~I'~IIe-. ~II~. ~~ It: . ::)jJ rg---r I I .... / 13 ~~\\""""~/I~~ I 1 ~..jlle."'--.jll~.".:IIII::.......jllt"."':111~.oojll~...jlll.!..JIII 9 II il 10 I ~ (. I r -, I, Minnesota. AND all that part af the abandDll,d t.l'
i I m~!",,~,,)'1~~ JL_....JL...._JL-...-i'L..._~~, {,., _..... II <,' ('}\.......~~~. JL_,,".J .! L ._JL. JL _JL_....JL__JL JL_:CJlc:.:.JIIl=::l(!~~~ l......!.. .. Ch/cQ.'9a.UHwaukIJIJ,St.pau,ondPar:lfk:RaiJ'OadPtV'
. ~""~~5 'Y s I I ,,~\ 12 ~~\,. .J"--.c: ~ ...... -.". -~- -..- !.-.-J'-- ILf-, J L-\::;.....~..J OacumlJllt No. 178639 /ying In th" NDrthw'lSt 1/4 o(
· I' 7''''~./y'/ . ...c.r.... '/"'I"'~s. I I I <" ~~,,_"L~~ ...-tC. ~ ~ IS .. If ~Ql~ it' rF- :-=-" SectT"" 16. Township "5, Range 22, Scott Ccunt~
, '-''F/ ./" UK'''~", ." ~. . 3 'i'~ I . ~~ s,Y ,.--- _ - .!l - ~ 'FfY1;;fNE I ',., I .. j , 'I Minnesota. AND ai/ that part of the ab<mdDfled
; I _.. ~ ~, "........ s ... I " ~," "~~~ " .,.... ,f1J __ I , 'g ~...." . S.I Chicago, Ullwaukee. St. Pau' OfId Par:lfir: Railroad per
i ~;z, ~-""r-"-.,r-"".,rli.-;'-. ~~ ., /. ('" .~!o.:-"")\: ..........~_;;.oo..., _"'_,,_-, r-=...,r-....'r-....,., r---,r- _ 0: L~:''':""J-l OocumentNIJ.'786S91J.;nglnIMSouther:Jst1/4af
, J,"'-i"J Il' ff;:::':J'r---lllr.lf'r'l,\r ;'\\:':"./' /-/-~~ " ~~ 1O\~v' ) ~~("'_.-'ll of fr,..,!lr.-l1-'1"r.lllr'11-.1"r~"'1Ir-"1r -ilr.t~: 1 II rr='=,' Zr;:::::o/!: Township 115, Ronga22. ScottCClJnty.
- ,. 8 *_~.~1I 7 III 6 II 6 II ...........~V /- ~ . <" ~~ -'''~i~''''' ///:.~ ~ \ 3f . " { ~! 19 _~I 18 I 117 II 18 II 16 114 II 13 llf;;"illr:lII!I';' ,I ' . 4 .1
. L~".:'.:41 ~ 'L.-..J..iIL.....:J..~:L.-..J"'ldL........l.i~ ,,/ ~ ",;.,," . . /' ~'"j :-'~y') --:-0..\~~,= ._.......:..oojJ ~[._~-&.J:.L~.....'! r..."'J.;1llL.........JIlL........i :......~:[.......J.~:.[..,!2..<<lI. 1!. :. 10 !~ L-~&-1J
;r....-:1; I. II ' " . II ._111 "'''''.... ( .~>>,. ....,.>')"" f \ ,--.-'" Jl .-11-. II . II .-11-'...1" . II JilL J C'....:J r-'.l'
~. 9'.) L___J L.,,_..J L....._J _..._.11...,,,,, ......... ,,~,t' 8 '~1I. )0 ",'J':'. \{. \ \.." " ~....-l L.._....I..__J '---' i.:fO....I..__.J I.. . J L . JilL . JI III ~ . 6~1
I I -..&.! ......_ .-""-.~...... " A.~""""" ~~ ~-, .. ...,. _"'-_."" .,"-, -- - __ -w ..........
L..!:::-::..:..--'J i. --. ,r---., r-----t: < .- ~~ ";';""/\ ,., _.. irr- --,r-""" ,r--',---' r--,r--'r- ._. L-~
r-r="'=.::P lr'lll,"{'-."'U, 'I .' '" ').~. 7\~'va. ~ .~ ~\<;:-r.~. ~(=~J \. \". Ilr.l"r'11Ir.1 !-'lllr'lllr. lr '~lr--:"-' r-,',' Development Data
I I I I I II I '''' 'I '" "'~''''''''''''>~V .~~~'\ ~ ~""\~'\' .\\\ 1 -,11 II II I II II lllf 111f II . 6 I
. . 10 . /. 9 d. 10 f" III . (!o. . 6' "~. ,,> ""\,.~,, ... '"" f 2 ~~ \ \ 29 ..) \ \X, .......... . :..2 il. :J ~l. 4 ~ 16 (1. 6 \. 7 ~I. 8 I. 9 .1 ,-E~-iJ I Total Site Area 80.75:1: "'"
. I L"'~.:Jt I 1E'."jll~"'j~.....'i./ ('<~\-'"'')..'\.VA~KV;/.''' .~\ ~~ .~;~~;:;\ ~\"';;;"";' ~\~':::.-1I1~....:jIle:;.~.:!LI''''''i 1?,":ld~::~."jdt":,,;1:E-...~r -a 'r:-=" Total5treetROW ,7.0Szoq.
- "'--",,-_-1 . L_..._J '-"_.I L .....h 'I . . ,/ ~" 6 ~~1'v: ",> . ..........('./"i~ 18, l' ,,:;:?{;r 3 \ \ ......~ ~~, ""- ""--'" '-....... L~.J ...._J. I....J".J L.........! I....,....J L....-l L ...._J . I. 7.1 Net Site Area 63.70z "'"
. I . -,,,,./ ("4.~~~"'''&)~'''' ..w'~)'.~~"">' \\.......~~('\~....'>).,. '1.. 1Il . L-~:."-..JJ Out/otA 7.50:/:01:.
..,........;.. - 1~.. '" ~v' 4. ~'v. ",. / -' '" < . 19 :\l ~. _ ) ~....f~ \ \ " PJr. '11::.,' · I') i- ~ I l- -4tf-r - - ,rr=:-="I Total Slngla F'omlly Lois '95
~ " ,^,~-....~'k.'"" '~ ^,.......& '~..~V ""~ 1. \ /, '?7__.~qr_'C:. . 8 '
. r--""--, r -, r- ., j- -..., ( .' ...~'< ."> ) :;.< . Aft" J '1/,/ 7~ " F\ 4' \~ ~~. 27 rlfr ' """"-"1,..-"-, r--"-., 'f-q;. ... __ _""_ .......... I Net OlJllslty 3.08 unlts/_
" I . II. If . II 7~ ....... oi" :J.!o.~Y :~",,...~t..!!!....~. ,/~z .\' \ ._..~~\~ .."'.....Z~r:. II II.. II. ...!.II II. if .-I,f . ' &t l.-~~~..J Sing/4Famlly(50'pDd) 73Unils
'I. .1"" .,.11,. I.III...........1l-..~ "" \. ,.....z....~"" " ~~.21 A:~I\ . r .........IJ rr 5 .If'~'~.j/<. J'l" 'L J1IL j.L "JIL.'-"JdL'''''''''j'''tlL-''J''dL'-''J&., l..r:......-1J EJdstlngZOfIlng Agrlr:uJlurcI
.. I. H .1' 11. kl/ 6.~\ .~\\ "\..~...; /.....-' :-:&~.'(~ z'l,.....::.::~..:::::-'.) I i=,:,,~J(r'~I'~---:-JL_._JL_..,.JL_:".J L. II . II ..'11 . II ., r-e--.=" ... PrapasedZOfIln9 .1?-tS,RIJ$/tjentlol
~ II II II 1. \ \. .......~.....5d& //_~ iA." '?# 22 ~ ~~E \' -..-- I 3-_"'""-' - I 'Ill' ')...... ,.......r 9.J L_ ..JL _.J L.__.J1-___J I' ~ 10 I IS: ~ (5.0 unlls/aq. moK)
,I 1111 'III '"l ql~ Vl6 \ ~. ~ v./~;,~~~.\,,;..........~ >: '\\\., ...!t1.. ~ n---:-nl' ',1. .'1 j:..l,lr'l'lr.-l'l;:':":1 r--.,....-"-,,..-.............;JO..'r.-...-.. I L_ ,,:"-iJ ~... PI'OpO$I>dSetbackq >.
I. . 'II" "II" "II".W 'I . \ \.o-~ ~, r.)). \.. '-- .--= J r I III I' I t II II '" . . r I . II . II . II ., - III Front JO ff.
.IL IllL JilL JllUlil /11 "......&\.\~ 't"~~<~<:::~\~\" &Yt:'.~.. ~"\~r~~..::ll Q j .L:S'd. I/:' 7 I:! s ~ I. 9j.,.l:IO~'.E"~j:I~. 12 [;Jl!f 14 If m If 16lf17!~ = rrtill!;j Side 10/tOff.
1 . -lll . II . II nLl/I-. -. ~ (30~A~~~~- ~~' \ 15 ~ ! ......... I ,......~ ,_...I 1_.. I....... I....,.. 1_... .. .. .~ .. I I ,-.... ..' ''IIii R
. L_....__JI:..~.JL.;o .,t....,__~ , ~'\\.,;Jf -. \.'\>~"'~~z. . \ ., _...i I I . 1.....JIIL.-.:..j 1-. II . II . II . -..III........~lIl:.-....:I"\:"'--..:I'II:......j 1 I L. I' .'I:Ii ear 30ft.
. ':- \ \\&~. '\.>'1 ~......... ~ 24J \ \,-,--_;::.;L.J L .-...-__JL.~-,.-Jl__.1 1....,,- l...--,,-..J.....,....-''N-....... L.: II II' II . II '.!. ......J1 CDmer(Slde) 20ft.
, \= ;i~ .....,..~~ , ~. -... L.>r .J '- _-' l.....,..-..J L..___ '- ___-;.J
1 . \ 1 ~. \ 'f\ 29:&~~. "l._~" Ii .rr-::- -: R l.. ~ _ --t- ~l!:. _ . . 20' TraD Easement, Block 2 O.JO:l: ac.
! ,\ ......... '. :f'.' I I 'C":~ ,.-~J ~. 14 ~I "'as<< "'0:' .~.. ~ .....
. 1-' . --" \ '~.f' . " -.,..~ ~....
\.._- --_""\~z~. ........& .J ~ 25 L _'_-:::...J -QL - -----, --"'-, r-......-, r-
i' · r'F;..~.\ \f(5.28~~"'~~~~~.. II r~-;'"1l ~ fr'-,l ~'r'-' I Ifr'lllr.lnri1 ~ Ir....-1r-. If-~l,'-:---' Fi7-:""=,'
f . . .' [t.~_~_.A~ .~~# .:;;!:jr2~~~ ! ~ l~~~ ~ t~jj lL~.::iJ~ 1~lnL!.6.jlC;'~I'L~"JJ; Q3lL~J..,!~]r!..11~..~[f:!..J! r~ L~"" il Notes
. . r-r-: -~7--1~~""'- . lilL .",,-::.. I I fr-:ll' ~ r---""" r ..... , 1 liP . II . ~il. I L JI'L JilL JIlL -'...
I I ILI")~~11 . _'. ~"\-J , 1 . ~_l: l I ~ 14 ~ I I ~ ? ~ l.___~ '--..--' I..__J LiJ...J L ._J L_'_J L_'_J L_':' ...J r F -=;"1 - The/ot dlmensTons and are~ on WISp/an are
i . OUTLOT A . ~ . 3 ',j1J'..11 "(;: --J 1.._ -"lli--~~'-J L.~ .~-' . ~ e"'':J ~ I L -:j I ~ r- , 1""--:1 r--, r..... ....4._ _ __ _Z4I ._ .1 i. 2.1 rJPpf'DxlmattJ. Refer to the Final Plat and supporting
I -.... '. .Ia I r:.....JIZ"'.~II".'lr-"-lr-'...lr--.,r -.,r ....-, L= .==J L :~;--~ Jq :r.ll:r'lllr'J r.ll. II . Ii . II '--" ~. l.:.e.::~---1j datafor_tiotdlmenslOllundt1/'BQ$,
; ~. .... ~ . r -::::~ -;,r ~ r '}I Ir .lllf . l"f 'lllf .lll[illr'. :r ~ ~ -q f'~ 18:' I ~ J: 1 ,. 2 ~ l- tJ lit! lll! lll! lll! if J b-'- ..,.-=;, - Castlfl1ents other than t1P1r:aIs ore noted on the plan, :
\. . . ~.III. 6 ~l! 611. 7 ~I.. 8 J.:. 9 I. 10 ~:." 1 . I ~~~ t t L ~:.ll . 1e.~-dd~"-1!lb........ I~..: ~lr..! 4 L~ J1L.?jL.!....;~ __3.... J..;J
i . I t-..... J.' ~lL"..j: 'L...::I,lt=':-jllt........~h d~."~Ill='."~1I ...... .. J. ~ - ...-=~ ~ ;;;:;::=~ l..___~ '-__-I L__J .~I .. '1::"......31 c.; . Jill.:: . ~.! I t:. _=..:::n.o-_..:;:1j.:JI. "'-teal Lot
I "'-..'--. J L ....11 . JL JC' '-.JL 'L _JL ,-+~ I/;!-' I I r -, ~ ... ... l.............I-......_JL_...---.J r-r. . -p .a.;rp
, ~ . \ .~--.....- ......-...-.r ...,.... .....~. ........1..... ... ~ 12. ~. 19. 1 . , · . 4.1 (No
I " ~ to """.... I I -.. ! III ..bJ1:t. ......... 1 SoaIe)
i . . ~ ~'~ !l-- _'t_ ~ ~,- ~ - ...... ~~~...... II'! l...L:_~J. as IO~ f-----...,.. l.. C::::_...:oa=-..:.;,J..J Street
. ~ a: (/"-....~'\':l. ..! q--=-p r-...-lr....-... r"'- . I"r' ":'-p
f . f"'~ - .-"-. .-..., .-A-. .--"'-. r--''--1 r-"-iri r-"-., ~\(.....1!... ~~~ I. 20. t I r 'lllr .lllr .lll -l1'" .... r-"--1 .....-, r-.a-, ~ . 5 .1
, .' .,llir-';;Iff-. -iHr 'llir- .jLr 'lltf .ll~11 , S.lllrg.ll, 10 ~~\ '1-~ l L-:~J i t..J....:~..!.u:~:..!....:~~I:r;1lr ~ 1: r ~ ~l'r ~ ~~ ., 1..~.~.::,J
. . r..~1 2 I tJL~1 4~' 5'_~1. 6 .~I. 7 ~...... d........ ........~.~\~ .1 r-r="',' 'L JIlL JIlL J' .......'''It......~I.........I-..JI ..........tl rr; .."
'I. '. . Jrli...._..J:t...j,li:'....:Jrlt~.JdL.....JdL~.::hIL...J,IL.J,L.~~~_...J ~~. .!!... ~ .I -eo;:;;:}1 . II . llL.JIl..JIIL.JIlL. llL.J, t~.._.JJ
. 1-. . JtB JL".......1L-v-JL........JL-v-JL~JL....,...JL~.J __ __~l\..__..._J 1-.L.:~~J __u~L ..,..JL-.,...Jt,7-.._JL ,..JL__JL......JL ... J ~;;;i-.,
. I ./' I. I I .....-, '~I. I I I I I I 26381 I I I I I I I I I I uW~~~ ~ .
,/ I Q I , 9AIlEY~ROAD -f1 a:::
,( . ~L_ L ~ L_ L Lsb~6RNb-J::-_ L t; Loy~~~~ L + l_L I _I-.l_~ +4t = j ~
!I (Ir---"--'1r- ~!.~<Cl~ I~. /w
~. Orx I -
~.l ,-" I I I <i
r I> ~~
I j
O' 100' 200' 300'
Latest Revision Date: 01/09/04
P-3 20031095PPPOl.OWG
Palo< 09/25/03 Shed: 3 OF 8
I r-._....llIop_".,.....,....._-r 1- I I :
=:r~-:::::.I:-~_......- rr~:;%~) =- OIP =: .1'reparedlO:: CENTEX HOMES Park Meadows Preliminary I
Wcila 1. Wc1>a ~""""_(o.Il IlQ 22400 WhlI8water.......... ......- "~ Plat
....... ~ twlddr _.....'t'~ ~ UN
_ 01/09/04 ~ 1>10. 12043 )AI"""onb. MiruIaala 55M$ ~ MImIesota
. , e #1f.p
'. a.d~~~
~D
CITY OF SHAKO PEE EXHIBIT G
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 03-116
TO: Shakopee Planning Commission
FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Park Meadows (Gonyea/Centex Development)
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2004
REVIEW PERIOD: September 25, 2003 - January 23,2004
SITE INFORMATION
Applicant: Centex Homes
Location: North of V alley View Road, east of Staghorn and west of CSAH
83 (Exhibit A)
Current Zoning: Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone
Adjacent Zoning: North: Agricultural Preservation (AG) wi Mining Overlay
South: Rural Residential (RR)
East: Agricultural Preservation (AG)
West: Urban Residential (R-IB)
Compo Plan: Single Family Residential
MUSA: This site is within the MUSA boundary
DISCUSSION
Centex Homes has submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of property
located as shown on Exhibit A. The plat, as currently proposed, contemplates the
construction of 195 single family homes.
Since the distribution ofthe agenda materials for the January 8 meeting, staffhas
received review comments from WSB and Associates regarding the engineering
information provided by the applicant. Those comments can be found attached to this
report.
The Engineering Department has recommended that the public hearing on this item be
continued to allow the resolution ofthe issues identified in the Engineering Dept. memo,
specifically Thursh Street. If the Commission wishes to provide a recommendation of
approval this evening, the following conditions should be considered.
. . e e
Prior to the review of the Preliminary Plat by City Council, the items .
I.
identified in the January 8, 2004 memo from Joe Swentek must be resolved to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
II. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of
the Final Plat:
A. Approval of title by the City Attorney.
B. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for Plan A and
Plan B improvements, as well as payment of engineering review fees,
and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule.
1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission.
4. h1stallation of sanitary sewer and stonn sewer systems, and
construction of streets in accordance with the requirements of
the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications ofthe City of
Shakopee.
5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Stonn
Water Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the
public improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees
as required by the City's adopted Fee Schedule for the entire
plat.
6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City
Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve
the Final Construction Plans and Specifications.
7. Park dedication requirements shall be met through land
dedication as shown on the plat (7.5 acres), plus a 20'wide,
650' long trail easement along the pond area, with the trail to
be constructed at some point in the future by the City, for an
additional .3 acres credited toward their park dedication
amount.
8. The applicant shall provide the sidewalks as shown on the plan.
9. Any remaining drainage issues in the park area shall be
addressed by the applicant, with review and approval bythe
City's Engineering Department.
10. All park dedication shall be recorded at time of final plat
approval.
11. The applicant is required to notify in writing those individuals
interested in purchasing lots with the trail easement about the
trail.
12. The applicant is required to post signage showing the trail
alignment.
e e
C. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City
Engineer.
......... .. ... '" .......... ....-......--D. -- ..-.-Thesurveydata(length.andbearings}shallbeshownfor eachlot........
E. The final plat shall be revised to evenly distribute the ponding area
between Block 2 and Block 4.
F. Temporary street signs shall be installed.
II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following
conditions shall apply;
A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and
access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of
building permit application(s).
If the Commission wishes to defer action on the item this evening to take additional time
to review the comments and recommendation provided before them, several options
exist. The 120 day review period for this application ends on January 23, 2004. As a
result, if the Commission does not wish to act this evening, the applicant would need to
grant an extension to the 120 day review period to allow the additional time. Ifthe
applicant is unwilling to grant an extension, staff recommends that the Commission
recommend denial of the preliminary plat to the City Council. A recommendation of
denial would allow the application to be reviewed by the City Council prior to January
23.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Obtain an extension of the review period from the applicant and continue the public
hearing to February 5,2004, to allow the resolution of issues identified in the staff
report.
2. Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions listed above.
3. Recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staffrecommends Alterative No. 1.
ACTION REQUESTED
Obtain an extension of the review period from the applicant and continue the public
hearing to February 5, 2004, to allow the resolution of. ssues identified i~ the staff report.
-"'< ,?/lu !1Lh1L
(j Ie KlIma
I
laMer II
g:\boaa-pc\2004\O 1-08\ppcent03116.doc
e e
City of Shakopee
Nfemorandum
. .... ....... ..... ,.. ... -.. .. ... .......... ......,' ... ..'. "..... ..... .. ". .,... .. ". ..... .. .', ....... ..".. .............
TO: Julie Klima, Planner II ~-d~~L
FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Park Meadows (Gonyea Property)
PID NUMBER: 27-916005-0,27-916008-0
CASE NUMBER: 03116
DATE: January 8,2004
After reviewing the above referenced application, I have the following comments for the
applicant and for the planning department:
Recommendation
I recommend continuance of the Preliminary Plat. However, if the Planning Commission
wishes to act upon the Preliminary Plat, I recommend approval subject to the following
conditions being addressed to the City's satisfaction prior to Preliminary Plat review by
the City Council:
A. General:
1. A wetland certificate of exemption shall be submitted for review and
approval by the City of Shakopee.
B. Storm Water Drainage: ;
1. The proposed storm water infiltration ponding area may need to be
increased in size following the results of the soil infiltration tests
previously requested.
2. The soil infiltration test results shall be submitted to the City for
reView.
3. A storm water infiltration system design providing pretreatment of
storm water runoff prior to infiltration of storm water shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval.
Q:"EMPLOYEE FO LDERS".JSwenlek\De\'e1opmenl. Re\iews\PI.l, Rc\;ew\Park,Me.doW5(Cionl'e.Prop)\Prelim,Plot, Rel';ew .Park ,.'le.dows #4,doc
lof4
e e
4. The proposed storm water infiltration pond design shall incorporate an
impervious liner to the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
volume.
5. Pre-development discharge rates and volume calculations shall be
submitted.
6. A written summary of all storm water calculations shall be submitted.
7. A written summary responding to all previous comments shall be
submitted.
8. A Class V injection well permit shall be obtained from the EP A for the
proposed storm water infiltration pond.
9. Submit additional storm water information requested in the memo
from WSB & Associates, Inc. dated December 4, 2003 (attached).
C. Preliminary Plat:
1. The applicant shall obtain all the necessary right-of-way and/or
easements for the proposed Thrush Street construction under Plan A
improvements or petition the City under Plan B improvements to build
the street and assess it. The applicant shall pay the assessment for the
street construction offsite and shall waive and release the right to
appeal the assessment.
2. The intersection of Meadowlark Lane and Molina Street shall be
revised to form a ninety (90) degree angle of intersection as per the
City of Shakopee design criteria. All impacted lots shall be revised to
reflect these changes.
3. Show the property lines for all adjacent parcels.
4. For all proposed lots adjacent to each side of the proposed storm water
infiltration pond, lot lines shall be extended to the pond center with a
drainage and utility easement encompassing the approved high water
level.
5. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot as
well as the plat boundary.
D. Preliminary Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan:
G:\.EMPLO YEe FOLDERS .JS"'cntck:Oc"clopmcnt Rc\;c",s'.PIOI, Rc"icw'.Park,Mc.dows(Gon,'C.ProPJ\Prelim Plol,Rc\;cw.Park,Meodows.#4,doc
20f4
'. . e
1. The applicant shall obtain a NPDES permit prior to grading operations
commencmg.
2. Work with the park and recreation department to develop an approved
grading plan for the proposed park.
3. Minimum building openings shall be three (3) feet above the approved
high water elevation. Minimum basement floor elevations shall be two
(2) feet above the approved high water elevation.
4. Show all proposed erosion control devices (silt fence surrounding the
entire site, rock construction entrance, bale checks, inlet protection,
etc.).
5. Provide City staffwith earthwork computations for the entire site.
6. No slopes shall exceed 3: 1. No slopes shall be less than 1 %.
7. Denote all high points and low points in streets, side lot lines and rear
yards (label with spot elevations and drainage arrows).
8. Provide top of curb elevations at each intersection with drainage
arrows indicating drainage patterns (this shall also be shown on the
street plan and profile sheets).
9. Catch basins shall not be located within driveways (the minimum
offset between the edge of a catch basin and the edge of a driveway
shall be five (5) feet).
10. Low point catch basins shall not be staggered, nor shall they be
located within street intersections.
11. Emergency overflows shall be shown for each low point (within the
streets and the rear yards).
12. The emergency overflow routes (with spot elevations and drainage
arrows) shall be shown for rear yard catch basin drainage ways to the
pond and ultimately off site (one (1) foot of freeboard shall be
provided).
13. Proposed spot elevations shall be provided for each lot corner.
14. Prior to construction, surveyor's bench loop notes shall be submitted
showing the benchmarks for this site have been established using the
City of Shakopee's approved benchmark system. The benchmarks
utilized shall be shown on the plan sheet.
G:',EMPLOYEE FOLDERS'JSw....k.'D....lopmcnt. RC\'i.ws\Pl.t. R"'i.w'.P,,,k M..dows(Gon)...ProPJ\Pr.lim. PI.,. R.vi.w .Park.M..dows."~ .doc
30f4
" e e
15. No site grading will be allowed tmtil preliminary plan and profile
sheets for street and utility work are approved by the City Engineer.
E. Preliminary Street/Utilitv Plan:
1. Provide City staff with pavement design calculations for all streets.
2. The engineer shall field verify the elevation of the outlet structure from
the Greenfield project to the West.
3. The engineer shall field verify the elevations of all street and utility
connections to the Greenfield project to the West.
4. Provide street and utility plan and profile sheets showing proposed and
existing elevations.
5. The street profiles shall be designed to a thirty-five (35) mph design
speed as per the City of Shakopee design criteria.
6. Through street intersections shall carry through a two (2) percent
cross-slope to the edge of the driving lane then transition to the side
street profile slope. Spot elevations shall be provided at the centerline
of the intersections and at the edge of the driving lanes.
7. All pedestrian ramps shall be located at mid-radius as per City
standards.
8. No mid-block pedestrian ramps shall be allowed.
9. The proposed sidewalk shall be six (6) inches in depth throughout the
entire site (denote on typical sections).
G'\EMPLOYEE FOLDERSIJSwenlek',Oe"elopment Re\,;ews'PI.. Re\;ew"Park.Meadows(GonyeaProprPrelim PIa, Re\';cw,Park,Meadows,#4,doc
4of4
. >. e e
.
.A WSB &: Associates, Inc.
WSB 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, #300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
(763) 541-4800
(763) 541-1700 (fax)
& Associates, 1nc,
Memorandum
To: Joe Swelttek
City of S/zakopee
From: Phil Belfiori
Todd Hubmer, P.E.
Date: December 4, 2003
cc: Bruce Loney, P.E.
City of Shakopee
JasOlt McCarty, P.E.
Westwood Professional Services, lltc.
Re: Comments Olt Park Meadows Preliminary Stol:m Sewer Plan & Computations .
WSB Project No. 1281-64
We have reviewed the information provided by Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
This information including the following:
. Two Revised Preliminary Plat Sets, dated 11/22/03
. Existing Conditions and Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Maps, dated 11/22/03
. Volume Calculations fotthe 2.S-inch storm event
. Ponding Calculations fort the 2- year, 10- year, and 100 - year; 24-hour storm
events ,
. Ponding Calculations for the 10-day, 100-year snow melt event
. Storm Sever Drainage Area Map, dated 11/22/03
. Strom Sewer Design Calculations, revised 11/22/03
Based on this review, we offer the following comments:
Hvdrologic/Hydraulic Model
. The site is predominantly Type B soils, approximately <10% are Type A soils in
the vicinity of the proposed infiltration basin.
. The proposed development site is 80.75 acres.
C:\Documents and Settings\JSwentek\Local Settings\Temporary
Intemet Files\OLKl 97\1 202031S2.doc
. . . e
Joe Swentek
City of Sltakopee
Decemher 4, 2003
Page 2
. The lot density is approximately 3.06 units /acres, which corresponds to a curve
number range of 69 - 71, which is deemed appropriate for the density of the
development. The runoff rate entering the proposed pond appears reasonable.
. The water quality "dead pool" ponding volume required to comply with NURP
recommendations is approximately 2.8 acre-feet for the 2.S-inch rainfall event. The
current pond proposes approximately 2.8 acre-feet between elevations 806 to 808
and approximately 30 acre-feet between the bottom of the pond and NWL of816.0.
. Proposed pond appears to have side slope of approximately 4: 1 with 1: 10 for
safety bench at the NWL. This appears consistent with the City's requirements.
. The lots adjacent to the treatment pond in Block 4 should not be platted into pond
drainage easement area or ponding area.
. Calculations are provided for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event and the 100-year,
10-day snowmelt event. Calculations provided currently begin at hour 12 ofthe 24-
hour event. Please provide calculations beginning at hour 1.0. This could effect
the anticipated I DO-year high water level.
. Please provide calculations for the back-to-back 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event
. Should the developer desire to have standing water within the pond, a pond linear
could be added to provide standing dead pool storage to the NURP volume.
. The pond area used to provide NURP treatment cannot be used in detennining the
discharge rate though infiltration for the pond. This will affect the infiltration
calculations provided. Please see attached infiltration design parameters below for
possible alternatives to address this issue.
. This pond will be considered a Class V injection well and does require a pennit
from the MPCA.
Storm Sewer Calculations
. The 36-inch RCP inlet at FES 70 is submerged 1 foot. This does not appear to
adversely affect the stonn sewer system hydraulic perfonnance. This pipe segment
may require more frequent maintenance due to freeze-thaw cycles.
. CBMH 82 to CBMH 79 is an 800-foot reach with a 12-inch Rep pipe connecting
to the Greeenfield development emergency overflow. The flow in this pipe does
not reach self-cleaning velocities. lfthe pipe was increased to an I8-inch Rep, a
velocity of2 ft.lsec. would be achieved, although 3 ft./sec. is preferred.
. The time of concentration used for road DA -1 appears to be too high, a value of lO
minutes is more reasonable.
C:\Documents and SettingsVSwentek\Local Settings\Temporary
Intemet Files\OLK 197\120203JS2.doc
- " e e
Joe Swelztek
City of Sltakopee
December 4, 2003
Page 3
Storm Sewer Plan
Onsite issues
. Low floor building opens in Block 2 lots 1-4 in DA-1 are I-foot below the 100
HWL and may not comply with City Policy regarding basement floor elevation of
need to be 2 feet above the 1 OO-year high surface water elevation for the area
(policy 8c- Section IV of the stormwater plan).
. The drainage areas defined in the "post-development micro area drainage plan"
appear to be correct.
Offsite drainage issues
. Drainage areas 3, 4, 5, and 6 drain off-site beyond the limits ofthe development.
No discussion has been provided to indicate the downstream impacts of thi~
drainage. Ifpossible, drainage should be maintained on-site.
. Drainage areas 5 and 6, which are approximately 8.06 acres, discharge to the west
and were not previously included in the calculations for stormwater infiltration
basin in the Greenfield development.
General
.. The infiltration rate used in the drainage calculations from the pond is I-inch per
hour. This appears reasonable, but soil testing by a certified geotechnical firm
should be used to verify this rate prior to final design. The total infiltration surface
area provided is approximately 3 acres and currently includes the pond area
required to provide NURP treatment.
. Consideration should be given to an Emergent /Upland Vegetated Buffer placed at
elevation above temporary storage area. This will minimize erosion potential of the
pond slopes.
. Recreational Trail is to be located close to a 1 Q-feet deep pond. Consider visual
buffer using vegetation around pond for safety. The pond does include a 10: I
safety bench.
. Is there a way to utilize Outlot A in the northwest portion of the property for
infiltration?
Attached is a concept for under pond infiltration. This system provides pretreatment of
storm water prior to infiltration.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact llS at 763541-4800.
Attachment
C:\Documents and Sellings\JSwentek\Local Sellings\Temporary
Intemet Files\OLK 197\120203JS2,doc
.
r
.. ...L:<.:;;:_..;~l;~~II~iil
,
Tile Line Design
/'.... .~......_._.._..... ,n" ........_h._____.._.,. _.__.....~ --- .....-. --- ..- -- --- - --..-....... -- -....- ..n.._.....__ .... .~..... ..0
I Stormwater RetentionJInfiltration Basin Design
; I e
\
1
!
i
1
I
I -. '.'.
I ..1' .':.
~~~1&~fi~}t~~Ji~:'
i
I
i ~wl, ~.~;;
I I'
! ,";'
-.. :'.1 : l,i;:"~;'
i -. "--'"" .".. -.: .::.... ...
! Wooded Area
.' I '......;.;..::;..:-.....,.:.:'",..:f......
i
I ~...\; '!S't!1!. ......:Iiw.l:~~. ='f;,,,~ ~;. ~'!':ii.;n.-:'
!
I Basin Outlet
i
I
\
I e
!
i
I
I
I
!
i
i
t:.!
::1
; I
"1
~-= I
i r... ..;:;::..:.."" ------, ...............-............ n...,. ...._.... _Ill 1lC...ll....
'i WSB _....." ----..---...-------.
:'~ flU.MI_
. I . _....... t,.,.......- .
~.=....~....- :..~.'=.'~:::::::.L___.__.._..!.. H"'. ._....____'____ ...- --- .._... ...__., M.._............ ......._,....___.. ..._~ - ,_.._._......~ . .....<F
OllO~/O4 14:15 FAX 9529367839 . CENTEX HOMES ~uu~
e e -=tff.p a.J~~~
~
CENTEX HCMES . GXH-I/3rrb
\\i.C~\~'E1 JM~ 0 8 1004 Minnesota Division '2400 Wt1ltawatcr Orlve
Suite: , 20
MlnnetonJcs.. MN 55343
phone: 962-9:36-7633
!'ax: 952-936.7839
J:mua1'Y S, 2004
Michael Leek
Gtyof Shaklpee
129 Holmes Street South
S~pee, :MN 55379
BY FAX
Dcar :Michael Leek.
Cemex Homes submitted a. prelimirw'ypl9.t application to the Oty of Shakopee on September 25, 2003. We
were' notified withiJ.l five days ~t our a.pplicatlon is complete a!ld the review' period will be e),.'tended by an
additional 60 da.ys for a. total of 120 da.y review period. Since then, Centex: l-Iomes has, made every effort to
work closely with staff to make requeSted changes to the plans so thcycan be fo~d to the Pla.a.olng
Commission for consideration.
Mer reviewing the staff report for January S, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, I see the recommendation
is to haveCenrex Homes submit a letter authorizing the continuation (beyond the 120 review period) of the
application to Feb~ 5, 2004 meeting. Under mOSt circumstances provicling this letter could be
accomplished. J.-Iowever, CenteX :Homes contnctu:l! obligatioDS with the seller'\l7ill not allow for further
el.'tension. of this a.pplication.
I :ull respectively requesting the staff and Pla.nning Commission t.':ke action on our preliminary plat ;tpplic.aoon
at the January 8, 2004 meeting. Based on the changes we have made to the plans that comply with mlf
recommenda.tions and the few minor revisions remmung I believe it would be reasonable to have a. conditional
a.pproval of the prc~ plat. As I undersund, the prinury issue centers on revised starm'\v,l.ter
d.culauons, which we have provided based on, requested pl:m changes bystaff. Cenrex undersunds the
calcula.tions need to ultimately be approved by WSB and the city and if there are changes required to pl:lt they
will be made.
CenteX Homes '\l7ill be at the meeting ThursdaY:lOd ~ be prepared to answer questions. I hope you can
understand oW' sintaooo. AsSUlnll1g the Planning Commission makes ll. recommendation, Centex: will
cooper::lte 'With suff to work through outstanding issues prior to the Cit), Council Meeting.
If you have :ulyql.lcscions ple:L$e do not hesitate to contaCt me.
Sincerely,