HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.A.2. Planned Unit Development Amendment for Shakopee Valley Marketplace-Res. No. 7362 General Business 10. A.
SHAK0141 T
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Kyle Sobota, Planner I
DATE: 09/17/2013
SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development Amendment for Shakopee Valley Marketplace-Res. No.
7362 (B)
Action Sought
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 7362, a resolution approving the PUD Amendment
Request with the proposed conditions, and move its adoption.
Background
Rick Plessner, representing Inland Commercial Real Estate has submitted a PUD amendment
request to adjust the amount and quantity of freestanding signage on the Shakopee Valley Market
Place site.
The applicant is proposing an enlargement of the existing sign near the intersection of Marschall
Road and 17th Avenue, as well as the placement of a new sign north of the existing buildings,
adjacent to US Highway 169 (see attached exhibits). The existing monument sign is 20' in height,
the applicant is proposing to increase the height of the sign to 25'2" to allow for the placement of
two additional sign faces on the sign (Caribou Coffee and Target Grocery/Pharmacy) on the
existing freestanding sign, while maintaining the existing sign faces.
The proposed additional monument sign near US Highway 169 is the identical sign to the revision
of the existing sign. The proposed monument it would be 24'8"wide and 25'2" tall, with an
increase of sign area of approximately 128 square-feet.
Staff notified the applicant of possible revisions to the sign ordinance that may allow additional
height and square footage for freestanding signs in the future, but since the applicant had interest
in additional signage to attract a potential tenant and not decreasing signage for any of the existing
tenants, they decided to make application for a PUD amendment for a larger sign, rather than
waiting for possible revisions to the sign ordinance. Currently the signage facing traffic traveling
on Highway 169 are wall signs for Target, Kohl's, and Office Max.
Staff believes the request appears to be in line with the recommendations from both the Planning
Commission and the Economic Development Advisory Commission direction on potentially
allowing increased height for freestanding signage in the vicinity of US Highway 169.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission reviewed this request at the September 5th meeting and unanimously
recommended that the City Council approve the request, as proposed.
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. All previous conditions of the Shakopee Valley Marketplace PUD remain in effect, except
conditions and plans related to freestanding signage.
2. Sign permits are required for all new signage on the site, which must include a diagram of
the foundation of the proposed signs.
3. Locations of all signage must be outside of State, County and City Right-of-Ways, sight
triangles, and will be reviewed at time of Sign Permit Application.
4. As proposed the new monument sign adjacent to Highway 169 is located in a drainage and
utility easement. The applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the
easement holder(s) prior to issuance of a sign permit.
5. Location of the additional sign must generally comply with the proposed plan regarding
location north of the existing buildings.
6. All signage must be setback at least 10' from a lot line.
Criteria for Approval
Section 11.50, Subd. 6 of the City Code outlines the criteria for granting a Planned Unit
Development. The following is a listing of the criteria and draft findings for this application.
Criteria No. 1: Whether the proposed development is consistent in all respect with the
comprehensive plan and with this section.
Finding No.l: The comprehensive plan guides this area for highway commercial development,
the allowance of additional freestanding signage does not conflict with the comprehensive plan.
Criteria No. 2: Whether the proposed development, including deviations from design
standards of the underlying zones, is compatible with surrounding land uses.
Finding No. 2: Shakopee Valley Marketplace is adjacent to 3 major roadways, the additional
signage will not impact the other surrounding commercial land uses, the increase in additional
height of the proposed sign at Marschall Road and 17th Avenue is screened from residential uses
by mature existing trees.
Criteria No. 3: Whether the proposed development, including deviations from development
standards of the underlying zone, provides adequate open space, circulation, parking,
recreation, screening, and landscaping.
Finding No. 3: No changes are proposed in regard to landscaping, open space, or circulation.
Criteria No. 4: Whether the primary function of the PUD is to encourage development
which will preserve and enhance the worthwhile, natural terrain characteristics and not
force intense development to utilize all portions of a given site in order to arrive at the
maximum density allowed. In evaluating each individual proposal, the recognition of this
objective will be a basic consideration in granting approval or denial.
Finding No. 4: This proposal does not affect the overall density of the development of the site.
Criteria No. 5: Whether there exists an overall compatibility of land uses and overall
appearance and compatibility of individual buildings to other site elements or to
surrounding development. However, the architectural style of buildings shall not solely be a
basis for denial or approval of a plan.
Finding No. S: The ultimate development of the PUD will provide for overall compatibility of
land uses, buildings, and other site elements to the surrounding development.
Criteria No. 6: Whether the proposed PUD plan would afford a greater general public
benefit than would be realized under the underlying zoning district and/or general zoning
provisions.
Finding No. 6: The increased signage is in line with the need for better visibility for a large
commercial development for traffic traveling at a different elevation.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Recommend the approval of the PUD amendment, subject to conditions.
2. Recommend the denial of the PUD amendment based on the proposed findings above.
3. Table action on the item and request that additional information be provided by the applicant
and/or staff.
Recommendation
Staff recommends Option 1, approval of the PUD amendment, subject to conditions.
Budget Impact
This PUD Amendment request has no direct budgetary impact.
Relationship to Vision
Allowing additional signage in order to fill a vacant commercial space within the city relates to
the visioning goal of allowing growth or development in a positive manner.
Requested Action
Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 7362, a resolution approving the PUD Amendment
Request with the proposed conditions, and move its adoption.
Attachments: Location Map
Applicant Narrative
Site Plan
Sign Drawing
Sign Elevation
Resolution No. 7362
Scott County, MN
i
-12 K ". 1233 12;5 '145 t2.t] 1928 2913 2tY+] 2ita
03�i. 1255 U 1271 - .
1278 yti101 1,3-5-1Ua 121161 W3 t
1294 f 1L33 ,, it735 R�13�35 /1--. . tA91,18031813 14]1 1�3 1435 ?445 24u
1235 1331 1123 1525 i555 \1625 1. -1�j
1251 129 11235 1232 f-'1949-laia-M,1 .
1471CH3 1353 512711 1 12 2 12ES"12tH fa7 td'1? 1431. 1808 1212 2498 12k1
1 1254 :1257 1252! 1 35'1 12]8 1�, 1?f]{ 1241 h 1271213
1321. 1103 13;15 1 �td37tt2�r iii 1 -jS 1251 t .� 12371'123
'1343 1291 �- 1272 d 1 I 1617 1793 13�i 12� 11 7 12 `
1322 1447 1271 127' 1234 ,�t Y `
(,.1343 iii 1128 1127 1274 1232 12a5 1272 1299 "�..:t9T2t127-0 12711y� i '11256I
1 1393. 12831 2 123s 11231 '15113 t' jt28r,_
tail �, 11 1267127$
Ili 2 ()3 1133 1193 ° --°�1_ j� .128112-2, 21
f 1443
i42'a 1249
1223 1522 13567
..14.33: t352 1 1 hTt4�lta>7T 2A361 2]90(12128
'035 '. 9'i?Y(]IL+-tij93 �.[a., 1f4y''.
Ign
113 1534
1483 1262 e
10% 0 193€1
1c15n'f ltiti:4
10519..:1113 1241
1431 iita�
�Y 1239 �'k
11
v 1 iff �0 Ge,13 ts
1o3s /,3ao 10953 4� q 5
21sr 15zi
,(,X3�335�•-�'� 51 '
20,1
t aim ' , '1515
+U? 2]4'3 `�`�207519.18
16 '1
1445 Igo_, .�1J1r""ii
1023 13]5.
1u`75
tftltixl'3�' t9ia3-Li933 tri3 '��t-Y3ft511
cU74 311 •_.2122
15
1 tEi14 1$52i916�i..... 290220].3 .
1 53• 1817 ia351931 r1'�J7'w iatu 1$njt3
*�4 i ta21� Islas 19,....-1, x .1551 lab!
14Li14 1 115311, ! 133f 1571
115331', f -.� 1"'1a11a1F431 f9fli 1413 .2041 2071 2151
13371 ,,yi_ ,
'433. 1837
trr:� ts731 5:133 1:;�t 1��1 t��� ��1�s�1�7 . ta24
iae13� .1687 lam 1cY�t11342142]:1952 393Q?G46 2]3421
17 r3`
170(1 .1191 X22] 1512 •'"'1 �T.T3 1I ta^a1 9-Vj i 19 1745
173/ "et•r flit! 1211122• 17lt 'el � t C 1 11"''3�`�✓ 8521 1731
1?2t 1727 ., 1712 ( f-'T��� f -22u1.
tte'iz 1328 - 1772 1751
t7 1131, 1225 1-Wi 1732 ( t 19s7 1377 1477 14Z, T 5
� --2 113 ! lata 1785 1N2 1. 1
ltT3 .17447 - 135313731433 1913 �ry
�PPlPr't� 173: t'i'n 373 17521 ! 11845 1892 1eD37
143; 17711777 1,,is z� 1751 t tl 1392 !! r1 Tit,3 1195�7 20k 2474 52114
1759 t 13931 t i772 1893 1304 M. ! 1424 14.;3 i 21St 209 ?ti'1 176
t 1.?33 1 19U 1 I'll 203 /1454 1543-1772
593 -1045 106 1Tatg ! -iFws 1385, wt5 1935 2925
1939, .t y41035-J ! t875'� 14z5yt4n"i-+-_, .193< 19D 17aa
1815 1905 1733
18133 _ x,1+"4'•1433��ry 1355 1569
iffit t 11537 ! ( ( 1513 1535- 6831 1 13y3 20M / 7
W4 11827 late 11.815 1 1=5� 1355 lad-14_M Zllir3 X171. taa:.
1339 ir'%i3.1 !t$2 ! ! 1�7"> iFi-'.5 1.948 .'1921 1491
1833 18;99 1'33 1 t 1941 k2477-1812.
1842 1845 1831 1531 ! 1825 �132i! 1311 1431 2489 2?3i'f8k]
ti 8 1851 1eV�] t$]4 1 ( 1895 14]1 195t t8r'1
2732. 151
ta34 18571}.1 �1$t7 ( 1 "T F 4 ^ V 1813'114-E-*� 3211121'MM
1893 183]1856 1$55 ( ( ` 1312 1441 1435 �§ ''201319 2162
.1893 1864 18% 1839 ( 1822 r•1921 1.._.1"�.,°' �' 21Q
•1875 1372 1871 ( ( 1852 1901. 941 1�t-]3}31 ` 2112
1884 1673 1313 ( '.1362 2114 "6351
9si.. 1881 ( 1912'�1TT�� 2123
99Q. 1898 k1487 1 15234 � 1 �l a la82 i9k'2 1982 11722 21C1e'' l2'kit �
This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nora survey and is not Map Scale N
intended to be used as one.This drawing is a compilation of records, 1 inch=65.58 feet
information,and data located in various city,county,and state offices,and
other sources affecting the area shown,and is to be used for reference W E
purposes only Scott County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein Map Date
contained.If discrepancies are found,please contact the Scott County
Surveyors Office. 7/8/2013 S
Inland Commercial Property Management, Inc.
Inland has been successful in negotiating a new lease agreement with Caribou Coffee to occupy
the vacated Starbuck's store at Shakopee Valley Marketplace contingent on pylon sign
improvements.
The success of every coffee store is based on customer's impulse awareness of the coffee shop's
presence and ease of access. The need for Caribou Coffee to be added to the existing pylon sign
is paramount to their sustained success and continued operation of their store.
Based on the discussions with Caribou Coffee, Inland believes that the Shakopee Valley
Marketplace property would be better served by(1)improving the existing monument sign at the
intersection of Marshall Road and 17th Avenue East and(2) constructing a new monument sign
of the same sign area along the North property line visible from Highway 169.
Request 1:
Inland is requesting a PUD Amendment to allow for the current pylon at the intersection of
Marshall Road and 17th Avenue East to be increased in size and height.
The existing pylon sign combines the Target and Inland land parcels sign rights into one
structure.
The revised pylon sign would increase the Target sign area 26.25 s.f. and the Inland sign area
would increase 32.50 s.f.
The revised pylon sign would increase in height 5' 2"and the existing width of the sign would
remain as 24'8" (see Proposed Monument Sign Exhibit).
Request 2:
Inland is requesting a PUD Amendment to allow a new monument sign to be constructed along
the North property line that would be visible to Highway 169.
The sign area would be the same as the revised Marshall Road monument sign.
The sign height for the Highway 169 sign would be higher than the Marshall Road sign to
provide for reasonable visibility form Highway 169.
7117 10th Street North
Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
p651-738-7777 f 651.738.2801 Member of
htemenorW Ceund
www.inlandrealestate.corn of Shooft Cemen
F---i
u Km
n
ITT 9
4
� t
i4'
r FlII
}� �1r' @ r r. i t
N V I
%_ q mo
,
� zY
14-kyi.-b.1
° 1 1 I�-J ;\ T?TTT .1 tS--F•��i �Ti xl
�wm
�?
T
Z •I �1
;F —
I. v t
� � R .�.... a' 06'a FW4?tve a I H+ i t-rs• � `•t`l, j I ,h ,
E - H rTib 1111
_ -
- K
l S'
rd i+
E
t I
{ ti I Inxl
Il�x4�
3 -
�
71
m
' :'v
Z
II IL
e 1 +•�. i�: - _ ------
YYyy AL/
r <.
• w:h -
-
Y a H Y 4 r Y 1-17 ♦f ---- _ -_ ___--
-a.v �
N>L
mr.C A m r �I.Paul Meyer proposed Monument
z v • Signs:
A0-U
m A2CHITEC16,INC Shakopee Valley
0 0 IWO 36TH--NORTH,SUITE 170 COlt1E1Mi'�ae
ND-4 m PLYMOUTH,IfMNF50TA 55446 property Management,Inc. Marketplace
O y Q TEL 7b0.55140b1 I F./b3.557.v233 3f01 Buaert Id Rd 1529-1667 17th Ave.
y Z w�" PRCIERN hnAIM Chk 6r°°k,li.60523 Shakopee, MN
RESOLUTION NO.7362
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA,APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR SHAKOPEE VALLEY MARKETPLACE
WHEREAS,Rick Plessner, applicant and Inland Shakopee Valley Marketplace,Dayton
Hudson Corporation, and TNP Properties LLC property owners, has made application for an
amendment to the Planned Unit Development for South Valley Health Campus; and
WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described
as:
See Attached Legal Description; and
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2000, the City Council of the City of Shakopee did approve
Resolution No. 5340, approving the Planned Unit Development of Shakopee Valley
Marketplace;and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Shakopee did review the
amendment to the Planned Unit Development on September 5,2013;and
WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing for the Planned
Unit Development Amendment were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing at the
hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon;and
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Shakopee did review the amendment to the
Planned Unit Development on September 17,2013 and adopted the following findings:
Criteria No. 1: Whether the proposed development is consistent in all respect with the
comprehensive plan and with this section.
Finding No.]: The comprehensive plan guides the area for highway commercial
development. The allowance of additional freestanding signage does not conflict with the
comprehensive plan.
Criteria No. 2: Whether the proposed development;including deviations from design
standards of the underlying zones,is compatible with surrounding land uses.
Finding No. 2: Shakopee Valley Marketplace is adjacent to 3 major roadways, the additional
signage will not impact the other surrounding commercial land uses, the increase in
additional height of the proposed sign at Marschall Road and 17th Avenue is screened from
residential uses by mature existing trees.
Criteria No.3: Whether the proposed development,including deviations from
development standards of the underlying zone,provides adequate open space,
circulation,parking,recreation,screening, and landscaping.
Finding No. 3: No changes are proposed in regard to landscaping, open space, or
circulation.
Criteria No. 4: Whether the primary function of the PUD is to encourage development
which will preserve and enhance the worthwhile, natural terrain characteristics and not
force intense development to utilize all portions of a given site in order to arrive at the
maximum density allowed. In evaluating each individual proposal,the recognition of
this objective will be a basic consideration in granting approval or denial.
Finding No. 4: This proposal does not affect the overall density of the development of the
site.
Criteria No. 5: Whether there exists an overall compatibility of land uses and overall
appearance and compatibility of individual buildings to other site elements or to
surrounding development. However,the architectural style of buildings shall not solely
be a basis for denial or approval of a plan.
Finding No. S: The ultimate development of the PUD will provide for overall compatibility of
land uses, buildings, and other site elements to the surrounding development.
Criteria No. 6: Whether the proposed PUD plan would afford a greater general public
benefit than would be realized under the underlying zoning district and/or general
zoning provisions.
Finding No. 6: The increased signage is in line with the need for better visibility for a large
commercial development for traffic traveling at a different elevation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA,AS FOLLOWS:
That the Planned Unit Development for Dean Lakes is hereby amended to allow:
1. All previous conditions of the Shakopee Valley Marketplace PUD remain in effect,
except conditions and plans related to freestanding signage.
2. Sign permits are required for all new signage on the site,which must include a
diagram of the foundation of the proposed signs.
3. Locations of all signage must be outside of State, County and City Right-of-Ways,
sight triangles, and will be reviewed at time of Sign Permit Application.
4. As proposed the new monument sign adjacent to Highway 169 is located in a drainage
and utility easement. The applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with
the easement holder(s)prior to issuance of a sign permit.
5. Location of the additional sign must generally comply with the proposed plan
regarding location north of the existing buildings.
6. All signage must be setback at least 10' from a lot line.
Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held on the day of ,2013.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
Julie Linnihan, City Clerk
PREPARED BY:
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee,MN 55379