Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.B.4. Authorize and extension agreement for a limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) & MPCA Petroleum Brownfields for MNDOT Parcel 37 General Business 4. B. 4. SHAKOl'EE TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney,Public Works Director DATE: 11/05/2014 SUBJECT: Authorize an Extension Agreement for a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)& MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services for MNDOT Parcel 37(E) Action Sought Authorize an Extension Agreement with WSB&Associates,Inc.for a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)&MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services for MNDOT Parcel 37. Background The City of Shakopee is interested in purchasing MnDOT parcels 37&43 near CR 69 and TH 169. Staff had a Phase I ESA done for these parcels to determine their environmental status. The Phase I report revealed no Recognized Environmental Conditions(REC's).However, it did find two Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions(HREC's)associated with Parcel 37,the former Gopher State Truck Stop. Attached to this memo is the main body of the report with the findings,conclusions, opinion and recommendations. The main recommendation is to do a Phase II ESA to assess current subsurface soil, soil vapor,and groundwater conditions against current regulating criteria as an option for the property as future development. Attached is the Phase II ESA proposal from WSB &Associates,Inc. the purpose of the Limited Phase II ESA is to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions at the property. this evaluation will be used to determine an approximate soil correction cost that would be incurred for future development. In addition,the property will be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program in order for the City and successive purchasers of the property to not be held responsible under stat statute for the contamination identified at the property Recommendation Staff recommends approving the extension agreement to determine the extent of environmental conditions of the historical recognized environmental condition site for possible purchase and for possible future development. Budget Impact The cost of the Limited Phase II ESA&PBP Service is estimated to be$10,537.00 and to be funded out of the EDA fund. Relationship to Vision This supports Goal E: Deliver effective and efficient public services by a staff of well-trained,caring,and professional employees. Requested Action Authorize an Extension Agreement with WSB&Associates,Inc. for a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)&MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services for MNDOT Parcel 37. Attachments: ESA Report Phase I Phase II ESA&PBP October 24, 2014 PHASE I SHAKOPEE . Environmental City of Shakopee Site Assessment 129 S.Holmes Street • Shakopee,MN 5 (952)233-9300 Vacant Land Parcels 69110120 and 2791 10260 Shakopee, MN 55379 1418 P ro j P c t No, 1 811-42 0 ti • a r 1 fi w. s 701 Xenia Avenue South,Suite 300 �� Minneapolis,MN 55416 Tel:(763)541-4800 Fax:(763)541.1700 wsbeng.corn Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vacant Land Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 Shakopee, MN 55379 Prepared for: City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee,MN 55379 Prepared by: WSB &Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South,Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 October 24, 2014 Ryan G. Spencer Environmental and Remediation Scientist Phase 1 En%leonine ntal Site:1<ssessment Parcels 641111120 and 270110260 V1 SUS Project No.1811-420 Table of Contents TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.Summary 1 2. Introduction 3 2.1 Purpose 3 2.2 Scope of Services 3 2.3 Assessment Limitations and Assumptions 3 2.4 Special Terms and Conditions 4 2.5 Previous Environmental Documents 4 3.Site Description 7 3.1 Subject Property Location 7 3.2 Property Vicinity and Characteristics 7 3.3 Current and Historic Use of the Property 7 3.4 Description of Structures, Roads,and Improvements 7 3.5 Adjoining Properties 8 4.User Provided Information 9 5. Records Review 10 5.1 Regulatory Database Review 10 5.2 Regulatory File Review 12 5.3 Physical Setting Information 12 5.4 Historical Use Information 13 6. Site Reconnaissance 16 6.1 Methodology 16 6.2 General Site Setting 16 6.3 Exterior and Interior Observations 16 7. Interviews 18 8. Findings, Conclusions,and Opinions 19 8.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions 19 8.2 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions I9 8.3 Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions 20 8.4 Vapor Intrusion 20 8.5 De Minimis Conditions 20 8.6 Items of Environmental Note 21 Phase I I sis ironmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 '%S11 Project\o. 1811.420 Table of Contents 9. Recommendations 22 10. Data Gaps 23 11. Qualifications of Environmental Professionals 24 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Project Location Figure 2 -USGS Topographical Map Figure 3 -Scott County Soils Figure 4-Surface Geology Figure 5 - Bedrock Geology Figure 6- County Well Index Figure 7 - HREC Locations LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A-Scott County Property Information Appendix B - Photographic Documentation Appendix C - User Questionnaire Appendix D - EDR Report Appendix E- Fire Insurance Maps (Unmapped) Appendix F- City Directories Appendix G -Aerial Photographs Appendix H -Topographic Maps Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 1V'SI3 Project Ao, 1811-420 1. Summary WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) was retained by the City of Shakopee (the City) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the vacant land consisting of parcels 69110120 and 279110260 in Shakopee, MN (the property). The objective of the assessment was to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the property according to ASTM E1527-13 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments". The property is located in the southwest quarter of Section 11,Township 115 North, and Range 23 West,in Scott County, Minnesota. The property is currently owned by the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation and is adjoined by County Road 69 to the west, commercial properties to the north, and residential properties to the east and south. A property location map is included as Figure 1. WSB has performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.3 of this assessment. This Phase I ESA has been prepared exclusively for the City. No additional parties may rely on the contents of this report unless written authorization is obtained from WSB. This Phase I ESA has revealed no RECs and two historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs)associated with the property. The HRECS include: HREC- 1:Petroleum Release(Former Gopher State Truck Stop) This site is located on the northeastern portion of the property (parcel 69110120) and was identified on the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) database. The former Gopher State Truck Stop reportedly was in operation at from approximately 1957 to 1989. The associated leak (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) ID 701) was discovered in 1988 and resulted from a leaking 10,000 gallon leaded gasoline underground storage tank (UST) and two 4,000 diesel USTs. All associated USTs were reportedly removed from the site in 1989 and five groundwater monitoring wells were installed. The site was issued site closure by the MPCA on June 06, 1989. No monitoring wells or evidence of a petroleum leak was observed at this site during this assessment. The documented petroleum release at the property is considered a HREC. HREC - 2: Volatile Organic Compounds Release (Former Gopher State Truck Stop) During the investigation of MPCA leak 701,volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were also identified in groundwater samples at the property. Specifically, 1,1,2- trichloroethene, 1,2-dicloroethane, and trichloroethene were detected in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 %%SR Project No.1811-420 Page 1 groundwater of the Shakopee Limestone formation at the property above their respective Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Health Risk Limits (HRLs). Based on the likelihood that the compounds originated from off-site, the MPCA issued a No Action Letter for the VOC release on August 23, 1994 conditioned on three successive years of groundwater monitoring. A No Further Action determination was later issued by the MPCA on June 26, 1998. The documented VOC release at the property is considered a HREC. Additionally,the following environmental items should be noted: Soil and Asphalt Piles Two soil piles and one asphalt pile were observed on the northeastern portion of the property at the former Gopher State Truck Stop (parcel 69110120). The soil mounds were approximately 100 cubic yards in size and were covered with vegetation. The asphalt pile was approximately 500 cubic yards in size and observed to be uniform. No construction debris or evidence of regulated waste was observed in the piles during the site visit. Concrete Foundations and Light Poles Two large concrete foundation pieces and numerous light pole footings were observed on the northeastern portion of the property at the former Gopher State Truck Stop (parcel 69110120). The concrete foundation pieces were approximately 4 cubic yards in size and were removed from the ground. The light poles footings approximately 0.5 cubic yard in size and in place during the site visit. 1'hase I Ens ironmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 N:SI3 Project No.181 1-420 Page 2 2. Introduction 2.1 Purpose WSB was retained by the City to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the vacant land consisting of parcels 69110120 and 279110260 in Shakopee, MN. The objective of the assessment was to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the property according to ASTM E1527-13 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments". The ASTM E1572-13 Standard defines the term recognized environmental condition as meaning "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or(3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment." The term is not intended to include de minimis condition's that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. WSB's understands that the City intends to redevelop the property for mixed residential and commercial purposes. 2.2 Scope of Services The Scope of Services performed by WSB is defined by the ASTM E1527-13 Standard and the methodologies and procedures described in the body of this report. The ASTM E1527-13 Standard is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner,contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability, which is the practice that constitutes "all appropriate inquiry into previous ownership and uses of the property with good commercial or customary practice" as defined in 42 U.S.C. 9601 (35) (B). 2.3 Assessment Limitations and Assumptions This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. The property was covered with vegetation which limited direct observation of the ground. No conditions were encountered that were determined to be significantly limiting to the purpose of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 1%S8 Project No.181 1420 Page 3 The Scope of Services for this Phase I ESA did not include the completion of soil borings, the installation of groundwater monitoring wells, or the collection of soil, sediment, surface water, or groundwater samples. In addition, this assessment did not include collecting or analyzing samples for the presence of asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, radon, or urea formaldehyde as this is beyond the scope of the ASTM E1527-13. 2.4 Special Terms and Conditions The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on the general guidance provided by ASTM E1527-13, available data cited in this report, and property conditions noted at the time of the site reconnaissance. A Phase I ESA cannot wholly eliminate the uncertainty regarding the potential for REC at the property. This assessment is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty related to the potential for RECs in connection with the property within reasonable time limits and cost. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report represent WSB's professional opinions. These opinions are arrived at in accordance with currently acceptable Phase I ESA practices at this time and are subject to the inherent limitations of environmental assessments outlined in this section. WSB obtained, reviewed, and evaluated information provided by property owner/representatives, Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) Report and local/state public entities. WSB's conclusions, opinions, and recommendations are based in part on this information. WSB's services did not include the verification of the accuracy or authenticity of this information as this is beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA per ASTM guidelines. This report is based upon the standard gathered information (ASTM E1527-13) and WSB's observations made during the site reconnaissance. Given the inherent limitations of environmental assessment work, WSB does not guarantee that the property is free of hazardous or potentially hazardous materials or conditions, or that latent or undiscovered conditions will not become evident in the future. WSB's report is prepared in accordance with WSB's Scope of Work and no other warranties,representations,or certifications are made. 2.5 Previous Environmental Documents WSB was provided previous environmental documents pertaining to the property by the MPCA and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Office of Environmental Stewardship. Files were reviewed both electronically and at the MPCA's St. Paul office on October 20, 2014. Select electronic files are available upon request. The following information was gathered during review: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 %S S6 Project No.1811-420 Page 4 Former Gopher State Truck Stop -This site is located on the northeastern portion of the property (parcel 69110120) and was identified on the LUST database. The Gopher State Truck Stop reportedly was in operation at the site from approximately 1957 to 1989 with the operating address of 11551 Johnson Memorial Drive. The associated leak (MPCA ID 701) was discovered in 1988 and resulted from a leaking 10,000 gallon leaded gasoline underground storage tank(UST) and two 4,000 diesel USTs. All associated USTs were reportedly removed from the site in 1989 and five groundwater monitoring wells were installed. The site was issued site closure by the MPCA on June 06, 1989. No indications of soil correction or remediation activities were apparent in the site files. The documentation petroleum leak at the property is considered a historical recognized environmental condition (HREC). In addition, during the investigation of MPCA leak 701, VOCs were identified in groundwater samples at the site. Specifically, 1,1,2-trichloroethene, 1,2- dicloroethane, and trichloroethene were detected in the groundwater of the Shakopee Limestone formation at the site above their respective MDH HRLs. The site was entered into the MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) program in 1994 and was issued the facility ID of VP4510. Based on the likelihood that the compounds originated from off-site,the MPCA issued a No Action Letter for the VOC release on August 23, 1994 conditioned on three successive year of groundwater monitoring. A No Further Action determination was later issued by the MPCA on June 26, 1998. The documentation of VOC release at the property is considered a HREC. Land Adjacent to Former Gopher State Truck Stop - According to MnDOT environmental files, petroleum contamination was encountered in the soil adjacent to the County Road 69 right-of-way which was previously part of the property (parcel 69110120) prior to 1989. MnDOT completed improvements on the adjacent right of way in 1996 during the Trunk Highway 169/101 reconstruction project. The project included modifying the alignment of County Road 69 adjacent to the Former Gopher State Truck Stop. MnDOT reportedly excavated approximately 6 feet below the former grade for the construction of a drainage ditch directly adjacent to the property (parcel 69110120). The petroleum impacted soil extended onto the property (parcel 69110120) but was not removed as part of the road construction project. The excavated petroleum-impacted soil was reportedly stockpiled on the property(parcel 69110120). In 1999,the stockpiled soil was field screened for petroleum impacts. The soils with organic headspace readings above 10 parts per million (ppm) were reportedly hauled offsite for thermal treatment and the soils with headspace readings below 10 ppm (approximately 500 to 600 cubic yards) were thin spread on the property (likely on both parcels 69110120 and 279110260). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 !1`Sli Project No.1811-420 Page 5 Documentation of the petroleum-impacted soil excavation, stockpiling, and thin spreading at the property was not included in the reviewed MPCA files. An additional environmental drilling investigation completed in the County Road 69 right-of-way was reportedly conducted in April 2013 for Scott County. Petroleum contamination was reportedly detected during this investigation at concentrations exceeding regulatory criteria. WSB contacted Scott County on October 21, 2014 and to date, the final 2013 investigation results have not been provided. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSB Project No.1811-120 I'age 6 3. Site Description 3.1 Property Location The property consists of two parcels located east of County Road 69 and approximately 500 feet north of U.S. Highway 169 in Shakopee, MN. The property is located in the southwest quarter of Section 11, Township 115 North, and Range 23 West, in Scott County, Minnesota. A property location map is included in Figure 1. Property information regarding the property was obtained from Scott County's Property Information Database. Based on this information,the property parcels are listed as 69110120 and 279110260 and owned by the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation. The property parcel ae listed as non-homesteaded and total 26.16 acres in size. Copies of the Scott County Property Information sheets are included in Appendix A. 3.2 Property Vicinity and Characteristics The property is located in a mixed residential/commercial district with commercial properties adjoining the property to the north and residential properties adjoining the property to the east and south. The property is bound by the County Road 69 to the west. The property grounds consist minimally of manicured grassland (parcel 279110260) and include a wooded section on the northeastern portion (parcel 69110120). The newly constructed paved road (Vierling Drive West) transects the property. 3.3 Current and Historic Use of the Property The property was historically used for agricultural purposes from at least 1940 to 1956. A truck stop (former Gopher State Truck Stop) was reportedly in operation on the northern portion of the property from approximately 1957 to 1989. The remaining areas of the property were utilized for agricultural purposes from 1940 to present. The property is currently vacant since 1989. Photographs documenting the current property conditions, including a photographic location map, are included as Appendix B. 3.4 Description of Structures, Roads,and Improvements No buildings or structures currently are present on the property. A newly constructed paved road (Vierling Drive West) transects the property. Two large concrete foundations and numbers light poles were observed on the northern portion of the property on parcel 69110120. The concrete foundation pieces (approximately 4 cubic yards in size) were removed from the ground and the light poles (approximately 0.5 cubic yards in size) were in place. The foundation pieces Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 .A SB Project No.1811.420 Page 7 and light poles are believed to be remnant from the historic truck stop (former Gopher State Truck Stop) that occupied the property from 1957 to 1989. 3.5 Adjoining Properties The adjoining property use was noted on October 15, 2014 by WSl3. The adjoining property use is described below: North: County Road 69 followed by residential properties and a commercial strip mall (Shakopee Town Square) East: Residential properties South: Vacant wooded land and residential properties West: County Road 69 followed by vacant land Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 %S11 Project No.1R11-420 Page R 4. User Provided Information In order to satisfy the requirements of All Appropriate Inquiries (AM), the property user was provided an environmental questionnaire. The user is the party seeking to use the Phase I ESA and has specific obligations under ASTM E1527-13. WSB provided a user questionnaire to Bruce Loney (City of Shakopee) for the purposes of satisfying the user provided requirement for ASTM and AAI requirements. Mr. Loney completed the questionnaire on October 13, 2014. Mr. Loney was not aware of any pending litigation or pending/past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products or any pending administrative proceedings associated with the property. In addition, he was not aware of any environmental permits, underground storage tanks, aboveground storage tanks, or environmental report documents (other than the information included in Section 2.5) associated with the property. However, Mr. Loney indicated knowledge of a leak associated with at the former Gopher State Truck Stop located on the northern portion of the property as being possible REC. A copy of the completed user questionnaire is included as Appendix C. Phase 1 E nNironmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSB Project No.1811-420 Page 9 5. Records Review 5.1 Regulatory Database Review A Federal and State database records review was conducted by Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) a commercial regulatory database service provider. An EDR Report was generated for the property on October 17, 2014. This report was used to identify verified or potentially hazardous substances and petroleum releases associated with the property,adjoining properties,and surrounding area. A copy of the EDR report is included as Appendix D. The Federal and State regulatory agencies database was evaluated and the minimum search distances used are consistent with the ASTM E1572-13 Standard Practice. The EDR Report includes descriptions of the databases examined and radius maps showing the locations of the sites identified. Property Listings The EDR report identified one database listing determined to be located on the property. Below is a summary of the identified property database listing: Former Gopher State Truck Stop - This site is located at 11551 Johnson Memorial Drive and is listed on the No Further Remediation Action Planned (CERC-NFRAP), Minnesota List (MN LS), LUST, Financial Assurance, Site Remediation Section (SRS), UST, and VIC databases. These listings are related to a leak (MPCA ID 701) discovered at this site in 1988. The leak consisted of gasoline (unknown) and was issued site closed by the MPCA in 1999. Site closure indicates the identified leak was determined not to pose a threat to human health or the environment in its current state. Site closure does not indicate the site is free of contamination. The seven USTs with the site were reportedly removed in 1986. This site was also entered in the MPCA VIC program (VP4510) in 1994 due to the presence of non-petroleum related chemicals found in the groundwater. The MPCA issued a No Action Letter for the VOCs 1,1,2-trichloroethene, 1,2-dicloroethane, and trichloroethene compounds present in the groundwater at the site on August 23, 1994. A No Further Action Determination was later issued by the MPCA on June 26, 1998. The property LUST and VIC database listings represent HREC at this time. Additional property LUST and VIC details are included in Section 5.2 and additional HREC definition information is included in Section 8.2. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 SI3 Project No.1811-420 Page 10 Adjoining Property Listings, The EDR report identified one database listings for sites adjoining the property. Below is a summary of the identified adjoining property database listing: K-Mart 9386 - This site is located east of the property at 1200 Shakopee Town Square and is listed on the Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (RCRA- CESQG) database. Inclusion on the RCRA-CESQG database means the site generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month. No indication of a hazardous material release or violation was reported. Based on the type of database listing, the adjoining database listing does not represent a REC at this time. Surrounding Area Listings The EDR Report identified ten database listings within the search distance from the property. The listings are associated with six surrounding area sites.The identified listings include: • One RCRA-CESQG listings; • Two historic auto station (EDR US Hist Auto Stat) listings; • One federal information system (FINDS) listing; • One AST listing; • One UST listing; • One licensing information system (MDA-LIS); • One LUST listing(closed by the MPCA); • Two Financial Assurance listings. Based on the database listing types, regulatory status (all the identified leaks have been issued site closure by the MPCA), and distance from the property, the identified surrounding area listings do not appear to be RECS at this time. Not Mapped Listings The EDR report identified six database listings as not mapped". These are sites which EDR could not determine an exact location due to incomplete or inaccurate database information. Based on the review of the listings, the sites appear to be located beyond the appropriate search distance from the property and are not considered RECs at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 N'SIt l'roject No.1811-420 Page 11 5.2 Regulatory File Review ASTM Standard E1527-13 requires that a regulatory file review be conducted if the property, or adjoining property, is listed on a public database. Based on the information provided by EDR (see Section 5.1), a file review of one property LUST site was deemed necessary. Ms. Dianne Mitzuk with the MPCA provided electronic copies of available files on October 16, 2014 and WSB completed a file review at MPCA's St. Paul office on October 20, 2014. Select electronic files are available upon request. Based on the documents reviewed, below is a summary of the additional information gathered: Former Gopher State Truck Stop - This site is located on the northeastern portion of the property (parcel 69110120) and was identified on the LUST database. The Gopher State Truck Stop reportedly was in operation at the site from approximately 1957 to 1989 with the operating address of 11551 Johnson Memorial Drive. The associated leak(MPCA ID 701) was discovered in 1988 and resulted from a leaking 10,000 gallon leaded gasoline underground storage tank(UST) and two 4,000 diesel USTs. All associated USTs were reportedly removed from the site in 1989 and five groundwater monitoring wells were installed. The site was issued site closure by the MPCA on June 06, 1989. No indications of soil correction or remediation activities were apparent in the site files. The documented petroleum leak at the property is considered a HREC. In addition, during the investigation of MPCA leak 701, VOCs were identified in groundwater samples at the site. Specifically, 1,1,2-trichloroethene, 1,2- dicloroethane, and trichloroethene were identified in the groundwater of the Shakopee Limestone formation at the site above their respective MDH HRLs. The site was entered into the MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) program in 1994 and was issued the facility ID of VP4510. Based on the likelihood that the compounds originated from off-site,the MPCA issued a No Action Letter for the non- petroleum release on August 23, 1994 conditioned on three successive year of groundwater monitoring. A No Further Action determination was later issued by the MPCA on June 26 1998. The documented VOC release at the property is considered a HREC. 5.3 Physical Setting Information Based on the Unites States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle maps, the property elevation is 819 feet above mean sea level (amsl) as outlined on Figure 2. The property grounds are relatively flat and slope to the south/southwest. The property consists of minimally manicured grass areas and included a wooded area on the northern portion. The newly constructed Vierling Drive West transects the property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 ■S'SB Project No.I811-420 Page 12 The Soil Survey of Scott County classified the property soils mainly as Dickman sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes) as illustrated on Figure 3. The property surficial geology consists of sand and gravel of the Langdon Terrace as illustrated on Figure 4. The underlying property bedrock consists of sandy dolomite Praire du Chien rock of the Ordovician period (see Figure 5). Bedrock is estimated to occur at a depth of approximately 40 feet below ground surface (bgs) at the property. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) County Well Index was reviewed to determine if registered wells are located on the property or surrounding area. One verified well (ID 507541) was identified on the property and two verified wells (IDs 404373 and 206813) were identified in the surrounding area within 500 feet of the property. In addition, two unverified wells (IDs 507542 and 507544) were identified on the property. A well index search map is included as Figure 6. No wells were observed on the property during the site visit. Based on review of the well information and previous environmental reports, the depth to groundwater is estimated to approximately 80 feet bgs and the property. The general groundwater flow direction at the property is estimated to be north towards the Minnesota River. It should be noted that groundwater levels can fluctuate due to seasonal,natural,and manmade events. 5.4 Historical Use Information WSB reviewed historical information to determine if past property uses have led to RECs. WSB consulted historical sources that were readily available, practically reviewable, and likely to be useful to determine the past history of the property within the timeframe and constraints of this Phase I ESA. The sources consulted included the following. • Fire Insurance Maps: Sanborn fire insurance maps were requested from EDR for the property. Often,areas of potential environmental concern,such as locations of former storage tanks or hazardous substance storage,can be identified by referencing fire insurance maps. The property was not covered in the Sanborn fire insurance map search conducted by EDR. A copy of the Certified Sanborn Map Report is included in Appendix E. • City Directories: EDR provided city directories from Cole Information Services for Johnson Memorial Drive and Old Brickyard Road. Directories from 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2008, and 2013 were reviewed (see Appendix F). Based on the directories reviewed,the following information was gathered: Phase 1 Environmental Site;assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSB Project No.1811-420 Page 13 Property Addresses The only known property address (11551 Johnson Memorial Drive) was not listed in the directories reviewed. Adjoining Property Addresses No adjoining properties addresses were identified in the directories reviewed. • Aerial Photographs: EDR provided historic aerial photography of the property and surrounding area dating back to 1940. Aerial photographs were reviewed for the years 1940, 1947, 1957, 1966, 1969, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1987, 1991, 1997, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, and 2010 (see Appendix G). In addition, a property aerial from 2013 is included as Figure 1. Based on the aerial review, the following observations were made: Property Observations The property was developed for agricultural purposes in the 1940 through 1957 photographs. The former Gopher State Truck Stop (including a building and truck/trailer storage) is present on the northern portion of the property on the 1966 through 1987 photographs. The service road providing access to the Shakopee Town Square is present on the northern portion of the property in the 1978 and subsequent photographs. The northern portion of the site is a vacant wooed lot in the 1997 through 2013 photographs. Adjoining Property Observations North -The adjoining land to the north (across County Road 69) of the property is occupied by the residential properties in the 1940 through 2013 photographs. The strip mall to the northwest of the property (Shakopee Town Square) is present on the 1978 and subsequent photographs. East-The adjoining land to the east of the property is developed for agricultural purposes in the 1940 through 1991 photographs. The residential townhome complex to the east is present on the 1997 and subsequent photographs. South - The adjoining land to the south of the property is developed for agricultural purposes in the 1940 through 1957 photographs. Residential houses are present on the 1966 through 1987 photographs and are not present on the 1991 photograph. The land to the south was vacant in the 1997 photograph and developed with a residential townhome complex (to the southeast) in the 2005 and subsequent photographs. Phase I L:rrvironmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSIt Project\o.1811420 Page 14 West - The adjoining land to the west of the property is developed for agricultural purposes in the 1940 through 1991 photographs. The realignment of County Road 69 is first apparent on the 1997 and subsequent photographs. The land to the west (across County Road 69) is vacant on the 1991 and subsequent photographs. • Topographic Map: EDR provided historic USGS topographic maps for the property and surrounding area. Topographic maps were reviewed for the years 1905, 1958, 1972, and 1993 (see Appendix H). Based on the topographic map review,the following observations were made: Property Observations The property is depicted as undeveloped in the maps reviewed. No evidence of railroads, mining,dumping, or chemical storage was depicted at the property on the maps reviewed. Adjoining Property Observations The adjoining properties are depicted as undeveloped in the maps reviewed, except for the Shakopee Town Square buildings (east of the property) which are depicted on the 1993 map. No evidence of railroads, mining, dumping, or chemical storage was depicted at the property on the maps reviewed. • City Building and Inspection File Review: WSB visited the Shakopee Building and Inspection Department on October 15, 2014. The City had no available records since the property was historically located in Jackson Township. The City advised searching the Scott County records. • Scott County Building and Inspection File Review: WSB visited the Scott County Building and Inspection Department on October 15, 2014. Mr. Peter Scott provided the available property building and inspection file pertaining to the property. The file contained an MPCA No Further Action Letter dated June 8, 1998 and a demolition permit associated with the former Gopher State Truck Stop dated October 11, 1989. No additional information was included in the file. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSB Project No.1811-420 Page 15 6. Site Reconnaissance 6.1 Methodology WSB conducted observations of conditions at the property and adjoining properties on October 15, 2014. The site reconnaissance included a walkthrough of all accessible property areas and adjoining properties. The adjoining property observations were limited to the public right-of-way and no access limitations were encountered. 6.2 General Site Setting The property is generally flat and slopes gradually to the south-southwest. The grounds are comprised of minimally maintained grass areas and include a wooded lot on the northern portion. In addition, a stormwater pond is located on the southeastern portion of the property. 6.3 Exterior Observations WSB conducted observations of the property,adjoining properties, and surrounding area on October 15, 2014. Site reconnaissance photographs are included in Appendix B. A summary of the site reconnaissance is outlined in the table below: Site Reconnaissance Summary Table Observed Issue During Site Comments Visit Yes No Aboveground / Underground X None observed, Storage Tanks Drums/Containers X None observed. Animals X None observed. Buildings/Structures X None observed. Construction/Demolition An asphalt pile, two concrete footings, debris X and numerous concrete light poles were present at parcel 69110120. Drainage Ditches X None observed Dirt/Spoil Piles X Two dirt piles were present at parcel 69110120. Floor Drains X None observed. /Sumps/Vaults Hazardous X None observed. Substances/Petroleum Phase 1 lIn%ironmental Site:■ssessment Parcels 69111)120)and 279110260 VI SR Project No.1811-420 Page 16 Observed Issue During Site Comments Visit Products Landfills X None observed. Odors X None observed. Oil/Water Separators X None observed. Pipelines or Utilities X None observed. Pits, Ponds, Lagoons X None observed. Pools of Liquid X None observed. Railroad Spurs X None observed. Septic Systems X None observed. Solid Waste Disposal X None observed. Solvents X None observed. Spills or Releases X None observed. Stained Soil/Concrete X None observed. Stressed or Dead X None observed. Vegetation Transformers X None observed. Unidentified Substances X None observed. Wastewater Discharge X None observed. From Property Wells X None observed. Asbestos X None observed. Lead-Based Paint X None observed. Mold/Moisture X None observed. An asphalt pile,two large concrete footings,and numerous concrete light poles were present on parcel 69110120 at the property. In addition, the two soil piles were also present on parcel 69110120. The presence of the construction debris is an item of environmental note (see Section 8.6). No other environmental issues or items of concern were observed at the property,or adjoining properties, during the site visit. Phase 1 Environmental Site:1.ssesstneut Parcels.69110120 and 279110260 %S SR Project No. 1811.420 Page 17 7. Interviews WSB conducted interviews with individuals who may have knowledge of current or past information regarding the property. Specifically, WSB made inquiries regarding knowledge of existing or former storage tanks, leaks, dumps, spills, drums, mold, clandestine drug labs, environmental documents, or potential environmental concerns associated with the property. The following individuals were contacted in person,phone,email,or via questionnaire: Interview Summary Table Resource Title or Organization Results of Interview Mr.Loney completed a user questionnaire on 10-13-14 and indicated knowledge of a leak on the Bruce Loney City of Shakopee Public property(former Gopher State Works Director Truck Stop)on the questionnaire (see Appendix C). The presence of these closed leak site was determined to be HREC. Mr.Smith indicated knowledge of Scott County Environmental the former Gopher State Truck Stop Peter Schmidt Health Supervisor and also provided WSB with the parcel 6911020 building and inspection file(see Section 5.4). Tom Pitschneider City of Shakopee Fire Mr. Pitschneider did not have any Marshal information on the property. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 1W'S13 Project No.1811-420 Page 18 8. Findings and Opinions 8.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions This Phase I ESA has revealed no RECs associated with the property. 8.2 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions The ASTM E1572-13 Standard defines the term historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) as meaning "a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (e.g., property use restrictions, Activity and Use Limitations (AULs), institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release a HREC, the environmental professional (EP) must determine whether the past release is a REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted (e.g., if there has been a change in the regulatory criteria). If the EP considers this past release to be a REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the conditions shall be included in the conclusion section of the report as a REC." Based on this assessment, the following HRECs have been identified in connection with the property: HREC- 1:Petroleum Release(Former Gopher State Truck Stop) This site is located on the northeastern portion of the property (parcel 69110120) and was identified on the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) database. The former Gopher State Truck Stop reportedly was in operation at from approximately 1957 to 1989. The associated leak (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) ID 701) was discovered in 1988 and resulted from a leaking 10,000 gallon leaded gasoline underground storage tank (UST) and two 4,000 diesel USTs. All associated USTs were reportedly removed from the site in 1989 and five groundwater monitoring wells were installed. The site was issued site closure by the MPCA on June 06, 1989. No monitoring wells or evidence of a petroleum leak was observed at this site during this assessment.The documented petroleum release at the property is considered a HREC. HREC-2:Non-Petroleum Release(Former Gopher State Truck Stop) During the investigation of MPCA leak 701, VOCs were also identified in groundwater samples at the property. Specifically, 1,1,2-trichloroethene, 1,2- dicloroethane, and trichloroethene were identified in the groundwater of the Shakopee Limestone formation at the property above their respective Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Health Risk Limits (HRLs). Based on the likelihood Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 %'SB Project No.1811-420 Page 19 that the compounds originated from off-site, the MPCA issued a No Action Letter for the non-petroleum release on August 23, 1994 conditioned on three successive year of groundwater monitoring. A No Further Action determination was later issued by the MPCA on June 26, 1998. The documentation of non-petroleum release at the property is considered a HREC. A HREC location map is included as Figure 7. 8.3 Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions The ASTM E1572-13 Standard defines the term controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) as meaning "a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (e.g, as evidence by the issuance of NFA letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority),with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (e.g., property use restrictions, AULs, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A CREC shall be listed in the Findings Section of the Phase I ESA report, and as a REC in the Conclusions Section of the report" Based on this assessment, WSB did not identify any CRECs in connection with the property. 8.4 Vapor Intrusion This investigation has revealed a LUST site associated with the property. The property LUST sites was determined to be a HREC as summarized in Section 8.2. There is a potential that the LUST site have resulted in vapor impacts to the property. If future property development involves disturbances near this site (former Gopher State Truck Stop),vapor monitoring should be administered during construction activities and vapor controls (i.e. vapor membrane or vapor mitigation systems) may be incorporated to reduce vapor intrusion risks to buildings and/or utilities trenches. 8.5 De Minimis Conditions No de minimis conditions were identified during this assessment. A de minimis condition is a condition that does not threaten human health of the environment and generally would not be subject to enforcement action. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 %SB Project No. 1811-420 l'age 20 8.6 Items of Environmental Note The following environmental items should be noted: Soil and Asphalt Piles Two soil piles and one asphalt pile were observed on the northeastern portion of the property at the former Gopher State Truck Stop (parcel 69110120). The soil mounds were approximately 100 cubic yards in size and were covered with vegetation. The asphalt pile was approximately 500 cubic yards in size and observed to be uniform. No construction debris or evidence of regulated waste was observed in the piles during the site visit. Concrete Foundations and Light Poles Two large concrete foundation pieces and numerous light pole footings were observed on the northeastern portion of the property at the former Gopher State Truck Stop (parcel 69110120). The concrete foundation pieces were approximately 4 cubic yards in size and were removed from the ground. The light poles footings approximately 0.5 cubic yard in size and in place during the site visit. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69I 101211 and 279110260 IA S13 Project No. I011-4211 ('age 21 9. Recommendations WSB has performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 for the property consisting of parcels 69110120 and 279110260 in Shakopee, MN. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.3 of this report. This Phase I ESA has revealed no RECs and two HRECs associated with the property as described in Section 8.1 and Section 8.2. As a result of the documented historical releases, a Limited Phase II ESA is recommended at the property to assess current subsurface soil, soil vapor, and groundwater conditions against current regulatory criteria as an option for the property is future development. The Phase II ESA should focus on the former Gopher State Truck Stop (parcel 69110120) located on the northern portion of the property and include analytical testing of both petroleum and VOC constituents. Based on the results of the Phase II ESA, a Response Action Plan (RAP)/ Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) may be necessary to ensure unexpected contaminated materials encountered during redevelopment are properly identified, managed, and addressed. The RAP/CCP document should include: procedures for handling and providing proper characterization and disposition for soil excavated to accommodate the new structures and underground utilities; provisions for installing vapor barriers beneath new structures and in utility trenches (if necessary); and venting systems for new structures (if necessary). It is also recommended that the City consult with the MPCA regarding applicable vapor intrusion policies for the development of the property pending the Phase II ESA results. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 691101211 and 279110260 NS SH Project No.1811-120 Page 22 10. Data Gaps Data gaps are defined as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by the standards and practices despite good faith efforts. Good faith efforts were taken to obtain information about the property from a variety of readily available, practically reviewable,and likely to be useful sources. However,the following information was not able to be obtained: • Title, Environmental Liens, or Activity and Use Limitation Search were not provided. Please note that the lack of recorded sources listed above is considered a data gap but is not considered a material limitation for the completion of this Phase I ESA. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSB Project No. 1811-420 Page 23 11. Qualifications of Environmental Professionals To the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we have met the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in CER 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in general conformance with acceptable standards and practices in the industry. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 14:S11 Project No.1811-420 Page 24 FIGURES Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Parcels 69110120 and 279110260 WSB Project No,1811420 APPENDICES pxwuogeoo1 parcud IBId\sdelrytSiJoZt,VI18I.as-ri --; •'* `1';'-itit 1....1r4lrit r r „ .'.:,,t.„„ ,''',,t..-it „;ii 1 ,r , "' 7,' el ioj,:i , . ,.. . �g W „. ,,,<, Al..,,., ,tr+ y .-� . dd ` : Y C I T ¢ ^ Si HVSo ?. R o, f r r -?- , �� , 1 4JuirO a 110(auirto O o IS ifs r - r { r 7: : 2 a. Sri - , 4i -' v t w„ i. i5 „fit p r Is v , #a / i` _ F ,r •E - ' 'J'' a+ rf VC'''‘ ,. a" C. . ' ' ! Y a. x '£`* 1 Vii. .1.i. +.:# TI. .. f p $ t »k M .. a e. }•+w a 7 {.s-.. CD ;9" i S'i i c d 0 ,N. ti o. IN, / !p ,. C N 0 k. ' SJ / r ' ti -0 J `� r � . J i' C ..) x_ chaparral Ave ('1� LA..,-;— <, CD I I r�• "" P2!Peel 1 PIO co # M sw o) M•.. acT . a4 w �h cx 9 � CO '> fix, r ." e. ,�, ,• , - .. I-s+r ! f� v„_r r., ,ak t < w aA a • wt x t y ;'sy � x+, i r '4;2'14n R,i!'°:!*.**,.drF NMn ,^,.4. 81 �S ♦t xyy ! T �t, .. o°y ?.. f - -. z' % ,v 4 *- _�W,, '�* s gam. 44- ...r ,. x r '�` "g• - . 1 I ...., -4 4 74 1- " ',. •j• 1 ‘„ ,,,. .tV t 11 li.. i,..1 ,- r ...-....,:„..4ff.ft,..., ,,,, ,-**,441 4 i _.. '.,i- 10,:io.1 :§7,,' 4"./ * , - - - - - / ., , '1*, t •mrt.7r=r=t-k"-7.7": " „ ... * ft - t *it. - = _ II ,:l., i C.-- — 1 4'''... 11---:' • 4 4 44 4. flif -44 .,,,,, , ,• 1 4 V* .....• ' - . .,,. , m , ,, - _ —. -.1e-. .. ... .3 1,, ,,, ,. ,. * jar -..., -.4, . 4*. , ,-, r '4 _ . . , . . -- ,,- , , - . cs 0 p. , I kjoi,4 ,..,„..., v / t ; .,.... ' t i' .... ..«. . . itt. * -,t . t ,i .. . -, .... . to t t 1, ;:',tt-` ' g . os . t '1.1 ' . 4.' - _ 1, - . 1..dikr,1 at 4, • N Itt, •a,ta, ‘11.74 8' * 'r 7 4 , f• 7 'ff- '.. * 4-4 ,4 -,, ..... __,-.44.010........._2 f • • - ' 4, .+.- •10 - . •64,, ., <04, . , f• -''4-tikf 7 • ''' ''''''-' - * .„.... ... II , , '• . v* ., -t, ..... .,.. . , ... . --.. , ..,.. -. = i . .' '"---.t'-'4 , ::'-' '„ -'-,4::'-•:, ':r,„:1‘./.-.:,,a44-;i--;,'"'"4'.,,..-."''.1*-:-i-' ',1,- , .. . . '.. - „.'.- '''.a: •;''''''''' ,i Ir. 1 WSB &Assoc- engineering.planning•environmental•construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis,MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 October 30,2014 Mr.Bruce Loney Shakopee Public Works Director 400 Gorman Street Shakopee,MN 55379 Re: Scope of Work&Cost—Limited Phase II ESA&MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services for Parcel 69110120 located in Shakopee,MN 55379 Dear Mr. Loney: Outlined below is the scope of work and cost to perform a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services for Parcel 69110120 (as known as the former Gopher State Truck Stop) located in Shakopee, MN (the property). The historic leak associated with the property (MPCA ID 701) was discovered in 1988 and originated from an underground storage tank(UST). Soil excavation/remediation activities were reportedly completed on the northeastern portion of the property in 1996 during the County Road 69 realignment to facilitate the Highway 169/101 reconstruction project. Petroleum impacted soil was stockpiled on the property and approximately 500 to 600 cubic yards of soil with organic headspace readings less than 10 parts per million (ppm) were thin spread on the property and on the adjoining parcel(279110260). The purpose of the Limited Phase II ESA is to evaluate the subsurface soil (up to 24 feet below ground surface [bgs]) conditions at the property. The results of the investigation will be used to determine an approximate soil correction cost that will be incurred during future redevelopment of the property. In addition, the property will be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program in order for the City (and successive purchasers of the property) to not be held responsible under state statute for the contamination identified at the property. The following tasks are anticipated to be performed as part of the Limited Phase II ESA and MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services: Task 1: Limited Phase II ESA-$9,314 Minnesota Department of Transportation(MnDOT)Permitting WSB will submit and secure all required MnDOT permits prior to initiation field work activities. The anticipated MnDOT permits include: • MnDOT Miscellaneous Work on Truck Highway Right of Way Utility Locate Prior to conducting subsurface work, all utilities will be located by conducting a Gopher State One Call and a private utility locate firm(if necessary). St.Cloud• Minneapolis•St.Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com Mr. Bruce Loney Limited Phase II ESA&MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services October 30, 2014 Page 2 Soil Borings& Sampling The soil boring sampling activities will consist of the following: • Advancing six(6)soil boings to a depth of 24 feet bgs. • Advancing three(3)soil vapor borings to a depth of 8 feet bgs. • Screening soils using a photoionization detector(PID)with a 10.6 eV lamp. • Collecting one soil sample from each boring(total of 6)and analyzing for: o Diesel range organics(DRO)using the Wisconsin Method o Gasoline Range organic(GRO)using the Wisconsin Method o Volatile organic compounds(VOCs)using USEPA Method 8260 • Collecting three soil vapor samples(total of 3)and analyzing for: o VOCs using USEPA TO-15 • Submitting all analytical samples to a MN certified laboratory. • Abandoning all borings per Minnesota Department of Health(MDH)requirements. Assumptions: The property is tree covered and tree removal will likely be required prior to field boring activities and with approval by MnDOT. It is assumed that the City will perform all necessary tree removal. Composite Soil Stockpile Sampling Composite sampling will be completed on the two soil stockpiles present at the property for characterization purposes. The composite soil stockpile sampling activities will consist of the following: • Collect representative composite soil samples from the two soil stockpiles using a hand auger and in accordance with the MPCA soil sampling guidance 4-04. • Screening soils using a PID with a 10.6 eV lamp. • Collecting one representative composite soil sample from each mound (total of 2) and analyzing for the following parameters: o DRO using the Wisconsin Method o GRO using the Wisconsin Method o VOC using USEPA Method 8260 • Submitting all analytical samples to a MN certified laboratory. Reporting WSB will summarize the results of the Phase II ESA in a final report. At a minimum, the report will include the following: • Scope of work • Sample location map • Sample methods and procedures • Investigation results • Conclusions and recommendations Mr. Bruce Loney Limited Phase II ESA&MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services October 30, 2014 Page 3 Task 2: MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services-$1,223 Petroleum Program Application WSB will complete the required application and compile the proper documentation to enroll the property into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields technical assistance program. It is anticipated that the following liability assurance letters will be requested: • Petroleum Leak Site File Closure Confirmation Letter • Leak Site Tank Removal Verification Letter Note: The MPCA charges $125 per hour for technical assistance review which will be billed to the enrollment applicant and is not included in this scope. It is estimated that the MPCA review fees will be $500. MPCA Correspondence WSB will coordinate with the MPCA via phone and email to ensure all required application and environmental documents are received. WSB will also ensure the enrollment and review process is completed in a timely manner and the applicant receives adequate updates on the process/status. Typically,the MPCA's application review process takes approximately 30 days to complete. Total Cost and Schedule The cost to perform the described Limited Phase II ESA and MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Services is a lump sum of $10,537. If during additional services are required beyond the above scope WSB will perform the work on a time and materials bases upon approval from the City. Upon authorization, the field work can be performed as early as the week of November 17, 2014 and preliminary laboratory results will be available 10 business days after the investigation. If you wish to authorize this work, please sign below and submit a copy to WSB. Sincerely, WSB&Associates,Inc. gi"'`412-04 ?f4+1..0,Ottalla Ryan Spencer Jamie Wallerstedt, PE Environmental and Remediation Scientist Project Manager I hereby authorize the above scope of work, schedule,and cost. Signature Date