Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.B.1. Rezoning Request from Rahr Malting to Rezone Property from Highway Business (B1) to Heavy Industrial (I2)-Ord. No. 868 General Business 11. B. 1. St 1AKo!)E1: TO: Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II DATE: 04/16/2013 SUBJECT: Rezoning Request from Rahr Malting to Rezone Property from Highway Business (B1) to Heavy Industrial (12) - Ord. No. 868 (B) Action Sought Offer a motion to approve Ordinance No. 868, An Ordinance Approving a Rezoning from Highway Business (B1) to Heavy Industrial (I2) and move its approval. This action has no immediate budget impact. DISCUSSION Rahr Malting Co. has filed an application requesting that property be rezoned from Highway Business (B1) to Heavy Industrial (I2), Caselog No. 13 -009. This application has a review period deadline of June 13, 2013. The subject properties are located north and south of 1st Avenue East and east and west of Shumway Street. The collective properties are approximately 6 acres in size. The adopted Comprehensive Plan guides these properties for Industrial use and Mixed Use. Therefore, the request to be zoned Heavy Industrial (12) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its April 4, 2013 meeting and has recommended to the City Council approval of the request by a 3 -1 vote (Commissioner Joe Collins dissenting). Please find attached a copy of the April 4 staff report to the Planning Commission for the Council's reference. RELATIONSHIP TO VISIONING Goal B: Positively manage the challenges and opportunities presented by growth, development and change. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the rezoning request. 2. Deny the rezoning request. 3. Table a decision and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council the approval of the rezoning request. ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion to approve Ordinance No. 868, An Ordinance Rezoning Property from Highway Business (B 1) to Heavy Industrial (12) and move its adoption. Attachments: Ordinance No. 868 Planning Commission Report PC Report Exhibits ORDINANCE NO. 868, FOURTH SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ADOPTED IN CITY CODE SEC. 11.03 BY REZONING LAND TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (12) FROM HIGHWAY BUSINESS (B1) WHEREAS, Rahr Malting Co., applicant and property owner, has made application for the rezoning of property from Highway Business (B 1) Zone to Heavy Industrial (I2) Zone; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: Lots 6 -10, Block 8; and Lots 1 -4 and 6 -10, Block 9, Lots 4 -9, Block 10, City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota; The East Half of Shumway Street which lies West of Block 9, City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota; The North 150 feet of the West 10 feet of the South 150 feet except the West 10 feet of the South 142 feet of all that part of Apgar Street in the City of Shakopee lying between Block 8 and 9, in the City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota; The North half of Lots 1 -5; and all of Lots 6 -10, Block 18, City of Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota; Together with all vacated alleys within said Blocks; (PID Nos. 27- 0010920, 27- 0010930, 27- 0010950, 27- 0010991, 27- 0011000, 27- 0011261, 27- 0011231) and WHEREAS, notices were duly sent and posted, and a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on April 4, 2013, at which time all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the subject property rezoned as stated; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard the matter at its meeting on April 16, 2013; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Shakopee hereby adopts the following findings of facts relative to the above -named request: Finding #1 The original zoning ordinance is not in error. Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. The most recent adopted Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Industrial and Mixed Use development in order to allow for flexibility in development along this corridor. Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have not occurred. Development has occurred and is proposed consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Finding #4 The Comprehensive Plan requires a different provision. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding and would bring the zoning into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the request to rezone the property as stated in this ordinance is hereby approved. Passed in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this day of 2013. Mayor of the City of Shakopee Attest: City Clerk Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the day of , 20 1 CITY OF SHAKOPEE Memorandum CASE NO.: 13 -009 TO: Shakopee Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, Planner II SUBJECT: Request to Rezone Property from Highway Business Park (B1) to Heavy Industrial (I2) MEETING DATE: April 4, 2013 REVIEW PERIOD: February 21 — June 13, 2013 INTRODUCTION Rahr Malting Corporation has made application to request rezoning of property from Highway Business (B 1) Zone to Heavy Industrial (I2) Zone. The property is located north and south of 1 East and east and west of Shumway Street. The subject site is approximately 6 acres in size. Please see Exhibit A for the proposed location. DISCUSSION The applicant submitted the attached narrative (Exhibit B) in connection with the application. The request for rezoning to Heavy Industrial (I2) Zone is consistent with City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the area south of 1 Avenue for Industrial use and the area north of 1 Avenue is guided for Mixed Use. Please see attached Exhibits C and D for the current zoning and comprehensive plan designations of the subject property and the surrounding properties. The City's Comprehensive Plan sets basic policies to guide the development of the City. The purpose of designating different areas for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses is to promote the location of compatible land uses, as well as to prevent incompatible land uses from being located in close proximity to one another. The Zoning Ordinance is one of the legal means by which the City implements the Comprehensive Plan. Under Minnesota statute, zoning is to conform to a city's comprehensive plan. Copies of the land use plans and the Zoning Ordinance are available for viewing at City Hall and will be made available at the April 4 meeting. As previously stated, the City's Comprehensive Plan guides this property for industrial and mixed use development. FINDINGS The criteria required for the granting of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment are listed below for the Commission's consideration. Criteria #1 That the original Zoning Ordinance is in error; Finding #1 The original Zoning Ordinance is not in error. 1 Criteria #2 That significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place; Finding #2 Significant changes in community goals and policies have taken place. The most recent adopted Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Industrial and Mixed Use development in order to allow for flexibility in development along this corridor. Criteria #3 That significant changes in City-wide or neighborhood development patterns have occurred; or Finding #3 Significant changes in development patterns have not occurred. Development has occurred and is proposed consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Criteria #4 That the comprehensive plan requires a different provision. Criteria #4 The Comprehensive Plan requires a different provision. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding and would bring the zoning into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. ALTERNATIVES 1. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone the property to Highway Business (B1) Zone and provide direction to staff regarding which criteria are met. 2. Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the denial of the request. 3. Offer a motion to continue the public hearing and request additional information from the applicant and /or staff. 4. Close the public hearing, and offer a motion to table and request additional information from the applicant and /or staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone property from Highway Business (B1) zone to Heavy Industrial (I2) zone (Alternative No. 1). ACTION REQUESTED Offer a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of the request to rezone property from Highway Business (BI) zone to Heavy Industrial (I2) zone and move its approval. Julie Klima Planner II h: \boas. -pc \2013 \04- 04\rezone rahr 13009.doc 2 __--_ _-___ ...... S. ����� �m � �����y Y=���UDk�&y y �DU _ _____ �_~====�-__ - _~' -_====^`=~= -==~ / / c - \ | ,..., / ) | ---1 � ~ / \ ., ' | | \ \ v \ v I | ^ ( - _ - - _ _ _ • • - � � ' •-... ; , \--, ... . 1 T -T-T --- . -- , k3N.,, _ ....... __ ....._ i ---c- v_ v, i ,-7---..-cl r* . , i T O n_______1_,, t .3 , , ., ,_._. _ .... ____ .........1.:-_.-:,_,,...7,---____._-_-__,...---___,:::,:c -..,..:,,,,:::,_.,,._,...,::..73,-„____...,,1,.....i."...,_:..... ,, . 4 , --- 'I 1 t _J— 15 r - 7 - r --- .. I, q.,.: -. t rVi. - ---.--rin i • 1 '' -- I\\ \-- 1 1 I , '".7 ' I '' 1 _,_„---- -'1 ' il.r. - - T --- -1- 1:30 . 9-) 1, -.-P i ---- _..,,,--- ..1 ___ -.. .-•-r V I - 71.1i i _ 1_;_____-__ VA -- '1 t 12,,i 1 _ T t_ '-. 7T-iiiTTIL 'it,Y p-i:o... , Act I, ____„_ i, -- "Z. VilatH 3 • P ra t . .„ , ,,,_____:„ ,,,.. 7.- P 'i' ' , -21 7 ° 3 l'A k.....E.11-- .... , V 1 k,)3' \ y:.3 . 4 l' .._ ._,--- y) I . I c .....,...... 135 tp 'I ' - ' - - 7:! -- . ,. _ ,. . . : ..-- k ., , , i\ 333 \_ 1 1 L ----- 2 i,, \\I t _ _L- - ,_-.,c, -- --- -- 7 . - r - - 1 . ,i . , i . ' .. ii, , . - - I i j. , .:_,-V v--r - . IL__ -.:9: - s --L- 71 ,, % foll k _1-1- _ __ 1 3)4 C) .,,- , --1 -r c 1 t 1 F22:1\ 1 kt... . ' .----t-' - - A' % • , 11 -- __,......- IQ -, 23j 212;,: ...„ :It P -- ..7,... ' 1 1 ‘ '''' --- — ,r - -1- ; , ic---71 ,v1,-. ' .7 C /I ' ,.....„3.__A v q i_,._.,_ , , , , i _t , ,i ,,i,.,:e.„,...,:, . "Lfl• --- --- xci 1 1 A • ‘ . \ 1 t ‘ \ ..!, ,.. V1 -1- ... 53 7 4 0, i. T. ,. ,...0., 10 . 1....... k_---- , i A i ' ;_ _A '' 1 3 , ,-°: - ' . . 3 435,,.. 421 1: 4,75\ This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not Map Scale ded to be used as one, This d 1 inch =423feet other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference VV E -)('F I Rezoning Application Additional information -The property submitted for rezoning includes (2) main components: The first of these components is the east %2 of the former C.H. Carpenter site from Apgar Street west to Shumway. This property adjoins our existing plant site and has been in use as a warehousing function since purchased from C.H. Carpenter. Granting of the 1 -2 zoning will recognize this current use and establish uniform zoning for the Rahr site. The second component includes the property on the north side of County Rd 69, which was recently purchased from Associated Capital. It includes a former car lot and adjourning vacant land. It is our current intent to utilize this site as a warehousing facility for our Brewers Supply Group subsidiary. The property is ideally suited adjacent to our existing site and has excellent access to County Rd 69 which is designed for this use. - Criteria Requirements: It is the belief of Rahr Malting Co. that the rezoning request meets a number of the key criteria required in that the rezoning could reflect changes in the neighborhood development pattern. The former house and outbuildings on this site had been removed prior to our purchase of the property. In addition we are currently cooperating with the Shakopee Public Utilities on improvements and significant expansion of their substation to the west of this property. It is our long term belief that this corridor will continue to move in a direction consistent with the rezoning request. In addition, we believe that the rezoning request for this property is consistent with the long term comprehensive plan i.e. Mixed use on 2030 Land Use Plan. • \\\ ' L -,....\\ Land Use I W � ' + ' � ' t S:_ +• . ,Iy1tr„ n ---� --- (Final August ) on Aii �� 01 t , l �.;i-?i j Fi Adoption City ,,��a-•�� W Au 8, 2009 Lr'' :.3�•sr.. tl ��`n;1. Ctn r rs u�" - ' _ r-� - — - - -- -- `-� r• d t y s �; ��'� r_l ,, ` .i�s g�. �, a�n ' .� v .1- ' ■Ip� \ °4o6� '�1> I Ij ``�••;.'"° ```'1 -;"_ N. r� • V� _ J f , �L r 1 , ; i - r . ,cm ' ' _ - , ... 1 C - : . \ 7 /tII' L • 7t L `— ` . — _ '4 • � •• _ � • ct+ i I i r : I ir J t • E 1 :i T �M' „ 7011 i tf6. 1 i i l l l� ,, V• L _ II� l �. \ J » i a T r - : -E= _ 5 -a - 8 a #`' ✓1 % r � " � �� ' t om 12 u ` — i City Boundary ¢ 'a ( , .s _ ' � x.c � _ " r` f "v. _ � �� \�r� x x .. Potential Aggregate ning ea � � l� F ro - 1_1_ _�: x xxx -" l a z - m , � ' a h" - '�'i'• l� � 1 l l I� et. -��� i J y ' `, :i s a. •' �r . , - �+_, ,i,..,'.1. . � u ° ® ,� r - L #_ . .. •- .. . = uT, . ��. �- Existing MUSA Boundary � t .,, � 7 ¢. [?-u .. -. q ,? ) . , ,., i ' 4, ` : l. K ' . - IFF3�'f_+, % . .' r '. ' Ai . .;.:: =%9 l7 ,- f - �, „ c �� L 1 .: �ti: u ry< <<��1J c ? 44 ti ,r ( c el: �. ■ . •y.- r 3,. ` u . � t'(l - F - � Ix 1� — i. - -_ — ▪ ^ _ - . per C I� ,.,� �,, , �j 1i ,1� u s , s SMS Pro a in Fee /Trust W'- _ } �� t.Q �_ ± ` ' '. ia " / � . - • 1 J ' : n, _ Proposed Land Use T r ra■ t u u, , . . O t a 98n 1 �� 1 l to i, �+: GU , \ 4 �. � ' � e S = Dn %/ j°1117-t.' t ,,,,,,,,, ate .r;.., &i ti ` �u„ 1 . t' III T .. � . . ,�'� y - •� �t E e s t . "H .. _ x x xxx x - -% 7 a,_. .,,f Cv°. ., ; fre : .° . ' ' . .`' i ; xxxxx xxxx ,• / t • { . ! `S � ■ i ' ; . 5 I " 1 , , xxxxx xxxxxx I I �. ��R �\` i- TH r ' 4 7J, �i - �' : I I wt< 41st'' . - ■ 4r : ::::: u l — ? iT 4 . J _ � �` I q zt °` � u C - F� i f. xxxxx I / ate. ,� —� 7r � >r J7 • �. � n _ Jtu - _ =� t/ / nmeltt �� _ Imo :" .� Ili „ _ %/% �4j�.. • ■ \1 y. -t U : p l e 1. '��- 7 �� _. i 11 ��_ � . iai ll • • I � : , t t1 ;i�I I IFS. ' ' - ' F4— , ■• .. f � LL . -� �� � Institutional • - 1 11-- ' - n r ✓ ,� 1 4 3 IU r J . xx xxxx , MiXedUSC ?l x %% X XX %% ` t g l ' x x xx x I � � High Density Residential xxxx xxxxx i /� / / /�� ; a ` - :J` ■�.*�? . ' x xxx / ci ` : \9 '� t! </ _ f , I ,/ / : _ M ed i um Density Residential • - ������ ! � _ �. 1 �• �� Downtown S hakopee Inset single Family Res. (3 -s units/Acre) " � a� 4 , Ir ili ,... ii; .. I L ff Open Space Park n 'j j i; : i ► �► ,„ S �n- �, ?; �1�1�71:`uk ' ' d ` j q j� 7 1..1_ ' , 1 I . i._ - -- /� t g s t ._ ; t �.1 �: .. I •- 0. - ,, _ t ... - i , ' i �E fk \\.,,,,,c , ,,,,,, -v- ^- 10„,, : � j �. , I� j � � _ � t . � � r � tl 1 i .: : � t.. s�i .. T �s`•T �lU tt � t, C : Ctll � I�l / �� _ .- ,L. � r ((� U� `1.1 �` • t1 +) � 11 � 1 � L'�.�J� � , 1 � / s �i ■_) �L Gi7� t � ]t1L 1 1 .ill�(lTtllilll • I. • J 7 %. j (�.'i l ��b . �� 1 '1 � t}4'' jj ��Il��1�1T�f 1 11 ■ Illyllltlll i . l 'c 4� 1j S C LI.is 11 i Ill I f -. " , ..___,_ /// \ t\ .... 1 1_ \ ga _ / 1\ - 0 F Of- j\ kyilli<1% 1 E 3 \il • :- .„ F, M FA-- f: — ! . w m r „„o. En tio .1111111.%7 -a A % ; -1 - - v e 5 = x .. ■ .> _ r r� SHAKOPEE % ' Tor q 1: Lt a Et Z1 fI� n<<!- Map Updated: Ap1i129, 2009