Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14.B. Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes 5th Add'n and Amendment to PUD-Res. No. 6345 'f ) lY, 8~ CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CASE LOG NO.: 05-111 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition and Amendment to Dean Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) MEETING DATE: December 14, 2005 REVIEW PERIOD: September 22,2005 - January 20, 2006 Site Information Applicant: Ryan Companies Property Owner: Ryan Companies Location: South ofHwy 169, East ofCSAH 83 and North of Dean Lakes Blvd. Current Zoning: Business Park (BP)/ PUD Overlay Adjacent Zoning: North; Business Park (BP) South: Medium Density Residential (R2) East: Business Park (BP) West: Business Park (BP)/Medium Density Residential (R2) MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary. CONSIDERATIONS Ryan Companies has made application for preliminary plat and final plat approval of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition, as well as, an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the site. The proposed development is located south ofHwy. 169, east ofCSAH 83 and north of Dean Lakes Blvd. The subject site is a portion ofthe overall Dean Lakes PUD. The application for amendment to the PUD addresses the requests for parking setback variations and to allow lots without street frontage. Please reference the attached November 3 and December 8 Planning Commission reports for additional information regarding the PUD amendment and plat applications. 1 The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat and PUD at its November 3 and December 8 meetings. Copies of the Planning Commission memorandums have been attached for the Council's reference. At the December 8 meeting, the Commission recommended approval, by a 4-1 vote, of the requests subject to the conditions contained in Resolution No. 6345. The final plat is in substantial conformance with the proposed preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Resolution No. 6345, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition and Amendment to the PUD, subject to the conditions presented. 2. Approve Resolution No. 6345, subject to revised conditions. 3. Do not approve the PUD amendment, preliminary and final plat and direct staff to prepare a resolution consistent with the direction of the Council. 4. Table the matter and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No.1, approval of Resolution No. 6345, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition and Amendment to the PUD,subject to the conditions presented. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion approving Resolution No. 6345, approving the Preliminary and Final plat of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition and Amendment to the PUD, subject to the conditions presented. and move its adoption. h:\cc\2005\12-20\pudppfpdeanslakes5th05111.doc 2 RESOLUTION NO. 6345 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF DEAN LAKES FIFfH ADDITION AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEAN LAKES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) WHEREAS, Ryan Companies, applicant and property owner, has made application for preliminary and final plat approval of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition and an Amendment to the Dean Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: Outlots D and J, Dean Lakes First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof Scott County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, all notices of the public hearing for the Preliminary Plat and Pilltendment to the Planned Unit Development were duly sent and posted and all persons appearing'at the hearing have been given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and i WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed preliminary plat and PUD Amendment with conditions; and WHEREAS, on December 20, 2005 the City Council reviewed the proposed preliminary and final plats, and amendment to the.PUD. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota that the preliminary and final plat of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition and an amendment to the Dean Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) is hereby approved subject to the following conditions; I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval of title by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for security for public improvements (watermain) within the Final Plat, engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule. 1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 4. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment , Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the public 3 improvements, engineering review fees, and other fees as required by the City's most current Fee Schedule. 5. Developer shall pay existing levied special assessments or may request with the application for the final plat, that special assessments be reapportioned against new lots. If request is approved, developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineers reapportionment. 6. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shako pee's right-of-way and drainage and utility easements priorto construction. C. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Provide a minimum of 30 feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the existing storm sewer (connecting the store water basins in OutlotM and Outlot L) in Lots 2 of Block 1. 2. Provide a minimum of 30 feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the existing storm sewer (connecting the storm water basin in Outlot L and Outlot K), in Lot 3, Block I. 3. Provide a minimum of 10 feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of all Block 1 lot lines adjacent to outlots and conservation easements. 4. Provide a minimum of ten (10) feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of al.l Block 2 lot lines adjacent to outlots and conservation easements. 5. The applicant shall provide the City of Shakopee with an easement, for the purposes of access from Dean Lakes Boulevard through Block 2 to the eastern most portion of Lot 6, Block 2. D. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot. E. Shall provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the Engineering Department. F. The applicant shall work with City staff to eliminate parking from within the drainage and utility easement along the West property line of Lot 1, Block 2 (due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main and existing trunk watermain). G. The applicant shall work with city staff to eliminate the proposed retaining walls along the southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lot 7, Block 2 (due to the close proximity to Outlot E, a conservation easement containing an existing wetland and an existing nature trail to the East). H. The previously dedicated drainage and utility easement encompassing the existing wetland in Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, shall be placed in an outlot. This outlot shall be subject to a conservation easement that the applicant will record, and which will protect the property from development in perpetuity. I. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approval/permits for proposed improvements within the Minnegasco pipeline easement (as per document no. 62189) prior tq vonstruction. 4 J. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvaVpermits for proposed improvements within the Xcel Energy easement (as per document no. 1 I 7544) prior to construction. K. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvement within the MnDOT right-of-way prior to construction. L. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shako pee's right-of -way and drainage and utility easements prior to construction. M. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer shall be private. The .. ~ applicant shall provide suitable easements for access to all adjacent properties utilizing the private sewer system. The easements shall be approved by the City prior to the recording of the plat. Maintenance of these utilities shall be the responsibility of the applicant. N. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvaVpermits for proposed improvements within all private utility easements prior to construction. O. The applicant shall verify the location of the outermost electrical transmission lines located in Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block I. A drawing showing the location and the easement as it relates to all proposed structures shall be submitted to the City. P. The applicant shall make all modifications to their proposed site plan, as required by the City of Shakopee, to comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes I st Addition. Q. The applicant shall be required to obtain a NPDES permit prior to any land disturbing activity. R. If the variations for parking lot setbacks are approved, the applicant shall be required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City for all parking lots located within the drainage and utility easements containing public utilities. S. The applicant shall work with the City of Shakopee staff to realign driveways to provide adequate separation from existing above ground public utilities/appurtenances. T. A document shall be executed for the new easement for the replacement pipeline installed in 2004, as requested by CenterPoint Energy. U. The drawing shall be revised to accurately show the gas main existing location change. V. The drawing shall be revised to reflect the 10 foot electric easement being clear from the gas easement. The underground electric was installed per Ryan Companies staking of the easement limits. Any corrections shall be at Ryan Companies expense. II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply; A. The variation to allow lots without street frontage shall be approved for Lots 5 and 6, Block 2 subject to an easement for access being executed. B. A variation is approved to allow a front yard parking setback of 30 feet for Lots 1 and 5, Block I, subject to the following conditions: 5 1. The applicant shall construct a 3.5 foot berm within the setback area for screening purposes. 2. The landscaping plan for the 3.5 foot berm shall meet or exceed ordinance requirements for screening, and shall be subject to approval by City staff. 3. The building setback on Lots 1 and 5, Block 1 shall be increased. from the required fifty (50) feet to a minimum of seventy-five (75) feet. 4. Loading docks for building in this plat shall be oriented away from any adjoining rights-of-way. C. No portion of a parking lot shall be'located within the drainage and utility easements along the frontages of Lots 1 - 4, Block 2. D. The variation request to allow side and rear parking setbacks of 0 feet shall be denied along the west property line of Lot 1, Block 2 and the southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lots 6 and 7, Block 2. E. The variation to allow a rear yard parking setback from 30 feet to 7 feet for Lots 1-6, Block 2 shall be denied due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main. F. The applicant shall provide an average impervious surface percentage for each separate block, providing the results comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes 1 st Addition. The averages are separated by block since each block drains to a separate storm sewer system. G. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s). H. Construction debris shall be contained. Any windblown construction debris shall be collected weekly. I. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or desired noise mitigation measures. J. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of all areas held in common ownership. K. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements ofthe Design Criteria and Standard Specifications ofthe City of Shakopee. L. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. M. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street signs are installed. Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held the _ day of . 2005. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk 6 J:b~ CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum TO: 8hakopee Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Dean Lakes Fifth Addition Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment MEETING DATE: December 8, 2005 REVIEW PERIOD: September 22,2005 to JaJ.?uary 20,2006 CASELOGNO.: 05-111 DISCUSSION At its November 3 meeting, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing on this item to allow additional time for the applicant to address the following issues: . Provision ofthe required 50 foot parking setback along Coneflower Lane; and . The wetland area in Block 2 be designated as an outlot. Please find attached for your reference, a copy of the November 3 memorandum to the Planning Commission. Also attached to this report is communication dated November 28 from the applicant. In this letter, Ryan Companies provides responses to the issues identified above. ill summary, Ryan states that they are unable to designate the wetland area as an outlot because of the existing mortgage on the site. Ryan is willing to record a conservation easement over the area. The Commission should discuss whether, under the circumstances, the Commission feels an easement will suffice. With regard to the parking setback along Coneflower Lane, the applicant states that providing the 50 foot required setback would result in an unacceptable loss of potential developable area. Please see communication from Ryan for additional details on this issue. The applicant is proposing that they be allowed the 30 foot parking setback with the provision of3.5 foot landscaped berm and increase of building setback from 50 to 75 feet. The letter from the applicant addresses a concern that they perceive as a misunderstanding between staffand the applicant. It is clear that the PUD approval in 2003 did not approve variances for the business park area (a statement which the applicant concurs with). The applicant's letter is silent on the provision in City Code (Section 11.50, Subd. 5.A) which states "Except when otherwise provided in this subdivision, applicable underlying zoning district requirements other than use restrictions described in Subd. 3, are superseded by the approval of a pun development plan by the City Council. The pun development plan establishes the requirements for a pun and shall govern and take precedence over underlying zoning districts provisions except where the pun development plan is silent as to a specific provision." Because the PUD approval resolution is silent on any of the variations that the applicant has requested during the development of Dean Lakes, the underlying zoning (Business Park and Highway Business zones) standards have been applied. By contrast the applicant believes variations from Business Park standards should be imputed from the PUD concept plan of 2003. Of course, actual development on the site is changed from the concept plan depiction. Staff does not believe they have the authority to vary from those standards on an administrative level. Those variations can only be approved by the City Council. Furthermore, the applicant has in previous applications termed this development to be a conservation development. Reduced setbacks andincreased impervious surface percentages seem inconsistent with the notion of a conservation development which Dean Lakes is. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment to the City Council subject to the conditions presented in the November 3 memorandum. 2. Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment to the City Council subject to revised conditions. 3. Recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment to the City Council. 4. Continue the public hearing for additional information. 5. . Table the request for additional information. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and PUD amendment, as recommended in the November 3 memorandum or subject to revised conditions. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment, as recommended in the November 3 memorandum or subject to revised conditions, and move its adoption. .~~ utie ~ Planrier II h:\boaa-pc\2005\12-08\dean lakes 5th 0511 1. doc " RYAN COMPANIES US,'NC. IYAN . 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM Minneapolis, MN 55403. 2012 BUILDING l.4$TING RELATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax r 'I.) ~;'; "., ,:., ..;, -'J ..:' ','., ...." ....\, ;. ''i;. 'n,:>:ff Il.j' (;,.. ~I 1'1" ,. ~ ." ,. ~ f"" '. " , ". ";",'1211' _.;~ t.x',-:,' ".:- .~:." -pI l!,~. i~: '~t 1.1 ..1 ~"._.t" ,ll\; . - .- .~.. November 28, 2005 L Ms. Julie Klima Planning Department City Of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Dean Lakes 5th Addition Dear Ms. Klima: Thank you for taking the time to work through the revision that Ryan has made to its plans for the Dean Lakes 5th Addition submittal. In particular, I would like to thank you, Joe Swentek, and Ryan Hughs for meeting with us on Nov. 18 to discuss the comments that were received from the Planning Commission at the Nov. 3 meeting. As a result of those comments and our revisions, we now agree on 33 of the 35 conditions of approval that . were identified in the original staff report. This leaves only two items for further discussion. The first item is number I. H., which suggests that the 1.63 Ac. of land that is located within the drainage and utility easement in the southeast portion of Block 2 be dedicated to the City as an Outlot. At the Planning Commission on Nov. 3rd, we explained a number of the practical issues raised by that. request, most notably the fact that the property is currently part of the legal security under a complex mortgage loan for the project. Since then, at your request, we have contacted BNC Bank, the primary mortgage holder at Dean Lakes, to inquire about the chances of getting that property released from the mortgage. Attached is a letter from Brian Whitemarsh, an officer at the bank. It indicates their inability to release that property as security for their (oan, a position further complicated by the fact that BNC is merely the lead lender in a group of lenders whose collective consent would be required for a release. For this reason we are simply unable to dedicate the property to the City. However, in the spirit of working to achieve the City's intent of preserving that area from development, we can offer the following solution. We can try to record an easement over this 1.63 acre area that will protect it in perpetuity. This would achieve the City's objective of protecting the land, and this we are prepared to accept as a condition of plat approval. The second item is number II. B., which addresses the parking lot setback from Coneflower Lane. In its initial report, based on Ryan's initial submission, staff supported a 30 foot parking setback. On November 3rd, the Planning Commission expressed interest in a 50 foot setback, and asked Ryan and staff to work on that issue. - -WWw.RYANCOM-PANIE'COM---- --- -... .. .5~;;J~~i~hi"f~ ...----IYAN 2012 BUILOl/lG LASTING RELATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax Since then we have looked hard at the impact of a 50 foot parking lot setback in that area. The area in question is bounded to the north and west. Each foot of increased parking Jot setback from Coneflower (to the south and east) therefore results in a foot-far-foot loss to the depth of the buildings adjacent to Coneflower. Increasing the parking lot setback from 30 to 50 feet therefore creates two issues that effectively make it impossible to achieve the development goal for that portion of Dean Lakes (if the plan reviewed in November of 2003 is a reasonable reflection of that goal): 1) Losing 20 feet across the entire length of the two buildings adjacent to Coneflower Lane means that the development capacity in that portion of Dean Lakes shrinks by 22,300 square feet. One way to measure this loss is to note that it is essentially the size of the Open Systems project that was completed at Dean Lakes in November. That project retained 60 to 70 jobs that could otherwise have gone elsewhere, and approximately $3,000,000 of new commercial property is now generating taxes that can be used to support a variety of City services. Our sincere view is that a loss of this magnitude should only be accepted in the event that a 30 foot setback cannot be made to create a reasonable separation. 2) Apart from the sheer loss of development capacity described above, the setback creates a true hardship situation in which the only buildings that can be built adjacent to Coneflower are unusually shallow (120 feet in depth). The companies to whom we market Dean Lakes typically need buildings that are 160 or at least 140 feet deep from front-to-back. Creating a situation in which these depths cannot be achieved would be creating the conditions for failure over a large portion of the project. . In the package reviewed for the overall Dean Lakes Development in November of 2003, the setback from Coneflower Lane was 15 feet. Had we been interested purely in minimizing all setbacks in our current application, we would have asked for formal approval of a 15 foot setback. We did not do so because the most intelligent plan for the area did not require such a minimal setback. In the plan submitted for Planning Commission on November 3rd of this year, we essentially doubled the requested setback from 15 to 30 feet in that area because doing so did not cripple the resulting opportunities. But expanding the parking lot setback by another 20 feet does eliminate the possibility of achieving the development goal for that area. Because the impact of a 50 foot parking lot setback from Coneflower is severe, we would respectfully suggest the following solution to the issue of securing an adequate separation between the two areas in question: 1. Enforce a minimum parking setback of 30 feet, double the 15 foot parking setback contemplated in the plan reviewed in November of 2003; 2. Require a minimum berm height of 3.5 feet. 3. Require the developer to work with City staff to provide landscaping along the top of the berm to provide additional screening where appropriate. 4. And finally, since the most perceptible separation occurs between the relevant buildings (rather than between parking areas), increase the building setback in Block 1 from the minimum ordinance standard of 50 ft to 75 ft. '~~--~~-T~-- ~---- ----~~;;M::;~~f:: aYAH WWW,RYANCOMPANIES. OMea I, . ... . ... ~_._._.__.._. - - -- - __00_.. 2012 BUILDING ~ASTING RELATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax We have attached a copy of the cross-section for the 15 foot berm shown on the plans reviewed in November of 2003. We have also created a cross-section for the 30 foot berm that we are proposing under the revised plans for this submittal. We sincerely believe that when combined with an increased building setback of 75 feet, the .30 foot berm - with its proposed extra height and landscaping - secures the desired separation between the commercial and residential portions of the development. If that is the case, then further increasing the setback from 30 to 50 feet does little except make it impossible to achieve the development projections for the area. I'd like to finish with two general points that have at times,1 think, been the source of misunderstanding between Ryan and City staff. Ryan Companies understands that no formal variances from standard ordinances were granted in November and December of 2003 when the Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the final master plan for the Dean Lakes project. Ryan was not in a position then to request formal variances I because the implementation of the plan was yet to be determined, and so none were granted. At the same time, we believe that the plan voted on .at that time did represent the general agreement that all parties had reached after a lot of hard work as to the overall development goals for the project. As we have platted the various areas of the project since, we have simply tried to maintain those goals as best we know how. We operate within standard ordinances whenever we can, and vary only when we feel that the overall goals of the project cannot be met without doing so. In this application, as in others, we have actually proposed more greenspace than was proposed in the original plan, and less density. Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us and to work through the revisions that were made to the plans since the November 3rd meeting. We've also attached requested greenspaceand shoreland calculations. Please feel free to call or e-mail with any questions or comments in advance of the meeting, otherwise we took forward to seeing you at the December 8th Planning Commission meeting. We will submit complete sets of revised plans after the meeting. Sincerely, Ryan Companies US, Inc. ~~ ,~ ~, Lee KOPPY, P.E. Team Leader 11/28/2005 11:57 FAX 6123714388 . BNC NATIONAL BANK-CRE ~ 002/002 BNC National Bank A S..",,,llmYllrI!NC:C\.lRP.Ino, The-Af.4tof Financial Suc;cess~ 3:3) South Seventh SrJ"~~l Sult~ ZOO Minncapoli~. MN 55402 wWw.bncbank.com Telephone: (612) 30l.2200 PAX, (612) 305-0414 November 28t 200S Ms. Julie Klima Planning Department City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopeel MN 55379 RE: Dean Lakes Development, Shakopee. Mn Dear Ms. Klima: . . At the request of Mark Schoening, Vice President of Development with Ryan Companies Us, me., we have reviewed a request that Ryan Companies dedicate approximately 1,7 acres of land located along the eastern edge of the project to the City of Shakopee. Because the City did not express an interest in owning this property in late 2003, when Ryan Companies secured financing for the project, it is currently part of the security for a very large and complex first mortgage loan. After careful review of your request, we have determined that our loan does not provide for the release of this property for dedication to the City. The. situation is further complicated by the fact that the loan is currently syndicated to a group of participating banks whose approval would be requiredt and whose approval will not be forthcoming. I am sorry that we could not accommodate your request. Mr, SChoening has asked me if we would be willing to consent to an easement over the area that would restrict it from development in perpetuity, and we would try to accommodate that request if asked to do so. s~~ Brian Whitemarsh . Senior Vice President Commercial Real Estate G:r Member :F!.llC (IfI,ILHOIIIIHO LEMlIll $fe CITY OF SHAKO PEE Memorandum TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Dean Lakes Fifth Addition Preliminary Plat .and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment MEETING DATE: November 3, 2005 REVIEW PERIOD: September 22,2005 to January 20,2006 CASELOG NO.: 05-111 Site Information Applicant: Ryan Companies Property Owner: Ryan Companies Location: South ofHwy. 169, East ofCSAH 83, and North ofCSAH 16 Current Zoning: Business Park (BP) Adjacent Zoning: North: Highway 169 South: Business Park (BP) West: Highway Business (B 1) East: Business Park (BP) Acreage: 42.11 acres Comp Plan: Business Park MUSA: The site is within the MUSA boundary. Pre/iminarv Plat Ryan Companies has submitted an application for Preliminary and Final Plat of Dean Lakes Fifth Addition. The Planning Commission is asked to consider the Preliminary Plat only. Final Plats are no longer reviewed by the Planning Commission. The subject site is a portion of the overall Dean Lakes PUD previously approved by the City Council. The specific area subject to this application is located north of Dean Lakes Blvd., south of Highway 169. Attached, as Exhibit B, is a copy of the Overall Area Sketch for the whole Dean Lakes project. Please note the location of the proposed Dean Lakes Fifth Addition. The preliminary plat proposes the creation of twelve lots from what are currently platted as Outlots D and J, Dean Lakes First Addition. Please see Exhibit C for a copy of the proposed preliminary plat. I . Park. dedication for this developmenfwasciddIessedWith-lliefinal plat of Dean Lakes First Addition and thus there is no outstanding park dedication to be dealt with. The Engineering Department has provided comment which has been attached as Exhibit D. Staff has incorporated the appropriate conditions of approval into the recommendation contained within this report. The Finance Department has commented that the existing special assessments shall be reapportioned and the fee for reapportionment shall be applied. CenterPoint Energy has commented that a document shall be executed for a new easements for the replacement pipeline installed in 2004 and that the drawing shall be revised to accurately show the gas main existing location change. . Shakopee Public Utilities has commented that the 10 foot electric easement must be free and clear of the gas easement and that the underground electric was installed per Ryan Companies staking of easement limits. Any corrections shall be at Ryan Companies expense. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment The applicant has requested an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the overall Dean Lakes project for the following: 1. A reduction to the front yard parking setback from 50 feet to 30 feet for Lots 1 and 5, Block 1 (the applicant is proposing to construct a 3 foot berm within the setback area and agreeing to not provide loading dock areas oriented to the rights- of-way); 2. A reduction to front yard parking setback from 50 feet to 15 feet for Lots 1,2,3, and 4, Block 2 (the applicant is proposing to construct a berm within the setback area and agreeing to not provide loading dock areas oriented to the rights~of~way), the applicant is proposing to request a 30 foot parking setback in these areas if . they are allowed to construct parking facilities within the easement area on the north side of these parcels; 3. A reduction to the side yard parking and rear yard parking setback from 20 feet to o feet for lots with shared parking and loading docks; and 4. A reduction to the rear yard parking setback from 30 feet to 7 feet for Lots 1,2,3, 4,5, and 6, Block 2. 5. The BP zoning district allows an impervious surface maximum of 80%. The plans submitted by the applicant indicated impervious surface percentage for Dean Lakes 5th Addition at 80.16%. In response, the applicant is requesting that they be allowed to calculate impervious surface percentage for all properties zoned for BP use and meet the 80% requirement, rather than meeting the requirements. on per lot or per development (4th Addition and 5th Addition individually). 6. A variation to allow Lots 5 and 6, Block 2 to exist without public street frontage. 2 The EngineeringdDepartmenthas provided comment that .ifthe variations are . approved for parking setbacks that the applicant be required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City (please see ExhibitD for further details). In response to Request No.2, engineering staff is recommending that no portion of a parking lot be located within the drainage and utility easements along the frontages of Lots 1 - 4, Block 2. In response to Request No.3, staff is concerned that individual lots have not been identified for this request. The request seeks to reduce setbacks on lots that have shared parking and loading docks but since individual users are not identified at this time, final site designs are not proposed. In addition, the proposed plan indicates variations to the parking setback requirements, even though no formal request is made in the application. Engineering staff is recommending denial of the proposals along the west property line of Lot 1, Block 2 and the southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lots 6 and 7, Block 2. In response to Request No.4, staff is recommending denial of the parking lot setback reduction request of the northern property lines of Lots 1 through 6, Block 2 . (due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main). In response to the request for impervious surf~ce coverage, staff recommends denial of the exception to the maximum allowable impervious surface percentages set forth by City Code due to there being no specific users defined for these lots. The applicant can work with City staff to provide an average impervious surface percentage for each separate block, providing the results comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes 15t Addition. The averages are separated by block since each block drains to a separate storm sewer system. Staff has provided the following list of conditions for the Planning Commission to consider for the PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plat of Dean Lakes Fourth Addition: I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval oftitle by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developers Agreement with provisions for security for public improvements (watermain) within the Final Plat, engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule. r. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 4. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Stonn Water Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment 3 ,^. Charges, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, security for the public : improvements, engin~ering review fees, and other fees as .:.. . "1' required by the City's most current Fee Schedule. .'. 5. Developer shall pay existing levied special assessments or may request with the application for the final plat, that special assessments be reapportioned against new lots. If request is approved, developer shall pay the current fee for reapportioning assessments and agree to the City Engineers reapportionment. 6. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shako pee's right-of- way and drainage and utility easements prior to construction. C. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Provide a minimum of30 feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the existing storm sewer (connecting the store water basins in Outlot M and Outlot L) in Lots 2 of Block 1. 2. Provide a minimum of 30 feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the existing storm sewer (connecting the storm water basin in Outlot L and Outlot K), in Lot 3, Block 1. 3. Provide a minimum of 10 feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of all Block 1 lot lines adj acent to outlots and conservation easements. 4. Provide a minimum. of ten (10) feet of drainage and . utility easement along the interior of all Block 2 lot lines adjacent to outlots and conservation easements. 5. The applicant shall provide the City. of Shakopee with an easement, for the purposes of access from Dean Lakes Boulevard through Block 2 to the eastern most portion of Lot 6, Block 2. D. The survey data (length and bearings) shall be shown for each lot. E. Shall provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the Engineering Department. F. The applicant shall work with City staff to eliminate parking from within the drainage and utility easement along the West property line of Lot 1, Block 2 (due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main and existing trunk watermain). G. The applicant shall work with city staff to eliminate the proposed retaining walls along the southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lot 7, Block 2 (due to the close proximity to Outlot E, a conservation easement containing an existing wetland and an existing nature trail to the East). H. The previously dedicated drainage and utility easement encompassing the existing wetland in Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, shall be placed in an outlot. This outlot shall be dedicated as a drainage and utility 4 easement and as a conservation easement. The site plan shall be adjusted accordingly. 1. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approval/pennits for proposed improvements within the Minnegasco pipeline easement (as per document no. 62189) prior to construction. J. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approval/pennits for proposed improvements within the Xcel Energy easement (as per document no. 117544) prior to construction. K. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/pennits for proposed improvement within the MnDOT right-of-way prior to construction. L. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the City of Shako pee's right-of -way and drainage and utility easements prior to construction. M. All proposed sanitary sewer and stonn sewer shall be private. The applicant shall provide suitable. easements for access to all adjacent properties utilizing the private sewer system. The easements shall be approved by the City prior to the recording ofthe plat. Maintenance of these utilities shall be the responsibility of the applicant. N. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approval/permits for proposed improvements within all private utility easements prior to construction. O. The applicant shall verify the location. of the outennost electrical transmission lines located in Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1. A drawing showing the location and the .easement as it relates to all proposed structures shall be submitted to the City. P. The applicant shall make all modifications to their proposed site plan, as required by the City of Shakopee, to comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes 1 st Addition. Q. The applicant shall be required to obtain a NPDES pennit prior to any land disturbing activity. R. lfthe variations for parking 19t setbacks are approved, the applicant shall be required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City for all parking lots located within the drainage and utility easements containing public utilities. S. The applicant shall work with the City of Shakopee staff to realign driveways to provide adequate separation .from existing above ground public utilities/appurtenances. . T. A document shall be executed for the new easement for the replacement pipeline installed in 2004, as requested by CenterPoint Energy. D. The drawing shall be revised to accurately show the gas main existing location change. V. The drawing shall be revised to reflect the 10 foot electric easement being clear :from the gas easement. The underground electric was installed per Ryan Companies staking ofthe easement limits. Any corrections shall be at Ryan Companies expense. 5 if... .. FoUowiiigapp-rovalancfrecordiiigor.tliefiiiarpIit,the"followirig ... ._._. .._m_. conditions shall apply; A. The variation to allow lots without street frontage shall be approved for Lots 5 and 6, Block 2 subject to an easement for access being executed. B. A variation shall be approved to allow a front yard parking setback of30 feet for Lots 1 and 5, Block 1, subject to the construction ofa 3 foot berm within the setback area and no loading dock areas shall . . be oriented to the rights-of-way. C. No portion of a parking lot shall be located within the drainage and utility easements along the frontages of Lots 1 - 4, Block 2. D. The variation request to allow side and rear parking setbacks of 0 feet shall be denied along the west property line of Lot 1, Block 2 and the southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lots 6 and 7, Block 2. E. The variation to allow a rear yard parking setback from 30 feet to 7 feet for Lots 1-6, Block 2 shall be denied due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main. F. The applicant shall provide an average impervious surface percentage for each separate block, providing the results comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes 1 st Addition. The averages are separated by block since each block drains to a separate storm sewer system. G. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building penmtapplication(s). H. Construction debris shall be contained. Any windblown construction debris shall be collected weekly. 1. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or desired noise mitigation measures. J. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of all areas held in common ownership. K. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and. Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. L. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. . M. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street signs are installed. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment to the City Council subject to the conditions presented.' 6 ....... .........."..~.. . .......... . .......... .............. .......... .. ...."....... .......... . ..-... . ..... ... . .i.--Recomrn.end-approvaCofthe Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment to the City Council subject to revised conditions. 3. Recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment to the City Council. 4. Continue the public hearing for additional information. . 5. Table the request for additional information. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and PUD amendment, as .- . - -.--.-clo.-----.--15'-...-rr.-...-..-.-.-d..--...-d.t' . ------..-- retbfififien e or su ~ec 0 reVIse con I Ions. Action Requested Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment, as recommended or subject to.revised conditions, and move its adoption. ,.... .~ ./ ,.- h:\boaa-pc\2005\11~03\deanlakes5th05111.doc 7 Shakopee - Location Maps Page 1 of 1 6~UI&rrA - HI C'~ ~~ lfi' ~ .. _ Subject Property ........ Shakopee Boundary SHAKOPEE I . COMMUNmPRlDaSlNCJl:lllS1 S c:J Zoning Boundary c=J Parcel Boundary Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Planned Unit Development Amendment for Dean Lakes 5th Addition 'htt.-..Jlm" It'\O';C! l'Ira/c;:nj:llrnrlp.p.l1nr.j:ltinnmj:ln/ml'ln 1'l~n?titlp.=Prp.limin~rv+P1Rt%?r.+FinR1+Pl.q... 10/01/200:1 ~~XNrarr a . \./ IYAHe HIGHWA Y 101/169 BY-PASS BUILDING lASTING RElATIOI'{SHIPS RYAN COMPANIES US,XNc. ey...PASS 50 South Tenth sire.... Sulto 300 AD moN 4 MiDDeapol/t, MN 55403-2OU Y 101/169 1 3 5 ADDITION 6:12-492-4000 tel FOURTH' tAKES F1ml HIGHWA PROPOSED DEAN 612-492-3000 lax WWWJlYA.NCOMPANIES.COfd ", 'TI ~or ,., vvr,.vI I.J PEAJ/.I.Af(ES-SL\D- ........... ............... ....-.__... ...-.... OUn.OT K ,. .' OUn.OT I 011'10., ~ ~ Oun.or E ~ ~ PROpOSE'D I), g ~N lAKE's F7f7'H AI), OUTLOT J ,., 1[)1l70N W OUn.OT F' Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I 3701 12lh.....North,_ZOI Sto aovlt,MN SbOJ Phon'IJ Ao.zn..MsS Fax: lzo.2IJ.I7l7 i ~~ ...fOO !IO)BCrN.!MI fJ 1 ~q~ DEAN LAKES 6 7 OUTLOT ,AJ FIFTH ADDITION -. LOCA'l'lON . SHAKOPBE., . MINNESOTA ,,, ,.,.., "",. " VUIC,.VJ v SHBIl'l'TIl'LIl co. RD. NO. 16 ~l r----- - OVERALL AREA PLAT ---.--- . - -- .............. -- I I .... JlEVISIONS I I AReA SUMMARY AReA SUMMARY ARE'A SUMMARY AREA SUMMARY AReA SUMMARY DeAN LAKE'S FIRST ADDITION DEAN I.AKES SECOND ADDITION , DEAN LAKES 11-I1R,D ADDITION DEAN I.AKES toUR11-I 'ADD/71ON PROPOSED DEAN LAKES FIrTH ADDITION BLOCK 1 .. 446,829 SF. .. 10.2532 AG: BLOCK 1 BLOCK I . BLOCK 1 BLOCK I Bl.OCK 2. a 98,551 SF. - 2.2165 AG: LOT I .. 177,838 S.F. .. 4.0780 ACRES LOT 1 .. 587,317.:/: SF. .. t:3.024:/: ACRES LOT 1 .. 117,558:/: S.F. .. 2.899:/: ACRES LOT 1 .. 197,852:/: SF'. .. 4.542:/: ACRES BLOCK 3.. 92,578 SF'... 2.1253 AC LOT 2 .. 188,531 SF'. .. 3.8890 ACRES LOT 2 .. 61,28f:/: SF'. .. f.#J7:/: ACRE'S LOT 2 .. 177,244:/: S.F'. .. 4.089:/: ACRES LOT 2. .. 145,977:/: SF: .. :s.351:/: ACRES BLOCK 4 a 102,435 SF:.. 2.3518 AG: LOT 3 .. 52,199:/: S.F'. .. 1.198:/: ACRES . LOT 3 .. 360,679:/: 5oF'. .. 8.280:/: ACRES LOT 3 a 215, 920:/: 5oF'. - 4.957:/: ACRES BLOCK 5 - 247,170 S.F'. a 5.6742 AC. BLOCK 2 LOT 4 .. 52,329:1: S.F: .. 1.20f:/: ACRES LOT 4 .. 206,363:1: S.F. ... 4.737:/: ACRES LOT 4 .. 149,065:/: SF'. "" :J. 422:/: ACRES BLOCK 6 - 112,3SJ S.F:.. 2.5800 AC. LOT 1 .. 107,3!59 S.F: .. 2.4846 ACRES LOT 5 .. 86,415:/: S.F'. .. 1.525:/: ACRES LOT 5 .. 221,217:1: S.F'. .. 5.079:/: ACRES LOT 5 .. 275,241:/: s.F'. .. 8.319:/: ACRES BLOCK 7.. 92, 160 SF'. .. 2.1/57 AG: LOT 2.. 64,396 s.F: .. 1;4783 ACRES LOT 6 .. 155,279:/: S.F: .. :s.565:/: ACRES I hereby cerdCJr that thl. pha, .peclficatloll, BLOCK 8 .. 160,117 SF. - .J.6758 AC. LOT 3.. 70,380 SF'. .. 1.6157 ACRES LOT 7 "" 141,470:/: SF'. .. 3.247:/: ACRES TOTAL .. 1,083,059:/: 5oF... 24.884:/: ACRES TOTAL .. 984,055:/: SF'.- 22.S91:/: ACRES or 11l1'0tt was prepued by mo or WIder my OUTLOT A.. 487,079 S.I'". .. 11.1818 AC. (BLOCK 2, DCAN LAKES SECOND ADDmON) LOT 4.. 73, 119 SF: .. 1.6786 ACRES 7tITAL AREA 1,096,290:1: SF:.. 25.167:1: ACRES BLOCK 2 dkoc:t SUponlslon and thAt I am. dilly LOT !5.. .80,853 s.F'. .. 1.3970 ACRES .. IJCOllJecl land Surveyor WIder tholaws of OUTLOT B.. 228.253 5oF:.. 5.2400 AG: LOT 8 "" ftO,973 SF'. ... 2.5478 ACRES LOT 1 .. 214,496:/: SF: .. 4.924:1: ACRES ~~ OUTLOT C - 1.08J,0S9 s.F. .. 24.8636 AG: ffEAN I.AKES FDUR11-I ADDmON) LOt2 - 194,050:1: s.F.... 4. 45S:/: ACRES OUTLOT D .. 1,834,58(1 s.F'. .. 42.1163 AC. BLOCK 2, DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITION) BLOCK 3 LOT 3 .. 198,S11:/: s.F'. .. 4.557;/: ACRES OUTLOT E.. 739,:J59 S.F'. .. 16.9734 AC. LOT 1 - 228,247 S.F: .. 5.2398 ACRES (P /0 DOM LAKES FOURT11 ADOfTTON) LOT 4 .. 199,665:/: 5.;' .. 4.584:/: ACRES OUTLOT F.. 68S,084:/: S.F. '" 15.7958:1: AC. LOT 5 .. t86,014:/: SF: .. 3.811:/: ACRES ~ OUTLOT G.. t,:J8S,I46:/: S.F'. .. J1.S674:/: AC. OUTLOT A "'. 854,812 s.F: .. t9.623S ACRES (P/O DEAN LAKES FOUR11-I ADOf710N) LOT 6 .. 828, 192:/: S.F:. .. 14.375:/: ACRES A itA. en , OUTLOT H '" 65,179 s.F'." 1.4963 AC, LOT 7 .. 235, 658:/: 5oF: .. 5.410:/: ACRES RllGISTRATIONNO. DATE OUTLOT I.. 206,374 SF'... 4.7377 AC. 7tlTAL AREA .. 1,916,:J08 SF'. .. 43.9924 ACRES TOTAL .. I,S34,586:/: SF'... 42.116:/: ACRES REG. #23002 .~~s" OUTLOT';.. 984,055 s.F. '" 22.5908 AC. (BLOCK I, DEAN LAKES FIrTH ADDf710N). OUTLOT K.. 102,774 S.F:" 2.3594 AC. OUTLOT L" 146,398 s.F: '" :s.3608 AC. <O:ZOO5RVANCOMPAHJESlJS.IHC. OUTLOT M .. 56,35B S.F: .. 1.2938 AC, OUTLOT N .. 1,077,388 SF: - 24.7330 AC. (P/O OEAN I.AKES 11-IIRD ADDf710N) SlIEBTNllMBllll OUTLOT 0.. SO,032 S.F... I.S373 AG: OUTLOT p.. 346,189 S.F'... 7.9469 AC, (BLOCK " DEAN LAKES SECOND ADOITION) 6 OUTLOrQ.. 18,922 s.F:.. 0.4344 AC, (P/O DEAN LAKES 11-IlRO AOOf710N) SITE AREA - 10.882,198:1: S.F. - 249.8210:1: AC, 250 0 250 500 .750 DRAWNllY CHl!CXED llY r--"I SWK SAG Seale In feet. JOB NllMBIm DAn ,nn1RnAA /lit --....- L,j III . I ~lU'1fiN. < ~ I f ...." .., : I C'~UR I r '.., I I A Vr..-~ I V \ , '> , -A ~I I ,t.-v <, ('\C ("'II ~ 1.J'I 8' rV''K .. \ L5 I I BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS j,)1.- L.Vv . I I , I c,:, I f , I , 4 . , .. t.t:- . RYAN COMPANIES Us, INC. . a-.. SO South Tenth Street, Suite $00 ..J. '" Ll__~~_ Mlnneapolls,.MN S5403-20:\2 6:12-4924000 .el 6:12-492-30001la WWW.RYANCOMPANlBS.COM ...._-_._--~-.. .,..........--..- 3. 4 I W I 1 Westwood Professional ServIces, Inc. J7Ol1ZlhSlmlNarth,S1lftom :St. Clod, MN 5GOJ PhOMl3ZCJ.ZS3.S4!1S Faxz hO-2Uo1737 r- 2 lao)l!Cl'NlMIl 2 DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITION LOCAnON SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA SIlIlBT T1TIJl () BLOCK 1; c --\ 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT r- c:)-\ ........ Propolted DraInage and UWlty EeI.,mlnts are shown \hut: RB\IISIONS BL.OCK S':. ........ --- ., ., ---l___~______L__ I I . .. Being S /0$\ ill lIld\h and adjoIning lot IIn.., . )> unle.s otherwl.e shown. , OWNER Ie DEVELOPER DEVELOPMENT INF'ORMA TlON RYAN COMPANIES US, INe. 60 South lOth SIr..t, CURRENT ZONING: 8P SuIt. 300 Minneapolis, MN 5540;1 BUILDABLE LOrs - 5 PLANNER.,.ENGlNEER' RYAN COMPANIES Us, INC. OULOTS = 0 50 South loth SI,../, Sull. 300 7t1TAL SITE AREA - 24.864 ACRES MInMapolls, MN 55403 PROPOSEO STREET RIGHT OF' WAY AREA .. 0 ACRES I ARCHITECT RYAN COMPANIES Us, INe. . LOT AREA - 22.591 ACRES SO South 10th St,..I, DAn Sull. 300 MINIMUM LOT WlOTH .. 265 FEET /~h~t~ Mlnnsapalls, MN 6S403 AREA SUMMARY SUR\'l!'YOR: MINIMUM LOT WlOTH PER ZONING ORDINANCE '= 100 F'EET ,. Cll2005RYANCXlIlPANlESuo,lNC. BLOCK 1 1I6Tl100D PROmSlONAL SERVICES, INe. MINIMUM LOT SIZE 3701 12tJr StrHI North LOT 1 = 197,B52:/: s.F. I: 4.542:/: ACRES SUIte 206 (LOT 2, BLOCK I)" 3.351 AC. SIIllETNUHBIlR LOT 2 = 1405,977:/: S.F. .. 3.351:/: AeRts Sf. Cloud, MN 56303 MINIMUM LOTS SIZE PER ZONING ORDINANC~ = 1.0 AC. 4 LOT .] = 215, 920:1: S. F. .. 4.957:/: ACRtS 320-253-9495 LOT 4 = 149.065:1: s.F. .. 3.422:1: ACRES LOT 5 = 275,241:1: s.F. .. 8.319:1: ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTION 100 0 100 200 300 DRAWNBY CH:SCXBD BY OuUots D and'" DEAN LAKES FIRST ADDI1ION, ~ , SWK SAG 7t1TAL = 984,055:1: s.F... 22.591:1: ACRts Scale In toet ~;::::l'a. to the recan:'d pial the,.of, Scott Co"nlx 10B Nll!oIIlllR ~~'iA1r.~)][1~i~~'h. ~ntI"JCnRR nil; 'r~',i~f.,lM~.j,,,. "~'_"'w'" " .... .,. .,.~. .1." ...... . ,. Gz-. I I YAle I lJl^I^IC-C''''''T'A I"Ir-"/:)ART'AiC-^'T' rlC- . I IVI1IV/VI-.,,)VU.... ve,1"I /lVII-IV I VI BUILDrNGlASTINGRELATONSHIPS I T'DA ^'C'O""'RT''' T'lrI^1 RII""/T' rlC- IUAV AII^I^IC-C'rlT'''. f"IC"OIlRT'AiC-A/T' 1"lC- TDIIAIC'O""'RT'ATII""IAI F':/lI""LIT I""IC". fUAV A 11""1 -7'" -1") Il\nIV';>, V 11"1 I./VI V H::Ir71 VI YVnl I VII I VI VI-.,,) V 11"1 V,-,I'"I /lVII-IV I VI I 1\1"11 V.,,), V In/lV/v r\H::Ir71 VI rV1"I1 IVV. I"'V-/4. I A/I"l -7'" -1 ~ IVV. /V-: lit..; . . HIGHWA Y 101/169 BY-PASS I 1\YANCOMPANIESUS.JNC. . I PARDEL 74 50 SouthTenthStreot,Sulto300 PARDEl. 74 Minneopallo,MNS5403-2012 -- unurr""""" ~ cmurrFAQUrr I 6.lZ-49Z4000 tel /J" EASDItlIT 1'1R.... Nf1 rwm '1 DI$fMEN7'Df D<<. HI1 11"''' 6.IZ-4!l2-3000 ra;.; ....... '/:',...... . . . . . .",...,. -..... . . ./ . . . .. -. -- ' 282 II :UST ., \:aT ...257 2511/'.. unurrWE11ENT ~ / 1197 T t I I . J" ~ NO. m-. ,. . . --II. - . - . - . ::::z f .-ll.-J- -. . ; 1-.-. .,; ._._._.!:I ._,_._.!:I '-'-,-, .-. -....~....._._:a_._.-<-._._._,_\._._._.....,- I .f 1._',_ __1:_11__ r:.'-_____H .14. H~...............-.......-=-.:.r &:---------~~-----..... ---~ _ ----lfE)-'~---r--i. ____"'\.~_-------__-~-+ ----"'"..-..,."........=..=-__...,t"..=..__ _ ._. I --- --T-----t::L J::::-;______::.t:._ ---------=----.:::-t- --=-----:....----"'"-------:....-:..--- ---:..."'"------,."..---=----- '-""'_-""""""" _-=- .~__, , n-....... ......... . .. . ID ---:.- !! ' .---., \ <#. . . ............ ..._~ _ I~~ '':........___ '~,_...."""""""""" .. / I L 1 -J-r -T 1 t' ~ . - ~~ / "".osr ""'DO<:HI1_ I'fllDEANWI$FlltSTADM1rJN . I...... --- -----,.l.~ "'l- -r------- :.1_ ../ . I ..... - .c- _ '...........r. I " I _. _ _ <~ " --eIJll.DlIKJ smACK UNIi.d;:-~~ /" / /' . " . . " . ~~._"".. ._ wtMlNr .". . If . / C) 4u I- ~NA<n:AND U11UTY " k~/ /" I {" / PrR_HI1_ ./ " / JIll / I j", I ~, ~ . CAsrJJENr PER DFAN ',. (-:' , r " I , " 1", . 0 LAl<EH/1/ST ADDl7/ON- , ' . " , . " I cS .f-"r/ /,/1 Iffj /"/ /'U/' p,; / ~ C:) I .". ./1. .". .11 ./1. ~ I "C / I /'1 { JIll {"/ /" I' / II / otf! -, . I, . /I " " " '-I) I rt ., /'1/ '1'. ,,,. ./1. .11. ~ ., r, ~ / ' 1 I I II { /" / /"/ {" / I r I fC ~.' . I,. /I . " . II" .....I~~" ,~.. .. ., Ii I J I" I . I/" ," I BLOCK 2 .5, . .if' . 6 . ~DI , ,v I \ iT [> ~. I 1 .il. 2 '111 J .11. 4 1111 5 1,11 """ . ( ~ / / /~I' / ;~"I' I~ f / {. " /' 20 " . ~ . /) lii , . I I~I r II 2D ~ ;! / I ( Iii '1' . ill i OUTLOT .JD' {f . i If/' Westwood Professlonal ServIces, Inc. ~ '.' 2f1..., 1 . , 2f1 -: I . 2D I , , ...,1""'..............'..,... 'oJ 20 I- I I, I l- 2f1 /' 11/' tf r 2D . I I r' ~ ~ " /' :t=t.':::..".......D-Im '>/ '1,. ." " C'ODI <, {' . " . " . . , If'. /I . 1.5 / I .,I! 1f1{ !"/ Illi /'/...~ . C:) " r " 'I . . " . d 1 j . " 'J'): .'~~-BUIl.DIN. SETBACK /JNF:__, PBO)BCI'IlA!IB. I .'" , { " I-.. \d 11 . - . - . !I L \ Ii . I I . . I , . 1 'i-..;.... ~1- . --::!It.--- -i'o!....JL . -. -. \ DEAN. LAKES e I- ..L ! ,/n~~"'''BflILDIN.smAQ(UNIi..c:'f1d / (,','/ --'_SE7BAQ(UN~ ~ ~;;.-.-::::. - . =--:-==7::::-~~i-~~-::.._ -::..'-:..-=.:.;;;;;;:.... FIFTH ADDITION '1- " l' I . " . . r'C ~ . - __ . r . "----0::" . ---- (, La Il -..-....} ILl._. '''L' 'I/I~<e-;:) /~7~jP' .. .~'<:~ ""'7"11"'\7" c- LOCA'1'1ON --- \ 1._ - #4 , -'-.-11/ J"~ .l"?"'" ... VUIL.VI r.;. '-. -------- --n.. 11'- --../' l . 'i~/' SUAv-.OPEE ' ---us 1> ~ '\ v .n..nJ.">.: , - - - - - - " 72.1.62 H8-/. '27~;-""-- Il - ~. 07. ....v~. 61, MINNESOTA' - 1 .. r - - - _ D~N L~KE$ BOULEVARD . I 1>'" oa:~ ~ ~ '.<:~ . y 7 --PCN- -I'OH_ I . . - - - ......; - _ _ ,,// N.~ P.\_~/ SBBBTTIl'Lll 1"'\1 '7"//"'I'r I ~1"'- -""'--- . - - - -;.:'~ J;:gj t;;-i';...J' BLOCK 2' VUIL.VI / a:l -~__ -PcH r!I;,.fJ\ '\.. .~ " '--. , " . :to / De-I" ~~- ::::....~ 180.2-1 =;:-:::---.:.-:....--- PRELTh1INARYPLAT / !!7 I ~ nfi'/-v;f. . :M/C\\.. _,_____ ;:j OUTLOT G . ~:;5og ~"=~-, ' ~.~ POII-'- ... .....,:--_____ / 3 / 1>.\66 /"" '\ ~~~J... 00,," . ____. L 'tR~ND.,'ffs~-w.. POI/- llBVlSIONS -'IlH-..., ,pI" I' '.lti .u y~",~... . _ . _ . . ---..., . - - ceo 1V:,'" "0'0 7"'~1l . _ . ... '''''_ I e:t-r~. PlJN~ . ~ - - - -.: - "--. \ ~ .J~ij> ~f.1l '-' .~. 428.48 . - . - . i . . P,."...d DIYl/Mge and U8nty Easem.nts ",.. "'.... /hue: I L .,/' ---'::::::::~'!'1Mi:1-'.AND CQIIIll' j\)'d ~ tl S/HooU'29"E __,', _j ------- ,....,....- --------""'---':,9It-.\~ 17 \ 7 WI WI .; -- ~""'- J., / l L /,. \ -PCN- ,~, ._ _ __ _ -,....,...... I C'l!Jif".l.f]; 0-__ -""'_ ~~.e I t , / r- - / ~i' /' _""'_ Bolng 5 "'of Tn width and adjoinIng lot lines, / ~ gO> unl.ss othsrwls. shown. ~fj .. / / / OWNER Ii: DEVELOPER ~ I ~~Affoucg'f~'Efftr~:" INo. / SUit. 30Q / Mlnnl/Gpo/fo, MN 554D3 I he:eby certlfy that tbio pt.n, speci6cadon, PLANNER-ENGINEER I Of zepo<twu p:epared by me or UlIder my RYAN COMPANIES US; INo. DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION dh:ect8llpet\'ll10nondthathm..du1y 50 South 10th str11s4 LIcensed dSllrveyorunder thel1wsof SUit. 300 . CURRENT ZONING: SP the Sea EMInn..Olllo , . Mlnneopolls. MN 55403 > . SU/WASLE LOTS.. 7 'if:.'f!/rg~PANIES US; INo. OULOTS '" 0 AREA SUMMARY gelt;~go lOth str..~ TOTAL S/~ AREA _ 42.116 ACRES BEG1S'l'IlA.TIONNO. DATE Mlnnl/Opalfs, MN 55403 REG #23 O' ~/~_ SLaCK 2 PROPOsr:D STREET RIGHT OF WAY AREA.. 0 ACRES . 04 I ',iI LOT' .. 214,496:1: S.F. '"' 4.924:1: ACRES S/JR~ LOT 2 ~ '94,OSO:/: 5.F. =- 4.455:1: ACRES 1I!'S7WOOO PROfESSIONAL ~RI.fCES INC. LOT AREA _ 42.118 ACRES Ql....RYNlC:O""'AHlSSus.lNO. Lor 3 '"' 198,511:1: 5.F. '" 4.557:J: ACRES 3701 12th SlrIIet North LOT 4 '"' 199.665:1: 5.F. =- 4.584:1: ACR€S SUltl/ 208 MINIMUM LOr WIDTH = 258 FEET SBEIlTNOMBBR LOT 5 - 166,014:1: S.F. = 3.811:J: ACR€S st Cloud, MN 58JOJ LOT 6 '"' 628,192:1: S.F. =- 14.375:1: ACR€S 320-253-9495 MINIMUM Lor WIDTH PER ZONING ORDINANce _ 100 fEerS LOT 7 = 235,658:1: S,F. '" [HID:I: ACRCS ,.... LEGAL DESCRIPTION MINIMUM LOT SIZE .' ,! .iji;:,.. TOTAL '" 1,834,S86:1: 5.F. ~ 42.116:1: ACRES . . (LOT 2 SLOC/( 2) = 4.455 AG. 100 0 .100 200 300 DRAWNBY ~~I,"d~~+fu,. 1"~i; ... OutJat9 0 ond " DEAN LAKES FIRST ADDITION. . .,....., SWI( . \",;.1f'I':r~i~l"~~~ll{lji~ . .1 -, · .. -"'" '"' ...., ..,,,~... _ "'IS "'" "'" ""'"' """""'" - ,.". ""'" . "'~""".I.I"!'> ",",.' .. ,,",. _..,~ ..,1":_ .....:.:::::::.:::::-_~~~t~,,, ------- . ,. .~ . ,/. .>( ---- <J '-'. ..... ..................>., .;-.;--=-___ ~ rA...N~}: ----::::::. II n ...... Si" ~ . . . ......~p ___ r\7i BUILDING LASTING RELATIONS~ltS .~ ~--_. , ~., n; ..:! RYAN COMPANIES US,INC. · . . 50 South Tenth Str.... Sult.300. MlnneapollJ, MN 55403-2OU\ . 6U4~OO~ 6U49Z-3ll00 I'al<<' ---- WWW.RYANCOMP~.COM -----il-_ I' I OFFICE . 52,500 SF / 2nd flOOR: 21,750 SF OFFicE I _ . _ WAREHOUSE, S7,l~ SF Schoell ~T4 & 3.42 AC Madson, Inc. Planning Engineering Surveying POND-2 OFFICE I 10S80Wayzata~IeYonl,SuIlll1 N- -7'9 00 Mlnneopolls, M1nnesolll 5S305-1525 HWL-783:oo W AREHOU S E phone: (952) 54607601-l'0x: (9S2)S16-9D65 554 Tl1Ird 5treet NW, Sulle 1DD 98 800 SF Ell< RIver, MInn_ 5533001409 ' phone: (763) %'1100108 -I'ax: (952) 5460!1D6S WWW.s<hoellmadson.<om LOT 5 6.32 AC PIDJllCT NAlIE DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITION LOCA:I'ION OFFICE I SHAKOPBE, 'WAREHOUSE ~OTA , , 53,400 SF .DT 1: \ SIIIlBT TlTLtl "' "'" , BLOCK 1 ILOG: 64,400 SF \ 'ARKING: 188 STALLS REQUIRED \ SITE PLAN 40.5K OFFICE & 23.8K WAREHOUSE \ 'ARKING: 186 STALLS PROVlOED \ 'ARKING: 2.9 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG \ ~PERVlOUS: 79.3~ (3.60 AC) \ IlEVISIONS \ OT 2: \ OT: 3.35 AC \ LOG: 53,400 SF ARKING: 85 STALLS REQUIRED \ . 10.5K OFFICE, 42.9K WAREHOUSE \ ARKING: 85 STALLS PROVIDED \ ARKING: 1.6 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG \ !PERVIOUS: 85.1~ (2.85 AC) \ ~~ \ JT: 4.96 AC \ .oG:.74,250 SF \ OFFICE I 4RKING: 297 STALLS REQUIRED \ 74.3K OFFICE . \ 4RKING: 297 STALLS PROVIDED \ WAREHOUSE ~ING: 4.0 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG \ PERVIOUS: 86.3" (4.28 AC) \ 64,400 SF Ib",eby<=lfytbattbiJplan.spcci.fication, IT 4'. \ or report was prepared by me or UlIder my m j 42 AC direct supervisiound thar I am ,daly DG' 57 100 SF \ Licensed Professional Engineer under th. IRKiNG:' 97 STALLS REQUIREO \ ALL WORK SHALL 8e: PERFORMED IN ACCOROANCE WITH THE CITY laws oft&eS....ofMlnn..ota, '"'' ""'" "'''' ..,,,,""" , OF """"" ""'""n"" "" u"", "'''''' """"""',. ~ _ . ..... " """' "'''''''' , ~ ..... ,., """' '" "'" " OF "-"" " """ '" """'''' ,.... "" """, '"" """"" ,,.,"" . '" ~ERVlOUS: 89.S~ (3.06 AC) \ REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCllON DETAILS. 'T 5: \ N 1IllGlS'l'RAnONNO. DATIl ;:, ','Mi " " "'- "'",.."" "",.. M< '" '''' " "'" .,,'" '''''' M,,..,,.,,... .RKING: 223 STALLS REQUIRED \ OTHERWISE. l 41.4K OFFICE. 57.4K WAREHOUSE \ BUILOING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE Of' BUILDING FACE (TYP.) <<>"''''VAHCOMP'''ESU~INO. RKING: 223 STALLS PROVIDED \ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RKING: 2.3 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG \ SBllllTNllMBER 'ERVlOUS: 80.3" (5.08 AC) \ ALL CURB AND GUmR TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED ' "''''''''-.... 12 \ "lYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED ~ RKING REQUIREMENTS USED: \ OTHERWISE. DRAWNBY CHIlCXEDBY U""''''"' " - '"'" , 0 " ,,~ ~ ~ " iTALL!EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT - \ PERIMETER DRAINAGE '" UllUTY EASEMENTS TO BE FlLEO AS , J:i REHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) \ I ''''''A''A'''' l'\""'''''~''T ""~ r.~, ,_. .. _.._ _. _.... _.. __.. _ ... '. ~ " ....-......"...~'~llfo ".' "'~rr.' , .: ': '.il( '.! .:...K,\.::. ,,.,, .~. " SITE DATA: DEAN LAKES FIFTH AOomON - BLOCK 2 . HIGHWAY 169 LOT 1: LOT: 4.92 AC BLOG: 71,400 SF PARKING: 275 STALLS REQUIRED 57.9K OFFICE & 3.51< WAREHOUSE . RYAN COMPANIES Us, INC. PARKING: 275 STALLS PROVIDED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER MINNEGASCO PIPEUNE EASEMENT PARKING: 3.9 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG 50 South Tenth Street, Sulle3DO UNDERGROUND UTIUTY FAClUTY IMPERVIOUS: 82.9" (4.08. AC) MlnneapollJ, MN 55403-2012 DEAN LAKES FIRST ADDITION EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T133932 ~ LOT 2: 612492-4000 Id LOT: 4.45 AC 61249:103000 fllX BLOG: 75,500 SF PARKING: 216 STALLS REQUIRED WWW,RYANCOMPAN.lIlS.COlo( UG 46.8K OFFICE, 28.8K WAREHOljSE PARKING: 216 STALLS PROVIDED PARI(JNG: 2.9 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG ..--- IMPERVIOUS: 84.3" (3.75 AC) ---- fW -4;- LOT 3: LOT: 4.56 AC - BLOG: 78,400 SF PARKING: 213 STALLS REQUIRED #.~K OFFICE, 33.5K WAREHOUSE PARKING: 213 STALLS PROVIDED 2 PARKING: 2.7 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG IMPERVIOUS: 82.5% (3.76 AC) OFFICE I I PARKING REQUIREMENTS USED: Schoell ~ WAREHOU E OFFICE I OFFICE I 4 STALLS/l000 SF - OffiCE l- I STALL/EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT _ & iJj 71,400 SF WAREHOU E WAREHOU E WAREHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) Madson, Inc. m15 ~E LOT 1 75,600 SF 78,400 SF PlannIng EngIneering Surveying ~g 10S80 Wlyzalzl Boulevartl, SuIlll1 ::J< 4.92 AC LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 Mlnneopon., MiMesota SS305-1S2S 1=1- SITE NOTES ,chone: (9S2) 5'16-7601- fax: (952)~ =>12 OG:: 4.45 AC 4.56 AC 4.58 AC 5S4 TI1lrd SlreeI: NW, SUite 100 ~[:J ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WIlli TIlE CITY Elk RIver, Minnesota S533D-t'i09 t--' phone: (763) 211-ll108 -l'ax: (952) S4&-91l65 ~~ . DISTRICT BOUNOMY 140' OF SHAKOPEE SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILOING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS; www.schoellmadscn.com i~ ~Af~1l 140' REF'ER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. ::>T5 1--' REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. ~- 140' PlOJEClNlllll ?rrs~Tl. . ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED DEAN LAKES OTIlERWlSE. . ,/ '--~-- ..~B.O~~'-- .. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILOING FACE (TYP.) FIFTH ADDITION .-.-.-.-. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOlED. .--..--.--. ~.O~~.3 ALL CURB AND GUTlER TO BE CONCRElE B612 UNLESS NOTEJ) LeCAIlON 01liERWlSE. SHAKOPEE, .-' ,/ TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED MINNESOTA ,/ 140' 01liERWlSE. ,/ PERIME1F:R DRAINAGE &: UllUTY EASEMENTS TO BE FILED AS SHEllTTlTLB ,/ SEPARAlE DOCUMENT FOR EACH LOT AT .TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT BLOCK 2 ,/ ,/ APPUCA 1101'1 SITE PLAN WEST ,/ ,/ "'" ,/ ,/ ,... ,/ K8VISIONS ,/ ~------ ---= . II - - - - sM; FRONT PARKING I -----_____~C/( (PUo Amend) I I ----------1 f Elc"EII~INOUS 5L . _ ----__.,._______ I heteby wtlfy that this plan, specification, ,. . SAN LAKES 'BLVD"al. . _ . _ . __ . _ _ or report WllS ptllparCd by me Or under my dire." supetvision and that I am . duly ~----- . Licensed p",r..sloaol Engineer under the - /- ---------- lo.... o,me S.... ofMlnneso... ....... -....--." --::~ ---- -...:--===-=--~"':...- --- ,,--:?" ----- -- =----- t2i~ u( .r'- ::::--------------:I. :::------------=::=::::::::.::----, ~, -- J . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . _ ___ , _____ """" .-.-.-.-.-.-............ .............,....., N RIlGISTRATIONNO. DATI! . I ---_ _, , ' . ---------- '~" " , ,.,- ----........., II -------- \ " #41287 09/2212005 I -----------__ . I ',', / -.......... " ! ' . OllTlmtJ:l' G --------__ . /,'" , fX1 I r'. .'\\ t1l2ODlRYAN COMPANlIB US, lNC. I ______ ',' , , II N\\I.-7~OO -7'-:""'-~ '", J . ,,- . IIWI ~"I". , 5HEETNUMllER .,. 13 60 120 DRAWNBY CHECKIlD BY 0 COL LRK ~......- I ... ... ,'.~u. H""'4'>'mul!~~.~.1rt1il~iff':, -'!\',;JitJll' Ihi'-,Jrr~"..!Aifj.: I' '. ".H~..i;1V!'~~ll'W$. r" If!' -~.''!i;~li. n". ri." J 11 I -- ~I N. ei>': MINNEGASCO PIPEUNE EASEMENT UNDERGROUND UTILITY FACILITY MINNEGASCO PIPEUNE EASEMENT I . . ..ii.l. EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T133932 ,.. <.i 3) BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS, .~ ---"7 \.0<: lm- L.J.. -- '_}~ -;- -=7 .:~ --1- ,~ I _ ' - . - RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. . t. . 7. __- !OSouthTenthStreet,Sullc300' - II /'-;::.._-- Mlnneapolle,MN55~2012 571' "/ /" 612492-4000101 : OFFICE I /~ /'. - . ~ 612492-30oof.. 140' I. I- /, /. . 2 LOT 6 I WAREHOUSE /... " I / / WWW.RYANCO)IPAMEs.cOM ----~-8 AC I, l:~:r:~~rl',fg,~ ~H 200' ~<T --, O FI E I ' . .. 2nd FLOOR: Bl.5k SF It / F C I 3rdFLOOR: Bl.5kSF. I/o I WAREHOU E I' /; " . -67,200 SF -- I / / J _'_ 480' I II I II /' LOT 4 LOT 5 ({ / I 4.58 AC 3.81 AC \~, \ Schoell ~. & \\ \ d " . Ma son, Inc. 140' - . _ lHOR.EtANO \ ' . II ) Planning Engineering Surveying . OVERLAY DISTRICT \ d>i )) . - BOUNDARY , qy; '/ 10590 Wayzolll Boulevard, Sllll1l1 . , b /; ,/ Mlnneopolls, _ 5530S.152S . I '4'/ ,...------;/.~ . phone:(952)S4&-7601-fax:(952)546-905S . ,1."/ q ",....--__ r/' . . - . - . - . - . . - ---. , ~" /'/""..-r 554 TI)Ird5tleetNW,SUIllI100 . LLIf ^ . '\ // E1kRlver,_ 55330-1409 trs~n~4 . .,) _.t-~ ////.. . '7 pIlone:(763)241-GI09-fox:(952)5'I&-905S " ,,-::;: ~ - - - - - ./ . ........",.. ........ www.sdulellmodson.= EX. \\E11.AND .r: .... . - - - -/ . . . _ .LlM.- ... . _ . /' ~OFn.1l . ..... ........ I .~~ \ . r I /j . /' PIl0Jl!Cl'NlMB I ./~ .; /' DEAN LAKES I I~ I (/ FIFTH ADDITION 'Iii! II / I i .(Y') I I LOCATION I I", W T- II / SHAKOPEE "'2 II, I -. 20' II MINNESOTA .....J --~~~ s I - - _Ac.!L ITE DATA: DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITION _ BLOCK 2 ----- ( SIlEBTTrnB -- ---- . . BLOCK 2 - ., LOT 4: SITE PLAN EAST '\ LOT: 4.58 AC . BLOG: 77,500 SF '- PARKING: lB4 STALLS REQUIRED 35.5K OFFICE 8< 42.0K WAREHOUSE 1UlVISI0NS PARKING: 1 B4 STAllS PROVIDED PARKING: 2.4 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF SLOG IMPERVIOUS: 77.67. (3.55 AC) 01 LOT 5: LOT: 3.Bl AC BLOG: 67,200 SF LOT 7 . ~ PARKING: 152 STALLS REQUIRED 61,200 SF2B.3K OFFICE, 38.SK WAREHOUSE '" PARKING: 152 STALLS PROVIDED 5 41 AC PARKING: 2.3 STAllS PER 1000 SF OF SLDG . IMPERVIOUS: 83.47. (3.1B AC) SITE NOTES LOT 6: LOT: 14.38 AC, /~----------- ALL WORK SHALL SE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE W1T1i T1iE CITY BLDG: 314,000 SF . ( . - . '"' -', J OF SHAKOPEE SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. PARKING: 820 STALLS REQUIRED IhOlebycenifjrthattbisplaa,specificatioo, 0. I ( . - 16B.7K OFFICE, 145.3K WAREHOUSE orteport_p:eparcdbymcotundermy . ' PARKING: B20 STALlS PROVIDED . . I ' ~' . ~ '\ " / REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. PARKING: 26 STAllS PER 1000 SF OF BLOG lli;rectsupetvisIo~lJldthat.IaI1..duly ~ ~ 1 " ",2' "-....: REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS IMPERVIOUS: 75.307. (10.64 AC) ~'f'iP_tOsf"510f~~gtnecrunderthc .""....... .. . --- , ...~ I . ..u.wso we; tatco DWlUe!Oca. I " 7--_____. - -=--.; con ~ .......~%' ... 1"RAIh11t"'ON UNE TOWERS --~7:::':- -- 0--- S ~RKI ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURS UNLESS NOTED LOT: 5.41 AC ,\ I . - . - ------ OTliERWlSE. SLOG: 61,200 SF ~ \ I' . - . PARKING: 245 STAllS REQUIRED Eft. P \ \ I - . . . - . . SUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) 61.21< OFFICE [g] I UNLESS OTliERWlSE NOTED. PARKING: 240 STAllS PROVIDED H REGISTIl.ArIONNO. DATE / I . POND-B - PARKING: 3.9 STAllS PER 1000 SF OF SLOG ~>\. \,\ I I N_74i.00 ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED IMPERVIOUS: 71.07. (3.84 AC) l #41267 09/22/2005 \. . H_752.68 OTliERWlSE . \ \ \ I . <J2lXlSRYN<COUPA/l!ESU',INC. \ " \ '" OllTLOT G TYPICAL FUll SIZE SO' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED - ~ - ,\ "- . '"' - . - . - OTliERWlSE. . PARKING REQUIREMENTS USED: SHEETNtlMBER . ---:~~=-.;. - . - . . - 4 STALlS/l0aO SF - OFFICE PERIMETER DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE FILED AS 1 STAll/EMPLOYEE" ON LARGEST SHIFT - '"" 14 SEPARATE DOCUMENT FOR EACH LOT AT TIME OF BUILOING PERMIT WAREHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) ......... APPUCATlON o 60 120 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY " ,eDL LRK SCALE IN FEET JOB NllMBER DATE "aInu,,,. "" , 1M , _ft. 6tH 1811' 0, ........... ........~~o/l)r~~a.~op..ee.. .. ...... .. ....--.0 Memorandum. TO: Julie Klima, Planner IT FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat & PUD Amendment - Dean Lakes 5th Addition PID NO.: 27-373311-0,27-373317-0 CASE NO.: 05111 DATE: October 28,2005 The application indicates a Preliminary Plat, a Final Plat and a Variance for Parking Setbacks request. After reviewing the above referenced application, we have the following comments for the applicant and for the planning department: General 1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for public improvements (watermain) within the Final Plat and the engineering review fees. 2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission (SPUC) approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 5. The applicant shall work with City staff to eliminate parking from within the drainage and utility easement along the West property line of Lot 1, Block 2 (due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main and an existing trunk watermain). 6. The applicant shall work with City staff to eliminate the proposed retaining walls along the southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lot 7, Block 2 (due to the close proximity to Outlot E, a conservation easement containing an existing wetland and an existing nature trail to the East). C:IDocuments and Settings\lKlimaILocaI SettingslTemporaty Internet FilesIOLKAIPP.FP.PUD.Variance.Review.Dean.Lakes.5th.doc Page I 00 Dz. ... .................7.,..... .S.1:1,9ulQ.:fu~.Y~rianc_~JQ.LR.arkiI!gJ9t setQ!!9kr~g!!~:tiQ!!J?~n~PPl"()y~q,Jg.~_~ppliQ..aJJJ~~aJl.ge .... ..-"--........ required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City for all parking lots located within drainage and utility easements containing public utilities. 8. The applicant shall work with City of Shakopee staff to realign driveways to provide adequate separation from existing above ground public utilities/appurtenances. 9. All proposed sanitary sewer and storm sewer shall be private. The applicant shall provide suitable easements for access to all adjacent properties utilizing the private sewer system. The easements shall be approved by the City prior to recording of the plat. Maintenance of these utilities shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 10. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits. for proposed improvements within the City of Shakopee's right-of-way and drainage and utility easements prior to construction. 11. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within the MnDOT right-of-way prior to construction. 12. The applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals/permits for proposed improvements within all private utility easements prior to construction. 13. The applicant shall verify the location of the outermost electrical transmission lines located in Lot 3, 4 and 5 of Block 1. A drawing showing the location and the easement as it relates to all proposed structures shall be submitted to the City. PreliminarvIFinal Plat 1. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat to the engineering department. 2. The previously dedicated drainage and utility easement encompassing the existing wetland in Lots 6 and 7, Block 2 shall b.e placed in an outlot. This outlot shall be dedicated as a drainage and utility easement and as a conservation easement. The site plan shall be adjusted accordingly. 3. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall include, but not be limited, to the following: . . Provide a minimum of thirty (30) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the existing storm sewer (connecting the storm. water basins in Outlot M and Outlot L), in Lot 2 of Block 1. . Provide a minimum of thirty (30) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the existing storm sewer (connecting the storm water basins in Outlot L and Outlot K), in Lot 3 of Block 1. . Provide a miuimUlll often (10) feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of all Block 1 lot lines adjacent to outlots and conservation easements. C:\Documents Ill1d Settings\JKIimalLocal Setlings\Temporary Internet FileslOLKA 'iPP.FP.l'UD. Variance.Review.Delll1.Lakes.Sth.doc Page 2 00 1)~ . . Provide a.minimum often (10) feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of all Block 2 lot lines adjacent to outlots and conservation easements. . The applicant shall provide the City of Shakopee with an easement, for the purposes of access from Dean Lakes Boulevard through Block 2 to the eastern most portion of Lot 6, Block 2. Storm Water Mana2'ement Plan 1. The applicant shall make all modifications to their proposed site plan, as required by the City of Shakopee, to comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes 1 st Addition. Recommendation Engineering staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat request, subject to the comments listed above being addressed by the applicant and approved.by the. City prior to recording. of the Final Plat. Engineering staff makes the following recorinnendations concerning the requested Variances for Parking Lot Setbacks: 1. Variation #2 - Front Parking Setback Reduction (Lots 1. 2. 3 and 4. Block 2): No portion of a parking lot shall be located within the drainage and utility easements along the frontages of Lots 1-4, Block 2. 2. Variation #3 - Side/Rear Parking Setback Reduction (Lots with shared parking/loading 40cks): The proposed site plan shows variations to the parking setback requirements, even though no fonnal request is made in the application. Engineering staff recommends denial of the proposals along the following property lines: .. West property line of Lot 1, Block 2. . Southern most and southeastern most property lines of Lots 6 and 7, Block 2. 3. Variation #4 - Rear Parking Setback Reduction (Lots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 and 6. Block 2): Engineering staff recommends denial of the parking lot setback reduction request for the northern property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 2 (due to an existing trunk sanitary sewer main). 4. Variation #5 - Impervious Surface for All Lots: Engineering staff recommends denial of the exception to the maximum allowable impervious surface percentages set fort~;by City Code due to there being no specific. users defined for these lots. The applicant can work with City staff to provide an average impervious surface percentage for each separate block, providing the results comply with the storm water management plan approved with the Dean Lakes I st Addition. The averages are separated by block since each block drains to a separate storm sewer system. C:lDoeuments and SeuingslJKlimalLocal SettingslTemporaQ' Intemet FilesIOLKAIPP.FP.PUD.Variance.Review.Dean.Lakes.Sth.doe Page 3 of3 19.B. , v RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. IYAN 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM Minneapolis, MN 55403- 2012 BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax r f"l ':' .'cq;;: r 1] Y' D ):W~ 2 .~\ M!1~I""i ~~,. ~uJ 'v - ... -.... November 28, 2005 L Ms. Julie Klima Planning Department City Of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Dean Lakes 5th Addition Dear Ms. Klima: Thank you for taking the time to work through the revision that Ryan has made to its plans for the Dean Lakes 5th Addition submittal. In particular, I would like to thank you, Joe Swentek, and Ryan Hughs for meeting with us on Nov. 18 to discuss the comments that were received from the Planning Commission at the Nov. 3 meeting. As a result of those comments and our revisions, we now agree on 33 of the 35 conditions of approval that were identified in the original staff report. This leaves only two items for further discussion. The first item is number I. H., which suggests that the 1.63 Ac. of land that is located within the drainage and utility easement in the southeast portion of Block 2 be dedicated to the City as an Outlot. At the Planning Commission on Nov. 3rd, we explained a number of the practical issues raised by that request, most notably the fact that the property is currently part of the legal security under a complex mortgage loan for the project. Since then, at your request, we have contacted BNC Bank, the primary mortgage holder at Dean Lakes, to inquire about the chances of getting that property released from the mortgage. Attached is a letter from Brian Whitemarsh, an officer at the bank. It indicates their inability to release that property as security for their loan, a position further complicated by the fact that BNC is merely the lead lender in a group of lenders whose collective consent would be required for a release. For this reason we are simply unable to dedicate the property to the City. However, in the spirit of working to achieve the City's intent of preserving that area from development, we can offer the following solution. We can try to record an easement over this 1.63 acre area that will protect it in perpetuity. This would achieve the City's Objective of protecting the land, and this we are prepared to accept as a condition of plat approval. The second item is number II. B., which addresses the parking lot setback from Coneflower Lane. In its initial report, based on Ryan's initial submission, staff supported a 30 foot parking setback. On November 3rd, the Planning Commission expressed interest in a 50 foot setback, and asked Ryan and staff to work on that issue. J ~YAN COMPANIES US, INC. I'AN 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM Minneapolis, MN 55403- 2012 BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax Since then we have looked hard at the impact of a 50 foot parking lot setback in that area. The area in question is bounded to the north and west. Each foot of increased parking lot setback from Coneflower (to the south and east) therefore results in a foot-for-foot loss to the depth of the buildings adjacent to Coneflower. Increasing the parking lot setback from 30 to 50 feet therefore creates two issues that effectively make it impossible to achieve the development goal for that portion of Dean Lakes (if the plan reviewed in November of 2003 is a reasonable reflection of that goal): 1 ) Losing 20 feet across the entire length of the two buildings adjacent to Coneflower Lane means that the development capacity in that portion of Dean Lakes shrinks by 22,300 square feet. One way to measure this loss is to note that it is essentially the size of the Open Systems project that was completed at Dean Lakes in November. That project retained 60 to 70 jobs that could otherwise have gone elsewhere, and approximately $3,000,000 of new commercial property is now generating taxes that can be used to support a variety of City services. Our sincere view is that a loss of this magnitude should only be accepted in the event that a 30 foot setback cannot be made to create a reasonable separation. 2) Apart from the sheer loss of development capacity described above, the setback creates a true hardship situation in which the only buildings that can be built adjacent to Coneflower are unusually shallow (120 feet in depth). The companies to whom we market Dean Lakes typically need buildings that are 160 or at least 140 feet deep from front-to-back. Creating a situation in which these depths cannot be achieved would be creating the conditions for failure over a large portion of the project. In the package reviewed for the overall Dean Lakes Development in November of 2003, the setback from Coneflower Lane was 15 feet. Had we been interested purely in minimizing all setbacks in our current application, we would have asked for formal approval of a 15 foot setback. We did not do so because the most intelligent plan for the area did not require such a minimal setback. In the plan submitted for Planning Commission on November 3rd of this year, we essentially doubled the requested setback from 15 to 30 feet in that area because doing so did not cripple the resulting opportunities. But expanding the parking lot setback by another20 feet does eliminate the possibility of achieving the development goal for that area. Because the impact of a 50 foot parking lot setback from Coneflower is severe, we would respectfully suggest the following solution to the issue of securing an adequate separation between the two areas in question: 1. Enforce a minimum parking setback of 30 feet, double the 15 foot parking setback contemplated in the plan reviewed in November of 2003; 2. Require a minimum berm height of 3.5 feet. 3. Require the developer to work with City staff to provide landscaping along the top of the berm to provide additional screening where appropriate. 4. And finally, since the most perceptible separation. occurs between the relevant buildings (rather than between parking areas), increase the building setback in Block 1 from the minimum ordinance standard of 50 ft to 75 ft. . . RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. IYAN 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM Minneapolis, MN 55403- 2012 BUILDING LAST'NG RElATIONSHIPS 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax We have attached a copy of the cross-section for the 15 foot berm shown on the plans reviewed in November of 2003. We have also created a cross-section for the 30 foot berm that we are proposing under the revised plans for this submittal. We sincerely believe that when combined with an increased building setback of 75 feet, the 30 foot berm - with its proposed extra height and landscaping - secures the desired separation between the commercial and residential portions of the development. If that is the case, then further increasing the setback from 30 to 50 feet does little except make it impossible to achieve the development projections for the area. I'd like to finish with two general points that have at times, I think, been the source of misunderstanding between Ryan and City staff. Ryan Companies understands that no formal variances from standard ordinances were granted in November and December of 2003 when the Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the final master plan for the Dean Lakes project. Ryan was not in a position then to request formal variances, because the implementation of the plan was yet to be determined, and so none were granted. At the same time, we believe that the plan voted on at that time did represent the general agreement that all parties had reached after a lot of hard work as to the overall development goals for the project. As we have platted the various areas of the project since, we have simply tried to maintain those goals as best we know how. We operate within standard ordinances whenever we can, and vary only when we feel that the overall goals of the project cannot be met without doing so. In this application, as in others, we have actually proposed more greenspace than was proposed in the original plan, and less density. Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us and to work through the revisions that were made to the plans since the November 3rd meeting. We've also attached requested greenspace and shoreland calculations. Please feel free to call or e-mail with any questions or comments in advance of the meeting, otherwise we look forward to seeing you at the December 8th Planning Commission meeting. We will submit complete sets of revised plans after the meeting. Sincerely, Ryan Companies US, Inc. ~~ Lee Koppy, P.E. Team Leader .11/28/2005 11:57 FAX 8123714388 BNC NATIONAL BANK-CRE ~ 002/002 BNC Nation.al Ban.k A;;.h."Ir,"y"mNCCORP,!n<, The,,4Ai'uf Financial SUccess~ 333 South Seventh Srr'~~t SI)ltt' 2.00 Minncapoli~. MN 55402 wWw.bncbank.rom Telephone: (612) 30,-2200 FAX, (612) 305-04H November 28, 200S Ms. Julie Klima Planning Department City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street Shakopee, MN 55379 RE; Dean Lakes Development, Shakopee, Mn Dear Ms. Klima: At the request of Mark Schoening, Vice President of Development with Ryan Companies Us, Inc., we have reviewed a request that Ryan Companies dedicate approximately 1.7 acres of land located along the eastern edge of the project to the City of Shakopee. Because the City did not express an interest in owning this property in late 2003, when Ryan Companies secured financing for the project, it is currently part of the security for a very large and complex first mortgage loan. After careful review of your request, we have detennined that our loan does not provide for the release of this property for dedication to the City. The. situation is further complicated by the fact that the loan is currently syndicated to a group of participating banks whose approval would be required, and whose approval will not be forthcoming. I am sony that we could not accommodate your request. Mr, Schoening has asked me if we would be willing to consent to an easement over the area that would restrict it from development in perpetuity, and we would try to accommodate that request if asked to do so. sm:5~ Brian Whitemarsh Senior Vice President Commercial Real Estate 1S:t Member FDIC iQllAl,M!IlIM lBIlIEIl _._._.~~--_..- I I PAR KIN G SET B ~ eKE ~ H I BIT /_--------,~--.. . _ . _ . _. _ --=-t---m-m--m-----m-m--m----__________________~~_:~-- IVAN. \ ~~----- ~o ,/,/' -.......... \ -------__ '.- . ..,'J-'-POND=.4-'-'-'-'_'_ "" - ~ ~ , \ \ f." ~ ///' ./''/ I \ \ - -\ - - - - - - - - - _N'M..:=747.50 . .......... \ BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS \ \ ~// o.Qu"'" _,-"-"',/'~ ./' . i I .~ H'M:=751:57---_______________~'L_~\_ 'v /q> ~~s ~ ,/"---. I i xca ENERGY/NC \ _, ___ _ _____ - - - - - - - - - ,\...",~y ,/-// - - "': EASEMEN T PER Ii 7544 I : - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ///' _______ - POND-3 / :' - . - . _ . _ . Il. ! -- ~~ v -:,7-"" - 7 - - - - - _N'M.=747.00 / . _ I I RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. - - - - ,/. HWl:=751.51 _ _ _ _ _ ../ / __ : . - - - -/ -- - - - ~~ - - -/--,/. ./ - - - - - =--- ~ - - -.-<-"-:" '50 South Tenth Sueet, SlUte 300 7/'- V - - -::,~'- - - -~ Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 '- ' ", ,// . --- - - - ~ '- y /// ./ ./ .0 612-492-4000 tel / ,/ 612-492-3000 fax / / --------- I // - WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM / .........-- " ./ ~ (, ~ _ _ ./ \\..1 t4Q\ 24.0'~ \ _.- \J~ "---~ , 20.0' \-- (' 20.0' \\' f,;\ 24."1' ,-- ~~ 52,500 SF / 2nd FLOOR: \. /'/ 1 ~ ~ \\@ 57.100 SF / \' ~~ \) \ =- \\@ 240'~. LOT 4 \ \. @\) ~ .)... \)@ 3.42 AC PARKING SETBACK KEY ~~Nl49~oo \ ' \ 98,800 SF _ 30' FRONT PARKING SETBACK (MAINTAINED FROM 9/22/05. LOT 5 INCREASED FROM 15' ON 2003 APPLlCA TION) - 0' SIDE SETBACK (TO ALLOW FOR " 6.32 AC PROJECfNAME ~H~~~gl:gCDEg~K~RIVES, PARKING LOTS", '\ DEAN LAKES - 10' REAR SETBACK '\ FIFTH ADDITION , \ IA. .... - 50' FRONT SETBACK , ..-yOO.... LOCATION \ E ~ ~=~ SITE DATA' DEAN LmS ACT" ADDmON -- BLOC' \ OFFIC I .q"'D MINNESOTA WAREHOUSE .q V~ "">IT""" 53,400 SF . BLOCK 1 tgi: 1~.54 AC SITE PLAN BLDG: 64,400 SF PARKING: 186 STALLS REQUIRED 40.5K OFFICE & 23.8K WAREHOUSE PARKING: 186 STALLS PROVIDED REVISIONS PARKING: 2.9 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG 11/29/05 _ CITY COMMENTS IMPERVIOUS: 79.3% (3.60 AC) f- LOT 2: ~~~~:3';g4~~ SF 0 PARK\~~~K 8gF~~~:L~2~9E~U0~~~HOUSE tt'\ PARKING: 85 STALLS PROVIDED ~ r- . _ . PARKING: 1.6 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG '4 '\ IMPERVIOUS: 85.1% (2.85 AC) ~ \ \ LOT 3: r- LOT: 4.96 AC ~ \ BLDG: 74,250 SF ~ PARKING: 297 STALLS REQUIRED ~ \ P ARK;N~~K 2~;F~CT~LLS PROVIDED tn I hereby certify thar this plan, spt.-dfication, PARKING: 4.0 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG (J) 64,400 SF or report was prepared by me or under my IMPERVIOUS: 86.3% (4.28 AC) "b- ..l SITE NOTES dlrectsupcrvlslonandthatlamaduly ~ licensed Professional Engineer undL"!' the LOT 4: ..., T CITY laws of the State of Minoesota. LOT' 3 42 AC ,." ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HE BLOG: '57,100 SF ~ ~ OF SHAKOPEE SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. PARKING: 97 STALLS REQUIRED ...... c 13.3K OFFICE, 43.8K WAREHOUSE r-- . i REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. lEE R. KOPPY PARKING: 97 STALLS PROVIDED ~ \ PARKING: 1.7 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG ~ \ REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. I REGISTRATION NO. DATE IMPERVIOUS: 89,5% (3.06 AC) -/ \ #41267 09/22/2005 LOT 5: ~"'" \ ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED ! LOT: 6.32 AC Tn \ OTHERWISE. @J200SRYANCOMPANIESUS.INC BLDG: 98,800 SF ~~ BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) PARK~~~/~~F~~~L~~.:~~~i~oUSE ~~. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHEET NUMBER PARKING: 223 STALLS PROVIDED d\n ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED ~ 12 PARKING: 2.3 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG ,., OTHERWISE. ...y~ IMPERVIOUS: 80.3% (5.08 AC) . ...J.... ~ TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED -, OTHERWISE. DRAWN BY CHECKED BY " 0 60 120 CDl lRK I PARKING REQUIREMENTS USED: PERIMETER DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE FILED AS I OB NUMBER DATE 4 STALLS/l 000 SF - OFFICE SEPARATE DOCUMENT FOR EACH LOT AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SCALE IN FEET J 1 STALL/EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT - APPLlCA TION 0905..()Q8 09/22/2005 WAREHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) ~ L I [ BUILDING SETBACK EXHIBIT ------- IYAN- - - .-- - - - -X'- - _ _ _ - \ ~ ,..~o // --, \ ( \ ~ ~ _/./ \ -'-. r \ // u\...~~ -/--/' ../ I ! "'- BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS --- ~ eO ---./ , ,,< €oS ---------'--- . - . i ! --- ----- /;r>- ~~ //' _' : 1 - --- - .-- - - \ -- --- I -------- ,-_... -- , - - - . ~ -\, - - /' PONO-3 I ! t. / ~ ~7<~c/-~-_"...-m-oo ; '-'-'--. I RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. - 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 ;~,- -- -. -::~;/;--:~-;.-::~:._-~ - ~-~-~: ~:~ ~ -~- - ~~_::/ ------------ --- - ------ ------ ------------ Minneapolis, MN 55403.2012 612-492.4000 tel 612-492.3000 fax -- -' / - WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM - ./ -. I ./ I I ~ - \\@ -011 , - \ _. - I '.......----- -.- "'t ---- -- 52,500 SF / 2nd FLOOR: 21.750 SF .', I \\@ 57.100 SF Schoell \ & ~@ 24.0'1- LOT 4 Madson, Inc. \ @\ 3.42 AC Planning Engineering Surveying \ 10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Sutte 1 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55305-1525 \ \\@ phone: (952) 546-7601 - fax: (952) 546-9065 554 Third Street NW, Suite 100 \ Elk River, Minnesota 55330-1409 98,800 SF phone: (763) 241-0108 - fax: (952) 546-9065 www.sdlOellmadson.COO1 \ LOTS \ 6.32 AC BUILDING SETBACK KEY PROJECT NAME \ DEAN LAKES - 20' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK \ FIFTH ADDITION c::::= 75' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK \ \ ~OO '" LOCATION \ \ \ ~(~ SHAKO PEE, \ \ OFFICE / MINNESOTA SITE DATA: DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITION - BLOCK 1 \ \ \ NO~ \ -"./ WAREHOUSE V~ SHEET TInE , / 53,400 SF BLOCK 1 / LOT 1: / SITE PLAN LOT: 4.54 AC \...,,/ BLDG: 64,400 SF PARKING: 186 STALLS REQUIRED 40.5K OFFICE & 23.8K WAREHOUSE REVISIONS PARKING: 186 STALLS PROVIDED PARKING: 2.9 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF 11/29/05 - CITY COMMENTS IMPERVIOUS: 79.3% (3.60 AC) 1- LOT 2: LOT: 3.35 AC ~ BLDG: 53,400 SF PARKING: 85 STALLS REQUIRED 10.5K OFFICE, 42.9K WAREHOUSE PARKING: 85 STALLS PROVIDED ~ r-._. "\ PARKING: 1.6 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG IMPERVIOUS: 85.1 % (2.85 AC) \ r'" \ LOT 3: \ LOT: 4.96 AC ~ PONO-\ OFFICE / BLDG: 74.250 SF PARKING: 297 STALLS REQUIRED \ N'M..=746.00 74.3K OFFICE ~ H'M..=751'f WAREHOUSE [ hereby certify that rhis plan, specification, PARKING: 297 STALLS PROVIDED \ \ or repon was prepared by me or undet my PARKING: 4.0 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG \ 64,400 SF SITE NOTES direct supervision and that [ am a duly IMPERVIOUS: 86.3% (4.28 AC) 1-~ \ \ licensed Professional Engineer under rhe LOT 4: ~ \ ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITl-I THE CITY laws of rhe State of Minnesota. LOT: 3.42 AC \ ~ OF SHAKO'" SPECleC. TIONS AND BUleDlNO PERMIT REOUIREMENTS BLDG: 57,100 SF ~ ~- \ PARKING: 97 STALLS REQUIRED 'Fe \ t.-. \ REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. 13.3K OFFICE, 43.8K WAREHOUSE lEE R. KOPPY PARKING: 97 STALLS PROVIDED \ \ ~ \ REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTlON DETAILS. REGISTRATION NO. DATE PARKING: 1.7 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG \ \ . IMPERVIOUS: 89.5% (3.06 AC) \ ~ \ ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED #41267 0912212005 LOT 5: \ \ ! LOT: 6.32 AC Q \ OTl-lERWISE. @2005RYANCOMPANIESUS,INC BLDG: 98,800 SF \ 1 ~ BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) PARKING: 223 STALLS REQUIRED \ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHEET NUMBER 41.4K OFFICE, 57.4K WAREHOUSE \...-' \PO ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED PARKING: 223 STALLS PROVIDED ~ 12 PARKING: 2.3 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG OTl-lERWISE. IMPERVIOUS: 80.3% (5.08 AC) · ~ TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY (' OTHERWISE. 0 60 120 CDL lRK PARKING REQUIREMENTS USED: ~ PERIMETER DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE FILED AS I I DATE SCALE IN FEET JOB NUMBER 4 STALLS/1000 SF - OFFICE SEPARATE DOCUMENT FOR EACH LOT AT TIME OF BUILOING PERMIT 0905~08 09 / 22 / 2005 1 STALL/EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT - APPLICATION WAREHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) .J L __________________...__________._______________n_ P A 7 K , N G S ~,N~~,~ ~~ E X H , B , T "'NNEGASCO PIP'L1N' EASEM'NT ~~A~~,f~~~6~ '''~''T "" OC^' IY ANI BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS I I / / - @ ~~k~~~ UNDERGRouN'D="; --, ~-~-~+(~ _I 7-~-=@-~=---=~' j- ===~=~@--~=~-====...-@1I~~=~-@-~-==~ ~-,- _=~==========/~-===~--=========J--~r-----~----1l------7----~UL------------U---i-------- ------------0------/_----1;---- -------------- ------- -----------~__i, // /"" L - . - RYANCOMPANIESUS,INC. !@ r ~~ ~ (1:/'''\ I / / 16 @ ~ @o /"" ~18 r 50 S~uth Ten~h Street, Suite 300 'Y I /"" Mmneapohs, MN 55403-2012 == 15T = @ /"" ~ 1 I ii I 7 /"" 612-492-4000 tel !l! , /' ~ /,/" - --- 612-492-3000 fax , , 571 . /"" 140' :;:i : OFFICE / ~./ @[Y.(;913 1 / WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM 1:11 I WAREHOUSE ./ (i8) @ / / ili LOT 6 I ./ /' <1" ,,; I TOTAL: 314,000 SF ./ ./ / liil 1424 AC I 1st FLOOR: 151k SF 200' ~ /' ~o ~ I' I OFFICE / ~. I . I 2nd FLOOR: 81.5k SF /' / & 0 " . E ' , : 3rd FLOOR: 81.5k SF . ./ @ @ I -;-/ I I AREHOU E 67,200 SF 13 13i 13 I ./ I J -- 4 ~ 480". I ./ 24- 78,940 SF I .! 1 /' 577' ; I 1 LOT 5 iiii I ./ (I LOT 4 3 79 AC !f'! S h II 4.60 AC . ; ; @ @ @ \ C oe flil ./ \ &.. 16 149'--r, i @ ~ . Madson, Inc. 140' 94' I [} @O ~18./ } Planning Engineering 5U1veying SHORELANO . - . - \ OVERLAY DISTRICT L@,B.//I0580waVUJ.taBoUlevard'Suitel - -- -- .;,j BOUNDARY --1 20'. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55305-1525 t5-:- __ ,9' ./ ./ \ phone: (952) 546-7601 - fax: (952) 546-9065 i ~ i5 i5 . -1. / /"" 554 Third Street NW, Suite 100 . - . - . - . ---- 0:;::- ;:, ;:, -- 0 @~ ~4 \. /7 Elk River, Minnesota 55330-1409 - I ~ ~ ~ ~ . -l:!...MITs OF T/ '1 . ~ ,) / phone: (763) 241-0108 - fax: (952) 546-9065 <ri~ g~ --....; ER~ @ @ '-..../ /' www.schoellmadson.com 8 .::'i iE if -- __ EX. WETLAND I ./ ~t 9 if -- L1MITSO@ "- - ....... ./ f?g .Vl f? --F~3 "- OJ ~ kf g . /' PROJECT NAME __ - /" "/ DEAN LAKES '" I; - -- ./ FIFTH ADDITION '" / '" /' ./ LOCATION ./ SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA ~- 1!>V NOTES "SITE DATA: DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITION - BLOCK 2 ~ /''''' q SHEETTITI.E j~ / ::J' ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY BLOCK 2 ~ / / ____ ' _ !<jq;Y OF SHAKOPEE SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ~ ~ '- , / q> LOT 4' SITE PLAN EAST -@ '-"~ ///..,6 REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. LOT: 4.60 AC 12 " / BLDG' 78940 SF fi5I '-.: J REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, PARK'ING:' 164 STALLS REQUIRED ~ i / .' 28.4K OFFICE & 50.5K WAREHOUSE REVISIONS 3 II ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED PARKING: 164 STALLS PROVIDED 11/29/05-CITYCOMMENTS II OTHERWISE. PARKING: 2.1 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG 12 I . IMPERVIOUS: 77.7% (3,57 AC) . -- I l BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) --= I " UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. . -- . > LOT 5: I I ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED LOT: 3.79 AC F LIMITS I OTHERWISE BLDG: 67,200 S LOT 7 -- . OFT/E . PARKING' 141 STALLS REQUIRED 53 160 SF -- R 2 j II / . '~ TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED 24.6K OFFICE. 42.6K WAREHOUSE 5 41 AC I / OTHERWISE. PARKING: 141 STALLS PROVIDED . '" I PARKING: 2.1 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF SLDG t / ' PERIMETER DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE FILED AS IMPERVIOUS: 81.3% (3.08 AC) ( I / SEP ARA TE DOCUMENT FOR EACH LOT AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT LOT 6: I I APPLlCA TlON LOT: 14.24 AC ,-- ---, - , )1 <. BLDG: 314.000 SF ,/ _. "" ___ I PARKING: 806 STALLS REQUIRED I hereby certify that this plan, specification, /. ...........', --@ ------ "'-, 164.0K OFFICE, 150.0K WAREHOUSE or report was preparcd by me or under my : (g," ", j PARKING SETBACK KEY PARKING: 806 STALLS PROVIDED direct supervision and thatl am a duly I .) '\, "" - - - "'" I PARKING: 2:6 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG l.Jcensed ProfeSSional. Enh'1!leer under the I I ' , -- - _ ~ IMPERVIOUS. 72.7% (10.35 AC) laws of the State of Mmnesota. - - - - - - ~ - _ _ _ _ \. ""_ ~-..__ @n J~ J - - ~ 7 ~ - 30' REAR PARKING SETBACK (INCREASED FROM 7' ON PREVIOUS LOT 7: ~ ' - - - - -'~ - ~-=-----__ 20 ",un;LDG ~K"""'- _ .. @O "'" / '1 APPLICATION) LOT: 5.41 AC : I . -. _ . ---- _____ 2~PAR'R'PsE'iBA~_____ ~ ~ - 15' FRONT PARKING SETBACK (REDUCED 30' - INTENDED TO ~L~G: 5?,160 ~ALLS REQUIRED LEER. KOPPY i . - . - _ ----- ------____________ --- . -" / COMPENSA TE FOR INCREASED REAR SETBACK) A K~3~2/~FFICE ~ I . - . - , - . - . - . - , _ . _ ------------ ' - 0' SIDE SETBACK (TO ALLOW FOR SHARED ACCESS DRIVES, PARKING PARKING: 213 STALLS PROVIDED I REGISTRATION NO. DATE I . POND B . - . - " -77 LOTS & LOADING DOCKS) PARKING: 4.0 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG #41267 09/22/2005 : I N\It\.=749.00 -..... ") - 20' SIDE SETBACK (INCREASED FROM 5' & 7' ON PREVIOUS IMPERVIOUS: 61.6% (3.33 AC) ! \ ! H\It\.-752.66 ) ) ,/' APPLICATION) 02005 RYANCOMPANtESUS, tNC. \ \ ..... .;' ,/' . _ 25' WETLAND SETBACK (SHOWN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE) \ " "-. ./ .../ PARKING REQUIREMENTS USED: SHEET NUMBER - -\ - - - - - _ '~~ _ -. - . - . -- . .../ ,/ ,,4- STALLS/lOOO SF - OFFICE \ -- - - - - /- .... 10 SIDE SElBACK (INCREASED FRO" 5 ON PRE~OUS APPLlCAnGN) 1 STAll/E"PLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT -.... 14 WAREHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) ...~... o 60 120 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY I I CDL LRK SCALE IN FEET JOB NUMBER DATE 0905~08 09 / 22 / 2005 -- --- -- ------ .-.. -- --~---_..-- BUILDING SETBACK EXHIBIT lYING I MINNEGASCO PIPELINE EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DEAN I MINNEGASCO PIPELINE EASEMENT LAKES FIRST ADDITION BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS - - .- RYAN COMPANIES US, INe. 16 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 ./' 612-492-4000 tel ./' /' - --... 612-492-3000 fax 571' 140' I OFFICE / / WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM I / I WAREHOUSE / LOT 6 I /' / I TOTAL: 314,000 SF /' / / 14.24 AC I 1st FLOOR: 151k SF 200' I I 2nd FLOOR: 81.5k SF ~o -e- I 3rd FLOOR: 81.5k SF /' @ "- I 67,200 SF I / J 480' I 78,940 SF 577' I /' LOT 5 I I ( I LOT 4 3.79 AC 4.60 AC I @ \ Schoell \ &. [? @~ \ Madson, Inc. 140' 94\ '""'~~ I Planning Engineering Surveying .-.-. . -.--- --- OVERLAY DISTRICT @ <lJ BOUNDARY I -l L20, / 10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1 --- ~. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55305-1525 if of /./' phone: (952) 546-7601 - fax: (952) 546-9065 .- ---- 554 Third 5treet WI, Suite 100 -.-'- --- @o /" // Elk River, Minnesota 55330-1409 . -!:!..MITS .EJ:JIER 4 @ phone: (763) 241-0108 - fax: (952) 546-9065 --- "-./ ./' www.schoellmadson.com --- - I / --- . UMITS 0 ~ "- .......... --= .F~J / / PROJECT NAME / DEAN LAKES "'-- -./ FIFTH ADDITION "'-- / "'-- / LOCATION / SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA SITE DATA: DEAN LAKES FIFTH ADDITlON - BLOCK 2 ./ SHEET TITLE BLOCK 2 LOT 4: SITE PLAN EAST LOT: 4.60 AC @ BLDG: 78,940 SF PARKING: 164 STALLS REQUIRED REVISIONS 28.4K OFFICE & 50.SK WAREHOUSE REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. PARKING' 164 STALLS PROVIDED 11/29/05 - CITY COMMENTS PARKING: 2.1 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG --- ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED IMPERVIOUS. 77.7% (3.57 AC) --= OTHERWISE. --- BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) LOT 5' --- OFFlCE- . ....!:!!!ITSOF UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LOT: 3.79 AC BLDG' 67.200 SF LOT 7 53 160 SF . -..!/ER 2 ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED PARKING: 141 STALLS REQUIRED , ~ 246K OFFICE, 42 6K WAREHOUSE 5.41 AC OTHERWISE PARKING: 141 STALLS PROVIDED TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'X20' UNLESS NOTED PARKING' 2.1 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG OTHERWISE. IMPERVIOUS. 81 3% (3.08 AC) LOT 6: PERIMETER DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE FILED AS LOT: 14.24 AC / / - SEPARATE DOCUMENT FOR EACH LOT AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT BLDG: 314,000 SF / PARKING: 806 STALLS REQUIRED I hereby certify that this plan, specification, --=-...... ==-===== APPLlCA TION 164.0K OFFICE, 150.0K WAREHOUSE or report was prepared by me or under my PARKING: 806 STALLS PROVIDED direct supervision and that I am a duly --- PARKING: 2.6 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG Ucenscd Professional Enhoineer under the -- BUILDING SETBACK KEY IMPERVIOUS: 72.7% (10.35 AC) laws of the State of Minnesota. LOT 7: LOT: 5.41 AC - 50' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK BLDG: 53,160 SF PARKING: 213 STALLS REQUIRED LEE R. KOPPY - 20' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK 53.2K OFFICE REGISTRATION NO. DATE .-'-'-'- PARKING: 213 STALLS PROVIDED . PDND-8 - /-7; PARKING: 4.0 STALLS PER 1000 SF OF BLDG #41267 09 / 22 / 2005 NWL-749.00 --.... ~ 25' WETLAND SETBACK IMPERVIOUS: 61.6% (3.33 AC) ! HWL-752.66 ~ 2005 RYAN COMPANIES US, 1M::. - 30' REAR BUILDING SETBACK / PARKING REQUIREMENTS USED: SHEET NUMBER - -.-.---.. ./ W DRAINAGE & UTlLlTY EASEMENT (PROHIBITS BUILDING CONSTRUCTION) 4 STALLS/lOOO SF - OFFICE --- 1 STALL/EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT - ~ 14 ~ WETLAND & WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (PROPOSED CONSERVA TlON WAREHOUSE (ASSUMED 1/1000 SF) EASEMENT) DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 0 60 120 CDL LRK I I SCALE IN FEET JOB NUMBER DATE 0905-008 09 / 22 / 2005 '-- -- ~ ~-----~-~ - - - -- -- ~ --- -- - --_.... .. - -. ~ .-- - . -. --- @ -. - .. -"',,",:o.~ . };j " ,--- <: - . - .- -- -......__:::~._- 4' OJ, .- ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ;'::'--....,.".,.,--- -- c~ ~-- --~. ~ ~~-' . -~- - ;:;..:"W -.,-:;::---: _ ____""" _~ ~ "'->. d~ ~-'::I ~ ~ ~ ~ @ ~~ ~ ~ ~ <.l @ I N I ---- L I .-J f:'( J. ~ I Carriage Townhome Concrete Sidewalk Commercial Building Street Trees Landscape Berm for Screening Parking Lot R ~ . ,-- Dean Lakes 5th Addition ~--- ~ - - - -~ -'. - -- ~ :..-- PL -=- Coneflower Lane Jon . ~ .- _.~ -. - - PL 11/29/05 11 '-25' 66' R.O.W. 30' 73' ( 180'-194' Dean Lakes Cq)nceffil.ower LaBile ~~~~@lID .,- i<.:~ ~- ,":<< _ "', 7_ ,;'" -:_ '- ,~' 'i. ': -it, ..:;> ~-- ~~-- -_.~-- - ---- t~~(lD~UII~OO 6~~CCt1((l)~ngurr~ 'I I ~<::';;f'~.,\ "'~~'i'I'~ii(~;;!:r'~ .~;~ .'J;..'fj, ,,:;,'i;~TI/}"'J'~~~'''' . ~ I I,"'., '~~':~'~I;;~" ~ ' ~ : ! I I' r., ., ~," I ~. .".< I II ~,~ . , . ~ , ; I I ~!~; . ~.. ..... ~'~,; I~i' ~:~'1'!~'~.~;l!j :0: -<!(-i ~ 1<1 10 ~~~ "",/f! ~"',\~ ,.f,\,r il' -.~I ,. I ~/!' ~.. ~ . ~~? ~i>~;!~;~ r st p ), : i ~"..;. -",,!! ~~. ~ .. _ I 'tSV I: f~ .. .i. ... fit", ,~ ,~\ Iii :'1m- ~ ~.,. ~ f?:"'~ ~ I ~ @) ~'; , \.i.}L. ~~I r, i;I,,, 'i: ;~" "'!t!J:iI(;;[' .~-r ~'{j:: !li<., 0";: 11" J!F:\ ! ti~ .... ~.' ..;&.'. ~'~.'.~...,,~,:;~ .,,;t~~(~il" F;::;~; "'~'~~.,d,{J;' ';i'<~({t, rfj'~}1i'~ r I =6 ~..4. i ~.~ fI .' "':'111.~ ~ 't:~iP (T,jl. :>>'~~ :." ~ "0 b..' I. G P ; S . " - '~i>"Jl ~,;. ~ ~;,i ~ I < 4J) I ?fi! .. t - ....:.' if'\" ~ ...,. .. ,.."<<' ~ 'li . '!' ili; tn . "" ,. ... , , ~ '" -" . "l"'-";~ ,:&;J IF~:~ 7 .c = i ~ f!;p , ..,:, "w';' l;;r~~ ~;"l'~~ ~, , ~ 0\ =: i t~' "1 : .. .. ~ l ~ ". '~' ,~ ~~ii\ !N1;'~]>i ;'k,:;Ji ] ~ .;. <l . iJ l'J.."" ., lr-- i' C': Wt - J ;4. ...J ~' I \'.! ' " rU = I ! I !. ~--,~~ '] " $ ~ ' . ,! If/' ,~,. ,,.......,...."1 ti' ..' "ii. !....~ ..,... "'.' I 14 '-." 'U ij, ~ ,~J2 ~ 'I~' 1- N" --}OA lAf~ ~ . .~ , ' :.; ~/PJ: ',; ~il ' , I~,. ";~L:tf'f[lif~ Ir~.::~,'. .. : I .. ,. - . '. . ".p:' \}!lfi'.~ 0 u(J ...... ' \ Holl"",. .. :~~ ;',: I~A' ~-t-"-,O II ~iflllil"fl:(l~~., . .l"~'- i ; ~~ r ~."-M1I:~ ,."~~~ r; ; I .'.:,.~ . ~ '. hi, . I:;:. , ~.J~l ! I,,! " ",; .,. i..' ...,. i' .: Ii' .~_ ~_ ... ...., · !?'-J ( ~ . C> I I "" }... -1----111(.... ,,::, ~:):'ril 'i " . '~.:=:.=. -,..........~.~. u... . ' i"':,~- L, ~.:" ~_ '7~ : I .~" .. --.j I ;: I!, \~ ,,' ~ A:t#:::~~",~~~_____ ' 'nIl ,.:" i ' ,;It:' ,. . c '~j ,: .."" . >, --. il I I _.. . ..:p ,'1.-- ,------... I .I : I'~~ 'l-. .,",:~"~:..~:j,, ~ ~'~, ~ ~,'~'/ · 'J.J,.I 'I . 'r ~ I I \11, t II. 'j , . \ . ;;. ~", ,\ , .,' '" ' .. ~ I ~ , I ~n.. . I, III /.. .LLJ;...:;.t .1,1., ~ i ~~,' \ J,i . ~ =- i ~ ~ .......-", ,~ ~"'~ . 1 I l' 'it! ; :' 7" . I~ I.~. ~ -.h.. "\.)., :x-.: \ , ~;' t:lLi .' ' I ! ;,1 i" ) ~m<illj":l'1~l""'J;ill IE .:- ilf..- :; - - 1':G.' ~~':30 ' ,// , I C \ 'I ,~~ ~ ;v : tt -.. J::. -. i rE-~ ~-:~ . "~\ ~~ ~,------_/ .// :; .. , i1.~ =r=J~ ,-. 1 ':5~ f/.~? 1:--<' .' F -;;J: ~:;,. )~. 7---------/ == '. I ,$1 ) ;;J --_ :~ I ~ fsc"--J ~-~ il"'-~ ~_ ~);~ ',' ~ .. ." \ *-. I: ~.....,~ ,~ _~ f I -r~ ;;;::j~~~ '~,E:j_ -- C-'~ ~ ~. _~.a*- I, ~ , \. !": j _ =;' _ . ~ i.\ ~g/ ~ .., - -~ 11/ ~ ~ i~" . . --~ ~,:.. 'W'-j, , --....,. " .- - I \z.\ ,,, '''''' ,.. '''' .,,;,.',' ,,, ' -~ 6:~,} ~ 1 ~ t:1f:--"1 ~: ~/ !~ ~, " i:: .3 I '.. .'"," _I," rAJiA'..__" II,""", .", '''_,!" J "~ :,!\_, ~ ".' . ~-~'~ ";;;j ~ __. ~ .-.~) d ~ ' ~ _ .\., \\ ~~\,~ r.n.- ., "..,,,,"~) ~(~~I,~flf1f!rr~~" ,~~~)f~:j~ ;~~:~' E ct:lLi r- .=:. , .G l('.o.; " "," . "";;l!V;.';..iIJ:_Jl,- "7fIJ<)~~' 1=---:::1 - -" : ...~~ l::: \ ' .'* . . ::1'" _ ,IP = : - > :,..' ./ ',f;.......... ::i' fit': I""""-~""'" ,Ip ..", l;::i: , ! ftl tt'~ !'. ''''n~--if ,:,#>~~.. ~m~b tJt. ':j ". .Im. " c5 ~ A..." c<,. ., ~ \ - h E l ~~,,,-.;'-'-1. '. ' '--:: .~ I' " ~ f'.,~_ _ It;; II. \ f - II" . ~ """,,~ ~ ~. . ~ /,Ia. ~ f' I",,, ' "4,'., '" ~ r.t.( , _ [i,,-.;,;' :- . \ " '!? : v ij ~, ""..., ~. -' --:"'" ' ,. . \' ~'" .'\": ~ ' ,J: '2.. 3 "'I, "bh -<\~~. " ~ ; ~ - :':L P" i -, ), <:f . '''' - t==- ~ ~~ ~---~- ~ >- " " q i:r ~ \ \ I \. , OJ [U' ~, = =... ,~\.'X',.......lII. \~ - "., \ \ ' ~ " ,- ~.; 1'<<" ~" 1t."" ...tII:\ .14-"1' \ \ ,~ 0 - '~. .- ; "\. ,,0 ~. \\~ C~ 'I'd ,\ '&i R''''<\'':.~ ,r' ,:,;.,~ "~.,'<~,~ . \V~..."~l I , H ____ , . v.....~...... ~ 'to .. \'~,.~ nD\ \ \" ." ~~ '\ '" ,,:.!~ "';::'~~'" ,.. ::1\2li \L 'C mmr. .. \ ' ," ", ~ \, ~" o~~' , ~.' ~'TIll , ill ' \ ~ ill;' ~ 'j. \ J,~It.~ -'" \ 1~' ~~ Q' '- ., }.~ ~H I , f'". -"r: \ ,\' '- < ", ,\' ~ '- \" ~, '. !;...:fr .' \ "J:~~ ~~',~~~.', ... \.~.~ ,,~ 1\~~1:~'~~_ .'.~~..'... ....0. \.'\...'.'.... 0"\...,\. "~', .'. . I... tl.\...1J.. .F. '. if'.. I ~ \ "":1.~""":4 ~~;. ,"'" ,'" , 't ..-~".'.. '. . ... . ' . . i. P) ~. ,... '. . ..., ..... ~,... ~.., ,. ~...' , . /, I ,,,,,,.!i$ ~_.. ~ \\ , . fI .; , . c (l\~, ' , ,,\.\ 1, , I '" . ~ .. 'i'#' n . '. . '.. - .,,"W' I . IiIi . . '" ' ~ ~ \' ~;;i ~.~ ~ iII.~ ,..,\.... ::," .~, ': .:i' ..._~,., . . . ~,' ..I \ \ \' 11',"'1 ' ~ ~\. ,^' \~ ~;"""":': ~,~ .' .....-.a- : I.. . 0 \ ....,.iJ .. . .... .~......:/.... '..~ ' QO \r\ \ .\\~. ''''i~~~' .... .'., ~. '8,'" . .~.J~.. !I~~... .;tx~ii:>t.:;;.."I. ",iff.'''...:.',.} W \ - :"i \ .\' ~r:.c-'.;~ ~ B- ". , " ~"m. ~..- "pA,~ .;.' :\1\ \ \\ ".~:&,;.. :;\ir~'i.ll.' " . Y ".,,'1.,' -" ," ,:,,~~, \.'\ \ \ \. \. \~"I\ 'jlAi?~~"~ lft:> . , '"'' . .. ".... ...., -- \ ,\\"""'"'' "."'" '"''''''""''',' ,. '~,'''''' " " , ..:"."",;;.I!.., c, \' \ \ ;1,%' ....~ lk.,~ >~ ~1I. .\\\<JG!umPlttfl:llllliJ!!IW'''': ,".~ . :~ :: . \ ':_~::\Bi F "..." ' . ~'\W'" \.. "f\\\II'\~ .mTITTTTmmr". f :t '" II. \ I I \ ". .~~4 / ,,~,~. '.w,,,,,t./ ~ ~., ,~~\ _:ilii!HiiH!~IHllrnllllt.r.;, ..~ ~.'~'.~~,t.'~ \ ~ E 1 ~ I! \ \ \ \l> ~Ilt(;, flfT~&I' ~ ' .... \\\9~'~~IH!HifHtHlTIHH!iHHHi' J . J.~, r: ~ ~Li ; :, \ . ~~'!T'h: / . " ~ "UI"\llIil'lI"lIIP..~ N'\" '> :If \ \ . ,~ "~~ D~;{j! ,\'.,'" ~ ,rtlllT"mtrr1,fHY '.), ..... .....c 1- , if! \ I \, I ,,!t0Aft,'5! iil.i;< :\ ' -laiplllUlll!!~t!tL ":.~ ~ CJ CJ I. . II \ \ 1 \ ~1," . ~ ~ "if. rrmi n "m-.tr . Q. ~ ~ 0 'i ",; ': ~,~~~~~l~\; ~,.. " '. ~""~ ~ I\ : f!1Hllt.!i!tHIHHH' r I) ; ~ ~ b .. . :: ~ ! I \ \ ~. is = .. ~' (A ~:,~: : "'l+till!UllllW~'.~. ' r.IJ (fJ ,~ 1 s \ \ ~ ,\ tiIII'i, TI! IIlITli;)IV I..... ~ J, . \ ' ",' ~ It .:./v.,\~, l~ "1 ~ 1IlI.I;f.4l.i1jldtA ;: I ~ 1.0 'CJ \0 I! ' , c" _ \ I .'~. I 'Vi" '''', ..,. v _. C \0 /, ',' \ ,...~~~~.~ .~iIt.::Q~I== {1;11 J .. , f3 I ' \~:\,~ ,~~ .~.I_= D.' .""-l ",lfHlH.HtuU.' It 3"-:":".4=.~t: .H+W.:H~H.mHmCP ~....... L_,. ..1.. I ~ I , J ;"< 1 - ..ICl"W'~ ,....~ ..G'."""l'T"'''I..ft. ,:..~l I ,0. ~ , \ '" W,e, ':: .. . .', ~if<.:' 0' j ~ .... ,.. or:tTntttrt,ti.tnhif,'" t~" __ . ' I - - ( " ' ,,~ .' "Il" ,".! . . . '.', .<< E ~ o :: r/ I';;~! . fHjl~!hlHaJ'. .... I . ., .~ ~ '" '" : ~ ~:H::;,:,:;:~.:H",,~~..,,~ I,. .. ,... .;(I:...~. ~ :9 I ~ \ , . ' n_.L~,,,,,,:,*., ...."'~ '~'~B?~~.t.f~, ::: (fJ . \ -\ ,____ _ _' gr~tI.l' "5f).t~~f!H. " "--- Q I \ \r.r. l)r\ ~ .~, ,',r I" ,,' ----- ~-t ., \. \_\_ .I'LJ. . ' , __ CJ I. "\ ( \ \ \:\ r_ ;,,,.. i,X.. /:". I ( -= 'I ( .;JJ ~ ~ '\"i !Ii (,@" /' -l:<m' I. Q trl III l'€It', . '"IWW " " ; U ~ I U - I - I I I ~ - --~" ---~------"~----~ _.~~-~._~---~-~------- ---_.._~-. - ~ ~ -._-~~ ..-- --~----._--~---_.~~~-~~~--.--~-------- --" --,------- ------------ --- --~------ ~ ~ @ Carriage Townhome ~ Concrete Sidewalk Commefcial Builcling . ~ Street Trees ~ Landscape Berm O~ ~ for Screening ~ 0\ ~ ... .; {~!:l P~king Lot 4li~. ~ , , . . ... . : 0 ""'~ .. 0 " ~ --.- - - / PL~Coneflower ume ,-- !!'/'I:L -----r- { t 11' - 25' 66' R.O.W. . .. ., 15' 73' . . " ., 165~-.179' ~ ~1 t:::O 6'3 ~ @ Carriage Townhome Concrete Sidewalk Commercial Building < ~ / , / / Be"m Height 3.5' Parking Lot ~ .{;~ ~ h -- - ~--- _ ';'h ~.- I .- ~- --~ - PL ~ Corieflo,,;er Lane- - ~- <-- PL )1 11 ' -25' 66' R.O. \V. 30' 73' ( 180' -194' ]))~&ffil ILillk~~ <C (o)ml ~ft1kD)'~"~rr LillID ~ ~ce~{ffi (lJ) IID --~'---'--_._--~---- ---.__.------_.-- ----. --~-------~ IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS Dean Lakes 5th Addition November 29,2005 Total Area Impervious Area Impervious % Lot 1 197,762 SF 156,825 SF 79.3% Lot 2 145,926 SF 124,183 SF 85.1% Lot 3 216,058 SF 186,458 SF 86.3% Lot 4 148,975 SF 133,333 SF 89.5% Lot 5 275,299 SF 221,065 SF 80.3% TOTAL 984,020 SF 821,864 SF 83.5% Total Area Impervious Area Impervious % Lot 1 219,107 SF 178,134 SF 81.3% Lot 2 195,149 SF 163,340 SF 83.7% Lot 3 199,069 SF 165,625 SF 83.2% Lot 4 200,376 SF 155,692 SF 77.7% Lot 5 165,092 SF 134,220 SF 81.3% Lot 6 620,294 SF 450,954 SF 72.7% Lot 7 235,660 SF 145,167 SF 61.6% TOTAL 1,834,747 SF 1,393,132 SF 75.9% 145166.56 Total Area Impervious Area Impervious % TOTAL 2,818,767 SF 2,214,996 SF 78.5% Total Area Impervious Area Impervious % TOTAL 1,083,337 SF 815,008 SF 75.2% Total Area Impervious Area )mpervious % TOTAL 3,902,104 SF 3,030,004 SF 77.7% SHORELAND CALCULATIONS Dean Lakes 5th Addition November 29, 2005 Allowable Proposed Tier 1 OSF OSF Tier 2 54,792 SF 44,365 SF Tier 3 230,571 SF 170,439 SF * Tier 4 47,306 SF 37,554 SF ** TOTAL 332,669 SF 252,358 SF * Includes 534 SF in Dean Lakes 4th Addition ** Includes 3,484 SF in Dean Lakes 4th Addition Allowable Proposed Tier 1 OSF OSF Tier 2 39,286 SF 41,855 SF Tier 3 267,757 SF 311,829 SF * Tier 4 46,998 SF 73,960 SF ** TOTAL 354,041 SF 427,644 SF * Includes 13,713 SF in Dean Lakes 4th Addition ** Includes 6,674 SF in Dean Lakes 4th Addition Allowable Proposed Tier 1 OSF o SF Tier 2 94,078 SF 86,220 SF Tier 3 498,328 SF 482,268 SF Tier 4 94,304 SF 111,514 SF TOTAL 686,710 SF 680,002 SF * Includes 14,247 SF in Dean Lakes 4th Addition ** Includes 10,158 SF in Dean Lakes 4th Addition