HomeMy WebLinkAbout13.C.2. Review of Draft Scott County 2008-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
/3,C.2j
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: Mayor & City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Review of Draft Scott County 2008-2017
Transportation Improvement Program
DATE: November 7,2007
INTRODUCTION:
Attached to this memo is a Draft Scott County 2008-2017 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) for the City to review and comment on before consideration by the County
Board.
BACKGROUND:
Scott County Highway Department prepares a TIP every year similar to the City's
Capital Improvement Program. Earlier in the process, Scott County asked for
Community requests for consideration into the 2008-2017 Draft.
Attached to the Draft 2008-2017 TIP is a list of Community requests and County
response to those requests.
The purpose of this item is to review the County's Draft 2008-2017 TIP and provide
comments to the County. Attached to this memo is a draft letter with responses to the
county on the various projects in the City of Shakopee.
Staff will review the Draft 2008-2017 TIP with Council and County staff will be
available to answer questions. Council can provide staff comments which can be
incorporated in the letter to the county engineer which will be sent to the County Board
prior to the County Board's consideration of adopting the 2008-2018 TIP.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Review the Draft 2008-2017 Scott County TIP and provide comments for staff to
submit to the County.
2. Table for additional information.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Council should provide comments as to the schedule of improvements for C.R. 101,
CSAH 21, CSAH 17 in the City of Shakopee. These comments need to be submitted by
November 16, 2007, prior to the County Board's consideration of adoption of the 2008-
2017 TIP.
ACTION REOUESTED:
Approve a motion to send comments on the Draft 2008-2017 Scott County
Transportation Improvement Program to the County Board.
~&t
g
ruce Lone, .E.
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGRl2007PROJECTSI20907COUNClUSCOTT-COUNTY-2008TlP
November 1,2007
Mitch Rasmussen
Scott County Highway Department
600 Country Trail East
Jordan,MN 55352
RE: Review of Draft Scott County 2008-2017 Transportation Program
Dear Mr. Rasmussen:
This letter in response to your letter dated to the City of
Shakopee's comments and recommendations Department's
2008-2017 Transportation Improvement the draft
County TIP with City Council and has the fol
2008
'",""<>;;il:;;@,
C.R. 101. from Lewis Street Bridfle to(iS%lIJ~iWilic;;&
oH""'"7\'0&1+""
~cC;Z4C' "',
'\::::"il........ .,-"iV":" """""'\>j2tlmm,;.i~~)\~J;~iiimii;i'..-j>
. Attached is a lett~ic, '.. d October r($m)I~007 frorrf:.Jre County requesting the City to
advise the Co .~~ishes for tI~~i;s segment Issues needing direction would
depend on '. . ty' sill;.. ,e vision for t~.~ ..~ea. Reconstruction of this segment is
currently ~ 201 ut could be I!!pved up if the City provides direction to
the COl;1!!ty. The 0 ?fl. . 'r8 vision goals to review and discuss this
ar~l~tll1lmJ!:'I~~i~~e th <unty inp ~. early 2008. These comments are for this
iToject ShOwnJi!i~lil~;he ye 13 as well.
.J1!ii! !<i;lillill!li.) .;;Iil~!!!m
. .
'1;",::",::;:,1,) ':.'<-:':::,
c... '
~ ...
<",_. '7-"
;i~~~;;w' t1iiillllfri
.. , "'W
"<ijHUi;jlWc ftj:;+~;
""T!;!iJ!iilYf>,.!ii:d8iiii'
C.R. 101 Briil!!aReolacetttent and Overlav to West of CSAH 83
'1t!~;) /d::IIIIIIH
Y_JF7. .."iCi"'
. A detour wirr;:I~lilhecessary for bridge construction and City streets may be needed
for the detoUf0~0 The City may request County's funds to repair or restore the City
of Shakopee pavements utilized in the detour, if necessary.
CSAH 21 - CSAH 16 to CSAH 18
. County is receiving federal dollars for this project, including funds for a new park
and ride facility. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community has recently
purchased land south of CSAH 16 that could affect project timing. Although
shown in 2008, the actual construction start is more than likely in 2009.
. County is showing more Federal/State/Local funds than actual project costs. City
of Shakopee cost share is not shown by County. Previous estimates have been
approximately $750,000.00 and the city would request that the county use Federal
Funds to lower the city's share of this roadway.
12009 I
C.R. 101 Mill and Overlav from West of CSAH 83 to West of 7(/h Street
. This project should match into the City's overlay 0
2007.
CSAH 21 from CSAH 16 to CSAH 42
. Completes the CSAH 21 roa City's share of project
is not shown. Previous esti be $750,000.00. The
county may receive Federal F the city requests that
the Federal Funds be used to low~'0~he
!ill@iiiiiiii:ffiffii&i&' \
,,/L\""-'iHiHuniUiiUiii;. "
..:ffiiiffiU:Ui2i&i&ffi22ffiU:i&U2Ui&iUi&!illL"
12011 ~0TF??;'; :\ I
,",'dBXN
1itamiJi 'ilit
1Um!~?
12012 I
CSAH 15 - T.H.169 to 6th Avenue Mill and Overlav
. This project is to preserve pavement life. The City of Shakopee supports this
project.
12013 I
C.R. 101 - Spencer Street to CSAH 17 Reconstruction
. Roads may need to be widened depending on CSAH 17 corridor study and may
need to be reconstructed. City and Shakopee Public Utilities staffs are planning to
replace utility lines in this corridor. See 2008, Paragraph #1 for County's request
and City of Shako pee's response.
CSAH 17 from St. Francis Avenue to CSAH 42 5;;;'1,"";:2;
"';mrn
'7
. The cost of project is appro~imatel~ $1.2,000,OO~llmpe'tl1~it!e. Ci~'~ share is not
shown but could be substantIal. Wldemng of r~i~dwaY~~~liiprovldmg turn lanes
for safety is definitely needed ~or this .7f!!i':~ CS~~:do~ study is
underway and should be done In 2008. i i of ShakoP~~I]I:would request a
cost share breakdown and would enc4 age the County to '~'fain additional
funding from Federal, State and Regie ces. it.iill:
Beyond 2017
'~'''''. .....".................,,"'.
'~i!:" ''''<i\ijiWiit4it.*';ith
CSAH 16 from Dean Lake Trail to Future CSJtf!.lij121,
'~'Ii. :l111111111:1'7:+:::::~I:~llllI11:1'0it
. This project di i ic;liIj .... i: the Count~::~'~ TIP; ho~~ver, the County will monitor the
4II1II' -. +,,1111, .,
traffic capac~, 'as this' \1~ develops. 'i,ll'
.'
~~
, list of ~+ofuments for the Draft County TIP in the
t you have any questions in regard to these
~~..
'iontact me at (952)233-9361.
Sincerely,
Bruce Loney, P.E.
Public Works Director
BUpmp
ENGR/EMPLOYEEFOLDER/PPENNINGTONILETTERSIRASMUSSEN
*
~'''&-.
l~~" !., SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
Srott HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST. JORDAN, MN 55352-9339
(952) 496-8346 . Fax: (952) 496-8365 . WWW.CO.scott.mn.us
LEZLlE A. VERMILLION
PUBLIC WORKS DIREaOR
MITCHELL J. RASMUSSEN P.E.
COUNTY ENGINEER
October 15, 2007
Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street S
Shakopee, MN 55379
Subject: Draft Scott County 2008-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
Dear Mr. Loney:
Enclosed is the Draft Scott County 2008-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) which was recently discussed with the County Board in a workshop session. In
reviewing this document, you will notice a few changes. These changes include
updated cost estimates, adjustment of some projects' construction schedule to
accommodate funding constraints, and the addition of new projects selected from this
year's solicitation.
Please review this draft and provide any comments to us by November 16, 2007. The
final TIP will be presented to the County Board for consideration and approval at a
Board meeting in December. Please note that the map is in draft form and still needs to
be updated.
Also enclosed is a listing of the community requests and staff recommendations.
If you have any questions please contact me at 952-496-8491 or email at
mkeen@co.scott.mn.us.
Sincerely,
'f{l~~
Mary Kee
Scott County Public Works Tech
An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer
o Printed on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer content
1311
,
,
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Scott County Hiahway Department
The Scott County Highway Department is responsible for the planning, design,
construction and maintenance of roads, bridges and traffic control devices on the
County Highway system. The department works with cities, townships, adjacent
counties, Mn/DOT, and Metropolitan Council to develop and maintain the county's
highway infrastructure.
Scott County Strateaic Initiatives
Scott County Board of Commissioners adopted five Strategic Initiatives in
September 2004. These strategic initiatives are direction provided by the Board
to all County Departments in establishing priorities. The Scott County Highway
Department helps meet these strategic initiatives by:
. Create Safe, Healthy and Livable Communities
);> developing the Transportation Improvement Program
);> maintaining the highway system
);> managing safety improvements
. Develop Strong Public Partnerships and an Active and Informed Population
);> working with staff and officials from the cities, townships, other
counties, and state and federal agencies
);> developing newsletters
);> hosting open houses
);> creating project management teams and advisory committees
. Manage the Challenges and Opportunities Derived from Growth and
Development
);> working with developers on preserving right-of-way
);> constructing bypass/turn lanes
);> determining future county road needs with corridor studies
. Sustain the County's Excellent Financial Health and Economic Profile
);> delivering projects in the planned year
);> reviewing current program delivery processes
);> evaluating business processes
.
Transportation Plan Goals
Scott County is committed to providing a safe and efficient transportation system
for current and future residents and businesses in a cost-effective manner. The
Transportation Plan includes the following goals to carry out this commitment:
1. To PRESERVE the existing transportation infrastructure, in order to
protect the significant investment already made, and reduce unnecessary
premature costs of replacing existing facilities.
2. To MANAGE the existing transportation system to maximize safety and
efficiency.
3. To IMPROVE and EXPAND the existing transportation system as
necessary to meet current and future transportation needs.
4. To explore AL TERNATIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION based on
the needs of those who live, work, and travel in Scott County.
5. To provide TRANSPORTATION PLANNING that results in a local
transportation system that will safely serve the needs of current and
future residents and businesses, support the County's development plans,
and compliment the regional transportation system.
Programming Strategies
Projects included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) implement
needs identified in the Scott County Transportation Plan. The plan also includes
policies to guide the development of the Scott County Transportation System. The
2008-2017 TIP is organized by preservation, management, and expansion projects.
The following program development criteria are used and are consistent with the
Transportation Plan policies.
Proqram Development Criteria
. Safety issues
. Local agency requests
. Structural deficiencies
. Geometric deficiencies
. Capacity issues
. Traffic volumes
. System connections / continuity
. Balance staff workload / ability to deliver
. Funding partners
Transportation Plan Goals
Scott County is committed to providing a safe and efficient transportation system
for current and future residents and businesses in a cost-effective manner. The
Transportation Plan includes the following goals to carry out this commitment:
1. To PRESERVE the existing transportation infrastructure, in order to
protect the significant investment already made, and reduce unnecessary
premature costs of replacing existing facilities.
2. To MANAGE the existing transportation system to maximize safety and
efficiency.
3. To IMPROVE and EXPAND the existing transportation system as
necessary to meet current and future transportation needs.
4. To explore AL TERNA TIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTA TION based on
the needs of those who live, work, and travel in Scott County.
5. To provide TRANSPORTATION PLANNING that results in a local
transportation system that will safely serve the needs of current and
future residents and businesses, support the County's development plans,
and compliment the regional transportation system.
Programmina Strategies
Projects included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) implement
needs identified in the Scott County Transportation Plan. The plan also includes
policies to guide the development of the Scott County Transportation System. The
2008-2017 TIP is organized by preservation, management, and expansion projects.
The following program development criteria are used and are consistent with the
Transportation Plan policies.
Program Development Criteria
. Safety issues
. Local agency requests
. Structural deficiencies
. Geometric deficiencies
. Capacity issues
. Traffic volumes
. System connections / continuity
. Balance staff workload / ability to deliver
. Funding partners
.
.<
2008 Hiahliahted Pro jects
Preservation Pro iects
Bridge Replacements - The bridges listed, identified as deficient, are programmed for
replacement. These structures generally are large box culverts that meet the State's
definition of a bridge, and are eligible for replacement using State Bridge Bonding funds.
Generally, the bridges are programmed as soon as they become eligible for bridge bond
funding, long before they pose any safety concerns.
CH 101 Turnback - This project will replace Bridge #5944 and will mill and overlay the
road surface from the Bridge to west of CH 83. This project is eligible for Truck Highway
Turnback funds.
CH 101 Turnback - Railroad Crossing - This project will reconstruct the railroad crossing
just east of CH 83. This project is eligible for Trunk Highway Turnback funds.
Manaqement Pro iects
CH 2 from 1000 feet west of Idaho Avenue to Church Street - This project will
reconstruct a three-lane urban roadway from Church Street to Todd Street then will
transition to a two-lane urban roadway with turn lanes to 1000 feet west of Idaho Avenue.
CR 66 at CR 61 - This project will install trails at this intersection.
CR 77 from Vierling Drive to 1/8 mile south of 17th Avenue - This project will install a
bike/pedestrian trail.
Expansion Projects
CH 42 between Glendale/Joppa and County Line - This project adds one through lane in
each direction. It also removes a signal at Huntington and revises that intersection to a t
access. This is a joint project with Dakota County and the Cities of Burnsville and Savage.
Studies
CH 9 R/W Preservation - This study will develop a preferred geometric layout for a future
interchange for the purpose of R/W preservation on the north side of CH 9 / TH 169 /
TH 282 intersection.
CH 2 / CH 86 @ I-35 Interchanges - This study will determine a preferred geometric
vision for future interchanges for the purpose of preserving necessary R/W. This is a
joint project with MnDOT and Rice County.
.
Individual projects are then prioritized using the following criteria:
. Maximize safety - correct existing deficiencies in geometry and capacity
. Reduce operating/maintenance cost - correct existing deficiencies in
structure.
. Minimize social and environmental impacts in the most cost-effective
manner.
. Maximize effective project size.
. Utilize all possible funding sources.
The following process is used for gathering public input for developing the Annual
TIP.
. May Distribute project solicitation letters/guidelines
. June Local agencies submit potential projects
. July Review Committee scores submitted projects
. Aug. Workshop with County Board
. Sept. Circulate draft TIP to local agencies for comments
. Nov. Summarize comments and prepare final TIP
. Dec. TIP presentation and County Board Adoption
Individual projects are then prioritized using the following criteria:
. Maximize safety - correct existing deficiencies in geometry and capacity
. Reduce operating/maintenance cost - correct existing deficiencies in
structure.
. Minimize social and environmental impacts in the most cost-effective
manner.
. Maximize effective project size.
. Utilize all possible funding sources.
The following process is used for gathering public input for developing the Annual
TIP.
. May Distribute project solicitation letters/guidelines
. June Local agencies submit potential projects
. July Review Committee scores submitted projects
. Aug. Workshop with County Board
. Sept. Circulate draft TIP to local agencies for comments
. Nov. Summarize comments and prepare final TIP
. Dec. TIP presentation and County Board Adoption
.
Scott County, Minnesota ~"
I.SCOtt
2008 - 2017
Transportation Improvement ,~;^~ ~~
Program JfJ~~ ~1!iI... ~ _10'--"'" h ,g=
~ I. lu............ ~ N ~t'd'r
LEGE' IUD ~_ .: ~ I. 11~, ~1691'..... ~ , ~f"-, . I
1 'I. ~l~j ~~. ~" ,.,.. l
. 69 T"""'I" _ ~ ,.. ~:I "' .JJ-8-;
_ 2008 _ 2011 2014 ~ ,t.., -; ~ f7 . I -. ---"\..' ..,r",., I
1 I-rL - ~L _-1 "~6 \
-2009-2012-2015 W "-1 r~/'Th<.)' ~r;, ~ -Ii ~ 'JJ
-2010-2013 I~ \.11 ;9i~j I]> ~ I!
I '" I -- -~ -rd I
') I , V\l1?9 " ';:) -- ~ I
. 2008 . 2010 . 2013 ---_I _~___:.::J_ .Ol-~~_ . 'll I /:__ -L,
~~ _. - b~~,~-u~ (~r 11:1 ~rr5 I
~1- .-- 7.9 ~1l ~ ~ (f
r '!? . - , -\ ~ JJ > _ r.;!' "iiiij J (
.( , 19. ( ~ r ~ ,.!t',",' ~"r ~ J?l. \j
J!;~~ ~J ~ pj- ~o~ IJ 'I ?A,7C~.
~ ~~~~ N ~l 9 'It( ''9'/,.... II.
f<'\. r/ L ~: ,-;:' r/n' 1 -',-- ~ _ ( 1- '1-7 ->-i Ii gi~r) '1:.
d~ ~~~r~j]i I ~. '. l- v,.~ ~...uv .
~~ "117J .~ ..::L I I' _ ~
~ (f J~ _J "\n~ I I I [f \, '\U I' \ L uV, '- ~ J '- A
-- ' -c t~ , 1" [81~ ~ -
-'" . J61J \.~.r-.:. ~ =-l - :--. :..A \ I
~- ~ r '_!t_ "">-_~ __~ ~ """-. f- ~ ,-</ . -\/":> '.''-' ~~- ~~ 10
" J . ~~. 2. .L '''' . L- ~ - ~ - I~ "1 ~ -, (~ '.
, -- 1 64 ~.- .~ ""69 ~ 11......... I 1".0 -f-i
, .' I \; 1~1i6il :~{I ~,E~ ~ ~ ,E"'~\Yx'. - < rf~ e-h:' ~ ';~ ~I
n=J. ~60 . ; ,~ W ,- , ~,.;1,~ _ 9 1..F:l rf l r-"l ~ \ I -'1'1~" _.....~
~ - , - ( _-4 64 I .~ 1- t:: r-r"l ,,~. 1-/_ I \
_ - ::L _ __ I- ~ - ~,'" \_ ~... 6.1 ~
~~ ,. ,,,! ~ \J _ ". >- 1 -' )ii "~'1l ::1'" ~. I( ~ ~~
~1'\ 51 ~f~ ' ~~~.I.. ~' ~ t- -)). ~ I IV fJ ~5 .156 I III~ 1-, II .1.-- I"--' n:-:
~ lJ}f" ]]>. / LF1U l ~ LL" ItJ,--:..,. j
I I '6" I . r-- I ~ I' . -~' ... M
I?V.. / ' cf . i ~ -,~ . ':~ _r-C, . '- ~ ,.; ~J~ Jr~J,.r L _ ~ rl
r" 16 53; I I ~ I ~ ~ I -, - I
hi ,~( I) T I ~ J j 1 ~~-l-' ill ~9 ~ L\ I-~ ~.... 1 ~ J, "...1 3 rl
~ - , \ ... ~ ..). . r ' .) I . ,. "\ J ~ '""
,
.... ' E Map Date: September 21, 2007 This drawing is neither a leg. aly recorded map nor a survey and is not intended
o 1 2 4 6 8 to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and
~ Miles Scale: R.F.: :;:~j~~a~eed ~~av:~=, ~~d i~Ot~n~ ~snedd ;~~t~ef:~~:' ~~~~e~nJ~~~~~~
1 inch = 17,000 ft. 1:204,000 County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If
discrepancies are found, please contact the Scott County Surveyors Office.
Project Location: S:lJocalgis\departmenls\transportation\pfojects\5_ Year _ CIP.mxd
2008 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Federal! State
Road Type of Local County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds Funds
PRESERVATION
.- County-Wide 2,200,000
6 Blakeley Twp 00 380,000 65,500
7 Belle Plaine Twp 193,000 100,000 93,000
7 Belle Plaine Twp 216,000 120,000 96,000
7 Belle Plaine Twp 216,000 124,000 92,000
8 Helen Twp 611,835 450,000 161,835
23 Cedar Lake Twp 820,500 360,000 460,500
56 Cedar Lake Twp 414,500 310,000 104,500
66 St. Lawrence Twp 316,000 225,000 91,000
101 Bridge #5944 to west of CSAH 83 2,000,000 2,000,000
101 RR Crossing 120,000 120,000
MANAGEMENT
2 1000 ft west of Idaho Ave to Church St. 0.81 3,797,000 2,845,000 952,000
66 CR 66 at CR 61 intersection 85,000 85,000
77 Vierling to 1!8 mile south of 17t7 75,000 75,000
86 TH 19 to CSAH 27 $V , 7,712,500 5,788,215 1,924,286
-- Contingency - 700,000 700,000
EXPANSION
21 CSAH 16 to CSAH 18 1.40 New Construction - 4 Lane Divided 11,462,000 12,529,416 (1,067,416)
42 HUntington~8) (8~nY Corridor Improvements 3,553,407 1,710,700 1,842,707
STUDIES
A' ~ :
9 CSA~6:9 ITH 282lntern}n . Geometric layout for RIW preservation 40,000 40,000
2 &86 Internection , v, Geometric layout 60,000 60,000
~I
~\.~v < .
,-
2008
2009 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION Overla,/CIR ~
-- County-Wide 2,000,000
101 W of CSAH 83 to W of Valley Park Dr Mill and Overlay - Turnb~bnds
101 W of Valley Park Dr to W of 70th St Mill and Overlay - T~~nds
MANAGEMENT
-- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 700,000 700,000
EXPANSION
2009
2010 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County.Wide Overlay/CIR 2,500,000 2,500,000
12 CSAH 17 to W of Stemmer Ridge 0.50 Reconstruction. 2 Lane 4,815,000 2,415,000
12 E of SLRP to Walnut St 1.20 Reconstruction. 2 Lane U 4,810,000 2,130,000
MANAGEMENT
-- Contingency .. Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 700,000
16 CSAH 16 @ Lynn Ave/Glendale Rd Intersection Reconstruction 913,512 240,968
EXPANSION
21 CSAH 42 to CSAH 16 1.50 8,906,021 4,450,000 4,456,021
27 CSAH 44 to 0.30 Mi North 0.30 3,039,200 1,435,000 1,604,200
44 Prior Lake CL - CSAH 27 1.00 3,810,400 840,000 2,970,400
2010
2011 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide 2,700,000 2,700,000
8 CSAH 23 to Calmor Ave. 0.50 2,384,000 2,384,000
69 TH 169 to N of RR Bridges 3.00 9,000,000
69 N of RR Bridges to Fuller Street 3,000,000
MANAGEMENT
87 CH 56 to CSAH 8 3.00 Reconstruction - 2 Lane Rural/Gravel 200,000 5,375,000
-- Contingency -- Traffic Safety 700,000
EXPANSION
2011
2012 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,700,000 2,700,000
MANAGEMENT
15 TH 169 to 6th Ave 1.00 Mill and Overlay 200,000
56 CSAH 23 to CH 87 1.50 Reconstruction - 2 Lane RurallG 2,820,000
-. Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,000,000
EXPANSION
2012
2013 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,800,000 2,800,000
101 CSAH 17 to Spencer 1.00 Reconditioning 3,000,000
MANAGEMENT "
15 N from TH 19 through 270th Street 1.25 Realignment on Alton A"enuel; 700,000 1,165,000
68 At CSAH 91 intersection Roundabout 1,150,000
-- Contingency .- Traffic Signals/Spot Safety 1,000,000
EXPANSION
17 St. Francis to CSAH 42 8,300;000 15,442,000
.
2013
2014 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY OEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,800,000 2,800,000
MANAGEMENT
-- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot 1,000,000 1,000,000
EXPANSION
15 TH 169 to 17th Avenue 0.25 - 4 lane divided 2,300,000 700,000
2014
2015 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 2,900,000 2,900,000
MANAGEMENT "'-"-<
-- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Saf~ y 1,200,000 1,200,000
EXPANSION
16 From CSAH 15 to CR 69 750,000
42 Boone to Louisiana 1.00 9,310,000 8,271,326
NOTE: Projects to be added once recommendations from studie
2015
2016 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide Overlay/CIR 3,000,000 3,000,000
MANAGEMENT
-- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Sa y 1,200,000 1,200,000
EXPANSION
NOTE: Projects to be added once recommendations from studi
2016
2017 Draft
SCOTT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Road Type of County
No. Location Len th Construction Funds
PRESERVATION
-- County-Wide Overlay/CrR 3,000,000 3,000,000
MANAGEMENT
-- Contingency -- Traffic Signals/Spot Sa y 1,200,000 1,200,000
EXPANSION
NOTE: Projects to be added once recommendations
2017
Community Requests to 2008-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
AGENCY REQUEST COUNTY RESPONSE
Belle Plaine CSAH 3 at TH 169 Intersection - The City of Belle Plaine has submitted a If the Federal Application is approved, the County will work with the city and MnDOT to program the
Federal Funding STP Application to build a bridge on CSAH 3 over Trunk County's share in a future TIP. Since the outcome of the application will not be known before this
Highway 169. If this application is successful, they are requesting Scott year's TIP is approved by the County Board, this project will not be reflected as being programmed.
County program $700,000 in the year 2011 to help fund the match for this
project.
Jordan TH 169/282/ CSAH 9 Intersection - The City of Jordan is requesting the The County is programming $40,000 for preliminary engineering as our cost share for this effort in
county to participate in the advanced preliminary engineering and official 2008.
mapping for the CSAH 9 side of the intersection based upon a future grade
separated interchange.
Jordan CSAH 10 at CR 66 Intersection - The City of Jordan is requesting the The County will program $25,000 for our total cost share in the corridor study with funding from the
County participate in a corridor study. 2008 contingency TIP item.
Shako pee CSAH 16 from Dean Lake Trail to future CSAH 21 - The City of Shakopee Based on current traffic volumes, this segment does not yet reach the threshold where staff would
is requesting Scott County widen this road when the traffic volumes warrant. recommend a capacity expansion project. The County will continue to monitor this as development
occurs particularly with the completion of 1 in Avenue to CSAH 83 and the future completion of
CSAH 21 from CSAH 42 to CSAH 18. both of which will significantly influence traffic patterns in the
eastern Shakopee area.
Shako pee CR 79 at Vierling Drive - The City of Shakopee is requesting that this The TIP does not specifically schedule intersections improvements. It is our policy to include a lump
intersection be studied and improvements (signal or roundabout) be sum in each year of the TIP to accommodate justified intersection improvements, spot safety
constructed when project warrants. improvements and contingencies. We will continue to monitor intersections and will program
improvements when an intersection study shows an improvement is warranted.
Shakopee CR 77 from Vierling Drive to 1/8 mile south of 17th Avenue - The City of The County is programming $75,000 for our total cost share for this project in 2008.
Shakopee is requesting the County install a bike and pedestrian trial on the
east side of CR 77 over the TH 169 bridge.
mk-c:\documents and settrngs\rbkeenm\my documents\trp presentatlon\tlp 2008-2017\2006-2017comm_requesLstafLresponse_draft.doc
.
".
.....~*~
~ ,~~\""
S'tt SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
A=, COZ:t,- HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST' JORDAN, MN 55352-9339
(952) 496-8346 . Fax: (952) 496-8365 . www.co.scott.mn.us
LEZLlE A. VERMILLION
PUBLIC WORKS DIREGOR
MITCHELL J. RASMUSSEN P.E.
COUNTY ENGINEER
October 16, 2007
Bruce Loney, P.E.
Shakopee City Engineer
500 Gorman Street
Shakopee,MN 55379
Dear Bruce,
The County has received several concerns recently regarding the condition of CSAH 101 (First
Ave E) in Shakopee between Spencer Street and CSAH 17 (Marschall Rd). County forces
recently completed a maintenance patching project on this segment which, while vital to
preserving the longevity of the pavement surface, has resulted in an increasingly rough ride for
users and a worsened appearance. As you know this segment is not programmed for funding
until 2011 due to several unresolved issues.
As you are aware, the roadway currently suffers from the following issues, among others:
. Poor condition of pavement, surface drainage, storm sewer, and underground City
utilities;
. Wide roadway without medians is not conducive to pedestrian crossings and encourages
higher traffic speeds;
. Lack of left turn lanes causes roadway to sometimes operate as a de-facto 3-lane;
. Lack of adequate parallel routes for local traffic;
. High density of access points, both public and private, increases conflicts and makes
signal justification unlikely within the corridor;
. Lack of railroad crossings between Minnesota Street and CSAH 17 forces local trips onto
CSAH17;
. Morning demand for the CSAH 101 river crossing causes routine congestion in the
westbound right lane;
. Narrow right-of-way limits options for expansion or reconfiguration;
. Numerous roadway patches for recent watermain connections spurred by redevelopment;
. Likelihood of future redevelopment creates unknowns for both future geometric design
and aesthetics.
At a City Council meeting in late 2005, when the County was addressing the Council regarding
the improvements made on First A venue between CSAH 17 and Veterans Memorial Park, the
An Equal Opportunity/Safety Aware Employer
o Printed on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer content
1311
~ ,.
County offered to work with the City to address this segment of First Avenue and suggested the
City and County could undertake a study of the corridor to comprehensively address the
numerous issues in this segment. At that time the City was not interested in conducting that type
of study.
Currently, the City and County are participating in a study ofCSAH 17 and CSAH 101 which
will look at future lane needs for capacity but will not address development issues, as was the
City's direction to the County. The County as the ability to redirect Trunk Highway Turnback
Funds currently targeted for a segment of CSAH 101 between CSAH 17 and TH 169 in order to
fund the First Ave East segment earlier than 2011. However, without addressing drainage issues,
lane configuration, corridor aesthetics, access consolidation, and adjacent land use, the County
would only be able to address the surface deterioration. The other issues listed would remain
unresolved and certainly more difficult to address once the investment in the resurfacing had
been made. Resolution of the remaining issues would then, most likely fall to the City's
responsibility and then, to protect the investment made in the reconstructed road surface may not
be approved by the County.
The condition of the surface meanwhile continues to deteriorate, and we request that the City
advise the County of its wishes for this segment ofCSAH 101, such that capital funding
decisions can be made and improvements scheduled which correspond to the needs of the
corridor.
Sincerely,
~(~~ -
Mitchell J. asmussen, P .E.
County Engineer
'. J ')
,:) c ~
/ .
.-
DI{ 1 A f2JL ~
November 1, 2007
Mitch Rasmussen
Scott County Highway Department
600 Country Trail East
Jordan,MN 55352
RE: Review of Draft Scott County 2008-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
Dear Mr. Rasmussen:
This letter in response to your letter dated October 16, 2007 and in r~gard to the City of
Shakopee's comments and recommendations on /~/6ttl""COunty Higl'mray Department's
2008-2017 Transportation Improvement Progr~' (TIP). Staff has reyiewed the draft
County TIP with City Council and has the fo!lQ~1?-~ co111ih,~nts for you to Consider:
. ~'\t~~~~~)i!liCt;~~)i:?,\\,
I 2008 . ~<:~\~)t'h I
't({{t:h;:tf:?:-"
"'.'-':-':"::::i ''0~';i;li)' ;xi
C.R.101t from Lewis Street Bridee to CSAHJ7 "(':;:h'.
V-',\-\\-
;:>,'-
,,-r.'
. Attached is a le~~~~,~~t~~ October 16,4007 from the County requesting the City to
advise the C3;~tY'~fqt~~~shes for ~s segment. Issues needing direction would
depend on,!l1~..;~ity's tU\~e vision for tl1is ~ea. Reconstruction of this segment is
currently sho~jh 20 13~~ but could be l110ved up if the City provides direction to
"<J'~:_"?/\'i\ .. A-s~}~~4-~
the COunty. Thdr€;hY'~~()Ui1qi1Aha~;4ltits vision goals to review and discuss this
"<;;~e~:~:::'~ -':':""'"~""~ i'1::":~:::,(.:'~"4:~.~'!n'
~~a a.Ildp1'9xj~e ilieQ(RQ,};!llty inputYiii1 early 2008. These comments are for this
project shown in. the y~~i~iQ}3 as well.
"~~';$~~
C.R. 101 Bride€! Reolacemifnt and Overlav to West of CSAH 83
.....'.:.....
. A detour wi1F~e;l1ecessary for bridge construction and City streets may be needed
for the detour: The City may request County's funds to repair or restore the City
of Shako pee pavements utilized in the detour, if necessary.
CSAH 21 - CSAH 16 to CSAH 18
. County is receiving federal dollars for this project, including funds for a new park
and ride facility. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community has recently
purchased land south of CSAH 16 that could affect project timing. Although
shown in 2008, the actual construction start is more than likely in 2009.
.
.
. County is showing more Federal/State/Local funds than actual project costs. City
of Shakopee cost share is not shown by County. Previous estimates have been
approximately $750,000.00 and the city would request that the county use Federal
Funds to lower the city's share of this roadway.
12009 I
CR. 101 Mill and Overlav from West of CSAH 83 to West of 7f1h Street
,L,,_:,,~~
4:f~:i;::,S;(~>-",:__
. This project should match into the City's overlay 0111yalley'Park Drive done in
.".:::.<,,'-";-'-
2007. ,,(9;~~~ii'
12010 ~~~ic;; I
....' ,,". ~->
<,,'>,"
~;\z7~:;'Y::-~:,-~;<
CSAH 21 from CSAH 16 to CSAH 42 }:~-j::>
<f;"
. Completes the CSAH 21 roadway from T.R. 169t() I-35. City's share of project
,,<>>
is not shown. Previous estillf~t~~:,Pr City's sharesould be $750,000.00. The
county may receive Federal Fuii~s:i8tB3,l}~t:uct this road and the city requests that
the Federal Funds be used to 10wl;~,th~z'6i~t~i,~h~e proportionately.
\({iti~t(:~i(~~P""0;'?~~~i~i!1~~';>
/2011 ,> -,. I
"ii:(.',
\~:::::
\. ,"ec<;t'
)'i~1~~?
CR. 69 - T.H. 169 to North of Railroad Bridfll/s Overlav
"<ii}~R~~_ril~~tb' "'>i>> , . '. ..'....,>,
CR. 69,,4.North of Railroad Bridfle to Fuller Street Reconstruction
',',,' ....-.,'. ..
;:J~f~~;tf;>., "'i!~~t~;i
'e "l?rpJ~~t funding d~Rendenti()n State Turnback funds. The City of Shakopee
reql1~~t,~, that rehaB~i1tation and repainting of the RR bridges over CR 69 be
'Fc<'~<_~~{'~~ t.:,?~~
includeq.Jn, this turl1gack project.
?"~~~@}~'I~);~fJ5lfi'
d~~:~:/7
12012 I
CSAH 15 - T.H.169 to 6th Avenue Mill and Overlav
. This project is to preserve pavement life. The City of Shakopee supports this
project.
.
.
12013 I
CR. 101 - Spencer Street to CSAH 17 Reconstruction
. Roads may need to be widened depending on CSAH 17 corridor study and may
need to be reconstructed. City and Shakopee Public Utilities staffs are planning to
replace utility lines in this corridor. See 2008, Paragraph #1 for County's request
and City of Shako pee's response.
CSAH 17 from St. Francis Avenue to CSAH 42
. The cost of project is approximately $12,000,000 pel'lnile. City's share is not
shown but could be substantial. Widening of roadway ancl providing turn lanes
for safety is definitely needed for this corri,~Q~. A CSAH 17 corridor study is
underway and should be done in 2008. . ~1f~''''ci'ty of Shakopee \Vould request a
cost share breakdown and would en<;Qfuage the County to obtain additional
t'c"-">\<:" . ~,~
funding from Federal, State and Regidfi~R'~~J;Vces'~~!#t'
~<~~~~~g.I~\, /:f;~~"pP'~;:{'~~'-..
12014 "z~~J\~;ji" I
CSAH.15 - TH 169 to 1ih Avenue ""?W'I~f,!';jli;'!~!;S"
~i>:<;>
/F'
. Reconstruction of GR 15 does not show the city's share in the project.
.~::#~~j0:~~~:~iPf:t0:~~i~;c;~:,
12015 (,>C,.i':' ~<<~:;;\m'[ft, I
<<<:t>
;. '~,::\<:'<i~:"", '<:8:::>',,<
, . '",i;f~{~ti'" i~~~~",
CSAH 16 - From CSAHil5.,to1'(?Rt69;'""",_"
"~;~~:'~1}' '..., "'<'ttt~",@~~~~'I~r:"i
. This roadway is throtigijj;.~e proposed Bluffs at Marystown and may be built
~?oner than shoWl1., The<,~~ulity is not showing any County funding for this
proj~~t. Cost ofth~projes~'~ll be more than $750,000.00 as this is a mile long
segment of new construction.
.
.
I Beyond 2017 I
CSAH 16 from Dean Lake Trail to Future CSAH 21
. This project did not make the County's TIP; however, the County will monitor the
traffic capacity as this area develops.
This concludes the City of Shakopee's list of comments for the Draft County TIP in the
year 2008-2017. Please review this list and if you have any questions in regard to these
suggestions, please feel free to contact me at (952)233-9361.
Sincerely,
Bruce Loney, P.E. .
Public Works Director
BLlpmp
ENGR/EMPLOYEEFOLDER/PPENNINGTONILETTERS/RASMUSSEN