Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14.E. Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates-Res. No. 6283 CITY OF SHAKOPEE /1. ..g- Memorandum CASELOG NO.: 05-075 TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates MEETING DATE: August 16, 2005 REVIEW PERIOD: May 13,2005 - September 9, 2005 DISCUSSION Pavek Family Investments (College City Homes) has submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of Glacier Estates, proposed for property north of Eagle Creek Blvd., west of County Road 18, and east of Hilldale Drive (Exhibit A). The plat, as currently proposed, contemplates the construction of 49 single family homes on 16.49 acres, with right-of-way proposed for 5.82 acres, approximately one acre dedicated for park and an outlot of 12.62 acres that encompasses the wetland area. (Exhibit B). PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At its August 4, 2005 meeting, the Planning eommission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat to the City Council by a 6-0 vote, subject to the conditions listed in the draft resolution. A copy of the report to the Planning Commission has been attached for the eouncil's reference. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Resolution No. 6283, A Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates. 2. Approve Resolution No. 6283, A Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates, with revisions. 3. Direct staffto prepare a resolution of denial of the Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates. 4. Table a decision and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant. 5. Table a decision to the September 6,2005 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion to approve Resolution No. 6283, a Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates, and move its adoption. Mark Noble, Planner I g:\cc\2005\08-16\ppglacierestates.doc ~. RESOLUTION NO. 6283 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GLACIER ESTATES WHEREAS, Pavek Family Investments Corporation (College City Homes), applicant and property owner, have made application for preliminary plat approval of Glacier Estates; and " " WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as: See attached legal, Attachment #1 WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the preliminary plat on June 23,2005, July 21,2005 and August 4,2005; and WHEREAS, all required public notices regarding the public hearing were posted and sent; and WHEREAS, the Shakopee Planning Commission has recommended approval of the requested preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the eity Council reviewed the preliminary plat request at its meeting of August 16,2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, THAT THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GLACIER ESTATES IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval oftitle by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developers Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for public improvements within the Final Plat, as well as payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the City's adopted fee schedule. 1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 4. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems, and construction of streets in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the eity of Shako pee. 5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment eharges, and Trunk Sanitary Sewer eharges, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Pinal eonstruction Plans and Specifications. 7. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy ofthis permit shall be forwarded to the City. 8. The applicant shall work with City staff to provide a future sanitary sewer trunk extension. 9. A storm water infiltration system design providing pretreatment of storm water runoff prior to infiltration shall be submitted to the eity for review and approval. 10. The applicant shall obtain all necessary right-of-way and/or easements to perform work offsite. 11. The applicant shall obtain the necessary Scott eounty permits/approvals (access, right-of-way, drainage, etc.). C. Street names and addresses shall be provided to the Shakopee Fire Inspector for review and approval. D. The applicant shall provide an emergency service vehicle access to County road 16, consistent with the Shakopee Fire Inspector's requirements. E. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street signs are installed. F. The developer shall provide connecting watermains consistent with SPUC's requirements. G. An 18-inch trunk watermain shall be extended from eR 18 to the west edge of the plat along Eagle Creek Blvd (CR 16); with SPUC paying for the oversizing per their standard policy. H. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files ofthe Final Plat and all record drawings to the engineering department. I. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) permits and approvals for all proposed wetland impacts. J. The approval of the proposed impact to the existing wetland in order to enhance wildlife habitat is contingent upon receiving a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. K. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits for all structures to be removed from the site and/or demolished. L. The applicant shall obtain a NPDES permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of this permit shall be provided to the City. M. The applicant shall work with the City of Shakopee to provide two (2) trunk sanitary sewer extensions to the South and one (1) trunk sanitary sewer extension to the West. N. The applicant shall work with the eity of Shakopee to provide an adequate maintenance traiVaccess to the proposed storm water basin and the proposed trunk sanitary sewer. O. The existing wetland complex and the mitigated wetland shall be located within an outlot. P. Minimum drainage and utility easements for sanitary sewer and storm sewer in non-paved areas shall be provided at a one to one ratio, depth versus width, I .~ plus two (2) feet on each side of the pipe alignment. The easements shall be centered along the utility alignment. Q. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the eity Engineer. They shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Provide a minimum of thirty-two (32) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed storm sewer, between lots 1 and 2 of block 2. 2. Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage through lot 4 of block 2. 3. Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage in the rear oflots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of block 2. 4. Provide a minimum of fifty (50) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed sanitary sewer, between lots 17 and 18 of block 2. 5. Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage in the rear oflots 19,20,21,22 and 23 of block 2. 6. Provide a minimum of twenty (20) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed storm sewer, between lot 1 of block 4 and the proposed park. 7. Provide a minimum often (10) feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of the proposed park. R. The applicant shall provide the required documentation and/or drawings that address, to the City's satisfaction, all comments noted in the June 13,2005 letter from Todd Hubmer and Steve Gurney, WSB & Associates, Inc. II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply; A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s). B. Noise issues along the County roadways may arise as traffic levels increase in the area. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or desired noise mitigation measures. C. The developer should implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and stormwater management during construction. D. The applicant must meet the eity's Woodland Management Ordinance requirements. E. The developer utilize the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas as a technical reference for erosion control. F. The developer install tree protection fence prior to mass grading. No grading should occur within the drip line or Critical Root Zone of protected trees. G. The developer adhere to the Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for projects within the development area, dated June 30, 2005 and any following revisions to the application. This includes, but is not limited to, the management, maintenance, monitoring, and performance standards included in the permit narrative extended to 10 years. H. The developer work with City Staffto establish a buffer width and install buffer signage provided by the City. I. The developer provide a 25 foot buffer from the wetland delineation line. The grading to create the storm water management pond, install utilities, and create the trail would be exempt from this requirement. J. The proposed storm pond be seeded with a native wetland seed mixture and erosion control blanket be placed four feet either side ofthe normal water level and around outlets to prevent erosion and sediment deposits into the wetland mitigation sites and enhancement areas. K. Provide placement of at least one overstory/shade deciduous tree in the front yard. L. Provide sod placement in front yard and seed or sod placed in side and rear yards. M. Provide placement of 6" of topsoil. The soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements. N. Provide rain sensors for any irrigation system. O. No landscaping, ponding, berming, or signage shall be permitted within the County right-of-way. P. Any change in drainage entering the County right-of-way requires detailed stormwater calculations to be submitted to the County Engineer for review and approval. Q. The applicant shall meet park dedication requirements by dedicating a combination of land and cash. R. Park dedication fees in the amount required by the City Code and adopted City fee schedule shall be calculated prior to the recording of the final plat. If any portion of the property is being platted as outlots to accommodate a phased development, the park dedication fees for each future phase shall be based on the fees in effect at the time of final plat approval for those outlots. Land required for park purposes shall be dedicated with the initial final plat. S. The applicant shall work with staff to design and construct the park as part of the construction of the development. Construction costs shall be credited toward the applicant's cash contribution requirement, and the applicant shall provide the city security for the full park dedication fee amount. The applicant shall bring back a park plan for review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. T. The applicant shall continue to work with the city to determine a trail connection to the Riverside Fields trail, and finalize the trail alignment prior to final plat approval. U. The applicant shall provide a trail connection from the park area to Glacier Lane, at a location approved by the city. v. eonnecting sidewalks should be provided throughout the development. W. The wetland complex shall be provided to the city as an outlot and incorporated into the city's park and open space system. x. The applicant shall install park, open space, and trail boundary signage as determined to be needed by the city. The city shall provide the signage, and the applicant provide the posts and installation of the signage. y. In the park area, the developer shall: 1. Fine grade the site, picking rocks and dirt clumps %" and greater in SIze. 2. Provide a finished grade that is approved by the city as suitable for park use. 3. Ensure a minimum of 6" of topsoil. 4. Apply a grass seed mixture "Pro Turf Lawn Mix" at a rate of 60 pounds per acre that meets the following criteria: Item %of Minimum Purity Mix Germination Alene Kentucky 30 90 95 Bluegrass Denim Kentucky 30 90 95 Bluegrass Secretariat 20 90 99 Perennial Rye Mardigras 20 90 99 Perennial Rye Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this _ day of , 2005. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk - F~,~'r =* \ i ! Abstracters eertificate Legal: That part of the east one-half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota lying north and east of the following described line, COl'llllencing at the intersection of the east line of said east one-half of the Southwest Quarter and the center line of county Road No. 16, said point being 1486.36 f_t south. of the northeast corner thereof, thence north along said east line a distance of 427.49 feet to the actual point of beqinning of the line to be described, thence west at right angles to said east line a distance of 615.98 feet more or l.s. to its intersection with the east Hne of the plat of ZOSCHKE'S ADDITION TO SHAXOPEE, Scott COunty, Minnesota, thence north along said east line of said ZOSCHKE'S ADDITION TO SBAKOPEB to the north line of said east one-half of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating. AND That'part of the east one-half the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 115, Range 22, Scott COunty, HinneBota, described as follows: COllllllencinq at the intersection of the east line of said east. one-half of the Southwest Quarter and t.he center line of county Road No. 16; Baid point being 1486.36 feet south of the northeast corner thereof, thence north along said east line a distance of 427.49 feet to the actual point of beginning of the parcel to be described, thence west at right angles to said east line a distance of 300 feet, thence south 82.49 feet; thence east 300 feet, thence north to the point of beginning. AND A tract of land in the east one-half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, TownShip 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows I Beginning at the intersection of the east line of said Bast 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 with the center line of Co. Rd. No. 16 said point 1486.36 ft. south of the northeast corner thereof, thence north along said east line a distance of 345.0 feet, thence west at right angles a i distance of 300.00 ft., thence south and parallel to said east line a distance of 384.44 I feet to the center line of said Co. Rd. No. 16; thence easterly along aaid center line a distance of 302.58 fest more or less to the point of beginning. l: i; AND I The East 300,00 feet of the West 600.00 feet of the South 904.00 feet of the North 1049,00 feet (as measured at right I angles) of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, I AND The West 300,00 feet, EXCEPTING the North 145,00 feet thereof (as measured at right angles) of that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13. Township 115. Range 22. lying Northerly of the center line of County Road No. 16. Scott County, Minnesota Residential Home Service's Title, LLC, does hereby certify that it has made a search of the public records of Scott County, Minnesota and disclose that the names and addresses ofthe apparent owner's. within a radius of350 feet of the above referenced property which consist of 34 entries on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Dated this 220d day of November, 2004 Residential Homes -s-erv~ LLC C1 A;"d K:f,t,., <><,.~J Licep:?eo Abstracter O:arci K. Hamann LiQensed Abstractor State of Minnesota CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 05-075 TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Planner I SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Glacier Estates MEETING DATE: August 4, 2005 REVIEW PERIOD: May 13,2005 - September 9,2005 SITE INFORMATION Applicant: Pavek Family Investments (College eity Homes) Property Owners: Henry & Christi Blaskowski, Dean & Christina Berg, Larry & Ann Kraayenbrink Location: North of Eagle Creek Blvd., West of County Road 18, East of Hilldale Drive Current Zoning: Urban Residential (R-1B) Zone Adj acent Zoning: North: Rural Residential (RR) Zone/Planned Residential District (pRD) South: Rural Residential (RR) Zone East: Rural Residential (RR) Zone West: Rural Residential (RR) Zone Area: 35.92 Acres Compo Plan: Single Family Residential MUSA: This site is presently within the MUSA boundary Attachments: Exhibit A: Location/Zoning Map Exhibit B: Preliminary Plat Exhibit C: City Engineering Memorandum Exhibit D: Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director Memorandum Exhibit E: Natural Resource Specialist Memorandum INTRODUCTION: Pavek Family Investments (College City Homes) has submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of Glacier Estates, proposed for property north of Eagle Creek Blvd., west of eounty Road 18, and east of Hilldale Drive (Exhibit A). The plat, as currently proposed, contemplates the construction of 49 single family homes on 16.49 acres, with right-of-way proposed for 5.82 acres, approximately one acre dedicated for park and an outlot of 12.62 acres that encompasses the wetland area. (Exhibit B). DISCUSSION: The applicant has provided a concept plan that identifies a singIe.-family development with two streets that would access Eagle Creek Blvd. The site topography is varied, but it generally slopes to the north. There is a large wetland on this property, and a substantial number of trees that are proposed for removal. The City's Engineering Department is recommending approval of the request, provided the conditions outlined in their memorandum are incorporated into the plat resolution (Exhibit C). Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director, has commented that the Park and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) have made a formal recommendation on this request. He has provided several memorandums, including recommended conditions which will be incorporated into the plat resolution (Exhibit D). Ryan Hughes, Natural Resource Specialist for the City, commented that the Environmental Advisory Committee (EAe) reviewed the proposed Glacier Estates preliminary plat at their June 8, 2005, regular meeting, but continued action until further information could be provided by the developer. The EAe resumed discussion at their July 13, 2005, regular meeting. He noted that he attended a TEP meeting, and the following are comments from that meeting: . The elevation within the wetland enhancement area will be addressed by making Army Corps of Engineers approval a condition. All other TEP members approved the wetland enhancement project. . The TEP prefers the trail be constructed along CSAH 18. This will reduce and maybe eliminate wetland impacts. 0 The ponded area east of the Riverside Fields trail stub is a County wetland mitigation site. The TEP does not want impact occurring to this wetland. 0 A boardwalk was suggested if the trail were to cross the wetland. The City Fire Inspector has been working with the developer on a design for the second access (located at the east edge of the property), with it preliminarily designed to be 14 feet wide and able to accommodate the weight of the fire trucks. Additionally, there will be bollards installed at this access to limit the access to emergency service vehicles only. Shakopee Public Utilities (SPUC) provided a memorandum, noting that connecting watermains must be installed between Lots 18 & 19, Block 2. An easement of30 feet total is shown (15 feet each lot). An 18-inch trunk watermain shall be extended from CR 18 to the west edge of the plat along Eagle Creek Blvd (CR 16), with SPUC paying for the oversizing per their standard policy. The City elerk provided a memorandum, commenting that the developer shall address park dedication, the woodland management plan, street names and sidewalk/trail issues. The Building Official commented that if approved, temporary street signage will be required, and that permitted lots shall be accessible. Scott County Public Works provided a memorandum, noting a number of issues that shall be addressed. The developer has received a copy of that memorandum and is working to address the issues. I STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary Plat of Glacier Estates, subject to the following conditions: I. The following procedural actions must be completed prior to the recording of the Final Plat: A. Approval oftitle by the City Attorney. B. Execution of a Developers Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for public improvements within the Final Plat, as well as payment of engineering review fees, and any other fees as required by the eity's adopted fee schedule. 1. Street lighting to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 2. Electrical system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities eommission. 3. Water system to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission. 4. Installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems, and construction of streets in accordance with the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard Specifications of the City of Shakopee. 5. The developer shall be responsible for payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges, Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges, and Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges, as required by the most current eity of Shakopee Fee Schedule, 6. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utility Commission approve the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 7. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of this permit shall be forwarded to the City. 8. The applicant shall work with City staff to provide a future sanitary sewer trunk extension. 9. A storm water infiltration system design providing pretreatment of storm water runoff prior to infiltration shall be submitted to the eity for review and approval. 10. The applicant shall obtain all necessary right-of-way and/or easements to perform work offsite. 11. The applicant shall obtain the necessary Scott County permits/approvals (access, right-of-way, drainage, etc.). e. Street names and addresses shall be provided to the Shakopee Fire Inspector for review and approval. D. The applicant shall provide an emergency service vehicle access to County road 16, consistent with the Shakopee Fire Inspector's requirements. E. Temporary street signs shall be provided until such time that permanent street signs are installed. F. The developer shall provide connecting watermains consistent with SPUC's requirements. G. An 18-inch trunkwatermain shall be extended from CR 18 to the west edge ofthe plat along Eagle Creek Blvd (CR 16), with SPUC paying for the oversizing per their standard policy. H. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat and all record drawings to the engineering department. I. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate Wetland eonservation Act (WCA) permits and approvals for all proposed wetland impacts. J. The approval ofthe proposed impact to the existing wetland in order to enhance wildlife habitat is contingent upon receiving a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. K. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits for all structures to be removed from the site and/or demolished. L. The applicant shall obtain a NPDES permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy ofthis permit shall be provided to the eity. M. The applicant shall work with the City of Shakopee to provide two (2) trunk sanitary sewer extensions to the South and one (1) trunk sanitary sewer extension to the West. N. The applicant shall work with the City of Shakopee to provide an adequate maintenance trail/access to the proposed storm water basin and the proposed trunk sanitary sewer. O. The existing wetland complex and the mitigated wetland shall be l<;,cated within an outlot. P. Minimum drainage and utility easements for sanitary sewer and storm sewer in non-paved areas shall be provided at a one to one ratio, depth versus width, plus two (2) feet on each side of the pipe alignment. The easements shall be centered along the utility alignment. Q. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall include, but not be limited to, the following: . Provide a minimum of thirty-two (32) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed storm sewer, between lots 1 and 2 of block 2. . Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage through lot 4 of block 2. . Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage in the rear oflots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of block 2. . Provide a minimum of fifty (50) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed sanitary sewer, between lots 17 and 18 of block 2. . Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage in the rear oflots 19,20,21,22 and 23 of block 2. . Provide a minimum of twenty (20) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed storm sewer, between lot 1 of block 4 and the proposed park. . Provide a minimum often (10) feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior ofthe proposed park. R. The applicant shall provide the required documentation and/or drawings that address, to the City's satisfaction, all comments noted in the June 13, 2005 letter from Todd Hubmer and Steve Gurney, WSB & Associates, Inc. II. Following approval and recording of the final plat, the following conditions shall apply; A. Building construction, sewer, water service, fire protection and access will be reviewed for code compliance at the time of building permit application(s). B. Noise issues along the County roadways may arise as traffic levels increase in the area. The developer and/or their assigns shall be responsible for any required or desired noise mitigation measures. C. The developer should implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and stormwater management during construction. D. The applicant must meet the City's Woodland Management Ordinance requirements. E. The developer utilize the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas as a technical reference for erosion control. F. The developer install tree protection fence prior to mass grading. No grading should occur within the drip line or Critical Root Zone of protected trees. G. The developer adhere to the Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for projects within the development area, dated June 30, 2005 and any following revisions to the application. This includes, but is not limited to, the management, maintenance, monitoring, and performance standards included in the permit narrative extended to 10 years. H. The developer work with eity Staff to establish a buffer width and install buffer signage provided by the City. I. The developer provide a 25 foot buffer from the wetland delineation line. The grading to create the storm water management pond, install utilities, and create the trail would be exempt from this requirement. J. The proposed storm pond be seeded with a native wetland seed mixture and erosion control blanket be placed four feet either side of the normal water level and around outlets to prevent erosion and sediment deposits into the wetland mitigation sites and enhancement areas. K. Provide placement of at least one overstory/shade deciduous tree in the front yard. L. Provide sod placement in front yard and seed or sod placed in side and rear yards. M. Provide placement of6" of topsoil. The soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements. N. Provide rain sensors for any irrigation system. O. No landscaping, ponding, berming, or signage shall be permitted within the County right-of-way. P. Any change in drainage entering the County right-of-way requires detailed stormwater calculations to be submitted to the County Engineer for review and approval. Q. The applicant shall meet park dedication requirements by dedicating a combination of land and cash. R. Park dedication fees in the amount required by the eity Code and adopted City fee schedule shall be calculated prior to the recording ofthe final plat. If any portion ofthe property is being platted as outlots to accommodate a phased development, the park dedication fees for each future phase shall be based on the fees in effect at the time of final plat approval for those outlots. Land required for park purposes shall be dedicated with the initial final plat. S. The applicant shall work with staff to design and construct the park as part of the construction of the development. Construction costs shall be credited toward the applicant's cash contribution requirement, and the applicant shall provide the city security for the full park dedication fee amount. The applicant shall bring back a park plan for review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. T. The applicant shall continue to work with the city to determine a trail connection to the Riverside Fields trail, and finalize the trail alignment prior to final plat approval. U. The applicant shall provide a trail connection from the park area to Glacier Lane, at a location approved by the city. V. Connecting sidewalks should be provided throughout the development. w. The wetland complex shall be provided to the city as an outlot and incorporated into the city's park and open space system. X. The applicant shall install park, open space, and trail boundary signage as determined to be needed by the city. The city shall provide the signage, and the applicant provide the posts and installation ofthe signage. Y. In the park area, the developer shall: 1. Fine grade the site, picking rocks and dirt clumps %" and greater in SIze. 2. Provide a finished grade that is approved by the city as suitable for park use. 3. Ensure a minimum of 6" of topsoil. 4. Apply a grass seed mixture "Pro Turf Lawn Mix" at a rate of 60 pounds per acre that meets the following criteria: Item %of Minimum Purity Mix Germination Alene Kentucky 30 90 95 Bluegrass Denim Kentucky 30 90 95 Bluegrass Secretariat 20 90 99 Perennial Rye Mardigras 20 90 99 Perennial Rye ALTERNATIVES: 1. Offer a motion to recommend to the City eouncil the approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the conditions as presented by staff. 2. Offer a motion to recommend to the City eouncil the approval of the Preliminary Plat, subj ect to revised conditions. 3. Offer a motion to continue the public hearing to request additional information from the applicant and/or staff. 4. Offer a motion to table a decision and request additional information from the applicant and/or staff. 5. Offer a motion to recommend denial to the eity Council of the Preliminary Plat. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the conditions as presented by staff, and move its adoption. Mark Noble Planner I Shakopee - Location Maps Page 1 of! &~\e\T" ~' . .. R1B AG AG ~ N _ Subject Property W.E ....."'''' Sha[(opee Boundary SHAKOPEE tY CCMIolUNIlYFIlIDI!SINCII2151 S c:J ZonIng Boundary c=J Parcel Boundary Preliminary Plat of Glacier Estates ---- . - . , 1.1. __,,___.L!.._____ I _ ___t'J...:...,_ 1")__1: :___...l..D,...++,...+'..l..nlo,...;..,.-1-P~ M/1 RI?()n~ tK+'\€:>\ 1 C, l City of Shakopee Memorandum TO: Mark Noble, Planner I FROM: Joe Swentek, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Glacier Estates Addition PID NO.: 27-913066-0,27-913060-0,27-913069-0 CASE NO.: 05075 DATE: July 28, 2005 The application indicates a request for Preliminary Plat approval of a single-family (RI-B) residential development located Northwest of the Country Road 18 and County Road 16 (Eagle Creek Boulevard) intersection. - This review should be considered preliminary, as more comments are to follow with additional submittals. However, I offer the following comments at this time for the applicant and for the planning department: General Comments 1. Execution of a Developer's Agreement, which shall include provisions for security for public improvements within the Final Plat and the engineering review fees. 2. Payment of Trunk Sanitary Sewer Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 3. Payment of Trunk Storm Water Charges and Trunk Storm Water Storage and Treatment Charges shall be made, as required by the most current City of Shakopee Fee Schedule. 4. No public improvements shall be constructed until the City Engineer and the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) approves the Final Construction Plans and Specifications. 5. Provide electronic (Auto CAD) files of the Final Plat and all record drawings to the engineering department. 6. The applicant shall obtain the necessary right-of-way and/or easements to perform all proposed work offsite. , C:\Documents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK9\Prelim,Plat.Review.Glacier,Estates.doc Page 1 of3 E)(th B\T Co'L . 7. The applicant shall obtain the necessary Scott County permits/approvals (access, right-of- way, drainage, etc.). 8. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) permits and approvals for all proposed wetland impacts. 9. The approval of the proposed impact to the existing wetland in order to enhance wildlife habitat is contingent upon receiving a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 10. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits for all.structures to be removed from the site and/or demolished. 11. The applicant shall obtain a NPDES permit prior to any land disturbing activity. A copy of this permit shall be provided to the City. 12. The applicanf shall work with the City of Shakopee to provide two (2) trunk sanitary sewer extensions to the South and one (1) trunk sanitary sewer extension to the West. 13. The applicant shall work with the City of Shakopee to provide an adequate maintenance trail/access to the proposed storm water basin and the proposed trunk sanitary sewer. PreliminarY Plat 1. The existing wetland complex and the mitigated wetland shall be located within an outlot. 2. Minimum drainage and utility easements for sanitary sewer and storm sewer in non-paved areas shall be provided at a one to one ratio, depth versus width, plus two (2) feet on each side of the pipe alignment. The easements shall be centered along the utility alignment. 3. Easements shall be shown on the Final Plat as approved by the City Engineer. They shall include, but not be limited to, the following: . Provide a minimum of thirty-two (32) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed stonn sewer, between lots 1 and 2 of block 2. . Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage through lot 4 of block 2. . Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage in the rear of lots 4,5,6, 7, 8 and 9 of block 2. . Provide a minimum of fifty (50) feet of drainage aug lltility easement, centered on the proposed sanitary sewer, between lots 17 and 18 of block 2. C:\Documents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK9\Prelim.Plat.Review.Glacier,Estates,doc Page 2 of 3 EKi-lI e. 'T C.3 . Provide additional drainage and utility easement to encompass drainage in the rear of lots 19,20, 21, 22 and 23 of block 2. . Provide a minimum of twenty (20) feet of drainage and utility easement, centered on the proposed storm sewer, between lot 1 ofblock4 and the proposed park. . Provide a minimum often (10) feet of drainage and utility easement along the interior of the proposed park. 4. Simultaneous to the recording of the plat, a deed restriction shall be recorded on lots as designated by the City of Shakopee. Storm Water Manae-ement Plan Review Please see the attached memo from Todd Hubmer and Steve Gurney ofWSB & Associates, Inc. dated June 13,2005. Recommendation Engineering staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions above being addressed by the applicant prior to Final Plat approval. C:\Docurnents and Settings\MNoble\Local Settings\Ternporary Internet Files\OLK9\Prelirn.Plat.Review.Glacier,Estates.doc Page 3 of3 i~,~" ~, CITY OF SHAKOPEE MEMORANDUM - .. To: Mark Noble, Project Manager From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director Date: July 28, 2005 Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Review of the Preliminary Plat for Glacier Estates, College City Homes INTRODUCTION I am writing to provide you park related comments for the Glacier Estates development, and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board's recommendation. DISCUSSION The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) reviewed the proposed Glacier Estates preliminary plat at their June 27 meeting, at which time they recommended general approval of the plat, but with additional research on the feasibility of providing public owned park land or private recreational amenities in the development. Park Area Staff continued to work with the applicant during the months of June and July to determine whether or not publicly owned park land was desirable in the development. Based on the distance to the nearest future park (Riverside Bluffs, over j'2 mile on foot), it was deemed desirable by staff to have a smaller neighborhood park in the Glacier Estates development. The applicant submitted revised drawings that showed a central park of approximately one acre with approximately 200' of road frontage. We initially had concerns about the proposed location of the park due to the topography shown on the grading plans. However, after a site visit, we have determined that the topography is acceptable. In addition, the proposed location will protect a significant number of mature trees that will be part of the park area, something that we haven't seen happen in many recent developments. The proposed park does not have the recommended 300' of road frontage set forth in the city's comprehensive park plan, so to mitigate this deficiency, we recommended that a trail connect south to Glacier Road between either lots 18/19 or 19/1. The applicant is agreeable to this, but the drawing would. need to be revised to show either an outlot or a trail easement. Also, we had significant discussions with the city's Park Maintenance division about the impact that a smaller neighborhood park would have on their workload. Given the proximity of the future Riverside Bluff's park, the existing Whispering Oaks park, and the significant park and open space areas in Southbridge, although it would increase their . workload,. they will be in the area to maintain other park land. r~,~ ,,... t:>'L. We presented the concept to the PRAB at their July meeting, and the Advisory Board concurred with our opinions and the revised plan, with changes as noted above. Wetlands The city's Environmental Advisory Committee has incorporated a policy statement in the natural resources section of the city's comprehensive plan update that significant wetland complexes be incorporated into the city's park and open space system to help ensure long-term protection. The original plat drawing had the wetlands in private ownership. The applicant has redrawing the wetland complex as an outlot that will be dedicated to the city. The PRAB was agreeable to this concept. Trail Alignment The applicant shows a proposed trail alignment on the east side of the project. This trial ends at the County Road 18 right-of-way line leaving a dead-end trail. We need to determine how to make trail connections to the Riverside Fields trail, which also dead ends. At this time, we are still analyzing options, including possible wetland crossings. However, wetland crossing would require board walk. If the application is recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, we strongly suggest that a condition be included that the trail alignment needs to be confirmed before final plat approval. Fu/lfi/lment of Park Dedication Requirements Finally, we have not finalized with the applicant how full park dedication requirements will be met. The recommendation from the PRAB is that the requirements will be met through a combination of land and cash contribution, and that the cash contribution be credited to the applicant in exchange for design and construction of the recreational amenities. Decisions related to the trail will ultimately determine the final requirements. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD PARK DEDICATION RECOMMENDATION The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended approval of the proposed preliminary plat, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall meet park dedication requirements by dedicating a combination of land and cash. 2. Park dedication fees in the amount required by the City Code and adopted City fee schedule shall be calculated prior to the recording of the final plat. If any portion of the property is being platted as outlots to accommodate a phased development, the. park dedication fees for each future phase shall be based on the fees in effect at the time of final plat app.roval for those outlots. Land required for park purposes shall be dedicated with the initial final plat. 3. The applicant shall work with staff to design and construct the park as part of the construction of the development. Construction costs shall be credited toward the applicant's cash contribution requirement, and the applicant shall provide the city security for the full park dedication fee amount. The applicant shall bring back a park plan for review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. 4. The applicant shall continue to work with the city to determine a trail connection to the Riverside Fields trail, and finalize the trail alignment prior to final plat approval. 5. The applicant shall provide a trail connection from the park area to Glacier Lane, at a location approved by the city. 6. Connecting sidewalks should be provided throughout the development. E)c+'h~, ,... 03 STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Finally, I would note the following additional requirements should be added as conditions of approval for the preliminary plat: a. The wetland complex shall be provided to the city as an outlot and incorporated into the city's park and open space system. b. The applicant shall install park, open space, and trail boundary signage as determined to be needed by the city. The city shall provide the signage, and the applicant provide the posts and installation of the signage. c. In the park area, the developer shall: 1) Fine grade the site, picking rocks and dirt clumps %" and greater in size 2) Provide a finished grade that is approved by the city as suitable for park use. 3) Ensure a minimum of 6" of topsoil. 4) Apply a grass seed mixture "Pro Turf Lawn Mix" at a rate of 60 pounds per acre that meets the followina criteria: Item % of Mix I Minimum I Purity Germination Alene Kentucky .30 90 95 BlueQrass Denim Kentucky 30 90 95 Bluearass Secretariat 20 90 99 Perennial Rve Mardigras 20 90 99 Perennial Rve Please let me know if you have any questions. . EK\..he., T E, CITY OF SHAKOPEE MEMORANDUM To: Mark Noble, Project Manager From: Ryan Hughes, Natural Resource Specialist Date: July 27,2005 Subject: Environmental Advisory Committee Review Glacier Estates Preliminary Plat College City Homes INTRODUCTION I am writing to provide you natural resource related comments for the Glacier Estates development, and the Environmental Advisory Committee's recommendation. DISCUSSION The Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC) reviewed the proposed Glacier Estates preliminary plat at their June 8, 2005, regular meeting, but continued action until further information could be provided by the developer. The EAC resumed discussion at their July 13, 2005, regular meeting. The EAC struggled with the application at the June meeting since the proposed project involved excavation within a wetland complex as part of a wetland enhancement. In addition, the proposed development involves significant tree removal within bluff/and. Based on these issues, College City Homes and their wetland consultant worked diligently with Staff and the EAC to prepare a plan that attempts to reach compromise with the most significant natural resource issues. Specific items that the EAC discussed included the following: 1. Wetland Enhancement Project The applicant proposed the approximate 6.7 acre wetland enhancement project without completing a review with the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). Following a review by the TEP a Wetland Conservation Act rNCA) permit application was completed and submitted to the jurisdictional agencies. The EAC reviewed the WCA permit application and provided comments at the meeting. The application included a maintenance, management, and monitoring plan and schedule for the wetland restoration. The EAC determined the management plan be extended to a period of 10 years. The EAC reviewed the permit application and came to consensus that the proposed management plan adequately addressed any concerns from the June EAC meeting. Based on this process the EAC will require a review of the WCA permit application for future preliminary plats, "'''\o\\~\T ~1... 2. Woodland Management The revised preliminary plat included a dedicated park in the central area of the development near the existing homestead. This revision preserved approximately 26 trees previously proposed to be removed, The slope of the area may be a concern for Parks and Recreation. The EAC prefers to preserve the trees in this location. Additionally, the scenic vista from the proposed park is an amenity that the EAC would like to be preserved for area residents. 3. Wetland Buffer The EAC discussed establishing a wetland buffer setback along the wetland delineation line. Currently, the City does not have an ordinance to require buffer setbacks. The development is within the Shoreland Overlay Zone which requires a 25 foot undisturbed buffer from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) level. The EAC deferred to City Staff to determine a buffer width. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Environmental Advisory Committee recommended approval (6-0) of the proposed preliminary plat received July 13, 2005, with the following conditions: 1. The developer should implement the use of Best Management Practices for erosion control and stormwater management during construction. 2. The applicant must meet the City's Woodland Management Ordinance requirements. 3. Placement of at least one overstorylshade deciduous tree in the front yard. 4. Sod placement in front yard and seed or sod placed in side and rear yards. 5. Placement of 6" of topsoil. The soil composition should be similar to the MnDOT topsoil borrow requirements. 6. Rain sensors for any irrigation system. 7. The developer adhere to all MPCA NPDES requirements and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City prior to commencing land disturbing activities. 8. The developer utilize the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas as a technical reference for erosion control. 9, The developer install tree protection fence prior to mass grading. No grading should occur within the drip line or Critical Root Zone of protected trees. 10. The developer adhere to the Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for projects within the development area, dated June 30, 2005 and any following revisions to the application. This includes, but is not limited to, the management, maintenance, monitoring, and performance standards included in the permit narrative extended to 10 years. 11. The developer work with City Staff to establish a buffer width and install buffer signage provided by the City. E"~.ll6tT' E) STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS If the Planning Commission recommends approval, conditions of approval should include the items stated above. Additionally, Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The developer provide a 25 foot buffer from the wetland delineation line, The grading to create the storm water management pond, install utilities, and create the trail would be exempt from this requirement. 2, The proposed storm pond be seeded with a native wetland seed mixture and erosion control blanket be placed four feet either side of the normal water level and around outlets to prevent erosion and sediment deposits into the wetland mitigation sites and enhancement areas. Please let me know if you have any questions. 18~ ~~~~ ~ 6069i: 'ON '9311 :]J,VO li(JI'{';jgdlllllllJS L .. ! omvl! .,. ssulln:J 0069-69....Z~6 :'IcI 5allnSf[ J:l!:l810 ., ....:l Iii 1! l! g: III u ~~'O m~~ Nr1 'gD!^"'I8'l ~ .E "^,1I gll!~ OLliL ' ~€ "~. ... .~. If ad ~ :i ";)UI '5;lWOH ,{JO a:ll:Jno~ lUTe! Aml1!mn~.Ie! .e 0101S alii )0 "",01 alii ...pun _11I6 pas...u to ~ ~ 6i i ,(lrIp 0 WD I 10lfl plOJ IOJI"l^Jlldns l"J!P .<w ,ij .. ~ .IOpun JQ aw ,(q IlUKIoJd so.. uono.upods .. "\JUdoJ 'Wid "I1fI 101f1 .<j!lJ83 ,("'..... I :!N311:J I :!:J3l'OlJd " 31111 133HS I AD I NOISVI311 I ]lVQ "'0 ...._ ~-.;3 11:; 8 " -ti _0 1i~:gi!8'5 :rcr-:~ ~ :5 oe oz :5 ""'0 1n.C' 1: -... i1 1fij~~ u II CD '0'"6 'C; ~~ 151i~Qtit -~. cB.!!" & @....o~-.; " d:o " B& '1", .. 013&_ uO .....!! o%~ " Db ..; :!-U.!!~ D .!:il-Oii - " '" :5c ..: B~B~ Ii -: -il ~u 0 U S:5cg-ili-v ~.!i~lJ'o S ,ill i h 00 ",,;I; :&8=ij 5;1; l'O ~ =! ~~ & gj~~g g~ft_ei :3 lio~ 0 a] i::~~i5'C; ~-.u u ." .. 6: !i! :;1"" .E:.,~ g c:!:it ;; "e :5.! :::>!!ill! on'" -' ill m a.. 2= a__E CI 2:Edio~ a:!iq ~ l! :5=> ~~ UJ .: Zay!j ~ ~~~; ~"Ol~8:!i ~-;;.=a ~ -. :- lU ~~ ": 7 J.<( g 5 e~ D = .s:;:! 05 ...Ii hU:~ Co lU i5"'al:l"'; iJ!:! - I ::E Jt 80l'O " -0 0 w ~:5~!a u..c ide u~:gUJ! E ;;- " z olol-&!;i :: hill ~ . :::i~ :: ~JJB~i .! '1", :;::5 ~ ~S!!1i~~* :z wow .lili~1i :S -.s; ~- ~ ~N~.. .Ia 51 if ~i 0 W :!lC~vunuOt o ~ it ... u:S 0 ":5j~ ... ~ 0:5 ::trl_uN- ~l:~:e 5' 'i'il_ ,5 og U . ""'-1:1 11"0 :515:" III::tt;D 0 g i~ &:!l5~o2s wf-. fiB II.. :S"b.1l.~ t~ c't.s :: Ie :3 :I ~ :So z~ lI:'Gc~.i II: :J D = ~~lii.! 5! z E- ~~li.z:e ~,5(1if .J: i,... "d' ::! !:o: 1: ~C; a.~'O.9 0 -_:5'1: 0 '1:8 _:I '- " "i5 .g.o,:,"_:c . ~,,1;.!1l % -'" "c "i~ODa-UI " 01;- .!!,s li1:5]:3J: I~;-;;~j; _:5;_ E = ..." 02 DiI-_Ci ~1.:5:0-i ::!";j5"it; D:I t2;S~5g~ - ~o 0"" j~" u.!! 0 i!u ~i ~rol"D :st: oofli~:ri.8 .. 0_ - -:5:!!:g "0 00 -1l~5.o II :I;;ll..; :! E" -u j~I!lE,s5 15 8 u= 8- 11'I u coo Co ..s :5= ... 0- Q iU'ii,;i '1;:; 8-~ 0 ~1i ~Jt ~ii~:2 ooi ~ ~ "Ii;i! 0 0 li .. ~c;it-D:5 .. " . ~:i;1::8 :g ~o:sG3 5 liI.. =::1 liI.i'C;! II \J';:.a~.s B .01:'15 ~l:I. 5. 0" I!l~ _:5 Z.. 1:::5..0- '0 1i=:SJI!i,s -eEl!! lo.;S 1=" l:I _::I c31i:iiti ~ :1- ... ,,& tl~ 15 3:;5 _OtG._..= 6!'ti.s-:g ~ 2=:5 u =5 s'"'ii lj~ :; a.-. =.5~.3=::-;; 0. "ii _:5...0.. :J .:a!] 'C;'" ,Ii ~ t: ~i"g.9Z:!5 ;= i1,!!.s Ii cl;:5 E - -on ~~'" ';.e. I- ~l:I~~ "(088) u_ i:ii:!lii :5 ~ -- if 0 l'O'::5.s:5 .!!- :5Z "" .!!ij f3-;~B~ ! ~,5.-1~ :5 -(Iii l:!f oil ,::!Ji;;-; _ 5 R:5 u 1'1"'- "'gg :z:-i,!i ~~ lJ wo: .u~.9 15 "_ .: :g ~ ..:s ~A ,,-8 ~ri m~-~ o(15l.ilmD\ :501"'_" 5; :S !:!loo:S.!! ;; c15=.. :S:;:iz I ~~~~ '" "'r:!ori::l< i I- ali! osg:tio ob;hg of Co Dt -- I ; ~a'~~ w . . ~&.g i~ w ~< _-",~E:s:5 iii- iE_ "~,,qli .... 1;;'" ~j!:rn J!1I~, ii ~i 15..:5g1; ;;0:- 1= a~!h I!l .l!;~h:; wO .c. f)t.D t: R ,,& tl&& .~ ...- -'0" J.'C5~.!~ L:5i"ai- - :5'0.... >.. ,s", ='" ~I-t-t- 9- ..:,.!j!! Co I. !b~ z &Iu.~u..'l 5-a.G_....:: i!~,s'C;! "OJ! ~.;~ "0"0 N999 ~~ii!l!Bi5 ';!i o -"'o"Ovi~b ;;ili"ii~ :5.r~gl -" ~~>- ~!!i~1I~o6 ~";j ..r:;:;; ~:a !~~~ oornjol!J 1->- II "''iI:ii ,sh~~ .l!! .l!!r .!!i ",""0I!;!i ~"!ii! ~o i!jw j!;1l!~,.: .0=50-- ~ hil3.:i oil 8 ;; ga. ~~~~ e:fil u =j!!~1I ii] "'0 ire!! o~ ...B", ...:z: ~!:!l!J~ "ii8!!i:]!: Jim:!!::: go dt!!l ~1 m hli",Ul ...6 liloof~ 3!;o!cll> O~:su..!!2 15. 0= g... '0 ;;-a.~ ;;ij -:5 m~~j!: ~-5 :;J. 3:o:s:!! -:~. a.Wz.e.1O 'U 0_ 5 0 .:ID ~Ii>. :Iii CI -- - c:5 ~ ot"3-.;5i o ,g~sf :5 .l~ 0 w" on~iiS w D..."O.. ~ 0 ,," 0 ill!! ....t:~5SJi "0 ~ ~1~J!.9 ~,<t8.~ z '!:olI ~ I5rn.1l ~ "'::J~!i 0( ~gd 0 ~ 0 N Iii ... :0; ~ ... ::J ~ III i:! II> ~ 0( 2 '" 2 ;r; !i( is w g; ..J III ~ CI ill % rn ~ 0 is 0 m Co I 0 I It.... -........... \ \ , I ~-~ ~ ~ \--- I !l \ \ -- - " , \ !:! ""'--~i"~~ \\'l.- \ \ 0; I R ......-- !II "\ \~.... \ \ I , i! - '\\\\ ~ I \ I E ~ I ...'" f.! \, \ t ~__...l I $I /1 ./ \ \' __ __1 I o. .;' I" --_J + ~ -- , O' ... ~\ f.! << / ~ / I O' ,,' ~ ~ c, / I ....-.--;;$' ll, / I / \~t# \\- I /. I II - 51 ~I ~ ~/ ~/ E -~ \ ~ ~ 50 ! l:> 0 0; /1 g i ... / l" . , I .. \~L / l" ; / I .