The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12.C. Rezone Property-Ord. No. 785 CITY OF SHAKOPEE /~, c" Memorandum CASE NO.: 07-050 : TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Rezone property from Urban Residential (R-1B) and Low Density Residential (R-1A) to Urban Residential (R-IB) and Low Density Residential (R-IA) ! MEETING DATE: September 4, 2007 INTRODUCTION Associated Capital Corp. (ACC) has made application for the preliminary plat of Maple Ridge Estates. This proposed 40 acre development is zoned a combination of Urban Residential (R-IB) in the northern portion ofthe project and Low Density Residential (R-IA) in the southern portion of the project. The existing zoning line between the R-IB portion and the R-IA portion follows the current property line. However as would be expected, with the platting of the property, lots lines are not proposed to cleanly mirror the existing property line and zoning boundary. Staff is proposing that the zoning boundary line be reconfigured to follow the lot lines that will be created with the platting of the property. Because the lots are legally created with Final Plat, staffis recommending that the publication of the ordinance be delayed until such time as the Final Plat is approved. If the Final Plat assigns different lot and block numbers than are reflected in the preliminary plat, staffwill make the appropriate housekeeping change to the ordinance prior to publication. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its August 23rd meeting and recommended to the Council that the rezoning be approved as depicted in Exhibit C of the Planning Commission report. A copy of this report is attached for the Council's reference. ALTERNATIVES 1. Offer and pass Ordinance No. 785, an ordinance rezoning property within the Maple Ridge Estates plat. 2. Offer and pass a motion directing staff to prepare alternative an alternative ordinance. 3. Table the request to seek additional information from the applicant and/or staff. ACTION REQUESTED Offer and pass Ordinance Noe 785, an ordinance reZOnllip~ Ridge Estates. Ie KlIma I Planner II h:\cc\2007\09-04\rez maple ridge estates 07050.doc 1 ORDINANCE NO. 785, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONINp MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE SEe. 11.03 BY REZONING LAND LOCATED WITHIN MAPLE RIDGE ESTATES WHEREAS, the property located in the southwestern corner of CSAH 17 and CSAH 78 is currently zoned as Urban Residential (R-1B) and Low Density Residential (R-1A); and WHEREAS, the City ~as received an application for preliminary plat approval of this property; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is appropriate to reconfigure the zoning boundary between the Urban Residential (R-IB) and Low Density Residential (R-IA) zones to correspond with the property lines that will be created with the platting of Maple Ridge Estates; and WHEREAS, the subject properties that shall be zoned as Low Density Residential (R-1A) Zone are legally described as: , Lots 1 through 6, Block 3; Lots 7 through 12, Block 5; Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 10 through 14, Block 2; and Outlot A, as depicted in the preliminary plat for Maple Ridge Estates, Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the subject properties that shall be zoned as Urban Residential (R-IB) Zone are legally described as: . Lots 1 through 7, Block 4; Lot 7, Block 3; Lots 1 through 9, Block 1; Lots 1 through 17, Block 6; Lots 1 through 4, anI! Lots 13 through 15, Block 5; Lots 4 through 9, Block 2, as depicted I in the preliminary plat for Maple Ridge Estates, Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on August 23, 2007, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the subj ect property rezoned as stated; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on September 4,2007; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above-named request: Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error. The original zoning ordinance established a zoning boundary that is not compatible with individual lot configurations. Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place. Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred in that the subject property is proposed for a unified urban residential development. The existing zoning boundaries are not conducive to property lines proposed with urban development. Finding #4 The Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, by the Shako pee City Council is consistent with the request. 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to rezone the property as stated in this ordinance is hereby approved. I ! Passed in regular session of th~ City Council of the City of Shako pee, Minnesota held this day of ,2006. Mayor of the City of Shako pee Attest: Judith S. Cox, City Clerk Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of ,20_. 3 A ~ *--0 CITY OF SHAKO PEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 07- I TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Rezone property from Urban Residential (R-IB) and Low Density Residential (R-IA) to Urban Residential (R-IB) and Low Density Residential (R-1A) MEETING DATE: Augtlst 23,2007 INTRODUCTION Associated Capital Corp. (ACC) has made application for the preliminary plat of Maple Ridge Estates. The subject site is located at the southwest comer ofCSAH 17 and County Road 78 (see Exhibit A). The subject site is approximately 40 acres in size. The.northern 25 acres are zoned Urban Residential (R-1B) and the southern 15 acres are zoned Low Density Residential (R-IA). Please see Exhibit B for the zoning line between the two districts. The applicant is proposing! to subdivide the property for single family residential development. Because the lot lines of th~ proposed plat are not able to directly correspond to the existing zoning boundaries, the lots propo~ed along the existing zoning boundary are split between the two zoning districts. Staff is bringing forward a rezoning request in order to reconfigure the zoning boundary to coincide with proposed lot lines. The rezoning would eliminate parcels having conflicting zoning designations for future development and title work. Please see Exhibit C. The dark line indicates the proposed zoning boun.dary between the Urban Residential (R-IB) and Low Density Residential (R-IA) districts. . FINDINGS The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below with proposed findings for the Commission's consideration. Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error; Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error. The original zoning ordinance established a zoning boundary that is not compatible with individual lot corifigurations. Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place; Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have not taken place. Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred; or Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have occurred in that the subject property is proposed for a unified urban residential development. The existing zoning boundaries are not conducive to property lines proposed with urban development. 1 , Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision. Finding #4 The Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, by the Shalwpee City Council is consistent with i the request. i STAFFRECOMMENDA'EION After evaluating the request ~gainst the stated criteria for rezoning, staff recommends approval of the rezoning as proposed on Exhibit C. ALTERNATIVES 1. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone the subject site as depicted qil Exhibit C. 2. Offer a motion to recotnplend to the City Council the denial of the request to rezone the subject site as depicted on Exhibit C. 3. Offer a motion to continue the public hearing and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff. 4. Close the public hearing, and offer a motion to table and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the rezoning of the subject site, as depicted on Exhibit C, and move its approval. iiJLf)~. . · .ft lie Klima anner II 2 , '::>lli:l.K.Ul't:::t::: - LUCl:1llUIlIVH:l.P1:i ""-'."", Page 1 of 1 RR RR RR ~ N _ Subject Property w. SHAKOPEE .".... Shairopee Boundary CoMMtlNnYl'1UDESlNCE 1857 S c:J Zoning Boundary c::J Partel Boundary Preliminary Plat of Maple Ridge Estates http:// gis.logis.org/shakopeellocationmap/map.asp ?title=Preliminary+Plat+of+Maple+Ri... 05/1112007 , \1' B I( =-i-/ - .. . I , ".!E} "L'''~ -L ~ v n 1,. t.. v l.... L.. V ' ..; r f'f \1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19. Township t 15, Range 22. Scott County, Minnesota. ,,-~. \ - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- ,..~'" -....... \ --- ." ~,.'- .' ".....,... - . ZONING INFORMATION KALLIO " 'r, fJ () ~I n EXISTING ZONING = RIA Engineering -" \ - -lHf: NORTH UNE OF 'THE NW t/4 OF THE HE 1/4 OF ::>1:,1,;. 19, 1.110, R. N89"T3'Q7"w--r:J.5 . (APPLIES TO BLOCK 1; LOTS ~-6. BLOCK 2; BLOCK ~: LOTS 1-6. ENGINEER/SURVEYOR \ LOTS 13-15. BLOCK 5. ANO BLOCK 6 KALUO ENGINEERING INC. 10175 Poppltz tane \ .., \ -EXl5nNG HIGHW...... EASe.lEHT MINIMUM LOT \110 TH = 60 FEET 10775 POPPITZ LN Chaska ,MN 5531B '" MINIMUM LOT DEPTH = 100 FEET CHA5KA, MN 55318 P; 952-448-5725 ~ 8' lfTT, TRAil MINIMUM LOT AREA = 6000 5Q. FT. CONTACT: CURT KAlUO. P,E. F; 952-400-8492 . ._....'~h._ ".,.._...,....."" .. MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK = 30 FEET 952-446-5725 ~ MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10 FEET www.kal/loengtneertnq.com MINIMUM REAR YARO SETBACK = 30 FEET MINIMUM SlOE STREET SETBACK = 20 FEET OVVNER/DEVELOPER ~ en ~~.s 0 en EXISTING ZONING = R1 A ASSOClA TED CAPITAL CORPORATION '-~-6(() '" 327 S. MARSCHAll. RD 0" ~ N "- , ~I (APPLIES TO LOTS 1-3 .I< 9-1~, BLOCK 2: LOTS 7-12, BLOCK 3: ANO -i~o5 ci BLOCK 5. SHAKOPEE. MN 5S379 ooE_ z 952-445-5020 itooo w MINIMUM LOT \I10TH = 95 FEET :"1 ~Q <3 ~ w MINIMUM LOT AREA = 12.600 SQ. FT. a.~:~ . ~ '" MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK = 35 FEET ~ MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK = t 5 FEET :E~g:: ~ MINIMUM REAR YARO SETBACK = 35 FEET - itc:~ "'i 0 MINIMUM SlOE STREET SETBACK = 20 FEET It~~.el" ] ~~ ~ ~ _......-..~ ... ._,.... . -."..-....,... ...-'. ....-. II ~~~~ ~~ LOT INFORMATION .- c.c.~ => ~.~~.~~ U -.J PROPOSED LOTS = 69 Ii/) J/j, . ~8 g-o ~ ...... i:i OUTLOTS = 1 ~~:5~3 8 I I~ OUTLOT AREA = 4.16 ACRES 21 Ii :: lirE~o '" '" I GROSS AREA.= 40.95 ACRES 0 S PROPOSED R.O.W. = 11.61 ACRES ~ I "' GROSS DENSITY = 1.7 LOTS PER ACRE / , - NET LOr DENSITY = 2.7 LOTS PER ACRE !, 135 ~.J SITE INFORMA nON ----~----_.._- Ir---l'l lJ'J ---- !!! I I MINIMUM LOT \I10TH AT SETBACK UNE IN SUBDIVISION =, 72 FEET 0 i!! ~ I 3 /011 MINIMUM LOT OEPTH IN SUBOIVlSION = 135 FEET .... .fJ I!l I 11."8... Ie I " I') :; !, LL___J-.J I > ~ ::v \1l ~ om ~ /j -0" I r -135- 1 ~ I '" a:M i!! wi ~ (Ij =~ I" I 2 I 011 I N i:r:: c.>~z l!s -' B r... a: .", u:.: ~ '" I I" Il. ~ 0 M ~ QJ' 11.745Iq. It. <( 'c a ..... ~ L L___J-.J ~ ~ 01 0 .- :E: 41. R-I B '" ~ vi ~ I r-'~-l~ u '" i!! "" '" ....... Il. <l; "'-'" I"' I 1 1011 "' w MlIl "' a: 01 I 1'2.775'sq. ft.l UI / a. ~ L ~=~ \; ~ - SAMARA Q - - j1J S TR E E T ii: .... '" I (l:l ., i-- Jl,- ;:;:; OJ ~r---r Jj~ ;,. . r12.S-, B-. 1-4,71421q. fl Q ~ 12 I 7 \ ~ ,:.: ., . bOlAndary u (l:l 000 30 30 zonin, !lj c .", & lil - 113.4sl... ILl. I ~ o .- ;;::~ g: S ~;.:= ., -'" \\'-::""' --- - " 15.'" r > (l) 2/ I '" ... Ol F~ ~ I" ~ \ 10 / ~ f= \ "8,617 sq. ft. ./ >-- P10 279190112 '" :l LL -I'IS.::..:" .--II I w :x: 1Il r- --II 1 III ( di~~ n >- I I I -\ I 0 II lD ~ I 1-4.207 sq. ft. 1 g .--,YJ>- I "" /w L L'40-.J ~ \ ~ 0 R- I z I A 0 ~\ .... I lil 14.488 ~ fl , ..., I \ , , Q " .., L L llW - -.J --1 .... I 11-13--/ ~ I ~- z / 0 Vi I~ I 14.486 'lIq. It. I l---- 5 ~I E w .... a: )> I I / I z L L -1'15 _.J --1 I j!! m S~ "" Ir---11 ( 0 14 / I'" I 13,ns... Ie I ilIl ~ -5 ~ .01 I I ./" -1 .-J L L L L -1'15 - J -1 -,- 43 <84 75 - 0 80 160 1__lHE SW'7H UHt a 1HE NW 1/4(7 1HE HE 1/... a: SEe. 19, T.II5. R.22 S89019'45"E 1326.37 PIO 273360100 PID 271350010 H \; l( R : .E D E :.: , S T II r"'\ ,.., I'" I 1"\ ". -.-.-- BEING 5 FEET IN \I1DTH AND ADJOINING SCALE IN FEET , 1"\ U lJ I I I V '1 LOT LINES. AND 10 FEET IN \I10TH AND BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED. -/- -I- AOJOINING RIGHT OF WAY UNES AS - - - - - - - SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. PIO 271350020 . OENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 1 SHEETS =--i-/ - I( II A I I " "~ "2L --1 ~ v ,.." 1,. L. , v '- '- 1'1 \, LEGAL DESCRIPTION - The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19. Township 115. Range 22. Scott County. Minnesota. \ , ,.~ - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- 'Wo.,:, \ ...."...' ,~, - --- - ...,. ..,;.:....... . ZONING INFORMATION KALLIO " ^ tJ (1 :' [L ~ EXISTING ZONING = R1B Engineering \ --THE NORTH UHE OF THE NW 1/4- Of THE Nt. 1/4 or :st.\,;, HI, 1,115, R. N89"T3'07"w--r:33 . (APPLIES TO BLOCK 1: LOTS 4-8. BLOCK 2: 8LOCK 4: lOTS 1-6. ENGINEER/SURVEYOR \ LOTS 13-15. BLOCK 5. ANO BLOCK 6 KALLIO ENGINEERING INC. 10775 Poppltz Lane \ ::l \-EXIS11NG HIGHWAY EASEMENT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH = 60 FEET 10775 POPPITZ LN Chaska,MN 5531B ~ MINIMUM LOT DEPTH = 100 FEET CHA5KA, MN 55318 P: 952-448-5725 B' 1JTT. IRA" MINIMUM LOT AREA = 6000 SO, FT. CONTACT: CURT KALLIO, P,E. F: 952-400-8492 '.',-.~,.".....~..._.,~"..,~ ... 952-448-5725 ~ MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK = 30 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD SElBACK = 10 FEET www.kalllcengfneennq.com MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK = 30 FEET MINIMUM SIDE STREET SETBACK = 20 FEET OWNER/DEVELOPER ~ <n ....~.3 0 <n EXlSnNG ZONING = R16 ASSOCIATED CAPITAL CORPORA nON 5~-6~ <0 " (APPLIES TO LOTS 1-3 &. 9-14. BLOCK 2: LOTS 7-12. BLOCK 3: AND 327 S. MARSCHALL RO N 2 ...:,;1 o:S , 21 BLOCK 5. SHAKOPEE. MN 55379 55E- ci 952-445~S020 c. 00 z / w ;~" ~Q I MINIMUM LOT WIDTH = 95 FEET ci w ./' MINIMUM LOT AREA = 12,800 SO, FT. -a~:5~ . ~ a:: MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK = 35 FEET ~ MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK = 15 FEET ~ ~g~ ,~ I DRIVE MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK = 35 FEET - - - MINIMUM SIDE STREET SElllACK = 20 FEET 1I/J~IiIJt -- Ea -g ~ o 0.'- :I VI ~". .... .h.. __. II :~.~~ ~f:Q II' LOT iNFORMATION :e : %.~ d a -...I /1J) Ju. - ~~: liig !!l PROPOSED LOTS = 69 f~:].~ l- I '" OU1\.OTS = 1 ( 1 8 ~ :!! '" I~ OU1\.OT AREA = 4.18 ACRES ~ iE~~ 0( ~ GROSS AREA = 40.95 ACRES 0 !!f 3::: PROPOSED R.O.W. = 11.61 ACRES ~ ! i5 GROSS DENSITY = 1.7 LOTS PER ACRE ~ / . - NET LOT DENSITY = 2.7 LOTS PER ACRE t:l i!5 1~5 0 ./ :; ~.J SITE INFORM A nON .~ --- !l! Fr-- l""l MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK LINE IN SUBDIVISION = 72 FEET .... III I ffi o 0 :g ~ 1 3 1"'1 030 MINIMUM LOT DEPTH IN SUBDIVISION = 135 FEET <"I ~ I<) 2 i!5 I 11,748 sq. fll ~ ~ ::~ :; :; L L - --=J.-l I >- III ~ ~'" ~ Fr-f35 l""l ;>; "..... I " a: <"I :g <<:S =~ I" I 2 1 "'I wi I ~ NCJ::: U 1z i!5 ..J ~ i-- .. I I'" Cl. ri! "C U:z !l! 11,745 1Iq. It <C ~~ ? 0 ~ ~ QJ' " L ~--=J.-l g 01 Lo. ~ ::E: 0 '0 ~ ~. I" r-''35-ll Zu w ~ ul ~ :g a:: 0( '" ..... '" I 1 I "'I ~ a. ~ N..l: F W <"IV! a:: I t2.775sq:. (t.l U\ I a. ~ Ll-=O=~ II - SAMARA - -JU STREET 0 0: 'iii III I '" i-- * 13 R-l& :a:: 'tii ~ r- -;=-125- -, "1 B-'8 14,t70 sq. ft. C ~~ b \8 I 7 \ ~ .:.: '" . '-' (\l .go &. lil - 113,4" .. It.!. ~ I!j C I 0'- i:2~ - I g: .S '" ..c: -- ~- ].'" -- ) (l) .- 2/ I w .... ",0.. ::E IN ~ \ 10 / ~ pro.-." zoni..., b._o I" \ 18,617 sq. ft. / .... PlO 279190112 ~ w LL -1.5.::..:-' -A w ::I: III \' r--II n 11 ( <ii~~ II >- \CD \ 14,207 sq. ft. \ 0\ I 0 III N I I '" .__o;rP- I '" I~ \ -J o. , I 2 R-I A. -- - 0 - - I , - ... 4 , - ..... .g - , g - - - - - I I I ~- z 0 in E l---- 5 w r- a:: )> I 2 L L -11,5-=-...1 .-J I m w 5--1 .... Ir---ll 0( 0 14 ./' 1 I~ I 13.775 sq. It I IIlI O! c L5 - . I I ./' -1 .-J -'- LL_'1,5_J -1 - - PROJECT NO: 43 254 4114 75 0412 - S89019'45"E 1326.37 0 60 160 '--THE SOUTH UHE Cf" THE NW 1/4 Of lHE HE 1/4 Cf" SEe. 19. T.t15, R.22 PlO 273360100 PlO 271350010 H~I<R:EDE - ~ A ..... " I T I '" ... -'-'- BEING 5 FEET INWlD'lH AND ADJOINING SCALE IN FEET - f"\ U lJ I II V 1'1 LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND I -I- -I- I ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY UNES AS BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED, - - - - - - - I SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. PIO 271350020 . DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 1 SHEETS