HomeMy WebLinkAbout13.B.2. Appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Determination for the Kwik Trip Inc.
/3. 8. :L ·
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 06-041
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II
RE: Appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Determination on a Sign
Variance for Kwik Trip, Inc., to be located at Crossings Boulevard and County
Road 18
DATE: April 4, 2006
INTRODUCTION
K wik Trip, Inc. has filed an appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals (BOAA) decision concerning
a variance to allow a freestanding sign at their proposed site at Crossings Boulevard and County Road 18.
They have provided a letter that expresses their position on why the variance should be approved.
Additionally, they have provided an elevation plan that shows a revised monument sign design (10 feet
tall, 64 square feet), where the submittal reviewed by the Board was for a 20 foot tall, 116 square foot
SIgn.
The Board of Adjustment and Appeals held a public hearing on a conditional use permit (CUP) and
variance request for Kwik Trip at its March 9, 2006 meeting. By a 7-0 vote, the Board denied the
Variance request. The Board determined that the request did not meet all of the criteria required for
granting the variance, and that there were several options available for the applicant to pursue that would
adequately advertise their business and would be consistent with the City Code regulations. At that
meeting, the applicant stated that they could provide the necessary signage for this site either on the
building or on the gas pump island canopy.
A copy of the March 9, 2006 CUP and variance staff report to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals,
which includes in the draft resolution language denying the variance request, is attached for the Council's
reference.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Uphold the determination of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and direct staff to prepare a
resolution for the Council's consent agenda that is consistent with that decision.
2. Uphold the appeal of the applicant, thereby granting the requested variance, and direct staff to
prepare a resolution for the Council's consent agenda that is consistent with that decision.
3. Table the appeal for additional information.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion directing staff to prepare a resolution for action at the next meeting, and move its
adoption.
g: \cc \2006\04-04 \appeal kwiktripsignvariance. doc
KW.lK Kwik Trip, Inc. - RE:dl Estate
TRIP 4815 James Ave. South' Minneapolis, MN 55419
Phone: (612) 916-5864. E-mail: svantassel@kwiktrip.com
TN
INCORPORATED "To serve our customers and community more effectively than anyone else by treating our
customers, co-workers and suppliers as we, personally, would like to be treated."
March 20, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Mayor and City Council,
Virtually all of the convenience station/stores that sell petroleum products in Shakopee are
located in the B-1, Highway Business, zoning district. Kwik Trip's proposed location is located in
a similar setting as the other convenience station/stores in the City as it is located on an arterial
street (County Road 18). It is also located adjacent to a major commercial development that is
the fifteenth largest in the Twin Cities metropolitan area measured by retail building square
footage. However, this location is within the PRO Planned Residential District. The PRO district
does not allow freestanding signs. The City of Shakopee no longer allows the creation of PRO
zoning after May 18, 2004. Instead of asking for a rezoning to B-1, which was previously
contemplated by the owner of the land and the City. Kwik Trip asked for a variance to allow a
freestanding sign. The requested sign measured 115 square feet and was twenty (20) feet in
height which met the B-1 regulations. The variance was denied by the Board of Adjustments and
Appeals.
In the spirit of cooperation, Kwik Trip has made a number of changes to it's original proposal to
address the concerns of the residential neighbors, staff and the Board of Adjustments and
Appeals. Kwik Trip agreed to the following: flip the location of the c/store building and gasoline
islands, eliminate one driveway, add additional landscaping/screening; reduce the hours of the
car wash; reduce the hours of deliveries; limit the use of the loudspeakers at the canopy; agree to
pay for a break in the existing median in Crossings Blvd. to make the first intersection on
Crossings Blvd. full access and has further agreed, with the owner of the property, to close this
break in the event the City determines this full access does function as needed.
Kwik Trip is amending its request for the size of the sign. Kwik Trip is now proposing a sign that
is sixty-four (64) square feet (8 feet x 8 feet) that is set into a brick base giving the sign a total
height often (10) feet. An illustration of the sign is attached,
Kwik Trip feels the variance to allow a freestanding sign is justified due to the unique zoning of
this property relative to similar settings in the community. We feel we are keeping within the spirit
of the ordinance. We also feel that the new sign proposal with reduces the size to sixty-four (64)
square feet and ten (10) feet in height demonstrates our willingness to arrive at a fair conclusion
for all parties.
~SUbmllted.
. Samuel . V~ssel. elM
Real Estate Manager
Shakopee, Minnesota
-Brick to match store brick color
· 10'" LED price displays
· 88 Copy on Reader board
~ 8' --1
Co
b
en ,....
BANANAS21C/lb
~ 82.11
-
~L~~OSSlL~IGNCO.0' *KT Shapkopee SCALE: 3/8"=1'..0"
*COLORSONSKETCH ARE ONLY A REPRESENTATION, . This ill1WoTk is oopyrig1lted ll1ld may notbt otherwise Ilsed without permission.
ACTUAL COLOR OFf/NISHEDPRODua MAY DIFFER It is the propmy of La ~ Sigfl Co., inc., and must be telurruid to. tltem.
Shakopee - Location Maps Page 1 of 1
-
II
RIB
r-- RR
~ r I
-.,,-~~ -
~ N _ Subject Property
W.E
SHAKOPEE ......Shakopee Boundary
OoMMUNnYpmoB&NCE1M7 S c=:J Zoning Boundary
EJ Parcel Boundary
Appeal to City Council of Board
of Adjustment and Appeal Denial
of Variance for Free Standing
Signage
htt :// is.1o. 's.org/shakopee/locationmap/map.asp?title=Appea1+to+City+Counci1+of+B... 03/20/2006
'..
CITY OF SHAKO PEE dP1
Memorandum
CASE NO.: 06-021
TO: Board of Adjustment and Appeals
FROM: Mark Noble, Planner IT
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24 Hour Gas Station/Convenience Store
with a Car Wash; Variance for Freestanding Sign
MEETING DATE: March 9, 2006
REVIEW.PERIOD: January 27,2006 to May 26,2006
Site Information
Applicant: Kwik Trip, Inc.
Property Owner: Shakopee Crossings, LP
Location: Outlot B, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition (West of CSAH 18 and North of
Crossings Blvd.)
Current Zoning: Planned Residential District(pRD) Zone
Adjacent Zoning: North:. Highway Business (B-1) ZonelPlanned Unit Development
South: Planned Residential District (pRD) Zone
West: Planned Residential District (pRD) Zone
East: Community Commercial (CC) Zone
Compo Plan: Commercial
Acreage: 81,320 Square Feet (1.87 acres)
.MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary.
Attachments: Exhibit A: Location/Zoning Map
Exhibit B: Applicant Letter
Exhibit C: Site PlanslElevations
Exhibit D: . City Engineering Memorandum
Exhibit E: Natural Resource Specialist Memorandum
Exhibit F: Shakopee Public Utilities Memorandum
Exhibit G: Dale Everson E-mail
INTRODUCTION
Kwik Trip, Inc. has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow a 24 hour Gas
Station/ Convenience Store with a Car Wash. Additionally, they have requested a Variance to
allow a Freestanding Sign. The subj ect site is located at the northwest comer of CSAH 18 and
Crossings Boulevard (Exhibit A).
1
. .
Within the Planned Residential District, neighborhood commercial developments are listed as a
conditional use. The purpose ofthe Neighborhood Commercial Zone is to provide areas for the
development oflow-intensity, service-oriented uses for servicing the immediate residential areas
(described as those areas that are generally within five (5) minutes walking distance ofa
neighborhood commercial area).
Kwik Trip is proposing the construction of a gas station/convenience store, with a detached car
wash located north of the convenience store (Exhibits B & C). The convenience store/gas station
is proposed to be a 24 hour operation. Additionally, they have asked for a canopy that would have
an overall height of 28 feet, instead of the maximum height of 18 feet provided under the City
Code.
The Board may be aware that this specific use was the subject of much discussion as the Plaruting
Commission and Council considered the preliminary plat of Southbridge Fields. A copy of the
Council report on that preliminary plat (which includes copies of some of the neighborhood
correspondence) is attached for the Board's information.
Specific design issues that should be addressed by the Board in reaching its decision on the
requested CUP and Variance include:
. The desirability of allowing an overheight canopy. Staff is recommending that this
variance not be granted.
.. Whether the location of the canopy. and site lighting will create any adverse. impacts on .
the nearby residential propertie~.
. Whether the proposed building materials and design are consistent with the City's design
standards (see City Code Section 11.60, Performance Standards, a copy of which is
attached).
. Modifications that may be required to the site and/or adjacent roadways to accommodate
truck turning movements.
. Whether the proposed site plan provides for adequate screening.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:
City Code Sect. 11.87, Subd. 2. F., S. provides the following standards for the requested uses:
Gas Stations:
1. shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone.
.2. shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed and inoperable on the premises, except in
appropriately designed and screened storage areas.
3. shall not conduct automotive repair, assembly, disassembly, and maintenance of vehicles,
except minor maintenance such as tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement.
4. shall not have a public address system which is .audible from any residential property.
5. shall provide stacking for gas pumps for at least one (1) car beyond the pump island in each
direction in which access can be gained to the pump. The required stacking shall not
interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall
not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required
parking setback.
6. shall not sell, store, or display any used vehicles.
2
,
7. may have a canopy which projects up to ten feet into the required front or rear yard setback.
The setback shall be maintained clear of all obstruction up. to a height of thirteen feet. The
canopy shall have a maximum vertical thickness of three feet. The canopy shall have a
maximum height of 18 feet. .
Car Washes:
1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan.
2. shall be screened from view from residential zones.
3. shall utilize a water conservation or recovery system.
4. shall provide stacking for at least three (3) vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall
not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and
shall not be located iri any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the
required parking setback.
Planning staff have noted that several trees/plantings are shown over utility service lines along the
south and west property lines. Although staff suggests that those plantings that are located in
conflict with the utility service lines be moved, it is imperative that plantings be provided in these
areas for screening purposes. Additionally, the photometric plan shows some areas where the light
levels exceed one footcandle at the property line. The site lighting plan shall be modified to
ensure that installation of sight lighting be consistent with the City Code requirements. Regarding
the building design, it is noted that the store is 23'-6" tall, and is constructed of brick (as is the car
wash building). As previously noted, the buildings design and materials submitted do not appear
to comply with the minimum standards outlined in Section 11.60, Performance Standards of the
City Code. The incorporation of acc~nt materials, additional windows on Ill:ultiple sides of the
building, additional contrasting yet complimentary colors, and variation to the wall depths, shapes,
roof lines, and/or other design features may bring the building(s) in compliance with the minimum
requirements. Other design and performance standard conditions will be reviewed in more detail
at time of building permit, provided this request is approved.
Several city and outside agencies have also provided comments on this request, as follows:
e Engineering staff proposed several conditions, which have been included in the draft
conditions of approval (Exhibit D). Those conditions include requests to modify the
existing infrastructure to acconunodate conditions of approval of the preliminary and final
plat of Southbridge fields, provide a traffic study and information/drawings showing truck
turning movements, and modification of the right-in/right-out access to Crossings
Boulevard.
. The Fire Inspector has commented that if approved, the project shall comply with all
applicable building and fire code requirements.
. The City Natural Resource Specialist provided a memorandum (Exhibit E) that noted
conditions of approyal, including detailing recommendecl tree speci~s t() be pl~ted on this
. .__.___----pmperty.-------------.----------------- .. ..----:- -.- ....--~-_........-. .......--.-..... ............-..-.-.
. Shakopee Public Utilities has provided a memorandum (Exhibit F) with conditions of
approval, including a condition that water service plans shall be revised and shall comply
with their requirements.
. The City Clerk conunented that city licenses would be required for sale of beer and
tobacco.
3
For the Board's use, staff has prepared a draft resolution approving the CUP with conditions of
approval, including those provided by the review agencies and those conditions specifically noted
in the City Code, and denial of the requested variance.
The applicant scheduled a neighborhood meeting on March I, 2006, making themselves available
to address the residential neighbors concerns. One neighbor (Dale Everson) provided staff an e-
mail in which he expressed a number of concernS (Exhibit G). A number of the issues expressed
by Mr. Everson have been shared by several other residential property owners in Riverside Fields,
at the time of Preliminary and Final Plat review of Southbridge Fields. The Preliminary Plat for
that project has been approved by the City Council, with several new/revised conditions from
. .'. .
when the Planning Commission reviewed the application. Two conditions that will be carried
forward in this application by staffis that the configuration ofthe access points to Crossings
Boulevard shall be determined at the time of final plat approval of Southbridge Fields, and that the
applicant/property owner shall be responsible for all future improvements to Crossings Boulevard.
FINDINGS
The criteria required for the granting of conditional use permits (per City Code Section 11.85,
Subd. 1) are listed below.
Criteria #1 The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially
diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity;
Finding #1 The Bodrd finds that the use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor
substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity,
provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met.
Criteria #2 The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses .allowed
in the area;
Finding #2 The Board finds that the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the
normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses
allowed in the area, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met.
Criteria #3 Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have
been or will be provided;
Finding #3 The Board finds that adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary
facilities exist to serve the proposed use, provided the conditions noted in the
resolution are met.
Criteria #4 The use is consistent with the purposes of the zone in which the applicant
intends to locate the proposed use;
Finding #4 The Board finds that the use is consistent with the purposes of the Planned
Residential District, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met.
Criteria #5 The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
4
.,
Finding #5 The Boardfinds that theproposed use is consistent with the purposes of the
Comprehensive Plan, which guides the subject property for commercial use.
VARIANCE:
K wile Trip has requested a Variance to allow a freestanding sign, where the Planned Residential
District/Neighborhood Commercial guidelines do not allow this type of sign. The City Code permits
wall signs on the front and certain sides of the building, wall projecting signs, awnings, wall signs,
alld area identification signs in the PRD/Neighborhood Commercial Zone.
FINDINGS:
Section 11.89, Subd. 2, of the City Code contains provisions for the granting of variances only if all
of the following circumstances are found to exist. Staff has provided draft findings for purpose~ of
discussion by the Board. The Board may use or modify these draft findings as it sees fit, as well as
propose other findings.
Criterion I:
The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means
the following:
I.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions
allowed by the official controls;
Finding 1.A. The property can continue to be utilized as a commercial development with signage
that would adequately. identify. the site yet comply with the regulations as stated. in the City Code.
The applicalit could install wall signage that could adequately advertise the business/gas prices,
consistent with the City Code requirements.
I.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property;
Finding J.B. The plight of the applicant/landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the
property. The circumstances are based on their desire for additional signage beyond what is
allowed by City Code. .
l.e. The Circumstances were not created by the landowner;
Finding l.e. The circumstances were created by the applicant/landowner as a result of their desire
foradditionalsignag~
1.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
Finding J.D. The variance would alter the essential character of the locality.
I.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists .under the terms of the
ordinance.
Finding J.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations.
Criterion 2:
It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of this Chapter.
S
,
,.
Finding 2.
The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in
that it would allow additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. .
Criterion 3:
The request is not for a use variance.
Finding 3.
The request is not a use variance.
Criterion 4:
. Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance to
protett the adjacent properties. .
Finding 4.
(Dependent on the Board's action on the request.)
Criterion 5:
Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria:
Finding 5.
(Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone)
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit as
presented, and denying the variance request to allow a freestanding sign; and move its
adoption.
2. Approve Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, with
revised conditions, and denying the variance request to allow a freestanding sign, and move its
adoption.
3. Approve Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, with
revised conditions, and approve the variance request to allow a freestanding sign and direct
staff to prepare a resolution with findings as proposed by the Board, and move its adoption.
4. Deny the Conditional Use Permit and Variance, and direct staff to prepare a resolution with
findings as proposed by the Board.
5. The Board may continue the public hearing for additional information.
6. The Board may table the request for additional information.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends Alternative No.1, approval of Res. No. PC06-021, as presented.
ACTION REQUESTED
Offer a motion approving Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use
Permit as presented, and denying the variance request. to allow a freestanding sign, and move its
adoption. ~
Planner
g:\boaa-pc\2006\03-09\cupvarkwiktrip06021.doc
6
\
RESOLUTION NO. PC06-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, GRANTING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A GAS STATION IN THE PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD) ZONE; AND DENYING A V ARlANCE TO ALLOW A
FREESTANDING SIGN. .
WHEREAS, Kwik Trip, Inc., applicant, and Shakopee Crossings Limited Partnership, property
owner, have filed an application dated January 26, 2006 for a Conditional Use Pelmit to allow a gas
station under the provisions of Chapter 11 (Zoning) of the Shakopee City Code; and
WHEREAS, this parcel is presently zoned Planned Residential District (PRD) Zone; and
WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as:
Outlot B, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, notice was provided and on March 9, 2006, the Board of Adjustment and
Appeals conducted a public hearing regarding this application, at which it heard from the Community
Development Director and invited members of the public to comment.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND
APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
That the Board hereby adopts the following findings offact;
Finding #1 The Boardfinds that the uSe will notbe injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially
diminishes and impair property values within the immediate vicinity, provided the
conditions noted in the resolution are met.
Finding #2 The Board finds that the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal
and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses allowed in
the area, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. .
Finding #3 The Boardfinds that adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary
facilities exist to serve the proposed use, provided the conditions noted in the resolution
are met.
7
)
Finding #4 The Boardfinds that the use is consistent with the purposes of the Planned Residential
District (PRD) Zone, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met.
Finding #5 The Boardfinds that the proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the
Comprehensive Plan, which guides the subject property for commercial use.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the application for Conditional Use Pelmit No. PC06-021 is
hereby GRANTED, subject to the following conditions:
1. Shall comply with design standards of the Planned Residential District (pRD) Zone/
Neighborhood Commercial Zone.
2. Shall comply with the applicable design and performance standards specified in the City Code.
3.. Approval ofthe CUP does not constitute any approval for signage on the site. Any applicable .
signage shall require an approved sign permit.
4. Shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone.
5. Shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed and inoperable on the premises, except in
appropriately designed and screened storage areas.
6. Shall not conduct automotive repair, assembly, disassembly, . and maintenance of vehicles,
except minor maintenance such as tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement.
7. Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property.
8. Shall provide stacking for gas pumps for at least one car beyond the pump island in each
direction in which access can be gained to the pump. The required stacking shall not interfere
with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located
in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback.
9. Shall not sell, store, or display any used vehicles. .
10. Mayhave a canopy which projects up to ten feet into the required front or rear yard setback.
The setback shall be maintained clear of all obstruction up to a height of thirteen. feet. The
canopy shall have a maximum vertical thickness of three feet. .The canopy shall have a
maximum height of 18 feet.
11. Shall be located adjacent to an arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan.
12. Shall be screened from view from residential zones.
13. Shall utilize a water conservation or recovery system.
14. Shall provide stacking for at least three (3) vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not
interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not
be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking
setback.
15. Prior to any work within the City of Shakopee's or Scott County's right-of-way, the applicant
shall obtain the appropriate permit(s).
16. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and/or building permit.
17. The approval of the CUPshall be subject to certain conditions imposed upon the Southbridge
Fields preliminary plat and final plat. Revisions shall be made as required.
18. The developer/property owner(s) adjacent to any modifications to the existing infrastructure
required as a result of conditions imposed upon the preliminary plat and final plat of.
.......... .. -.-.. .......----Seuthbriage-FielEls-shaU-SH-0SpGIlsible-fof-the-assGciated-cGsts...-------.----------.---------.........----......--.. .---.--.........- -------......
19. All modifications to the existing infra.structure required as a result of conditions imposed upon
the preliminary plat and final plat of Southbridge Fields shall be completed prior to building
peffi1it issuance.
20. The applicant shall provide a detailed traffic study analyzing the impacts this proposed use
will have on adjacent streets.
8
,
'.
21. The applicant shall provide drawings and information showing truck turning movements to
and from Crossings Boulevard.
22. The existing right-in/right-out intersection serving as the first access to the site (West of
County Road 18) shall be modified to a right-in only.
23. The building permit applicant shall be responsible for payment of all Trunk Storm Water
Charges and Trunk: Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges, as required by the most
current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule.
24. The storm sewer design for the site shall. be subj ect to City of Shakopee approval at the time of
the building permit review. The design shall adhere to the previously approved storm water
management plan for the area.
.25; The approval of the CUP does not constitute approval ofthe submitted drawings.
26. Access points to Crossings Boulevard s:hall be determined at the time of final plat ~p'proval of
Southbridge Fields.
27. The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for all future improvements to Crossings
Boulevard.
28. The project shall comply with all applicable building and fire code requirements.
29. Water service plans shall be coordinated with SouthbridgeFields plans, and shall comply with
Shakopee Public Utilities requirements.
30. City licenses would be required for sale of beer and tobacco products.
31. The applicant shall provide 6 inches of topsoil below areas to be sodded. The soil composition
should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements.
32. The applicant shall provide rain sensors for any irrigation systems.
33. Erosion control silt fence shall be installed prior to any grading/construction on site. The
fence shall be removed following establishment of permanent vegetation.
34. The applicant shall plant a diversity of tree species to reduce the impacts of potential tree
diseases or epidemics that may occur in the future. Recommended tree species to utilize in
this area are:
a. Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)
b. Northern Catalpa (Catalpa speciosa)
c. Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa)
d. Red Oak (Quercus rubra).
35. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion cop.trol and
stormwater management during construction.
36. Install plantings consistent with City Code requirements. Plantings located over utility
services and/or easements shall be relocated to avoid conflict with those areas.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
That the application for Variance is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings with respect to
City Code Sec. 11.89, Subd. 2, "Criteria for Granting Variances."
Criterion
The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the
following:
9
,
,
I.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions
allowed by the official controls:
Finding 1.A. The property can continue to be utilized as a commercial development with signage that
would adequately identify the site yet comply with the regulations. as stated in the City Code. The
applicant could install wall signage that could adequately advertise the business/gas prices, consistent
with the City Code requirements.
I.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property;
Finding 1.B. The plight of the applicant/landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property.
The circumstances are based on their desire for additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code.
LC. The circumstances were not created by the landowner;
Finding 1. C. The circumstances were created by the applicant/landowner as a result of their desire
for additional signage.
I.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
Filtding J.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
I.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the
ordinance.
Finding 1.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations.
Criterion 2
It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of this Chapter.
Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11
(Zoning) in that it would allow additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code.
Criterion 3
The request is not for a use variance.
Finding 3 The request is not a use variance.
Criterion 4
Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance to
protect the adjacent properties.
Finding 4 (Dependent on the Board's action on the request.)
Criterion 5
Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: ......
Finding 5 (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone)
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals ofthe City of Shakopee, Minnesota, this 9th
day of March, 2006.
Chair of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals
ATTEST:
Community Development Director
10
SHAKOPEE KWIK TRIP
{ 10'-0" {
.~
'.,;6 ., I~I ~I D:i
~ '. I:':' ~-sg
,RIP E85:-r I
, 1~1~1.!'1I~1 .
\a" ~ 1"10-11:': ,"",",-,---~'lIn
f.!l .~, .
~ ~ . !"-u;h,,-.&.7l1:r.l."'''~:>'\lJI,l
S TOR ES I I " 1.....~8W.J.....,'._'J,"~,j
.=n...~"l:=-.....=-r- -
I . I
o ~ ~ ...."iI""JJ..-....~ -I
I" F.
-'i.-">~I"'"
. . l."'"r~~~;-d~...~
17~I,ilfD)nml,il~fU71 ~
~~LnJ L'lL'l ~c:JLnJ F='r.'~=-=.
.':..~r:',I:'1WJ~~oI'..J:.:J.1
. tl n
i---'::;:r.... .
i.-J.d. ., -~
~~~"l:.'=~~;f"W'~
L~l. ~..,.j:...J
r-, I
:':l'fI. li'ftlffi..-'1l""""";
ELECTRONIC ~l:i~~23 J
.. _,::1_... '!,......! 0
MESSAGE.. ,,' N
CENTER
~@@[Q)~rnffi\Yl~(g~
. KT fACES ARE 4'-4" X 5'-9- ... 24.9 SQ. FT. . i~
PRICE FACES ARE 5'-6. X 5'-9" .. :50.7 SQ. FT . CI:='f"""-
FOOD SERVICE FACES ARE 1 0' X 2'-0'" 20 0 SO. F"T i . """'i""'"~"""J :
MAIN CABINET TOTAL 75.6 SQ. FT. -~.....l.'-r.--, !
CAR WASH FACES 2' X 8' .. 18.0 SO. 1'1:, ~:.;:r::;r~ i
.......J..-y-=r..
MESSAGE CENTER SCREEN. - L':ll...J..,..,~,....J . . ]'
:5'-2" X 7'-8- U . ,
MESSAGE CENttR TOTAL .. 24.28 SO FT, ~ I
TOTAL SQ fT. = 115.88 PER ~ I
SIDE .k- - =' .
· THE MESSAGE CENTER IS ONLY 3'-2. X 7'-8-. THE. I! I
REMAINDER OF THE MEA SHOWN IS METAL CLADDING. t..r- -~1 ,
-------.--__ L-1:::::cL .
I
i
- - .-- 1
I
,
1
#11.. PYLON SIGN '
SCALE: 3/Sn= l'