The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11.C.1. Approval of Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road Intersection Design General Business 11. c. 1. SHA KOPEE TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director DATE: 04/16/2013 SUBJECT: Approval of Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road Intersection Design (E) Action Sought Approve a motion approving an intersection design for Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road associated with the Valley View Road Improvement Project. Background During the CR 17 Corridor Study, and open house, public concern was expressed to the amount of additional traffic by the Prairie Village and Pheasant Run neighborhoods, specifically Mooers Avenue with the Valley View Road connection from CR 17 to Sarazin Street. From this concern, staff did have a traffic study prepared with alternatives on the increase traffic to various connections such as Mooers Avenue, Alden Avenue and St. Francis Aveneue and conducted a public meeting with the residents. The results from this meeting and subsequent Council action was to have essentially a one way westbound on Mooers Avenue and no eastbound traffic into Mooers Avenue from Valley View Road. Attached to this memo are the following items for Council information: 1. June 23, 2008 Initial Mooers Avenue Traffic Study. 2. August 28, 2008 Updated Mooers Avenue Traffic Study. 3. October 21, 2008 Council Minutes on Mooers Avenue alternative. 4. October 21, 2008 Council memo on Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Recommendation. 5. April 5, 2013 letter to residents with attached drawing of intersection alternatives. 6. Drawing showing potential one way street construction on Mooers Avenue from Sarazin Street to Hazen Street. During the design of Valley View Road, staff has reviewed alternatives with WSB & Associates to comply with the Council decision of October 21, 2008. Alternatives No. 1 & No. 2 involves modification of the intersection to narrow the street opening of Mooers Avenue with Sarazin Street. Cost of this work is approximately $20,000 - $30,000. Alternative No. 3 involves signage and striping to indicate no entry with Mooers Avenue from the west and can be done for approximately $1,500. Staff is recommending Alternative No. 3 at this time as the most cost effective alternative and allows staff time to review a one way street design on Mooers Avenue from Sarazin Street to Hazen Street. Ideally to have a one way street, Mooers Avenue from Sarazin Street to Hazen Street should be reconstructed to a narrower width. Mooers Avenue was constructed in 1999 and will be due for an overlay in 2019 -2020. Approximately 200 feet of street will need to be reconstructed for the one way street design. A question for this future project would be who should pay for the reconstruction of the road and whether this would be necessary. At this time, staff recommends Alternative No. 3 for the reasons stated earlier. At the time of writing this memo, staff has heard from one resident on Alden Avenue questioning the one way design as this resident was not present for the meetings in 2008. A total of 50 letters were sent out. Also staff is proposing to have stop signs on the east and west legs of the intersection and to study this intersection and the St. Francis Avenue and Sarazin Street intersection for the right traffic control after the improvements are completed. Currently St. Francis Avenue and Sarazin Street is a four way stop and the recommendation from the updated Mooers Avenue study is to consider a four way stop for the Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road intersection when Valley View Road is connected from CR 17. Recommendation Approve a motion approving Alternative No. 3 for the intersection design of Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road associated with the Valley View Road project. Budget Impact The cost of striping and signage will be part of the Valley View Road Improvement Project. Relationship to Vision This supports Goal E, Deliver effective and efficient public services by a staff of well - trained, caring, and professional employees. Requested Action Approve a motion approving Alternative No. 3 on the attached drawing for the intersection design of Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road associated with the Valley View Road project. Attachments: JUNE 23, 2008 TRAFFIC STUDY AUGUST 28, 2008 UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY OCT. 21, 2008 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCT. 21, 2008 COUNCIL MEETING MEMO APRIL 5, 2013 LETTER TO RESIDENTS WITH DRAWING OPTIONAL ONE -WAY DESIGN A WSB Infrastructure • Engineering • Planning • Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & .4ccociates. /uc. Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Bruce Loney, PE Public Works Director City of Shakopee, MN From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: June 23, 2008 Re: Mooers Avenue Traffic Study City of Shakopee, MN WSB Project No. 1381 -21 Introduction In October 2000, the City of Shakopee completed a Traffic Study for the Valley View Road area between CSAH 83 and CSAH 79. That study analyzed various alternatives for the alignment or realignment of Valley View Road, specifically in the area of CSAH 17 (Marschall Road). The traffic study recommended two phases for the reconstruction and realignment of Valley View Road. Phase 1 included the realignment of Valley View Road connecting into Sarazin Street east of CSAH 17. This phase of the project was completed in 2002/2003. Phase 2 of the recommendation was to realign St. Francis Avenue between CSAH 17 and Sarazin Street to a point approximately 500 feet south. This would provide better traffic signal spacing on CSAH 17, as well as creating an opportunity to continue the east/west collector roadway (Valley View Road) from Sarazin Street through CSAH 17 and ultimately to CSAH 79. This phase of the construction was recommended to be completed at a time when either development occurred in this area that would provide opportunity for the realignment or when the CSAH 17 improvements south of St. Francis Avenue would occur. Scott County is now in the process of the preliminary design for CSAH 17 from just north of St. Francis Avenue through the CSAH 42 intersection. This now provides the opportunity for the City to work with Scott County on the realignment of Valley View Road / St. Francis Avenue. Preliminary concept plans have been completed for CSAH 17, including the proposed realignment of St. Francis Avenue / Valley View Road extension. At the initial public meeting, several comments were made by the residents east of Sarazin Street concerned with the amount of additional traffic that would be added to their neighborhood streets as a result of the anticipated realignment, specifically on Mooers Avenue. K `.013 81- 11 ,AdnunDocs1LTA•bloney- 061908 doc Bruce Loney, PE City of Shakopee June 23, 2005 Page 2 of 4 Based on these comments, City staff authorized a traffic study be completed to document the existing traffic patterns in the area and determine the amount of diverted traffic that would be on the streets within the area. Figure 1 illustrates that study area in which data was collected, as well as the detailed analysis area. The data collection area was bounded by 17 Avenue on the north, Valley View Road on the South, Sarazin Street on the west, and Independence Drive on the east. The detailed study area included the intersections of Sarazin Street at St. Francis Avenue, Sarazin Street at Mooers Avenue, Mooers Avenue at Mathias Road, St. Francis Avenue at Mathias Road, and Alden Avenue. Data Collection Traffic volume data was collected by the City in the study area during the end of May and early June 2008. Forty -eight (48) hour directional approach counts were conducted on all roadways entering the study as illustrated in the following table: Roadway Average Daily Traffic Peak Hour AM PM St. Francis Avenue (east of Sarazin Street) 1,732 131 150 French Trace Avenue 880 86 95 Brittany Drive 323 26 41 Thrush Street 2,260 188 285 Crane Street 623 46 61 Williams Drive 607 50 74 Pheasant Run Street 824 70 89 Mathias Road 132 11 14 Alden Avenue 298 22 30 Mooers Avenue 249 18 25 Total Area 7,928 650 873 AM and PM peak -hour turning movement counts were also conducted at the following intersections: • St. Francis Avenue at Sarazin Street • Sarazin Street at Mooers Avenue • Mooers Avenue at Mathias Road • Mathias Road at St. Francis Avenue K 1013 81..1lAdmin\Do cs\L7R•blon ey.061908. do c Bruce Loney, PE City of Shakopee June 23, 2008 Page 3 of 4 Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the counted Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes and AM and PM peak -hour turning movement counts conducted as part of this study. Traffic Analysis As discussed previously, the primary focus of the study is to determine the amount of traffic that would be diverted to Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue should a realignment of St. Francis Avenue / Valley View Road occur. The first step in this determination was to conduct existing traffic counts as discussed in the previous section. The next step is to determine the amount of traffic that actually uses St. Francis as a "cut through" from Sarazin Street to Mathias Road. This can be determined by looking at the existing number of homes in the area and subtracting these associated trips from the counted trips. Based on field observations and aerial photography, there are approximately 775 homes in the overall study area and approximately 96 homes in the area adjacent to St. Francis Avenue. Based on this data, the cut - through traffic on St. Francis was determined as follows: Totals St. Francis Avenue % of % Trip Rate /o Cut - Through Area Trips Area Trips Total ADT 7,928 10.23 983 56% 44% AM Peak 650 .84 81 61% 39% PM Peak 873 1.13 109 68% 32% These factors can then be applied to shifting of traffic from St. Francis Avenue to Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue. Based on these factors, the assumed traffic diversion was determined. Figure 4 illustrates the AM, PM, and ADT anticipated traffic diversions. As can be seen, Mooers Avenue will increase in traffic from approximately 250 vehicles per day at Sarazin Street to approximately 825 vehicles per day. In addition, there will be an increase during the AM peak hour from 20 vehicles to 50 vehicles and during the PM peak hour from 19 vehicles to 50 vehicles. The resulting traffic volume on Mooers Avenue would be similar to the traffic volume currently on French Trace Avenue or Pheasant Run Street. Adjacent to Alden Avenue, there are approximately 18 homes that would have traffic diverted from St. Francis Avenue to Alden Avenue. This would result in an increase of approximately 185 daily trips, 20 PM peak -hour trips, and 16 AM peak -hour trips on Alden Avenue. The assumptions for the diversion of traffic should be considered a worst -case condition. It was assumed that all non -local traffic on St. Francis Avenue would be diverted to Mooers Avenue or Alden Avenue when, in fact, some may be diverted to other routes such as 17 Avenue or further south on Valley View Road. K: W1381.211AdmitAD.sku R-bioney061908 Bruce Loney, PE City of Shakopee June 23, 2008 Page 4 of 4 Conclusion Based on the traffic analysis discussed above, it can be concluded that traffic volumes on Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue with the realignment of St. Francis / Valley View Road, will increase significantly over the traffic volume today. However, the end result traffic volume is very similar to a typical City street including those in the Study area. In fact, with the relocation of St. Francis Avenue / Valley View Road, the distribution of traffic into the study area will be more balanced amongst the roadways, specifically along Sarazin Street. K ^A 1381.21 .Admin'Docs\LTR.bloney- 061908 do c , ..": :,:ii--- -- -9 z • • i "`- ., .. ,..... , ,...: •„„, \.:',: . _......--,4, ..... .'•-•. ••..._ .,•.,„ .„.., T.:. i A,s,11Ptry ;‘, • A ,. .1-- c•-+ Q:... n i ..:CN , : • ,., c=4" - 7. - --7=1 tts :'. "II ON )'Ar. ''''''''....... ,fA . .3,...., 1 ^-:-....., _1. ii ' , F.; ..."..--,■ 1E, 4 ; 11 i f)cl'A. ."/ " -,..-- kt ' I 7.. O.: R ; 5:. •• ,, Z....-AAL.."2 1 , . ; „, ,.....T1,7,2,, 9 - 1 , , .), v ., 1 t____ ... j . 8 ._„i- __,.........„...-- L ....,.„.... -..._—_,---- 5 ;T..< \J"•••: < , "..-.ai..! ..J=.1 L,{ "./ i --- - mi k_.„--- c p,. c 5 5 . 'I]. I ...:-•:., -.::-.-" T ,,.. :'` '• •; L. ' 7; ZIT"ft .J : it - -- .-- ,,..,.., 1 ,_:, ..., __,_ ..„„...,,,__ ..,,... , —_,_ , :)..•,:,,,,-„,.-,,,-_..„.,...._‘-, -..1.... c?,;c: - i ,,, _..-,...„...,...-7.-- — :„.-z----,::;.4:::::::::---r..-;:lz."'''''''' .............-..-,--,7---- ,....... ,,,.. 2 :0 • .,"•.... '':"• r' ;.. 169 ,,,,_ , .,\,?) ,,,, i, , ,,.... , ...,.z., ..:!,..,, ,... ..... 4-.. . ...,. .,. ,... . _ _ ___ ....: ...........,....,.:.......„:„ ..c,, ,.. ,- .:] ".. •::';'" --......,' ' ....1■:::•;.-:R-1. ..... •:.' ..* C "..",?:•:.-:.,-::::-.:,,,,==-"---- : ;, .,..:,:c-,,;"‘ - , •>,..1 , -= , --• 1 . i 1 i ''' '' ,1 .',:-. --1 ;; • 1,<>61 .--',: I Ay ;:: : ii '•(?.. - ,...,.. E , ' • 1 '"i't i ' , , : < , ..,..‘ AV_I_J- , KING .,,,! , . '' 4----;,:),, it- ...T.,11 R .• • : ;1 . . 52. I N ./‘• 9 1 •-ir II, MI ' L ' . ,.• ,; 1 ,:::::C.C.. % ;FRENCH TRACE AVE. ,--' r- Lf--711- 3 . '''' 0 15 t el 1 ;I- ';'•• il 11 : - i 1 4 ,•• ,......... .,,, c . : 4 D1L0Lii. CT ...I i ■ , .1. i ' '=tc..... zit • _ . i, w• i ,..„,,,, c.■ 7, f• ,' , c, T C T1 • ^ or . • , \ , Data Collection ,,,,.,\ ‘,,..,,-... ....-..,... .-- .. •.,-.. .,,.; -- :1 ' ..., ,...•E0 ,,,7:5;P-44' a. 1 6, s \, ,,,,.i' • ,:: :, 1i 1t_______ ,..., . ' ,A1 • ; ' 'it. 1 < 41 , ,;.* c . Area ... •::. Detailed i •--,--,----{\\ .. , ,. 2 . rRo v LI ANL .‘ -- ,.... , .„ Study Area v. '[.m_29,,-Es-, ' ii:"7- THRusH ........- ---_-- -----:;\ . ;C: Y Powas ,;1 1 1Z11 7 I ' T •('' ••( ' 1 C":". ., ".1i i AL E . • 1" i I VE. L.,,,.... ,..),. ' .. ".. 4.- L °L \ ' . ' 4 - -==:..7..^, "5.,.., ", ''';'.."'—' .' l.) (.1:1 1 ..... Llit ■ 4. ..* LI ' •AIN ' 1! r.'1, . ^ A: ;.• ',.. K , . - 7, i., A . L ; i ---4:"..;:-.... .2' ; CI ' • • L1A ________ v l, , ..II ,,_ .%' a: Fnl...;>:.- .'., I tY q .„, . v...,, 'AL - I T — . ,„ 4q.,.......,1, i .., . c::= . c ' T.. L...ARY X ik.-.... ........4).'P •<'-'‘' '' •,.. v..; ';,2...'' L ,,,, 41 .... ••••-•-•• 7.T II .'"----' 1 \ :,a ,,,i,1 '.'";.,, , ., ',... • , ....■.',47- I: frifi 't; 'i, I T i 1 ° ___± d '19 11-1-' 1 '1' •--":' '&`, .1 tfo_.--, V.- c.S:',-; _...., CR 1 -. ", 9 I Ti ",---, - r QS , :, ',•. 1,;',11 i, II -...K.E 1.7.62<NI rg;(. 0' 3 < 7 1 t, 1---- 'eclt So l'i ':'-'' ti ' ':" • . .%.:, 4._ .„. T A .; .,..,..,42 ° '''' ' .[.., 'kin ", " .0. ' L t. , c , ,! ::-:, ,,,,,, ii i'il ‘N N c, " ' ‘"- •----:-)-'4,./. ...... ::: ;■ . , ,. ,-*-_____ j ELS I v . 5 ,-- \:..;.:, I ‘. - Rot,ASE '>.‘l ' . 'f';C •••-• \' • ,,,, ,...• n5 t ' i I 1?, 1 ,.'• ....,../ L1.4 .. 11 L A. '' :),.. ..---) IL ci-. ........— ..., ..," ,I1 '....;:.:.., ...,..2-1. _....\::.:,...........\\..,%........N, __ .... - L--- ' 11-i..,_,..., '''''''.:11 r ■ i 2.±: , -3 vino,) II Duc, -,7 ,1 11 o' ;: - ..=:=7.-,-..,7 . -1....T._.u .: -..,•:::— ...........:, - .ii OU7 ' : :` i • 1 11 <T. ., r...'01.- a ■il .‘!‘"11' . 1 \.‘ i ) ....; \ z i /....IL „... ..„.. , . ...„- .. A ,.. 4 ■Is sil i■W ill " .1111 ‘ ___..._ ‘'. ...--4 ... - ,: -- .A:9., •, .....„--/ ",/ ." ''," —75----- ' ' Pilliti Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 1 S HAKOPEE City of Shakopee, Minnesota Project location .,..,-, . 1 7', Ot ....... ' 7 . ...; 2 .- • x ' • 't,: : ,t ‘'. ----..--'\ 1 -1* ' 4 ‘ `i r ,,,,,\ 4 --- o . I , (7. • 1 .. -) '‘< ' 1 ::.15 H i 1 Z '' <4-.. k.,'. 1 I kl, ... H ,!: i 1 . --'10...)1! P . ,F., .;-) 0 ', 1 " I ('` '1 1 Vb .! I '---' ; '' j `"----:", ' L i L......i i.:z. • ' ,-, ,........ 1 I....::- s•-• \ ......_......_, — ....._............-- ... . : .----- ----- ,-- ( - 1 1 105 ;'... . ..... ,...: l..0 ..-: ....--- 7.3 . i . 1 , , e• - O. •,--, , 1 7 - r I I I ' i INT4. '''' "..‘ 1----- L-1 I, I' , • T ‘‘ ,,,.....i ,, ,, , 1 N i I i R. •-• , , ,,.. ',.., ,-..... : , , 4 vc , , 1 ,_ : Lik-'L-!.1 =4--,--1-1 . -,,,/ -'-- ----4 2 7 i r ) - ___..... - .. 1 1 ; ; I ; \ ;;;Z: ' ' ' '1 t•-••:.. ! I ; ! ! ; - 7 4 ., .., 7 -!..!,.!!::: I i. ,....: _...... ...„_,.. _................. _ ......... , :r.:::::-..........-..-- . ..-__.-....., ,...-- .. --_.......----........_. . • , 1 „ , cleChir LL)4 -..\ i ! -C"-------- '7 ' '-'" C`..) .,.... • , 1 r'7', , . '...' t -1 . . ! ; • ...?:::- N ' r- L., T r..) '' .: , ., i ti": , _,..., r i A \ , .' r 7 • ,.. 7 , , ,.... A v , . ',..,. h , '.---......--!! 1...i..; ,, A ,.., N T C . L .-7 ' , ',--' 1 1 7 0 Li 4. Ii. L T ' v)" '( c. ( ' ---- :e (_) 1! C ,:■ ,/,.--'-- -'•-\\,/ NI , i • • .., ... . . - . ,. , , ,, ■ f 1 c , C -q \ .....) „ ..,- i'..< A. I l_, I ...) i7321 , f 3043 : I i Z 1' co I I , ..," 0,1N \ f.-- 1 pi) -----,\ (.,- 1 ...,,,, : ,, •„..... , ." ---, s, h ,, r . i! ! i / I c. 17' 1, , !CO , 1 1 i..:1"., 1 r"...i 1 r- ,.. - ........... ---- \ ti' 1 .... 43 1.- - ... j //,....,`,.,,.... <17 1 G R 0 \i E 1.., N D \ ,...... -7 1 i 1 2260 ■ ''‘ i i , i ----- u ..,.. ....... Lm... ,..., ` -, 11\110 } ,'. 'L • \\ '-'''''f •\""- 1- F. )1 •,' , • , . / i - • ......-- .......... (-, • •.....1-.. 1 i • ' L " / ---•,•"', 1 \ ..' i ■ I :-. c _---....----- ifil 1 I (----...) 0 N J , Ir-- ! I . /-- -------- ( .,...,::,., ," / \ \ k , i -,11 i 1 /ir---- j/ ';'•••,4).., f) i/ 1- 11<ii‘ 11 / ›- yr".... , .... I \ • ' *I ' '4, It ‘ ,/,-',/, (.___..--:::,11", . 4! N 1 ' _ii, _AVR,I1 .,-- ..---- --. 1 , 7.....;,! ,,-- ; ,........_...7 :-...-- i.-----.-.., '-.---0 ) ) ... i ; 1 ! ,. , ; , ■,./ 1 1298 -- 1r I Zi I . ! 1. : ; -,, • ( ., . , , • , . .,:d1 , .i 1 1 r- , ' , : ; ,.. 1 ....L. J I i "; , ...i.J : , . •,.„) I ' ' • . , ..::-) i I ( .:::) ! > - 1 ! .' 1 r''''' /1 : ' ::-..::::"'-' \ `... PL I i v '''' i ._..J - . , '--. Y ---' i 'Is' ' ° ,,. •T• -v : 1,,..-N, • , <•••:.:, ,, • ■ ,' --...__ „±- , ! ' i LL.il t V „le : , 1 , ....L., , --.-: --;:,,, ----;, _, ;; . ._.„ , ,.... . 1 i ..-,- I -", • ,-- , VIE ,, ------.:---:-.„, — - 1 I ) 1 i L-- I' — ! L 1:, :, , / \ i 623/ / 11 .. ) r .Z.• --......„--„,.. ",; L.--..._ I ,, Pt.''''' , ‘,.'''.../21 .■;ic I li ,, •if , ;.., -"`")1 ,r.----:-....,-- ,•----- , /b. i , --. ! • -- i ,,.. r , ,z-, .,••„ i i,-, -- ••:.,‘„ \,) . ie).. '_ F-53: i i c...› i i ,,-,- , I : 1 ' , :;:. , ••-, ' ...., •, • \ .._......: ,. ,, i j ' .--"" . : , ',. ., '-' .." 77----- , r... - •::::: - . - ..,/,.i.-/„„t ,, ..... '•,,,-..-, i LtI) • ,,, „„,.._........_. _. ....... _. ... „ . Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 2 S i .. t :.7 -1 IA K ' 131.:,1 " City of Shakopee, Minnesota Existing (2008) Average Daily Traffic 07. d 1 �` St. Francis Avenue ,i V 1 Grovetand Way / c0 C� J y r' Mooers Avenue as Q o t r \`5 1 4• j W c zi i d l Alden Avenue LEGEND AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic rg Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 3 �� KC�� 1,1: Cit of Shakopee, Minnesota Existing Peak Hour Traffic 11 Y P N ,hi, I''N I t 11.11.11.1111.1 St. Francis Avenue -256 -51 ( -315) ( -48) -762 a Groveland Way v7 c N m U) 1 Mooers Avenue a s � o 4256 +31 \a5 ( +315) ( +32) _ 4`�`� i ® I * I 2 in m I I m I Alden Avenue +20 • ( +16) +185) LEGEND L AM Peak Hour Traffic Diversion Y PM Peak Hour Traffic Diversion {--) ADT ? w Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 4 s TTA fi TT r 3 . n City of Shakopee, Minnesota Traffic Diversion I I S i . _... ItiC�C.�I A. WSB 4111111101111111111k Infrastructure • Engineering ■ Planning • Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & Associates, Ltc. Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Bruce Loney, PE Public Works Director City of Shakopee, MN From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: August 28, 2008 Re: Mooers Avenue Updated Traffic Study Alternative Review City of Shakopee, MN WSB Project No. 1381 -21 On July 31, 2008, a neighborhood meeting was held to review and comment on the proposed realignment of Valley View Road to line up with Mooers Avenue. More than 32 persons were in attendance and provided input on the Traffic Study completed for the project. Based on the discussion, it was the consensus that the primary concern was the connection of Valley View Road at Sarazin Street. It was understood and agreed that the relocated Valley View Road at Marschall Road was planned by the County in a satisfactory location. Several alternatives were proposed and discussed at the meeting. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize and review the proposed alternatives. Each is discussed below and shown in the attached Figures 1 through Figures 4 1. Closing Mooers Avenue — This alternative would close Mooers Avenue at Sarazin Street. The only access to the street would be via Mathias Road. The realignment of Valley View Road would connect to Sarazin Street as proposed. Advantages • Only local traffic on Mooers Avenue Disadvantages: • Increases traffic on St. Francis Avenue • Increases traffic on Alden Avenue • All traffic on Valley View Road will need to turn at Sarazin Street K \ 01381. 21 Admin Tots 1LTR= obney- 082108.doc Bruce Loney, PE City of Shakopee August 28, 2008 Page 2 of 4 • All local traffic on Mooers Avenue will need to enter and exit via Mathias Road • Will require additional construction cost to close Mooers Avenue 2. Converting Mooers Avenue to a One - way Westbound — This alternative would close Mooers Avenue to eastbound traffic from Sarazin Street to Hazen Street. The street would be a One -way westbound. Residents entering Mooers Avenue would be required to use alternative routes via Mathias Road. The realignment of Valley View Road would connect to Sarazin Street as proposed. Advantages: • Reduces traffic on Mooers Avenue from the original proposal • Reduces traffic on Mooers Avenue in the PM peak from existing conditions • Reduces traffic on St. Francis Avenue from existing conditions Disadvantages: • Increases traffic on Mooers Avenue in the AM peak and Daily from existing conditions • Increases traffic on Alden Avenue from existing conditions • Increases traffic on Alden Avenue in the PM peak from original proposal • Increases traffic on St. Francis Avenue from original proposal • All eastbound traffic on Valley View Road will need to turn at Sarazin Street • Requires either additional police enforcement or construction to restrict the eastbound traffic 3. Realigning Valley View Road to the south and connecting Sarazin Street into Valley View Road. - This alternative would realign the proposed Valley View Road to curve south and connect to existing Sarazin Street. The existing Sarazin Street north of Mooers Avenue would tee into the new Valley View Road. Moores Avenue would tee into Sarazin Street. Advantages: • Reduces traffic on Mooers Avenue from original proposal • Reduces traffic on St. Francis Avenue from existing conditions Disadvantages: • Increases traffic on Alden Avenue from both existing and original proposal conditions. • Requires additional right of way from Betaseed K.4:11381.21 AdounSDocALTR-bloney-082108 doc Bruce Loney, PE City of Shakopee August 28, 2008 Page 3 of 4 4. Shifting Valley View Road to connect into Sarazin Street South of Mooers Avenue — This alternative would shift the Valley View Road alignment south between Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue. Advantages: • Reduces traffic on Mooers Avenue from original proposal • Reduces traffic on St. Francis Avenue from existing conditions Disadvantages: • Increases traffic on Mooers Avenue for existing conditions • Increases traffic on Alden Avenue from both existing and original proposal conditions. • Requires additional right of way from Betaseed 5. Shifting Valley View Road to connect into Sarazin Street North of Mooers Avenue — This alternative would shift Valley View Road alignment north between Moores Avenue and St. Francis Avenue. Advantages: • Reduces traffic on Mooers Avenue from original proposal • Reduces traffic on St. Francis Avenue from existing conditions • Reduces traffic on Alden Avenue from original proposal Disadvantages: • Increases traffic on Mooers Avenue from existing conditions • Increases traffic on St. Frances from original proposal • Requires additional right of way from Hospital Conclusion / Recommendation Based on the updated traffic analysis discussed above, the following conclusions can be made: • With any alternative, one of the three primary streets entering / exiting the area (St. Francis Avenue, Mooers Avenue, or Alden Road) will be impacted. • The original proposal will increase traffic on Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue. • Alternative I will increase traffic on St. Francis Avenue and Alden Avenue. • Alternative 2 will increase traffic on Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue with traffic more distributed between the three streets. K:10138I - 21kAduiinZocan •Money- 082108.doc Bruce Loney, PE City of Shakopee August 28, 2008 Page 4 of 4 • Alternative 3, Alternative 4, or Alternative 5 would not have significant traffic volume changes from the original proposal. • Alternative 3, Alternative 4, and Alternative 5 will require additional right of way from Betaseed or the Hospital. Based on the above conclusions and input from the neighborhood meeting, the following recommendations are made: 1. Implement Alternative 2, creating an eastbound one way from Hazen street to Sarazin Street. 2. Implementation of the one -way alternative would be completed with the realignment of Valley View Road as part of the CSAH 17 project. Details of the concept (i.e., physical improvements or signing) will be completed at that time. 3. Traffic control of the new intersection of Valley View Road / Mooers Avenue (one way) and Sarazin Street is anticipated to be an all -way stop. The existing all -way stop at St. Francis Avenue and Sarazin Street will be removed unless additional studies are completed to justify maintaining it at this location. K: W I J 81 -21 *AloudZowILTR- bloieyO8 I O8. doc Existing Condition N St. Francis Avenue 131 (150, cED Mooers Avenue � N 1 B , 2 1 € `r \D9 c M i6 co Alden Avenue 22 130 Ciff) Y V LEGEND s x x AM Peak Hour Traffic x x ' PM Peak Hour Tragic C ADT pilittall M ooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 1 SI••IAK{.OPEE City of Shakopee, Minnesota Existing Traffic Volumes , , Original Proposed St. Francis Avenue 80 i102 ,. Mooers Avenue q> Q LEGEND Alden Avenue xx AM Peak Hour Traffic ( xx PM Peak Hour Traffic (483) (U) ADT Alternative 1 St. Francis Avenue 142 0E:5, eigg -z-c> ,c Mooers Avenue . LEGEND Alden Alden Avenue AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic 0 , (397) ADT Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 2 Si AKOPFF City of Shakopee, Minnesota Proposed Traffic Volumes Alternative 2 St. Francis Avenue 85 (134 4E 10 3.6. 1 .1 "cr) in Co N Co U) Mooers Avenue o t, 4-- ONEWX < C\ Nit' LEGEND Alden Avenue A AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic (534 ) ( xx) ADT Alternative 3 St. Francis Avenue 80 (-10:n to iid%iid.! - 1+3 1 Mooers Avenue ra Q • • • 3: • ";, • LEGEND Alden Avenue AM Peak Hour Traffic " PM Peak Hour Traffic s 2 3 1 (77 CD ADT cs Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 3 - Si IAKC)PEE City of Shakopee, Minnesota Proposed Traffic Volumes Alternative 4 St. Francis Avenue 80 (102) C M tr3 C N Mooers Avenue Q --() (7 \'S LEGEND Alden Avenue AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic ,& 7, cm C ADT Alternative 5 St. Francis Avenue 9.5 ci (r2T2) _ri ll Cmid 1.111111.1.1 Mooers Avenue 4 O U) N z's LEGEND Alden Avenue xx AM Peak Hour Traffic PM Peak Hour Traffic .12 ; (483) ( 7117 ) ADT .i " Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Figure 4 City of Shakopee, Minnesota Proposed Traffic Volumes 1AKOPFF I 0 Official 4roceedings of the October 21, 2008 Shakope City Council Page -5- I Mr. Loney presented Council with the Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Recommendations. Mr. Lone y discussed the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Shakopee and Sco County. The MOU essentially agreed to relocate the existing Valley View Road connecti •n to CSAH 17 to a location further north and would line up with Mooers Avenue street connecti en at Sarazin Street. The alignment configuration was also agreed upon by Betaseed and St. rancis Regional Medical Center who would be affected by this connection. Mr. Lon • y stated that at an open house on the C.R. 17 Corridor Study several residents raised a concern e f the increased traffic to Mooers Avenue. Staff had WSB & Associates perform a traffic st dy to analyze the traffic impacts to the neighborhoods. Chuck Richart of WSB presente ,' Council with the results of the study. Mr. Lon y said that based on the study various alternatives were suggested. One alternative is to close Me oers Ave., connecting Mooers Avenue to a one -way westbound realignment of Valley View Read as an offset so direct connection was not made at Mooers Ave. Mr. Loney said after present' g the alternatives to area residence, staff is recommending the one -way alternative as a westbo d one -way. John He kel, 1863 Mooers Avenue, who is the spokes person for the Mooers Avenue residence. Mr. Hec el wanted to thank City staff and the County for listening to the neighborhood concern Joos/Le an moved to accept the Mooers Avenue Updated Traffic Study and its recomm. ndations, noting the Mooers Avenue one -way alternative is a westbound one -way. Discussi en followed. encl. Le 1 an asked if Hazen Street was part of the alternative. Mr. Loney said that the recomm. ndation for the one -way is from Sarizan St. to Hazen St. on Mooers Avenue. Mayor S hmitt asked for a vote on the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Lon -y presented Council with the Authorization of Additional Traffic Control Signage for 10 Ave ue from Spencer Street to Fuller Street. Mr. Lon y stated that he met with Chris Lindholm, Principal at the Shakopee Jr. High, Mike Burlage of the School District and Sgt. Lynn Lipinski and Officer Chris Christy of the Shakopee Police D- partment to discuss safe pedestrian crossings and vehicle movements into the Jr. High. Mr. Loney said it was concluded from the meeting that the following procedures be put in place: • r school speed zone be established at 10 Avenue, from Spencer Street to Fuller Street . d installed by the City. • ee portable In Street Pedestrian Crossing Signs be purchased by the School District . d placed in the middle of the street in the morning and removed after the students are u ismissed in the afternoon for Sommerville St., Lewis Street and Holmes Street rosswalks. 4) CITY OF SHAKOPEE , 3. D. 2, A Memorandum TO: Mayor & City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Mooers Avenue Traffic Study Recommendations DATE: October 21, 2008 INTRODUCTION: Attached is a Mooers Avenue Updated Traffic Study and the initial study done this year to address the traffic impacts from the connection of Mooers Avenue to CSAH 17. Staff will present the study and ask for Council consensus on a recommendation. BACKGROUND: Attached also is a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Shakopee and Scott County which was signed on April 3, 2001. This MOU essentially agreed to relocate the existing Valley View Road connection to CSAH 17 to a location further north and would line up with Mooers Avenue street connection at Sarazin Street. This alignment configuration was also agreed upon by Betaseed and St. Francis Regional Medical Center who would be affected by this connection. At an open house for C.R. 17 Corridor Study, several residents raised a concern of the increased traffic to Mooers Avenue. Staff had WSB & Associates, Inc. perform a traffic study, with staffs assistance, to analyze the traffic impacts to the Pheasant Run and Prairie Village neighborhoods and in particular the street connections of St. Francis Avenue, Mooers Avenue and Alden Avenue. After the study was completed, a neighborhood meeting was held on July 31, 2008. Based on the discussion and input received, an updated study was done on the various alternatives. Those alternatives were to close Mooers Avenue, connecting Mooers Avenue to a one -way westbound realignment of Valley View Road as an offset, so a direct connection was not made at Mooers Avenue. Advantages and disadvantages were listed for each alternative. The final conclusion from the updated study was to implement a westbound one -way on Mooers Avenue, from Hazen Street to Sarazin street. Also, this one -way would be done with the construction of Valley View Road, from CSAH 17 to Sarazin Street. In addition, a four -way traffic control stop condition is anticipated and the all -way stop at Sarazin Street and St. Francis Avenue could possibly be removed. It is staffs intent to present these traffic studies and Chuck Rickart, of WSB & Associates, Inc., will be available for questions on these studies and recommendations. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve a motion accepting the Mooers Avenue Updated Traffic Study and its recommendations, noting the one -way alternative is a westbound one -way. 2. Approve a motion accepting the Mooers Avenue Updated Traffic Study and its recommendations with modifications. 3. Table for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Alternative No. 1, noting that most residents were in favor of a one -way design and comments received for the updated study have only been on looking at a roundabout and perhaps Alternative No. 3, which is realignment offset intersection design. Staff is in favor of the one -way westbound on Mooers Avenue connection, as it minimizes the traffic impact the best, while still making the connection planned for in 2001. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a motion accepting the Mooers Avenue Updated Traffic Study and its recommendations. :nice Loney, . Public Works Director BUPmp ENGR/ 2008 - PROTECTS !2008- COUNCILMOOERS -AVE- STUDY - RECOMMENDATIONS SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT L. f �. 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST r , a � 'Af � Yi JORDAN, MN 55352 -9339 (952) 496-8346 BRADLEY J. LARSON Fax: (952) 496 -8365 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/ COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER b - May 9, 2001 j Q ZOO/ CI rIF � Bruce Loney, P.E. .tlOp- Public Works Director City of Shakopee 129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, MN 55379 SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding Dear Mr. Loney: Enclosed is your copy of the signed MOU between the City of Shakopee and the County of Scott regarding Valley View Road and CSAH 17. Please call us if you need additional information. S incerely, 17q J19.1 Bradley J. Larson, E. Public Works Director /County Highway Engineer BJL /Wink Enclosure mk- w:hvord\Ietter\mmk\br adlmou- Shakopee- valleyviewroad -csah l7.doc An Equal Opportunity /Safety Aware Employer MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This memorandum of understanding is entered into by the City of Shakopee (City) and Scott County (County) on April 3 , 2001. WHEREAS, the City has prepared a traffic study for the Valley View Road area between CR 79 and CSAH 83, dated October 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the traffic study reviewed several alternatives for access to CSAH 17 from the new east -west collector road; and WHEREAS, the City and County have had public meetings with the residents and businesses adjacent to CSAH 17 and Valley View Road; and WHEREAS, the City and County have agreed that the alignment extending the new east -west collector road along the Betaseed/hospital property line would provide the best operational characteristics for CSAH 17 and the new collector road; and WHEREAS, the City and County have agreed that the construction of this east -west collector will be completed in two phases. The first phase to include the extension of existing Valley View Road curving north along the Sarazin Street alignment as currently being developed by the City. The second phase would be the extension of the east -west collector road along the Betaseed/hospital property line to a point approximately 500 feet south of St. Francis Avenue; as shown on the attached drawings, and WHEREAS, the City and County desire to document their respective understandings regarding certain aspects of the proposed alignment, and the timing of the access to CSA}I 17. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY UNDERSTOOD THAT: • 1. East -West Collector Street The East -West Collector Street from Sarazin Street to CSAH 17 will be constructed at such time that one or more of the following occur: A. Development of the Betaseed property or the St. Francis Hospital property east of CSAH 17. B. Development of property in the area on the west side of CSAH 17 requires additional access to CSAH 17, or requires a change in the existing access serving Betaseed. C. The City and County agree that traffic conditions indicate a safety problem exists or is imminent at the CSAH 17 and St. Francis intersection, or they agree on the need for possible changes in traffic control at St. Francis Avenue. Such problems may be apparent through excessive delays to St. Francis Avenue traffic at CSAH 17 or through crash problems at the intersection. 2. St. Francis at CSAH 17: The St. Francis Avenue at CSAH 17 intersection will be studied in detail once the new intersection of the east -west collector street and CSAH 17 is planned for construction. This will potentially include restricting this intersection to 3 /4 access or to a right - in/right -out only. The • C, \WIIlDOWS\TEMP\Memo of understanding revisod2.doc • City and County acknowledge that such access restrictions will also directly impact any access to CSAH 17 from the west (existing Betaseed property). 3. CSAH 17 at Existing Valley View Road: The existing intersection of Valley View Road and CSAH 17 will be closed as part of the construction of the new east -west collector street, and traffic will be redirected to the collector street. This will be 100% City cost to close this access. Such work shall be included in the access permit application requested by the City of the County as part of the new collector street connection (See #6). 4, Jurisdiction The City and County acknowledge that, as the jurisdictional authority for CSAH 17, the County retains the right to make any and all determinations on traffic controls along the CSAH 17 corridor. 5. Development of Plans and Specifications The City will be responsible for development of all plans and specifications for the east -west collector road extension to CSAH 17. The County will review and approve such plans. 6. Permits The City will request a County access permit for a street connection to CSAH 17. The County will be responsible for review and approval of the permit application. CITY OF SHAKOPEE SCOTT COUNTY M Y Chair, County Board • By: Jon P. Brekke By: Pt'*- exiil t'1ex"PYlf may - Dated: April 3 , 2001 Dated: / , 2001 City Administrator_ By: Mark McNeill C't Clerk By: Judith S. Cox C: \WINDOWS\TEMP\Memo of understanding rerised2.doe / F Ymni`�rU 1 � -.... 4 i .,_` \� I : 1 �t onnii ► �/ l U ■ ii ♦ 1,1 u i a e ,.r' ■ i i i� iii l� +v '011,..... r a t ♦ ► � *�' �� _ a : , � : `'1 t �r 0 i I f 1Ia]t t � 14. i . G Cp r' f . 4 ��'. U4i =It.••t'.• • jaa t0 th �� —^ a __ .• I�t rr 9 I O ru .' u r N 4/tt � � �� _ _ ~ . _ / �p p ?i 4,0 ; 47-'0 S is ' MO - i'. ■ ■t A �■i 41 — _ _ _ I�tl pf y��9 ►\��t.� � ■ �ti. ttt It " 111 / !�_' ii111 • �� ►!i 41111111rial � � .,v.......,„ • t , v � arun • low : : : •ij 1 rru+ 1E :: ° Mili. i a t I L •p as • ,► • paa 1�, 4#4 UIL - n i �Eti '[,,,„e I s � = = � ' I! iilUita•a E. Q 00,0 , • • Z' ----Li! 0 i ego • 104: 1 " - tit "A ° ' k 'N'''t Ili j ti l II.W '' -- 1 N - - i ® ®I, ® '.`.., , ,. , COUNTY ■ ,, IQ[](, ". " Y; i it t ) Ill V <4 ti4 ' .- _ Li ,,:.; G 1 4 4 `17 � , a 1 St S P , ( St Frauds Av MU S • T 9 1r t v•-,‘ /Ilk 83I \ 1110 jiff �� d� 1� E: cou { G . i? 1! SE 2 ;r =t►t . %. !11111= • 111 At • iliGl xf! sa H A r ...... 's °: A ..., s '� V ?n �i � %{ J iiiP ili. �4 ,, � SCOTT" �' ` ef ; �. ; , '. 78 I Val iew R COUNT Y �t 1�1 1 l � ► .., sco , uro s' Ammo. r � � u, 1 1 7 I . .""� 1 LEGFND -�� ((( , " .- Signal System t COUNTY N _ -- . , COUNTY if a ,_ , 350 Westwood lake Office Stud W$8 Plojed No. 1247 - 001 Date: December 2000 WS ` 8541 Wayzata Boulevard Y �Q Minneap�ils. MN 56928 �� cn.an.leao Valtey View Raad Area Preferred Alternative R Assoau/ca, bK. FAX 170D City Shakopee, Cit of Shako Scott County, Minnesota Figure 7 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS J y f t: N1247.004 \ Study ', 4;9'07. dqn 0 April 5, 2013 Resident Name Resident Address RE: Mooers Avenue and Valley View Road Intersection Design Dear Property Owner: This letter and attachment is intended to update the residents in the Pheasant Run area of the intersection design for Mooers Avenue associated with the upcoming Valley View Road Improvement Project. Previously, on October 21, 2008, City Council did review a traffic study with alternatives and how to deal with Mooers Avenue with the intersection of Valley View Road. The alternative selected was to provide a one -way in which west bound traffic could leave Mooers Avenue to Valley View and east bound Valley View Road traffic could not enter Mooers Avenue. Staff has reviewed intersection design with our consultant WSB & Associates and the attached drawing shows three intersection design alternatives. Staff is recommending intersection alternative #3 to have striping and signage which would alert motorists not to enter Mooers Avenue from Valley View Road. This intersection design would also include an all way stop at this intersection as previously discussed in the traffic study for this intersection This would be recommended to the City Council. Alternative #3 would be the most cost effective alternative to accomplish the intent of the previous Council action. It is staffs intent to present these intersection alternative designs to City Council at its April 16 2013 Council meeting. That meeting will begin at 7 PM in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall. If you have any questions, concerns or comments prior to the April 16 Council meeting feel free to email me at bloney@ci.shakopee.mn.us ci.shakopee.mn.us or call me at 952- 233 -9361. Sincerely, Bruce Loney, P.E. Public Works Director CC: Mark McNeill, City Administrator Mike Hullander, Public Works Superintendent Chris Dellwo, Police Captain ENGRt2012 PROJECTS+ ValIevViewRoad 'LetterVloocrsAvenue • • . ; ,.4,3 4 :•,'" ' ; ' " . 4 : . .,• ..,. , Intersection Alternative 1 " ----1 . - , -'. ;i . ...' , ' .' .,, - ... . . ,- fl • . • • .... ... • _„; ...„-:-...-4,..;4--,41......,.4---. , - . . , / ,..,..„. ONtY .,..,..,_-,....,_. ., -- - r ',. „, ,... , 4 ; , ' k 4 ' :.:.: l:sie-r- - • '' -..' ' ''. ' ''''•••- ' .' • 1 " 1 _ , =, , :' ' ' • ' .. '''' * w.,. • :' ' ''' .. . .. . * 4 ' --."'. , , ,„,,,, . .. ^4' O''''‘i' Cr.,..,4 • ' ... "••• ir.:' ' .... ' " - ....t, ma ...-1 1. '. 22 .- . :• .— V alley View Road .---------- .11 venue r Mooers A ...„..._,._,._.,..,_,_,,,....._.,., ---1,,...,--t Q_,,,..,,_... . • - 7.-1 • '-' • . . . -_—. ._ ' • - r ■ _ -.. .... -...----- -:' • - -, .1.1$ • . • ..,1 .....1 '' .1 . ' '. ' r ', • - A, ' • ' - *-- -.1"e .4, ' -..4: , ' ' ••*• ' 1 t 4 71 5 ' - .04 v.:. • . , 1 , -.It "< 0 4` 5 4 , ..4, . "•' 1 ''• % • , 1 ,' I ' . . . - .,. , - - -- : \ , , 4 . % *- .,.., . ; ..,. . - -A, -1 4.• ,,s . 4..1. ' • _ : 1. ..., • 1 ` - ' ". ' .",. ^, •' ''7' '!- — .; 1 :'' • .' •. •., .. •' • - .- .,\_. ..‘ . •: , •-,:...„ . .., ' -J.--7-• , • - • -' .-- . • - • 1 •• • oi. -- :,,,-N"' •• ,4, i9 2 , - '1011. 4 ,„^ ----, -.1 I ''% .' • . Intersection Alternative 2 -.-...-,. - --. ,.-• -- . , . N.A. .. . ,. . ....., . ...,....., 0 I , ,..., i_ •- - • --,, ''..' .1"I' ' ..'" • ,.. in. • _ • ' ' ' -- ' - '.- :,''' .',', .11 .l• l '''. ' • ' • . ' ,.1 •-. ''' 2 1i. •'" .-`-' 1,„ 1 .,,, ' , ** • ! " ...- , : 1,' .; -1...4,,-.1 . 1 1.-,,i ' • 4 ,1‘, • ,, ,, , 4 r . , • ' - ."- • -., "4 -, -- le .."•1 '''C' 4,,, -. e ' '1 A, ...,,, . .., -R. - , ti le tIP.: **$ 1,4 t*I"'"$ *4 # ' ' '.. -'": ' w 2 l 14 . :. ' ;11 • '" ' '.... ' ...--......-........_-- -•- ' 14- ■ ,, ,„.,/ ' .... ., .,, ,..,„ , . ' " ' ' ' : ,A■e‘ nwIt • • * • • , 1.9 0.4.0111.V , • : ' ' ..". ' , - . ' - ' I • - --""--- - ',---=',1,-.% , - ..'t es, ,11 .... s 7 '2164 ' ' 5 * 2' 4-41, 7. 'y eVIew Rood : Valley View Road .., •4 "A` ::', , • ' i . ; r im m...A..... - ... '''. 1 ` , ' I' l'', i - -,..,,...L . ... ..... _ .,''''' A ; • .... ' ■ .,... I . ' 4 . ki i NEN CATCH SASIT •/ - '4,1: " -" ' *4, , .. . , • 9 • , ., . ,, '; . , . t$, , ., igi , dr-11 ' ..., 1 ---- ---------- J. A ' ' ° .-. / ,A...' ' ' '' , e. ' — ' 1 I 1 im . 5 : 5%4 4 a t; .9 -* 14 0 •* ' r ' ' & ).. ' / ,/ . . •5 ".‘ 2. TI - 'TT - e l , -4 . ' < 0 L' 51- eA ,4 / ' ° .8 . °' "J', tt ' I i,•—. ... , 4 2 ..,.- . .R. ,*'■ -' 41 "". ■ .. ; , I , , I ; t.,1 1: - ' • '' ..'1. . .„. .:.‘ . , • " ..., •1 .... .1;, '''''' . ''',", . ' ,: I • 1 - I" 4 . _ 1 ! 1 • - 1- 41 ,!' , \ "I 1 ' '47 '+..21 "I i'l "If "'",. • ".'--; -,- ''` ' ' i t . — . - Intersection Alternative 3 -„ -; (Striping Only) 1 ,•._. .-.--. „ ., -‘, 1 .';' . „ , - ■ - --' .1 .., 44 •i ' , ..,,,, - 1 -4 ' ' ''' - • 1 '-' •4. T, ---• 1 „ , t %, ' .•( ';': ' s " 17 . $$ '' 1.- • lt -, ----$.x.„--- .::-.., . - 7„ ..1.. , • .„ - ,A . .2 ' _ "a - 1- ' , ..1 . 1. ...- .- • , .?.;." fiv- ' , ... - 1 '. 1 '- . , • . - 0 ... 1 f; , - , , .-ONLY ••• [ • . 41; +1 .. • \ Valley View Road ft Mooers Aven. ', :.. . .• F Ilk , --, , ,, , , „,,, . ' i STRIPING OW 1' '' 1 • 1°' \ •__ ...4 •., i 0 ,, -,, _ _ -, ,, _ _ E 1 . -\ .,,, ., - 2,1 ' 4 I — "< 0 . • • ....,. . , ....., - L. .4 .1 . . ..'s r 4 • • -. -.- ' 1" Valley View Road I Mooers Avenue Extension SHAKOPEE City of Shakopee, Minnesota (6 LEGEND PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER DENOTES STREET AREA TO BE REMOVED 1A ‘i AND RESTORED AS BOULEVARD fir— 0 < =I ; i MOOERS AVENUE r w J h co Z W IlliiiikAl OPTIONAL ONE -WAY DESIGN DATE APRIL 201 DRAWING NO 0 50 +oo SHA O E SARAZIN STREET & MOOERS AVENUE D RAWN BY: RLT SCALE IN FEET 1 pppy PRIDE %CR ler SHAKOPFE FMINTERING 0FPARTMENT