HomeMy WebLinkAbout13.C.2. Gradng Permit Application from Randy Noecker of Ridge Creek I-Res. No. 6769 13,C•~.~
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Grading Permit Application from
Randy Noecker of Ridge Creek I, Inc.
DATE: May 2, 2008
INTRODUCTION:
A grading permit application has been submitted by Randy Noecker of Ridge Creek I,
Inc. to grade 80 acres. The purpose of this agenda item is to review the grading permit
and receive approval from the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
On January 7, 2008, a grading permit application was deemed complete, as submitted by
Randy Noecker of Ridge Creek I, Inc. for the Ridge Creek proposed subdivision. Staff
did extend the 60 day review period to May 7, 2008, thus the City Council needs to act on
the application at the May 5, 2008 City Council meeting.
Attached is a letter from Joe Swentek, Project Engineer, to Randy Noecker of Ridge
Creek I, Inc. on the extension of the review period and outline of requested revisions that
are needed for staff to continue to review the plans. Staff has not received any further
revisions from Mr. Noecker, as requested by the Apri125, 2008, 4:30 P.M. deadline.
Staff has prepared a resolution which recommends approval subject to a list of
conditions which includes those recommended in Joe Swentek's memo dated May 2,
2008, Ryan Hughes' memo dated May 2, 2008, and WSB. The action for City Council is
to consider Resolution No. 6769, a resolution approving a grading permit for the Ridge
Creek I, Inc. application subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution.
Staff is attaching the Grading and Erosion Plan sheets 1-11 for council review and the
redlined Grading and Erosion Plan sheets 1-11 are available by request and will be
available at the city council meeting as they are 22" x 34" large plans.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Offer Resolution No. 6769, a resolution approving the grading permit for Ridge '
Creek I, Inc. and move its adoption.
2. Table to May 6, 2008 City Council meeting and direct staff to draft resolution
denying grading permit application to be considered by the City Council at its
May 6, 2008 meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Offer Resolution No. 6769, A Resolution Approving the Grading Permit for Ridge Creek
I, Inc. and move its adoption.
ruce Lone
Public Works Director
BI,/pmp
ENGR/2008-PROJECTS/2008-COUNCII,MIEM6769-APPROVE-GRADING-PERMIT
4
i
g1g
SHAKOPEE
E
February 27, 2008
Randy Noecker
Ridge Creek I, Inc.
8315 Pleasant View Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
RE: Grading Permit Application
Mr. Noeeker:
The City of Shakopee has completed its initial substantive. review of your grading permit
application.. The documents reviewed and commented upon include the fallowing:.
• Grading & Erosion Control Plan (11 sheets) prepared by Plawe Engineering -
dated 7/26/07 ~
• Woodlattd Management Plan (4 sheets) prepared by Carlson & Carlson, Inc, and
Plowe Engineering -dated 11!22106 (updated 12/19/0'1)
• Landscape Plan (1 sheet) prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated 11/21102
Comments and requested revisions to these plans are outlined in. the attached copy of the
redlined Grading. & Erosion Control Plan set and the attached memo from Ryan Hughes,
Natural Resource Coordinator, dated February 13, 200$.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 15.99, Subdivision. 3(f), the City of Shakopee is
extending the review period for your application by an additional sixty (60) days because
additional time is needed; (1) for you to address the comments and needed revisions to f
your plans; (2} for you to resubnut revised plans; and (3} to allow City staff adequate
review time to consider your revisions prior to the City Council acting on the application.
The grading permit application was deemed complete as of January Z, 2008 and the
initial sixty (60) day review period expires on March 7, 2008. With this extension of the
review period for an additional sixty (60) days, the City Caune'l well act an your ~
application by May 6, 2008. In order to allow City staff adequate time to review the
resubmittal prior to this meeting, all revisions must be received. by City staff na later than ~
4:30 pm on April 25, 2008. For your information, the City Council will also be meeting j
on March 18t~`, April lst, and April IS`h. If you desire to have the City Council consider I
your application at one of those meetings, t1~e needed revisions to your plans must be
received by City staff at least 10 calendar days before the meeting date.
~OAI~iUIVITY I~RIDE iINC6 Z~J~~
129 Iic~Imes Street Souttt • Sliakopce, Minncsat~r • 5379-13.51 • 952-233-430U • r:~X 9?2.233-3SU1 • cvtir~~>.ci.sf~akopee.mn.us
H:tEh1pLOYEE FOLRERSVSn'emeklPennils iBP GPA~~&PUmits=Ri3gaQedlGzadwg.PelmiLAppErattea(Ll-i-07t2.'x3er Extension L.et~tc 2-21-US,IIOC
Page LOf2
I
If you have any questior~ or if you require additional 'information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (952) 233-9363 or iswenteknci.shakopee.mn..us.
Sincerely,
Joe Swentek
Project Engineer
cc: Mark McNeill, City Administrator i
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Michael Leek, Community Development Director
Julie Klima, Planner II
Ryan Hughes, Natural Resources Coordinator
Jim Thomson, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered ~I
Kim Kozar, Hoff, Barry & Kozar, P.A.
C
4
H:1E.4st6SEE FOLIIERSVSnrn(xktPemrits:(BP GPp.6radmg.Pamirs`Ridge.CreklGradngPecmit lpplic~[ion p!•1~07)V~cecLer_E.aensido iettar 2-?7-0S.DOC F
Page 2 of 2 i
RIDGE CREEK
ING EROSION CONTROL / / %i i I' ;
i ' ' / ~ / ~ ~ ' ' / /
Gl ~l 1L ~ I / / 1 / / / ~ ' ~ % ~ ' / / / ~ 1 V / M4(WUESS ~6~ o reoomi
~ / ~
I - - _ - s AAA ave 6
CifyofShakopee, Minnesota i, ~ ~(~i% /i / ~~Q ~i~iC,~iC~Q ~ ,iC~i . ~ - _.....a.
~ '~-1~ / t r ~J -~,'uYrE / ~'r• ~ -"-`e ~/J T~ / / ~C ~ , 7"., aA 5.yn,lmg pN„Y F y an,
% / " ~ ; ~ ~ - 1- i '`1 , T - /r! ~ i _ _ r ~ / ~,nhrh~ IM Sin wrc P3 d vi lu
/ 17~, ~ / I~ 7%~ ~,i6 9' o U~ 12~ ~r~ ,Y I~I ' S ,fp~~ / I ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~
I "7r- ~ 61' 21~ 22 23 2 ' D~ ' _ 1 ~ ~ o [nslun aid
N ' / / / i ~ / / ~ / ' ~ - L - / / ~ ~ q
' ~ >I ~ I ~ ~ Ana'
' / ~~1 ~ ~ ~ / : / / / / , i h'~~ 2 j/ B / ~ i~lll~ oRZJ~~mt'N~~y erp
/ I / i ~ % f iB 16
~ ~ / ~ % ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ / ~ / ~ a , ~W / / ~I ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ m
/ ~ % 1 ~ ' ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - - _ - - - _ _ n lbllmn Orb F IMGu)n t'' AleCutl he
/ ~ 1 I ~ / / / 'ate' - ~ ,iorytp ~'zq al~
/ ~ . • 11 I /I~ % / ~ I,g,lirAYegik tE 9r ' O?OiJNA1lIF0
i S
' - _ ~ r~ r- VIC{N~Y MAP
- - -
` BFNCNMARH LOCATON/ELEJAlION
/ 1 ~
~ iop nut Nyd. o) iunhritlge C[. = 76293 (Ek'/afian)
/I D 1 ~ TaP nut Hyd of O.tPoM Rd. / SouM Sn'dge PMVUY =
~I 1 LO \ \ 759.99 (flrvafian)
- -
~
~ 1
I 8 K 1 rote
I o I
c~eNmn~i
sPCC~Ptrana+s~avolxsr~ORUlaa¢°o
Go~ra"~ au~°~a~FS~r
a~B
Ivum cnxsmurnax u» it@ cm' oP SwPAGPEE owcx cwtmu
Ji-'~-^a - a~
1
I ~ 1 ~
_ ~
I
NB44JJ'46W
I3Ag!' 1
X x / '
"'~~X ~ ~ ~ ~ % ' I TOTAL S!!E AREA 79.4 AC
LO r X , / ~ " , ~ I TOTAL SRE ARE4 DISNRBED 765 AC
, i r
CONEERtlA7IDN EASEMENT $ - ' 4 % /
/ ~ I
/ % ~ '
I,'~ ,
/ \
i/
i / i
, / 1 ~ I
i ~'asTuocew,~ G / ~ % 1'' j" ~ ; i 1 COVER SHEET
' ' ! / ~ ~ / ' 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
~ / 'I ~ i ~ 3-7 GRADING PLANS
e ~ B A3 / V' / 8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
~ ~ `9. io rt /t2 j' % / ~ 9 DETAILS
r / 10 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPPJ
r ; % ;i % 11 ON SITE BORROW PLAN
SCALC
nP :eP rxan
aa/O6 oy Gammon I/Ardd I nerMY cprli]y fhsl Nm pkn wos preparee Dy mm or under wv~ PlrtPUUB PoR~ Bn1E II/2t/OP
B[SlCnro BY: J__V. my direct su~ervsmn d IAOI I am a duly LRSrued Professiolwl
] 6/d] eb ~mrnnb 1/B,~at Fn9i IA< has a/ IAe Stale of Ninn solo. Y~W i ~ .~~.4 ~i. C0~8f$T SILFf
o nw+nw m~. +x. i Y
' l inch = 1211 IL ~ir'~ ov 'e'~-s., h.` ENCCNEENING 8775 Pleasan! Yow Dt. WCGE CREFH ~
ClYtkfO B~~ GwP. eI,c1AYFOxn¢I@,sBlR lid Noundf HBW~ MN 55112 U ll
g u_ ~smNwie~
u'i i+OW me-a,d] gWJ(CPE7; MN
-RIDGE CREEK-~~__________~,`\,_____,.:r 'e~=
1663
' EX15rWG CONDIT10N5 PLAN courm srw~ Nu wicHw~Y No" 2t ; °
200 foot right-of-way °o l ,
v v u as ~ 1
S 89'44'18' E (ummpro ed) ~ 01
City o{Shat<opee, Minnesota
_ _ _ _ _ _ -205J.53-- \ fence yI 1
)IrbR : /
~s~a vaCl6.-= sw=,~-^ 'sP°~ ~ ~6e:F ~--u'i--=nac=~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ 1 ,r,,- ~h tren.... B~~~Y¢+mmontm6fl5 ~ ~ ~ 161..
ra ~r~'S94 s ) `•_'`.~T'_ _ ~ ~ _ , ) ~ no c+ Oerb 6 ~n t
I~,~ ~ --b"I2.30-J~fi4 I )ss.6 is6,G---, I 491.0. ) .a t ~ ..241. -s.1 Ei ~ c~. 4~
4e2~- I } \ yre]n 1 \ I •)e63 '156) 'i50.] '7`v&9 ~1 '155b ']55.G ~s;.a ']5y,, ']s35. N• ]qa l~ / isao ]533 4.4 9VIn Ln ~ :w
I ~ \ \ / North line of the Sp,hhweat ~t/4\of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14, Townsfn 115, Range 22 ~ J r \ ~ ~ ~ I 1~I ~ _
I # ~ I ~ ~ .
i
\ s a / ~1 I Plorth line) of the Sonlhe~st 1/4 of\lhe Northeost'~/4 Sec 14 15~m ~2 ria< ` 6
~ tis.o / ~ I t \ i ! a.y~is : Canlbri:lge~ 1~'?y
/ '76w.1 •755.3 ]956 '15510 )5).a fi6,a ']55.i II 11 ~ 41: )92.6 ~ ~ i
I;
1 / B~9 ']510 ')5!A /%>ii.l '%Ya \ 'i565 ']SE.S ']54.3 ')552 , j` \Im ]52~ / n
\ I i ' I 1 1 a'y~ r `4 Ebill ~1 S rin s Ln E
L( id}1I-
1}S~ei )µ5ll \`\5~ \,ZSb]i-'aS~~'~~)56d~/')55.9 ']550 ']5aB I '15G4 . . i I 1 tS~S/ \ :~~U~J~ ~y-per 9 _
]56.6 ')Y.9 / \ \ ~,a,,,,~~P+ ~.y' pY7 133.] i:« }
„_l~ J } ')G2.9 J754.9 ')Y.; ''15x.9 >54.3 ']5).I '>i,G.S 1 ))i'D173~\/~bA~~\\Y ~ ~ i
J)s~i.~ I S k/, I / ~ ~ tar t i
i. ']ss.3~6idrs.~o ¢~\.p ~ I W I \ h 1 I I / . yis,a'-Tance !~TT~j
~ ~M •
~ I is, `2s'>SJ >s14 ~ ~EL A ~~,2'.] `~srz--; ]sb4 v' i a,o ~ ~ \ ! 1 / s~ FJl.I 1:J M1
\l \ )508 1~,~ ~ 51 ''IS;.B I ]56.7 \ d /A\ ° ~ ~ rte
r ']55.2 1 1. 1 ']SS9 y 1 Q l~
fencB I }1 I~ I7 / 1~1 ~.W~^ 7 ~ 1 1 )56.3 ']5fi.5 .1548 'T55.'-'4 '75].0 / / \ m ~ h .sJ' I ~f }
~ 10 ° I'/50B )51J Q.,, ~ \ \ ~ d]559 \')r:~0 / \ A \ d ~ ~
I;o Ilm J ~meoa Z5~\ ~o ~-35G.\ o u \ I i''• ~ rv`~'•-~:,,.~~1@CYP )~h B'
1751. 5Y9S J1S ]SO~06 .750b \ b \ m t }",~~~51 y w . ,R P*, [llU(~d3-
` I i'z 160.0 "]b1.4 ')615 '751,b I 2377-~ ')546 'lh5) ']fifi]\\ •%56.5 '150.6\ 155.6 1~5 )560 7552 '1595 /]54/ ')51.9} 160 ]69.9 m ~ w'~ 0 .r""']'1
It o o \ \ \ ,e ~j N ~ ~ 14
Il \ \ I \ 1 ~ ~ •,$!6 '§i5) e\ ° :o Hor¢on
I 11L ~ 1 151.3 , I / I, ')ss.2 m / ')53A 153.] ''Wfi t I ~ \ '~C B\ 0 a C1Y~ ~:..a~,„.„ ~•1
w I)sl oii5 eaaa34.a ')s.9 ']51.4 ')s12 '75x3 '1 ~ I /'ny~ '7ssa / / \ \ r: '
66' GAS E/SEMENi D9 ~ a~'
t1 ]sLZ p ')45 '7567
. ~ 1 \ \ ~ 11 I I ~ "7~8_ _ i 755.9 ')5].0 / p~ a , i' \ m
r p I ~wwz ,'7s1o I I / r ~ \ ° \ ~]6o.Bu LO _ ~
~ 3 1512 )5IV I I / / ° ° .e, ~ ~T," ~ ~ ~i
ro.. m'\ 0• 7s6G I > z z l~ \°75)8 s\ E U I .c. ea'~
7 ]530
~ I ? \ \ ~ t.2~1~-/' , r_-)3{o I / I /m ')>3s )b21 •]saa )s44 ~»s~s lil m \ _ ~ N 3 ~ ,s yhr .
~ ` ~ / )sGB n1.5~ ~']sls \ I I 1 •l 1 is7 ')s].6( ']s..a « ~ s1~ « m M ~ Ye ~..a~.
I v/ 45)9 )69G y. a I ~~'c w '
z I In • 1, ' ],Pll 5~.13ni a ~&5~~ k b ~ . r )sa 41 / X5'8 / / / I i !c Cy )se 1 0 r
155 ys19:5n SJ~965 7s o ~`~Fy,'/ ~ ,,,M '~yA 4~ I / / `0 1 0 A ~v o vl I 0 x4
- Lt \ S]'r`y \ ]aoa';N> I l'~ / rt 1 ai)siA ° 9 m I Lew-
B~iS ~"'~3 ~SA.9~,1'f.B~"1~/(,
]53?~/`\ i ~ \..253'=/i553 >56 ']s'.e \55G1 ~ ~i52G VCINTY MAP SCALE 1"=1800'
` 22.30 ')55A J , 5~ . ]559 ,~lbg6 lArg ~ . ~ I Y'
~
_ , ~ )551 / 155,4 5 .5.3 IB3.3 ]538 ~
`]1 ~ / `-S 89'44'18" E I I / r~,_ \ '.vv'..°'9 ~~7i5~)s2. .)al ]s,.e 1rI9 m I l~{~~r~~}i/v r~~T
a J/ \ ~ 5 ',5521 1 /r / /17 0 ) 31 026 ]52G 7526 Pea r6w .r. I' U'11L1r 1111. S1,HLE
:]sa`~sf I. T. f ] 2s c3sG1~-_..._ / u~t1.. ° I II lissl I2G eo sn 2w 4m
'1me is»~~ -_asr4=c7~zc$i~x°z _ ~.,ss ~ ~ _ =.Z`.~ -]s''9 zs-rs_+'- --`7sz 3' - =r,34-- '~;sa--'~o~'II I ~ 056.4
' - - - ~~-2--~== _ _ .,b:, SCALE: 1" = 120'
in.3 \i s4.) .)s3.3~ •lssa 1s4o- _---=aas:t--\ a5a4 I (IN FEET
_ ~ 154.2 )Y.0. \ l3 r / J' - .0 I 15319
s / )Y.a c ~ \ / 'n5.1 _ I I t°ch = f2G ft
I f 15,u'111~ ~ t ~s~ i 1 y m` ~ wm,l,wK )s.4•
/ _
1 Rx 1BeB) is reB Ge cnmc e4m - ]s2s: wme LEGAL DESCRIPi10N:
11 ~/w6gi:~~ ~'f\~a'G] ~6$.i JJ5]~ kB ~ n 111 %-I~~r~ 9~~m
r
I '1ss.1 X54, Bak'B°4S,~r~e •z J4,; I ~ I y ]5°.3591.75
6~.I J ~ I~=3B II I chat part of the West half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14, township 115, Range 22,
\ 153.',5538 lying Northerly of the North right-of-way line of County Rood No. 16, excepting therefrom
(7559 /]Sfi0 Tv- ]6~5a, '+'2b] ~ _ / - _ '7528 W I the West 410 feet thereof.
')5.4.4 \w9 pNi 7. Bk2 ']54.8 \`'~¢~`.-._157539 "~39~ •]SJ.a $ i]53t -`.h ~r.
' ,t f ~ \ x`11 r / S4-_/^\,- II III 755.1 ~ISa.1 The Southwest One-quarter of the Northeast One-quarter; the Southeast One-quarter of the
\ / ~§avssa ~ 4/~/d?' i l _ \ a I~ I i I I Northeast One-quarter excepting the Easterly Five Hundred ninety-one and seventy-five one
\ 1 / 1\~` WASTE BLUFF / ~ •ies.e ~5 I,Ss3d1 I 1 I hundredth feet. thereof; all in Section Fourteen, Township One hundred Fifteen, Range
\ T / 1 / ' )562 / 1~,` / 1Y) \ \ II J I { I iuventy-two, Scott County, Minnesota
\ asss W 3:ri.a 'ssi --'rss~\_ ris? 5]~3~ ~..~~1599 m \ Ji•sEi ~.l I r,a
\ / .South line of the Snuthw+s4 1/4 of the~Northeost 1/4 of Sec Y4 ,rn,ma t 1nRE.a x46.0 0 D E 0 •,~6_61~---_ ~ `~3 III I I 1 ~szJ
4~ ~ \ ? 7asdf6e: ,-a~e~u~_, \ _ l } I '7557
\ ]S7. -756.4 .~]59)b -4 ~i i4med ~Ye i . ti'
~ _ .,'S~^ 15]6 l-~ ] 2 ~0 1 ~~eia _ 4 lSB.G '~7~2~ i& e I' NOTE: Area of arcel 3,460,423 S Ft. /9.44 Acres
\ ~ ~I \\4,` its s t (rses 60 .rr5,w<le- _i~~ ~ )jdA- - ~Z]5 I ~ ( I P q~
\ ~l II Vsae \ / ( f o,am 12:8 ' 12onemr .3 ~ uth Ft
v' of 11h~ S°oBtheest tj4'o~Eha
N east ~~g[wSec'14~~/ (I 1~~1 _ 1
, \ I~ ~)b9.J / .414 1)583 / 11,~d'~'~B'' ''i eoL-\ J. ~Bt~,,.. ~ ]600 a,f`~11 I
-)578 i ~ / / ~ z ,,5. _ - G- _ ZSD. _
_ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~~,44;-..2.3 N 88'47'46' W
) _ ea ]a6,.Nye)'y~6 sr? //rte ~)g~ q9 - /'4~~~=
==_rr== - __m -t~9.. 5 ^^R- -.591.77-_
=~,s91LL.~ _ -a".~iw ~a.a u~~ `]'Y 1 /77_"`^w q ]eta } =ass.
~~i~?-- \ \ ~ 1m~ _1 -1 ':u.l~
- -r==~- 4dAt3 ~ ~
/ \ n~--~;,'- =~~._i]>,r_ .N'89'4`3'+46'",\ _ ~(nce I i Eart 1F4oome~
";"l ,m arm l9Rr ~f1~-~//%/~ / _ \ .~e3a\ \ \ \
=e7:~.?'~ - ~e°''m'.-,'BB'9°°;t'g,z »u~ I-`////// /e's~]ess ~See4. \ ]e39~'~°".' Un6`? \ \a ~ \ ` \ 1
~aE-r]eo- '6~-),~Swwn,,6-i~mi
~,~."°a,~:.r.._j80_:ji/ / 1ee]'7eUrs \.-ie'\ 1 \ \ \ \ \ I
4 _ ha \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
IE ]fi963 -'_~--~---__.f6/1C0-r ~ A-l-_ .~'1'~1i6 ~ , t _ ~ ~5~] • `a• \ I ..1 ~ \ \ \ \ \
I ~ ~~i~csa4. - / \ '"'Sscn°YSd6 \ ~:aswn~\~i73 I \ \ \ \ \ \ 1
r L ~ 'lad "'ro4$rb-~.)'~6r13'~~W F4 9 mm \ T"~~1 C\ \ \ ` \ \ \ 1 1 U i
t o 41000=~_ 6 ~ ~a.e ) AA_ Z I v v. ~ v v\ V A 1 \ V I
' 9W9 va+ '98+1se5 ~ / e'e,5 1 . P eBo'~ ~ `7 v'--\\ \ \ \l 1 1 \ \ 111t I
„ 4+e r )9:a nz.i ]91.b _ 1 1 1 I
I~ < m~ ~ ~w ~r' " rr. ~ 11~~~~ I -'.was / ' ~ / / '--->rob 1 1 11A 1 1 I
_ 7 1„ ? / / / 1 1 r Denotes Iron Monument Found
~ I / m I Tar am 0.1 ; ,a.nnnu ^ V ' A . r"-__ ) 1 1 ) / 1
,I, ~ p~~ ( ~ y ~ N I "'°am '~G3P o' 489 4Fi.. *~~~r94s I , ~ / / / I ~I I / :?¢u~// I
~i1 G-n„~a,.• ~ y N p, gP ~,~,o /.)t~1 '~4 ~ ~o / / ~mr / / l r/rl.e 0 Denotes Iron Monument Set
6S'w _ G"1liv/' ~ o ~my 9s9a ~~a'hS ']y~9ss ( IM ~ / /
~ I ,w-~\! b . ,osm n. sn. ~m,.y, 2 \ -.I 1 ° ~N N~„y/ / / 4d~//////1/ll1/
II P~~'- \ .P"" I a 'mod I ~ 'r / /re' I! h
I / o z I A ifiB'~3, y fMl. 'D9].i ih. 6 ! 'm.4 j
m:n r I° h I ' I
„ll \ 0 4' mn,tl°.J4~.2 r ,~N I n..~... e 1,p!'c 6 a,l L ~ D I I ~ J ( / ~ 1 I I
I ~m ds~d"rss•wn! r '~~;'J'4a!Y ~'aaPa Is^mnq so~>ae2.r--~b7m'-2s~v),o1y~t3
~r~/ 9u'r~ I \ I I. IJ I
4,~ ~ Y ~ a ~ / ° nsaas '9I e'em:1,'aal~e ~ ')919 / ~ '1 toll I 1 i I / ` \ \ 1. i ll 1
° 1 ~ f ; m I s B~) mfin'ree Pow3cmo r e n~' __".C,7\. r / / / ~ 1 / \ \ ; \ /
J` m t > r N ~9~.n 0-'-' . "9smJ / / 1 I la;..! `1'"I' 4.'
s ~ 1 i d aP a , ~ ~ ~ s d''y / ~ / m11. I i 1 I I J' i / /
1 ~ - 1 I: ; ;std I ~ ~ay s e9l . r n 2„ ~
M ws: +I / l... / r,j, 97 -J' \ I ~ • „ / /
5 - . \ o ° w1 di a I >,,6, '.o /hVa 94P~~ ~ 94~z tz =.n 1'2 ems / 5 III / I 1 _ , f ti / / /"Y. ~11j1 \ .9' '
r ~'L~ \ a ai ~ eh , :~l V t / / 1~`•'kFl=. r r
I ' R..'- ' \ I I ,o ,v / mdrxa a A r~B ~ 1 1 / 1 I / /
( ~~3' 6 u X5.4 eel ']s'2 ae6s 1es.so I f ~ / / r'.('' I I / /
I I ~ a u I a2 a ' ~ a9 = n e- A v ~ ~ / e~`•bx14 I I I I I I:.. / / / /
1~1 I 10.1.E \ "~•~L-3E~1~T.;9~"oir,3 ~n - ~ / ~ s ~ a9v ~ ~ / /l I II I /
}~,.-+S 7 me b~ ~ q> m ~P I 6m1. ! ~ 33\ 1 t I'! /7"11.11111° / / /
I ,gN ,yw ell,n"e me~rmrl„ SURVEY PROVIDED BY:
\ , \ )96.3 )90.6 \ \ / / / /
y 1 I ~ 78947 ' l e,"IG'meme I° \ } l,J, / / / 6T n//„ /
r 1 ~ _ ~ 1 •iB,.a ~ /'•i , CARLSON & CARLSON, INC.
/ ~ ~ 1 I - 71 7.y, ` 96.5 \ \ ~ } 1 / r p°A % r' ~ /
I 10:6- )9901 I'19tlH \~19);ga • I,>"~9 BJ.9 \ J 1 , LAND SURVEYORS
1 ,./,9fip~ I \ ~195J ~~'.7BL' .I 0 \ ~ ]a3u R" / , . i
Tele. No. (952) 888-2084
9 \ ` I --T~',^~, ~ Iron ~ z: \.,,:.or`:.. \ ~ / I ~~F'r/~.Kr'~ 1.
"'-'a~ _~-~rr4_`~,.. i' v~.:i~h6 VB9B 'Yee, ~ 1} \ = m 111/1 i _,a'., /
`p~BS,``=`--=
`--:A~~„a~~=L_
v ' ]B6a.. ° s'\ ~4`~_ ' l if / ,r' /
N 86'54.,(1" W ~sa ~z a yo9 ' \ p ( I ~t'• 7 / /
'.•"pl~ A ~_`--eo. n =.`L=~s~~: 6: ~?@ .ally i J'':1 / Il J~/f _,r` /
MIlON ~6GO.e oo -]93~~~13'':' 3 / I ~ \ / / /
dOUIEVARD { R= 3525.36~`~~'.
M ' ],Bx S I i I \ \ I/ ~ / 1 / / ~ „r: / ! n"rmy cerrry nwt mn ploa I.w p,onmee ty me w mmmr ~w:,,m amrnnm rax: u1e 1 f/2Va
4= 5'41'08" m ie9:7 id~t`~~~ ~ Ilp 1 \ \ / / my e;rmat a"Pm,z2mn mee mm 1 m,m a amly ?romsee r,menreem 1
• V
]9G.0 r 6'~7es \ 15 / ' a,?' Eas+aw,~ or !n, smw w wrom~m. ADOE Cif 4 NC. EXP~fNG CAfDffpfA sr4m
i ';e:rJ~•3,. ' / .1~~ II(tlQIC6R111tl BJ15 Pleumnt Yew Gr. PI.PN 7/ I~
n1~A~7~~.~1+jt).-~-' i`-' 1P' ~ ~ • ~ me ~.95mumFnesuml,o RIDGE CREEI( /
• n .fTr'R~rx'- MounrM Yew, MN 55172
RIDGE CREEK
G(ZADING PLAN CO. RD. 21
City o{Shakopee, Minnesota .
E-OF ~___--------'760---------------"~, ~__..0O7G0---~I-- _ I_~'lY^\\ p~__/15"RC APRON I
'
_ _ .
• ~ ~ o ---~----'"-'758--'-----------., 75'-15=`RCP ®0.25%% _ "'I°"` .la~~e _ _ - _ 10'-15" RC`~1~.5D% E 753.5 89 44 18 I
I sssa~ Tsra''' E
S53`~- :TSgAe----756---`e'-~_ x.756,--~~-_ 0-758--' ~ ---EOF -S _ E
,_..~i ~ \ s. a rT ~ _ IJ58 2~5~.53~ 250'-15=. RCP ~-0.327----756--.. 7
7575 i 5~ 0 0185- 5 RCP ®0.253' 7, 56 ' 1.-0 ' RCf7+' 1.46 ~ O .B" 2!0--- ~ D-- 7 _ -'1"4 '-18" -D.2 ~ S6:S~
EOF \ ~ 15" PO CB 588 756,5 757.7 0. 75Y.
_ I - ~ "IE 7 754 - - 6 I E R 1 - - 1. ~c5c.'68MkL6 -T~.gs. _ CBMH 62 r+~- 7'-r_ - $~~~Mli 6i>~~~~<
\ 600 r 752.,3 vIE~75~.i4 753.10--' - V •~RE 755.45 •p0 '6C I~755.65"~ 'g0 'cF~E 756.0 , SO*~~ _T.--~yrt, s¢
~ • ° ~ 758 I ' ~ 758.... ~ , ~ ~ IE 75 , \
~ f 7ss 1`1 --ZS&.2_, 758.0~~;~758.0 Ir758.0,r 755.0, irJBQ.Q~I I 759.7 ~759_7_~o~,~Z59.2_,LrZ~9?, x759_2 ~ 75e
I 7,~g 9 III Z5~.2 1 759.2 759.E 759.2 \7.
v A~ 0.,-~I~~~ 758.3 I (7fi8.3)lo I~58.•3~ ~ (758.3) (758.0 I (757.3}I I~(757:0) (757.0) ®Y I ~ r_ r----~ ~--~-~I Ir,-
~(75b.5) I I (756.5) I I (756.5}III (756.~sj--, . I (756.5) h I (756.5 (756.5) 756.5) (j
i VA 15ga i I I n 'i LO LO a LO I I I LO I I LO I I i I~ ~ I 'LQi I I i I *L01 V i I (LO I I f
g I LO I I 10; I I 7sD1 I I I I II
1 ~ 1 ~ L. I - I o: 766.0 l I I I I -
G r I I
I `TOWS / 1~ \ S 1 76b.0 I~~ ,7 7 765. T5 \ 7634-1' R P7® 0.38% I ~ I I I ~p I.7p I I I ~ I I I 7 ~8p I I
~ I ~aG----J I ---G~II ,G-----~,II~~ ---~ie~~~ 7~k'DU_--J1. 76 D-°----G~ I G~---~I G III G N G ! G Bp G 111 G 's
J L----'~ L----J ~-----J s c~--
/ ~ ' ^ \ ' ~ l ~ - ~ 35'-18" RCP II~ ~ D ~ 766 ~ 766 ~m I v ~B 60A I ~N - ~ ~ y, 784
GL h~~ ~ G i' S a- ~ J wG8 58- - J ~ J _ ~ w~ - NJ I~B 608 i J z. _ _ _ n~ I - ~i I - J 6~ -
\ \ ~ \ ~/h0 \v 16 N ~ ®0.309 ~ _ ~ ~ ~B i,dE 751.69 m h E~61:25 -
C
~ I ~
~ ~ G>~sID!
j - _ IE 751.79 _ \ _ - - - - - _ \ /1_ ~ i~~{~ - ~a4'-1t
RCP 3%
5,1 •6 c 35 5" I
i \ x' I - 7 .5= < <03 c<" ®••~r < tl eP
-'c ~5]'4ei 5 <?icy-pe<~<~-~<-=< < . < F^.•--<c-•~[
gym' I ~ , ,\r/~ \0 380 g3•`~ 163 p5 3.20 OAK CR EK DANE ~.1D 425 q.1D 2 35'-27" RCP 4 ~ I {'~.84~` 5 I
1°" / i N.~.~-E--~~ -~fY 7!~ a6 3. ®0.30% ~ . 3,2 10 ~~~m~_ 2.2p \ 7.57 I t.iD
asq o ~ o.53 0.529 EOF/761.8
I % ~ i ~ ~Ik ~1 v_I =7631 _ - - I-I-3'S,•r-~~-~'---I I IZi-1~ ~ 0. 5" _ y= - ~ 62g3 I ? - 61.8'>~y I II~, \96~3~-~- % - -
~ _
~
h , / , X67 - - ~ - _ - - ' I - 'RE762:480 ~"-1-' - ~ - - RF'7g9~5 ~ ~'o'~ > - ~I~- ~ t,~ a~~~4 ~likR~ 6D.~7~.~ I; _
O 1~'~ / ~ - - - ' %E 762:60 - °i ` al. - - _ ! m ~ ' I ` - ~ 1
54- N R ~ A i ~ _ . I I _ -'-764 ~ 4 u ~ -
hloJ d ~ ~ " `7~ 751sa ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ EOF )6J. ' I s 9 i,b,- ~ QTR- ~ ~ I- 75 7/ I ~r-= -
h / / ~ 19'-27"
\n ~ / - ~ ~F 764. ~11E, 751_48 Y~m5p0 165j0 5 I~~ ! ~I ~ 9p 0 0 0~ ~ `p k~ h I I ~ r
i N~ i l l 9`~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ 8 ~ 15~_- j~~i 10, iI~~S~,D~ ~_-_-~i~6FG 1'~_ RcP®o~51 ~ 4 ~x~rG 15 ~ ~i rG ~ i D
11 c l a/ ~G G 0 G ~r' ~ 6A I II ~ --r ~ ~
I / ~6~~ ~ ~ ~i II I III I I 1 ~5~ III I I I ~I' ' G I,.-' ~ ~ I
I L_ ' i l k 4 I I I 766.0 1766.0 11 I 766.0 I I /bb.0 I,~ I 766.0 I I I 766.0 7 0 I I 766:0 I I P---~--~ I/ I 1 I I I 11 0 I
754. I r ~ ~ li Q ~ ~ ~'V )
D I ~ ~ ~ x.
_ ~ ~ I I1 ~ ~ 1_ _ I I I I I I
°5 ~ II(~ •.I. ~ I ~ : _.I I J I III ~ I~I~I III ~ ~I III I I L~ I , 1656 on I~I - L~' 2~II111 tro~~~Illll L~ I~~111~4L I
I~ I I I I! L--~ ~ L- A I L------~ L L L------ I------L I L-----L \ ¢li I------J L-__-+_J, L 23 1 L 1 hl -~i i
II sse 6 I ~~$0 78.0 ~ 75u,0 758.x- I 758.0 ~-f 758.0 758.0 0„ I 7 SEO 758.0 759.3 0 759.'
~U tii~ Ii 759.3, 759T~1- iI ,
OI I I I ~ ~A r I I I I i~ I v I ,I i i RE 763.20 I I l I I V I ~
EO ~ ,n a ~L I 1 I a ~ IE 751.41 ~ ' 6a 6 pp, . / \ 1
1\ ~ 1 I I I • I ~O \ I l • 11 1" RC APRO I'N I' 1 i ~ ~ ~ 30" RC APRON w ~ _ ~ 9 1 1 - - I I - I_ m I _ 1/
/ ~ ~ I / I~." L - - I ~ I ~ - - - J I. - - I ~ ~ IE 751. r1- I' _ _ 7d yA, 4. r 7 3Q _,JI
j
i / \ I~ I I I - C9J I i r 6~ D I 11 ~ Ir J'%~ \ - - - - - - - - - '-754' - - - ~ - . - 1 ~ v ' • ~ - - - , - _ ~ ~ 'I
v% v` 7 ~ ~ _~ES'6 1(~ \ 1 j~ ~ ~ ~ ( ^ ~ ~ ~ " 752751.8 - - - - - r r ~ 1 I ^ 1 - ~ \ II f"- / -11 I I 1 .
~ 1 ~ d- 1 ~ ~ l ° I ~ ~ 2 t I I (t h~ 4 B L I ; ~ I L~
I fk
-L{ ~b 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ •/i'\v _ ~ 750 _ _ ~ I I 6 58-- II o--
ii( ~,L - , I
1 ~ TS~ ~ 1 I ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ \ V 746 I tnl,• ~ i p ~ ° I. I ) I l 8 .1 III o,
~p I I~ I ~I r ~
~il° ~ Il 1 1 6 005 1 \Tc 5'•~;, ~ 744 ~I , O I I On yti I '.I ~ b I hl ~OI 3~ pT.
\ r o5 I I ~ 1 , ` ~ 1h ~ a OI ` GIB b~~ ~ ~ 0' ~ '
~6S C9 J LO \ ~
~J I I b.ll 1 ~ L\ "~\,1g~'r O ~ ~ ~ 742 ~x s5. ~ / ; ~~x ~z In y 156`01 I \ t
` ~ I 1~ ~z~, ~ 1 ) n 112 v v,7~a
.9 , I 1 ~yn1~ 1 ~ 3 V ~ ' ~ ~ ~r VA ~ 2~1 1 ~ 15° ~P ~ ' ~ 5
qq5§ 10V I \ 7 @'~,~~, 6 J ' I ®0.30 V ~''~'l G'\
I ~ \ f ~ ~XT65.90 A 6 v / ;~~0 V 1 I 3 ~ A N 6,~'1 ~ . yA\ ~ l.:
~j~ vv
i I I ~ ~ - ~ Lj .\~,~E v / • ~ wn ~S I POND i I _ 1~ ~ \ 6 \ 1 G ~6 ) ~ 3 ~j~ (2 ~ 1 1'
' I il' ' ~ \ ~ "7 k0 \ s54 yy~ S NWL-751.8 ~ \ O G') % ~ ~ ~ 9 R 9 \
I I j1' ( \ \ 0 \\\Od
p/, t~L9 \ A,~,~~ HWL 754.6 1 \ l~/I'~--- , BUJ 1 ~ v 11
\S ~ ~ -
15 \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ HWL 755,30 CHANNEL \ \ / ~I /G ~ g 1 ,1 1 Q I / d ` ,y0/\ 0 1
s Ii.S.vb O\ cA 1~` 0\ \ ~ ~ I ScP\ I ~ ! I~ ~ MN 48A .S y . (
I f / 7
i 6 , . ; , ~ PROPOSED RIP R/tP & GE07EXi+LE FILTER FABRIC; D I / , 75A80 ) 1
1 fir' ~ci 5.ap 1 \ (TYPICAL AT ALL A BONS 6 1 ~ ~ 1 EOF ~ I
1 'Lj\ 9\ ` \GcO. ` P ) ~ J~I~L~, Ci3MM~47A ~ r / 56• / IE 1.65 iCEM754.80 n h 1 l
l~ \ j i~ \ \ / ~0~',1~N//(LO 127"RC ~ ~ ----27"RCAPRN '---RE ~',.'.O AD. 72,-I 6tiPIE 1
I ~ ~ ~ ( \ 6~4. 1r y.~ :I I 15" RC APRON q - - 6 4 6 RE
~ o IE 75 \ 7,Q / 1~75i.50 `0 1 P %
f . / iS \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ 1 W/ iRASH(+UARD I \ ~ 756 f ~ 5 4D 756 °'I'S 56 4D E ;
~ ~1 \ \ d ~S ~ ~ + _ N ~I IE 749.40 ~1
o ~ ~51r 4, J8'-15" RCP Y
MATCN EXISTING OR AD U T B f521j i' ~ \ ~\~Sc- b~ , 2 0,287
~ 1~ _ : 26'x15" RCP I I I ~ ~ ®0.53% BM
\ 1 lakr`~ ~
RADIUS IN FlNAL DESI N AS ap ~ - ~ _
APPROVED BY CITY ~ ? S` / . V r ®D.0% I OF` 8'- CP ~ IE - - -c ---c<--c<-
S1 `~J5~ 18 RGP~ 83A501, i 6 ,.21 ' ~ ~ I II r ~ 0.247 - Q` ~ <--c<_.-«---t<-~~
\ ~ 'f % ® 22% ~ < < 2 5' 27" RCP ®0.20% "i.• ° ao, ~8
•_'f.09% 15 0.50%
'L n 6 - < I ` RE 757.12 T,TS'-15" RCP~~,
~ - 752 \ ~ ii\° V \ o ~ t, ? a 4D ~s'p • ~ 75?, ~ I I 4ss.eo ~ - _ ass CROSSING B
~ ter' / hti/ \ M SD CB 4 ~ 1 765.x8 O 1110 ~ I .IE,-752.3 ~ / - ' j SO
' S ~ I ~ / ^ o.\ ' `fl RE 7 d8 5011E 751.37. W I I ~ ~ ~ 9/ 0 ~>56.65~~78%
I ~ ` I I rA ~ ~ 16 751 4~°I I 2A ~ I ~ 1 Ilu1 i I ~ POND SKIMM d~9 d5 ,J2C°P 5 y3 ' .
JJ ~ ~D:-Sb% -'n x'0.70.% _ 1 I
~ \,_I6t Cp ~ / I rl~ I ~ .4~ n I I _ r~ .'I ~p 2 (1W0) 135'-72'x5' BOX
E S eL ~ b. i CfA 43 I I! 1 8 U :~~[j N. ; q = S I 00 ' s. 1 ULVERTS PRECAST CONCRETE)
~ 752754 - - -RPP~Z55.21 ~ L _ to I;l, ,g 0}I I k - IE ~~6~ ~,~`~~`I~~.p~ ~ ,~5~.-'l" ~ ~ ~3mo ~ ` IE 748.27 - - ;
_ _ _ ~ - - --x15 - - _ K--~~i I ~ -,tea CB ~6 ~ _ ~ - f W 1 ~
_ 758 ~ ~ L-_ ~ RE 755,80 ~ B P\ !
, (n ^ "RCP \ ''GA.R i l' _ _i_ k~ _ v j'~~ EOF ~ s. - \ ~~~6~1
•i~',1° ~a ®0:42% 2. _ 5g1 .11% I 3 1ya _ 2.11 6n
p5 _ 1 50 / 58,50 ~1~ 0.5C!% ~ 'X 3 ~S? ~ ~5 V V
. ~ ~5 %
1-
~ p - ~~.3-,~°'-~ j3CP D _ I ~ 1~~ C -o , ~ DSO ~ ~`L
6 , 6,' , D~ ) f V - = ASS
1 -RE752.40~ ~ 756 - ' ~ /'LO ~ 1 ° 1 ~xCONCRE7E - -756 y754 "y • 0 ~ ~ I r \ < ' ~ 1 \ A \
754 _ _ _ ~ E 7 W ^;,;752. - v. ,E ..>8~ . _ 5. ~ . ..2~ ,_~..rL,v ~u
i `~ry762 1 \ \ niji.-v.nn.n,n~752„-n.~. _ _ _ ..v _ n:i F - 0..l.i' ..•v ..n.^ l n . , _ n ~•^_1^ ~ \ ~ r.. I..~ i .,v
T "N x..vvnr ,7 8' , nn. • .i.i. , ~ ~ T . ~ . ~ ~ r - J s .,:n.~.,,,
.,1. .n s3 _ .-.,~.•7~ -T i ~'7a2^I J^t ~ _ \ ~
F n
Mise Nof°s °All pRAkYM15 5% OR fESS WIIN EXCEPTION OF THE
rare Au smr~r Oluwsr9xs NE BENCHMPWf LOG1iroN/F1&AlION 2, AI°axx d~leM1
g
da d= ];71Dx fti(LpµcNG SEE SHEET 2 FOR TYIICAL LO7 DETAIL
--980-- ExlBtln COOtGUf o'>xuvnsc
~ ONIE[S p nu Md, v ge CL = 762.9] (Elews°n) 3, Min ditch gmdv = 15:1 B,5x-LOTS 5 & iB BIx 3, LOi 11 BLK 6
le I / run6rid p ~ _LOTB 22, 16, ]2 8 33, BIX B TOTAL SITE AREA 79.4 ACRES
LEGEND: g <:MnxS!°°
pp1~ _ 5; Max Shoat Grvde = 7%
-G- EhlSfln G0S Llne lV 1Dp nul Nyd. vt Oxfard Rd, / SoutA Brfd a Pkwc g,p%{OjS 8, ~1 & 2JJBIX 2 7
g 759.89 (FJavoc°n) g ? 6: Min Strad cr°do = 0.5% TOTAL SISE AREA DISNRBFD 78.5 ACRES
-oNW- Existing O'JC'rhCOd 1'UifCS ~ J: Mvx R. Crude 5D' Oom intorsediwr = J% -LOT 1, BLY I, LOT 12 BIX 3
Existing Storm Sewer - s - -Lpr n, a'x 4, mrs zT ~ ]6 Buc 7 I
N RAI NO S: Sllt Fence lax-LOTS ] & R B(K 4 SEE EROSION & SECIMENT CONTROL PLAN (SHEET 8)
1J THE INFORM0.110N 6HONN ON THESE DRATNNGS CONCFAtSVG 1YPE AND PfOpOSCd $tOTfTI $BWCf SCAL}; _iti~N111i
LOCATION OF EYJSPNC U1g1PE9 IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE aR X880.85 Proposed $pOt EBVOt101T nrm:
ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CWVIRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING H6 OWN jNolU; Pr°pw'ed spol elev°livne G6Cn[0 ox J_V, °/r'?v6 nU're*mmm V a t nerc°y cenYy Umt IAk Obn wva prc?mva Ey me ar untlv pprppq~ ~
rrr~I ` arc a/zVoz
d ® Proposed Catch 6asin/Wlanhole ~ ,
OETcRMMATON AB TD 1HE TYPE AND IOCATON OF UIlUDEB AB MAY BE shovm ore ground ,urfoce, °I ~ ~'v j~ r/zvJa rh mm".rc aie/°s my G,red supmisbn and lMt 1 vm v euy licensed Prolenivnol ^ ~ ~
Engineer °r mr 1°w" er lne smm m ton<s°Ia
uEGPSSARr TO AvoiD DAUacE rp THESE uwnES. biwnimo~s sUrfoca or gultcr Imo unrml er. a.¢ ~ PoDOE CPE9C l oRADRq PLAN s,¢
..J g. .,..e";•,... ;;+;y x•.xrrvurcaxur.
- RIDGE 'REEK
GRADING PLAN
Cityof5h~kopee, Minnesota TYPICAL LOT_
' CO. RD. 21 GDRYkR"~(IIP,~r
55.5 56.0 D.wEC110N OF FLOW
N ~ ~ FlN CR1DE 0 BFAR
S89'44'18"E i EOF ~~`i i EOF 1, - &SE11LMftJDR
" 2057.53' 250'-15: RCf ®-0.31%----756..-, 1+~ 1556e\. ' X55 I c ss5.0 ENDIES LDDKOBT TYPE _
I ~ - -+lena \ .~N,w ~ - ~ l0 DROPPm I LWMEE
_ _ 756.5 757.7 _ /57. , _ _ _ ~ 1s ~ ~ - _ ~ ( > xOUSE w/caR ftDOR
6, ~ 758.0 756 Y= Zto - I nx cw nOO.R E,tv o ~"=-nw.
oe4
_ MH 63~ _ ~ no__
7~5A0 754.7 -°-may= - :J ~ y_ F"oM OF Cw
S a5 'a .iE 5 o P 'e.,s •Op 7~.3. u.oA? ~ ~ ~ ~ - ; , 24, 0 wD-waxaur
99 'c~ E 756.0 ~ ~ pe ~ ~ 'c r) IE 75 , cE ~ 1's ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~iEV t 6q \ ss ~ Ei ~ ~ R'~~ ».,~w,
V ' 4E I 0 \ NWL--247.5 N -cw rt mwx I cSUnsE
758 N i ~ A J'F.x 1 ~ Irl ~l HWL 70. E/747.50 6G,3 PRa"DSm cawcE LOCSrrox
~ ~ ~ Z`~9? ~I ~ 759.2 ~ ~_a.59'.Q ~ ~ ~ _759._2 ~ ~ v759,2 ~ 759.2 759.2 I 759:2 ~ ~ y5 ~ 174x- Ja4•
j rt ) Y ~ -I I~~ ~ I I ~ I I r ~ r ~ ~ `a'2~=~ v; ' ~ i i ~ ~ ~ s4.a
756:5 ~'J 756.5 ~ ~ ~ ~7 LGSM' ~ ~ ~ 756.5 ~ 756.5 755.5 I ~ ~ I 756.5 1 ~ 1 756.5 ~ ~,~~-1 756.5 I ~ 1 ~j ~T , v ~ vv 742 i , ~ ,v
LO I I I~~*.~0,~'I I 7601 I xLO~ I~ ~I_ LO I~ ~1 LOS.vI ~1 LO* Icc~~l L0~' I~I~I LO* I~I~I %~]'wi//`v~. ss9 v i I ~%ii/~~ \ i'~~ .,~.."."m«
I I I I I I I '1 I I I I .I p `h \x /!~~\''''SB ~ \ I /i//~i
' I G G G~R'~ •v G 7 P lyd 2 ~h;-„I' r~,~, 5q' r ~ ~ \;d / j y~o ~f
Po ~ B3 ~ 764 ~eD G~ ~ ~zep -J ~ ~ J L----~ I - ---G ~a I x / s~v _ v ~ 63.0 EEK
~ ~ ~ ~ D PROPOSED CR
:B 606 f'" I RI 764 I 761~G ~ m~, - i,'~ s2 \ ~ : 0 1
~6rslzs ~ N~ J ~ _ J ~ - - J - - J ~ _ce.sc . - - - ~ - - N-- / ~ • 'so . . / ; ~~I ~ ;i~i 6~. ~ - CROSS SECTION ; µ,~~~n.~u~'e ~<A.,~,~p
1E-753.07-~~x'-14 - - ° yEY56.8'Y - - ~ ' a .f.; ~ \ ~
57.41 S 253'-L~1~RCP ®0.26% ~ ~ - N ~ 2s 6-~ 1~ ~ 4 > 'i{^~ \s r ~ r ~ G / ""A~EnKpA°"
/5~~=4< '84'-18' RCP ®0.28%(' 7~3 _ _ _ ~ ~ { ' \ ~ ~ /
'2.2D ` 151 I 1.10 0.52% EOF/761.8 t51 jss.. qa F Z6R v'~J/' , ~`'.V ~l , r -
e 2 - 761.6 52%~ I I ~ ,J_ ~~84% 084% 6 0.50%~i ~
-50,°7 1 ~ 4 ~ ,Vp 1 ~ i I ~'r.., .
J. \ ~ ~~~-1 I~. 76 I ( s~ ~ _ _ , _ ~5: _ T,7~' c 1 \ - f `ate I o 1 I ~ ° ~ 4: 7
Iy~ - - - ~ 4 C6 1 = ~ ,ev 1UI` ~n ~i1 ~,,,ea I n ~ ) ~ a. S(OpF
o - - ~ - - 66.;r7L I A _ Da 62= - - - - ~ m' I ~ , ! I 1 1
~ ~ _ 5"17- I_ ~ ~ q, ° - - \ - h "9 ' _ ~ l r / 1
1 94 ro ~ - m h - - N J I~ I Z .57 ~ 'x / I F
6• I n 1 n~ 7- N / ~ P`^ ~ ~ l i~ I I i
F~ ICI. 00 n .~II ,~Y ~ 9 u U N iv 1- - ~ ~ ~ - ' .7 7 ~ ~ f / Imo-
,h ~------t r-~k:-- ~ ;1 ~a of ~ I I t ~ 1 16te66 - m D l~~i 1 ~ J,. ~ / 8' WIDE BDTIOM s
,0 764./ ~j~ 5 I ~ ~ I / ~ '~i3~U- ~ A a;0 _ l ~ ..r~~~ ~ ~ ' /
~ 11 0 I ~ ~ h ~ ~ U 6 59~ ~ I liy ~ ~ I I v e,~~ 'Lt 6. 76' f~ - -1~ I ~ I ! r I I , ~ ( ~ 72' EA EMENT -r
RW~ I A-) I I ~ •C I G~ ~ 6 ~ ~ I ~ rn ~ I v\ A'V-=~' ~~.8 iv 1 a ~ ~ v ~ ~ o~ !r l ~ ~ ~ %
v L__ 1 I I ~ I I~ s I C I ,RO R I~ I ~ I 1 h I~ I y O t X; i~ I
,6 ~ I L-o* I I * I Lo L ~ ~ I I t ~ ~ / -
oQ ~ 21 ~ Lo 22\II 23 IT~~1124 I I,=O a' S~ ~ 101 301 ~I 1 P,+ ~ i I~~ II _ ~ .
al L-----J L--- JI IL--- J 1 LI-1--- -J/~~ Y 686 fj0 E-- t$`I •r,}) OI I ,~l A I ~ iNN~\ I r-~
0 759. / ~ ~ I• I 759 ~J ~ 1 ~ 1 1 Ain r,o- - _ ~ I `f I r~, -i- ~
16 16 - - ~ - _ ~I ~I 'y~ s" t ~50 ~&P~ , ~ _ e7,~' s7~ 7 7.8- - ~x ~ x i
V _ n'~ l ~ 80C ~ \ I 1 ~1' MH 54 ~ 9 A I tk' ~ l ro tl ,o0mrts ua~ce naoa 1
/ 3 - /1 o R 756.8 I ~ ~ ~ ! ~l ouSSE w SLOCx EmeEw
~ 4. ~ 1. 7~ ~ - - - ~ =-7( ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 I gp' ~ I I I } ; ' 1 t ~ ~ srnxowA Icm
~ - - - - - - - - ~ 1 N ~I 753.851 U7 ~ ~ I OW~I ~ /
v - -7 I 1 o D> > ai ~ f , ai I t ~ V ~ I zs' RADINc
I I L~ y ' p I ~ J IILI D 'a~,t~ ~ W m 1 II ~ 5I- P ° ~ I n ~ ~ GRADE
Z , ~ ~ ~ I ~ H 4 B 3 ~ I ~ ro ~ ~ 7~ 9 ~ I h `I .15 ~I ~ h I ^ ® I I I I Iv+'V ,c o.' n y ~ ~ ~ r :
/ ~ 3:1
I 0 rl 5 .1 Jl ' 1j1 ~ ~ p~o `:b 0 ~ 3: ~L CBMH 53 ~h C7 II ~ L ~ V n 1 s ~ ~ ' ~ ^o ui
C 1 I N 10' FNISHED I
\ ~ t- ! I ~q'.y// ~-REJ 75¢. 5 ~ 761 I i- ~ ~ 58. ~ GRADE
V hry I O 10 I .5 ~I~';0 1 6` r ,..IE:Z53.3 ~ ~ ~<-«--< ~ -~71. ~ , I- - / ~
'1 0' d LI~ 1ro m e' 1 ~ 0.50°/ r~ - L . T IF-- ! • .l
4 ,1\ h 1 rrn ~ ~ S , h / ~ ' T- B B CB 5 f 1 ~I \ 1~ e 1• ~ ~ ~
/
/ ' h 20 ) n ~ I l 125 v x~5p ~ ` _ ~ ~ ~ /1r0 7 ~ II I I E ss.a _ ~ I a
` ! ~ I 1 OV~1$" I,FCP~/ ' ^ ` .o J % -'c{r / I 80 N ~ O E .~6.' 0~ ;IE 17 00 'I xl \ Nj~ w I ,'~I/ `~C, s5~ / -1 1~
s7p:',p' d .~J ®0.30'V / C\ ro 8 7 ~;ILp <I I I 0 B1 o
Ae.hb/ ~ \ ' x r m /r^ ~ J ~ ~ h f y ~ of I. ~ ,b .
- ~'tm~ ~ ' / y- 764 ~ ~~Q' /7/6'-18" RC I 11181' t ~ Nl ` / f G BASEMENT 0.5' TOPSOIL
- '1 ~ / 6V \ ~ ~ n. A~ 1s ~ p , ®0.42% ~ H-53~~ 3 I \ 'l 7611 II 10 ~It\ ( oy~"s'•.. 66.6 FLOOR
7 11 ~ 3 tt% ~ ~ 2~ B R 756.x__ __O~ I l \ i .s.e,. `
~ 9/ ~ J 1 / \ r i rG-~-754~ \•'x\ i~~ I 5-3:04--.- 76.6 I V L_0 _J~ ~ f \ JLe ~U LOOKOUT
I _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , - - ~ 759. ~
b 18 \ 17)s\\ 11 i I r-- - I ~C7 - I , , ,~1 , ~ / LF=57.6 wexmrsenmraeoa r
MH 48A \ 9 \ r \,\\v 71'-iB" R Ib 1 I 6t'143 I I ..~I ' 60,8 R ccuut of emcrc mnrn R
~ ~ ~ 2 ~ / ! Q 1 x ~ ` ~ 7 ~ I O '01 N ~ ~ ~ 30' 60' x~w srtirMVro :nu
~ / ' ~E~F 75A80 ) ~ 1 ~ / ~ , ®0.311 ~ 7.1 NI N m I n -
1. L<BMN 4BC L _ M rn ~ J I y I ~ ~ lf) qI~ _ l /~v .5' GRADING
I ~ 56 41 , / E 754.80 yV' ~ / EOF ~ .1o r N ~ ; I co N J h M 1, / ~ \ JI . ~ I ICI GRADE I
_ _ 759.2 _ I >v rv ~ ~ ~ I n rvI ~
CBMH~47 / 5 0 ~ ~ r 6ry q hD . , ® 7 2.0%-_ _ .6 ~ 1-_ J'~ A / 3:t
RE ? 6 4 7 - ' GB 52 I ' I I i I ~-I ~ 10' °
IE 751.50 l r`D 75 ' AO gl-. P / RE 755.64 93< 'R 756,04 L. _ _ J 1 1 69 _ _ I ~ 7587~,_~'--~ - - - ^ H ~ 0~ I
` ~x1 756 5 ,~75 47 4-21"
RCP ~ I 752.82 7 iJ l -76D- 1 -
- 0 ,tea - - ~ -76~i B ~ ~t6~ - - 762 g4-- _ - -
BM ' - - - _ _ _ _ FNISHED
' / -l3ff~RAIL .asxc-~` _ \ ~ N rGRADE
rB~na ~ - ` I ° j I
<~,«___«---t< RE 755.81 a ~-~T
< _ I 5 0.50% am 1 4% ~
6198 0.82% 'x ~ - AQ T=G6Ai t~
205'2/ RC_P ®0.20% 1. " am AB .!1.099< ~qg~ 0.5D)~- E 7 2.42 15-- . _ _ ~ ` °
CROSSING BI ' . ' RE 757.1 r,75'-15° RCP A E 751.92 i(756' -.°~u' - =~p6 -lob- 163,`-- 1..~~\, _..-~y6~-- - - BASEMENT
r s4% \ EOF 761.4 I ' I I FLODR
- >~950 J ~ IE 752,72 S _ _ _ __t~l, - ~ 9.5`°TOPSOIL
_ / -6 T, WALK OUf
2 (TWO) 135'-12'x5' BOX I CB 50 i
P I RE 755,81 ~ \
S, , CULVERTS PRECAST CONCRETE) , IE 752.50 \ I -764----~ roxorrsuw.wEncon I
~ T ` IE 748.27 - - - , \ ~ 1 I R 30' S0' n
w'a sr%rlaw~u~rti'~s R
W ~ GRADING
9 / EDF - 1 I I 1 rn1ADE
_ rVtA~ 1 f _ ~ 1-' - ° I ~ FINISHED
3 J ~ 1 -Tr I - \ i' -110 0 ~ -ld /rGRADE
S2 \ ~ 1ry ~ ~ 6 1 _ ~`~755:.~'-='-762. I I_ i 1 ,
~ ~~o ~ , ~ -
r--_.
.i
' ~ ) I' - Ss 1 I OASEMENT 0.5' TOPSOIL
~ \ 4 , / ^ - I._.:..,_ FLOOR
' < i ~ \ ~ \ CREEK HWL 75G' ] 756 I /i I -
p. v, ~~~~.~,,~g,pI~ ~ ~ s .w.n-.w.n-.~_~.~, v,_ ~~.~nn.•..i`n...n_..-,~:..- _ ..T.,`~.~r,~..` - " I 4x~~ I RAMBLER
...0,.~.1,~..~,.~~.„~.~,, ,~~,,.,.,.„.,,.~G.V,d:c~.T1~L(~.,./~Gi,L~.-.C.I/,...,:„~.;,...,..,,.:.„~.,.,-.,.,.~.,.'s.,.:,„,.1,.,.:..,...I-~..~,
Misc. Ablea •ALL ORNEWAI3 BX OR IfsS B7TN IXCEPRON OF THE
i BENCHMARK LOCAiroN/FI.EL'AiI(AV 7. Yax ddvewvy grvds = 10.4 FOLLOWIN4.
Noce PLl smFEr OIWIEIOILS' A% 2. Max ditch grvdv = 3:1
--950-- ~Y.IBfIGg Gan taJr GBRAINSE NDIEO Top nut Nyd of iunbndge q, _ ]62.97 (Elevaeon) grade = 15:7 B.SR-L015 5 @ 1B BLK 3, LOT 12 BIH B
~I LEGEND: m ~`~B 3. Mm ditch
4; Mox Slope gradA = 3;1 -Lots 21. 2s, J2 k 37 Bllt a TOTAL SITE AREA 79.4 ACRES
-c- Existin GOS Line N m s: Mar stroaL c~adn = rx
y p nut Hyd ar OAAI'd Rd. /South Bddga Pknny = -LDIS ZY, 23, $ J2, BIR 7
759.89 (Elevvfivn) 8: Min Slrtel Gmde = 0.5R 9.OX-L015 B. 11 & 23 BLN 2 TOTAL SITE AREA DISTURBED 78.5 ACRES
-Dxw- Existing Overhead Wires r. Max sl. cmda 50' wm mm~eaean = 3x -LOr t, But 7, Lor 7z BIx 3
Existing Storm Sewer
GENERAL NOTES: - s - Sill Fence -tor IL But 4, Lors z7 M 3t But 7
PrOpOSed StOTm Sewef I0X-LW5 J & 4, BO(4 SEE ERD610N & ~DIMENT CONTROL PLAN (SHEET 8)
Ij PTE INFDAMAPON GNONN ON 1HESE DRA'MNGS CDNCERNING TYPE ANO %BBa,e5 PrOpOSEd SpOf E2VatI0n SCALC
' LoCA71oN OF EpSPNG UPDPES IS NOT GUPRAN7EE0 TD BE ACCURATE OR Plole: Pro o ed s t elevations 1w561.'fIl 6r Jw NrLOe cry e.,,mwrr r/c/a6 I IlneEy adily Inal IM1IS n.wm
~n .n
All INCLUSIUB. 7NE DaxmacTOR Is RESPDNSIBIE vDR Mutwc res Dun ? ® Proposed Catch Bosin/Manhole C P % Pa 96 ,Po Pma wa: pnPared Br me w wader IA
my EuvN n ~ [Rn,~ PAfPMEp 10R
' OEIERMINAPON AB TD PIE ME ANB LOCAPON OF UPDPES AS MAY BE shaven ure ground surface, , rnr wm.m. yyos pervrslm and toot I am o ouq urensed wofnosmaN I, ~ ¦ OAtE: f I/21/a
ounrcl b,` dy. Engineer Iur the Imrs v! the Slain MMnoeoo. w~~~ ~
NECESSARYNAx910 DAMAGE TO PIESE UPt17Fi n: ~,--_a~„-,___m--, blluminous surlace, or gutter line ~ n~r ~ ~o~ t ORS!)NQ PLNJ ,Mrp
RIDGE CREEK
GRADING PLAN
City o{Shakopee, Minnesota
9 ~
r
t gCP~' r \so 1ti OUTLOT C \ , I
I AP G' i , ~ ~ ~ )s, A ~ -
.~756 754, '15 O _ M I a 1 ~ , , CREEK HWL 756'_ l 75s I' r r I I
752-750 '~1 .J _ s..nr r- ni..,~_^.,. ^_..~.r_•,,.._nnw.= _!'v..i.,tiirv`v~r.-vw~.~n.._nT..,i..~n~.n.~i,Jw _ I ~
746 " r,i.~ .w~ v._r ~ . 5 Pr 1 v :'L~_N v.n.~_r,.,~v,,i. r t7,-~p~~~nn, v. ~ v~.r.Mn.,v...ti.,..n~.,r _~..~~.i.nJ~,i.ni. I / .i~
,Mi'.. S _i.,a \ ...v\.n..n.'~.,n..l n?\.n.. \n.~,;`./~.,~,.N~. J ..n.r`..^..N\.1/v^-s1N.-1.V~/,J~.hiV~i`,.n/s.r",N~N~`~S ~4-
750- i -rr w i \ ~ ~ I 6~. r 1 I
.n. ~.,~v.:..~' w• •.p ~b~r.i.r,.., ct..n• .~,1ryi{~r~ -75 ~ tin~~.nr.~.,l-v".:.. /tea Fl ,~n.,!...~.\n~? /v. i.r-
\.~v.,.~,'w~..r,.n..v...-..ni.n.~.~rl / If .n.~,
' ~ r,~752~ ~ ,~..I~ . , ~~ti 1C~?~. ~ . c.}-fy^ j:..i.. 1'. v.,...< .ns.,.._~.....•....~_:. ~ ~.~?'-ri~~~1~1'Wv._rr...~,f,v~?.,~..n.n,~wv._...,._:`~?_:=.~_..n~.....^.iti~.. ~.~.n~ I 66~ GAS
'754 ~ ~ .i... / ~ _ N ,~.•,..v., ti, ~ M, r ,'~1:~~
n1,.t _ yr \.r.~w`r.f+_;.r..~,..r., ,~A.
..~;./.i.n.,\~.v;.'.r
::ww..~.n..•.,v.n.~rw1..~..v,.i..~~c:~:. ..?^~i
c I EAS MENT
/ / / --1 , X64 ~ _ s - - ~.N.. _ I
156, 754 752 ~ ~ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ ~ ~s0 \ - MATCH E"XISiING APPROVED ~ I
5°'x \ \ \ @ 0 ' O J \ ~ ti \ GRADES IN~RIVER BLUFF,'$ ti 1
%75 • ~ , ~ \ / \ / 1 \ ~ ~ 16 \ ~ \ S6, ADOliION PARR _ T
X750 ~ PROPOSED RIP RAP \ I \ \ 6 ~ x ~ \ ~ \ , ~ ~ \ \ - ~I v \
il'PICAL Ai ALL AP ) ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ I
1~1d". ~ l..-_ -_'~.~-76x'7 ~ 6&6 7 .O ~s ~ > r, I1
742 ~ n / POND 2 I ~ Y ssg ~1 ` ,T i5, SQ >SZ >Sp >48 X48>SO>S2 > I ~
-7 HWL-751.50 ! - - A`
~ _ ~ ~ HWL-755.0 ~ 55.~-- ~ y~~, \ \ ~ ~ 1\ ~ ~ ~ 156' A\ ~A~ ~ s~ 'I
`1g HWL 755.30 CHANNEL \ \
' ,PRON ~ - a \ g \ 1 \ ~ GRADE PARK TD SLOPE j^ ~ ~ I
9GUgR0~1 ~ \ \ \ ~16 1 1 t ^ 4 9 70WAR0 CHANNEL ~ r I
\ _ ~ m 16~ ~ ( 25.9.0-- ~ I ~ ` f I
~ _ I' ° _ ~/p/
o ~ ~ 3 ~ X2:0% ~1 '76 2 J 1gk ~ Ir'~759.3~ II IIr~~(>s9o \ EXISitNG CHANNEL WITHIN ~ ` r"J' I
. - - - - - . - l' _
- - - - - - I 0 I s9~ \ ADJACENT PROPERtt ip s-^ ~ I
` ~ f O ~ ~ I C ~ - ~ c ~ I I % ~ 1 BE REGRADED BY OTHERS _ ~•~\l-
~ a .58.E -1 1 >
~ j E 75o.ss ~ ~ ? ? ~ ~ {.75.9 I 759:31 , G~ ~ • ~ 5 1 SA~~ I'~,;.,. I
I T , I I ~ ~ I ~ I ® ~ _ Ir(~58.Sj'...I, ~ - 76448 ~ I ,...(I I,~~~, ~ 766,5D~`~ ~ . • ~ ~ _
_ _ _ _ ~r
T r ~ r a 758.5 I I ml 3'-r "RCP I f'~; ~ ~ m,, \ -
t s_ (7,b'B.Ya~~1 I I (758.5) I I j (758.5) I ~ I (758,5) ~ ( I 76a ~ tfD , , le~°/ \ ~ 6'60 / ~N ~ ~ -
' ~ n I CB 2 _ C~-25B--'--J~i =1~ r- _ns n.;.
7sa xl I I Ao -G 116
aO IEis ss a ,;l' 7x3,37 ~ 050 6 °~,,~t-1a -cal°~I'" ~ 'y I
766 1 ~j I `
I I I I I~ - ~ ~
~ 58~-42" I~CPJ ~ w l I
i I--' RE~763.54 j 'tn _ 1 I rt I 1 /
{ G ~ ILA 0 ~-o.-r ~ I. ~f • r /6°p~ I~ r I
L I Ydsap 7-- ~ °~'sO a<s.----- 75 _ i ~ -1 B'-15" R 6 • N L _ 1 ~,q/.r I
766 ~ s ®Or 03 ti t 7'63 j ~ 1 I .
EO r; R~sz=n' _ . < Gh' g 95 H ss. - J
' ~ ~ - - L - - ~ ~ IE 75 N" "a= _ t 1 , am 1 mu 16~'D.52~"' 0 I ~ ~ ` i ,J ~ I
- - I ~ - I. \ ~ < 6a 3~-0.52 RID 'C EEK S~1R ~ - - ss.o 6
r` - , ~ . $P 6x,78%1~=_ _ r! jS~~so 1~.6 ; ~ -----756-__~ ~ /1h
»-»--50 00 " 10 63' 0.78% 13-~' - ®2.03 n~ y ~,.J : ~ q 1 ~ ~ \ ~ _ / yl ^ ~ ~
Am IDG~ C EEK 64• 6A• 163• 0 59R _ 1._-•~~. H A - ~ s / ( "x'756 ~ \ ~ / !
~S2p ~90 ~6~ " R ~ - ~ _ 64.1-EA . B-ZG- - - I_ - y66i~\~~ / o- I ~ 1 ~ ~ -
CB2 E-75D.99 ~(S 76pA0 ` ~7 s:DD~- e~s / ~ \ 0.
766 1,~-------I ~
- a ' - - - s
00767.0 ~ L r -76?.0 c 1 767.0 I se,~0_ ? - a~' - z _ ~ ~ - - - -
~ _ -.758 ~ 758' 76 ~ 7
- - 7s - - ~ i _-f"f E- Bea--°=- I fis~~767 0 ~ ~ 759.3 6!, I 739' - -j61 / ~ 754 75z--=~s ~ n , 5g'
j ~ ~ r 760,/ -7x4 ~ I 7
-,0 bC n:Zp 0~+,~58' 6pD -766 ~ 6¢60 ~ e~'a07~GT~,~ I (79.3) I Ij 766 5g / _ ~ I % _ 750 a' ,1~' .-f76 ~
7&8,0 ~~I ~ , I ~ T 766,5 Gl d ; I I .._7s4, w ! .75750 / ~ , 6 _ g
- x-11 c 767s ~ 1 c 767.5 c ~s6.5 ~ I I , / I 748 ~~v
-I I I I W0~ ~ ~ t ~1' ~ ' 7 RC APRON / - 7 v 748
760:3• I I 759.8~~ I 759.1 ~ 758.17s4- `~Z58.1 ° ~y, .,fit Lac-7-,-!~ I WO ,-..,1~~v754a4~'-~,v>/ 951.., ~~75z i5D ti
I ~ ~ ~ --759 C CBMH 29 /59 0 ` ~ F6+w"
_ - __754 r i~
I I * I I~ LC B H 3 ~~1~J \ 5.7.01 _ AP Q30"~ - -1 _ _
F ~ ~I LC I (_C _ ~ 7C62-L ~ h E~B~15~ 2 ~S J8-ltrp _75 x(1.30" IE75.B3--i - ;R 6Rr~ ~~!„58 .5.50--'~ - ~ lr~ _
--C I---- JJ L_~-'__' RE~
58. h 16 P ~ ~ t-< <--=cc.. <---<~]S,_RG 3.3D r' m
.I.. I r~ _ I~`C8 "~C ~ 760.8 ~ "4. 0 ~ IE 752, f ;1G9 - C~OH 27 _ n ~
~<--«~85~ 6x. ~ EOF _ _ ~ _ G ~ _
---7-~3. 7~ ' ~i-~ _IE AsS. o A'.. 50 F. , ° _ - , \ \'°,n- - ! ~r / ~ a .DO.
. ~ E 5b :455 53 b4. 2 - i, i F 1 _ -a fUm ° - s / ~ ~ f -
~4-_ ~E Z5fi ~ > > , , 1 e t ~ - z ~=aGa._~ E~Fr
7.5~ 8 _ 4~ ! -1
w%.at..~a t -18 P J U- - - ~ / i,96 R t ~ _ - ~ _ --_-i i'~ - ~ ~1 ~r - ,~c-- -1~760~ - \I
_ - ~-B i - ~ j62 -=7~'=_ "rl ~ -~:=mss---~ 762-`
- ;\\J^ _.7G6- ,,168 0-- ~ ~ , ~fi 7%164 / ~ ~
~.~v:.~ ='=1--''~ ps.m-="~; \ ~ 1 ~i
i',\ 40'-1,5 w 0--'-- ~ a -c ` , ` - - ..~-'764-' s J ~ f
/i \ ~ / d 1 - ,f / - I 766 \ ~ <Tl4 ~ __7G6-,.,, '645 T4.3 ` \ 'li4.0 r \ 64.0 ~'--`\I. ~
',l: t~ 4_ - ~ 774-- _ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ X776 - ,p,76 ~w ~
~i~~-~YL`(/ /778~~r- ~ __-_-'-a' 755.00 JI X770 ~ -'X788 - .675._ ` ~ s\__~~ ~ ~ I 1 II
~ ~-i~ ffi-78 q-~~~~2r'y y>~~~ - 760 _78x__ ~i I LL _ _ 1; Z7.1.$_ I `72.8_ `~1` 7lQG ~G95 - W~, _-:~8-- Nd ~i. ~I I ~ ~ '
152'>y~~, ,--6' ~ f H ~ dn` I I (771.)) II 7172"-., II (~Z3:.~.J I ml ~.8~ _ ~ ~ ~ l\ a'3.3 ~.,G 3.0 C .730 ~ 6 732` G G ~ 3.5 ~ I~ I m
_7 X4.50 p __T. ~ / G ~ 73.5 I
-~~-'-~11 ~ ~1 I }10.5 I 774 778-{ ~ ~ G 7t8 ~ \ V r
- - x _
r~ I _ 6Z0 778 I ~ - ~ I r G 7615 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~
^
-
-
I`_~ h~ - I 779.iT.+ I -Z7-9.5_ i I 780.5 r~,\787;~5_-j- ~ >4 0 '~~.c 7~:5 ,-L, - ~ \ •I I
- - 3, _
7797 ~ lsss - G7~{~~ ~ G; - ' ' - v -
~..~a~_ _ -v ~ ~ - I--~
~ ~ ~
~----,~7 ~ N 7b.ffi__~JI I AD- ~ ~ e ; Po JI ....1 I _ , I ~ _ I -~--r'" - -
I 788.0 I ~ _ -,r / 4 ES 770.37 , I ~ ~ - ~ _i- _ _ r.. - _ _ -
J
~k~_~794 ~I~r~ ~ IiszoD ~(TT EQF EE b7204 _7 ^CP. ~ ` ~ ^_~_1 --a.-r` - s°`"'"' ~.Y- ~ 7. y- Via: , _
LLL''' IrAS EW`771.68~ ' ~ `;Tvn
e _ Aso ~ _a1.. ro ~ ~ v .
J dv ~ I ~ ~ ~
~ =---I,~ .I I - I ~ ~ d --I
Mice Nolna •All DRNEWAYS B% OR LESS FNfH IXCEP7ION OF 7NE
6ENCHMaRK LocanON/ELLVAIwN I• Mox dmowoy grodr = Ipx FOUawrNC: SEE SHEET 2 FOR TYPICAL LOT DETNL
xD@ Au store! auEA510NS AAE 2. Mox ditch grede = 7:1
--9~-- EY.IStIn COI1t0Uf osg
Fxm~rp DNS p nu hyd, o gn (OnwSoN J. Mi0 ditch grdde = 15:1 8.5X-LOIS 5 & 18 BIX 7, L07 1Z 6Dr 6 ~ '
LEGEND: T f rTuoWia ~.=75Y.97
9 ~i a Mox slope grade = Ss -LOrs az, 26, Sz & 77, oafs TOTAL SITE AREA 79.4 ACRES
-c- EXistlfly Gas Line 1V Toy nut Hyd. 01 OxtoN Rd. /south fridge Pgwcy = x ucx s4oe! Crode = 7z _,p7S 12, p7, g ,7p, BL'f g
759.89 (oewtkn) s. Min street credo m 0.5% s.Dx-tors e, f I & 27 euc 2 TOTAL SITE AREA pISTURBED 78.5 ACRES
-OxN- Exis tiny 6YefhCOd Wifes j 7.' Mar Si Cmde 50' fmm infnrseclion = JX -LOi 1, eLK I, COT 12 9LK 7
- Existing Storm Sewer _ s - I -LOT n, elx ~ Lars SI ~ 71, elK 7
Silt Fence Iox-LOTS 7 a m, DU(4 SEE ERaGION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (SHEET 8)
rF;~A
N~,oir~• Proposed Storm Sewer SCALr r re
xesDSS Proposed ;pot Elevation
oe wmm cx
' reu
1) 1NE INFDRMA710N SHOkN DN 7Nf5E DRAWINGS CONCERNING ME AND (Note: Proposed spat elerolians o cs w I orscnm sr. a_u c r,5
n_mm.a, I/eta I hermy caLxy tool Inv rl"" woo popaed Dy mn or under
Locanox oP Exlrnxc unums Is xoT aIaAARTEED To eE acwAaTE oR ? ® Proposed Catch Basin/Manhole mown e,e ground surface, re ~rxm od ~^^"^M aaros mr a'<erl cwmrm," end mm I em < d"y Mse",ed w"rr;:moor 5 r"E°""~`o f0'p a"re IIri1/o
ALL WCLD9NE 1HE CON7RACNfl IS AESPONSIBIE FOR VAKINC HIS DWN Dituminous surfara, of gutter Ilne oR;NH eC J . - Eogmov um Nr laws of Ine Slde o Mmnroola. ~ ~ P R~(~ ~(I~ N(,`, pRfp~~Al1
OEIERMMAIIDN A610 THE TYPE AND LOCATON OF MLIIIES AS MAY EE ,r_ flirariinn of GirfnrP I)MinnnP iinlnee nlNarwl~:n nN"d 1 rv" I~ /J//,stn /./,-A/ i//rjr., ~ [ ENGINEENING " WL~
- ,iTM~~a /H .Y ~U i'tA9' .!!ti: BIIS Pboseot View Dr. "~nrc r m. i .s~
RIDGE CREEK
G2ADl NG PLAN
Cityof5hakopee, Minnesof~
n,o--_'7J0-`---"~-- - ---_-CD~SERU~DU~ ~~_'x`~a---at~-=-~'I -~759.5D~~__i,%~_ ~~r @'.Q~,~- - j _F. - '"'I. :~i,!--==y= .~`=~77~ ~_7B6•*~
--772--_"___----_-~---------- -,JE 75642.' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I' ~ 6-~ _ ~
=h- _774----_-'~_-_-"~---~_-_--__-"_-_-_-----_EASEME---' - ---CBMji-T )~L_t ' 778 ~ ~C9 F- a - •vir'~ \ 778-- - __57_5,
- 776---- - - _ _ ~ ~ nR ~ ~ 1755.00 I \
=rte-_778-- - - - ~-Rf•76Y.00_' ~ ~ ~-Iy~ -7$0_-__ - \ -
780--------------- 8D' - r.- _ -1Ei7T~ ~ s'tf"--.~ -78 ~ _(~~EW-76 __rl I I .69.5
=t, - _ ~ _ 6• - -~8~28 ~ 27.18_.772.8 -
~I - _782_-:784=~~==;-~ -R~ J a~ --L62~-72 P.~»--Y~ ~ - - -'1 F- "ll If ~ ~ f-----~ 1•.lvP
` F - ~ --_1~b. > ¢o-_°~" _ _~~14~50 - ~ ~ an I ,I (771.1) I 7172r I (723.1)_ ^IeP ~-Q--
I .I x".786-' / 1790 ~I„~!ti - 1a6J~- J- - ~~''.~'°/-~"l~ I _ ~1 II Y.'70.5 ° 774 776 -
.1~I ~ r _ _1 3.J _G ~~7r.1 I _ 67.0 778 ~ ~ G 7615
,•y I - i~prh.:~~~". ;zs:nc` ~ _ i , ~ -L~ I j`_I~ I ~-~y _ / I ~ 77Q.0~. I_Z7~S_ I I 1.787:5, I .C 7B`
I ~ ~ , r I ,r ~ rJ_ I ~ 779.7 + I 780.5 I ;h. -I- ° ,p'
,~~i9s 7,e-~~--~--~ - ~ rrjS6 - .D ~ Y I,~ ~ 7sss -G~I~ IL---- ~J ~G _ _JI L9o ` _ \ I
' ~ J a.. I---- I 4~-----7 .7 N 7d. i8-- pD gbD'----_~ I ~ /
7s6.~\ l x5'8793-\`• sn ~ -99. 'I'-_ I 1-~~- 788. I Ur----1-~ Zo 770.37 Tls' 780 I - `
11.L=788.4•, , LL=790. LL=792.6 ~ LL=783.1 ~ LI~.
7193.y 1~Ip~ Il II I 791. X94 ~5~^-'- _ psz~ 1(7T EQf
27 R r ~~•04 83'-7 IRGP- - - -~1 `~y~ t"
- p~sa + _ ro - G EW 1.68" n _
I I I ~1 ~t~/$Z•1~,I ~~inEsi~- o Bp'Sp ~-';--~1 ~ ;mar=- ' ~ ti
I I I I ~IG 7y5,5-~ RE 78.8.-~~ - m ~ ` 98 , •fl
~ 17ss.a G. 798.7 C. 800.8 G ( Boi.1 c. Bofal c.~ ~ 99.50--_ i {'9s--' 19d ~ IE7 .3 ,>t'E'"~i 28~6~y ~~~~6 773.7 7 82~ a ~L1g51 `I~~~m _ I 8 -
798 ~ °p ~ IE - ~ 0 1 ~Q~3~-- ~j - °3 - I-I--`'nm 9s~~,, I Ls
I 7ss 6oD 600 8°0 - ~r~'® 22.m~ 00 o go-°-2:11 77&.DD 0.779 / •9a -
_ s - ~ ~'l~ °0:00 8 X00 86.00 Bq - 1 r ' n RE 776 $@ __.28~ ~ 77 N-- 778 ' ; r
_ 9 A~ I .atD 1 I ;g~', 1 i I 's ~ ~ 0° .1 Ate" 1g 51' 6 - =7.78"~ --In !E 77 ( R F 1 i7 - I - 774
} j -
rp ,)q6:_ ti _ ce 1 N - ~ I ~pq/ I a~ 1 1 7 5 oD ~ 1 /
I ~ \ o°'' g6 ~1gd 19 7 D 8.2 ,~-'7f • _ ~ , ^ %V1-11- ?1--- - 'j 7 Ln I, ~ I I,• -o,
~ ~ ~ J 6. B, ~ ~ _ _ 7~-~~~.0- fir- ~ EOF ~ ~ i~ t~ I / t~78~ 0 ' m /.v
CB 5 r - -I I G (77_.9) I n I ~ 0 I .45% n ~
/ _
- 01 '-15 _ ~ ~ I I I G~G/~3.6) I I Ao I a I ~ q0 ~ I I ~luo ~ ~ , 1 ~ ~
I ~ 7x4. 1 0.42 p '4® ¢:as~ ~ , I-, I I~ rleP R n /o~Tl m p I f I ~1~ I
r, Ih\., 1 n c
f I ~ I ~ - ~IE-787:2 ' . R -7180.2 ( I I l I ~ 85. D 12 I I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I A v
~ / • \ , ~ r , t 7 s.7 4 , -O 11 :.I 4 ~ R I I I ~ ti I`'1
0 L ~~3 'pD j I co _ I nl l~ ~ \ ; ' ° .
1 i~ S I ~ - ® ~ 781.0 _ I i ~ r~ ~ .
:T ! / - 32'-1 C I ~ ~N I ~•1 III 782.0 I n L°, l-- 1789.5 ~ i-&-~L~ f ~ I _
I I ~ ~ B ~ t.~o" ~ I ~ - I 1 - - _
I \ ,CLo m I k I ~ 07 ~oplN I ~ L_____J o r b --7.7 I' /
I ~1-- _ ~ ~ c; I ~ ,NOIW -a- oCl N 38 I Iv HIV ~ I L- = -J ~ ~ r-- - ~ I ~ I I / ~ / u
II ,,.'78'p oA i r, nom' h'lujl~ I 1AIG 1 1C9 i 7`0.0 I ' ~ gl vo /
I m a ~ Iii L- _ _ J l )B Inl ~ I
d ~ $ III m 1 101 011 4~ _.1 I-' D I ` n0 6 4 I I / ai / ~ /
i~ e II m ' I n 1 7132. P-- } l I I a ~ I I I
I ' ~ u ~ i. ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I - - - '4c I ~ 16.,-' ~~i I nl ~ J I I ,N I I ~ Id I / . jl' j i / ° / -
I I - v E 7 .os ~ I 1 , ~ n I~-9 I 3 I I n n ° RE. ess7 / d
,I \ _ -
k _ O I I ~ - al ._~N6 n L-_ - B B ~ n r / n I 1
. ~ / ~ ? ° / ! ~1 ~Ir -'7, 1G ~ 775.4 C 7-- - -'78.3 ~ - 1 1 ~ ; ' 1 I 1
I I ~ I _ ~n~ II 11 - I'~ ~ I ,t~l ~ C6- - ~ ~ _ _ R 77.0- _ 78 _ - - - / I( ! ~ / rp ~ I
I 1 roN - - ~ ~ f / I~ I ~ ~ I • oJLN RE 77 . ) -v ~ 7 1.5 _ ~ ~ ti _ , I / I 1 I
I ~ II" m ~ I m a °ro0a. a / Olai~'~t0 1 m ~ I ~ 773.8$ I ~ 1 71~ I-v J,_ 1~~ ~ > ~ ,fib r/l~ ! 'fro 1
° ~ om Il~ro ~ / ~ I~ ~ m,v ~ , I ~ 772. ]d' T I ..J r~-'"°l l~9' t lm
m CO
' I\ ~ a ° w i / I~ voy,la ~ r. m 3 ' L _ 1J m 780 0 1. I~ 4.- EO U7 ~ ! I Y /
I o ~ m u ~ ~ K .ODE I B B - -i -'8.x.6 ~ n/--~ ~B AO -IhV I ,r N I i f 1 l ~ ;
I I ~ ° ~ ~ ~ 7~s~--- I _ Xp Jr~ I I ~ 6,5 ~ I <Ii ~h I I / ~ ~
i I ,.-,qg ~ ~ ~ , ~ .-----3~ ~ 19'~°~'~ ~ " ~ 7sa.3 ~ r I I I® I~ ~,I I I~~ ~I,~ , ( ~ ,7r
- ~ oT ~ ! r 7
IJ-r-. ~/\'~0F 2 \ ~ ~r-84.6 II--783_& - ~ 1g ~ 3 r,/ l r. °.l d `
I ~ pD 0 I i ~ (784,,] 1I -Zti~3 ~ s q , L_ _J--~ 'i~,/ ! o I ' ,
I'1 ~ = _ _ \ ` g6. I~ l~ ~ 783 1- - 9 - ~1 / ! ^!f.
I \ ys9a ~ n ~ h \ ~ _ _ _ 788 xT7 l I
y ICIPM1' I .I ~ / O
1gEPi n- t / m II IA 9 I \ - L ^ , / 78 - / - ~ ~ ~R '
/ m I`~ m~3~ 1 19 e ~ ~ 92 I IG '`-I I ~ I ~ ( 17 ~ n/
- ) ~I~ I G 1 792.Q' ~ n \ ~ ~l ~ I ~I°j ~ la/ 1 ~
I~ f eos.~lr;eo~s'~ v c o 92 ~~L_-----1 6~ __J / ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1~ r
l u 1~ ~ 9 _ i ~O I I\I ! !
~ - - / 1 I ~ 1 v ~ / ~ 79 C7 ~ ~ I I
8Q6 1, ~ ~ ..1 v~~-, _ 2 I ?0 L--- all ` n n i / I °
~ ~ 11 Y } od N ~j9 ~ s I. 'Po- - . 9t \,1y~ Lv ~X167o6 _ ~ ~ ~ I / I I
E I ;:1 y I -.y \ 9(793. ~ / _ I -0 1
I ` \ ~ ~ .vf ~ ~ I ~ \srn 0 ~ I. ^ 9--. ~ )86 75'2 ` , J T N i ~ ~ ~ I o -I- 1 f.
I / \ 8 \ \ ~ /o°'' ro ~ \ - ,ty ~m~ g2 ~ ' IE 777.69 8 •7 ~ - ~ 1 ~ 1
1 y / I \ / ~ ~ ~ I 61 1 ) ye:"°~ 0 CZ , 4D B„ CP - / / ! III I. ^ I l~ ~
P ~ I ~ s _ ~°v / ~ do I ~ oD~ EAGL 90. sa ~ 5% / „I B ~d I 1\~~ \I \ ~dP. ~
II a ` 0~ ~ BOB.B ~ / p. ~ , , I 9\' ` m ~ _ 0.10 10 / CC '7~f, ~II ° 1 i
~T ' &7 ~ Ou'/' J V 1 ' ~°'y
I I - _ , v / .6'ro° / 1" ~ , ~ / / ) ~ 794.00 0, " , ~ / \ ~,dj' ( . \ , \ ,
p6;' I l~\\ - . / , 1~~, .~o ~I -M _ _ ~ _ I ce 2D u n ~ ~ I 5~ ~ \ r~ ~ '
` 7 / r _ 9~ m ~ 794 ~ ~ ~ 9 . ~ i ~ l_/~ N ro ~ b~l 1 D ~ ~ ~
1 t\ ~ ~ ~5. ~ ( I G 3' I I i~~o7 IFr780:30 S 0 790- "~~~qN \ \ / I ~ m ~ s~ ) \ o g m 5y~
o ~ ~ -L'.=8~p))~ ~ ~ 1 ~ P~ 7s4. 7 ~ ~ 5~ ~ I I -,l _ e ~ ' _ _ P` 5D 10s 1 18(G ~ •v~/ i ~ n ~ ~ ~ v ° o `1 ° ~,P
/ \ ,~,ioo- - J , ~ 1°~E 7$~ 0 - . ~ I • ~G ~9~ 1s 5a \ \ \ ; i ^ ,~I°. / ,1~ \ \ 1 1
l ~ i ~ / ~ P /lp ~`S~ w/ v r/l ~rG) ~ I i ~ ~ I I .~94• D ~ I J ~ ~ G _ _ I G 1 1A ~ ~ ~ A _ - ~ I \V` v'1 Il ~ ;
1
_ 6 I ~ 1' ~ ~
I I 1 \i'
° . \ ~ X78 ` / . I I I ~ I LO I 7sD `n~ `1 14 ~ \ ~ ` ~ 1 \~1 ~ ' ~ 1 s,
~I , ~ ~ o ~ 7s6 ~ V - - - i67 5 P ~89;~ ~ tr ~ ce 2 .l III I ~ 2 p 1 ^I
` ~ 8 I o ro LO 1' ~ I 7~ ~ n
-602-+--_.. ~-`0 799AI ~'CB~4 y ,-Rr tss. I d0 I~ Lp ~ I 1 1 ~~p~~.
. ° bE ~ e90 6.85 .0% 2.d~'' B7~ _ ~ ,4-J ~I- ~ 10- I I•,`q~ I I '~`Z 1 5az.zY ~11 ~~l ~ ~ ,r'_
IS~•~pT ~ ~B 1 _ - ~ IB - i . °E 95 ° 70 2.0~'' 7. 87,5 I 'g 7t. ~ 78 I_ ~ 7~3 / \ \ 1 ! 1,~-' \i ~ , \ ° 1 :r
~ ° 1 I ' 00.5 _ >88i6 ,95so 8 NY=~~~ -~0 3"- .~o ` ` \
ACl.E' 1 ~ Eeli~ ~ rt+.'~ E 796 ~ 7 4. 0 792 ' ~7 0 2. % \ i ~ > »..j ~ -.5-~ p~= _ 1 d. ~ ~ ~ 1 ` sB NDre E51yTwc onrvnwv sTwu _ _ `
1 I e6 ~ QL 1 i b ~0P< d ~Sn ,wD °wnm toV
85g5A„~,`CR2''.Ejr~llr `'802' 9aeRwl~\• elmlisB~yExt BB19 '~°1,~ z, T' _ { r.wcanors
t ~ 00 ~ ,ivliB ~CB ~~FiA 7g-.., 78p 7~p0\\ °s ~ ~oEC,'assrsw~e ~6
D, ~ &I~ ~ B2 +nlson~ws~°B seasoip'V Frm vz 1? ~ ~ B d' ~ s .I 9p.0 g 787.75 ? 1 ~7 _ \
•J1 [B ~EB ..55 i-~N`65R/-
00x'' ~\~IOP (l 6DD~ \ I Oe •le 6 7D~~ 1 ~t
,Y~ "EgA ~e~\. ~ ~v.p. ~ a°BZ',roY ~s>I ~y8` vss.ls I ,iew~~ BIEN 780.87 veb. 78 5 t '..`\176 972` _ \
, ` y
EsJ'1"'~„ l,`A. ff -6 ti~ B~ gyp. ~ , . ^ _ _ - S enm ` ^ Ion r~bf ° ~ IEE 760.90 ~ ~ ' GE y . °E b/. c' .°b- :_~~,\)g ~ -
s\ I u, ~ C 2xg =~6J rg~4\ ~"''`"~.D-... B°s es vn ~ - ' T 67s m 91 ~ \ 1 7~ -tea ~ >O 6j
\ ~'OB'D~ 4„~j` ---~=~..-`_°~°oa28"3)`~)'- ~ _ ~ 1~~",ae°=-~__ d 9 - b~sl~~\~ 0"
I~ sue - ~ ~ - - _ ~v o -''s°f„i^'~~ -~y0°zro
em'- ~ fy- 2. \ ROCK CONSTRUC~D j~ ~~--rrz \ ZT
-
'Iri:: ~ ~ ~ •ise. reo.s -t- ' _ - ~ ~ ENTRANCE 1.'~~ \
: - _
I , J. ' ;il~ . r _ _ . ~ - - _ ' 'sp osw„meB,~ ~ ~ - ~ _ ` , s w~ 1_.n~o I z ixcn PI c\~ ~ ~
,
I 1-K`^ „e "-J~~ - \ `,\~°o \ ~~'w~~ ,e aa.: a~•a..e~),i I/ r-\~ ~~1.
l
LEGEND , Mix. N°fas ^ALL DRAEWAY6 BR OR LESS W!M IXCEYnON OF THE
Mme Au 61AFEr DluFirslDxs roe BEn'CNMARK LOGnav/ocvAlroN ~ M~ tl
~ da 3• I7aR FoLLOVnNC: SEE SHEET 2 FOR T'(PICAL LOT DETAIL
io BncR of nwB uwas 7, Min ditch grade = 15:1
_ --980-- LXIStIn COnt011r OiHERNhY NJrtG Tap nut Ny2 Tun6ndge q, = 76p.97 (tl°wlion) B.SR-LD1S 5 & IB B!H 7, LOi 12 BU! 6
E%I6tln St OfiTl $eVfBf g TT 4: Nox Slope groda = 3:1 -L07511, 26, 3Y tr 77, BIX B TOTAL SITE AREA 79.4 ACRES
g 1V 5: Mm 5lraxt Cnde = 7R
- --n- Existing Gas Linz 7°p m,t Nyd. or ox°rd Ra. /sown Bndq> Pllw°y = -tn7s 2z, 27, & a2, But 7
Y) - Proposed Storm Sewer 759.99 (Ekv°nen) s: N0 sheet Oroda = 0.5R g,OR-tots B, II k 27 BtK 2 TOTAL SITE AREA DISNRBEO 76.5 ACRES
L -oRn- Existing Overheod Wires ~ T MOx st. Devde so' hem InlersBCtPon = 7R -mr euc 1, LDr f2 eLx 7
GENERAL NoT~. ~ ® Proposed Catch Basin/Manhole - s - Silt Fence Lor II elx < wn zt ~ 7 etx 7
a) THB INFOAMAnON 5HO`AN ON niESE DRAVANGB caNCFRNINO TIDE AND SCALE 10R-L015 J ~ 4, BLK 4 SEE EROSION & SEDIMENT CDNTROL PLAN (SHEET 8)
LucanoN or ExlsnNC unulES Is NDT cuARAaiEEO To sE accuRaTE oA Direction of Surface Draina a xefio.9s Proposed Spo! Elevation ~ w .m
ALL INCLUSIVE. niE CONTRACiOA I6 RESPONSIBLE FOA MAaNC HIS OYM g y>yoa say nm,w, vArsa I hum6y seHiry Inm Ims qon v°s prepund a eav a>>rol•+•
DE1FRAiINAl1OX AS N 1HE TYPE AND 7-0CAT10N OF UiWRFS AS MAY BE - (Mole: Proposed spat eiw°Lions dSiCnm er. d_v. Y me or u ' ux PnVa4N row: wre If 7
r/bAmr W Cemmmn .Wr9s my Jdoct svpnnision ontl N°I I an o duly License! Prol 1°nol yr ; Our
e9D- Pra osed Contour 31Tr w
NECESSARY TO AYDID DAMAGE TD THESE dnllnES. p bhOwn Ore ground Bufl°co. Crglneer ess
2) CONTACT GOPHER $TA7E ONE-CALL AT fi51-95FDDD2 FOR EAiSRNC hitomin°us surlOCe, or 9uller line Osrnx ar. y% sr mo ivn °I the 5ble °t MNnes°m, ' . p}. mp~, qp;,E NC, aRADNp pI-AN
~j YY~~Y sxm
Unl1TY LOCATWNS Onlecs oeherrrise holed.) 1 inch = 50 ft ni-EnrD en _awg ! P~ ~ ENGINEERING 8315 Pk°sent Vew W
~~1 ` RrocE GREEK n ne
\ . .a
RIDGE CREEK ~ _ _ _
EROS1dN B~SEDIMENTCONTROL~ - _ . , r__
1',~ 1 rl-r ~ I r ~ ~J~
v v, r ~ ~ ~ II J+ 11 i C i i i i I i ~'}C., I I ,'I~~i i i ~,i l 'i~i~_~r~l l i lam, ~ rw
City of5b~kopee, Minnesota I ~ ~ I` , ~ ~ I~I~I I~--~' ='--~I ~ ~~~I~ 9 ~ /
~ 4 -=-=oPxa~:o9r - T e-.x--tt_k
~ 11 r--_r r~~ 9~ - ~ r Tlr ~ ri I I Irv. A
L Ali ~i i -ili ~ ihr ill III III Ili i, III ~ ~ ~ I ' I ~ i i I ,
\ ~ I l I ~ 1`"'~ I I~ 1- Ttl~~ i,J ~ L' _J I \I ~ d I I I
f i P, ~ g
' A ~ - ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1115 ~ ~ I L
1' I~ ~ I - - - w~ I V`~ v `_,v' rid. I.. it ~ _
1 I 1 1 - - - i I -i 'r'- 'y/ •J n I I/ i I I I,1
lit 'I i 1~ v` - -'~i. i l k ~~.1 i i~ 4 11 1 I y ''Y L_ J I~• L 1 k
15 1 ~ \ ~ w 1 1 ? l~ p I tR. \li f f- \ r - _ is
`yyr•\ \ NM 751.81 - ~ (f/ I~>J ( ^\\1„r-•~n~~~~ _ / L_ J ~ III`` ~ 1~
1~ ` ^ s / . MM 7546 i l: ~`'-"~•,,4~ li ~ \ \ ~r\~/~ f- 'I I I I. r- }
~1 \ ~ ~ ~ I v' ~vv ~~'til 1 i L ~ I i it ~ / ,
t z 1 k - I t I I I~
i ~;~~A~ A~ v v I 1 - 1 L~ of _A %
v v v S ~ I
i
~~R \ v\\~ L- a~a 1 I I .,1 x
n o I I I
_ ,
- / - --r-=L-- \ ~ d vw PA° PER \
+ \ ~ ~ ~
as--aa-- >a ~ \ 'M-~ \ ~N
\ _ ~
/ \ ~ ~-yr ~ ~'4 ~ 1\ 1 w RIE PARK ARFA ME OMNER 51WU
/ 5 - - ~
\ \ \ \ 1 , i 1. FlNE L4NOE n1E 6¢E PIL4AN0 ROCNS
~ y AA'0 WM CW1W6 3/4' ANO CRE0.IFR
F~ i > p arnx a'sw smiMLxran6x 1 w szE
/ / 'IY I WMB J PER BE7All ~ 1. PRONCEA FlNISHLie GLADE nM IB APP~4FD
~ 6f iXE CRY 0.S .NRABLE POR PARR USE
/ / ~
C / -en.,_ 3. ENSUPE A MINBAIIM OF 6' OF 7GP501L APPLY
r f / ~ 1+ _ d"' A CPASS 5® MIATURE PRB IURF ULAN Mlk'
rl / / \ E r-"' r _ I~ ~Y _ ^ I ~ ~ I ~,y ~ > 1 _ _ _ _ 4~ iNEANLLOWIxc~CmIFR~N.
5 PER ACAE MaT NEE75
I \
k I 1 1 ~ ~ ' I m » ` (1~ _ _ T ' - MIA9MUd
L ~
,.r~ 1 I I ~ REM x OF MIX GERMINAnCN P>lRe1'
.r ~ _
err !r I r L~~~ _ ~ L\ amp L J A[ENE KENNCMI
~ .,P. I ~ ,F ~M1; .'I 1 - _ ~ leasa~- ~ ••'L. r rJ ew6cAASr SO 90 B5
I I L a--aa-»-^>a- _ _ ~J_ . ~ MFAMIIEM g7CH CHECRSr19 9EIMf xEN1UCRY
I ~ , / "hx.,' ~ `w6fALIID 6/ CnRAe AIANC BWEClNSE 30 90 95
1 ( ' 1 / , - ~ / Fl, fi0f1pM
/ ' L .tA' ~J' c _ _ ~ ~ / C11UN! `~.Y' ~ ECREIAANi PERENN4a :0 90 98
I I __~l r r r- y JT ~W~. ~ RYE
I _ ~ ~1~\! \A, ~/1 ~~I ~ ~ I ~ r___' I. - i ~,.1_d __rrJ. r___ TM`' .[\-Gi I., 4l~ I ~ - ~"'idr'-~, I MAROM.IWS PFRENNMl 10 90 99
m .=c_°Sc.c==`==_ _ ~ - I Existing Storm Sewer
_=n _______:mFY2lroiEC_Aw1 - _ y~-c •_~g~ _ \ ~ tl I~
_ _ 'rr NO CMNWEL ICOxsmu ON SWll BE CCO,RCRfARD III PfOpCeed $tOfm $Cwef
~t ~I ~ _CONSFAVAMkI'Fi1541.1 ~ _ _ _ ~ - WRx RI6<iE CREE%I, INC. CITY OF SxaAOPP~~EE @ II
~ /
t r\ _~/~_t°° _:.p _ ~ I II ~ PAlar wlE mRwc Nn xmia iJ 1j1 -oeo- Proposed Conto~f
1 /
- / - I._.` 1 I I ~ I IL - 777 I
/
` _ / _ L ~ L`T j 1 ` 1 I x-~ 1__ _ --eub--- Existing Contour
_ ~
tI _ _ _ - _ IRAO>' PER' _ . _ _ _ . _
I I I L~'~ ice„ \ \ -S- Silt Fence
III' .I j i` " - m ~ -~,.1 _ . - i ~-x+. Tree Protection Fence
o I _ " _ - m lV r r
i k ll I I I 1/ '1
I I ~
I ~ I 1~ ~ ~ ' I~/~ I .1 L_ J ~ ~ Ili.
i I I ~ L_ J 1 f 1 I I I I rl ii
~ I `I 1 I I I
I _ I
'II I Irt a_ , I ~ 'PA R L_ ..1 I~ ~ I ~ .r Ir•// / / /
7- I L J /~-+~'f'A-- {
! I 1 f _ Q r- ~ / 1 % r EROSION L18?TAi
7L NO1E3
r e L _ J Y I / ! / / ALL 6AOSION Ax0 5t91MEh7 covnwl SFWL aE
r I I ~V" J_ y ' f II! l 1 r / / / 6dVE w ACCORCANCE wi7x ix15 PLW AN5 n+E
'1 ~ I 'dv - ` ; ~ vI "1 ' ' / / ,r ~~o~ BNRM w,mR Pou~N PUN
' 1 /
-3,0 _ 1 _ Y I f _ j ;I' ~:u~--- . - jam,.
1 1c -q- 'L__~ _ I I IIlI I / /
~ ~~\y1 \ ~w~ / ~.E ~ JI IIII I ~ i / ~ \ ERn$roN CONIROI. NOTES ANO IpP NENfATroN s.NE171uc
I * 11~~ I / ~ f , 1 III I \ _ / /A. 7
//~,4 EAaLe" " - / ~ II 1 1 ~ ' / ~ U PMCR m Rcucx cluowc, wsrNE mr smP PExcs IN
R9Cf /
V`. ~ ~',a ' I - < ~ Ill I}~.r. ~ w v - ~ ~ ~r r ~ I ~
~ a
mt~
wN
moNris WIRGM~
B~t'~wm
1 o w h ! - , _ ~ ~ r A ~ . ~ I R Q L! li•, v-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~(,~V J (y Raven oxwlNO.uwu. PROC® oN ar uron Br,wea eels
~ f~ , I 'I r , .k.k II \ \ r• %v ( % m LAxIMIZE uNCCMRk1m AREAS
~ ~ I Ir` ~ t 1 I I \ \ I / r f l 3 A9 ETCH AAEA LS CRAOm, PROMOE N51NE iOPSCIf, 8L'FD MD
M a
~ ~ ~~~,I i~,~-.i I av1v~ ~~``.i~ l' / / o~cx~An~wca~iw~Re"~au~uwrs.w~nxwl4mrs
\
, o~ ~ '-0. ~ ~ i \ 1 ~ i~ , ~ (±1 N~~I
aLni'J~uimi'°EC~iro ils~rsraeusxm~Pmva
\ !
~n•.~ , ~ ` " 1 'v ~ ~ I l i j ~ r ~ (sJ voNmNC AeEU ro sE sEmm wm1 wemE wErwlo sEEO Ma~uRLc
11 r ~a ~'t=5~\ , ~ = $ ~ _ -~i~,\' I l\ (6)SFE SNPPP
ASCR CCNSMU \l _J ll _ ~ \ ~'1` II ~ Jr ~ f
-
ROCK CWrnRUCRO ~
SCALE ENIRWCErPm6ElNIJ ~~-L
a ,:a :,P
J'b'as ab Cemnmh VUa6 I Aere6Y PMily Not IAb Olen vaa papwetl by me ar under 'iewPUfl u~av9m
tt5c4F? BY:_ d-V._ mY Srwl su d IhPI I am a duly lioensod Paola
brwl r urcP PRFPAam ~ an? f IJ21/OP
l.a/oi cy ammenA Jid(as PsrrisiPn an al M.iinosota
//En9//ms//~~D__ uMer~~rAa Tors of IAv SI/P/q ~ '
1 inch ~ 12d (f, aWieN el': J~9 sD I~ H n A}a 8~ SNQi
• ewrr,.rP nw rwP. ~ (//Y'R~~Wz? "r`~~ r1: P CNGINEEWNG 8315 Pleasant View Or. n /~i
RID CE CREEK
` DETAILS
Cityof5hdkopee, Minnesota
q• L. NU.I
PDGi SPACWG
u0.L[5 BIACED EBCE
uMRFO dCFq
Po 4 gITGH PI BIOAM PIIEf
rWINE OR 141RE /
-1" X 1" riVOD POSr s'IESL T SNDDFD pC51 I G \r
Ai 4'~MAX SPACIIdi AT IfiINNA'.G SPAdNG ~T ~ ff\~ q^_yl•
] - PUSIIC ]IP iEG C 3,y ^ ~ illiER FADRIC
K r..
lOCA1E0 IH t0P B"-~ NOIE: PORII A 4USr BE A p iggpp ppST
' WIBAp.I OF 12" HICMIER, /
RnLE DIiCN CNEC% RWi PCWT A / ~ -y-___
amlE%cxE raesnc, ]s vvra a+AB wcH c«'ECxs :aE ~ rwlrn
(MIWr ]ABET) IHEYGRCUNR
5D FRP1f11, HNI NNl _
GEp1FNALE fAERIC FACE NIAHLES MVFY OTHFRINSE SRi FENCE, v
FRg11 FIBiHC FACE aIOROLL CR RDA pith ~ ~
i0" Mul, FIBRIL NICHCRCLE IRErICII, d¢016 G1ALL DE USEO, ~
fAIAIC ,WCHCNBE 1RElICH. 0.4C%ERL !11111 iN.IPEO
OIAEg1lON OF e0.CNFiLL WDN TAMPm IUNRAt SOIL
aU1mFF FL0V7 ~ NINRJd SgiL - FLWI - FLCW -
v/ r 1^ x r WDOO posy
'~!'~~~\/!~`•A ~ '~%~~v~"'- ,,I~x/~~~\~~/il.;~~' cEmExnLEFaGrac 1 _
1,5 IAN. 5 P Hlfl 6" ~ y. "A6RIG ANdIDIL1MT
POA CAI6EDNEIIi MIN. PO'T LkN_Di vVi IAN FARiM CC, /r 1AENCH &LNFlLL WRH
FYI. WN / TMIPFA NANRm. SOIL
r I
FLOYI FLGN ' ~'A 6" - 4
"".5~ Via' ~ \H ~ ! :EJM ~ I f McLLT WttN R,¢9WLarRnbeL~r~On~NW YmmO Ntb
6~iw'
WW 5
NOtE: ~ ~ I r "NY^ m musunY
NGW DUTY Rili iGlCE 91All ff 16WD NSLALLCD. - IEMBE~IdE11iT AI a xa~d~wino~n'w~x¢
QI t3" BI1RV tOR IA1CHIrlE DIKED 51Li fGmE 11DR: OP11011 I CPI1p! Z I A V~ Omsvl mppL wwu rm vww cmMlrs u crvas~
D[E EWCpr 15'1] NR I:ndIINE 9lICED SILT FENCE REgUTAEIA[HB Q TYO YA 2' r1DOU ,MILD D" D1FBL RPll1FTAdlm f44Rti IH FFCIA D4E 411D L SECfroN 41E1Y NGiE:
EIIDIfUpB IN THE CAWND 10' AIIIPAtBY. SILT FENCE SIWLL CONFOAN i0 '
hlE AEOUY2EMENTS OF
(AIN/DOi ]Ga6)
¢YL tKK I(iNv n9' M?.5 N9: arenwsal
~L~ INLET PAOTEC110N eawrrc sw ~y~~~,y~~.~,~
SILT FENCE °°A rxwrc wn 9 20D7 HEAVY O1T11' SILTFENCE rev unm a'w+M ssm ?002W GALE CHECKS " 2009 wr1 am DITCHCHECK Aaamu oAlo M1uurc awT 1m
RatMa'E[HIIXrRme9e 9fPIRnnNf mux9Pa elcluna9w cnAna9rt~ PAEAS6EMfiLED 2M4 ~i3MW(pm 2005
mmx'mm mnuoumrt vwaPS DwR;taw mwwrmrt
6EUII.fE1~R TRf3 PS MANUFAC'TURCO 0Y:
4NMC0 LL., SHAKOPEE. MIJ.,
ES6 Ok05., LOkE1T0. MI1., OR APPRWED EWAL
FPESIFJCNIPJffi+AS(dN11619d _ _
pSC Ime11 A 11P S(_Ff1
~CU,518NFDgN. 91N EONAN.
- AI'li $J[L[tlDp vx1DIN P~ - ~ , 01.1-9H. '
R9 CfR 19]0 - paltA..WEI_1 L~
PAINT I t~lUBr DE A M1IIINAIYI CF 12"
NGHG RIAN PAINT 2 t0 FNSUrc
Ily,i" 1 I nalE~ MAT'MAiER ttOIVS 01tiR THE DINE '
/ RP]ER FLG'I! RA2 (MAONCH TYPE EF FILiFA) O.fi] =Is tl 9' Havd - .--3' LEVEL (11111.) NVD NOi ARWNO 1HE ENAS
w,%CAU4 CVEAtIUY A„"tE 5.W cla G 15' FeN 6' % 6' 1RCI1E'.H 1',1M LEApIIG
/ / 4' 614A3Y EDGE OF Ch1EG0RY ] EROSI011
CONiRp. EWINET SrAPLED hi
~ s ~ ' 'I ~ 9m OR sLm AnmtJlrryE a' Ixluru, AIJD oncRFlUeo .
_ vnm IurvHnL saL. ~ \ paar I
~yo sD• om EAmR PUre ~ ~~1 ~ _
f gKAFmw +0 - ¢meR 1u
' rrW / I ~.~~rILTER AsmnoLr ~ x x r, m" LoNO lvaapeH ,
11 ) 111 ~ -stn%ES ®MIN. 1' spAdnD. /
v$, ?>ti -y'1~ OVFRFLOw p -TAP Dr dlfa GA% \ \ pllt2 iHAOUCH LIETONL' k
~ I 7 r.- 1 yyJ,~".,, / ``\4 lo' Fluor ABSE11NLr FlLIEe LDC.
p~l~ r 1 / 1 r 1\ ~RDW \ \y/'
,~J ~ \ CUPG L CMER I' SPACUlG ON SIAPLEi
A60A6GilE `yF' LTALD UI:~R G'
GEOIE%IILE pAaRIC / ~.4~~n'
6"UIN OEPM ro~ `,1 r a~\ `-PGNr 2
G" GIORgLL PEA
cG-]3 HIGH-f LOW `6' I1 CAWE METAL
HWII-1if)Y! RMJNC NNOOi ]GD'I DinP1E9 6PAClD 2' au
TPE 3
CA'RGCRY 5 EI?PSIDN
tID1E: CpliRp. pL0.1NET ,
f.L,on Iillnr nleJln alter exN relA ercnl and rcpb=9 if YINr h rbg6uJ vAlh wY11ueM.
Armove =vAir/ao-Tmont frmm ra<aptab oll<r rW1 roil =raM.
ADCK CDN6TAUCTIOW revaw CATCH OFrS1N A=r~m1 ~ EAO610N CONTflOL =m mru w, ~uiL~ ~wmnr~ onAL 1n
I'• Amv~H rAm r
^y}yA.Kppgg ENIAANCE mm erv~umvmPo 2008 ,crIA1~F8 6EDIMENTTflAP manr wm 2007 JsfihP,fi7S5 fiIANKET „'W'um: +v.vMr u9, 2~S FILTER LOG
r slwnre mm Yexm emvAlumrt mvmr¢ DcruMrc 9vrc1lmur DImYCNN9 wwRmDrt
wsrrcw ar, M~v. aznF uv 9mw.nrc I/tron I nrreor =Klwr Not IIJa pl9n .ma p<epRrrd Ay me =r undo run ~x;vR nREpaAED fAR:
„y,yT <ur p,Mxnlr y~g/gy my abet! cuoerri.lon and D,al I om o Ju+/ Licanxed Prolaaiond s " ~ WiC~ 11/1102
EnyYleur IAa bws IYe 5fulo r! ANrme:
CAARN YY: J.V. ~J M~J~YII F. ADC~Q~Ir NC. D~N-G sx[fT
aY'uEA m1 c.ler, r, EKGINEE[UNO 6)15 Plea9ent vrew Dr. PIOCE CREEK Q X11
_ ~ L'~_ Mo,mdv vw. MM ssnP
RIDGE CREEK
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTfON PLAN (SWPPP) DETAILS
City o~Shr~kopee, Minnesota
GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE SPECIFIC EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
INSPEC710NS AND MAINTENANCE AMENDMENTS 70 SWPPP ~ ~ EflQ9ItlN g
The Pumittee(s) (eilhu the ovrner yr opnrota) must routinely inspect the The Penniilee(s) musk amend the BWPPP as necesswy Ip indatle addilion¢I This project will consist of the construction of t5J .:;nyle lamgy resitlmlial lots. SIAUCNRAL Pf1AC71CE9
consWction site on every seven (7J days during active construction tied within ra9uiremen(s, earl, as adtlitPonpl or modifced AMPS, designed to correct problems' 1. Spt Fence - velll be installed prior to any grading activities along the pet'mela of
24 hours after a roinlall event greater than 0.5 Inches In 24 hours. Itlentlfied or addresv situallons vA,eneva: The mnofl from this site drains into w rile Slarm sa:sr 4eatment pod rote those portions of Tne site whid~ ore downstream of storm voter run-elf a as
cwlyd pwde. diraatetl Dy U,e CTty.
All insp«liws tied maintenwae eoMUCted during construction must be recorded in r, There h a change M design, construction, opaoli,m, maintenance, wevthu ur
nritmg and these records must he retained with the 34VPPP in accordance with on conditlans that has a signlBmM effect an the discharge of polulanH la 2. Storm rvaler Menogem¢nt -Stolen voter is to be collected and routed to a
AECOAO REIEIJTION. Records of such inspection tied moin{enonce aclivi{y Shall surface wafers a wderground wofera; Soil dlsWrb'v,g oclivities will Incude: inslollation of n rude cane Wctiw en Vance; regiond stamnvter pond that has been prevrously wnslructed for This and the
nclude: shall Include: 2. Ins eetiws a investigotiws b le o nralore, tool, slate or fedora) oliicials instolmtlon al sat fence where surface run-af( leaves sire, of in lawtions' os surtvwding sites.
a, Date tied time (nspeclions; indicate We SVNPP u not elfecllw o elinlnahng a signiflcmlly minimizing the directed by the city, site grading (to include the import ar arport of material); storm Sewer aldxl Proleckw -such as rip-rap tins gedextile Eller Ivbric will
dischor I II t t Lo surface voters ar underground colas or that the turf restoration par NPDES requiramenls; storm Sewer, walamain ontl sanitary be Installed of ma storm savor avuel hto the pond m a permanent voslsn
b. IJome of person(s) ronddefmg inspttliws•, ge o po u m s r inslollatians; buidinq ewslruclion including foundollon excovptlw; driveway ranted mzsae.
a Findings of inspections, indutling rewmmvtldipns for corrective octiar, discharges era causing water qudlty stwdwd exceedvncos. or construction; vnd. preporotlw for Wrf restorvtiw.
d. Corrective actions token ('including dales, tunes, and party completing 1 the SriWPP Is not aMlevin9 the general objectives of controlling pollutants in starve OTHER COMROLS
mainlmpnce acflvlliesJ; water tlischorges wsodated with cwshuclipn activity, or Ne SWPPP Is not 1. Construction V,bste IAateriols -All waste malalals generotsd as o result of site
e. Opra we amount o/ raNfdl events greater Ihon 7/2 inch (OS inches) conslstml wiU the terms and condlUona of this Derrnit. BEFORE CONS7PUC110N AFTER CONSTRUC110N wnsiruction shall be collected and ranoved according to all locvl and/ar slate
in 24 hours; and 4. Al any time otter Dermit cowr¢ a ie effective, the MPCA coo detarnine Ihut Th¢ waste mono nmt re lotions b a llcensd sdld waste mwa9emml sampan
r. Documenfolian vl changes mode to the SWPPP. 9 Y TOTAL SITE AREA 78.4 ACRES 79.4 ACRES gal gu y y.
project's storm vats dischages may cause, hove reosonotla polenlid to cause, or 70TAL ESIIMAtEO IMPERNWS 0.7 ACRES 24.0 ACRES The contractor will ensure That oil silo pasonnd are instructed in chase practices.
Yfnere parts of the construction sits hove undergone Mal stobilizalion, but work conWbut'e Wnon-attainment of any applicable voter quelily slvnda0. If MPCA TOTAL ESTIMAlEO PEAYIOUS 78.7 ACRES 55.4 ACRES Z ylozardaus Pbstea -All hozordous waste mvterials shell he stored properly to
n other parts of the site, inspections of the slvbilized areas may be makes each a determination, the MPCA will noUty the Permillee(s) In wriliny. In prevent spills wd vondolisrn. When necessary, hazardous wastes wBl be disposed
reduced Ip once pm month. Wove work has been suspended due to Irozen yround response, We Pemsitlee(s) must develop a supplemmtd BGP attkn plan a al In the manna specieetl by local and/or stole regulation ar by the manufaciwar.
mndlllons, Ibs required Inspections vnd mvinl¢nonte must take plwe as soon as vppropriate SY/PPP amendments describing SWPPP modifcvlions to adJress Ine 3. Sanitary Waste -All sanitary waste will be collected Irom the pMOde antis by o
runoff occurs of the ells or prior to resuming wnstructlon, whichever came fret identified cancans ontl submit inkrmollon requested by the MPCA, whkh maY 13E048iCE OF 311E GRA?Nfi MD iMJOR ACTNfIES local, liconsad water mowogement company, as required by local regulpllon.
pp eraslm prevmllm and sediment cmird OMPs must bx Inspected to ensure Include an intlivltlud pemit opplicatbn. If AIPCA's written nolif lion requires u
response, Failure to respond wllhin the specified limelromo ronslilutes a permit 1. Prior la any grading opaallons, Ne cwlracla shall Install a rock cons++ucliw 4. Ollslln vohide Trncleing - A rock canslructiw entrance will be pnNtlad to help
integrity ontl efleetivaess. All nonlunctbnol BIAPS must be repaired, replotad or vialoflw, xntronce and perimelar silt fence vs shown w plan. (Cpntacl City to inspect reduce vehicle trvclting of sediments. The paved street odpcent la the rile
swpplemenletl with luneklonol BMPS. 7Ee Pamitee(s) must invesligale and comply erosion ventral measure, prior to amstruclipn.) Fddlllonal slit fence may be entrance shall be swept on w as-needed bosh, a as determined by the qty.
with lha fallowing Inspection vnd mamlmvnca requlremenU: necessary if toed condtions require. Dump Trucks healing loose molarids (sand, topsoil, etc.) to and/a ham the rile
All sit fences must Be repaired, replaceJ, or suDDlemented •when they become F(NAL STABWZA710N shall be covered with a tarpaulin
nanWndicnol (develop leafs, detach hem posts, post become dislodged from Tne Pamitee(s) t enaura final stobil'¢alipn of Ine site. lho Famitet(e) must 5. Vahida Cleaning - No rngine deyreusiny is ulitwxd on-site. External washing of
granQ etc.) r the sedimml reaches I/J of Iha height of the fence. These wbmit a Notice d Taminalion wllhin 30 days alter final slnbil'rztlion is complete, vehides to be confined to a do0ned area (Done yard") w-site.
repairs must be mode within 24 hours of Jiacovery, a os soon vs the Uald a another owner/operofw (Permi[lee) has assumed control over ntl avow of the Perform remaintlar of sire graeirry un arc area-by~ar« Uosis to minimize
conditions allow access site that hove oaf undergone fool stabiliml'mn. Final slobilizalion con be achieved completed arms. As each arev w canpleled, dl erposvd soils must have- ~ P
Tanporary wd permanent aedNnenkalion ponds must ba drained and the sediment in ono eF the toNowFg ,rays: temporary erosion control prolerfion or pertinent rover occordnq to the fdlowing Woo aee'Mp«tlona wtd MekdeMnce' V,da'(A9VEf1A1 EA0.SgN AEA SEDIIAQJf CPNBiOU
oved xhen the depth of the sediment colleted in the basin revches 1/2 the time table: Tne follorving are the inspection tied mdntmance prvclices Ihol will be uutl to
stooge volume, Grainoga and remowl must be cpmplefad Mtl,in 72 hours of I, All still disturbing of the site hpvC been campl¢led tied all soils must bu stabilized mainlvn eruvlon ontl sediment controls.
diswvery or as soon as field conditions allow access by a uniform perennial vegetative cove with a density of 70 percxnt oven Hte 11PE OF SLOPE 11MEw • All control measures will be InspactaJ pt Iwsl a;ee each week tied following wy
Surface wofera, including drainage ditches and ppnwynnce systems, must be entire previous mrloce ores, ar other equivalent means neceswary to prevwl soil uu:mum tMa an vrvo em
Inspected for evidence of sediment being deposited by aas'tan. The Permilee(s) failure antler erosive condltlons wd; Steeper than 4:7 7 tlo}s non span when tnv area k storm even of 0.5 inches or greater,
must remove dl deltas and sedimml deposited in surface wvters, Including p. All dralnoge dltt$es, canalrucfed to drvin water from Iha site alter rma(mction is ID;1 to +:1 14 tla s not unhMy befog worked.) • All measure will be mainluined In good working older, it a repair is necessary, It
dralnoge wvys. cvtnh basins, and other drainage systems, ontl ratohilize the arms camplelB, must be stabilhed to preclude erosion; Flaller then 10:1 21 days will be initiated wllhin 24 boon al report.
hers sediment remowl msnlts in exposed soil. The remvvvl and stobllizatbn must 4 All temporary s}nlhetic, wd sWcturd avsian prevention mtd sediment conlyd • Ouit up sediment wiW be removed from sill fence when Il has reached one-third
lake place within 24 hours of discovery unieas prelWed by legal, regulatory, a Best Management Plans (wch as sill fence) must be rornowd os part of the Bile (1/3) the height of the fence or vs dractnd by the city.
physical access conslrvuls. Thor Permkee shah use all reasonable efforts to obtain Ilnol slabilizatlon; and • Sill fence will bx inspected for depth of sediment, tears, to see if lee lobric Is
s. If precluded, removal tied stoblllzotiw must take plate within 24 hours o£ All sod seed, mulch and fertiiza sndl calam wM the laliowing MnDOT ecurely attached to the fence posts, tied to sae that the fence posts. are firmly
obta ring ceeass. The Pvmilee is respanalble la wntacWg all bco6 regbnd c, fie Permltes(s) must clean out ail sediment from conveyances stl from specirlcalims as modified below. n the ground.
stoke and letlerol aulhailies ontl reaiuing any epplicabla permits, prior to lemporory sedimentation basins shot are to he used os permanent ,valor quality • iempavey Seed'ng tied planting will be nspected for bare spots, washouts, tied
conducting my work. monagemml baSMS. Sediment must be stabilhed to prevent it from being washed
back info the basin, conveyance and tlrnNaga nays discharging al(-site or w ITEM MnDOT SPECIFlCAiION AND NOTEB hevllhy growth.
Construction wile vehicle exit larotions must be inspected tar evidence off-site surface voice. the clew out of pemanent basins must be suiliclenl to return Sed '5078 A maintenance report will be made after each inspection.
sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. cracked sedimml mwtst be removed from the Iwm to design capacity. J-
oel off-site paved 5urfpces, within 24 hours of discovery ar if oppllrode, vrithin a Bead 3376 MS~.1AtLOUB iFOWApgtCW ,
shorts time. 2. For residmlid construction only, rend stobllixatlw has bow athinved when ~ For Pontling AYeas (above IJWN.) AlizWre 1U0 (ol 30 Ibs/acre)
temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter conlyd fw individual lots 1) Wlovroole working nears shall be in conformance to the Clty of Shakopee
The Permitlee(s} re responsible far U;e opaaflw and molnlvance of temporary has been camDleted and the residence has keen transfased to the Homeowner. fa General Arevs Misture 6C0 (tOD Ibs acre) rcquiremonts.
ontl pumurant valor quality management BMPs, w well as aW erasion prewnlicn Addltiwoiy, the Pamitee must dslribula the A1PCA "hrwsteawner fact sheet' W the Alvlcn 3982 (Type 1 - Dlse Anchored)
and sedlmenl ronlyd BIAPs, for the duration of the construction work of the site. homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need far, ontl benefits ol, final FatBiner 3361
fie Pamittee(s) are responsible until mothv Permitee has assumed ventral over stabilizallon.
areas of the site that have not been really stabilized or the site has wdergwe ' Wnerx applicade.
renal atabai:otion, and p Nalice of iammaliun has been sahmitletl to me MPDA RECORD RETENTION
(see TERMINATION DF COVERAGE).
If sediment escapes tM constructron site, off-rAle acamalations must he ranaved The SWPPP, 011 changes ka il, vnd inspections vnd mvinlpnanco records must be
manner tied at a frequency nulriciml to minimhe off-Hite impacts (e. g., kept of Dle dt8 doting canstmalion by the Permitee who nos cperolitnd control The cwlractor shall I I allenlmn la all aJ t t Tha
fuglllve sedunent in sireels could be washed inM storm severs by the next rain of Yhal potion of (ha site. The SWPPP c« be kept in eilhar the iidd attire rl ~n pay specs jacm proper y iin¢s,
and/ar pose a safety hazard la vas of public streets). an w-sift: vehicle. A copy shall ba provided to the city attar to awxtNClion. contractor must moka sure ihn erosion control protricns inploce in those stew
prevents miytolion of setllment onto adjacent properties and the xrhllnq storm
All Infitroflon arms must be Inspectetlelo ensure Thal no sedment from wgoing All owner(s) u t keep the SWPPP, along with the lollawing uddillonul records, w sewer.
mnslrucflw ocbvities is reaching Iha infiltrptlon area tied these areas ore file la three (3) ywrs after wbmllled of the NOi os outlined in TERMINATIDry OF
pmtecled (tom canpatHon doe to cwslruetlon equipment driving across the COVERAGE Thls does no! ncluda wy records offer submilld of the 110T, 1f any Slopes appear to be laMng, additlwol alt Imo, ead{mmt fogs ontl erosive
inAllrplipn Oren conlyd blwket, ect sT¢II be added os needed, a as tlirecletl by the city.
POLLU710N PRE4ENRON MANAGEMENT MEASURES 1. Any other permits required for the projecp The conlrwla shall maintoio and r~oir all sill fence (nduding the remowl of
2. Records of all inspection ontl moinknonce conducted during ~ccnsiruclion ccumdaled sNiment) Until wgetatian is esloblishod and the site Is stabilized. _
The Permitee(s) Shall implement the lollorring polluliw prevention management 3. All permanent operatldn and maintenance agreements Ihvt hove been hnplemenlW, (See dso IWSPECi101VS AIID MAInITEIdANCE).
measures on Iha site: includng all right of way, contracts, cpvmonls, tied other b'mdinq regwiremwls 3. U radio cam lotion the wnwocier man a Halle to •oil, seed ens
Spud Wwte: Cdlected sadlmenL asphalt and concrete railings, Ooo Hog debris, regording perpetual mdntmonco; and mpon 9 9 D prcvid p,
Ich anchored pith a straight set disc within 49 hours of final grading.
paper, plosdc, fobriq consimetion and demolition debris and oNa wastes must be 4. All required cvlwlolions fa design pt the temporary ontl perrtlwenl sWmr rvaler 4 Excess sail should be treated Ike other e~:pcwd s7N ¢iM stabilhed
disposed of properly tied must comply with MPCA disposal requiremmis. managemut systems. per NPDES
raquW,ments,
Hoxadaus 7Aetuials: ql, gasoline, paint and any hozordous aubsiwees must be 5. Contractor shall be responsible for remowl of all eraion d: sedimont conhol
properly seared including sewdary wntoinmenl, to prevent spills, leaks a cthu IERMINAIICN DF CDIkTtAGE measures wee fxwl Wrf has been eldslknae par tdPDES requiranwla.
discharge. Resfncied attess to storage onus must be provided la pnwnt
w dpllsm. Storage and disposal of hazordwa waste roust be in compliance wiU I. Permitlee(s) ebbing to lammote covaoge antler ibis parmlt must submit a tlnlica
MPCA regulollons, of Termination (NOT) to the IAPCA. Compliance whit U,e permit is required until v
Exlemol washing of Trucks and other conslractldn vehicle must bs Ilmiked loo NOi h suhmittetl. The Permlllae(s) outhpzixotion to JWehorge vntlor this permit
properly p lerminotes aL midnight of the day the NOT Is signed.
defined arm of the site. Runoff must be contained and wosie die seed
al. No engine degreasing is allowed on sits. & All Permlllxe(s) must Suhmll a NOT wllhin inirly (30) days allot ono w rnoro cl
the lollowlnq condltlons hove hem met:
DEWATERINC AND BASIN DRAINING a Fnd Blabilizallon has been ochioved on dl ponipns al tho silo Inv wnid, the
Dewotvln9 or basin dromiog (e.g., pumped discharges, trerKhJdltch cuts fa Permllea is respmsible (Including Ns rxmowl al all lernpprory erosion control
drains a laced to the cnnslrucfion attivily that may have Wrbid or crtdimeni meosvres such as slit fence, and if applicable, reWrning agritukurd land to Its pro
laden disehar a rvaler must be dlschar ed fo a tom mar t comWctbn agkulWrol use);
q g p y ar permonen
sadimentoUun basin on the project site. If the water cannot be discharyed loo b. Aiwlher owner/opaola (Permilae) has assumed conlyd oeortlisq to Pat 11.8.5 0l
sndimenlotian basin prior to entering the surface valor, Il must Treated wiU the MPCA Permit No. MN RID0001 over all areas of the silo Iltol navD not been Ntally
opproprivte BhJP, such that Ule discharge does nor! odversdy oflecl the receiving sto5ilzed; or
voter a downstream Iwdownen. The Permitlae(s) must enure that discharge c. For residential construction only, temporary aosipn proleclinn vnd down yrudlent
points are adequately prolecled ham erosion and scour, the dlachorgo must be L r control for indlvfduol lots has been canpleled onJ the residence Has
dlspased over naturd rock tiptop, sand Bogs, plvallc sheetNg or olAler occeptetl perime e
energy Jisslpalion measures, Adequate sedimmlatipn control measures are been transferred la the homeowner. Atldlllanody, lhp Pamitea must tlistrlbufa the
regdred for tllschorge wotu that rnntdns suspmdad sdids. fAPCO:s "hamaswnar 1«taheet' to lha hameawnm la Inform the homeowner el the
need tar, and benefits of, Mol stabilization.
All note Irom dewaterin9 or bbsin draining activities must De discharged in o
manner that does not cause nuisance ewdldons, erosion in racaivelg channels or
w downslope propMies, or inundation In wellpntls causing segnificdnl adverse
Impact to the wetlon4
n.u,.
ydP/nb [ly fameeW I/C/Po I hooey ewdily Nat ffiis plan wa pepaed ky me ar nMer luwe,o pRrvwEa f0A
OESrtHD 0Y: J__Y. mw ~ ~ w¢• 71/21/02
my dxvcl supurv,wan and fAal I vin o duly licensed Wvlessivnd ra
vaayy nw ~m=w a/e~a ~ ar Env rows ¢r Inn side ar a«m. ~O rr~ P1TCiE Cft~(I, NC. SWPPP PLAN sxEn
akawu ur. J_u °r
. c;mrvn wv c.w.p, ~?<.'L`, ENWNEERIN6 33fs Pkamwt Mew Dn 1/1 /11
m,.,.ernv,v,,.n a;~.,,,, RIDGE CREEK
M°
:m r Vtl I j rm 889Y4'18'E
y-_.._._
RIDGE CREEK_
_ - I I
m .rx-. .C .G
_ - _ G
' ON SITE BOR20WAREA PLAN II I , , _ ~ - -
r------
~ r---- -
I
ill I; i - I
~ I I I I
F d )r7 d ~ ' ~ ~ • I I ----III) I I , I I , i ;
I,
Cify o Sh kopee Mn esof ~ , . ` . - ' Q I ~ ~
I - -
,'fJ _
J
~ _ ' _ I _
n / A ~ ~ I F-' f 1 r ~ xrr. I,` r _ ~ ~ \ s __7 ^
~`6 i ~ lrl; ~h I I Y-'Ir,- 11f ,li 111 ~i ili i'----
i ~ f ~I I~J~~ I 1 j ; ~ ~I ~ -i _
^ - ~ I ~ - 1.1 ~ ~I ~ I L--- p I ~I~`I`- - 1 ~ 11 ,4~' ; ! DENOTES BORROW AREA
'II_II ~ I ~ - - IL rJII .A f/A 1\ F+ ~ ~I~ I~ E IY
4 , I7 v'~wu , V E- ~ , r~ IIF..;~ , I nv';' ~ l~l- II 0
1V ~A - ^y. \ /%I L ~i' \ jy~ rm F'- l •I CONRkCR1R SWLL KKK IHE LIMIfS OF FACH SORROW MEA STMEO NN MPRDiED
I Ve 1` \ _ ~ F ' I ~ r al' i' i ^ I I ~ ~ / i0 PRflENE ENGt0.4pINkM IMO HWSE PPD k IINGINCROUNR PIPE AR645.
li ~ ' ~ i r I ~ xy <r r~^ .`ti1r q-~={\ ` L__ J ~ I I L 1 j 0 FEET FROM PADS. SOILS FNC~ SIWL OEIFAMWE W.YIMUM OFPMS
` \ I \ - ' h'am' - ~ , I i i ~ 0.N0 SLOPE OF A!L BORROW MEAS.
~ _ 'IIL__-__ A ~t I I I I I
r f I Ir , w~
fem=.
a \ I
i-~
N m - \ \
x ,
,
.I
C ~ ~ ' _ ~ .
~ „ 6 _ I q I I I I 'V 6
y ~ I _ - li
1 ~ ~ J r 1
. -
I ) ~ ~ ~ ; -t- r--- - rya. _ ~ I ~ _ ,
~ ~ ;
j / ,e x I
- ~ ~ r ~
's ,y, yam- - = - - ~ I L_ ,V~-r m A_~~-~ ~
r"'W, -
_
1
--eu-.. .
.--...,rx,. - -
Ir- .
F'~ L - _ _ _ _ "o - 1 i a X _ m~__ IN
>g ;Ax I r. 1 ~ _ ~ 111
. r-,.
r
- ^ _
~ - J - - - _ _ III
I y _
I
\ ~ _ `rte
e I
~ .
r'
,I.' ^ I J
h;- A
1 I -
q l__
--~-'T-
I r _ - ,
~ I ~ f l
.J _ , ~ I r r i
- ~m I - - ~ , x
I ~ I I
v 1 ~ '
• = i
I kl .
' ` ~ I ~ ~ ~ A i~
.r i . ~ 6d" ~ A' ~ ~ ~
1 _
er. , ,I
~ r ~ i
I~ ~ ~Il~
~ ~ , - - , I~, ~ -~1 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Imo. / ~ ~11----~~ l
x~==~- , ~ ~
- , I,` ~ `
SCALI; _ _
n fio sv
Y:tro6 GV Cwnmmm I/WCe I he <xrlil ihvl This I xu mew
msnhtt0 8n~{Y_ ebl Y pan rus prepvre0 Dy mew tler PRFPMED 60.f
>,'M,%m Cib 6'Cmmmm l/B,N6 my tlimefi supemsim vnd IAOI I vm v Buy limnxed YmlexxionW • ~ OI1G 11~Y1/02
pR6nw er. ~v Enylnagjrna6r Ine bmr of me slave of 6Gmle6em, RAGE CP~f 4 NC,
I inuh = 120 fl /~~r ~ f~vLv, ~ ~ g~Eflpy(PIAN
n1[6xm on, cw ,r f i ~ w,. ~~5;<, / SENC WEERING 8,715 Pleasen( N'ew Ilr. 11 /11
- O~' s ~ PLOD uwnl.uvz ll'em~uii"a Movnds Yaw, MN 55112 AIOCE CAEIX
RESOLUTION N0.6769
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
.APPROVING GRADING PERMIT
FORRIDGE -CREEK
WHEREAS, Ridge Creek I, Inc.("Applicant") submitted an application fora
grading permit for Ridge Creek on November 1, 2007 ("Application" or "Grading
Application"); and
WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 80 acres legally described on
attached Exhibit A (hereinafter "Site" or "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant previously submitted a preliminary plat application on
November 18, 2005 to subdivide the Property; and
.WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
. preliminary plat application and recommended denial of the requested preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and denied the preliminary plat application
at its meeting of July 18, 2006; and
WHEREAS, in December 2006 the Applicant commenced a district court action
in Scott County challenging the City of Shakopee's denial of the preliminary plat
application and asserting that is wetland replacement plans were approved by operation
of Minn. Stat. § 15.99 in a matter captioned Ridge Creek I, Inc. v. City of Shakopee
Court File No: 70-CV 07-19 ("Action); and
WHEREAS, final judgment has not been entered in the Action; and
WHEREAS, while the Action was pending in district court the Applicant submitted
-the Grading Application; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted with its Application. a Grading and Erosion
Control Plan (11 sheets) prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated 7/26/07 (hereinafter
"Grading Plan"); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted with its Application a Woodland
Management plan (4 sheets) prepared by Carlson & Carlson, Inc. and Plowe Engineering
- dated 11/22/06 (updated 12/19/07) ("Woodland Management PIan"); and...
WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted with its Application a Landscape Plan (1
Sheet) prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated 11 /21 /02 ("Landscape Plan"); and
1
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2007, .City staff notified the Applicant that the
Application was incomplete; and
WHEREAS, on January 7, 2008, the Application was deemed complete; and
WHEREAS, in a letter dated. February 27, 2008 City Staff provided the
Applicant with the City's comments and requested revisions to the Grading Plan on an
enclosed redline copy of the Grading Plan (attached hereto as Exhibit B);
WHEREAS, also in the letter dated February 27, 2008, City Staff provided the.
Applicant with the City's comments and requested revisions to the Woodland
Management. Plan in a memorandum enclosed from Natural Resource Coordinated dated
February 13, 2008; and
WHEREAS, in the February 27, 2008 letter the City Staff advised Applicant that
pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 15.99, Subdivision (fj the City of Shakopee was
extending the review period for, the Application by an additional sixty (60) days until
May 6, 2008 because additional time was needed (1) for the Applicant to address the
comments and needed revisions to the Application; 2) for the Applicant to resubmit
revised plans and 3) to allow City staff adequate time to review the revisions prior to the
City Council acting on the application; and
WHEREAS, the above revisions were requested to be received no later than 4:30
p.m. on April 25, 2008 which is 10 days prior to the May 5, 2008 City Council meeting;
and
.WHEREAS, the Applicant failed to resubmit any of the requested revisions; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, NIINNESOTA, THAT THE GRADING PLAN,
WOODLAND MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR RIDGE
CREEK ARE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. The following must be completed prior to the issuance of a grading permit and
prior to conducting any Iand disturbing activity on the Site:
A. The Applicant must provide the following to the City Engineer as required by
the grading permit application process:
1. The Applicant must submit a detailed contractor's bid for the proposed
land disturbing activity.
2. The Applicant must submit the contractor's-certificate of insurance (in
compliance with City Right-of--Way permit requirements in Section 7.07
of the City .Code).
2_._..
3. The Applicant shall post an irrevocable Letters of Credit in favor of the
City, on a form approved by the City Attorney, in the amount of $78,500
to assure compliance with its obligations established in this Resolution and
to guarantee its performance.
4. The Applicant must pay to the City the Grading Permit Fee which shall be
calculated as set-forth on the City's standard Grading Permit application.
B. The Grading Plan must be .revised to incorporate the hand written revisions
and directives shown on the redlined Grading Plan (EXHIBIT B) provided to
the Applicant as an enclosure in Project Engineer Joe Swentek's letter to
Applicant dated February 27, 2008.
C. The Grading Plan must be revised to incorporate the comments and revisions
required in the memorandum of Joe Swentek dated May 2, 2008 attached
hereto as EXHIBIT C.
D. The Grading Plan must be revised to incorporate WSB's written comments
and requirements related to Ridge Creek's storm water management plan .for
Ridge Creek which includes but is not limited to the memoranda dated May 9,
2007; May 16, 2007; June 5, 2007; and June 25, 2007 attached hereto. as
EXHIBIT D and any future memoranda issued by WSB after the
incorporation of WSB's comments and resubmission of the storm water
management plan.
E. Once the Grading Plan is revised as required herein, it must be re-submitted to
the City Engineer and WSB for final review and approval. All re-submittals
must accurately reflect the, date of the revisions.
F. The Woodland Management Plan must be revised into one separate document
with the plan sheets consecutively marked.
G. The conservation easement shown on the Woodland Management Plan shall
be revised as required by the City's Natural Resources Coordinator in his
memoranda dated February 13, 2008 and May 2, 2008 attached hereto as
Exhibit E.
H. Once the Woodland Management Plan is revised as required herein, it must be
resubmitted to the City Engineer and Natural Resource Coordinator for final
..review and approval. All re-submittals must accurately reflect the date of the
revision.
L The final Grading Plan and Woodland Management Plan must be revised to
be consistent with each other and comply with alT requirements of this
Resolution.
3
J. The Applicant must comply with the City's Natural Resources Coordinator
memoranda dated February 13, 2008 and May 2, 2008 attached hereto as
Exhibit E wherein he has identified the conditions that must be satisfied prior
to removing trees or conducting any land disturbing activity on the Site.
K. The Applicant must submit an application and receive City approval of a
Wetland Mitigation Plan.
L. The Applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit from the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency for work on the Property. A copy of this permit shall be
forwarded to the City Engineer.
M. The Applicant shall obtain approval and any required permits for the proposed
.impact to the existing wetlands on the Property from all regulatory authorities
including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
N. The Applicant shall execute. and record the City's. standard Conservation
Easement Agreement to grant an easement to the City over the Conservation
Easement Area identified on the approved Woodland Management Plan. The
Conservation Easement Agreement shall include the legal description of the
easement area.
O. The Applicant shall submit an application and receive approval to alter the
location of the Prior Lake Channel from all regulatory authorities, including
. but not limited to the committee established pursuant to the Memorandum of
Agreement and Joint Powers Agreement by which jurisdiction over the Prior
Lake Channel is shared by the City of Prior Lake, City of Shakopee,
Mdewankanton Sioux Community and the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed
.District.
P. The Applicant shall grade the Site in accordance with the approved Grading
Plan and shall complete all grading on the Site in one phase by October 1S,
2008. Grading shall mean bringing the Property up to the proposed finished
final grade with City approved materialsand consistent with the approved
Grading Plan.
Q. As a part of Applicant's grading of the Site, the Applicant shall completely
remove private driveways/field accesses to the Property from the County
right-of--way on or before the date required by the County Right of Way
permit.
R. Concurrently while grading on the site, the Applicant shall remove from the
Property and properly dispose of the approximate 7S' x 300' area identified as
"waste bluff' on sheet 2 of 11 of the Grading and Erosion Plans. Also,
concurrently while grading the Property, the Applicant shall remove from the
Property and properly dispose of all unauthorized fill and debris buried on
4
Property which includes but is not limited to that buried south of the Waste
Bluff shown on Sheet 2 of 11 of the Grading and Erosion Plans.
S. The Applicant shall provide a direct haul route on the Property -for trucks
bringing in fill to avoid undue wear on newly constructed adjacent City
streets. The haul route shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval and is
subject to change to avoid disturbance to adjoining lots and areas.. '
T. Applicant must install tree protection fence/silt fence in accordance with the-
approved Woodland Management Plan and the Grading Plan and must remove
the tree protection fences/silt fences prior to the release of security for the
grading permit. The Applicant shall remove tree protection fences and silt
fences when turf is established, as determined by the City Engineer..
II. The issuance of a grading permit shall be contingent upon the satisfaction of
the conditions set forth in Section I herein and further subject to the
following conditions:
A. The Applicant must comply with the conditions and requirements set forth in
the City's Natural. Resources Coordinator memoranda dated February 13,
2008 and May 2, 2008 attached hereto as Ezhibit E.
B. The Applicant must comply with the Supplemental Conditions of the Grading
Permit for Ridge Creek proposed in the memorandum of Joe Swentek dated ~ "
.May 2, 2008 attached hereto as Ezhibit C and execute same.
C. The Applicant must comply with the General Conditions of The Grading
Permit for Ridge Creek'attached hereto as Ezhibit F.
D. The approvals granted by this Resolution are subject to the completion of and
compliance with all requirements set forth in the City Ordinance Code, written
policies, resolutions and regulations. .
E. The Applicant must comply with any Wetland Mitigation Plan approved by
the City.
F. The City has not approved a preliminary plat for the Property. In the event a
preliminary plat is approved in the future, additional revisions may be
required to the Grading Plan, Woodland Management Plan, and Landscaping
Plan to accommodate the preliminary plat, specifically the proposed streets
and utilities.
G. Despite the Applicant's submission of Pavement Design. Calculations as
required with its Grading Permit Application, these plans are not approved as
apart of this Resolution and are subject to review as a part of the street and
5
utility plans submitted in connection with a future preliminary plat
application.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held this day of , 2008.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST
City Clerk
6
EXHIBIT A
(legal description for Site)
7
f.
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description for the proposed Ridge Creek Bluff & Ridge Creek Final Plats
That part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 115, Range
22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the North right-ofway line of County
Road 16, Excepting there from the West 410 feet thereof.
The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter;. the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter excepting the Easterly 591.75 feet thereof; all in Section l4, Township 115,
Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota.
EXHIBIT B
Redlined Grading & Erosion Control Plan (1 l sheets) prepared by Plowe Engineering -
dated 7/26/07 enclosed with Project Engineer Joe Swentek's letter to Applicant dated
February 27,.2008.
8
i
(s'
4
t
February,27, 2008
Randy Noecker
Ridge Creek I, Inc.
831 S Pleasant View Drive
Mounds View,. MN 55112 .
RE: Grading Permit Application
4
4
Mr. Noecker:
The City of Shakopee has completed its initial substantive review of your grading permit z
application. The documents reviewed and commented-upon include the following:
• Grading & Erasion Control Plan (11 sheets). prepared by Plowe Engineering -
dated 7/26/07
• Woodland 1Vlanagement Plan{4 sheets}.prepared by Carlson & Carlson, Inc. and ;
Plawe Engineering -dated 11/22/06 (updated l2/19/0~
~ Landscape Plan (1 sheet) prepared by Piowe Engineering -dated 11121/42
Comments and requested revisions to these plans are outlined in the attached copy of the
redlined Grading & Erosion Control Plan set and the attached memo from Ryan. Hughes,
Natural Resource Coordinator, dated February 13, 2008.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 15.99, Subdivision 3(~, the City of Shakopee is
extending the review period for your .application by an additional sixty (60) days because
.additional time is needed: (1) for you to address the comments and needed revisions to ~
your plans; {2) far you to resubmit revised plans; and (3} to allow City staff adequate
review time to consider your revisions. prior to the City Council acting on the application.
The grading permit application. was. deemed complete as of January 7, 2008 and the
initial sixty (64) day review period expires. on March 7, 2008. Willi this extension of the
review period for an additional sixty (60) days, the City Council will act on your
application by May 6, 2008. In order to allow .City staff adequate time. to review the
resubmittai prior to this meeting, ail revisions must be received by City staff no later than
4:30 pm on Apri125, 2008. For your information, the City-Council. will also be meeting ~
an March 18~', April 1St, and April 15th. If you desire to have the-City. Council consider p
- year application at .one of those meetings, the needed revisions to your plans must be
received byCity staff at least. l0 calendar days before the meeting date. 4
COI<iMtTN1TY `RIDE Sitvc~ xS57
t25 Iinimes Street South • Sti7l:opec, Min))esot~ • i?379.1351 • q2.233-93t?f} • SAY 952.233-38D1 ~ ~vtiv~t~.ei.sl)akci~see:mr).us
Fi:1E\1P1.OYEE FOLI3ERSVSu~nuek3eno0s (HP GPP~GndSug Pemti[s~Aidge.CreefittmdingPamu.AppGceGou ([1-t~07)V\acktr Eaieasian Lamer 231.OS.DOC
Page I o(2
{
k
j
F
If you have any questions ar if you require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (952) 233-9363 or jswentek(a,cishakopee.mn.us.
Sincerely, f
Joe Swenfek
Project Engineer
cc: Mark McNezll, City Administrator
Bruce Loney, Public Works DirectarlCity Engineer
Michael Leek, Community Development Director
.Julie Klima, Planner II
Ryan Hughes, Natural'Resources Coordinator
- Jim 'Thomson, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
Kim Kozar, Hoff, Barry & Kozar; P.A.
f
s
i
3.
Z.
)
}L~EAfl'LOYEE FOLbL•R5VSnrn~ckWcrtn'as-(BP_OPpbrad'mg.PennLsYtiQgc.C~ttktGradiugPctwitAppltca~ioo(17-607)V:xcker £~-lension_Leuer 2.27-0g.DOC -
Page2of3
EXHIBIT C
City's Project Engineer's Memorandum dated May 2, 2008
9
City of Shakopee
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill; City Administrator
FROM:. Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Ridge `Creek Grading Permit Application
DATE: May 2, 2008
The. City of Shakopee has completed its initial substantive review of the grading permit
application and all submittals made along with the application.. The plans and documents
reviewed by-staff include the following:
• Grading: & Erosion Control Plan (11 sheets) prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated
7/26/07
• Woodland Management Plan (4 sheets) prepared by Carlson & Carlson, Inc. and Plowe
Engineering -dated 11/22/06 (updated 12/19/07)
• Landscape Plan (1 sheet) prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated 11/21/02 (updated
12/19/07)
• Summary of Estimated .Earthwork Quantities prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated
7/26/07)
• Pavement Design prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated 6/6/07
• Storm Water Runoff calculations prepared by Plowe Engineering -dated 6/1/07
Copies of the redlined Grading .and Erosion Control Plan were forwarded to the. applicant on
February 27, 2008. Also included in'the packet was a memo dated February 18, 2008 from Ryan
Hughes, Natural Resource Coordinator, regarding the woodland management plan and landscape
plan. Once the following comments and requested revisions are incorporated into these plans and
documents, there -are likely to be other impacts on the plans necessitating additional comments.
along with potential revisions.
Grading & Erosion Control Plan
Sheet #1:
• Clearly show. the conservation easement(s) required in the City's Natural Resources
Coordinator's memoranda dated February 13, 2008 and .May 2, 2008.:
• Drainage and utility easements must comply with the City's Design Criteria.
• Provide a more legible vicinity map showing all existing streets.
H:\EMPLOYEE FOLDERSUSwentek\Perarits (BP_GP)\Grading.Permits\Ridge.Creek\Grading.Pernrit.Application (I1-1-07)\Noecker.GP.Review.Ltr (5-02-OS).doc
Page 1 of 9
• .Provide the following note: "Upon review of street and utility plans submitted with
any future preliminary plat application, changes to these..plans may be necessary. and
shall: be accommodated by the Developer and the. contractor(s). T
• Provide the following note: "Storm sewer shown is not approved." The storm sewer
shown on the plans has not been approved and will be reviewed with street and utility
plans submitted with any future preliminary plat application.
• In a block provide the contractor(s) contact. information and an earthwork summary.
Sheet #2:
• No comments. at this time.-
Sheet #3:
• Drainage and. utility easements must be provided per the City's Design Criteria.
• Provide the quality .level of the plan. set beneath the. General Notes.
• Provide the following. additional. note `beneath the Misc. Notes:. "Minimum slopes in
non-paved areas = 2%". All. non-paved areas must have a 2% minimum slope.
• Provide current surveyed spot elevations on all property boundaries.
• Clearly denote all emergency overflows for all Iow points.
• Provide intersection details as previously requested.
• Proposed; storm sewer in the rear of:Block 2 conflicts with the proposednoise wall.
and the proposed landscape plan. Revise to eliminate conflicts.
• Replace all proposed flared end. sections in :the rear of Block 2 with catch basin
structures.
• Proposed low point catch basins in Oak Creek Drive shall be at the same station.
• Slopes exceed the maximum allowable 3:1 between Lots 5 and 6 of .Block I and are
not permitted.
• Show the extension of the proposed bituminous trail along Crossings Boulevard to '
existing Pike Lake Road..
• Provide the .following note in the storm water. basin: "Install clay liner .per -City
requirements". Clay liner must be installed per the City's requirements..
• Provide the following. note in the storm water basin and comply with the following
requirement:. "Class IV rip rap is to be installed at each flared end section to the
bottom of the basin".
• Resolve the emergency overflow issue identified by WSB in the rear of Lots 17-19 of
Block 1.
• Align the street dimensioning of Crossings Boulevard. to the curb and gutter.
• Revise the contours and/or drainage and utility easements to accommodate drainage
from Lot 15 of Block l across Lot 14 of Block 1.
• Revise the contours and/or drainage and. utility easements to accommodate. drainage
from Lot 24 of Block 1 across Lot23 of Block 1.
• Provide legible text at the. intersection of Oak Creek Drive and Oak Creek Court.
• Denote the radius dimension of Oak Creek Court as typical.
• Correct the Misspelled "Crossings Boulevard" just east of Ridge Creek Drive.
H:\IIvtPLOYEE FOLDIItSUSwentek\Permits (BP GP)\Grading.Perntits\Ridge.Creek\Grading.Permit.Application (1 I-i-O~llVoecker.GP.Review,Ltr (5-02-OS).doc
Page 2 of 9
Sheet #4:
• Drainage and utility easements must be provided per the City's Design Criteria.
• Provide the quality level of the plan set beneath the General Notes...
• Provide the following additional. note beneath the Misc. Notes .and comply with the
following requirement: "Minimum slopes in non-paved areas ° 2%".
• .Provide. current surveyed spot elevations on all property boundaries.
• Clearly denote all emergency overflows -for all low points.,
• Provide intersection details as previously requested.
• Proposed storm. sewer in the rear of Block 2 conflicts -with the proposed noise wall
and the proposed landscape plan. Revise to eliminate conflicts.
• Replace all proposed flared end sections in the rear Of Block 2 with Catch basin
structures.
• Reroute the proposed storm sewer between Lots 32 and 33 of Block 1 as shown on
the Redlined Grading Plans.
• Provide right-of--way and. street width dimensions for Oak Creek Drive.
• The proposed driveway slope for-Lot 31 of Block 1 exceeds the maximum allowable
10%. Revise to comply with City's .requirements..
• Resolve the emergency overflow issue in the rear of Lots 17-19 of Block l identified
by WSB.
• .Revise the contours and/or drainage and utility easements. to accommodate drainage
.from Lot 24 of Block 1 across Lot 23 of Block 1.
• Provide legible text at the intersection of Oak Creek Drive and Oak Creek Court.
• Correct the Misspelled, "Crossings Boulevard" just east of Ridge Creek Drive.
• Revise the contours through Outlot C to reflect a 2% slope from Crossings. Boulevard
to the realigned Prior Lake Outlet Channel. '
• Revise the cantours in the rear of Lots 31-35 of Block 2 to reflect;the construction of
one swale :between this property and the property to the East.
Sheet #5:
• Clearly show the :previously requested conservation easement(s) per -the City's
Natural Resources Coordinator's memoranda dated February 13, 2008 and May 2,
2008.
• Drainage and utility easements-must be provided per the City's Design Criteria.
• Provide the quality level of the plan set beneath the General Notes.
• Provide-the following additional note beneath the Misc. Notes and .comply-with the
following requirement: "Minimum slopes in non-paved areas = 2%".
• Provide current surveyed spot elevations on all property boundaries.
• Clearly denote all emergency overflows for- all low points.
• Provide intersection details as previously requested.
• The site's proposed contours must match the existing contours of the property to the
West.
• The minimum low floor elevations for Lots 1-4 of Block 1 shall be 758.3.
H:IEMPLOYEE FOLDERSUSwentek\Permits (BP GP)\Grading.Petmits\Ridge.Creek\Grading.Permit.Application (I1-1-07)\Noecker.GP.Review.Ltr (5-02-08).doc
Page 3 of 9
• The minimum low floor elevations for Lots 13 and 14 of Block 3 shall: be 759.3.
• Slopes .exceed-.the maximum allowable 3:1 near the northeastern corner. of Lot 1 of
Block 1. Revise to comply with City's requirements.
• ' Slopes exceed the maximum allowable 3:1 near the northernmost corner of Lot 1 of
Block 2. Revise to comply with City's requirements..
• Slopes, exceed the maximum allowable 3:1 between Lots 14 and 15 and 15 and16 of
Block 2. Revise to comply with City's requirements.
• Lessen the slopes along the. northern portion of .Lot 16 of Block 2 for maintenance;
access purposes. This requires: changes in grading and/or additional easement.
• Provide the following note in the storm water basin:. "Install clay liner per City
requirements". Clay liner must be installed per City requirements...
• Provide the following note in the storm water basin :and comply with the following
requirement: "Class IV rip rap is to be installed at each flared end section to the
bottom of the basin".
• Replace the proposed flared end sections in the -rear of Lot 6 of Block 3 and the one
extended to the conservation easement with' catch basin structures.
~ Provide legible text in the rear of Block 3 lots.
• Remove theproposed retaining wall from within the drainage and utility easement in
the reaz of Lots 9 and 10 of Block 3.
Sheet #6:
• Clearly show .the previously requested conservation. easement(s) as required by .the
City's Natural Resources Coordinator in his memoranda. dated February 13, 2008 and
May 2, 2008.
• Drainage and utility :easements must be provided per City's Design Criteria.
• Provide the quality level of the plan set beneath the .General Notes..
• Provide the following additional note beneath the Misc. Notes .and .comply with the
following requirement: "Minimum slopes in non-pavedareas = 2%".
• Provide current surveyedspot elevations on all property boundaries...
• Cleazly denote all emergency overflows for all low points.
• Provide intersection details as previously requested.
• Re-label the "existing creek location" as "existing Prior Lake Outlet Channel".
• Clearly identify the existing "waste bluffl' and denote its removal from the site and
appropriate disposal..
+ Provide the following note in the park area and comply with the following
requirement: "Grade Park to slope towazd channel at 2% minimum".
• The minimum low floor elevations for Lots 13 and 17 of Block 1 shall be 759.3.
• Lessen the slopes along the northern portion of Lot 16 of Block 2 for maintenance
access purposes.. This requires changes in grading and/or additional easement.
• Slopes exceed the maximum allowable 3:1 between Lots 14-and 15 and 15 and16 of
Block L .Revise to comply with City's requirements.
• Replace the proposed flared end section in the rear of Lot 19 of Block 1 with a catch
basin structure.
H:\EMPLOYF.E FOLDERSUSweMeklPermits (BP GP)\Grading.PermitslRidge.CreeklGrading.Permit.Application (11-1-07)INoecker.GP.Review.Ltr (5-02-OS).doc
Page 4 of 9
• Denote the radius of the curb and gutter entering Ridge Creek Courtas typical.
• Remove. the proposed retaining wall from. within the drainage and utility easement in
' the rear of Lots 5 and 6 of Block 1.
Sheet #7:
• Clearly show the previously requested conservation easement(s) as required by the
City's Natural Resources Coordinator in his memoranda dated February 13, 2008 and
May 2, 2008.
• Drainage and utility easements must be provided per the City's Design Criteria.-
• Provide the quality evel of the plan set beneath the General Notes.
• Provide the following additional note: beneath the Misc. Notes and comply with the
following requirement: "Minimum slopes in non-paved areas = 2%".
• Provide current surveyed spotelevations on all property boundaries.
• Clearly denote all emergency overflows for all low points.
• Provide :intersection details as previously requested.
• Provide: the correct existing contours for the property to the West...
• Provide the correct existing contours for the property to the East.
• Redesign contours in the front of Lots 1-4 of Block 3 to drain directly to street and
not across the downstream lof.
• Redesign contours in the front of Lots 12-15 of Block 1 to drain directly to street and
not across the downstream lot.
• Provide. a high point spot elevation between Lots 10 and 11 of Block 1.
• Revise the high point spot elevation between'Lots 12 and 13 of Block 2.
• The minimum low floor. elevation for Lot l l of Block 1 shall be 787.5.
• The minimum. low floor elevation for: Lot I O of Block 2 shall be 779.5.
• The proposed driveway slope for Lot 11 bf Block 2 exceeds the maximum allowable.
10%. Revise to comply with City requirements.
• Slopes .exceed the .maximum allowable- 3:1 .between Lots 14 and. 15 of Block 1.
Revise to comply with City requirements.
• Revise the contours and/or drainage and utility easements to accommodate drainage
from Lot 7 of Block 2 across Lot 8 of Block 2.
• Delete the following note: "Existing driveway shall be removed .and graded to
proposed plan grades on or before Dec. 31 St 2008".
• Provide. the following note at each proposed rock construction entrance: "Rock
construction entrance (see. detail)".
Sheet #8:
• Provide a symbol in the legend for erosion control blanket.
• The. installation of erosion control _blanket is required on .all slopes equal. to 3:1.
Revise the plans to reflect the same.
• The installation of erosion control blanket four (4) -feet above and below the normal.
water level of each storm water basin is required. Revise the plans to reflect same.
H:\EMPLOYEEFOLDERSUSwenteklPeradts(BP GP)\Grading.Petauts\Ridge.CreeklGrading.Petmit.Application(11-I-07)\Noecker.GP.Review.Ltr(5-02-08).doc
Page 5 of 9
• Additional .erosion. and sediment control measures may be required by the City.
Therefore, provide the following note beneath erosion control :notes: "Additional
erosion and sediment control measures may. be required by the City".
• .Revise. note #3 beneath erosion control. notes and implementation. schedule to read:
"As each. area is graded, provide. topsoil,: seed. and mulch anchored with adisc-per
NPDES requirements". Comply with this requirement.
Sheet #9:
• No comments at this time. Once the comments: and requested. revisions in this memo
are incorporated into the plans and documents, there are likely to be other impacts on
the plans necessitating additional comments along with potential revisions.
Sheet #10:
• No comments at this time. Once the comments and requested revisions in this memo
are incorporated into the plans and.documents, there are likely to be other impacts on
the plans necessitating additional comments along with potential revisions.
Sheet #11:
• Provide the following note: "There - shall be no borrow taken from below the water
..table". No borrow may be taken from below the water table.
• The borrow limits are subject to change due to field conditions and these changes are
subject to the City's approval. Therefore, provide the following note: "Borrow-limits
.are. subject to change due to field conditions. These changes are subject to City
approval".
• Delete the proposed borrow .area from the rear of Lots &26 of Block 2 (adjacent to
the CSAH 21 right-of--way).
• Delete the proposedborrow area from the rear of Lot 19 of Block 1.
Woodland Management Plan
Revise the Woodland Management Plan to incorporate the comments and revisions included in
the memoranda dated February 13, 2008. and May 2, 2008 .from Ryan Hughes, Natural Resource.
Coordinator.
Landscape. Plan
The applicant shall remove all. proposed landscaping .from within all ..drainage and utility
easements containing emergency overflows (EOF) and drainage and utility easements containing
public utilities. Currently the proposed :landscaping plan does .not reflect this requirement as
outlined in Section 4.03,. Subdivision 2 (Prohibitions. and Limitations) C & D of the City of
Shakopee City Code. Landscaping to be removed shall include, but: not be limited to, the
following areas:
H:\EMPLOYEE FOLDERSUSwentek\Pernuts (BP_GP)\Grading.Permits\Ridge.Cteek\Grading.Permit.Application (11-1-0~\Noecker.GP.Review.Ltr (5-02-OS).doc
Page 6 of 9
• The drainage and utility.. easements containing the.. proposed storm sewer in the rear of Lots
10-19 of Block 1
+ The drainage and utility easements containing the proposed sanitary sewer between Lots 7-8 '
of Block 3.
• The drainage and utility easements containing the. proposed storm sewer between Lots 8-9 of
Block 3.
• The drainage and utility easements containing the proposed. storm sewer in the rear of Lots 6-
9 ofBlock 3.
• Drainage and, utility easements containing proposed emergency overflows, proposed storm
sewer, proposed sound. walls and proposed landscaping adjacent to the CSAH 21 right-of--
way.
Also comply with requirements in memoranda dated February 13, 2008 and May 2, 2008 ;from
Ryan Hughes, Natural .Resource Coordinator.
Summary ofEstimated Earthwork Quantities
The information submitted with the Grading Permit Application must be revised and resubmitted
with the detailed quantities of import and export on site..
Pavement Design
The Pavement Design is not approved at this tame. The Pavement Design will be reviewed with
the street and utility plans .submitted. with any future. preliminary plat application.
Storm Water Runoff (Storm Water Management Plan)
The proposed storm water management plan has not been approved by the City of Shakopee's
storm water consultant WSB & Associates. The storm water management plan must be revised
and incorporate WSB's commentsin its memoranda dated May 9, 2007; May 16, 2007; June 5,
2007 and. June 25, 2007 and resubmitted for review. These:. revisions have the potential to_
significantly impact any proposed future preliminary. or final plat drawings, he proposed
grading and erosion control plans and any future proposed street and utility plans.
Any Grading Permit issued shall also be subiect to the followins~ Suggested Supplemental
Conditions•
• Approval of the grading permit does not constituteapproval of a preliminary or final plat,
street and utility construction plans, nor any noise walUlandscaping construction.
• Changes to the grading and erosion control plan may be necessary in order to accommodate
revisions required due to future preliminary plat applications, .specifically any proposed
street and utility plans.
• By acceptance of the Grading Permit the Applicant accepts all risk that the Grading and
Erosion plan may have to be altered to accommodate any future preliminary plat application,
including street and utility plans.
H:\EMPLOYEE FOLDERSUSwentek\Permits (BP_GP)\Grading.Permits\Ridge.Creek\Grading.Permit.Application (11-1-O'n\Noecker.GP.Review.Ltr (5-02-OS).doc
Page 7 of 9
• Prior to grading commencing, the applicant shall provide a certificate of insurance for the
contractor performing the work. The form of the certificate of insurance shall be in a form
acceptable to the City's attorney.
• Prior to grading commencing, the applicant shall provide a security in the amount of $1,000
per disturbed acre.
• Prior to grading commencing; ..the applicant shall provide the permit fee as outlined in the
City's Fee Schedule. This-fee shall be based on current bid prices for the project.
• The applicant shall schedule an onsite pre-construction .meeting prior to commencing any
land disturbing activities. The applicant, the contractor, applicable subcontractors, applicable
City of Shakopee staff, eta shall be in attendance.
• All work done within the City right-of:way shall require aright-of--way permit. Please
contact engineering department for details concerning the City of Shakopee's permit
requirements...
• All erosion control measures (silt fence, rock construction entrances, etc.) shall be fixrnished
and installed by. the. applicant and accepted by the City of Shakopee prior to any land
disturbing activity. Please contact the engineering department to arrange an .inspection.
• Prior to grading within the easement: jointly held by the City and the Prior Lake -Spring
Lake. Watershed District (PLSLWD), the applicant shall obtain the appropriate permit(s).
• Prior to grading within the easernent_held by Centerpoint Energy, the applicant shall obtain
the appropriate permit(s).
• The applicant shall adequately delineate all existing wetlands: on the site.
• No impacts to the .existing wetlands shall be allowed until a wetland .replacement plan
application has been submitted. and approved by the City, Additional erosion. and sediment
control measures may be required should grading commence prior to .thin occurring to .protect
the wetlands on site.
• The applicant.-shall obtain the necessary easements/permission to perform work on adjacent
properties. Changes to the grading and erosion control plan may be necessary should the
applicant be unable to obtain. these easements. By acceptance of the Grading Permit .the
Applicant accepts all risk that it will be unable to obtain these easements which in such case
may require changes to the Grading and:Erosion plan.'
• No construction traffic shall be allowed to enter/leave .the site via Pike Lake Road or
Crossings Boulevard without written permission from the City Engineer.
• All .fill placed on the site (previously and throughout the grading of the site) shall be clean,
structural fill free from deleterious materials (thisincludes but is not invited to large rocks,
trees, street sweepings, organic material, recycled material, hazardous materials, etc.). The
material shall be subject`to soil sampling and testing. prior to placement onsite at the City
.Engineer's (or his designee). Materials deemed unacceptable by City staff shall be removed
from the site.
• The applicant shall be required to grade Crossings Boulevard. to the .existing portion of Pike
Lake Road.
• -There shall be no over-excavation for borrow purposes below the existing groundwater table
without written permission from the City Engineer.
H:\EMPLOYEEFOLDIItSUSweniek\Permits(BP GP)\Grading.Perntits\Ridge:Creek\Grading.Permit.tlpplication(11-1-0~\Noecker.GP.Review.LV(5-02-08).doc
Page 8 of 9
• The .applicant shall provide the contractor with the most current set of grading and erosion
control plan sheets prior to the scheduled onsite pre-construction meeting.
• The entire site shall be graded in onephase.. Grading shall be defined as bringing the site up
to the .proposed finished grade. with City approved materials, providing topsoil. per :City
requirements and applying seed. and mulch per. City requirements. Grading operations and
erosion control installation shall be completed by October 15, 2008. -
• By acceptance of the Grading Permit, the Applicant has agreed to the above conditions..
H:\EMPLOYEE FOLDERSUSwentek\Permits (BP GP)\Grading.Permits\Ridge.Creek\Grading.Petmit.Application (11-1-07)\Noecker.GP.Review.Ltr (5-02.08).doc
Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT D -
WSB's memoranda dated May`9, 2007; May 16, 2007;
June 5, 2007.; and June 25, 2007.
10
Memorandum
To: Joe Swentek, P.E., City of Shakopee
From:. Ted Witkowski, Engineering Specialist
cc: Bruce Loney, P. E., City of Shakopee
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E., WSB
' Julie %lima, City of Shakopee
Sim %zar, KHB & K, P.A.
Dater May 9,.2007
Re: Ridge Creek Stormwater Management Plan Review
-City of Shakopee,. MN
WSB Project No.1281-91
The Ridge Creek Development Stormwater: managementplans and preliminary construction plans have
been reviewed for conformance with the City's overall stormwater management plan. The site is
located immediatelynorth of Eagle CreekBoulevard (CSAH 16) and east of the proposed Pike Lake
Road extensiorrto thenorth. The documents providedfor review by Plowe Engineering included the
following; .
• Ridge. Creek Stormwater runoff memorandum -dated 02/21/06
• Summary of drainage calculations -dated .09/21/05 -revised 02/22/06
• HydroCad Stormwater management calculations -dated 02/21/06
• Ridge Creek preliminary Stormwater management delineation maps -Sheets 24-25 -dated
02/22/06
• Ridge Creek preliminary construction plans -dated 11/21/02-modifed 02/22/06-signed 05/07/07
• Ridge .Creek Storm Sewer Design Calculations -dated 05/09/07
• Ridge Creek Storm Sewer Drainage Area Map -dated 05/04/07
The :Ridge Creek Stormwater management plans and preliminary construction plans, were previously
reviewed on January 5, 2006, and March 9, 2006. The development plans and site layout have
,undergone modification by the developer's engineer. The outstanding issues from the previous reviews
will be included as part of this document. Please be advised that Mr. Todd Hubmer has nothad an
opportunity to review the documents. due to the shorted review time requested bythe City. Based on my
review of the Stormwater management plans and preliminary construction plans,. I offer the. following
comments and observations for your consideration: -
C:1Documents and SettingslbloneyU,ocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK1081MEMO jswentek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
Page 2
Summary
• The low building opening for Lots 1-18, Block 6 doesnotappear to conform with the City's 3
foot frreboard-requirements. This must be modified as discussed in greater detail later.
• The developer's proposed stormwater management water quality calculations are in
conformance with the City's stormwater management plan requirements for the site. Please be
advised that the Pond 1 & 2 depths exceed 10' maximum recommendations for a water quality
treatment pond and the deadpool volume being created exceeds the required water quality
volume by 10 times. It is recommended that the Ponds be constructed to a depth of 8' below the
normal water elevation due to safety concerns for the residents adj acent to the ponds.
• The majority of storm water management rate control model for the site appears to be in
conformance with the site requirements. The storm water modeling for the CSAH 16 drainage
area will require,minor modification to reflect the fully developed conditions and adjustment of
the SCS CN'for the drainage area. This revision will be discussed in detail later in the review.
• The Prior Lake Outlet Channel structure design for Ridge Creek Lane and Ridge Creek Drive
was not included as part of this submittal. It was indicated by the developer's. engineer that the
structure design would be included as part of the final construction plans. The preparation of the
.detailed design plans, hydraulic risk assessment, permits, and coordination with the regulatory
agencies are anticipated to be primarily the responsibility of the developer's .engineer.
• The developer's engineer has indicated that the Prior Lake Outlet Channel structures at Ridge
Creek Lane and .Ridge Creek Drive will be increased in capacity to serve as the emergency
overflow route. The additional capacity requirements to be used in the final design documents
will be discussed in detail later in the review.
• The storm sewer system design calculations do not appear to include storm water discharge from
CR 21 and C SAH 16. The storm sewer. design mast be revised to include runoff from the CR 21
future right of way and CSAH 16 fully developed conditions in the analysis. It is requested that
the fully developed conditions storm water runoff from these areas be included in the storm
sewer design calculations..
• The preliminary stormwater management-plan delineation map should include the entire CR 21
.right of way north of the site. The CSAH 16 right of way drainage area to the centerline of the
road should be used in the storm sewer drainage area map and analysis. The storm water
drainage. of this area should reflect the fully developed conditions in the analysis. It is
recommended that the developer's engineer obtain a copy of the proposed CSAH 16 road plans
..for theanalysis.
• The storm sewer design calculations provided for review contain discrepancies between the
structure identification in the plans anddesign calculations. Dueto the limited review time, the
utilityplans could not be reviewed to verity adequate system capacity. In order to complete the
review the structure identification discrepancies must be corrected for future submittals.
• The storm sewer design calculations should include catch basin spacing calculation for Crossing
.Boulevard in the event that this road is added to the City State Aid routes. The use of 0.4 as a
runoff coefficient for. Crossing Boulevard does not represent the percentage of impervious
C:IDocuments and SettingslbloneylLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK1081MEM0 jswentek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
Page 3
surface in the road drainage areas. The runoff coefficients for the road should be revised in the
storm sewer design to reflect-the amount of impervious surface within the road right of way. '
Based on our review of the preliminary construction plans, the project, as currently proposed, does not
meet the City's stormwater management policies. Lwould recommend the plans not be approved at this
time. The followingcontains.aBst of items that should be addressed by the developer in future
submittals:
General Comments
1. The design for the upsizing of the. Prior-Lake Outlet Channel structures to serve as the.
.emergency. overflow route for the Prior Lake Outlet Channel should be forwarded for review. It
was indicated by the developer's, engineer that the structures would be increased in capacity. It is
requested that the structures be increased to include an additiona160 square feet below elevation
75.5, It is requested that this design element be addressed in the construction plans. Please be
advised that the overflow route going north over Crossings Boulevard. into Block 6 from the
Prior Lake Outlet Channel will require modifications to insure freeboard to the low building
openings for Lots 1-4, Block 6. The grading plan of the overflow elevation to the east appears to
be at elevation 756 which is within 1.0 feet of the low building openings. (Sheet 5).
2. The low building elevations for Lots 1-18, Block. 6 do not appear to have 3' of freeboard to the
Prior Lake Outlet Channel water surface elevation of .755.3. The low building will require
modification to meet the freeboard requirements. The-low floor elevation for the structures that
are hydraulically connected to the Prior Lake Outlet Channel from Pond l and 2 should be at .
.elevation 758.3 or higher.
Storm Water Modeling
l . The storm water modeling input for subcatchment 9S of the CSAH 16 right of way should use
an SCS CN of 85 to reflect the fully developed.conditions. The use of an SCS CN of 65 does not
reflect the fully developed conditions for the right of way with the future widening and
construction of the path. Please modify the model input accordingly.
2. The storm water modeling output for the 100-year 24-hour event for subcatchments 9S, 125,
135, 14S does not correspond to the notes shown on sheets 24 & 25. The water volume and
discharge rate notes should correspond to the model output.
3. The Pond 1 and 2 outlets should be modeled with skimmer devices to be consistent with the City
policies. The construction plans should include skimmer device details that correspond to the
outlet structure model. input.
4. The CR 21 right of way subwatersheds 12S,13S, and 14 S should be modeled under fully.
.developed conditions with an SCS CN of $5. The use of an SCS CN of 61 is not representative
of the future runoff from this area. The model input should be modified to reflect the fully
developed conditions.
C: (Documents and SettingslbloneylLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesiOLK1081MEet?O
jswentek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
Page 4
Sheet 1-Cover Sheet
1. The Oak Ridge Trail street name should be correspond with the Ridgeview Farms development
street name of Oak Ridge Avenue..
Sheet 3 -Preliminary Plat
1. It is requested that the City evaluate easement widths for the following lots. It is estimated the
storm sewer systems will be approximately 12 feetdeep in front of the walkout structures. The
width of the easements in the vicinity of the-front of these walkout structures should be
evaluated for future replacement or maintenance of the systems. This condition exists in the
following locations:
• Lots 10-11, Block 1 (13 feet)
• Lots 18-19, Block 3 (15 feet)
• Lots 20-21, Block 3 (15 feet)
• Lots 11-12, Block 4 (16 feet)
• Lots 1-2, Block 7 (14 feet)
• Lots 7-8, Block 7 (14.feet).
• Lots 10-12, Block 6 (12 feet).
2. - The drainage and utility easement between Lots 11-12, Block 4, will encompass a 48-inch -
diameter storm sewer pipe which may require additional width due to the trench bottom required
for removal or installation of a new system at this location. The drainage and utility easements
along thisproperty boundary should also incorporate thepipe depth and diameter to establish the
necessary easement width.
3. The storm sewer drainage utility easement along the Lots 6-1D, Block 1, rear yard area is
approximately 5' on the north side of the system. It is recommended that 10' of width be
provided in this area:
4. The drainage and utility. easement on the east side of Lot 19, Block 3 should be 10' in width in
-the vicinity of CB 47.
5. 'The drainage and utility easement in Lot 16, Block.3 does not appear to be 10' from the storm.
sewer on the north side. The. easements should be modified in this area.
Sheet 4 -Preliminary Plat
L The drainage and utility easement over-the storm sewer in the rear yards of Lots 16-24, Block 7,
appears to be within 5' of the storm sewer pipe on the south side. It is recommended that 10' be
provided on the south side of the storm sewer system. The drainage and utility easements in this
area should be modified.
2. The proposed gas line easement across Lots 29, Block 6, appears to overlap the proposed
building pads. Easements in this area should be verified and corrected as necessary.
C: (Documents and SettingslbloneylLocal SeningslTemporary Internet FilesI0LK10811v1EMO jswentek-050907, doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
Page 5
3. The Outlot C boundary located onthe northeast corner of the site-does .not appear to be
accurately defined.. The property boundaries in this area should be modified as necessary to
reflect the Lot 30-31 property limits.
4. The drainage and utility easements on Lot.7-8,-Block 6 should encompass the overland overflow
route.
5. The storm sewer drainage and utility easements across Lot 1, Block 6, over the storm sewer
from CB 3 to CB 4 should be verified. It appears that the proposed system -does not have a 10'
drainage and utility easement on the west.;
Sheet 5 -Preliminary Grading Plan
1. The emergency overflow routes and elevations from all street lowpoints, rear-yard depressions,
and the Prior Lake Outlet Channel overflow route should be included in the plans. The spot
elevations indicating the overflow elevation must be shown on the plans for the following
locations: Oak Creek Drive Low Point - CB 28, Oak Creek Drive Low Point- CB S, Ridge
-Creek Drive - CB 31, Ridge Creek Drive Low Point - CB 36, Ridge Creek Drive- CB 33, and
Oak Creek Drive - CB 5.
2. The overflow from the Prior Lake Outlet Channel. appears to be directed across Lot 25, Block 3,
into the rear yard areas at elevation 756 based on the proposed grading plan. The overflow. from
the channel was not anticipated to be directed to this area.. Please show the top of berm elevation
between the Prior Lake Outlet Channel. and the: rear yard of Lot 25, Block 3. The Prior lake
outlet Channel should not be allowed to overflow o this area.
3. The extension of the proposed trail on the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the Riverside
Bluffs developmentthrough the-park area should be illustrated on the grading plan.
4. The overflow elevations for the .rear-yard depressions of Block 6 adjacent to the. future CSAH 21
right-of--way on the north. east appear to be within 1' of the low building openings. The overflow
elevations must be lowered to provide at least 1 foot of freeboard. The emergency overflow.
route located in the northwest corner of the site should be located within a drainage and utility
..easement..
Sheet 6 - Preliminar~Grading Plan
1. The emergency overflow. route and elevations from the .street lowpoint on Ridge Creek Lane at
CB 36 should be illustrated on the grading plan.
2. The drainage from the street Iow point in the northeast quadrant of Ridge. Creek Court and Ridge
Creek Drive. intersection should be addressed with storm sewer. It appears that a depression will
be created in this location adjacent to the curb based on the street grades.
3. The emergency overflow elevation on the southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 2, does not appear
to provide the required freeboard to the low building opening for Lot 13, Block 2. The overflow
elevation at this location should be modified to provide the required freeboard to the low
building opening or the structure type should be changed from a lookoutto a rambler for Lot 13
in order to provide sufficient freeboard.
C:IDocuments and SettinASlblaneylLocal SettinQslTemporarylntemetFiles10LK108W1EM0-iswentek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
..Page 6
4. The emergency overflow route and elevation from the Oak Ridge Trail street low point should
be illustrated on the grading plan. It appears that conveyance north from the street lowpoint to
the walkouts located in Lots 19-23, Block 3, may not have adequate freeboard to the low
building opening. The overflow elevations and the rear yard depressions should be shown on
the grading plan. The issue of the grading plan providing an overflow from the Prior Lake
Outlet Channel into these rear-yard depressions adjacentto the walkouts was previously
discussed. The. grading. in this area. and low-building openings will require further review once
the emergency .overflow route for the .Prior Lake Outlet channel east of Ridge Creek Drive has
been updated. .
5. The drainage and utility easement on Lot 12 and 13, Block 1, for the overland overflow from the
-rear-yard depressions to-the east should be adjusted to encompass the stormwater conveyance
route. It appears that the overland overflow route will be in close proximity to Lot 13, Block 1,
walkout. The grading plan. in this -area should def ne a swale for the overflow-from this area
which is inward of a drainage and utility easement.
6. The emergency overflow elevation between Lots 10-11, Block 2, should be defined in order to
evaluate-the freeboardprovided to the low building openings within the rear yards of Block 2.
The overflow route elevation of 778.5 appears to be within 0.9' of the Lot 10,-Block 2 finished
grade at the structure. The proposed building elevation and/or the overflow route must be
modified to provide 1' of freeboard to the structure.
Sheet 7 - Preliminary Utility Plan
1. The Pond 1 storm sewer outlet structure should`be illustrated in the utilityplan. The storm
sewer outlet from Pond 1 should include a skimmer structure as outlined in the City's
stonnwater policies. The structure detail should be included. in the final construction plans.
2. The Pond 2 storm sewer outlet should include a skimmer structure similar to the Pond 1 outlet
structure.
3. The storm sewer connection to CB 23 (const. plan ID) .indicates that the structure will not have
adequate structure wall between the pipes. It does not appear to be constuctable. Please. review
the storm sewer configuration and constructability of the system.
4. The high water elevation of Pond 1 and 2 is 755.3 based on tail water from the Prior Lake Outlet
.Channel water surface elevation. Please update the highwater elevations on all plan sheets for
Pond l & 2.
5. The- Prior Lake Outlet Channel structures sizes and types at Ridge Creek Lane and Ridge Creek
Drive should be illustrated on the plans. The finalplans should include the plan sheet for these
structures.
6. The. storm sewer structure identification numbers do not correspond to the design calculations.
The storm.-sewer system data will not be reviewed at this time due to limited review time.
7. The utility plans should include a structure schedule to verify the structure type, structure
diameter, .and casting type.
C:1Documents and SettingslbloneylLocal SettingslTemporarylnternei FilesIOLK1081MEM0-1~'entek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
Page l
8. The storm sewer from CB 4 -5 (const. plan ID) appears to be in close proximity to the sanitary
sewer in Oak Ridge Trail. The utility clearance should be reviewed by the developer's engineer.
9. The storm sewer from CB 19-20 (const. Plan ID) appears o be inclose proximity with the
sanitary sewer. Please review clearance.
10. The storm sewer from CBMH 15-14 inthe rear yard of Lot 28, Block 7 does not appear to have
10' of drainage and utility easement on the west side of the pipe. Please review the easement
width at this location.
11. The drainage of the northwest quadrant of Ridge Creek Court and Ridge Creek Drive should be
provided in the design which should include a catchbasin.
12. The structure identification upstream of CB 34 (const. plan ID) should be added to the plan.
13. The watermain in the northwest quadrant of Crossings Boulevard and Oak Creek Drive appears
to be incomplete.
Sheet 8 - Preliminary Utility Plan
1. The drainage and utility easement over the storm sewer on Lots 16, Block 3, should be verified
for 10 feet of horizontal distance from the storm- sewer system. The hydraulic angle of the storm
sewer system at CBMH 52 (const. plan.ID) is not recommended.
2. The drainage and utility easement over the storm sewer system from `CB-72 to CB-69 in the rear
yards of Block 1 should be verified for 10 feet of horizontal .distance on the north side.
3. The storm sewer pipe between CB-42 and CB-41 appears to be in close proximity to the sanitary
sewer manhole within Ridge Creek Lane. It may be beneficial to move CB-41 east in order to
create horizontal separation between the two utilities.
4. The storm sewer manhole located in Ridge Creek Lane south of Lot 6, Block 4 should include
structure data.
5. The storm sewer, configuration at CB 41 creates a poor hydraulic angle in the. system. It is
:recommended that the system direct flow from CB 41 north to CB42 and continue in the north
curbline to CB 40.
Sheet 14 -Storm Sewer and Street Profiles
1. The riprap quantity should use the standard plate volumes .included in the City of Shakopee
details plates, The entire storm sewer system apron outfalls should use the quantities listed in-
the City of Shakopee standard plates. The apron outfalls and inlets should include trashguards
as shown in the City: of Shakopee standard details.
2. The storm sewer system aprons and last three pipe joints to all inlets and outfalls should be tied
to improve the storm sewer structural integrity. - - -
C:IDocuments and SettingslbloneylLocal SettingslTemporarylnternet Files10LK1081MEM0 jswentek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
..May 9, 2007
Page 8
3. The storm sewer profiles were not verified with the design calculation. at this time. Once the
developer's engineer updates the structure identification in the plans with the design
calculations; we will verify the profiles.
4. The sanitary sewer and watermain crossings with the storm sewer were not verified as part of
this review. The developer's engineer should verify and resolve conflicts with other pipe
networks
Sheet 1S -Storm Sewer and Street Profiles
1. The Ponds 1 and 2 pipe outlet profile should include skimmer structures as previously indicated.
The pipe profiles will require modifications to include the outlet skimmer structures. The
structure detail should be incorporated into the. plans.
2. The storm sewer outfall from CB-31 appears to be a rather steep slope, 10.6%. It is
recommended that the structure build for CB-31 be increased in order to flatten-the outfall pipe
to Pond 2. It was anticipated that this will reduce the outfall velocities of the stormwater into
.Pond 2 and reduce erosion.
Sheet 16 -Storm Sewer Street Profiles
1. ' The storm sewer pipe profiles from CBMH-53 to CBMH 52 should be flattened to reduce the
velocities_in the storm sewer system.. It was anticipated that the build for CBMH-53-.and
CBMH-52 could be increased in order to reduce the velocities inthe storm sewer and eliminate
a hydraulic grade line that may exceed the rim elevation of CBMH-52. The hydraulic grade line
in the storm sewer system design at CBMH-52 should be verified once these calculations have
::been completed..
2. The storm sewer profiles were not verified at this time..
.Sheet 17 -Storm Sewer and Street Profiles
1. The storm sewer pipe from CB-57 to CB-56 does not appear to provide adequate pipe cover at
Sta. 4+00 based on the proposed design. It is recommended that a minimum of 1.75 feet of
cover be provided above the pipe in this area.
2. The CB-45 structure build proposed on the pipe profile does not appear to be necessary at this
location. It is requested that the structure build for CB-45 be reduced in depth in the final
design.
3. The storm sewer profiles were not verified at this time.
Sheet 18 -Storm Sewer and Street Profiles
1. It is recommended hat the pipe slope. from CB-56 to CB-51 be flattened in order to reduce the
anticipated velocities within the system and limit the hydraulic grade line through CB-51, which
may exceed to 4.45 foot build- proposed in the-design. It would appear that this system could be
flattened to a slope which. is consistent with the sanitary sewer that it is between Lots 7-8; Biock:
3.
C: (Documents and SettinRslbloneylLocal Settin~slTemporary Internet Fi1es10LK1081MEMO jswentek-050907.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 9, 2007
Page 9
2. The storm sewerprofiles were not verified atthis time,.
Sheep 21- Preliminar~Park Trait Plan
l . The future park trail on the northeast side of the Prior Lake Outlet Channel within the park,
.should be illustrated. on the plan sheet.
This completes my review of the Ridge Creek Stormwater Management Plan and preliminary
construction plans. If you have. any questions or comments associated with this review, please do not
hesitate to contact me at your convenience.
lh/sm
C: (Documents and Settings161oneylLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLK1081MEMOy'swentek-05090Rdoc
Memorandum
To: Joe Swentek, P.E., City of Shakopee
From: Ted Witkowski, Engineering Specialist
cc: Bruce Loney, P. E., City of
Shakopee
.Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.,' WSB
Julie Klima, City of Shakopee
Kim Kozar, KI~B & % P.A.
Date:. May 16, 2007
Re: Ridge Creek Storm Sewer Design Calculations.Review
City of Shakopee, MN
WSB Project No.1281-91
The Ridge Creek Development storm sewer design calculations have been reviewed for conformance
with the City's overall stormwater management plan. The Ridge Creek development is located
immediately north. of Eagle Creek Boulevard (CSAH 16) and east of the proposed Pike Lake Road
extension to the north. The documents provided far review by Plowe Engineering included the
following:
• Ridge Creek Storm Sewer Design Calculations -dated 05/09/07 (email)
• .Ridge Creek Storm .Sewer Drainage Area Map -dated 05/04/07 (email)
The Ridge .Creek storm sewer design calculations were previously reviewed on January 5, 2006, and
March 9, 2006.. The outstanding issues from the previous reviews will be included. as part of this.
document. Based on my review of the storm sewer design calculations, I offer the following comments
and observations for your consideration:
Comments and- Observations
• The storm sewer design. calculations will require modifications to include the fully developed
conditions CR 21 and CSAH 16 right-of--way areas. The design calculations should reflect
runoff coefficients that are consistent with the amount of impervious surface within the right-of-
waycorridors. The runoff coefficient is assumed to be approximately 0.7 to reflect the amount
of impervious surface in the right-of--way. The fully developed conditions'for the right-of--way
should be used in the design calculations.
• The storm sewer system design calculations do not appear to match pipe crowns or at least 80%
of the. pipe size difference (0,2' per pipe size increase). It is recommended that the design ,
calculations include this typical design practice..
CaDocuments and SettingslbloneylLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLK1081MEM0-iswentek:051507doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
May 15, 2007
Page 2
• The storm sewer system data in the construction plans should correspond with the storm sewer
design calculations data. The plan view data and profile data should be updated.
• It is requested that the storm. sewer system hydraulic gradeline from CB 8 (drainage map ID) to
Pond 2 be provided to evaluate the. system capacity and comparison of the hydraulic gradeline
with the storm sewer rim elevations.
• The storm sewer system configuration at CBMH 60, CBMH 3, and: CBMH 33 (drainage map
ID) appears to create poor hydraulic angles. Please provide a system configuration that improves
the hydraulic angles at these locations.
• It is recommended that the. storm sewer system be -tied at locations that exceed an 8.00% vertical
slope. The storm sewer system should include anti siphon diaphragms-concrete collars from
CBMH 8 to CBMH 4, and from CB_7 to CBMH 4: It appears that these segments of the storm
sewer. system down the bluff due to the vertical slopes could be susceptible to undermining..
• The 48" apron diameter indicated at the Pond 2 outfall does not appear to correspond to the 42"
diameter pipe from. CBMH 1 to Pond 2. Please verify .and correct as necessary.
• The storm sewer system tabulation should be included in the construction plans for review.
Please verify the tabulation data with the design data.
• The majority of the storm sewer system appears to be designed to meet the 3 feet per second
velocities criteria with the exception. of the following segments: CBMH 44 to CBMH 43
(Z.Sfps), 12" Apron to CBMH 63.(2.8 fps). The segments of the system at 2.9 fps appear to be
within acceptable velocity limits for the design.
Based on my review of the preliminary storm sewer design, I would recommend the design and
construction plans for the storm. sewer not be approved at this time. It is requested that the design be
updated to address these issues. In addition, it is requested that the updated design calculations and
construction plans be submitted simultaneously to expedite the review process.
This completes my review of the Ridge Creek storm sewer design and drainage area map. If you have
any questions or comments associated. with this review, please do not hesitate to contact me at your.
convenience.
lh/sm
C: (Documents and SettingslbloneylLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK1081MEM0
jswentek-OSISOZdoc
,w,~
WSB
~ Infrastructure ¦ Engineering ¦ Planning ¦ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
& Associates, Inc.
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763 541-4800
Fax: 763 541-1700.
Memorandum
To: Joe Swentek, PE, City of Shakopee
From:. Todd E. Hubmer, PE, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Ted Witkowski, Engineering Specialist, WSB & Associates, Inc.
cc: Bruce Laney, PE, City of Shakopee
.Iulie Klima, City of Shakopee
Kim Kozar, KHB&K, PA
Date: :June 5,2007.
Re: Ridge Creek Stor~nwater Management Plan and Grading Plan Review
City of
Shakopee,111N
WSS Project No.1281-91
The Ridge Creek Development stormwater management plans and preliminary grading plans have been
reviewed for conformance with the City's overall stormwater management plan. The site is located
immediately north of Eagle Creek Boulevard (CSAH 16) and east of the proposed Pike Lake Road
extension to the north. The documents provided for review by Plowe Engineering included the
following:
• Ridge Creek stormwater management plan response memorandum to 05/09/07 review
comments -dated 05/29/07; received the e-mai105/30/07.
• Ridge Creek storm sewer design response memorandum to OS/16/07 review -dated 05/29/07;
received via a-mail 05/30/07
• :Response. memorandum to City review comments -dated 05/29/07; received via a-mail
05/30/07
• .Ridge Creek preliminary plat -sheets 3 & 4 -signed 05/30/07; received OS/31/07 via a-mail
• Ridge Creek grading plan -sheets 1, 6 -.signed 05/29/07; received.05/30/07 via e-mail
• Storm sewer design calculations -.02612 pipe sizing .xls -undated -received 05/30/07 &
6/04/07 via e-mail
• Ridge Creek storm sewer drainage area map -revised 05/29/07 -xeceived 05/31/07
• Ridge Creek storm water drainage area map -revised 05/2/07 & 2/22/06 -received 06/04/07
The documents provided do not completely address the review comments from May 9 and May 16,
2007. This review will primarily focus on the preliminary plat and preliminary grading plans. The
stormwater management calculations and stormwater drainage area mapping was received today.
K101281-911AdminlDocsIMEMO jswentek-060407.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
June 5, 2007
Page 2
Therefore; review of the storm water design calculations for eonfonnance with the previous comments _
and response memorandum will be limited in nature. The storm sewer system designand drainage area
map are proposed to be reviewed simultaneously with,the construction plans, as indicated in the May 16
review comments. The storm sewer design calculations and preliminary utility plans have been
reviewed as part of the submittal documents. However, the final storm sewer design calculations will
require verification with the constructionplans once they have been provided.
Summary
• It is recommended that the grading plan. and preliminary plat not be approved at this time. The
.Prior Lake outlet channel emergency overflow route east of Ridge Creek'Drive has not been
revised from previous submittals. The developer's engineer proposed to construct an emergency
overflow similar to the grading plan that was previously reviewed in January, 2006 and it was
determined that. significant modifications to the grading plan, as well as the drainage. utility
easements; within Block 7 would be required to accommodate the proposed overland overflow
route. The following items would be required in the grading plan and plat to accommodate an
overland overflow route as proposed:
o The grading plan in the rear yards of Lots 26, Block 7, on the southeast corner, should be
revised for the construction of a channel of adequate capacity below elev. 757.4, which
-would require a bottom elevation of 756.4 and 30 feet in width. This emergency
overflow channel-section will also be required across Lotsl-2, Block 6 and 17,18; and
19:of Block 7.
o The drainage .and utility easements within Lots 1-2; and 17-34, Block 7, will require
modif
cation to encompass the area of inundation to elev. 757.5 at a minimum to
accommodate the proposed overflow route.
o The proposed overland overflow route at the elevations defined above will offer
approximately one foot of flow within the overflow prior to the Prior Lake outlet
channel overflowing into the rear yards of Block 3 at elev. 757.5. Due to the proposed
emergency overflow route by the developer's engineer, significant modifications to the
grading plan andplat north of Crossing Boulevard withinBlock 7 will be required.
o This emergency overflow at the elevations indicated above is necessary to provide flood
protection for structures upstream of the Ridge Creek development with low building
openings that would be subject to potential flooding based on the current grading plan
and emergency, overflow elevations.
o It may be necessary to eliminate one or two lots to adequately accommodate the
currentlyproposed emergency overflow. Additionally, the lots containing the overflow
will need additional protections and easement limitations to prevent alterations to the
EOF. These restrictions should include: no construction of fencing, gardens, grading
alterations, or placement of out buildings within the easements.. These limitations may
be troublesome, as many of the yards are adjacentto Crossings Boulevard and residents
will. want fences for security, safety and aesthetics.
o We still prefer and recommend the option of a third box culvert or three-sided structure
to provide an adequate EOF.
K101281-91IAdminlDocsIMEMO-iswentek-060407.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
June 5, 2007
Page 3
The review of the remaining documents provided indicates that the storm sewer design calculations are
incomplete. The storm sewer systems on Oak Creek Drive have not been incorporated into the design
calculations. Please find"the following comments associated with the storm sewer design calculations
and preliminaryutility plan.(Sheet 7-8).
• The Oak Creek Drive storm sewer structures CB64A, CB64, CB60B, and CB60C were provided
via a-mail on June 4 in the afternoon. Due to the limited time for review, we may provide
additional :comments at a Inter date. The calculations contained discrepancies and errors from
CB 64 to CB 60 based on the pipe lengths and slopes. Please correct the design calculation pipe.
lengths and slopes for these segments of the system.
• The hydraulic-grade line calculations for the. storm sewer system from CB8 to CBMH4 should
be provided for review to evaluate the system .capacity.. Please be advised that the-addition of
CBMH4A within the storm: sewer system includes a 4-foot. drop which may reduce the hydraulic.
grade line below the structure rim elevations. Please provide the hydraulic grade line
calculations as previously- requested.
• The stormwater discharge velocities from CB38 to Pond 2 at 13 ft. per second duringfull flow
should be reduced to minimize the potential erosion at the apron outfall.
• The storm sewer design calculations for apron pipe diameters to CB57 and CB59 should be
verified and corrected as necessary.
• The 12-inch diameter. pipe from CB2 into CBMHl in the design calculation should be modified
to a 15-inch diameter pipe.
The following comment items require verification between the storm sewer design calculations and
preliminary utility sheet 7 and
• The apron pipe diameter to CBMH37 should be verified and corrected.
• The Location of CB43 should be moved to the Crossing Boulevard curb line...
• The structure identifications for CB40, CB41, and CB42 should be shown on the plan sheet.
+ The storm sewer .pipe slope from CBMH 52 to CBMH 51 should correspond to the design
values.,
• :The pipe slope from CB60 to CB60A should be verified with the design calculations. and
corrected as necessary.
• The storm sewer pipe slope from CB58A to IV1TID should be verified. with the design
calculations and corrected as necessary.
• The pipe apron diameter to CB34 on Sheet 8 should be verified and corrected as necessary.
• The pipe slope from CB34 to CB33 on Sheet 8 should be verified with-the design calculations.
• The pipe data from CB32 to MHC shouldbe updated on Sheet 8 to correspond with the design
calculations..
• The apron elevation on Lot 12, Block 3, to CB32 should be verified with the design calculations
and corrected as necessary. .
• The pipe diameter from CB2 to CB 1 should be increased to a 15-inch diameter at a minimum in
the design calculations and on Sheet 8.
K101281-911AdminlDocsIMEMO-iswentek-060407.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
June 5, 2007
.Page 4
The- pipe length from MHA to CB 1 should correspond to the design calculations. Please correct
and modify as necessary.
• The pipe slope from. CBMH7 to CBMH6 should be updated on Sheet 8 to correspond withthe
design calculations.
• The pipe inverts at CB 12 on Sheet $ should be verified with the design calculations and
.corrected as necessary:
• The pipe slope from CB 12 to CB8 should be updated to correspond to the design calculations on
Sheet 8.
• .The pipe slope from CB 11 to CB 10 on Sheet 8 should correspond to the design calculations. -
• The pipe slope from CB20 to CB 19 on Sheet 8 should correspond to the design calculations.
• The pipe slope. from CB27 to CB2$ should be verified with the design calculations:
• The Pond 1 skimmer structure should be located above the normal water. elevation of the grading
plan. The pond. should not overflow into the skimmer structure for events less than the 100-
year, 24-hour storm. Please review the proposed pond skimmer location and relocate
accordingly.
Preliminary Plat -Sheets 3 & 4
• The drainage and utility easements on Lot 12, Block 3, should be evaluated in the area of the
proposed storm sewer apron. It appears that the apron is located outside of the drainage and
utility easement.
• The drainage and utility easement on Lot 17, Block 3, should be verified for 10 feet of
horizontal separation from the storm sewer system inthe rear yards. The preliminary utility plan
did not appear to have l 0 feet of horizontal separation.
• The drainage and utility easement on Lot S, Block 1, does not appear to have 10 feet of
horizontal separation from CB24. Please verify and. correct as necessary.
• The drainage and utility easement of Lots 7-8, Block 6 (Sheet 4), does not appear to encompass
the overland overflow route to elev. 756 as -shown on the grading plan. The easements across
Lots 7 and 8 should encompass the overland overflow route to the overflow elevation of 756 as a'
minimum.
• The Lot 29, Block. 6, proposed. gas line easement does not appear to be completed with respect
to he tie-in point on the northwest corner. of the lot. Please verify and .correct as necessary.
The drainage and utility easement overthe overflow route to the northwestshould be
incorporated into the plat.
• The drainage and utility easement over Lots 17-34, :Block 7, should be revised to encompass
elev..757.5 as the result of the proposed emergency overflow route. in this area. This issue was
discussed with Mr: Charles Plowe on 06/04/07 based on the proposed overflow system for the
Prior Lake outlet channel
KI01281-911AdminlDocsIMEMO-iswentek-06040Rdoc
Mr. Joe Swentek
June 5, 2007
Page 5
Stormwater Modeling
• The stonnwater model appears to-be in conformance with the City criteria for water quality and
water quantity policies. The stormwater model dead pool volumes below the outlet elevations
will require minor modifications of the input to correspond with the grading plan. The reviewed
preliminary stormwater management plan drainage area mapping (Sheet 24-25) should indicate
the final revision date and updated date in the signature block, once the finalplans are prepared.
This completes are review of the Ridge Creek development stormwater management plan, storm sewer
design, grading plan, and preliminary plat. If you have any questions. or comments associated with this
review, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience:
Ih
K101281-911Adminl DoaclA9RiL1t7-icwentek-Oh0407.dnc
iiww,-
YY
- Infrastructure ¦ En meerin ¦ Plannin ¦ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
& Associates, Inc. g g g
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
TeL• 763541-4800
Fax: 763.541-1700
Memorandum
To Joe Swentek, PE, City of
Shakopee
From: Todd E. Hubmer, PE, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Ted .Witkowski, Engineering Specialist, .WSB & Associates, Inc.
cc: Bruce Loney, PE, City of Shakopee
Julie Klima, City of Shakopee
Kim Kozar, KMB&K, PA
Date: June 25, 2007
Re: Ridge Creek Stormwater Management Plan and Grading Plan Review
City of Shakopee, MN -
WSB Project No.1281-91
We have reviewed the County Road (CR) 21 right of way Stormwater routing to the northeast pond
on the Ridge Creek Development: as well as available ponding options in the area. Based on-our
review of the draft CR 21 geometry file and hydrologic delineation file received from SRF, please
find the following ponding options for the CR 21 right-of--way.
1. Direct the storm water from the CR 21 right-of--way as originally proposed to the northeast
pond.
• Credit property owner for 6.439 acres of CR 21 right-of-way directly north of Ridge
Creek based on delineation from SRF. The area credited assumes that a portion of the
road typical section would drain to the north.
• Credit. storm sewer oversizing of 0.34 acres of CR 21 right-ofway (8" x 1826') based on
.geometry file placing sidewalk 10' from Ridge Creek Development. It is assumed that
the typical section would extend 2' past sidewalk prior to 1:3 sideslope down to match
grades.
• Creditfor Pond 1 water quality and quantity for CR 21 right-of--way for 0.34 acres of
grass area on sideslope to rear yard storm sewer in Block 6.
2. Expand School Pond on the north side of CR 21 to accommodateright-of--way and lowpoint
at Station 226+00.
• Design may require a retaining wall adjacent to the pond within the drainage and utility
easement to maintain existing trail at current location.
• The City would not need to give the developer pond expansion credit.
C: (Documents and SettinRSlbloneyiLocal SettinPSlTemporary Internet FilesIOLK1081MEM0-lswentek-062507.doc
Mr. Joe Swentek
June 25, 2007
Page 2
• Credit. for Pond 1 water quality and quantity for CR 21 right-of--way for-0.34 acres of
grass area on sideslope to rear yard storm sewer in Block 6.
• Credit storm sewer oversizing of 0.34 acres of CR 21 right-of--way (8" x 1826') based on
geometry file placing sidewalk 10' from Ridge Creek Development. If is assumed that
the typical section would extend 2' past sidewalk prior. to 1:3 sideslope down to match
grades.
• .The storm water would be conveyed to the north away, from the Eagle Creek watershed
into Savage.
3. Revise CR 21 vertical profile and route storm water runoff to expanded Fire Station Pond.
• Existing. outlet structure modifications.
• Raising the grade in the area mayresult in increase in noise to residences adjacent to CR
21 in the development.
• The. City would not need to credit for pond expansion.
• .The same storm sewer-and Pond 1 credit for CR 21 grassright-of-way.
4. Construct a new pond on the. north. side of CR 21 located southwest of the School Pond.
+ Tha pond would not require credit to developer.
• The pond.would require someof the trees in-thearea to be removed and reduce
screening.
• The outlet could be connected to the School Pond for conveyance to the north away from
the. Eagle Creek watershed into Savage.
• The same storm sewer and Pond 1 credit for CR 21 grass right-of--way.
5. Revise. CR 21 vertical. profile and route storm water runoff to a new Pond either on the
Northwest-Northeast quadrant of CR 21 & Southbridge Parkway.
• The pond construction may require wetland mitigation (Increase Cost).
• The expansion of the Fire Station Pond would not be required to increase developable
area.
• Raising the grade in the area may result in increase in noise to residences adjacent to CR
21 in the development.
• The same storm sewer and Pond l credit for CR 21 grass right-of--way.
These are some of the options available to the County to provide a pond for the CR 21 right-of-way
located north of the Ridge Creek Development. The CR 21 lowpoint at approximately Station
202+75 east of South Bridge Parkway will require either expansion of the Fire Station Pond or
creation of a new pond. It appears that expansion of the Fire Station Pond is feasible to
accommodate the CR 21 right-of--way.
C: (Documents and Settin¢slblonevlLocal SettinpslTemnorarv Internet Fileslnl,K10RIMF,Mt7-i.cwentek-Oh2507.dnr.
Mr. Joe Swentek
June 25, 2007
Page 3
The Ridge Development Grading Plan received via email on June 18, with the revised emergency
overflow through. Block 7, does not appear to meet the parameters provided to the. developer's
engineer. Based on ourpreliminaryreview, we offer the following comments:
1. The 760 elevationcontour on Lot 18 is not accurate based on the building padelevations.
The 7b0 contour elevation should be shown based on the LO house type and the grades in
the overflow. Swale should be adjusted accordingly.
2. The sideslope grades should be shown on the plan from the Lot 18 building pad to the
bottom of the overflow Swale. It appears -that the sideslope will be approximately 4:1 from
the building pad down to the bottom of the swale. This would. indicate that the rear. yard .
grading will not create 10' of available rear yard behind the structure prior to the down slope
to the overflow Swale. It is assumed that the grading plan for the rear yard of Lot 18 does not.
meet the City grading standards. Please advise me if this grading is acceptable.
3. The sideslope from the bituminous trail on the north side of Crossing Boulevard to the
bottom of the swale appears to be 3:1. Please advise me if these -side slopes are acceptable.
4. The verticalprofile of Crossings Boulevard has been modified at the overflow to 0.5% to the
low point. The vertical curve was also modified at the EOF route over CB 45 and 46 on
Crossings Boulevard: from Pond l . Please review the proposed vertical curves with the.
design tandards. It appears' hat the road will be undulating in this area.
5. Please `be advised that the low floor'elevations below 757.5 in Black 7 may be subject.to
_ saturation in the event that the overflow route is inundated for an extended period of time.
This completes my review of the. grading plan and CR 21 right-of--way pond options. If you have
any questions feel free to give me a call. Thanks.
lh
C:IDocuments and Senin2slblonevlLocal SettineslTemoorarv Internet Files10LK1081MfiM0-rswentek-06250Zdoc
EXHIBIT E
City's Natural. Resources Coordinator memoranda
' dated February ,13, 2008 and May 2, 2008
11
.CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
From: Ryan Hughes, Natural. Resources Coordinator
Dater February 13, 2008
Subject: Ridge Creek Grading Permit Application Comments
Based on a preliminary review of the revised Woodland Management Plan. submitted for
the Ridge Creek grading permit application, original application received November 1,
2007, staff has the following comments:
1. There is no staff approved conservation easement provided over the. natural bluff
and no conservation easement agreement has been executed. The Applicant is
required to execute the conservation easement consistent with MN .Statute 84G to
protect these natural resources prior to beginning any grading activities.
2. The plan does not include an 8-foot bituminous, trail along the north side of Eagle
Creek Boulevard (County Road 16) connecting the two trail stubs from adjacent
developments.
3. The plan does not include an 8-foot bituminous trail along the north side of
Crossings Boulevard connecting to Pike Lake Road.
4. The tree replaceinent/landscaping component of the Woodland Management Plan
does not indicate the size of the replacement trees. Please specify the size of the
proposed replacement trees in the plan.
5. Move the tree from the front easement in Block 1, Lot 24 of the tree
replacement/landscaping component of the WoodlandManagementPhn. Tree
planting and placement are- required to be consistent with the Shakopee Tree,
Shrub and Bush Planting and Placement Policy and Standards. Please review the
policy and standards to determine acceptable locations of trees, specifically along
the County Road 21 right of way and the side and rear lot line easements of all
lots. A copy of the policy and standards is available at
htip•//www.ci.shakopee.mn.us/nr trees woodlands.cfin
6. Staff recommends planting replacement trees along Crossings Boulevard where
feasible.
7. The plan does not contain a tree planting detail. Please reference the Shakopee
Tree,. Shrub and-Bush Planting and Placement Policy and Standards..
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer
From:. Ryan. Hughes, Natural Resources Coordinator
Date: May 2, 2008
Subject: `Ridge Creek Grading Permit Application Conditions
Based on a preliminary review of the•revised Woodland Management-Plan submitted for.
the Ridge Creek grading permit application, original application received November I,
2007, staff has the following conditions:
1. The applicant adhere to the City's Woodland and Tree Management Ordinance.
2. The applicant is responsible for preserving all trees indicated as saved on the
Woodland Management Plana If, as a result of grading, .any of these trees are
determined to be wounded sufficiently to be considered dead or dying by the City,
the applicant will be required to replace the tree(s) according to he Woodland and
Tree Management Ordinance.
3.: The applicant execute a City approved conservation easement consistent with MN
Statute 84C to preserve the natural bluff features .such. as woodlands, steep slopes,
and erodible soils within the Natural Resources Corridor Map prior to beginning
any tree removal or grading activities.
4. Pursuant to City Code § 11.60 Subd. 9(C)(3) trees planted must not be less than
one and a half (1-1/2")'inches diameter.
5. Tree planting and placement is required to be consistent with the Tree, Shrub and
-Bush Planting and Placement Policy and Standards included in Resolution No,
6719 A Resolution of the City of Shakopee Adopting Uniform Policies and
Standards Relating to Tree, Shrub and Bush Placement-and Maintenance. .
6. Pursuant to City. Code. § 1 l .60 Subd. 9(E)(2) no grading permits shall be issued
until the applicant has installed proper protective fencing around the trees being.
preserved or protected and shall be inspected by the .City prior to approval. Please
call the Natural Resources Coordinator at 952-233-9510 to request an inspection.
7. Tree protection fence for grading is to remain in place the duration of the land
disturbing:activities, including the building of residential homes.
8. , Maintenance of silt fence and/or tree protection fence be completed as required by .
the plans or City Staff.
Page 1 of 2
9. Man-made, non-natural debris (metal, glass, tires, :etc.) is required to be removed
from within the proposed .conservation easement areas with minimal or'no
.disturbance to adjacent trees.
10. Silt fence and/or tree protection fence is to be removed following establishment of
.vegetation as determined by an inspection completed by City Staff.
l l . The applicant provide an 8-foot bituminous trail along the north side of Eagle
Creek Boulevard (County Road 16) connecting-the two trail stubs. from: adjacent
developments.
12. The applicant provide. an 8-.foot bituminous trail along the north side of Crossings
..Boulevard connecting to Pike Lake Road.
Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT F
General: Conditions of The Crrading Permit
12
Permit #
~t~~
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF TFIE GRADING PERMIT FOR:
1. Original copies. (2) of the Contractor's. certificate of insurance shall be received by the. City of
Shakopee prior to any grading of the site.
2. Applicant agrees `to hold the City of Shakopee harmless for any claims arising out of the City
approving the grading permit. prior to Final Plat approval, Final Plat recording and. Final
Construction Plan approval
3. The Applicant shall obtain a NPDES permit. The City of Shakopee shall receive. this permit
prior to any. land disturbing activity.
4. All erosion control measures shall be furnished and installed by the Applicant-and. accepted by
the City prior to any land disturbing activity.
5. All erosion control measures shall be routinely inspected by the Applicant'. and replaced as
necessary or as directed by the City of Shakopee.
6. Erosion control maintenance shall be the responsibility of the Applicant throughout the life of
the grading permit...
7. Adjacent streets shall. be kept clean of any offsite sediment tracking..
8. Turf . and permanent vegetation shall be established in accordance with the: NPDES
:.requirements..
9. Six (6) inches of topsoil will be required over disturbed areas not part of building pads. Building
pads not starting immediate construction require four (4) inches of topsoil. All areas not
involving immediate building or construction shall haveturf established. in .accordance with
NPDES requirements.
10. Final Plans and Reports required upon completion:
• An "as-built" grading plan shall be submitted to the City: when the grading work has been
completed. A statementshall be included from the Applicant's engineer that the grading
work is in conformance to the "as-built" plan and specifications. Also, as apart of this plan,
a statement shall be included from the Applicant's surveyor that the high water elevations.
around ponds and wetlands' are within the existing and/or proposed drainage easements of
the .plat. No building permits will be issued until the City Engineer has approved this plan.
Please refer to the City of Shakopee's Design Criteria for as-built grading plan requirements.
• A report prepared by the soils engineer .including locations and elevations of f eld density
tests, summaries of field and laboratory test, other substantiating data and comments on any
changes made during the grading and. their effects on the recommendations in the .soils
report.
Page 2 of 3
Permit #
~s~iss7
GENERAL CONDITIONS' OF THE GRADING PERMIT FOR:
l•l. All Topsoil (whether salvaged. on. site or brought in as import) to be used on site for turf
establishment shall be identified, tested :and.. approved by City of Shakopee Engineering •
Department prior to placement of said topsoil. Topsoil test results shall comply. with MnDOT's
"STANDARD SPECIFICATION: FOR CONSTRUCTION" 2000 Edition, Specification 3877
for "SELECT TOPSOILBORROW" (spec. 3877.2 B, Table 3877-2).
12. Grading shalLbe limited to the plat/property boundaries and as shown on the. submitted grading
plan.
13. County and State permits to be obtained are the responsibility, ofthe Applicant.
14. See the following conditions from.. the ..Natural Resource Director and the Community
Development/Planning Department:
Community Development/Planning:
Natural Resources/Park and Recreation:
APPROVED BY: CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
BY: DATE:
APPROVED BY: CITY NATURAL RESOURCES/PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT:
BY: DATE:
Page 3 of 3
4 ~
Bruce Loney
From: Kim Kozar [kkozar@hbklaw.com]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:12 PM
To: Baune, Craig
Cc: Perry, Jack Y.; Thomson, James J.; Bruce Loney; George Hoff
Subject: RE: Hearing on Grading Permit Application- 3200-242
Attachments: Briggs Email Logo.gif; Briggs Email Logo.gif; Briggs Email Logo.gif
Craig,
The matter will be continued to the May 20, 2008 meeting.
Kim
Kimberly B. Kozar
NOFF, BARRY & KOZAR, P.P~.
160 Flagship Corporate Center
775 Prairie Center Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
dir: 952-746-2708 main: 952-941-9220
fax: 952-941-7968
www.hbklaw.com
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee listed above
and no one else. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended
recipient, please do not use this transmission in any way, but contact the sender by telephone or email.
From: Baune, Craig [mailto:CBaune@Briggs.com]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:09 PM
To: Kim Kozar; George Hoff
Cc: Perry, Jack Y.; Thomson, James J.
Subject: RE: Hearing on Grading Permit Application- 3200-242
Kim,
With respect to any pending grading permit application, Ridge Creek is waiving any potential section 15.99 claims against
City, provided a decision is made by City on or before May 31, 2008.
Please let respond immediately to confirm that this is clear, and that the matter is continued to the May 20, 2008 agenda.
Craig R. Baune
Attorney
~i :ni a
1