HomeMy WebLinkAbout12.A.1. CSAH 101/Sommerville Intersection Realignment and Pedestrian Improvements
I :J . fl. L
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Meeting Date: April 17, 2007
Subject: CSAH 101/Sommerville Intersection Realignment and Pedestrian
Improvements
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item seeks direction from City Council on a cost sharing agreement for the
CSAH 101/Sommerville intersection realignment and pedestrian crossing improvements.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
I was notified by Scott County on March 23 that the County has prepared a cost sharing
agreement for the CSAH 101/Sommerville intersection realignment and pedestrian
improvements. You might recall that Bonestroo completed an analysis of how to
improvement pedestrian crossing safety from downtown to Huber Park (attached), and
the County's proposed improvements were reviewed by Council as part of the Huber
Park design process.
Scott County has been an active participant in the Huber Park and related riverfront
design team. Many of the improvements are occurring under permit from the County,
including the boat launch, archery range road, and pedestrian underpass improvements.
I appreciate their participation and willingness to work with the city on this project.
Unfortunately, during the 101/Sommerville redesign work, there was no discussion about
the city cost-sharing for the improvements. At the time, we were under the impression
that the improvements would be funded from the County's safety improvement funds.
After I was notified of the cost sharing agreement, I contacted Bruce Loney and Jeff
Weyandt to discuss. Mr. Weyandt served on the design team and was under the same
impression as I was where the project would be funded from other sources. Mr. Loney
reviewed the County's Transportation Improvement Program where the project is
identified and noted that it does indicate funding from other sources (city). According to
Mr. Loney and Mr. Weyandt, cost sharing for intersection improvements is common
practice, and Council has authorized many cost sharing agreements with the County in
the past.
Mr. Loney, Mr. Weyandt and I reviewed the intersection and discussed the need for the
improvements. Mr. Loney also talked to the County in more detail about the design.
According to Mr. Loney, the County indicated that if they would construct this
intersection today, it would not use this same design. Therefore, it appears that the
project is still worthwhile.
-----------
The City's cost for this project is estimated at approximately $40,000. If Council wants to
move forward with the improvements, Mr. Voxland has indicated it could be funded from
one of the following three sources:
1. Huber Park Project BudgeUPark Reserve Fund
2. Capital Improvement Fund
3. General Fund Fund Balance
Although the project is a road improvement project, the impetus behind the improvement
is Huber Park. If you feel the funding should come from the Park Reserve Fund,
although the overall state of the Park Reserve Fund is not good, it appears that there
should be adequate funding in the project contingency to cover these costs. Although we
still have considerable work yet to complete, as of April 12, the completed project
balance is projected to be under budget by -$152,229.
Mr. Loney will be available to answer more specific questions related to the cost sharing
agreement and the proposed work. I also want to note that if this project moves forward,
I have asked Mr. Loney to have Engineering take the lead on any additional work related
to the project.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Proceed with the proposed improvement project and authorize a cost-sharing
agreement with Scott County.
2. Defer the project.
3. Eliminate the project.
RELATIONSHIP TO VISION
A. Active and Healthy Community
REQUESTED ACTION
If City Council concurs,
1. Move to authorize a cost sharing agreement with Scott County for the CSAH
1 01/Sommerville intersection improvements.
2. Provide direction on funding the work.
Also, if you would like a representative from the County to attend the meeting, please let
me know in advance.
Mark Themig
From: Rasmussen, Mitch [mrasmussen@co.scott.mn.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 12:26 PM
To: Bruce Loney; Mark Themig
Cc: Gustafson, Joseph
Subject: RE: 101 /First Project
Bruce & Mark,
Joe has indicated to me that there has been some surprise expressed by the City with regard to the
contribution of City funds on the 101/First Avenue signal improvements near Huber Park. This work was
requested by the City last year and was incorporated into the County's Transportation Improvement Program
for this year. As such, we began design work in January and had planned to advertise it for bids early this
spring, we realize a letting and contract award can not take place until we have finalized the Cooperative
Agreement with the City for construction costs and operational responsibilities.
We propose that the cooperative agreement would state the standard city/county cost share for signal and
road construction projects, which is that signal costs are split by approach leg jurisdiction. In this case, there
are three legs, and the County will therefore fund two thirds of the Signal bid items. There is also some road
work to remove the porkchop island (as requested by the city) and tighten the north curb line to reduce the
crossing distance for pedestrians. The roadway and curb work will be split by the standard construction cost
share, which means that the City's financial contribution would include 50% of the curb and gutter and storm
sewer costs, and 100% of the sidewalk. We currently estimate these costs to be approximately $40,000, but
we will have a better refined estimate once the plans are further along.
Please let us know as soon as possible if the City would like us to suspend further work on this project. We
apologize for any miscommunication on our part, we assumed the City, when making the request knew the
project would follow our normal cost participation practices.
Mitch
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustafson, Joseph
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1 :35 PM
To: Rasmussen, Mitch
Subject: Fw: 1 01/First Project
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Loney <BLoney@cLshakopee.mn.us>
To: Mark Themig <MThemig@cLshakopee.mn.us>; Gustafson, Joseph; Jeff Weyandt
<JWeyandt@cLshakopee.mn.us>
CC: Mark McNeill <MMcneill@cLshakopee.mn.us>
Sent: Sun Apr 01 18:51: 11 2007
Subject: RE: 101/First Project
I have not heard of a city contribution for this but this has not been a public works project.
1
Bruce Loney
Public Works Director
Direct No. 952-233-9361
Fax No. 952-233-3801
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Themig
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 4:29 PM
To: 'Gustafson, Joseph'; Bruce Loney; Jeff Weyandt
Cc: Mark McNeill
Subject: RE: 101/First Project
Thanks Joe for the update. This is the first I've heard of a City contribution. Is Bruce aware of this - don't think
we've talked about that in the past?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustafson, Joseph [mailto:JGustafson@co.scott.mn.us]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 4:24 PM
To: Mark Themig; Bruce Loney; Jeff Weyandt
Subject: 1 01/First Project
Mark, Bruce, and Jeff,
Just a quick update on the 101/First Signal project:
The preliminary design was received by us today, we need to get comments (including any city comments, if
any) back by April 4th.
We hope to have a final plan set by April 5th or 6th, with a Bid Letting for May First, and an award date at the
following County Board meeting.
This gives them about a month to get it done before the park opens, which is tight, but possible.
As a heads-up, there will be an agreement which will need to go to the Board and the City Council for the cost
participation. At this point I am guessing that the total project cost will be around $100,000, which is less than
I'd initially feared, but higher than a rosy projection I got a few weeks ago. This means roughly $40,000 in city
costs (inc.
engineering and inspection). The signal costs will be split 33/67 but I believe the curb and sidewalk costs will
figure differently. I will probably have a more fine-tuned engineer's estimate by the time the agreement is up
for approval.
Please contact me with any further questions
Joe Gustafson
Scott Co. Hwy
2
\'d-\\s\as
S<:"~'l.-~~~ \C ~~.s..G-N
Intersection Redesign ~.R~ s''t..~,~" (:) v'J
"\ ~ Cs::5:l u.. v-.:x... \ L-
-Eliminate "free right" and reduce CSAH 101 width
-Would increase pedestrian safety
-May require restricting truck turns from eastbound CSAH 101 into downtown. Other
truck turns not affected
-Met with Brian Turtle to discuss truck delivery (most comes from east or south)
-Would require continued work with Scott County
I .
I~t_] RIVE RF R,GJ N T iPAlfi K
-. 'H "U B E R
_IIC&
. _...
>I, ., ~~' ,,,,^. !Co! ;m; .&
~..Nc;"""1t
Intersection Redesign
.~
i ·
i~
""'';;
,
,
:
I
I
I
WB 101 to SB Sommerville
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NB Sommerville to WB 101
,
I
I
I
I NB Sommerville to EB 101
I~t~ :H lJ B ER R:' I'V E:R F1 R (1 N T :R,A R K3
-.1 ti>
'. ~~
" ,,", '.': - h, :J ..,_c_
..,.....,...,.,.hlIM.l
J[]j Bonestroo Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk and Associates, Inc. Is an AffirmatIve Action/Equal
OpportunIty Employer and Employee Owned
_ Rosene Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. . Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. . Glenn R. Cook, P.E. . Robert G.
Schunicht. P.E. . Jerry;;'. Bourdon, P.E.
Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, P.E. . Joseph C. Anderlik, P .E. . Richard E. Turner,
1\11 AnderJik & P.E. . Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A.
Associates Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon, P.E. . Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. . Richard W. Foster.
P.E. . David O. Loskota, P.E. . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. . Michael T. Rautmann. P.E. . Ted K.
Field, P.E.. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E.. Mark R. Rolfs, P.E.. David A. Bonestroo, M.BA.
Engineers & Architects Sidney P. Williamson, P.E., L.S.' Agnes M. Ring, M.B.A.' Allan Rick Schmidt, P.E.. Thomas
W. Peterson, P.E.. JamesR. Maland. P.E.' Miles B. Jensen, P.E.. L. Phillip Gravel III, P.E.'
Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. . Ismael Martinez, P.E. . Thomas A. Syfko. P.E. . Sheldon J. Johnson.
Dale A. Grove, P.E.' Thomas A. Roushar, P.E.. Robert J. Devery, P.E.
Offices: SI. Paul. SI. Cloud. Rochester and Willmar, MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago, IL
Webslte: www.bonestroo.com
SHAKOPEE CROSSING STUDY
Introduction
This report discusses the pedestrian crossing across County State-Aid Highway (CSAH) 101 at
the intersection with 1 st A venue in the City of Shakopee. The future importance of this crossing
is briefly discussed followed by an analysis of pedestrian crossing options. Recommendations
for the pedestrian crossing conclude this document.
Existing Conditions
Located on the northern edge of Shako pee, CSAH 101 provides east-west travel from Trunk
Highway (TH) 169 to the intersection with CSAH 69 in the downtown City area. Sidewalk is
provided on both sides of this highway from the intersection with 1 st A venue east to the City
borders. 1 st A venue provides a local by-pass of the intersection of CSAH 69 and CSAH 101 as
well as access to local businesses. Sidewalk is also provided on both sides of this roadway along
its entire length. Controlled by a traffic signal system, the intersection of these two roadways
provides an at-grade pedestrian crossing. Pedestrians are currently able to use this crossing to
traverse CSAH 101 to/from downtown area parking and local businesses to/from the sidewalk on
the north side ofCSAH 101, a westbound bus stop, and Huber Park immediately north of this
intersection.
The pedestrian crossing across CSAH 101 is designated with zebra striping on the west side of
the intersection. Pedestrian crossing on the east side of the intersection is prohibited. Crossing
five lanes of traffic (an approximate 100- foot crossing distance), the existing striping does not
use the center median or the right turn separation island as pedestrian refuge. Once activated by
pedestrian push button, the pedestrian phase ofthe signal system provides a 7 second 'Walk'
time followed by an 18 second flashing 'Don't Walk' time to finish crossing.
Vehicle counts at this intersection show 98 northbound left turning vehicles and 68 eastbound
right turning vehicles potentially conflict with pedestrians during the p.m. peak hour. This count
was taken on July 28, 2004 and also showed 137 northbound right turning vehicles during the
p.m. peak hour. Westbound left turning vehicles on CSAH 101 numbered 93. Eastbound and
westbound through volumes on CSAH 101 were not counted at this time.
Proposed Park
A reconstruction is planned for Huber Park, north of the crossing intersection that will revitalize
the park. Among the proposed improvements are: a performance stage, gathering space,
improved parking, a riverfront trail, and a river valley overlook. Due to these improvements,
pedestrian movements between Huber Park and the downtown area are expected to increase.
The CSAH 101 crossing becomes a vital link for the new park and its safety is a primary
concern. With regard to improving safety at the pedestrian crossing, the remainder of this report
examines different crossing options and improvements.
Analyses
For the pedestrian crossing ofCSAH 101 between downtown Shakopee and Huber Park, three
basic options are available - overhead, underground, or at-grade. As mentioned, the current
crossing is at-grade. Each option is explored separately below.
Overhead Pedestrian Crossing
An overhead crossing spanning CSAH 101 would require a bridge at a minimum of20 feet
above the roadway (for large truck clearance). This facility would completely separate vehicle
and pedestrian movements. To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a ramp
needs to be provided for pedestrians from move between the ground and the bridge. Advantages
of this type of separated crossing include:
. Safer crossings. Vehicle-pedestrian conflicts are completely eliminated.
. Continuity. Pedestrian would be able to continue from one facility to another without
having to stop for traffic by using the overhead crossing.
. Shorter vehicle queues and delays. Without pedestrian movements, the signal will be
able to react quicker to vehicle movements and motorists will be able to proceed without
the need to wait for pedestrians.
. Signature architecture. A new bridge would provide the City an opportunity to create a
unique and distinctive connection between the downtown area and Huber Park.
Disadvantages of an overhead crossing include:
. Expense. The deck of the pedestrian bridge over CSHA 101 alone would likely cost
$200,000. Adding to that cost is the price of the entry ramps, which may stretch 500 feet
on the south side and 1,000 feet on the north side to meet proper standards, traffic
control, lighting, aesthetic enhancements, type of fencing on bridge, etc. In addition,
right-of-way may be needed, especially on the south side of the intersection, to provide
the needed space for the entry ramp.
. Illegal at-grade crossings. The lack of space on the south side of the intersection would
likely require a tight spiral ramp for pedestrians to reach the bridge. The grade change on
the north side ofthe intersection may require the use of either a long gentle slope or a
larger spiral ramp. In addition, it may be difficult to connect the entry ramp to the
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
sidewalk on the north side of the intersection. Pedestrians on the northern sidewalk may
have to walk down the slope to the entry ramp or use an extension that would require
them to walk away from the intersection before going up and over. Studies have shown
that pedestrians may avoid a grade-separated crossing if it appears inconvenient or
difficult to use. If the overhead crossing is perceived to increase travel time by 50
percent or more compared to the at-grade crossing, virtually no one would use the
overhead crossing even if the at-grade crossing is prohibited. In this specific case,
pedestrians may perceive the overhead crossing as an added burden and still attempt to
use the at-grade crossing without the benefit of pedestrian timing in the signal system.
. Vehicle sight distance. An overhead bridge may block all or portions of the signal for
approaching vehicles on CSAH 101. fixing this problem would likely require additional
signing and/or additional signal heads, driving up the cost of this option.
. Reduction of green space. The stairs/ramps to the bridge will require land that could
otherwise be used for additional green space.
. Increased maintenance. This type of facility would add a new bridge that the City,
potentially in conjunction with the County, would be required to maintain. Besides the
physical structure, maintenance may also include general cleaning, plantings, and/or
graffiti removal. An overhead pedestrian crossing would need to be maintained to ensure
pedestrians do not avoid it because of its appearance.
. Traffic delays. During construction, traffic may need to be reduced to one lane in each
direction to allow building of the bridge supports. Reducing the driving lanes for through
traffic on CSAH 101 would create significant delays, especially during the peak periods.
Although this condition would only be present during construction, it is a concern.
Despite the potential gain in safety, the primary drawbacks to an overhead crossing include the
cost and potential non-use by pedestrians. A crossing of this type would be an expensive
undertaking by the City and/or County in terms of design, construction, and maintenance.
Encouraging pedestrians to use an overhead crossing at this specific location would require a
unique and special design. The physical layout of the site does not lend itself toward this type of
crossing, as it is not along the normal path of pedestrian movement. The entry ramp on the north
side would rise up about 40 feet above the Huber Park, which would likely be very imposing to
some pedestrians. fencing or other physical barriers designed to promote its use could become
unsightly, drive the cost up, and may still be ignored by some pedestrians. Therefore, the
overhead crossing would not be recommended for this site.
Underground Pedestrian Crossing
Similar to the overhead crossing, an underpass would physically separate pedestrian and vehicle
movements. While the overhead crossing requires a minimum 20-foot roadway clearance, an
underpass could be as little as eight feet high. A ramp would again be necessary to comply with
ADA requirements and move pedestrians to and from the underpass. Advantages of an
underground pedestrian crossing include:
. Safer crossings. Vehicle-pedestrian conflicts are completely eliminated.
. Continuity. Pedestrian would be able to continue from one facility to another without
having to stop for traffic by using the underground crossing.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
. Shorter vehicle queues and delays. Without pedestrian movements, the signal will be
able to react quicker to vehicle movements and motorists will be able to proceed without
the need to wait for pedestrians.
. Natural fit. The slope on the north side of the intersection appears to provide a good fit
for an underground crossing. The tunnel would be able to exit directly to the park
without the need for entry ramp.
Disadvantages include:
. Expense. The box culvert used for the underground crossing would likely cost in excess
of $500,000, depending upon the exact lighting, aesthetic enhancements, length/depth of
the entry ramps, type of fencing around the entries, security, etc. In addition, right-of-
way may be needed on the intersection's south side to provide the needed space for the
entry ramp.
. Drainage issues. The underground crossing would likely alter drainage around the site,
which could require more an extensive storm sewer network or other measures to
properly control rain water.
. Security. Underground crossing generally require additional security measures to ensure
pedestrians fell comfortable with their use. Items such as video cameras, 24-hour
lighting, and/or extra police patrols would drive up both construction and maintenance
costs. The existing underground tunnel to the west of this site provides lighting, but does
not have any visible security. It is unknown whether that has had any effect on its use.
. Utility conflicts. The underground crossing could require moving one or more utilities
resulting in increased costs.
. Illegal at-grade crossings. The north entry/exit to the underground crossing would likely
lead directly to the park. Therefore, uses of the northern sidewalk adjacent to CSAH 101
and of the bus stop would need to travel up or down the slope to make use of the
crossing. On the south side, the entry, while likely not as extensive as an overhead
crossing, could still discourage users depending upon its perceived convenience. Either
case could result in some pedestrians still making use of an at-grade crossing on CSAH
101, even if the movement is prohibited. Studies have shown that pedestrians may avoid
a grade-separated crossing if it appears inconvenient or difficult to use. Similar to the
overhead crossing, if the underground crossing is perceived to increase trayel time by 50
percent or more compared to the at-grade crossing, limited use would be expected. In
this specific case, some pedestrians may perceive the underground crossing as an added
burden and still attempt to use the at-grade crossing without the benefit of pedestrian
timing in the signal system.
. Reduction of green space. Specifically on the south side, the entry ramp would require
land that is currently undeveloped.
. Increased maintenance. As with an overhead crossing, the new underground crossing
would require physical maintenance as well as periodic cleaning, graffiti removal, and/or
security updates.
. Traffic delays. During construction, traffic would likely be reduced to one lane in each
direction to allow cutting into the ground. Reducing the driving lanes for through traffic
on CSAH 101 would create significant delays, especially during the peak periods.
Although this condition would only be present during construction, it is a concern.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
The potential gain in safety with this type of crossing is offset by the expense and potential non-
use by some pedestrians. Drainage, utility, and security are all issues that could potentially drive
the cost up further than expected. In addition, any security provided for this crossing would
likely need to be duplicated in the underground crossing to the east, adding more construction
and maintenance fees. Despite all this expense, some pedestrians, especially those using the
sidewalk and/or bus stop on the north side ofCSAH 101, may cross at-grade (which would be
illegal with this option) to avoid the perceived inconvenience of the underground crossing. For
these reasons, the underground crossing would not be recommended at this time.
However, an underground crossing may be appropriate at a future date. The underground ground
crossing is a better option that the overhead crossing. The existing green space on the east side
of the intersection appears to have sufficient space for the entry ramp and, as mentioned, the west
side could open at the same elevation as the park without the need for an entry ramp. An
appropriate time to more fully examine the feasibility of an underground crossing would be when
CSAH 101 is totally reconstructed. Added to the preliminary planning of a CSAH 101
construction, the drainage, utility, and security issues of this type of crossing could be fully
determined. Waiting would also allow the extent of vehicle-pedestrian conflicts to be better
known as determined by the success of the park in attracting pedestrians and potential increases
in CSAH 101 traffic volumes. With this information, a more accurate cost-benefit analysis could
determine the viability of an underground crossing at this location.
At-Grade Pedestrian Crossing
As mentioned, the current crossing ofCSAH 101 is at-grade on the west side of the intersection
with 1 st A venue. Features include zebra stripes marking the crossing area, push button activated
pedestrian timing for the signal, and 'no pedestrian' signs for the other side of the intersection.
Advantages of this type of crossing include:
. Convenience. Pedestrians do not have stairs or a ramp to go up or down to get to the
crossing. They simply push the button and wait for the walk signal.
. More green space. When compared to the overhead or underground crossing, the at-
grade crossing uses very little green space.
. Less expensive. The road and signal system are needed regardless of the type of
pedestrian crossing. The remaining costs include the pedestrian push buttons and
indications, some signs related to the crossing, and pavement markings. These costs are
minor compared to the structural costs of grade separated crossings. Additional items are
also available to improve the safety of an at-grade crossing which are relatively
inexpensive.
. No drainage or utility issues. The road design deals with these types of issues and would
be needed whether the crossing is there or not.
. Less maintenance. Although the pavement markings, signs, and signal indications need
to be maintained, the cost is minor compared to upkeep of a bridge or tunnel.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
Disadvantages of an at-grade crossing include:
. Decreased safety. Pedestrians will cross in front of CSAH 101 traffic and with traffic
from 1 st A venue. This creates a crash potential from vehicle-pedestrian conflicts that
could result in injury or death to pedestrians.
. Increased vehicle delays and queues. When a push button activates the pedestrian timing,
traffic on CSAH 101 is forced to wait longer than would be necessary without the
pedestrians.
. Less direct route. Pedestrians traveling between the downtown area and Huber Park face
an incline between the sidewalk on the north side of CSAH 101 and the actual park
grounds. The current path from the northern sidewalk to the park is located just east of
the intersection. Some pedestrians may view this as an obstacle compared to the grade
separated crossing which would likely provide entries directly onto the park grounds.
The primary advantage of an at-grade crossing is the lower costs while the primary disadvantage
is the decrease in safety. In this case, the cost and safety must be weighed against the same
factors for the grade-separated crossings. The at-grade crossing has three factors that suggest it
would be a more logic crossing at this location. First, concerts, activities, and general use by the
public are likely to occur in the evening hours outside ofthe peak traffic periods. Therefore,
more pedestrian crossings are expected during off-peak traffic times, which help reduce vehicle-
pedestrian conflicts. Second, other measures are available to provide added safety to the at-grade
crossing. Most of these items are relatively inexpensive and have helped pedestrians, and
vehicle recognition of pedestrians, in other areas. Finally, with the need for entry stairs/ramps
and the potential to increase perceived travel time, pedestrian use of an overhead or underground
crossing is uncertain.
Based upon these factors, an at-grade crossing is recommended for this site at this time. To
improve safety, additional measures should be taken, which are detailed in the next section.
Crossing Improvement Options
Several options are available to help improve pedestrian safety at the existing crossing. These
options are discussed separately in the following paragraphs.
Additional Crossing on the East Side of the Intersection
Currently, pedestrians are allowed to cross CSAH 101 only on the west side of the intersection.
Crossing could be allowed on the east side instead of the west side, or on both sides. The
advantages of switching the crosswalk to the east side include a reduction in potential vehicle-
pedestrian conflicts (137 northbound right turns versus 68 eastbound right turns and 98
northbound left turns) and closer proximity to the path between the Huber Park and the north
sidewalk on CSAH 101. Disadvantages of providing the crossing on the east side only include
the cost of switching signs and pedestrian indications to the opposite sides, the cost of removing
the west crossing pavement markings and adding new ones on the east, and the reduction in
safety due to the likely additional crossing of 1 st A venue by pedestrians between Huber Park and
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
the downtown area. Finally, sidewalk would need to be added between the east crossing of
CSAH 101 and the sidewalk to the south of the intersection, which does not currently extend to
the intersection on this side.
The advantages of providing crossings on both sides include a more direct crossing for
pedestrians coming from either side and elimination illegal crossings by people who currently
determine the east side is better for crossing. It should be noted that no illegal crossings were
witnessed during the limited observations of the intersection. Disadvantages include increasing
the potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts, the cost of providing additional pedestrian indications
for the signal, the cost of additional pavement markings, and the cost of extending the sidewalk
on the south side to the crossing point on the east side of the intersection.
The exact cost of providing a crosswalk on the east side of the intersection, either with or without
the crossing on the west side, depends upon which option would be selected and other factors
such as the amount of sidewalk needed. Due to the likely higher cost of this option, it is not
recommended. The safety of the intersection for pedestrians could also be decreased with this
option, especially if eastbound right turn on red is prohibited.
Advanced Stop Location
This option includes a pavement marking (12- or 24-inch white solid line parallel to the
crosswalk) for eastbound traffic placed four to 20 feet in advance of the crosswalk. Additional
signing could also be installed on each side of the stop bar with the text 'Stop here on red' and an
arrow pointing to the stop bar (Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - MN
MUTCD - sign R10-6 R or L). This option strives to reduce motorists' incursions into the
crosswalk area. The primary advantage of this option is allowing motorists to better identify
where to stop when approaching a red light as well as the location of the pedestrian crossing.
The disadvantage of this option is if vehicles are stopped too far from the intersection, which
would reduce the audible cues for visually impaired pedestrians crossing the street. In addition,
the existing eastbound loop detectors may not be in an ideal location and may need to be moved.
Continued maintenance to ensure the pavement marking is visible could also be considered a
disadvantage. Limited studies of this option have shown some improvement in the number of
drivers stopping at least four feet in front of the nearest crosswalk marking.
Cost for this option depends entirely upon the type of pavement marking material used and
whether supplemental signs are used. Using paint without signs, the costs could be $500 or
lower. Poly-preform pavement markings with one sign on each side could cost $2000 or more.
Advanced stop bar pavement markings, preferably with supplemental signage, is recommended
for this intersection.
Center Median Pedestrian Refuge
A pedestrian refuge provides a safe stopping point in the middle of a roadway. Currently, the
CSAH 101 center median does not extend into the current crosswalk. In addition, a minimum
median width of six feet and a pedestrian push button must be provided for pedestrians that are
stopped in the middle of the roadway. For this option to work at the CSAH 101 and 1 st Street
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
intersection, the existing crosswalk would need to either shift west or the existing center median
would need to be extended.
Shifting to the west would allow the crosswalk to use the center median where 6 or more feet of
width is currently provided. This shift would likely be 30 or more feet and require the eastbound
vehicle stop bar to also shift to the west. A pedestrian push button would also need to be
provided for pedestrians to use if stopped on the center median. The advantage of this option is
providing a safe refuge in the center of CSAH 101 for those who cannot finish crossing, because
they are slower than the programmed walk time or start late. The signal timing could also be
altered in this case to reduce the pedestrian crossing time, since pedestrians only need to get to
the center median rather than fully across the road. Reducing the crossing time would likely
reduce vehicle delays on CSAH 101. The primary disadvantage of this option is moving the
pedestrian 30 or more feet away from the intersection. Motorists, especially westbound, would
not likely anticipate pedestrians this far removed from their expected position at the intersection.
In addition, some eastbound motorists may not stop at the new stop bar and proceed forward
closer to the signal. These increase the potential conflicts between pedestrians and motorists and
may result in a less-safe crossing even with the center median. Other disadvantages could
include providing additional sidewalk to reach the new crossing location, the cost to provide a
pedestrian push button in the center median, and criticism from pedestrians if the crossing time is
shortened and they must cross one side of the road at a time. In this case, the negatives outweigh
the positives and this alternative is not recommended.
The second alternative would require extending the center median 60 feet or more to provide the
necessary 6-foot minimum width. The advantage of this alternative is providing a safe stopping
point in the middle of CSAH 101 without moving the existing crossing. As mentioned, the
signal timing could also be revised in this case to potentially reduce vehicle delays on
CSAH 101. The primary disadvantage of this option is its effect on turning traffic from 1 st
A venue. The current location and shape of the center median on CSAH 101 provides a taper that
allows semi tractor-trailers an easier left turn from 1 st A venue to westbound CSAH 101. With an
extended center median, semi-trucks would likely encroach on adjacent lanes or drive over the
center median. Other disadvantages could include the cost to provide a pedestrian push button in
the center median and criticism from pedestrians if the crossing time is shortened and they must
cross one side of the road at a time. The cost of this item depends mainly upon the degree to
which the center median would be extended. Due to the potential effects upon semi-truck traffic,
this option is not currently recommended. However, this alternative could become more feasible
if truck traffic is determined to be minimal and/or encroachment upon other lanes is determined
not to be a concern at this location.
Leading Pedestrian Signal Timing
With this option, the pedestrian walk indication would be activated for about 3 seconds in
advance of the green indication for traffic on 1 st A venue. The purpose of this option is to allow
pedestrians a head start across the intersection before 1 st A venue traffic receives a green light. In
addition, left turning traffic from 1 st A venue may better recognize the pedestrians in the
crosswalk and would be less likely to cut in front of pedestrians. Advantages for this option
include reducing vehicle-pedestrian conflicts and increasing motorists' awareness of pedestrians.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
The disadvantage to this option applies to visually impaired pedestrians. Without a surge in
traffic, these pedestrians may not recognize that they are allowed to proceed and the advanced
time would be wasted. In addition, the extra time for the pedestrian phase may have
repercussions on traffic operations. The traffic impact is anticipated to be minor since the time
only occurs when the pedestrian phase is activated. Limited studies have shown a significant
reduction in the number of pedestrian right-of-way violations once the leading time is installed.
This option is estimated at $1,000 depending upon the present capabilities of the existing signal
controller. The cost reflects personnel time needed to re-time the controller and could be higher
or lower based on the expertise of the personnel and the time needed for re-programming.
Additional cost could be incurred if accessible pedestrian signals are installed to provide audible
cues for visually impaired pedestrians. The use of a leading pedestrian signal timing is
recommended for this location.
Countdown Pedestrian Timers
A countdown pedestrian timer provides the pedestrian with exact knowledge of how much
crossing time remains. Used in conjunction with existing pedestrian indications, the timer would
start counting down at the onset of the pedestrian phase of pedestrian clearance phase. Reaching
zero on the timer would coincide with the end of the pedestrian phase and the change to a steady
'Don't Walk' display. This option is to provide additional information to pedestrians to be better
informed about when to enter the crosswalk. The primary advantage of the pedestrian
countdown timer is preventing pedestrians from crossing at the end of the pedestrian and then
being stranded in the roadway when the 'Don't Walk' phase begins. Disadvantages of this
option include its use by motorists to get a head start before the green light and the
encouragement of pedestrians to start crossing during the flashing 'Don't Walk' clearance phase.
Studies conducted in the City of St. Paul and elsewhere have shown success in preventing
pedestrians from crossing at the end of the pedestrian phase.
Countdown pedestrian timers cost about $500 per signal indication. The cost has been
decreasing in recent years as their use becomes more widespread. The installation of countdown
pedestrian timers is recommended for this location.
No Right Turn on Red
The July 2004 turning movement count showed 68 eastbound right turning vehicles during the
p.m. peak hour. Although a small raised concrete island provides separation, the eastbound right
is not a free right. When eastbound and westbound traffic is stopped at a red light, eastbound
right turning vehicles should stop before the crosswalk and then proceed only if their path is
clear. This situation creates a conflict with pedestrians who also cross CSAH 101 during this
phase. By posting 'No Right Turn on Red' signs (MN MUTCD sign RIO-lId), this conflict is
removed. Thus, the advantage of this option is providing pedestrians a safer crossing by
reducing the vehicle-pedestrian conflicts. The disadvantage of this option is the reduction in
service for vehicles and likely increase in delay and queues. The precise increase in delays and
queues could be determined by a capacity analysis of the intersection.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
The cost of providing this option includes purchasing at least two signs to be posted at the
intersection and the labor to install the signs. A capacity analysis of the intersection is
recommended to fully determine the impact to traffic operations. Assuming the effect on traffic
operations is minor, this option could then be used.
Additional Signs
Additional signage could include signs mounted at ground level or on the signal mast arms for
both motorists and pedestrians. Signs could be mounted for the northbound vehicle approach
(for the left turning vehicle-pedestrian conflicts) and the eastbound vehicle approach (for the
right turning vehicle-pedestrian conflicts). Warning signs could include pedestrian crossing
signs (MN MUTCD sign Wll-2) or a 'Trail Crossing' signs (MN MUTCD sign WII-X7).
Regulatory signs could include 'Do Not Block Crosswalk' (MN MUTCD sign RlO-7a), 'Stop for
Pedestrian in Crosswalk' (MN MUTCD sign R1-X1), or 'Look' (MN MUTCD sign R15-8).
Other customary signs, such as a 'Watch for Turning Traffic', could also be installed for
pedestrians. The purpose of the signs is to better alert motorists to the presence of pedestrians
and/or better alert pedestrians to the conflicts with turning traffic. The potential advantages are
better awareness of this location as a major crossing site and thus, improved safety. The
disadvantage is increased sign proliferation and potential overload depending upon the number
of signs used. Motorists and pedestrians may start to ignore the messages due to being
overwhelmed by the sheer number of signs. Regular users may also tend to ignore the signs after
the initial installation, reducing the effectiveness of the signs.
Signs cost approximately $200 each depending upon the exact size and message (standard or
customized). At this point, additional signs are not recommended to avoid overuse at the
intersection. Based upon the limited observations of the intersection, most motorists did not
infringe upon pedestrian right-of-way and were aware of their presence. However, signs could
be installed at a later date if a specific reason provides justification for their use. An example
would be continued violation of the crosswalk by motorists. In that case, a 'Do Not Block
Crosswalk' sign may provide a greater benefit.
Pedestrian Pavement Markings
Provided at the start of the crosswalk on each side, text could be added on the pavement, such as
'Watch Turning Traffic', to better alert pedestrians of the potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.
Pavement markings for pedestrians are in widespread use in London, England, where the text re-
enforces the driving direction (on the left, rather than on the right) for tourists. The advantage of
this option is improved safety through a better informed and alert pedestrian. Disadvantages
include-increased maintenance to ensure the text remains readable and reduced effectiveness
over time as regular users become familiar with the location.
The cost for pavement markings depends upon the type of material used and the exact text used.
Painted pavement markings could be $500 or less with poly-preform pavement markings costing
$1000 or more. Pedestrian pavement markings are not recommended at this time due to the
increase in maintenance and decreased effectiveness over time. Based upon the limited
intersection observations, the majority of motorists did not infringe upon pedestrian right-of-way
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
and were aware of their presence. However, pavement markings could be used at a later date if
deemed appropriate for a particular situation.
Textured/Colored Crosswalk
Textured or colored crosswalks are used to better differentiate the crosswalk for approaching
motorists and for crossing pedestrians. Examples used in other cities include red or orange
colored bituminous, stamped bituminous to look like brick, and brick placed into the bituminous
or concrete. The advantage is better informed drivers and pedestrians of the crossing area to help
avoid right-of-way infringements and provide a safer crossing. Disadvantage includes the cost of
installation and the maintenance of upkeep.
The exact cost of this option depends upon the exact type of crossing desired as well as the
timing of the improvement. A stand-alone project to change the crossing will cost more than a
change during a reconstruction of a street. At this time, a colored or textured crossing is not
recommended due to the cost of installation. However, when CSAH 101 is scheduled for regular
maintenance, such as mill and overlay or reconstruction, this option should be considered.
Remove the Turn Lanes on CSAH 101
Turns lanes, both left and right, on CSAH 101 add to the roadway width that pedestrians must
cross. If the eastbound right turn lane and the westbound left turn lane were removed, the
crossing distance would be shortened and/or a larger median could be provided to act as a
pedestrian refuge. The advantage includes improved pedestrian safety by less exposure to traffic
on CSAH 101. The disadvantages include the cost of reconstruction the intersection without turn
lanes, the jncrease in delay to vehicle travel, and the decrease in vehicle safety.
The cost ofthis option would likely be very high since a majority of the intersection would need
to be reconstructed. In addition, the signal system could need adjustments such as shorter mast
arms or the moving of one or more pole bases further driving up the cost. This option is not
recommended due to the high cost, the decrease in vehicle safety, and the increase in vehicle
delay and queues.
Other Issues
Americans with Disabilities Act Acceptability
The ADA guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in public transportation, .~-".
among other things. Several items on the signal system and crossing should be examined to help
ensure compliance with this act and the safest 'use for all pedestrians. The pedestrian push
buttons could be replaced with new larger red buttons, easier to locate and push. The existing
curb ramps at each end of the crossing should be checked against current standards. Accessible
pedestrian signal information, such as directly audible tones or speech, should be considered for
visually impaired pedestrians. The cost of these items depends upon the exact type of work
needed.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113. 651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
Finally, the clearance phase for pedestrian cycle should be re-timed to comply with current
Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) standards. Currently, 18 seconds is
provided for the clearance phase. Standards state the distance traveled is considered the edge of
curb to the far side of the farthest travel lane. The rate of travel is assumed to be 4 feet per
second. With an approximate distance of 100 feet, the more appropriate flashing 'don't walk'
clearance time is 25 seconds. In addition, if a higher volume of children or senior citizens is
expected, the assumed speed may need to be reduced to 2.5 feet per second, increasing the
clearance time to 40 seconds. Increasing this time will cause increased delay for vehicles on
CSAH 101 only when the pedestrian phase is activated.
Street Lighting
Any weekday concerts at the reconstructed park would likely be in the evening ended at twilight
or later. Therefore, lighting of the crosswalk is essential to ensure the safety of pedestrians.
Overhead lights are provided as part of the signal system and offiamentallights are located
around the sidewalks on each side of the intersection. These lights would appear to provide the
necessary degree of lighting for safe crossings. However, this intersection was not observed
during the night when a true determination of lighting adequacy could be made. Lighting should
be examined to ensure safe travel for pedestrians across CSAH 101 as well as on the sidewalks
surrounding the intersection.
Treatment of 1 st A venue/Sommerville Street Intersection
Besides the treatment ofthe pedestrian crossing at the CSAH 101Ilst Avenue intersection, the
adj acent intersection on 1 st A venue should be examined. The 1 st A venue/Sommerville Street
intersection is also likely to experience an increase in pedestrian activity with the reconstructed
park. Currently, the crosswalk striping at this intersection is either totally gone or fading. It is
also unclear whether crossing is allowed across all the approaches or only selected ones. Based
upon observations of the intersection, crosswalks should be provided on the three sides required
to stop - the north, south, and west sides. Striping, preferably zebra stripes to match the CSAH
101 crossing, should be provided at these locations.
Signs directing pedestrians to Huber Park would also benefit pedestrians by ensuring they travel
to CSAH 10111 st A venue intersection crosswalk on the west side and are not forced to either
backtrack or cross illegally.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based upon the analyses presented in this report, the pedestrian crossing at the intersection of
County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 101 and 1 st A venue is recommended to:
. Remain at-grade on the west side of the intersection at this time. The disadvantages of a
grade-separated crossing, namely costs and potential non-use, out-weighed the
advantages at this location. In addition, other measures are available to improve the
safety of the at-grade crossing. A crossing on the east side of the intersection, either in
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
addition to or replacing the west side, did not provide enough benefits over the current
single crossing to be justified.
. Provide additional safety measures. To help improve the safety of the crossing for
pedestrians, the following items should be used: advanced stop bars, a leading pedestrian
phase, countdown pedestrian timers, and prohibiting right turns on red for the eastbound
direction. A capacity analysis should be completed to fully understand the impact to
traffic operations before the right turn prohibition is enacted.
. Consider extending the center median on CSAH 101 to the east to provide a pedestrian
refuge without moving the crosswalk. In addition to potential signal timing changes and
the need for a pedestrian push button in the median, semi tractor-trailers turning from
northbound 1 st A venue to westbound CSAH 101 would likely need to encroach upon
more than one lane for this option. These effects from this option should be clearly
understood before extending the median.
. Consider other safety measures. Additional warning or regulatory signs and/or pedestrian
pavement markings could be used to further improve safety. Although these items do not
appear necessary now, they could be easily installed at a future date. Care needs to be
taken to avoid the over use of signage reducing the effectiveness of all the signs.
. Consider an underground crossing in this location at a future date. Combined with
preliminary planning for total reconstruction of CSAH 101, the exact drainage, utility,
and security issues could be determined. The exact number of pedestrians using the at-
grade crossing would be known as well as if traffic on CSAH 101 continues to increase.
This information would allow a better cost-benefit analysis of the underground crossing.
. Provide a textured or colored crosswalk area. When CSAH 101 is reconstruction at some
future date, textured or colored pavement could be considered for the crosswalk to help
differentiate the crossing area from the drive lanes for both motorists and pedestrians.
. Improve the 1 st A venue/Sommerville Street crossings. Providing zebra stripes to
designate the crossing areas as well as signs directing pedestrians to Huber Park would
improve the safety at this intersection and reduce illegal crossings at the
CSAH 10111st Avenue intersection.
. Provide American with Disabilities Act (ADA) acceptable items. The existing signal
components and curb ramps may not meet new ADA standards for accessible
transportation. Although not required to immediately retrofit, providing new standards
would increase the ease of use for all pedestrians.
. Retime the clearance phase of the pedestrian cycle. Currently at 18 seconds, standards
suggest a minimum time of 25 seconds be provided. If a significant amount of children
and senior citizens are expected to use this crossing, the clearance time should be further
increased.
. Ensure adequate lighting of the crossing and surround sidewalks.
. Improve the pedestrian amenities at the intersection of 1 st A venue and Sommerville
Street. At a minimum, zebra stripes for the crosswalks and signs directing pedestrians to
Huber Park would improve the safety of this intersection and help prevent illegal
crossings of the CSAH 101 intersection.
2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113.651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
County Project No.CP 101-03
CSAH 101 at First Avenue
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of ,20_, by and between
,'I'ljllil
the County of Scott, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State"I~~lllt:I,tnnesota, hereinafter referred
11,IIIII/IIIII'ljl"lllll,."
. . ,1'iI 'iiiI'I ,,!I, .
to as the "County" and the Shakopee, a body polItIC and corporate un~l~lil'llil"I:i':.'~II~aws of the State of Mmnesota,
.111111'i'11111111'11111.IIIII'III'11
l'I'I',IIi'lliIj 1,1111i'1111,
hereinafter referred to as the "City" , 111111111111111'1'1,1111111"11111<'1,111111111111111111111111'
. ,,'I '11111111 .1111' 1,/11..111111'1'1
'I'I'IH 1l'lllj'lIild I , "IIIIIIII,llllillllll'"
'1'1'1'11111'11,1' "I,'''I",IIII'jl'
'111111'''' '1I111'1i1'1'1!'I'I"
RECITALS 'I 1111.' '11"II.lI/I'I"!II'
. . : ,ilJi!JJ!jth, Ii 11111)111,111111'1
'''1''1'1'11,11'''1 hll! ii iJ'1
>ll'1I111I11111I<1'1'11111i/i' 11111!I/lIIIIII,IIII!,II,"
,!I'IIIIi'lllilHIIIII,I' "'11,1"11,11,11'
A. The County and the City seek to improve the inter.~i~lffi'geometrics and in~~IIII:llllil~affic control signal
,'+II'II'IIII"II,IIII'I!" 1,1 i',1 Ib"IIII'I'1
. . . ,"'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIII" .. "lq~IIIII,IIIIIIIIIi' .
system WIth mast arms and mtegral street lIg~MI'I'I:ii~lllltIie mtersectIOn of CSAH 1 0 1!11'1'~~1 rust Avenue m
'1,1.1"1"11111111111. 1'11111' 1!111111111!11f;1~11111
"111111,+11'11"'1"1" .>iI111111'1'111'1 , "1111111 Ib,
. . 'i!l','!l'l"'. 'I'll It' 11. '"ii"
the CIty of Shakopee (heremafter referred to as't'I",",'II'IIII~Oject). '111111111111111!I!jl!II;11111I11> ,,1111111111111111
"'bill 111,11111111'1', ,IIiIIII.lII/llI/ll11111 '
'i,l llIMl1dt!!~I!' ,l,!lmmma 11111111!1'
. .... ,1M!,!!>! 'r ~1' . dl1jl1""W" M, I .
B. The above descnbed Project lIes WIthm the corporaf"III,.~W!~~III~~lthe CIty.
"'IIIIIIII'IIIIIIIIIIIHI~IIIIIIIII'
1'1111 ',IN 1111" I 'III IN,,'
. Inll (III. . 1,111111,1 j1ll . . .. .
C. The County Engmeer has prepare~l'ill 1,,,,ill;~Ji},~eer's estImat~lliWI'I~llgl" uantItIes and unIt pnces of matenal and
1,1I~11111I1111'1iI,1'111111'11'I'IIIIIIIII"I" "lilll'llllI IJiIIII:'"
I,!II l.I, 'I, II!I 1 ,11i'i 1111'11,"1'11'
labor for the above described Proje 1111~dlll ' 111!I~tl imate of the It~~.Iii""cost for contract work in the sum of
'IIIIIIIIIIII~ ""I,I,II~IIIIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII!I"" ',I~lllllllij,IIII!II'
11II1II1 I, ',hlll'IIIII\111 /"", 1I!1,I,llill I I
cents ($ ). A copy of saiJIIIIIII~imate eml " liilIll~LExhibit i1.'IIIIIII:IIIIIIIIIIII" ") is attached hereto and made
'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! '1"III;Wlltllfllllllllli"lllllllli'IIIIIIIIII~ITIIII'III' ""ljIlll,'
'llllljl''''lll ljj1l<l!I! ,<lljjllI1!j1!!llljllll 1111 'lljl I
a part hereof. "ITillll!I!III!I!I!!I!IIIIIII!I!!I!ll!!Iilllll!I!'!iliil1'1" III 1IIIIIIII,III"IIi; , 'lillllllllll!l~iilllllllllll, ,IIII'III!IIIIIIIII!IIIIIIII'IIIIII~llfI'
111111111'1111'11 Ili','IIiiI"'1. """'I<II,I),'II",IIIII!I 11I11~11'11I1i'1'I'llllliI'llli'VIII<" '1111,111'
'IIIII!<IIII'''II,III'I'' ',III'I'WiI'I,"I, II. '!II' III III~II'II~ "
D. The City has el~I'II~s~ed its wlOO~~~ess to I 'I ~tIpate in the revision and continued operating cost of
,'i'llji'III'IiiiII'IIIIIIIIIII!I" 1111,11111111111111 "IIIII!lill"illl'
,',ijj'lII Illi, !, 'ill , 11'
'd' t ~~'IIiiliI""lill!I:"--d' I flllill~1 'th' t '111111,1 II t t I' ht
sat m ersee~ ~'l!rll'an SIgna sys.Mi1iii~ilS WI me" 1 I'I~ ree Ig s.
'1lFllliiiljililljll dll'I'hl,IIII'I!" '1"111111'1'1'
11,;1,1,11111'1111"1'. dll''l'I''IIIIIIII'II'11 1111111111'11'1'
i!llll,wllll!!, l'I,111,jjjlll' 1 lil~~f
E. It is contemplatellllilblilt said"l. '" III'"'''' 'I,t...:work S li!i'l be carried out by the parties under the provisions
,,!IIIIIIIIIWi'III'I"I" l";IIIII'j'IIIIII'I'IIIIII!iIWII"IIIIIIiiII_~III'II'llllil'lllimlll'IIIi'IIIII"" '111AIi"
"I!~III~llh 1!1I1111111"11111111111 ,I"II'II,!, I! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHllllllllllli'iliIIlll' II,
of '~.II~I!tat See 1 (i~I'iI~III~II~;I,~ubd 1 " '1I!llliil,IIIIIII,lllllllllIiI,1
, 1I1i1llillllll,I,IIIIIIIIIIIWIIIIII.IIIII!lljll'liil~III~.~ ''I,III~llllililll'Ii;:I'' ., , '''IIMilll'
, ,III 'i "II:< HE FIi.,* IT I~IiI.'llBEBY AGREED'
"111111'1:'111'11111111111' , "'lilllll~IIII!llli~IIII!II'" "IIIII!!I[,;IIIIIIIIIIIII:"" '..
1. '1IIIIIIIilll" 'I,!e County shall Pi~~lli the del~~ary plans, speCIficatIOns, and proposals; shall perform the required
"I,.IIIII!IIII!I!IIIIII 'I IIIIIII~IIIIIIIIII'I Wllilllllllllllllllllllill:
ei'if,":,,!,:,~ I ring and inspectI~;I::I~IIIfU1d shalllllfevise, or cause the revision of the roadway and inplace full-traffic-
'II'IIIII'!'IIIII'IIIIII'> llil ,lllflll III!,
I,IIIII!I"'II' I IlliII 1i'111 . . . ..
actuat' ~11111~~~ffic control s~! I,,~l system WIth mast arms and mtegral street lIghts at the mtersectIOn of
'.1111111111111111'11111'1'" lillllllllllllllll!,11 .
CSAH la'~IIII:'lhd FIRSTI:IIIIII~iBI'II'llliENUE. Such revision, as described immediately above, shall be identIfied
,1II11111'llllli'I'l'> ill@IIIIIII'Ilmllli/imillilll,m,jI,'
''>I,I II"II,I!I,I"!II , 'II'IIJII' I' 1111'
lJ'l11 !IHii'!.j, 'illl f~1111 \11 . ..
and aCCOmPliSI~(Wllllllnll,1 county Project No. CP 101-03, heremafter referred to as the "project", all m
".IillWlllIlllll'llllllllllllli
!lwW'''i11
accordance with Sala project plans and specifications which plans and specifications are by this reference
made a part hereof.
1
County Project No.CP 101-03
CSAH 101 at First Avenue
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
2. The term "Specifications" as used herein shall mean the 2005 Edition of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" and the project special provisions.
3. The City agrees that any city license required to perform electrical work within the city shall be issued to
the Contractor or the County at no cost to the Contractor or the coun..ty. ..1'1.11111.lliifl,hl~l~ctrical inspection fees shall
il"I'IIIIIII!II'II!II!IIII,I.'
iililllililil.l "]11
be not more than those established by the State Board of Electri~~:I,;I>lI!I!,lin the most recently recorded
1111111'I11"i,I''''11 'III ,.
.illl ,,,1 11111111Ii1'1'11"
El . I I . F S h d I ,,'11111111111,1111"1111""111
ectnca nspectIOn ee c e u e. "II'III'llii'lllil!I!III'!III~I/!IIIIIIII'IIIIIIIIIII'i'
"'111'11111,11 ,+111111,1'1111', dlllllll'lli,
,'[1'1"'1"" lilli' .Iqlilillllhlll',
4. The City shall continue to provide the electrical energy forl'.~lllhperati~II!!!~:f, the inplace traffic control
1'1'1111111""IIIi' "IIIIII!!IWlllllillllllll'l
"'IIII!II!m~I!I!I'1 'II,!II"II,III,I'I"I
signal system and integral street lights to be revised UIJ.~~II,~e project, all at tl~!II'III~~I~e cost and expense of
111111111111111'111:111111,'1 "1111<11111111111111111
th C'ty '11i'1111111,,1I'I'IIIIII' IIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
e I ,'11"111111111'11'11, """1'1"1"1"'1111
. 1111111111111111'111 Ii" "%III,[I,IiI'.III'
11,1111111111,1 ''''1111'1''1'1'''1'
"11'111' 11,1' '1!!II'i'lrlll'l
5. The County or its agents shall advertise for bid'~III~' 1 '~I"the work m;ri11:I~onstruction of tl1~~.(I)resaid project
',III, [lliiilllll'II'I' 1I'IIIIf:ilIIII'I'II'IIIIIIIII" 1111111111111[11
'ill'IIII'I'I' 1'1111"11'11111 'ill,'
'1111"11'1< 'III III '
No. CP 101-03, receive and open bids pursuant to S 'i~llllidl veIOO~~' 'I~nt and enter into a contract with the
'<lill Illllllilllllll'IIIIIPIIII,III'IIIIIIIIIJI'
, 11'lllllllli'l!illmili"I""
successful bidder at the unit prices ~Q'~c~'fied in the bid'~i~:"I!'iliISI;~h bidder, according to law in such case
"II,II~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'I'I'I" 1'11111111111111
IlIlIililllll"II'11 ifil\W""I'11>i 'II, 1II,1I11111
Provided for counties. The form conlJ!l~~~IiIII~'~~lnding the plan' 1111,1111 _I" 'l'l~pecifications prepared by the County
IIWIII'IIII "!~"I"~'I'II(I'I'''I'''"1 "1'1' 11I' I
111111111('11111 '"1\11,,111[111'[1111111111111 "11'11111111' III'
. . '!hhfl,'. lidl:I:I:111 II II , I h
or Its agents, are attached Incorporated ~1:'~i'I' hlblt',1'III'IIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIII'I'''' "ltlilllll~IIIIIIIIIII"
1>11'11'[1'11111 ""III I ill[iI'1 1'1'1"'1111111 , "11'1''111111111'
'III'II~I'II', 1'I1,11111111111111111111'1,lllllli'I"" 11111111111"
6. The construction cost 0'1'!1 1!i?llliiD,roject shall',,~II":II'llthe clq'.'ctli,III~~I'II'lllil~MS tHe cost of equipment purchased by
I" 1111,",111111 !IIIII ,,,'illli11 " '1Iil. k IIW '1IIIIiIIIIIIIIINI'IIJI' Imllillllll'N'ljllllllllll'II'
th C ty '1,I111!lllill~~IIIIII'lilllilllilllll'IIIII~I~IIII'I'!L.' 11111!~II"llIillll~IIIIII<II' t' ""'liMi!lIIIIIII"It' d t d th t th t' t d
e oun necess <I'IIIII'lllfU m ~'II' '~Ile SIgna \!lilli IIIJil opera IOnal. ' IS un ers 00 a e es Ima e
1'1I111,1!111! ! 111I1 II I, 'ql~I,llill!llll[<, '\IIII~I!IIII !f'"
construction cO~~I'II~~1 ed hereinaft<l' ~1111~lb for info "111[,, II ional purposes only. The estimated construction cost
"III'*'I~IIIIIJI[III~' 1111'1111 r "1'1111111'111'1
'1I,"II,i.lI'IIIIIII' "11111111111,'111 11111111111111,1,111'
. . "', 'I' III, "II' 111.1"'1
ofthis pro] ect IS I, '1111'~il~O. i~III:II!IIIIII~IIIIIIIIII!III!IIIIIIIIIII!111111111111111' IIII!II!IIII'IIIIIIIIIII"
7 Th C h 11 hllllll~illlllllll!'IIIIlli, 'dllllll~lllllljilllllililiJlilllilllll'IiIIII~IWII~I!I!III'1IIIIIllillll' 11'<1,' :'111 IIIJIII,I , h d . h . f h
. e 0!rW,,~ s a av:; 1'~~lm 1III'autnorhj"I'hli,'llii' WSter t e contract an Inspect t e constructIon 0 t e
1'I'111111!111!IIIIIIIIIIIII!lllllilll!lllllllllill'Illl' '111111:Il1~11'11111~1111'111'111'111'111'1111'1!111' " "11111111111111111111"1',111111"
i"II.I, ,II'lliIiIIll'liiillllillllilllll',,1 111"lii'I'I'1 'III I, I, ,,'
cqj' '~I~lllllwdrll!:I~~~lllilltJ;:le pr "',' II'~~I'I' The County shall have ultimate authority in initiating and determining
"11111111111 I1III Ilffiill" "'111111111111'111111111111'11 '111,111'1'1111111'II'jlll<
'II!III'!IIIIIIIIIIII,I 'I"l 1iI1'11' 1t111'1"1I ''1,11>11'111111" . . ., .
'1iIIIIill!II~I' I ge orders, sup~~~~,ntal J~~III~lments and final quantitIes. The City Engmeer shall cooperate With the
'1IImllll!II!I!II!!II'II'II' "lIliilli~WIIIIIIIIIII 1IIIIIilllllllll~IIII'
1,1"'1" II "'I",,,I,II.~I I I III
"I'~I'lI"li\. nt-v Engineer and'lllill1i!lloo~'I' staff II' 'l'lllli,~heir request to the extent necessary, but shall have no other
'4lii'IIII,iliilillll'I'I'I'~ J ~!III"'III'II" iI~
'; illilili!ilJli 11)!l; 1IIIili I'
Illi~IWJjll~~h'I' ~ h IJlIllllllllii' . f h k
reSp~~Il!Ml Ity lor t e supti1!!~'1S10n 0 t e wor .
'1"liiillilli!I!I!i!llil'l' 1!llitl'lllllllll
8. The ci~IIII~I~u, reimbur~~III~:,::I' County for its share in the construction cost of the contract work for said
<.!ll!!!!I!IIIII!I!j!II!!I!h, .111111!lINl!j!jl!llllil!1!1!
. d "It!i!IJiJli"'lI'I' I LiI'I'II"I,,1 '111111' . hall b . d ~ rth' h D' . . f
project an tli~IIIIt~~~',IIII~i~L,ii,'"llcontract constructIOn cost s e apportlOne as set 10 In t e IVlSlOn 0
"'I[lIIIII~lllllllilillllllll~III!111111111>"
Cost Summary 'i~I!llp~ibit II ". It is further agreed that the Engineer's Estimate referred to in this
Agreement are estimates of the construction cost for the contract work on the project and that the unit
prices set forth in the contract with the successful bidder and the final quantities as measured by the
County Engineer shall govern in computing the total final contract construction cost for apportioning the
cost of the project according to the provisions of this paragraph.
2
County Project No.CP 101-03
CSAH 101 at First Avenue
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
9. In addition to payment of the City's proportionate share of the contract construction cost, the City shall,
as its share of the construction costs, pay the County fifty percent (50%) of the actual revision costs of
the roadway and traffic control signal systems with integral street lights. The City shall pay the County
ten percent (10%) of such share of the construction cost as payment fO~III.~' design of the traffic control
dlllllll'jllllll'llllllllllllll'
. . illllllllll.1I1111111' .
system and roadway Improvements; and eIght percent (8%) of sueJilllll!i!lme of the constructIOn cost as
"I'PIIIIHI'I'IIIiii1I'I'IF
'1111111'li'II'II"
payment forinspection of County Project No. CP 101-03. ,1111'11'111111111111111111111111111,11111,11111111111III'
IIIHIII i 11111111,11 I"",IIIIII~IIIII'
10. The County shall include all necessary modification o~iill~~IIIIII~lplace I, '~~il~ncy Vehicle Preemption
I"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~" Imilllll:illllllllpl'
(EVP) system construction with the project. This ite.IIII~I1 be incidental':~J!i!IIII'1 'I~'d Item No. 2565.616
1'111111'1"1'1,1.11"'1" "1Iili1 II I'll I I III
d!!!!;i!l!1!l!l!llllli1lj!!:W' 1 I! Iii I II
(REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM). '1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII'iIIIIIIIII.lI' 11111111111111111'11'1111
"'1111111111111111'111111111111111. "11111'1'1111111,
. .. . . 11111'1111111111'1'1' . I" ,111,1,11'
11. The CIty shall not reVIse by addItIOn or deletIo'il~llllit!lb~ alter or adJ~~~"any component;I'I, ,I ,~, sequence, or
'11111111'1111111,[, 11111111111111111111111111111' "1,1111111111
. . . . 1,,1111,lliH', "111111'11,11111;1>' ..
tImmg of the aforesaId traffic control sIgnal systeml)li1IllilllllPVP,IIIIIIIII'8111'1!i\~~m; however, nothmg herem shall be
1iiiI111"II~" ,"'I '111111 I' ilV1'
"1"1111111'111'1,1111,11111111,111.11',1)
. 1,[11'lIlllllil,I,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI" . .. . . .
construed as restraint of prompt, pru,~~~t",~ctIOn by prope~~llli~~'nstItuted authontIes m SItuatIOns where a
. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111'1"1" . "IIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIII .
Part of such traffic control SIgnal syst~ ,I 111'1' I, "II'IIIII~~I'I'.dIrectly mvof~I~I' 111m an emergency.
.III III 11I'I'1I1"IIIIIIIIIi'i 1ilIiI11'1"llffillic
1'11', 11'1' Idlllllll'IIIIII'IIIIIII~111 ""1'11'11111111111111,'
12. Upon completion of the work, the CO I, ',,'I}I'III!?hall'I"'II~I~ . II and re~~~IIII~aid traffic control signal system at
III'III'I!IIIIIIII "'111,1111111111 II 111'11 I JilII' I , "%111111111111111111,'
"11111>1111111' . '1111111111 III HIIIIIIIII"I "liIlilllilll.. .
the sole cost and expen~lil:lljll~he County. ' 'Imlither, ~1~lli' II~' "I'II,shall mamtam and repaIr the components
'1IIIIilll!III!lllIiillllllllll!lllllllllllli!IIIIIII!;I~1M III 'II . '11111!IIIIIIIIIIIIIII~illll"llllllllllllllllllj.I" "lIillil,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII:,'
of the EVP system d!iit:IIIIl1t11Y rep" 1'lreqUIred ~ ' 111'11 ~ at the sole c~st and expense of the County. Further,
"illlllllll'I!I,II'IIIIII" '1111 1'111111 WI, "1111111 1111111~1i"
111111111111111itI1111" 1111111111..1111111 "111111111,111' . " .
the County sh~l00IIIII:~' 'aintain the ~OOi:~~gral streef!IIIII~, IJltS except for the City maIntamIng photo electrIcal
'l!l:hWIIII,I",,1' 11111111111'1111" 'l'III"IIII'ill11h.1
\1111,~llllllllilllllll.. lilll11lililWIII' 11111111111'1'1111
controls, relampll!l~lll~nd glass~~IIII~heieof. 1111111111 111111
>fl!~!!WFlml ' ljijihll:IIIII$ni1 1'1 lj1'11111'11 I I Jll I,
',I..I.!'IiIIl,III' 111111111;111111'111,11,1'1111 III 1!t:1!t:1.l1 11111' 'II 1111.11, II'
. ,11111I"IIHII',1ill ..II.I'I..Idlllll:ll~IiIjl,l,ImLl~ Illlllllllrlillllllll~1'11 ,11iI"" IIIII~IIII . . .
13. The EVP <:!vstem mpr~ ' 111,atlll'I~I, In 1u~lliIi,~11I ' "~I~..h VENUE shall contmue to be operated mamtamed
''iII''~IIIIIII~!ifIll~'111 1'1111111111111111111'1111111111'11'" ""II'IIII'I'I'IIIIII'I'111IiIi11 '
,!IIIIIIIIIIIIII ul~I~I,II!III~IIII' III! 11111111111' II, 1111!1!llllllllllu~;,I . II 111:llillli. . .
oIi'1 ", iV'ect'1 ,,' 'Itt:dance:., 1111~h the followmg condItIons and reqUIrements:
'1'IIIIIII~i:lilllll!1111111 ">liIIlIIIIIII:I'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'1 1'I:,lilillrl'I~IIIII:IIIIII,
11 j, !! ! . . pUll: ihl . II 'I" .. .
11111111111111,11111-11" EmItter umtsl"""..I, , II,bl e ms~ll~~, and used only on vehICles respondIng to an emergency as defined In
'11'11'111 11,11 '1111111111'111 1I111'!1111'l'Imrll'
1111 111111'li1h '111.1111111 1111itllllllllllllllll' . .. ..
I, 1'" "esota Statues Sec ~IIIII:~:I' 9.01, S1!!1,'I~II,5 and 169.03. The CIty WIll proVIde the County Engmeer or hIS
Itjlllllllllll III'I!IIIIIIIIII 'M
, I d 1111, . Iii Iii, I . ....
dul [,I ';I~I~nted represent~'I,11111 a lIst of all such vehicles WIth emItter unItS upon request.
I,IIW 111111111111I1 11111'111111'
1'''IWII~11111i III;,II~
(2) Ma~mnctions ofthe,III' 'lilll'W" P Systems shall be reported to the County immediately.
'1111111111111111111111111111'11 1,1111111111111111111 . . .
(3) In the e~i'~III~ai~lll.ill ,p Systems or components are, m the opinion of the County, bemg mIsused or
'II 1111111111111 III!I III Illllllulllllllllll
the conditions se~III,'" ~h herein are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the
~qw
City of written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP Systems. Upon
removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector
receivers, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the
property of the County.
3
County Project No.CP 101-03
CSAH 101 at First Avenue
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
(4) All timing of said EVP Systems shall be determined by the County.
14. Initial pedestrian striping for the intersection shall be included as part of the signal construction. The
City shall be responsible for all subsequent roadway pedestrian striping required after the initial work
and shall be responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of the subsequ~~~II~~lated costs.
"lllil',IIIHI'IIIIi,I,llllk'
11!j!~'I~~b jLi!!H:!W'
15. In the event that a dispute arises, the County and the City agree,t,4,fI,~illl~~IIII~isputes between them arising
'III'IIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIIIW"
f . h' l' d "llllltlllllll,IJ1!!!I!MI'1 b . . .
out 0 or relatmg to t IS Agreement shal be submltte , uponlii,~'t'J;~trlilrl of oth partIes, to mediatIOn,
,,'lillllillllllljllllll' ,111111;!illllilllllllli!,
with the cost being shared equally. ,'III!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,I> 1I1111111I11I111111111I111I1 'I,
!i1li!!!!bll;, Ii!' "iiil!!!!!!j!M!!!!!!i\Ii>.
,~!dl! li!"l!lml" 41M!!>!M1,!, 1"'1
16. Since each party recognizes each other as a political ~~!:':",I"'ision of the Stat~IIII~III'I,II",Minnesota, each party
IIV'I!i'IIPf!li'I,llliiI)IU 1'1'1"1'
,Iilllll111111I1111111111i' ',jI,IIIIIIII~III~1
shall maintain general liability and automobile liii!im~~i~wcoverage protecting its~tllllll~t,;? officers, agents,
I'ililllllllllll'IIIIIIIIIIWIIII!!;iIII[I'IIPlljllll'['I'
,!'i~!~i!\i!:!I\h:llhhW" . 1 . , 111 illl, I W. !llik~'
employees and duly authorized volunteers agairl!~II!II'~~iY usual andgil!l!~~9mary public liei', ~~'~\T,I"claims to the
'>/> 1~111111~r','t!1!r,11 '''I'I'''''''',ilIi!~111i '~IIIIm:llll!!Illll '
'11111111111,[111111" ..:1111[111111'1'1<111111,1.' '1'11.1
""""~~Iilll" ""I,IIIIIIIII[I[I'!"" '
limits prescribed under Minn. Stat. Sec. 466.04 and'III'~lill~""i"ers,,'lr!lllllill'I~~pensation and shall be in accordance
"'1'1'1"1'11""1' 1'111 I III!I""'I 1/11""
'",II''';,IIIIIIII'!'I,IIII,I'IIIIIIIIII''I "
'1111[i'I~tl!I'IIIIr,,m 111,11'
with the Minnesota statutory requirem,',~its. Said policie'~III~1 illlllll'!1 i,llbe kept in effect during the entire term of
',!lliIll"I'I'ilWI1ill", "'i"'IIt'ilp'll'l
\11111'11111111I11111!li!lllllfillllllillli. 1iI1111111!!IIII'III!!II'I"
. Ii!! 'Ii! :''I1,lh' '1'1,11 jll' .'!""'! ,If'f! iiii~!'
thIS Agreement. "I!III',lljlll~IIII:',',111111111111111111111111111111111"1'1', "III'IIIIII!II!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII",
11'1111.00 '1,11111111 !!NI'I"I ,1111 'll'llllh
'111111111111111\ 'l'lilil!I!I!'AIIII li,lllllllillili' ' '111111111111111111111'>1
17. All records kept by the City and the COU~H:I'lwitlil;!tI~~;II,i"II':I:~,ij,,t,,.P,, the Pi~j~~~IIi~,h,all be subject to examination by
'WI,JJ1'IIIII, 1;!,llllllllilililtlllllllll'II'II'I'" " '!'illll'll!m,II!II,!!II'li'
'111111111111111111'i'lllllllllllilllli'II~[lIIIIIIII!11'I","I,III,III~;
the representatives of e , , ',lllliQflryv. All dat~'III!!'bl)lect~~III'IIII"~~~I'; :mlllli~l;ll'lieivea, maintained or disseminated for
"I'llliIllii"III!.Illllffll1l.llli%, "1,!tllll.!I!, l,!IIIIIII[I:[I~J I Illillllmllllll' 11'1 IIII'
..rI['iI[II,II~1111 !1~11111~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,IiIIIIIIl', I'IIIIIII'I,IIII,IIII!I l'III!IIII,i~f .l.1'IMIIIIIII, ~III,II .
any purpose by th~IIIIL!'::I,!,11 tles,Ii~IIII.~, countYllllll~IIIIIJllY pursuant t~"'thIS Agreement shall be governed by
"'11111111111111111111111" 11111111111i'111111111 1'1111,11'11'111'111111111
. ,lllli,i,iliIL '!'ml'!l!!!!, 'I Ill' ',. .. .
MInnesota St8;~~1111111 ", hapter 13, "L'III!jlmended, a,lllllthe MInnesota Rules lmplementmg such Act now m
I Itlilllllllllllll,III,III',llllhi','" 'I,!,IIIIII~IIIIIII'I'IIIIIII/I' IIIII!IIII'II'II'IIIIIIIIIII'I'III'
""'I',.", I", 111111111'11 II I
force or hereaftet'llllll;I"ited. dlnl,llllllllllll'lll I 1'''1'1'11111'11 "I " 1,11111111111!1111i
"111111111111111111111 l'IlllllllliIllllll[;IlIIllj'II:[.III,IIIIIIIr..lIII!IIIIIIIIIiIlI'!III" '1111 'II 1!11i1111'1':,
I'" Ujljl'l ,11'1'1' 111111'1" ,1 I! \'I"j",,,,1INi"" ,!If'I'n ' )!I)1
18 N 'th ,~'h C ty "I~4!lI"i'II"III,IIi"'+:, ",IiI,II,II,III,lliIli,!ii"dllljlllllll'I",";"',I!,/,rrIlJiIillIIIllIIM,'I'IIIIIII,I"III,I,I;!,'Ii,HIt,II,iiS:""'" I~I" "th . th' . d"d 1 f~' I 'ty h 11
. el erM:i oun fti~lll,'lw'I"!l!~~~agemS'16'l!1I11II'I'IIll:'l!!!I~eo el er m elr m IVI ua or 0 1.lCla capaCI s a
",'11111111111111111111 1I,III!I,lllliI'l.i'I,' ", ' '111111111111'1111111,11111,'1'1111111111" '''''illl,II,IIIII,:IIIIIIIIJIIlilllI!111111: ' ,
"IIII_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIII~ililjllllill{'lllilll~!'i" 111111111111,1111111;1 '1,,;1111111
belij"I'::II,::::J~hSlI~"lll:!": 11~!~;lbl,e in"III::\:',III'lmanner to the City for any claim, demand, action or cause of action of any
11111%11111:11,111111:' IIli!III~llllljlllllib 1IIIIIIilllllllllllllllllhlll!'I'II'
,I' 'I 1:1111,' 'II fI,lllillli, ,I" 'I'I!.!,I, .
11'lllllli,III,I, II,', or character 11~,"~~'OOl~ outl:!ll~qlllll,a,II"egedlY arising out of or by reason of the performance, neghgent
'111111!11111111~111'1111':':I"'ill!lllllllllllllllil111,1 "'illlillllllll~!IIII!h,
\ HII 1111, ll! j, I(L idl!w, 'f,,) l .. ..
IFir~' Il~ ance or nonpe'l~lllnance olllilil:e descnbed mamtenance, restoratIOn, repair or replacement work
'~IIIIIII'I,IIIIIII!!lill" '~I,lrnIIIIIIHIII[.IIIII;1 '''111111111''
'1'lllilll'll'I' 1111.1"
by tl~II,II[I;':,I'I'lity" or arising 0 ,.,1111111::11'11" the negligence of any contractor under any contract let by the City for the
"'1'1111111'11'1', 11I'..lm!II'
'I'II'IIIIIMII' 1111+11[1111
Perfomi"[ :1~1~IIII'if said wor'I,!ljllllliliHl1ji,!I' d the City agrees to defend, save and keep said County, its officers, agents
'I~I~III!II'I "I"'II'mll1!lf~
'1'lllii'I,11111111'i1 .'(II'I~.Ii'II'IIIIIIIIIIIIi"
and employ~~~,:IIIII~~""""~~I~llqlllllltrom all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of negligent
~III~.I'II"'III'~' '~'!'~I,mjllllll~I"
qllilll!llllllllllllll,lil'IIIIII!" .
performance by tl]ll;IIII'IJ.!y, Its officers, agents or employees.
4
County Project No.CP 101-03
CSAH 10 1 at First Avenue
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
19. It is further agreed that neither the City, its officers, agents or employees, either in their individual or
official capacity, shall be responsible or liable in any manner to the County for any claim, demand,
action or cause of action of any kind or character arising out of, allege~~I!ljl\j\fising out of or by reason of
""11111'1'1111111111[1111111'"
the performance, negligent performance or nonperformance of the"I~I~I'I,I'ibed maintenance, restoration,
",;ii~!Hiljqlilllll!l!!W'
"ilillllll!:'IIIIII!'i::I-'
repair or replacement work by the County, or arising out of th~I'I'I"I'!~I~l00IIII~~~,' e of any contractor under any
"11111 f'lmlll'I'I" """mulllllll"I'
.,,'1111111'1111,[11111111" "liillllllllll!!I!!I!IIIII:"
contract let by the County for the performance of Said wo~~;,III.I'the C6~IIIII~grees to defend, save and
l'I'lllljllill' "III'IIIIiI,III'I"III;,
!:l . .~f f!il,. .1,) nll,l! :Jl"J'!'~
keep said City, its officers, agents and employees h ,,' I,I~I ~llllrrom all claims,'IIII~I_lij.nds, actions or causes
>l111111111iI11111!111111:[<' 'ltllll!I!IIIIII!!llillh
e~!h!ii!ni;!!ili![\l!ji 4mjl,!11;aml!jhI1>1
of action arising out of negligent performance by t, ,4~iil'llcinty, its officers, agents oiIIBi:Joyees.
I'I,mllllllllllllllll*lllli "lillllllllll,,lill'"
,1'1 1IIId !<I ',UI,II,I '
. . '1'!'!,IIIII.Hlll,,' ,II".' "111"111,1111'11'1
20. It IS further agreed that each party to thIS Agreel11J.!~"""""I',sha,ll not be"llil'1!i'IJ,l ponslble or hablelll~lllliIJle other or to
"11l1li1111,111,1111'1 '.>I'II'I~~IIIIIII'III~I' '1l111!1I11111111'
"i,IIIIIIIIIIII'III~'1 'I,'!I 1111 I 11111 "IlI,I'
any other person or entity for any claims, damages, 1l1~ooll::il',' ,s, ' ,9 'II!IIII~III es of actions of any kind or character
'Imllll I '11111 I11I11 l'II!II'1i Wllllltl'
III iillllllll,li 111111111"11"
arising out of, allegedly arising oU,tllllll~, ';(11 or by reason 51,111111'~ I'~IIII performance, negligent performance or
i!11~lq!'i!IIIIIIIIIII,lllllllil"I" "II,/IIIIIIIiIIII/I/III'
'1IIIdIIIIIll:IIW,lhlll' 'I~WI'i'i IIIWlllrlllll~I' .
nonperformance of any work or part J1~,',"IIt!,II~i5IIIII~~~I,illlll~?el ' other as Pi~~11I'leldl herein; and each party further agrees
'1~IIIIIII'1 '"I~I!III~MIIII'I"" "'IIIIIIIIIJII" III
'11111" '11h ">lIIIII!III,I!" 11'1<1<1111"11"" "11'11'11111,111111'
. 'm:,,! iill . t,iliJd hllllllll 11:1 1111111 . 1,1 ,hi J .
to defend at ItS sole cost and expense anl!II!PtlOn'(I)ilIillll1\II'~'fdmg c(j 1,1;;.',: I~nced for the purpose of assertmg
1111111111111111111" ':,::IIIIIIIIII!IIII!II!IWIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'I,IIIIIII'" II'IIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
. II.. 11jljl,P"I", "I'''''.*Hlllll'dilj1'~''l'*''''*''l -If'. .
any claim of whatsoeve~I'~'" ',lij.cter ansmllllllllllll conn4li!l1., l~tll>l"1 ,~!ijllllll", by IVlrtue of performance of ItS own
d I I "'1'1111 gllllllIil t> ' -,4i\m~i'I" "!I.I!~ln'I!L li1h
,"lil,IIII/lllllhl,'I'IIII'llil/!IIIIIIIII/li!lllllil1,'11111111111/1111', '<lIIIIIIII,IIII[I!11111 "'111'111,'11'1111111111'111111>' "I,[IIIIIIIIII~!IIIIIII"
k 'd d h I' i!i1,"~' I, I1II ,,, ''''''''''11>1<1111111111111,'111 , ",'1'1111'111'1"11'111'11111111" "/dlllll'"
wor as prOVI e i'liiii:i~' ,,~,I"<lIIIIIII'IIIIII'III'II' 111/11111111111,1,111111111111' '
"1'11111'111111111111 ,111111111'111' 1111'1"1'111 I"
"III!IIiIIIIlI!IIIII''1l1lllllll.lrll 1'111111111111111'1" . .
21. It IS further a<rrfl~, 11,111' at any and aI~II,11 , ployees OIlitlII~,,1!l, " 'i CIty and all other persons engaged by the CIty m the
OiWJliillll'll1 '1'11 II ' I~ 11'1 ill" ..ljlll~~"
'>llltllll!IIIII'11 , .111111,llplll/ 111/11111111111111'1
performance of ~11'illl!I'I~prk or s, e '1111!!IIII!II~~I'teaUired, or P~I,~II'I'\lided herein to be performed by the City shall not be
,I 11111111 rlllllll' "lilllllllllllll~111111111111 1IIIIII,IIIWI'IIII~I~III'lllllli I '1"'1;' '1I111111~[l111111i<
'd, 'i ' I "IjIIIIIIHII.III'Iit., ,1~'lllllllllilllil!i;111I ill~lIdllllllllllllllll,'llIllllllmlilillll'IIIII""'I" </- 1IIIIIIIIItl f th C ty d th t d aliI' th t
conSI ere emp oyee~lilliliil" fflti'l maep 1l'1""Ii'<~'ltjl ors 0 e oun an a any an c anns a
'<"I'IIIIIII'IIIII,IIIIIIIIII'IIII'IIIIIIIIIII,I,IIII!Ijll!lllllllljllllIll '1'1111111111,11"1'11111, III I I'I!I!IIII' ""''',IIIIIU.lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' ,
l'llllllk!f fl JI!IIWjllF ~!'!'; !III#I~ 5. 'l, 111. Ji!l!. .
m ai,~II~II!II!~lllllmllb'I1~il!I~~I~~I' I"'un. d, e~il,li' i"~:'IIIIWIIO, rker's CompensatIon Act or the Unemployment CompensatlOn Act of
i!!W,,,iilIl'III'I'I'I'iI' 0 .!~miilllll '"IiIIII~lil' 'I
l'II'llllllijilll'II~VI' "lliiilll'I'ljIi U 1111"1111' , '1II'illq"lilll'
flj j I II1III ' I l11 llllll 11111 ' III . ;,1 I !l,~ 'f! ,
'i'II'II'IIIIII:,' ..'1,\11 tate of Minn~~'~'I'lipn be ',,, 'l'II!'lli said City employees while so engaged and any and all claims made
111,m I !IIIII!IIII'I I" "III,lllil,II.lllwIIII. "'lilli'II'~III'illllll'III'
"11:1111 '1'111'11 <!1"Wllrlll'I'~ \I 1111/) 1"
'11111111~y third parties as'~IIIIp.seque ~11',lli~f any act or omission on the part of said City employees while so
"1'/11111'11'1,1111'1'" '/1/111[1111:1'1,1111 II'
"IIIIIIIIII,II!I!IIIII' '111/1111,111[\1 .. .. . . . "
engl!j[l'~~illlshall be the soleifi~nonslblhty of the CIty and shall not be the obhgatIon or responslblhty of the
1II'llIl'IlllI'l'i" 11'11'lll'dl~'
1,[IIIIlliIiJd,I:'I'" ,/""1'11111111
"''''111''1'1''1''1' 1'11/111'1'11'
"I,lif'l( ,,1,1',1', ,.11 II ,,,
County. "IIIIIIII,Ulllllllllllill,IjiI'IIII,IIIIIIII!1
"IiIIIIIIIIII'lliLlIIiI' '/111111111:1:1111'11,1
"'''111111111111,'1,111" ,.;1,/1,',11,1,1"l1li,',1'
1~IMII'!lI""i.\ 1111'1'1' l111L"1 ..
Any 'q::"lllllitftlllllllllll:,;rl,r:,tbyees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County m the
"IIIIIII'lll'dJlIIIII'I'I'iIIIIWi'l'Iilllll!1
. 'II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! ! 11111111111i' . . . .
Performance of a.tli1i,'IIIPork or servIces reqmred or proVIded for herem to be performed by the County shall
'11,1"
not be considered employees, agents or independent contractors of the City, and that any and all claims
that mayor might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act
of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said County employees while so engaged and any and all claims
made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees
5
County Project No.CP 101-03
CSAH 101 at First Avenue
City of Shakopee
County of Scott
while so engaged shall be the sole responsibility of the County and shall not be the obligation or
responsibility of the City.
22. The provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec. 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to Civil Rights
and discrimination and the affirmative action policy statement of Scott Glii!~ty shall be considered a part
.;!!)!!!Ili!i!!!l!l!!!li!i!!\\'
. . . .,"1111,,1'111""""11"1",1
of thIS Agreement as though fully set forth herem. See ExhIbIt "A". dllllllillilllll"IIIII!IIIIII'
,"IIIIIIIIWFillli!"iil,I"
11'11"III'IIII"I"i'"
. ,!'iIIIIIIII~""'III'h'!,
23. Pursuant to MInn. Stat. Sec. 16C.05, subd. 5 (2004), the b09<i~~IIIII,!i~tl~~~, documents, and accountmg
"I'IIIII'I~'I"IIII"II'" "'llIlIlii'I'IIIIIII'"
,,",I""'"'T"I'I"'''''''','''''I'I'III''
procedures and practices of the County and City purs~~~IIIII!:'8 this'~~~!tf,ment shall be subject to
/jjl1l1!m!!I~Il~'1 "'li!!!I!!!l!lll!l!!!l!!l!"l
examination by the County, City and the State Audi~~~~II!III'bmplete and ac~.~_ records of the work
.ilillllllll!IIIIIII!!~IIIIIIIII' '"IIIIII:II,iIII~I' I
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be k~I~III:~'I"the County and City fO'rliilJlilliPimum of six (6)
'1'1'6"'"11111111111"11" I, III~IINI'I\
,"IIIIIIIII'iII'IIIIIIIIIl>" . ' lililillll'lll'
. ... ,.'ii'ilili\ilili.lili". . 'Ill- I H,!#,ill i l', .
years followmg termmatIOn of thIS Agreement fo~II:I~IF.h audltmgi.,9ses. The reten '~~II~~nod shall be
'!inm!m!!!I!III;llilli . 'fld!!I!!m!!il!!!!!!!I!!!rY '!l1!lllliiw'
. II d d d . th f dnli"ll"""h . ""IIII"'i/"II"o . . I . . I' h C
automatIca y exten e Uflng e course 0 any a '!1tiI~tt;~tI'?i~!II~!"'II~lu ICla actIOn mvo vmg t e ounty or
t+hllillli1'!!i,liI', llll.,l'l'lll!l'll"i'
"11111111111111111111,'11111111'11'111111111,1111'
the City regarding matters to which ,~~II'I~~cords are rele\f~~~lilllhe retention period shall be automatically
III,IIIIIIIIIIIIHIII~III'I"" 1111111'hlllllll!'
11111,llllll,iI~ ' 11.1111,'1111'"" 111"'111'1'111'1',
extended until the administrative or j'tl~:' ~1~lllllItion is finally,I~~Ip,leted or until the authorized agent of
"'I!fIIII!f!IW "~Jillll!ll '''li'liWJIII "'lii'II!Ii',/,
11"1'1""""1'11 "'lllIil,IIIIII"llllJIIII. "I IIll1illliiilllI!'III
.. . 11111111 1-. 11'1 jlll!!l!\'lllijHill'!il' 'jiilHlj,j,j I,l!in,
the County or CIty notifies each party IItllll;111' ,'"tmg ~Blt!II~~li~~cords nOIII~llQger need to be kept.
'""1'"'""'111 "'':':''P'I'III'"III',IIIIII'I''' '1',1,11111"'''1''
",11'1" II ','II'IIIIIIIIII'IIIIiiI'IH'I""'. 1II'I'IIIhl'IIII'
'11,111111 i'''''llllllililllil''IIIII'III~'1I ,1,1111'111,1,
24. The laws of the State ot'l~Ii~,sota shall '~I,:,I~p1 a~~IIII'i'I,~dl~:'I:IIII',':'4,inteTpretations concerning the validity
d . f ~1111Illa d h ."II~I'I: b '""I~IIII' h . d ~ d .
an constructIOn 0 ,'~ 1,1 ,I,l" gree' ':llan t e '> "111"",1 atIOns etwe h t e partIes an per ormance un er It.
.,'liIIIIIIIIilIIIIIIIIIIW' "I111'111111i1i111', "IIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIII'
"1- '~II'I 1""""1
The appropriatillll~~1'Ie and jurisd~I~~bn for anylil~~llation hereunder will be those courts located with the
'11'''1' 'II I" WI't'l'W'1 ''11111'' I
"'1iI1111111I11111 "1'111 I !II ! "I' '""liHIII,
"'>11"''1''11", . .lli~",III' ... 11,,1..11" ...
County of Scott~II,III,~~te of MI"I. ~~a/",LltIgatIOn~IIIII:lwever, m the federal courts mvolvmg the partIes
'''IIIIIII"I'III'i'iiI'I' "II 1'1111111111111 l'I'III"I'i'I'lll"I"1'I1111111111111i'11 , .'. 'IIIH'!IIIIII'III'
1!1111'1111,i!I'!h 'j'i jil'#lll'illliiiidiUjli,iJih " 1 ;'l'; 'Ill '.l"l!'
. '+II'IIIII~IIIIIIi'JI' illjllllllll'liilUIHililllillhIllIllll'IIIHll.lllldlllll"~'~11111111 .
shall be tbe approp111la'l!~"f!"'I" court '~ 1', , " ',~ ,., 111~,ate of MInnesota.
111'1'11' +1"111'11"'"""'1111111111'1'1'11111"'111'1 'IIIii' "">1"1111'1'11" 1'1'1'1"'1'111'1> ,I"
,,111"1,'11 IIIIIIIII',I!I'IIIIIIIIIIII" ""11111111111111111'11'11,1 II.hhU,IIIIIIIIIII,'
25 I _111,1~,I,~I.I"I~IIIIII!III,I''''~IIii'' . '(jlllllll th' A t h 11 b h Id' l"d d ~ bl th . .
. ]1>'1'1",,",11,1,' n'''aiI1J!l,,,IIII.f,OVISI.'I,I,,,,;,11 IS greemen s a e e mva I an unen orcea e, e remammg
'111"1111111111111111111111 III' "illll,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!III'1111 "illlll!llliIIlll~lllllll~
~'I'I'hlllllliil'. . +11'I11''''~i d ~ I 'I~. h' I h' rd' 1:4 bT Id
l'IIIIIIIIII,',"II,:'VIslOns shall bel,';::;!':'I;, an '~:;,~g upon t e parties un ess sue mva I Ity or non-en orcea I Ity wou
'1Iillllll"III'I,' "'111'111111111 ".1*1111111111111'1'1', .
'1.1"11'11'11111" ,I, I, II... . ""IIIII'II!!IIIIIIIIII" .. . .
I~~ the Agreement I" 11111, I Its p.e. One or more waivers by either party of any provlSlon, term,
I'IIIIIIII'III~II'II' '11111' ~ 1111'11111'
IIIIIIIIIIIIW~IIIIIIIII .
conaJ~~lill!tl,.lor covenant Sha1I~III' ot be construed by the other party as a Waiver of a subsequent breach of the
'1111111111111111111" illlllllll
"I,nI"'I'I, II'
b '1I'~~~illlth arty. ,'1111111111111111
same y. .",,' . er p . "1'111"11"11
"1111111'11"1'1" 1'i+1,11111I '"
1'>Illllllil.lllllll'llIl "'IWIIIIIIIII'III!III
26 Th C '~IIIIIIIIII.bh,~'IIIiIl'III,IA ~ h f h d " . f h' A . M . A
. . e ounty'SiIMil,;IIL' 1 QJ1'2'i~: I gent or t e purpose 0 tea mlmstratlOn 0 t IS greement IS ana .
<1111'llllliIIlliliII'II'II'"i'1'!I'I"'!'I"'111I'
1.111'11"11,'1,,11,,111'1111111,
!Mlq,!.ll~ji'i'jlljjMII ,
,~" f !ll" V Vi' 11
Heller, Public 't!ilII~"'Technician, or her successor. Her current address and phone number are Scott
"!~!l!jl'
County Highway Department, 600 Country Trail East, Jordan, MN 55352, (952) 496-8369.
The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is , or
his successor. His current address and phone number are Any change in name, address, or
telephone shall be noticed to the other party.
6
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
(SEAL) !'illl
'1'111,111111111",
"IIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIII!III!I!IIIII'
'1IIffl"I'WiII""IiII'
""111'1111""""''''
'11111'111'1i1' 111111'"
'1'1'11111111111"111111<"
'ill I!! )iil!II'L~illl >
11"1'11111"1",11"'111'1,,,,11,,,
" l11l 'H' H )1< l'l'
By And"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~11111111111I1111111111111111111IJII'"
John J. Schmitt, Mayor Mafl!ltI~Neill~IIII~~ Administrator
"I'I"I"IIII/"IIIiIIJI'I'jl'l'III"llliIi
,1'i1i'11111111111!!11"I,I,I,III,IIIIIIIiII'
"IIIh'iI,IIiiIlIiiIIIII' 'ii'll:ffiI,III"!'I'IIII'
,h,,,, ,Ul<l,wv", 'j ,jl' , "'I'
D t D '~!lI!II'I'IIIIi'IIII' . 1,111i!"II'li!illl!ll'l'
a e ,iiII,Ij1,1lI11Ip!"!j Ji1:1iI!1ihm!!;!l
,,',IIII!IIIIIIIIIIIII!llllIiI' IIIIIIIIIII'II,IIIIIIIIJII
,~, L ,,,,,,1,1 II", 'I' " !.
""1,1'''1''''''''1',1",, 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIII"I,LIII
l'l'll''''''Hll' ." II'II""!I
'11+111'1111111111'111111" ""'111'1"1'1"'1'11'
111111,1111,1111/11:111,1 , "1:1,11111111'11111
'''IIIIII,I'I,IiliIi'iIi' 1",1111i'1 11111111'111111111i'1111'
COUNTY 01FICOTT 'iliili'IIIIIIIIIIHi'IIIiI"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII"
'1IiII'iliJllwlil'III' illllll'l'III'I'JiiIIIIIIIIIII '!'IU'"
1 11,11i1ll"'1IliIi'li, 11"111>:1111'111111,,1,1,
<l'l,+M""I"l"'l 'II '~"II"!'!IIIII,1
'llll!l:illlljMl~lljll'!1 111111i!!1}ll1l!l!j!I!!11!!hU
ATTEST- '''Illlliliil,l'I)iIlllll;iJlhllil",III'IIIII'
. 'mllhJl<lwllllliljiitii!un!h II
,IIIIII'!I' "'111:;1111'1111/111,111'1111
11'lliI'I'III"II,I,illll" "111111111'1"%'1
< l' , Mil I PI '\1, 111'm'
1111i1111:111111'11,I11111'\IIiIIII'I'" ,11i'illilll'II'ililll
,,1.1 jl ,I"" Hid I ""I ''''
By 111111,11111111:,'''''1'1111 IIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIII'I !IIII ,By "'IIIIIIIIIIII,IIII!IIII:"
David Unmacht, County Administrator "~liil"II'I'II,IIIIIII'I"I" "'"llllllllllllililillll'jll!lllllii"I!mnl"II",Barbara"IUIi;schall, Chair of Its County Board
1111'111 ""ij",,, 'II "1"1111 !II"I"~\!IIII"
IIII!IIIIIII:IIIIIIIIIIII "",11111111"1111111111,11111111111111111111'111111111,, 1'"IIItIIII!III:IIII!I:IIIIIIIII'
D t hll!I'1111111 ril!i\l"III'I'III,I, "'111"'1" 'ii'l'lll '
a e 1'1'1"1,, "'1" "1111,1111111111 1'1i'~jI 111>111'11'1,11111111111111'111, "I"
I "l' '! ~,II"""'IIII~H' "'II 'M 11'1 1\ Ililll MI!li!ml~WI' Il, ,ll "II' I
,1111'11:III!I'III'II'llllllllilllllllliillm~IIIIII'I'I'1IIIIIIIII!IIII '1111111'illlllll'II'IIIIII~IIIIII'IIII!II:llllllil'll1IIIIIIIIIiI',I ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!I,!III\IIII!I!IIIIII'
1111'11111"1'1'" ,III' '''II,III''HIIIIII'IIII 111'11' II 111'1'11',,' 'I
'1'11'111111111111'lllliI'l '1111111111r:i'l'llllll "',1111111111111111111'1'
'il'IIi:I'"wlllll''' '1111::111'1'1'11111 "lIIrlll'IIIIIII'
Upon proper executi<~:!~I'I~I']Jls agreemen~IIIIIIIIIII:1111 '11'11,11i1111!III' RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL:
'IIIIIIIII~' ,,"'It I' "11'1, '1IIII'II'I!lih
will be legally valid an~:I~inding. '11111:11111111\1111' "I'illllllrlll'l
"IIIIIII:III!IIi"I'II!lh "11111111,11'1'111111111:1""", , 111111111111111,1111,
'''I'''LJIJ'J''It, 11'1t11111"I,IIIIII'''''''i'IIIII'III'''"'' ,,1111'1'"
'Iflli !!IIVIQlllj If I j 11#11j.!' i ! l!p,ljIll J,I !fMfiN'U! !1\iIIINI1 j HII! ill Nt
B '1IIINI'I'i'IIIIIII!, 1'111111,11111111111111111111111111111111,1111111'11",,1,,1,1111""'1111:1111'111,,,,, 11111,,,1,
Y 1[1[llljl!U! !!lbll If*~l!l!ml,I"llllll*1 ,1 l 1 IlliIi111!!lllllljlll!ldmWII i*!l,lll'llllll'!llll y
"""III'"'' ',',"11" I' "1'1 """111,1,1111'11\'111'1'1',1 "!'II 1
P t Cil'b""'.I""I"II'I'~'I""W'" ~ Att"'lillWililliliIJI"I'I"II'I'IiIIl' """,,11/1'111111, II II 1111'11Ii Ii II M't h II J R C ty E .
a 1,,,~!m!r,:,,:~\I,~ij,glQ .... OI\ft~I,Illilll,l' ":'1',1,11,11111111 Ice. asmussen, oun ngmeer
'!!'IIIIIIIIIII'I'I"IIIII 11II1I1"I',,,mllllii'l'I'iIIllI'lI'llIl,,1 1111 "" "'111'1",'''111111'1''
",1'1 1:111'111111"Ii''''I,I,!'IIIIIIIJlmllll''''II'I'h, "I:IIII!IIII""I
"lmml'I'I'I), ,I,I '''''''I''''llllllj'I'''I'' " ,,,,1'111:
"1111'1'111'111,',111'111,, "1,11111'1'111''1::11'1111 ",,111'11:11111,.11"'"
.lpl' 1 II'P'l .,1,1 111'1'::' hi' l;llf"l,l~l!ilih
Date. "III'II'IIIIIIIIIII.lIIIIIIIIIl" ,1"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'lrllll' "IIIIIIIIIII'II'I'II'IIIIIi'i, Date
,if ",,,,,l,,"!l!",!, .1,,,1,,,,,11,1,,11>. ,I"" .,j,HI,I,
'"'''''''1'1111'1'1'11'11''' ''''''''''''I'I'I'J''J'I "'11'1'1"''''''''111'.''
'%1'" 11111" "'IIIWill'll'l' I I' "!,1'lllliUIII I '1"'"
"4111'1'11'11,1!'!1" ""II"lllllllliJl11. "','11111111'1,111','1'
"'Iii'II'II"'I',III" "1111 1.111' ""11'111'1111
,II III I!IIII!I '111'111" '.11,11111111,111 "'IIIIIII,111i1111l
"'1""",,1111/111'1111' \1,11.1111111111,'1,",. "'JlII,'111
'11'1' li"i" '1'1'11"1' ""
'1!1,1~,~,. LlM:I.h. . ',1,1.,1\..1._,: '
APPROVE~IIf:l:\;S TO EXECUTifliill1'T:
'!ii1Ii1111111'1'1"liIIIJI; , '!II'II'IIIIIII,II!!.'I"
111(1'111""111'/1" ,11111'1'1111
I, j !'!,!Iih, -I/I!!:I:,'"
1,1111111111"1111111'1, illlllllllllllllllll
B "'"''IlllllliillllllIl'l. '11'11'1'llliIi'll'll
Y "J,frl,IIIIIIIl,,1llillll" dlilll,IIII'I'II'1
<I:i""" .11'li.. ."\,1..",,,,111.1,,
Pat Ciliberto c~ll~ Au~II'"
, '''''IIII'il~lillilll' '''''jll'''1'I'I''II'I'111' y
"',llllll'iii'llhll'lflj'jlli'llllIlll,I
II[Jllnlll hll~l~ilhl.l {f!l!lll!l<
'1iIi1i111'llllllllllllllllii'
Date ""'1111111111'"
W:\ WORD\PROJEC1\CP 10 I-03\Coop Agreement_ Shakopee.doc
EXHIBIT A
r POLICY STATEMENT I
It is the policy of Soott County Government to provide Equal Opportunity to all employees and
applicants for employment in accordance with all applicable Equal Employment Opportunity
laws. directives. and regulations of Federal, State. and local governing bodies or agencies
thereof. including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363.
Soott County will not engage fnany employment practices which discriminate against or
harass any employee or applicant for employment because of race. color, creed, religion.
national origin. sex. disability, age. martial status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to
public assistance. Such employment practices Include, but are not limited to, the following:
hiring, upgrdulnQ. uumQUon, transfer. I'ecrultment or recruitment advertising. selection, layoff,
disciplinary action, termination. rates of payor other forms of compensation, and selection for
training, Including apprenticeship.
Further. Scott County fully supports inoorporation of nondiscrimination rules and regulations
into contracts and will commit the necessary time and resources to aohieve the goals of Equal
Employment Opportunity.
Any employee of the County who does not comply witt) the Equal Employment Opportunity
Policies and Procedures set forth In this Statement and Plan will be subject to disciplinary
action. Any subcontractor of the County not complyl,,9 with all applicable Equal Employment
Opportunity laws, directives. and regulations of Federal, State. and Iooal governing bodies or
8t)encles thereof. including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363. will be subject to appropriate
oontractual sanctions.
, Soott County has designated the Employee Relations Director as the manager of the Equal
Opportunity Program. These responsibilities wUllnclude monitoring all Equal Employment
Opportunity actIVities and reporting the effectiveness of this program, as required by Federal,
State. and Ioeal agencies. The Scott County Administrator will receive and review reports on .
the progress of the program. If any employee or applicant for employment believes he or she
has been discriminated against. please contact the Scott County Employee Relations Director.
Scott County Employee Relations, Government Center Room 201. 200 Fourth Avenue West,
Shakopee. Minnesota 55319-1220, or call (952) 496-8103.
1;1rr ~ mJA~!f
Date 1/2/007 Barbara Marschall Date 11212007
Scott COunty Administrator Chair, Board of Commissioners
jia~ '
,.;P> }."-,,~ ~~S.~.H. 101 - ~\<?if:"?fC.-kC6""',1\\-''''1
i';":- ~ ~ STA. 3+46.6, 24.0' RT. \\'
,r TC=735.20 f'\, . n", d t. ta .\
:;: INV=730.37 ~
~ .,('\., /'_',_, -INSTALL CASTING
~'+--~.~-,---::,~o.~, \..)~C 18' x 12' RCP
L ~-~ IS' RT:.~'-"'--~'"'"-"'-~<o<<~,=-,._~.,-=.."., ~2:_~::~~~~~~6E T~T~Gn~k~~ J. ~5?6. .:8CT (p~~~ :~~:~~\ k
" -----.-___. MATCH
W <;=0 I" THRU ~'XI~T1HG
1~ Cf. C.$.A.H. 101 ~~ 15' THRU ~ ,-"', :-.!Q..."-' _.__. 3+64:.48. .:.-'T
, ~~-==__~ _ 1005 '....> ~~ ..r>' 53.0 L Ti,;>"" .-,,-.(.
o=_~~_'::;";:':~=::'~ -::-~-::-~~_.~-~=~~~~<=__. "/~}:'~~~ ~<., '-,'.... ,.~ ..':';~'
~ 20 0 50 1 +00 - , ._~':;~-=="==-==-~=::~~'>-~=~-._-__ ~_, ~~~.~< ,. -r-.. '';::::':>,'' ;1;~ " 1;CONSTRUCTION
~ ~.........-..... 2+0015' T ~~----=""" L:::l-.''''- '~\'o...:::" ~ 0'> LIMITS
a scCJIe feet 0+00 r-J'.... HRU "~"-~'~"""'-""'_ -Qj'<,::,:""" " -:"::::::~:::}:' l~; Cp END CONSTRUCTION
--;....> 12' """'>,~ ".... '-"'''' 8 Co '-"',', ",-
1004 '" :~HRU " ~""'''' """ -'_'''''' Wc "-_'..,-7''''';..'''c,c, C C S A H 101
'::~""~~'"=<:.. 'n . ~.,.oo '"'~~,..~"".~~~~ --::'~ . Jft4l." ~,~ ,,::!"~,~-"" "t.. . . .
(:)"-<7(:::~:",,"./j<~'-<'~o~__ 14' RTL . 6624 C&G ~007 ~>1.;- -', I( '-'/;" < . STA. 4+69.53, 53.0' LT.
',J ,,-, ~'''' ----- __. r-4. -,. MATCH EX 1ST ING
~~-~ --.....t...;':-.....:...tf. ------- ,-" ~. ~\ ......~t~'-~ / .''"_.....__ .
\..:)..~i___J! L~"_: "_ '::;,::,::"__ ~ CONSTRUCTION ~_\!J'--' "<<''''''=-_~.~'-'''_......,__ {~)~,'
-" --c:.~' ~"'" --- l LIMITS "'''''", '''''".,. '-~ ",
", ~ ---"''''......,.,,::',- ~ -"- ,- "'f-l---.
1<7,' 4 -':-""'''''':'''''.'' -, . A B624 C&G '1'--k. ,,' "'-"'--'
'-- d -::-l<~.<""""'::-__ 11 ~ -.-1-00 ~.o '___ --"'''''''__'__
", EX MH 3 fr'~ . ~~, -...l '--. r;-~_ '2
' ""~\.'""": ~"',..., .... 1 ~ .... .........................::.::."",......... ' --....~-Z-__
c C.S.A.H.IOI "~ '." ~__ , -..~"'~
~ EXISTING PAVEMENT BEGIN CONSTRUCTION -', STA. 3+35.5. 38.6' RT. ~~' ~ ~ ""~ ..'1,,/ 2010 ' .~=~==
:> C '\,TC=134.90 3 ".. ^i '
~ TO BE REMOVED ~ C.S.A.H. 101 111!L=730.25 FC;1~ ' ,
.c:. rlS I NSET A STA. 2+50.71, 26.0' RT. '(?~nINAG_7.~SSEM8LY )-r~- / ~ 'J/I 1010
II VAR. MATCH EXISTING \. C:=,30+ \ '2 /
f\ " , '~I
. i\:U:L IR=48'J.. 8' /COP(C:j~?' ,
i 8624 C&G <INP.1 -L\l. 1 '''1 '.w*'lK./., '" - / I '''if ~,;;~'-:~F~~~'---"
.... v. ~.. y.- .; 1 '<><~
B624 C8.G (TO BE REMOVED> \';1 .;-; ;';,';-:,';';,'>;.';- \ //)(:J;/ <6, : ,/ y(~/'" '~<_::"'~_"""= (
SAWCUT___ 04 VAR. \ ~ " , ""~ "\ CONSTRUC\ION / / ',/1 ' 0 j ",/ ap~~~:--"""C UC.L. >'~'~.,,<.~, '-
\ ~:.....- ---.. O'V .<r ",tv LIMITS "r. "/ );.,1/ ' / 0: Iff' "."~",,,
- --- - " '--'.-' '-"i ' .1'.1\1''' ~-'-L / / '4'<,{ 'I 'J. ,1 2007 !f-' ,/:y, 8 I LIMITS '~'>"">" \
J >----l 1./ -- - ------- -- - uE51\7'" \" / / I~", I ...,~ L,'<> 1ST AVENUE '=~_~,
- -- I I ".' : '\-,.' / ~ f' I ?' / I - STA 1+181 240' LT !i.'1 -~'f=....
- - I-___.J (J . ;[" , / / '. I. q ..... \.. -,-, '"
. I L BEGIN CONSTRUCTION'", / C\_;;;ii5: ./::;J / //;-- TC=734.47 :.' ,'~ ....<;.lk, '''r' "''>,
11 EXISTING --l 1 0' TYP . -., ". ,/ r ' . .zo/ INV=730.66-"-;'-
PAVEMENT '". - 4.0 TY 2.5 BITUMINOUS It. 1ST AVENUE '~B624 C& .' - /, / /v/ -INSTALL CASTING A};
.. INSET A '- gR~~~i~kOPE MIXTURE FOR PATCHING - f' /; ,I /..1;7 -CONNECT TO r'E,XISTING
~ STA. 0+23.60, 26.0' LT. ."',/' "k~1 STORM SEWER~'
ii GRADING GRADE ~ -1.0' ClASS S AGGREGATE BASE UAT CH E X IS TI NG 0+00 . __;/- -~C(~~~/\ /?/ ~ :'~~,Jf RCP ''''" _ 1
TYP I CAL SECT ION (j '_,. <~:;-;=- 2004,,,../"< \ Cf. 1 $T AVENUE J~~
(.J Iv: ."y'/' ',\ ",._ ,_,- .. ('"
SE C T ION A - A ~ ".._~''''''''{). " \ __'''::'~:::--- __/ "!II\('
...., ......"....".-=r"""""" _ _ --' ; --~" - \.~_.--......--
'=$""",, 1:-'>:,/ \ ' :
~\ / .1 \ \
ALIGNMENT TABULATION () , (V .; \
L-J 'j.. ;.
CIRCULAR CURVE DA T A ,D, \ \
POINT COOROINA TES . \
NULlIlER POINT ST A nON DEL T A DEGREE RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH AZIMUTH
X I Y
C.S.A.H. 101 (101E61
1004 PC 0+00.000 ~45,935.32021219,461.6850 78055' 28.95" LEGEND
1005 PI 1+70.014 300 42' 25.05" RT 90 14' 59.99" 619.414' 170.074' 331.967' ~46, 102.2268 219,494.3561 P[ SOD TYPE LAWN
1006 CC ~46,054.3089 "18,853.8072 ~. . ,,'.'
",.'h. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - SEE INSET A
c 1001 PT 3+31.961 ~46,262.4148 "19,437.2159 1090 31' 54.00"'" ",
'"
d. 1010 POT 4+87.044 ~46,408.4768~19,385.1l46 ~ TRAFFIC FLOW
":
~ ------, CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
~ 1ST AVENUE II STAVE 1
~ 2000 POT 0+00.000 ~46,22t.9220 ~19,295.1252
~ 2004 PC 0+29.438 ~46,250.8196 ~19,300.4234 79037' 54.10"
co
J 2005 PI 0+72.162 600 00' 00.10" LT 710 25' 36.22" 74.000' 42.724' 71.493' 446,292.9059 b19,308.1l26 PI
~ 2006 CC 446,237.5615 219.373.2151 HORIZONTAL CONTROL:
~ 2007 PT [+06.931 46307.2600 2193483531 190 37' 54 00. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS BASED ON SCOTT COUNTY COOROINATES SPECIFIC NOTE:
.. , . . . WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE MINN. STATE PLANE COORDINATE
g 2010 POT 1+75.562 446,330.31791219,412.9944 SYSTEM (NAD831 SOUTH ZONE. <D CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STD. PL. 7036.
Vl
/'
Vl
/' .
; DESIGN TEAM ~rh~~~~~ ~~~:~~c~h~t.,~~7s~~on ~~t~~~Pf~ ~Yd~Y J '"' __~~, SCOTI COUNlY ;{
c;; DRAWN BY, CIF LIcensed ProfessIonal EngIneer under the lows of /~ l'HONE. 1651>490'2000 .v.:S'~. .' "..' C S A H 101 /1ST AVENUE CONSTRUCTION PLAN 4
DESIGNER- HLR the Stote of "Innesoto. ~ 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. I .cott;. ..,,, ""
. CertifIed By: L1c.No..~ SEH ST PA
CHECKED BY' HLR u.,..,... Prot......... Enolneer . Ul."N 55110 ,__,,,. . COUNTY PROJECT NO.10Hl3 AN 0 0 ET AI LS
. NO. BY DA TE REVISIONS PrInted Nome. HE. THFR I RfOETZKF Dote. 03/2112007 ... ... 11