Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13.B.1. Appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Determination for Kwik Trip, Inc. /3. 8. I. CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 06-040 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II RE: Appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals Determination on a Conditional Use Permit for Kwik Trip, Inc., proposed at Crossings Boulevard and County Road 18 DATE: Apri14,2006 INTRODUCTION Lisa Masica, resident of the Riverside Fields subdivision, has filed an appeal of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals (BOAA) decision concerning a conditional use permit (CUP) for Kwik Trip at their proposed site at Crossings Boulevard and County Road 18. Ms. Masica has included a letter with her appeal application that addresses her rationale as to why this application should be denied. Additionally, staff has received an e-mail from Glen Armes, also a resident of Riverside Fields, who expresses similar concerns regarding the proposed Kwik Trip 24 hour gas station and car wash. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals held a public hearing on a conditional use permit (CUP) and variance request for K wik Trip at its March 9, 2006 meeting, and by a 6-1 vote, the Board approved the CUP request, with revised conditions. The Board determined that the request did meet all of the criteria required for granting the CUP, subject to the revised conditions. It should be noted that Kwik Trip had submitted revised plans to staff just prior to the Board review of this request, having made a number of changes that addressed staff and neighbor concerns. Those revised plans are attached to this report. Additionally, staff has attached, besides the letters from neighbors as part of the Board packet, a copy of a traffic review from the applicant's engineer, and some materials from a resident concerning gas station health related issues. A copy of the March 9,2006 CUP and variance staff report to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, which includes in the draft resolution language approving the CUP request, is attached for the Council's reference. AL TERNA TIVES 1. Uphold the determination of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and direct staff to prepare a resolution for the Council's consent agenda that is consistent with that decision. 2. Uphold the appeal of the applicant, thereby denying the requested CUP, and direct staff to prepare a resolution for the Council's consent agenda that is consistent with that decision. 3. Table the appeal for additional information. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion directing staff to prepare a resolution for action at the next meeting, and move its adoption. ~ k- Mark Nob . Planner II g: \cc \2006\04-04 \appeal kwiktripCUP. doc March 10, 2006 Lisa Masica 1834 Penstemon Lane Shakopee, MN 55379 952-403-1643 RE: Appeal to the City Council for CUP approved by the Planning Commission/80M Mayor and Members of the Council, We urge you to take a closer look at some unresolv~d issues that we believe did not meet the specified criteria for the CUP approved by the Planning Commission/80M. We believe that the following criteria were not met... Criteria #1: "The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within.the immediate vicinity;" Criteria #3: "Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided;" Criteria #4: "The use is consistent with the purposes of the zone in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use;" In addition, we urge you to make further. amendments to the CUP and/or table this issue until further review and study is completed. We believe that it is to the benefit of the neighborhood, the city and ultimately the developer of these properties that we make the right decisions the first time. We would like to bring to your attention that because this is zoned a Planned Residential District the development falls under the Neighborhood Commercial ordinance. This ordinance reads as the following... . Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intensity, service-oriented uses for surrounding the immediate residential areas. Immediate residential areas are understood to be those that are generally within five (5) minutes walking distance of a neighborhood commercial area. (Ord. 563, November 25,1999) We believe that the introduction of Kwik Trip is neither of low intensity nor will be used mainly by immediate residential areas. Further, we strongly feel that this ordinance was written specifically to protect residents and neighborhoods exactly like the one we live in. There are five specific uses that are permitted by neighborhood commercial- retail; administrative, executive, and professional offices; medical or dental clinics; services; and public buildings. We would welcome these uses as they follow the guidelines of low intensity and their service hours are compatible with the neighborhood. Although a gas station is one of the uses permitted with conditions, we believe that because of the proximity to the neighborhood that these conditions need to be strict and severely limit the impact this type of establishment will have on the surrounding residents. We believe that it is the duty of the Council to protect residents against businesses that would negatively impact the enjoyment and property values of our neighborhood and thereby putting the citizens well-being before the profit of companies like Kwik Trip. Traffic Design The current design of the road will not allow for the types of vehicles such as semi-truck trailers and gas tankers to move freely. This is an issue that we have all discussed before. We as neighbors ask that you table the approval of this CUP until further study can be done and we have a solution. There is currently no way for a truck to exit out of the commercial d,evelopment without driving through our neighborhood. This is a problem that needs to be solved before any permits are approved as every establishment in this development will have some sort of delivery truck that will not be able to exit without severely impacting a residential neighborhood. Number of Pumps The proposed plan asks for ten pumps with a total of twenty fueling stations. A gas station of this magnitude is bound to make a significant impact on traffic and is not low intensity. The closest gas station in a zoning of B-1 has only six pumps and twelve fueling stations; significantly fewer than the Kwik Trip. is proposing. We have yet to find another gas station in the metro area that has 10 pumps other than the Kwik Trip (on Co: Rd. 83 and Co. Rd. 42) and the Sam's Club gas station. This is not the location to encourage more traffic. If anything, in keeping with the idea of neighborhood commercial, this station should have, at a minimum, the same amount if not fewer than other gas stations . in the metro area. We urge you to significantly reduce the number of fuel pump stations, preferably down to six. 'Hours of Operation Currently Kwik Trip is requesting 24 hours of operation. Again, this does not follow the intent of neighborhood commercial. We do not believe that it is in the best interest for the neighborhood to encourage traffic and people throughout the entire night. We believe it will negatively impact the resident's safety. peace , of mind and enjoyment of their home and neighborhood. When we asked Mr. Tygen, the CFO of Kwik Trip, the need for a twenty for hour station he replied with a chuckle. "We don't want our customers developing a bad habit." We do not take this comment lightly and it is clear that he is more concerned about the profitability of his station than the enjoyment and safety of the residents. We believe that is important enough to close the c.ar wash at 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. because of the impact the noise might have on the neighbors, but somehow we have set aside how the introduction of people at those same hours will impact th'e neighborhood. We are also concerned with the precedent a 24 hour operation sets up for other establishments in this development. Potentially if every establishment, or even half, asked for the same condition we could have an even bigger problem. We believe that any business in this area should close no later than eleven o'clock at night and open no earlier than five in the morning. This 'commercial development is as much a part of the neighborhood as any of the residential homes and we believe its proximity makes it unique to any other development we have seen in Shakopee. As residents we believe it is important to look - at the description of Neighborhood Commercial and to hold all establishments to the required standards such as low intensity and servicing immediate residential areas. The purpose of a conditional use permit is so that the establishments that are placed in a particular area can be limited with certain conditions so that each may exist in harmony with one another. I believe that with the exceptional service Kwik Trip claims to have and given the location it will flourish even with only six pumps and operating under our requested hours. As the Council, Kwik Trip will make requests for various conditions; we, the neighbors and citizens of Shakopee, have made ours. We hope that you fall on the side of the people whom reside in this community. 'We elect you as representatives to look out for our best interests and we believe we have pointed out what is best for our neighborhood. R~Q;3~ds, ~ .f'"'/- .,>04~.~,#'r ..1" I..:lsa Masl a Mark Noble - From: Michael Leek Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:29 PM To: Mark Noble Subject: FW: Kwik Trip Gas Station built in Riverside fields Backyard FYI. From: Glen and Lynele Armes [mailto:lgarmes@armesnet.com] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 6:39 AM To: John Schmitt; Steve Clay; terryjoos@hotmail.com; Steve Menden; mlehman@mn.rr.com; Michael Leek; Kris Wilson; Ed Schwaesdall; Mark Themig; Bruce Loney; Dan Hughes; Mark McNeill Subject: Kwik Trip Gas Station built in Riverside fields Backyard Greetings, I am a resident of RiverSide Fields and have been made aware that a gas station is going to be our new neighbor. This worries me, in that this is not how we want to grow Shakopee. Building gas stations connected to residential areas is bad for property value, not to mention the health concerns for immediate neighbors. Traffic, crime and other issues related to gas stations are great concern for my family and I. I really hope our elected officials and representatives will not let the gas station be built at the targeted location. There is plenty of commercial real estate in this area to build a gas station. The appeal is set for April 4th and I hope that you will assist and getting the gas station denied. Thank you, Glen Armes 651-303-9705 03/21/2006 Riverside Fields Community Rajeev K Rai Shalini RailArnav Rai AppeallPetition 8425 Blazing Star Circle Shakopee, MN 55379 March 31, 2006 Mayor & Members of Council, City of Shakopee, MN Dear Mayor & Members of the Council: As a concerned residents Riverside Fields community we approach you with great confidence in our city planning systems to balance the economics of development and safety of residents. A gas station and a fast food restaurant is not the type establishments found within 75-200 feet of single family homes and adjacent to a community swimmina pool which you have approved in the past. as a part of the community. After reading the PRD zoning & Neighborhood Commercial zoning code, it is not the spirit & intent of these zones to have high traffic commercial establishments and 24 hours usage. In addition we were very disappointed with how the.board of planning commission casually debate & discuss these issues. We were not looking for positive outcome but a healthy discussion We understand that these lots are zoned as PRD and with CUP's the Gas station is a potential usage as per the zoning. Please consider the fallowing aspects while making your decision: a. Access to these establishments should be considered with careful considerations of vehicle movements of all sizes and shapes and the adiacency to the pool. Attached is our visualization of what this looks like using the Scott county GIS Maps. a. At this timewe would like to bring to your attention that in the last meeting of the City Council on Feb 21st, Mayor and the council members were very concemed about the types Of establishments planned and the access issues. The preliminary plat was approved with conditions that developer/tenant will do the updates to access,as needed in the future. b. We would like the Traffic study & finalization of access issues prior to any usage being approved even preliminarily. The have been multiple proposals for access but no decision & funding by city to make a decision. b. The intersection of Crossing Blvd & Penstemon lane as per the current design will promote movement of delivery vehicles and consumers to go through the entire residential neighborhood, due to the narrow turning lane. c. We would like you to consider the following conditions for these establishments based on the proximity to the residential area & aesthetics of the area; a. The proposed 24 hours Usage is not acceptable with such proximity to the residential neighborhood and is not the intent of neiahborhooCl commercial zone. b. Strict Restricted times for large vehicles access either early in the morning or after 8.00 p.m. c. Access issues to prevent movement of consumer only/delivery vehicles through the neighborhood (Penstemon lane). d. No big Gas Station Signage and very subtle signage on the building. The signage should be ONLY 1 for the entire set of commercial establishments towards the proposed Ctv Rd 21 e. The proposed burming and buffering is not adequate to prevent i. Noise pollution to the neighbors ii. Light Pollution & Headlight wash - No mega Neon signage except and heights exceeding the neighboring houses. . Page 2 March 31, 2006 d. The demographics of this neighborhood is relatively young people with small children. The proposed establishments definitely compromise the safety of our kids in & around the swimming pool and around neighborhood due to the nature of traffic & all outflow traffic coming out from the commercial establishments next to the pool including Delivery Trucks. We would welcome the usage of small office bldgs, Child Care Center, Dr's Office or Banks, Restaurants like Panera or a Bagel company which our open having hours from 7.00 -10.00 p.m or so. e. We as residents strongly feel that the Builders of our communities Rvland & Centex did not provide adeauate disclosure about proposed concepts plans/usage of this land. In addition they were in the know of proposed concept plans for last 2 years and still chose to risk the safety of residents by putting a swimming pool amenity next to it for. purelv marketina purposes and increase the valuation of their homes. f. As planning board members I urge to call on Ryland & Centex as well to state their position on this. Also for the future I propose that this type of development should be approved all to-aether with Planned Usaae and better appreciation of impact to the residential neiahborhood which is approved. g. We have heard from the Mr. Soltou that he had proposals for a Child Care and a Pharmacy as well after he had received the request for the Gas Station. We believe that the owner of commerciallots/outlots adjacent to the Riverside Fields community should be able to make productive use of the land at the same time not disturb the harmony & safety of the neighborhood. At this time our view is that the proposed establishments are not the best uses for these lots. I will bring a CD with pictures of the area & neighborhood for you to gain better appreciation of the issues described above. We are looking for your careful considerations of the issues. Thanking you, Regards, (Rajeev K. Rai) . Page 3 March 31 , 2006 8425 BLAZING STAR CIRCLE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-736-8260 (H) 612-327-3683 (C) (Vijay Ramanathan) 8421 BLAZING STAR CIRCLE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-402-0695 (H) (Sridhar Akula) 8433 BLAZING STAR CIRCLE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-930-1010 (H) Cc: Mayor & Members of the City Council . CITY OF SHAKOPEE -:ti Memorandum CASE NO.: 06-021 TO: Board of Adjustment and Appeals FROM: Mark Noble, Planner II SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24 Hour Gas Station/Convenience Store . with a Car Wash; Variance for Freestanding Sign MEETING DATE: March 9, 2006 REVIEWPERIOD: January 27, 2006 to May 26, 2006 Site Information Applicant: Kwik Trip, mc. Property Owner: Shakopee Crossings, LP Location: Outlot B, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition (West of CSAH 18 and North of Crossings Blvd.) Current Zoning: Planned Residential District (pRD) Zone Adjacent Zoning: North: Highway Business (B-l)ZonelPianned Unit Development South: Planned Residential District (pRD) Zone West: Planned Residential District (PRD) Zone East: Community Commercial (CC) Zone Compo Plan: Commercial Acreage: .81,320 Square Feet (1.87 acres) .MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary. Attachments: Exhibit A: Location/Zoning Map Exhibit B: Applicant Letter Exhibit C: Site Plans/Elevations Exhibit D: City Engineering Memorandum Exhibit E: Natural Resource Specialist Memorandum Exhibit F: Shakopee Public Utilities Memorandum Exhibit G: Dale Everson E-mail INTRODUCTION Kwik Trip, Inc. has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow a 24 hour Gas Station! Convenience Store with a Car Wash. Additionally, they have requested a Variance to . allow a Freestanding Sign. The subject site is located at the northwest comer of CSAH 18 and Crossings Boulevard (Exhibit A). 1 ? Within the Platmed Residential District, neighborhood commercial developments are listed as a conditional use. The purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial Zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intensity, service-oriented uses for servicing the immediate residential areas (described as those areas that are generally within five (5) minutes walking distance of a neighborhood commercial area). Kwik Trip is proposing the construction of a gas station/convenience store, with a detached car wash located north of the convenience store (Exhibits B & C). The convenience store/gas station is proposed to be a 24 hour operation. Additionally, they have asked for a canopy that would have an overall height of 28 feet, instead of the maximum height of .18 feet provided under the City Code. The Board may be aware that this specific use was the subject of much discussion as the Planning Commission and Council considered the preliminary plat of Southbridge Fields. A copy of the Council report on that preliminary plat (which includes copies of some of the neighborhood correspondence) is attached for the Board's information. Specific design issues that should be addressed by the Board in reaching its decision on the requested CUP and Variance include: . The desirability of allowing an overheight canopy. Staff is recommending that this variance not be granted. . Whether the location of the canopy and site lighting will create any adverse impacts on . the nearby residential properties. . . Whether the proposed building materials and design are consistent with the City's design standards (see City Code Section 11.60, Performance Standards, a copy of which is attached). . Modifications that may be required to the site and/or adjacent roadways to accommodate truck turning movements. . Whether the proposed site plan provides for adequate screening. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: City Code Sect. 11.87, Subd. 2. F., S. provides the following standards for the requested uses: Gas Stations: 1. shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone. . . . 2. shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed and inoperable on the premises, except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. 3. shall not conduct automotive repair, assembly, disassembly, and maintenance of vehicles, except minor maintenance such as tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. 4. shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property. 5. shall provide stacking for gas pumps for at least one (1) car beyond the pump island in each direction in which access can be gained to the pump. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. 6. shall not seU, store, or display any used vehicles. 2 , I. 7. may have a canopy which proj ects up to ten feet into the required front or rear yard setback. The setback shall be maintained clear of all obstruction up to a height of thirteen feet. The canopy shall have a maximum vertical thickness of three feet. The canopy shall have a maximum height of 18 feet. . Car Washes: 1. shall be located adjacent to an arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan. 2. shall be screened from view from residential zones. 3. shall utilize a water conservation or recovery system. 4. shall provide stacking for at least three (3) vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located iri any public right-of-way, private access easement, .or within the required parking setback. Planning staff have noted that several trees/plantings are shown over utility service lines along the south and west property lines. Although staff suggests that those plantings that are located in conflict with the utility service lines be moved, it is imperative that plantings be provided in these areas for screening purposes. Additionally, the photometric plan shows some areas where the light levels exceed. one footcandle at the property line. The site lighting plan shall be modified to ensure that installation of sight lighting be consistent with the City Code requirements. Regarding the building design, it is noted that the store is 23' -6" tall, and is constructed of brick (as is the car wash building). As previously noted, the buildings design and materials submitted do not appear to comply with the minimum standards outlined in Section 11.60, Performance Standards of the City Code. The incorporation of accent materials, additional windows on ID:ultiple sides of the building, additional contrasting yet complimentary colors, and variation to the wall depths, shapes, roof lines, and/or other design features may bring the building(s) in compliance with the minimum requirements. Other design and performance standard conditions will be reviewed in more detail at time of building permit, provided this request is approved. Several city and outside agencies have also provided comments on this request, as follows: e Engineering staff proposed several conditions, which have been included in the draft .conditions of approval (Exhibit D). Those conditions include requests to modifY the existing infrastructure to accommodate conditions of approval of the preliminary and final plat of Southbridge fields, provide a traffic study and information/drawings showing truck turning movements, and modification of the right-in/right-out access to Crossings Boulevard. . The Fire Inspector has commented that if approved, the project shall comply with all applicable building and fire code requirements. . The City Natural Resource Specialist provided a memorandum (Exhibit E) that noted conditions of approval, including detailing recommended tree species to be planted on this property. . ShakopeePublic Utilities has provided a memorandum (Exhibit F) with conditions of approval, including a condition that water service plans shall be revised and shall comply with their requirements. . The City Clerk commented that city licenses would be required for sale of beer and tobacco. 3 " I For the Board's use, staff has prepared a draft resolution approving the CUP with conditions of approval, including those provided by the review agencies and those conditions specifically noted in the City Code, and denial of the requested variance. The applicant scheduled a neighborhood meeting on March 1,2006, making themselves available to address the residential neighbors concerns. One neighbor (Dale Everson) provided staff an e- mail in which he expressed a number of concerns (Exhibit G). A number of the issues expressed by Mr. Everson have been shared by several other residential property owners in Riverside Fields, at the time of Preliminary and Final Plat review of Southbridge Fields. The Preliminary Plat for that project has been approved by the City Council, with several new/revised conditions from . . when the Planning Commission reviewed the application. Two conditions that will be carried forward in this application by staff is that the configuration of the access points to Crossings Boulevard shall be determined at the time of final plat approval of South bridge Fields, and that the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for all future improvements to Crossings Boulevard. FINDINGS The criteria required for the granting of conditional use permits (per City Code Section 11.85, Subd. 1) are listed below. Criteria #1 The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity; Finding #1 The Bodrdfinds that the use will not be injurious to the use mid enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Criteria #2 The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses .allowed in the area; Finding #2 The Board finds that the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses allowed in the area, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Criteria #3 Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Finding #3 The Board finds that adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities exist to serve the proposed use, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Criteria #4 The use is consistent with the purposes of the zone in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use; Finding #4 The Boardfinds that the use is consistent with the purposes of the Planned Residential District, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Criteria #5 The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 4 , Finding #5 The Board finds that the proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, which guides the subject property for commercial use. VARIANCE: K wik Trip has requested a Variance to allow a freestanding sign, where the Planned Residential District/N eighborhood Commercial guidelines do not allow this type of sign. The City Code permits waIl signs on the front and certain sides of the building, wall projecting signs, awnings, wall signs, and area identification signs in the PRDlNeighborhood Commercial Zone. FINDINGS: Section 11.89, Subd. 2, of the City Code contains provisions for the granting of variances only if all of the following circumstances are found to exist. Staff has provided draft findings for purposes of discussion by the Board. The Board may use or modify these draft findings as it sees fit, as well as propose other findings. Criterion I: The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: I.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used .under conditions allowed by the official controls; Finding 1.A. The property can continue to be utilized as a commercial development with signage that would adequately identify the site yet comply with the regulations as stated. in the City Code. The applicant could install wall signage that could adequately advertise the business/gas prices, consistent with the City Code requirements. 1.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; Findiltg 1.B. The plight of the applicant/landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The circumstances are based on their desire for additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. I.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner; Finding l.e. The circumstances were created by the applicant/landowner as a result of their desire foradduwnalsignag~ I.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Finding 1.D. The variance would alter the essential character of the locality. 1.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property . exists under the terms of the ordinance. Finding 1.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations. Criterion 2: It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. S I ,- Finding 2. The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in that it would allow additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. . Criterion 3: The request is not for a use variance. Finding 3. The request is not a use variance. Criterion 4: Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance' to prote~t the adjacent properties. Finding 4. (Dependent on the Board's action on the request.) Criterion 5: Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: Finding 5. (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone) ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit as presented, and denying the variance request to allow a freestanding sign; and move its adoption. . 2. Approve Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, with revised conditions, and denying the variance request to allow a freestanding sign, and move its adoption. 3. Approve Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, with revised conditions, and approve the variance request to allow a freestanding sign and direct staff to prepare a resolution with findings as proposed by the Board, and move its adoption. 4. Deny the Conditional Use Permit and Variance, and direct staff to prepare a resolution with findings as proposed by the Board. 5. The Board may continue the public hearing for additional information. 6. The Board may table the request for additional information. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends Alternative No.1, approval of Res. No. PC06-021, as presented. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion approving Resolution No. PC06-021, a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit as presented, and denying the variance request to allow a freestanding sign, and move its adoption. ~~ Planner . g:\boaa-pc\2006\03-09\cupvarkwiktrip06021.doc 6 RESOLUTION NO. PC06-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A GAS STATION IN THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD) ZONE; AND DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A FREESTANDING SIGN. WHEREAS, Kwik Trip, Inc., applicant, and Shakopee Crossings Limited Partnership, property owner, have filed an application dated January 26, 2006 for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a gas station under the provisions of Chapter 11 (Zoning) of the Shakopee City Code; and WHEREAS, this parcel is presently zoned Planned Residential District (PRD) Zone; and WHEREAS, the property upon which the request is being made is legally described as: Outlot B, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, notice was provided and on March 9, 2006, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals conducted a public hearing regarding this application, at which it heard from the Community Development Director and invited members of the public to comment. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: That the Board hereby adopts the following findings of fact; Finding #1 The Board finds that the use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminishes and impair property values within the immediate vicinity, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Finding #2 The Boardfinds that the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses allowed in the area, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Finding #3 The Board finds that adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities exist to serve the proposed use, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. 7 Finding #4 The Boardfinds that the use is consistent with the purposes of the Planned Residential District (PRD) Zone, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Finding #5 The Boardfinds that the proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, which guides the subject property for commercial use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the application for Conditional Use Permit No. PC06-021 is hereby GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed consistent with the revised site/landscape plan (dated 3/2/06) and revised elevation drawings (dated 3/7/06), except as specifically noted in the following conditions. 2. Shall comply with design standards of the Planned Residential District (PRD) Zone/ Neighborhood Commercial Zone. 3. Shall comply with the applicable design and performance standards specified in the City Code. 4. Approval of the CUP does not constitute any approval for signage on the site. Any applicable signage shall require an approved sign permit. 5. Shall be screened from any adjacent residential zone. 6. Shall not store any vehicles which are unlicensed and inoperable on the premises, except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. 7. Shall not conduct automotive repair, assembly, disassembly, and maintenance of vehicles, except minor maintenance such as tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. 8. Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property. 9. Shall provide stacking for gas pumps for at least one car beyond the pump island in each direction in which access can be gained to the pump. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. 10. Shall not sell, store, or display any used vehicles. 11. May have a canopy which projects up to ten feet into the required front or rear yard setback. The setback shall be maintained clear of all obstruction up to a height of thirteen feet. The canopy shall have a maximum vertical thickness of three feet. The canopy shall have a maximum height of 18 feet. 12. Shall be located adjacent to an arterial street as identified in the comprehensive plan. 13. Shall be screened from view from residential zones. 14. Shall utilize a water conservation or recovery system. 15. Shall provide stacking for at least three (3) vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking setback. 16. Prior to any work within the City of Shakopee' s or Scott County's right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain the appropriate permit(s). 17. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and/or building permit. 18. The approval of the CUP shall be subject to certain conditions imposed upon the Southbridge Fields preliminary plat and final plat. Revisions shall be made as required. 19. The developer/property owner(s) adjacent to any modifications to the existing infrastructure required as a result of conditions imposed upon the preliminary plat and final plat of Southbridge Fields.shall be responsible for the associated costs. 20. All modifications to the existing infrastructure required as a result of conditions imposed upon the preliminary plat and final plat of Southbridge Fields shall be completed prior to building permit issuance. 8 21. The applicant shall provide a detailed traffic study analyzing the impacts this proposed use will have on adjacent streets. 22. The applicant shall provide drawings and information showing truck turning movements to and from Crossings Boulevard. 23. The existing right-in/right-outintersection at Crossings Boulevard and the first access to the Southbridge Fields commercial development shall be modified to a right-in only. 24. The building permit applicant shall be responsible for payment of all Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 25. The storm sewer design for the site shall be subject to City of Shako pee approval at the time of the building permit review. The design shall adhere to the previously approved storm water management plan for the area. 26. The approval of the CUP does not constitute approval of the submitted drawings. 27. Access points to Crossings Boulevard shall be determined at the time of final plat approval of Southbridge Fields. 28. The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for all future improvements to Crossings Boulevard. 29. The project shall comply with all applicable building and fire code requirements. 30. Water serVice plans shall be coordinated with Southbridge Fields plans, and shall comply with Shakopee Public Utilities requirements. 31. City licenses would be required for sale of beer and tobacco products. 32. The applicant shall provide 6 inches of topsoil below areas to be sodded. The soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements. 33. The applicant shall provide rain sensors for any irrigation systems. 34. Erosion control silt fence shall be installed prior to any grading/construction on site. The fence shall be removed following establishment of permanent vegetation. 35. The applicant shall plant a diversity of tree species to reduce the impacts of potential tree diseases or epidemics that may occur in the future. Recommended tree species to utilize in this area are: a. Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) b. Northern Catalpa (Catalpa speciosa) c. Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa) d. Red Oak (Quercus rubra) 36. The applicant shall implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and stormwater management during construction. 37. Install plantings consistent with City Code requirements. Plantings located over utility services aJid/or easements shall be relocated to avoid conflict with those areas. 38. The hours of operation for the car wash and deliveries shall be between 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. 39. The southernmost driveway access to the site shall be eliminated. 40. The median located at Crossings Boulevard and the first access to the Southbridge Fields commercial development shall be designed to include an at grade curb opening to provide for an accessible pedestrian and non-motorized traffic crossing. 41. The gas island canopy shall utilize brick columns in its construction. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 9 That the application for Variance is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings with respect to City Code Sec. 11.89, Subd. 2, "Criteria for Granting Variances." Criterion I The strict enforcement of the ordinance provisions would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship means the following: 1.A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls: Finding I.A. The property can continue to be utilized as a commercial development with signage that would adequately identifY the site yet comply with the regulations as stated in the City Code. The applicant could install wall signage that could adequately advertise the business/gas prices, consistent with the City Code requirements. l.B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property; Finding 1.B. The plight of the applicant/landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The circumstances are based on their desire for additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. 1.C. The circumstances were not created by the landowner; Finding 1. C. The circumstances were created by the applicant/landowner as a result of their desire for additional signage. 1.D. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Finding J.D. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 1.E. The problems extend beyond economic considerations. Economic considerations do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Finding J.E. The problems do not extend beyond economic considerations. Criterion 2 It has been demonstrated that a variance as requested will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. Finding 2 The proposed variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of Chapter 11 (Zoning) in that it would allow additional signage beyond what is allowed by City Code. Criterion 3 The request is not for a use variance. Finding 3 The request is not a use variance. Criterion 4 Conditions to be imposed by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will insure compliance to protect the adjacent properties. Finding 4 (Dependent on the Board's action on the request.) Criterion 5 Variances in the flood plain overlay zone also shall meet the following criteria: ...... 10 Finding 5 (Not applicable since the property is not within the flood plain overlay zone) Adopted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, this 9th day of March, 2006. Chair of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals ATTEST: Community Development Director 11 E~,e.,'\' A I HI ~~ 11 I 11 ~ ... _ SubJect Property SHAKOPEE ....... Shakopee Boundary COMMUNttY l'RlDnSlNCI! 1ll$1 S C:J ZonIng BOUndcuy . . [:J parcer Boundary . Conditional Use 'Permit for 24. Hour Gas Station/Store and Variance for Free Standing Signage &H,~rr-,~ , KW.fK Kwik Trip, Inc. TR'P.. 1626 Oak Street. P.O. Box 2107 La Crosse, WI 54602.2107 Phone: (606) 781.8988 . Fax: (608) 781-8950 70 serve our customel'll end 'Ommunlty more effectively /han snyans else by treating our customers, co-workers and suppUel'll a. we, personally, would like to be /reeted. . DATE: January 24, 2005 TO: City of Shako pee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 Atten: Mark Noble - Community Development. FOR: Proposed Kwik Trip Store at Crossings Blvd and C.S.A.H. 18 Dear Mr. Noble, This letter is intended to accompany our application to the City of Shakopee for the requested Conditional Use Permit and variances. Conditional Use Permit K wik Trip Inc. is requesting a conditional use permit for placement of a 24 hour gas and convenience store with a single bay carwash for.the above referenced site in the Riverside Fields 3rd Addition. Currently, the parcel is zoned PRD which requires a C. U.P for all commercial uses. Included in this submission are all site and engineering plans,. . along with building elevations for review. We feel this siteis well suited for the prop~sed use and that our operation. would not have any adverse effects on current surrounding or proposed uses. With in the C.U.P. Kwik Trip, Inc. is requesting an increased overall height of the proposed gas/fuel canopy. As shown in the color elevations, we are proposing a peaked style roof with bricked columns. The total height of this canopy would be 28'. Kwik Trip believes this style of canopy is more architecturally pleasing and creates a cohesive unit visually with the proposed brick building. Request for V mance 1. Kwik Trip. Inc. is requesting a variance to allow a freestanding price sign on site. The overall proposed sign package. is included with this submittal. The presence of a freestanding signage amU)Ullcing current fuel prices is critical to the operation and competitiveness of our stores. As shown in the sign submittal package, the freestanding sign wou~d use brick style capped colunms to match both the building and proposed canopy architecture. K wik Trip .would be happy to provide any additional information or answer any questions or concerns the City of Shakopee may have with our submission. Please feel free to call me at 608-793-6461. Sincerely, ~ ~,. . . ~ ... /~ .; i :~7J~(lc/L .~trzi:&t,~:J Leah Nicklaus Berlin Store Engineering Kwik Trip TM Stores * Kwik StarTM Stores * Convenience Transportation TM, LLC * Tobacco Outlet Plus ™ Hearty PlatterTM * Hearty Platter Cafe™ * Hot SpOPM * Hot Spot™ Plus . . cvH'tb\'r b, , City of Shakopee . Memorandum TO: Mark Noble, Planner II FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for a Gas Station/Convenience Store with Car Wash; Variance for Free Standing Signage (Outlot H of Riverside Fields 3rd Addition) PID NO.: 27-379021-0 CASE NO.: 06021 DATE: February 23, 2006 The application indicates a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a gas station/convenience store with a car wash and for a Variance for :free standing signage in an area proposed to be zoned Planned Residential District (PRD) should the Southbridge Fields preliminary plat and final plat be approved and recorded. . Recommendation After reviewing the above referenced application, the engineering department recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The approval of the CUP shall be subject to certain conditions imposed upon the Southbridge Fields preliminary plat and final plat. Revisions shall be made as required. 2. The developer/property owner(s) adjacent to any modifications to the existing infrastructure required as a result of conditions imposed upon the preliminary plat and final plat.ofSouthbridge Fields shall be responsible for the associated costs. 3. All modifications to the existing infrastructure required as a result of conditions imposed upon the preliminary plat and fmaI plat of Southbridge Fi.elds shall be completed prior to building permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall provide a detailed traffic study analyzing the impacts this proposed use will have on adj acent streets. 5. The applicant shall provide drawings and information showing truck turning movements to and :from Crossings Boulevard. C:\Documents arid Seuings\MNoblelLocal Settings\Ternporary Intemel FUcs\OLK9\Case.Nurnber.0602I.CUP.Gas.Sralion.Signagc (Oullel B RSF 3rd).doc ft...... 1 ..,..., '5~ ,e.,... . D"L. . 6. . The existing right-in/right-out intersection serving as the first access to the site (West of County Road 18) shall be modified to a right-in only. 7. The building permit applicant shall be responsible for payment of all Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges, as requited by the most- cun-ent City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 8. The storm sewer design for the site shall be subject to City of Shakopee approval at the time of the building permit review. The design shall adhere to the previously approved storm water management plan for the area. 9. The approval of the CUP does not constitute approval ofthe submitted drawings. C:IDocuments and'Selting5lMNobl.ILocal S.tlingsIT.mporary lnt.rn.t Fil.s\OLK9IC....Number.0602I.CUP.Gas.St.rion.Sign.g. (Outlot B RSF 3rd).doc ... ...,... E .Jc'4-ll ~ l ,.... e.. , ,CITY OF SHAKOPEE MEMORANDUM To: Mark Noble, Project Manager From: Ryan Hughes, Natural Resour~e Specialist Date: February 15, 2006 Subject: Kwi,k Trip, Inc. CUP and Variance Application Outlot B, Riverside Fields 3rd Addition Based on a review of the application materials provided, the following are required conditions for approval for the Kwik Trip, Inc. CUP and Variance application: ,1. The applicant provide 6 inches of topsoil below areas to be sodded. The'soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements. The following are recommended conditions for approval of the above mentioned Kwik Trip, Inc. CUP and Variance application: 1. The applicant provide rain sensors for any irrigation systems. 2. Erosion control silt, fence be ,removed following establishment of permanent vegetation. 3. The applicant plant a diversIty of tree species to reduce the impacts of potential tree diseases or epidemics that may occur in the future. Recommended tree species to utilize in this area are: a. Hackberry (Celtis ocoidentalis) b. Northern Catalpa (Catalpa spe%sa) c. Bur oak (Querous maorocarpa) d. Red oak (Quercus rubra) 4. The applicant implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and stormwater management during construction. U:\Plan Review Memos\021506.Riverside Fields Kwik Trip,doc r" . ~)e+f\!>n- F , SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTlLITIES COMMISSION ;M .... "Lighting .the Way - Yesterday, Today and Beyond" MEMORANDUM TO: Shakopee Community-Development Department FROM: Joseph D. Adams, Planning and Engineering Director SUBJECT: . STAFF REVIEW RECORD COMMENTS for: Conditional Use Permit for Gas Station/Conl"enience Store with car wash and Variance for free standing sign age CASE NO: . 06021 DATE: 2/24/06 COMMENTS: . Municipai water service is avaiiable subject to our standard terms and conditions. These includel but are not limited to: installing a lateral water main distribution system in accordance with utility policy, paying the associated inspections costs, paying the Trunk Water Charge, and paying the Wafer Connection Charge. Underground electric service is available subject to our standard terms and conditions. These include, but are not limited to= entering into an Underground Distribution Agreement, granting any nece.ssary easements, and paying the associated fees. Street Lighting installation is available subject to our standard terms and conditions. These are contained in.the current City of Shako pee Street Lighting Policy, Applicant , . . m~st pay the associated fees. Applicant should contact Shakopee Public Utilities directly for specific requirements relating to their project. Note: Water service plans show connecting to non~existent watermain. Plan' revisions shall be coordinated with Southbridge Fields plans. Post Office Box 470.. 255 Sarazin Street + Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-0470 (952) 445-1988 + Fax (952) 445-7767 eJe+<, Q fT" 'r Mark Nobte , From: DEverson [deverson@mn.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 5:09 PM To: Steven D. Soltau; Andreas Bjorneby; Ashish Shah; Bala Karanam; Chemehra Bhimavarepru; Dan & Deb Schmitz; David & Cyndy Hunter; Debasis Das; Doub & Andrea Hawkinson; Jagian Muttasseri/; Sherry Blair; Jeff Brinkman; Leslie Wolf; Lisa Masica; Mary Zielund; Michael Smetak; Murali Mohan; Raj Vallamkondu; Raja Poranki; Rajeev Rai; Rman Patole; Sahjam Valium; Scott & Deb Ridgeway; Seth Quiggle; Sreeni Gaddam; Steph Duval; Tracy & Marc Oliver; Vladan Pulec & Katerina Pulcova Cc: ' Mark Noble; Sam VanTassel Subject: Re: Southbridge Filedsl Kwik Trip Neighborhood Meeting 1 traveling that day, so I can't attend, but here, are my concerns I not any order..Lighting spill into the neighborhood, Hours of leration, security. Garbage how often to they police site; architecture, is it compatible with the neighborhood, screening to' lighbors. how many pumps? ,can the n'umbers be reduced if the people feel there are too many..timing of deliveries.. I would afer it not be there I would hope the city would reject this type of usage so close to a neighborhood ---- Original Message --- From: Steven D. Soltau To: Andreas Biorneby; Ashish Shah; Bala Karanam; Chemehra Bhimavarepru ; Dale & Maraie Everson; Dan & Deb Schmitz; )avid & Cyndy Hunter; Debasis Das ; Doub & Andrea Hawkinson; Jagian Muttasseril ; Sherry Blair; Jeff Brinkman; Leslie Nolf; Lisa Masica ; Mary Zielund ; Michael Smetak; Murali Mohan; Rai Vallamkondu ; Raia Poranki; Raieev Rai ; Rman :latoJe ; Sahiam Valluru ; Scott & Deb Ridaeway ; Seth auigale ; Sreeni Gaddam ; Steph Duval; Tracy & Marc Oliver ;, Vladan :lulec & Katerina pulcova ~c: Mark Noble; Sam VanTassel ,ent: Friday, February 24,2006 12:05 PM Subject: Southbridge Filedsl Kwik Trip Neighborhood Meeting {epresentatives from Kwik: Trip will conduct an informal informationalmeeting on March 1,2006 at the Southbridge )ne office building from 6:30-8:00 P.M. 'This invitation is only being delivered through e-mail; so please feel free'to ~hare this information with friends and neighbors that may have an interest in attending this meeting. I will also be Lttending the meeting and look forward to working with you to address some of the concerns that have been brought o our attention. If you cannot attend or have any questions, please feel free to contact me. lteve :teven D. Soltau :hakopee Crossings Limited Partnership 170 Old Carriage Court North, #210 :hakopee,:MN 55379 952) 465-3939 'ax (952) 465-3936 Soltau@visi.com , , 03/03/2006 10:22 FAX 9964343 BEST BUY MARKETING GROUP 141002 . RiVerside Fields Community Rajeev"K Ral Shalinl RallAmav Rei AppeallPetition 8425 Blazing Star Circle Shakopee. MN 55379 March 3. 2006 Chairman & Members, Board of Planning Commission, , City Df ShakDpee, MN Dear Members of the Board: Asa concerned residents Riverside Fields community we approach you with great confidence '.n our city planning systems to balance the economics of development and safety of residents. : A gas station and a fast food restaurant is not the type establishments fDund wifhin 75-200 feet of Sil'.lgle family homes and adjacent to a community swimmino pool which vou have approved in the past as a i:lart of the community. After reading the PRO zoning & Neighborhood Commercial zoning code, ills not the sp:rit & intent of these zones to have high traffic commercial establishments and 24 hours usage. We understand that these lots are zoned as PRO and with CUP's the Gas station is a potential usage as pe~ the zoning. Please consider the following aspects while making your decision: : a. Access to these establishments should be considered with careful considerations ,of vehicle movements of a/l sizes and shapes and the adiacencv to the pool. Attached is our vlsuaHzatlnn of what this looks like using the Scott county GIS Maps. a. At this time we would like to bring to your attention that in the last meeting of the City Council on Feb 21St, Mayor and the council members Were very concerned about thc~ types of establishments planned and the access issues.' The preliminary plat was appj'oved with conditions that developer/tenant will do the updates to access as needed in the futurr~. b. We would like the Traffic study & finalization of access issues prior to any u~l3ge being . approved even preliminarily. The have been multiple proposals for access but no !i:lecision & funding by city to make a decisIon. I b. The intersection of Crossing Blvd & Penstemon lane as per the current design will promote ~!'I1ovement of delivery vehicles and consumers to go through the entire residential neighborhood, due to :!:he narrow turning lane. c. We would like you to consider the following conditions for these establishments based on thi'l proximity to the residential area & aesthetics of the area: a. The proposed 24 hours Usage is not acceptable with such proximity to the I residential neighborhood and is not the intent of neiQhborhood commercial zone. , ' b. Strict Restricted times for large vehicles access either early in the moming or after 8:;)0 p.m. c. Access issues to prevent movement of consumer only/delivery vehicles through the neighborhood (Penstemon lane). ; d. No big Gas Station Signage and very subtfe signage on the building. The signag~' should be ONLY 1 for the entire set of commercial establishments towards the oroposed Ctv Rd 21 e. The proposed burming and buffering is not adequate to prevent i. Noise pollution to the neighbors ii. Light Pollution & Headlight wash - No mega Neon signage except ai"ld heights exceeding the neighboring houses. i d. The demographics of this neighborhood is relatively young people with small children. TM proposed establishments definitely compromise the safety of our kids in & around the swimming pool ~ind around neighborhood due to the nature of traffic & alf outflow traffic coming out from the (ommercial 03/03/2006 10:22 FAX 9964343 BEST BUY MARKETING GROUP @J003 , : . Page 2 March 3, 20(;'6 " establishments next to the pool including DeliverY Trucks. We would welcome the usage of ~mall office bldgs, Child Care Center, Dr's Office or Banks, Restaurants like Pan era or a Bagel company which our open having hours from 7.00 - 10.00 p.m or so. e. We as residents strongly feel that the l3uilders of our communities Ryland & Centex did n'ot provide adequate disclosure about proposed concepts plans/usage of thIs land, In addition they ~'ere in the know of proposed concept plans for last 2 years and still chose to risk the safety of residents;:by putting a swimming pool amenity next to it for purelv marketino Duroosesand increase the valuatipn of their homes. : f. As planning board members I urge to call on Ryland & Centex as well to state their positli:m on this. Also for the future I propose that this type of development should be approved all to-d:sther with . Planned Usaoe and better appreciation of imoact to the residential neighborhood which is approved. g. We have heard from the Mr. Soltau that he had proposals for a Child Care and a Pharm6'C}' as well after he had received the request for the Gas Station. We believe that the owner of commerciallots/outlots adjacent to the Riverside Fields community shol~ld be able to make productive use of the land at the same time not disturb the harmony & safety of the neighbc.r.rhood. At this time our view is that the proposed establishments are not the best uses for these lots. I will bring a CD with pictures of the area & neighborhood for you to gain better appreciation of j~e issues described above. . . . We are looking for your careful considerations of the issues. Thanking you, Regards, IjY (Riljeev K. RaI) 8425 BLAZING STAR CIRCLE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-736-8260 (H) . 612-327-3683 (C~ .tr \[ Ish <M ' eJlN (Vijay Ramanath ) 8421 BLAZING STAR CIRCLE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-402-0695 (H) ~d' ~ ,,,,,c:\k (jyV (Sridhar Aku a) " 8433 BLAZING STAR CIRCLE . SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-930-1010 (H) Cc: Mayor & Members of the City Council 03/03/2006 10:23 FAX 9964343 BEST BUY MARKETING GROUP raJ 004 , . Page 3 March 3, 20('6 Proposed Commerical Site Development Plan Adjacent to the Riverside Fields Community E , 7' & , i .Il 3 ~ I 2711140UO' GtPATC fllYEJ\SIOf FIEI.OO fSTAoomOM "IllUSTRATIVE ONLY'; Not to Scale or Architecture F:icture March 3, 2006 Lisa Masica 1834 Penstemon Lane Shakopee, MN 55379 RE: Southfield Development and Conditional Use Permit for Kwik Trip Gas Station Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing to you as a concerned citizen living in the Riverside Fields neighborhood that is adjacent to the plot of land known as Southfield. As a resident I have many concerns regarding the use of this parcel. As per city ordinance this development falls closest under the constraints of Neighborhood Commercial. This ordinance reads as the following... Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intensity, service-oriented uses for surrounding the immediate residential areas. "Immediate residential areas are understood to be those that are generally within five (5) minutes walking distance of a neighborhood commercial area. (Ord. 563. November 25. 1999) I believe that the introduction of Kwik Trip is neither of low intensity or will be used mainly by immediate residential areas. Further, I strongly feel that this ordinance was written specifically to protect residents and neighborhoods exactly like the one we live in. There are five specific. uses that are permitted by neighborhood commercial- retail; administrative, executive, and professional offices; medical or dental clinics; services; and public buildings. We would welcome these uses as they follow the guidelines of low intensity and their services are more likely to draw the business of the immediate adjoining . neighborhood. . Although a gas station is one of the uses permitted with conditional use, I believe that because of the proximity of the commercial area that these conditions need to be strict and severely limit the impact this type of establishment will have on the surrounding residents. I have several concerns regarding the proposed plans. Traffic Design First and foremost the current design of the road will not allow for the types of vehicles such as semi-truck trailers and gas tankers to move freely. There is currently no way for a truck to exit out of the commercial development without driving through our neighborhood. These types of vehicles do not have a street radius large enough to make this turn. This fact was confirmed to me by the developer, Steve Soltau. Currently no one from the city has a clear answer for what should be done to alleviate this problem. We have discussed with the council several solutions, such as making the first entrance full movement, increasing lane size, and shifting the median. This is a problem that needs to be solved before any permits are approved as every establishment in this development will have some sort of delivery truck that will not be able to exit without severely impacting a residential neighborhood. Size and Orientation of the Station The proposed plan asks for ten pumps with a total of twenty fueling stations. A gas station of this magnitude is bound to make a significant impact on traffic and is not low intensity. The closest gas station in a zoning of B-1 has only twelve fueling stations; significantly fewer than the Kwik Trip is proposing. Furthermore, the height of the canopy suggests that it would invite larger trucks, semi~trucks and buses to use the fueling pumps. Already we know there will be an issue with movement of these vehicles through our neighborhood. In addition this goes beyond the idea behind neighborhood commercial. I urge you to significantly reduce the number of fuel pump stations as well as shorten the height of the canopy. Next the orientation is such that is causes the greatest impact as far as light and noise pollution. I feel that it would be best to orient the building such that the back of the store faces outward toward Crossings Boulevard. I believe we will achieve the most screening ?lnd blocking when using the building as a barrier. Various Concerns: Hours of Operation, Signage. Landscape Materials, etc. There are several other aspects of the project that I feel need changing or limitations. Currently Kwik Trip is requesting 24 hours of operation. This is in no way keeping with the idea of neighborhood commercial. We do not believe that it is in the best interest for the neighborhood to encourage traffic and people throughout the entire night. We believe it will negatively impact the resident's safety, peace of mind and enjoyment of their home and neighborhood. I believe that any business this close to homes should close no later than ten o'clock at night and open no earlier than five in the morning. Furthermore, the height of the signage should be limited to less than ten feet so as not to impact the neighborhood. The sight of the station should be enough to draw people in and if we are true to neighborhood commercial the majority of the clientele should be neighbors who won't see the sign from county road 18 anyway. The current berming plan illustrates only deciduous trees along the edge of Crossings Boulevard. I believe a mix of both coniferous and deciduous trees provides a better alternative to year round screening. Along the bike path, there is a barrier which would hinder the free movement of pedestrians or the like using that path. I believe it is important to make a cut away in that triangular shaped median to allow for safe movement of pedestrians using that pathway. Last, it has been our experience from other Kwik Trip stores that we have visited that there is a loud speaker playing music. We believe that this is unnecessary and would ask that they have use of the loud speaker for emergency purposes only. As you can see there are many issues still to be worked out with this site. Some of them have easy solutions others are much more complicated. As a resident I believe it is important to look at the description of Neighborhood Commercial and to hold all establishments to the required standards such as low intensity and immediate residential areas. This commercial development is as much a part of the neighborhood as any of the residential homes and I believe its proximity makes it unique to any other development we have seen in Shakopee. I urge you to make citizens and people of the area the first. priority. Regards, Lisa Masica Momorandum 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, Maple Plain, MN 55359 ,../"-'v'''" ~~Wenck Phone: .763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 To: Steve Soltau, Shakopee Crossings From: Jim Benshoof~o.~ Date: March 9, 2006 Subject: Supplemental Traffic Review for Proposed Development Southwest of CSAH 18 and Crossings Boulevard Wenck File # 1626-01 This memorandum is to address the following three points: a) What was the prior plan that accounted for full access on Crossings Boulevard at the first intersection south of CSAH 18? Attached is a drawing that was included in the Benshoof memo report dated October 3,2003, which showed this potential full access. b) What would be the effects on level of service at the Crossings Boulevard/CSAH 18 intersection if the presently proposed commercial development were approved and constructed? In the Benshoof memo report dated October 3, 2003, we reported that the Crossings Boulevard/CSAH 18 intersection would operate at level of service C during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the projected 2020 volumes. These projected volumes accounted for the following development on the property subject to your current development plans: 10,000 square feet of retail and 25,000 square feet of office. As we understand, the current development plans consist of the following components instead of the preceding retail and office uses: 8,000 square feet of retail, a gas station and convenience store, a fast food restaurant, 11,000 square feet of office, and a drive-in bank. With these new uses, we have projected that the p.m. peak hour trip generation for the overall property encompassed by these uses would increase by 229 entering trips and 210 exiting trips. We have focused on effects during the p.m. peak hour, because this combination of uses would have more impact during this period than during the a.m. peak hour. We have allocated the increased trips by turn movement through the Crossings Boulevard/CSAH 18 intersection and have analyzed the associated effects on level of service. From this capacity analysis, we have determined that the Crossings Boulevard/CSAH 18 intersection will accommodate the updated 2020 p.m. peak hour volumes at level of service C, the same as with the 2003 traffic forecasts. c) Would semi-trucks be able to adequately make the left turn from the north on the driveway serving the commercial development to the east on Crossings Boulevard? We have investigated this situation and have determined that semi-trucks could effectively accomplish this maneuver, provided that the existing median on Crossings Boulevard is shortened by 50 feet to the north. This shortening of the median, together with use of double yellow striping, is shown in the attached figure. FIGURE 4 RECOMMENDED PlAN FOR 1 CROSSING BOULEVARD , .........._ 2 2003 0 <10' 80' '^"""'" . P".... I Benshoof&AssocIates.Inc. ~ ~ \ 8W01 ~ g ~ 3 ro 2 , 0\ ,C; , 1 .-.- . , .' -." .. .' .' ,- 16. -:. - .. .- ~~ ;[!]@OJ' 0 ~ ' EJGi~OJ fTl ~ r;l lJU r;l 167~ I G 0 ~ ffi.~ rFD@(u)~~ ~~~@~~~IM[Q)~[Q) ~l}{]~IM@~~ If'@ ~~[Q)D~OO @IM N ~~@~~D~@~ ~[L W[Q)g If'@ ~~~@~~@[Q)~ iJ~ [L~rFiJ iJ(u)~~~ ~)f ~~~Dc> iJ~(u)~~~ March 9, 200S I I Wenck Assocoates, lroc. 0 50' IRIEMOVIE 50 FlElEl OIF MIE[D)~AN AN][D) RlElPtACIE WITH DOUBLE YEllOW STIRIP~INlG .. '. .:.' '-l ~~\) 00\..€ '\6' .: :' GS " . ........ ~ '. . SS\~ .... ,.~.. J" c~o ,\4 -<' ) ,\4' uJ z <( .-I Z @) 0 :2: l.Ll I- 1E8 . (j) z .. l.Ll .; 0- .' ~ '. l .... 0 .- 1 c. r . 0 < '. 23 AU9Ust.200~ Gas 11.111111 Linked To Risk Of Childhood leukaemia Living close to a garage or g:as station may quadruple the risk of acute childhood leukaemia, suggests research published in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine. The findings are based on 280 cases of acute childhood leukaemia and a comparison group of 285 children matched for sex. The children were drawn from four hospitals in France and almost two thirds (60%) of the children with leukaemia were aged between 2 and 6. The mothers of all the children were interviewed about their employment and residential histories. There was no clear association between the mother's occupation during pregnancy or levels of residential traffic and the risk of her child developing leukaemia. But a child whose home was in the vicinity of a g'~'$ station or a commercial garage that carried out repairs was four times as likely to develop leukaemia as a child whose home was not close to these outlets. The risk appeared to be even greater for acute non-lymphoblastic leukaemia. This was seven times more common among the children living close to a petrol station or commercial garage. The longer a child had lived close to a petrol station or commercial garage, the higher the risk of leukaemia seemed to be. Occupational exposure to benzene has been identified as a possible risk factor for leukaemia in adults, say the researchers, and petrol ..111..) and commercial garages are a source of benzene emissions. "These findings, as far as we know, have never been described before, and could be due to chance. However, the strength of the association and the duration trend are arguments for a causal association," the researchers concluded. tsenzeneCampmgn -.Facts about Benzene Page I of5 This is Goo g I e's cache of http://www.oregontoxics.org/Benzene/Benzene_Facts.html as retrieved on Feb 1, 2006 00:06:26 GMT. Goo g I e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web. The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting. This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only. To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search? q=cache:2sjRkrwPIrkJ:www.oregontoxics.org/Benzene/Benzene_Facts.html+gas+station+cancer&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=23 Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content. These search terms have been highlighted: gas station cancer .. Home Benzene Campaign .. Benzene Campaign .. Benzene Facts Benzene Facts " Press Room Benzene Exposure and Leukemia l!l Importants Links Your Right to Know about your Toxics in Community's Air " Map IS Take Actionl What is in ieopardy? Children's Health. " Support OT A @) .. Join Us http://64.233.1 79.1 04/search?=cache:2s 'RkrwPIrkJ: . Benzene Cam})aign - Facts about Benzene Page 2 of5 .... being diagnosed with leukemia when repeatedly exposed to benzene. Leukemia 50% What is benzene? 0j Benzene is a volatile, colorless, highly flammable liquid that is a natural component of crude and refined petroleum. Almost 100% of benzene IS commercially derived from petrochemical and__ petroleum refining Industnes. It IS found In common consumer products such as glues, paints, and marking pens. Benzene is also used in the production of other products, including styrofoam, plastics, various resins, nylon and synthetic fibers. How does benzene get into the air and into humans? Benzene is released into the air from emissions from burning coal and oil, gasoline service stations. and motor vehicle exhaust. Other sources include hazardous waste sites, underground gasoline storage tanks that leak, waste water from industries that use benzene, chemical spills, chemical manUfacturing sites, and petrochemical and petroleum industries (ATSDR). These sources contribute to elevated levels of benzene in the ambient air, which may subsequently be breathed by the public. Benzene is brought into the human body primarily through inhalation and can also be absorbed through the skin. In humans, respiratory uptake has been determined to vary from approximately 47% to 80%. For the general public, smoking is the largest human-generated source of benzene exposure. The estimates of daily intake of benzene from a single cigarette vary: from 5.9 to 73.0 micrograms. ~ How is benzene harmful to health? The EPA has classified benzene as a Group A, human carcinogen. There is no evidence for a saTe tnresnolo level or exposure of benzene. A low-level exposure (2 ppm) increases the risk o~ leukemia as well as higher .Ievels of exposure. 1/ Benzene has been associated with a variety of maladies from internal bleeding to cancer. Short- term exposure from inhalation can result in drowsiness, dizziness, headaches, tremors, http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:2sjRkrwPIrkJ:www .oregontoxics.org/Benzene/Benzene F . .. . . . . .. ~ .... 1_',...__.... DCll.Z.t:llt: \..-aIUpm.gn - raCIS aOOut .tSenzene Page 30[5 confusion and/or unconsciousness. Long-term inhalation exposure has caused various disorders including: . increased incidence of leukemia (cancer of the tissues that form white blood cells) · damage to blood cells (aplastic anemia) and internal hemorrhaging · infertility for women . reduced sperm quality for men · adverse effects on the developing fetus (observed in animal tests) ~ Benzene and the link with Childhood LQ,Ykemia , A strong correlation between childhood leukemia and proximity to gas stations, refineries and automobile traffic has been established by multiple research studies. France's national research institute recently published a study of 280 children with acute leukemia. Two-thirds of these children were 2-6 years old when diagnosed. The study found that children living near gas stations were four times more likely to have contracted Jeukemia~ These children were seven times more likely to contract Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML).Ghildren living for longer periods near a gas station experienced higher rates of leukemia. r Another study in England tracking 22,458 children who died from leukemia or solid cancers found that higher rates of childhood leukemia is associated with living near distributors and . industrial users of petroleum products. . A Journal of Occupational Medicine published in 1984 study found that infants whose fathers work at gas stations, a high-exposure occupation. have a higher observed susceptibility to develop acute leukemia. Compared to children of unexposed fathers, children whose fathers . were occupationally exposed to benzene and alcohols used in industrial products were nearly 6 times as likely to develop leukemia if the exposure occurred prior to the pregnancy. @ Exposure in proximity to gasoline servi~~_ ~tations , http://64.233.179.1 04/search?q=cache:2sjRkrwPIrkJ :www.oregontoxics.or Benzene/Ben ..~ tlenzene CampaIgn - Facts about Benzene Page 4 of5 According to OSHA, the legal exposure limit for breathing benzene is 1 ppm in an 8-hour period and 5ppm in any 15 minute period. Exposure to benzene at gas stations can range from 1 - 32 ppm. Gasoline station workers and their families are at risk for exposure to benzene. Customers of gasoline service stations maybe significantly exposed even within the cohfines of their vehicle. People who live in proximity to gasoline service stations are also at risk. Residential exposure has been observed at levels of up to 6.6 parts per billion (ppb) in outdoor areas that are in close proximity to gasoline service stations. ~ Families living near gas stations or other petroleum product industries can experience long-term effects without ever having short-term effects because repeated long-term effects can occur at levels not high enough to make you immediately sick. This is especially true for children or people who are already ill. One recent study showed that when gas stations use benzene vapor recovery equipment, attendants have reduced post-shift automobile accidents (less drowsiness and confusion from exposure). The use of vapor recovery devices greatly reduces their level of exposure to benzene. Vapor-Control Equipment at Gas Station~ can Help What is Stage One Vapor Control equipment? This is a system of valves and gaskets inside the hoses of delivery trucks and the underground gas tanks. The equipment creates a vacuum that recaptures fumes that would otherwise leak to the air when filling the tank. A gas station can easily reduce its gasoline vapors by requiring trucks that fill the station's underground tanks to use this system. A 1978 law requires gas stations in the Portland metropolitan area, Salem, and Medford with an underground tank capacity of 1,500 gallons to install vapor control equipment. As a result, gasoline delivery trucks have installed the equipment to do business in these three metropolitan areas. However, equipment to control noxious fumes is not required in other cities, including Eugene. @ What Can We Do to Improve our Local Air ,Quality and Our Health? Do you think Eugene parents should have the right to learn how much benzene is in the air near their children? ThIS Will be the question when the Eugene City Council decides whether to add gas stations to the list of Industn-alfaclhties that must report under Eugene's toxics right-to-know law. h" ://64.233.179.104/search? - a - -------- --...t"'-~b.a..a. ... ~"''''u wouv......... ..L"I'\,I.1!.LJ\,,/J.J.'-' Page 5 0[5 Please let your Mayor and City Council know that you want to strengthen Eugene's Toxics Reporting Program by including gas stations, petroleum product distributors, and other businesses that use over 2,640 pounds of toxic chemicals. Join Oregon T oxics Alliance in letting our elected officials and business leaders know that you - value the Community toxics Right-to-Know program - that there is a public benefit to gaining kn!>wledge about levels of air toxics in our community. http://64.233.179.1 04/search?q=cache:2sjRkrwPlrkJ :www.oregontoxics.org/Benzene/Benzene_Facts.html+ as+ . .' SITE DATA' ~ ZONING DISTRICT: PRO . I .. ~ I. - CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR PLANTING IN ALL _ TOTAL SITE AREA: 81,320 Sf 174,S10 Sf WIO R.O.WJ 1"'::;). ~ . . · ~\~ ~ ...:s.. \-r-1I!.. V ~ ~~:t.DSCAPE CpNTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY EFFECT HIS 11II,"'- EX. HARDCOVER, UNDEVELOPED .~~ ~ .-.....,........, CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL ."",., 651-4S4-0002 (METROI PROPOSED GREEN AREA, 25,208 Sf 34Yo 800-252-1166 (MINNESOTA TOLL FREEl 7J PROPOSEO HARD COVER: 49,3025F 66Yo - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHA.LL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS AT SITE ~~rp PAVED AREA: 42,252 SF S7YO AND COMPLETE HIS WORK peR OWNeRS CONSTRUCTlON SCHeDULe. BUILDg:;~~~A: ~~~~ ~~ gYo - ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED ONE 111 FULL YEAR UPON TOTAL CAR WASH.. 1766 SF ~~~~;~;:~~E A~~:~~E~~~~C~E~~E~~N~;, ~~~R~NE TlME REPLACEMENT AT - REPLACEMENT TOPSOll SHALL BE CLEAN, FREE OF STONES, WEEDS, AND OTHER / . / / //~/ UNDESIRABLE DEBRIS. . , / . /. / / / - PLANTING SOIL MIX UNCIOENTAL COST [TEMI /S/T Q.R ES . . . 1. MIX 1 LB. 5-20-20 COMMERCIAL fERTIL[ZER PER CU. YD. TOPSOIL // / ,o' '/ ~ I SLIM JIM SCOTCH PINE <::::::; 2. THOROUGHLY MIX '-PART SAND AND '-PART PEAT MOSS WITH 5-PARTS / T ~ :EU~~L~~~~~~g ~giL ~~\LL LOCATlONS PER DETAILS THIS SHEET. 14 I MICROBIOTA _ - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TOPSOIL DEPTH AND NOTIFY OWNER Of ,,- ANY DEFICIENCY. I _ SOD SHALL BE CULTURED WITH PRE DOMINA TEL 'I' KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED OF 21 I TANNENBAU M MUGO PINE ~41 ENDLESS SUMMER HYDRANGEA RECENT DISEASE RESISTANT INTRODUCTIONS. NO GUARANTEE ON SOD EXCEPT _. MfA W- I T I ANY SOD NOT SATISFACTORY AT TIME OF COMPLETION INSPECTION SHALL BE IR . D JE W R . . . \ PROMPTLY REPLACED PREDR TO COMPLETION OF JOB. STAKE SOD ON SLOPES 3,1 . 10 E EL C ABAPPLE 521 MINT JULEP JUNIPER AND GREATER. S *' I I \ - EXISTING TREES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING ALL ~ I NORTHERN PIN OAK PHASES Of CONSTRUCTION. . STAKE H[GH VISIBILITY POLY FENCING AROUND EACH I~ TREE AT DRIP LINE. REMOVE DAMAGED, DISFIGURED, AND DESEASED llRANCHES. I ~ _ .=... PRUNE FOR HEALTHY GROWTH HABIT. I I p<I .v-~. ~{;; v, r-=~ SOD - WHERE EXISTING CONCRETEI ASPHALT AREAS ARE TO BE REPLACED WITH I Iso 0 LANDSCAPING, PROVISIONS SHOULD 8E TAKEN TO COORD[NATE EXCAVATION Of I Iso 0 SUBSOIL TO A DEPTH Of 2' WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. REPLACE WITH I ~ ----- -- ----7 .C~ -- .------------------------------- ---- ---- ---~ ----., COMPACTED TOPSOIL. ALL AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED AND SODDED SHALL BE I I _~ (~~ .' \~ r.L' V .1_ I GRADED SMOOTH AND EVEN. I I I' \ ......... ~ . . . .. . - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSI5LE FOR SODDING oM.!. AREAS WHICH ARE I I... / ~ 5 0 0 51 (\ ~ m ~ /\"""'>. /\ ~ ,~~ . r ~ +. I DISTURBED 6Y CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ALL R.O.W. AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES. I=.=.=.~ _ I I ,'''''- l r7 l )' ~ + ' . LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 'VALLEY VIEW', "6LACK DIAMOND" EDGING I I I ~':I'Y'I'I'I'~I.Y.Y.lIl.Y.Y._., .Y.Y-+'V'. . .Y."'-!.UT.Y. .y. . . . . .y~. .Y.r.-y.y.y.y 11'- --------'. ,I AROUND ALL PLANTING BEDS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. KWIK TRIP, Inc. I I I 6r.'f,;, I ' 1 - USE SHREDDED HARDWOOD eARK MULCH. INSTALL 4" DEPTH. NO FILTER fABf;IC P.O. BOX 2107 I~ I " v.. . h VA .". OR EDGING AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUB 6EOS. 1626 OAK STREET 'I II '~ I 1 BOULEVARD LINDEN iH~Ue:~HRES:RN . . ; i~:;'; .~:;,; .'~.~ I. ffl'v . GRAVEL MULCH SHALL 6E 1'" DIA. WASHED "RIVER ROCK". INSTALL 4" DEPTH LACROSSE WI 54602-2107 I"" I I . . ,... r-;' ~ r-;" .' ~, WITH APPROVED WEED FABRIC BARRIER IF INDICATEO PLAN. . I I , . I g~~~~:;N Mp~'fN' .. v' ~ .' LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR [5 RESPONSIBLE FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND PH. (6081 781.8988 I , \ I . ~ I . r-;v r: cj [NSTALLATION PER CITY LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. DESIGN SHALL BE FAX 16081 781-8960 1 I I - - - - - - - - ,/." '" >- I APPROVED 6Y OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOULD : I' I ...,;;;; =-.. I . 0.0 HO.o ~ ,...., "'-j I >.: I ,j ENCOMPASS ALLtANDSCAPE AREAS WITH SOD ANDI OR PLANTINGS, FROM CURB INSITES : I ... ,--------, . I ,/ I I : , . ~ TO CURB. R.O.W. SHOULD BE IRRIGATED FROM SPRINKLER HEADS LOCATED WITHIN : I. i ~ Q "~ I 00 ~21 IIl9 [!] 19 [!] (9J I ~ lJ ~b1l1 --j 0 : I :: / r' PROPERTY 5OUNDARY. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN VICINITY Of ALL WALKS AND !>. !>. , I I. I '-_______.1 I . ~ IOU ~ LJ ~.-' L.J I .,:. DRIVES TO MINIM[ZE OVER SPRAY. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ALL PVC SrrEPU.NMNGlAN'DscAPEAAtj:lmciURf, 3 r---------, _ _ . . SLEEVE UNDER DRIVE AREAS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 890' A"ec O"ve 4" OEPTH SHREDDED I . · I 00 ~21 I . \: ~ I r. . LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ALL PAVEMENT AREAS AFTER ALL Eden P..;~~e .~'."~;~~to "437 MRK MULCH IN SHRUB, ' . II "'LA l' L - - - - - - - - - -' 1 b ~ ~ :-- 7 I..!.;.,}:.. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE AND ACCEPTED BY OWNER. GENERAL ... ;"." ;."'. AREA. NO FILTER /;. ~""'tYI2>' r---------.-, ':i Y\. I ~,*"1~" CONTRACTOR TO SWEEP PAVEMENT AREAS PRIOR TO TURN OVER TO OWNER. FABRIC UNDER ORGAN[ . 3 I I 00 (:J~ I 1..1 - 0 f ~..' i . I hereby certify .hot thi. plan, MULCHES. PROVIDE I I L__________...I 1l9[!] [!]@J, 1 .~ ~~ [ o. I ~. ',I PL.ANT MATERIAL .pecilicotion,orreportwo. prepared EOGINGe,ETWEEN I . I r-----I-----., . . I 0'~!I/!~. bymecrundermy-direot&upervieion. PLANTINGS AND SOD. I I 0 ~')I 0 ~')I I tI}f 0 I. W' '~\it~",,, ROOT COMMON NAME ond thot I om 0 duly Iieen.ed I I. L _ _ _ _ :1_ _ _ _ _.......1 I . . I ~ % QUANTITY SIZE TYPE 50TAN1CAL NAME Lond.copo Archileel under tho low. of I jIt ;1' 0 0 0 0 .i- ' ~ Ihe 510'0 of Monne.oto. I i. !tit 5 I' J Jc 1ta... b~T (.\ 5 2." CAL. Bo\.B NORTHERN PIN OAK 001. Roo. No. 19~06 \ Ii",) 7 I - (~.,,"~~~ ) Quercus ellic&Oldah& Slaned I ~ Dl I 119 [!] [!] ~ 1 ~ 0 10 c f r I. :t- 0 7 2" CAL. B0\.5 5.0ULEVARD L[NDEN Rob.r'Mue".r ~ ~ 3il ~ I ~ I )/ rille orner-Icone 'Boulevard' : . ~ I I . ...h ... ""' m I ~tI~l'$' 0 3 6' HT B0\.5 5LACK H[LL SP~UCE : 1.1: 3 I 1 u.. I-LrtJ ~ 5001 I'. . . Piceoaloueoden.e'o. ! ~ I 1 . V I fl.U . (l\ 10 1.5" CAL. POT RED JEWEL CRABAPPLE I , . _ I ~ l~f#II' 1IJt~ '0 Malue. IJewelcolel ! I . ~\ 1@[!]l90@J,. 0 f i..t # ~ 3 30" HT. POT SLIM JIM SCOTH PINE.ISPECIMEN QUALITYI : I \ I 1 ~,i W Plnu. .ytvo.lr'. 'Slom Jim' ~' I . 1 ( . /.. r . '''' 0 TANNENBAUM MUGO PINE 1 'I . . . 21 30" HT POT I . I . I IV I I I I . . . . Pinu& - muao ITonnellboum' '" I f 1 I . I,~. ~ I I I. I( g.r-;u I I . W ~ : : ~ ~ I ~ 1119 [!] 19 [!] ~ I ' .~ f ~}. I ~ 0 28 1.5" CAL. POT ENDLESS SUMMER HYORANGEA cr ~ I I ~ I DO D I I / ". J/ l"ll ~ Hydronoeo mocrophyUo 'Endl... Summer' 0 t I I Ir-- I J - - - - - - - - " . !~~. 1 l': 0 14 2.4" SPR POT MICROBIOTA Z I- <t I~ I I I ~ F=== / (~ IV . Mierobiolo deeu..oto 'Northern Pride' <c .... ':: I I I r= '----" I ~ if 0 81 " HT POT MINT JULEP JUNIPER t/) 0 g I I I I 1 f1~' (iJ . 30. Juniperu. ehlnon.i. 'Monlep' ..J en ~ ' " I 1 I a. w w ~ : ::: SOD ----------~-- ~ -------------------- ~v w " ~ ~t ! I I I~A . ""Mr-... "' _""Mr-... _r---.. ------- ! a. Z ~- ~ \ I I I _7 - fV":.o,,' -- '.]V -------- r ----.- I . W :!! ~ \ I I -- ~~ W ~ -- _ \\ d 1 " ~. <c - .. Sl \ I ISO D --l11f-. ~ P- ......'<:. 00 "OT CUT "A'N Le..... .. 0 w ~ 'I It~-. 1-- -----J -- - -~~..!:. --D~~ ---------S!; -'::!"-k l ',,\-t -,..-_..# I / 'eM. ."'''AOA''' ". ;... () Z Zw ill' '- - ~~ - 5 0 0 A~ " - r. -. I MO..N .'ANe"... . . . ~^ W ~\ " I I -~ J i(A -~' .,.81 -lob ---;, 1f --_, MAINTAINNA.TUItALTl\eePOR!ot. ... . VI .0. - , 'I....... ,~. ~ _OJ VL.. 'Ill!:.. -" -~ - . .. . > ::x: 0 ~ \ ',- r, _ _______ ________ ___________ ___________ ~ .A'9' 0......{-_ SOD - - - :..... ~.'~ C . g \ '~\, 'V ------........~y~~.~..;.._, '-__ ~~M~~:~M~~LeADe". "~:. Z Z <~ ra \, // \,~ \, ~...~....~ --..;.... ~DJl;eN eltANCHe5 .:.. . :..' 0 . <t '" " / ,,- .... - ";1>... ~ . ~=: <c en::x: - " / ... -.- . .. . --.;; JE~ STAKtNG' GU'rtNG ::., .';: ,,~ " . ~ "" / I I 6 I BOULEVARD LINDEN 2 I NORTHERN PIN OAK ____ .- t;... os "..0.0 . ..'" . ... ...I - (.) en :ge. I{, I II I J ______ F" ~~~ ~::";NG ONI.Y NO. DATE DESCRIPTION , I . -- .e / \ I / \ I " r-. J l.-.. I seT CrtOWN 01'" It.OOT e.AL~ . A 03/02/06 Hf!{GffeORHOOO MfG. COI./MeNTs ~ I I: ',( h.. A~OVeI:XUI"~INQ GRADI: - _. ~ ,I / / 1 I \ \ - OI:PTH MULCH ~ ........ I I --...----.....j--------------------f--------~------7,-----~. ~ I III f ~ . ~ . "'''IS" ...00 '''. - - ",--_I' I I / \, \ /291 MINT JULEP"..JUNIPER/ ,,--------~ 1~1j/ ~... ~ ... ,.. - - ;:; ..... / I r-:/--~--_r-------- '" _I -'- "-- , I -_ ~. ~~..: (I.~J' J::I Iii ..... I I / I \ \ " ',- ,'-', /..:::- _. , --__,"'- .~? . . It.OLl.bAeK e.URLAP. ,.:'- JM:\ - - , ~ " , __"',' -_;,.. I.. ,...;. .~.;; ':4,\ CUT WUlt: &ASK!:T . ...-.; :t.J ' ......f. I / / . ',', " " ',--:>'- - . ' 71;- ,~~".;";". .,.T., TR.. PLAC...NT ""'" t';>7;:,""=' < ......c...,.. ~ / 'J I . _ ........... .,.. ,. W,:;'..,:'.:~r.;\l:t.oi-<.: a...... I -I- I \ \ ", ',: -- -{, - - - f_ OMPACT SOlI. - " DRAWN flY tNSITES c:: -..... I I .....,t 1.' \', ' '" /,. UNDI:R ROOT eAU. l ...... -I- I ..... '/.... \', ", " :.....---_.. . ~ 'l.Q T H PACT!:D SU&GItADe SCALE 111 . 2.01-011 ~ I....." .....( .......... \, ", \, ", " / -1 5 fALl: 111 . 2.0' PROJ. NO. 2.005 45 ....~..... " , " ,r~ Ii i / /........ ..........:.......... '\' "" //' i I! I) 20. 10 . 20 40, OATE 2006 01-03 ~ / /.................... ", ", /' i I i I /I /I I TREE PLANTING DETAIL SHEET L1 ~ I ...... '- " 'J I ill". /I I NOT TO SCALE East Elevation Looking frolD County 18 0 North Elevation KWJ'K KWIK 0 0 KWIK TRIP STORES 0 0 Sr*,iiJ TR'P 0 A4 0 Revised MAR 07, 06 0 DLARSON Dale DEC27,05 Shakopee, MN. ,... 1M 0 DA R CHI TEe T Checked: TPL STORES STORES 0 Drawn: TPL Proj~ #: South Elevation Looking fronl Crossings Boulevard KW'K KW'K 0 . 0 D West Elevation KWIK TRIP STORES Sr*1i' TR'P.M BA3 D n~ Shakopee, MN. STORES 0 0 STORES D Revlsed MAR 07. 06 DLARSON Date: DEC27.05 Checl:ed: iPL lOT Drawn. iPL ARCHITEC Project # I' Fat, .' J3.8_ News Children Living Near Gas Stations at High Risk for Leukemia February 02,2006 Children Living Near Gas Stations at High Risk for Leukemia Families across the United States are becoming increasingly aware of environm.ental hazards close to home, especially those posing health and safety risks to children. As a result, many are shocked to learn that something as common as the neighborhood gas bar can be threatening the lives of their children, releasing unmonitored levels of benzene into the soil, air, and water supply. According to a recently published study by France's National Research Institute, children living near gas stations are four times more likely to develop leukemia, a lethal form of cancer. Benzene is a highly toxic chemical present in crude oil and gasoline. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), automobile service stations are among the major contributors of benzene exposure in the environment. The major dangers are not in plain view, but often result from faulty gasoline storage tanks buried underground. Excessive benzene vapors can enter the air when tanks are refilled improperly. And too many cases of gasoline tanks leaking have allowed dangerous levels of benzene to enter soil and water supplies. Chronic exposure to benzene involves fatal health risks, whether inhaled through polluted air or ingested through tainted water sources. According to The Department of Health and Human Services, benzene exposure contributes to the degeneration of the bone marrow and it is a known carcinogen (cancer-causing agent). The most alarming aspect is that very little legislation exists regarding the monitoring of benzene emissions and leaks occurring at local automobile service stations. With nearly 200,000 gas stations across the country, the health and welfare of staggering numbers of American families are at jeopardy. They are left. unaware and uninformed of dangerous accidents, spills and leaks. A recently published article from The Decatur Daily News, examines the plight of the Terry family. In 1999, an underground gasoline storage tank leaked at the neighboring Bud's Chevron, contaminating the groundwater beneath their property with benzene. However, when discovered shortly thereafter by The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) and by Bud's Chevron, Petroleum Sales Inc. (PSI), no area families were notified. The Terry family was unable to take any precautions to protect themselves . . from potential hazards. Tragically, the Terry's6-year-old daughter Haley now suffers from leukemia. ADEM notified the Terry family in 2004, five years after the leak occurred. Currently, the Terry family and four of their neighbors have file suit against the owner of Bud's Chevron, PSI, for failing to notify them of the dangers presented to their families' health, and for reducing the value of their properties. PSI's lawyer said that PSI had no legal obligation to notify nearby residents of the leak, but was only required to notify ADEM. And apparently ADEM is under no legal duty to inform nearby residents. A lack of legislation and policy regarding immediate resident notification exposed the Terry family and their neighbors to poisoned water supplies for years. Any family living in close proximity to a gas station, or near a former gas station should be entitled to know of any leaks, spills, or dangerously high levels of toxic vapors released into the environment. Gasoline contains benzene, and any exposure through soil, water or air can put a child's health, and potentially their life, at risk. If you or a loved one have suffered benzene exposure related to a gas station leak or spill, contact Jim Adler and Associates to discuss your case. Treatment for diseases such as leukemia can be financially and emotionally debilitating. You could be entitled to financial compensation for medical treatments, lost wages and pain and suffering. Jim Adler and Associates have over 30 years of legal expertise and can protect your family's rights. Click now on the link below. 1-800-683-8383 ". ~. J 3.6. Date: Aprl-4-2006 Riverside Fields & Centex Home Al2Peal petition Concerns regarding existence of a Gas station in our neighborhood. 1. Noise pollution, light pollution & inviting strangers in.our neighborhood. (Neighborhood commercial zoning Criteria # 1 has not been satisfied). Criteria #1 The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity; Finding #1 The Boardfinds that the use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Why we feel this Criteria has not been met. . This area is very much a part of our neighborhood. The access roads to this area touch our backyards. There isn't sufficient burming. . How can a 24 hour gas station "not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of our Homes "? . Why would I enjoy my home if I know that there are strangers driving past my yard every day at mid night? . . How will I enjoy my home if I have to wake up at 1 :00 AM because someone decided to play loud music in their car? . The car wash closes down at 11 :00 PM to reduce noise, what about the noise oflargevehic1es driving.down in the middle of the night. This Criterion was made to protect residents & allow for proper planning of the city of Shakopee. We expect that the city council, planning commission & Board of appeals should be sure that 1000/0 of the conditions in these criteria are met before any decision is made. "," ;,,' 2. Traffic & Access roads (Neighborhood commercial zoning Criteria # 3 has not been satisfied) Criteria #3 Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Finding #3 The Board finds that adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities exist to serve the proposed use, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Why we feel this Criteria has not been met: . This neighborhood was not designed to accommodate 10 pumps & 20 fuelling stations & it should never be. . There is very clear evidence that this area was planned with the purpose of having buildings for professional services & establishments like daycare, doctors offices etc. . The width of the roads is very narrow, 9 feet in the location where 8 cars per minute & 200 cars per hour would pass if this gas station does show up in our neighborhood. . It is very difficult to find a gas station with 10 pumps & 20 fuelling stations in the metro area. This Criterion was made to protect residents & allowfor proper planning of the city of Shakopee~ We expect that the city council, planning commission & Board of appeals should be sure that 1000/0 of the. conditions in these criteria are met before any decision is made. ". ~~.' 3. Swimming Pool (Neighborhood commercial zoning Criteria # 1 has not been satisfied). Criteria #1 The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity; Finding #1 The Boardfinds that the use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity, provided the conditions noted in the resolution are met. Why we feel this Criteria has not been met: . The swimming pool is in the immediate vicinity of the access road to the gas station. The swimming pool was approved by the city of Shakopee. . Ryland homes sold us our homes with the swimming pool as an "enjoyment" component of our property. We will not be able to use the swimming pool because of the gas station, so will this "not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted". Clearly Criteria #1 has not been satisfied. This Criterion was made to protect residents & allow for proper planning of the city of Shako pee. We expect that the city council, planning commission & Board of appeals should be sure that 1000/0 of the conditions in these criteria are met before any decision is made. . .. 4. Health (Neighborhood commercial zoning Criteria # 1 has not been satisfied). Article # 1 Children Living Near Gas Stations at High Risk for Leukemia February 02, 2006 Families across the United States are becoming increasingly aware of environmental hazards close to home, especially those posing health and safety risks to children. As a result, many are shocked to learn that something as common as the neighborhood gas bar can be threatening the lives of their children, releasing unmonitored levels of benzene into the soil, air, and water supply. According to a recently published study by France's National Research Institute, children living near gas stations are four times more likely to develop leukemia, a lethal form of cancer... .. '" please see handout Article #2 Families living near gas stations or other petroleum product industries can experience long-term effects without ever having short-term effects because repeated long-term effects can occur at levels not high enough to make you immediately sick. This is especially true for children or people who are already ill. Article # 3 11"18 ....~. Linked To Risk Of .Childhood Leukaemia """""""",."" .",~d*lm%",;;%.l"f1_ Living close to a garage or 11111 station may quadruple the risk of acute childhood leukaemia, suggests research published in the journal Occupational and EnvironmentalMedicine. The findings are based on 280 cases of acute childhood leukaemia and a comparison group of 285 _ matched for sex. The ~e drawn from four hospitals in France and almost two thirds (60%) of the;!: ... with leukaemia were aged between 2 and 6. Why we feel this Criteria has not been met: . Because children are at a risk in our homes. . , . . Conclusion · We want a thorough, real & independent Traffic Study to be done by the city & then measure that against the demographics of our neighborhood & the vicinity of homes & swimming pool before even a preliminary permit is given. This will give a real picture of how this gas station is going to change the enjoyment of our homes. · We the residents may decide to measure the noise & pollution that this gas station will cause in our homes by various means including but not limited to the use of recording devices & video cameras in our backyards. We will use this proof to prove to those who still disagree with our concerns. · Any resident that we have talked to in our neighborhood (close to 100+ homes) is opposed to this, does the city not care of this fact, does the city not realize that there is something wrong here, or is it that 100+ residents are making too much of something insignificant. . In the next 10-15 years if there are multiple accidents next to the swimming pool especially involving children, we the residents will be back with these very documents & these very facts that had been presented to the city. . If a gas station will eventually. show up in our neighborhood, we want to have the city to add a condition that the CUP be reviewed annually & we will not accept a 24 hours gas station so close to our homes. We will take whatever action is necessary to stop this from happening. . If the value of our properties does go down, we will pursue all channels to make things right. . Ryland Homes, Centex Homes have not been forthcoming with this information, they do not care. The developers do not care. We have the city to look out forus. . Residents bought this property by trusting the city to do its job & plan in a manner that is consistent with aresidential property. We still have faith the city will seriously look at our side of the story. Residents of Riverside Fields & Centex Homes j ~ p) -- 1l Appeal to Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council - The Residents of Riverside Fields Community April 4th, 2006 < . The objectives of this presentation are to: - Bring to the attention of members of the City Council, the concerns of the community residents with regard to the proposed Kwik Trip Gas Station - Request a healthy debate on the issues - Urge the elected members to · reiect the pro/Josal for a gas station in our neighborhood and/or · mitigate the future risks bv providing solutions to the issues/concerns presented ) . Safety, Peace & Harmony - Traffic near the pool & in the Community - Strangers in the Community at Nights - Road Access Issues . Pollution - Noise - Light - Chemicals . Health Hazards - Chemicals c "Neighborhood Commercial": Issues and Concerns of Residents Subd. 1. Purpose._The purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial zone is to provide areas for the development of low-intensity, service-oriented uses for surrounding the immediate residential areas. Immediate residential areas are understood to be those that are generally within five (5) minutes walking distance of a neighborhood commercial area. (Ord. 563, November 25, 1999) . This ordinance was written specifically to protect residents and neighborhoods exactly like the one we live in. There are five specific uses that are permitted by neig h borhood - commercial- retail; - administrative, executive, and professional offices; - medical or dental clinics; - services; and public buildings. · The Kwik Trip Gas Station, as proposed, is neither of low intensity nor will be used mainly by immediate residential areas. . It is important to look at the description & true intent of "Neighborhood Commercial" and to hold all establishments to the required standards such as - low intensity - services are more likely to draw the business of the immediate adjoining neighborhood. - The purpose of a conditional use permit is so that the establishments that are placed in a particular area (this one happens to be adjacent to homes whose values approach $400,000 to $500,000) can be limited with certain conditions so that each may exist in harmony with one another. . The proposed plan asks for ten pumps with a total of twenty fueling stations. . A gas station of this magnitude is bound to make a significant impact on traffic and is not low intensity. - The closest gas station in a zoning of B-1 has only six pumps and twelve fueling stations; significantly fewer than the Kwik Trip is proposing. - We have yet to find another gas station in the metro area that has more than 6 pumps other than the Kwik Trip (on Co. Rd. 83 and Co. Rd. 42) and the Sam's Club gas station. - In keeping with the idea of neighborhood commercial, this station should have at a minimum the same amount if not fewer than other gas stations in the metro area. - This commercial development will be as much a part of the neighborhood as any of the residential homes and its proximity makes it unique to any other development we have seen in Shakopee . Proposed Solution: Limit the number of pumps to 6 - We believe that with the exceptional service Kwik Trip claims to have that given the location it will flourish even with only six pumps - Limiting operating hours to 5.00 8.m to 11 .00 p.m. . A 24 Hour Operation will - negatively impact the resident's safety, peace of mind and enjoyment of their home and neighborhood. - Encourage unwarranted traffic and people throughout the entire night with the associated noise & light pollution - Kwik Trip agreed to close the car wash at 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. because of the impact the noise might have on the neighbors but somehow they have swept aside the question of how the introduction of trucks and strangers at those same hours will impact the neighborhood . This does not follow the intent of neighborhood commercial - Low intensity - Neighborhood usage etc. . As Residents we will NOT ACCEPT 24 Hour usage AND will continue to APPEAL through all channels & avenues available to us. · Raman Patole - Another community Resident has done the research & will present his findings from real scientific data. City's Criteria for CUP - Many Not Met Criteria #1 : "The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vi c i n i ty; " Residents' Finding: · Conducted Informal survey of 3-5 Realtors & Appraisers - we have found that the value of property adjacent to & in the neighborhood of such commercial establishments is significantly (adversely) affected. - Gas Station, among them, is a top depreciation element. . How can a 24 hour establishment next to a residential neighborhood be ENJOY ABLE? . How can oil tankers and semis passing through our community swimming pool and back yards at all times of day and night be ENJOYABLE? · Who will want to buy homes approaching nearly a half Million dollars with a Gas Station welcoming them into the community? For some of these homes, this gas station will be their backyard ornament. . Proposed Solution: - Reject the proposed Gas Station on the grounds that this criteria has not been met - Set appropriate conditions that need to be met and get appraisals done by Scott County or independent appraisers. The onus is on the Approvers to be sure of the findings. ., Criteria #3: "Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been or will be provided;" . Residents & City Council findings: All of us have agreed to this point that this criteria has clearly not been met including the city council and the dissenting vote in Board of Planning Commission: - The traffic study done earlier was not meant for this type of usage. - The Roads have not been designed to serve 50 foot tanker trucks, - The approved plans show inadequate buffering between the commercial lots & the community and hence never assumed this type of usage . Access to these establishments should be considered with careful considerations of vehicle movements of all sizes and shapes and the ggjacency to the pool. - There is currently no way for a semi-truck, gas-tankers or even a 24 foot U- haul to exit out of the commercial development without driving through our neighborhood. - These types of vehicles do not have a street radius large enough to make a turn with out having impact with the curb or median. - Attached is our visualization of what this looks like using the Scott county GIS Maps. - At the last meeting of the City Council on Feb 21st, Honb'le Mayor was very ~oncerned about the types of establishments planned and the access Issues. - The preliminary plat was approved with conditions that developer/tenant will do the updates to access as needed in the future. - We would like the Traffic study & finalization of access issues prior to any usage being approved even preliminarily. The have been multiple proposals for access. . This is a problem that needs to be solved before any permits are approved as every establishment in this development will have some sort of delivery truck that will not be able to exit without severely impacting a residential neighborhood. . The adjacency of to the pool for ALL TRAFFIC coming out of the commercial lot has been completely ignored. How many pools are there in . Per previous discussions and pictures that were shared, how. will the proposed additional traffic not hinder the safety and enjoyment of the community? . To kindly resolve the issue of Access before approving an establishment that will bring greater and undesirable traffic to the community. . How will safe movement of community traffic, pedestrians, bikers etc. be assured? . Proposed Solution : - Reject the proposed Gas Station on the grounds that this criteria has not been met - Set appropriate conditions that need to be met to completely to assure safe and efficient movement of all kinds of traffic in, to, from the community · Criteria #4: " The use is consistent with the purposes of the zone in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use;" · Residents Finding: Although a gas station is one of the uses permitted with conditional use, we believe that because of the proximity of the commercial area that these conditions need to be strict and severely limit the impact this type of establishment will have on the surrounding residents. . How was Swimming Pool approved at a location where we will see a lot of traffic to and from the Gas Station? . What is the purpose of Planning? Why are builders & developers allowed to get away with this? . Apparently the builders & developers have had this use in mind for over 2 years. . The residents buy properties with the trust in the process that the City's planning for the future will approve things that are in harmony with prior approvals & not in contradiction of them . Proposed Solution: - Reject the proposed Gas Station on the grounds that this criteria has not been met - Set very strict conditions that have to be met to assuage the concerns of the residents who we believe are your primary constituents , Our Appeal: Be Our Advocate · We believe that it is the duty of the Council to protect residents against businesses that would negatively impact the enjoyment, quality of life, safety and property values of our neighborhood and thereby putting the citizens well-being before the profit of companies like Kwik Trip. · We elect you as representatives to look out for our best interests and we believe we have pointed out our concerns & issues - which clearly leads to NO GAS ST A TION or any usage which requires high intensity traffic flow · We urge you to reject the proposed Gas Station and request the developer to consider other Low-Intensity usage for these commercial lots - We would welcome the usage of Small Office Building, Child Care Center, Doctor's Office, Bank, Health Clinic, small sit-down Restaurants, etc. - We will support & encourage such establishments by providing our business to these establishments . Overall Plan: It is responsibility of this body to consider drastic changes to the overall pre-approved plans if new plans are to be considered & criteria defined are to be met: - The Swimming Pool needs to be moved a better location in the community for the safety of our Children and residents by the CITY . The builders & developers should be able work with the City to get this done . This is an insignificant investment in the scheme of $4 million to build the Gas Station, Redesign and development of the city roads & intersection on Crossing Blvd . Usage Conditions: - No 24 hour usage for ANY proposed usage for the safety of the residents - Number of Pumps to be maxirpum 6 - Height of Burming at least 5 feet - Traffic Design to accommodate the type of usage - No big Gas Station Signage and very subtle signage on the building. - ONL Y 1 for the entire set of commercial establishments towards the proposed Cty Rd 21 - No Liquor License - No Cigarettes - No Loudspeakers & music other than to make emergency announcements Thank You , Appendix , . The reason for this feedback is not about positive outcome but real concern about how city's planning commission listens and discusses issues presented to them in the realm of powers given to them. . As engaged residents of the Shakopee city & the community we were very disappointed with the working of the Board: - The was no healthy debate or discussion on the issues & concerns presented by the residents - Residents were accosted for bringing facts to the table - There was no discretion applied to. the CUP which is the purpose of going to the planning commission - They seemed to be a sign off authority on Staff's finding - A Board with significant responsibility and powers need to show the residents a fair listening and empathy to-wards their concerns - There were casual remarks about" this is a 24 hr world" - The chair & the commission did not generate any level of confidence among residents that they ever had a chance of being heard. - The planning commission member who proposed the motion dissented later on the ground that criteria 3 was not met was funny & absurd. He did not bring it even for discussion earlier that he thought is was not met. , . . OUTl.OT A . 7 I> 5 4 J 2 i <II "" 27\f1-m1111 i 1 1IiI is 19 2 2 S 17 J!! 3 J S 15 21 " 42 7 15 l!2 ~e RIVERSIDE flEl.tlS 1ST AllDmaN "ILLUSTRA TIVE ONLY" Nnt tn ~~~Il"! nr Ar~hitl"!~h Irl"! Pi~h Jrl"!