The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.1. Update on MnDOT's State Highway Investment Plan (MnSHIP)-County Res. No. 2013-140 31 Update on MnDOT's State Highway Investment Plan (MnSHIP) 0 MG � � 20 -Year A ,o Transportation oak State Hichway 0 Fiji • g Investment Plan Scott County City of Shakopee July 29th, 20 13 ,.._ ,°'_ w 1'1 DOT's Family of Pl i i ,, 20-Year State Highway Investment Plan (M:iSHIP) Statewide Years f Years Years 1 Mir : :nesota GO Multi :modal 11-z0 : 5-10 14 i Construct 50 Vision Transportatiwi i t 1 10 -year work plan i 1 updated annually t Why is MnSHIP Important? MnDOT charged with constructing, operating, and maintaining the 1 2,000 mile state highway system Minnesota's economic vitality and quality of life depends upon a strong, well- connected, multimodal state highway system Fiscally constrained 20 -year plan guiding and communicating MnDOT's capital investment decisions for this system Provides transparency and builds trust State Highway Revenue Sources Federal Aid State Programs Highway Program State Fuel Vehicle Vehicle ederal Fuel Tax Sales Tax Registratio Tax 31% 8% Tax - 21% 31% State Trunk State Trunk Highway Hwy Bonds Fund 9% Capital revenue 2014 -2033 = $18 billion Changes in inflation impacts buying power 2012 dollars (in millions) under 5% inflation assumption S1,200 II Projected Revenue Adjusted for 5% Inflation Projected Revenue in Year of Construction S1,000 CC 1. cc 0 >2 oc c S400 ,C V0 2014 2015 2016 2011 2018 2019 2020 2021 2012 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 20B 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 State Fiscal Year Ten Investment Categ ories Asset. Management Traveler Safe I. Pavement Condition 4.Traveler Safety 2. Bridge Condition 3. Roadside Infrastructure Condition Regional + Community Critical Connections Improvement Priorities 5.Interregional Corridor Mobility 9.Regional + Community 6.Twin Cities Mobility Improvement Priorities 7.Bicycle Infrastructure 8.Accessible Pedestrian Project Support Infrastructure IO.Project Support Evolving Transportation Needs Aging state highway system 50% of pavements are over 50 years old 35% of bridges are over 50 years old Increasing emphasis on a multimodal system Increasing pressure to support local economic development and quality of life M n DOT's Capital Investment Needs $30 billion to meet performance targets and key objectives Investment area Total need Asset Management $17.6 billion Traveler Safety $1.3 billion Critical Connections $5.7 billion Regional and Community improvement Priorities $1.7 billion Project Support $2.9 billion TOTAL $30 billion Additional local and regional concerns and opportunities beyond $30 billion Evaluati n Investment A g Approach r a 1 • Asset Management Approach B • Traveler Safety Current) • Critical Connections i ■ • Regional + Community Improvement Priorities -- • Project Support A B C Key Themes from Public Outreach Pursue a diverse program Address pavement needs strategically A statewide network of well- maintained roads is critical to freight movement and regional access - Promote economic competitiveness and quality of life through greater mobility investment Remain responsive to evolving needs Public vs. MnDOT Input General agreement that making progress towards all goals and objectives is desirable Public leaned "C", greater emphasis on multimodal mobility and local priorities MnDOT leaned "A", greater emphasis on maintaining existing assets Public input MnDOT input 36% 33 °Io 22 A B C A B C Development of Investment Priorities Influenced by: Public input State requirements Federal transportation policy MnDOT policy Bridge condition Responsiveness Maintenance operations budget Setting Investment Priorities Summary of rationale Diversify investments for as long as possible Meet GASB 34 minimum condition levels Meet MAP -21 targets and maximize federal funds Maintain district flexibility where possible Planned Investments Year 1-10 Total: $7.8 billion Biggest strengths Accessible Pedestrian • Diversity. progress in all Infrastructure Project Support $120 M investment categories RCIP $870 ml • Mitigates key risks Bicycle $520 M Infrastructure 7 c/ - \ , • Aligns well with public input —\, Pavement $110 IA . \\ Condition 1% TC Mobility $2.90 B Biggest weaknesses $520m 38% • Limited response to growing and evolving needs i Traveler Safety Roadside Bridge • Asset conditions decline on non- $320 M Infrastructure Condition $670 M NHS 4% $1.59 B 9% 21% Planned Investments Year 11-20 Total: $9.2 billion Biggest strengths Accessible Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Infrastructure • Meet federal and state performance $100 % M 7 $180 M requirements (assets at GASB 34 ,... 2.0,s -___ ...... Traveler SafeiVi --- - ' minimum condition levels) $300 M Project 3.3% Support • Alleviate some of growing pressure on $460 M Roadside 5.0% operations budget to keep roads safe Infrastructure $820M Biggest weaknesses 8.9% Pavement • Assets decline on higher volume Bridge Condition highways Condition $5.41 B $1.89 B 59.1% 20.6% * No appreciable progress towards non- asset goals • Many unfunded needs in all categories Explanations for Shift in Years 1 1-20 Reduction in buying power of =60% by 2033 Meeting MAP -21 performance targets and GASB 34 minimum condition levels becomes increasingly challenging and costly Stewardship responsibility to maintain existing assets for future generations Outcomes — Existing Assets Current conditions Through 2023 Through 2033 2033 Risk Interstate NHS 2.4% poor 2% poor 2% poor .... At (assumed) • pavements (45 miles) (40 miles) (40 miles) -- MAP-21 target Other NHS 4.3°o poor 4% poor A 11 poor w At GASB 34 pavements (250 miles) (230 miles) (690 miles) v minimum Non-NHS 7.5°o poor 11-13% poor v 11-13°o poor ..... At GASB 34 pavements (505 miles) (810 miles) (810 miles) -.* minimum NHS bridges 4.7% poor 2-3% poor A 8°o poor • At GASB 34 minimum Non-NHS 2.1°/o poor 4-6% poor • 6-12% poor • Exceed GASB 34 bridges minimum Roadside Many aging assets: Focus on NHS; v Focus on NHS; , Significant stress infrastructure few fixes at optimal condition of many condition of many on operations point in life cycle assets declines assets declines budget Outcomes — Critical Connections Current conditions Through 2023 Through 2033 Twin Cities 21.4% congested Targeted investments to address spot No investment. Nlobility during peak travel & operational issues. Also. complete: Congestion and periods • I-35E MnPASS in St. Paul reliability issues • MN610 extension to 1-94 worsen. • 1-94 IN,InPASS Minneapolis to St. Paul • I-35W MnPASS Minneapolis to US10 Interregional Performance target No investment. Performance target No investment. Three Corridor met (average corridor met though average speed declines on highways need work to (IRO) Mobility travel speed) several corridors meet targets Accessible 50% curb ramps, 27% Most signalized intersections and curb Focus on maintaining Pedestrian signalized intersections ramps are ADA compliant. ADA compliance Infrastructure ADA compliant Bicycle Not well known, Accommodate primarily as part of Maintain high priority Infrastructure studyiplan in progress bridge and pavement projects accommodations Outcomes — Safety and RCIPs Current Through 2023 Through 2033 conditions Traveler In 2012, 388 Focus on lower cost, high benefit Focus almost exclusively Safety deaths on state treatments. Address several locations on lower cost, high benefit highways, a 40% with a crash history. Continue to partner treatments. Continue to reduction in 10-yrs in TZD initiative partner in TZD initiative. Regional and Invest through: Address through partnerships, design No investment. Little-to-no Community • district add-ons in add-ons, and a few stand alone ability to address local Improvement local projects including concerns, partner, or spur Priorities communities • Several interchanges and urban economic development. (RCIPs) • major projects in reconstructions statewide Greater • MN60 2 to 4 lane Windom-Mtn. Lake Minnesota • TH371 2 to 4 lane Nisswa-Jenkins • statewide • US14 2 to 4 lane N. Mankato-Nicollet solicitations MnDOT Project Selection Process Historically (since 1 993), used a successful regional input model, the Area Transportation Partnerships (ATPs) MAP -21 (2012) emphasized making progress towards targets for federal performance measures on the National Highway System Modified project selection process to ensure adequate progress to avoid any potential financial penalties for failure MnDOT Project Selection Process The new process has two programs to mitigate risks ° Statewide Performance Program ° District Risk Management Program Time constraints required MnDOT to implement the new process with less than ideal stakeholder involvement Used the new process to select FY2017 projects for the draft 2014 -2017 STIP Used the new process as a starting point for selecting planned projects in FY2018 and beyond How will MnDOT Evolve the New Process? Commit to maintaining the ATP process by: Better defining the ATP role Seeking input from ATPs in August/September Involve more local partners on a technical advisory team Adjust accordingly as MAP -21 final rulemaking concludes What does it Mean for a Project to be in MnSHIP? Years 1-4 (STIP): Committed projects, highly likely to be delivered Years 5-10: Planned and in the budget, though changes are possible Years 1 1-20: No projects listed; long -range planning years Selecting Projects to Achieve Outcomes:Two Investment Programs Statewide Performance Program Focuses on federal performance requirements identified in MAP -21 NHS road system (US 169, I -35, CH 42, CH 21) District Risk Management Program Focuses on non -NHS highways and addresses unique conditions at the district level Metro District Planned Investments ,, �Ye Figure H -9: Planned Investments for Years 2014 -2017 Figure 11-10: Planned Investments for Years 2018 -2023 RC RC S24.0M (2 %) $15.6M (7%) AP PS PS $26.6M (2 %) S180.0M (12 %) AP S16.9M (7%) PC B( _ S4.2M (2 %) S126.4M (550) $29.2M (2%) PC BI S377.7M (25%) S7.8M (3 %) � _ a TC S7.8M (3 %) TC S354.OM (23%) BC BC S297.5M (19%) S22.1M (10%) TS RI S11.7M 15`': S24.7M (11 %) TS RI S91.4M S145.8M (6 %) (9 %) 14 - 20 I T IP Pr ojects r 7 M et o • ': ts 5 3 6 7 Q - Ole 26 3 1 ro awl/ j 2 Carver Co . Sco :4 0:0 1 04 tt o . Metro Work Plan: ProjectYears 5 -9 Proiects in Scott Countv Pavement Preservation _ I is ..,_,__ ,o, _., , 1 gilms..... 2 .. A a im =;r F 1111 . 1171.1111P1 , Carver C.o. ��. IG C 400000 art hi 13 1 r i-------. 000 01) _ '_ 1 1 35 SCOtt o« s l I ' Unmet Needs Given the projected $12 billion funding gap, there will be many unfunded priorities Years 1-10: asset condition declines on non- NHS and many local priorities will not be addressed Years 1 1-20: asset condition declines on all non - interstate roads. Many unfunded needs in all categories Summary of Comments on MnSHIP Support the completion of Highway 610 and the regional system Support the inclusion of the inter - regional corridor system in the plan Applaud MnDOT's efforts to move towards performance measures ° Continue to work with local partners to leverage non -MnDOT funding sources Support MnDOT's efforts to build support for additional transportation funding to address preservation, safety and mobility funding gaps Recognize Transportation system and regional economic development relationship -SCALE TED Initiative Questions? e P. • oro 20 -Year M State Highway for T„ °` ° ° " "' °° � 0 61 Investment Plan 10.4 AGENDA # SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: JULY 29, 2013 ORIGINATING DIVISION: Community Services ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Program Delivery CONSENT AGENDA: I-' Yes ' No PRESENTER: Lisa Freese — 8363 ATTACHMENTS: IV Yes h No PROJECT: TIME REQUESTED: 30 Minutes ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -140; Authorizing Submittal of Comments to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) on the Minnesota State Highway Investment Plan (MnSHIP) CONTRACT /POLICY /GRANT: r County Attorney Review FISCAL: Finance Review r Risk Management Review r Budget Change ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES: r Provide a Supportive Organizational Culture Develop Strong Public Partnerships Manage Challenges and Create Opportunities r Assure Long Term Fiscal Stability Emphasize Excellence in Customer Service DEPARTMENT /DIVISION HEAD SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SIGNATURE: Approved: DISTRIBUTION /FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Denied: Tabled: Community Services, Mitch Rasmussen Other: Community Services, Eunie Quade Community Services, Lisa Freese Deputy Clerk : Date: Background /Justification: The purpose of this agenda item is to adopt Resolution No. 2013 -140, authorizing submittal of comments to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) on the Minnesota State Highway Investment Plan (MnSHIP). MnSHIP is MnDOT's instrument for deciding and communicating capital investment priorities for their system for the next 20 years. MnSHIP is a fiscally constrained plan, meaning the planned expenditures must align with expected revenues, which total $18 billion. Meanwhile, the projected transportation needs on the state highway system total $30 billion. The plan considers many factors when setting priorities, including federal and state law, system conditions, and public input. The result is a set of investment priorities that vary over the next 20 years. MnDOT's priorities for the next 10 years balance preservation of existing infrastructure with investments in safety, new connections for multiple modes of transportation, and other projects that advance economic development and quality of life objectives. However, investments in the second 10 years focus almost exclusively on preserving existing infrastructure. Despite this focus, the number of roads and bridges in poor condition will more than double and perhaps even triple within 20 years. Given the projected $12 billion funding gap, there will be many unfunded priorities within the 20 -year horizon. Community Services staff have reviewed the document and prepared a letter with comments for submittal to MnDOT. The primary comments include: • Support the completion of Highway 610 and the regional system • Support the inclusion of the inter - regional corridor system in the plan • Applaud MnDOT's efforts to move towards performance measures • Continue to work with local partners to leverage non -MnDOT funding sources • Support MnDOT's efforts to build support for additional transportation funding to address preservation, safety and mobility funding gaps • Recognize Transportation system and regional economic development relationship -SCALE TED Initiative The comments above are included in the letter to MnDOT. Public comments on the MnSHIP document will be accepted through July 31. A link to the MnSHIP document is included below. http: / /www. dot. state. mn. us / planning /mnship /participate.html Fiscal Impact: None BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Date: July 29, 2013 Resolution No.: 2013 -140 Motion by Commissioner: Seconded by Commissioner: RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -140; AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) ON THE MINNESOTA STATE HIGHWAY INVESTMENT PLAN (MNSHIP) WHEREAS, MnSHIP is MnDOT's instrument for deciding and communicating capital investment priorities for their system for the next 20 years; and WHEREAS, the plan considers many factors when setting priorities, including federal and state law, system conditions, and public input, resulting in a set of investment priorities that vary over the next 20 years; and WHEREAS, MnSHIP is a fiscally constrained plan, meaning its planned expenditures must align with expected revenues; and WHEREAS, expected revenues total $18 billion, while the projected transportation needs on the state highway system total $30 billion leaving 40% unfunded needs within the 20 -year horizon; and WHEREAS, Community Services staff have reviewed the document and prepared a letter with comments for submittal to MnDOT; and WHEREAS, the primary comments include: • Support the completion of Highway 610 and the regional system • Support the inclusion of the inter - regional corridor system in the plan • Applaud MnDOT's efforts to move towards performance measures • Continue to work with local partners to leverage non -MnDOT funding sources • Support MnDOT's efforts to build support for additional transportation funding to address preservation, safety and mobility funding gaps • Recognize Transportation system and regional economic development relationship -SCALE TED Initiative WHEREAS, the comments above are included in the letter to MnDOT. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Date: July 29, 2013 Resolution No.: 2013 -140 Motion by Commissioner: Seconded by Commissioner: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Scott County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes the submittal of comments to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) on the Minnesota State Highway Investment Plan (MNSHIP). COMMISSIONERS VOTE Wagner t Yes r No r Absent r Abstain Wolf r Yes r No r Absent r Abstain Menden f Yes r No r Absent r Abstain Marschall F Yes r No t Absent I Abstain Ulrich lL Yes I"""_ No r Absent r Abstain State of Minnesota) County of Scott ) 1, Gary L. Shelton, duly appointed qualified County Administrator for the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Scott County, Minnesota, at their session held on the 29 day of July, 2013 now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Shakopee, Minnesota, this 29 day of July, 2013. County Administrator Administrator's Designee