HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. Presentation by Steering Committee of Draft Recommendation of Strategic Visioning Initiative
CITY OFSHAKOPEE
Memorandum
TO: City of Shakopee Board and Commission Members
City Council
FROM: John J. Schmitt, Mayor
SUBJECT: Visioning Presentation
DATE: October 25, 2005
The purpose of this memo is to invite you as a member of a board or commission serving
Shakopee, to reserve 7:45 - 9:30 P.M. on Monday, November 14th, to hear a presentation
of the draft results of the Shakopee Visioning Initiative. The meeting will be held in the
City Council Chambers, and will be cablecast.
Since June, 2004, hundreds of Shakopee residents, including many of you, have
participated in our Strategic Visioning Initiative, guided by the Council-appointed
Steering Committee and facilitated by consultant Anne Carroll. Over the past several
months, the input received at dozens of "Community Conversations," community events,
and surveys was crystallized into critical issues, then further detailed and prioritized.
From this broad perspective a draft Vision Statement was developed and then goals and
strategies were identified that, when adopted in final form, will guide the City as we chart
our course into the future.
The purpose of the meeting on the Nov. 14th is to hear the initial presentation, and gather
input. It will follow a joint meeting (6:30 P.M. start) between the City Council, Planning
Commission, PRAB, and EAC, to discuss Greenway issues.
I hope that you can join us on the 14th.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact your staff support person, or me.
~~a
· John J. chmitt
Mayor
JS:th
CC: Barb Marschall
Jerry Hennen
i
I
j
/
//
..
'"
.'
Shakopee
Visioning Initiative
Community Update
November 14,2005
SteerinQ Committee members:
Phil Burke, Jane DuBois, Kathy Gerlach, Marge Henderson,
Wayne Herstad, Terry Joos, Charley Kubler, Joan Lynch,
Farmer Marschall, Bob Mitchell, Bill Nevin, Paulette Rislund,
Carol Schultz, Arv Sornberger, Tom Steininger, Don Wagner
1
~ Mission
The mission of the City of Shakopee is to
provide the opportunity to live, work, and
play in a community with a proud past,
promising future, and small-town
atmosphere within a metropolitan setting.
The city will provide customer-friendly,
high-quality public services that are
intended to meet the changing needs of its
residents and the community at large
2
1
"
-.
~ Agenda
· How We Started
· Vision Statement
· Building the Vision
· Creating Goals and Strategies
· Case: Goal, Strategies, Tactics
· Creating the Future/Recommendations
· Discussion
3
~ How We Started
· City Council began exploring a visioning
initiative in 2004
· Process:
- Council discussed needs and hired consultant
- Council appointed Steering Committee
- Steering Committee guided work
- Steering Committee actively engaged
community; consultant added 7 grad students
- Staff actively supported process
- Council monitored process 4
2
.
,
~ How We Started
· Steering Committee served as stewards of
the process with the following principles:
- Ensure broad and representative participation
- Provide active and regular communication
with the City Council and community
- Bring forth all voices and perspectives fairly
and equitably
- Ensure open and transparent process
5
e Vision Statement
Twenty years from now Shakopee
will be known and valued as a
unique city...
6
3
"
,>
~ Shakopee Vision Statement
... Where a vital and
historic downtown
anchors an active
riverfront district; and
where the Minnesota
River serves as a
beacon for residents
and tourists.
e
. ...Where distinct neighborhoods and
business areas connect with each other
through green ways and trails to protected
natural habitat, recreational attractions,
and other destinations; and where the arts
deepen and enhance our community.
4
,
<
e
... Where active, healthy,
individual and family
lifestyles are supported
through varied
recreational and
educational
opportunities; where
we demonstrate our
commitment to youth;
I'IAKOPEI:
9
...Where both young and
old enjoy community
gathering places; where
neighbors of all
backgrounds respect
and appreciate each
other; and where
diversity is celebrated.
10
5
>
>
~ ...Where homes meet
residents'lifetime
needs and are in
neighborhoods that
are accessible and
connected with one
another; where
housing developments
and public spaces
reflect community
needs;
11
~
...and where the city's
unique historic personality
is thoughtfully balanced
with easy access to urban
conveniences.
12
6
... Where we support high quality, life-long
educational opportunities; where employees
receive living wages; and where both local
businesses and corporate 'headquarters are
welcomed and well-supported. 13
... Where residents are
invested in the
community and
provide input on local
issues; where open
communication and
community service
are valued;
14
7
.~
...and where high
standards reflect
our vision and
commitment to
creating a sense
of community
forgenerations
to come.
15
e Building the Vision
· i8-month process allowed broad
engagement and sufficienttime to build
understanding of values and issues
· Vision built carefully and respectfully
directly on those values and key issues
· The integrity of the process gives strength
to the Vision
16
8
.
.
.~ Building the Vision
1. Identified and analyzed stakeholders
2. Gathered community input
- Nearly 25 community conversations and
focus groups
- Industry, real estate surveys
- Open House
- Shakopee Showcase
- National Night Out
- Recorded detailed comments from
hundreds of people and published for
public review
17
~ Building the Vision
3. Identified values and priorities, and
developed issue briefs
- Small-town feel
- "Close but not too close"
- River roots, environment, and
historic downtown
- Recreation and the arts
- Economic opportunities and challenges of growth
- Social opportunities and challenges of growth
4. Developed 20-yr vision to support mission
and reflect community values, priorities 18
9
o Creating Goals and Strategies
· Joint Council-Steering
Committee workshop
included city staff,
County Board and
Planning Commission
members, developer,
public policy/planning
students
· Toolbox workshops
and committee work
yielded detailed tactics 19
MISSION
i
VISION
TACTICS
10
.
Goals
High quality
/ of life
Active and
healthy
community
L Great place
~ for kids
to grow up
Vibrant,
resilient, ~
and stable
Financially
strong
Goals and Strategies
11
,
Great Place to Grow Up!
Make community a
welcoming Place,~,' , Pr~tect the
, ~ ~envlronment
____ Provide high-
quality services
Foster
Increase citizen community
partiCiPat\ion comjmunication ~~i~~~~r~~~~
and community
Regularly up~ ate the, ' .""",. ,,/' events
comprehensive plan ~' ,
\ ' ' , " . Create
.. '."" "," .:.". , community
Grow mtelhgently_ .,..,...'"., :, .,.,.,"',.,., '..,.,..,,'.:,.,,.,'.',,.,,",.'..,. '....." ~, gath~ring
createstrong~/.:.:\"I:!i!"\'... ~ ':::
multimodal ' recreation
transportation system, progra~s to
serve diverse
people
Facilitate access
to local amenities Complete Expand arts
pedestrian trail opportunities
connections
12
.
.
Great place for kids to grow up!
MISSION
r
VISION
GOAL.S
TACTICS
Great Place to Grow Up!
Make community a Protect the
welcoming place ~ ~environment
____ Provide high-
quality services
Make downtown and
riverfront inviting
13
.
.
Increase
Communicate citizen ~
vision to participation ~ Facilitate
everyone \ diversity
initiatives
- Regularly
update ,Use natural
comprehensive \ /. .m... to "",at.
plan ~ .------ nelg, hborhood
~ ~ sense of place
Promote
Shakopee's ---- _____ Create
h;"o", h.""" / ~ "",mmUMY
\ / \ gathering places
Develop and preserve
historic downtown Make neighborhoods
Support more pedestrian friendly
neighborhood
Expand arts and community
opportunities events
e Creating the Future
· 20-year Vision of Shakopee's future
grounded in community values and
priorities
· Vision should drive Comprehensive Plan
28
14
<
.
,
~ Creating the Future
· Steering Committee has served as
stewards of this process at City Council's
request
· Creating the future is the entire
community's responsibility
· Council must provide leadership to
achieve Vision and Mission
29
e Creating the Future
Recommendations:
. Formally adopt the Vision Statement
. Formally adopt the goals and
strategies
. Work with staff and community to
begin implementation
. Routinely monitor, evaluate, and
change to meet community needs
30
15
,
~
~ Creating the Future
We trust community leaders to make
strategic decisions about Shakopee's
future for "generations to come" --
based on the community values and
priorities framed by the community
vision
31
~ Thank you!
Shakopee Visioning Initiative
Steering Committee members
Phil Burke, Jane DuBois, Kathy Gerlach, Marge Henderson,
Wayne Herstad, Terry Joos, Charley Kubler, Joan Lynch,
Farmer Marschall, Bob Mitchell, Bill Nevin, Paulette Rislund,
Carol Schultz, Arv Sornberger, Tom Steininger, Don Wagner
Consultant Anne Carroll
Graduate students: Kelly Betteridge, Nick Wallace, Breanne Daines,
Lynn Vandervort, Jena Min, Katie Farnham, Judith Spanberger
32
16
.,
.
v
Shakopee
Visioning Initiative
Community Update
November 14,2005
SteerinqCommittee members:
Phil Burke, Jane DuBois, Kathy Gerlach, Marge Henderson,
Wayne Herstad, Terry Joos, Charley Kubler, Joan Lynch,
Farmer Marschall, Bob Mitchell, Bill Nevin, Paulette Rislund,
Carol Schultz, Arv Sornberger, Tom Steininger, Don Wagner
1
,
ill
Mission
The mission of the City of Shakopee is to
provide the opportunity to live, work, and
playin a community with a proud past,
promising future, and small-town
atmosphere within a metropolitan setting.
The city will provide customer-friendly,
high-quality public services that are
intended to meet the changing needs of its
,
residents and the community at large .
2
.
Agenda
· How We Started
· Vision Statement
· Building the Vision
· Creating Goals and Strategies
· Case: Goal, Strategies, Tactics
.. Creating the Future/Recommendations
· Discussion
3
,
How We Started
· City Council began exploring a visioning
in itiativei n 2004
· Process:
- Council discussed needs and ,hired consultant
- Council appointed Steering Committee
- Steering Committee guided work
-Steering Committee actively engaged .
community; consultant added 7 grad students
- Staff actively supported process
- Council monitored process 4
.
How We Started
· Steering Committee served as stewards of
the process with the following principles:
- Ensure broad and representative participation
- Provide active and regular communication
with the City Council and community
- Bring forth all voices and perspectives fairly
and equitably
- Ensure open and transparent process
5
Vision Statement
. Twenty years from now Shakopee
will be known and valued as a
unique city...
6
f
Shako pee Vision Statement
... Where a vital and
historic downtown
anchors an active
riverfront district; and
where the Minnesota
River serves as a
beacon for residents
and tourists.
7
... Where 'distinct neighborhoods and
business areas connect with each other
through greenways and trails to protected
natural habitat, recreational attractions,
and other destinations; and where the arts
deepen and enhance our community.
~I ~f'
~';:!l'~\Jrt!'I" f"
,<,Y~0r~~)2.;~Y~"I:!:y;!,;;~j"~i:~j ", ;
8
,
... · Where active, healthy,
individual and family
lifestyles are supported
through varied
recreational and
educational
opportunities; where
we demonstrate our
commitment to youth;
liMDge;!
:.-...., . . --.- -", ;.- _:;, '" .'.' -'- ~--" -.
.
Shakopee,
, Minnesota 9
...Where both young and
old enjoy community
gathering places; where
neighbors of all
backgrounds respect
and appreciate each
other; an.d where
diversity is celebrated.
10
... Where homes meet
residents' lifetime
needs and are in
neighborhoods that
are accessible and
connected with one
another; where
housing developments
,
and public spaces
reflect community
needs;
11
...and where the. city's
unique historic personality
is thoughtfully balanced
with easyacce.ss to urban
.
conveniences.
12
... Where we support high quality, life-long
educational opportunities; where employees
receive living wages; and where both local
businesses and corporate headquarters are
welcomed and well-supported. 13
... Where residents are
invested in the
community and
provide input on local
issues; where open
communication and
commulJity service
are valLied;
14
.
...andwherehigh
standards reflect
our vision and
commitment to
creating a sense
of community
for generations
to come.
15
,
Building the Vision
· 18-month process allowed broad
engagement and sufficient time to build
understanding of values and issues
· Vision built carefully and respectfully
directly on those values and key issues
· The integrity of the process gives strength
to the Vision
16
<
Building the Vision
1. Identified and analyzed stakeholders
2. Gathered community input
- Nearly 25 community conversations and
focus groups
- Industry, real estate surveys
- Open House
- Shakopee Showcase
- National Night Out
- Recorded detailed comments from
hundreds of people and published for
public review
17
Building the Vision
3. Identified values and priorities, and
developed issue briefs
- Small-town feel
- "Close but not too close"
- River roots, environment, and
historic downtown
- Recreation and the arts
-
- Economic opportunities and challenges of growth
- Social opportunities and challenges of growth
4. Developed 20-yr vision to support mission
and reflect community values, priorities 18
, .Creating Goals and Strategies
· Joint Council-Steering
Committee workshop
included city staff,
County Board and <'~.;:
Planning Commission ,;
members, developer,
public policy/planning
students
· Toolbox workshops
and committee work
yielded detailed tactics 19
MISSION
i
VISION
i
GOALS
i
t
TACTICS
20
Goals
High quality
of life
Active and
healthy
community
Great place
for kids
to grow up
Vibrant,
resilient,
and stable
Financially
strong
Goals and Strategies
_____ High quality of life .~
\ 1
-----.. Active and healthy
community
I
,
Vibrant, resilient . Great place for
and stable ~ kids to grow up ~
1
~ Financially strong
~
Great Place to Grow Up!
Make community a Protect the
welcoming' place
~ environment
Great place for
~ kids to grow up "-------- , Provide high-
quality services
Make downtown and
riverfront inviting
Foster
Increase citizen community
participation communication Support more
neighborhood
Regularly update the and community
events
comprehens\ plan ~ Create
community
Grow intelligently
.--------- gathering
---------.
locations
Create strong Increase
multimodal recreation
transportation system programs to
serve diverse
Facilitate access people
to local amenities Complete Expand arts
pedestrian trail opportunities
connections
. Great Place to Grow Up! .
MISSION
r
VISION
r
GOALS
r
,1
TACTICS 25
Great Place to Grow Up!
Make community a Protect the
welcoming place
~ environment
Great place for
~ kids to grow up ~ Provide high-
quality services
Make downtown and
riverfront inviting
26
Increase
Communicate citizen ~
participation . .. ........... Facilitate
vision to
everyone . ' , diversity
initiatives
Regularly Use natural
update areas to create
comprehensive ~ neighborhood
plan ~ sense of place
Promote
Shakopee's ~ ~ Create
historic heritage community
\ gathering places
Develop and preserve
historic downtown Make neighborhoods
Support more pedestrian. friendly
neighborhood
Expand arts and community
opportunities events
Creating the Future
· 20-yearVision of Shakopee's future
grounded in community values and
priorities
· Vision should drive Comp'rehensive Plan
28
Creating the Future
· Steering Committee has served as
stewards of this process at City Council's
request.
-Creating the future is the entire
community's responsibility
- Council must provide leadership to
achieve Vision and Mission
29
Creating the Future
Recommendations:
. Formally adopt the Vision Statement
. Formally adopt the goals and
strateg ies
. Work with staff and community to
begin implementation
. Routinely monitor, evaluate, and
change to meet community needs
30
,
Creating the Future
We trust community leaders to make
strategic decisions about Shakopee's
future for "generations to come" --
based on the community values and
priorities framed by the community
. .
vIsion
31
,
<
Thank you!
Shakopee Visioning Initiative
Steeri ng Comm ittee mem bers
Phil Burke, Jane DuBois, Kathy Gerlach, Marge Henderson,
Wayne Herstad, Terry Joos, Charley Kubler, Joan Lynch,
Farmer Marschall, Bob Mitchell, Bill Nevin, Paulette Rislund,
Carol Schultz, Arv Sornberger, Tom Steininger, Don Wagner
Consultant Anne Carroll
Graduate students: Kelly Betteridge, Nick Wallace, Breanne Daines,
Lynn Vandervort, Jena Min, Katie Farnham, Judith Spanberger
32
~--~-_. ------
By Kevi,.! Frazell
<0>
he world economy is changing. while your city goes through endless citizens-well in advance of any specific
Has your city done everything public hearings, extensive councildis- project proposal. It is critical that all
necessary to be a player? More cussion, and protracted litigation. Those stakeholders-including those whose
specifIcally, have you engaged cities and regions that know what property might need to be acquired,
your citizens in a common vision they want and are ready to respond to or who otherwise could be tempted to
I for the development and redeve1- opportunities w'ill be the winners. But see themselves as "losers" in new devel-
" opment of your community? unless you've engaged all the stake- opment-be brought to the table well
Where America once clearly holders of your city in a vision for eco- before the city is considering a specific
I dominated the world economy, our nomic development, you may not be as proposal fi-om a specific business. Make
, nation and our cities now compete in a prepared as you think.You risk having sure everyone understands what will
global ma.rketplace. Ours is a relatively the best-laid plans blow up at just the happen, why, how they will be aftected,
'I expensive country in which to dopusi- 'wrong time. ' a1!d;if necessary, how they will be com-
ness. Our citizens and communities are I The virtual firestorm of controversy pensated. Honestly soliciting everyone's
learning all too painfully how easily surrounding the recent Kelo vs. New early ideas far how to most successfully
II manufacturi~lg ca.n sWi[.tly shiftto l~w- London, decision ofthe ~.S, Supreme obta~1l new. developm.ent in th.e com-
cost cornpeotors 111 Cnma and MeXIca. Court illustrates the pomt. The Court, mUl11ty, whIle protecong the rIghts of
And even the work associated with by a narrow 5-Lrdecision, upheld the individuals and minimizing the disrup-
routine customer support and service right oflocal govenmlent'to use eminent honto their lives, can go a lang way to
operaJj.ons can now be outsourced domain for economic development and winning broad public and stakeholder
to well-educated workers in India. redevelopment projects that are back eo support for the tough decisions that
Distance is becoming irrelevant. by a well thought out plan and a _ may have to be made later.
I America is emerging in the global demonstrable "public purpose." But the The plaintitJ:s in Kelo represented
economy as a' provider of high value- caurt minority has been joined by an only seven of the 90 househalds that
added, creative services-finance, engi- unusual caalition of the left and rigJ:1t in were disp4Iced by New London's project.
neering, design, research, management, loud protest that the qecision betrays a With only one additional vote on the
entertainment, marketing, producing, narrower "public use" test imposed by Supreme Court, their wishes would
and applying knawledge. The resource the constitution, and will result in tax have prevailed over the interests .of the
base necessary to compl',':te in that hungry local governments and power- other 83 homeowners who wished to
economy is less about access to natural ful busine$s interests violating dIe rights sell, of a high-tech pharmaceutical firm
resources and more about having a of individuals. Proposals for legislative needing t.o create the type of environ-
higWy-educated and creative workforce. curbs on this "abuse" have already been ment necessary to recruit and retain the
Yet even here, American cities must introduced in both the u.s. Congress creative employees of the 21st century,
compete with the creative centers of and in many state legislatures, including I and of the 25,000 citizens of an economi-
Canada, Europe, Asia, and elsewhere. Minnesota's. Regardless of the ultimate cally distressed community who surely
Can your city fmd its niche in this new outcome oflegislative attempts to rein . had a vested interest in a revitalized
wodd? What can your region do better in the use of eminent domain, it is watertl-ontandstrengthened ta..'t base.
or sooner than anyone else? Does your dear that cities are going to be under Get started now, to make sure that
community provide the kind of envi- increased and intense public scrutiny citizens who might feel disenti-anchised
ranment where members of that creative whenever using it. Many will assume' I don't derail your community's eco-
workf.orce will want to live and work? the worst. I nomic future. ~
So how does all of this fit with the Ec.onomic development can no I
ideals of democratic governance or longer be the behind-the-scenes purview I
active citizen participation, which haw of just the economic development I
been articulated in recent "Governing director, the city council, and the I
Your City"columns? In today's break- chamber of commerce. I
neck business world, where capital liter- I Cormnunities that want to succeed Kellin Fmzell is member services director
ally ~.ows arou~d the world in seconds, I at economi,c developmen~ in the ;2,tst I with the League if Mim:esota Cities.
a busmess \>rantmg to get a new product I century would be well adVIsed to develop Phone: (651) 28.1, -12.1). E-mail:
or service to market can't afford to wait , a genuine dialogue with citizens-all I kfrazell@I/1'lnc.ol~f/,.
.--------_._----~-~._---^----_._._._.__._._.._-~--- ----_._------~...._----
,'\UGUST 2005 MINNESOTA CITIES 1:
...._. ""<I>~~~RW.[~l,-!.z:,~.