The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15.B.2. Bids for Soccor Complex Building, Project No. PR2005-2-Res. No. 6256 CITY OF SHAKOPEE /5".(3.?-. MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator From: Mark Themig, Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Director Meeting Date: June 7, 2005 Subject: Bids for Soccer Complex Building, Project No. PR2005-2 INTRODUCTION City Council is asked to consider bids for the 1 th Avenue Sports Complex (Soccer Complex) building and decide whether to accept or reject the bids, BACKGROUND The design of the building that will provide restrooms, concessions, meeting space, storage, and trash enclosure for the 1 ih Avenue Sports Complex has been underway for several months, As you may recall, there was considerable discussion at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and City Council about the design, cost estimates, and park reserve funding. As a result, the building went through several revisions in 2004 to reduce costs. City Council approved the final design on December 21, 2004 and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications. Bill Egan, Park Maintenance Supervisor, Sherry Dvorak, Recreation Supervisor, and I worked with, Paul Dahlberg from BKV Group during the first quarter of 2005 to finalize the plans and specification, Bid requests for the building were published on May 5, and bid opening was on June 1. There were nine plan holders and six contractors submitted bids, DISCUSSION Low bid for the project was $528,500, The architect's estimate from 2004 was $424,510, The bid package includes several deduct alternates (Attachment A), The bids are significantly over the 2004 estimate. I spoke with Mr. Dahlberg about the difference between the estimates and the actual bid, and there appear to be two possible explanations: 1, Inflationary costs due to the time that has elapsed since the initial estimates and bid date, 2, Final design and engineering dictated additional materials for the canopy, For comparison, the base bid for the Public Utilities building that was constructed on the site this year was $560,280, Options to Consider 1. Reject All Bids The first option is to reject all bids. If we reject the bids, the project can be redesigned to reduce the project costs. There are several redesign options that could be considered: . Eliminate the canopy: According to the low bidder, the price of the central canopy is somewhere in the $90,000 range, The canopy could be eliminated from the design, but would leave minimal sheltered areas. . Reduce the size of the canopy: Reducing the size of the canopy by ~ could result in an estimated $30,000-$35,000 savings, . Eliminate the meeting/storage building: Controls for irrigation and electrical would need to be relocated into the remaining restroom/concessions building, No cost estimates are available for this option at this time, . Eliminate the alternates: Alternates could be eliminated from the project. The most expensive alternate is the trash enclosure, but eliminating this alternate would not meet city code. The other alternates appear to be a good value and should not be eliminated. If you choose to reject bids and direct a redesign, the project can be redesigned and rebid in about 60 days. I should note that we discussed the idea of awarding the contract to the low bidder, then negotiating a change order to reduce or eliminate the canopy. According Mr, Thomson, if Council desires a significant project reduction like this, it would be more appropriate to reject all bids and rebid the project with the reduction, Had we known that the costs were going to be significantly higher than the estimates, it would have been beneficial to bid the canopy be an alternate, 2. Award the Contract and Allocate Additional Funding The total budget in the 2005 CIP for Phase 2 of the complex was $480,000, This amount included $440,000 for the building, and an additional $40,000 for remaining site improvements such as fencing along the ponds, ADA modifications, and picnic tables, Factoring in the building bid cost, this would bring the total project to $568,500, If you desire to move forward with this design and bid, there are funds available in the Park Reserve Fund to meet the higher bid cost (see attached preliminary 2006-2010 CIP overview that has been updated to reflect the bid cost). The only caution I would add is that we are waiting on a decision from the Public Utilities Commission on what additional costs there are for the Huber Park project water main looping and power line undergounding, ALTERNATIVES 1. Reject all bids by offering Resolution No, 6256, A Resolution Rejecting Bids for Construction of the Soccer Complex Building, Project No. PR2005-2, and provide direction to staff as to how to proceed, 2. Award the contract by offering Resolution No, 6256, A Resolution Awarding a Contract To Met-Con Construction for Construction of the Soccer Complex Building, Project No, PR2005-2, and direct additional project funding be allocated from the Park Reserve fund. 3. Reject the low bid and award the bid to another bidder. REQUESTED ACTION City Council should, by motion, move an alternate consistent with your direction, If you offer either of the resolutions attached, please indicate whether it is the resolution rejecting bids or awarding the contract, SHAKOPEESOCCERCOMPLEX Shakopee Parks and Recreation Department Shakopee, Minnesota TABULATION SHEET, SHAKOPEE SOCCER BUILDINGS - Shakopee, MN: Bids Received - June 1, 2005 11 :00 A.M. BKY Group, Inc, Project Number 1536,03 American Liberty Ebert Greystone Lund Martin Meisinger Met-Con Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction BASE BID: $567,000,00 $567,200.00 $567,000.00 $625,500.00 $637,000.00 $528,500.00 ---- Mechanical $40,000,00 $40,000,00 $40,500,00 $5,300,00 $38,200.00 $37,800,00 Electrical $30,000,00 $26,000,00 $27,000,00 $26,000,00 $26,400,00 $26,400,00 Reciept of Addendum #1 #1 #1 #1 #1 #1 - Days to Complete 150 100 120 150 120 105 -- Alternate No,1 - Omit Insulation ($2,600,00) ($6,000,00) ($9,000,00) ($7,000,00) ($1,500.00) ($4,500,00 " Alternate No.2 - Omit Trash Enclosure ($27,900.00) ($34,000,00) ($27,000,00) ($38,000,00) ($32,500,00) ($25,000,00) - Alternate No:3 - Substitue TPQ Roofing in Lieu of Metal NOBID NO CHANGE $40,000,00 $7,500,00 NOBID NO BID Alternate No.4 - Substitute Painted CMU for Burnished ($2,400,00) ($2,600.00) ($3,710,00) NOBID ($4,000,00) ($5,500,00 Unit Price UP-1: Strip & Haul $6,001 CY $5,501 CY $5,30 1 CY NOBID $6,25 1 CY $9.901 CY - Unit Price UP-2: Strip & Stockpile $4,001 CY $3.251 CY $3.18/CY NOBID $3,751 CY $3,301 CY Unit Price UP-3: Import & Compact $12,001 CY $11.751 CY $12,11 CY NOBID $13,75/ CY $13,20/ CY ---- Unit Price UP-4: Borrow _& Compact $7,00/ CY $5,50/ CY $5,50/ CY NO BID $6.25 1 CY $4.40/ CY Unit Price UP-6: Excavate & Stockpile $5,00 / CY $4,25 / CY $4.48 / CY NO BID $5,00 / CY $22,00/ CY Bid Security Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond -- NOTE: Gen-Con Construction, KA Witt Construction & Merrimac y Construction did not submit bid proposals, BKY Group, Ino, 222 South Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 Page 1 612-339-3752 Bid Tabulation 6-01-05,xls RESOLUTION NO. 6256 A Resolution Rejecting Bids For Construction of the Soccer Complex Building Project No. PR2005-2 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Construction of the Soccer Complex Building, Project PR200S-2 bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Met-Con Construction Inc. $528,500 American Liberty $567,000 Greystone Construction $567,000 Ebert Construction $567,200 Lund Martin Construction $625,500 Meisinger Construction $637,000 AND WHEREAS, the low bid exceeds the project budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. Bids for the Shakopee Soccer Complex Building, Project No, PR2005-2 are hereby rejected by City Council. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of ,2005, Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 6256 A Resolution Accepting Bids For Construction of the Soccer Complex Building Project No. PR2005-2 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Construction of the Soccer Complex Building, Project PR2005-2 bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Met-Con Construction Drive $528,500 American Liberty $567,000 Greystone Construction $567,000 Ebert Construction $567,200 Lund Martin Construction $625,500 Meisinger Construction $637,000 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Met-Con Construction, Inc, 3107 Industrial Drive Faribault, Minnesota, 55021 is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA: 1. The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Met-Con Companies in the name of the City of Shakopee for the construction of the Shakopee Soccer Complex Building, Project No, PR2005-2, according to the plans and specifications therefore authorized by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk, 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted in session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this day of ,2005. Mayor of the City of Shakopee ATTEST: City Clerk 'BKY GROUP Architecture Interior Design ---- Engineering Boarman --------------- Kroo. -- Vogel D ~ Group ----, ,--, 'J Inc, Ir~~~il 222 North Second Slree Minneapolis, MN 55401 I I Telephone: 612,339.375: Facsimile: 612,339.621: I I www,bkvgroup,com I I CONSULTANTS c1 I I I I PROJECT rolE LL~~~Jj CITY OF SHAKOPEE rRA5f-l ENCLOSURE____ ~ SOCCER COMPLEX SHAKOPEE, MN SHEETTrnE SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CERllffCAOON Ihernbycertilylhatthkplon.spedf\cctlcn Of report we, prepaed by me or und... my dmcl wpelVl<ion and that I <lm a du~ Ucen<edPrafeWonol NchHect under lhe laW$ollh..St"!,, or Mln.....<ola. -- '------oate Ucerne Number -..------ REVtSlONS No. DATE ------- -, ~ 06-11"()'( DRAWN BY - - ~ CHECKE~!____ _ PDD CO/WldSSlONNO. ~ Q;) ~1~E80~~~N SHEET NUMBER 153"--03-ASP AO o 2004 BKVGfOUp B KY GROUP Architecture ~ Interior Design Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Slree' Minneapolis, MN 55401 Telephone: 612,339.375, Facslmne: 612,339,621, www,bkvgroup,corr CONSULTANlS PROJECTTTTLE CITY OF SHAKOPEE SOCCER COMPLEX SHAKO PEE. MN SHffiTlTLE / / FLOOR PLAN / PRELIMINARY b / i / NOT FOR (~~ CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION Ih",..bycertlfythalthi$pI<In.speclf\cotion otmpott wo, p<epaed by me or und.. my dmct >UpeNi<lon and tholl am" du~ lk;e",edpror"ssionol Archltect under th<>lawsoftheSloteolM>'1oo<oto. " ~o " / Dale " / ~~ ~ liceme Nvmber REV~IONS "0 DATE NORTH DATE 06-11-()'( DRAWN8Y = j 1 _CHECKED BY roo COM'l1lSSI0NNO. 1536.03 SHEEfNUMBER (L) ~~??~,_~.LAN 1'>5'.0' Al IS3{'-03-AFP (;) 2004 BKVGroup B KV STNG)IN(i 5fN1 G R 0 U P M<TAL ""'" Architecture FN::E: flRlCl( _ SRIQ: tl ""''''''''OF Interior Design sa1/~ ""'"""""'" (fl1',) Engineering rN:.L!lRlQI:IN!.fRT- pA/NTa) STL Boarman llRlCK "2 $EE 7/At """"'" ROO:. fACE Bl.OCK5ILL Kroos ""'" FACE PRfFIN. MTL Vogel p"",,- Group Ino. IBLDG "A"I IBLDG "A"I 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 Telephone: 612,339,3752 @ ~~R~~::5T ELEVATI~~_u~_Ar.L @ ~~R!~~JST ELEVATI~~_03-AEL Facsimile: 612,339,6212 www,bkvgroup,com CONSULTANTS STAHOIHli 5E.N'1 M<TAL """ "'''''''''''''''''' FACE~ - BR.JQ<; ~ TYP, ~~ROOF ""''''''''OF ""'"""""'" py;l;E-flN. METAL PROJECT TITLE 3b'X:2'" \.D.JVER-sEE MEal. COLOR TO MATOl METAL PANEL ROCK fACE Bl.OCK CITY OF SHAKOPEE SOCCER ROO:: fACE Bl.OCK COMPLEX IBLOG "B"I @~U!~~J5T ELEVATI~,~_O"_AU SHAKOPEE, MN Q0 ~U!~::5T ELEVATI~~""_03_AEL SHEETTlflE ~~~~~~'~ EXTERIOR _J.. (Q'IJ~5f1N:5ET HEV ATIONS STANOltti 5fAM """""''''''''''' Hm6lHG ~ rcr M<TAL ""'" "'''''''''''''''''' I=~- PRfFIN.rrT1... M<T AL ""'" p- """"'-MT1. MORTAR """" FIa: BRICK - BfOCK.. p- i" ;~:;';.': ~ FACE BRIO( INSERT- fN:;fElRlQl(;-BRlCKSl ~ ), 3-5.16" fACE aRia< CERTIFICATION BRlOC "2 sa 1/JI(1 FACE BRICl' INSERT - ,. I hereby certMy thaI Ihls pion. speciticatlon 1 ". ' e' ROCIC;-FACEO CMU orreporlwQlproporodbymOOfundermy BRICK 1:;2 ME 7/1a (Tr1".) . -, MORTAR HASI-l ~I:l:'cdo' ROCK fK.E. Bl.OCX SILL ~1"o~"O'WIO, ROCKFN;:E6l..O(X~ """"" CONSTRUCTION S.5TL.. COOHTER TRAY ,"""-"",""^,,,,oo:tR Dole ~.~n.. RClUJ"" IBLDG IIB"I ""'""'"""'" License Numbcr ~ I BLOG itA" I REVISIONS No, DATE Q0~U!~~o~5T ELEVATI~L03_AEL @ ~~R!~::5T ELEV A TI~""_03_AEL @BRICK IN5ERT DETAIL5 DATE OS-Q6.()5 DRAWN BY or ]/2" - 11-0. CHECKED BY FOO COMMISSKJN NO. 1536.03 SHEET NUMBER A2 o 2005 BKV Group ~~~ BKV ::=UIU. ~~ G R 0 U P ~ . Architecture lIIo_ Interior Design ~_ __ Engineering DT. ru_ ... ~ .- Boarman ~1!OlOC~.c. Kroos \if-:lll-P '"""" ,;;.;.. Vogel 1V~lIlALMfW~f'::O " Group lfM'" 1 -- Inc lfIf:lIlI:I'"" ....... . ...._ 222 North Second SlreE Minneapolis, MN 5540 Telephone: 612,339.375 ~ROOF EDGE DETAIL @ROOF EDGE DETAIL @ROOF EDGE DETAIL ,: @BOLLARD DETAIL Facsimile: 612.339,621 . 3/4'-1'-0' 3/4'.1'-0' 3/4"~"_0' ~""" 3/0'.,'-0' www,bkvgroup.cor -- "'c,,,,,,.,,'- ~"Tm.. PLATe CONSULTANTS CONe. SPI..A$W ..we et"((H) .~ -pAJ(f SEE eTRUCT ~~ r;w-QP/C(lPII'ti IilllIIlIQB. tlI:ZBlCB ~Nf~1 FACE. eRlCK IN&ERT - ~ ~ BRICK ~ SEE 7/KJ. ~ .. TAAO: (~~ TO MATa-l) ~ ..lA/"e 4' fACE eRJa:. @WEAD ~ DOOR TRACk &'REII'F.CMJ.- ~ ~ .4'ROClC,-I'ACED ltIIE&Il:B?t5Pl...~~(}f' ~DRlPft).;'E PRO.'ECTTlTLE TYP.PAlKTIN5lDE ,. & Cf'IJ Clf'ft:OHl4'~TVO~ \~ ~ ~ 1,..,""",,"><ED ~~..! . -........,""" W&-~ CITY OF SHAKOPEI ~ ~ m",,~""'- 5M'" SOCCER cak: f- P....INT wi ROD .. 9fAl.ANT m.~PAlNf) t ... "No FOR T1'PI<AL ell'" NlD a1U >W.J; """"'" ~bl'&k COMPLEX ~ ~ Ig;r.~'"' @..... IO'-tr' ~ ~ & -=- -=- -=- -=- -=--=- -=- -=- -=- -=- _ -=- ~ ~~~.- ~~~.ENCL5. OJ~. DOO=RlGlDRtXII'~~~~1 EDGE DETAIL @ CANOPY ~~ ~.. SHAKOPEE, MN ~ @TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION. SlA' 00". PL"l"HOXl SHEETTITLE -r:::y '" 1/4-..1'-0. lIa"1FT SLOPE @~~~"'~'~' ~ DETAILS 1/4"..1'-0. ra-JW O><f.mL o.v.T ~~ "Jla,/~ PREFlN.. M11- ~. ~ CERTIFICATION <MV.~ STOPICOPl,.... f'lli' a.c. ~ O"IJ I he<eby certify that th~ p.,,,, ,pecifcoli::> ~!~ ~~~ == 14"~N2eRKX ~:i~i~~ ~ROCX-~JaD ; :::~= ~ IWfhen:nt'nne'OIO' 1,..,""",,"><ED ;" """",,><ED ~ '( CONSTRUCTlOr ~~ O'\J 5lM. 1 Dote I license Nvmber I I &' CGHC. 9Ua (SLOf'fll_ I REVLSIONS No. DATE & ~ W1l6.I2"EJoCl.l~T I --- -------- I ~ ~~ ------------ L-=-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-----::::J fJ..1OO'-<J'NrI @ TRA51-1 ENCLOSURE ELEVATION @ TRA51-1 ENCLOSURE ELEVATION '" 1/4-..1'-0' " 1/4"-1'-0' caiT. "'"ld BCtll) BM.. DATE 05-06-05 REIf'. HI 2116 DRAWN BY BT CHECKED BY POD 2" mro fot'.U.. COMMlSSION NO. 1536.03 SHEET NUMBER """"""""- ~x~~ A6 @ TRASH ENCLOSURE ViALL 5Et.-1 IVI>J 3/4"-1'-0' o 2005 SKV Group \1 \ J-\ \OS c\\~ ~ u.-IJ'.') C \ L- cc. cc. 17th AVENUE SPORTS COMPLEX BUILDING DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATES Earlier this year, the city retained the services of BKV Group to design and administer construction of the restroom and support building at the 1 ih Avenue Sports Complex. Paul Dahlberg from BKV Group is the project architect. Proposed Design We met with the Soccer Association and park maintenance staff to develop design concepts that would meet the needs of current and future park users, and at the same time, minimize short and long-term maintenance, In addition, we wanted to ensure that the building was designed with quality materials that were similar to the two existing adjacent schools and the future Shakopee Public Utilities well buildings. BKV developed three concept plans that were reviewed by future users and staff, In addition, we had a neighborhood open house to present the concept plans. Although the open house was not well attended (only one family), their comments about ensuring the building had some architectural detail and reduced doors on the residential side were integrated into the proposed design, We presented a final design to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in June that included: . Two buildings that are separated by a canopy, . Restrooms, storage areas, small meeting area, and concession area. . Large patio with picnic tables for seating, . Brick and block exterior using similar materials found on other adjacent buildings, . Metal roof, . Dumpster enclosure to be constructed using two parking stalls in the parking lot to meet city code. . Seasonal use (no heat). The Advisory Board had considerable discussion about whether the structure should be integrated into one building instead of two to reduce costs, the design of the canopy, and whether or not the building should be heated for winter use, They directed staff to return with more information on each of these items (Attachment A). - Two Buildin s Curved Roo $346,147 Pitched Roof, Pitched Clere Sto $344,357 Pitched Roof, Round Clere Sto $347,359 Heating for Winter Use In order to heat the building for winter use, the building would need to be combined, The least energy efficient heating option would be $27,355, The most efficient would be $40,655, Other uses for the site during the winter: . Flooding a turf area for winter skating use would have detrimental effects on the turf, . Cross-country skiing is not an activity the city (or many other cities) provides. This site could function for instruction or beginner cross-country skiing, but the most attractive sites have a mix of terrain and more natural areas, . Snowmobiles are not permitted in park areas, although we could do training under a special use permit. However, snowmobiles could also damage the turf, . Trails would be plowed for walking, which was a popular activity last winter. The Advisory Board recommended that we proceed with the two building design and not heat the building, This fall, we returned with a revised canopy design that they recommended for approval. The final proposed design is provided as Attachment 8, Cost Estimate The cost estimate for the construction of the building, canopy, and dumpster enclosure, relocating existing irrigation controls, and site improvements is $424,510, This is a reduction from the original estimate of $448,000, However, it is still a substantial cost for a season building. For comparison of construction costs, I received the bid information from Shakopee Public Utilities for their well building along 1 th Avenue, Their low bid was $560,820, REQUESTED ACTION City Council is asked to provide direction regarding the design and cost estimates for the proposed 1 th Avenue Sports Complex building, If inclined to move ahead with the proposed design, move to authorize construction documents and bidding for the 1 th Avenue Sports Complex building. Proposed Preliminary 2006-2010 CIP (6/02/05) I I Project Task Estimate Funding Source 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 I Status *~";;l~ ~~::'jJ'~~_Q,,"_".'"' l~~~~::"'''"''.." .............-.- .:~'EI~t~~::~: ------~l~'::: "0" I "::,, . '''0'' ...-..-- "00" .-.. . ~i~:~:::::,::::::::::::~:~~~irnm MPCA ,,,,,,,,,.i'""di", 'Of oomomi',"O;;;;"';"O" .. ..,......,..." "" ' ,... I,C9.,n.str.uc:!i9."......,., ,.....'..'"" .. "... '" .. 2,~'O','O''O'O...q9..natioT1s. " ....,.. ........."..".., '" """... '" """"'" ...,... ...1 g.o,,9.9..o., , ..."...,'~ 50,000, ,.... "..., ...,... ....................... "... ,~,~!lJ.r.e ,...,...,... ...........,... Huber Park Improvements 1 a: Roadways, Parking, Undergroundin( 400,000 Park Reserve 4.0.0,.0.0.0 Feasibility study in progress'. Awaiting"a'eCisions'from"SPUC"re'g'areIing'water'j'o'oplng"arlc{ underg'ro'li'ii'd'ing:................ ........., 1a: Roadways, Parking, Undergroundin( 87,000 Assessments 87,.0.0.0 1a: Roadways, Parking, Undergroundin( 200,000 SPUC 2.0.0,.0.0.0 SPUC contribution to be finalized June 6. Community Built Playground 15.0,.000 Donation 15.0,.0.0.0 Fundraising in progress, 1 b: Park Development 1,00.0,.000 Park Reserve 1,.0.0.0,.0.0.0 Fall design. :t.i:~~6::~~~~:jr~:i:c~i.~!"'r.ri:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'.....:: ~!'~~~~~~~~~~\~E.~1.iiJ.6":::::::........."...,... ,:..':::..::::::':j:~~;:~~:~:::,~;'i~~~~~iY~"..:': ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:..' ':: 192.,5QD.': ::::::J:!~~:~.:~~O .................... "" ',...............::::,::'::., ,..... ,~~%~:!:~j:.sril:po.rk.ing wit~Arrt.1yqorps f9.r p.CJ.~,~,i,b.I,'" fuTlding. Tahpah Park Redevelopment Field Improvements 313,5.0.0 I Park Reserve 313,5.0.0 Fall design. ...., ...." ....., ..... Parking Lot and Playground 375,.0.0.0 Tax Levy 375,.0.0.0 Field Construction 14.0,.0.0.0 Park Reserve 14.0,.0.0.0 's'olithbridg'e comm'unitY"Parkbeveiopmeiii Park 1: D'eslg'ii'and Construction '" '1'05)i06"'~'Park'ReseiVe ",.....,..1'05,6.00 "..."... , ...,'.... .....', i surriine.r'desi'gn.:'.......,...,... .."..., ",... ..'....,...,.... .................,..... """,..." """,'.'......................., Park 2: Design and Construction 117,5.0.0 Future 'Park 3: Design and Construction 52,5.0.0 Future Parcel 75: Design and Construction 25.0,.0.0.0 Future Lions Park Improvements Fountain 3,.0.0.0 I Park Reserve 3,.0.0.0 Proposed project, ,...,......, , ......' ,.., .............. , ....., ,... ........, Construction 4.0,.0.0.0 Donations 1.0,.0.0.0 3.0,.0.0.0 ,Future ~~I'~~;~;:;~;;;:;:::~l~~~~::~:;~:~~i~;::i:~:::!i~~~E~I.__ ..._.--i~:~~:.. ;:;;;: .-.:... ~~:;~~:.:;=:~!~,::::::J:::l: .Eiimi"~d:___.:m--::::::.::.:_.-. ..:__..;;.;....... . .-..:....:::::-- 16,302,25.0 I 2,759,5.0.0 I 3,693,500 I 2,732,5.0.0 I 1,872,500 I 1,312,500 I 1,972,50.0 I Revenue 5/31/2.0.05 1-Jan 1-Jan 1-Jan 1-Jan 1-Jan ~~~!~::'~~".~;~.i~:. . .:::::_-=:-:::: . .......::ii~:~~1 ::::::-::::- ...........'iiii!~;~~ !:::~Q~;~Q~;.!l?~Q~~. ! ...!~;Q~Q!!~,'~~~~~~~iiJ;~~~~y~~t~:;'~:~;i~;~~~~:~m'"" .. ......... .. . ....:....: Miscellaneous 10.0,.0.0.0 1.0.0,.0.0.0 I Miscellaneous dedication iees. .......... ...., ,.., .............., ,.., ......, .. , , .... .........., ,..... ...,...... ........, ....., ~~::;:~...~;~,6;~~f~::~>...~hlitr.iJ.~::NO:rt.hr ' "',..........,..:::..::':,:,:::::::...... i 1.~,~::~,~~,!,............,...}~~::~.~:~:. :.' .....', , , :::::, ,:',...... "" ':::'.::::::':::::::' ,:~t::i~It:;;:~fl'g~~~~:6:~~~~~~:~o'~E.~~;~::.g~t:.m~~~~;;~~s Cou6!i.:,... .....:':::::::::::::,:... , ':':, ::::::..:::::,:::::::::::...,... Grants 15.0,.0.0.0 2.0,.0.0.0 1,45.0,.0.0.0 165,.0.0.0 2.0.0,.0.0.0 ...... ,................................... Revenue Subtotal Park Reserve Fund Expenditures Expenditures 12/31 Ending Balance Soccer Complex Phase 2 Project Costs 6/7/05 Item Estimate/CIP Bud et Bid Update Construction Bid $424,510 $528,500 Additional Site Improvements 40,000 40,000 . ADA Modifications/Short Trail Connection to Building . Fencing . Picnic Tables . Si na e Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) 0 5,700 . 54 fixture units = 3 SAC charges . 3 SAC char es $1,900/unit Water Connection Charge (WAC) 0 6,900 . 3 WAC units @ $2,300/unit Trunk Water Charge (TWC) 0 40,440 . $1,348/acre . 30 acres . Commission discussed TWC for park areas on 6/6/2005, but did not make a definitive determination how to assess the fee, This is the maximum TWC that could be assessed. S eciallns ections and Testin 0 2,500 Buildin Permit Fee Provided b Bidder Included in Bid Surve in /Stakin Provided b Bidder Included in Bid Contin enc 5% 0 26,425 Total 480,000 650,465 (CIP Allocation)