Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.A. Community Center study options General Business 9. A. SHAKOL'EE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jamie Polley, Parks & Recreation Director DATE: 05/06/2015 SUBJECT: Community Center Study Options (A, B, D) Action Sought The City Council is asked to further discuss the results of the Community Center feasibility study, review various options and set public meetings if desired. Background On March 31 Jeff King of Ballard* King and Associates and Tom Betti of 292 Design Group presented the feasibility information, market analysis, programming recommendations, architectural concepts and operations analysis for the Community Center 2.0 project. The City Council chose to take a few weeks to review the information. A draft of the final report from the consultants containing the information that was presented is attached. Discussion At the March 31 workshop the idea of hosting open houses for the public was briefly discussed. The purpose would be to provide the public with the opportunity to come and see the proposed plans and options, ask questions and offer feedback. If Council wishes to proceed with these open houses, staff would recommend hosting them on Thursday, May 28 and Monday, June 1 at 7:00 p.m., with one at the Community Center and the other at either Eagle Creek or Red Oak Elementary. Council members and members of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board would both be encouraged to attend in order to hear directly from residents. If the Council decides to proceed with these open houses, there is a need to decide what options will be presented. Possible options include: Option A (Attachment A): •New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased •Remodeled Community Center including expanded fitness, indoor playground and child care •Aquatic facility in the existing ice arena shell Option B (Attachment B): •New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased •Remodel of Community Center including expanded fitness, indoor playground and child care •Athletic space in the existing ice arena shell (no aquatic facility) Option C (Attachment C): •New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased •Remodel of Community Center including expanded fitness, indoor playground and child care •Do nothing with the existing ice arena shell at this time Option D (Attachment D): •New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased •Operate the Community Center as it is today •Do nothing with the existing ice arena shell at this time Option E (Attachment E): •Update the current ice arena refrigeration system only •Operate the Community Center and ice arena as they are today The above options can be altered, combined or deleted to arrive at a list to be presented at the open houses. Relationship to Vision A. Keep Shakopee a safe and healthy community where residents can pursue active and quality lifestyles. B. Positively manage the challenges and opportunities presented by growth development and change. D. Maintain, improve and create strong partnerships with other public and private sector entities. Requested Action If the Council concurs, it is asked to set the dates of May 28th and June 1st for two open houses for the community to review and provide input on the Community Center improvement options and to provide direction on the options to be presented. Attachments: Draft Final Report Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D & E X _ Community Recreation Facilities Study April 30, 2015 0.....................„00 ., *s.,..." ---...,....,........,,,............r N.. ..... t, i a . . . , .. ...........,,,,,„,,... . .I. , 1 s". „..-, '::'',,',„„„,:,,..;,-;,;1,-.- -,% ',.. ,' ' -- ,:4- t• `-4-‘,27.-4-:, V 292DesignGroup Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROCESS 4 MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary& Market Review 6 MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment 36 PROGRAM 43 CONCEPTS New Ice Facility 45 Repurposed Community Center 48 Ice Arena Repurpose Variation: Gymnasium 51 Existing Community Center Addition/Renovation 52 BUILDING SYSTEMS 54 COST ESTIMATES 55 OPERATIONS 60 APPENDIX Market Analysis: Stakeholder meeting minutes 64 Zoning map 74 Zoning code: parking 75 292 12 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This feasibility study explores the options for enhancing the City of Shakopee's existing community recreation facilities. The building program, concept drawings and associated cost estimates were derived from a iterative process with city staff, Ballard King—a recreation and operations consultant—and RJM Construction. Process City staff worked with Ballard Kind on a demographic and marketing analysis that allowed them to better understand the needs and desires of their community residents,as well as the recreation and fitness amenities that were already located within the community center's service area. Ballard King prepared a demographic analysis based on US Census data, researched and compiled a list of recreation/fitness providers in the area(public and private)and held meetings with various stakeholder groups to understand, first-hand,the needs of the community. Based on all of their research, Ballard King prepared a preliminary building program that was the framework for building concept development. 292 developed initial building concept plans in response to the preliminary program. After numerous reviews with the City, the concept plans were finalized and sent to RJM Construction so that they could prepare construction cost estimates. Results The study includes program summaries—spreadsheets that outline square footage requirements—for a new ice arena facility and repurposed community center building. It also includes conceptual plans that identify those program elements and their relationship to one another. Acknowledgments Thank you to City staff and collaborating consultants for their efforts in developing the enclosed feasibility study concepts. Their insight was invaluable. 292 13 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study PROCESS Based on the demographic analysis, market analysis and Concept Direction proposed building program prepared by Ballard King,292 Because of the challenges for including both an ice Design Group and City staff first studied the expansion and and aquatics expansion at the existing building, 292 renovation opportunities of the existing community center Design Group and City staff also looked at the potential to fill the proposed program needs. However,early in this for a stand-alone ice facility. A distinct facility for ice process, it became evident that the large components would provide greater opportunities for other program in the proposed program—aquatics and the ice sheet— activities at the existing center.A concept plan for a new, presented challenges at the existing center and site. two-sheet ice arena was prepared in conjunction with an option that explored repurposing of the existing arena Challenges to accommodate non-ice program activities—an indoor Site:The existing, two-level community center is aligned aquatics center or gymnasium space. in a linear fashion on a sloped site. The center's main entry is at the upper level, as is the majority of parking. Resulting Options and Cost Estimates Meeting rooms, access to spectator seating, the teen/ 292 Design Group then created the following options, senior center, and administrative offices are also located along with cost estimates, to help the City determine on the upper level.Secondary service entrances that lead the most desirable direction for Shakopee's future directly to the ice sheet,locker rooms and gymnasium,are recreational offerings. located on the lower level.Because of the existing center's linear alignment and the site's topography, expansion of Option 1:Add a second ice sheet to the existing arena the arena to include a second ice sheet is limited.Potential This option explored the potential for a second ice rink to for a future third sheet expansion was not available. be added to the west end of the existing ice arena.The option included the following amenities: Parking:Parking was another hurdle.Should the existing • NHL-size ice sheet(85'x200') building include both a second ice sheet expansion and • Spectator seating for 900 aquatics component, a significant increase in parking • Meeting rooms spaces would be needed and the current topography and • Concessions linear building alignment provide challenges. Additional • New lobby to relocate spectator crowds away from the parking would be a considerable distance from the main community center entry entry.Additional entries,closer to the additional parking, • Dryland training center would introduce control point difficulties for City staff. • Restrooms • JV and varsity team rooms Infrastructure: The ice and aquatic components are • Youth team rooms both large spaces with particular and distinct building • Refrigeration and ice resurfacer room systems requirements. The ice arena does not share any • Lower level lobby significant infrastructure with the rest of the building • Storage space but, unfortunately, the existing arena's ice refrigeration • Additional 150 parking stalls system requires upgrades and most likely replacement. Both the new ice and aquatics addition would require This option keeps the ice arena and community center on space for their unique mechanical systems. the same site. It essentially separates the ice arena from the rest of the community center by creating a new ice Program activities: Programatically, hockey is a arena entrance.The community center can be accessed destination activity with a defined activity timeframe. by walking through the existing ice rink,but it isn't a direct The facility is used for events and rented by the hour, circulation path. A cost estimate was prepared by RJM versus the drop-in nature of other community center Construction for this concept and is included in the Cost activities. Holding events requires a control point for Estimates section of this report. The cost estimate took admission (as events here often include admission fees), into account replacement of the existing refrigeration in addition to the control point required for the remainder system and ice rink floor of the original ice arena. of the building and its associated activities.Activities in a proposed aquatics center would not require an additional control point for the building. 292 I 4 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study PROC ESS Option 2:Construct a new two-sheet ice arena The existing ice arena is constructed of materials that are This option creates a new, two-sheet ice arena on a site conducive to an aquatics center,mainly precast concrete, to be determined,and includes the following amenities: masonry, and steel. It is a large, open space that has • 2 NHL-size ice sheets(85'x200') exposures to the south and west which would allow • Spectator seating for 900 in one rink and 250 in the other large amounts of natural light to enter the space—ideal • Meeting rooms for an indoor aquatic center. A second level would be • Concessions constructed over the existing bleachers to accommodate • Management offices much needed fitness space. (A variation shows sport • Dryland training center courts in the existing ice arena space, in lieu of an • Multi-purpose meeting rooms aquatics component.) This option, and the variation, • Restrooms validated the idea that the existing ice arena could be • 1v and varsity team rooms repurposed into an aquatic or gymnasium type of space, • Youth team rooms both integral components of many community centers.A • Refrigeration and ice resurfacer room cost estimate was prepared by RIM Construction for this • Storage and support space concept and is included in the Cost Estimates section of • 150 parking stalls this report. This option allows for efficient operation with no conflicts Council Workshop between ice arena activities and community center The three options were presented at the Shakopee City activities. It is designed to allow for a third or fourth Council Workshop on March 3, 2015. 292 Design Group ice sheet to be added on in the future. A cost estimate requested direction from the City Council on which ice was prepared by RIM Construction for this concept and arena option to pursue as it would impact the recreation is included in th Cost Estimates section of this report. study's planning and operations analyses, as well as the Creating a new, two-sheet ice arena on a different site design, location, and potential cost of the community provides an opportunity to repurpose the existing ice center. arena into another use, an opportunity explored in Option 3. Option 3:Repurpose existing ice arena This option explores reuse of the existing ice arena as an aquatics center and renovation of other existing spaces to address Ballard King's building program needs. The option includes the following amenities: • Women's,men's,and family locker rooms • Aquatics office • Zero depth pool with current channel • Single slide that exits and re-enters the aquatics space • 4-lane lap pool • Whirlpool • New exterior glass facing south and west • Pool equipment room • Storage • New weight/cardio area • 2 fitness studios • Spinning studio • Teen/senior center • Childcare • Indoor playground • Multi-purpose room • Party/event rooms 292 15 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Ballard*King&Associates was contracted by the City of Shakopee to complete a feasibility study for additions to the current community center. The following is a summary of the basic demographic characteristics of the identified service areas along with recreation and leisure participation standards as produced by the National Sporting Goods Association and the National Endowment of Arts. Service Areas: The goal of an expanded facility in Shakopee would be to serve the residents. As such the City of Shakopee information is reflected in some of the key indicators in this report. However, in order to be consistent with previous studies a 12-minute drive time has been identified as the Primary Service Area. Primary Service Areas are usually defined by the distance people will travel on a regular basis (a minimum of once a week)to utilize a facility or its programs. Use by individuals outside of this area will be much more limited and will focus more on special activities or events(tournaments, etc.). Service areas can vary in size based on the types of components that are included in a facility. A center with active elements(pool,weight cardiovascular equipment area,gym,track,etc.)will generally have a larger service area than a more passively oriented facility. Specialized facilities such as a sports field house, ice arena or large competitive aquatic venue will have even larger service areas that make them more of a regional destination. Service areas can also be based upon a facility's proximity to major thoroughfares. Other factors impacting the use as it relates to driving distance are the presence of alternative service providers in the service area. Alternative service providers can have an impact upon membership, daily admissions and the associated penetration rates for programs and services. The presence of alternative service providers can also have an impact on the number and frequency of events that could be held at a specialized facility. 292 16 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Service Area Comparison Chart: City of Shakopee Primary Service Area Population: 2010 Census 37,076 68,768 2014 Estimate 39,260 72,401 2019 Estimate 41,849 77,167 Households: 2010 Census 12,772 24,234 2014 Estimate 13,488 25,533 2019 Estimate 14,353 27,229 Families: 2010 Census 9,275 17,875 2014 Estimate 9,790 18,780 2019 Estimate 10,401 20,000 Average Household Size: 2010 Census 2.83 2.79 2014 Estimate 2.85 2.79 2019 Estimate 2.85 2.80 Ethnicity: Hispanic 8.8% 8.3% White 74.6% 78.7% Black 5.6% 4.2% American Indian 1.1% 1.1% Asian 10.9% 8.9% Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.02% Other 5.1% 4.3% Multiple 2.7% 2.7% Median Age: 2010 Census 32.3 33.9 2014 Estimate 33.3 34.8 2019 Estimate 34.1 35.5 Median Income: 2014 Estimate $82,263 $86,355 2019 Estimate $93,773 $101,734 Household Budget Expenditures': Housing 140 152 Entertainment&Recreation 142 155 1 This information is placed on an index with a reference point being the National average of 100. 292 17 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Age and Income: The median age and household income levels are compared with the national number as both of these factors are primary determiners of participation in recreation activities. The lower the median age,the higher the participation rates are for most activities. The level of participation also increases as the median income level goes up. Table A-Median Age: 2010 Census 2014 Projection 2019 Projection City of Shakopee 32.3 33.3 34.1 Primary Service Area 33.9 34.8 35.5 State of Minnesota 37.3 37.9 38.5 Nationally 37.1 37.7 38.2 Chart A—Median Age: 39 s 38 17.1 ;> 37 _�•, 36 3; , w' 34 ai11111 33 32 31 EMI 30 29 f 2010 2014 2018 •City of Shakopee ■Primal).Service Area ■I\iinnesota National The median age in the City and Primary Service Area are significantly lower than the State and National number. This points to families with younger children who are primary users of indoor recreation and sport facilities. 292 18 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Map A—Median Age by Census Block Group: 12 Pa s ' Aoci �x u. 2013 Median Age(Esri) by Block Groups ❑25.5 to 35 ❑3510 40.7 040.7to47.7 o47.7to59.9 ■59.9 to 74.7 9 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Table B—Median Household Income: 2014 Estimate 2019 Projection City of Shakopee $82,263 $93,773 Primary Service Area $86,355 $101,734 State of Minnesota $58,634 $68,448 Nationally $52,076 $59,599 Chart B—Median Household Income: $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 �, $40,000 I 1111 $2_0,000 $0 2014 2019 ■City of Shakopee ■Primary Service Area ■Minnesota National Based upon 2014 projections,the following narrative can be provided the service areas: In the City of Shakopee, the percentage of households with a median income over $50,000 per year is 75.5% compared to 52.2% on a national level. Furthermore, the percentage of the households in the service area with a median income less than$25,000 per year is 9.3%compared to the level of 23.8%nationally. In the Primary Service Area, the percentage of households with a median income over $50,000 per year is 76.0% compared to 52.2% on a national level. Furthermore, the percentage of the households in the service area with a median income less than$25,000 per year is 8.9%compared to the level of 23.8%nationally. The median household income in the State of Minnesota and the service area is higher than the National number. This higher median household income must be balanced with the overall cost of living in the service area;however it may point to the ability to pay for recreation services and facilities. 292 110 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Map B—Median Household Income by Census Block Group: 12 m::wtr V 9 �. 2014 Median Household Income(Esn)by Block Groups ❑S17.400 to 553.454 ❑S53.454 to 574214 ❑$74.214 to S95.301 ❑S95.301 to 5128.488 ■5128.488 to$200.001 11 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review In addition to taking a look at Median Age and Median Income, it is important to examine Household Budget Expenditures. In particular looking at housing information; shelter, utilities, fuel and public services along with entertainment & recreation can provide a snap shot into the cost of living and spending patterns in the services areas. The table below looks at that information and compares the service areas. Table C—Household Budget Expenditures2: City of Shakopee SPI Average Amount Spent Percent Housing 140 $29,342.95 30.5% Shelter 142 $22,811.70 23.7% Utilities, Fuel, Public Service 132 $6,531.26 6.8% Entertainment& Recreation 142 $4,568.54 4.7% Primary Service Area SPI Average Amount Spent Percent Housing 152 $31,852.77 30.3% Shelter 154 $24,722.04 23.5% Utilities, Fuel, Public Service 145 $7,130.73 6.8% Entertainment& Recreation 155 $5,002.25 4.8% State of Minnesota SPI Average Amount Spent Percent Housing 108 $22,542.30 30.0% Shelter 107 $17,167.93 22.9% Utilities, Fuel, Public Service 109 $5,374.37 7.2% Entertainment& Recreation 111 $3,595.85 4.8% SPI: Spending Potential Index as compared to the National number of 100. Average Amount Spent: The average amount spent per household. Percent: Percent of the total 100%of household expenditures. Note:Shelter along with Utilities, Fuel, Public Service are a portion of the Housing percentage. 'Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2004 and 2005 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. ESRI forecasts for 2014 and 2019. 292 112 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Chart C—Household Budget Expenditures Spending Potential Index: 160 140 s I. as as IP II 1.0 100 pit 80 z� x a 60 �: r ,Q ;, :n ti _ { r J Housing Shelter Utilities,Fuel.Public Entertainment Service Recreation •City of Shakopee ■Pruni'Service Area aAlinnesota National Chart C illustrates the Household Budget Expenditures Spending Potential Index in the service areas. There is consistency between the Household Budget Expenditures SPI and the Median Household Income. That consistency is positive in that the overall cost of living appears to be slightly higher while the median household income is also slightly higher. This points to the ability to pay for recreation services and facilities. It will be important to keep this information in mind when developing a fee structure and looking at an appropriate cost recovery philosophy for the facility. 292 113 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Recreation Expenditures Spending Potential Index: Through the demographic provider that B*K utilizes for the market analysis portion of the report,we are able to examine the overall propensity for households to spend dollars on recreation activities. The following comparisons are possible. Table D—Recreation Expenditures Spending Potential Index3: City of Shakopee SPI Average Spent Fees for Participant Sports 158 $185.32 Fees for Recreational Lessons 157 $187.64 _ Social, Recreation,Club Membership 151 $252.83 Exercise Equipment/Game Tables 124 $92.45 Other Sports Equipment 127 $9.93 Primary Service Area SPI Average Spent Fees for Participant Sports 172 $202.47 Fees for Recreational Lessons 174 $207.93 Social, Recreation,Club Membership 167 $279.67 Exercise Equipment/Game Tables 136 $101.64 Other Sports Equipment 140 $10.88 State of Minnesota SPI Average Spent Fees for Participant Sports 107 $126.16 Fees for Recreational Lessons 107 $127.50 Social, Recreation,Club Membership 108 $180.03 Exercise Equipment/Game Tables 93 $69.88 Other Sports Equipment 113 $8.80 Average Amount Spent: The average amount spent for the service or item in a year. SPI: Spending potential index as compared to the national number of 100. 3 Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2006 and 2007 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 292 114 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Chart D—Recreation Spending Potential Index: 180 160 140 _.____ _ . W___... __ _ ti 120 00 00 00 100 00 "1 100 cinr ,„ R,x � wi P.. Z v 60 , 40 _ 0 ` Fees for Fees for Social, Exercise Other Sports Participant Sports Recreational Recreaiton,Chub Equipment Game Equipment Lessons Membership Tables •Cit} of Skakopee SPiimary Service Area •Minnesota National The Spending Potential Index for Recreation is very comparable to the numbers in the Household Budget Index in that they follow the same pattern. The State of Minnesota and the service areas are higher than the National number,except in the case of"Exercise Equipment/Game Tables." It is also important to note that these dollars are currently being spent, so the identification of alternative service providers and the ability of another facility to capture a portion of these dollars will be important. It is possible that a portion of the dollars being spent is already being captured by the City of Shakopee. 292 115 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Map C—Entertainment&Recreation Spending Potential Index by Census Block Group: 7 Or OF A' 2013 Entertainment/Recreaoon \ (Index)by Block Groups IIII 34 to 90 0 90 to 130 ❑130to176 ❑176 to 228 0 228 to 318 292 116 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Map D—Primary Service Area Map: �,.. ,. 292 117 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Population Distribution by Age:Utilizing census information for the Primary Service Area,the following comparisons are possible. Table E-2014 Primary Service Area Age Distribution (ESRI estimates) Ages Population %of Total Nat.Population Difference -5 6,013 8.2% 6.5% +1.7% 5-17 15,666 21.7% 17.2% +4.5% 18-24 5,247 7.3% 9.8% -2.5% 25-44 21,838 30.1% 26.5% +3.6% 45-54 10,664 14.8% 14.1% +0.7% 55-64 7,079 9.8% 12.3% -2.5% 65-74 3,708 5.1% 7.5% -2.4% 75+ 2,187 3.0% 6.1% -3.1% Population: 2014 census estimates in the different age groups in the Primary Service Area. %of Total: Percentage of the Primary Service Area population in the age group. National Population: Percentage of the national population in the age group. Difference: Percentage difference between the Primary Service Area population and the national population. Chart E-2014 Primary Service Area Age Group Distribution 35 30 - ..5 .v r 25 P. 20 1.2 c. 14.1 or, 15 5 12.3 �: 9.8 6 10 7.5 _ m 6.1 P. 0 -5 5-17yrs 18-24 25-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ ■Prunary Service Area ■City of Shakopee National The Primary Service Area, when compared to the characteristics of the national population, indicates that there are some differences with an equal or larger population in the -5, 5-17, 25-44 and 45-54 age groups and a smaller population in the 18-24,55-64, 65-74 and 75+age groups. The largest positive variance is in the 5-17 age group with +4.5%while the greatest negative variance is in the 75+age group with-3.1%. 292 118 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Population Distribution Comparison by Age: Utilizing census information from the Primary Service Area, the following comparisons are possible. Table F—2014 Primary Service Area Population Estimates (U.S.Census Information and ESRI) Ages 2010 Census 2014 Projection 2019 Projection Percent Change Percent Change Nat'l -5 6,120 6,013 6,356 +3.9% +4.7% 5-17 14,494 15,666 17,031 +17.5% +1.8% 18-24 4,406 5,247 5,352 +21.5% -2.4% 25-44 22,817 21,838 22,542 -1.2% +10.4% 45-54 9,887 10,664 10,646 +7.7% -6.2% 55-64 6,018 7,079 7,998 +32.9% +13.7% 65-74 2,954 3,708 4,693 +58.9% +32.9% 75+ 2,073 2,187 2,550 +23.0% +9.5% Chart F—Primary Service Area Population Growth _ 25,000 20,000 c 15.000 10,000 a I5.000 -- y 5-1-yr 18-24 25-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ 112010 ■201-4 ■2019 Table-F illustrates the growth or decline in age group numbers from the 2010 census until the year 2019. It is projected that all of the age categories will see an increase or static growth in population, except, 25-44. It must be remembered that the population of the United States as a whole is aging and it is not unusual to find negative growth numbers in the younger age groups and significant net gains in the 45 plus age groupings in communities which are relatively stable in their population numbers. 292 119 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Below is listed the distribution of the population by race and ethnicity for the Primary Service Area for 2014 population projections. Those numbers were developed from 2010 Census Data. Table G—Primary Service Area Ethnic Population and Median Age (Source—U.S.Census Bureau and ESRI) Ethnicity Total Population Median Age %of Population %of MN Population Hispanic 5,982 23.4 8.3% 5.3% Table H—Primary Service Area Population by Race and Median Age (Source—U.S.Census Bureau and ESRI) Race Total Population Median Age %of Population %of MN Population White 57,012 37.0 78.7% 83.9% Black 3,009 25.2 4.2% 5.6% American Indian 819 28.1 1.1% 1.2% Asian 6,429 32.3 8.9% 4.5% Pacific Islander 15 22.5 0.02% 0.04% Other 3,149 24.0 4.3% 2.1% Multiple 1,969 13.8 2.7% 2.6% 2014 Primary Service Area Total Population: 72,401 Residents Chart G—Primary Service Area Non-White Population by Race 1.1°0 ;0o , 0.02°o UBlack *American Indian *Asian 4Pacific Islander 4Other Inlultiple 292 120 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Tapestry Segmentation Tapestry segmentation represents the 4th generation of market segmentation systems that began 30 years ago. The 65-segment Tapestry Segmentation system classifies U.S. neighborhoods based on their socioeconomic and demographic compositions. While the demographic landscape of the U.S. has changed significantly since the 2000 Census,the tapestry segmentation has remained stable as neighborhoods have evolved. The value of including this information for the City of Shakopee is that it allows the organization to better understand the consumers/constituents in their service areas and supply them with the right products and services. The tapestry segmentation system classifies U.S. neighborhoods into 65 distinctive market segments. Neighborhoods are sorted by more than 60 attributes including; income, employment, home value, housing types, education, household composition,age and other key determinates of consumer behavior. The following pages and tables outline the top 5 tapestry segments in each of the service areas and provides a brief description of each. This information combined with the key indicators and demographic analysis of each service area help further describe the markets that the City of Shakopee looks to serve with programs,services and special events. Table I—Primary Service Area Tapestry Segment Comparison (ESRI estimates) Primary Service Area U.S.Households Cumulative Cumulative Percent Percent Percent Percent Boomburbs(04) 37.9% 37.9% 2.4% 2.4% Up&Coming Families(12) 12.4% 50.3% 4.1% 6.5% Sophisticated Squires(06) 11.0% 61.3% 2.5% 9.0% Aspiring Young Families(28) 8.4% 69.7% 2.3% 11.3% In Style(13) 7.7% 77.4% 2.3% 13.6% Boomburbs(04)—These communities are home to busy, affluent young families. This is home to one of the highest concentrations of young families with children. The median age is 33.8 years. There is little ethnic diversity in the population, most residents are white. For exercise,they play tennis and golf,ski, lift weights and jog. Up & Coming Families (12) — A mix of Generation Xers and Baby Boomers with a median age of 31.9 years, this segment is the youngest of Tapestry's affluent family markets. Residents of these neighborhoods are young,affluent families with younger children, 80% of the households are families. Most residents are white, although diversity increases as the population increases. Sophisticated Squires (06) — Residents of these neighborhoods enjoy cultured country life on the urban fringe. These city escapees accept longer commutes to live near fewer neighbors. Mostly married couple families; more than 40% of the household are married couples with children that range from toddlers to young adults. Most residents of these neighborhoods are white. Many of these residents own a treadmill or stationary bike to stay fit. Aspiring Young Families(28)—Most of the residents in these neighborhoods are young,startup families,married couples with or without children,and single parents. Approximately 2/3 of the households are families,27%are single person and 9%are shared. Typical of younger populations residents are more ethnically diverse than the total U.S.population. In Style (13) — These residents live in the suburbs but prefer the city lifestyle, professional couples predominate. Married-couple families represent 54% of households. Household with children comprise more than 2/3 of all households. There is little diversity in these neighborhoods. Residents stay fit by exercising,eating a healthy diet to control their weight, buying low-fat foods and taking vitamins. 292 121 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Demographic Summary The following summarizes the demographic characteristics of the service areas. • The City of Shakopee is a growing City that seems to be trying to hang on to the small community feel despite the growth. This dynamic pits long time residents that like the way Shakopee was 15 years ago against newer residents that are demanding and looking for more services and quality of life opportunities. The primary service area with an estimated population of over 72,000 is large enough to support sport facilities in Shakopee. Other Twin Cities communities of similar size and smaller have sport facilities that are supported by Shakopee area residents. It will be important to include sport components that appeal to the youth sport spectrum in this service area. • The median age of the City of Shakopee is significantly younger than the State and National number. This younger median age point to a higher concentration of families in the Primary Service. Participation in most sport activities is driven by age and the general market conditions for expanding sport facilities in Shakopee is strong. • While the cost of living in Shakopee is greater than the National number and is balanced out by the higher median household income than the State and National number. This greater median household income points to the ability for residents within the service area to pay for sport and recreation services. • In the service area, residents are already paying for entertainment and recreation services at a higher rate than the State of Minnesota. It will be important to identify any other service providers for indoor recreation facilities in the service areas. It will be equally important to engage the residents and determine what components should be included in an indoor sports facility. 292 122 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Sports Participation Numbers: In addition to analyzing the demographic realities of the service areas, it is possible to project possible participation in recreation and sports activities. Participation Numbers: On an annual basis the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA) conducts an in-depth study and survey of how Americans spend their leisure time. This information provides the data necessary to overlay rate of participation onto the Primary Service Area to determine market potential. B*K takes the national average and combines that with participation percentages of the Primary Service Area based upon the age distribution, median income and region. Those four percentages are then averaged together to create a unique participation percentage for the service area. This participation percentage when applied to the population of the Primary Service Area then provides an idea of the market potential for various activities. Community Recreation Related Activities Participation: These activities are typical components of an active community recreation center. Table J-Recreation Activity Participation Rates for the Primary Service Area - $ ctnn " _ T` ., ... i .c u e ' . Regio atgoiltraig: :.ii*P.ge Aerobic 15.5% 17.6% 16.0% 15.3% 16.1% _ Baseball 4.7% 4.8% 6.1% 4.1% 4.9% Basketball 9.9% 8.8% 10.8% 8.9% 9.6% Cheerleading 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 1.2% 1.5% Exercise Walking 32.4% 35.4% 36.6% 33.4% 34.4% Exercise w/Equipment 17.8% 21.3% 22.8% 18.4% 20.1% Football (tackle) 3.0% 3.0% 2.6% 2.6% 2.8% Gymnastics 2.2% 1.8% 2.0% 1.8% 1.9% Hockey(ice) 1.3% 1.4% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% Lacrosse 0.2% 0.9% 0.6% 1.0% 0.7% Running/Jogging 15.6% 16.7% 16.9% 14.6% 15.9% Soccer 5.3% 4.7% 4.9% 4.5% 4.8% Softball 3.8% 4.1% 4.3% 3.5% 3.9% Swimming 16.9% 18.9% 16.6% 15.8% 17.1% Tennis 4.6% 5.1% 3.8% 4.4% 4.5% Volleyball 3.8% 4.2% 4.2% 3.5% 3.9% Weight Lifting 10.9% 14.4% 13.6% 10.9% 12.4% Workout @ Clubs 11.4% 15.0% 11.9% 11.8% 12.5% Wrestling 1.2% 1.2% 1.4% 1.1% 1.2% Yoga 9.0% 9.8% 8.9% 9.0% 9.2% r : 11%-;:,4b .. t .,. .. _' . ' L r. Ili 4.6,,ic- ` recti i ', s tlUn , .i teiao'°`. ... Did Not Participate 21.4% 18.3% 19.3% 21.8% 20.2% Age: Participation based on individuals ages 7&Up of the Primary Service Area. Income: Participation based on the 2014 estimated median household income in the Primary Service Area. Region: Participation based on regional statistics(West North Central). National: Participation based on national statistics. Average: Average of the four columns. 292 123 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Anticipated Participation Numbers by Activity: Utilizing the average percentage from Table-J above plus the 2010 census information and census estimates for 2014 and 2019(over age 7)the following comparisons can be made. Table K-Participation Rates Primary Service Area Activity Average 2010 Part. 2014 Part. 2019 Part. Difference Aerobic 16.1% 9,664 10,251 10,944 +1,280 Baseball 4.9% 2,954 3,133 3,345 +391 Basketball 9.6% 5,767 6,118 6,531 +764 Cheerleading 1.5% 908 963 1,028 +120 Exercise Walking 34.4% 20,687 21,944 23,427 +2,740 Exercise w/Equipment 20.1% 12,058 12,791 13,655 +1,597 Football (tackle) 2.8% 1,684 1,787 1,908 +223 Gymnastics 1.9% 1,167 1,238 1,322 +155 Hockey(ice)4 1.3% 752 798 852 +100 Lacrosse 0.7% 398 422 451 +53 Running/Jogging 15.9% 9,576 10,158 10,844 +1,268 Soccer 4.8% 2,909 3,086 3,294 +385 Softball 3.9% 2,362 2,506 2,675 +313 Swimming 17.1% 10,248 10,871 11,606 +1,357 Tennis 4.5% 2,690 2,854 3,046 +356 Volleyball 3.9% 2,359 2,503 2,672 +313 Weight Lifting 12.4% 7,477 7,932 8,468 +990 Workout @ Clubs 12.5% 7,516 7,973 8,512 +996 Wrestling 1.2% 736 781 833 +97 Yoga 9.2% 5,510 5,845 6,240 +730 Average 2010 Part. 2014 Part. 2019 Part. Difference Did Not Participate 20.2% 12,135 12,873 13,742 +1,607 Note: The estimated participation numbers indicated above are for various activities that could take place in an indoor community recreation facility in the City of Shakopee. These numbers do not translate into attendance figures for a facility in the Primary Service Area. Typically a private provider would want to capture between 10-15% of the market for various activities within a 5-mile radius of their establishment. The "Did Not Participate"statistics refers to all 51 activities outlined in the NSGA 2013 Survey Instrument. °BK has found that the activity participation percentage for Ice Hockey in Minnesota is understated and participation in Minnesota is greater than 1.3%. 292 124 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Participation by Ethnicity and Race: Participation in sports activities is also tracked by ethnicity and race. The table below compares the overall rate of participation nationally with the rate for Hispanics and African Americans. Utilizing information provided by the National Sporting Goods Association's 2013 survey, the following comparisons are possible. Table L-Comparison of National,African American and Hispanic Participation Rates Primary Service National African American Hispanic Area Participation Participation Participation Aerobic 16.1% 15.7% 15.6% 12.2% Baseball 4.9% 4.2% 2.9% 4.9% Basketball 9.6% 9.0% 13.2% 11.6% Cheerleading 1.5% 1.2% 1.4% 2.3% Exercise Walking 34.4% 35.8% 28.7% 28.1% Exercise w/Equipment 20.1% 35.8% 14.7% 15.5% Football (tackle) 2.8% 2.8% 6.5% 3.7% Gymnastics 1.9% 2.0% 1.3% 3.3% Hockey(ice) 1.3% 1.0% 1.1% 1.7% Lacrosse 0.7% 1.0% 1.1% 1.7% Running/Jogging 15.9% 14.0% 15.2% 15.3% Soccer 4.8% 4.8% 2.4% 7.6% Softball 3.9% 3.7% 3.0% 4.0% Swimming 17.1% 17.0% 5.8% 10.9% Tennis 4.5% 4.8% 2.6% 4.4% Volleyball 3.9% 3.6% 3.2% 5.0% Weight Lifting 12.4% 10.9% 10.1% 9.2% Workout @ Clubs 12.5% 12.3% 8.2% 9.7% Wrestling 1.2% 1.0% 1.8% 2.3% Yoga 9.2% 8.0% 7.8% 7.3% Did Not Participate 20.2% 21.9% 27.1% 25.6% Primary Service Part: The unique participation percentage developed for the Primary Service Area. National Rate: The national percentage of individuals who participate in the given activity. African American Rate: The percentage of African Americans who participate in the given activity. Hispanic Rate: The percentage of Hispanics who participate in the given activity. Based on the fact that there is not a significant Black or Hispanic population in the Primary Service Area, those participation rates become more relevant to the impact on overall participation percentages. 292 125 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Summary of Sports Participation: The following chart summarizes participation in both indoor and outdoor activities utilizing information from the 2013 National Sporting Goods Association survey. Table M-Sports Participation Summary Sport Nat'l Nat'l Participation Primary Primary Service Area% Ranks (in millions) Service Area Participation Exercise Walking 1 96.3 1 34.4% Exercising w/Equipment 2 53.1 2 20.1% Swimming 3 45.5 3 17.1% Aerobic Exercising 4 44.1 4 16.1% Running/Jogging 5 42.0 5 15.9% Workout @ Club 10 34.1 6 12.5% Weightlifting 11 31.2 7 12.4% _ Yoga 13 25.9 9 9.2% Basketball 14 25.5 8 9.6% Soccer 20 12.9 11 4.8% Tennis 21 12.6 12 4.5% Baseball 23 11.7 10 4.9% _ Volleyball 24 10.1 13 3.9% Softball 25 10.0 13 3.9% Football (tackle) 32 7.5 15 2.8% Gymnastics 39 5.1 16 1.9% Cheerleading 45 3.5 17 1.5% Hockey(ice) 46 3.4 18 1.3% Wrestling 48 3.1 19 1.2% Lacrosse 49 2.8 20 0.7% Nat'l Rank: Popularity of sport based on national survey. Nat'l Participation: Percent of population that participate in this sport on national survey. Primary Service%: Ranking of activities based upon average from Table-J. Primary Service Rank: The rank of the activity within the Primary Service Area. 'This rank is based upon the 51 activities reported on by NSGA in their 2013 survey instrument. 292 126 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review In addition to examining the participation numbers for various indoor activities through the NSGA 2013 Survey and the Spending Potential Index for Entertainment & Recreation, B*K can access information about Sports & Leisure Market Potential. Table N—Market Potential Index6 for Adult Participation in the Primary Service Area Adults participated in: Expected Number of Percent of Population MPI Adults Aerobics 5,492 10.8% 121 Baseball 2,400 4.7% 106 Basketball 4,385 8.6% 104 Football 2,874 5.7% 113 Ice Skating 1,562 3.1% 120 Jogging/Running 8,539 16.8% 132 Pilates 1,664 3.3% 118 Soccer 2,218 4.4% 116 Softball 1,813 3.6% 105 Swimming 9,908 19.5% 123 Tennis 2,738 5.4% 127 Volleyball 1,954 3.9% 109 Walking for Exercise 15,598 30.8% 110 Weightlifting 6,793 13.4% 126 Yoga 4,561 9.0% 126 Expected#of Adults: Number of adults, 18 years of age and older, participating in the activity in the Primary Service Area. Percent of Population: Percent of the service area that participates in the activity. MPI: Market potential index as compared to the national number of 100. 6 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services,applied to local demographic composition. 292 127 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Non-Sport Participation Statistics: It is recognized that most community centers are more than just sports oriented facilities. Participation in a wide variety of passive activities and cultural pursuits is common and essential to a well- rounded center. This information is useful in determining some of the program participation and revenue in the operations section of the report. While there is not an abundance of information available for participation in these types of activities as compared to sport activities, there are statistics that can be utilized to help determine the market for cultural arts activities and events. There are many ways to measure a nation's cultural vitality. One way is to chart the public's involvement with arts events and other activities over time. The NEA's Survey of Public Participation in the Arts remains the largest periodic study of arts participation in the United States, and it is conducted in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau. The large number of survey respondents—similar in make-up to the total U.S. adult population—permits a statistical snapshot of American's engagement with the arts by frequency and activity type. The survey has taken place five times since 1982, allowing researchers to compare the trends not only for the total adult population, but also for demographic subgroups.' 'National Endowment for the Arts,Arts Participation 2008 Highlights from a National Survey. 292 128 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Table 0-Percentage of U.S.Adult Population Attending Arts Performances: 1982-2008 Rate of Change 1982 19922002 2008 2002-2008 1982-2008 Jazz 9.6% 10.6% , 10.8% 7.8% -28% -19% Classical Music 13.0% 12.5% 11.6% 9.3% -20% -29% Opera 3.0% 3.3% 3.2% 2.1% -34% -30% Musical Plays 18.6% 17.4% 17.1% 16.7% -2% -10% Non-Musical Plays 11.9% 13.5% 12.3% 9.4% -24% -21% Ballet 4.2% 4.7% 3.9% 2.9% -26% -31% Smaller percentages of adults attended performing arts events than in previous years. • Opera and jazz participation significantly decreased for the first time, with attendance rates falling below what they were in 1982. • Classical music attendance continued to decline - at a 29% rate since 1982 - with the steepest drop occurring from 2002 to 2008 • Only musical play saw no statistically significant change in attendance since 2002. Table P-Percentage of U.S.Adult Population Attending Art Museums,Parks and Festivals: 1982-2008 Rate of Change 1982 1992 2002 2008 2002-2008 1982-2008 Art Museums/Galleries 22.1% 26.7% 26.5% 22.7% -14% +3% Parks/Historical Buildings 37.0% 34.5% 31.6% 24.9% -21% -33% Craft/Visual Arts Festivals 39.0% 40.7% 33.4% 24.5% -27% -37% Attendance for the most popular types of arts events-such as museums and craft fairs-also declined. • After topping 26% in 1992 and 2002, the art museum attendance rate slipped to 23 percent in 2008 - comparable to the 1982 level. • The proportion of the U.S.adults touring parks or historical buildings has diminished by one-third since 1982. Table Q-Median Age of Arts Attendees:1982-2008 Rate of Change 1982 1992 2002 2008 2002-2008 1982-2008 U.S.Adults,Average 39 41 43 45 +2 +6 Jazz 29 37 43 46 +4 +17 Classical Music 40 44 47 49 +2 +9 Opera 43 44 47 48 +1 +5 Musicals 39 42 44 45 +1 +6 Non-Musical Plays 39 42 44 47 +3 +8 Ballet 37 40 44 46 +2 +9 Art Museums 36 39 44 43 -1 +7 Long-term trends suggest fundamental shifts in the relationship between age and arts attendance. • Performing arts attendees are increasingly older than the average U.S.adult. • Jazz concert-goers are no longer the youngest group of arts participants. • Since 1982, young adult (18-24 year old) attendance rates have declined significantly for jazz, classical music, ballet,and non-musical plays. • From 2002 to 2008, however, 45-54 year olds-historically a large component of arts audiences-showed the steepest declines in attendance for most arts events. 292 129 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Table R-Percentage of U.S.Adult Population Performing or Creating Art: 1992-2008 Rate of Change 1992 2002 2008 2002-2008 1982-2008 Performing: Jazz 1.7% 1.3% 1.3% +0.0% -0.4% Classical Music 4.2% 1.8% 3.0% +1.2% -1.2% Opera 1.1% 0.7% 0.4% -0.3% -0.7% Choir/Chorus 6.3% 4.8% 5.2% +0.4% -1.1% Musical Plays 3.8% 2.4% 0.9% -1.5% -2.9% Non-Musical Plays 1.6% 1.4% 0.8% -0.6% -0.8% Dance 8.1% 4.3% 2.1% -2.2% -6.0% Making: Painting/Drawing 9.6% 8.6% 9.0% +0.4% -0.6% Pottery/Ceramics 8.4% 6.9% 6.0% -0.9% -2.4% Weaving/Sewing 24.8% 16.0% 13.1% -2.9% -11.7% Photography 11.6% 11.5% 14.7% +3.2% +3.1% Creative Writing 7.4% 7.0% 6.9% -0.1% -0.5% Adults generally are creating or performing at lower rates-despite opportunities for displaying their work line. • Only photography increased from 1992 to 2008-reflecting, perhaps,greater access through digital media. • The proportion of U.S.adults doing creative writing has hovered around 7.0 percent. • The rate of classical music performance slipped from 1992 to 2002 then grew over the next six years. • The adult participation rate for weaving or sewing was almost twice as great in 1992 as in 2008. Yet this activity remains one of the most popular forms of art creation. Table S-Percentage of U.S. Adult Population Viewing or Listening to Art Broadcasts or Recordings, 2008 (online media included) Atte Jazz 14.2% 31.9 Classical Music 17.8% _ 40.0 Latin or Salsa Music 14.9% 33.5 _ Opera 4.9% 11.0 Musical Plays 7.9% 17.8 Non-Musical Plays 6.8% 15.3 Dance 8.0% 18.0 Programs about the visual arts 15.0% 33.7 Programs about books/writers 15.0% 33.7 As in previous years,more Americans view or listen to broadcasts and recordings of arts events than attend them live. • The sole exception is live theater, which still attracts more adults than broadcasts or recordings of plays or musicals(online media included). • Classical music broadcasts or recordings attract the greatest number of adult listeners, followed by Latin or salsa music. • 33.7 million Americans listened to or watched programs or recordings about books. 292 130 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Below are listed those sports activities that would often take place either in an indoor community recreation facility, or in close proximity to, and the percentage of growth or decline that each has experienced nationally over the last 10 years (2004-2013). These activities could take place at the various facility types that the City is investigating. Additionally, this provides the City base-line information as to what they may expect with their current facility and program offerings. Table T-National Activity Trend(in millions) Sport/Activity 2013 Participation 2004 Participation Percent Change Yoga 25.9 6.3 +311.1% Wrestling 3.1 1.3 +138.5% Lacrosse$ 2.8 1.2 +133.3% Running/Jogging 42.0 24.7 +70.0% Aerobic Exercising 44.1 29.5 +49.5% Hockey(ice) 3.5 2.4 +45.8% Tennis 12.6 9.6 +31.3% Gymnastics9 5.1 3.9 +30.8% Weightlifting 31.3 26.2 +19.5% Exercise Walking 96.3 84.7 +13.7% Workout @ Club 34.1 31.8 +7.2% Exercising w/Equipment 53.1 52.2 +1.7% Soccer 12.8 13.3 -3.8% Volleyball 10.1 10.8 -6.5% Basketball 25.5 27.8 -8.3% Football(tackle) 7.5 8.2 -8.5% Cheerleading 3.5 4.1 -14.6% Swimming 45.5 53.4 -14.8% Softball 10.0 12.5 -20.0% Baseball 11.7 15.9 -26.4% 2013 Participation: The number of participants per year in the activity(in millions)in the United States. 2004 Participation: The number of participants per year in the activity(in millions)in the United States. Percent Change: The percent change in the level of participation from 2004 to 2013. 8 Participation trend since 2007. 9 Participation trend since 2009. 292 131 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Aquatic Activity and Facility Trends: Without a doubt the hottest trend in aquatics continues to be the leisure pool concept. This idea of incorporating slides, current channels, fountains, zero depth entry and other water features into a pool's design has proved to be extremely popular for the recreational user. The age of the conventional pool in most recreational settings has been greatly diminished. Leisure pools appeal to the younger children (who are the largest segment of the population that swim) and to families. These types of facilities can attract and draw larger crowds,and people tend to come from a further distance and stay longer to utilize such pools.This all translates into the potential to sell more admissions and increase revenues. It is estimated conservatively that a leisure pool can generate up to 20% to 25% more revenue than a comparable conventional pool and the cost of operation, while being higher, has been offset through increased revenues. Patrons seem willing to pay a higher user fee at a leisure pool than a conventional aquatics facility. Another trend that is growing more popular in the aquatic's field is the development of a raised temperature therapy pool for rehabilitation programs. A raised temperature therapy pool is typically developed in association with a local health care organization or a physical therapy clinic. The medical organization either provides capital dollars for the construction of the pool or agrees to purchase so many hours of pool time on an annual basis. This form of partnership has proven to be appealing to both the medical side and the organization that operates the facility. The medical sector receives the benefit of a larger aquatic center, plus other amenities that are available for their use, without the capital cost of building the structure. In addition, they can develop a much stronger community presence away from traditional medical settings. The facility operators have a stronger marketing position through an association with a medical organization and a user group that will provide a solid and consistent revenue stream for the center. This is enhanced by the fact that most therapy use times occur during the slower mid-morning or afternoon times in the pool and the center. Despite the recent emphasis on recreational swimming and therapy, the more traditional aspects of aquatics (including swim teams, instruction and aqua fitness) remain as the foundation for many aquatic centers. In the case of Shakopee the competitive swim demands are currently being met by existing aquatic providers. The multi-function indoor aquatic center concept of delivering aquatics services continues to grow in acceptance with the idea of providing for a variety of aquatics activities and programs in an open design setting that features a lot of natural light, interactive play features and access to an outdoor sundeck. The placing of traditional instructional/competitive pools, with shallow depth/interactive leisure pools and therapy water, in the same facility has been well received in the market. This idea has proven to be financially successful by centralizing pool operations for recreation service providers and through increased generation of revenues from patrons willing to pay for an aquatics experience that is new and exciting. Indoor aquatic centers have been instrumental in developing a true family appeal for community-based facilities. The keys to success for this type of center revolve around the concept of intergenerational use in a quality facility that has an exciting and vibrant feel in an outdoor like atmosphere. Also changing is the orientation of aquatic centers from stand-alone facilities that only have aquatic features to more of a full-service recreation center that has fitness, sports and community based amenities. This change has allowed for a better rate of cost recovery and stronger rates of use of the aquatic portion of the facility as well as the other "dry side"amenities. 292 132 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Due to the increasing recreational demands there has been a shortage in most communities of the following spaces: • Gymnasiums • Pools(especially leisure pools) • Weight/cardiovascular equipment areas • Indoor running/walking tracks • Meeting/multipurpose(general program)space • Senior's program space • Pre-school and youth space • Teen use areas • Fieldhouses As a result, many communities have attempted to include these amenities in public community recreation facilities. With the growth in youth sports and the high demand for school gyms, most communities are experiencing an acute lack of gymnasium space. Weight/cardiovascular space is also in high demand and provides a facility with the potential to generate significant revenues. The success of most recreation departments is dependent on meeting the recreational needs of a variety of individuals. The fastest growing segment of society is the senior population and meeting the needs of this group is especially important now and will only grow more so in the coming years. Indoor walking tracks, exercise areas, pools and classroom spaces are important to this age group. Marketing to the younger more active senior (usually age 55-70)is paramount,as this age group has the free time available to participate in leisure activities,the desire to remain fit,and more importantly the disposable income to pay for such services. Youth programming has always been a cornerstone for recreation services and will continue to be so with an increased emphasis on teen needs and providing a deterrent to juvenile crime. With a continuing increase in single parent households and two working parent families, the needs of school age children for before and after school child care continues to grow as does the need for preschool programming. As more and more communities attempt to develop community recreation facilities the issues of competition with other providers in the market area have inevitably been raised. The loudest objections have come from the private health club market and their industry voice IHRSA. The private sector has vigorously contended that public facilities unfairly compete with them in the market and have spent considerable resources attempting to derail public projects. However, the reality is that in most markets where public community recreation centers have been built, the private sector has not been adversely affected and in fact in many cases has continued to grow. This is due in large part to the fact that public and private providers serve markedly different markets. One of the other issues of competition comes from the non-profit sector (primarily YMCA's but also JCC's, and others), where the market is much closer to that of the public providers. While not as vociferous as the private providers, the non-profits have also often expressed concern over public community recreation centers. What has resulted from this is a strong growth in the number of partnerships that have occurred between the public and non-profit sector in an attempt to bring the best recreation amenities to a community. 292 133 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Community Center Benchmarks10: Based on market research conducted by Ballard*King&Associates at community centers across the United States,the following represents the basic benchmarks. • The majority of community centers that are being built today are between 65,000 and 75,000 square feet. Most centers include three primary components A) A pool area usually with competitive and leisure amenities, B) Multipurpose gymnasium space, and C) Weight/cardiovascular equipment area. In addition, most centers also have group exercise rooms,drop-in childcare,and classroom and/or community spaces. • For most centers to have an opportunity to cover all of their operating expenses with revenues,they must have a service population of at least 50,000 and an aggressive fee structure. • Most centers that are between 65,000 and 75,000 square feet have an operating budget of between$1,500,000 and $1,800,000 annually. Nearly 65% of the operating costs are from personnel services, followed by approximately 25%for contractual services,8%for commodities,and 2%for capital replacement. • For centers that serve a more urban population and have a market driven fee structure, they should be able to recover 70%to 100% of operating expenses. For centers in more rural areas the recovery rate is generally 50% to 75%. Facilities that can consistently cover all of their operating expenses with revenues are rare. The first true benchmark year of operation does not occur until the third full year of operation. • The majority of centers of the size noted (and in an urban environment) above average daily paid attendance of 800 to as much as 1,000 per day. These centers will also typically sell between 800 and 1,500 annual passes (depending on the fee structure and marketing program). • It is common for most centers to have a three-tiered fee structure that offers daily,extended visit(usually punch cards) passes, and annual passes. In urban areas it is common to have resident and non-resident fees. Non- resident rates can cost 25%to 50% higher than the resident rate and are usually a topic of discussion amongst elected officials. Daily rates for residents average between$3.00 and$6.00 for adults,$3.00 and$4.00 for youth and the same for seniors. Annual rates for residents average between $200 and $300 for adults, and $100 and $200 for youth and seniors. Family annual passes tend to be heavily discounted and run between $350 and $800. • Most centers are open an average of 105 hours a week, with weekday hours being 5:00 am to 10:00 pm, Saturdays 8:00 am to 8:00 pm and Sundays from noon to 8:00 pm. There is now a trend to open earlier on Sundays as well. Often hours are shorter during the summer months. 10 Note:These statistics vary by regions of the country. 292 134 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Demographic Summary & Market Review Sport Facilities Market Orientation: Based on the demographic makeup of the service areas and the trends in indoor sports and recreation amenities, there are specific market areas that need to be addressed with such community facilities. These include: General: 1.Youth sports—Given the demographic makeup of the primary service area and lack of available sports facilities in the area it is critical for any center developed in Shakopee to focus on providing practice and game space for a variety of sports.Sports teams and sport organizations have a tendency and capacity to pay premium fees for access and space.This revenue source is vital to the offset operating costs. 2. Drop-in recreation activities - Critical to the basic operation of any community sport center is the availability of the facility for drop-in use by the general public. This requires components that support drop-in use and the careful scheduling of programs and activities to ensure that they do not dominate the center and exclude the drop-in user. The sale of annual passes and daily admissions, potential strong revenue sources for a center, requires a priority for drop-in use. 3.Instructional programming-The other major component of a sport center's operation is a full slate of programs in a variety of disciplines. The center should provide instruction for a broad based group of users in a number of program areas. The primary emphasis should be on teaching basic skills with a secondary concern for specialized or advanced instruction. 4. Special events-There should be a market for special events including kid's birthday parties, sports tournaments and other special activities. The development of this market will aid significantly in the generation of additional revenues and these events can often be planned for before or after regular operating hours or during slow use times of the year. Care should be taken to ensure that special events do not adversely impact the everyday operations of the center. 5. Community rentals - Another aspect of a center's operation is providing space for rentals by civic groups or organizations as well as the general public. Gyms and multi-purpose rooms can be used as a large community gathering space and can host a variety of events from seminars, parties, receptions, arts and crafts sales and other events. It is important that a well-defined rental fee package is developed and the fee schedule followed closely. Rentals should not be done at the expense of drop-in use or programming in the center. 292 135 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment Section II—Program Assessment The following section details specific recommendations for the proposed expansion of the Shakopee Community Center. Remarks are grouped by area of interest and components. When combining the results of the demographic analysis, stakeholder group information, community survey and alternative service providers, the following preliminary program has been developed. Shakopee Community Center Gymnasium: One of the most frequently heard comments during the community stakeholder process is the need for more gymnasium space.The School District staff reported that the demand and request for gym space by local sport associations exceeds what the Schools can accommodate.As a result, many Shakopee based youth sport associations are having to travel outside of the City for access to indoor gym space.To compound this problem, the gymnasium space at the Community Center is limits and a significant portion of space has been dedicated to fitness. A large indoor sports space at least three full-sized basketball courts that can be used for a multitude of activities is recommended.The indoor sport space should be a separate enclosed space with a playing surface to accommodate a variety of programs including indoor soccer, in-line hockey, baseball batting cages, gymnastics, wrestling, basketball and volleyball. This space can also be used as trade show/convention space and collectively will provide for hosting events. If ice is re-purposed for sports courts It should be noted that having a new, expanded gymnasium facility in Shakopee will not eliminate the need for Parks and Recreation and youth sports associations to have access to School District facilities. In fact, the current use of school facilities will likely continue at the current level even with a new gymnasium facility added to the community inventory of space. Indoor Walking/logging Track:Walking is rated as the top activities according to the NSGA(National Sporting Goods Association) and represents over 128,000 people in the primary service area. Having an expanded opportunity to walk/jog in an indoor environment, especially during the harsh winters in Minnesota is important in attracting a wider variety of customers. Aquatics: Without doubt, a progressive and notable trend in aquatics continues to be the recreation pool concept. Incorporating water slides, current channels, fountains, zero depth entry and other water play features into a pool's design has proved to be extremely popular for the recreational user. Recreation pools appeal to the younger children (who are the largest segment of the population that swim) and to families. Creating a theme for the indoor recreation pool is important for enhancing the swimming experience and creating a unique marketing opportunity. These types of facilities are able to attract and draw larger crowds and people tend to come from a further distance and stay longer to utilize such pools. This all translates into the potential to sell more admissions and increase revenues. It is estimated conservatively that a recreation pool can generate up to 25%to 30% more revenue than a comparable conventional pool and the cost of operation, while being higher, may be offset through increased revenues. Of note is the fact that patrons seem willing to pay a higher user fee for a leisure pool than a conventional aquatic facility. However, that being said, building an indoor recreation pool will compete with the City's outdoor pool during the summer months. Careful consideration should be given to selecting aquatic components that do not duplicate the components at the outdoor pool. 292 136 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment The School District has a competitive pool that is meeting the competitive swim needs of the community and consequently a competitive lap pool is not recommended at this time. The YMCA has a zero depth entry but lacks many of the components found in leisure pools today.The YMCA pool is available to members only and public access to the School District pool is limited and the water temperatures are too cold for recreation programming. The recommendation to not include a competitive swim venue is also influenced by the fact that most competitive swimming pools' require a significant subsidy to offset operating cost.The limited use and fee elasticity competitive swimmers are willing to pay are obstacles in recovering a greater percentage of operating cost through revenues. Fitness: Statistically, exercise walking, exercise with equipment and aerobic exercise all rank in the top fifteen activities/sports mo,t popular in the U.S, according to the National Sporting Goods Association statistics. Exercise and fitness are one of the components that will drive membership,daily admission and participation.As a result,the fitness component has become the cornerstone for many community centers by virtue of generating revenue and participation. In addition, fitness activities appeal to a wide range of ages to help combat obesity along with improving the quality of one's life. Obesity is becoming an epidemic in the United States, especially for youth. Youth fitness is one component that can help address this issue locally and will differentiate the proposed community center from other facilities. However,fitness also is the one component that will create the greatest opposition from the private sector and the YMCA. The private sector will claim unfair competition but the reality is that the private sector caters to a different market niche than a public center, which has more on community. Clearly the private fitness providers in Shakopee have a singular focus for adult fitness and do not want more competition in the market place. The private sector realizes the importance of the fitness market and tries to promote themselves as public service providers. The fee structure programming and operating practices employed by the private sector is significantly different than a community-based center. As a result, there is enough market and difference in the operating philosophy and practices for the private sector and public facility to operate in the same service area. An area within the fitness component that can accommodate health screenings and testing along with a treatment area will supplement the fitness programs and use.The fitness component of the proposed center will generate the most revenue per square foot within the facility and consequently should not be undersized or underemphasized. The existing space in the Community Center is simply too small to accommodate program demand and membership access. Group fitness space is another supplemental area required for reaching the fitness and wellness market.The demand for Yoga, Zumba, Pilates, Spinning and group exercise is growing. Interest and participation in fitness classes are on the rise nationally, recording a significant increase in participation over the past 10 years. Group fitness space was strongly supported in the community stakeholder meetings, especially by existing group exercise participants. Group fitness space has proved to be a popular amenity in centers around the country and it is not uncommon to have between 25-40 classes per week in these spaces. At least two fitness studios are needed to meet the demand for group fitness classes. Field House/Multi-purpose Sport Courts: Some interest was expressed for a field house/multi-purpose sport courts to expand training opportunities for, soccer, lacrosse, baseball, softball, basketball and volleyball. Since most of this interest was generated from competitive sport organizations and high school sports teams, a field house/multi- purpose sport courts component is not recommended at this time.Additional field house/multi-purpose sport courts gymnasium space is a project better suited for the School District to pursue. 292 137 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment Synthetic Turf Field: There are various delivery methods should the City of Shakopee decide to include a synthetic turf field in the future. A model that installs an inflatable bubble over a synthetic turf field for winter use might be the most economical model. Synthetic turf field space could include a 200M track around the perimeter to expand track opportunities and exercise walking/jogging. Another model is to construct an hard-shell enclosure that makes synthetic turf field space available on year around basis in a controlled environment. However, participation and use of this type during summer months decreases significantly as people want to be outside during the warm weather months.A turf component,which could be a joint project with the City and School District, is an ideal component to consider as part of a phasing plan. Meeting Room/Classroom/Multi-Purpose: Multi-purpose meeting room space was supported through the stakeholder process.There were several different opinions as to what size this multi-purpose space should be. Multi- purpose space in centers' provides support for other activities in a center, class room opportunities, meetings and small receptions.A sufficient amount of square footage is needed for meetings and multi-purpose space. Historically, meeting room space does not generate enough revenue to be a self-supporting component. However, these spaces are valuable as support spaces and the multi-use flexibility enables the facility to meet a wide variety of program needs. The classrooms are needed to meet a wide range for programs that have a multi-generational appeal and help meet the non-sport needs of the community. Ice Arena: Without question the strongest need and interest in expanding facility opportunities was for another sheet of ice. Hockey is very popular in the Minnesota and the Twin Cities area and Shakopee could easily fill the available prime time ice with a second sheet of ice. There is a level of efficiency that must be considered when adding a second sheet of ice. The operating costs for a second sheet of ice will increase somewhere between 50%- 60%but the operating income will likely double. In addition to a second sheet of ice there is a need for expanding the support spaces associated with expanding locker room and dry land training facilities along with integration into the existing facility and traffic flow. There are some legitimate concerns if and how a second sheet of ice fits on the existing Community Center site and how to integrate a second sheet of ice from a building flow, parking and access control perspective that merit consideration for exploring an alternative site for the Ice Arena. Teen Center: The existing Enigma Teen Center within the Community Center represents about 5,000 SF of program space. By nature this space is very flexible without the limitations of walls and or heavy equipment to impede easy set-up and tear-down for activities.The wide variety of equipment and activities that include play stations,TV, music, game tables and special gathering space is attractive to the "tween" population. Currently the Engima Teen Center operates about 40 hours per week or about only 38% of the time the Community Center is open. Consideration should be given to expanding the use of this space beyond the 6th-12 grade market. Senior Center: The Senior's attending the stakeholder meetings were very vocal about wanting to continue senior programming activities at the Community Center. There was no interest in having a dedicated senior center located somewhere else in the community. Instead, seniors are looking for program space within the Community Center and most of the senior program needs can be met with classroom/meeting room space, expanded fitness space and gymnasium space being proposed.Some of the seniors were open to using the Enigma Teen Center for programming or social activities during the day as long as there was adequate lightings. However, if the Enigma Teen Center is not used for senior programming then consideration should be given to provide the senior some dedicated space within the community center. 292 138 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment Child Watch Area: Many of the stakeholders were very vocal about having access to child watch at the Community Center. In most community center settings a child watch operation will only recover 40%-60%of the cost to provide the child watch services. However, having access to child watch for parents will increase facility membership and program participation. Many facilities look at child watch as a membership service that supports programming and membership. Indoor Playground/Birthday Party Room/Game Room: A major focus on the programming of the building centers on youth. These spaces are designed to attract young people to the proposed community center and provide the spaces that differentiate the Shakopee facility from other service providers. The indoor themed playground introduces a concept for indoor recreation that has proven successful in the Twin Cities by providing a themed playground designed to attract elementary and pre-school aged children. The proposed Shakopee expansion, by virtue of the facility components and attractions, will generate a tremendous interest for birthday parties. To meet this anticipated market for birthday parties two specially designed rooms to accommodate birthday parties are needed.The game room provides an area for young people and teenagers to gather to enjoy games and socializing in a controlled area and also can be the same space senior citizens use during day time hours when young people are in school. In addition to the aquatic area,the indoor play feature of this component will provide the "wow"factor that will attract young people to the proposed recreation center. The proposed center should have a "family" orientation and meet the broad based leisure and health needs of the community. Multi-use, flexibility of space and versatility of operation are important and the facility should not be seen as just a sports center.The focus of the center's diverse market segments and activities should be a function of time rather that space. Intergenerational use must be emphasized and the center needs to truly have something for everyone. The ability to deal with the delicate balance between programming and drop-in needs will determine how accessible the facility will be perceived. Programs(leagues and classes)clash with drop-in users and can become very disruptive to drop-in users and care must be given to manage the balance between drop-in activities and programming needs. 292 I 39 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment Program Recommendations The focus of the overall project is on meeting the community's recreational and wellness needs of the City of Shakopee. Based on feedback collected from community stakeholder and public input sessions, and the goal of making a facility as self-sustaining as possible,the following represents the program recommendation. Gymnasium—A sport space that is approximately 15,000 sq.ft.and divisible into three gym areas(each with a 50'by 84" basketball court)by a drop curtain.The main gymnasium space should be set up for a variety of activities including youth/adult basketball,youth/adult volleyball and potential convention/trade show space. Portable seating should be included (tip and roll type bleachers). Expand Running/Jogging/Walking Track—A ten-foot wide track that surrounds the gymnasium and goes through other parts of the facility that can be used for walking or jogging.The track expansion is approximately 5,000 sq.ft. Ice Rink—An area of about 30,000 for another sheet of ice and adequate locker room space, storage and dry land training facility. Aerobic/Fitness/Dance Area-An area approximately 2,000 SF that features a mirrored wall, dance bars mounted on the wall, free-floating impact floor, sound system, storage area and storage cubbies. This space would be used for aerobics, dance, pilates, and martial arts programs. A smaller auxiliary fitness room of approximately 1,000 SF is recommended to accommodate spinning classes,yoga and smaller classes not requiring the size of the main aerobic room. This room should also have a free-floating wood floor and adjustable lighting to adjust/modify the environment for yoga and relaxation classes. Aquatic Area — Recognizing the importance of competitive swim needs, the consulting team strongly believes the community needs are currently greatest for the therapeutic and recreational aquatic elements. A space that is approximately 14,000 sq ft. including a lap pool for fitness activities and swimming lessons, as well as an indoor family recreational pool is recommended. The recreational pool should be designed around a specific theme with features that include zero depth entry, current channels, and other water play features. The aquatic area should be supported by a whirlpool bath and separate teaching/therapy pool that can accommodate rehabilitation, lap swimmers and swim lessons. The overall aquatic design should account for a future expansion of a competitive swimming venue.This will give the community flexibility to decide how a venue like this could better align with future community development strategies. 292 140 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment Weight/Cardiovascular Area—An area of at least 6,000 sq. ft.that includes free weights, selectorized machines and cardiovascular equipment for youth and adult fitness, sport specific training, rehab/exercise and stretching. In addition,a space of approximately 200 sq.ft.dedicated to health screenings and personal training client space. Multi-Purpose Room —A space of about 3,500 sq. ft. that can be divided into smaller rooms for multiple program functions. This space would be used for community rentals as well. A small catering kitchen for food service with direct access to the meeting room is desirable.Also a small sink for cleanup and storage cabinet for program supplies is required. Indoor Playground-A themed area designed for children ages 1-10 featuring a fun land with creative and interactive play equipment including a complex matrix of tubes, spiral slides, climbing apparatus, interactive music, hollow logs, and multi-level play structure. This space should be approximately 1,000 sq.ft. Game Room—An area of about 500 SF that creates a game room with pool table,air hockey, ping-pong,foosball and limited video games. This space has multigenerational appeal as seniors may use equipment during the day and youth/families use the equipment in the evening. Birthday Party Rooms —Two rooms of approximately 400 sq. ft. each that is immediately adjacent to the leisure swimming pool and indoor play area. These rooms will be used to host birthday parties and serve as a (messy arts class room). Child Watch Area:This space requires about 1,200 SF with a separate quiet room and activity room that includes an area for the children to play games and toys.The childcare area should be adjacent to outdoor space and have direct access to the indoor playground. Ideally the childcare area is located near the lobby of the building with good visibility from the front desk or administrative area. Support Spaces—There must be sufficient space and resources allocated for the following: Lobby/lounge space Front desk area Resource area Restrooms/Locker Rooms Concession and vending Office space Storage,storage and more storage Mechanical systems 292 141 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study MARKET ANALYSIS: Program Assessment Preliminary Program Summary. Based on the program assessment the following program summary is possible for the proposed Shakopee Community Center. Spaces are listed in square foot estimates and does not take into account re-purposing existing space within the Shakopee Community Center. Component Base Facility Aquatic Area 14,500 Gymnasium 15,000 Ice Rink 30,000 Track 5,000 Weight/Cardio 6,000 Aerobic/Dance 3,000 Multipurpose Room 3,500 Babysitting 1,200 Birthday Party Rooms 800 Indoor Play Area 1,000 Game Room 500 Support Spaces 19,500 Net Building 100,000 Circulation (18%) 18,000 Total Building 118,000 Note:This is a preliminary facility program only and is pending approval of the study committee.Validation of the square footage,and circulation percentage needs to be verified by 292 Architects. 292 142 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study PROGRAM: New Ice Facility Shakopee Ice Arena/Shakopee,Minnesota New Building:Preliminary Building Program 3/30/2015 Rinks and Associated Areas SF # ,, Ice Sheet 17602 2 35,204 Deck Area(incl.deck around both ice sheets) 7957 1 7,957 Seating(831) 4261 1 4,261 Seating(360)Portable bleachers on lower level 3203 1 3,203 Sub-Total 50,625 Mechanical/Electrical/Storage Ice Mechanical Room(Refrigeration) 987 1 987 Resurfacer Room 1322 1 1,322 Resurfacer Room 1270 1 1,270 Mechanical/Electrical Room 602 1 602 Mechanical/Electrical/Sprinkler Room 523 1 523 Elevator Equipment Room 43 1 43 Sub-Total 4,747 arm., Team Room:Visitor 902 1 902 Team Room(HS Men;Varsity&JV) 1351 1 1,351 Team Room(HS Women;Varsity&JV) 1315 1 1,315 Team Rooms 432 8 3,456 Team Room(with toilet&showers) 658 1 658 Figure Skating Room(12'x12'min.) 206 1 206 Coaches Room (12'x12'or 10'x10') 180 2 360 Coaches Room (12'x12'or 10'x10') 171 1 171 SHA Office 180 1 180 Referees Office 166 1 166 Referees Office 158 1 158 Toilets(Unisex) 56 4 224 Storage 143 2 286 Storage 432 1 432 Sub-Total 9,865 Skating Support Spaces Dryland Training 5016 1 5,016 Janitor&Storage 532 1 532 Skate Changing Area 438 1 438 Sub-Total 5,986 Lobby(incl.concess.seating,vending,trophy cases&vestibule' 7930 1 7,930 Pro-Shop/Ticketing 479 1 479 Manager Office 243 1 243 Concessions w/prep&storage 811 1 811 Multi-purpose Meeting Room(s) 3228 1 3,228 Public Toilet Rooms(Men:Main Lobby) 357 1 357 Public Toilet Rooms(Women:Main Lobby) 504 1 504 Public Toilet(Unisex) 79 1 79 Public Toilet Rooms(Men:Upper Level) 236 1 236 Public Toilet Rooms(Women:Upper Level) 302 1 302 Janitor 61 1 61 Sub-Total 14,230 Circulation(first level) 4920 1 4,920 Circulation(second level) 2769 1 2,769 Contingency(walls thickness,etc.) 5,422 292 143 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study PROGRAM: Repurposed community Center Shakopee Repurposed Ice Arena/Shakopee,Minnesota Renovation:Preliminary Building Program 3/30/2015 Aquatics(Additional 1334 SF at corner extension) 16683 Party Room 598 Women's Locker Room 1658 Sauna 105 Family Locker Room 1238 Men's Locker Room 1453 Aquatics Office 220 Lifeguard Room 130 Aquatics Mechanical 1005 Storage 1116 Sub-Total 24206 Gymnasium 12400 Multi-purpose 2921 Multi-purpose storage 438 Party Room 947 Storage 947 Janitor 230 Storage 1079 Women's Locker Room 1402 Men's Locker Room 1392 Men's Toilet 255 Women's Toilet 255 Janitor 27 Elevator Mechanical 77 Sub-Total 22370 Party Room 711 Office Area 2288 Teen/Senior Center 2854 Childcare 2007 Storage 944 Mechanical 928 Spinning 862 Stretching 835 Fitness Studio 1 2023 Fitness Studio 2 2026 Weight/Cardio 5903 Playground(Additional 627 SF at entry) 1560 Fitness Lockers 280 Sub-Total 23221 Subtotal:All Building Program Spaces 69797 Lower Level SF(Existing SF&additional SF inAaquatics and Playground as noted.Also includes circulation space,mechanical spaces and wall thicknesses) 61170 Upper Level SF(Existing SF&additional SF inAaquatics and Playground as noted.Also includes circulation space,mechanical spaces and wall thicknesses) 36205 Note:Italicized spaces indicate existing,unchanged program areas 292 144 D Ery>> v E c EIII Si =..Oa)Na Nu o u-. °,m ° E a c 7 w u c v c m m E a M o CO a- u ea no o wmCw z c 3 aaoma a - 3 X o3EOV ° o v _ aN °' .- v 5 a a w azr. 0= $y 1- o ° w cu '° `°a al o .c_cotim- ' a-°c«y aa v i= V 'av m a Zvo0v-el • a nwcoE COo u nfE u E .ffll v 3 a co U 0 1:1411 M U U / m N lIiooh <= U ! .O, Oji .� _ ' -- — tee, ii�� )pOP lilik��ii k 6 / t N SY _0; Miii00 b) k k!-_...........,..irt! r .... „, ,, � ..t {�ot . „ , • ,,,,,. . tib„ ...... N ...._. ..... a 1. �U I c Y , ,. / O O ii 1T T a i . 0 i,„ _ ___ Ip_ �i ,� dui 1--- —JL u —a `a:,. - <-1-' iL' — �.i- 4 r 4, , , / ---I, 0 iiii ! 1 1� - _ 1 l l I I I I I I I I I O _ _ - j 40 . w• ri > C°-o c8c $ `c ° A g m«L oco 0 > G - G f Nc W � Na « O R a�=,, - E v" E ✓ > vGDaC w Fl.,C too' ` aO o NNou E a E o 2 a - wu v o 0-o 11888-2ya aao aav E0.-i LL Fie-2 aEav9 L , a . Ec-oaYN C c ,, Y apNCh 2O ,i, .i O aCC « ` CDmKC 2 :7,46: E _2.= m0 C -Ng aawO mCNa Urc. p « a @g :-.. cm aE rN ALyU- 41 " me m Ny 2ma o u a0aEu .9 E av _ z a 0 cau aYom ^ E LE m o >0o 0 o 7,.E, m N a « ua U c m m a n 1tiU'OZ L 0 LE SE " ao • lifluui m .' a c L'. G q L N a. p .^ mW O « d a, «7.Y. u u g E ` u te uN ,Oa « A a u 2' o >uymm NCw a .111-11ill ,„' o a» c a, C W Mk, Qymm gimmYwL . gm a > m p1 I La 5- c aor 5-7111n sag mAa � aaill :°,33 L to O T U NL. NL 0 0 0 0 ,0 0411k a J 0 4. 0 0 ih ii.' JEW EVn P 9 imaiNIE INI ��a 1 _ _ them - i g lifj_T_*V g' < i' .11111Mail 11 1 Il M. ` i Ar o- dhGl �?{11 i�! ' 1.4 000 d Ilrir s •! a 7 itphi owe" I� Hir; 1�� . •* 0 ig O o 0 @ d R y ill ¢ X16 A Z '.- 0 0 ,. Qp V I 41/ ° ° ' r in .s. 0 1:I ,,. rier...1 i �.®..s�.:: ,. art. ,_ .. •.h r i r I i -ate a m AL uJJ _1 _ Tu ',`r=_-, ' % nS . v 3 c ^a >. gilt oc ; D .- 2.110 ,z, 7, c, _ UaC H tvE U = 5 El' glii «� LLj '0 a mmo" a ° 3 "'— 'u m E oym V r ° nn 0 � nacEm ocLLl °' vEii En' p ' c a., acctc ° wx. Jw' S amz w a a ua` doaY CO o « n mc vF u E.-.2..9- .0c o� z .,z i T °' $ yN,a -b >' m `6; cc U t ` 74a« z Y m3me u m E E c a .§ w 'E Q c t w g o m IAN u :442 .7 ?-:t C pp 0. E 21120 e Na c « F,3 !4 n E o , m:rt.; :1 n o m w g y '0'.52` 5 o L ° c a ✓ Ev c „ I > v '° a « v E • mmrt $ no iO fE03a mL. n . QYIH i :c4.. n, _c V 8 V 0 0 1%' II Cr . 0% 0 y M 1 CO Ask ' 1 0 O O • 1 0-- O O 0 n • • • • • • a •• • 0 > " y .1°.. c a mu a% er v oNU a Op 01 c LW 0 ta a3 c Y W Y >c v <N W Zy « u a 'm c ° mU a O, c • GL0dN 13cNWc m c Jg dNU - 1ca raV _ vciE a .Ny « . 10 a ny LVt% Nl � it--' « 2 E C Ol C .« W A Y u J C O L m 1O 0 vl O'C O—a A 1.1 = U O u m L a s >N E ii Ol y Y y c vYJi N `m Y C O E «ET of a m° aoi E c m 3 'c " ,..,_.. 0., °i v v d v N o«c 3-oo ip Cs- g E 5 '°a Ow mm A E �' v al E :15.« �n y. va �a cL�t v U E a cL n— ,� o a E o« ., a «.a « a' '6 Eme ,9'Lv, 3 u o F1, c $ Nue m u cm 3.o..t E v c v c O ,2 ., N c m N N C U d Y N t A O O m'O^'OO L Yn L O d j a 3 aJ 2 c 9 c v 3 E " o.v y n u c.� v > ° 2 o v_ S w c 0 2 -0 Y L L C O �^ N C 01 EE v n u« c Y. > m 6 m a L a w o E o 3 is m > Y u c o O cc k-61-42 ,6./lo N. ET d E�✓' d ,'O N p u y m N '6 a a 87, 1GL NmF5 � N a HIUHuIilIh2ilU!il aacvd. ooaOo Lac cv « E vm aw = E 0ciNyL c va o! 2LO Y $¢ u 5 W.H 3 3 v v .V H ca Lu t ( <1 ilti j Q\i� pF0 >,1;41,01 3 t"Y — W lip l L / Cpl / e I - 1 0 0 Y u h `i k''^ oda, 1. ¢01, 1`y i \\` z�� H l v w — Z i 1 - 11 )U JU L Milk" w JU�ao L w4 �o'oo c =, s o I1111111 iwo E BE "Ii F / / I— Iw ,ILIuu n._..Jr�nn I>I O N 0 a I/ — I I R' rc" a' CO G 1 i L-- n tm Ev 4,f. a .-Yv1pts U5E v N ° C ?'O O O t C C W J Qd N C > o E £= w ` v5 c E ay 32., a 1aao• £ m wu «,o = f mm 3mm ^ w `mc v « cc0i u v „ a osca cy q. v Aim a « wm . ?y _ cc. ° ° °z 21 a, E vm w mIw7 ° e =o oy ` > oad ` — m •o rE o w c u E o c �' a w m o r a E m oE3 ° ; r, E ° � , Eo ° E cw .=to m d-c> o [2'u. Y Em E w E c E c si « 4,p Y m m`0 tog c E L a c ° m�n v coo E a t vLi i °' a £ ,it gg rI1ll.i:IiIflhII 2 PI law )Ai ?41 1.,2 II, Idilli V 1m G PyFI Q% F N I r I4,2L f ''' OM AN.- r,,,,,, 7171 b,, — I�, r MI,TI 3 tt w x Iio :o---`-1o: v rj _t - w `£ :LL C� g o ► F 17 11.. I d it i ma IQ K CE ' J 5 n/ o A 2 � r� ti► 0 ��orrr ,—= :r�ir r r�r 11► LLQ I /► o I „ 0 Y v - Nv o o cm o a d ° tim ° a c3 c _:ilENccNUo `▪ c c -a ,"3-g.7°. ° o«vi to 10 c m °m 2 ,1g v l-.. "=m -22 .T . "' m d E - t2 ;' 1;-: `" g ' c °a C0 r, ., ,, .r, ., ,, . v° u o o.m oaE £▪as3 ° O —4 dV ° ` ud - dON NOtm 8 .o m 5O £.° u „ cU Cd ' =Ecv '64 � 900., EoA ri cd «nE 2 ticoo flHflil AiimX2CUOUvE OqyCO 1 1 0 ,..,r -__--1 • 4 0I I 1* ; 1 1 I 0 &1"1,x3■ II; Io . i vei II 11 iiiiiiliteW.1 ' _\ 'Uri, I , Ai 1 a0' n� 1 qLice tr_ta ` ',. ��' a , C) z S ,,C�f��y s 3 6 O O A i:�N'JeS36262 6•a - 0 a la be ..... €. �u...� ina�� S121f10ONVId 21001d 13A31213ddf1 O — Mil a t+ a Z6Z I it I NIC33dON9NS A,i N LL ® gal 1 a m 3SOd2111d•321 VN32JV 331 Q° VN321V 33133dONVHS C C o E N >. w l7 N C ' - 1 G -2 E 0 , 111111 O ,1IIIIII� V Q 4 N a C- Y0 CL N Vf w C O Q V v Ln Lu 1 , V z n C 1 V A I o I a I o r -I.lff-- ffir #141444 o ti 7i i C c Ii C cL c ills --.,.. / C11111 1 \ O c_), 1 \ 5$ ',_ _iZ E ill .-..... ,-- P i 11 3' () 0 () iii 111111 ,, �� § e 111111 >° 1 0 ( ) 0 q 11111111.1 n \ C .m 1111vl ! CIo ) m.�,_| WI | �` ,ts ,® _. z6z |l | V ®g Qit !_ , ,, It / - % ^ i.u cc \ /7-110: �L, /E. t» l -.- 1 \ e mu . - }�/ LIJ E. n U :: :�< i m: _ „,:iir r- � \, U ......) _.....9 V. w ° r- x_ : num, — E1 r2»5 / \ZMI�14 /& #& / Ja.. ; ! / « ; , --� , !ab _ƒ S± . . . i 1 / \ . . I . •: . / .4 , , !E o \ \ 1 I ~ 0 ',7 , § /_ i ; i ; . § / | // / § / )}z I ^ � t 0/ // / X . . /ii/ -o c J .. ........ f+O nN�iS_.cZR 11 I O S , 11$ 9 {6 NVld 2i001313A31ii3MOl £ NW'33dONVHS p I ) ISe CIZ6Z 11 1 ra 31 9 M 0 NOIlI00tl tlN3Ntl 301 LL , B €#a - VN3V 33133dOHtlHS Q O C O 77 II c U Q 1--� 'E v °r- /- -1/ r o A I e 1 I vill xV r ZS TW H d w O V ,L-,--)_ ; a 1, 7r4 m 1 (1111111111111111.1V � if/I.3...„. +I l �" 00 3,_ .tl I ioe s8 i�w a8 — ✓- U Wm. - a < A kW IkW 'LCt EN 1 z• 0 \ 00000 1 .I. I ? il ,„,._ ,, I I . I, 1 11031,11 y O O On 1 H03W 1 ,a«t s: 4015 a` in i 8 zri 8 : I II. • '" 0.C 2'1K City of Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study BUILDING SYSTEMS When preparing the cost estimates for the new ice facility, the following assumptions were made regarding the building materials and systems. They outline the basis for facility quality level. • Precast concrete wall panels with grey concrete and colored aggregate • R-30 insulated roof with white EPDM roofing over long- span steel bar joists and metal decking • Brick or stone accents at front entry • Aluminum storefront and glass at main entry • Concrete block interior walls,painted • Stained concrete lobby floor • Tile walls in public restrooms • Precast concrete bleachers with aluminum plank seating • High efficiency high bay lighting in the arenas,and high efficiency lighting in the support spaces • Rubber flooring throutghout the team rooms,hallways, and rink access • Industrial Ammonia indirect refrigeration system with concrete rink floors and heat reclaim for sub-soil heating system and snow melt pit • Desiccant dehumidification systems • HVAC rooftop units with energy reclaim • Complete fire protection system • Carpeting in offices and meeting rooms Detailed cost estimates are included in the following section. 292 154 City of Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study COST ESTIMATE: New Ice Arena CONSTROCTiOk 292 155 City of Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study Cr ESTIMATE DATE: February 24, 2015 PROJECT: Shakopee Ice Arena (New 2 Sheet Arena) Vil ARCHITECT: 292 Design Group DRAWING DATE: January 26,2015 CONSTRUCTION Site Paving $267,225 $2.66 Site Concrete $98,024 $0.98 Site Utilities Allowance $150,000 $1.49 Landscaping Allowance $50,000 $0.50 Survey $25,068 $0.25 General Conditions $806,992 $8.04 Final Clean $25,105 $0.25 General Liability Insurance $149,321 $1.49 Builders Risk Insurance $32,579 $0.32 Building Permit $150 477 $1.50 Bond $95,552 $0.95 Subtotal Construction Costs $14,064596 $139.44 Escalation $420,078 $4.18 Contingency $721,134 $7.18 Contractor's Fee $454,314 $4.52 Total Construction Estimate $15,598,122 $155.33 Owner Costs SAC/WAC Fees $0 $0.00 Owner Furniture&Equipment $0 $0.00 Phone and Data $0 $0.00 Audio Visual $0 $0.00 Security Systems $0 $0.00 Owner Moving Expense $0 $0.00 Owner Artwork and Signage $0 $0.00 Subtotal Owner Costs $0 $0.00 Design Fees Arch. Design Fees $1,091,869 $10.87 Subtotal Design Fees $1,091,869 $10.87 Contingency Owner Contingency $0 $0.00 Subtotal Contingency $0 $0 00 Total Project Estimate $16,689,990 $166.21 56 City of Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study COST ESTIMATE: New Ice Arena CONSTRUCTION 292 157 City of Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study COST ESTIMATE: Repurposed Community Center CONSTRUCTION 292 158 City of Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study COST ESTIMATE: Repurposed Community Center ESTIMATE DATE: March 30, 2015 PROJECT: Shakopee Indoor Aquatics ARCHITECT: 292 Design Group DRAWING DATE: March 23, 2015 CONSTRUCTION Contingency $459,695 $7.85 Contractor's Fee $337,876 $5.77 Total Construction Estimate $9,991,470 $170.64 Owner Costs SACJWAC Fees $0 $0.00 Owner Furniture&Equipment $0 $0.00 Phone and Data $0 $0.00 Audio Visual $0 $0.00 Security Systems $0 $0.00 Owner Moving Expense $0 $0.00 Owner Artwork and Signage $0 $0.00 Subtotal Owner Costs $0 $0.00 Design Fees Arch. Design Fees $699,403 $11.94 Subtotal Design Fees $699,403 $11.94 Contingency Owner Contingencyp $ $0.00 Subtotal Contingency $0 $0.00 Total Project Estimate $10,690,873 $182.59 Indoor Aquatics Preliminary Estimate: $6,700,000 Community Center/Aquatics Upgrades Preliminary Estimate: $3,291,470 Sports Dome Budget: $5,500,000- $6,000,000 59 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Operations The operations analysis represents a conservative approach to estimating expenses and revenues and was completed based on the best information available and a basic understanding of the project. Fees and charges utilized for this study reflect a philosophy designed to meet a reasonable cost recovery rate and existing rate structure and are subject to review, change, and approval by the City of Shakopee. The operations plan has been assembled by the major program area being considered by the City of Shakopee.There is no guarantee that the expense and revenue projections outlined in the operations analysis will be met as there are many variables that affect such estimates that either cannot be accurately measured or are subject to change during the actual budgetary process. Expenditures Expenditures have been formulated on the costs that were designated by Ballard*King and Associates to be included in the operating budget for the facility. The figures are based on the size of the center, the specific components of the facility,and the hours of operation. All expenses were calculated to the high side and the actual cost may be less based on the final design,operational philosophy,and programming considerations adopted by the City.The operating pro-forma was formulated using the following hours of operation for building the operating model.Hours usually vary some with the season (longer hours in the winter, shorter during the summer), by programming needs, use patterns and special events.The projected hours of operation of the community center are as follows: Monday—Friday 5:30am to 10:00pm. Saturday 6:00am to 10:00pm. Sunday Noon-8:OOpm Revenues The following revenue projections were formulated from information on the specifics of the project and the demographics of the service area as well as comparing them to national statistics, other similar facilities and the competition for recreation services in the area. Actual figures will vary based on the size and make-up of the components selected during final design, market stratification, philosophy of operation, fees and charges policy, and priority of use. All revenues were calculated conservatively as a result. Future years:Expenditures—Revenue Comparison:Operation expenditures are expected to increase by approximately 3%a year through the first 3 to 5 years of operation.Revenue growth is expected to increase by 4%to 8%a year through the first three years and then level off with only a slight growth(3%or less)the next two years. Expenses for the first year of operation should be slightly lower than projected with the facility being under warranty and new. Revenue growth in the first three years is attributed to increased market penetration and in the remaining years to continued population growth. In most recreation facilities the first three years show tremendous growth from increasing the market share of patrons who use such facilities,but at the end of this time period revenue growth begins to flatten out. It is not uncommon to see the amount of tax support to balance the community center budget increase as the facility ages. 292 160 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REVENUE ESTIMATES Acct Existing CC Ice Turf Number Budget Expanded Arena Aquatics Center 4762 Membership 204,000 444,087 0 40,800 0 4766 General Admission 116,500 116,330 14,000 82,000 0 4770 Lessons 84,000 72,000 36,736 140,250 12,000 4780 Youth Activities 28,700 28,700 0 0 15,000 4795 Adult Programs 9,000 12,500 0 0 0 4796 Room Rentals 12,500 6,000 0 0 0 4797 Room Rentals 250 1,500 0 0 0 4798 Rentals 28,100 28,100 2,500 8,000 76,000 4774 Ice Rentals-Taxable 50,750 0 81,200 0 0 4775 Ice Rental-Exempt 218,125 0 392,125 0 0 4800 Skate Sharpening 2,000 0 4,500 0 0 4810 Concession 27,000 1,000 4,000 25,000 2,500 4812 Vending 4750 2,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 4817 Advertising 2,500 0 5,000 2,500 2,500 4818 Other 2,750 1,250 2,000 1,500 1,000 4761 Membership Insurance 37,000 0 0 0 0 Total 827,925 713,467 545,061 303,050 111,000 292 161 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study OPERATIONS ANALYSIS EXPENSE ESTIMATES Acct Existing CC Ice Turf Number Budget Expanded Arena Aquatics Center 6002 Wage FT 558,750 345,100 160,955 100,440 181,167 6003 Wages PT 468,720 399,252 90,072 377,229 33,334 6015 Overtime 9820 7,500 5,000 7500 2,500 Benefits 244,410 134,072 55,176 58,978 56,900 6202 Operating Supplies 109,900 56,450 33,200 45,750 3,500 6210 Office Supplies 7,475 8,500 1,500 1,500 500 6211 Recreation Supplies 45,720 44,720 2,250 1,750 5,500 6112 Uniforms 5,975 1,675 1,700 2,500 3,250 6213 Food 725 500 250 300 100 6215 Materials 6,000 6,000 0 0 0 6222 Motor Fuel 5,670 450 1,000 7,000 1,000 6230 Building Material Supplies 41,250 6,500 12,500 50,000 6,500 6240 Equipment Maintenance 8,350 6,000 5,000 5,500 150 6250 Merchandise 19,000 23,000 1,000 1,000 0 6310 Attorney Fees 2,000 3,500 0 0 0 6315 Building Maintenance 119,750 70,750 84,000 12,500 7,500 6316 Equipment Maintenance 11,850 6,200 4,800 4,800 2,500 6325 Instructors 31,025 34,375 17,280 21,750 1,500 6324 Transportation 8,200 1,500 0 0 0 6326 Cleaning 45,000 45,000 17,280 17,280 8,500 6327 Other Professional Services 37,900 33,400 3,500 2,500 1,500 6332 Postage 9,375 8,000 750 600 250 6334 Telephone 13,120 4,600 3,250 4,750 1,750 6336 Printing 33,150 27,250 4,000 2,000 1,000 6338 Advertising 7,200 5,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 6352 Liability Insurance 22,600 8,500 5,950 7,550 4,800 6356 Auto Insurance 400 400 0 0 0 6354 Property Insurance 28,700 16,000 15,000 12,750 7,500 6362 Electric 139,000 75,000 84,000 46,000 12,000 6364 Water 14,500 4,500 8,500 24,000 500 6365 Gas 41,400 24,000 27,500 20,000 17,000 6366 Sewer 4,500 2,600 4,250 2,000 500 6368 Storm 4,400 1,500 2,500 2,000 500 6410 Software Fees 20,950 15,400 1,200 1,500 4,200 6415 Software 28,600 19,800 3,520 7,050 3,520 6420 Equipment Rental 1,530 750 150 1,000 250 6425 Equipment 10,336 3,500 10,500 1,500 2,500 6430 Building Rent 249,660 109,200 221,000 155,710 165,000 6435 Other 5,000 5,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6472 Conference/School/Training 6,360 3,000 500 1,000 2,000 6475 Travel 4,550 2,700 1,500 750 750 6480 Dues 4,160 1,750 1,650 1,650 400 6490 Subcriptions 375 375 150 0 0 6650 Credit Card Fees 12,400 15,000 800 0 0 Total 2,449,756 1,588,269 895,633 1,012,587 542,821 292 162 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Market Analysis: Stakeholder meeting minutes 64 Zoning map 74 Zoning code: parking 75: 292 163 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Shakopee Stakeholder meetings—General Questions • Tell us about the size of your group. • What trends are you seeing with participation? • What does it cost to participate? • Where do you currently go for your practices/games? • What do you pay to utilize these facilities? • What needs are not being met with existing facilities? • What components is your group looking for? Stakeholder Schedule 6:30-8pm Jamie 8-9pm Fitness members 10-Noon Rec staff 2-3pm Hockey Association 3:30-4:30 HS Hockey 5-6pm Finance 9:15-10:15 Senior group 1-2pm Hospital 3-4pm Activity Directors 4-5pm YMCA 5:45-6:45 Sport Assoc(Basketball/Volleyball/Wrestling) 7-8pm Sport Assoc(Baseball/softball) 8:15-9:15 Sport Assoc(LAX/Soccer/Football) School District Dr. Rod and Ed and Mike Interested in swapping/trading with the City for amenities Interested in seeing the sports dome on the SD campus Ballot question needs to be completed by the end of January Support for the potential to build new rink on school property Potential to partner with School for tennis program New/expanded school only is looking at a couple of grass fields and a turf field Looking at creating a campus—looking at maybe 6-7 different entry points Hockey coach is looking at space to expand and develop dry land training—space to shoot,train Prior Lake Rink is a good example to visit Committed to an additional $62,000 in Ice Time hours and looking at an additional$20,000 more if extra ice is available but School District is willing to double their commitment for ice time and leasing the training space. HS team is forced to use 5:30am practices currently Trying to build program for 40 boys/40 girls players School District would pay for locker rooms/dry fitness. School may also commit resources to include locker rooms/dry land. Lease agreement works best for School District -School District willing to take on some equipment cost along with booster club. Adding six basketball courts as part of the school expansion—becoming a destination 292 164 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study Gymnastics is a need although the High School does not have a team More storage and gym space for wrestling is needed At the very least a turf baseball field—not necessarily an indoor field Interested in indoor space for spring sports including LAX/golf/soccer—robotics/drones also. Joint power to cover operations—streamlining scheduling and programs Benefit of having one person involved in schedule—having one person for School District and City contact has been an improvement Special needs group could use warm water—currently going to Dakota Intramural will be a growing issues—especially if school doubles in size. School District wants a classy intramural program with a coordinator and support staff. Outdoor cricket need is growing Spirit of more cooperation is in place currently Potential to expand parking area with the School District School District needs to plan backwards from May 2015—decision on ice is top priority The second high school site will need infra-structure if used for potential ice rink location Finance Dept Shakopee has experienced a 13%growth in 2014 plus new commercial growth—stars are aligning— creating more tax revenue Caution about using utility to fund any recreation expansion even though recreation would pay loan back. Tax abatement debt finance—right of way recovery fee. City has all of the right of ways—all developers/cable companies etc pass on fees to others.Tax abatement financing has stood the test of a federal challenge.Tax abatement in Shakopee is estimated to generate$750,000 per year Building fund is well stocked with about$7M in reserve.Julie would support using some of the reserve for a second sheet of ice Tax abatement—development tax does not require a referendum will handle$25M in debt over 20 years Challenge will be to get Council to support without a referendum. How to you bring a higher economic base into the city—quality of life issues. City is not getting the higher income residents/professionals. Tax level to support operations$1.6M from a 10% levy—it will be off-set by new growth. Market growth alone is increasing property tax.A portion of tax could be dedicated to rec center/fund designations. For discussion -tax increase "guess-timate" might be$175.00 on a$175,000 home value. Overall need to annex more land to expand tax base huge impact on getting/expanding tax base. EDAC involvement—perhaps get a spokesperson/committee behind the City's efforts. Need for developing a foundation of support in the community. Low income options/support available for Shakopee residents through County and State. Not sure the City should be the face of the project maybe EDAC lead the charge?? Canterbury will benefit from City facilities—especially with events hosted by the City bringing in tourist. City will help bring in more gate attendance for Canterbury Focus on who will be served with new center—senior,youth, high school,sports, pre-school groups— need to be tax supported. Receptive to another location 292 165 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Hospital Not interested in operating a fitness center Have rehab in Chaska CC—small satellite location possible in Shakopee Phase 4&5 cardiac rehab is possible at Shakopee CC Urgent care space? Open to naming rights/sponsorship Aquatic rehab a need—especially for warm water therapy Wide open market for community education—largest space on St Francis campus is for 75 people— looking for space Screening/community wellness Interest in the potential to lease space from the City Assistance in safe work place training/initiative Hospital rehab/therapy is available without referral Athletic training/acceleration type services similar to Chaska Model like Chaska would be of interest—maybe 4,000-8,000 SF more if urgent care is part of the scope Contract hospital staff for athletic training Potential to subsidize corporate wellness program for hospital employees Potential for collaboration of corporate wellness to area employers Support for community events/sponsorship for events—adventure race,etc Alina Health and wellness initiative might be a good model to pattern City's corporate wellness after Mike likes the idea of shared staff opportunities—trainers/instructors, etc Obesity initiatives—obesity rate in this County or Twin Cities Mason City/YMCA model Youth Associations—BB/VB/Wrestling Christine—VB Oct-may season—15 teams - 12 club levels and 3 prep teams Practice twice/week—rent space from Catholic School @$50/hour and Eden Prairie @$75/hour Don't host tournament or league games Strength/agility training provided at elementary school twice per week. Limit the number of teams because of gym availability- 120 girls plus camps and clinics Space use at the school gyms is free except for afterhours/weekend use. Girls pay$800 per player—paid coaches. $17 fee collected for City only covers use of school facilities Cutting about 20 girls per season—could have added another 4 teams. Brad—wrestling Minnesota club of the year—one of the largest clubs in Minnesota All Shakopee kids—90 kids pay$110 membership fee plus volunteer and equipment deposit K-9th grade Use West Jr High and HS gyms. One tournament per year for 500-600 wrestlers.—major fund raiser for the club. 4 rings in main gym and 4 rings auxiliary gym. Boys Basketball -538 participants 35 teams—travel and in-house Share gym space—1/2 court 292 166 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Host one large tournaments (8 courts for 112 teams) MN.Youth Athletic Tournament gets concession revenue—also 5 fall league weekends. BB program pays for custodial services/rental for events when they host/tournaments Summer camp Getting less than half of the gym time they actually need. Fees are $295/season in house$80/player Participation growing 3.5%per year Issue with teams having to share a court with two teams—similar to ice hockey One point of contact from scheduling for each program Primarily gym use occurs on Mon/Tues/Thurs Needs: VB needs time for 4 more teams or a total of 48 hours per week Wrestling needs a space for metro program on Monday—having different teams come in for practice and Brad needs 1 gymnasium space for this program Six new gym spaces will help the court teams(BB/VB) Getting access to school gyms on weekends without having to pay the custodial fee would help with capacity issues Group agreed that if 6 more courts were available at the schools then the associations don't need to duplicate facilities at the community center—their needs would be met. Baseball/softball RJ—Girl's fast pitch/Alan—baseball/Chet baseball Fast pitch 200-250 girls for both travel and in-house Use Savage dome for try outs in March and winter development programs Playing in dome ball leagues around the Twin Cities Base registration$120 plus$125-$150 for travel teams. $1,000 fee for the selected 14-16 age group Baseball 595 kids 28 in house 26 teams traveling Use Jackson Township for fields, pitch to pitch in Burnsville (contract), Savage dome for tryouts Indoor gym at high school Fees range from $100-$450 per player depending on level Needs: Savage/Eden Prairie dome examples Currently there are two cages—added 9 BB and 6SB batting machines for outdoor fields Savage has three cages. Dome is a soccer field divided into thirds Need a winter facility for softball league and indoor practice for baseball—one infield size would be nice Recommend soccer facility size turf space Older athletes go to bigger/stronger program at the high school Low priority for dry land training but would be value added service Meeting room space/video capabilities Storage/storage/storage Willing to sign a long-term contract with the City Height of existing rink is prohibitive for baseball/softball 292 1 67 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Losing Stemmer with High School expansion will displace 2 fields Existing field meet the minimum needs based on current participation levels Existing community center is not attractive—looking for modern look—Eden Prairie model Football/LAX/Soccer Soccer—year round soccer program -spring rec program has 600 kids, spring competitive program has 500 kids,fall competitive league has 250,fall recreation program 400 kids. Futsol program at HS gym on Sunday and Fridays.—about 200 kids(Nov-April). Rent out Soccer Blast on Monday and Thursday—same group that is playing Futsol.Soccer growing 10%/year Having another 4-hours of indoor space would meet the soccer needs Special population program in the spring At risk kids—middle school about 100 kids(Hispanic) Competitive fees$400-$500, Rec at$85/$95 Camps$45/$90 Field maintenance—(field 1&2)with overuse. Fields are lighted some they get football use also Turf field would help alleviate this problem Need: 16 field spaces for meeting today's program—need an addition 4 fields since the city only has 12 fields in their inventory-maybe 25 fields in another 5-years Access of rental time at other facilities during winter Hosts one 175 teams tournament in spring Host Minnesota State games Sports complex has 7 full-size fields Parking is an issue during soccer practice. Need to have one way signage in the soccer complex parking lot LAX is taxing the existing field inventory Could use an additional 3 days per week at 4 hrs per night or 12 hours per week(full field) Locker storage for equipment desired No need for locker rooms Concession stand would be nice Larger track,gym space for plyometric training Soccer would use a turf area at CC if ice was moved to another location Hockey Association Jim—president of hockey board 406 kids—most over last 5 years(375 players 5 years ago)about 200 families Dropped players after last referendum loss Number of players that waiver out—40 over a 6-7 year period—15 this year/12 during 2013/14—some players leave for better/more competitive associations (26) Prior Lake, Chaska, Eden Prairie and Bloomington—most moving to bigger associations 62 new players out of 406 participants this season Bantams pay-$1,400, Peewees$1,200,Squirts$1,100 and U8$400 Buying$50,000 of ice from Dakota per season E-Train each team gets 10 work outs per$200/team 1.5 hours Ply station,treadmill, synthetic ice. Accounts for about$32,000/per season 292 168 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Need 1,700 hours of ice to meet USA standards—currently using 1,200-would add $250 per player for additional ice time or$100,000 per season. Youth Hockey has$100,000 set aside for a second ice sheet Possibility of adding a user fee to help fund capital-$50 rink fee per player($20,000/year) P&R pays building rent to the City—now part of the Park asset fund Building fund is a possible funding source for new facility(partial) Put in$350,000 per year into building fund-$100,000 pool, $150,000 rec center,$100,000 ice Adult hockey is a difficult task in Shakopee—too far away from Cities to attract players Possibility of getting on-going rental groups—informal Oct-March season for second rink No figure skating interest—Bloomington has a strong program. LTS possibility Storage lockers Off-ice shooting area/synthetic ice/treadmill ($100,000/unit) Potential for dedicated locker rentals Meeting room space—possibly for all sport associations Concession a must have Mail box/communication system for associations would help communicate with members Coaches room with storage area Association's storage area. Lobby area is important 10' hallways/oversized doors would be nice Youth hockey pays 15%of net-$1,700-$2,300/year Youth hockey pays$2,500 per season Access to gym space Potential for multi-association fund raising efforts. Senior Group 24 participants Who we are/what we are doing/ground rule Need more pickle ball courts—especially on Sunday-more gym space or expanded times at the least Senior center located here—ground level space, kitchen (catering), a larger room for pot lucks/evens Lounge area for visiting Seniors strongly supported keeping all senior programs and activities at the CC—not interested in moving to a new facility Computer room,craft room with cabinets.Storage/Storage/Storage Handicap accessibility Many participants felt the City"should give us our space"for both senior activities and ice rink—"it's time for the seniors as they have sacrificed for other groups of users in the past." Using GO bonds require a referendum vote.Tax abatement program could fund the facility through tax abatement that would not require a referendum More fitness space with a good sound system desired Group fitness space—dedicated space to contain music More pickleball opportunities (USAPA.org) 292 169 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Need More room for exercise classes TV integrated on equipment Stretching area Day care facility for children Water aerobics—zero depth,water slide, hot tub,exercise area/lap lanes,water play feature Dedicated senior space within the center that could be used for other activity but some space (lockable) for senior events—dedicated storage Railing in the facility, especial to senior program areas is important. Library?Some interest with a kiosk.At the very least a book exchange Invite Speaker in—having a music room also Hospital lunch series and screening—mixed results, some people wanted it, some said no Outdoor space—trail/Bocci/pickelball HS Activities Director Biggest need is more ice—maybe even three sheets Intramural programs? Not sure HS would offer an intermural hockey program. Cut varsity players play in a junior gold team—providing an opportunity to play Jr Gold program is part of the youth hockey program—parent funded Potential to develop a rink on the school grounds has support within SD Sports dome could also go on school property Important to look at seats in the ice arena for 2,500-3,000 people—similar to the Richfield Arena Dryland training and locker rooms are critical If plyometric and weightlifting is available then other sports would be interested in participating. Existing training space at the high school is now too small Space for baseball, softball, LAX,football,soccer,track—focus on practice If the school add a field house the need for City to build indoor space will go away Timing is a critical issue for the School District referendum Ice is top priority—next is multi-purpose turf—possibility to dome the facility—gym space—swimming pool YMCA—River Valley Chris/Pat/Mary executive director/Greg—Prior Lake YMCA Existing YMCA is 51,000 SF center attached to a church/assisted living Fitness center 12,000 SF, 2 group X studio, aquatic center,vortex, splash pad,water slide, lap lanes, kids gym—no full size gym or track Opened 2009 Working on a strategic plan around the Twin Cities for fitness—big hole in the Victoria, Shakopee, Carver area. Looking at this area as the economy is improving. Also where are kids/families for camps, after school program opportunities live. Developing facility in Forest Lake—9 acre site. City netted $9M in tax abatement program and gave the money to the Y to build and operate.Y is floating a $4.5M debt to complete the construction Child care, membership,camp, and youth sports are 4 main entities that generate revenue for the Y's. It should be noted that membership is driven by the fitness components 292 170 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Y's priority is to add a gym Collaboration between City and YMCA might be having the Y operating the fitness center and/or pool. Looking to collaborate with leasing gym space. No set model but looking to reach a larger community. It appears the YMCA is interested in operating the programs areas with the greatest potential for revenue. What are opportunities to create more community?Gaps South of Shakopee—underserved and prioritize.YMCA looking at developing a hub and spoke concept—relationships with health systems. Looking at possibly developing an express Y concept with hub being in Shakopee and the express Y's being the spokes Discussions w/Allina systems—Penny George clinic—acupuncture/urgent care/yoga/fitness.Allina would contract with Y for services. Forest Lake will include a 500 SF clinic space. Minute clinics support hospital with referrals. Options for additional care after being released from hospital. Possibility of express Y in Bellevue. Prior Lake is saturated for fitness according to the YMCA Pat's concept is to flex and adapt with different sized or type boxes. Prior Lake Y is also close to Dakota facility Land availability across the YMCA is attractive to the YMCA—potential to partner? Potential for developing outdoor park with tribe land for development of sport fields on 80 acre site— potential for regional development. Recreation Staff Child care needed to reach full potential Need day care—losing class potential Need to be ADA compliant If we need to prioritize then we should take care of what we have first Fitness area is about 2,200 SF—should be at least 5,000 SF Past memberships have run between 2700-3,000 members One group x studio of 3,500SF with ample storage Yoga studio of 1,500 SF Dedicated spinning room Design a community room that could be used for fitness/classes Large stretching area TRX/classes HVAC/TV adaption (walls—not integrated)—Survey users?? Integrated fitness tracking Accelerated sports area—partnership w/hospital Private instructors/screenings office Aquatics—school pools too deep and cold Need warmer water,exercise area—leisure play Zero depth rock wall,water slide, lap lanes, zip line Deeper water required for swim lessons-9 foot depth Water spray/play feature and hot tub Birthday party rooms(3) Indoor/outdoor area—outdoor(perhaps splash pad) Locker rooms w/family locker rooms 292 In Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX Ice Arena Second sheet—with piping for a third rink Locker rooms (6) Dry room—5,000 sf for leasing out for shooting stations/weight equipment—skating terminal - Could space be used for other sports than hockey Meeting room—1500 SF—could be used for B'day parties Concession stand for HS—fund raiser for associations Offices,skate sharpening, skate rental Seating capacity—not sure. New rink would be at least 1,000 for one and 500 for the other sheet.Jamie is looking at new sheet being the game sheet with 1,000 seats Community space Child care—indoor play structure Community living room w/lobby Concession area. Teen center/senior center—could existing space be re-purposed for multi-purpose Location with skatepark makes sense to have teen center at currently location. Community room of about 3,000 SF that is divisible into 2-3 smaller spaces—with technology Storage/storage/storage...Storage off the gym—storage to serve the outdoor fields Staff offices and front desk format/layout Sports/Athletic Center Synthetic turf dome size of a football field 50,000 SF for turf sports Separate court space for basketball/volleyball Potential of moving ice rink to another location and converting existing rink to a court facility Interest of putting a bubble versus a building Locker rooms, concession and support spaces Court space—4 courts with bleachers or apron around the courts but existing rink w/3 courts works Lobby area Batting cages/golf simulator Big archery program—gym/field house program Fitness Users 6 attendees plus Park Board member and instructors Comments: Use to go to Gold's Gym—more facilities Blue collar gym -$300@family Looking for value No spandex-comfortable Use to use Lifetime—expensive Would like a towel service Need more equipment 292 172 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study 2-year member of CC Anytime Fitness was too small—no classes/Lifetime too expensive Like Shakopee class offerings/quality Membership meets need—fees/not crowded/comfortable Would like adult/child boot camp No frills—just get the workout in Paula—instructor for 10+years Class offerings are attractive to members Facility is dirty—glad to hear a FT maintenance position is being added to CC Currently contract out custodial Need day care facilities to build classes Use to be at Lifetime Need more free weights More benches BOSI balls/medicine balls/ropes&bands Hand weights Boot camp member for past 5-years Longer track would be nice Keeping facility clean/well maintained Dedicated group X space Designed/dedicated spin room Stretching area Self-directed fitness area Operating hours close early Cross fit area—especially with a turf complex Storage space is an issue TRX area Child watch Batting cages Dry land for hockey rink 292 I 73 Shakopee: Community Recreation Facilities Study APPENDIX -- -.1 .-- ,------ , PikAl .,...... , SHAKOPEE Zoning Map } /,,,_ r\ ,..,74.-- 3,, liv,*,,,,1 . 7„,,..! a a 4- m....„B.- i N4:- ......,..., '..\-.,,,„1 , III.NC NeigitoThood CominkreW 11111.......a LT!Pliti.Plarmed Ran... r —11.Law INaly Reernial I 4 L _ A ' 'r-, ' Downtown Shakapee .s. V ' 11.1121-.144eFamiy I* , :2:- --,--,,,,,..-L-L- __,..,,, 114 1.1.14 Nab... ..Z 0 1 a N .1T.' k,411 I ii. i, I, ,,,, ,,,...,.......7.—.—•--- ,............ 04,11 wime, * 17=.... ,?;"":',.,-- C.__ ___,.--' -''' '''''''''\c--' • --' , ...,,---- /7/7-7— __----------_--------- - • ' --- 694 ...., ,, „:444-: 44-, 1 ,„, -, , ,,,- ''',,,-.., L-.....,-J-- ..,', a '- 4 1.1":14,ei *• ----, .'4.., , . ,. :„,:.• a4—,— :::=-1----- ----- 292 I 74 §11.61 SEC. 11.61. PARKING. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose for the regulation of off-street parking is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking of vehicles based on the use of the land. Subd. 2. General Provisions. A. Application. The provisions of this section apply to the required and non-required off-street parking in all zones, except that property within the central business (B-3) zone is exempt from the off-street parking requirements. These provisions apply to the entire area used for vehicular circulation and parking. 8. Where May Park. 1. Except in the agricultural preservation (AG) zone, a vehicle may be parked only on a street or alley, or in a properly surfaced parking facility. Vehicles may be parked on grass or outside a parking facility when a flood or other emergency prohibits the use of the parking facility, or when the required parking for a particular use is insufficient to meet a business rush, such as during the holiday season. 2. A recreational vehicle may be parked for more than twenty-four(24) hours only on an approved sales lot or self-storage facility, as specified in the parking provisions relating to residential parking facilities, or in a campground. C. Expansion of Existing Uses. Any existing use or structure which is altered or enlarged must comply with the provisions of this section. D. Reduction of Parking Spaces. Off-street parking spaces existing upon the effective date of this Chapter shall not be reduced in number below the requirements set forth in this section for that use. E. Use of Parking Space. No required off-street parking space shall be used for an open sales lot or for open storage. F. Maintenance. The owner of the principal use, uses, or structure shall maintain the parking facility and curbing in a neat and adequate manner. G. Residential Parking Facilities. 1. Required. Off-street parking facilities located outside of required setbacks shall be provided for at least two(2) vehicles for all single family dwellings. A suitable location for both a garage measuring at least twenty(20)feet by twenty-four (24) feet and a ten (10) foot driveway, which do not require a variance, shall be provided and indicated as such on a survey or site plan to be submitted when applying for a building permit to construct a new dwelling or alter an existing garage. Gogo revised n 2009 1360 75 §11.61 2. Use. Off-street parking facilities in an rural residential (RR), low density residential (R-1A), urban residential (R-16), Old Shakopee residential (R- 1C), medium density (R-2), or multiple-family residential (R-3) zone shall be used solely for the parking of personal vehicles. 3. Location. Off-street parking facilities in a residential zone shall not be located in the front yard setback or in a street side yard setback. 4. Recreational Vehicles. In a residential zone, one (1) of the exterior driveway parking spaces for a dwelling or a properly surfaced parking area meeting parking requirements for the zone may be used for parking or storing an unoccupied recreational vehicle that is•either defined as a recreational vehicle (RV) under state law or which is a camper and that is less than thirty-five(35)feet in length. If parked in a location other than the driveway within a single family residential zone, RVs and campers shall be setback five (5) feet from an interior side or rear lot line, fifteen (15) feet from a street side lot line. RVs and camper shall not be parked in the front yard unless they utilize an exterior driveway parking space. No living quarters shall be maintained nor any business practiced in the recreational vehicle while it is so parked or stored. The recreational vehicle shall utilize only the existing driveway into the site. The vehicle shall be owned or leased by the property owner or resident on which the vehicle is parked. No more than two (2) utility trailers, trailers for recreational vehicles such as snowmobiles and all-terrain vehicles(ATVs), and boats twenty(20) feet or less in length may be stored in a rear or side yard on lawn or turf or other surface, but must be setback five(5) feet from an interior side or rear lot line, fifteen (15) feet from a street side lot line. (Amended, Ord. 648, January 2, 2003) A camper or RV recreational vehicle brought by a visitor may be parked or occupied for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days while visiting the resident of the property. 5. Sales Trailers. Sales trailers may not be parked in any zoning district in the City of Shakopee. (Added, Ord. 609, August 30, 2001) H. Combined Parking Facilities. Required off-street parking facilities for more than one (1) use, lot, or parcel of land may be provided through joint parking facility, a shared parking plan, or a cooperative parking plan. When required off-street parking facilities are provided off-site, written authority for using such property for off-street parking during the existence of the use shall be filed with the City. No such parking facility at its closest point shall be located more then 300 feet from the use being served. 1. Joint Parking. Off-street parking facilities for two (2) or more uses may be provided in a joint facility. The joint parking facility shall include sufficient spaces to meet the separate requirements for each use. pa;,o tensed in 2009 1361 76 §11.61 2. Shared Parking. Off-street parking facilities for two (2) or more uses with substantially different hours of operation may be provided in a shared facility. Evidence must be submitted showing that the uses normally are not open, used, or operated during substantially the same hours. Up to 50% of the required off-street parking facilities for a use may be provided in a shared parking facility. Shared parking is not a right, and the City shall have the discretion to give credit up to the 50% limitation based upon its review of plans, uses, and other information related to the off-street parking needs. 3. Cooperative Parking. Off-street parking facilities for one (1) use may be provided on the property of another use in a cooperative facility when that use has more parking spaces than are required. The excess spaces may be shared with another use through a cooperative parking plan. 4. Application. An application for approval of a shared parking plan or a cooperative parking plan shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator. The application shall be signed by the owner or owners of the entire land area to be included within the cooperative parking plan, the owner or owners of all structures then existing on such land areas, and all parties having a legal interest in such land area and structures. The application shall include plans showing the location of the use or structures for which off- street parking facilities are required, the location of the off-street parking facilities, and the schedule of times used by those sharing in common. 5. Review. The application shall be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Upon approval of a shared parking plan or a cooperative parking plan, the plan shall be recorded in the office of the Scott County Recorder. 6. Residential Parking Facilities. Required off-street parking in residential zones shall be on the same lot or parcel of land as the structure for which parking is required. Subd.3. Design Standards. • A. Access. Parking facilities shall provide a direct access to a public alley or street. B. Traffic Flow. Parking facilities shall be designed so that vehicles may enter, circulate, park, and exit in a convenient and orderly fashion. Backing onto streets is prohibited in multiple-family, business, and industry zones. C. Angled Parking. Parking spaces oriented at less than ninety (90) degrees to the aisle shall be limited to one(1)-way circulation. D. Surfacing. Except for parking facilities for single family dwellings within the agricultural preservation (AG), rural residential (RR), low density residential (R-1A), urban residential (R-1B), and Old Shakopee residential (R-1C) zones, the entire parking facility shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. Parking facilities for only one (1) or two (2) vehicles may be surfaced with other material which is dust-free and impervious to penetration by water. Page tov,aed,n 2009 1362 77 §11.61 E. Setback. In all multiple-family residential, business, and industry zones, a minimum fifteen (15) foot setback shall be required between any parking facility and a street. A minimum five (5) foot setback shall be required between any parking facility and any other property line. These parking setbacks shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements listed in Section 11.60. F. Handicap Facilities. Required handicap spaces and ramps shall be provided as specified in the State Bui'ding Code. G. Minimum Size of Parking Spaces. Each parking space shall be not less than nine (9) feet wide. Other minimum dimensional requirements for the design of parking facilities are shown in Table 1. Parking spaces beyond the minimum required number may be smaller or of different dimensions. TABLE 1 Parking Lot Design C...., 513£ LOT UNC CURB UNE FRONT LOT UNI h© CURB UNE /swam, .141 ✓ � ..... REAR LOT LINE paga aevisOd in 20C9 1363 92 78 §11.61 Angle of Parking • Dimension Diagram 45° 60° 75° 90° Space width, parallel to aisle A 12.7 10.4 9.3 9.0 Space length of line B 25.0 22.0 20.0 20.0 Space depth C 17.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 • Aisle width between space lines D 12.0 16.0 23.0 24.0 Space depth, interlock E 15.3 17.5 18.8 24.0 Module, edge of pavement F 44.8 52.5 61.3 64.0 to interlock Module interlocking G 42.6 51.0 61.0 64.0 Module, interlocking to curb face H 42.8 50.2 58.8 60.5 Bumper overhang I 2.0 2.3 2.5 0.0 Offset J 6.3 2.7 0.5 0.0 Cross aisle, one way K 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 Cross aisle, two way K 24.0 24.0 . 24.0 24.0 • Subd.4. Required Number of Parking Spaces. A. Floor Area. The term "floor area" for the purpose of calculating the number of required off-street parking spaces shall be the total floor area of all levels of a building, minus hallways, utility spaces, storage areas for uses not Involving warehousing, and other accessory spaces. B. Calculating Space. When determining the number of required off-street parking spaces results in a fraction, each fraction of one-half (1/2) or more shall constitute another space. C. Benches. In public assembly places where seating is provided on benches, pews, or other similar items, each twenty-two (22) inches of such seating shall be counted as one(1)seat for the purpose of determining required parking. D. Uses Not Listed. When the parking requirements for a use are not specified, the Zoning Administrator shall determine which listed use or uses are the most similar to the proposed use. The parking requirements for that listed use or uses shall apply to the proposed use. Page revisod in 2009 1364 79 §11.61 E. Required Off-Street Parking. Each use must provide, at a minmum, the number . of required off-street parking spaces listed on Table 2. For lots or parcels of land containing more than one (1) use, the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces for each use must be provided. TABLE 2 NUMBER OF REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES PER UNIT OF MEASUREMENT • Use or Use Category Number 1. Residential and Lodging a. Single family,two-family 2 per dwelling (Amended, Ord. 603, dwellings August 2, 2001) b. Multiple-famity dwellings 2.25 per dwelling (Added, Ord. 603, August 2, 2001) c. Senior citizen housing and 1 per dwelling congregate housing d. Bed and breakfast inns 1 per guest room 1 per operator e. Motels, hotels-excluding 1 per guest room restaurants and night clubs +1 per two employees 2. Education, Cultural,and Institutional a. Middle, elementary, and 1 per classroom nursery schools +1 per 50 student design capacity b. Senior high schools 1 per 7 student design capacity +1 per classroom c. Churches, auditoriums, 1 per 4 seats in main assembly area funeral homes d. Nursing homes 4 minimum +1 per 500 square feet of floor area over 1000 s.f. e. Hospitals 1 per 2 hospital beds f. Publ`.c buildings, community 10 minimum centers, pubic libraries, +1 per 300 square feet of floor area over 1000 s.f. art galleries, museums, post office g. Public recreation 1 per 3 persons attending, design capacity page revised in 2009 1365 l 80 §11.61 h. Golf courses, sports 20 minimum facility, fitness club +1 per 300 square feet of floor area over 1000 s.f. Athletic field 1 per 8 seats minimum j. Commercial recreation 15 minimum +50 per acre of developed recreation area 3. Business/Industry a. airports and heliports 1 per 4 seats in waiting area +1 per employee on largest shift b. animal hospitals, 1 per 500 square feet veterinary clinics c. bowling alley 5 per bowling lane d. bus terminals 1 per 500 square feet e. car washes 3 per stall f. cemeteries 4 minimum g. commercial feedlots 1 per employee on largest shift h. concrete or asphalt plants 1 per employee on largest shift day care facility 1 per 5 children j. dry cleaning plants 1 per 300 square feet k. financial institutions 1 per 200 square feet of floor area forestry and nursery uses 1 per 500 square feet of sales area m. funeral homes 1 per employee on largest shift n. furniture and 1 per 400 square feet of floor area appliance stores o. gas stations 1 per 6 gas pumps +1 per 150 square feet p. grain elevators 1 per employee on largest shift q. industrial or technical 1 per 3 students training schools +1 per employee on largest shift r. junkyards 1 per employee on largest shift page revised el 2009 1366 81 §11.61 s. kennels 1 per 400 square feet t. landscaping service 1 per employee on largest shift and contractors +1 per 500 square feet of sales area u. manufacturing and processing 1 per 500 square feet of floor area, or employee facilities on largest shift,whichever is greater v. medical, dental clinics 1 per 200 square feet of floor area w. motor freight terminals 1 per 1000 square feet +1 per 200 square feet of office area x. offices 1 per 250 square feet of floor area y. open sales lots, uses with 1 per 500 square feet of sales area exterior storage of goods for sale z. printing or publishing 1 per employee on largest shift facilities aa. private lodges and clubs 1 per 4 seats bb. railroad operations 1 per employee on largest shift cc. recycling or composting 1 per 1,000 square feet of floor area, or employee facilities on largest shift, whichever is greater dd. research, experimental 1 per employee on largest shift or testing facilities ee. restaurants (class I) 1 per 3 seats ff. restaurants (class fl) 1 per 50 square feet of floor area +1 per 3 seats gg. retail establishments 1 per 150 square feet of floor area hh. riding academies 1 per 4 horse stalls ii. seasonal produce stands 3 minimum jj. self-storage facilities 1 per 10 storage units +1 per employee on largest shift +1 per resident manager kk. service garages for 4 minimum major vehicle repair +1 per service stall II. retail centers 1 per 200 square feet of floor area (Amended, Ord. 702, May 13, 2004) pago revised in 2404 1367 i 82 §11.61 mm. taverns 1 per 50 square feet of floor area nn. taxi stands 1 per employee oo. theaters, auditoriums, 1 per 4 seats or sports arenas pp. truck or trailer rental 1 per 400 square feet facilities qt. uses having a drive-up 1 driving lane or drive-through window rr. vehicle, marine, implement, 6 minimum garden supply, building +1 per 500 square feet of floor area over 1000 s.f. and material sales ss. vehicle rental facilities 1 per rental vehicle +1 per 500 square feet of floor area tt. vending machine establishments 1 per vending machine uu. warehouses 1 per employee on largest shift vv. wholesaling establishments 1 per 1,000 square feet of floor area, or employee on largest shift, whichever is greater (Ord. 31, October 25, 1979; Ord. 96, November 11, 1982; Ord. 158, January 31, 1985; Ord. 185, December 25, 1985; Ord. 246, June 17, 1988; Ord. 259, November 11, 1988; Ord. 264, May 26, 1989; Ord. 279, December 1, 1989; Ord. 377, July 7, 1994; Ord. 546, May 6, 1999; Ord. 702, May 13, 2004) (The next page is 1370.) pago revised in 2009 1368 83 Attachment A Option A: • New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased • Remodeled Community Center including expanded fitness, indoor playground and child care • Aquatic facility in the existing ice arena shell • No covered turf at this time (could add to project for $6 Million) Estimated Cost: $27.4 Million j 7 _ E I- �� ['":::1 a -- ---- Y � a U ,i., .2. :51:4. 1., .cps . .n L io1. Ici4 I T BEP Ifil ' T, g � t, 1� ,,, ir OOCC ' v ,-r 1 7 Fi I �€ .— 7 'fir—S� . -, .nom. C ,. U UJJ —nom Attachment B Option B: • New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased • Remodeled Community Center including expanded fitness, indoor playground and child care • Athletic space in the existing ice arena shell (no aquatic facility) • No covered turf at this time (could add to project for $6 Million) Estimated Cost: $23.7 Million (rough estimate; more information will be available on Wednesday, May 6th) i.LLo r_ o � o0 0�0 -. • 41 � J � ! 41 0.li O. — __ _ eae,,,,, tfonif 3 r1 rt �I"-1 r1 I n,� ❑ -wi :lf � 11 IL Iry 11 n_ um,�afn " ss 1 U \e''!'loo'i Vr ‘0' 11 *7'; icy' 4 :7-0-;:,t/ / a ^- L — --__ -- ; IIIKi AJiJ n. µ Ui I --2— � 4 Y a a,4 1 —ilium e `, v J .� J� 1/ ( y ,_ ni iiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiirn / *The plan to repurpose the Arena to sport courts is very preliminary. 292 Design Group will be tweaking the concept and the estimated cost to be presented at the City Council meeting. Attachment C Option C: • New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased • Remodeled Community Center including expanded fitness, indoor playground and child care • Do nothing with the existing ice arena shell at this time • No covered turf at this time (could add to project for $6 Million) Estimated Cost: $20.7 Million f , J 1 IMI It------------' :- 7 di , r ..."1-1 '' .1. , : . ;row g-i— 1, I-- D [ w Ys ''''_T" - ,r7--'7— ,r:—r--1—r-77,---,—_,:z isi ili _,., az. [ILI,:- .6, • Tlt _ 1 (,,,,:. [ row a.1 Attachment D&E Option D: • New two sheet ice arena on land that does not have to be purchased • Operate the Community Center as it is today • Do nothing with the existing ice arena shell at this time • No covered turf at this time (could add to project for $6 Million) Estimated Cost: $16.7 Million (1`) c , II - 1 Option E: • Update the current ice arena refrigeration system only • Operate the Community Center and ice arena as they are today Estimated Cost: $1.75 Million