HomeMy WebLinkAbout12.D.8.B. Natural Resource Design Standards Manual Report
CITY OF SHAKOPEE 1;J. .n. r . ~
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Ryan Hughes, Natural Resource Specialist
On Behalf of the Environmental Advisory Committee
Subject: Natural Resource Design Standards Manual Proposal
Meeting Date: February 21,2006
INTRODUCTION
CR Planning has provided a proposal to work with the City of Shakopee to complete the Natural
Resources Design Standards Manual. The Environmental Advisory Committee recommends
approval of the proposal and for work to begin on the Natural Resource Design Standards
Manual.
BACKGROUND
On November 14,2005, staff and representatives from the Environmental Advisory Committee
presented an update on the work completed in creating a Natural Resource Corridor system.
Following this presentation, City Council authorized work to finalize the Natural Resource
Corridor Map and to begin developing the Natural Resource Design Standards Manual.
DISCUSSION
CR Planning was the firm that assisted the City in analyzing the natural resources and developing
the Natural Resource Corridor map. This work was funded by the DNR as part of a grant that the
City received.
Due to the anticipated workload in 2006 for the Natural Resource Specialist, we asked CR
Planning for a proposal to continue working with the City and helping to develop the more
detailed design standards. CR Planning has provided a proposal with a cost not to exceed
$15,000. The average hourly rate CR Planning would be charging is $55.
Funding to complete the project is available in the Natural Resources budget. The Natural
Resources budget includes $10,000 in professional services to complete a Wetland Management
Plan. In essence, the Natural Resource Design Standards Manual will include the same
information and provide the same preservation policies as a Wetland Management Plan. Thus,
staff recommends the $10,000 be utilized for work to be completed on the Natural Resource
Design Standards Manual.
The additional $5,000 to complete the work would be funded by the money budgeted to complete
the Natural Resource Inventory update. Based on information obtained fromthe engineering
department, the cities of Scott County have decided not to take aerial photos of the county until
2007. If a Natural Resource Inventory were to be completed in 2006, the most recent aerial
photos taken in 2003 would be utilized. This would only update the inventory to 2003
conditions. All development occurring between 2003 and 2006 would not be included in the
update. Thus, staff recommends utilizing the $5,000 budgeted to complete the Natural Resource
Inventory Update to complete the Natural Resource Design Standards Manu~l in 2006, ~nd defer
the Natural Resourcelnventory update until after new aerials are available.
VISIONING RELATIONSHIOP
This action appears to meet the following aspects of the City's vision:
Goal: Active and Healthy Community
High Quality of Life
Strategies: Protect the Environment
REQUESTED ACTION
If the Council concurs, move to authorize an agreement with CR Planning to assist in developing
Natural Resource Design Standards, in an amount not to exceed $15,000.
DIm Planning
Qmwl,mity
~urCflll
IYfr. Mark Themig, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
City of Shakopee
Via e-mail
December 13,2005
Dear Mark:
I am pleased to submit this proposal to work with the City of Shakopee on the development of Natural
Resource Design Standards as the first step in implementing the Natural Resources Priorities Map. I have
enjoyed working with you, Ryan and the Environmental Advisory Committee throughout the past year.
Moving into implementation of the map would be exciting. My skills as an attorney and my experience
developing multiple land use ordinances, many with a focus on natural resource protection, are directly
applicable to this project My familiarity with the Priorities Map would help the project move quickly over
the proposed four-month timeline which includes one month for public hearing and adoption.
Attached to this proposal is a detailed work plan and a resume describing projects I have managed. In
addition to my general enthusiasm for working on natural resource ordinances, my specific skills most
relevant to this project are:
Deve!opin<..f!, natura! resource protection ordinances - I am familiar with a broad range of techniques for protecting
natural resources through development ordinances. I am also very familiar with the minimum state and
federal standards for shoreland, wetland, erosion and sediment control, and floodplain controls. I have
applied this knowledge in ordinances for multiple local governments in Minnesota.
Managingprojeds on tight timelines - I managed a 10- week project to develop program guidelines for the
Dakota County Farmland and Natural Area Program. Working with a committee of the Metropolitan
Council, I managed a three-month project to develop rural policiesfor Blueprint 2030. The keys to
success for both of these projects were consistent contact with the client and a clear schedule with
milestones. . In addition, my current workload is decreasing with projects ending in December. I have
only one project continuing into early 2006 and would be able to devote enough time to this project to
complete it by the beginning of the building season in 2006.
The following page contains a work plan and schedule reflecting our discussion about scope and schedule. I
have highlighted tasks where staff will contribute time or take the lead. The proposed scope does not include
outreach to the general public or stakeholders. It is assumed staff will manage outreach such as open houses
and review by stakeholder groups. To accomplish the proposed work plan I estimate a total of 274 hours.
In addition to me, my project assistant will provide word processing, layout and illustration assistance. The
total estimated cost of the proposed scope is $15,000; with an average hourly rate of $55.
Thank you for considering this proposal. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional
information
Sincerely,
Jean Coleman
CRPlanning, Inc.
2634 Vincent Ave. North
Minneapolis,11l'I55411
612-588-4904
jcoleman@crplanning.com
Dim Planning
C~m\lniW
R~Q\ll(.~$,
Work Plan and Schedule
Shakopee Natural Resources Design Standards Proposal
1. Project management Staff available for Throughout
Coordination with Shakopee Staff: Parks, Rec., and 20 hrs.
Natural Resources & Community Development coordination project
2. Meetings with EAC and City Council Staff will make
The consultant will meet with the EAC throughout
the project to discuss drafts and receive comments. meeting
Meetings may be at regular EAC meetings or special arrangements; and Throughout 20 hrs.
workshops. prepare and present project
The City Council will be briefed throughout the City Council briefings
project on progress.
3. Inventory existing Shakopee natural resource
ordinances and identify needs for new or modified Provide current natural Memo prepared
standards resource ordinances;
The consultant will prepare a memorandum Review and comment by forth week of 20 hrs.
identifying, by natural resource, existing ordinances on needs memo project
and needs for new or modified ordinances.
4. Research best practices and outline proposed
language for needs identified in Task #3 Assist in research up to Memo prepared
The consultant and staff will conduct research on best 20 hours; Review and by end of fifth 40 hrs.
practices to address the needs identified in Task #3. comment on memo week
The consultant will then prepare a memorandum with
ro osed Ian a e meetin the needs.
5. Prepare draft outline for Natural Resources Design Review and comment Outline prepared
Standards, including list of illustrations, and photo on draft outline by end of sixth 10 hrs.
needs week
6. Prepare illustrations and photos Assist in preparing Completed by Prepare
illustrations up to 40
hours; Gather 10cal end of eighth illustrations
hotos week 40 hrs.
7. Prepare draft Natural Resource Design Standards
The draft and final design standards will be delivered to Review and comment Completed by 80 hrs.
staff in an agreed upon electronic format. Preparing on draft standards end of 10th week
hard co ies and CD's shall be the res onsibili of staff.
8. Prepare final Natural Resource Design Standards Review and comment Completed by 40 hrs.
on fmal standards end of 12th week
9. Attend ublic hearin Hearing arrangements During April 4 hrs.
DIm Planning Jean Coleman' has extensive experience in natural resource and farmland
protection, preparing comprehensive land use plans and zoning ordinances,
CQmm\llli~ group process facilitation, and growth management. Ms. Coleman's work
:R~~~~i combines her interests in planning and law by using public participation and
conflict resolution techniques to develop policies, ordinances, and programs.
JEAN COLEMAN Ms. Coleman enjoys working in a variety of landscapes and has managed
multiple projects at the neighborhood, township, county and regional scale.
LAND USE PLANNER / RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
ATTORNEY
. Using Natural Resource Information in Land Use Planning: Pilot
Projects and Guidebook, Current. As a contractor to the Minnesota Dept.
EDUCATION of Natural Resources, Jean is facilitating natural resource-based land use
Juris Doctorate planning in three communities faced with growth pressures. She developed a
refmed greenways plan for the City of Shakopee, J\1N, based on a recently
University ofIowa, 1986 completed :MLCCS natural resources inventory. The greenways plan identifies
M.A. Urban & Regional Planning areas for protection and recommends strategies for implementation. Jean is
also working with the City of Oak Grove to raise awareness of natural
University ofIowa, 1986 resources and how development design choices can protect or impact these
RA. Political Science resources. Jean obtained funding for a natural resources inventory and
recently completed a "BioBlitz" as part of raising awareness for the Mid-
University of Northem Iowa, 1983 Minnesota stretch of the Mississippi River, north of St. Cloud.
EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE . Comparative Research of State-level Land Conservation Initiatives,
March 2003 - present 2005. Jean researched efforts in twelve states to develop state-level land
President/ Owner conservation initiatives. The research was used by the Campaign for
CR Planning, Inc. Conservation, a consortium of environmental and sportsmen's organizations
Minneapolis, :MN developing a 50-year vision for land conservation in Minnesota.
1993 - 2003 . Natural Resource"Based Land Use Planning Guidebook, 2003. Working
Principal! Owner with the University of Minnesota, Department of Landscape Architecture,
Biko Associates, Inc. Jean developed public participation and land use implementation sections for
Minneapolis, :MN EnvironmentallY-Based &gionalSmartGrowth Planning and Design. This handbook
presents a GIS-based process for analyzing green infrastructure and
1990 -1993 determining local protection and development priorities. The Metropolitan
Midwest Office Director Council funded the application of the process in Washington County,:MN.
American Farmland Trust
Chicago, IL . Farmland and Natural Area Program Guidelines, 2003. Jean managed
the creation of an implementation guidebook for the Dakota,County
1987 -1990 Farmland and Natural Area Program. The $20 million, ten-year program will
Project Manager protect priority farmland and natural areas in Dakota County through the
Trust for Public Land purchase of land and easements. The guidebook project involved working
New York, NY with Dakota County staff and Board of Commissioners to develop policies
for project selection, property valuation, negotiations with landowners, and
1986 -1987 property management.
Junior Planner
T &M Associates . RuralArea Policies for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. 2002. Jean
Middletown, NJ managed policy and implementation strategy development for the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Council's Rural Issues Work Group as part of the update of the
2030 Regional Blueprint. Recommendations included: enhancement of
traditional rural population centers through coordinated planning with
surrounding rural areas, transportation improvements and utility investment;
defining urban expansion areas; cost estimates and program components of a
regional Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program; and promotion of
a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program.
[1m Planning . Model Environmental Ordinances for Project NEMO, 2003. Jean
worked with the Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources and the Minnesota
CQ;IlUll;Unttjl Erosion Control Association to create model stormwater, erosion control,
Ri}~:OO;%$ shorelandand subdivision ordinances to protectwater quality. The
JEAN COLEMAN ordinances contain options for rural and urban communities and communities
with high to low levels of administrative staffmg. The project includes a
Resume, Page Two PowerPointâ„¢ slide presentation to expand the Non-Point Education for
Municipal Officials (NEMO) series.
. Conservation Easement Impact Survey, 2005. Working with a national
PROFFESSIONAL team managed by Prof. Thomas Daniels, University of Pennsylvania, Jean
evaluated conservation easements in eight states for their effectiveness in
ASSOCIATIONS meeting the goals of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF).
Admitted to Minnesota State Bar NFWF has made grants to local land trusts for twenty years for the acquisition
since 1994 of conservation easements to protect habitat. The easement impact survey
assessed the effectiveness of these easements in meeting NFWF habitat
1000 Friends of Minnesota protection goals.
Board of Directors
. Natural Resource Protection Toolbox, 1998. Jean authored the guidebook
Project NEMO Protecting Your Communi!}'s Natural Resources: A Land Protection Toolbox for Local
Steering Committee Government as part of the LCMR-funded Green Corridor Project. The
(Non-point Education for Toolbox guides local governments in the implementation of a natural resource
Municipal Officials) protection plan using incentive-based techniques such as PDR and TDR. The
project included a literature review and survey of existing PDR and TDR
programs.
CONTACT INFORMATION
CR Planning, Inc. . Lake Watershed Carrying Capacity-Based Planning, 2003. Jean managed
2634 Vincent Ave. North the public participation and ordinance development portions of the Itasca
Minneapolis, MN 55411 County Soil and Water Conservation District lake watershed carrying capacity
612-588-4904 project. The project analyzed water quality impacts of several future
fax 612-588-2637 development scenarios and educated local residents on the connection
jcoleman@crplanning.com between land use choices and water quality. The project will support a
www,crplanning.com carrying capacity-based reclassification of county lakes and changes in
lakeshore zoning provisions.
. Model SustainableDevelopment Ordinances, 2000. Jean authored the
growth management ordinances section of From Polif)! to Reali!}: Model
SustainableDevelopment Ordinances for the Minnesota State Planning Office. The
model ordinances are used by local governments and include urban expansion
districts, natural resource protection districts, transfer of development rights
(TDR); and natural resource protection overlays.
. 'Natural Resource Protection Ordinances, 1996-2005. Jean has
incorporated natural resource protection in zoning, subdivision, and
traditional neighborhood design (IND) ordinances for Clay County, MN;
Crow Wing County, MN; Linn County, IA; Rice County, MN; Itasca County,
MN; Cook County,:MN; Town of Farmington, WI; City ofMt. Horeb, WI;
and the City of North Branch, MN. These ordinances include
cluster/ conservation subdivision districts, agricultural and forest protection
clistrtcts,natural resource protection overlays, scenic protection districts,
transfer of development rights (!DR), mixed-use districts, and defined urban
service areas.