Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.B.1. Discussion of Unmanned Aircraft System Regulation General Business 10. B. 1. TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Jeff Tate, Police Chief DATE: 07/15/2014 SUBJECT: Discussion of Unmanned Aircraft System Regulation (A) Action Sought Council is asked to discuss the potential regulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). Background Staff was recently directed by City Council to examine ordinances and regulations surrounding the use of drones or Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and report back to council in June. Along with the City's attorney, staff has looked into the drone regulation issue and whether the City has authority to adopt an ordinance, similar to the City of St. Bonifacius, limiting the use or operation of drones in the City's airspace. While UAS regulation raises numerous constitutional and common law issues, the issue of federal preemption is the major preliminary issue. By federal law, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is charged with U.S. airspace safety. Generally, this authority preempts any state or local government from airspace regulation. Furthermore, the courts have made it clear that local regulation of air safety is preempted by the FAA. The FAA acknowledges that, although it has the power to regulate the operation of aircraft, state and local governments still retain some authority to limit the aeronautical activities of their own departments and institutions. Therefore, it appears that while a city may have some legal authority to regulate the activities of its police and other departments in the use of UAS, it probably does not have valid authority to limit or ban the activities of other public or private UAS activities, which are under the jurisdiction of the FAA. The police department has recently received multiple complaints about UAS flying over residences. The FAA does not permit widespread use of UAS. UAS are divided into two categories: Civil UAS and Public UAS. Model aircraft, like those operated in Shakopee, which generated the complaints, are exempted from certification. Congress has directed the FAA to create a framework to integrate the use of a wide range of small civilian aircraft systems into the national airspace. This is expected to be completed by early 2015. The legitimacy of any local regulation will most likely hinge on the upcoming federal regulations. Therefore, it is our recommendation that council avoid any preemption and invalidation by federal laws and hold off on any local regulation until the FAA addresses the UAS issue. Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council wait for the FAA to address the issue before moving forward with an ordinance of our own. Should no federal regulations be adopted by early 2015, the City could re-visit this subject in July 2015. Budget Impact There is no budget impact. Relationship to Vision The action supports: Goal A: Keep Shakopee a safe and healthy community where residents can pursue active and quality lifestyles. Requested Action Council should consider whether to wait for the FAA to address the issue of UAS or move forward with an independant ordinance. Attachments: