HomeMy WebLinkAbout14.D. Tahpah Park Schematic Design and Cost Estimate
1'1. D.
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MEMORANDUM
To: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
From: Andrea Weber, Parks and Recreation Landscape Designer
Meeting Date: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, December 19, 2005
City Council, December 20,2005
Subject: Tahpah Park Schematic Design and Cost Estimates
INTRODUCTION
This agenda item involves review of the schematic design and cost estimates for Tahpah
Park redevelopment. In order to stay on the timeline needed to complete the related
proposed public improvement project that portions of Taphah Park redevelopment would
be bonded with, we need to move forward with review in December with both the
Advisory Board and City Council.
DISCUSSION
The redevelopment of Tahpah Park is divided into two areas on the basis of the funding
mechanisms which they are attached to. The parking lot reconstruction, storm water
improvements and playground replacement would be a part of the 2006 bonding request
in conjunction with the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project. We have included the draft
Feasibility Study for these improvements, prepared by Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik and
Associates (attached). The final feasibility study would be incorporated into the 2006
Street Reconstruction feasibility study and presented to City Council in January.
Design Committee and Design Considerations
As with all of our planning process, we asked for participation on design committee.
Members of the design consisted of representatives from various park users as well as
the Shakopee Jaycees. We held five meetings to discuss various topics, with each
meeting having 3-7 attendees in addition to staff. The design committee has helped
define and prioritize what improvements should be made to Tahpah Park. They also
helped select the lighting system (Musco) and the playground designs.
Although we tend to focus on baseball and softball, the Youth Football Association is
also a Tahpah Park user. We met with the current Youth Football president, Mike
Kemper, to look at what their needs might be for the future. Their program is growing.
The. challenge with this group is that due to the season of play and the length of daylight
at that time, lighted fields are a real necessity in order to have practices and games on
week nights.
Lit fields are a high expense item, and we are fortunate to be able to accommodate
youth football in the outfield of fields 1, 2, and 3 at Tahpah Park. However, these fields
end up being smaller fields and will not meet their overall needs as the association
grows.
Ideally, multiple-use fields are the best return on investments. The 1ih Avenue Sports
Complex is a possible site that could accommodate f9otball. However, the fall soccer
season would conflict. Finally, we discussed the use of the new high school site for
football, and Superintendent McBroom indicated that it is definitely a possibility, although
it would not be confirmed until nearer to completion of their project. He also indicated a
willingness to consider lighting, if it was paid for by others.
Schematic Design
The schematic park design process developed a plan that is intended to be a master
plan for the overall park. The design includes all elements from a "wish list" that was
generated at the first design committee meeting. The primary goals on the wish list
include:
. Reconstructing the parking lot and adding additional parking
. Installing curb and gutter and storm water systems for the parking areas
. Introducing some speed control devices into the parking lot and roadway designs
. Installing additional lighting on softball fields
. Extending fencing from the current 260'-275' to 300'
. Creating a "showcase" softball field for key tournament games (field 4)
. Redesigning the entrance to Schleper Stadium by creating a designated drop off
location and eliminating the current traffic lane directly in front of the entrance
. Installing minimal parking lot security lighting
. Installing new play equipment
. Constructing a new baseball field with similar dimensions to Schleper Stadium on the
southwest corner of the property
Parking Lot Reconstruction and Expansion
The current parking lot is in need of reconstruction. In addition, there are functional
issues with the parking lot drainage: the current parking lot does not have curb and
gutter and much of the storm water is directed along trails. The parking lot also has
significant condition issues due to age as well as safety issues to address.
The current parking lot has 232 spaces, though additional parking on gravel and grass
areas are also used. The schematic design for reconstruction and expansion of the
parking provides 278 spaces (46 added spaces). In addition, we can accommodate two
additional parking alternates that could add be added:
. 34 more spaces to the north, in Alternate 1
. 14 spaces to the south near the batting cage in Alternate 2.
However, looking at the area calculations for impervious surfaces, if both additional
areas of the parking lot were to be built, additional storm water ponding would be
required. Since this was not intended as part of the design, Bonestroo suggests
choosing one of the two additional parking areas if desirable. Depending on final design
and bidding, the final quantity of parking spaces may need to be adjusted if either of the
alternates are chosen in order to meet budget.
The redesign of the existing parking lot also includes landscaped islands (per city code),
lighting; and a drop off area in front of the Schleper Stadium entrance. The drop off area
for the Stadium is in direct response to safety concerns with the current condition of a
through drive lane directly outside the entrance.
The parking lot reconstruction also provides a designated pedestrian path between the
stadium and the playground. This path is actually an elevated section that provides
greater visibility for the pedestrian path, as well as a speed reduction tool.
Finally, the parking lot design includes curb and gutter and storm water systems for the
entire lot. This design element would (hopefully) help defer the off pavement parking that
is occurring now, and would address several areas of erosion that occur as a result of
parking lot run off running along trails.
Attendees of the last design committee meeting seemed to favor the north parking
option (#1) and thought the south option (#2) was fairly expensive for the number of
parking spaces gained. In addition, we can only do one of the two options due to the
storm water regulations.
Park Improvements
The park improvements identified in the schematic design primarily involve installing
additional lighting on fields 1 and 4, extending fencing on fields 1, ,2,3,4,7, and 8,
relocating lights on fields 2 and 3 to accommodate extended fences, and constructing a
new baseball field. As part of the field work, field 4 would be re-graded to address
drainage problems, and the entire field would be upgraded to become the showcase
field for championship games. Other site improvements include installing trails to
address accessibility issues, and addressing grade changes behind fields 2 and 3.
The baseball field dimensions would mirror Schleper Stadium, and would have the
capability of installing seating at some point in the future. In addition, we have preserved
room for a batting cage, should that be desirable in the future.
As you will see, in order to increase the parking, field 5 would be eliminated. The
usefulness of field 5 is on ongoing topic. Due to the alignment, it's not a desirable field to
play on during the evenings. Lighting additional fields would compensate for the loss of
this field.
Plavgrounds
We requested proposals from 6 manufacturers and received 5 proposals. The play
equipment was separated into two playground areas:
. Playground A was to be a feature climbing piece for $35,000, and
. Playground B was to be modular equipment for ages 2-12 along with a swing bay
for $40,000.
The Design Committee preferred Midwest Playscapes (Playworld) for Playground A,
which included a segmented climbing wall as well as a fitness course (attached). The
Committee preferred MNIWI Playgrounds (Gametime), though there were several other
designs that also received votes. Upon closer review of the Gametime proposal, Staff
discovered that there were issues with the proposal in that it didn't include the elements
specified in the correct Playground areas (swings were supposed to be a part of B, but
they were shown in A, if this were accepted, there would be no swings in the
playground), as well as several ADA issues that staff did not find acceptable. Gametime
prepared a new quote and rendering, and it was brought back to the Design Committee,
along with the other top three proposals. The Design Committee decided that they
preferred the Flanagan Sales (Little Tykes) proposal instead (attached).
Budget
The proposed CIP Budget for 2006-10 includes $1,435,500 for Tahpah Park
improvements. Funding has been identified from two different sources: Park Reserve
and Tax Levy.
From those sources, $455,250 from the Park Reserve Fund is allocated for
improvements to the ball fields and other park improvements. $980,250 is shown as
being bonded for "redevelopment" portions: parking lot reconstruction, storm water
improvements and the play ground equipment. When we presented the CIP to City
Council, there was some discussion about bonding for these improvements. City Council
will need to confirm that they are comfortable with this approach.
The preliminary cost estimates (attached) for the project is as follows:
Park improvements (park reserve fund): $605,559
Parking Lot, Storm water, Playground (bonding): $1,009,400
Since the preliminary estimate for all of these items was over the allocated funding,
committee identified the following priorities:
. Prioritv 1: New LiQhtinQ for Field 1 and Field 4. The lighting is needed to increase
play time on the remaining fields especially to offset the loss of Field 5 which
would become part of the expansion of the parking lot.
. Prioritv 2: Relocate and Improve Liahtina for Field 2 and Field 3. The lights are
currently aimed for the existing outfield length of 265'. If the lights are moved to
the position needed for the 300' field extension work, the actual field work could
be done later. In order for the old lighting to be relocated and still provide the
recommended light levels, it is proposed that two new lights be added to each of
the outfield poles. They could then be aimed to maintain even lighting for the
expanded field area. The priority is to do all of the electrical work at one time in
order to get efficiencies for this part of the project.
. Prioritv 3: Extend Field 2 and Field 3 to 300'. This would include the installation of
new fences, relocation of the warning track and extending the irrigation in each
outfield.
. Prioritv 4: Improvements to fields 7 and 8. Ultimately extending these fields to
300' and adding lighting is a longer term goal. Space is being protected from
development in the parking lot project to allow for this expansion.
. Prioritv 5: Construction of a new baseball field in the west end of the park area.
We do have estimates from early 2004 for this work, though Public Works has
expressed an interest in doing this construction as their schedule permits in the
next 2 years. In addition, the women's softball league has expressed a desire to
donate the site furnishing for this field.
Using the priorities 1 and 2, we anticipate that we can complete all improvements to
Field 1 and Field 4, as well as relocate lighting in Fields 2 and 3 for a budget total of
$494,619.00. Although this is above the budget, Shakopee Jaycees has indicated an
interest in funding improvements, ($25,000.00 or more) and Women's' Softball
(approximately $18,000) are also anticipated, though we do not have exact dollar
amounts at this date. (The Jaycees will decide on their budget in January 2006). Taking
these estimated donations into account, we would have a remaining balance of
$3,631.00. If the final donations do not turn out to be in the amounts anticipated, we
could cut out the fence extension on Field 1 which would keep the project within the CIP
budget (with approximately $9,000 remaining).
Timeline
The proposed timeline for this park is to have bid documents available for advertisement
in spring 2006 for August and September 2006 construction. This timeline is structured
to meet the most favorable bidding time as well as begin construction after the softball
season is over.
We would need to work with youth football to coordinate construction activities and their
use, although there would likely be some impact. We are also trying to coordinate use of
other fields for this year.
If City Council orders the project and authorizes plans and specifications, the
Engineering Department has agreed to prepare the construction drawings and
specifications for the parking and storm water portions of the project, while I would do
the drawings and specifications for the ball field improvements.
REQUESTED ACTIONS
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
The Advisory Board is asked to review schematic design and estimates for park, parking
lot and storm water design and provide a recommendation to City Council. This
recommendation will be presented verbally to Council at their December 20th meeting.
City Council
City Council is asked to review the schematic design and cost estimates. In addition,
Staff needs a decision on whether you are willing to proceed with bonding for the
portions of this project as discussed above.
If Council concurs with the project, move to approve the Schematic Design for Tahpah
Park redevelopment and authorize preparation of plans and specifications. (Plans and
specifications would only include the components that we can fund with the current
budget.)
Note: Council is not asked for approval of the Feasibility Study at this time. The
Feasibility Study will be presented formally in January as part of the 2006
Reconstruction project.
SHi-\I(OPEE
Feasibility Report For
Tahpah Park - Parking Lot and
Storm Water Improvements
Shakopee, Minnesota
December, 2005
File No. 77-05110;..0
n Bonestroo 2335 West Highway 36. Sl Paul. MN 55113
IiiD!iiII Rosene
1\11 Anderlil{ & Office: 65'1-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
Associates VNolW. bonestroo com
Engineers & Architects
December 14, 2005
Mr. Mark Themig
Parks, Recreation, Natural Resources and Facilities Director
City of Shakopee
1255 Fuller Street
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Feasibility Report for Tahpah Park ~ Parking Lot and Storm Water Improvements
Bonestroo File No. 77-05110-0
Dear Mark:
Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report on proposed improvements for
Tahpah Park, The report-presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost
estimate.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council, yourself, and other interested parties at a mutually
convenient time to discuss this report. Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City with this
pr~ject.
Respectfully submitted,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
C/J---Q#
Dan D. Boyum
I hereby certity that this report, drawing, or specification
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
D.~~~;r!fr
Date: December 14. 2005 Reg.No. 23451
. St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee. WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmalive Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Jl]j Bonestroo 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113
-=- Rosene
1\11 Anderlik & Office: 651-636-4600. Fax: 651-636-1311
.. Associates www.bonestroo.com
Engineers & Architects
December 14,2005
Mr. Mark Themig
Parks, Recreation, Natural Resources and Facilities Director
City of Shakopee
1255 Fuller Street
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379
Re: Feasibility Report for Tahpah Park - Parking Lot and Storm Water Improvements
Bonestroo File No. 77-05110-0
Dear Mark:
Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report on proposed improvements for
Tahpah Park. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost
estimate.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council, yourself, and other interested parties at a mutually
convenient time to discuss this report. Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City with this
project.
Respectfully submitted,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Dan D. Boyum
I hereby certify that this report, drawing, or specification
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
Dan D. Boyum, P.E.
Date: December 14. 2005 Reg.No. 23451
· St. Paul,St. Cloud, Rochester, MN · Milwaukee, WI · Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
Table of Contents
Letter of Transmittal I.
Table of Contents .2.
I. Introduction 3.
2. Parking Lot Improvements 4.
3. Storm Sewer Improvements 7.
4. Easements and Permits 9.
5. Cost Analysis 10.
Table 1 - Project Cost Summary 10.
6. Recommendations and Conclusions II.
7. Project Schedule 12.
Figure I - Location Map
Figure 2 - Concept Drawing
Appendix A - Cost Estimates
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 2
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Introduction
On November 1,2005 the City of Shakopee adopted Resolution No. 6320 which ordered
the preparation of a feasibility report to analyze the feasibility of the following
improvements at Tahpah Park:
. Reconstruction of the existing parking lot
. Reconstruction of all or portions of the existing entrance road from Adams Street
. Construction of additional parking space
. Construction of various storm water improvements for the park consisting of curb
and gutter for parking lot and entrance road, storm sewer piping and structures,
and storm water ponding.
. Construction of parking lot lighting.
. Comments on how the existing sanitary sewer system is operating and any
performance feedback.
Figure 1 at the end of the report shows the location map of Tahpah Park. . The proposed
improvements are part of a larger redevelopment plan for Tahpah Park being studied by
the City's Park and Landscape Department. This report examines the feasibility and cost
effectiveness of the proposed improvements and reflects feedback from the Park and
Recreation Design Committee and City Staff. Descriptions of the proposed
improvements are found in the following sections of this report. Cost estimates are
provided in the Appendix A, and financing considerations are provided in the cost
analysis section of this feasibility report.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 3
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Proposed Improvements
Parking Lot
Section 1 - Main Parking Lot, Entrance Road, and new Northerly Parking Lot
These improvements are shown on the Figure 2 Concept Drawing at the end of this report
and include:
. Reconstructing the existing bituminous entrance road and parking lot with curb
and gutter and a new street/parking lot section.
. Constructing a new parking lot to the.north of the existing parking lot in the area
of Ballfield #5. Existing Ballfield #5 is being eliminated with the overall Tahpah
Park redevelopment.
. Constructing landscaped islands with trees and shrubs.
. Constructing a drop-off and larger pedestrian area at the entrance to Schleper
Stadium.
. Adding parking lot lighting.
The existing parking lot is in poor condition and shows various pavement distress
conditions including alligator cracking and block cracking. Portions of the parking lot
were constructed approximately 20 years ago and other portions 35 years ago. The City
wants to reconstruct the entrance road with concrete curb and gutter to help control
people pulling off the road and parking in non-designated areas.
Based upon review of current parking needs, City Staff have identified a need for
approximately 300 parking spaces in this part of Tahpah Park. The reconstruction of the
existing parking lot and construction of the north parking lot will result in 278 parking
spaces. The lots are configured to avoid parking in a 50 foot area from proposed fence
lines to help minimize balls hitting parked vehicles as per the Park and Recreation Design
Committee feedback.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 4
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
The City hired a geotechnical consultant to take soil borings in the parking lot area in
January of 2004. Two borings were taken and showed an existing section of 1 inch of
bituminous and 3 to 4 inches of gravel. It is proposed to reconstruct the existing entrance
road and existing and new parking lots with the current City Street Section of 8 inches of
class 5 aggregate base, 2 inches of bituminous base, and 1.5 inches of bituminous wear.
Based on feedback from City Stafffamiliar with soils in the area, it is anticipated that
20% of the existing parking lot and all of the new parking lots will need a 1 foot subgrade
correction. The soil borings show approximately 4.5 feet of fill under the parking lot and
then poorly graded sand/gravel to the depth of 12 feet. We anticipate the fill material was
brought onto the site during original park construction and that the new parking lot areas
would have a similar fill material and poorly graded sand/gravel beneath the fill section.
Thus, we do not anticipate additional borings are needed at this time.
The new and reconstructed parking lots are proposed to match as close as possible to the
existing grades with some changes for pedestrian ramps, storm sewer catchbasins, and
improving drainage along new curb lines. Additional elevation. information and
surveying are needed and will be done as part of the design phase of the project to
finalize the parking lot elevations and grades.
Islands with trees, shrubs, and wood mulch will be added to the existing parking lot.
Because of concerns on having more room for pedestrians at the entrance to Schleper
Stadium, a larger concrete area was created in this location as well as a drop~off area.
Trees are proposed for the new drop off area near the stadium entrance. The final
number of trees and location in this drop-of area and other locations will be determined in
final design.
The existing parking lot does not have lighting. Due to the costs associated with lighting
the entire parking lot area, it is proposed to add lighting in just a few areas to improve
upon the existing condition. Proposed locations are shown in Figure 2. We anticipate
some adjustment to the final location ofthe street lighting during final design.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 5
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
The costs for the recommended parking lot improvements are presented in the Cost
Analysis section and Appendix A.
Section 2 - Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot
As shown on Figure 2, adding Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot would add an additional
35 parking spaces to the 278 spaces discussed in Section 1. The total parking spaces
would then be 313, which exceed the 300 parking space number discussed in the previous
section. The parking lot section, grades, and elevations would be the same as discussed
in Section 1.
The parking lot is listed as an alternate, and the City can decide to continue to look at this
alternate during design and bidding. If the City chooses this option, then the City still
would have the option to delete it from the project following review of bid results. The
cost for Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot is presented in the Cost Analysis section and
Appendix A.
Section 3 - Alternate 2 - South Parking Lot
As shown on Figure 2, adding the Alternate 2 - South Parking Lot would add an
additional 14 parking spaces to the 278 spaces discussed in Section 1. The total parking
spaces would then be 292, which is less than the 300 parking space number discussed in
the Section 1.
This parking lot area currently has gravel base and is next to the batting cages. The
parking lot section, grades, and elevations would be the same as discussed in Section 1.
The parking lot is listed as an alternate, and the City can decide to continue to look at this
alternate during design and bidding. If the City chooses this option, then the City still
would have the option to delete it from the project following review of bid results. The
cost for Alternate 1 - North Parking Lot is presented in the Cost Analysis section and
Appendix A.
City ofShalwpee - Tahpah Park Page 6
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Storm Sewer Improvements
The storm sewer improvements involve construction of storm sewer structures and piping
to convey surface water runoff from the existing parking lot, entrance road, and new
parking lot areas to the Upper Valley Drainage Way.
Currently, the majority of the existing parking lot drains by overland flow in a
northwesterly direction. There is an existing catchbasin under Schleper Stadium that is
connected to catchbasins at the west end of the existing parking lot. These structures then
connect to a catchbasin in the low area between BallfieIds 6 and 7. This piping ties into
the Upper Valley Drainage Way at the Northeast side of Ballfield 6. Some of the runoff
from the east end of the site drains overland along the existing trail between Ballfields 2,
3, and 4. This easterly route experiences erosion and requires continual maintenance by
the City.
Part of the scope of this study was to review storm ponding requirements. Based on the
Main Lot, Entry, and North Lot improvements, the City is not required by National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to construct a pond since the proposed
improvements will not add more than 1 acre of new impervious surface. The City could
add Alternate 1 - North Lot or Alternate 2 - South Lot and still remain under the 1 acre
of new impervious surface. However the City could not add both of these areas without
exceeding 1 acre of new impervious surface.
From discussions with City Staff on the City's overall surface management system, there
are concerns with adding ponding to this area and not allowing the runoff from this
portion of Tahpah Park to get to the Upper Valley Drainage Way and then downstream as
soon as possible before upstream flows arrive. Additional modeling would need to be
done to verify this concern. At this time, construction of a storm water pond is not
included in the study.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 7
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
The storm sewer system shown on Figure 2 reflects routing runoff from the reconstructed
and new parking lots up to the Upper Valley Drainage Way via a westerly and easterly
route. The preferred option would be to route all the drainage to the west end of the
project. This area has fewer conflicts with existing trails, ballfield lighting, existing
forcemain, etc. However there is a shallow sanitary sewer line that crosses the existing
parking lot from the restrooms at Schleper Stadium to a lift station near the concession
stand between Ballfield 4 and 2. More information will be obtained on the elevation of
this sanitary sewer line during final design, but at this time it is anticipated that its
elevation will be in conflict with the elevation ofthe new storm sewer.
Routing storm sewer pipe at the east end of the existing parking lot and to the north along
the existing trail between Ballfield 2,3, and 4 will require restoration of the existing trail,
possible supporting existing lighting, possible crossing of underground wiring, and other
miscellaneous restoration.
It is anticipated at this time that the existing storm sewer system at the west end of the
project will be removed due to size and depth issues. This situation will be evaluated in
final design when additional survey information is obtained. If possible, reusing portions
of the existing storm sewer system will be evaluated in order to reduce construction costs.
We did review the existing sanitary sewer system with Shakopee Public Works. The
sanitary sewer system in the park is seasonal and not used in the winter and appears to be
working fine. Because of the seasonal use, there is not a freezing issue with its shallow
depth. At this time, there are not plans for improvements to the system under the parking
lot. We would recommend Public Works televise the line prior to construction to
confirm the condition of the line is adequate in order to minimize the need to repair the
line after the new parking lot is constructed.
The costs for the proposed storm sewer improvements are presented in the Cost Analysis
section and Appendix A.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 8
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Easements and Permits
All ofthe work is proposed to be done within City property or County Road right-of-way,
and no easements will be needed.
Work in the right-of-way of Adams Street (County Road 15) will require a permit from
Scott County. Due to the size of the project, a General Storm Water Permit for
Construction Activity will be needed from the MPCA.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 9
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Cost Analysis
The estimated costs of the proposed improvements are summarized in Table 1 and
Appendix A. The costs in Appendix A include 5% for contingencies and 20% for
indirect costs for Parking Lot Improvements and 10% for contingencies and 25% for
indirect costs for Storm Sewer Improvements. The contingencies and indirect costs are
less on the Parking Lot Improvements for budgetary reasons.
Table 1 - Project Cost Summary
Item Estimated Cost
Section 1- Parking Lot - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $647,200
Section 2 - Parking Lot - Alternate 1 (North Lot) $55,400
Section 3 - Parking Lot - Alternate 2 (South Lot) $32,800
Section 1 - Storm Sewer - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $169,900
Total Project - Base Bid and Alternates $905,300
.
Base Bid and Alternate 1 (North Lot) $872,500
Base Bid and Alternate 2 (South Lot) $849,900
The City will be bonding for these park improvements along with the 2006 Street
Reconstruction Project.
City ofShalwpee - Tahpah Park Page 10
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Recommendations and Conclusions
The improvements described in this report are feasible from and engineering standpoint.
This project is necessary to reconstruct the existing bituminous, create parking, and
install storm sewer and other parking lot improvements to Tahpah Park. The project is
cost effective based on conditions and acceptable standards proposed to construct the
improvements.
The estimated cost of the parking lot and storm sewer improvements is $905,300 for the
Base Bid, Alternate 1, and Alternate 2. The estimated cost for the Base Bid and Alternate
1 is $872,500 and Base Bid and Alternate 2 is $849,900. The following
recommendations are presented for consideration of Shakopee City Council and Staff:
1. That the improvements presented herein be considered for 2006 construction.
2. That the City Council bond for the project costs.
3. That the City review whether the Base Bid and Alternate 1 - North Lot or Base
Bid and Alternate 2 - South Lot is preferred and choose one or the other due to
ponding issues.
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 11
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Schedule
The City wants to have these improvements completed after August 1, 2006 based on
discussions with Adult Softball groups. The following schedule is proposed to meet this
requirement.
Item Date
Council Reviews Report December 20, 2005
Council Authorizes Preparation of Plans and January 3, 2006
Specifications
Council Approves Plans and Specifications March 7, 2006
Advertisement for bid published in Local Paper March 15, 2006
Advertisement published in Construction Bulletin March 17 & 24,
2006
Open Bids April 7, 2006
Council A wards Contract for Construction April 18, 2006
Construction Begins August 4, 2006
Construction Ends October 27, 2006
City of Shako pee - Tahpah Park Page 12
Parking Lot and Storm Sewer Improvements
. . ----.. .... .... .'. .,.--;~;-:-
. . . .'. .. u 'f! ... . =-
. ~'II 7
o . . " " ,'. , .,' -:
,.' .:}.'dl . ~ " 0 .' ~, ... ,;.jj ..... :;~:i.;' ..-
. ..,'" ,I " " ;, '"
. ;:': ". ':i = .~ )'" 'V,). .
.'. .' ,} ~ K'. . ' '''Y''Y "', " ,.,..
": ".. ';, ~ -, I KA ., "", (Ii.";; , .,;;.... '1
;, ." . ".i,';;' III JJ' _ II ,- ", i;\:7i~;
';::.., " " ,,,, '
I r..' _ _ '" f\ S '" ',' ;,
.1 UJ -:', :." 11I1111111111 '-' IIIIl3 ~"'" "" . ",," '-'.. ...
.:J ' - ~\ -., .
" ..' 0. ,.11,
" I, .. \" ~ ; ff".. ". $*, 5 .. '~,; \!' :c:~: .~
(' " ,1,:, 1,;1 '.; ~_, os "" v cf ,,' ti I;<;'_.~i ~~ ':
Iff ~:"!I ~ ~ ~ '<>;~: .' ~ ~I m,,~ I
J~t: '. ,r II ,) Q 0 ~ m1j'I&~~~i 'I 'm~~'
" r . ~), [j ~OiJm I
c" ~) '" EI ,~~~~. ,[~T
j: ",:.IF ,.' ~:,t ~~" ~~fjm\i\1fj\ I f
, ~ L"::r:' ~ci'," '^ · ~\i\mm!;\\\ji\$
'; . J . 'I Rl" .~ illS. mm~li\~m I'"
pill!' iIi'" ~ "
rt/~ J,'f'mf :'~j\. ~ <5. I ,~,_~I~i.il~-IS
.. Q I J "" . I _~mV;l\\~mmmli' '"
& Il::::'!i ,: iiii c. R.I _~=V;I\\m~~1l ~,
"I ' , ' ~ 11)"0 ~ ~m ~ '
~ .:.. '" Iffiffif m I mrn~~
'1, . .. m ''Ii mfum
~m ~ ~ I m. -m mm~~
....' "" m ~
~" ~ "I - .. -1111
". ) ~ b
U h:' ~: -IL' ~- c-d~ ,J IIHIlIl B :;- ~ l'i!C.1m ~
~ ! = ~, '"'-- f-< , ,~
I, . ~R: CH"I J'D '\ ,-I II 1;U IIHIlIl h -rnriY \ 1 ..I ~ I-.J II- ':3-
, ':1' "1' (\I I ~ lil ~ vq- :::
.' ., 1 ,~ I '!if C. .17 H ~..-!r- .
!!m;;: , " j---L 'II' ~t "n
. .; "'1] - .~,~ ""
.V =1= - Jiii:), I HJiI)j' .. -.. - \
:.'; J' iii~ -'-r l1tr m;i ~ ~ ~ [I '- ' : ]
~ .... '. HlH!I?~~lr" .. L t J
" ~'" ~:. == 'J1~9It ~ hD - .1 '
"-', \ '- 'lI/ c:::." .; ,
. ::.' =" ~ ~ ~ !i!&(> '" U ~ -' I ""
HE I r :'Il. a_ II - ffiHjj 11 W~::YH ."IIHB~ -,J
n i! 'I . "". ~ [If JI/
_ 0- a ~WI '1,' :
lIt::; I - ....-- I
,,,- ~ - -
_ 8
h=jl
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 1
City of Shakopee Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot)
SCHEDULE A - Parking Lot Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantitv Unit Price Total PriCE
1 Mobilization LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
2 Traffic Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 12700 $1.50 $19,050.00
4 Remove Concrete Walk SF 880 $1.50 $1,320.00
5 Common Excavation CY 8550 $6.00 $51,300.00
6 Suborade Excavation CY 1850 $6.00 $11,100.00
7 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 1850 $12.00 $22,200.00
8 Class 5 Aaareaate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 8" thick) SY 17100 $5.00 $85,500.00
9 Bituminous Base Course, 2.5" thick SY 15060 $5.75 $86,595.00
10 Bituminous Wear Course, 1.5" thick SY 15060 $4.25 $64,005.00
11 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GL 755 $3.00 $2,265.00
12 Entrv Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desian B612 LF 1560 $9.00 $14,040.00
13 Pko Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 3615 $9.00 $32,535.00
14 Concrete Walk SF 6555 $3.50 $22,942.50
15 Parkina Lot Liaht Quad EA 4 $7,200.00 $28,800.00
16 Pedestrian Ramp EA 6 $400.00 $2,400.00
17 Speed Humps EA 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00
18 Silt Fence, Heaw Dutv Tvpe LF 2130 $2.50 $5,325.00
19 Soddino, Type Lawn SY 3160 $3.50 $11,060.00
20 Handicap Svmbol EA 7 $120.00 $840.00
21 4" White Stripina LF 6640 $0.50 $3,320.00
22 Zebra Striping cross walk SF 144 $5.00 $720.00
23 Install new sion SF 40 $100.00 $4,000.00
24 Mulched Islands SY 845 $4.50 $3,802.50
25 Shrubs for Islands EA 42 $50.00 $2,100.00
26 Deciduous Tree EA 21 $400.00 $8,400.00
Subtotal $513,620.00
+ 5% Contingency $25,681.00
Subtotal $539,301.00
+ 20% Indirect Costs $107,899.00
Total Schedule A - Parking Lot ImJlrovements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lo ) $647,200.00
APPENDIX A - Page 1 of 4
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 2
City of Shakopee Alternate 1 - North Lot
SCHEDULE A - Parking Lot Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantil1l Unit Price Total PriCE
1 Mobilization LS 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00
2 Traffic Control LS 1 $0.00 $0.00
3 Reclaim Bituminous Pavement SY 0 $0.00 $0.00
4 Remove Concrete Walk SF 0 $0.00 $0.00
5 Common Excavation CY 760 $6.00 $4,560.00
6 SubQrade Excavation CY 505 $6.00 $3,030.00
7 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 505 $12.00 $6,060.00
8 Class 5 Aaareaate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 8" thick) SY 1,510 $5.00 $7,550.00
9 Bituminous Base Course, 2.5" thick SY 1 ,460 $5.75 $8,395.00
10 Bituminous Wear Course, 1.5" thick SY 1 ,460 $4.25 $6,205.00
11 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GL 75 $3.00 $225.00
12 Entry Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desian B612 LF 0 $9.00 $0.00
13 PkQ Concrete Curb and Gutter, DesiQn B612 LF 405 $9.00 $3,645.00
14 Concrete Walk . SF 0 $3.50 $0.00
15 Parkina Lot Liaht Quad EA 0 $7,200.00 $0.00
16 Pedestrian Ramp EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
17 Speed Humps EA 0 $1,000.00 $0.00
18 Silt Fence, Heaw Dutv Tvpe LF 0 $2.50 $0.00
19 SoddinQ, Type Lawn SY 500 $3.50 $1,750.00
20 Handicap Svmbol EA 0 $120.00 $0.00
21 4" White Stripina LF 920 $0.50 $460.00
22 Zebra Striping cross walk SF 0 $5.00 $0.00
23 Install new siQn SF 0 $100.00 $0.00
24 Mulched Islands SY 0 $4.50 $0.00
25 Shrubs for Islands EA 0 $50.00 $0.00
26 Deciduous Tree EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
Subtotal $43,980.0C
+ 5% Contingenc~ $2,199.00
Subtotal $46,179.00
+ 20% Indirect Costs $9,221.00
Total Schedule A . Parking Lot Improvements - Alternate 1 - North Lc $55,400.00
APPENDIX A - Page 2 of 4
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 3
City of Shakopee Alternate 2 - South Lot
SCHEDULE A - Parking Lot Improvements
Item # Description Units QuantltV Unit Price Total PriCE
1 Mobilization LS 1 $1,250.00 $1,250.00
2 Traffic Control LS 1 $0.00 $0.00
3 Reclaim Bituminous Pavement SY 0 $0.00 $0.00
4 Remove Concrete Walk SF 0 $0.00 $0.00
5 Common Excavation CY 405 $6.00 $2,430.00
6 Subgrade Excavation CY 270 $6.00 $1,620.00
7 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 270 $12.00 $3,240.00
8 Class 5 Aooreoate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 8" thick) SY 805 $5.00 $4,025.00
, 9 Bituminous Base Course, 2.5" thick SY 750 $5.75 $4,312.50
10 Bituminous Wear Course, 1.5" thick SY 750 $4.25 $3,187.50
11 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GL 40 $3.00 $120.00
12 Entrv Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 0 $9.00 $0.00
13 Pkg Concrete Curb and Gutter, Desion B612 LF 410 $9.00 $3,690.00
14 Concrete Walk SF 0 $3.50 $0.00
15 Parkin~ Lot Lioht Quad EA 0 $7,200.00 $0.00
16 Pedestrian Ramo EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
17 Speed Humps EA 0 $1,000.00 $0.00
18 Silt Fence, Heavv Dutv Tvpe LF 0 $2.50 $0.00
19 Sodding, Type Lawn SY 500 $3.50 $1,750.00
20 Handicap Symbol EA 1 $120.00 $120.00
21 4" White Stripino LF 330 $0.50 $165.00
22 Zebra Stripin~ cross walk SF 0 $5.00 $0.00
23 Install new sign SF 1.50 $100.00 $150.00
24 Mulched Islands SY 0 $4.50 $0.00
25 Shrubs for Islands EA 0 $50.00 $0.00
26 Deciduous Tree EA 0 $400.00 $0.00
Subtotal $26,060.0~
+ 5% Contingency $1,303.00
Subtotal $27.363.0~
+ 20% Indirect Costs $5,437.00
Total Schedule A - Parkin~ Lot Improvements - Alternate 2 - South L( t $32,800.0~
APPENDIX A - Page 3 of4
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Tahpah Park Improvements SECTION 1
City of Shakopee Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot)
SCHEDULE B - Storm Sewer Improvements
Item # Description Units Quantitv Unit Price Total PriCE
1 Mobilization LS 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00
2 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 300 $1.50 $450.00
3 Remove Storm Sewer Pipe LF 850 $7.00 $5,950.00
4 Remove Manhole or Catch Basin EA 3 $200.00 $600.00
5 Clear and Grub EA 4 $500.00 $2,000.00
6 Common Excavation CY 100 $6.00 $600.00
7 Class 5 Aggregate Base (100% crushed Limestone, 6" thick) SY 380 $4.00 $1,520.00
8 Bituminous Wear Course, 2.5" thick SY 300 $7.50 $2,250.00
9 Connect to Existina Pioe EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
10 15" RCP Storm Sewer, CI5 LF 654 $30.00 $19,620.00
11 18" RCP Storm Sewer, CI 5 LF 1,370 $35.00 $47,950.00
12 18" Flared End Section, Includina Trash Guard EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
13 27" Dia Storm CBMH EA 1 $800.00 $800.00
14 2' x 3' Catch Basin EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00
15 4' Dia Storm CBMH EA 10 $1,500.00 $15,000.00
16 Class III Random Riorao CY 20 $150.00 $3,000.00
17 Sodding, Type Lawn SY 2,350 $3.50 $8,225.00
18 Protect Liaht Pole EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00
19 Protection of Catch basin Non-street EA 3 $150.00 $450.00
20 Protection of Catchbasin in Street EA 11 $150.00 $1,650.00
Subtotal $123,565.011
+ 10% Contingency $12,356.50
Subtotal $135,921.511
+ 25% Indirect Costs $33,978.50
Total Schedule B - Storm Sewer. Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot $169,900.011
SUMMARY - Tahpah Park
Description Total Price
Schedule A - Section 1 - Parkina Lot Imorovements - Base Bid (Main Lot, EntrY. & North Lot) $647,200.0C
Schedule A - Section 2 - Parkina Lot Imorovements - Alternate 1 (North Loll $55,400.00
Schedule A - Section 3 - Parking Lot Improvements - Alternate 2 (South Lot) $32,800.00
Schedule B - Section 1 - Storm Sewer Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $169,900.0C
Total. Tahpah PaM $905,300.0(
SUMMARY - Tahpah Park - Base Bid and Alternate 1 (North Lot)
Description Total PriCE
Schedule A - Section 1 - Parking Lot Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North Lot) $647,200.0C
Schedule A - Section 2 - Parking Lot Imorovements - Alternate 1 (North Lot) $55,400.00
Schedule B - Section 1 - Storm Sewer Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $169,900.0C
Total - Tahpah Parkl $872,500.0(
SUMMARY - Tahpah Park. Base Bid and Alternate 2 (South Lot)
,
Description Total PriCE
Schedule A - Section 1 - Parking Lot Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entrv, & North LoO $647,200.00
, Schedule A - Section 2 - Parkina Lot Imorovements - Alternate 1 (North Lot) $32,800.00
Schedule B - Section 1 - Storm Sewer Improvements - Base Bid (Main Lot, Entry, & North Lot) $169,900.00
Total - TahDah Park! $849,900.011
APPENDIX A - Page 40f 4
\0
0
0
N
lJ
c
.::::t. Q)
l... E
CO ~
0.. e 0
0. M
.c E';n
CO 1-1 'C =
a.'OQ)r1
Q)<(
.c :gM~
CO 0.010
I- e ~ u
a.. '-" (/)
CO CHAL~~~GERsJ
NOTES:
1) This play system design will meet the ADA Accessibility
Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities, effective
November 17, 2000, as published by the Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, when installed
64'<;' over accessible surfacing, based on the following ctiteria:
;...//"'--l--~------------- --------:::B~::-----r------', " a.) An accessible route must be provided to the play area.
/ ~ -1 ~ I " b.) Of the JL elevated play activities, ..Q. must be along an
accessible route.
..........-' (84" WAlL) 6'.r ............ c.) -2.. elevated play activities are accessible by transfer station.
~~ , d.) .Q.activities of ..Q.types of ground level play must be provided, as
....' ........
/ , required by lAW. document -36 CFR Part 1191-, Table 15.6.2.2.
....... ...., e.) 11 activities of JL types of ground level play are provided.
....,.... '....
,....'.... ....~ f. ) At \east OlIO of each type of ground level play activity must be
~ I along an accessible route.
I I 2) This site plan should be checked against the actual site area
I I prior to the purchase or installation of equipment.
: 6'~ 3) Kick plates must be instailed between 12" deck increments,
I I
I 6'-3" ROCKBlOCKS I 4) The unit of measure located In the center of the platform
i END WALl. (84") I indicates the height above the protective suriacing level. The
I 1 protective surfacing for this design must accommodate a fail
I I
Wow! ::: ~ : height of at least g Ft.
5) The structure size for this unit is 52' X 27' X 11'
I I requiring protective surfacing for an overall use zone of
I . : 64'6" X38'11" . The approximate surface area is
\ 6' SPiRAl 9'-3 9'-3" I 2109 Sq. Ft. . as required by ASTM F1487-Q1 guideiines.
\ LADOER ~ ~ 6'-1"1 6) This structure is designed to accommodate 49 children from
5 to 12 years of age.
I ~ I 7) Supervise children as they play.
I I
\ J TRIPLE TWIST r 8) To ensure that eccurate measurements are obtained from this
\ ~~ " I drawing, print copies on 11 x 17 paper at fuil seele.
\ CHIN \ I
\ BAR _J 9) This design configuration is the property of this firm and
\ -- ------- PJaywo~d System.., and may not be raproduced or used in
\ FLIP-FLOP _--..;.------ any manner without the expressed written consent of this finn
\........... 6' \ _-------------- and Playwo~d System"'.
I 6' 1" _------
\_____L__________------------- ------- :" - ~, 1~ REV: DATE:
- 11-0CT-05
SCALE:
1/8" = 1'-0"
CRAWN BY:
TIM LOSCH
PLAYWGRLDTM TAHPAH PARK MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES, INC.
500 Pine Street, Suite 104
When trustmatters™ SHAKOPEE Chaska, MN 55318
C2004 P1ayworld Syslems,tIc:.
PlaI""O'ld'"lsabmndolPbyworkISy$l$mse.hc.
PLAYWORLDTM
MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES INC. W hen t r u s t mat t e r S'M
Park, Playground & Recreational Equipment
500 Pin~S:..I~ :;~. ~~~.;;::.. Jtt,..,....,...,.....................,..........,.....................,.".........
or (952) 361-3504 -
Fax (952) 361-3549 4 "f:
email: playscapes@earthlink.net . '::4"""
View B It.
View A ~
Featured Colors:
.
Red
.
Blue
.
Greystone
Challengers@ Design @2005Playworld Systems, Inc.
055480.MID Playworld™ is a brand of Playworld Systems@, Inc.
ii-Dct-OS
Tahpah Park Updated Cost Estimates 12.13.05
Bond Funding
Parking Lot Reconstruction and Expansion
Parking lot reconstruction-primary area $ 647,200.00
Parking lot north expansion (34 spaces) $ 55,400.00
Parking lot south expansion (14 spaces) $ 32,800.00
Storm Sewer Reconstruction $ 124,000.00
Playground Equipment $ 75,000.00
Total $ 934,400.00
Estimated Bonding Capacity (Preliminary Estimate) $ 1,500,000.00
Park Reserve Funding
Park Redevelopment
Field 1 improvements $ 127,716.00
lights, extend field, ADA,' new fence
Field 2 improvements $ 70,930.00
Relocate lights, extend, trail reloc,. ret. Wall, new fence
Field 3 improvements $ 59,680.00
Relocate lights, extend, ret. wall, new fence
Field 4 improvements $ 231,645.00
regrade, lights, extend field, new fence
Field 7 improvements $ 35,760.00
extend field, new fence
Field 8 improvements $ 35,760.00
extend field, new fence
New Baseball Field with lighting $ 325,000.00
in undeveloped area
Fixed Project Costs $ 100,918.00
Design and admin, mobilization, surveying, erosion, soil, etc.
Allocated Park Reserve Funding S 455,250.00
Proposed Improvements
Field 4 improvements $ 231,645.00
regrade, lights, extend field, new fence
Field 1 lights, extend field, ADA. new fence $ 127,716.00
ADA access, new lights, relocation of football light
Field 2 Lighting only $ 17,170.00
Relocate lights, add fixtures to existing poles
Field 3 Lighting Only $ 17,170.00
Relocate lights, add fixtures to existing poles
Fixed Project Costs- $ 100,918.00
Design and admin, contingency, mobilization, surveying, erosion, soil, etc.
total proposed improvement budget $ 494,619.00
Jaycees donation (estimated) $ (25,000.00)
Womens' Softball Donation (estimated) $ (18,000.00)
Estimated final budget $ 3,631.00
.
/1, (J.
;; ON TfJ /!;,,~
Tahpah Park
Redevelopment
Schematic Design Presentation
December 19, 2005: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
December 20, 2005: City Council
SH~](()Jl~E
COMMlJNI'rYl'rUDE5INCE1.857'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Existing Park Overview
Background
. Tahpah Park was purchased and constructed in several phases starting in 1971
with an initial purchase of 40 Acres from the State of Minnesota.
. The most recent acquisition was an additional 10 acres purchased from MNDoT
in 1997.
. The overall park is 54+/- acres, most of which is devoted to active recreational
uses.
. The Shakocee Jaycees have contributed to the development of this park, most
recently wi h the expansion of the Concession Building in 1993.
. As the city's primary softball and baseball facility, the park is home to multiple
user groups (who were all invited to user group Design meetings), including:
. Adult Baseball: Shakopee Coyotes and Indians, and Over 35
. Adult Softball: Men's, Women's, Co-Rec
. Some Youth Baseball and Youth Softball (tournaments)
. Youth Football
. Tournaments: Shakopee Lions, Jaycees and others as scheduled
IIIIiIIIIIIII . . City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
a.l!~l?s~~ Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20,2005
'"'
Park Redevelopment
Existing Conditions:
. Outfield lengths range from 265'-275', while the ASA Standard is
now 300'
. Two fields have lighting, 7 are unlit. Lighted fields are highly desired
to get more games sCheduledter field, and fully utilize the field,
especially for tournaments an evening play.
. Grading problems including ponding and erosion are occurring
. Layout of Field 5 makes it very undesirable to play on in
afternoon/evening.
. Parking is occurring where it shouldn't and the existing parking lot
has age and drainage related problems, some parking occurs on
unpaved surfaces, which is not in accordance with City Code.
. Safety of pedestrians is an issue at the bottom of the long entry
drive as well as at Schleper Stadium entrance.
. Playground equipment was removed in 2004 due to incompliance
with safety standards.
-- City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~AI<OlWE Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
...~~~.~,f_______1&91
-------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tahpah Park User Group
Design Committee
The "Wish List"
The first meeting of the User
Group Design Committee
was focused on creating
a "Wish List" of items to
be added to or changed
within the park. This list
was used to define items
in the master plan and
was then prioritized to
develop the proposed
schematic plan.
__ City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SHAKQPIlE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
COMMUN1Wl'Rll)ESINC6.~ I I
.
-
Individual Field Review: Field 1
Field 1 Issues
. Not lit
. Erosion near road
. Parking off road
. No ADA access Field 1 Wish List
. 265' outfield . Add lights
. Grading adjustments
. Add curb and gutter
. add ADA access
. extend outfield to 300'
.... · City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~!!2,~,~! Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Field Review: Field 2
Field 2 Wish List
Field 2 Issues . relocate lights
. Erosion near infield . Extend outfield to
300'
. 265' outfield . New fence
. Trail close to outfield . Retaining wall
fence . Relocate trail
. Monument sign close to
outfield
.. City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~l!~2,~;; Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
'.
Individual Field Review: Field 3
Field 3 Issues
. Erosion near infield
. 265' outfield
. Trees at outfield
Field 3 Wish List
. Relocate lights
. Retaining wall
. Extend outfield to 300'
. Preserve trees
... City Council & Parks and RecreationAdvisory Board Presentation
SHAI<.Ol'EE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
COMMl.lNITYPlUDE SJNCEl8S7: . . .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------
Individual Field Review: Field 4
Field'4lssues
. Not lit
. Great central location with
good orientation
. Poor drainage in outfield
. 265' outfield
Field 4 Wish List
. Add lights
. Grading adjustments
. extend outfield to 300'
. Turn into centerpiece
fieldl
IIIiIIIIIIIII City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SHAKOPEE . Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
COM.\lUNIT\'PRlDESlNCE,~ . ,
J
Individual Field Review: Field 5
Field 5 Issues
. Solar orientation poor
. Inhibits expansion of
adjacent fields
. Field 4 foul balls land
near benches
. A field of last resort Field 5 Wish List
. Remove this field
. Add Parking
. Unprogrammed green
space
. Use space to expand
field 4, 6 and 7 with 50'
buffers
... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SII1\.KQPEE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
I:o~NlTYPJwjE~~CE;185?: I .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Field Review: Field 6
Field 6 Wish List
. add ADA access
Field 6 Issues . extend outfield to regular
shaped arc
. Not lit . New fences
. Hemmed in by
other fields
. 265' outfield
_ ... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SIIAKQPEj3 Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities . December 19 and 20, 2005
!:OM-'d.U.Nlf(l'RJPJ$_Il'!~:1&Si: I I
iJ
Individual Field Review: Field 7
Field 7 Issues
. Not lit
. Newer field
. Far away from lit
fields
. Parking in west
lot
. 275' outfield
. Residents along Field 7 Wish List
west edge of . Add lights
park . extend outfield to 300'
. Shade and block sun to west
-.. City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SHAI<QI.'El$ Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
~~U.N!~.~E~.I~~~.~:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Field Review: Field 8
Field 8 Issues
. Not lit
. Newer field
. Far away from lit fields
. Parking in west lot
. 275' outfield
. Residents along west Field 8 Wish List
edge of park . Add lights
. Close to Field 9 if . extend outfield to 300'
extended . Shade and block sun to
west
-.. City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SRAI<()PEE Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
COMMlINl1Y 1'ItltlE S.INCE'lm:
.
Individual Field Review: Field 9
Field 9 Issues
. Not lit
. Parking off road
. No ADA access
. 265' outfield
Field 9 Wish List
. Future Youth Baseball
. add ADA access
. extend outfield up to 280' or
evaluate raising fence
... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~lIA~HPEE Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
tMlINlnt- :J; ma:.18S7.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Area Review: New
Baseball Field
New field
. Interim needs met at High
School and new High
School
. Funding doesn't allow
construction in 2006
. Rough graded
. Design drawings to match
Schleper Stadium
. Potential in-house labor by
Public Works
. Space still available for
batting cage in future
IIIiIIIIIIIII City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SHAKOPEE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
~OMM:~rn::.I;'lqP~~INCE18S7 I . .
.
Individual Field Review:
Football Field
Football Field Issues
. Parking off road
. No ADA access
. Full size field with lights
Football Field Wish List
. Add ADA access
. Control vehicles
. Preserve full size
... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~HA~Ps~! Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20,2005
M)f~rrt:"YE.,~".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Area Review:
Playground
Playground Issues
. Too close to Parking
. No ADA access
. No play equipment
anymore!
Playground Wish List
. Add new play structures
. add ADA access
. Keep location
. Add green space/buffers
... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SHAl(OrEE Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
<;oM.\lUNIT'tfRl[lJ; INCE1851
.
,
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Parking Issues:
. Pavement is old, uneven,
and cracking
. No curb and gutter
. Erosion due to storm
water flow
. Not enough parking, use
of green spaces and
gravel for parking
. Pedestrian safety
. No lighting
-... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~~~s~,~! Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Storm water Issues:
. Runoff is mostly
directed overland
. Trails act as drainage
ways
. Site is very flat
. Erosion at open channel
of Upper Valley
Drainage way
. Potential conflicts with
Sanitary sewer line
IIIIiIIIIIII City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
$HAKOPEE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities . December 19 and 20, 2005
(XlMIoI1.(N:I'~~("\lIPE 5,jN(E1S57c ' ,
.
~
Tahpah Park Schematic Design
The "Priorities"
The wish list was refined into 5
priorities which were developed
mto the Schematic Design
1. Light Fields 1 and 4 and extend
outfield fences to 300'. Focus
improvements on Field 4 to become
the showcase field
2. Relocate.and enhance lighting on 1J-........,
J./hf'R.
fields 2 and 3 for 300' outfield length mdl<?
3. Extend Fields 2 and 3 to 300' outfields
4. Improve Fields 7 and 8 to be lit and
300' outfield length -~t~
5. Construction of new baseball field in
SW addition with interim use of new
High School
."",.".".. ...........
... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SIIAKOI'IlE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
COMllfUNlTYPiliOESIN<'Eusi', I
-----------------------------------------------------------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Area Review:
Playground Playground 8 $40,00.00
Playground A $35,000.00 . Ages 2-5 and 5-12, swings
. Signature Climbing structure . Flanagan Sales, Little
. Midwest Playscapes, Playworld Tykes
.... City Council & par~s and Recreation Advisory B~ard Presentation
SHAKOI'1l1l Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities . December 19 and 20, 2005
~~ffiD:E~l~~:~: I "
,
~
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Proposed Parking Lot
Improvements
. Base Bid = 278 spaces
. Alternate 1 = 35 spaces
. Alternate 2 = 14 spaces
. Constructing both
alternates will require
storm water ponding
PRAB Discussion
. Base Bid plus Alternate
1, if funding is available
and need is shown
(summer counts)
.... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
~HA.~'pE~ Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20,2005
!M1.INlTY .E lNCE.'1851 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Summary of All Proposed
I morovements:
1. Parking Lot, Storm Sewer
and Playground
2. Add lights to Field 4
3. Extend and re-grade Field 4
4. Enhance site furnishings on
Field 4
5. Add lights to Field 1
6. Relocate and enhance lights
on Field 2 and 3
7. If funding allows, Extend
field 1
PRAB Discussion
. Consensus to proceed as
proposed
......-.-----.....".
.... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SIIAKOPEE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
~\WNJTn'aIP_E;;JN<;E~ _ ' _ _ I
.
~
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Funding and Cost Estimates from 2006 CIP
Bondina for Parkina Lot and Playground Imorovements
Proposed in CIP: $980,250 Current Estimate: $934,400
1. Reconstruct existing lot with new expansion
2. Construct Alternate 1
3. Storm Sewer Work
4. Playground
*2006 Street Recon project preliminary estimate of $1.5 million in bonding capacity.
Park Reserve For Park Improvements
Proposed in CIP: $455,250 Current Estimate: $494,619 *
1. All Field 4 Work
2. Light Field 1
3. Relocate and Enhance Lighting on Field 2 & 3
4. Extend Field 1 Fence if Budget Supports*
*Funded with Botential funding from Women's Softball ($6,000) and Shakopee Jaycees
($25,00 )
..... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
Slr:A.I(.o~E. Parks & Recreation, Natural Resources, and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
~.~1'RJl)E.____.:1SS'J .- .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
Tahpah Park Redevelopment
Requested Action
1. Review proposed
improvements
2. Approve schematic
design
3. Order plans and
specifications for
proposed work
. Work related to
Fields 1-4
. parkin% Lot work
would e part of
2006 Street Recon
feasibility study
..... City Council & Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Presentation
SIIAKOPEE Parks & Recreation Natural Resources and Facilities December 19 and 20, 2005
COM'\{UNITYPltmESINCO~' - I