The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10.C.1. Emerald Ash Borer Management Options General Business 10. C. 1. SHAKOPEE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jacob Busiahn, Natural Resources Technician DATE: 04/21/2015 SUBJECT: Emerald Ash Borer Management Options Action Sought Approve a motion directing staff to move forward on Option No. 1 - "Treat best and replace remaining", for an emerald ash borer management plan for public ash trees within the City. Background Emerald ash borer (EAB) is a non-native invasive insect which kills ash trees. It is currently in the Twin Cities Metro area, with the closest confirmed infestation being in Bloomington, MN. EAB has proven to kill all ash trees which are not chemically treated and an infestation within Shakopee is inevitable. City staff completed an inventory of City managed trees in 2014. It was determined that 1 in 3 publicly managed trees are ash. A higher percent of street trees are ash compared to park trees, as seen below. •34% of street trees are ash (1500 ash trees) • 18% of park trees are ash (500 ash trees) •Certain parks have a much higher percent of ash-Riverview(100%), Hiawatha (88%), Tahpah (36%), Lions (27%). Based on the experiences of communities who have faced EAB, it is highly beneficial to take a proactive management approach versus waiting for EAB to kill trees and responding. Taking no management actions before EAB is confirmed in our community will be more expensive, and will take a much higher ecological, aesthetic, and social toll. Staff analyzed five options for managing EAB. The options include different combinations of ash removal, replanting, and chemical treatment (protecting trees). A cost/benefit analysis was performed for each option. Options considered by staff and the Park and Recreation Board are as follows: Option 1: Treat best and replace remaining Option 2: Treat best on high density streets and replace remaining Option 3: Remove and replace all Option 4: Remove all without replacement Option 5: No management The costs included removing, replanting, chemically treating, and maintaining the trees. The benefits were calculated based on the monetary value trees provide in relation to stormwater interception, energy consumption, property value, air quality, and CO2 sequestration and reduction. Details on management options, chemical treatment, and what to expect when EAB arrives can be found in the attached document "Overview of EAB Management Options". Maps associated with management options are also attached Staff will give a presentation during the meeting reviewing each management option and issues the City will face due to EAB. Recommendation On March 9th 2015, the Parks & Recreation Board voted unanimously to recommend Option 1- `Treat the best ash trees and replace the remaining' to City Council. This is also the recommendation of City staff It protects —40% (-750) of the public ash trees and removes and replaces the remaining (1100 trees). About 140 ash trees would be removed/replaced each year for the next 8 years with this option. Those trees proposed to be protected are in general the largest most healthy ash trees. This recommendation is made based off of the following: 1. Provides the highest tree related benefits to the community 2. Has the highest return on investment 3. Has the least impact on community character 4. Allows for a more gradual transition from ash trees to other species. 5. An ash tree can be treated for 20-25 years before the cost of removing/replacing that ash tree is reached 6. Offers a manageable workload to the City's Public Works Dept. Budget Impact Whether the City takes a proactive management approach or not, EAB will cost the community money. It is estimated to cost over $1,000,000 to remove all public ash trees without replacing them (which would need to be done if no management was taken). The current staff recommendation would require an increase of$50,000 to the Natural Resources budget starting in 2016. This would be funding treatment ($30,000) and replacement ($20,000) of public ash trees. It is estimated that the Natural Resources budget would need to be maintained at this level for the upcoming 8 years. After this, it is anticipated most ash not being treated would be removed and replaced and treatment intervals would decrease-resulting in the funding request being reduced. Tree removals are already budgeted for in Public Works and no additional funding requests are anticipated at this time. Current Natural Resources 2015 budget is at $138,660.00. Relationship to Vision This supports Goals A & D: Keep Shakopee a safe and healthy community where residents can pursue active and quality lifestyles; and Deliver effective and efficient public services by a staff of well trained caring and professional employees. Requested Action Approve a motion directing staff to move forward on Option No. 1 - "Treat best and replace remaining",for an emerald ash borer management plan for public ash trees within the City. Attachments: Overview of EAB Management Options Map of all public ash trees Map of'Treat Best and Replace Remaining' Map of'Treat Best on High Density Streets and Replace Remaining' City of Shakopee Summary of EAB Management Options February 13,2015 Additional resources (click on blue links): List of EAB Webinars—here is a recommended webinar overviewing management options http://www.emeraldashborer.info/ http://d nr.wi.gov/topic/UrbanForests/documents/EABTooI Box/EAB-LessonsShared.pdf What is EAB? Emerald ash borer is a non-native invasive insect thought to be brought into Michigan on shipping material and discovered in 2002. It attacks and kills ash trees and has currently spread to many states in the northeast/midwest region of North America and parts of Canada. How close is EAB? EAB has been confirmed within less than 15 miles of Shakopee, most recently in the Cities of Bloomington and Eagan.So far the following Minnesota Counties have been quarantined (cannot move hardwood out of the county, due to EAB): Hennepin, Houston,Olmsted, Ramsey,Winona,and Dakota. What are our options? EAB has been shown to kill 100%of ash trees not chemically treated in the communities that have experienced it. This leaves us only two options: chemical treatment(which has proven effective)or removal. What will happen if we take a'wait and see'approach instead of proactive management? EAB is estimated to take 8-10 years from the initial infestation to kill all non-treated ash in a community.There is a low probability of detecting an EAB infestation in the initial years(see table below). If detected after 3 years we would have^'5 years to remove all of our ash trees,with the majority(1300 trees) needing to be removed in years 7-8.This situation would result in incredibly high workloads, costs,and environmental/aesthetic impacts. "Waiting and doing nothing will be more expensive. It costs two to three times more to remove a completely dead ash tree versus a declining but live tree.Waiting until EAB hits before you make a plan to remove,dispose of and replant your ash may leave you with no contractors available, no markets for your waste wood and no trees to buy and plant.Communities that planned ahead have funds to respond.Those that waited to react do not" (EAB Lessons Learned in Michigan and Ohio). Wa tand See Expected Progression of EAB Damaged Trees and Likelihood of Detection To the right is an #Trees to %Ash Trees Affected by estimate of what Year remove <1 1 2 4 = 15 : 2 64 100 100 100 100 100 Shakopee's public 0 0 EAB ash tree removal 1 19 Years Until All Ash Trees 2 19 would be with a Are Damaged or Lost to 8 7 6 3 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 EAB 'wait and see' 4 77 approach.City staff 5 154 Likelihood of detection lo."; medium high currently averages 6 307 Source: Purdue University Extension, EAB Cost Calculator 20 removal 7 615 trees/year. 8 692 Total 1921 Is it probable that EAB is already in Shakopee? EAB was confirmed in 2009 in the TC metro area. First found in South Saint Anthony Park in St. Paul.Since then it has been confirmed in a number of areas in the east central portion of the metro, most recently in the cities of Bloomington and Eagan. Due to Shakopee's close proximity to confirmed infestations and EABs history of exponential population growth, it is assumed to be here but not yet detected.The analysis below assumes EAB is present in Shakopee but affecting<1%of our ash. 1 How big of a problem is EAB? EAB is now considered the most destructive forest pest ever seen in North America. It is estimated to cost the US $10-20 billion and has already exceeded the destruction of Dutch elm disease. If an ash tree is desired to be saved,when should treatment begin? Researchers recommend waiting until EAB is confirmed within 15 miles of your location to begin treatment.The EAB finding in the City of Bloomington is^'13 miles from Shakopee City Hall,this is the closest confirmed infestation.To protect a tree from EAB,chemical treatment is required every 1-3 years.Although some have concerns over use of pesticides,arguably,an equal or greater environmental impact exists for the loss of benefits provided by mature ash trees. If we begin treating ash,will we have to treat the tree the rest of its life? EAB's population is expected to rise and fall in a matter of 8-10 years,ash desired to be saved will need to be treated every 1-3 years at this time.After all of the non-treated ash have died,EAB's food source will be limited to small regenerated ash(saplings), mostly in natural areas. EAB is expected to survive in our area with low numbers into the future,posing a reduced threat to ash which survived the initial invasion wave.EAB management efforts are beginning to occur on a region wide scale,biocontrol(stingless wasps intended to parasitize EAB)and a strategy called Urban SLAM(which strategically treats limited ash to control EAB population) have potential to reduce populations even further.These efforts are fairly new and research is ongoing.Currently it is recommended to anticipate a treatment every 4-6 years after the rise and fall of EAB's population.This treatment interval could possibly be lengthened with the efforts listed above and active sanitation of infested trees. Treatment should not be looked at as something that is useless unless continued for the life of the tree. It can be used as a tool to allow only an acceptable amount of EAB damage per year. Treatment can simply ease the transition from mature ash to newly planted trees of other species, allow us to better manage costs, workloads, retain a portion of the benefits mature ash provide us,and maintain the charter of our community. Treatment should be looked at as a way for the City to control the management of our trees, rather than EAB. Treatment is recommended as a fundamental component of an EAB management plan. Shakopee's EAB Management Options Not Treating Trees Wait and see- This plan will remove an ash tree after enough of it has been killed to make it likely to drop limbs or fall down. No ash trees are replaced after removal. This plan should not be considered due to incredibly high spikes in workloads, costs,and losses of environmental/aesthetic benefits. Remove all without replacement- All ash trees will be removed. No trees will be replanted. Removal will take place in a structured method as to reduce spikes in costs and workloads.Remove 240 ash trees/year for 8 years. Remove and replace all- All ash trees will be removed and replaced with a new tree. Removal will take place in a structured method as to reduce spikes in costs and workloads. Remove-replace 240 ash trees/year for 8 years. Treating Trees Treat best and replace remaining- Saves^'40%of ash trees,the remaining ash trees will be removed and replaced (140 ash/year for 8 years).Those saved are in general the largest and best condition trees.They must meet the following criteria to be candidates for treatment: • >11"tree diameter • Condition rated as fair or better • No utilities overhead or conflicting 2 Treat best on high density streets and replace remaining- • - g Saves-30%of ash trees,the remaining ash trees will be removed and replaced (164 ash/year for • years).This option limits treatment to street segments*with a high density of mature ash trees and • • • parks.The street segment percentage is calculated as such: (total diameter inches of all City managed • • • E trees on street segment/total diameter inches of City managed ash trees on street segment).Trees • must meet the follow criteria to be candidates for treatment: • • • >11"tree diameter • • • • • Condition rated as Fair or better • • • No utilities overhead or conflicting • Located on a street segment with>=33%tree diameter as ash • • • Located on a street segment with >=36"total ash diameter(this is due to some street segments • • only having a few City managed trees) • • • • es* • E E *Street segments are generally one block long(see red on image to right). E E *, • • Cost/Benefit Analysis The cost/benefit analysis below uses the following information and assumptions: EAB is present in Shakopee but affecting<1%of our ash trees. Costs include tree/stump removal,replacement,treatment, and maintenance of existing trees for each year, all based on tree diameter. • Costs associated with EAB management were calculated using the EAB Cost Calculator produced by Purdue University. Below are some of the values used in the calculator: o Treatment Cost:$5/tree diameter inch (This is based on the average cost for a municipality to hire a private contractor in the Midwest,treating with City staff would be an estimated$3.5/dia. in). • Years between treatments during EAB outbreak:2 years • Years between treatments after outbreak(outbreak est. 12 years):4 years o Replacement Cost:$130/tree(This is for a private contractor to plant a 1.5 caliper inch bareroot tree). o Removal Cost:$28.47/tree diameter inch (This is based on the average cost for City staff to remove a tree and grind the stump in 2013). o Maintenance Cost:$3.5/tree diameter inch/year(This is based off the 2006 Midwest Community Tree Guide: Benefits,Costs,and Strategic Planting.General Technical Report PSW- GTR-199) o Benefits were calculated with the National Tree Benefit Calculator which is internationally used, peer reviewed software.The calculator estimates the monetary value trees provide in relation to stormwater interception,energy consumption, property value,air quality,and CO2 sequestration and reduction.Calculations assumed it was a street side ash tree of the specified diameter in front of a residential home.Other less researched benefits are not accounted for(e.g., human, social,and communal health). ❑Stormwater ❑Property Value O Electricity ❑Natural Gas 0 Air Quality Nc02 To the left is a breakdown of the calculated annual value a 14 diameter inch $40 01 street side ash tree $34.47 provides(totaling $130/year). 14 diameter inches is the average size ' of a Shakopee public ash $16.22 $5.24 tree. 'w020, 4,,.-. $7.35 3 $26.84 Cumlative Costs and Benefits of EAB Management (Over the next 25 years) $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 •Total Cumlative $2,000,000 Costs •Total $1,500,000 Cumlative Benefits $1,000,000 $500,000 "l f1 So N f.'1 so f\ R l0 C'l O N r h n 00 N V O M $0 n v vt N Remove and Replace All Treat Best Ash and Replace Remove All without Replacing Treat Best Ash on High Density Remaining Streets and Replace Remaining Figure 1.Shows cumulative costs and benefits of different EAB management options over 25 years.Also see Table 1 at end of document. Annual Cost of EAB for City Managed Trees $400,000 --Remove and Replace All $350,000 $300,000 Wait and See $250,000 ',$200,000 —Remove all Without $150,000 Replacement $100,000 —2 per.Mov.Avg. Best and $50,000 Replace Remaining) $0 O M C' ul SD r` CO Ql 0 •-■ N CO V 1.!) (0 N 00 m 0 .-1 N M V ul .-4 4-1 ei e 1 ..l N N N N N N >- Figure 2.Shows annual costs of EAB management options over 25 years.The cost of chemically treating ash fluctuates due to providing protection for 2-4 years,requiring multiple treatments through time.Options that treat or replace ash account for maintenance costs of new or retained trees.See Table 2. at end of document for more detailed information on annual costs. 4 Cumlative Costs of City Managed Ash Trees $3,500,000 $3,000,000 —Remove and Replace All $2,500,000 —Treat Best and Replace $2,000,000 + -_______- Remaining $1,500,000 Remove all Without Replacement $1,000,000 —Treat Best on / High Density $500,000 Streets and Replace Remaining $0 Jean ti ti 3 b h A % ,y0 'is' V y yb ,yh ti y1 yob yai ti0 tit i")" i> tib ti� Figure 3.Shows the cumulative(total amount spent)of each EAB management option through time.See Table 1.for further information. Cumlative Benefits of Retained City Managed Ash/Replacement Trees $4,500,000 54,000,000 —Remove and $3,500,000 Replace All $3,000,000 —Treat Best $$ and Replace 2,500,000 Remaining $2,000,000 Remove all Without $1,500,000 Replacement $1,000,000 —Treat Best on High Density Streets and $500,000 Replace Remaining $0 O r-1 N fY1 ll1 lD f� W Cn O ,H ,1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-I c-I ,-I N ON N N N N N Y Figure 4.Shows the cumulative monetary value provided by retained or replaced City managed ash trees. 5 #of City Managed Ash Trees to Remove/Year 800 700 —Treat Best and Replace 600 Remaining —Wait and See 500 400 Remove all 300 —Treat Best on ■200 High Density Streets and 100 Replace Remaining 0 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Figure 5.Shows the number of public ash trees removed/year through the EAB infestation.This graph does not include tree removals required for reasons other than EAB. Return on Investment for EAB Management 200.00% —Remove and Replace All 150.00% —Treat Best and Replace 100.00% Remaining Remove all Without 50.00% Replacement —Treat Best on 0.00 a —_ High Density 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Streets and Replace Remaining -50.00% Figure 6.Shows the return on investment for each management option. 6 Table 1.Shows costs,benefits,net benefit,highest annual cost,and highest number of removal trees in one year,for each management option. Over the next 25 years Total Total Cumulative Cumulative Highest Highest#of ash Costs Benefits Net Benefit Annual Cost to remove/year Remove and Replace All $1,945,646 $2,195,703 $250,057 $205,546 240 Treat Best Ash and $2,945,716 $4,264,620 $1,318,904 $223,425 140 Replace Remaining Remove All without Replacing $1,142,715 $971,338 ($171,377) $178,302 240 Treat Best Ash on High Density Streets $2,769,399 $3,897,709 $1,128,310 $208,339 164 and Replace Remaining Wait and See $1,540,819 $1,755,271 $214,452 $354,122 692 No EAB $1,452,560 $7,159,567 $5,707,007 $62,640 38 Table 2.Shows annual costs of each management option. Annual Cost of EAB for City Managed Trees Remove all Treat Best on High Treat Best and Year Remove and Replace All Without Density Streets and Replace Remaining Replacement Replace Remaining 1 $78,670 $88,352 $83,226 $83,757 2 $205,546 $178,302 $162,479 $155,657 3 $195,849 $167,317 $208,339 $210,464 4 $187,516 $157,108 $158,936 $164,993 5 $177,163 $145,653 $201,557 $213,019 6 $175,783 $143,161 $155,702 $150,261 7 $177,358 $141,103 $202,993 $223,425 8 $174,958 $121,719 $164,529 $127,639 9 $19,867 $0 $119,483 $118,794 10 $22,013 $0 $55,081 $63,171 11 $24,071 $0 $105,707 $124,615 12 $26,031 $0 $58,433 $66,723 13 $27,903 $0 $109,535 $129,031 14 $29,683 $0 $62,630 $70,109 15 $31,357 $0 $64,179 $71,742 16 $32,982 $0 $65,635 $73,128 17 $34,530 $0 $117,019 $136,520 18 $35,985 $0 $68,152 $75,959 19 $37,424 $0 $69,659 $77,543 20 $38,781 $0 $68,790 $76,813 21 $40,097 $0 $120,761 $140,323 22 $41,331 $0 $71,409 $80,126 23 $42,519 $0 $71,794 $81,345 24 $43,611 $0 $75,564 $82,454 25 $44,621 $0 $127,807 $148,104 7 City of Shakopee December 30th, 2014 Managed Ash Trees ei t ,.. µ 1_ "'' *There are 1921 ash trees located ° a, cR to;"> R,,,1 r 3 R •••• ••• „"idt•ttA✓e1- » h t on City managed property* g_`.r:1.:::. G1i'101 ibt AV e L N .r n v C'R 1 7 ShaI el" ttlAvet: •• • • •1vcE• N 1 d I _r • • 7 •• •r�w 1 �^ ••• • • •• •• " •• i•• 4th Ave E •_ it • •, • •• • ;4th Ave E tIP S ✓tit • r f IS • ',or* r• c o e4e: Isle i1' • 3 ii1i.A'- t 1 0 o 4,d A9 ,%••1•l . _ • hsM1 Pinewood Or • •� • Is:, • n • �, GRenway ,n�� • : ••• • •••� « • °`Sari Parkwa7, Praia ! s Ili • • • S! y Seni�R P. • • i- t ! •.. - m v Eastway Barenscheer Blvd Park ? iVet • N •�' �• t L• •• v •0111,•• , 111,••/—••••��•ui it•• •••w•*AP• • •�ah� GaryL� 'Po„, ~ • • • • !W ~ ahor s°C,, AI it /med Or r G'-�tOe• • e ••e• �S ec�e Ave tl•: ! .11•,..„,„ •t•.�1 N�YAkoPCe Ave E• S �a'�!e Cr°4 v pr .•'r Barenscheer Blvd • Bra It' 0th Ave v • • • •1OS'j a VIM �• 1/! •t O•� I 10 Ave E rn u, n I • • s r *A • rn `o o` ` • * t• e• I • • �• vs n 3 - • •E I, , .. • ..,;4. 11th Ave E• • o • • • ! �••� w % • • 0 11th Ave •• par `a • r•, • • n • Thomas Ave • `u 'I.Q <' h - = y y •y. �s nests sicat • as° .i ,�� N N " ;n HenneiAue`7r �i r mss• ep •Prairie O n• c ,� _r a a 5snc 12th Ave • = $ a k, a 12th Ave E c F a •• u .1,, Mmk •W `` • Het itage�� aver?•M1. _ Q e r • •• • • •• ■! I etanat Or kft 12th tie�.0 &!� • #.Jg r S• • • i 4. Secr • • Westwind AveW t .. i •V I • ••• StrL . Murphy Ave mera/ • 1 a • •P'r S Mcnnens Al ••• oeh •• '.'twY`eE • • • ota• •• sOr 5 c Granted Onyx Dr nF Ea0°Q u „ . t.0... '�� , ^�� • • G0\30 •• M,n r v\e • b DaDe P n = p`�°tee Ln '�g! _ _ ex: ai 13th 1Re Nor • • • • F4+9fwe L,r h �.° S�`g �c"°y r `P X48 Dr Ev; • • - • • • is alk •• fir' • w N Jc Qts6` v • •10 e��'et'‘ Dean Lakes Siva s • • •erlivtl • • t 4 t • �♦ 1 K •S• Boulder.Pointe a ,• c c! n r' V A t u S v m Liz ac f_t ..r..^--"."..—, Q Woo' • ••41•1"% Tahpah i a Orchard A4y 3 E Mour,d, F • m` P pe MGM Park OW ' • `r Sr f ---. • _ b O to • I • , c E'Sand St -,i o"" clrrrosis fM.,. ��" ,'C ••.� - 8311n°,� 1 Gon°tt 5� ° a m ^ = Bulrush Blvd a Princeton Ave D4::::::-'1":31:15: v • v 17th Ave E... .-...... --.-. _._, - _ • Z rn N oIn H Z m Providence Or ,, 8 n o 0 0°^Ave King Ap A. Eagl°Creek Br ° .G o vs c c • • o w a :n s ; Mockingbird Ave 0 f O h,! �oWCk Way vtl as E C a e. — o Z o 3 u 'a+ - m o e : u - 17th Ave E m 17th Ave E �: 3annann Ln c g. n ; a o CP H r • o o c •• .fly,dads Cr ° "" Pd Ave ur Arabian Ave E O u • ,Ul1a 'n 17th Ave E-. •�wPo c French Trace Ave 18th AveE elakewood4- 17th Pv e'T1 60` _- t 3 ° ^e ` _ Anton •ha • ri L a y a lit eV Danube Ave Z ^ ey. 1 OL a r •i,Cn o ewer Rd Val/ty` St Francis Ave gtaY al Or •! • a 3 �Ob°re Vn 4De Wesrches �`R °o % Grovcva' a ` r lei Av° d o ■ �lsyttd a ;-> 11,3 ° w 'o Thrush St tln U` sOr • H Thrush St v rc e Patters 1 • E rn ° Karma - v Hdtw ood Dr orr w • a O ° 2 • • Alden Ave h� a 128rh St » v"' • _ °r *Not all ash trees are included W n 'n vi RdE Wilhelm Cr i c 3 o z o a m N ,� .• •. • 9 I • CtaryC o teeny La on this map, additional trees r V n are located in Southbridge area* 1 0 Crane St �,. o n 8 • ; ° m o `e • 4sarumCt v er16 Sy m o c Damta Cm iy� Eldo S Molina St vi 130th St W CR-78 CR-ie •Valley V• i R� S ♦ ••••• • • •Jalte y • If 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles City managed ash tree Shakopee EAB Management Options March 3rd, 2015 Map of 'Treat Best and Replace Remaining' N • ry I • MIA 161 CRK61 sm 4R 131 WAN 10i • Fla' �,,,+.!a... CR 101 5 W Lt, •• cR,P+latAveE s s o \ • OS p11st Ave E • • .. zna ave It es -. G�.6"t'e-°vim • e L We • • z• le, ,p • an • v •�• • s se Yo t:R 69 Sal Awe Sha n • • • • ,: •�c M • �' • 3 • !p� 9� • •!th A • ••• dt•ve F • •• • ..,,�•e • • • • • • l'°w'• Y • P� • • ;.,,2 v^ • T hp,. • • • I (,,- •;,a Aye v: • • • • s, •� • • ?'o•pt • Z • •• •jam • A,E • • • g •4th��g-�r • v ` •�,7 • i Parkway Ave • • •�I'.z"' iIC A° •• • • 9 M ee s' •• > :':•. M• • • E • .. 1 am ve SR y • • _RvA:.M• S • s ttn h �•• 1th Avc •5N AVey • °�' • \ Merl F • St vi • • • M�•*al* • • •• M • Bth e E 'A F •' r4 es r.p • • •" ��A E •• • •• Garden N• !• •••gtr,.61••f j ~ '`',4,„b °r chansmanr Dr :Jr:.• • • Eas Niew °"xe C _ c rtaiy; Dr • $ a A c 1 t• t • C. i o Aatrmea or ,� • •• - • •'•Sna a Ave w •_ •• —••sit, .VI • • •• shakoPl�,�>! •• • " c ceeenA D. p+` • ••• • ' • r • • Shakoaee Ave E 60 • N N •• • • • •Y crt 173 • _ • • �� • �'s,,,o m �- 10th Ave w tack eve W • ••• N• •• Ye ••• • ••• • • • • • • • 101 • • 1•th Av E • 10th Ave E °f - I • • • :• •• • •• A _ _ y'° i. • a if • p • •• i •• • _ n f ➢ > Z F f •4P `emu » • 11th AveE ° •t/M A,y�W C1A • • 11th Ave W • ••• •» • _ • 11fi Ave AreE 11M Ave E _ 11th Ave E •�� • ; • • • •• • • `u _ _ • • • ••• ur QS tkw 4 by, • • '^ �. A t.o.- o u• •• U } •M • c: N ae+•1. Za • • �+• ~• _ f et<nk • y Gt V o o '• Prone« • �" nn■e>ue,-, 4,• <•r 121n Ave w • •• •• <tztlt�ve M ' • � • �.-- Westw,ntl Avc W • • op ; • • •• • •• •�'°' C� •• •• • 3 - KennslnA •• •• Murphy Ave • n r • ° Granite Ave •• or 5 • p,...,,,,,,..„ g • Mwnen • • x,t • • • _ a`s< • om es" NWM«SIm 6 _•• CdA it M i •� I�9 y n h •14 m n• e+ s • P$ • °Se' s um w7 7 • 46411111• °; • rvenm +< BoWeer Ponm a • R° • a tc Was Arn®1on Ct y V e o-14P CO ••• . : • i •• ulAC Ct uti•169 N 5••< n 00 N USA• • �5. Oe6ud Pk, E Mound St m = •qya<c. • •Pet J dOD a i Menro i it < sun n«C1,°me • E Mound Y'l _1 I • "`° $iQe n *Not all ash trees are included Of �• MerntnsM1 G`` A ••f pFlebtassomEnW APprao 1890 j6"�,!. on this map, additional trees 121,T32 us 169 s US 169 N are located in Southbridge area* s ® ..--.. US-169 N - US-169 N..--. x 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles E Ash meeting criteria for chemical treatment (Save) • Ash trees to be removed Shakopee EAB Management Options March 3rd, 2015 Map of 'Treat Best on High Density Streets and Replace Remaining' • . / .:41'••• • D, „5„ N W --••1&11. ,; • N.i61 NMN 1Qt �j '0.,. t E GR tOt 5 r 3Z r `�, • $ cR,sui ls,AVe a • •• • • • yy�ll Avt E SC • t' • Z c .1G1 •} t l .:AV<E lc' A-M1SI.Ave E. .v t; • •,,.PrW P •ti ult • Ash meeting criteria for chemical treatment (Save) 6»gyp`' » • ZnaA°� .,W G • ' tnd Avt: f • • •c9y691tt ve • • •• Ash to be removed _ ••• •n" ~v s e r zn �a �rt ••�Percent ash on street segment '�» • e•• 33% - 66% 66.1% - 100% •••,t tS • • " * S �AV •Ord Ade vv • •• • • • ti v A a''_ • • • aI ,K •� • •• �i • • • .. • • u Cc :Alh��aa•n •. • • • u i")fin, r •me • • Ea5::::::;,:::: t..n• r �� i • • • t illi• 7th Avt E• • 5th Aver\ •• • • !�' - 6 -•t •eta• • AA ^•...M�Q••• � • • • 404P•00 • 4th ve F A fJ ••h y • • •,r, • • • East. �un"� Ear 4i • • • • • • • o s 9P�, • • c Q C A1 mM Dr, .,.... Pv°,N • • �• t w:... -_.•�' •� _ •• • •� • • ••• Shah •• • • • s _ Cascade Ue or C7 M • ;• IF 4 • • �'4'''''D•F > ♦a Ili•nr'4 iom Anew • • •• re... , *th • N1 •.. _ _ • _ a 1 ai c"e • - a • • s• • • - _ °e„<� .*4,r t v o VLP •tltlil W • 'In,r.aN . M• _ Ilh AveE • , .,. _ I1M Ave ••• % i H 1 •• r a o < —da,...-- .... ,_ D • <:''y rna49o„ r • 12th Ave W • • •• •• • r, .... n ,A.,... •• • •� �„rl��•� ••11!«tea°•'�'• • i• • •• ' - y • Kennsinpfoh0 •• • • • tbailljr e, • ••• KDn`DE •,, �`. ° a.< • Hw n� • • c • • • vo `c „NMe.St 5 • • • °ands c` s 1�:°•`° . � y _ ..• i • • •• ..•.. _ 9weLnr n t�°'° d, Vra!in7 Or - 2 C •ilb 17MW • �'i r Iavt - • Q • • • • • ,• •�ItIDQ • • S c eC i 1� � M• wudder Pointe C R� :� c A+° v1 !utstenr m c �.. �5<e'r Waanm9ton et - - 3 e - j •• ,„.0, u3.tfi9 ,Dale \e r,oe • • : w ° orchard Pk,,,,.. E n s t. ev •Pe J o $ 2 McNto� it S F Mound St q s •• °^'Pe, sDnea+e' • et ft Bro MUrn Or E Mound 5` Sage Ott usp59s *Not all ash trees are included US-189 N Tahoe., ��• Nnntoth G� �'. on this map, additional trees '� ADDIeb{ossom Ln W ADP'„ -. Ug 69$ • °°rt.L°` -=-- are located in Southbridge area* -..--.. OS S-159 S us l69 5 US.t 69 N - _. -. --- - US-169.5 -. -. 'r' 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles