HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.A.4. Levee Drive Restroom Building
b. ft. q,
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM CONSENT
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director
Meeting Date: April 3, 2007
Subject: Levee Drive Restroom Building
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item seeks approval from City Council to proceed with demolition of a
restroom building at the west end of Huber Park on Levee Drive.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed the condition and options for the
future of the restroom building that is located at the end of Levee Drive, just west of the
CSAH 101 Minnesota River bridge. The attached staff report to the Advisory Board
outlines the options for the building. i
The Advisory Board concurred with staffs' recommendfition to proceed with demolishing
the restroom building and have the new restrooms tha~ are being constructed in Huber
Park serve as trail restrooms.
If City Council agrees with this, we will proceed with getting estimates for demolition of
the building, which would include talking to our Public Works department about whether
it would be feasible for city staff to do the demoltion.
I should note that I have made several inquiries to the Lower Minnesota River
Watershed District about their interest in the building since my letter went to them in
February and I have gotten no response. Given this, I am under the impression that they
have no interest in the building or its future, but should I hear something different, I will
provide that information to you prior to any demolition.
RELATIONSHIP TO VISION
F. Housekeeping
REQUESTED ACTION
If City Council concurs, move to direct staff to obtain estimates for the demolition of the
Levee Drive restroom buildings.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM I
I
To: Parks and Recreation Advisory Boar9
From: i
Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, anq Facilities Director
i
Meeting Date: March 26, 2007 I
I
I
I
Subject: Levee Drive Restroom Building I
i
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item seeks feedback from the Advisory Board on the restoration or
demolition of a restroom building at the west end of Huber Park on Levee Drive.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
As part of the redevelopment of Huber Park and the riverfront area,we have been
analyzing what to do with the restroom building that is located next to the newly
constructed parking lot on Levee Drive. Initially, we had planned on renovating the
building and using it as a trail head restroom building. However, after further analysis, it
may be more cost effective long-term to demolish the building and utilize the new
restrooms that are being constructed in Huber Park. ,
i
I
This building has been in a state of disrepair for several, years (5-10?), and is in need of
plumbing upgrades, fairly significant structural changes to meet current ADA
requirements, a new roof, stucco repair, and painting. bur estimate for this work is
$15,000-$20,000. In addition, once the roof is replaced, it will be subject to future
premature wear due to the snow and salt from snow removal on the CSAH 101 bridge.
(The bridge was constructed after the building was constructed.)
The building was constructed in the mid-1980's under an agreement with the Watershed
District. It appears that the District provided some funding for the construction costs, but
there is nothing in the agreement that discusses the long term commitment that the city
and the District have. I submitted the attached request to the Watershed District in
February, and I am waiting on their response. I hope to have an update on the
Watershed District's position for you at the meeting.
If we demolish the building, trail and park users will need to use the new Huber Park
restroom buildings. However, that building is further away from the parking lot. If we
retain the building, we will incur costs for maintaining the building.
After discussing with Public Works staff, we believe that demolishing the building is the
preferred action due to the availability of the Huber Park restrooms and the ongoing
operating costs associated with renovating it. We estimate that it will cost approximately
$10,000 to demolish the building.
REQUESTED ACTION
The Advisory Board is asked to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council
on the future of the Levee Drive restroom building.
NOTES' LEGEND qu~
l. SEE GENERAl. NOTtS ON SHEET com.
2. SEE SHEET" C102 FOR PAVING: MATERIALS. ,.. l;-'lCA';"s ';;;;RK-ro - " a ::i ~
J.. SEE SHEETS esOI-5OS fOR LAYOUT ENlARGEMENTS.
4. El..E:CTRON!C AlESWlU BE' PROVIDED 10 lllE COtflRACTOR , BE PERFORMED UNDER ~
FOR LAYOUT PURPOSES AfTER CONtRACl' AWARD. I ~~ERBI~~~D~I
'" SJIDVORK 81D PACKAGE) --.-"~.
------"
COHNEer NEW PAl>> TO EXtSTlNG PATH.
PROVIOE SMOOlli TlWlsmoN,
FUTURE RI'Y'[R
CONNECT NEW PATH 'TO EXISTING PAnt
PROVIDE'. SMOOTH TRANsmoN '"
sa: BOAT lAUNCH II.IPROVEMEm'S DRAWINGS ~i
(SHEETS 1-4) FOR WORK Iff iHlS AREA- all
~
~
B ~~ ~ ~ i
~ I~ ~ ~ ~
ruru.. :;~~~!i
SLEDDING HILL
IMPROVEMENTS f~l~~ ~
(HI.C.) ~~~~~ S
PARlONC LOT
UCffilNG. lYP. N ~ i
SEE ELECT.
DRAWINGS.
.
g,,~~ !
ill ~"li'O ~ ~
c:: ll'l\:Jg.. i
~~~:2 l!
~~--', /. ~O~jl
- ~ .11>> ...--- :1 BITUMINOUS PATHS. lYP. It ..
/ SEED~L~~~ , , "_.~
", .-..€r 6' ADA PICNIC TABLE ON
..7 5. cotlCRElt PAll. Ttl'. OF 9. 'l Sl~R WIlH RAIt. Ttl' ' .
",lfl6'us PATH, lYP. s' PICNIC TABU: ON SEE DEl'An. E/ce04
SEE o~~:(~~ .r _"'\ s. CONCRETE .!.AD~1Y?...:... Of...,! 6' BENCH, 1YP OF'tO
EXIS11NG PAlM. \ (arrRY COlONNADE. '\ SEt DErAIL IYCSOi
~; -~, -\ . ~~1~~ <
_.:--_'- --\---=-t E- -~~ b~
:::__-~_ C_C --~~
~-:.~~ BP ......~._"" ~;;:
_:--=-_~ ('1._~ '::::::.._ ~"'"S "
- .e SE:Cl.lftl'n.~D). -~~..... 1/ -....::~""...". . ZI- j
\ 0} _ :Jl_105P""~' '-""'II.. ','. ZZ
_0 0.
',_; (t SEE SHttl' Cl0Z FOR c............... ::Ee: '3
~ _ _ _ _ _ 5VRFAC'NO """!1l ..DOt: .\, "<I. I "........ 0:: 0
8P , . ,PARK EN11lANC< PYlO"'SlCN \ -,' '- I (j '----- 'W 5
, . 1 sa SNW~5 r- 'j "' '-" ~ !:::liE
, -,...---- rr1 \ .." a... 0:: J;g
'iJ"'-""""--" .' ., ,,'\--, -'<- 1Il
\ _ ~....: \ I, I 11 _ b .....IM OW
\ 0 \ Vl .~,J:; ~/~.,. ,') ,1'- ~(D
<(::l
#'~ "I~5) ~- (I' . :r::I:
;;-:::-- .p '>.,.. ;U .~",.~ --/.. U'l
.:::.;':->--\ ';' 0~ '8 "8:, :==-_(~ \
/';;. --jk MURE5~1"',,",cl1Y )~~ ~.i",,:--' \ r{l
~_~-,..,.. ______ ... rr1 ,-"<;:-'"'-' ~
,,_ 0 ,~~~""'~PARK ENTlWlct PYlON SlCN~ 1 ~
"~.,(c. -'l>.!.- \.SEESHEET CUDJ - (1
"':~~f~---i--;;J ---.--- ~ ~
~ 0 ,.. 00' 120'
~ ~-
sc.w: IN F'EEI" 'CO'",1COO1.DWG
1><tc1'......1llII
C101
February 12, 2007
Terry Schwalbe
Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
1600 Bavaria Road
Chaska MN 55318
Subject: Levee Drive/Huber Park Restroom Building
Dear Terry,
I am writing to discuss the future of the old restroom building on Levee Drive (adjacent to the
CSAH 101 bridge) that the city constructed with assistance from the Watershed District.
As part of the redevelopment of Huber Park and the riverfront area, we have been analyzing
what to do with the restroom building that is located next to the newly constructed parking lot
on Levee Drive. Initially, we had planned on renovating the building and using it as a trail
head restroom building. However, after further analysis, it may be more cost effective long-
term to demolish the building and utilize the new restrooms that are being constructed in
Huber Park.
This building has been in a state of disrepair for several years (5-10?), and is in need of
plumbing upgrades, fairly significant structural changes to meet current ADA requirements, a
new roof, stucco repair, and painting. Our estimate for this work is $15,000-$20,000. In
addition, once the roof is replaced, it will be subject to future premature wear due to the snow
and salt from snow removal on the CSAH 101 bridge. (The bridge was constructed after the
building was constructed.)
The building was constructed in the mid-1980's under an agreement with the Watershed
District. It appears that the District provided some funding for the construction costs, but
there is nothing in the agreement that discusses the long term commitment that the city and
the District have. I have attached a copy of the agreement for your review.
I would appreciate your thoughts regarding the future of the building. I would like to bring a
recommendation to the city's Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on February 26.
However, if you need additional time to discuss this with the Board of Managers, I can
probably defer this until their March 26 meeting. Please feel free to call me at 952-233-9514
at any time to discuss.
Sincerely,
Mark Themig
Director