HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.C.1. Approval of Jennifer Lane Extension Concept Associated with CH 17-32 Project. General Business 10. C. 1.
Sl AKOPEE
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director
DATE: 10/15/2013
SUBJECT: Approval of Jennifer Lane Extension Concept Associated with CH 17-32 Project. (A
&D)
Action Sought
Approve a motion approving the concept of extending Jennifer Lane from Valley Creek Crossing
2nd Addition to Wood Duck Trail with Scott County and to consider deferring assessments to
benefiting property owners.
Background
Scott County Highway Department has begun design of CH 17 improvements south of Dominion
Avenue to the CH 17 & CH 42 interchange. Attached is a sheet from the draft Scott County TIP
for the project which is proposed to start in 2015.
Associated with the design, the County would like to remove private driveway accesses where
possible and as identified in the CH 17-13 Corridor Study. Attached is a drawing from this study
potential local roads to support the access management plan.
One of these supporting roads is the extension of Jennifer Lane from Valley Creek Crossing 2nd
Addition to Wood Duck Trail and Lakeview Circle. Attached for Council review is the extension
of Jennifer Lane and a preliminary subdivision concept of the parcels adjacent to this roadway.
Scott County hired Bolton& Menk, Inc. to prepare a concept to show the affected property
owners on how the combined area could be developed. The County has had meetings with the
property owners on the concept of constructing Jennifer Lane and estimates on increased land
value.
The concept proposal is for County to use Federal funds for constructing Jennifer Lane and the
necessary storm water improvements. The City and/or SPUC would front the utility costs for a
certain length of time. The property owners would dedicate the right of way for this road.
The County is preparing the concept to eliminate private driveway accesses from a principal
arterial. The benefit from the city is to connect Lakeview Circle and Wood Duck Trail to Jennifer
Lane and provide another way to the County road system and reduce the left turns out to
northbound CR 17. Also the Menden parcel is interested in developing soon and would make the
road connection to Farehaven Drive and eliminate another long cul-de-sac and provide
an additional road route to residents.
The concept for the City Council to consider is whether to front the assessment costs for sanitary
sewer, water and local street costs for a length of time. The estimated cost to front is $440,000.00
and is subject to change if and when this project moves forward.
Staff will begin back assessment agreements containing the details of deferred assessment such as
length of time and interest rates to the City Council if the concept is approved by Council.
Recommendation
Staff would recommend moving forward with the concept of deferring assessments to see if there
is agreement with most of the residents. In prior meetings, the property owner did agree that the
extension of Jennifer Lane should have sanitary sewer and water lines extended if the road is built.
Budget Impact
The potential project would be paid by Sanitary Sewer funds with the fund being reimbursed with
development paying off the assessments.
Relationship to Vision
This supports Goals A& D: Keep Shakopee a safe and healthy community where residents can
pursue active and quality lifestyles; and maintain, improve and create strong partnerships with
other public and private sector entities.
Requested Action
Approve a motion approving the concept of extending Jennifer Lane from Valley Creek Crossing
2nd Addition to Wood Duck Trail with Scott County and to consider deferring assessments to
benefiting property owners.
Attachments: CORRIDOR STUDY
JENNIFER LANE PREFERRED CONCEPT MAP
COUNTY'S CIP SHEET
_ .a so Y6eausy k k�' e
tv
00 0
D o CD 0
Wntr`aYe' .anY 41[:3 1 s CV
Y :Yams33F= s w e �> A^ o CD
o
- —
a y arJo9e4S gyps* anY.aaOOM¢VS.. ' ( �C 3 b
L C 0 LL
# � } Z H
i I 5
anY V10l 4. .0 anV�WOI v a — r' /rte A. N C C C
���nJ W7♦ � �a a �, �� Da es`� �, � `�,�Gr1 ` Jaa¢ � � �
z ( J a
�
R . a US nary 169 ..
os
i e ,roswi9>rCCY ,"(9,wossgg
.a,�,9t AwH SQR. .st•a+�
t
o 'eiaw ag- `�#?fir: ��•`�" � <gr"°d� 1#2" L � O
t
�r U m.��- wwas +�.,: � (9 7
,',. �Oua ej t ;Damn attl aid '�e'' d C
3 'ysr
r
a.oW�yfl a .
y
r
� O
a °
F=-
1 i �y�age V 393
♦F ! }g
.+' ♦ G S
Jr. �
CL
OVA
� . u1
Information from the September 2009 CH 17/TH13 Corridor Study:
• City Council passed a resolution approving the Study on April 7,2009
• A key feature of a Principal Arterial highway is a high level of mobility.This mobility can be achieved,in
part,by restricting direct access to/from adjacent parcels in order to provide for reduced traffic conflicts,
in turn providing a higher-speed facility for a larger volume-of vehicles.Traffic forecasts indicate that
improvements will be needed prior to 2030 in order to maintain this level of mobility.
• The CH 17 segment of the Corridor will experience unacceptable levels of congestion prior
to203O.The needs of this segment must therefore be addressed first.
• Mn/DOT and Scott County should continue planning for jurisdictional transfers of segments of
TH 13 and/or CH 17.
• Scott County,the Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake and Cedar Lake and Spring Lake Townships
should use the concept long-term plans and supporting roadway network as a guide to assess the
compatibility of new development proposals within the corridor.
• The City of Shakopee should continue to develop alternative routes of access to neighborhoods
that are currently served by a single point of access or those that may be affected by access
management or safety improvement measures recommended as part of the loner terin vision for
the CH 17 corridor.Potential alternative routes of access are identified in the supporting roadway
concept plan developed as a part of this study.
• The City of Shakopee should continue planning for supporting roadways in the Segment C area to
provide alternative access routes to neighborhoods consistent with the Vision for the corridor as
outlined in this study.
9.3 Supporting Roadways
A supporting roadway network concept plan has been developed in conjunction with the access
management measures. Supporting roadways are needed to relieve CH 17 and TH 13 from the short local
trips and also serve the businesses and residences in the study area.These supporting roadways will
provide connections to Collectors and Arterials and will provide safe access to CH 17 and TH 13 at a
public intersection with turn lanes.
A broad network of potential future supporting roadways is shown in Figures 1 O—I OD.A continuous
parallel supporting Collector roadway is depicted within approximately one mile from CH 17/TH 13 on
the east and west.Lakes,wetlands,and developed parcels constrain opportunities for future parallel and
connecting roadways. Supporting roadways shown are intended to represent important functional future
connections but are not intended to infer a preferred alignment. As development occurs, this supporting
roadway connections plan should be referred to as specific roadway location and alignment decisions are
made.
12.4 Recommendations for Future Access
Access needs are emerging along Highways 13 and 17 as new residential,commercial,and industrial
developments are locating on"prime"real estate near the highway.The need for a future system of
frontage and backage roads has become increasingly apparent in order to manage accessibility and
improve safety. In addition,planning is needed for a future system of county and local roadways to serve
contiguous development with logical street extensions as the communities grow.The future local and
County Highway system,including a system of frontage and backage roads,will effectively help
Mn/DOT, Scott County and the local governments manage potential development along TH 13 and CH
17.
A large supporting roadway network comprised of Collectors and local streets will be needed to
implement the full access management plan. Figures IOA— IOD demonstrate a supporting roadway
network concept plan necessary for the implementation of the access management recommendations
within the corridor.These supporting roadways would serve all residences and businesses in the growth
areas. It is important that a network be established and that these roadways be continuous so that future
developments will have effective and safe connections to the CH 17/TH 13 corridor.Travelers on CH 17
and TH 13 will benefit from the supporting roadways by enjoying improved operating speeds and safer
intersections. Businesses along CH l7/TH 13 will benefit from the new roadway connections by having
improved access to local roads for customers in the surrounding area.As segments of the corridor plan are
completed,private driveways will be converted to right-in/right-out operation or will be rerouted to
adjacent local streets that are not yet in place.Turns to and from the Arterial will be provided at public
intersections where left and right turn lanes should be constructed.A list of the recommended supporting
roadways is below.
Frontage Roads
New Langford Avenue from 253rd St.to County Highway 64
Langford Way from Parkfield Avenue to TH 13
Backage Roads
Vergus Avenue from TH 19 to County Highway 64
Zinn Avenue from County Highway 64 to TH 13
Baseline Avenue from TH 19 to CH 2
New Street from 253rd Street to 2471,Street
Xeon Avenue from County Highway 64 to County Highway 8
New Street from TH 282 to Marcia Lane
New Street from New Development to County Highway 78
New Street from Spring Lake Regional Park Development to CH 82
Maple Trail from County Highway 42 to Valley View Road
Independence Way from County Highway 42 to Valley View Road
Fairhaven Drive from Lakeview Drive South to County Highway 79
Lakeview Drive South from Fairhaven Drive to County Highway 78
Evergreen Lane from County Highway 78 to Weston Lane
Cross Streets
1901,Street from County Highway 79 to County Highway 81
Peace Avenue from Dominion Avenue to Independence Way
Wood Duck Trail from County Highway 17 to Independence Way
a
c � 'r_• 3 a t � c7 r
G V N C 3 L O O ^0 7 .T•.
S pa IIp93vEW
� m ex.• c° v z c ru H Z
0 go o 0
1 '
a / -_1____L___1__
1 I 1 1 I a 1 N
1 r-----
1T
1 1
Z k
ul.lajIuuaf
----------------- -< �♦ 1 I 1
1 1
♦
I 1
e'
,
Fn
' " 1 0
3
.LJ / ♦ r / N
V ' `� / I� `♦f �♦ I
�+
r-------I 1 I N
L , I
1 x.FI N L-----
1 R I av I r------
I a I w 1 L-----
.� ; m
LL II^3ww A
I
1
L I
fSS I `n
C �
I �
r
L
C i m
`M 1Q
�inrl
n+
N
O
ao
N
O O C) Cl 0 0 f- O CO O (O M 0 0 0 f- _
O O Cl) O Cl) c0 V' Cl) O O M U
7:4 803Y O LQ 0 C N N V' O O C
C N 7 t O N O O N O -t (D Cl)M O V 0 O I- V O V
O (D N N O
M CO 00
F- cD C) E- 00 rn
O p
N N
O O
N N
O p
C11 p)
C) �
•q•j O O
N N
a
�n
O p
V .. Cl n' 00 00
C_ OY a-
O
N N
z'AV3hii`P1,011
Y °f '" �� i O O O O O
zzu�
O_ O C:)
O
?O 2LZxY Q� 4�E _ GI
W z z o o rn r (O cD r cD O (D
N N
O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O
r (D 00 O — N O In N
C
N V' N 04 ap N cc co
t/7 cu
:3 C O 0 & 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O
O LQ O O O 00 00
LD
U O
O d)
N O p U) 00 U; O M O Il
O N - 0, � 00 p M N M
V' I`
U O L (.D CD CD
O O O O O O
S ❑ N U
d
'IT
O O O O
U ti ^ V
O Cl) Cl) 04 � M
N N V' (A
Z N 0) C
p O
CJD C _
O 0 El 0 ) S u) O O O O O O
C C O O .+ O O
r of (B 'D C O O 'D O O
Q O ,O _0 U OX' �,Oj C C' C' N
CL C O O O O
N O x a m L T
Cl) fn
D_ _ 0o y M M U) � � M M
L V'
C O v O >. v f6 .�.. � N a0_+ Y cl7 M r- 0)
o
U U Q. O i O Ln ,�, 'O In Ln
i O U O_ N y 0 Q O Q 0 O
CL
t >= O LCC: C W X �..
0 00 U F" O N v o w C n D V
a. U y p1
a v ^ S
r E Z O O O) v C. I v
= v 0) M O +•�
U lL a `
V U) d n o E v C Q
v a
n u
n o ;-°, a o L ii o x N o
i O o LL1 o) co M w 0 o N C C c F-V G B. N N N U •a
U 0 U 0 U 0
U N O
Na � co
6 C7 Q O
O C C CL 0 n cc � � EC
-1 U M 0 oo ) 0 p�ii000
N