HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.C.3. Overhead Power Relocation on 4th Avenue for the Valley Park Business Center �� Consent Business 4. C. 3.
5t�,���c�����-�-.
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Directar
DATE: 08/07/2013
SUBJECT: Overhead Power Relocation on 4th Avenue for the Valley Park Business Center. (D)
Action Sought
Approve a motion determining the existing overhead power lines on 4th from Shenandoah Drive
to approximately 900 feet be relocated and shall be placed underground.
Background
Recently the City Council approved a plat named Valley Park Business Center at the southeast
corner of 4th Avenue and Shenandoah Drive. Per the approved submittal, a sidewalk is required
along 4th Avenue where an existing overhead power line is located.
Per City Ordinance, the City Council can decide if the power lines can be relocated overhead or
be placed underground. Attached is a memo from Joe Adams on the power lines in the project
area as well as maps showing the power lines.
SPUC has adopted an Underground Relocation Fund to pay the additional cost of undergrounding
overhead facilities. Mr. Adam's memo does show the extra cost to underground on the 4th Avenue
segment adjacent to the development.
SPUC has reviewed the item and accepted the cost estimates and recommendations from Joe
Adams, Planning and Engineering Director.
The City did require SPUC to go underground with the street reconstruction project in 2003-2004
on 4th Avenue from CH 17 to Shenandoah Drive. With a sidewalk required on the south side,
continuation of undergrounding the power lines is recommended by staff.
Recommendation
Approve a motion determining the existing overhead power lines on 4th Avenue, from
Shenandoah Drive to approximately 900 feet east be relocated and shall be placed underground.
Budget Impact
This item does not impact the city budget and SPUC does have an Undergrounding Relocation
Fund to pay for this work.
Relationship to Vision
This supports Goal D: Maintain, improve and create strong partnerships with other public and
pricate sector entities.
Requested Action
Approve a motion determining the existing overhead power lines on 4th Avenue, from
Shenandoah Drive to approximately 900 feet east be relocated and shall be placed underground.
Attachments: SPUC MEMO
SHAKOP��PUBLIC U1'ILITIES ��
MEMORAIV'DUM
TO: John Crooks, Utilities Manag
�/
FROM: Joseph D. Adams, Planning& ,ngineering Director ,�'�.w�/
SUBJF,CT: `'alley View Business Park Project and Overhead Line Relocation
DATE: July 11,2013
ISSUE
The City of Shakopee is requiring a public improvement, specifically a sidewalk, be constructed within the
Fourth Avenue right of�vay east of Shenandoah Drive by the plat developer Scannell Properties. The location
of the sidewalk is in conflict with an existing overhead electric feeder line, circuit DL-41. Consequently, the
overhead power poles and wires for a distance of approximately 900 feet will have to be relocated.
BACKGROUND
The existing overhead po�ver line along Fourth Avenue has been in place a number of years, originally
constructed during the mid-1970's as the municipal utility extended service out to the industrial park from the
Shakopee substation. It has subsequently served as a feeder tie between the Blue Lake and,more recently,the
Dean Lake substations to the Shakopee substation, �vhile also providing lateral service to the adjacent properties
within SPUC's electric service ten•itory.
Located at the southeast corner of Shenandoah Drive and Fourth Avenue is an overhead platform�vith tlu•ee
large single phase voltage regulators that enable the circuit tie to transition from the 13.8 kV distribution voltage
of the Dean Lake substation to the 12.47 kV distribution voltage of the Shakopee substation.
Per the tenns of the City of Shakopee's Right of Way Management Ordinance,the Council may order the line
to be relocated underground pending notification of the cost difference between relocating the line overhead.
The Commission may recall that in 2003-4, 4vhen Fourth Avenue was reconstructed and transformed into an
urban section from a rural section west of Shenandoah Drive, the then overhead electric po�ver lines �vere
relocated and placed underground at the Council's direction.
Staff believes it is likely that the City�vilt have the sidewalk extended eastward atl the way to CR 83 in future
public improvement project and if the overhead line is going to be placed underground now the undergrounding
of the line�vill continue to the east and that the overhead voltage regulators should be replaced with pad mount
equipment no�v. And not just moved to the east end ofthis project,only to have to be dealt with again in the
future.
DISCUSSION
Staff has reviewed the construction plans for the right of way improvements, i.e, the sidewalk and has
determined that the estimated cost ofrelocating the existing facilities underground would be approximately
$144,000. This would include replacing the overhead voltage regulators with pad mount equivalent voltage
regulators, while keeping them in the same general proximity to the intersection.
Conversely,relocating the existing facilities back 5 feet to al low the sidewalk construction within the right of
way while keeping the facilities overhead�vould cost approximately$15,000.
7'he funding source for the relocation of the facilities would be from electric revenues via standard rates for the
first$I 5,000 and via the Retocation Underground Charge fi�nd for any excess(approximately$129,Q00)due to
placing the facilities underground if so ordered by the Cotincil. This is in accordance with the Commission's
relocation policy adopted in Resolution#7�2 Resolirtivn F,stablishing a Relocation Underground Charge c�r�tec�
Novemher 3, 2003.
Unfortunately, this was not an anticipated project for this year or anytime in the current five year CIP,as the
City did not have an identified project for the sidewalk in their five year CIP either. 1'he timing of the sidewalk
construction appears to be primarily development driven.
Regardless of the Council's determination on whether the facilities may remain overhead after being relocated
or will havc to be placed i�nderground, the developer Scannell Properties has expressed an interest in possibly
having the voltage regulators moved away fi�om the intersection, which is the entrance to their development, for
aesthetic reasons at their cost. Relocatina the voltage regulators to the east creates an added expensc
independent of the question to relocate the facilities overhead or underground. The intersection is the boundary
line between the distribution voltage levels on the electric system. SPtJ plans to add a firture Dean Lake feeder
running north along Shenandoah Drive from the substation which will also be energized at 13.8 kV. That
circuit would have to be extended an additional distance as far east as the voltage regulators at an added cost of
approximately $22,500.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission accept the estimated costs described above and direct staff to forward them
to the Council to aicl the Council in making their determination under the City's Right of Way Management
Ordinance whether or not to order the facilities to be relocated underground to accommodate the side�valk.
Staff further recommends that if the developer desires to have the voltage regulators relocated to the east that
the developer would have to first agree to fund the extra cost impacts to do so.
REQUESTED ACTION
Staff rec�uests the Commission adopt the recommended actians.
II I Existing OH Electrical
8"x6' TEE, 6" GV,
COPfNECT TO EXISTING CONNEC7 TO
I � I 13�-6" C900 dc ��H 6 SAN MH 3 EXISTING W/M
i HYDRANT ASSEMBLY E 740.48 ��-Z�� HDPE �E(W) 732.93 60LF-30" HppE
� 0.257. IE(E) 732.93
f ae" DIA. A 0.25R
� CBMH 5 4`^'� IE(S) 733.03
I RM 744.23 40 fT CHi-OF-W�Y E�SEIAEnT
, SC f IE 741.53 �.. YER DOC. N0. 2149V tY RCP IOLF-30' RCP
' '-r--"-°"" ae' DiA. Relocate(3)existing 5 FT U7 ITY E EMENT ER O O.00R
l,,I � - . A" R OOC. N0. 2V4917 pp�. NO 2t1 / .
pole mounted XFMRs
�� '420LF-24" HDPE �H LI OF THE NW 4�;�' S F7 SL E EASE ENT R
� O 0,25SG to concrete pads � , .; FES 3
. •�.� - — — — Provided by GC — 4Q SE� ao zu9ii _ _ , -� iE �39.0
HF SE I ' %i c. N .
_ J �''-,, �--_� . _.-_-- ______ ; ; ;• ; wer Pole �Eliminate Power Pole � — — � —
- ___ '� iminat Po
, — � _ tl9'�9�94�0290.00 _.� _T�. - -__ - � --�_--- Reloc'-.t_�;.__�--" •_.� --- -'_- -- ------_-- -°' , - __ --_.-_--.�.
_ _ a e existing OH - -_ses:
—�: ' -- -
y.��= ,��:--Q� . . ,_-_ _ --, - - - -- - . _ Eo 1caltoGround �" - - -- _-- --------z----- ----
- ------_____ lectr
-=. � , _
._ .
---- -...._..,._-_ __ ... _... _.,.� r.f . ...,__� _ _ oaca
� r _
- -�. 1i -� _:_ - -�- - - � - - - - - - - > > � > - - -__ - _ - - - -- - .�is� _..
I 1
I � ,y, � ., i Bix6' TEE; 6' GV. : ,:, FES 1 `, 1 ' ��-60�F-15" RCP
15'-6" C900 � � � �n `� �
22 � � � ���_I I 1 I I\ I I IE 740.0�',, � O O.SOX
� 1` � -R�P RAP---ACCess raN �
.; -- - � ♦ ' �
, � . . , ,i , , , i � f i ;
6�', !�
i � .. CBA/H 4 I � _ -� SwnLE , ' �.
" RM J44.23 ( ( � OCS 1
===-- i i �
IE 74t;9.3 - � � RA1 745.0
''I
%�� � � 48� DIA. - 8� N'/u CBMH 7 ♦ CBMH 8� � IE�(NE) 739.367
•=�" � t C900 PVC
o • - RM 747.5 ___ -- 10" W/1,1 RM 745�0 �
z ' � � _ IE �40.25 C� P� IE 740.0 Ub IE(S) 742.5
r� I .:.Z�.� :.�.1 I I -�crwr ,o" . 60� DIA. . .. -.... 60' DIA.�i �