The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About13.C.2. CSAH 101 Bridge Enhancements /3.C.J.." CITY OF SHAKOPEE MEMORANDUM CASELOG NO: NA TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator FROM: R. Michael Leek, Community Development Director SUBJECT: CSAH 101 Bridge Enhancements MEETING DATE: January 16,2007 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION: After Council provided direction on the type of bridge enhancements they wished to see, staff met with the Scott County staff and their consultant on the project, Boonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik. Accompanying this memo is a table showing the estimated costs, which are within the $125,000 amount identified in theCIP. Also attached are graphics that depict the enhancements. Council is asked for direction as to whether to inform the County to proceed with all of the enhancements as depicted, or to modify the enhancements so that design work can proceed. Staff did confirm that there are not any expected additional engineering costs for which the City would be responsible, and that the sidewalks are included in the County's costs. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Offer and pass a motion directing staff to inform Scott County that the Council wishes to proceed with the CSAH 101 bridge enhancements as depicted in the attachments to this memo. 2. Offer and pass a motion directing staff to inform Scott County that the Council wishes to proceed with revised enhancements as determined by the Council. 3. ACTION REQUESTED: Offer and pass a motion directing staff to inform Scott County that it wishes to proceed with the CSAH 101 bridge enhancements as depicted in the~ts to this memo. ~ . ~~-.L R. Michael Leek Community Development Director H:\CC\2007\01-16-07\CSAH 101 Enhancements.doc Memo J(jj Bonestroo -=- Rosene 1\J1 Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Project Name: CSAH 101 Bridge Replacement Client: Scott County To: Michael Leek - City of Shakopee File No: 569-05001-1 Bruce Loney - City of Shakopee Date: January 5. 2007 From:Jer~Pertzsch Re: Aesthetic Cost Estimate Michael, As a followup toourmeeting in December, we have prepared some drawings that show the monuments incorporated into the wingwalls at all four corners of the bridge. The wingwalls would have a brick veneer on both sides of the wingwalls with a concrete core. The drawings are attached to this memo. The drawings and cost estimates reflect the inclusion of six lights on the bridge instead of four lights that we had discussed. Our landscape architects indicated that the four lights, one at each corner of the bridge, would provide an adequate level of lighting on the bridge. Consequently, one additional light was needed on each side of the bridge. As requested by Scott County, we have discussed the configuration of the trail on the north side of the bridge with MnDOT. MnDOT has said that going with a raised sidewalk is acceptable to them. The cost estimate reflects that this railing is being eliminated. The drawings do not reflect this change since the person doing the drawings has been on his honeymoon this week. A large block pattern, roughly 18" by 36", was included on the front face and exposed faces of the wingwalls. The would receive the normal surface treatment as standard formed concrete. Therefore, the only additional cost to the City for the surface treatment is the forming cost. As you can see from the cost estimate, the estimate cost of aesthetic improvements is under the budget set by the City Council. It should be noted that the cost estimate is based on 2007 construction costs. With the bridge being constructed most likely in 2009, the actual costs will be higher. Estimated costs for 2008 and 2009 are provided at the bottom of the spreadsheet assuming a 5% annual price increase. Please call me at (651)604-4895 with any questions. Cc: Dan Jobe - Scott County Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 + St. Paul, MN 55113 + Phone: 651-636-4600 + Fax: 651-636-1311 MlJ'. BonestrooBridge Aesthetics Cost Estimate Rosene . Date: 1/5/07 c:::c.. Anderlik ~cot County Bndge No. 70542 \K]\)Ass -at SAH 101 over Stream By; JDP OCI es Engineers & Architects Item West East Total Unit Item No. Item Unit Abut. Abut. Super. Quant. Price Costs Total 1.0 Basic Abutment Aesthetics 1.1 Forrnliner (block pattern) SF 600 600 1.200 $6.00 $7.200 1.2 Anti-G raffiti Coating SF 600 600 1.200 $1.00 $1.200 Subtotal $8,400 2.0 Basic Railing Aesthetics 2.1 Partial-height Ornamental Metal Railing LF 113 113 $130.00 $14.690.00 2.2 Partial-height Std. Metal Railing (Deduct) LF 113 113 ($50.00) ($5.650.00) 2.3 Partial-height Ornamental Metal Railing LF 113 113 $130.00 $14.690.00 2.4 Partial-height Std. Metal Railing (Deduct) LF 113 113 ($50.00) ($5.650.00) 2.5 Concrete Posts Each 12 12 $1.500.00 $18,000.00 Subtotal $36.080 3.0 Wingwall Treatments .~ 3.1 Brick veneer SF 450 450 900 $35.00 $31.500.00 3.2 Precast concrete cap LF 50 50 100 $75.00 $7.500.00 3.3 Letters LS 1 t $2,000.00 $2.000.00 Subtotal $41.000 4.0 Lighting 4.1 Wingwall and sidewalk lights Each 2 2 2 6 $5.000.00 $30.000.00 4.2 Light Blisters (concrete and reinforcing) Each 2 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 4.3 Underdeck Lighting Each 2 2 $1,500.00 $3.000.00 8.4 Conduit System (Lighting) LS 1 $5.000.00 $5.000.00 Subtotal $39.000 Estimated Total . $124,480 Note: The prices are based on 2007 costs. For construction in later years. the costs will need to be adjusted to reflect market prices at the time of construction. Estimated Costs with 5% Escalation per Year 2008 $ 130,700 2009 $ 137,200 - - - / - ~ - -- - -. - - u I ~ ":~ I I ~ -" I '" I I :? I I I ~ - ~ - - u - - ~ -- - - - - - u - .. - .~ "- ~,..--~-,,-.~. n..-.....-.w -~^ ----,. -.... ~-~.- . . ~ ." ""~_...,, .' ."h ~.,:n ~~'_~":',_ , .' c "'.. " -~ ~ ';'-.:..',.0_ _(.. ~ ~ ....I .: , - .", ~. . ," . ., ....,",. ~ - ~~ ~ ~ , ." -----~ "'-, '''" ^ "'-, , ; "'-~, , '.'., '''^ . " " .. , ~ , - " " --;. , ,. ... , ~~% '.?.... " ;'~":-. . -J' .: <...~ .. 1-,-... , , ,~ ., ,- ~ -,.". ... ~. >. - ~:_-"-. -_. ~", . '-."' .',-". "", - / ~ ~~ . ...... I I I I . I I ! I ~ . 'W I I I i I I I - I I , I - I I I I I [ I I I I --- - ---- -- -- -.-- ---- -- -~ ---- -- "---- ~_.,_.._~- -?' ," --~ .,..,.........-" -.. -?,,' -':~ :"".:....-.;~. - - . ".' .-"' - ~ .-- / _. ." \ ~~/ ; , , :1- - - .:> ~" ~ .' . ..\ '"I .. \ - .-.1' ...~ ; - ,- "',.":f.r,,:: .'t .- - . . - .'~ , '-~' , ~- , , - . . ;:.~ ,. ,,~_""';:;';.l.- .:_ . .}~'~ ~ .' : .' -,- " , :~ .- u_ -- _.._~ '-.. '-.. "- '" ~ .' ',,- , .. ~ . ; "- " "- ", .-- '- .-- ". ., - - ,,\ ~. ~ ~ .~ '.: .. , .;; ~,. ~ . -.......... ,..... ~ '" ':. ......,~ ~ ~....... , ,. _..-~~ ..-" '--'~ ,-.-- , _ .-",-.,-. 0 , -- ---- -~ .'_-.-w~~ _-_~ro." - ~'- -