Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13.B.2. Appeal of Board of Adjustments and Appeals Denial of Variance on Allowable Building Materials for Valleyfair J~.B.'-. CITY OF SHAKO PEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 06-062 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II RE: Appeal ofthe Board of Adjustment and Appeals Determination on Allowable Building Materials for Valleyfair, located at One Valleyfair Drive DATE: June 6, 2006 INTRODUCTION Valleyfair has filed an appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals (BOAA) decision concerning a variance to allow for the construction of two (2) 40' by 32' steel sided buildings at their property, which is located at One Valleyfair Drive. The applicant noted in their application that the proposed buildings would remain consistent with existing steel structures, and by doing this, it would not draw attention to the proposed building. They also noted that this view of the park along Highway 101 is a service area, and that they are presently looking into additional landscaping in this area in an effort to enhance the appearance of the park from Highway 101. Planning staff noted that the back sides of the proposed building would be quite visible from the adjacent Highway 101, and that there are other Valleyfair buildings in the vicinity ofthese proposed structures that utilize building materials that are consistent with the current City Code requirements. Those existing buildings at Valleyfair that are constructed of steel would be considered legal non- conforming structures that were constructed prior to the current code language, which includes text in Sect. 11.60, Subd. 4 A.4. that states "major exterior materials prohibited include sheet metal, corrugated metal, or unfinished metal (except copper or other metal specifically engineered for exterior architectural use" (Section 11.60, Subd. 4.A.1-5, attached). Additionally, Subd. 4A.l. of the same section includes text that states building materials shall be attractive in appearance, and all new building facades and refaced facades of existing buildings shall include a minimum ofthree of the design elements listed in the City Code (which include accent materials, window coverage on each front that faces a street, contrasting yet complementary material colors, a combination of horizontal and vertical design features, and varying wall depths and shapes). The Board of Adjustment and Appeals held a public hearing on variance request for Valleyfair at its May 18, 2006 meeting. By a 4-Jvote, the Board denied the Variance request. The Board determined that the request did not meet all ofthe criteria required for granting the variance, that there were numerous building materials available for the applicant to utilize that would be consistent with the City Code regulations, and that this is an opportunity for Valleyfair to .--7 improve the outwardly appearance of the park. A copy of the May 18, 2006 Variance staff report to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, which includes the resolution denying the variance request, is attached for the Council's reference. ALTERNATIVES 1. Uphold the determination of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and direct staff to prepare a resolution for the Council's consent agenda that is consistent with that decision. 2. Uphold the appeal of the applicant, thereby granting the requested variance, and direct staff to prepare a resolution for the Council's consent agenda that is consistent with that decision. 3. Table the appeal for additional information. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion directing staff to prepare a resolution for action at the next meeting, and move its adoption. ~ -------- Planner II g: \cc \2006\06-06\appeal valleyfairvariance.doc . 1--:1 l CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 06-054 TO: Board of Adjustment and Appeals FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II SUBJECT: Variance to Allow the Construction of Steel Sided Buildings in the Major Recreation Zone MEETING DATE: May 18, 2006 REVIEW PERIOD: April 7, 2006 -- August 4,2006 Site Information Applicant: Valleyfair Property Owner: Valleyfair Location: 1 Valleyfair Drive (North of CSAH 101, West of Valley Park Drive, extended) Current Zoning: Major Recreation (MR) Zone/ Planned Unit Development Adjacent Zoning: North: Agricultural Preservation (AG)Zone South: Heavy Industry (1-2) Zone West: Major Recreation (MR) Zone/ Planned Unit Development East: Major Recreation (MR) Zone/ Planned Unit Development! Agricultural Preservation (AG) Zone/Highway Business (B-1) Zone Compo Plan: Entertainment Acreage: MUSA: The site is within the MUSAboundary. Attachments: Exhibit A: Location/Zoning Map Exhibit B: Site PlanslElevations INTRODUCTION Valleyfair has submitted an application for a Variance to allow for the constmction of two (2) 40' by 32' steel sided buildings at their property, which is located at 1 Valleyfair Drive (Exhibit A). The applicant has stated that these buildings will be consistent with existing storage buildings and surrounding steel structures, and that they will not adversely affect area propeliy values or change ' the appearance of the property. The applicant has submitted plans that illustrate and describe the proposed buildings materials and design (Exhibit B). Planning staffnoted that the back sides of the proposed building would be quite visible from the adj acent Highway 101, and that there are other buildings in the vicinity of these proposed structures that utilize building materials that are consistent with the current City Code requirements. If there are 1 ., buildings that are constructed of steel, it would be that those buildings are legal non-conforming structures that were constructed prior to the current code language, which includes text in Sect. 11.60, Subd. 4 A.4. that states "major exterior materials prohibited include sheet metal, comlgated metal, or unfinished metal (except copper or other metal specifically engineered for exterior architectural use" (Section 11.60, Subd. 4.A.1-5, attached). Additionally, Subd. 4A.1. of the same section includes text that states building materials shall be attractive in appearance, and all new building facades and refaced facades of existing buildings shall include a minimum ofthree ofthe design elements listed in the City Code (which include accent materials, window coverage on each' front that faces a street, contrasting yet complementary material colors, a combination of horizontal and vertical design features, and varying wall depths and shapes). FINDINGS: Section 11.89, Subd. 2, of the City Code contains provisions for the granting of variances only if all of the following circumstances are found to exist. . Staff has provided draft findings for purposes of discussion by the Board. The Board may use or modify these draft findings as it sees fit, as well as propose other findings. Criterion I: The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: I.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls; Finding J.A. The property can continue to be utilized as a commercial development with buildings to be constructed of mate rials that would comply with the regulations as stated in the City Code. 1.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; Finding J.B. The plight of the applicant/landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The circumstances are based on their desire for utilizing building materials that are not consistent with the current City Code regulations. I.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner; Finding J. C. The circumstances were created by the applicant/landowner as a result of their desire for buildings that do not meet the design standards of the City Code. 1.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Finding J.D. The variance would alter the essential character of the locality. t.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Finding I.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations. Criteriop. 2: 2 It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. Finding 2. The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in that it would allow additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. Criterion 3: The request is not for a use variance. Finding 3. The request is not a use variance. Criterion 4: Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance to protect the adjacent properties. Finding 4. (Dependent on the Board's action on the request.) Criterion 5: Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: Finding 5. (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone) ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve Resolution No. PC06-054, a resolution denying the variance request to allow steel sided buildings, and move its adoption. 2. Approve the variance request to allow steel sided buildings and direct staff to prepare a resolution with findings as proposed by the Board, and move its adoption. 3. The Board may table the request for additional information. RECO~ENDATIONS Staffrecornmends Alternative No.1, approval of Res. No. PC06-054, as presented. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion approving Resolution No. PC06-054, a resolution denying the variance request to allow steel sided buildings, and move its adoption. ~ Mark Nob e . Planner II g:\boaa-pc\2006\05-18\varvalIeyfair06054,doc 3 ~SOLUTION NO. PC06-:054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, DENYING A VARIANCE REQUEST BY V ALLEY FAIR TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL SIDED BUILDINGS AT 1 V ALLEY FAIR DRIVE. WHEREAS, Valleyfair, applicant and property owner, has filed an application dated Ap1i1 6, 2006 for a Variance to allow the construction of steel sided buildings under the provisions of Chapter 11 (Zoning) of the Shakopee City Code; and WHEREAS, this parcel is presently zoned Major Recreation (MR) Zone/ Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as: See Exhibit],' and WHEREAS, notice was provided and on May 18, 2006, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals conducted a public hearing regarding this application, at which it heard from the Community Development Director and invited members of the public to comment. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the application for Variance is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings with respect to City CodeSec, 11.89, Subd. 2, "Criteria forGranting Variances." Criterion I The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: 1.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls: Finding 1.A. The property can continue to be utilized as a commercial development with buildings to be constrUcted ofmaterials that would comply with the regulations as stated in the City Code, I.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; 4 Finding J.B. The plight of the applicant/landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The circumstances are based on their desire for utilizing building materials that are not consistent with the current City Code regulations. I.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner; Finding J.e. The circumstances were created by the applicant/landowner as a result of their desire for buildings that do not meet the design standards of the City Code. l.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Finding J.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. I.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Finding J.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations. Criterion 2 .It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in I{eeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in that it would allow additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. Criterion 3 The request is not for a use variance. Finding 3 The request is not a use variance. Criterion 4 Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance to protect the adjacent properties. Finding 4 (Dependent on the Board's action on the request.) Criterion 5 Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: ...... Finding 5 (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone) Adopted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals pfthe City of Shako pee, Minnesota, this 18th day of May, 2006. ~4 ATTEST: /.~)~"'///J~Y~ Community Development Director 5 E,,"" '6 ITA. ~ ~ ..--...., ~ - ~. 12 ~: MR H 12._ 'Zi, 12 <I v MR I I ~ .. _ Subject Property SHAKOPEE ........ Shakopee Boundary COMMUNrrYPIUDllSINCll16S7 s CI ZonIng Boundary o Parcel Boundary Variance for Construction Materials for 2 Storage Buildings .. . ,. . n.'.1 T 7' . t'" .1 ""_.._.&.~___.L':__I"I\K_. n A 11 1 l"Inn&: , ~ " "- ..\.. ~ - ~ } ~ } -i- ~ ~ .... ~ ").... .~ ~ ."""'" ''-.1 - ... A . ~ . ~ ~ c:::n ~', ~ tv) ~ ~ ~" - C) -::t" <::Q- ~ ~ .. <"i .. ~ "- ~ ~ ~ \S""") '\) ~ ,~ .s -;. ~ "-- ~~~ - - .~ \I) ..~ ~ ~ ('t) -)... -t=:. . -::t , : ... ....... .... . _..........'.. , . ..- . . " -. . January 31, 2006 , Ken Felber 1 Valley .F.Di~._Drlve . Shakopee~ MN 5$379 . SPECIFICATIONS 40' x 80' x 12'-4" high (from.t(l.(~~_T.P..9.mP'9) storage ..... -. STORAGE: 3-ply 2" x 6" laminatad columns spaced at ar.OJl on center, . " set In ground 4'8" :t on poured concrete footings (footIng 'designed for assumed soli bearing of 2500 PSF). 2" x 8" treated planking at perimeter of building placed one row high. 2" x.4".~~bypEla~':,w~H.glct!.~p~~~d.a~ 24" ~n ~en.ter. .. . Roof trusses spaced "at 5'-O'l.on center wIth a 35--5-5 loading at a 4:12 pitch. 211 x 4" roof purlins spaced at 16" on center. Roof finish to be 29 gauge Pro-Panel1J steel in standard colors. ~ Exterior walls to be ,29 gauge pro..Panel Il steelln standard . colors. All necessary trims and flashings. ACCESSORIES: Two 3068 primed Insulated metal service door with wood I~ wXl6 rI frames BRei daAda~ leek:sets. Two 4er ^ 1 fj uninsulatedsteel overhead doors with PVC weatherstrip In endwalt (In White). / - () ~ ~ r.' t!J foe. II t.. f .. . ' . , PRgPil" af7 I( - ." lJ \.. I .,... LJ- /.1 . ~ I" = "'. ~r:r-;;.~ , /. . ~ ~ t i } 1, ~' J ~ j . I . . I . ~ ~ _ ~~' ~ / \ J -' 1 a f;. '1, r" ~ 1 r '. ~ <:: /t). " ~ ....... , ' / j . V ~\j~ ~~ I / rt 2 ~~ / ~\ Ir LI · I '-~ "v,J. ()~ ~ . ~,~ ~ A · ..::""\ r7 · l ..~~. )~:::5J j .:~ .. q · I.~r - ~. -' A 'J 'I \ ~~ ( ~ ( ,. · ... L-) ~~ . I I I. , /. _ ):: l'~~. 0.:.. Ii V.:. J /1 I ~ % -\I ..:: ~~ ~ll ':'. .~ f ! ' ~ :/::;;;; " """' \' · .. I l(/Q , ~. .~: /I ..... I. . ~~~~-'~ F~erL ~~i[~ll~~ J'AJf'~ \ ~ I ~ A MJ Iv'" / ,:" ] 1IJ ' . W ~ ~ , A ~~.... ll::~'" D -- ~~~.}.. I- . Z . I , .....rr A -f< ''':'\ -' ~ ~. 'I ~-:J-;- I 1 I II"" - "" ~ 7. ~..... -......?"" L.-I '^ v-... ..... r< I\.. '\" q :.~:i '" I q ~ Jf ~ I ~\::"' .-.'%1 \'~f' 1,1 , Vr"-. '1 r. ,": I 0: 6::-- H~ I/r---.a 1\ A' ".h 0"":: 1 '11 .~ 1 f 1--1LI \ I I)~~/ 'ld~~~1 t>b;rv;:~ ~ ~r h ~~ /.? >: I ~_~"-_ I J.,(~~~ / ~-:"..J.y~~ _ J ~~~. I 8 (;(bJF:~:liA ) .:::E a. '......" ... -J~I 'I '~7 r ~ r-" 'f ~"'" ~ _ / '// Ir':\'" V, r, I J (lFJ1~ :r-~T ""1 \ - ~~ ( ;' 1:tlJ T _~ '. "\( IN '/'" -' ~ _ . /. L I A .9S6tZ" "'); v. ~l .~~~~~. &i.~~l . 1 V I~ '--"I ~.~ \Ui 7" ." '/ ~ I f ~~ ~.3 '" ,. ~rv\\'L-' r"','(. . I ,r". f .. rYA\ II ,. j; ~ / I L...J a .J ~ ; (;I'" 'r:!... ""C..,j -r": ,; i/ lr--zt- ~t-- ~ iJ- ~ I. II. ..,. ...... ~::-- J I >u:#:::->. .L D l I '\ ~ I . . 11$, -..:::: I f - Il' " --" \\\ ~ .' .... '-~ ~. I fl . I ~ ~ 1;:. 'Or-- tr'\ l...... > a .... !; '- ''"': j J. I ~ ~~/~s---~",,\rQJ <<<>0 ~~\'\t(M J 1 /1 . rl" ~'-'~~. 1_ ) I ~ \I~r~ 1 ,..".\~ r, I ,. ~ ~ i'-"~/ _ \'P ~.~I' \ r. Pi ~ r-1 ~n. it; 'X~ '@j. ~J' /1..1 . ~~~~ ~I I J r I l~ - l... I ~. ~.. '-J ~ U ~ ~~ 1/ I~ I ,..~~ · Y'~} J '" .........f? ) J. I I , - ~ I) 1I::l:./ II I . _ ..J L ..:( or -,.., P I. 1--- >--, _:::--L- --- Q'\.~ 1_ r r 1'2'"~ ~ ~~ V ~ f\-, ,,, ,'.I , 1\ 'j " ,V 1"\ V , \ It.( L ~~. t ~ .@ ] l I ,r\,) 1 ., .",:.J '-"'I l I' / \ I{ .7JJ v~......::=.. ~~ j , ~k~ ~~ / \r~=~~~~~ /4 ~~ / . ~~/'\ r~~ \ ~~"" r\~~} ~~~J < J , '1 \ r '\ '''l~-\\ UJ \h-: F'/.--::::Y/ i, . '. , \ \ ~\. ~ ""''' I~ -::;., ...... __""" J. a / '~ I I' I ~ ~'" ~~, It V \\ \ \\ ~j ~~ . ~~ . I . \ \\' Ll""~ \~- ~rr y / '1' \ \ \ ell . R'1 -...\i ~ ))V~....d I II / ,,- - i "?~~I T ~~, I ,il I \ - ->- -~ _L ~/ I ) Pi / / I I ~ '!.KJJ 19I!ltt INIl. . 233Jll CClUNlY_IG CCRCClIUH, l\II ssm l7I3l .sa.:ra.u l7I3l~ FAA ._.,... I ber,epy ~ rhIt.this plan, spociliCaticn Cll'1qlOlt was ~Jl'lI'=d by m. Cll'under . ~ direct ra,porvisillll..and !hit I IIIlllL liCensed prcfosslonal '.. engineer Iiws of lbC stare ; ,I '. .' .,..:: :. .' ., O...,311l21Cl5 . , . .. . 3068 METAL SERVICE DOOR LOCKSETS BY OTHERS ~ @ FRONT ELEVATION 12XlO' UN-INSULATED "TIN CAN" fri 1-4 SCALE: l/S" = 1'-0" . . OR. DOOR W/STANDARD OPERATOR In . ~ ~!) ". Q~ --. ................ ... . . -. - - ". ',U.J./-U-WmHUWUJl1lJ - - ., , . . .... .."' - : . ..... ~~~ '.. ' . . . . .. q lJII! I LUIIl nnwm II q. n .. .. ,!!' ~[if . 'i;\ . " .' ..' .' ." :ITl1nmnrmrrmrrm .... ,::' ~ ~~ @ .., i: .~ ,t ~ t ><t:>P3 :-,.' a ?-'lCIJ " ...-" . I f . . . . , . ' 29'GA. PRQ-PANEL!srEEI:.; No. 1tEVisION/ISSll! ,.. . . , .. .... .. . . . ... .... .. . .. . .... - A . ... GRAll'!:. "':"~"'::".'~"rll ,', III '.'1.1111 1111 ".l"'~ !""" '"'fl , ""'II""II1I1.""'ItI"~.~I~!'IIII/I~'/~/UI 11 _ .~:r^~:: . _.. @ SIDE ELEVATION SllEEr. . 2-4. SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 OF 4 - .. ... .., .. . - ~ ~!lIMT OA~........-." . WITH A ~~ ROOF TRUSSES SPACED AT 8' D.C. WIm A ROOF TRUSSES SPACED AT 8' O,c. 2DSO COUNTY 1IOAIl14 LOADING OF 35-5-5 AT A 4: 12 PITCH LOADING OF 35-5-5 AT A 4: 12 PITCH CORCMA/I,.IIN_ (7I3l~ 2"X4" ROOF PURLINS SPACED AT 16" D.C. STRUCTURAL POLE GABLE TRUSS :"~F'AX SET ON EDGE (MIN. 12" OVERLAP ON EA. END W/HORIZONTALENDSTEtiif"crtfu.ms 29GAUGE PRO-PANELlISTEEL~ 12 NOTCHED INTO . IN STANDARD'COLORS WI AIL . NECESSARY TRIMS &FLASHJNGS 4r:;:::; I~c:=liIythatlhisplan, specificallCSllX'repott was preplIRd by me CI' IllIdc:r . , mydirect~ll'ld. .~, , 29 GAUGE PRO-P ANBL II S'IEEL thaI.I am a liCoIlsod profes$ionat IN STANDARD COLORS WI ALL '!I)gmeo.r me JiM of NECESSARY TRIMS & FLAsmNGS the state 'f,.., esota ". <// :.,; ~ . NOTCHCOL. (TI(.rrSSBEARlNG) f.fe47 WI(5) 20D POLEBARN NAlLS Dille: 31ll2.ll6 Re..No.: I 2"X6" KNEE BRACE [yp. AT I 29GAUGEPRO-PANELIISTEEL EACH COL.ATA45) . 2"X12"SPRINGBOARD I 2"X6"&2"X4"NAlLERS. INNESTES:ANDSARARDY'r'Dqf>kPRS WI ALL (5) 20D'POLEBARN NAlLS W w O.H. DOOR 'mACK I I C uUJ.YJ.03&FLASBlNGS ....... ....0.. I ~ . 2"X4" !'BY-PASS" WALL GIRTS '" . C2 ,.,/ ~ \ cr I I ' SPACED AT 24" O.C. "<t (.? / =:.r ,-" a 8 ' . .I 0 ,/ I 0/ I 0 I I WALL BEYOND WRAP JAMBS 0\ . C'\ll-... . /..../ I r- 3-PLY2"X6" GLUED LAMINATED COL. WI ..... <n .; N.: 0 :i I ~ BO'ITOM6' .60 TREATED SPACBD AT 8'O.C. en I ..... l~'- I I If) ::> i.";:) 0 ~ IE I -,' fE. I J NOTE: HOLD O,H. DOOR UP FORR ~. ~ ! I I FUTURE eONCRETEFLOO 0 \ VERIFY W/OWNER CIJ \ ~/ - II I '-. -.... - Q TREATED 21X8" raCK PLATE ATPERlMETBR --" I I OP BUlLDING PLACED 1 ROWHlGH . ~yqj>.PLOOR . ')'11 . . ~~ ~ ,. . ~~~ I .~~~ ~~~ " ~~O / '" I f J-1~~ ,'/ia I to = ,/ -' g .' i5~ j. I 2 ~> i + v + . ~ >....-< CIJ ( ~ TREATED 2"X6" eOL. HOLD DOWN.J.- . /' .. " r-"- MIN. OF 12" LONG (ONE ~ SIDE OF COL.) L_/_ J ~ ~. ~~. L___J '. _ ~ ."".0."""" . . SEE PLAN FOR FOOTING SIZE' --.! EB TYP. CROSS SECTION EB O.H. DOOR SECTION _ 3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 SCALl3: 1/4" = 1'-0" mEaT: '30F4 ,